Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:15:37 +0100
From:      Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de>
To:        "Anthony M. Agelastos" <iqgrande@gmail.com>
Cc:        openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GCJ on OOo
Message-ID:  <43F7F0E9.2010005@chillt.de>
In-Reply-To: <55FF0D83-DAC3-4782-96C2-8B48008D0073@gmail.com>
References:  <55FF0D83-DAC3-4782-96C2-8B48008D0073@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I ask this because perusing the Makefile shows that one can use the
> gcj flag (but I cannot tell if it is marked as broken).


Maho has been working on gcj support for a while. Two weeks ago, he 
reported that he got OOo to compile, but it would crash in Java code.

So, for now, gcj is still a no-go. It's marked as broken in 
editors/openoffice.org-2.0's makefile, lines 82 to 84:

.if defined(WITH_GNUGCJ)
#BUILD_DEPENDS+=        ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gcc41:${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc41-wgcj
BROKEN= "still work in progress"

- Bartosz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43F7F0E9.2010005>