From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:29:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC6416A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:29:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818BB43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:28:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 12229 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 14:28:59 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO vaio.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2005 14:28:58 -0000 Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA5HIUvZ031477; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 12:18:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA5HIApc031475; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 12:18:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: vaio.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: "Mikhail T." To: ports@FreeBSD.org, "David O'Brien" , openoffice@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 12:18:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:29:00 -0000 I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, xmlsec, etc. etc. The vendor, with its requirement to run on the odd OS-es like Solaris -- with no good standard way of adding 3rd party packages -- has some excuse for providing all these. The FreeBSD port-maintainers have none... -mi From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:05:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493C916A420; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:05:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D5943D48; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:05:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9F01A3C24; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D4C4548F9; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:05:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:05:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511051218.09945@Misha> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, David O'Brien , openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:05:35 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > xmlsec, etc. etc. >=20 > The vendor, with its requirement to run on the odd OS-es like Solaris > -- with no good standard way of adding 3rd party packages -- has some > excuse for providing all these. >=20 > The FreeBSD port-maintainers have none... I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of those packages. Kris --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbkXsWry0BWjoQKURAsgYAJ90F7SynN9zHYkB29aMQyVO0JWLBwCdG+NQ NgmCwUBDCubmJydYfTYV99k= =bfBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:24:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B193116A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1528143D48; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C998D6118; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:24:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23530-05; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:23:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E6B610B; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:23:49 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <436E4A33.7040801@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:23:47 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050930) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig382D1F304F516378570C454C" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at makeworld.com - FreeBSD:The Power To Serve Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, "Mikhail T." , David O'Brien , openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:24:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig382D1F304F516378570C454C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > >>I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN >>C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, >>db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, >>xmlsec, etc. etc. >> >>The vendor, with its requirement to run on the odd OS-es like Solaris >>-- with no good standard way of adding 3rd party packages -- has some >>excuse for providing all these. >> >>The FreeBSD port-maintainers have none... > > > I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even > with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of > those packages. > > Kris Curious - is there a pkg_add version of OOo? -- Best regards, Chris Everybody who didn't want a pain shot when you were passing out pain shots wants one when you are passing out sleeping pills. --------------enig382D1F304F516378570C454C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbko5D5P/gMAbw2MRAi1/AJ9F8FYBihA2myJBn6INTybCW+9nKwCfb2XH Iq4B1CAqSJF4S2mEnpWy/zQ= =ApDE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig382D1F304F516378570C454C-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:44:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E634616A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EB043D46; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE2A1A3C27; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:44:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 983B9548F9; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:44:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:44:26 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Message-ID: <20051106184426.GA21318@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> <436E4A33.7040801@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E4A33.7040801@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org, "Mikhail T." , David O'Brien , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:44:29 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:23:47PM -0600, Chris wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > >=20 > >>I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > >>C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > >>db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > >>xmlsec, etc. etc. > >> > >>The vendor, with its requirement to run on the odd OS-es like Solaris > >>-- with no good standard way of adding 3rd party packages -- has some > >>excuse for providing all these. > >> > >>The FreeBSD port-maintainers have none... > >=20 > >=20 > > I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even > > with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of > > those packages. > >=20 > > Kris >=20 > Curious - is there a pkg_add version of OOo? Yes, whenever it's buildable. Kris --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbk8KWry0BWjoQKURAhzUAJsG8uueWickJ5WwRjdmLqvCGYgocQCg2pjW WRRoXvnGkOzEDeX/bTw6xWg= =g8yf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:59:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0907316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail17.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail17.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C567143D49 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 7334 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 18:59:07 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO vaio.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail17.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2005 18:59:06 -0000 Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6IwVxA085827; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:58:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA6IwGSJ085822; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:58:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: vaio.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: "Mikhail T." To: Kris Kennaway Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:58:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<=?koi8-u?q?kcG=5EEOVihy+z3/UR=7B6SCQ=0A?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511061358.15971@Misha> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, David O'Brien , openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:59:09 -0000 = On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: = > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN = > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, = > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, = > xmlsec, etc. etc. = I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even = with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of = those packages. Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ to keep it building the current way. The third-party packages -- installed by other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out for build problems. Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, unprecedented. The major problem, that the OOo maintainers have created for themselves is the rebuild of such things as mozilla (old, outdated version) and STLport4 (old, outdated version). Even when using ccache, these useless things take A LOT of time and diskspace. Plus, of course, a whole slew of small items (beginning with dmake). Maho -- the soul of our openoffice@ team -- is more of an OOo person, than FreeBSD person. And that's the root of it -- OOo's philosophy with respect to 3rd-party packages is that it MUST be buildable with the bundled versions and, OPTIONALLY, with the already installed ones. A FreeBSD port should be different... I'm trying to make an OOo port that would work on 64-bit arches (my main system is amd64). I'm long past the third-party packages problem -- it is all about 64-bit integers/pointers now... -mi From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:34:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0818216A424 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from badtrap@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0C443D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:34:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from badtrap@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o25so65475nfa for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:33:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=A/pSCCOKUzYd30uFJjOH4T/pfgB5CPuTLJcj2hqisXOFEXVhoRCgF2z/yU/9qt0RMLjd2UAsp8gxziqj/u+7Tk2M/vPb63zdzt4cxFcFQo6hyOIQC7W+3+4NJ7St/Hmxs5MgygVYdA4eJBbLiaXWQdJr5f1gFSTg4rt5Id23Cwo= Received: by 10.48.211.11 with SMTP id j11mr369693nfg; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:33:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.2.5 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:33:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:33:59 +0100 From: Marco Russo To: openoffice@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: deinstalling localized versions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:34:01 -0000 Hi, i've installed the editors/openoffice.org-2.0 port with LOCALIZED_LANG=3Dde= . Now i wanted to deinstall that stuff, and cd'ed into that port directory, typed "make deinstall", the port tells me it's deinstalling openoffice, and everything's fine so far. But, after a rehash, i noticed all the OOo binaries are still there. (Also i had installed the RC1 before, and those binaries are there, also) What can i do to really completely deinstall openoffice cleanly? Thanks for your help -- Greets, Marco From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:24:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FD716A420; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:24:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from neptune.phys.ufl.edu (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F6D43D76; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:24:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by neptune.phys.ufl.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1300601E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:24:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <436E8297.6000308@scytek.de> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:24:23 -0500 From: Volker Quetschke User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> <200511061358.15971@Misha> In-Reply-To: <200511061358.15971@Misha> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF355426B8FFB1EAB95D8FA0A" Cc: Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:24:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF355426B8FFB1EAB95D8FA0A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mikhail T. wrote: > = On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > = > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > = > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > = > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > = > xmlsec, etc. etc. > > = I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even > = with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of > = those packages. > > Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ to keep > it building the current way. The third-party packages -- installed by > other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out for build > problems. Then I suggest that you provide the patches and feed them back to OOo so that the next time you don't have to do it again once a new OOo version comes up. Don't forget to sign the copyright agreement. > Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, unprecedented. Feel free to work around the bugs that prohibit the use of *old* gcc versions or convince the maintainer of the regular (FreeBSD) gcc version to incorporate the visibility patch: > The major problem, that the OOo maintainers have created for themselves > is the rebuild of such things as mozilla (old, outdated version) and > STLport4 (old, outdated version). Even when using ccache, these useless > things take A LOT of time and diskspace. Plus, of course, a whole slew > of small items (beginning with dmake). Even though you have your point that a lot of packages are included as old versions there is also work going on to reduce these dependencies. Did you ever look at the "--with-system-XXX" parameters of OOo's configure? Also you complain about a tool (dmake) that takes roughly 10 seconds to build *and* that is available in the ports collection so that it doesn't have to be rebuild? Do you have the time to check/redo all the makefiles for a 300MB source package that builds just fine with dmake? (Insert nasty comment about BSD make vs. GNU make here.) > Maho -- the soul of our openoffice@ team -- is more of an OOo person, > than FreeBSD person. And that's the root of it -- OOo's philosophy with > respect to 3rd-party packages is that it MUST be buildable with the > bundled versions and, OPTIONALLY, with the already installed ones. A > FreeBSD port should be different... Maybe you should check your attitude. If you stop thinking of OOo as a port but as an application that runs on many OSs (including FreeBSD) and the failure to do so as a bug we might actually get somewhere. Maho, keep up the good work! > I'm trying to make an OOo port that would work on 64-bit arches (my main > system is amd64). I'm long past the third-party packages problem -- it > is all about 64-bit integers/pointers now... I see that you are already familiar with the internals so that I don't have to point you to Jan Holesovskys (and others) work on the 64bit version. You might want to have a look at the cws_src680_ooo64bit02 branch and Jan's presentation at OOoCon2005. His blog might also be interesting for you: So, keep up your work, I hope you get your /port/ of OOo running on 64bit soon. Volker P.S.: 64bit questions are discussed frequently on dev@porting.openoffice.org -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D --------------enigF355426B8FFB1EAB95D8FA0A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MinGW) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDboKcPTXJup+KeF0RAhNnAKCEAuK9Hlub7P0tLBvYFV/Ou3cfLQCdHmXy EExTpikLVQOWxhcGgs15Zu8= =zvyz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF355426B8FFB1EAB95D8FA0A-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:15:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B98816A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD2D43D46; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin04-en2 [10.13.10.149]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jA70Euww026201; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:14:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jA70EqYN028226; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:14:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:14:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <200511051218.09945@Misha> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:15:12 -0000 In Message-ID: <200511051218.09945@Misha> "Mikhail T." wrote: > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > xmlsec, etc. etc. People from Debian and others work VERY VERY hard to maintain --system-python and other --sytem-something flags; they are what you want, use system installed stuffs. OOo is huge monster, and maintaining source is extremly tough job. just adding --without-mozilla requires huge effort. --without-java is also such kind of thing. Hamburg team (SUN) admits patches to remove java dependency and others, but it doesn't immdeately mean we can use such flags. A lot of work required. I know some --system flags do not work for FreeBSD. please do submit JCA and patches. I can review your patches and I can commit patches to OOo directly. (BTW: it still takes time) -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:30:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57FE16A421; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF5543D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jA70TuCc011206; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jA70Tp01005025; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:29:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:29:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20051107.092946.71130787.chat95@mac.com> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <200511061358.15971@Misha> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> <200511061358.15971@Misha> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:30:05 -0000 In Message-ID: <200511061358.15971@Misha> "Mikhail T." wrote: > Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ to keep > it building the current way. The third-party packages -- installed by > other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out for build > problems. These patches should be upstreamed. I'm always trying to fix in main stream of source code... > Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, unprecedented. You must know, even I have been making a large effort to support gcc-3.3 as well (MacOSX has only gcc-3.3 or gcc-4.0). I've never seen from your name in IssueTracker so I think you are not interested in replacing this, right? > Maho -- the soul of our openoffice@ team -- is more of an OOo person, > than FreeBSD person. And that's the root of it -- OOo's philosophy with > respect to 3rd-party packages is that it MUST be buildable with the > bundled versions and, OPTIONALLY, with the already installed ones. A > FreeBSD port should be different... *sigh* As I told before, you can submit new ports which maitainer section is you... Fill the PR! subit your port! (BTW: I'm maintaining ~30 ports for FreeBSD) > I'm trying to make an OOo port that would work on 64-bit arches (my main > system is amd64). I'm long past the third-party packages problem -- it > is all about 64-bit integers/pointers now... Please paticipate in ooo-build. you can follow http://ooo.ximian.com/ . My first attempt to use ooo-build is already reported at this ML. and amd64 patches for GNU/Linux are here. I saw Jan at OOoCon2005, and from his presentation, it is working (but far from release quaility, though)! But I don't recommend you to try to port it FreeBSD; first, finish GNU/Linux amd64 port. -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:53:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4DB16A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:53:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F8643D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:53:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-45.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.197.45]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2005 19:53:57 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,298,1125892800"; d="scan'208"; a="117688248:sNHT291748800" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17262.42335.397247.201761@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:52:47 -0500 To: ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta23) "daikon" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: openoffice@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:53:59 -0000 Can we please finish moving this thread to openoffice@ ? I.e. remove ports@ from your responses. Please? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:33:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B751D16A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:33:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0F043D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:33:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA71WpeD057884; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:32:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA71WowP057883; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:32:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:32:50 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: <20051107013250.GA57771@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511051218.09945@Misha> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:33:12 -0000 On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, These are build dependancies. While it would be really nice to be able to use the native system compiler, I can 'pkg_delete gcc-ooo' when done building OpenOffice 2. The list I provided are _RUN_ dependancies. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:41:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8037616A420; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A343D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA71fVXM058105; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA71fVuH058104; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:41:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: NAKATA Maho Message-ID: <20051107014131.GB57771@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:41:32 -0000 On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:14:46AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <200511051218.09945@Misha> "Mikhail T." wrote: > > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > > xmlsec, etc. etc. > > People from Debian and others work VERY VERY hard to maintain .. Unfortunately Mikhail hijacked this thread about runtime dependencies. If we can get back to the initial topic :-) What functionality does 'devel/gnomevfs2' give us, and would it be better to make it optional? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:44:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21D716A4D1; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF6243D46; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA71inHD058187; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA71imTw058186; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Chris Message-ID: <20051107014448.GC57771@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> <436E4A33.7040801@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E4A33.7040801@makeworld.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org, "Mikhail T." , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:44:59 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:23:47PM -0600, Chris wrote: > Curious - is there a pkg_add version of OOo? Yes, its part of the 'i386' package sets FreeBSD's Portmgr group builds. NAKATA-san also provides them at: ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/ Which you can navigate by: http://www.openoffice.org -> Download OpenOffice.org 2.0 -> FreeBSD as your OS> -> I raised an Issue. http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57444 Hope this will be fixed soon. -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:59:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3460716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF1843D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:59:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 24073 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 02:59:52 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO vaio.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 02:59:51 -0000 Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA72xHHx087083; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:59:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA72x1g0087078; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:59:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: vaio.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: "Mikhail T." To: Volker Quetschke , ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:59:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:59:53 -0000 => Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ => to keep it building the current way. The third-party packages -- => installed by other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out => for build problems. =Then I suggest that you provide the patches and feed them back to OOo =so that the next time you don't have to do it again once a new OOo =version comes up. Don't forget to sign the copyright agreement. I am doing that, but I'm NOT an OOo developer. My patches tend to be FreeBSD-specific. FYI, I too have some experience in porting and I am well aware of the benefits of the vendor's accepting the patches. "Feeding them back" to OOo is a good idea, but it should not be holding back the progress of the FreeBSD port. And that is my point. In "lawyers' speak", the goals of the OOo and the FreeBSD are similar, but not identical. Maho has a "conflict of interest" -- and I feel the FreeBSD port is under-represented. And, obviously, I don't care for a "copyright agreement". The patches are/will be there for all to see, and -- by virtue of being part of a FreeBSD port, they will, of course, be BSD-licensed. => Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, unprecedented. =Feel free to work around the bugs that prohibit the use of *old* gcc I do feel very free, thank you. But you are not really countering my point here... Requiring a port-specific C-compiler is unprecedented. You stated the problem, but the lang/ooo-gcc is NOT a solution to it. =Even though you have your point that a lot of packages are included as old =versions there is also work going on to reduce these dependencies. Did =you ever look at the "--with-system-XXX" parameters of OOo's configure? Yes, OF COURSE, I did "ever look". Very nice of OOo to finally wise up to this (1.x releases had very little flexibility in this). Too bad, FreeBSD port does not use this, even where it can. =Also you complain about a tool (dmake) that takes roughly 10 seconds =to build *and* that is available in the ports collection so that it =doesn't have to be rebuild? Do you have the time to check/redo all the =makefiles for a 300MB source package that builds just fine with dmake? I don't have the time (to re-write makefiles into BSD or GNU make), but I don't object to using dmake per se. I object to using the bundled one instead of the devel/dmake. =Maybe you should check your attitude. If you stop thinking of OOo as a =port but as an application that runs on many OSs (including FreeBSD) =and the failure to do so as a bug we might actually get somewhere. I sure appreciate the OOo project and Maho's contribution to it. But I am talking about a different thing called "FreeBSD port editors/openoffice.org-2.0". Maho -- and, perhaps, yourself -- are OOo developers (nothing wrong with that). I'd like a good FreeBSD port... =I see that you are already familiar with the internals so that I don't =have to point you to Jan Holesovskys (and others) work on the 64bit =version. Thanks, I'm aware of Kendy's work and have exchanged e-mails with him already as well. Jan's work for the Debian port is an example, of what is lacking in the FreeBSD port. He even has patches, that HE KNOWS will never be accepted "upstream". Imagine that! -mi From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 04:44:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367F816A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:44:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F389643D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5B6812F58; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:44:47 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:44:47 -0600 To: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: <20051107044447.GB26973@soaustin.net> References: <200511062159.01367@Misha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511062159.01367@Misha> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:44:48 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:59:00PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > Maho has a "conflict of interest" -- and I feel the FreeBSD port is > under-represented. This is exactly the type of statement that is almost guaranteed to de-motivate someone from trying to work on FreeBSD. It has become all too common in the past month. I wish that we could leave these types of emotionally charged phrases out of the discussion and concentrate on the technical issues involved instead. If there is any easier way to do things, then let's test the patches that make that happen. I hope everyone can agree that anything we could do to simplify the build and QA cycle for this huge package would be a good idea. mcl From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 06:34:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ED516A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:34:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao06.cox.net (centrmmtao06.cox.net [70.168.83.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D51843D66; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by centrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051107063322.SLZQ24602.centrmmtao06.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:33:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:34:55 -0600 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> <20051107014131.GB57771@dragon.NUXI.org> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20051107014131.GB57771@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Linux, build 1358) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:34:21 -0000 On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:41:31 -0600, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:14:46AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: >> In Message-ID: <200511051218.09945@Misha> "Mikhail T." >> wrote: >> > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN >> > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, >> > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), >> sablotron, >> > xmlsec, etc. etc. >> >> People from Debian and others work VERY VERY hard to maintain > .. > > Unfortunately Mikhail hijacked this thread about runtime dependencies. > If we can get back to the initial topic :-) > What functionality does 'devel/gnomevfs2' give us ============================================ # cat /usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/pkg-descr The GNOME Virtual File System allows applications and users to treat any number of file system concepts as a part of the local filesystem. With GnomeVFS, filesystems across the internet, on connected devices, and in multiple formats are as simple to access (and write code for) as any directory on the local machine. WWW: http://www.gnome.org/ ============================================ Must be something that allow you to open and save file in VFS. Cheers, Mezz > , and would it be better to make it optional? -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:26:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338C616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D7B43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:26:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so357580nzn for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:26:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OPWSuvnnrIs7VliT+hRvz/9MaRn0ayxMKMvHoZ091PkBtQWXbZMFYMmGeFINiL6eKnqw6mLemepgbSXKan9nogzG9jNSXa6SLl2ArgEudd0brdiUar3zcEJfCp8pJGk89d0V/kjNeMeGrmYN/0qmWTvCQwKNUWx27k9UyE3SQmk= Received: by 10.65.119.19 with SMTP id w19mr4983615qbm; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:19:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.112.3 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:19:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:19:49 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> <20051107014131.GB57771@dragon.NUXI.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:26:17 -0000 On 11/7/05, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > What functionality does 'devel/gnomevfs2' give us > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > # cat /usr/ports/devel/gnomevfs2/pkg-descr > The GNOME Virtual File System allows applications and users to treat > any number of file system concepts as a part of the local filesystem. > With GnomeVFS, filesystems across the internet, on connected devices, > and in multiple formats are as simple to access (and write code for) > as any directory on the local machine. > > WWW: http://www.gnome.org/ > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Must be something that allow you to open and save file in VFS. > > Cheers, > Mezz The biggest advantage I see is that we can use OOo with underlying smbclient transparently to the user. I don't have a problem with it being optional though having it on as default may be more beneficial to regular desktop users in a mixed environment. Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 11:04:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AC716A430 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:04:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC51843D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:03:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7B3sTA051489 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:03:54 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA7B3rbA051483 for openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:03:53 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:03:53 GMT Message-Id: <200511071103.jA7B3rbA051483@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:04:00 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/11/29] ports/74518 openoffice openoffice-1.1 build failure on 4-stable: o [2005/03/04] ports/78428 openoffice Openoffice-1.1.4 stops compiling -> dmake o [2005/04/14] ports/79941 openoffice Openoffice 1.1.4_1 binary packages (i386) o [2005/07/11] ports/83252 openoffice Openoffice-1.1.4 build failure: Died at . o [2005/09/20] ports/86383 openoffice Can't compile openoffice.org-1.1 5 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/05/10] ports/66480 openoffice editors/openoffice-1.1 port uses root's $ o [2005/09/16] ports/86206 openoffice editors/openoffice.org-2.0: Unable to bui 2 problems total. From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 11:39:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633D116A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9AF43D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:39:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFD3A8734; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAE6138C32; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dslb-084-061-130-024.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.130.24]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5F5A970A; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from kiste.my.domain (root@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7Bd8A3040355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7Bd8K8011347; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA7Bd5Ya011346; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:39:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kiste.my.domain: lofi set sender to lofi@freebsd.org using -f From: Michael Nottebrock To: kde@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:38:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <9ieu33-jfi.ln1@news.t-online.com> <200511051526.28604.david@usermode.org> <436F2D77.2060409@chillt.de> In-Reply-To: <436F2D77.2060409@chillt.de> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: David Johnson , kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: OpenOffice2: Missing OpenOffice1 stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:39:15 -0000 --nextPart1448809.E0VBU55x11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 7. November 2005 11:33, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: > > Poking around the install directory I found some .desktop files, but > > they were broken. > > As has been pointed out on the freebsd-openoffice mailing list a couple > times, the desktop files can be fixed easily. Of course, manual fixing > and copying is no viable solution in the long run. Also, icons are not > getting installed and there is currently no known way of fixing this. > But if you want a short term solution, here it goes: > > The .desktop files get installed in: > > /usr/local/openoffice.org2.0.0/share/xdg Ah, that's where they're hiding. Unfortunately that directory does not have= =20 the correct structure to be automatically recognized by XDG compatible=20 applications... > The names of the executables referenced in the .desktop files are not > quite correct - you need to fix them. =2E.. and that doesn't help things much either. OpenOffice maintainers: If you install the .desktop files=20 to /usr/local/openoffice.org2.0.0/share/xdg/applications instead (the=20 applications subdirectory is important), I could extend the misc/kde-xdg-en= v=20 port to add usr/local/openoffice.org2.0.0/share/xdg to the XDG_DATA_DIRS pa= th=20 and the OO.o applications would automatically be added to the Office submen= u. Patching them to point to the correct executable name would be nice as well= of=20 course. What do you think? Cheers, =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1448809.E0VBU55x11 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDbzzZXhc68WspdLARAhEYAKCr84C+5Yh7Ny9mFDMBesa8HZZokwCff099 Q5g0x/G2hnQdzxml6T8/IcI= =Cbt5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1448809.E0VBU55x11-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:40:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB3A16A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from neptune.phys.ufl.edu (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BC243D62; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:40:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by neptune.phys.ufl.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4718D5FB7; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:40:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <436F6833.9020904@scytek.de> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:44:03 -0500 From: Volker Quetschke User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <200511062159.01367@Misha> In-Reply-To: <200511062159.01367@Misha> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3761A392D259A121C4E519A5" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:40:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3761A392D259A121C4E519A5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mikhail T. wrote: > => Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ > => to keep it building the current way. The third-party packages -- > => installed by other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out > => for build problems. > > =Then I suggest that you provide the patches and feed them back to OOo > =so that the next time you don't have to do it again once a new OOo > =version comes up. Don't forget to sign the copyright agreement. > > I am doing that, but I'm NOT an OOo developer. My patches tend to be > FreeBSD-specific. FYI, I too have some experience in porting and I am > well aware of the benefits of the vendor's accepting the patches. > > "Feeding them back" to OOo is a good idea, but it should not be > holding back the progress of the FreeBSD port. And that is my point. > In "lawyers' speak", the goals of the OOo and the FreeBSD are similar, > but not identical. Maho has a "conflict of interest" -- and I feel the > FreeBSD port is under-represented. IMHO there is no conflict of interest. (I shouldn't speak for Maho here, sorry for that.) There /should/ be no conflict as we all should only want a working and easily buildable OOo. And "under-representation" is obviously not solved by working on ports and not contributing back the patches to OOo. The mysterious "someone" that represents the evil OOo can only be Maho in this case. > And, obviously, I don't care for a "copyright agreement". The patches > are/will be there for all to see, and -- by virtue of being part of a > FreeBSD port, they will, of course, be BSD-licensed. That you feel that way about the copyright assignment will only make it harder for "them" to include your patches. > => Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, unprecedented. > =Feel free to work around the bugs that prohibit the use of *old* gcc > > I do feel very free, thank you. But you are not really countering my > point here... Requiring a port-specific C-compiler is unprecedented. You > stated the problem, but the lang/ooo-gcc is NOT a solution to it. Well, for a lot of linux distributions it was a solution to apply the patch to their system gcc. I assume the current FreeBSD system gcc is free of additional patches, so that would be unprecedented. ;) > =Even though you have your point that a lot of packages are included as old > =versions there is also work going on to reduce these dependencies. Did > =you ever look at the "--with-system-XXX" parameters of OOo's configure? > > Yes, OF COURSE, I did "ever look". Very nice of OOo to finally wise up > to this (1.x releases had very little flexibility in this). Too bad, > FreeBSD port does not use this, even where it can. As Maho said, there are problems (Bugs) with some of them. Maybe worth fixing? > =Also you complain about a tool (dmake) that takes roughly 10 seconds > =to build *and* that is available in the ports collection so that it > =doesn't have to be rebuild? Do you have the time to check/redo all the > =makefiles for a 300MB source package that builds just fine with dmake? > > I don't have the time (to re-write makefiles into BSD or GNU make), but > I don't object to using dmake per se. I object to using the bundled one > instead of the devel/dmake. Hmm, the OOo configure checks for an installed version of dmake, yes, platform independent, if it doesn't use the installed one and builds the included version this is a bug. But maybe just another dependency is needed. (Didn't check) > =Maybe you should check your attitude. If you stop thinking of OOo as a > =port but as an application that runs on many OSs (including FreeBSD) > =and the failure to do so as a bug we might actually get somewhere. > > I sure appreciate the OOo project and Maho's contribution to it. > But I am talking about a different thing called "FreeBSD port > editors/openoffice.org-2.0". Maho -- and, perhaps, yourself -- are OOo > developers (nothing wrong with that). I'd like a good FreeBSD port... Agreed :) > =I see that you are already familiar with the internals so that I don't > =have to point you to Jan Holesovskys (and others) work on the 64bit > =version. > > Thanks, I'm aware of Kendy's work and have exchanged e-mails with him > already as well. Jan's work for the Debian port is an example, of what > is lacking in the FreeBSD port. He even has patches, that HE KNOWS will > never be accepted "upstream". Imagine that! Yes, I don't know the specific patches here, but I can imagine that tons of #if defined(somemacro) blah #else blubb #endif constructs are likely to be rejected. It is a maintainance nightmare. And it doesn't matter if somemacro is related to 64bit or MACOSX, FREEBSD, WINDOWS, SOLARIS, you name it. Unfortunately it is a lot harder to write a nicely mainainable solution than the easy ifdef sprinkling. I also don't say that the code as is is perfect (it already has a lot of #ifdef sprinkling) but the number of supported OSs has grown and so have the expectations of the code quality. Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D --------------enig3761A392D259A121C4E519A5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDb2g3PTXJup+KeF0RArSSAKCg9TTdSdmJ5SQkt57/5Z6R0yQaIQCeOj8D d5UiLceLlC9Mbx6v3DI5+Y4= =Q9EL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3761A392D259A121C4E519A5-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:43:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C779316A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:43:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail15.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail15.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A243D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 11769 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 15:43:17 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO vaio.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail15.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 15:43:17 -0000 Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7FgTK1089503; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:42:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA7FgDtH089502; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:42:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: vaio.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: "Mikhail T." To: Volker Quetschke Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:42:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200511062159.01367@Misha> <436F6833.9020904@scytek.de> In-Reply-To: <436F6833.9020904@scytek.de> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<=?koi8-u?q?kcG=5EEOVihy+z3/UR=7B6SCQ=0A?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511071042.13126@Misha> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:43:19 -0000 = > "Feeding them back" to OOo is a good idea, but it should not be = > holding back the progress of the FreeBSD port. And that is my point. = > In "lawyers' speak", the goals of the OOo and the FreeBSD are = > similar, but not identical. Maho has a "conflict of interest" -- and = > I feel the FreeBSD port is under-represented. = IMHO there is no conflict of interest. (I shouldn't speak for Maho = here, sorry for that.) There /should/ be no conflict as we all should = only want a working and easily buildable OOo. "Working and easily buildable" _on FreeBSD_, please. = And "under-representation" is obviously not solved by working on ports = and not contributing back the patches to OOo. The mysterious "someone" = that represents the evil OOo can only be Maho in this case. There is a conflict, of course. There is nothing "evil" about OOo, but FreeBSD is just one of the platforms for them. They would not accept a patch if it breaks something on another OS, obviously. So the fixes need to be ifdef-ed properly, and sometimes configure-glue needs to be added, etc. Whenever one is working on that, one is working on OOo, not on the FreeBSD port. I'm not saying, either one is good or bad, but the distinction needs to be made, and the priorities better be acknowledged. I think that -- ensuring, that a patch is acceptable to OOo -- should be secondary in importance. If OOo builds and works on FreeBSD easily and cleanly, then OOo people can take the patches from the port's files/ and see about integrating them. May even be the same person doing it, just wearing an OOo hat. = > => Building a special version of C compiler is, AFAIK, = > =unprecedented. Feel free to work around the bugs that prohibit the = > =use of *old* gcc = > = > I do feel very free, thank you. But you are not really countering my = > point here... Requiring a port-specific C-compiler is unprecedented. = > You stated the problem, but the lang/ooo-gcc is NOT a solution to = > it. = Well, for a lot of linux distributions it was a solution to apply the = patch to their system gcc. I assume the current FreeBSD system gcc is = free of additional patches, so that would be unprecedented. ;) Dunno... I built OOo using the system compiler on 6.0/i386 (with a slightly modified port) and it seems to work... = > Yes, OF COURSE, I did "ever look". Very nice of OOo to finally wise = > up to this (1.x releases had very little flexibility in this). Too = > bad, FreeBSD port does not use this, even where it can. = As Maho said, there are problems (Bugs) with some of them. Maybe worth = fixing? If it is, then the Right Thing is to add the fixe to the FreeBSD ports of these packages. = > I don't have the time (to re-write makefiles into BSD or GNU make), = > but I don't object to using dmake per se. I object to using the = > bundled one instead of the devel/dmake. = Hmm, the OOo configure checks for an installed version of dmake, yes, = platform independent, if it doesn't use the installed one and builds = the included version this is a bug. But maybe just another dependency = is needed. (Didn't check) There is a trivial bug in configure's dmake detection -- it only works on Linux (I think). On FreeBSD sed needs the ``-E'' flag to do, what they are trying to do... Yes, I have a (FreeBSD-specific) patch. =[...] = #endif = = constructs are likely to be rejected. It is a maintainance nightmare. It is not the form of his patches, it is their intentions -- like removing the "registration" dialog, for example, that make them unacceptable. My point, however, was, that Kendy does not mind making changes, that OOo will never accept. I think, it is because, owning both, he wears a Debian hat more often than an OOo hat. As for the ifdef-nightmare, it is happily perpetuated by OOo themselves. Whenever a 3rd-party header is included, it looks like: #ifdef SYSTEM_FOO # include "foo.h" #else # include "foo/foo.h" #endif Spot two mistakes... And these are _new_ additions. But I'm drifting off-topic... -mi From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:29:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1816A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D821143D70; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.17]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EF8A8E17; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5B112E49E; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dslb-084-061-130-024.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.130.24]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5526CA8E1D; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from kiste.my.domain (root@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7GSsl9044140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7GSr6k032511; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA7GSpIu032510; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kiste.my.domain: lofi set sender to lofi@freebsd.org using -f From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051106180533.GA4574@xor.obsecurity.org> <200511061358.15971@Misha> In-Reply-To: <200511061358.15971@Misha> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." , David O'Brien , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:29:15 -0000 --nextPart34314835.aZRHPj8r9U Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 6. November 2005 19:58, Mikhail T. wrote: > =3D On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:18:09PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > =3D > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its = OWN > =3D > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLpo= rt, > =3D > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablot= ron, > =3D > xmlsec, etc. etc. > > =3D I don't think you realise how much work it is to keep OO building even > =3D with stock vendor sources, let alone with third party versions of > =3D those packages. > > Actually, I do realise that, and, in my opinion, it is _harder_ to keep > it building the current way. The third-party packages -- installed by > other ports -- have their own maintainers, who watch out for build > problems. I fail to see how going along with the vendor's default build system and=20 procedure is harder than having to massively patch around in there (and=20 having to redo those patches obsoleted every time the upstream sources chan= ge=20 significantly enough). Given how outdated some of the bundled sources are, I would guess that=20 OpenOffice probably would have many issues with the latest versions of its= =20 dependencies, requiring even more patches to OOo - or having to keep around= =20 obsolete versions of these dependencies in ports. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart34314835.aZRHPj8r9U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDb4DDXhc68WspdLARAsf8AKCOI25RxF+dAylz0G+Jzh7PCDzV+wCcDU5y r7fWIzszI1EphIbgLz4EGFs= =Q7jA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart34314835.aZRHPj8r9U-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:42:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A07016A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:42:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naughty.mark@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C649143D7E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:42:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naughty.mark@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so350112nzf for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:42:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CSbQf7EwIewPPcQ7nYAv7brVUhEaEyDDylqnxGi8MRc3ZIz8t2rnT1C4XBSwWnPhLS6AI4xeLJ6OzUO/BhP41T8SsICn76bwM4gNLEtJSrEMIcWnEZyifHlwKX4Wcq0Iiz/sH952xZueZMK0xzcLzpkTW6rppVmie/gxPxDl2LY= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr595484nzi; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.53 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <488847e40511070942y24c9e8beh477f22044a43e192@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:42:24 -0500 From: Mark To: openoffice@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: broken ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:42:32 -0000 i ran "portupgrade -ra" and it completely fried my bluefish, I have no text formatting that is the sole reason I use bluefish, so at this rate i might as well use vi *cough* when trying to select the text formating again in configure bluefish from the menu i get about 200-300 errors back to back that practically wears out my enter button to get past. how can i get back to an earlier version that actually works? I tried to also run portupgrade again and forced it to reinstall the port yet again and got the same results. I like the text formatting, again, that's why I use it, i could care less about pressing buttons and all that other jazz for someone who can write the code. so I ask again.... how can i gat back to a working version? thx, Mark 4.11 STABLE i386 -- Gmail rocks! Ask me about it if interested. From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:06:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE76816A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:06:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBAF43D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:06:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com ([151.204.231.237]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IPL00EDFJM7J6J0@vms040.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:06:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7I62oC054210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:06:06 -0500 Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7I5lHW009151; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:05:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA7I5jRK009150; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:05:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:05:44 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin In-reply-to: <200511071728.51547.lofi@freebsd.org> To: Michael Nottebrock Message-id: <200511071305.45292.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=koi8-u Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/1165/Sun Nov 6 00:12:58 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <200511061358.15971@Misha> <200511071728.51547.lofi@freebsd.org> X-Authentication-warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org, David O'Brien , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:06:48 -0000 > I fail to see how going along with the vendor's default build system and > procedure is harder It is harder, because: 1) it requires re-porting -- duplicating the efforts of the other ports' maintainers; 2) it takes a lot of time to re-test. Every time openoffice@ wants to do a test of a new patch/improvement/idea, they need to rebuild a lot of stuff (including the entire mozilla-1.7.5). Even with ccache, that's a big undertaking. The results are also inferior, because of the outdatedness affecting (the proper) QA. And there may be security implications too... > than having to massively patch around in there (and having to redo those > patches obsoleted every time the upstream sources change significantly > enough). The patching required is not all that "massive". A lot of things are _already_ in the OOo -- there is even the "--with-system-all" flag, as well as "--with-system-mozilla", "--with-system-python", and "--without-stlport4" (modern GNU C++ has capable enough STL implementation). But the current maintainers are not using any of these for some reason... > Given how outdated some of the bundled sources are, I would guess that > OpenOffice probably would have many issues with the latest versions of its > dependencies, requiring even more patches to OOo - or having to keep around > obsolete versions of these dependencies in ports. Only one such real issue came up so far -- with icu. And there is a patch for it already (from someone in the Linux world). I even updated our devel/icu to 3.4, so that we can use that patch. (And sablotron, and xmlsec1, and dmake...) There are also issues with Java on 64-bit platforms (or with jdk-1.5?), so I'm doing the --without-java here for now. We are all truly fortunate, that Java's licensing prevents OOo from bundling their own version with their source code... (dmake's license prohibits it too, BTW, but Sun/OOo did not care). -mi From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:40:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A6B16A421 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9D343D5C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from smtp.metz.supelec.fr (smtp.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.205]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id jA7IeOd23455 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:40:24 +0100 Received: from [193.48.225.2] (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by smtp.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA7IXIK21443; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:33:18 +0100 Message-ID: <436F9F86.2020901@altern.org> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:40:06 +0100 From: Gregory Nou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark References: <488847e40511070942y24c9e8beh477f22044a43e192@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488847e40511070942y24c9e8beh477f22044a43e192@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:40:29 -0000 Mark wrote: > i ran "portupgrade -ra" and it completely fried my bluefish, I have no text > formatting that is the sole reason I use bluefish, so at this rate i might > as well use vi *cough* when trying to select the text formating again in > configure bluefish from the menu i get about 200-300 errors back to back > that practically wears out my enter button to get past. how can i get back > to an earlier version that actually works? > > I tried to also run portupgrade again and forced it to reinstall the port > yet again and got the same results. I like the text formatting, again, > that's why I use it, i could care less about pressing buttons and all that > other jazz for someone who can write the code. so I ask again.... how can i > gat back to a working version? > > thx, > Mark I think I already get this. I solved it by installing pcre-utf8. -- Gregory From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:51:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249A816A420; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from neptune.phys.ufl.edu (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA19743D53; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from quetschke@scytek.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (neptune.phys.ufl.edu [128.227.64.7]) by neptune.phys.ufl.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230B5602C; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:51:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <436FA247.4040309@scytek.de> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:51:51 -0500 From: Volker Quetschke User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <200511061358.15971@Misha> <200511071728.51547.lofi@freebsd.org> <200511071305.45292.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200511071305.45292.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig115EC694483CE25DD71ED7ED" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:51:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig115EC694483CE25DD71ED7ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I will leave it to the actual FreeBSD maintainers to comment on the first (snipped) part. >(snip) > There are also issues with Java on 64-bit platforms (or with jdk-1.5?), so I'm > doing the --without-java here for now. We are all truly fortunate, that > Java's licensing prevents OOo from bundling their own version with their > source code... > > (dmake's license prohibits it too, BTW, but Sun/OOo did not care). But where do you see license problems with dmake? Every source file of the dmake package contains: -- COPYRIGHT -- Copyright (c) 1996,1997 by WTI Corp. All rights reserved. -- -- This program is NOT free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- modify it under the terms of the Software License Agreement Provided -- in the file /readme/license.txt. and that license.txt is GPL Version 1, February 1989. It's not BSD license, so what? Is GNU make illegal too? Please refrain from posting uninformed and false accusations. Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D --------------enig115EC694483CE25DD71ED7ED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MinGW) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDb6JKPTXJup+KeF0RAlr9AJ99WF8g8lxnFKiR+TIycGcQkng13wCgifoP mFIyIUx5hYJMwhvwdrbvfk4= =xAeb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig115EC694483CE25DD71ED7ED-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:55:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2321216A423 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:55:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667C843D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:55:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZD4m-0001k3-DT for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:54:44 +0100 Received: from p548fe4e0.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.143.228.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:54:44 +0100 Received: from rotkap by p548fe4e0.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:54:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:53:56 +0100 Organization: yes Lines: 6 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p548fe4e0.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O Subject: can I use OOo2 -DWITH_KDE under other windowmanagers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:55:56 -0000 Hi, if I compile OpenOffice.org-2.0 with the knop "WITH_KDE", what habens if I start it e.g. under fvwm2 or xfce oder icewm? Heino From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 22:00:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918E316A426 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:00:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2437843D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IPL000MVUG5I290@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:00:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:00:04 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Message-id: <200511071700.04682.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart565789820.mfdoLoXq0W; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Subject: Openoffice 2.0 broken save as X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:00:06 -0000 --nextPart565789820.mfdoLoXq0W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, What is the current situation with the broken save_as() for open formats? I= s=20 the problem FreeBSD's port or is it OOo? Also, is anyone working on it?=20 Should a PR be posted? //end of questions... Though looking at OO's code scares the heck out of me, I'm willing to test= =20 patches (OO takes ~5-6 hours to compile with ccache on my server). Nicolas. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Nov 5 12:12:36 EST 2005 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart565789820.mfdoLoXq0W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDb85kz38ton5LGeIRAqRrAJ9+oSfZ3mhK/C12aZaydsaXYGQX/wCfb0/R yklx8w1v291RKzsKJ5x1w3E= =NWtN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart565789820.mfdoLoXq0W-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:12:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBD816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:12:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E31043D95 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:12:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-115-072.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.115.72]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3B5C917D; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:12:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436FDF62.9030004@chillt.de> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:12:34 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco Russo References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deinstalling localized versions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:12:41 -0000 > What can i do to really completely deinstall openoffice cleanly? Why don't you just pkg_delete it? "make deinstall" needs to have the source extracted, to have the exact same version present as the one installed and for all the configuration options to be identical. Also, removing OpenOffice.org by hand isn't hard. All the files it installs are in /usr/local/openoffice[version], with a few additional symlinks in /usr/local/bin named openoffice*. - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:46:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B8A16A41F; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from public@troback.com) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2733443D48; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from public@troback.com) Received: from [10.46.150.25] (212-162-182-242.skbbip.com [212.162.182.242]) by mail.gelita.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA8DktRf019514; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:46:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from public@troback.com) Message-ID: <4370AC4A.6020200@troback.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:46:50 +0100 From: Anders Troback User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051108) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jack L." References: <436723F0.9030102@troback.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1166/Mon Nov 7 20:01:45 2005 on mail.gelita.se X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: openoffice.org-2.0.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:46:58 -0000 Sorry for the delay, have been busy... Yes the .openoffice.org2 is created and yes it's writeable. Don't know if this matter but our home drives are mounted over NFS... \\anders Jack L. wrote: > Is your home directory writeable by openoffice? Is there a > .openoffice.org2 directory in your home directory and is that writeable? > > On 11/1/05, *Anders Troback* > wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry if this is a repeting question but I can't find a answer any > where! > > I'm trying to use the openoffice.org-2.0 port on my FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE > and everything are compiling (make LOCALIZED_LANG=sv install) just fine > and when I start openoffice.org the welcome > screen are showning and I > finsh it with my settings and the program are starting and all seams too > work! > > Now to the problem! When I start the program next time the welcome > screen are showing again! The welcome screen are showing everytime! > > > Thanks for your time and thanks for porting OppenOffice.org to > FreeBSD!!! > > Regards > > Anders Trobäck > Sweden > -- > > ============================================ > Microsoft is not the answer. > Microsoft is the question. > And 'No' is the answer! > -------------------------------------------- > Anders Trobäck > http://www.troback.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing > list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > -- ============================================ Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. And 'No' is the answer! -------------------------------------------- Anders Trobäck http://www.troback.com From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 17:44:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB35F16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BAA43D73 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:44:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so572195wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:44:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pGofA8s6DX85ViIN2Hn9lnBaOFgSjyE7HAMkS2B9aXsRo57DnBSF66nSZfucZbS5zf9cuK/2aAChI7/ABFNO6yTJdfhQ7N+s44CM3IBJrCDhZ1u6Aku0rsiVVXhsT80zsOM1vVROZoq1SnclWRI1yXp9ljl8y+ynbnqq3AKHFeo= Received: by 10.70.90.13 with SMTP id n13mr39740wxb; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:35:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.28.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:35:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:35:23 -0300 From: Leonardo Santagostini To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:44:54 -0000 Hi !!! I was compiling OponeOffice 2.0 from ports and then i had this error. Someone can help me? Thanks in advance, Yours, Leonardo Here comes the output of the error checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to openoffice@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/config_office/= config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0. pcleo# ls /var/db/pkg/ Hermes-1.3.3_1 gtksourceview-1.0.1 =20 nas-1.6 ImageMagick-6.0.6.2 gucharmap-gnome-1.4.1 =20 nautilus-media-0.8.0_4 ORBit2-2.10.4 hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 =20 nautilus2-2.6.3_1 OpenEXR-1.2.1 imake-6.7.0_2 =20 net-snmp-5.1.2_1 amsn-0.94 imlib-1.9.14_4 =20 nspr-4.4.1_1 apache-ant-1.6.2 intltool-0.31.2 =20 nss-3.9.2 arts-1.3.0,1 jasper-1.701.0 =20 open-motif-2.2.3 artswrapper-1.2.1 javavmwrapper-1.5 =20 openldap-client-2.2.15 aspell-0.60_2 jbigkit-1.6 =20 p5-Archive-Zip-1.13 atk-1.6.1 jdk-1.4.2p6_4 =20 p5-Compress-Zlib-1.33 autoconf-2.13.000227_5 jpeg-6b_3 =20 p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 automake-1.4.6_1 kde-lite-3.3.0 =20 pango-1.4.1 bitstream-vera-1.10 kdeaccessibility-3.3.0 =20 patch-2.5.4 cdparanoia-3.9.8_7 kdeadmin-3.3.0 =20 pcre-4.5 coreutils-5.2.1 kdeartwork-3.3.0 =20 perl-5.8.5 cups-base-1.1.20.0 kdebase-3.3.0_4 =20 pilot-link-0.11.8_3 docbook-sk-4.1.2_3 kdegames-3.3.0 =20 pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 docbook-xml-4.2_1 kdegraphics-3.3.0 =20 png-1.2.6 docbook-xsl-1.65.1 kdelibs-3.3.0_2 =20 popt-1.7 dri-5.0.2,2 kdemultimedia-3.3.0 =20 python-2.3.4_2 eel2-2.6.2 =20 kdemultimedia-mpeglib_artsplug-3.3.0 qt-3.3.3 eog2-2.6.1_4 kdepim-3.3.0 =20 rpm-3.0.6_9 epiphany-1.2.8 kdeutils-3.3.0 =20 samba-libsmbclient-3.0.7_1 esound-0.2.35_1 lcms-1.13,1 =20 scrollkeeper-0.3.14_1,1 expat-1.95.8 libIDL-0.8.4 =20 sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_2 fam-2.6.9_6 libXft-2.1.6 =20 shared-mime-info-0.15 fileroller-2.6.2,1 libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 =20 speex-1.0.4,1 firefox-0.9.3_1 libaudiofile-0.2.6 =20 startup-notification-0.7 flac-1.1.0_3 libbonobo-2.6.2 =20 t1lib-5.0.1,1 fontconfig-2.2.3,1 libbonoboui-2.6.1 =20 taglib-1.2 freetype2-2.1.7_3 libcroco-0.5.1 =20 tcl-8.4.6_1,1 fribidi-0.10.4_1 libfpx-1.2.0.9 =20 tcllib-1.6_1 gail-1.6.6 libglade2-2.4.0 =20 tcltls-1.5.0 gcalctool-4.3.51,1 libglut-6.0.1 =20 thunderbird-0.7.3_1 gconf-editor-2.6.2,1 libgnome-2.6.1.2 =20 tiff-3.6.1_2 gconf2-2.6.4 libgnomecanvas-2.6.1.1 =20 tk-8.4.6,1 gdbm-1.8.3_1 libgnomeprint-2.6.2 =20 unzip-5.52_2 gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_2 libgnomeprintui-2.6.2 =20 urwfonts-1.0 gedit2-2.6.2_2 libgnomeui-2.6.1.1 =20 vte-0.11.11 gettext-0.13.1_1 libgsf-1.10.1 =20 windowmaker-0.80.2_3 ggv2-2.6.2 libgtkhtml-2.6.2 =20 wmicons-1.0 ghostscript-gnu-7.07_11 libgtop2-2.6.0_1 =20 xchat2-2.4.0 gle-3.0.3 libiconv-1.9.2_1 =20 xearth-1.1 glib-1.2.10_11 libid3tag-0.15.0b_1 =20 xfmail-1.5.5_4 glib-2.4.6_1 libidn-0.5.4 =20 xforms-1.0_3,1 gmake-3.80_2 libmad-0.15.1b =20 xmlcatmgr-2.1 gnome-icon-theme-1.2.3 libmal-0.40 =20 xorg-6.7.0_1 gnome-themes-2.6.3 libmng-1.0.8 =20 xorg-clients-6.7.0_4 gnome2-lite-2.6.2 libmusicbrainz-2.1.1 =20 xorg-documents-6.7.0 gnomeapplets2-2.6.2.1_4 libogg-1.1,3 =20 xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.7.0 gnomeaudio2-2.0.0 librsvg2-2.6.5_1 =20 xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.7.0 gnomecontrolcenter2-2.6.1_3 libslang-1.4.9 =20 xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.7.0 gnomedesktop-2.6.2 libtool-1.3.5_2 =20 xorg-fonts-encodings-6.7.0 gnomehier-1.0_19 libtool-1.5.8 =20 xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.7.0 gnomekeyring-0.2.1_1 libtunepimp-0.3.0_1 =20 xorg-fonts-truetype-6.7.0 gnomemedia2-2.6.2_6 libungif-4.1.3 =20 xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 gnomemimedata-2.4.1_2 libvorbis-1.0.1,3 =20 xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 gnomepanel-2.6.2_1 libwmf-0.2.8.3 =20 xorg-libraries-6.7.0_2 gnomesession-2.6.2 libwnck-2.6.2.1_1 =20 xorg-manpages-6.7.0 gnomesystemmonitor-2.6.0_2 libxklavier-1.03_1,1 =20 xorg-nestserver-6.7.0 gnometerminal-2.6.1_2 libxml2-2.6.13 =20 xorg-printserver-6.7.0 gnomeuserdocs2-2.6.0.1 libxslt-1.1.10 =20 xorg-server-6.7.0_9 gnomeutils2-2.6.2_1,1 linc-1.0.3_2 =20 xorg-vfbserver-6.7.0 gnomevfs2-2.6.2_1 links-2.1.p15,1 =20 xpdf-3.00_3 gnupg-1.2.6 linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.05 =20 xscreensaver-gnome-4.18 gsfonts-8.11_2 linux_base-7.1_7 =20 xterm-196_3 gstreamer-0.8.5 m4-1.4.1 =20 yelp-2.6.2 gstreamer-plugins-0.8.4 mc-4.6.0_13 =20 ymessenger-1.0.4_3,20020902 gtk-1.2.10_12 metacity-2.8.2_1 =20 zip-2.3_1 gtk-2.4.9_1 mozilla-1.7.2_2,2 gtk-engines2-2.2.0_4 mpeg2codec-1.2_1 From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 18:01:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E93016A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEC343D55 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-108-153.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.108.153]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F10AC6A3; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:01:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:01:22 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leonardo Santagostini References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:33 -0000 > and attach the > "/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/config_office/config.log" It might be a good idea to follow this advice and attach the config.log file. Whatever is going wrong, it seems that you don't have lang/gcc-ooo installed. It's a BUILD_DEPENDS, so it should have been installed automatically for you. Try installing that port manually and running make clean && make in editors/openoffice.org-2.0 again. - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 18:17:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEC916A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE76543D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so579651wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hWt00lOVFTVbiNmDjIcJmouNi2xXioaXjrNhTE6r81+j1WnQhXp7uiaMy8XRlQ1xi2n99hHTYzR+7BSYfZ1gO0md7146wJ4AAXqHttNFJzOiQDP4c6LIzmL2rAy0WLNK5zS0RcPZhCGuXrU6eKVqlKROBA0cirZaDs4daRkWyZk= Received: by 10.70.115.18 with SMTP id n18mr1078510wxc; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.28.7 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:17:06 -0300 From: Leonardo Santagostini To: Bartosz Fabianowski In-Reply-To: <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_533_7859857.1131646626320" References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:17:07 -0000 ------=_Part_533_7859857.1131646626320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Upssss Sorry i forgot something, here comes the log Thanks in advance Yours, Leonardo 2005/11/10, Bartosz Fabianowski : > > and attach the > > "/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/config_off= ice/config.log" > > It might be a good idea to follow this advice and attach the config.log > file. > > Whatever is going wrong, it seems that you don't have lang/gcc-ooo > installed. It's a BUILD_DEPENDS, so it should have been installed > automatically for you. Try installing that port manually and running > make clean && make in editors/openoffice.org-2.0 again. > > - Bartosz > -- ------------------------------------------- Leonardo Daniel Santagostini ------=_Part_533_7859857.1131646626320 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="config.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="config.log" VGhpcyBmaWxlIGNvbnRhaW5zIGFueSBtZXNzYWdlcyBwcm9kdWNlZCBieSBjb21waWxlcnMgd2hp bGUKcnVubmluZyBjb25maWd1cmUsIHRvIGFpZCBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgaWYgY29uZmlndXJlIG1ha2Vz IGEgbWlzdGFrZS4KCkl0IHdhcyBjcmVhdGVkIGJ5IGNvbmZpZ3VyZSwgd2hpY2ggd2FzCmdlbmVy YXRlZCBieSBHTlUgQXV0b2NvbmYgMi41OS4gIEludm9jYXRpb24gY29tbWFuZCBsaW5lIHdhcwoK ICAkIC4vY29uZmlndXJlIC0td2l0aC1nbnUtY3A9L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9iaW4vZ2NwIC0td2l0aC1n bnUtcGF0Y2g9L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9iaW4vZ3BhdGNoIC0td2l0aC1lcG09aW50ZXJuYWwgLS13aXRo LXN5c3RlbS1mcmVldHlwZSAtLWVuYWJsZS1jcmFzaGR1bXA9eWVzIC0tZW5hYmxlLXN5bWJvbHM9 U01BTEwgLS13aXRoLWpkay1ob21lPS91c3IvbG9jYWwvamRrMS40LjIgLS13aXRoLWFudC1ob21l PS91c3IvbG9jYWwvYW50IC0tZW5hYmxlLWxpYmFydCAtLWVuYWJsZS1jdXBzPW5vIC0tZW5hYmxl LWJ1aWxkLW1vemlsbGEgLS13aXRoLWxhbmc9ZW4tVVMgLS14LWxpYnJhcmllcz0vdXNyL1gxMVI2 L2xpYiAtLXgtaW5jbHVkZXM9L3Vzci9YMTFSNi9pbmNsdWRlIC0tcHJlZml4PS91c3IvbG9jYWwg LS1idWlsZD1pMzg2LXBvcnRibGQtZnJlZWJzZDUuMwoKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tICMjCiMjIFBsYXRm b3JtLiAjIwojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKCmhvc3RuYW1lID0gcGNsZW8KdW5hbWUgLW0gPSBpMzg2 CnVuYW1lIC1yID0gNS4zLVJFTEVBU0UKdW5hbWUgLXMgPSBGcmVlQlNECnVuYW1lIC12ID0gRnJl ZUJTRCA1LjMtUkVMRUFTRSAjMDogRnJpIE5vdiAgNSAwNDoxOToxOCBVVEMgMjAwNCAgICAgcm9v dEBoYXJsb3cuY3NlLmJ1ZmZhbG8uZWR1Oi91c3Ivb2JqL3Vzci9zcmMvc3lzL0dFTkVSSUMgCgov dXNyL2Jpbi91bmFtZSAtcCA9IGkzODYKL2Jpbi91bmFtZSAtWCAgICAgPSB1bmtub3duCgovYmlu L2FyY2ggICAgICAgICAgICAgID0gdW5rbm93bgovdXNyL2Jpbi9hcmNoIC1rICAgICAgID0gdW5r bm93bgovdXNyL2NvbnZleC9nZXRzeXNpbmZvID0gdW5rbm93bgpob3N0aW5mbyAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgID0gdW5rbm93bgovYmluL21hY2hpbmUgICAgICAgICAgID0gdW5rbm93bgovdXNyL2Jpbi9v c2xldmVsICAgICAgID0gdW5rbm93bgovYmluL3VuaXZlcnNlICAgICAgICAgID0gdW5rbm93bgoK UEFUSDogL3NiaW4KUEFUSDogL2JpbgpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL3NiaW4KUEFUSDogL3Vzci9iaW4KUEFU SDogL3Vzci9nYW1lcwpQQVRIOiAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL3NiaW4KUEFUSDogL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9iaW4K UEFUSDogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9iaW4KUEFUSDogL3Jvb3QvYmluCgoKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMK IyMgQ29yZSB0ZXN0cy4gIyMKIyMgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMzMzOiBjaGVj a2luZyBmb3IgZ2F3awpjb25maWd1cmU6MjM2MjogcmVzdWx0OiBubwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjMzMzog Y2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIG1hd2sKY29uZmlndXJlOjIzNjI6IHJlc3VsdDogbm8KY29uZmlndXJlOjIz MzM6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBuYXdrCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMzQ5OiBmb3VuZCAvdXNyL2Jpbi9uYXdr CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMzU5OiByZXN1bHQ6IG5hd2sKY29uZmlndXJlOjIzNzE6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZv ciBuYXdrCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyMzg5OiBmb3VuZCAvdXNyL2Jpbi9uYXdrCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNDAx OiByZXN1bHQ6IC91c3IvYmluL25hd2sKY29uZmlndXJlOjI0MTg6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBzZWQK Y29uZmlndXJlOjI0MzY6IGZvdW5kIC91c3IvYmluL3NlZApjb25maWd1cmU6MjQ0ODogcmVzdWx0 OiAvdXNyL2Jpbi9zZWQKY29uZmlndXJlOjI0NjQ6IGNoZWNraW5nIGZvciBzb2xlbnYgZW52aXJv bm1lbnQKY29uZmlndXJlOjI0Njg6IHJlc3VsdDogZGVmYXVsdApjb25maWd1cmU6MjUyNjogY2hl Y2tpbmcgYnVpbGQgc3lzdGVtIHR5cGUKY29uZmlndXJlOjI1NDQ6IHJlc3VsdDogaTM4Ni1wb3J0 YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKY29uZmlndXJlOjI1NTI6IGNoZWNraW5nIGhvc3Qgc3lzdGVtIHR5cGUK Y29uZmlndXJlOjI1NjY6IHJlc3VsdDogaTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKY29uZmlndXJl OjI1NzQ6IGNoZWNraW5nIHRhcmdldCBzeXN0ZW0gdHlwZQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjU4ODogcmVzdWx0 OiBpMzg2LXBvcnRibGQtZnJlZWJzZDUuMwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjY4MzogY2hlY2tpbmcgdGhlIEZy ZWVCU0Qgb3BlcmF0aW5nIHN5c3RlbSByZWxlYXNlCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyNjkwOiByZXN1bHQ6IGZv dW5kIE9TVkVSU0lPTj01MDMwMDEKY29uZmlndXJlOjI2OTI6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoaWNoIHRocmVh ZCBsaWJyYXJ5IHRvIHVzZQpjb25maWd1cmU6MjcwNDogcmVzdWx0OiAtcHRocmVhZApjb25maWd1 cmU6Mjc0NTogY2hlY2tpbmcgd2hldGhlciB0byBlbmFibGUgY3Jhc2hkdW1wIGZlYXR1cmUKY29u ZmlndXJlOjI3NTI6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyODA0OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVy IHRvIGRvIGEgZGVidWcgYnVpbGQKY29uZmlndXJlOjI4MTU6IHJlc3VsdDogbm8KY29uZmlndXJl OjI4MjA6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoZXRoZXIgdG8gYnVpbGQgd2l0aCBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGRlYnVnIHV0 aWxpdGllcwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjgzMjogcmVzdWx0OiBubywgZnVsbCBwcm9kdWN0IGJ1aWxkCmNv bmZpZ3VyZToyODM5OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRvIGluY2x1ZGUgc3ltYm9scyBpbnRvIGZp bmFsIGJ1aWxkCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyODY3OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRvIGVuYWJsZSBuYXRp dmUgQ1VQUyBzdXBwb3J0CmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyODc1OiByZXN1bHQ6IG5vCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyODgw OiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRvIGVuYWJsZSBmb250Y29uZmlnIHN1cHBvcnQKY29uZmlndXJl OjI4ODQ6IHJlc3VsdDogeWVzCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyODkzOiBjaGVja2luZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRvIGVu YWJsZSBmaWx0ZXJzIGZvciBsZWdhY3kgYmluYXJ5IGZpbGUgZm9ybWF0cyAoU3Rhck9mZmljZSA1 LjIpCmNvbmZpZ3VyZToyOTAyOiByZXN1bHQ6IHllcwpjb25maWd1cmU6MjkzNTogY2hlY2tpbmcg d2hldGhlciB0byB1c2UgUlBBVEggaW4gc2hhcmVkIGxpYnJhcmllcwpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjk0Mjog cmVzdWx0OiB5ZXMKY29uZmlndXJlOjI5NDY6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoZXRoZXIgdG8gaW5jbHVkZSBN eVNwZWxsIGRpY3Rpb25hcmllcwpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjk0OTogcmVzdWx0OiB5ZXMKY29uZmlndXJl OjI5NjA6IGNoZWNraW5nIHdoaWNoIHNoZWxsIHRvIHVzZQpjb25maWd1cmU6Mjk5NTogcmVzdWx0 OiB0Y3NoCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMDAzOiBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgdGNzaApjb25maWd1cmU6MzAyMTog Zm91bmQgL2Jpbi90Y3NoCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMDMzOiByZXN1bHQ6IC9iaW4vdGNzaApjb25maWd1 cmU6MzA1NDogY2hlY2tpbmcgZ2NjIGhvbWUKY29uZmlndXJlOjMwNjE6IHJlc3VsdDogL3Vzcgpj b25maWd1cmU6MzExODogY2hlY2tpbmcgZm9yIGdjYwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzE0NDogcmVzdWx0OiBn Y2Mtb29vCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMzg4OiBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgQyBjb21waWxlciB2ZXJzaW9uCmNv bmZpZ3VyZTozMzkxOiBnY2Mtb29vIC0tdmVyc2lvbiA8L2Rldi9udWxsID4mNQpnY2Mtb29vOiBu b3QgZm91bmQKY29uZmlndXJlOjMzOTQ6ICQ/ID0gMTI3CmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozMzk2OiBnY2Mtb29v IC12IDwvZGV2L251bGwgPiY1CmdjYy1vb286IG5vdCBmb3VuZApjb25maWd1cmU6MzM5OTogJD8g PSAxMjcKY29uZmlndXJlOjM0MDE6IGdjYy1vb28gLVYgPC9kZXYvbnVsbCA+JjUKZ2NjLW9vbzog bm90IGZvdW5kCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozNDA0OiAkPyA9IDEyNwpjb25maWd1cmU6MzQyNzogY2hlY2tp bmcgZm9yIEMgY29tcGlsZXIgZGVmYXVsdCBvdXRwdXQgZmlsZSBuYW1lCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozNDMw OiBnY2Mtb29vIC1PIC1waXBlICAgIGNvbmZ0ZXN0LmMgID4mNQpnY2Mtb29vOiBub3QgZm91bmQK Y29uZmlndXJlOjM0MzM6ICQ/ID0gMTI3CmNvbmZpZ3VyZTogZmFpbGVkIHByb2dyYW0gd2FzOgp8 IC8qIGNvbmZkZWZzLmguICAqLwp8IAp8ICNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9OQU1FICIiCnwgI2RlZmlu ZSBQQUNLQUdFX1RBUk5BTUUgIiIKfCAjZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tBR0VfVkVSU0lPTiAiIgp8ICNkZWZp bmUgUEFDS0FHRV9TVFJJTkcgIiIKfCAjZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tBR0VfQlVHUkVQT1JUICIiCnwgLyog ZW5kIGNvbmZkZWZzLmguICAqLwp8IAp8IGludAp8IG1haW4gKCkKfCB7CnwgCnwgICA7CnwgICBy ZXR1cm4gMDsKfCB9CmNvbmZpZ3VyZTozNDcxOiBlcnJvcjogQyBjb21waWxlciBjYW5ub3QgY3Jl YXRlIGV4ZWN1dGFibGVzClNlZSBgY29uZmlnLmxvZycgZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscy4KCiMjIC0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIyMKIyMgQ2FjaGUgdmFyaWFibGVzLiAjIwojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tICMjCgphY19jdl9lbnZfQ1hYRkxBR1NfdmFsdWU9Jy1PIC1waXBlJwphY19jdl9lbnZfQ1hY Q1BQX3NldD0KYWNfY3ZfZW52X0xERkxBR1Nfc2V0PQphY19jdl9lbnZfQ0ZMQUdTX3NldD1zZXQK bHRfY3Zfc3lzX21heF9jbWRfbGVuPTY1NTM2CmFjX2N2X2Vudl9DUFBfdmFsdWU9CmFjX2N2X2Vu dl9DUFBGTEFHU19zZXQ9CmFjX2N2X2Vudl9DWFhfc2V0PXNldAphY19jdl9wYXRoX1NFRD0vdXNy L2Jpbi9zZWQKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2hvc3RfYWxpYXNfc2V0PQphY19jdl9lbnZfYnVpbGRfYWxpYXNf c2V0PXNldAphY19jdl9lbnZfQ1hYQ1BQX3ZhbHVlPQphY19jdl9lbnZfTERGTEFHU192YWx1ZT0K YWNfY3ZfZW52X3RhcmdldF9hbGlhc19zZXQ9CmFjX2N2X2hvc3RfYWxpYXM9aTM4Ni1wb3J0Ymxk LWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKYWNfY3ZfcGF0aF9BV0s9L3Vzci9iaW4vbmF3awphY19jdl9lbnZfQ0ZMQUdT X3ZhbHVlPSctTyAtcGlwZSAnCmFjX2N2X2Vudl9DQ19zZXQ9c2V0CmFjX2N2X3BhdGhfVENTSD0v YmluL3Rjc2gKYWNfY3ZfYnVpbGRfYWxpYXM9aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKYWNfY3Zf ZW52X0NQUEZMQUdTX3ZhbHVlPQphY19jdl90YXJnZXRfYWxpYXM9aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVi c2Q1LjMKYWNfY3ZfZW52X0NYWEZMQUdTX3NldD1zZXQKYWNfY3ZfZW52X0NYWF92YWx1ZT1nKyst b29vCmFjX2N2X2hvc3Q9aTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2hvc3RfYWxp YXNfdmFsdWU9CmFjX2N2X2J1aWxkPWkzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNkNS4zCmFjX2N2X3Byb2df QVdLPW5hd2sKYWNfY3ZfZW52X2J1aWxkX2FsaWFzX3ZhbHVlPWkzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNk NS4zCmFjX2N2X3Byb2dfYWNfY3RfQ0M9Z2NjLW9vbwphY19jdl90YXJnZXQ9aTM4Ni1wb3J0Ymxk LWZyZWVic2Q1LjMKYWNfY3ZfZW52X3RhcmdldF9hbGlhc192YWx1ZT0KYWNfY3ZfZW52X0NDX3Zh bHVlPWdjYy1vb28KYWNfY3ZfZW52X0NQUF9zZXQ9CgojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwoj IyBPdXRwdXQgdmFyaWFibGVzLiAjIwojIyAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSAjIwoKQU5UPScnCkFO VF9IT01FPScnCkFOVF9MSUI9JycKQVNNX0hPTUU9JycKQVdLPScvdXNyL2Jpbi9uYXdrJwpBV1RM SUI9JycKQklTT049JycKQlVJTERfRE1BS0U9JycKQlVJTERfRVBNPScnCkJVSUxEX01PWkFCPScn CkJVSUxEX1RZUEU9J09PbyBFWFQgQklORklMVEVSIERJQ1RJT05BUklFUycKQlVJTERfVkVSX1NU UklORz0nJwpDQz0nZ2NjLW9vbycKQ0ZMQUdTPSctTyAtcGlwZSAnCkNPTUVYPScnCkNPTVBBVEg9 JycKQ1BQPScnCkNQUEZMQUdTPScnCkNSWVBUX0xJTks9JycKQ1NDX1BBVEg9JycKQ1VSTENPTkZJ Rz0nJwpDVVJMX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpDVVJMX0xJQlM9JycKQ1VTVE9NX0lNQUdFX1NFVFM9JycKQ1hY PSdnKystb29vJwpDWFhDUFA9JycKQ1hYRkxBR1M9Jy1PIC1waXBlJwpDWUdXSU5fUEFUSD0nJwpE Ql9JTkNMVURFUz0nJwpEQl9KQVI9JycKREJfVkVSU0lPTj0nJwpERUZTPScnCkRJUkVDVFhTREtf SE9NRT0nJwpESVJFQ1RYU0RLX0xJQj0nJwpETUFLRT0nJwpEUEtHPScnCkVDSE9fQz0nJwpFQ0hP X049Jy1uJwpFQ0hPX1Q9JycKRUdSRVA9JycKRU5BQkxFX0NSQVNIRFVNUD0nVFJVRScKRU5BQkxF X0NVUFM9JycKRU5BQkxFX0RFQlVHPSdGQUxTRScKRU5BQkxFX0RJUkVDVFg9JycKRU5BQkxFX0VW T0FCMj0nJwpFTkFCTEVfRk9OVENPTkZJRz0nVFJVRScKRU5BQkxFX0dOT01FVkZTPScnCkVOQUJM RV9HVEs9JycKRU5BQkxFX0tERT0nJwpFTkFCTEVfTkFTPScnCkVOQUJMRV9QQVNGPScnCkVOQUJM RV9SUEFUSD0neWVzJwpFTkFCTEVfU1RBVElDX0dUSz0nJwpFTkFCTEVfU1lNQk9MUz0nU01BTEwn CkVOQUJMRV9WQ1RLPScnCkVQTT0nJwpFWENFUFRJT05TPScnCkVYRUVYVD0nJwpFWFRSQV9ET1RO RVRfRklMRVM9JycKRkxFWD0nJwpGUkFNRV9IT01FPScnCkZSRUVUWVBFX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpGUkVF VFlQRV9MSUJTPScnCkdDQ1ZFUj0nJwpHQ0NfSE9NRT0nL3VzcicKR0NPTkZfQ0ZMQUdTPScnCkdD T05GX0xJQlM9JycKR0RLUElYQlVGX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpHREtQSVhCVUZfTElCUz0nJwpHTk9NRVZG U19DRkxBR1M9JycKR05PTUVWRlNfTElCUz0nJwpHTlVDUD0nJwpHTlVNQUtFPScnCkdOVVBBVENI PScnCkdPQkpFQ1RfQ0ZMQUdTPScnCkdPQkpFQ1RfTElCUz0nJwpHVEtfQ0ZMQUdTPScnCkdUS19M SUJTPScnCkdYWF9JTkNMVURFX1BBVEg9JycKSEFWRV9HQ0NfVklTSUJJTElUWV9GRUFUVVJFPScn CkpBVkFDQUNIRT0nJwpKQVZBQ09NUElMRVI9JycKSkFWQURPQz0nJwpKQVZBSU5URVJQUkVURVI9 JycKSkFWQV9IT01FPScnCkpESz0nJwpLREVfQ0ZMQUdTPScnCktERV9MSUJTPScnCkxBTkc9J0Mn CkxERkxBR1M9JycKTElCQVJUX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpMSUJBUlRfTElCUz0nJwpMSUJPQkpTPScnCkxJ QlM9JycKTElCU05fQ0ZMQUdTPScnCkxJQlNOX0xJQlM9JycKTElCV1BEX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpMSUJX UERfTElCUz0nJwpMSUJYTUxfQ0ZMQUdTPScnCkxJQlhNTF9MSUJTPScnCkxPQ0FMX1NPTEVOVj0n REVGQVVMVCcKTE9DQUxfU09MVkVSPScnCkxUTElCT0JKUz0nJwpNSURMX1BBVEg9JycKTUxfRVhF PScnCk1PQz0nJwpNT1pJTExBWFBDT01fQ0ZMQUdTPScnCk1PWklMTEFYUENPTV9MSUJTPScnCk1P WklMTEFfVE9PTEtJVD0nJwpNT1pJTExBX1ZFUlNJT049JycKTU9aTElCUkVRX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpN T1pMSUJSRVFfTElCUz0nJwpNT1pfSU5DPScnCk1PWl9MREFQX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpNT1pfTElCPScn Ck1PWl9MSUJfWFBDT009JycKTU9aX05TU19DRkxBR1M9JycKTU9aX05TU19MSUJTPScnCk1TUERC X1BBVEg9JycKTVlTUEVMTF9DRkxBR1M9JycKTVlTUEVMTF9MSUJTPScnCk5BU19JTkNMVURFUz0n JwpORU9OX0NGTEFHUz0nJwpORU9OX0xJQlM9JycKTkVUVE9PTEtJVD0nJwpOTUFLRV9QQVRIPScn Ck5TSVNfUEFUSD0nJwpPQkpFWFQ9JycKT1NWRVJTSU9OPSc1MDMwMDEnClBBQ0tBR0VfQlVHUkVQ T1JUPScnClBBQ0tBR0VfTkFNRT0nJwpQQUNLQUdFX1NUUklORz0nJwpQQUNLQUdFX1RBUk5BTUU9 JycKUEFDS0FHRV9WRVJTSU9OPScnClBBTV9MSU5LPScnClBBVENIPScnClBBVEhfU0VQQVJBVE9S PSc6JwpQRVJMPScnClBLR0ZPUk1BVD0nJwpQS0dNSz0nJwpQS0dfQ09ORklHPScnClBST0RVQ1Q9 J2Z1bGwnClBST0VYVD0nLnBybycKUFJPRlVMTFNXSVRDSD0ncHJvZHVjdD1mdWxsJwpQU0RLX0hP TUU9JycKUFRIUkVBRF9DRkxBR1M9JycKUFRIUkVBRF9MSUJTPSctcHRocmVhZCcKUFlUSE9OPScn ClBZVEhPTl9DRkxBR1M9JycKUFlUSE9OX0VYRUNfUFJFRklYPScnClBZVEhPTl9MSUJTPScnClBZ VEhPTl9QTEFURk9STT0nJwpQWVRIT05fUFJFRklYPScnClBZVEhPTl9WRVJTSU9OPScnClJQTT0n JwpTQUJMT1RDT05GSUc9JycKU0FCTE9UX0xJQlM9JycKU0NQREVGUz0nJwpTRUQ9Jy91c3IvYmlu L3NlZCcKU0hFTEw9Jy9iaW4vc2gnClNPTEFSX0pBVkE9JycKU09VUkNFVkVSU0lPTj0nT09PNjgw JwpTVExQT1JUND0nJwpTWVNURU1fQk9PU1Q9JycKU1lTVEVNX0NVUkw9JycKU1lTVEVNX0RCPScn ClNZU1RFTV9FWFBBVD0nJwpTWVNURU1fRlJFRVRZUEU9JycKU1lTVEVNX0hZUEg9JycKU1lTVEVN X0pQRUc9JycKU1lTVEVNX0xJQldQRD0nJwpTWVNURU1fTElCWE1MPScnClNZU1RFTV9NT1pJTExB PScnClNZU1RFTV9NU1BBQ0s9JycKU1lTVEVNX01ZU1BFTEw9JycKU1lTVEVNX01ZVEhFUz0nJwpT WVNURU1fTkFTPScnClNZU1RFTV9ORU9OPScnClNZU1RFTV9PREJDX0hFQURFUlM9JycKU1lTVEVN X1BPUlRBVURJTz0nJwpTWVNURU1fUFlUSE9OPScnClNZU1RFTV9TQUJMT1Q9JycKU1lTVEVNX1NB TkVfSEVBREVSPScnClNZU1RFTV9TTkRGSUxFPScnClNZU1RFTV9TVERMSUJTPScnClNZU1RFTV9Y UkVOREVSX0hFQURFUlM9JycKU1lTVEVNX1pMSUI9JycKVENTSD0nL2JpbicKVVBEPSc2ODAnClVT RV9TSEVMTD0ndGNzaCcKVVNFX1NZU1RFTV9TVEw9JycKVVNFX1hJTkVSQU1BPScnClZDX1NUQU5E QVJEPScnCldJVEhfQklORklMVEVSPSdZRVMnCldJVEhfRElDVD0nJwpXSVRIX0ZPTlRPT089JycK V0lUSF9GT05UUz0nJwpXSVRIX0dQQz0nJwpXSVRIX0xBTkc9JycKV0lUSF9MSUJBUlQ9JycKV0lU SF9MSUJTTj0nJwpXSVRIX01JTkdXSU49JzAnCldJVEhfTU9aSUxMQT0nJwpXSVRIX01ZU1BFTExf RElDVFM9J1lFUycKV0lUSF9PUEVOTERBUD0nJwpYSU5DPScnClhJTkVSQU1BX0xJTks9JycKWExJ Qj0nJwpYTUtNRj0nJwpYUkVOREVSX0xJTks9JycKWFNMVFBST0M9JycKWF9DRkxBR1M9JycKWF9F WFRSQV9MSUJTPScnClhfTElCUz0nJwpYX1BSRV9MSUJTPScnClpJUD0nJwpaSVBfSE9NRT0nJwpf Y2M9JycKYWNfY3RfQ0M9J2djYy1vb28nCmFjX2N0X0NYWD0nJwpiaW5kaXI9JyR7ZXhlY19wcmVm aXh9L2JpbicKYnVpbGQ9J2kzODYtcG9ydGJsZC1mcmVlYnNkNS4zJwpidWlsZF9hbGlhcz0naTM4 Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMnCmJ1aWxkX2NwdT0naTM4NicKYnVpbGRfb3M9J2ZyZWVic2Q1 LjMnCmJ1aWxkX3ZlbmRvcj0ncG9ydGJsZCcKZGF0YWRpcj0nJHtwcmVmaXh9L3NoYXJlJwpleGVj X3ByZWZpeD0nTk9ORScKaG9zdD0naTM4Ni1wb3J0YmxkLWZyZWVic2Q1LjMnCmhvc3RfYWxpYXM9 JycKaG9zdF9jcHU9J2kzODYnCmhvc3Rfb3M9J2ZyZWVic2Q1LjMnCmhvc3RfdmVuZG9yPSdwb3J0 YmxkJwppbmNsdWRlZGlyPScke3ByZWZpeH0vaW5jbHVkZScKaW5mb2Rpcj0nJHtwcmVmaXh9L2lu Zm8nCmxpYmRpcj0nJHtleGVjX3ByZWZpeH0vbGliJwpsaWJleGVjZGlyPScke2V4ZWNfcHJlZml4 fS9saWJleGVjJwpsb2NhbHN0YXRlZGlyPScke3ByZWZpeH0vdmFyJwptYW5kaXI9JyR7cHJlZml4 fS9tYW4nCm9sZGluY2x1ZGVkaXI9Jy91c3IvaW5jbHVkZScKcGtncHlleGVjZGlyPScnCnBrZ3B5 dGhvbmRpcj0nJwpwcmVmaXg9Jy91c3IvbG9jYWwnCnByb2dyYW1fdHJhbnNmb3JtX25hbWU9J3Ms eCx4LCcKcHlleGVjZGlyPScnCnB5dGhvbmRpcj0nJwpzYmluZGlyPScke2V4ZWNfcHJlZml4fS9z YmluJwpzaGFyZWRzdGF0ZWRpcj0nJHtwcmVmaXh9L2NvbScKc3lzY29uZmRpcj0nJHtwcmVmaXh9 L2V0YycKdGFyZ2V0PSdpMzg2LXBvcnRibGQtZnJlZWJzZDUuMycKdGFyZ2V0X2FsaWFzPScnCnRh cmdldF9jcHU9J2kzODYnCnRhcmdldF9vcz0nZnJlZWJzZDUuMycKdGFyZ2V0X3ZlbmRvcj0ncG9y dGJsZCcKCiMjIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tICMjCiMjIGNvbmZkZWZzLmguICMjCiMjIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0t ICMjCgojZGVmaW5lIFBBQ0tBR0VfQlVHUkVQT1JUICIiCiNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9OQU1FICIi CiNkZWZpbmUgUEFDS0FHRV9TVFJJTkcgIiIKI2RlZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX1RBUk5BTUUgIiIKI2Rl ZmluZSBQQUNLQUdFX1ZFUlNJT04gIiIKCmNvbmZpZ3VyZTogZXhpdCA3Nwo= ------=_Part_533_7859857.1131646626320-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 18:39:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A961A16A421 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C1743D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-108-153.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.108.153]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75007401B; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:39:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:39:16 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leonardo Santagostini References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:39:19 -0000 Lines 94 ff of configure.log: configure:3118: checking for gcc configure:3144: result: gcc-ooo configure:3388: checking for C compiler version configure:3391: gcc-ooo --version &5 gcc-ooo: not found As you can see, the configure script correctly determines that it should be using gcc-ooo as the compiler. But when it tries to invoke the compiler, the executable (/usr/local/bin/gcc-ooo) is not found. It really seems to me that something odd happened to your gcc-ooo installation, i.e. it got deinstalled improperly at some point in the past and the ports framework is thinking it's still there. As I said in my previous mail, try this (as root): cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc-ooo make clean && make && make install && make clean cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0 make clean && make HTH - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 19:09:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738C116A421 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:09:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F59D43D9D for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so597766wxd for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:09:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kk9zch+zH0i8y+784yeSXULevPpXUASd6XSx7ZEs/mWDzY8DjrSSCH0PZ9JbsiYJrAzZ0WFyNkKWNLjlpldGJMk6DoCBubh/35tE227viLm50n702fevhETkzjt9GbFSmhIpDCYAElkKzbO6F+COGtgWBkfZ/ksdS2q6y93WklM= Received: by 10.64.10.8 with SMTP id 8mr1250457qbj; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.74.17 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:53:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ab7eeeb0511101053x2373886av@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:53:02 -0300 From: Leonardo Santagostini To: Bartosz Fabianowski In-Reply-To: <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:09:57 -0000 Ok, i will try it. Thanks in Advance After all i will tell to the group if it worked or not. Yours, Leonardo 2005/11/10, Bartosz Fabianowski : > Lines 94 ff of configure.log: > > configure:3118: checking for gcc > configure:3144: result: gcc-ooo > configure:3388: checking for C compiler version > configure:3391: gcc-ooo --version &5 > gcc-ooo: not found > > As you can see, the configure script correctly determines that it should > be using gcc-ooo as the compiler. But when it tries to invoke the > compiler, the executable (/usr/local/bin/gcc-ooo) is not found. It > really seems to me that something odd happened to your gcc-ooo > installation, i.e. it got deinstalled improperly at some point in the > past and the ports framework is thinking it's still there. As I said in > my previous mail, try this (as root): > > cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc-ooo > make clean && make && make install && make clean > cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0 > make clean && make > > HTH > - Bartosz > -- ------------------------------------------- Leonardo Daniel Santagostini From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 19:35:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A216A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:35:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E9643D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so635551wri for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:35:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VpXm56YBy1j1vU+Tn5NFillfgVppzPpE64e+lWjsstjIDbzWFSvTvzV2p6gPiQSzYbOMAR+flNJDKKAIDK7Ghu635HGyQvM3M3DdEuxQ4LQEx41FDQjBuawxnH5srKHTdfSQfQ9lgcgsktosVAnrQMnPY4is+NvrKGlcrqFTWW8= Received: by 10.65.233.8 with SMTP id k8mr1304375qbr; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:35:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.74.17 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:35:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ab7eeeb0511101135x417c1e0o@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:35:43 -0300 From: Leonardo Santagostini To: Bartosz Fabianowski In-Reply-To: <9ab7eeeb0511101053x2373886av@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101053x2373886av@mail.gmail.com> Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:35:45 -0000 It seems that in my default ports installation the gcc-oo port doesnt come, but going into www.freebsd.org/ports i got it. Now im compiling in the right way. Thanks Leonardo 2005/11/10, Leonardo Santagostini : > Ok, i will try it. > > Thanks in Advance > After all i will tell to the group if it worked or not. > > Yours, > Leonardo > 2005/11/10, Bartosz Fabianowski : > > Lines 94 ff of configure.log: > > > > configure:3118: checking for gcc > > configure:3144: result: gcc-ooo > > configure:3388: checking for C compiler version > > configure:3391: gcc-ooo --version &5 > > gcc-ooo: not found > > > > As you can see, the configure script correctly determines that it shoul= d > > be using gcc-ooo as the compiler. But when it tries to invoke the > > compiler, the executable (/usr/local/bin/gcc-ooo) is not found. It > > really seems to me that something odd happened to your gcc-ooo > > installation, i.e. it got deinstalled improperly at some point in the > > past and the ports framework is thinking it's still there. As I said in > > my previous mail, try this (as root): > > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc-ooo > > make clean && make && make install && make clean > > cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0 > > make clean && make > > > > HTH > > - Bartosz > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------- > Leonardo Daniel Santagostini > -- ------------------------------------------- Leonardo Daniel Santagostini From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 19:46:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5E16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FBF43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-108-153.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.108.153]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC12292395 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:46:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4373A385.1000400@chillt.de> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:46:13 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101053x2373886av@mail.gmail.com> <9ab7eeeb0511101135x417c1e0o@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab7eeeb0511101135x417c1e0o@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:17 -0000 > It seems that in my default ports installation the gcc-oo port doesnt > come lang/gcc-ooo was created by Maho on 16th December 2004. It should be present on your system if you have cvsupped ports or run portsnap after that date. It it's not there, you should check what's wrong with your ports tree. Maybe your cvsup refuse file is too strict or the supfile does not specify that you want ports-all? - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 19:36:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE71F16A41F for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgilaard@yahoo.com) Received: from web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62DC043D45 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgilaard@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 72482 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Nov 2005 19:36:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WhV+kNUB9QtnYmG0ahjsGn710fqXHTGf84a8ECUvmsD05NLQqiLakyUdDV9tx2GZFHqjLAyT3JyUjkrVA18pKlePo4jcR+AU5j/EnLai+HWDQ0YZXP1IYk4Phb9612G5DAaAOrHko0IvJ4t/3ApPxE9Z+p5VCzF23ySjsHiUhNc= ; Message-ID: <20051112193603.72480.qmail@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [83.160.155.248] by web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:36:03 PST Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:36:03 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Gilaard To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: "OpenOffice.org 2.0" package for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:36:04 -0000 Hi there, my name is Robert Gilaard and I'm having difficulties to install the opnoffice.org 2.0 package on freebsd. I get the error message that the package can't be found from the ftp site if I issue: pkg_add -r {openoffice.org-2.0, openoffice.org,openoffice} What can I do to solve this? I'm running freebsd 6, no java and a i386 arch. Thanks in advanced __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 19:55:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA3B16A449 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538DB43D45 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:55:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-109-173.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.109.173]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239AB1DC69; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:54:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43764898.90808@chillt.de> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:55:04 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Gilaard References: <20051112193603.72480.qmail@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051112193603.72480.qmail@web34505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "OpenOffice.org 2.0" package for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:55:13 -0000 Hi There currently seems to be no OpenOffice.org packages on FreeBSD's mirrors. Just use a package from good-day.net. The default American English version is here: ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.0/FreeBSD6/OOo_2.0.0_FreeBSD60Intel_install_en-US.tbz For internationalized builds, browse this directory: ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.0/FreeBSD6/ HTH - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 20:34:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C96F16A41F; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19EB43D53; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jACKYj6f019731; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:45 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jACKYjLO019727; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:45 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:45 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200511122034.jACKYjLO019727@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88898: Openoffice 2.0 broken save as X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:34:46 -0000 Synopsis: Openoffice 2.0 broken save as Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->openoffice Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 20:34:34 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=88898