From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 02:01:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C198916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:01:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707E743D5A for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FEA1DD62A; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:01:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01926-13; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D8C1DD57E; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4461C00717; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:46 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:00:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> <200502250827.28069.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200502250827.28069.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502270300.45975.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: NO_LATEST_LINK in imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:01:02 -0000 On Friday 25 of February 2005 08:27, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Monday 21 of February 2005 02:44, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed? It's not going > > to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on > > any given branch. > > Sure, I'll remove it then :) Erm, while doing this I noticed that imake-4 and imake-6 both have the same UNIQUENAME (even before removing LATEST_LINK). Is this also not concern given there is no conflict or should different uniquenames be specified (imake-4 and imake-6)? Dejan