From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 10:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B0C16A40F; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBFA43D4C; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D4825CA2; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:34:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF1E11963; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48087-07; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mayday.esat.net (mayday.esat.net [193.95.134.156]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E784211942; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:34:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-w8BDeEn8fu9c/vst446N" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:34:35 -0000 --=-w8BDeEn8fu9c/vst446N Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on an IRC channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or are interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faster and get in touch with committers. The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure to get enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it was decided on friday evening CET). Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have been closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and participants who came, it was a lot of fun. The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathons in the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcement will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks before the event. In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters mailing list. Have fun fixing bugs! --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-w8BDeEn8fu9c/vst446N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFKiWwMxEkbVFH3PQRAgEtAJsFsK+HCt6RiOVp9uXNWKGRLaeWbwCcDcpZ u3wuRVonvB6Xz3Dvf0eXt9k= =D6wr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-w8BDeEn8fu9c/vst446N-- From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 16:20:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAE216A407 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FE043D45 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (ip70-177-190-239.dc.dc.cox.net [70.177.190.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k99GK12L055190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:20:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:19:57 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> References: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:20:04 -0000 On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 Florent Thoumie wrote: > Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this > week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on an IRC > channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or are > interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faster and > get in touch with committers. > > The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure to get > enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it was > decided on friday evening CET). > > Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have been > closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, > conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and participants > who came, it was a lot of fun. > > The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathons in > the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcement > will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks before > the event. > > In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel > #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters > mailing list. > > Have fun fixing bugs! I agree with Ceri, having a bug busting marathon during release cycle is probably bad; however, insta-MFCs are probably not a good thing anyway - even with single word fixes. I'll be keeping all of my changes in a new mailbox file. Once release cycle is over, the MFC will happen. I think the doc count is below correct. Ceri closed at least 4 IIRC, and I closed about 4-5 (some assigned to me). But whatever, we'll need to keep a "score board" next time. -- Tom Rhodes From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 17:06:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF6016A403; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr (smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6082143D4C; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6521349D67; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:06:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2935511975; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:06:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50363-02; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cream.stl.xbsd.org (cream.xbsd.org [193.120.13.130]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5280E11476; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:06:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wQU8kRWfbsrqlSrA5QrL" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:05:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1160413542.6936.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:06:28 -0000 --=-wQU8kRWfbsrqlSrA5QrL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:19 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 > Florent Thoumie wrote: >=20 > > Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this > > week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on an IR= C > > channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or are > > interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faster an= d > > get in touch with committers. > >=20 > > The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure to ge= t > > enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it was > > decided on friday evening CET). > >=20 > > Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have bee= n > > closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, > > conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and participants > > who came, it was a lot of fun. > >=20 > > The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathons in > > the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcement > > will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks before > > the event. > >=20 > > In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel > > #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters > > mailing list. > >=20 > > Have fun fixing bugs! >=20 > I agree with Ceri, having a bug busting marathon during release > cycle is probably bad; however, insta-MFCs are probably not a > good thing anyway - even with single word fixes. I'll be keeping > all of my changes in a new mailbox file. Once release cycle is > over, the MFC will happen. Well, HEAD isn't frozen and fixing bugs can't be bad. > I think the doc count is below correct. Ceri closed at least > 4 IIRC, and I closed about 4-5 (some assigned to me). But > whatever, we'll need to keep a "score board" next time. This will be the next feature of BugBuster, the Evil Bot, but it still requires that committers say when they close a PR. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-wQU8kRWfbsrqlSrA5QrL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFKoFmMxEkbVFH3PQRAqN3AJ9Higrc9AfOxenEs/QpAyStN/dMCQCgjwuK Etk8j+9X6LI0dI4FJUx4SkE= =rpra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wQU8kRWfbsrqlSrA5QrL-- From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 17:23:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC28916A40F; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FB143D46; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:23:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (ip70-177-190-239.dc.dc.cox.net [70.177.190.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k99HNs3p055757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:23:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:23:51 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <20061009132351.02936cbd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1160413542.6936.4.camel@localhost> References: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <1160413542.6936.4.camel@localhost> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:23:57 -0000 On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:05:42 +0100 Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:19 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 > > Florent Thoumie wrote: > > > > > Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this > > > week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on an IRC > > > channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or are > > > interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faster and > > > get in touch with committers. > > > > > > The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure to get > > > enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it was > > > decided on friday evening CET). > > > > > > Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have been > > > closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, > > > conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and participants > > > who came, it was a lot of fun. > > > > > > The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathons in > > > the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcement > > > will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks before > > > the event. > > > > > > In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel > > > #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters > > > mailing list. > > > > > > Have fun fixing bugs! > > > > I agree with Ceri, having a bug busting marathon during release > > cycle is probably bad; however, insta-MFCs are probably not a > > good thing anyway - even with single word fixes. I'll be keeping > > all of my changes in a new mailbox file. Once release cycle is > > over, the MFC will happen. > > Well, HEAD isn't frozen and fixing bugs can't be bad. > > > I think the doc count is below correct. Ceri closed at least > > 4 IIRC, and I closed about 4-5 (some assigned to me). But > > whatever, we'll need to keep a "score board" next time. > > This will be the next feature of BugBuster, the Evil Bot, but it still > requires that committers say when they close a PR. > Like: !closed NUM || !closed doc || !closed ? :) -- Tom Rhodes From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 17:29:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C7A16A407; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4EF43D79; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA3054CB7; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC0711973; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50452-05; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cream.stl.xbsd.org (cream.xbsd.org [193.120.13.130]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D182D11476; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:29:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <20061009132351.02936cbd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <1160390064.76522.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061009121957.01d50670.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <1160413542.6936.4.camel@localhost> <20061009132351.02936cbd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:29:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1160414957.6936.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:29:42 -0000 --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:05:42 +0100 > Florent Thoumie wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:19 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:24 +0100 > > > Florent Thoumie wrote: > > >=20 > > > > Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this > > > > week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on a= n IRC > > > > channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or = are > > > > interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faste= r and > > > > get in touch with committers. > > > >=20 > > > > The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure t= o get > > > > enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it = was > > > > decided on friday evening CET). > > > >=20 > > > > Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have= been > > > > closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, > > > > conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and particip= ants > > > > who came, it was a lot of fun. > > > >=20 > > > > The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathon= s in > > > > the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcem= ent > > > > will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks befo= re > > > > the event. > > > >=20 > > > > In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel > > > > #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters > > > > mailing list. > > > >=20 > > > > Have fun fixing bugs! > > >=20 > > > I agree with Ceri, having a bug busting marathon during release > > > cycle is probably bad; however, insta-MFCs are probably not a > > > good thing anyway - even with single word fixes. I'll be keeping > > > all of my changes in a new mailbox file. Once release cycle is > > > over, the MFC will happen. > >=20 > > Well, HEAD isn't frozen and fixing bugs can't be bad. > >=20 > > > I think the doc count is below correct. Ceri closed at least > > > 4 IIRC, and I closed about 4-5 (some assigned to me). But > > > whatever, we'll need to keep a "score board" next time. > >=20 > > This will be the next feature of BugBuster, the Evil Bot, but it still > > requires that committers say when they close a PR. > >=20 >=20 > Like: !closed NUM || !closed doc || !closed ? :) Yeah, kinda :-) --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFKobtMxEkbVFH3PQRAlw/AJ9ZLaPCGkIZWiACfbtxZNOutVieygCeMaQA EtAEw2TxegW2vQ/3DkK7yLQ= =OfPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Uqp21FuCxNEDeLV0WiBe--