From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 22 02:00:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDE816A41C for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 02:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com (lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C4F43D53 for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 02:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dns1 ([64.58.171.82]) by lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050522020005.TNRS3041.lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com@dns1> for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 22:00:05 -0400 From: Vizion To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 18:55:27 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca> <1116699934.887.2.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> In-Reply-To: <1116699934.887.2.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505211855.27748.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1M7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 02:00:07 -0000 On Saturday 21 May 2005 11:25, the author Andreas Kohn contributed to the dialogue on Re: Eclipse 3.1M7: & On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 11:06 -0700, Alex Varju wrote: & > I've actually already submitted an update for the eclipse-devel port to & > 3.1m7, somebody just needs to grab it: & > & > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81076 & & Will test this right away, thanks! & /me feels slow :) & & > I discussed adding FreeBSD as a supported platform with one of the & > Eclipse developers, but I'm not sure how feasible this is. The problem & > is that somebody still has to maintain the config files within the & > Eclipse tree, which isn't going to happen unless a FreeBSD developer has & > commit priviledges. & > & > I agree that porting Eclipse is a huge challenge right now, I'm just not & > sure how it the overall amount of work for everybody involved can be & > reduced. & & Perhaps we could arrange it like OO.o or bsd# or the BSD Java & thing...external patchset which is managed somehow centrally? I don't & know either actually, but I feel that following Eclipse becomes more & difficult with each code drop. I will grab it and have a go this week end and report back David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.