From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 13:06:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D83416A41F for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:06:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from joseph.day-light.net (gabriel.day-light.net [209.145.160.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF0F43D46 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from w1 (unknown [10.1.5.39]) by joseph.day-light.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F574F40B for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:06:17 -0500 (CDT) From: "John Brooks" To: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:06:17 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: IDE Raid Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@day-light.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:06:19 -0000 Performance wise, how do the following cards rank in a RAID 1 configuration? 3Ware 7006-2 Adaptec 1200a High Point RocketRaid 100 Are there any reliability issues with any of them? -- John Brooks john@day-light.com From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 10:32:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BAA16A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:32:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from support@ablebits.com) Received: from afalinasoft.com (afalinasoft.com [198.63.210.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C843D46 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from support@ablebits.com) Received: from afalinasoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by afalinasoft.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7UAuUZp060719 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:56:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from support@ablebits.com) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by afalinasoft.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j7UAuUaf060718; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:56:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from support@ablebits.com) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:56:30 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200508301056.j7UAuUaf060718@afalinasoft.com> X-Authentication-Warning: afalinasoft.com: mailnull set sender to support@ablebits.com using -f X-Webmin-Autoreply: 1 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: support@ablebits.com X-Originally-To: support@ablebits.com Subject: Autoreply to something for you X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:32:10 -0000 Your message has been received by AbleBits Support Service. This is an autoreply from to your message: === Dear Customer, We are on holiday till August, 31. Your message will obligatory be answered, but we cannot guarantee to answer it before September, 1. Sorry for inconvenience and thank you for your patience. Best regards --- Afalina Co., Ltd. www.AbleBits.com Support Team From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 10:34:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE6E16A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:34:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0951143D48 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:34:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=ganbold.micom.mng.net) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EA3oE-000Mxq-5h for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:57:42 +0900 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830193106.035351d0@202.179.0.80> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:31:16 +0900 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Ganbold Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: ng_netflow and bridging firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:34:55 -0000 Hi Gleb and all, I'm newbie to ng_netflow and I'm trying to collect Netflow traffic from FreeBSD 5.4 machine. Collector (flow-tools) runs on same machine. This FreeBSD has 3 interfaces and it acts as bridging firewall using IPFW2. It also uses dummynet. host# ifconfig xl0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 options=9 ether 00:10:5a:5b:e5:e3 media: Ethernet 100baseTX status: active xl1: flags=8943 mtu 1500 options=9 ether 00:04:76:dc:7f:d1 media: Ethernet 100baseTX status: active vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast x.x.x.x ether 00:0b:6a:24:f6:ab media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active I'm running ng_netflow module and ngctl with following parameters: ngctl mkpeer xl1: tee lower right ngctl connect xl1: xl1:lower upper left ngctl name xl1:lower xl1_tee ngctl mkpeer xl1_tee: netflow left2right iface0 ngctl name xl1:lower.left2right netflow ngctl connect xl1_tee: netflow: right2left iface1 ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=0 index=2 } ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=1 index=1 } ngctl mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp ngctl msg netflow:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 I'm just using second xl1 interface for ng_netflow. However when I see the flow data I can only see my network addresses in the dstIP field. Is it correct? I thought both srcIP, dstIP should contain my IPs, because I'm trying to catch traffic which goes both directions of xl1. Is my assumption correct? If I'm wrong, how to make it work in correct way? Another issue is firewall dynamic rules count almost doubles when starts ng_netflow traffic. Is it correct? How can I fix this? Also how can I include first interface xl0 to the ng_netflow configuration? I appreciate if somebody can give me some hint and advice. It would be great if someone can share configuration samples. thanks in advance, Ganbold From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 11:10:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E435616A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:10:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3863343D45 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7UBAnAQ073769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:10:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7UBAnw0073768; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:10:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:10:49 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20050830111049.GK60614@cell.sick.ru> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830190113.035378e0@202.179.0.80> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830190113.035378e0@202.179.0.80> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ng_netflow and bridging firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:10:54 -0000 On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:30:09PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: G> I'm newbie to ng_netflow and I'm trying to collect Netflow traffic from G> FreeBSD 5.4 machine. Collector (flow-tools) runs on same machine. G> This FreeBSD has 3 interfaces and it acts as bridging firewall using IPFW2. G> It also uses dummynet. G> G> host# ifconfig G> xl0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 G> options=9 G> ether 00:10:5a:5b:e5:e3 G> media: Ethernet 100baseTX G> status: active G> xl1: flags=8943 mtu 1500 G> options=9 G> ether 00:04:76:dc:7f:d1 G> media: Ethernet 100baseTX G> status: active G> vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 G> inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast x.x.x.x G> ether 00:0b:6a:24:f6:ab G> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) G> status: active G> G> I'm running ng_netflow module and ngctl with following parameters: G> G> ngctl mkpeer xl1: tee lower right G> ngctl connect xl1: xl1:lower upper left G> ngctl name xl1:lower xl1_tee G> ngctl mkpeer xl1_tee: netflow left2right iface0 G> ngctl name xl1:lower.left2right netflow G> ngctl connect xl1_tee: netflow: right2left iface1 G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=0 index=2 } G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=1 index=1 } G> ngctl mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp G> ngctl msg netflow:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 G> G> I'm just using second xl1 interface for ng_netflow. However when I see the G> flow data I can only see my network addresses in G> the dstIP field. Is it correct? I thought both srcIP, dstIP should contain G> my IPs, because I'm trying to catch traffic which goes both directions of G> xl1. Is my assumption correct? If I'm wrong, how to make it work in correct G> way? No. Look at ng_ether(4) manpage, and draw your graph. You are catching only one direction with the above script. G> Another issue is firewall dynamic rules count almost doubles when starts G> ng_netflow traffic. Is it correct? G> How can I fix this? I know that bridge(4) has a conflict with ng_ether(4). This is fixed in RELENG_6, and is not going to be fixed in RELENG_5 due to ABI freeze. You can try 6.0-BETA3 in this configuration. Probably the your ipfw problem is related to this conflict between bridge and ng_ether. G> Also how can I include first interface xl0 to the ng_netflow configuration? Read the netgraph manual pages and draw graph, then change the script so that a new graph is built. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 08:54:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276C116A41F; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:54:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BE543D46; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=ganbold.micom.mng.net) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EAOiA-0009aD-Rq; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:16:51 +0900 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050831173013.0355eaf0@202.179.0.80> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:50:21 +0900 To: Gleb Smirnoff From: Ganbold In-Reply-To: <20050830111049.GK60614@cell.sick.ru> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830190113.035378e0@202.179.0.80> <20050830111049.GK60614@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ng_netflow and bridging firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:54:02 -0000 At 08:10 PM 8/30/2005, you wrote: >On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:30:09PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: >G> ngctl mkpeer xl1: tee lower right >G> ngctl connect xl1: xl1:lower upper left >G> ngctl name xl1:lower xl1_tee >G> ngctl mkpeer xl1_tee: netflow left2right iface0 >G> ngctl name xl1:lower.left2right netflow >G> ngctl connect xl1_tee: netflow: right2left iface1 >G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=0 index=2 } >G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=1 index=1 } >G> ngctl mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp >G> ngctl msg netflow:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 >G> >G> I'm just using second xl1 interface for ng_netflow. However when I see the >G> flow data I can only see my network addresses in >G> the dstIP field. Is it correct? I thought both srcIP, dstIP should contain >G> my IPs, because I'm trying to catch traffic which goes both directions of >G> xl1. Is my assumption correct? If I'm wrong, how to make it work in >correct >G> way? > >No. Look at ng_ether(4) manpage, and draw your graph. You are catching only >one direction with the above script. OK. I see. I'm catching only incoming traffic to xl1 interface. I can see it from ngctl issuing msg xl1_tee: getstats command and also flowctl netflow: show command. I read the ng_ether man page and didn't quite get it. I'm including xl0 interface in similar way as xl1. Is following sufficient for catching outgoing traffic? ngctl mkpeer xl0: tee lower right ngctl connect xl0: xl0:lower upper left ngctl name xl0:lower xl0_tee ngctl mkpeer xl0_tee: netflow left2right iface2 ngctl name xl0:lower.left2right netflow0 ngctl msg netflow0: setifindex { iface=2 index=4 } ngctl connect xl0_tee: netflow0: right2left iface3 ngctl msg netflow0: setifindex { iface=3 index=3 } ngctl mkpeer netflow0: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp ngctl msg netflow0:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 The graph is something like: ng_ether upper | |lower left | |right ng_tee right2left| |left2right iface0 | |iface1 ng_netflow Maybe I did something wrong. How should I do it in right way? I googled and didn't find good source/samples of ng_netflow. thanks in advance, Ganbold From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 09:28:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3B816A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2095543D46 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7V9SmNt086395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:28:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7V9Smcs086394; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:28:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:28:48 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20050831092848.GI60614@cell.sick.ru> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830190113.035378e0@202.179.0.80> <20050830111049.GK60614@cell.sick.ru> <6.2.1.2.2.20050831173013.0355eaf0@202.179.0.80> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050831173013.0355eaf0@202.179.0.80> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ng_netflow and bridging firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:28:52 -0000 On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 05:50:21PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: G> At 08:10 PM 8/30/2005, you wrote: G> >On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:30:09PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: G> >G> ngctl mkpeer xl1: tee lower right G> >G> ngctl connect xl1: xl1:lower upper left G> >G> ngctl name xl1:lower xl1_tee G> >G> ngctl mkpeer xl1_tee: netflow left2right iface0 G> >G> ngctl name xl1:lower.left2right netflow G> >G> ngctl connect xl1_tee: netflow: right2left iface1 G> >G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=0 index=2 } G> >G> ngctl msg netflow: setifindex { iface=1 index=1 } G> >G> ngctl mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp G> >G> ngctl msg netflow:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 G> >G> G> >G> I'm just using second xl1 interface for ng_netflow. However when I see G> >the G> >G> flow data I can only see my network addresses in G> >G> the dstIP field. Is it correct? I thought both srcIP, dstIP should G> >contain G> >G> my IPs, because I'm trying to catch traffic which goes both directions G> >of G> >G> xl1. Is my assumption correct? If I'm wrong, how to make it work in G> >correct G> >G> way? G> > G> >No. Look at ng_ether(4) manpage, and draw your graph. You are catching only G> >one direction with the above script. G> G> OK. I see. I'm catching only incoming traffic to xl1 interface. G> I can see it from ngctl issuing msg xl1_tee: getstats command and also G> flowctl netflow: show command. G> G> I read the ng_ether man page and didn't quite get it. G> G> I'm including xl0 interface in similar way as xl1. G> Is following sufficient for catching outgoing traffic? G> G> ngctl mkpeer xl0: tee lower right G> ngctl connect xl0: xl0:lower upper left G> ngctl name xl0:lower xl0_tee G> ngctl mkpeer xl0_tee: netflow left2right iface2 G> ngctl name xl0:lower.left2right netflow0 G> ngctl msg netflow0: setifindex { iface=2 index=4 } G> ngctl connect xl0_tee: netflow0: right2left iface3 G> ngctl msg netflow0: setifindex { iface=3 index=3 } G> ngctl mkpeer netflow0: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp G> ngctl msg netflow0:export connect inet/127.0.0.1:8818 Looks like correct. G> The graph is something like: G> G> ng_ether G> upper | |lower G> left | |right G> ng_tee G> right2left| |left2right G> iface0 | |iface1 G> ng_netflow G> G> Maybe I did something wrong. How should I do it in right way? G> I googled and didn't find good source/samples of ng_netflow. G> G> thanks in advance, G> G> Ganbold G> G> -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 11:16:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6999716A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (www.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0A43D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id 63508186800 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:16:14 +0200 (MEST) From: "mdff" To: Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:16:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcWsmVw82FDYO1PcSGWK6wubiu2GxQBg+IyA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Message-Id: <20050831111614.63508186800@mgedv.at> Subject: fiber-channel HBA as bootdevice for rel 5/6 (OP was on fb-q) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:16:17 -0000 hi, i'm posting this to the isp list to hope there's more than 0 replies on that here ;-) we would like to run the following configuration: some i386-servers, each connecting to a SAN with a PCI or PCI-X FC-HBA with boot-ROM showing up as a SCSI-device for freebsd to use as the root-disk. does anyone know working HBAs (2Gbit speed) with rel 5 or 6. best would be support with the default kernel! anyone some suggestions/experiences with that? br... PS: please, just reply to the list, i'm on it! From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 12:32:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F1116A420 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF73A43D53 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7VCWUe2051075 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:32:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <4315A36C.8020701@centtech.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:32:44 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050815 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <20050831111614.63508186800@mgedv.at> In-Reply-To: <20050831111614.63508186800@mgedv.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fiber-channel HBA as bootdevice for rel 5/6 (OP was on fb-q) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:32:32 -0000 mdff wrote: > hi, > i'm posting this to the isp list to hope there's > more than 0 replies on that here ;-) > > we would like to run the following configuration: > some i386-servers, each connecting to a SAN with a > PCI or PCI-X FC-HBA with boot-ROM showing up as a > SCSI-device for freebsd to use as the root-disk. > does anyone know working HBAs (2Gbit speed) with > rel 5 or 6. best would be support with the default > kernel! > anyone some suggestions/experiences with that? > br... > > PS: please, just reply to the list, i'm on it! I use the QLogic cards (isp0: ) Which I think is sold as a 2340 or some such number. These cards work very well under 5.X, but I'm having some issues with them under 6.x which I'm working on resolving. I'm mostly using them in the case where I have a local boot device (local LSILogic RAID controller), and then I have partitions on disk arrays connected both directly via fiber and also through a SAN fabric. I did try the root install on fiber approach, and if I recall correctly it was so uneventful I moved right past it and on to other more fun things. :) The 5.x series has support out-of-the box, the only thing you might have to do is load the firmware on boot, which is easy enough (add ispfw_load="YES" to your /boot/loader.conf, or type 'load ispfw' at the loader prompt when booting). As far as performance goes, I've successfully put 180MB/s through fiber channel to disk using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE. Hope that helps. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 18:16:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B594A16A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: from server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar (server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar [200.51.132.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA78243D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:16:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: (qmail 22387 invoked by uid 510); 31 Aug 2005 18:16:31 -0000 Received: from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(200.51.132.7):. Processed in 0.025367 secs); 31 Aug 2005 18:16:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.124?) (200.51.132.7) by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 18:16:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 From: "Ezequiel O. Block" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050421) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:16:33 -0000 Hi Folks, I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range from another provider, which means I need to handle two default gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have had this issue before? any clue? Thanks in advance. Ezequiel O. Block Cooperativa La Lonja. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 18:57:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6D916A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C88F43D58 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:57:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1EAXk7-000G4X-Gc; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:55:27 +0400 To: "Ezequiel O. Block" References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:55:27 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> (Ezequiel O. Block's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300") Message-ID: <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:57:17 -0000 On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with > no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range > from another provider, which means I need to handle two default > gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD > cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have > googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have > had this issue before? any clue? Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:11:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2EE16A420 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: from server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar (server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar [200.51.132.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3ED8E43D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:11:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: (qmail 29494 invoked by uid 510); 31 Aug 2005 19:11:02 -0000 Received: from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(200.51.132.7):. Processed in 0.025541 secs); 31 Aug 2005 19:11:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.124?) (200.51.132.7) by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 19:11:02 -0000 Message-ID: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 From: "Ezequiel O. Block" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050421) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:11:05 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > > >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have >>had this issue before? any clue? > > > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > > WBR thanks for the replay! mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you think ipfw would be useful in this case? From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:13:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9757216A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:13:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstalledo@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B76043D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstalledo@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so13873rne for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index:in-reply-to:message-id; b=RXVVwCcTnMZ1fWEsxu4Td5CPI9kvsTbY6EwZxTU46DFU53mCihos5TCEDjJsDwdjap9/dCIUKknicO6A1SHmUSU9gPlaMNOH9Pe4GIwT6R2VEqlT9yh5GA0jWFnZ1kYGG/n63BbUW3mEgtm8cdJZ0SUg1ReHfpWc8OS/FQMMy/Q= Received: by 10.38.75.24 with SMTP id x24mr238044rna; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MISWRK04 ( [222.126.27.238]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 70sm37266rnb.2005.08.31.12.13.47; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:13:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kahlil Erwin S. Talledo" To: "'Ezequiel O. Block'" Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:13:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcWuX8PMTOqLeftORi2WSKZnohzvKQAAFOBg In-Reply-To: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> Message-ID: <4316016c.152acb92.0862.0d7c@mx.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:13:50 -0000 Ezequiel, Why not use pf instead? ;) I find pf more adorable than ipfw in cases such as these ;) though pf is native to openbsd it runs quite well on freebsd... Hope this helps. Regards, -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ezequiel O. Block Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 3:10 AM Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > > >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have >>had this issue before? any clue? > > > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > > WBR thanks for the replay! mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you think ipfw would be useful in this case? _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:29:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ADA16A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9414543D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1EAYEs-000G5k-TT; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:27:14 +0400 To: "Ezequiel O. Block" References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:27:14 +0400 In-Reply-To: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> (Ezequiel O. Block's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300") Message-ID: <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:01 -0000 On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > > > >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with > >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range > >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default > >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD > >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have > >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have > >>had this issue before? any clue? > > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, > such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you > think ipfw would be useful in this case? Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from internet while forwarding takes place at sending packets. Seems that proxyarp is not an issue here. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:38:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA0716A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: from server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar (server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar [200.51.132.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6285743D46 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar) Received: (qmail 451 invoked by uid 510); 31 Aug 2005 19:38:00 -0000 Received: from ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(200.51.132.7):. Processed in 0.065832 secs); 31 Aug 2005 19:38:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.124?) (200.51.132.7) by server1.pilar-ciudad.com.ar with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 19:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <431606E4.4030100@eobsistemas.com.ar> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:37:08 -0300 From: "Ezequiel O. Block" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050421) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:38:01 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > >>Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with >>>>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range >>> >>>>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default >>> >>>>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD >>>>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have >>>>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have >>>>had this issue before? any clue? >>> >>>Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > >>mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, >>such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you >>think ipfw would be useful in this case? > > > Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from internet while forwarding > takes place at sending packets. Seems that proxyarp is not an issue > here. > > > WBR You are right Boris, thanks for the info. Ezequiel. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 20:43:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E66F16A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from usmanbsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web80907.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web80907.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.95.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BBB143D4C for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from usmanbsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46319 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2005 20:43:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k9qv9iNUNoL4H7vlS+Fw1JdjIVq2HI/pcDjjC3lCh7LWBnZ8KoViVfNufpfRN9SylkdXc+dBtR+frey5pBjzXZ6+kK+ZjzYF7B9knoBaZnmABh/ETpNVvVUrpQm5XOaEGeGlQbLXZDncC/Hub9a+ICmdHgO8KM0EzPgeFHDzqcM= ; Message-ID: <20050831204345.46317.qmail@web80907.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.59.87.178] by web80907.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:43:45 PDT Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:43:45 -0700 (PDT) From: muhammad usman To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <431606E4.4030100@eobsistemas.com.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:43:47 -0000 Yes, you can do source based routing in ipfw. as fwd action doesnt alters the packet. But i guess you need to recompile kernel with IP_FORWARD option. PF can also do the same. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but not sure its possible in pf of freebsd. regards --- "Ezequiel O. Block" wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. > Block wrote: > > > >>Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. > Block wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, > serving 250~ users with > >>>>no problems so far, what I need now is to add > another ip pool range > >>> > >>>>from another provider, which means I need to > handle two default > >>> > >>>>gateways, one for each C class network. but it > seems that FreeBSD > >>>>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in > rc.conf ... i have > >>>>googled about it and couldn't find any solution > .. anyone here have > >>>>had this issue before? any clue? > >>> > >>>Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > > > > >>mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a > public ip address, > >>such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp > on them, do you > >>think ipfw would be useful in this case? > > > > > > Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from > internet while forwarding > > takes place at sending packets. Seems that > proxyarp is not an issue > > here. > > > > > > WBR > > You are right Boris, thanks for the info. > > Ezequiel. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail for Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 22:25:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4DF16A41F for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:25:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@shaggy.smf.ebay.com) Received: from smf-camp4.smf.ebay.com (smfcamppool04.emailebay.com [66.135.215.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FDF43D46 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@shaggy.smf.ebay.com) Received: from smf-camp8.smf.ebay.com (smfcamp8-snat.smf.ebay.com [10.108.160.37]) by smf-camp4.smf.ebay.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j81KIC69022216 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:18:12 -0700 Received: from shaggy.smf.ebay.com (fallback-camp.vip.smf.ebay.com [10.108.160.50]) by smf-camp8.smf.ebay.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j81KGMU7027599 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:16:22 -0700 Received: (from cmuser@localhost) by shaggy.smf.ebay.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id j81KGM225947; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Unexpected reply handler Message-Id: <200509012016.j81KGM225947@shaggy.smf.ebay.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <200509012014.j81KE9Ov020787@mailhost5.sjc.ebay.com> In-Reply-To: <200509012014.j81KE9Ov020787@mailhost5.sjc.ebay.com> Precedence: junk X-Loop: reply@reply.ebay.com Subject: Re: corrected X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:25:41 -0000 Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an automated response and your reply will not be received. If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or assist you in contacting us: http://pages.ebay.com/help/index.html If you would like to change your notification preferences, which determine what type of email you receive from eBay, please follow the steps below: 1. Click "My eBay" located at the top of all eBay pages. You may be asked to sign in. 2. Click the "eBay Preferences" link located under the "My Account" heading. 3. Click the "view/change" link to the right of "Notification Preferences." You may be asked to sign in once more. 4. On the "Change Your Notification Preferences" page, check the boxes to indicate the types of messages you'd like to receive from eBay. Then, uncheck the boxes to indicate the types of messages you don't want to receive from us. 5. Once you're done, be sure to click the "Save Changes" button at the top or bottom of the page. Again, thanks for writing eBay. -- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 09:50:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7159F16A41F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:50:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vesku79@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F093443D4C for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:50:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vesku79@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so34074wra for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Z2rAdFjVojdUhd9ZlTOrf+8fSPxvG5dVoMHc2B2COaW8ZCVzlIP+DvlPRgMVdwGh3Hj43thLErew4L/LZ1hvLHoda2iCaWzhc73tX9Hx+FplENKs2wZQT7ofxIyy/ff1B4+q0aX5pMIg7BxWnyw25f6FrO4qoGcBdHXscyzbvr8= Received: by 10.54.26.52 with SMTP id 52mr1980646wrz; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.99.8 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7b4bd96105090202504c139674@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:50:01 +0300 From: Vesku To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: IDE Raid Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vesku79@gmail.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:50:02 -0000 >=20 > Performance wise, how do the following cards rank in a RAID 1 > configuration? >=20 > 3Ware 7006-2 > Adaptec 1200a > High Point RocketRaid 100 >=20 > Are there any reliability issues with any of them? >=20 Others can give performance details, but as far as I know these all are so= =20 called software-RAID cards. Real hardware models start at 3Ware 7506-4L and Adaptec 2400a. I would=20 choose these hardware models for better performance and reliability. They cost more, but are usually worth the money. VA SysAdmin From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 15:34:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5BE16A41F for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2005 15:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MAILsweeper@robotec.co.il) Received: from relay.robotec.co.il (relay.robotec.co.il [62.90.87.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1A343D46 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2005 15:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MAILsweeper@robotec.co.il) From: MAILsweeper@robotec.co.il To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:33:33 +0200 (EET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20050903153418.AA1A343D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: ness@robotec.co.il Subject: Virus Detected In Message: Re: Encrypted Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:34:20 -0000 A Virus has been found in a message from freebsd-isp@freebsd.org to doroni@robotec.co.il Subject: Re: Encrypted Mail Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:32:44 +0300 Detected By Scenario: Scenarios/Incoming/Virus Scan: 'Data recognised as W32/Netsky.p.eml!exe virus.'. Scenarios/scr block: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'data.doc .scr'. Scenarios/Incoming/Virus Scan: 'Data recognised as W32/Netsky.p@MM virus.'. The message was stopped by MAILsweeper and stored in Please contact the system administrator.