Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:49:38 -0300 From: AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@tpu.ru>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging Message-ID: <200605132249.39497.asstec@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <ops9hifptx4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> References: <ops9fwnzbw17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net> <4465A8F8.2020601@elischer.org> <ops9hifptx4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 13 May 2006 07:08, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > > > would be cool however. > > May be, but I can't imagine a real situation where it can be useful, > as tables already contain IP adresses. Can you give a real-life > example where it helps ? cool = good may be = wonderful can't imagine = even worse means I need to read the intire thread = bad not cool J. A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605132249.39497.asstec>