From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 07:22:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A316A4CE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:22:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732C743D4C; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:22:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0A7M6CF074198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:22:06 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0A7M6Ud074195; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:22:06 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:22:06 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501100722.j0A7M6Ud074195@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: HP Netserver 60 will not boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:22:09 -0000 Hi, I installed 4.10 RELEASE on an IDE disk on a HP Netserver 60. This isa fresh/default install. Installing was no problem, but whe I try to boot, the machine freeze after the line: .... pcic0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0-0xfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 At that point, nothing answer anymore, I have to turn the power off. Any idea what isthe problem/how to get over it? TIA Olivier From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 20:31:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E47116A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:31:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.primetime.com (mail.primetime.com [146.145.135.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF0043D2F for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:31:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lister@primetime.com) Received: from [10.200.1.90] (unknown [10.200.1.90]) by mail.primetime.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625CCDED00 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:47:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41E31112.6010007@primetime.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:34:42 -0800 From: Lister User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040617) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: opterons in use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:31:40 -0000 I have an application that I want to see the performance difference for in an opteron, before I buy one. It would require some setting up, does anyone have one that they would be willing to let me access? I would be willing to pay, but as an 'exploratory effort', I am rather limited in this regard. Barter would be good too. From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 23:11:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E0516A4CF for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web42108.mail.yahoo.com (web42108.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A7A543D45 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drumslayer2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64747 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2005 23:11:05 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=lA9LtZ2782WWAsEu30Y5ObBMfB/adCaRBQpRF37aW9uAx5vpV8G7as4AXg5jDaWlqJ2W6Z2cqFCdrTncDJrl8fNCqQrUeE69bjsFsdi9Cth6hxAurfQZh2UgIJoHQqxkGcbuZ8qy5SZeENMpUVYlEPLVTE+98WCniWHjnxB8HlQ= ; Message-ID: <20050110231105.64745.qmail@web42108.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.112.21.27] by web42108.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:11:04 PST Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:11:04 -0800 (PST) From: Nicole H To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Looking for SCSI RAID controller advice Please X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:11:05 -0000 Hi I am looking for recommendations for a SCSI raid controller to use preferably with 5.3 instead of 4.X that can be monitored remotely. What do people use for their raid arrays so that they can verify that they are working ok without having to reboot a system? The only things I have found are the few Adaptec Cards with remote monitoring software that only work on 4.X. 10 Bonus points if it also works on AMD-64 Versions. Any help appreciatted. Thanks N. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 11 01:08:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB0716A4CE for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:08:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300F943D1D for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:08:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) j0B189wN003689; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:08:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/meer) with ESMTP id j0B182Qa044903; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:08:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.12.1/8.12.10) id j0B1813s044898; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:08:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:08:01 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: Lister Message-ID: <20050111010801.GD41849@meer.net> References: <41E31112.6010007@primetime.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E31112.6010007@primetime.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Meer.net LLC cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: opterons in use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:08:10 -0000 On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Lister wrote: > I have an application that I want to see the performance > difference for in an opteron, before I buy one. It would require > some setting up, does anyone have one that they would be > willing to let me access? I would be willing to pay, but as an > 'exploratory effort', I am rather limited in this regard. Barter > would be good too. What kind of access do you need? Can you do it with 'joe-user' access to a virgin 5.3-release system? -- Joe Rhett Senior Geek Meer.net From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 11 06:46:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0471016A4CE; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:46:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90FD43D3F; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0B6juKo030109 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:45:56 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0B6jtFn030106; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:45:55 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:45:55 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501110645.j0B6jtFn030106@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <200501100722.j0A7M6Ud074195@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> (message from Olivier Nicole on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:22:06 +0700 (ICT)) X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Re: HP Netserver 60 will not boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:46:00 -0000 Yesterday I wrote: > I installed 4.10 RELEASE on an IDE disk on a HP Netserver 60. > > This isa fresh/default install. > > Installing was no problem, but whe I try to boot, the machine freeze > after the line: > > .... > pcic0: on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: mem 0-0xfffffff at device > 0.0 on pci0 I was suggested to remove agp device from the kernel. As I could not find a way to do that on the target machine, I installed the hard disk in another machine and build the new kernel there. Then I installed the hard disk back on the HP netserver and it booted OK. Olivier From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 10:05:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3AD16A4CE; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:05:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F4143D41; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0)j0DA533Z030309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:05:04 +0100 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 402433CB4; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:05:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:05:03 +0100 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050113100503.GA1060@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Athlon XP-M/PowerNow for desktop system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:05:08 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [Reply-To set to freebsd-hardware@ - please send answers to that list only.] Hi, I'm currently thinking about replacing the Athlon 900 in my desktop machine with a more recent CPU, and I'd be interested in getting one of these Athlon XP-M "Low Power" CPUs. I think the mainboard - a MSI KT4AV-L (MS-6712) with VIA's KT400A chipset - supports those CPUs, but I'm not sure if I would be able to use their energy saving features with FreeBSD. I know about the powernow_k7 module [1], but not enough to say if it should work in this case or if there could be problems with desktop mainboards. Are there any catches one should be aware of when trying to do this? Stefan [1]: http://www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/bsd/ --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQeZHzlaRERsSueCzAQLPeQwAhUaWXtKTYFVr7pXqR/oeQmP3bqBOcqRk wl4ddr8SQuW7YKaRLI5UT12fwt9lVRTNCs6otTn5kyuy5E1xJfCJY07j/oFA24kz +8IrklallYow7OM5Qih4GYlhet1hmrPW4rp8qTsqW5INIwW+ldaucAI5SCflAc3z jz+qhesS9XxW9kUE/1HvYwC/VIFh3jAPiuu3QuZJnir6fS8vokDCs7asPK3rEXs+ 7dkwtHYi24BlBH0IFCLrXvL1bhu4kfEC+d7Aty9JkoDIBtdusd1JqbU1iYpCT9Xt 6yZfWDptogQTzPe4JjWYNgUS5UhPMhsiBmAOif9BoEEjbWWMsHHG5WT2WgOesJcZ LmtZn5mQq5MBzduPTnLK8eOWD2LPp5cCkuDHcjHmbLx/WmenBLNoPCW/sT7wGk0/ WLvZwA1skpaO8PCYSY1/hsTGwpMnmXVYM4q+2YjVS7M2ayUGoN0kuN8D3ZMjSi3v CrY3rAY8eeb4LEur4mAcGpWp1EoKl4qM =8VkE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 11:56:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A5016A4CE; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:56:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8819A43D2D; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim) id 1Cp3a4-0007WJ-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:56:00 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:56:00 +0100 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050113115600.GP19199@poupinou.org> References: <20050113100503.GA1060@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050113100503.GA1060@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Bruno Ducrot cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Athlon XP-M/PowerNow for desktop system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:56:02 -0000 On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Stefan Walter wrote: > [Reply-To set to freebsd-hardware@ - please send answers to that list > only.] > > Hi, > > I'm currently thinking about replacing the Athlon 900 in my desktop > machine with a more recent CPU, and I'd be interested in getting one of > these Athlon XP-M "Low Power" CPUs. I think the mainboard - a MSI KT4AV-L > (MS-6712) with VIA's KT400A chipset - supports those CPUs, but I'm not > sure if I would be able to use their energy saving features with FreeBSD. > I know about the powernow_k7 module [1], but not enough to say if it > should work in this case or if there could be problems with desktop > mainboards. > Generally, for an ATX motherboard, you may be able to change the multiplier of the CPU but not the voltage, the latter requiring a VRM mobile part. If this is a concern, you should consider an ITX form but you have to be sure that one do have a VRM mobile part. Of course, you may consider another kind of CPU if you need ATX form (amd64 class, maybe sempron, if you want to stick with AMD, comes to mind). -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 14:08:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E2C16A4CE for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:08:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147E043D53 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0)j0DE8V3Z031950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:32 +0100 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D87EF3CB4; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:30 +0100 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050113140830.GA1953@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <20050113100503.GA1060@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> <20050113115600.GP19199@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050113115600.GP19199@poupinou.org> X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fp: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Athlon XP-M/PowerNow for desktop system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:08:34 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bruno Ducrot in gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hardware: >> I'm currently thinking about replacing the Athlon 900 in my desktop >> machine with a more recent CPU, and I'd be interested in getting one of >> these Athlon XP-M "Low Power" CPUs. I think the mainboard - a MSI KT4AV-L >> (MS-6712) with VIA's KT400A chipset - supports those CPUs, but I'm not >> sure if I would be able to use their energy saving features with FreeBSD. >> I know about the powernow_k7 module [1], but not enough to say if it >> should work in this case or if there could be problems with desktop >> mainboards. >>=20 > > Generally, for an ATX motherboard, you may be able to change the > multiplier of the CPU but not the voltage, the latter requiring a > VRM mobile part. If this is a concern, you should consider an ITX form > but you have to be sure that one do have a VRM mobile part. As the mainboard is less than a year old, I didn't want to exchange that, too. I considered an Athlon XP-M because it consumes less energy and should be cooler than the desktop variant. If you can't change the voltage of the CPU on an ATX board, that's OK, but I'm not sure if it's really worth buying it if I possibly can't throttle the frequency when it's idle. > Of course, you may consider another kind of CPU if you need ATX form > (amd64 class, maybe sempron, if you want to stick with AMD, comes to > mind). If I had to buy a new mainboard, too, I'd probably take an Athlon64 now. (BTW: Does Cool'n'Quiet work well with FreeBSD?) There are desktop boards for the Pentium M now, too, but they're still too expensive, and there's no AGP support for the i855 chipset, so they're not an option. Stefan --=20 No reading beyond this point --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQeaA3laRERsSueCzAQKepgv/Q8IwfBZFmH0J4MMfUi2ju7bK24CYZYon iHXTwkobLZtnaZvbj4gOpPiyx8+KG2+gi/RwVUokZDCMJQHQ3wT5cXxaHIAlTllC 2+vwuYI1uuzhOfGVod8rf96q7EmzYCU2aAYmK+zXjOMraFJdoWNDfL2N76heuJCO TfSNHh5JxLJ14dTNmvEG+vYO4bHMPDEAJEVZdifayK8T/ixE1o//QXOEVdoMDNgz ujFod03pADDCBNvagwzoxtlZP8fIVQhKJZ7W/6llnZF2bcxYma4H1vk1Ks+YeGoT ZkH/Wc530T+q84T59JsLZEC+WzyqnYmZEzAaQSR9gn83nM7+CgOZ0WhEkCf8BFIE WNFtQ1Sox2oesDy+IHFGPKuFRVOmpP1AkQxHgYqAWT0SQsmfNx6QKnXGf289wUZu aGVxQaJzX6qyPa9YI9p1ImTLaWvLvMYuK47bssst+Ya0hAwf0+KNeEY5jXNKpTBb fn1GZ2li5xxkLvmJl6nqr9FXU2zF7iCd =DqKm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 17:31:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE3F16A4CE for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:31:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com [192.25.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A932D43D31 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:31:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darrylo@soco.agilent.com) Received: from relcos2.cos.agilent.com (relcos2.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.237]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7931826D0B for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:29:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from wcosvs02.cos.agilent.com (wcosvs02.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.188]) by relcos2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00413F7 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:29:40 -0700 (MST) Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com ([141.121.54.157]) by wcosvs02.cos.agilent.com with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:29:40 -0700 Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) SMKit7.1.1_Agilent) with ESMTP id JAA20704; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:29:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200501131729.JAA20704@mina.soco.agilent.com> To: Stefan Walter In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:08:30 +0100." <20050113140830.GA1953@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:29:39 -0800 From: Darryl Okahata cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Athlon XP-M/PowerNow for desktop system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Darryl Okahata List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:31:21 -0000 Stefan Walter wrote: > I considered an Athlon XP-M because it consumes less energy and should be > cooler than the desktop variant. If you can't change the voltage of the > CPU on an ATX board, that's OK, but I'm not sure if it's really worth > buying it if I possibly can't throttle the frequency when it's idle. It may still be worthwhile, if you live in an area with expensive electricity. I've forgotten the exact numbers, but the XP-M CPUs tend to use significantly less power than the regular desktop CPUs (something like 30-40+W less). A few months back, I built a 2200+ XP-M-based system which only uses up around 80-90W, and this could have been even lower, had I not also installed a power-hungry TV capture card (Hauppauge PVR-250). -- Darryl Okahata darrylo@soco.agilent.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day. From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 00:22:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64C216A4CE; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:22:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from one.valcatohosting.com (one.valcatohosting.com [67.19.219.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7C343D1D; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@moosoft.net) Received: from cpc3-nthc1-4-0-cust42.nrth.cable.ntl.com ([213.107.150.42] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by one.valcatohosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1CpA8a-00040z-4K; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:56:05 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <03FAB198-6595-11D9-96E8-000D93B7419E@moosoft.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam McMaster Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:57:47 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - one.valcatohosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - moosoft.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: if_ndis with custom CPUTYPE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:22:06 -0000 Hey, I've recently had a confusing problem using the NDIS modules and thought it might be of interest to someone. On Sunday I decided to update to the latest RELENG_5_3, since there have been some patches since the initial release. Everything seemed to work perfectly after everything was rebuilt and installed, until the next morning when I discovered that the PC was no longer able to connect to my wireless network. I'm still not sure exactly what the problem was, all I can say is that I never got an "ndis0: link up" message. After some thinking, I realised that I had customised the CPUTYPE and CFLAGS variables in make.conf since last time I built FreeBSD, and after some experimenting I managed to get it to work by rebuilding the ndis and if_ndis modules without the CPUTYPE variable set. So my assumption is that something GCC did with the CPUTYPE variable broke the ndis modules (or at least one of them). Interestingly, the card continued to work after a reboot. It was only after the PC was actually powered off (i.e. when I went to bed that night) and powered back on that the problem occurred. If it helps, the card is a Belkin F5D6020 ver 3, and I'm using the rtl8180 driver (available from the RealTek web site). In make.conf I had CPUTYPE=athlon, and here is the output of uname -a: FreeBSD phoenix 5.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sun Jan 9 17:10:20 GMT 2005 root@phoenix:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 That's all I've got to say; hopefully this can be helpful to someone in the future. -- - Adam McMaster From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 04:34:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1229216A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:34:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay16-f41.bay16.hotmail.com [65.54.186.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E776243D46 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eiriks_finne@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:34:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 219.94.54.118 by by16fd.bay16.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:33:00 GMT X-Originating-IP: [219.94.54.118] X-Originating-Email: [eiriks_finne@hotmail.com] X-Sender: eiriks_finne@hotmail.com From: "Eirik Finne" To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:33:00 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2005 04:34:02.0238 (UTC) FILETIME=[45D7A9E0:01C4F9F2] Subject: Mouse wheel on ums0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:34:03 -0000 Hi, I'm running 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 I got a problem configuring my usb mouse. I have the following in rc.conf: moused_port="/dev/ums0" moused_type="auto" moused_enable="YES" moused_flags="-z 4" usbd_enable="YES" At boot moused gives the following: could not open ums0 device busy If I put moused_port/dev/psm0 instead both the psm0 and ums0 works but not the mouse wheel. dmesg has the following to say about ums0: ums0: Logitech Optical USB Mouse, rev 2.00/3.40, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. My xorg.conf has the following:Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Buttons" "5" EndSection If I kill the moused that is controlling ums0 and run moused -p /dev/ums0 -z 4 the wheel works like it should, but it is a bit inconvinent to say the least. Can anyone tell me how to get it working from boot? Best Regards! Eirik _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets beste SPAM-filter. Gratis! From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 05:38:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6213816A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:38:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7A943D2D for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:38:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel.hyde@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so710304wri for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:38:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Ocy1gi153FOvZkk4ZOxUEPz7RGemSc4GlHnXB4UA/FWlE+7OvFIVVaBqSL5mj6PJdFAE7AbnlTypP4rssdZgcY0kvSt5r78E1LTEAquinmfW2lKJ5/SxWO+Z/xayQcoAEp3tooepjsqc1o0UcmkPgkqTF3N0i+6/05rmK2kalTE= Received: by 10.54.54.23 with SMTP id c23mr414541wra; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.39.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:38:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:38:54 +1100 From: Daniel Hyde To: Eirik Finne In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse wheel on ums0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Hyde List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:38:55 -0000 My mouse detects the same as yours. My XF86Config contains the same lines as yours, with the addition of the line: Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" I don't actually use moused myself; but I've noticed when I start X11 that I need to yank the mouse out and plug it back in for it to be detected. That said, I am running 4.9 on this system (hence xf86 rather than x.org), so this might be entirely usb's fault. On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:33:00 +0000, Eirik Finne wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 > > I got a problem configuring my usb mouse. I have the following in rc.conf: > moused_port="/dev/ums0" > moused_type="auto" > moused_enable="YES" > moused_flags="-z 4" > usbd_enable="YES" > > At boot moused gives the following: could not open ums0 device busy > If I put moused_port/dev/psm0 instead both the psm0 and ums0 works but not > the mouse wheel. > > dmesg has the following to say about ums0: ums0: Logitech Optical USB Mouse, > rev 2.00/3.40, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > > My xorg.conf has the following:Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "Buttons" "5" > EndSection > > If I kill the moused that is controlling ums0 and run moused -p /dev/ums0 -z > 4 the wheel works like it should, but it is a bit inconvinent to say the > least. > Can anyone tell me how to get it working from boot? > > Best Regards! > > Eirik > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets beste SPAM-filter. Gratis! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 07:22:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912E516A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:22:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay16-f26.bay16.hotmail.com [65.54.186.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6844443D39 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:22:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eiriks_finne@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:22:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 219.94.54.118 by by16fd.bay16.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:21:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [219.94.54.118] X-Originating-Email: [eiriks_finne@hotmail.com] X-Sender: eiriks_finne@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Eirik Finne" To: daniel.hyde@gmail.com Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:21:41 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2005 07:22:02.0386 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE142F20:01C4FA09] cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse wheel on ums0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:22:18 -0000 Hi again! Well as I understand it a version of moused must have started running on /dev/ums0 before the entries in /etc/rc.conf were read. Since moused reports that the device is busy. ps also shows a version of moused running on /dev/ums0 but without the -z 4 flag I specified in /etc/rc.conf. I have a feeling there is a very easy answer to this problem, but I just can't figure it out :( Have a nice weekend! Eirik >From: Daniel Hyde >Reply-To: Daniel Hyde >To: Eirik Finne >CC: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Mouse wheel on ums0 >Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:38:54 +1100 > >My mouse detects the same as yours. My XF86Config contains the same >lines as yours, with the addition of the line: > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > >I don't actually use moused myself; but I've noticed when I start X11 >that I need to yank the mouse out and plug it back in for it to be >detected. That said, I am running 4.9 on this system (hence xf86 >rather than x.org), so this might be entirely usb's fault. > >On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:33:00 +0000, Eirik Finne > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC >2004 > > > > I got a problem configuring my usb mouse. I have the following in >rc.conf: > > moused_port="/dev/ums0" > > moused_type="auto" > > moused_enable="YES" > > moused_flags="-z 4" > > usbd_enable="YES" > > > > At boot moused gives the following: could not open ums0 device busy > > If I put moused_port/dev/psm0 instead both the psm0 and ums0 works but >not > > the mouse wheel. > > > > dmesg has the following to say about ums0: ums0: Logitech Optical USB >Mouse, > > rev 2.00/3.40, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > > > > My xorg.conf has the following:Section "InputDevice" > > Identifier "Mouse0" > > Driver "mouse" > > Option "Protocol" "auto" > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > > Option "Buttons" "5" > > EndSection > > > > If I kill the moused that is controlling ums0 and run moused -p >/dev/ums0 -z > > 4 the wheel works like it should, but it is a bit inconvinent to say the > > least. > > Can anyone tell me how to get it working from boot? > > > > Best Regards! > > > > Eirik > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets beste SPAM-filter. >Gratis! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets beste SPAM-filter. Gratis! From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 17:57:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A7416A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx3.compete.com (cmpt-hq.compete.com [208.20.156.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35CE43D1F for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rkramer@compete.com) Received: from winops03.win.compete.com (winops03.win.compete.com.127.5.10.in-addr.arpa [10.5.127.44] (may be forged)) by mx3.compete.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0EHvLeO029038 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:57:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from 10.5.127.170 ([10.5.127.170]) by winops03.win.compete.com ([10.5.127.44]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:56:06 +0000 Received: from slappy by winops03.win.compete.com; 14 Jan 2005 12:57:20 -0500 From: Ross Kramer To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:57:20 -0500 Message-Id: <1105725440.11715.33.camel@slappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 (2.0.3-2) Subject: em0 issues with 4.10 + SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:57:21 -0000 Is there any known issues and solutions regarding this? My system specs are as follows: Supermicro Superserver 6013A-T Onboard Intel Pro 1000 (em) + Intel Pro 100 (fxp) Dual 3.2 Ghz Xeons 3ware 8006 S/ATA controller card with two 250gig drives in a mirrored config When I try to rebuild the 4.10 kernel for SMP, the system boots fine, but it looks like em0 is continuously resetting itself, repeating: "em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex" over and over again. I've tried with the driver version that came with 4.10 (1.7.25) and I tried upgrading to Intel's latest (1.7.45), both with the same result. It boots and runs fine with no problems when booted with the generic kernel. I've tried both the em interface and the fxp interface with SMP, and they both do the interface reset dance. I'am about at the end of my rope here, anybody have an idea? My boot messages: Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 14 11:23:18 EST 2005 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: root@fbsdweb02.lab.compete.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/CMPKERNEL Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.13-MHz 686-class CPU) Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf25 Stepping = 5 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Features=0xbfebfbff Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: real memory = 1073741824 (1048576K bytes) Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: avail memory = 1041833984 (1017416K bytes) Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: IOAPIC #0 intpin 16 -> irq 11 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: IOAPIC #0 intpin 17 -> irq 10 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 5 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: 2 CPUs Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: cpu1 (AP): apic id: 6, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: io0 (APIC): apic id: 7, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec00000 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0341000. Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: md0: Malloc disk Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00f4720 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: npx0: on motherboard Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pcib0: on motherboard Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: on pcib0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: at 29.0 irq 11 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: at 29.1 irq 5 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: at 29.2 irq 11 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: at 29.7 irq 5 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci1: on pcib1 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: twe0: <3ware Storage Controller driver ver. 1.40.01.001> port 0xbc00-0xbc0f mem 0xfe000000-0xfe7fffff,0xfeafec00-0xfeafec0f irq 5 at device 1.0 on pci1 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: twe0: 2 ports, Firmware FE8S 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci1: at 4.0 irq 10 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: fxp0: port 0xb400-0xb43f mem 0xfeaa0000-0xfeabffff,0xfeafd000-0xfeafdfff irq 5 at device 7.0 on pci1 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: fxp0: Ethernet address 00:30:48:73:6e:a2 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: inphy0: on miibus0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: em0: port 0xb000-0xb03f mem 0xfea60000-0xfea7ffff irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci1 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: isa0: on isab0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x24d3) at 31.3 irq 10 Jan 14 11:28:43 fbsdweb02 /kernel: orm0: