From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 08:23:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F3B16A41F; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 08:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326DB43D45; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 08:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j848NuXS021461; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:23:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j848Ns3H021460; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:23:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:23:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20050904082354.GH20880@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050819171555.GA45748@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050820025336.GA94049@xor.obsecurity.org> <3DBF403C-80AA-46B4-A57B-8B78F033E368@xcllnt.net> <20050820182755.GA57524@xor.obsecurity.org> <9D6502D2-02E7-4BAE-B3C1-AA6D4613C8BC@xcllnt.net> <20050820190957.GA66426@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: marcel@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kgdb still broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:24:00 -0000 On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:31:02PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Aug 20, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>What exactly is unreliable about backtraces in kgdb? > > > >Wih gdb53 I see the following: ... > >While the kgdb output is useless: ... > I see. As I said, kgdb cannot yet unwind across trapframes. Other ... > platforms and merged into gdb. I don't see a point in fixing > backtraces at the cost of the partial threading support we have > now. In other words: it requires too much work for me to embark > on it right now. So you removed our working GDB 5.3-based kgdb and replaced it with something mostly useless. That's progress. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)