From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 01:47:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FD716A420 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:47:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lankfordandrew@charter.net) Received: from mxsf33.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf33.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF74F43D6A for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lankfordandrew@charter.net) Received: from mxip30a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip30a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.189]) by mxsf33.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAD1ktZZ007395 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:46:56 -0500 Received: from 24-179-96-010.dhcp.snfr.nc.charter.com (HELO [192.168.15.100]) ([24.179.96.10]) by mxip30a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2005 20:46:55 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,322,1125892800"; d="scan'208"; a="424909199:sNHT19322378" Message-ID: <43769B05.5000801@charter.net> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:46:45 -0500 From: Andrew Lankford User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: xdm writes to /var/run/utmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:47:00 -0000 Does anyone know why xdm writes to /var/run/utmp on its own without even using sessreg in it Xstartup or similar configuration files (contrary to what the man page says)? Perhaps some people think that having this sort of line in the output of who utility as being useful: andrew :0 Nov 12 20:15 I don't, because it confuses other utilties like wall: wall: /dev/:0: No such file or directory ...and both sessreg and the +ut option for *term work just great (if you want them). So why do it, and how can you disable it short of commenting out the offending source code every time I want to upgrade? Andrew Lankford