From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 02:09:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBE016A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:09:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from keylime.silverwraith.com (keylime.silverwraith.com [69.55.228.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9555743D49 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) Received: from keylime.silverwraith.com ([69.55.228.10]) by keylime.silverwraith.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQFVt-0004Oc-OZ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:09:25 -0700 Received: (from avleen@localhost)j3Q29Oda016896; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:09:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) X-Authentication-Warning: keylime.silverwraith.com: avleen set sender to lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com using -f Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:09:24 -0700 From: Avleen Vig To: Danny Pansters Message-ID: <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com> References: <20050412213328.GC1953@lava.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050417185631.05349ee0@localhost> <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:09:27 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this > autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be > long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will > reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it? Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ?