From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 01:11:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BB416A407; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0043C9D; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kB31BIeU002683; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:11:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4572242F.8000004@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:11:11 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060910 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4570305A.4010908@freebsd.org> <20061202222423.GA3766@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061202222423.GA3766@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: rodrigc@crodrigues.org, Daichi GOTO , ozawa@ongs.co.jp, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-17 release, lock mechanism changed for robust working X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 01:11:29 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:38:34PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >> Hi Guys! >> >> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of >> the unionfs patchset-17. p17 have some significant improvements >> around the lock mechanism for robust and stable working. > > I got the following locking assertion as soon as I tried to start a > package build in the unionfs -b mountpoint. > Was this with the full p17 patchset applied, or just the partial set that was committed to CVS (which is about to be yanked if it doesn't get fixed)? Scott