From owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 16:28:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0527F16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:28:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CFA43D3F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:28:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gwk@rahn-koltermann.de) Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ClrY2-0005Kf-00; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:28:42 +0100 Received: from [217.232.158.153] (helo=hunter.localnet) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ClrY2-0001gZ-00; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:28:43 +0100 From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" To: Eugene Grosbein In-Reply-To: <41CAC3B4.F3378A56@kuzbass.ru> References: <41CAC3B4.F3378A56@kuzbass.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:29:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1104856145.994.1.camel@localhost.muc.eu.mscsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:90bcaad5e51ecc993b2919ba4b74e6dc cc: database@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle 10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-database@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Database use and development under FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:28:46 -0000 Am Donnerstag, den 23.12.2004, 20:10 +0700 schrieb Eugene Grosbein: > > I was trying to bring up Oracle10 on FreeBSD 5.2.1, but I get TNS:lost > > contact again when I "connect / as sysdba". > > > > Ktrace tells me that one of the last things that oracle does before > > exit(1), is trying to open /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax. That is apparently > > not implemented by linprocfs. > > > > Did anyone get farther than this? > > Hi! > > I've just upgraded working Oracle9i (9.2.0.1.0) upto 9.2.0.6.0 > It does nearly the same thing. Did you manage to solve the problem > that time? Unfortunately that's still on my list :( hopefully this year... -- Regards, Georg.