From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 9 00:09:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A0216A4DE for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 00:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from grunt13.ihug.co.nz (grunt13.ihug.co.nz [203.109.254.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78C743D46 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 00:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from 203-109-251-39.static.bliink.ihug.co.nz (heff.fud.org.nz) [203.109.251.39] by grunt13.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FzMrc-00086Q-00; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:09:32 +1200 Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5FFD1CC22; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:09:33 +1200 (NZST) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:09:33 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: Sanford Owings Message-ID: <20060709000933.GA7559@heff.fud.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Services on bridging host? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:09:34 -0000 On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:29:21AM -0700, Sanford Owings wrote: > Hello. > > I'm looking for some assistance (or at least some more understanding) > regarding a connectivity issue with a bridging host. In short, I have > a host with two interfaces, using the "options BRIDGE" type of > bridging. One interface has an IP assigned, and the other does not > (as suggested by the FBSD handbook). Hosts on the "IP enabled" side > of the bridging host can connect to that IP (ssh, SMB shares, etc), > but not to hosts on the other side of the bridge. In addition, the > bridging host itself cannot connect to services on the "non-IP > enabled" side of itself. [...] > I'd be happy to switch to if_bridge, but I had no luck with that at > all in my first attempt. What you want to do is much easier with if_bridge as you can assign the IP directly to it. What problem did you have? it should be pretty easy to get going, the most common hurdle is forgetting to 'up' the bridge and its members. Andrew