From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 06:58:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4190E16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:58:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf14.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf14.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D143D43D54 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keenpa19@uww.edu) Received: from mxip10.cluster1.charter.net (mxip10a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.140])j336wctW014464 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:58:38 -0500 Received: from 66-168-60-59.jvl.wi.charter.com (HELO [192.168.2.99]) (66.168.60.59) by mxip10.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2005 01:58:39 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.91,143,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="808447913:sNHT29698148" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <986019cd811303feb8f5f80a71880d49@uww.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org From: Peter Keen Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:57:41 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Subject: linux_base-8 in freebsd jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:58:40 -0000 I'm trying to compile linux-base_8 in a FreeBSD jail, and make fails with the following error: ralph# make install ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_6 /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/work/linux_base-8-8.0/dev/null mknod: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/work/linux_base-8-8.0/dev/null: Operation not permitted *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. ralph# Does a workaround exist to get this to install? This port is required by the jdk14 port, which is what I'm trying to install. Thanks for your help, Peter Keen From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 11:49:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFDD16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:49:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A87443D49 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd34.aul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1DI3bg-0006n0-03; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:49:32 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (ZXZWisZHwehpRpJH7orBiO2tvBEpjohSy7XR62YthCTR+C+tNdffre@[217.83.28.146]) by fwd34.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1DI3bZ-11WqY40; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:49:25 +0200 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) j33BnHBw066077; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:49:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:49:16 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Peter Keen Message-ID: <20050403134916.094b250d@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <986019cd811303feb8f5f80a71880d49@uww.edu> References: <986019cd811303feb8f5f80a71880d49@uww.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: ZXZWisZHwehpRpJH7orBiO2tvBEpjohSy7XR62YthCTR+C+tNdffre@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 39b056cd-ede2-49b1-bd64-516a2a346396 cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-8 in freebsd jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:49:35 -0000 On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:57:41 -0600 Peter Keen wrote: > I'm trying to compile linux-base_8 in a FreeBSD jail, and make fails > with the following error: > > ralph# make install > ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_6 > /bin/rm -f > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/work/linux_base-8-8.0/dev/null > mknod: > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/work/linux_base-8-8.0/dev/null: > Operation not permitted > *** Error code 1 In case you're using 5.3 or newer: Remove the 4 command lines around (and including) the mknod call in the Makefile. Bye, Alexander. -- Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:14:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0B216A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D3B43D4C; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gerald@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33KEVKW061049; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT (envelope-from gerald@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gerald@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j33KEVvb061045; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT (envelope-from gerald) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT From: Gerald Pfeifer Message-Id: <200504032014.j33KEVvb061045@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gerald@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79009: [patch] Some linux ports are incorrectly specified i386-only X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:14:31 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Some linux ports are incorrectly specified i386-only Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-emulation->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: gerald Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Apr 3 20:14:01 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Use canonical emulation@freebsd.org instead of freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79009 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 20:14:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0B216A4CE; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D3B43D4C; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gerald@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j33KEVKW061049; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT (envelope-from gerald@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gerald@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j33KEVvb061045; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT (envelope-from gerald) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT From: Gerald Pfeifer Message-Id: <200504032014.j33KEVvb061045@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gerald@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79009: [patch] Some linux ports are incorrectly specified i386-only X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:14:31 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Some linux ports are incorrectly specified i386-only Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-emulation->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: gerald Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Apr 3 20:14:01 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Use canonical emulation@freebsd.org instead of freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79009 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:01:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C41E16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:01:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5518943D1D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34B1gta012059 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:01:42 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j34B1fi1012053 for emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:01:41 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:01:41 GMT Message-Id: <200504041101.j34B1fi1012053@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:01:42 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/28] kern/53874 emulation /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base isn't wor 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/09/22] kern/21463 emulation Linux compatability mode should not allow o [2000/11/13] kern/22826 emulation Memory limits have no effect in linux com o [2001/03/28] kern/26171 emulation not work Linux-emulator, but hi is work i p [2002/04/16] kern/37161 emulation ext2 linux file system, error handling la o [2002/11/07] kern/45023 emulation flexlm does not run with linux-base-7, st o [2003/09/24] kern/57192 emulation linux-ibm-java1.4 freeze f [2004/03/04] ports/63747 emulation vmmon is not performing o [2004/06/20] kern/68131 emulation java/linux-ibm-jdk14: linux ibm jdk 1.4.1 o [2004/06/22] ports/68202 emulation [patch] Make vmware2 compile on -current o [2005/01/25] ports/76644 emulation FreeBSD 5.3 will freeze or crash when run o [2005/02/19] i386/77710 emulation Linux page fault sigcontext information i 11 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [1999/04/16] i386/11165 emulation IBCS2 don't work correctly with PID_MAX 9 o [2000/12/15] kern/23561 emulation Linux compatibility mode does not support o [2001/08/14] kern/29698 emulation linux ipcs doesn'work o [2002/06/12] kern/39201 emulation ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confuse o [2002/08/11] kern/41543 emulation Easier wine/w23 support p [2002/09/04] kern/42404 emulation TIOCSCTTY not implemented in linuxulator s [2002/09/06] kern/42466 emulation linux: 'ipc' typ=258 not implemented p [2003/01/22] kern/47349 emulation Fake a sound ioctl (plus linux hook) o [2003/08/21] kern/55835 emulation Linux IPC emulation missing SETALL syscal f [2004/06/30] ports/68532 emulation Add support for multiple VMWare instances o [2004/10/19] ports/72865 emulation emulators/vmware3 crashes on 5.3-STABLE o [2004/10/20] kern/72920 emulation linux emulation : path "prefixing" is not o [2004/10/26] kern/73165 emulation [patch] getting rid of COMPAT_43 dependan o [2004/11/10] kern/73777 emulation [patch] linux emulation: root dir special o [2005/03/19] ports/79009 emulation [patch] Some linux ports are incorrectly 15 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 18:22:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D680316A4D5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:22:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.rcac.purdue.edu (quark.rcac.purdue.edu [128.210.189.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270DF43D46 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:22:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from quark.rcac.purdue.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j37IM2HJ070875 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:22:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:22:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200504071822.j37IM2HJ070875@quark.rcac.purdue.edu> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:22:04 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions of -CURRENT include gcc3.3, which is much stricter about such things as function declarations, literal strings constants that continue over several physical lines, and forcing the deprecation of antique header files such as varargs.h (we should now be using stdargs.h). The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. If you need help in one or more build environments that you do not have access to, please ask for help on the freebsd-ports mailing list. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The build errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 4.x/5.x/6.x with target architecture'.) (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not the build error still applies to the latest version. The program that generates this report is not yet able to determine this automatically.) portname: devel/linux_devtools-7 broken because: Incomplete pkg-plist build errors: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.5.2005032807/linux_devtools-7.1_3.log (Apr 1 18:13:52 UTC 2005) overview: http://portsmon.firepipe.net/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=linux_devtools-7 If these build errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these build errors really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these build errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 16:20:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59716A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1674243D41 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:20:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j38GKQDX036527 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:20:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j38GKQUT036526; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:20:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:20:26 GMT Message-Id: <200504081620.j38GKQUT036526@freefall.freebsd.org> To: emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Brandon Hume Subject: Re: ports/76644: FreeBSD 5.3 will freeze or crash when run vmware on i386 platform with P4 1.7G CPU and ATI Video Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brandon Hume List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:20:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/76644; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brandon Hume To: czcc@163.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/76644: FreeBSD 5.3 will freeze or crash when run vmware on i386 platform with P4 1.7G CPU and ATI Video Card Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:16:43 -0300 I've been experiencing the same symptoms as those described here, with ATA_IDENTIFY timeouts, WRITE timeouts, and so on. However, VMWare *USED* to work fine. My problems started after a ports-related disaster and system reinstall. I believe I started at 5.3-RELEASE-p0 or -p1, then CVSup'd to 5.4-PRERELEASE; I had problems with ports and reverted to 5.3 with a full reinstall. When I put VMWare back, it started killing the machine on PowerOn. Like the original submitter, I've tried disabling ACPI, as mentioned in pkg-message; it made no difference. I've made no changes between my working kernel-conf and non-working kernel conf (although I've since made changes trying to treat this problem and another unrelated X lockup problem...) --- KERNEL CONFIG --- machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident SHUMIRA makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options SCSI_DELAY=15000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. # Debugging for use in -current options KDB options DDB #Enable the kernel debugger device apic # I/O APIC device isa device eisa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives device atapicam # SCSI emulation, needs scbus & pass options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI code device da # SCSI disk devices device cd # CD device pass # SCSI passthrough # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc device agp # support several AGP chipsets # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx device pmtimer # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device ppi # Parallel port interface device # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) device bpf # Berkeley packet filter device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 19:06:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F0916A4CE; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neon.webfusion.co.uk (neon.webfusion.co.uk [212.67.202.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C98643D41; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.hopkins@hopkins-research.com) Received: from 83-216-132-201.markch725.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([83.216.132.201] helo=[192.168.0.5]) by neon.webfusion.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DJyoe-0006J6-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:06:52 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:06:48 +0100 From: Michael Hopkins To: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" , Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Status of WINE on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:06:54 -0000 Hi all After having built a bunch of win32 executables on amd64 5.3 using mingw32, I'm now keen to run them as well. I tried to build WINE from ports and was told i386 only, so cheated by adding amd64 to the archs to see what happened. Got quite a long way then this: cc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -I/usr/local/include -O2 -o interlocked.o interlocked.c interlocked.c:299:3: #error You must implement the interlocked* functions for your CPU *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs/port. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310. *** Error code 1 Anyone have an idea how far we are from WINE working? How about building it within the Linux compatibility layer? ;o) I don't need speed, just to test that some command line tools work properly. TIA Michael _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ Hopkins Research Ltd _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.hopkins-research.com/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ 'touch the future' _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 09:38:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1D216A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:38:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post.00t.org (feynman.00t.org [217.160.135.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569F543D45; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:38:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ulrik@00t.org) Received: from [172.24.0.14] (p548C9847.dip.t-dialin.net [84.140.152.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by post.00t.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405F1192BD; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4257A2A4.9010202@00t.org> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:38:44 +0200 From: Ulrik Guenther User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050309) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Hopkins References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Status of WINE on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:38:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heya, I think this has been the state since for quite a while. Additionally, this is not meant to be easily fixed (nevertheless, you might want to have a look at the sourcecode). I'd suggest trying a binary version of wine under the linux compatibility layer. (There has been a report of somebody who got the binary version of WineX/Cedega running on i386, it might also be possible on amd64, but I have not tried it so far...) Regards, Ulrik Michael Hopkins wrote: | | Hi all | | After having built a bunch of win32 executables on amd64 5.3 using mingw32, | I'm now keen to run them as well. | | I tried to build WINE from ports and was told i386 only, so cheated by | adding amd64 to the archs to see what happened. Got quite a long way then | this: | | cc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT | -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith | -I/usr/local/include -O2 -o interlocked.o interlocked.c | interlocked.c:299:3: #error You must implement the interlocked* functions | for your CPU | *** Error code 1 | | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs/port. | *** Error code 1 | | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs. | *** Error code 1 | | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310. | *** Error code 1 | | | Anyone have an idea how far we are from WINE working? | | How about building it within the Linux compatibility layer? ;o) I don't | need speed, just to test that some command line tools work properly. | | TIA | | Michael | | | _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ | | _/ _/ _/_/_/ Hopkins Research Ltd | _/ _/ _/ _/ | _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.hopkins-research.com/ | _/ _/ _/ _/ | _/ _/ _/ _/ 'touch the future' | | _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ | | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCV6Kky06DkvPH780RAv8CAJ4su1WjolQHq+tUTu+EUQHJ54YbqwCfQj2I FLSu03JhVRoDmIHMaYIphSA= =zdLh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 10:00:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741C216A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:00:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neon.webfusion.co.uk (neon.webfusion.co.uk [212.67.202.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A1743D39; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:00:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.hopkins@hopkins-research.com) Received: from 83-216-132-201.markch725.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([83.216.132.201] helo=[192.168.0.5]) by neon.webfusion.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DKCkr-0005R5-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:59:53 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:59:52 +0100 From: Michael Hopkins To: Ulrik Guenther Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4257A2A4.9010202@00t.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Status of WINE on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:00:04 -0000 > > Michael Hopkins wrote: > | > | Hi all > | > | After having built a bunch of win32 executables on amd64 5.3 using > mingw32, > | I'm now keen to run them as well. > | > | I tried to build WINE from ports and was told i386 only, so cheated by > | adding amd64 to the archs to see what happened. Got quite a long way then > | this: > | > | cc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT > | -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith > | -I/usr/local/include -O2 -o interlocked.o interlocked.c > | interlocked.c:299:3: #error You must implement the interlocked* functions > | for your CPU > | *** Error code 1 > | > | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs/port. > | *** Error code 1 > | > | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310/libs. > | *** Error code 1 > | > | Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/wine/work/wine-20050310. > | *** Error code 1 > | > | > | Anyone have an idea how far we are from WINE working? > | > | How about building it within the Linux compatibility layer? ;o) I don't > | need speed, just to test that some command line tools work properly. > | > | TIA > | > | Michael > | On 9/4/05 10:38 am, "Ulrik Guenther" wrote: > > Heya, > > I think this has been the state since for quite a while. > Additionally, this is not meant to be easily fixed (nevertheless, you > might want to have a look at the sourcecode). I'd suggest trying > a binary version of wine under the linux compatibility layer. > (There has been a report of somebody who got the binary version of > WineX/Cedega running on i386, it might also be possible on amd64, but I > have not tried it so far...) > > Regards, > > Ulrik Hi Ulrik I just tried this 10 minutes ago! I installed the latest Redhat 8 WINE i386 RPMs into /compat/linux and branded the wine* ELFs etc, but trying to run it gives this: root@Athlon # /compat/linux/usr/bin/wine test wine: failed to initialize: /usr/lib/wine/ntdll.dll.so: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory I wonder if building from source using linux_devtools might work better? Michael _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ Hopkins Research Ltd _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.hopkins-research.com/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ 'touch the future' _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 10:13:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECE116A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:13:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961D443D31; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j39ADFqB029808; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:13:15 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j39ADF5G029804; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:13:15 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:13:15 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200504091013.j39ADF5G029804@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79655: linux_base-8 fails to install as non-root X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:13:15 -0000 Synopsis: linux_base-8 fails to install as non-root Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 9 10:13:07 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79655 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 17:37:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611916A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43AC43D2D; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39Hb6EK023090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j39Hb6uY023089; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200504091737.j39Hb6uY023089@aldan.algebra.com> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w y+z3/UR{6SCQ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org cc: voisine@gmail.com Subject: linux- ports on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:37:10 -0000 Hello! linux_base-8 installed without a hitch, but linux-gtk2 and its dependencies kept complaining about amd64. I had to patch them all with -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 and rename distinfo.i386 back into distinfo for the time being. linux-jpeg was a special case, requiring the following patch: -RPM_SET= libjpeg-6b-15.${MACHINE_ARCH}.rpm +RPM_SET= libjpeg-6b-15.${MACHINE_ARCH:S/amd64/i386/}.rpm As a result linux-firefox installed and is usable. Is this problem just an oversight or was there a conscientious decision to limit these ports to i386, when amd64 is also perfectly capable to use them? -mi