From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 05:04:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4833B16A41F for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBF643D46 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0FF7DA2; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:04:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:04:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Aaron Glenn In-Reply-To: <18f601940510151547ka3573f8v2f0633010ad2874f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051016010251.R90770@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20051012234337.K63956@zoraida.natserv.net> <57416b300510142221r2c3da329o65d54cb0aa04fc73@mail.gmail.com> <20051015133148.P97899@zoraida.natserv.net> <18f601940510151547ka3573f8v2f0633010ad2874f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD ISP list Subject: Re: Distributed authentication. Which one? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:04:10 -0000 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Aaron Glenn wrote: > Exactly. The problem I've always had is, what happens when you can > reach the device, but the device can't reach any KDC (for whatever > reason)? How can one fall back on another authentication method while > maintaining consistant login credentials? Food for thought... I am totally new at distributed authentication, but would think that at least the adminstrator(s), would want to have their id(s) in the local password database. > I would say LDAP, but then I've never used NIS. The general comment I am seeing in archives is that it is not commonly used anymore.