From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 15:18:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93C016A40F for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6724743D45 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7381DD4C8 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:18:45 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.0 (20060403) at yadt.co.uk Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ce4vcAVx0K3e for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:18:45 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6CD241DD4CB; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:18:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:18:45 +0100 From: David Taylor To: arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060910151845.GA79571@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: arch@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Modularize kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:18:48 -0000 On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Howard Su wrote: > On 9/7/06, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > >At Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:47:46 +0800, > >Hello Howard, > > > >The monolithic vs. modularized kernel is an old discussion. If you're > >really interested in pursuing this you'll have a lot of work to do, > >mostly in figuring out explicitly all the implicit inter-module > >dependencies. Fascinating and fun, but you likely need a good reason > >to do it. > I listed the advantages I can think about. Can they convince you? They may convince people it is a good idea in principle. But until someone actually comes up with a solid plan showing how it can realistically be done in practice, nothing will happen. -- David Taylor