From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 01:03:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA78716A536 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EEE243D55 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 90151 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2006 01:03:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 20 Aug 2006 01:03:28 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:04:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060624.162505.1678771172.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20060819200148.S952@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200606232341.k5NNf5Zm069547@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060624115603.25c962bc@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060624.162505.1678771172.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, itetcu@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cognet@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: __FreeBSD_version was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _timeval.h user.h src/sys/arm/include _types.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:03:30 -0000 On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : I don't believe you should relay on being the only user. > : At least please bump __FreeBSD_version. > > I'm pretty sure that he is the only FreeBSD/arm user that's using > RELENG_6 :-). We're using current at work, but will soon transition > to RELENG_6, now that these patches have been MFC'd. Of course, it > wouldn't hurt to at least document this change in the sequence of > version bumps on the 6.x timeline. But the number of people affected > can be counted on one hand, with fingers left over. > > Warner Maybe this has been discussed in the past, but why don't we just have __FreeBSD_version auto-incremented every day? It would be great for situations where we currently use it, and it's also be great for bug reports. Mike "Silby" Silbersack