From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 28 10:57:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7016A41F; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:57:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8E943D45; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1E9Kpf-0002Dm-OJ; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:56:11 +0400 To: Ian Moore References: <200508281014.29868.imoore@swiftdsl.com.au> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:56:11 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200508281014.29868.imoore@swiftdsl.com.au> (Ian Moore's message of "Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930") Message-ID: <87188868@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, trevor@freebsd.org, secteam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Arcoread7 secutiry vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:57:49 -0000 Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85093, the > upgrade to 7.0.1 is suppoed to fix the problem, but according to > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/portaudit/02bc9b7c-e019-11d9-a8bd-000cf18bbe54.html > and Adobe's web site at http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/331710.html, > the problem exists in 7.0.1 as well, but is fixed in 7.0.2. > I'm just wondering who is right here, or am I missing something? It looks like you missed the platfom to pay attention to. For Linux and Solaris "users should upgrade to Adobe Reader 7.0.1"... WBR -- bsam