Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 02:50:56 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Porting libumem (was Re: Is anyone working on a port of ZFS to FreeBSD) Message-ID: <20060602235056.GA48432@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <4480CD78.4070602@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060601150924.98192.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4480CD78.4070602@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-06-02 16:44, Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: >> IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article >> would've been much more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in >> the ports tree) and we had had libumem. > > Yes, that would have been nice, but when I tried to use ptmalloc, it > failed to work correctly. I don't remember the details anymore, but > ISTR there was something wrong with the ptmalloc port that I didn't > have the time to fix. It may still be worth trying. I only started looking at `umem' from sourceforge this week, but if there is more interest in ptmalloc, maybe it is better if I focused on why ptmalloc fails to work on FreeBSD. - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060602235056.GA48432>