From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 15:56:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857116A41F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from psknet.com (kennedy.psknet.com [63.171.251.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB24443D68 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from pool-70-110-2-141.roa.east.verizon.net ([70.110.2.141] helo=[192.168.1.104]) by psknet.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EU4gS-0008Md-5h for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:56:24 -0400 Message-ID: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:56:22 -0400 From: Troy Settle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Web Hosting - IPs, Quotas and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:56:29 -0000 I have a server running FreeBSD 5.4. It's a dual Xeon 2.8Ghz with 2GB of ram and a 4x36GB raid-5 array. Pretty sweet machine. On this machine, I've installed an administrative jail, which is running things like MySQL and phpMyAdmin. There's a 2nd jail running PureFTPd with MySQL authentication and a bare Apache server with mod_vhost_alias. All my simple/cheap hosting accounts are taken care of, they'll be automatically provisioned via my billing software. Anyways, here's where I need some help. I want to create a 3rd jail for Frontpage services. FP doesn't have any built in quota support that I've seen, so I'll need to depend on file system quotas. The problem with this, is that quotas do not seem to work in a jailed environment. Can anyone recommend a solution/workaround to this? Finally, I want to be able to offer advanced web services that will allow the customer to have SSL certificates, operate virtual FTP servers, etc... This requires that I have one IP per server, which means one jail per server. Jails are fun, but somehow, I don't think 50 jails would be fun. Should I just throw in the towel on the idea of jails and do these things on the host itself or possibly another host, but without jails? Thanks, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 866.477.5638 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 16:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC46616A41F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Received: from manor.msen.com (manor.msen.com [148.59.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DD143D46 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Received: from manor.msen.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by manor.msen.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9OGq7Hr060036 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:52:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Received: (from wayne@localhost) by manor.msen.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id j9OGq6OR060035 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:52:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wayne) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:52:06 -0400 From: "Michael R. Wayne" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051024165206.GA91006@manor.msen.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Web Hosting - IPs, Quotas and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:52:08 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:56:22AM -0400, Troy Settle wrote: > > Anyways, here's where I need some help. I want to create a 3rd jail for > Frontpage services. FP doesn't have any built in quota support that > I've seen, so I'll need to depend on file system quotas. The problem > with this, is that quotas do not seem to work in a jailed environment. > Can anyone recommend a solution/workaround to this? This can be (mostly) made to work. Mount the filesystem on the host machine with quotas enabled, pointing to a file reachable by the jail. Example /etc/fstabs: /dev/da0s1d /JAIL_NAME/home ufs rw,nosuid,nodev,userquota=/JAIL_NAME/usr/quotas/JAIL_NAME.home 2 2 In the jail, use /dev/da0s1d /home ufs rw,nosuid,nodev,userquota=/usr/quotas/JAIL_NAME.home,noauto 2 2 Remember that you only have a single namespace (numberspace?) for UIDs so do not re-use them in other jails. /\/\ \/\/ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 23:27:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5502B16A41F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@hoho.sjc.ebay.com) Received: from camp10.sjc.ebay.com (camppool10.emailebay.com [216.33.244.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CDA43D49 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:27:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@hoho.sjc.ebay.com) Received: from hoho.sjc.ebay.com ([10.112.159.101]) by camp10.sjc.ebay.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j9ONRcnF017551 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:27:38 -0700 Received: (from cmuser@localhost) by hoho.sjc.ebay.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id j9ONRcn27956; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:27:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Unexpected reply handler Message-Id: <200510242327.j9ONRcn27956@hoho.sjc.ebay.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <200510242328.j9ONRsaI014479@mailhost9.sjc.ebay.com> In-Reply-To: <200510242328.j9ONRsaI014479@mailhost9.sjc.ebay.com> Precedence: junk X-Loop: reply@reply.ebay.com Subject: Re: Mail System (ay.200130761.194470.0@reply.ebay.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:27:44 -0000 Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an automated response and your reply will not be received. If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or assist you in contacting us: http://pages.ebay.com/help/index.html If you would like to change your notification preferences, which determine what type of email you receive from eBay, please follow the steps below: 1. Click "My eBay" located at the top of all eBay pages. You may be asked to sign in. 2. Click the "eBay Preferences" link located under the "My Account" heading. 3. Click the "view/change" link to the right of "Notification Preferences." You may be asked to sign in once more. 4. On the "Change Your Notification Preferences" page, check the boxes to indicate the types of messages you'd like to receive from eBay. Then, uncheck the boxes to indicate the types of messages you don't want to receive from us. 5. Once you're done, be sure to click the "Save Changes" button at the top or bottom of the page. Again, thanks for writing eBay. -- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 09:32:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF4316A420 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (puremail.eis.net.au [203.12.171.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F25843D48 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:32:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (localhost.eis.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9P9Wl70000717 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:47 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: (from ernie@localhost) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9P9Wlwt000716 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:47 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie) From: User Ernie Message-Id: <200510250932.j9P9Wlwt000716@puremail.eis.net.au> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:32:47 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: DSPAM and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:32:52 -0000 I am trying to get the DSPAM 3.6.0 port running as an SMTP relay gateway receiving/filtering mail for several hosting servers. I am using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and sendmail. On the DSPAM website it only gives examples for either DSPAM as Mlocal delivery, or using Postfix as a relay. I am not familiar with the FreeBSD dual sendmail instance setup, so I can't get my head around how to configure Sendmail to listen to port 25 and do it's usual RBL checks I have set up, then pass mail to DSPAM, then finaly have DSPAM pass it back to sendmail to forward it to the correct mail hosting server. Has anyone done this, or can anyone suggest what to try? I had a look at the perl dspampd script but with no instructions I was stuck there as well. I also posted the question to the DSPAM mail list last week and got no replies. - Ernie. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 09:11:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE58D16A427 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECCF43D46 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:11:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from lapdance.yazzy.net (unknown [192.168.99.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CC839834 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:11:05 +0000 From: Marcin Jessa To: FreeBSD-ISP Message-Id: <20051026091105.0d5cbafd.lists@yazzy.org> Organization: YazzY.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SATA software RAID-inkernel vs hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:11:59 -0000 Hi guys. I need to set up a server with two RAID1 SATA drives to do mirroring. I was wondering if there was any point in using software RAID controllers like FastTrak S150 TX4. I've found some info avaliable for Linux and people say kernel raid is as good as any BIOS raid. Would that be true for FreeBSD as well? Also using a PCI card for the disc drives in place of the built in SATA interface may degrade performance, since the built in SATA is probably on a different PCI bus to plug in cards. So what would you guys suggest? Keep the card or go for inkernel implementation? Marcin. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 12:54:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D35316A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kenfreebsd@icarz.com) Received: from miramanee.icarz.com (miramanee.icarz.com [207.99.22.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4943D58 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:54:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kenfreebsd@icarz.com) Received: from deanna.icarz.com (deanna.icarz.com [207.99.22.19]) by miramanee.icarz.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9QCskje006073; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:54:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kenfreebsd@icarz.com) Received: from kenxp (netb-138.icarz.com [209.123.219.138]) by deanna.icarz.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with SMTP id j9QCsho0016873; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:54:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kenfreebsd@icarz.com) Message-ID: <013001c5da2c$6fa4e1a0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> From: "Ken Menzel" To: "User Ernie" , References: <200510250932.j9P9Wlwt000716@puremail.eis.net.au> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:54:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Score: -100 () USER_IN_WHITELIST X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: Subject: Re: DSPAM and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ken Menzel List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:54:49 -0000 Hi Ernie, I don't know DSPAM, is it a "milter" like mimedefang and spamassassin? I use mimedefang and spamassassin (mimedefang calls spamassassin) in a gateway spam filter/virus scanner etc config. In my /etc/mail/hostname.mc file I put in dnl # icarz customizations here INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', `S=local:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, F=T,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `mimedefang')dnl dnl Custom rate limits should be OK with 1 gig define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE',`10') define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `40' ) define(`SMART_HOST', `mailhost.icarz.com') You can change the mail filter to be any mail filter. The SMART_HOST sends everything to my real mail server. My mx records point to this host. I am sure there are better configurations, but this was easy. I hope this helps you with you question, Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "User Ernie" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:32 AM Subject: DSPAM and Sendmail >I am trying to get the DSPAM 3.6.0 port running as an SMTP relay >gateway > receiving/filtering mail for several hosting servers. I am using > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and sendmail. On the DSPAM website it only gives > examples for either DSPAM as Mlocal delivery, or using Postfix as a > relay. > I am not familiar with the FreeBSD dual sendmail instance setup, so > I can't > get my head around how to configure Sendmail to listen to port 25 > and do it's > usual RBL checks I have set up, then pass mail to DSPAM, then finaly > have DSPAM > pass it back to sendmail to forward it to the correct mail hosting > server. > > Has anyone done this, or can anyone suggest what to try? I had a > look at the > perl dspampd script but with no instructions I was stuck there as > well. > > I also posted the question to the DSPAM mail list last week and got > no > replies. > > - Ernie. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 13:55:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AC816A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from home.quip.cz (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2563F43D45 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (qwork.quip.test [192.168.1.2]) by home.quip.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677AAA22; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <435F8ACF.20203@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:55:27 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ISP References: <20051026091105.0d5cbafd.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20051026091105.0d5cbafd.lists@yazzy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcin Jessa Subject: Re: SATA software RAID-inkernel vs hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:55:06 -0000 Marcin Jessa wrote: > Hi guys. > > I need to set up a server with two RAID1 SATA drives to do mirroring. > I was wondering if there was any point in using software RAID > controllers like FastTrak S150 TX4. > I've found some info avaliable for Linux and people say kernel raid is > as good as any BIOS raid. Would that be true for FreeBSD as well? > Also using a PCI card for the disc drives in place of the built in SATA > interface may degrade performance, since the built in SATA is probably > on a different PCI bus to plug in cards. AFAIK built-in RAIDs on cheap mainboard are on the same bus, as plug in PCI cards sharing same IRQ. Some manufacturers are explaining this in manuals. Few months ago I was testing built-in SATA RAID on older ASUS board (with Silicon Image onboard SATA RAID). BIOS RAID was unstable and I was not able to found why. Then I setup gmirror which was OK. But all was just home testing, never used in production. > So what would you guys suggest? Keep the card or go for inkernel > implementation? > > Marcin. So my suggest is real HW RAID card (if you have money), or gmirror, but not onboard "pseudo raids". Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 20:36:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC8E16A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:36:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from discussion-lists@linnet.org) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779B943D45 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:36:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from discussion-lists@linnet.org) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1057326F; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:36:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B578489; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:36:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EUs0S-0003Jr-CX; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:36:20 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:36:20 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: Troy Settle Message-ID: <20051026203620.GA12734@uk.tiscali.com> References: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Web Hosting - IPs, Quotas and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:36:24 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:56:22AM -0400, Troy Settle wrote: > Anyways, here's where I need some help. I want to create a 3rd jail for > Frontpage services. FP doesn't have any built in quota support that > I've seen, so I'll need to depend on file system quotas. CGIs can write files too, so if you allow users to upload their own CGIs you'll have the same problem. The alternative solution is to 'du' the disk space usage periodically (e.g. nightly), and users who are overquota can be contacted and warned or their site suspended, depending on how draconian you wish to be. You'll probably need a similar mechanism in any case for dealing with users who consume excessive amounts of bandwidth. > Finally, I want to be able to offer advanced web services that will > allow the customer to have SSL certificates, operate virtual FTP > servers, etc... This requires that I have one IP per server, which > means one jail per server. Jails are fun, but somehow, I don't think 50 > jails would be fun. I believe you can use the same jail directory structure bound to different IPs; just run 'jail' multiple times. You'll just need to take care if running the same daemon multiple times; each instance will need to be told to write to a different pid file, and will need a different config file (otherwise there wouldn't be any point having multiple instances) Regards, Brian. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 20:59:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11F16A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:59:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@gaiahost.coop) Received: from biodiesel.gaiahost.coop (biodiesel.gaiahost.coop [64.95.78.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698E43D45 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:59:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@gaiahost.coop) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:64.65.195.19]) (AUTH: LOGIN mark@hubcapconsulting.com) by biodiesel.gaiahost.coop with esmtp; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:58:58 -0400 id 003580B2.435FEE14.000056EB Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:58:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:58:58 -0400 From: Mark Bucciarelli To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051026205858.GM3524@rabbit> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> <20051026203620.GA12734@uk.tiscali.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051026203620.GA12734@uk.tiscali.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Web Hosting - IPs, Quotas and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:59:02 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:36:20PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:56:22AM -0400, Troy Settle wrote: > > > Finally, I want to be able to offer advanced web services that will > > allow the customer to have SSL certificates, operate virtual FTP > > servers, etc... This requires that I have one IP per server, which > > means one jail per server. Jails are fun, but somehow, I don't think > > 50 jails would be fun. > > I believe you can use the same jail directory structure bound to > different IPs; just run 'jail' multiple times. You'll just need to > take care if running the same daemon multiple times; each instance > will need to be told to write to a different pid file, and will need > a different config file (otherwise there wouldn't be any point having > multiple instances) There is a patch to support multiple ip's inside a jail. Google for the mijail patch. m From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 23:20:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B6516A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD4043D45 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t5so524623wxc for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:20:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d71tU8rR0q39AE2OWin6iTb7hEVSnVok+ov/dGL2cxW4avIbWuRc5w/CxA6ZlQeCLcq6XZJe/N9S4IlFxV8J6L5NbqFmE8WqnompmS2MtuiTJ9GPuct35X0IGv/Kj1g1BQFyqb3ETcGTojsUSpppY2cZ0iXPaj8FAvMQAO/7u3Q= Received: by 10.70.118.5 with SMTP id q5mr866856wxc; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57416b300510261620u19309161v6788806167265765@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:20:28 +1000 From: Peter Clutton To: Marcin Jessa In-Reply-To: <20051026091105.0d5cbafd.lists@yazzy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051026091105.0d5cbafd.lists@yazzy.org> Cc: FreeBSD-ISP Subject: Re: SATA software RAID-inkernel vs hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:20:30 -0000 On 10/26/05, Marcin Jessa wrote: > I need to set up a server with two RAID1 SATA drives to do mirroring. > I was wondering if there was any point in using software RAID > controllers like FastTrak S150 TX4. > So what would you guys suggest? Keep the card or go for inkernel > implementation? For straight out Raid 1, I would recommend gmirror.I too have only used it for personal use, but it is simple to set up and works well. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 00:15:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4108316A41F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:15:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (puremail.eis.net.au [203.12.171.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8662F43D48 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (localhost.eis.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9R0F6cH006691 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:15:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: (from ernie@localhost) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9R0F6QM006690 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:15:06 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie) From: User Ernie Message-Id: <200510270015.j9R0F6QM006690@puremail.eis.net.au> In-Reply-To: <013001c5da2c$6fa4e1a0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:15:06 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: DSPAM and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:15:02 -0000 DSPAM is not a milter, it's a stand alone application that can run as a daemon or be piped to directly. It's basically an advanced adaptive spam filter written in C. I am currently running MailScanner -> SpamAssassin as a gateway feeding a bunch of hosting servers and client mailservers, it's been working for a year but a few problems have cropped up that make me want to cut to DSPAM. Firstly the Perl nature of the current setup uses stacks of RAM as I add more MailScanner processess to handle the load. Secondly a lot of SPAM is creeping through as the spammers get smarter, and I am always having to tweak rulesets. Lastly the whole set up is slooowww, especially if you use a lot of DCC/Pyzor, and other offsite checks, the average mail delay as reported by the vspan GUI, is about 25sec, and can be minutes in busy periods, hence the need to seek change. DSPAM is a C program, small footprint very fast especially if you use MySQL for the backend database. It has fantastic SPAM capture rate, and a GUI for clients to edit quarantined SPAM. I have DSPAM 3.6.0 from the ports collection running on 2 FreeBSD boxen, a 5.4-STABLE and a 6.0-RC1 machine, just as the Mlocal delevery agent which then passes to procmail on one machine and just to mail.local on the other machine, both configs work fine. I thought I would be smart and set the delivery agent in the dspam.conf file to /usr/sbin/sendmail and see what happened, got a mail loop and the queue filled up and I had to kill the process. So my problem is how to get DSPAM, remembering that it is set as the Mlocal program on the recieving sendmail process, to pass the mail after it has finished with it to the sendmail process that can do both external delivery to another email server or to a local delivery program like procmail? {Internet} --> [Inbound Sendmail] -->[DSPAM] --> [Outbound Sendmail] --> [Other Mail Servers] \ [procmail]-->[local users] I sort of thought it might be the sendmail process that uses the submit.cf file, however it does not seem to have a Mlocal entry that makes sense to me. - Ernie. > Hi Ernie, > I don't know DSPAM, is it a "milter" like mimedefang and > spamassassin? I use mimedefang and spamassassin (mimedefang calls > spamassassin) in a gateway spam filter/virus scanner etc config. In > my /etc/mail/hostname.mc file I put in > dnl # icarz customizations here > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', > `S=local:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, > F=T,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl > define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `mimedefang')dnl > dnl Custom rate limits should be OK with 1 gig > > define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE',`10') > define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `40' ) > > define(`SMART_HOST', `mailhost.icarz.com') > > > You can change the mail filter to be any mail filter. The SMART_HOST > sends everything to my real mail server. My mx records point to this > host. I am sure there are better configurations, but this was easy. > > I hope this helps you with you question, > Ken > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "User Ernie" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:32 AM > Subject: DSPAM and Sendmail > > > >I am trying to get the DSPAM 3.6.0 port running as an SMTP relay > >gateway > > receiving/filtering mail for several hosting servers. I am using > > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and sendmail. On the DSPAM website it only gives > > examples for either DSPAM as Mlocal delivery, or using Postfix as a > > relay. > > I am not familiar with the FreeBSD dual sendmail instance setup, so > > I can't > > get my head around how to configure Sendmail to listen to port 25 > > and do it's > > usual RBL checks I have set up, then pass mail to DSPAM, then finaly > > have DSPAM > > pass it back to sendmail to forward it to the correct mail hosting > > server. > > > > Has anyone done this, or can anyone suggest what to try? I had a > > look at the > > perl dspampd script but with no instructions I was stuck there as > > well. > > > > I also posted the question to the DSPAM mail list last week and got > > no > > replies. > > > > - Ernie. > > !DSPAM:435f7f7149181828790097! > > > > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 00:20:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2277316A41F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (puremail.eis.net.au [203.12.171.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDB043D4C for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:20:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: from puremail.eis.net.au (localhost.eis.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9R0Kqfh006750 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:20:52 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie@puremail.eis.net.au) Received: (from ernie@localhost) by puremail.eis.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9R0KpXn006749 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:20:52 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie) From: User Ernie Message-Id: <200510270020.j9R0KpXn006749@puremail.eis.net.au> In-Reply-To: <013001c5da2c$6fa4e1a0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:20:51 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: DSPAM and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:20:46 -0000 DSPAM is not a milter, it's a stand alone application that can run as a daemon or be piped to directly. It's basically an advanced adaptive spam filter written in C. I am currently running MailScanner -> SpamAssassin as a gateway feeding a bunch of hosting servers and client mailservers, it's been working for a year but a few problems have cropped up that make me want to cut to DSPAM. Firstly the Perl nature of the current setup uses stacks of RAM as I add more MailScanner processess to handle the load. Secondly a lot of SPAM is creeping through as the spammers get smarter, and I am always having to tweak rulesets. Lastly the whole set up is slooowww, especially if you use a lot of DCC/Pyzor, and other offsite checks, the average mail delay as reported by the vspan GUI, is about 25sec, and can be minutes in busy periods, hence the need to seek change. DSPAM is a C program, small footprint very fast especially if you use MySQL for the backend database. It has fantastic SPAM capture rate, and a GUI for clients to edit quarantined SPAM. I have DSPAM 3.6.0 from the ports collection running on 2 FreeBSD boxen, a 5.4-STABLE and a 6.0-RC1 machine, just as the Mlocal delevery agent which then passes to procmail on one machine and just to mail.local on the other machine, both configs work fine. I thought I would be smart and set the delivery agent in the dspam.conf file to /usr/sbin/sendmail and see what happened, got a mail loop and the queue filled up and I had to kill the process. So my problem is how to get DSPAM, remembering that it is set as the Mlocal program on the recieving sendmail process, to pass the mail after it has finished with it to the sendmail process that can do both external delivery to another email server or to a local delivery program like procmail? {Internet} --> [Sendmail IN] -->[DSPAM] --> [Sendmail OUT] --> [Other Servers] \ [procmail]-->[local users] I sort of thought it might be the sendmail process that uses the submit.cf file, however it does not seem to have a Mlocal entry that makes sense to me. - Ernie. > Hi Ernie, > I don't know DSPAM, is it a "milter" like mimedefang and > spamassassin? I use mimedefang and spamassassin (mimedefang calls > spamassassin) in a gateway spam filter/virus scanner etc config. In > my /etc/mail/hostname.mc file I put in > dnl # icarz customizations here > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', > `S=local:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, > F=T,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl > define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `mimedefang')dnl > dnl Custom rate limits should be OK with 1 gig > > define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE',`10') > define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `40' ) > > define(`SMART_HOST', `mailhost.icarz.com') > > > You can change the mail filter to be any mail filter. The SMART_HOST > sends everything to my real mail server. My mx records point to this > host. I am sure there are better configurations, but this was easy. > > I hope this helps you with you question, > Ken > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "User Ernie" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:32 AM > Subject: DSPAM and Sendmail > > > >I am trying to get the DSPAM 3.6.0 port running as an SMTP relay > >gateway > > receiving/filtering mail for several hosting servers. I am using > > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and sendmail. On the DSPAM website it only gives > > examples for either DSPAM as Mlocal delivery, or using Postfix as a > > relay. > > I am not familiar with the FreeBSD dual sendmail instance setup, so > > I can't > > get my head around how to configure Sendmail to listen to port 25 > > and do it's > > usual RBL checks I have set up, then pass mail to DSPAM, then finaly > > have DSPAM > > pass it back to sendmail to forward it to the correct mail hosting > > server. > > > > Has anyone done this, or can anyone suggest what to try? I had a > > look at the > > perl dspampd script but with no instructions I was stuck there as > > well. > > > > I also posted the question to the DSPAM mail list last week and got > > no > > replies. > > > > - Ernie. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 01:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC30E16A41F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@jpri.com) Received: from mail1.infinityprosports.com (mail1.infinityprosports.com [67.18.186.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5756B43D48 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@jpri.com) Received: (qmail 8581 invoked by uid 1009); 28 Oct 2005 01:58:04 -0000 Received: from c-24-1-75-4.hsd1.tx.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.2.200?) (james@infinityprosports.com@24.1.75.4) by mail1.infinityprosports.com with ESMTPA; 28 Oct 2005 01:58:04 -0000 Message-ID: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:58:33 -0500 From: James Ryan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cisco 2511 Access Server + FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:58:51 -0000 Hello all, I apologize if this is trivial, but I am having some issues getting a Cisco 2511 Access Server to talk to a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE machine connected from com1 to the async line #1 on the Cisco box via RJ-45 to DB9 serial adapter. I have enabled getty on ttyd0; here is the line from ttys: % cat /etc/ttys | grep ttyd0 ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure I also know that getty is listening on ttyd0: % ps -ax | grep ttyd0 30951 d0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 ttyd0 When I telnet to the IP address of the Ethernet interface on the Cisco box, it simply hangs upon connect. I am guessing this means there is no communication between the 2511 and my FreeBSD machine. This happens when I telnet from both the Cisco machine and any other box on the network. % telnet 192.168.2.10 2001 Trying 192.168.2.10... Connected to 192.168.2.10. Escape character is '^]'. Here is a copy of my cisco config: sterm1#show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration : 734 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname sterm1 ! enable secret 5 $1$aDXI$a60Yn9vChs6U10vGhQn0Q/ enable password xxxx ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip finger ip host port1 2001 192.168.2.10 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! router igrp 1 redistribute connected network 192.168.2.0 ! ip classless ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 16 no exec transport input telnet stopbits 1 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password xxxx login ! end I know this is a mess of information, but any advice anyone has with this would be GREATLY appreciated; I am about to pull my hair out. Cheers, James From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 02:06:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E016A41F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hugh@island.net.au) Received: from superfast.island.net.au (superfast.island.net.au [210.11.44.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054B43D46 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:06:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hugh@island.net.au) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (phoenix.cove.island.net.au [192.168.142.25]) by superfast.island.net.au (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9S26JHc014927; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:06:19 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from hugh@island.net.au) Message-ID: <4361879B.7080709@island.net.au> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:06:19 +1000 From: Hugh Blandford X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Ryan References: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> In-Reply-To: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cisco 2511 Access Server + FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:06:23 -0000 Hi James, have you tried using ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty 3wire.115200" dialup on secure on the cisco we have line 1 4 transport input telnet speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware Regards, Hugh James Ryan wrote: > Hello all, > > I apologize if this is trivial, but I am having some issues getting a > Cisco 2511 Access Server to talk to a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE machine > connected from com1 to the async line #1 on the Cisco box via RJ-45 to > DB9 serial adapter. > > I have enabled getty on ttyd0; here is the line from ttys: > % cat /etc/ttys | grep ttyd0 > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > > I also know that getty is listening on ttyd0: > % ps -ax | grep ttyd0 > 30951 d0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 ttyd0 > > > When I telnet to the IP address of the Ethernet interface on the Cisco > box, it simply hangs upon connect. I am guessing this means there is > no communication between the 2511 and my FreeBSD machine. This > happens when I telnet from both the Cisco machine and any other box on > the network. > > % telnet 192.168.2.10 2001 > Trying 192.168.2.10... > Connected to 192.168.2.10. > Escape character is '^]'. > > > Here is a copy of my cisco config: > > sterm1#show running-config > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 734 bytes > ! > version 12.1 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname sterm1 > ! > enable secret 5 $1$aDXI$a60Yn9vChs6U10vGhQn0Q/ > enable password xxxx > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip finger > ip host port1 2001 192.168.2.10 > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > router igrp 1 > redistribute connected > network 192.168.2.0 > ! > ip classless > ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 16 > no exec > transport input telnet > stopbits 1 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password xxxx > login > ! > end > > > I know this is a mess of information, but any advice anyone has with > this would be GREATLY appreciated; I am about to pull my hair out. > > Cheers, > > James > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Hugh Blandford Island Internet ph 1300 130 428 mb 0412 016 875 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 02:18:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D859616A42F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:18:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@jpri.com) Received: from mail1.infinityprosports.com (mail1.infinityprosports.com [67.18.186.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7991B43D48 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:18:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@jpri.com) Received: (qmail 27261 invoked by uid 1009); 28 Oct 2005 02:17:17 -0000 Received: from c-24-1-75-4.hsd1.tx.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.2.200?) (james@infinityprosports.com@24.1.75.4) by mail1.infinityprosports.com with ESMTPA; 28 Oct 2005 02:17:17 -0000 Message-ID: <43618A4A.20107@jpri.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:17:46 -0500 From: James Ryan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> <4361879B.7080709@island.net.au> In-Reply-To: <4361879B.7080709@island.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cisco 2511 Access Server + FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:18:05 -0000 Hugh, THANKS. it worked... James Hugh Blandford wrote: > Hi James, > > have you tried using > > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty 3wire.115200" dialup on secure > > on the cisco we have > > line 1 4 > transport input telnet > speed 115200 > flowcontrol hardware > > Regards, > > Hugh > > James Ryan wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I apologize if this is trivial, but I am having some issues getting a >> Cisco 2511 Access Server to talk to a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE machine >> connected from com1 to the async line #1 on the Cisco box via RJ-45 to >> DB9 serial adapter. >> >> I have enabled getty on ttyd0; here is the line from ttys: >> % cat /etc/ttys | grep ttyd0 >> ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure >> >> >> I also know that getty is listening on ttyd0: >> % ps -ax | grep ttyd0 >> 30951 d0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 ttyd0 >> >> >> When I telnet to the IP address of the Ethernet interface on the Cisco >> box, it simply hangs upon connect. I am guessing this means there is >> no communication between the 2511 and my FreeBSD machine. This >> happens when I telnet from both the Cisco machine and any other box on >> the network. >> >> % telnet 192.168.2.10 2001 >> Trying 192.168.2.10... >> Connected to 192.168.2.10. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> >> >> Here is a copy of my cisco config: >> >> sterm1#show running-config >> Building configuration... >> >> Current configuration : 734 bytes >> ! >> version 12.1 >> service timestamps debug uptime >> service timestamps log uptime >> no service password-encryption >> ! >> hostname sterm1 >> ! >> enable secret 5 $1$aDXI$a60Yn9vChs6U10vGhQn0Q/ >> enable password xxxx >> ! >> ! >> ! >> ! >> ! >> ip subnet-zero >> no ip finger >> ip host port1 2001 192.168.2.10 >> ! >> ! >> ! >> ! >> interface Ethernet0 >> ip address 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.0 >> ! >> interface Serial0 >> no ip address >> shutdown >> ! >> interface Serial1 >> no ip address >> shutdown >> ! >> router igrp 1 >> redistribute connected >> network 192.168.2.0 >> ! >> ip classless >> ip http server >> ! >> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit >> dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit >> ! >> line con 0 >> transport input none >> line 1 16 >> no exec >> transport input telnet >> stopbits 1 >> line aux 0 >> line vty 0 4 >> password xxxx >> login >> ! >> end >> >> >> I know this is a mess of information, but any advice anyone has with >> this would be GREATLY appreciated; I am about to pull my hair out. >> >> Cheers, >> >> James >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 02:23:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B69616A41F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kohi@bbtower.co.jp) Received: from sangiovese.noc.bbtower.ad.jp (sangiovese.noc.bbtower.ad.jp [211.14.2.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAE843D45 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kohi@bbtower.co.jp) Received: from sangiovese.noc.bbtower.ad.jp.noc.bbtower.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sangiovese.noc.bbtower.ad.jp (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9S2NCcb000810; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:23:13 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kohi@bbtower.co.jp) Message-Id: <200510280223.j9S2NCcb000810@sangiovese.noc.bbtower.ad.jp> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:23:12 +0900 From: Koh-ichi Ito To: James Ryan In-Reply-To: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> References: <436185C9.4000404@jpri.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.3) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cisco 2511 Access Server + FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:23:16 -0000 Hi, At Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:58:33 -0500, James Ryan wrote: > When I telnet to the IP address of the Ethernet interface on the Cisco > box, it simply hangs upon connect. I am guessing this means there is no > communication between the 2511 and my FreeBSD machine. This happens > when I telnet from both the Cisco machine and any other box on the network. > > % telnet 192.168.2.10 2001 > Trying 192.168.2.10... > Connected to 192.168.2.10. > Escape character is '^]'. You need to access port 2033(for Async 1 for example) rather 2001, don't you? Koh-ichi Ito From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 14:42:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B286A16A41F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:42:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@public-internet.co.uk) Received: from int.mail.public-internet.co.uk (int.mail.public-internet.co.uk [80.82.245.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAC643D46 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@public-internet.co.uk) Received: from kill.co.uk ([80.82.243.6]) by int.mail.public-internet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EUkzS-0007xL-6n for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:06:50 +0100 From: Tom Beard To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> References: <435D0426.6010107@psknet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:06:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1130331963.74696.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Web Hosting - IPs, Quotas and Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:42:24 -0000 On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:56 -0400, Troy Settle wrote: > Finally, I want to be able to offer advanced web services that will > allow the customer to have SSL certificates, operate virtual FTP > servers, etc... This requires that I have one IP per server, which > means one jail per server. Jails are fun, but somehow, I don't think 50 > jails would be fun. There are patches available for both 4.x and 5.x to add muliple IP support to jail, i've no idea if they work or what the implications are as I haven't tried them myself. http://garage.freebsd.pl/ Regards, Tom From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 06:53:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6192C16A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 06:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@hoho.sjc.ebay.com) Received: from camp9.sjc.ebay.com (camppool09.emailebay.com [216.33.244.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B57643D46 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 06:53:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmuser@hoho.sjc.ebay.com) Received: from hoho.sjc.ebay.com ([10.112.159.101]) by camp9.sjc.ebay.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j9T6r9LB025813 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:53:10 -0700 Received: (from cmuser@localhost) by hoho.sjc.ebay.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id j9T6r9b20108; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:53:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Unexpected reply handler Message-Id: <200510290653.j9T6r9b20108@hoho.sjc.ebay.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <200510290653.j9T6r26x017096@mailhost2.sjc.ebay.com> In-Reply-To: <200510290653.j9T6r26x017096@mailhost2.sjc.ebay.com> Precedence: junk X-Loop: reply@reply.ebay.com Subject: Re: Information X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 06:53:15 -0000 Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an automated response and your reply will not be received. If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or assist you in contacting us: http://pages.ebay.com/help/index.html If you would like to change your notification preferences, which determine what type of email you receive from eBay, please follow the steps below: 1. Click "My eBay" located at the top of all eBay pages. You may be asked to sign in. 2. Click the "eBay Preferences" link located under the "My Account" heading. 3. Click the "view/change" link to the right of "Notification Preferences." You may be asked to sign in once more. 4. On the "Change Your Notification Preferences" page, check the boxes to indicate the types of messages you'd like to receive from eBay. Then, uncheck the boxes to indicate the types of messages you don't want to receive from us. 5. Once you're done, be sure to click the "Save Changes" button at the top or bottom of the page. Again, thanks for writing eBay. -- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 12:59:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C92B16A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay.quest4@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68B843D46 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay.quest4@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so585010nzd for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=daRC1QwbrDfYoxAfb5RPWQp8Ao5tyUUcyh0gf0goNvZ9wrxTav8oQfb0yBljwukGdOAh04yAoaAiG5VTULfDBp2JyJL8YCXtKITjnRxSUc0QpkUSkdZuGAlfPRD+9BEWxRV6RmD/flTQP4xO42b5uBGd8MhG3o7XdUMq+ggNqFo= Received: by 10.65.54.18 with SMTP id g18mr126334qbk; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 4BANKS ( [4.226.249.146]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e16sm647566qbe.2005.10.29.05.59.14; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003401c5dc88$9076b990$92f9e204@4BANKS> From: "Jay Banks" To: Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:59:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Agoracart on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:59:17 -0000 I created an "error" FAQ for the free shoping cart, Agoracart, geared = toward getting it running on FreeBSD. I hope that it **might** be of = help to someone. It is published under a creative commons license and = published here: http://quest4.org/freebsd/ or=20 http://quest4.org/freebsd/agoracart_error_faq.htm Note: It is still a work in progress.=20 Maybe it would more aptly be called a complete idiot's guide to = understanding the errors you might run into in agoracart...because = believe me, a complete idiot wrote this FAQ. But hey, we all had to = start somewhere. :) Jay From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 18:41:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAF416A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:41:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from psknet.com (kennedy.psknet.com [63.171.251.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD9843D58 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:41:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from pool-70-110-2-141.roa.east.verizon.net ([70.110.2.141] helo=[192.168.1.104]) by psknet.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EVvdZ-0003sF-Tg for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4363C23D.5020502@psknet.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:41:01 -0400 From: Troy Settle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NFS & rebooting X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:41:07 -0000 All, A long time ago (3.x days?), whenver I rebooted an NFS server, all the client machines with mounted filesystems would completely freak out. I'm not talking about application errors, but that the nfs mounts were totally unresponsive. I couldn't unmount the filesystems and I couldn't remount them, the only thing I could do, was to force a reboot on the client boxes, after which, they would come up and mount their filesystems without issue. I'm looking again, at using NFS for my mail server setup, but need to know what the ramifications are if I need to reboot the NFS server, or if it's forced to reboot without the clients first dismounting any filesystems. Thanks, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 866.477.5638 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 18:51:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F56716A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:51:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A171643D48 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:51:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from lapdance.yazzy.net (unknown [192.168.99.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FBE39825; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:50:16 +0000 From: Marcin Jessa To: Troy Settle Message-Id: <20051029185016.1b6688c2.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <4363C23D.5020502@psknet.com> References: <4363C23D.5020502@psknet.com> Organization: YazzY.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS & rebooting X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:51:04 -0000 On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:41:01 -0400 Troy Settle wrote: > All, Hi Troy. > A long time ago (3.x days?), whenver I rebooted an NFS server, all > the client machines with mounted filesystems would completely freak > out. I'm not talking about application errors, but that the nfs > mounts were totally unresponsive. I couldn't unmount the filesystems > and I couldn't remount them, the only thing I could do, was to force > a reboot on the client boxes, after which, they would come up and > mount their filesystems without issue. > > I'm looking again, at using NFS for my mail server setup, but need to > know what the ramifications are if I need to reboot the NFS server, > or if it's forced to reboot without the clients first dismounting any > filesystems. A whole lot has changed since the 3.x times. >From my experience, the clients (FreeBSD, NetBSD and Linux) were fully responsive and could reach the NFS mounts when the NFS server came back up after reboot. Cheers, Marcin From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 18:59:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7FA16A421 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from psknet.com (kennedy.psknet.com [63.171.251.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2E243D49 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: from pool-70-110-2-141.roa.east.verizon.net ([70.110.2.141] helo=[192.168.1.104]) by psknet.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EVvvn-0004bo-3r for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:59:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4363C6A7.10808@psknet.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:59:51 -0400 From: Troy Settle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NFS & Consumer-grade GigE switches X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:59:56 -0000 Hey, while I'm switching over to NFS and distributing some front-end services, does anyone have any experience with putting a consumer grade (<$100) GigE switch into production? While I should probably get a managed switch, I just gotta wonder how far consumer-grade equipment has come and if it'll work for an NFS-only LAN. Thanks, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 866.477.5638