From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 03:21:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1326F16A420; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C544443D46; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j993LCCI078585; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:21:12 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j993LCBv078581; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:21:12 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:21:12 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510090321.j993LCBv078581@freefall.freebsd.org> To: markhobden@gmail.com, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86828: [update] java/eclipse-emf to version 2.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:21:13 -0000 Synopsis: [update] java/eclipse-emf to version 2.1.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 9 03:21:00 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86828 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 03:40:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F9216A41F; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0506743D46; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j993ekqW079918; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:40:46 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j993ek0s079914; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:40:46 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 03:40:46 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510090340.j993ek0s079914@freefall.freebsd.org> To: markhobden@gmail.com, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86830: [update] java/eclipse-gef to version 3.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:40:47 -0000 Synopsis: [update] java/eclipse-gef to version 3.1.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 9 03:40:28 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86830 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 04:00:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE7B16A448; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CDB43D45; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9940KBm080402; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:00:20 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9940KJx080398; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:00:20 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:00:20 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510090400.j9940KJx080398@freefall.freebsd.org> To: markhobden@gmail.com, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86832: [update] java/eclipse-vep to version 1.1.0.1 (Also fixes incomplete pkg-plist) X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 04:00:21 -0000 Synopsis: [update] java/eclipse-vep to version 1.1.0.1 (Also fixes incomplete pkg-plist) State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 9 03:59:51 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86832 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 06:20:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB7216A41F for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A4E43D45 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j996KMuk005227 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j996KMJd005226; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:20:22 GMT Message-Id: <200510090620.j996KMJd005226@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Norikatsu Shigemura Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86900: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Norikatsu Shigemura List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 06:20:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86900; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: "Panagiotis Astithas" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86900: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:12:45 +0900 (JST) On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:00:13 +0300 "Panagiotis Astithas" wrote: > >Number: 86900 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 > >Description: > This patch updates java/eclipse from version 3.1 to version 3.1.1. It contains the patch from PR ports/86860 as well. Humm.. Your PR's patch is broken. Please tar -cf eclipse- patch. Eclipse's patch files are too long file name. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 13:40:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D27C16A41F for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE0B43D45 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j99DeKxB061886 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j99DeKVO061885; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <200510091340.j99DeKVO061885@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86900: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Panagiotis Astithas List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:40:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86900; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Panagiotis Astithas To: Norikatsu Shigemura Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86900: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:38:20 +0300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000604080402060705050400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:00:13 +0300 > "Panagiotis Astithas" wrote: > >>>Number: 86900 >>>Category: ports >>>Synopsis: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 >>>Description: >> >>This patch updates java/eclipse from version 3.1 to version 3.1.1. It contains the patch from PR ports/86860 as well. > > > Humm.. Your PR's patch is broken. Please tar -cf eclipse- > patch. Eclipse's patch files are too long file name. Weird. I am attaching a uunecoded version of the tarfile you requested, so that it gets stored in the PR as well. If you still have problems with it let me know and I'll send it to you privately. --------------000604080402060705050400 Content-Type: text/plain; name="eclipse.uu" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="eclipse.uu" begin 644 eclipse.tar M96-L:7!S93,Q,2YP871C:``````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````#`P,#8T-"``,#`Q-S4Q(``P,#$W-3$@`#`P,#`P,3$T-C8P M(#$P,S(P-38U-3`V(#`Q,SF8@)'M74DM34D-]+W)EB`M0R`D>U!2149)6'T*(`E`)'M3141](%P*(`D@("UE(")S*R4E M14-,25!315](3TU%)24K)'M03U)41$535$1)4GTK9R(@7`HM"2`@+64@(G,K M)25*059!7TA/344E)2LD>TI!5D%?2$]-17TK9R(@7`HK"2`@+64@(G,K)250 M4D5&25@E)2LD>U!2149)6'TK9R(@7`H@"2`@+64@(G,K)258,3%"05-%)24K M)'M8,3%"05-%?2MG(B!<"B`)("`M92`BT)23U=3 M15)]*VT9)3$531$E2?2]E8VQI<'-E+FEN(#X@)'M74DM34D-] M+V5C;&EP"(O/@HM(`D)"3QP2!N86UE/2)W2!N86UE M/2)O&UL(B!D:7(](BXN M+RXN+W!L=6=I;G,O;W)G+F5C;&EP2!N86UE/2)O"(O M/@H@(`D)"3QP2!N86UE/2)W'0L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP'1E9&ET;W(L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP'1E M2PS+C$N,"QO M"PS+C$N,"QO'0L,RXQ M+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP'1E9&ET;W(L M,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP'1E2PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO"PS+C$N,"QO#@V(CX*9&EF9B`M&UL"BTM+2`O=7-R+W!O&UL M"5-U;B!*=6P@,S$@,#@Z,C8Z,34@,C`P-0HK*RL@96-L:7!S92]F:6QE&UL"51U92!/ M8W0@(#0@,C(Z-30Z,34@,C`P-0I`0"`M,2PV("LQ+#8@0$`*+2TM+2!F96%T M=7)E&UL+F]R M:6<)36]N($IU;B`R-R`R,3HU,CHU,2`R,#`U"BTK*RL@9F5A='5R97,O;W)G M+F5C;&EP&UL+F]R M:6<)5&AU(%-E<"`R.2`Q-3HU,3HT,"`R,#`U"BLK*RL@9F5A='5R97,O;W)G M+F5C;&EP2!N86UE/2)O2!N86UE/2)O"YG=&LN>#@V(B!T87)G970](B1[=&%R9V5T?2(^"BT@"0D)/'!R M;W!E"(O/@HM(`D)"3QP2!N M86UE/2)W"YM;W1I9BY005]225-#(B!T87)G970](B1[=&%R9V5T?2(^"BT@"0D)/'!R M;W!E"(O/@HM0$`@+3V9E871U&UL+&9E871U3X*+2T)"3QE8VQI<'-E+FED4F5P;&%C97(@9F5A='5R949I M;&50871H/2(D>V9E871U&UL(B`@"YM;W1I9BYI838T+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G!L M871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YL:6YU>"YG=&LN>#@V7S8T+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI M<'-E+G!L871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YL:6YU>"YG=&LN<'!C-C0L,RXQ+C`L;W)G M+F5C;&EP"YC87)B;VXN<'!C+#,N M,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G!L871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YL:6YU>"YG=&LN>#@V M+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G!L871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YW:6XS,BYW:6XS M,BYX.#8L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP&UL(B`@ M"YM;W1I9BYI838T+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE M8VQI<'-E+G!L871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YL:6YU>"YG=&LN>#@V7S8T+#,N,2XP M+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G!L871F;W)M+G-O=7)C92YF#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G!L871F M;W)M+G-O=7)C92YW:6XS,BYW:6XS,BYX.#8L,RXQ+C`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`D) M/&%N=&-A;&P@=&%R9V5T/2)R;V]T1FEL97,D>V]S?5\D>W=S?5\D>V%R8VA] M(B\^"B`@"3PO=&%R9V5T/@H@(`D\=&%R9V5T(&YA;64](G)O;W1&:6QE%]G=&M?>#@V M(CX**R`)/'1A%]M;W1I9E]X.#8B M/@H@(`D\+W1A%]G=&M?<'!C(CX*+2`)/"]T87)G970^"BT@"3QT87)G M970@;F%M93TB%]M;W1I9E]X.#8B/@HM*PD\ M+W1A&UL"51H M=2!*=6P@,30@,#`Z-30Z,3D@,C`P-0HM0$`@+3(P+#D@*S(P+#$R($!`"BT@ M"3QP;'5G:6X@=W,](FUO=&EF(B`@;W,](FAP=7@B(&9R86=M96YT/2)TF4](C`B(&ED/2)O"YM M;W1I9BY005]225-#(B!V97)S:6]N/2(S+C$N,"(O/@HM(`D\<&QU9VEN('=S M/2)M;W1I9B(@(&]S/2)H<'5X(B!F#@V7S8T(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE M/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)O"(@9G)A9VUE;G0](G1R=64B(&%R8V@](G!P8R(@9&]W;FQO860M"YC87)B;VXN<'!C(B!V97)S:6]N/2(S+C$N,"(O M/@HM(`D\<&QU9VEN('=S/2)G=&LB("!OF4](C`B(&EN"YG M=&LN>#@V(B!V97)S:6]N/2(S+C$N,"(O/@HM*PD\<&QU9VEN('=S/2)G=&LB M("!OF4](C`B(&EN M#@V(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED M/2)O#@V M(B!V97)S:6]N/2(S+C$N,"(O/@HM*PD\<&QU9VEN('=S/2)M;W1I9B(@(&]S M/2)F#@V(B!D;W=N;&]A M9"US:7IE/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)O&UL"51U92!/8W0@(#0@,C`Z,S0Z,38@,C`P-0HK0$`@+3(U+#0@ M*S(U+#<@0$`**R`)/'!L=6=I;B!W#@V(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE/2(P(B!I;G-T M86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)OF4](C`B(&EN#@V(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE M/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)O#@V(B!V97)S:6]N/2(S+C$N,2(O/@HK M*PD\<&QU9VEN('=S/2)G=&LB("!OF4](C`B(&ED/2)O#@V M(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)O#@V(B!V97)S M:6]N/2(S+C$N,2(O/@HK*PD\<&QU9VEN('=S/2)M;W1I9B(@(&]S/2)F#@V(B!D;W=N;&]A9"US:7IE M/2(P(B!I;G-T86QL+7-I>F4](C`B(&ED/2)O"(O/@HM(`D)"3QP2!N86UE/2)W2!N86UE/2)O M"(O/@HM(`D)"3QP2!N86UE/2)WW1A2!N86UE/2)A"(O/@HM(`D)"3QP2!N86UE/2)WW1A2!N86UE/2)A M&UL(B!D:7(](BXN+RXN+W!L=6=I;G,O;W)G+F5C;&EP"YI838T(B!T87)G970](B1[=&%R9V5T?2(^"BT@"0D)/'!R;W!E M2!T;V1I M'!R97-S:6]N#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W M="YG=&LN;&EN=7@N>#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YG=&LN"YP<&,L,RXQ+C`L;W)G M+F5C;&EP"YP<&,L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YG=&LN;&EN M=7@N:6$V-"PS+C$N,"QO"YX.#8L,RXQ M+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP'!R M97-S:6]N#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE M8VQI<'-E+G-W="YG=&LN;&EN=7@N>#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W M="YG=&LN9G)E96)S9"YX.#8L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP#@V7S8T+#,N M,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YG=&LN9G)E96)S9"YA;60V-"PS+C$N,"QO M"YP<&,L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C M;&EP"YP<&,L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YM;W1I9BYF#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE M8VQI<'-E+G-W="YM;W1I9BYH<'5X+FEA-C1?,S(L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C;&EP M"YP M<&,L,RXQ+C$L;W)G+F5C;&EP"YX.#9?-C0L,RXQ M+C$L;W)G+F5C;&EP#@V+#,N M,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YM;W1I9BYH<'5X+FEA-C1?,S(L,RXQ+C$L M;W)G+F5C;&EP#@V+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YG=&LN M"YI838T M+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G-W="YM;W1I9BYS;VQAV9E871UV-O;&QE M8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B!I;F-L=61E3X**R`)"3QC:&UO9"!P97)M/2(W-34B M(&1I"YP:&]T;VXN>#@V+R1[8V]L;&5C M=&EN9T9O;&1E#@V M(CX*("L)"3QM:V1IV-O;&QE8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B!I;F-L=61E MV9E871UV-O;&QE M8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B\^"BT@"0D\8V]P>2!T;V1IV9E871UV-O;&QE8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B!I M;F-L=61EV-O;&QE8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B\^"B`K"0D\8V]P>2!T;V1I M"YG=&LN:6$V-"\D>V-O;&QE8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B\^"BT@ M"0D\8V]P>2!T;V1I3X*+2`)"3QC:&UO9"!P97)M/2(W-34B(&1IV-O;&QE8W1I;F=&;VQD97)](B!I;F-L=61E M#@V M+R1[8V]L;&5C=&EN9T9O;&1EV9E M871UV9E871UV9E871UV9E871UV-O;&QE8W1I M;F=&;VQD97)](B\^"BLK(`D\+W1AV9E871U&UL"BTM+2`O=7-R M+W!O2!N86UE/2)O2!N86UE/2)W2!N86UE/2)O"(O/@HM0$`@+38W+#$Q("LW,BPR,2!`0`HM(`D)"3QP2!N M86UE/2)O#@V(B!T87)G970](B1[=&%R M9V5T?2(^"B`K"0D)/'!R;W!E2!N86UE/2)O&UL(B!D:7(](BXN+RXN+W!L=6=I;G,O;W)G+F5C;&EP2!N86UE/2)O2!N86UE/2)O M"(O/@HK0$`@+3$S-2PW("LQ-3`L-R!`0`HK(`D) M/&-O<'D@=&]D:7(](B1[9F5A='5R92YB87-E?2]F96%T=7)E&UL(B`@"YG=&LN<'!C+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N M:'!U>"YM;W1I9BY005]225-#+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R M8V4N;&EN=7@N9W1K+G@X-E\V-"PS+C$N,"QO"YG=&LN>#@V+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS M;W5R8V4N86EX+FUO=&EF+G!P8RPS+C$N,"QO"YM;W1I9BYX.#8L,RXQ+C`L(B\^"BTK"0D\96-L:7!S M92YI9%)E<&QA8V5R(&9E871U"YM;W1I9BYI838T7S,R+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE M8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N;&EN=7@N9W1K+FEA-C0L,RXQ+C`L;W)G+F5C M;&EP"YG=&LN>#@V7S8T+#,N,2XP+&]R9RYE M8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N9G)E96)S9"YG=&LN86UD-C0L,RXQ+C`L;W)G M+F5C;&EP"YC87)B;VXN<'!C+#,N,2XP M+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N;&EN=7@N9W1K+G@X-BPS+C$N,"QO M"YM;W1I9BYP<&,L,RXQ+C`L;W)G M+F5C;&EP#@V+#,N,2XP M+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N9G)E96)S9"YM;W1I9BYX.#8L,RXQ M+C`L(B\^"BLM"0D\96-L:7!S92YI9%)E<&QA8V5R(&9E871U"YM;W1I9BYI M838T7S,R+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N;&EN=7@N9W1K M+FEA-C0L,RXQ+C$L;W)G+F5C;&EP"YG=&LN M>#@V7S8T+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N#@V+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R8V4N"YG=&LN:6$V-"PS+C$N,2QO"YP:&]T;VXN>#@V+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C<"YS;W5R M8V4N;&EN=7@N9W1K+G!P8RPS+C$N,2QO"YG=&LN>#@V+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C M<"YS;W5R8V4N9G)E96)S9"YG=&LN>#@V+#,N,2XQ+&]R9RYE8VQI<'-E+G)C M<"YS;W5R8V4N86EX+FUO=&EF+G!P8RPS+C$N,2QO"YM;W1I9BYX.#8L,RXQ+C$L;W)G+F5C;&EP%]G=&M?<'!C(CX*+2`)/"]T87)G970^"BT@"3QT87)G970@ M;F%M93TB%]M;W1I9E]X.#8B/@HM*PD\+W1A MV9E871U X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF316A420; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7324043D45; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j99Eu1T1069800; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:01 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j99Eu1kT069796; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:01 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:01 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510091456.j99Eu1kT069796@freefall.freebsd.org> To: past@ebs.gr, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86900: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:56:01 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Update java/eclipse to version 3.1.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 9 14:54:36 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! Ah! I should say gzip -9 instead of tar -cf:-). Next time, please make a patch gzip+uuencode. Thank you! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86900 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 14:56:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2231216A420; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E0943D48; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j99EuJdG069845; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:19 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j99EuJJQ069841; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:19 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:56:19 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510091456.j99EuJJQ069841@freefall.freebsd.org> To: past@ebs.gr, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:56:20 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 9 14:56:08 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86860 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 05:03:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A79216A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9143D45 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.30.70.180]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FCF1A3C1B for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93F1953E52; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:03:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:03:23 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051010050323.GA97693@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: [ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: eclipse-viPlugin-1.12.2 failed on i386 5] X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:03:26 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers? If you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix, please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate case, so that users do not unexpectedly encounter it. See http://pointyhat.freebsd.org for the full log. Thanks, Kris ----- Forwarded message from User Ports-i386 ----- X-Original-To: kkenn@localhost Delivered-To: kkenn@localhost.obsecurity.org X-Original-To: kris@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: kris@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:22:12 GMT From: User Ports-i386 To: krion@FreeBSD.org, kris@FreeBSD.org Subject: eclipse-viPlugin-1.12.2 failed on i386 5 X-UIDL: )`k"!OZR!!mZC!!7k8"! X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=3Dbogofilter, spamicity=3D0.000000, version=3D0.96.0 building eclipse-viPlugin-1.12.2 on gohan26.freebsd.org in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/37170 maintained by: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org port directory: /usr/ports/java/eclipse-viplugin build started at Mon Oct 10 04:22:04 UTC 2005 FETCH_DEPENDS=3D PATCH_DEPENDS=3D EXTRACT_DEPENDS=3Dunzip-5.52_2.tbz BUILD_DEPENDS=3D RUN_DEPENDS=3DORBit2-2.12.4.tbz atk-1.9.1.tbz bitstream-vera-1.10_1.tbz cai= ro-0.4.0.tbz cdparanoia-3.9.8_7.tbz desktop-file-utils-0.10_2.tbz docbook-s= k-4.1.2_3.tbz docbook-xml-4.2_1.tbz docbook-xsl-1.69.1.tbz eclipse-3.1_3.tb= z esound-0.2.36.tbz expat-1.95.8_3.tbz fam-2.6.9_6.tbz fontconfig-2.2.3,1.t= bz freetype2-2.1.10_1.tbz gconf2-2.10.1.tbz gettext-0.14.5.tbz glib-2.6.6.t= bz gnome-icon-theme-2.10.1_1.tbz gnomehier-2.0_7.tbz gnomekeyring-0.4.5.tbz= gnomemimedata-2.4.2.tbz gnomevfs2-2.10.1_1.tbz gtk-2.6.10_1.tbz hicolor-ic= on-theme-0.5.tbz howl-1.0.0.tbz intltool-0.34.1.tbz javavmwrapper-2.0_5.tbz= jdk-1.4.2p7_1.tbz jpeg-6b_3.tbz libIDL-0.8.6.tbz libXft-2.1.7.tbz libart_l= gpl2-2.3.17.tbz libaudiofile-0.2.6.tbz libbonobo-2.10.1_1.tbz libbonoboui-2= .10.1.tbz libglade2-2.5.1_2.tbz libgnome-2.10.1.tbz libgnomecanvas-2.10.2_1= .tbz libgnomeui-2.10.1_1.tbz libiconv-1.9.2_1.tbz libpixman-0.1.6.tbz libxm= l2-2.6.22.tbz libxslt-1.1.15.tbz linc-1.0.3_3.tbz openldap-client-2.2.28.tb= z p5-XML-Parser-! 2.34_1.tbz pango-1.8.2.tbz perl-5.8.7.tbz pkgconfig-0.17.2.tbz png-1.2.8_2= .tbz popt-1.7.tbz python-2.4.2.tbz samba-libsmbclient-3.0.20_2.tbz scrollke= eper-0.3.14_1,1.tbz sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_2.tbz shared-mime-info-0.16_1.tbz = startup-notification-0.8_1.tbz tiff-3.7.4.tbz urwfonts-1.0.tbz xmlcatmgr-2.= 2.tbz xorg-fonts-encodings-6.8.2.tbz xorg-fonts-truetype-6.8.2.tbz xorg-lib= raries-6.8.2.tbz add_pkg =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D> viPlugin_1.12.2_E30.zip doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/eclips= e. =3D> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/port= s/distfiles/eclipse/. fetch: ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/eclipse/viP= lugin_1.12.2_E30.zip: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Attempting to fetch from ftp://pointyhat.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distf= iles/eclipse/. fetch: ftp://pointyhat.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/eclipse/viPlugin_1= .12.2_E30.zip: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Attempting to fetch from http://www.satokar.com/viplugin/files/. fetch: http://www.satokar.com/viplugin/files/viPlugin_1.12.2_E30.zip: Not F= ound =3D> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/port= s/distfiles/eclipse/. fetch: ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/eclipse/viP= lugin_1.12.2_E30.zip: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Attempting to fetch from ftp://pointyhat.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distf= iles/eclipse/. fetch: ftp://pointyhat.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/eclipse/viPlugin_1= .12.2_E30.zip: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this =3D> port manually into /tmp/distfiles/eclipse and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/ports/java/eclipse-viplugin. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D build ended at Mon Oct 10 04:22:09 UTC 2005 ----- End forwarded message ----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDSfYaWry0BWjoQKURAsmzAJ0Xp24LifCDoLof/TDh6rMwBHdpjQCgye8T IZfxvxZKi0CyXXCEPdJMR3w= =+rzq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 15:10:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C89216A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4402843D5E for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AFAEkW094174 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AFAEfl094173; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:14 GMT Message-Id: <200510101510.j9AFAEfl094173@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, past@ebs.gr Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:00:27 +0200 Hi, I am a bit late on this topic (PR already closed) but I just noticed a flaw with this change. javavmwrapper picks a JDK depending on several variables -- see javavm(1). With this change it is possible that a not suitable JDK gets picked up. Here is a patch that should fix this (I didn't test it though). Index: files/eclipse.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/java/eclipse/files/eclipse.in,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 eclipse.in --- files/eclipse.in 9 Oct 2005 14:54:21 -0000 1.5 +++ files/eclipse.in 10 Oct 2005 14:54:13 -0000 @@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ exit 1 fi -PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ +JAVA_VERSION="%%JAVA_VERSION%%" JAVA_OS="%%JAVA_OS%%" PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 16:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AD516A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5922D43D45 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AGALxK002441 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AGALDD002440; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 GMT Message-Id: <200510101610.j9AGALDD002440@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Panagiotis Astithas List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Panagiotis Astithas To: Herve Quiroz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:02:52 +0300 Herve Quiroz wrote: > Hi, > > I am a bit late on this topic (PR already closed) but I just noticed a > flaw with this change. > > javavmwrapper picks a JDK depending on several variables -- see > javavm(1). With this change it is possible that a not suitable JDK gets > picked up. Here is a patch that should fix this (I didn't test it > though). > > > Index: files/eclipse.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/java/eclipse/files/eclipse.in,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -r1.5 eclipse.in > --- files/eclipse.in 9 Oct 2005 14:54:21 -0000 1.5 > +++ files/eclipse.in 10 Oct 2005 14:54:13 -0000 > @@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ > exit 1 > fi > > -PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ > +JAVA_VERSION="%%JAVA_VERSION%%" JAVA_OS="%%JAVA_OS%%" PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ Why do you think this is necessary? What the eclipse executable does is invoke the java executable it finds in the PATH. Since we have made sure the javavmwrapper's symlink will get chosen as the default, it will honour the JAVA_VERSION and JAVA_OS variables, right? Am I missing something here? Regards, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 16:20:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2693616A43C for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28C443D4C for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AGKMQm002779 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AGKMfa002778; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:22 GMT Message-Id: <200510101620.j9AGKMfa002778@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:20:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:16:06 +0200 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:02:52PM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > >-PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ > >+JAVA_VERSION="%%JAVA_VERSION%%" JAVA_OS="%%JAVA_OS%%" > >PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/bin:$PATH exec "${ECLIPSE_HOME}/eclipse" $@ > > Why do you think this is necessary? What the eclipse executable does is > invoke the java executable it finds in the PATH. Since we have made sure > the javavmwrapper's symlink will get chosen as the default, it will > honour the JAVA_VERSION and JAVA_OS variables, right? Am I missing > something here? The port will pick a suitable JDK at *install* time depending on JAVA_VERSION and JAVA_OS in the Makefile. What your patch is about is the ability for the eclipse launcher to pick up a suitable JDK at *run* time. And you patch does this well, that is javavmwrapper will be used to find a JDK. Anyway, javavmwrapper will find a JDK depending on JAVA_HOME, JAVA_VERSION, JAVA_OS and JAVA_VENDOR (any of those which are defined). With my suggested changes, you still allow the launcher to let javavmwrapper pick a JDK but you enforce the policy of the java/eclipse port by restricting the choice of the JDK depending on JAVA_VERSION and JAVA_OS that were specified while installing the port, namely: JAVA_VERSION= 1.4+ JAVA_OS= native Without these changes, it is possible that Eclipse is run with a non-suitable JDK. For example: $ unset JAVA_HOME $ unset JAVA_VENDOR $ unset JAVA_OS $ export JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_BSDJAVA_JDK_1_1 $ eclipse --> This will have the launcher to pick java/jdk11 which is not a suitable JDK (as per the JAVA_VERSION variable specified in java/eclipse/Makefile). Herve From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 16:30:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2084016A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC12043D45 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AGUIiN003119 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AGUIGR003113; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:18 GMT Message-Id: <200510101630.j9AGUIGR003113@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:30:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:23:28 +0200 Ok, I just realized that the launcher was not executing a 'java' command but rather the original 'eclipse' executable so the fix may be more complex than the one I submitted. I am currently installing eclipse then I will have a closer look at this issue. Herve From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 17:10:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10FF16A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8243B43D45 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AHAI0l010475 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AHAIrU010474; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 GMT Message-Id: <200510101710.j9AHAIrU010474@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Herve Quiroz Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Herve Quiroz List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Herve Quiroz To: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:06:44 +0200 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Herve Quiroz wrote: > Ok, I just realized that the launcher was not executing a 'java' command > but rather the original 'eclipse' executable so the fix may be more > complex than the one I submitted. > > I am currently installing eclipse then I will have a closer look at this > issue. After a bit of testing, it appears that the scenario I presented in my other message (JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_BSDJAVA_JDK_1_1) will indeed break things. And that the fix I submitted does address this problem. Herve From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 20:30:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC3716A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BAB43D4C for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AKUPpR045084 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AKUPY4045083; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT Message-Id: <200510102030.j9AKUPY4045083@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Panagiotis Astithas List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Panagiotis Astithas To: Herve Quiroz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:26:23 +0300 Herve Quiroz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Herve Quiroz wrote: > >>Ok, I just realized that the launcher was not executing a 'java' command >>but rather the original 'eclipse' executable so the fix may be more >>complex than the one I submitted. >> >>I am currently installing eclipse then I will have a closer look at this >>issue. > > > After a bit of testing, it appears that the scenario I presented in my > other message (JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_BSDJAVA_JDK_1_1) > will indeed break things. > > And that the fix I submitted does address this problem. Ah, OK, I hadn't considered such a scenario. Thanks for the insight. Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 21:10:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFC16A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephenj@southern.edu) Received: from cervelo.southern.edu (cervelo.southern.edu [216.229.224.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8423E43D45 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephenj@southern.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (host-216-229-233-174.public.southern.edu [216.229.233.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cervelo.southern.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1B1FC1D1 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <434AD8D6.9070909@southern.edu> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:46 -0400 From: Stephen Jamieson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SAU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SAU-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 2) X-SAU-MailScanner-From: stephenj@southern.edu Subject: About jdk 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:10:49 -0000 I am using the linux version of jdk 1.5, and I was wondering if there was a way that I could install eclipse and get it to work with jre 1.5. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 21:14:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E125D16A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [62.103.84.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0609843D49 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9ALEV9V010985; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:14:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.200] (pptp.ebs.gr [10.1.1.200]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9ALEhh3011277; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:14:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <434AD9A8.4000302@ebs.gr> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:14:16 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051008) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Jamieson References: <434AD8D6.9070909@southern.edu> In-Reply-To: <434AD8D6.9070909@southern.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About jdk 1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:14:34 -0000 Stephen Jamieson wrote: > I am using the linux version of jdk 1.5, and I was wondering if there > was a way that I could install eclipse and get it to work with jre 1.5. > Thanks. You could probably use the linux version of eclipse. Just unzip it somewhere and give it a try. You may need to brandelf the linux binaries, too. Cheers, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 14 07:17:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED9F16A41F for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B065643D45 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:17:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3982FF240B for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06266-09 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6245F2405 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:17:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: eclipse@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-ixonWwnFuD2sHN7d3VER" Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting, Inc Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:17:11 -0700 Message-Id: <1129274231.24866.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: file dialog aborts on amd64 6-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sean@mcneil.com List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:17:33 -0000 --=-ixonWwnFuD2sHN7d3VER Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I tried to do an import -> plugins and browse the directory location. This consistenly causes the dialog to crash: # # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00000008021e9c1a, pid=24587, tid=0x51a000 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (1.5.0-p2-root_13_oct_2005_18_05 mixed mode) # Problematic frame: # C [libzip.so+0x7c1a] inflateEnd+0x3a # # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid24587.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please write # a letter to freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org mailing list # --=-ixonWwnFuD2sHN7d3VER-- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 14 07:50:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA2216A41F for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [62.103.84.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E75843D48 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9E7oi9V025670; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:50:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.158] (pc158.ebs.gr [10.1.1.158]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9E7ourW083215; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:50:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <434F6342.20207@ebs.gr> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:50:26 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051008) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sean@mcneil.com References: <1129274231.24866.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <1129274231.24866.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file dialog aborts on amd64 6-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:50:48 -0000 Sean McNeil wrote: > I tried to do an import -> plugins and browse the directory location. > This consistenly causes the dialog to crash: > > # > # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: > # > # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00000008021e9c1a, pid=24587, tid=0x51a000 > # > # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM > (1.5.0-p2-root_13_oct_2005_18_05 mixed mode) > # Problematic frame: > # C [libzip.so+0x7c1a] inflateEnd+0x3a > # > # An error report file with more information is saved as > hs_err_pid24587.log > # > # If you would like to submit a bug report, please write > # a letter to freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org mailing list > # As the message says, this should go to freebsd-java, along with the hs_err_pid24587.log file. Have you tried increasing the maximum heap size? Cheers, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 14 17:29:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD4216A420; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BEB43D55; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (hq@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9EHTDc4052401; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 GMT (envelope-from hq@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from hq@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9EHTDO4052397; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 GMT (envelope-from hq) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 GMT From: Herve Quiroz Message-Id: <200510141729.j9EHTDO4052397@freefall.freebsd.org> To: hq@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/87450: [update] java/eclipse-uml to version 1.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:13 -0000 Synopsis: [update] java/eclipse-uml to version 1.1.1 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-eclipse Responsible-Changed-By: hq Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 14 17:28:42 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87450 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 14 17:30:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EEC16A421; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71BF43D46; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (hq@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9EHUW21053065; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:32 GMT (envelope-from hq@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from hq@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9EHUWlf053039; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:32 GMT (envelope-from hq) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:32 GMT From: Herve Quiroz Message-Id: <200510141730.j9EHUWlf053039@freefall.freebsd.org> To: past@ebs.gr, hq@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, hq@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:30:33 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: hq State-Changed-When: Fri Oct 14 17:29:37 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: I'll fix this. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-eclipse->hq Responsible-Changed-By: hq Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 14 17:29:37 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll fix this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86860 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 00:15:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B16516A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB59343D46; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pelsia.ninth-nine.com (d110.GkanagawaFL7.vectant.ne.jp [202.215.69.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/NinthNine) with ESMTP id j9F0ExKr085847; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:15:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:14:59 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]); Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:15:09 +0900 (JST) Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, rtdean@cytherianage.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:15:20 -0000 Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users! Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse related ports should be located on proper categories. I think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone, do you have any idea? java/eclipse -> devel/eclipse java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core java/eclipse-devel -> devel/eclipse-devel java/eclipse-emf -> devel/eclipse-emf java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples java/eclipse-gef -> graphics/eclipse-gef java/eclipse-gef-examples -> graphics/eclipse-gef-examples java/eclipse-langpack -> devel/eclipse-langpack java/eclipse-log4e -> devel/eclipse-log4e java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat java/eclipse-uml -> devel/eclipse-uml java/eclipse-v4all -> devel/eclipse-v4all java/eclipse-vep -> devel/eclipse-vep java/eclipse-vep-examples -> devel/eclipse-vep-examples java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 04:15:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951BC16A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (cpe-66-75-60-23.san.res.rr.com [66.75.60.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F5143D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.34] (gulliver [204.68.178.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by softweyr.homeunix.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9F4F7dD058354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@opensail.org) In-Reply-To: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wes Peters Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:07 -0700 To: Norikatsu Shigemura X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, rtdean@cytherianage.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:30 -0000 On Oct 14, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users! > > Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse > related ports should be located on proper categories. I > think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone, > do you have any idea? > > java/eclipse -> devel/eclipse > java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC > java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt > java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle > java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core > java/eclipse-devel -> devel/eclipse-devel > java/eclipse-emf -> devel/eclipse-emf > java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples > java/eclipse-gef -> graphics/eclipse-gef > java/eclipse-gef-examples -> graphics/eclipse-gef-examples > java/eclipse-langpack -> devel/eclipse-langpack > java/eclipse-log4e -> devel/eclipse-log4e > java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz > java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd > java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum > java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat > java/eclipse-uml -> devel/eclipse-uml > java/eclipse-v4all -> devel/eclipse-v4all > java/eclipse-vep -> devel/eclipse-vep > java/eclipse-vep-examples -> devel/eclipse-vep-examples > java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin > java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme > java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse > I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be classified along with eclipse. In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a development tool. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 05:59:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2F16A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416543D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:59:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.34] (cpe-66-75-60-23.san.res.rr.com [66.75.60.23]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951C21407881; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:59:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8347452E-908C-4BE5-AC8F-E6378C1BF17C@softweyr.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wes Peters Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:59:09 -0700 To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:59:11 -0000 On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:15:07PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > >> I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the >> other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be >> classified along with eclipse. > > [adding freebsd-java to the Cc:] > > For some background, there's been on-and-off discussion on -java > about how the java category was never really a good idea. None of > the other languages have their own primary category. In particular > we've completely failed to train our users to send 'java' PRs only > for problems with the JVMs and 'ports' PRs for things in ports/java. Makes you wonder how much the rest of the ports system would be cleaned up with a 'perl' category and all those p5-something- something ports got tossed into that basket, doesn't it? >> In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT >> and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a >> graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a >> development tool. > > Well, Eclipse is one of these 'suites' that doesn't really fit well > in one particular category. You could make the same argument about > OpenOffice, opengroupware, ZendStudio, and so forth. (These 3 are > chosen deliberately because they're scattered in 3 different > categories). > > OpenBSD has a 'productivity' category although what it has in it is > more > like our 'deskutils'. Perhaps we should consider co-opting that name? I don't know that 'productivity' really describes what these are. In particular, I'm not sure if opengroupware adds productivity or subtracts it. ;^) Ditto for eclipse, for that matter. A category name that means 'big blobs of software with lots of options' might be appropriate. > (Our "deskutils" is a combination of things like calendar programs and > individual GNOME add-ons, so it's a little bit of a mixed bag. > However, > I'm not sure I can see Eclipse fitting in with those). > > There is also the fact to consider that at 1624 ports, devel is simply > too huge for its own good. Everything is in there including the > kitchen sink. devel is one of several categories that has grown useless; www is another. It's certainly worth thinking about a category that actually makes sense for these large software systems like openoffice and eclipse. > Even if we just went with an 'ide' category, there are still 27 ports > that would probably fit in there. Not a lot in my book (and I've > always > been against anything that would lead us towards having hundreds of > categories), but I could see an argument for it, even so. > > I'll leave the idea of completely reshuffling all the categories for > another time, since everyone is probably tired of listening to my own > particular views on that. > > mcl > -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 06:13:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495C516A420; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AB543D62; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id ECFC82F6F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:13:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:13:31 -0500 To: Wes Peters Message-ID: <20051015061331.GA31258@soaustin.net> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> <8347452E-908C-4BE5-AC8F-E6378C1BF17C@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8347452E-908C-4BE5-AC8F-E6378C1BF17C@softweyr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:13:37 -0000 On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:59:09PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > Makes you wonder how much the rest of the ports system would be > cleaned up with a 'perl' category and all those p5-something- > something ports got tossed into that basket, doesn't it? I do _not_ recommend we attempt to do the 1688 (one thousand six hundred eighty-eight) repocopies, even if anyone was insane enough to volunteer to try to do so. It would take months to sort through the damage to the depedency tree, during which time the ports tree would effectively be broken. No matter how much we tested it first, we would never get them all. And, of course, we'd have to have the tree frozen to run the regression test, or the test would become instantly obsolete the second we ran it. Nothing to see here, folks. Move along. mcl From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 12:49:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B036616A43C; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4843D49; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pelsia.ninth-nine.com (d110.GkanagawaFL7.vectant.ne.jp [202.215.69.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/NinthNine) with ESMTP id j9FCnIV9012221; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:18 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200510151249.j9FCnIV9012221@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]); Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:27 +0900 (JST) Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, nork@FreeBSD.org, rtdean@cytherianage.net, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:33 -0000 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:14:59 +0900 (JST) Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users! > Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse > related ports should be located on proper categories. I > think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone, > do you have any idea? Oops, I missed. Eclipse is very similar to Emacs: 1. IDE Emacs is a one of IDE(or platform). And anyone doesn't think that it is ONLY a elisp interpreter. But it is a editor. So I think that it is no problem that Eclipse may be categolize to editors. 2. Extension-able Emacs has many extention modules like news reader, language support, games, ... 3. Mode Emacs has many mode for descriptions like C, Perl, Java, ... 4. others It must be that there are other similar feature:-). java/eclipse -> editors/eclipse java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core java/eclipse-devel -> editors/eclipse-devel java/eclipse-emf -> editors/eclipse-emf java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples java/eclipse-gef -> editors/eclipse-gef java/eclipse-gef-examples -> editors/eclipse-gef-examples java/eclipse-langpack -> editors/eclipse-langpack java/eclipse-log4e -> editors/eclipse-log4e java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat java/eclipse-uml -> editors/eclipse-uml java/eclipse-v4all -> editors/eclipse-v4all java/eclipse-vep -> editors/eclipse-vep java/eclipse-vep-examples -> editors/eclipse-vep-examples java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 05:30:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1900F16A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A553943D48; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B46DE2F2B; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:30:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:30:03 -0500 To: Wes Peters Message-ID: <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:00:01 +0000 Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, rtdean@cytherianage.net, Norikatsu Shigemura , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:30:05 -0000 On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:15:07PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the > other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be > classified along with eclipse. [adding freebsd-java to the Cc:] For some background, there's been on-and-off discussion on -java about how the java category was never really a good idea. None of the other languages have their own primary category. In particular we've completely failed to train our users to send 'java' PRs only for problems with the JVMs and 'ports' PRs for things in ports/java. > In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT > and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a > graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a > development tool. Well, Eclipse is one of these 'suites' that doesn't really fit well in one particular category. You could make the same argument about OpenOffice, opengroupware, ZendStudio, and so forth. (These 3 are chosen deliberately because they're scattered in 3 different categories). OpenBSD has a 'productivity' category although what it has in it is more like our 'deskutils'. Perhaps we should consider co-opting that name? (Our "deskutils" is a combination of things like calendar programs and individual GNOME add-ons, so it's a little bit of a mixed bag. However, I'm not sure I can see Eclipse fitting in with those). There is also the fact to consider that at 1624 ports, devel is simply too huge for its own good. Everything is in there including the kitchen sink. Even if we just went with an 'ide' category, there are still 27 ports that would probably fit in there. Not a lot in my book (and I've always been against anything that would lead us towards having hundreds of categories), but I could see an argument for it, even so. I'll leave the idea of completely reshuffling all the categories for another time, since everyone is probably tired of listening to my own particular views on that. mcl From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 09:40:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A443316A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:40:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [62.103.84.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB6043D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9F9dr9V030031; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:39:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.200] (pptp.ebs.gr [10.1.1.200]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9F9dxdu004796; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:40:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <4350CE50.8080704@ebs.gr> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:39:28 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051008) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:00:34 +0000 Cc: Wes Peters , wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, tux@pinguru.net, Norikatsu Shigemura , rtdean@cytherianage.net, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:40:01 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:15:07PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > >>I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the >>other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be >>classified along with eclipse. > > > [adding freebsd-java to the Cc:] > > For some background, there's been on-and-off discussion on -java > about how the java category was never really a good idea. None of > the other languages have their own primary category. In particular > we've completely failed to train our users to send 'java' PRs only > for problems with the JVMs and 'ports' PRs for things in ports/java. > > >>In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT >>and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a >>graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a >>development tool. > > > Well, Eclipse is one of these 'suites' that doesn't really fit well > in one particular category. You could make the same argument about > OpenOffice, opengroupware, ZendStudio, and so forth. (These 3 are > chosen deliberately because they're scattered in 3 different categories). > > OpenBSD has a 'productivity' category although what it has in it is more > like our 'deskutils'. Perhaps we should consider co-opting that name? > > (Our "deskutils" is a combination of things like calendar programs and > individual GNOME add-ons, so it's a little bit of a mixed bag. However, > I'm not sure I can see Eclipse fitting in with those). > > There is also the fact to consider that at 1624 ports, devel is simply > too huge for its own good. Everything is in there including the > kitchen sink. > > Even if we just went with an 'ide' category, there are still 27 ports > that would probably fit in there. Not a lot in my book (and I've always > been against anything that would lead us towards having hundreds of > categories), but I could see an argument for it, even so. > > I'll leave the idea of completely reshuffling all the categories for > another time, since everyone is probably tired of listening to my own > particular views on that. Although I agree with everything you say here, I can't see how this is an argument against the fact that GEF and CDT most probably belong to devel. Unless I'm mistaken and you were not making one? Regarding the splitting of devel and www categories, perhaps we should wait until the port tree migrates to subversion (yeah, right :-))? Cheers, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 13:39:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7216A420; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C604543D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (nork@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9FDdu2U009340; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:56 GMT (envelope-from nork@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nork@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9FDduxO009336; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:56 GMT (envelope-from nork) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:56 GMT From: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-Id: <200510151339.j9FDduxO009336@freefall.freebsd.org> To: markhobden@gmail.com, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/87450: [update] java/eclipse-uml to version 1.1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:39:57 -0000 Synopsis: [update] java/eclipse-uml to version 1.1.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: nork State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 13:39:43 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87450 From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 18:15:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B53316A421; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from lakecmmtao06.coxmail.com (lakecmmtao06.coxmail.com [68.99.120.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9DE43D46; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dns1 ([64.58.171.82]) by lakecmmtao06.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051015181511.BUDS17511.lakecmmtao06.coxmail.com@dns1>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:15:11 -0400 From: Vizion To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:10:19 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> <8347452E-908C-4BE5-AC8F-E6378C1BF17C@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <8347452E-908C-4BE5-AC8F-E6378C1BF17C@softweyr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510151110.22123.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Cc: Wes Peters , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:15:08 -0000 On Friday 14 October 2005 22:59, the author Wes Peters contributed to the dialogue on- Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports: >On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:15:07PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: >>> I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the >>> other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be >>> classified along with eclipse. >> >> [adding freebsd-java to the Cc:] >> >> For some background, there's been on-and-off discussion on -java >> about how the java category was never really a good idea. None of >> the other languages have their own primary category. In particular >> we've completely failed to train our users to send 'java' PRs only >> for problems with the JVMs and 'ports' PRs for things in ports/java. > >Makes you wonder how much the rest of the ports system would be >cleaned up with a 'perl' category and all those p5-something- >something ports got tossed into that basket, doesn't it? > >>> In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT >>> and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a >>> graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a >>> development tool. >> >> Well, Eclipse is one of these 'suites' that doesn't really fit well >> in one particular category. You could make the same argument about >> OpenOffice, opengroupware, ZendStudio, and so forth. (These 3 are >> chosen deliberately because they're scattered in 3 different >> categories). >> >> OpenBSD has a 'productivity' category although what it has in it is >> more >> like our 'deskutils'. Perhaps we should consider co-opting that name? > >I don't know that 'productivity' really describes what these are. In >particular, I'm not sure if opengroupware adds productivity or >subtracts it. ;^) Ditto for eclipse, for that matter. A category >name that means 'big blobs of software with lots of options' might be >appropriate. > >> (Our "deskutils" is a combination of things like calendar programs and >> individual GNOME add-ons, so it's a little bit of a mixed bag. >> However, >> I'm not sure I can see Eclipse fitting in with those). >> >> There is also the fact to consider that at 1624 ports, devel is simply >> too huge for its own good. Everything is in there including the >> kitchen sink. > >devel is one of several categories that has grown useless; www is >another. It's certainly worth thinking about a category that >actually makes sense for these large software systems like openoffice >and eclipse. > >> Even if we just went with an 'ide' category, there are still 27 ports >> that would probably fit in there. Not a lot in my book (and I've >> always >> been against anything that would lead us towards having hundreds of >> categories), but I could see an argument for it, even so. >> >> I'll leave the idea of completely reshuffling all the categories for >> another time, since everyone is probably tired of listening to my own >> particular views on that. My solution is not popular even if it is logical. I say the ports structure needs a strategy that takes account of the reality of tools such as eclipse and soes not hesititate to create entirely new categories to meet those new neeeds. When the ports tree logic was defined (long ago in comparative computer history) it structure fitted well. We now need something like ports/eclipse where all the tools that form part of the eclipse fremework can be grouped together. But this view does not dit well with those who feel there is a virtue in preserving the existing structure which I cannot help but regard as an anachronism for these newly emerging frameworks which do not fit well into the traditional structure. david >> >> mcl > >-- > Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? >Wes Peters >wes@softweyr.com > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing bound for Europe via Panama Canal after completing engineroom refit.