From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 23:44:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3DE16A412; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E143D7B; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.66.16.234] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML21M-1GS0842HZb-0002qo; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:44:53 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: Robert Watson Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:44:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20060913150912.J1823@fledge.watson.org> <200609140253.06818.max@love2party.net> <20060923102438.N6562@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060923102438.N6562@fledge.watson.org> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1239404.VOxjc7JlCO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609260144.51691.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: trustedbsd-discuss@trustedbsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New in-kernel privilege API: priv(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:44:57 -0000 --nextPart1239404.VOxjc7JlCO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 23 September 2006 11:26, Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Max Laier wrote: > > Right now, prison_priv_check() is looking rather scary to me. If > > something else wants to decide on finer granularity, alright, but in > > my opinion it's easier (more obvious) to keep the "normal" > > information in the .h file where the privileges are defined and > > described - as we are aiming for centralization of the decision and > > information. On top of that the caller could mask off ALLOW_IN_JAIL > > if they think it's not appropriate in a special use case of the > > privilege. > > The attached version of the kern_jail.c diff removes all the extra > commented out privileges that aren't granted, and were largely there as > development scaffolding to make sure I considered all privileges. Does > this seem a bit less scary? Yes. The argument about modules getting out of sync already had me=20 convinced that encoding things in the value isn't the best idea. The=20 cleaned up version of kern_jail.c now really gives a good example what we=20 gain by this centralization. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1239404.VOxjc7JlCO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFGGnzXyyEoT62BG0RAqtDAJ9W0GAbj3dgaRx5EEMtGkw886TGEgCcDBxr xSNh283nrR873Ezy0nc4hqU= =4msj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1239404.VOxjc7JlCO--