From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 4 20:29:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B8F16A403; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 20:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don_oles@able.com.ua) Received: from able.com.ua (able.com.ua [80.91.162.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AFE43D7C; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 20:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don_oles@able.com.ua) Received: from able.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by able.com.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00D744C2E; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:28:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from vanta.oles.net (ip.85.202.111.30.dyn.sub-1.broadband.voliacable.com [85.202.111.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by able.com.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BFD44C2D; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:28:54 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:28:57 +0200 From: Oles Hnatkevych X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.71.01) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <184686318.20061104222857@able.com.ua> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at ABLE X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:36:59 +0000 Cc: pjd@FreeBSD.org Subject: geom stripe perfomance question X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oles Hnatkevych List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:29:02 -0000 Hello all! I wonder why geom stripe works much worse than the separate disks that constitute stripe. I have a stripe from two disks. Disks are on separate ATA channels. root# gstripe list Geom name: bigdata State: UP Status: Total=2, Online=2 Type: AUTOMATIC Stripesize: 262144 ID: 4233231544 Providers: 1. Name: stripe/bigdata Mediasize: 500118323200 (466G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 Consumers: 1. Name: ad1 Mediasize: 250059350016 (233G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e2 Number: 0 2. Name: ad2 Mediasize: 250059350016 (233G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e2 Number: 1 Now let's read one of them and stripe. root# dd if=/dev/ad1 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 14.579483 secs (71921343 bytes/sec) root# dd if=/dev/stripe/bigdata of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes transferred in 15.882796 secs (66019610 bytes/sec) What I would expect is doubling the speed of transfer, not slowing down. Am I wrong? Or is geom_stripe inefficient? I am running 6.2-PRERELEASE on Celeron 800. -- Oles Hnatkevych mailto:don_oles@able.com.ua From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 07:55:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BD816A4A7 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from bay0-omc2-s33.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s33.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9E543D72 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:55:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.38.35]) by bay0-omc2-s33.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:55:17 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:55:16 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.38.200 by by116fd.bay116.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:55:12 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.144.135.54] X-Originating-Email: [coolfire@live.fr] X-Sender: coolfire@live.fr From: "cool fire" To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:55:12 +0800 X-Priority: 1 Importance: High Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2006 07:55:16.0978 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FA68520:01C7049D] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:59:48 +0000 Subject: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:55:25 -0000 hi all, i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM, the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as follows: 3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, 1.95 what should i do to turn this up? cheers BR coolfire _________________________________________________________________ 免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 13:02:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B369516A407 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F9B43D45 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAAD2KZV023130; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:02:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <45547860.8010508@centtech.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:02:24 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061015) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cool fire References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2184/Fri Nov 10 03:37:20 2006 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:02:23 -0000 On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote: > hi all, > > i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM, > the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD > 6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as > follows: > > 3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, 1.95 > > what should i do to turn this up? You'll need to start with some additional information. If you have bsdsar installed, a quick output of bsdsar -a might help. Also, you should try to find out if the load is due to CPU utilization, or I/O (like disk) usage. top/iostat/gstat may help you in these cases. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 13:43:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663FD16A407 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silencer@free-4ever.net) Received: from orthosie.free-4ever.net (orthosie.free-4ever.net [88.191.27.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D6E43D62 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:42:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silencer@free-4ever.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by orthosie.free-4ever.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222FE1BC3F for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at free-4ever.net Received: from orthosie.free-4ever.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orthosie.free-4ever.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YN4F1YEHwclG for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.48.114] (unknown [83.145.94.46]) by orthosie.free-4ever.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2801B609 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <455481D4.7070800@free-4ever.net> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:44 +0100 From: Guillaume User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061013) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org References: <45547860.8010508@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <45547860.8010508@centtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:43:01 -0000 Eric Anderson a 閏rit : > On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote: >> hi all, >> i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM, >> the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD >> 6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as >> follows: >> >> 3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, 1.95 >> >> what should i do to turn this up? > > You'll need to start with some additional information. If you have > bsdsar installed, a quick output of bsdsar -a might help. Also, you > should try to find out if the load is due to CPU utilization, or I/O > (like disk) usage. top/iostat/gstat may help you in these cases. > > > Eric > > > > Hi, How much devices do you have in Cacti ? and how much graph per device ? Do you use Cactid as poller ?? Regards Guillaume -- Guillaume E-mail: silencer__free-4ever__net Blog: http://guillaume.free-4ever.net ---- Site: http://www.free-4ever.net From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 09:22:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0272416A403 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07F43D64 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551ED46B1D; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:22:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:22:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral In-Reply-To: <20061030192702.GG76994@registro.br> Message-ID: <20061111091844.I63959@fledge.watson.org> References: <20061030192702.GG76994@registro.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, kreios@gmail.com Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:22:32 -0000 On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > Dave, could you please describe you test set? > > I've posted some results months ago and they were kind different. > > I have done some tests [1] [2] with bind and queryperf and my result on > FreeBSD 6.1 was very poor if compared with 4.11. > > Besides this, I have had bad results with NSD + 6.1 too and it doesn't use > threads. Because of that I realized that there is something strange with UDP > traffic on 6.1, as it was discussed in the threads below. FYI: In response to feedback from ISC, there are UDP transmit optimizations in FreeBSD 7.x. These have a relatively minor performance impact for single-threaded applications, but in the special case of BIND accessing a single UDP socket from many different threads, it significantly improves performance. I'll look at MFC'ing these to 6.x after 6.2-RELEASE (especially if reminded in a month or so :-). With regard to the possible bge issue -- I would encourage you to test using a 7.x kernel, ideally with all the debugging disabled, and see if there's been any improvement (or regression). There has been a lot of change in these areas, and it would be helpful to know what, if any, impact this has had. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge > > [1] > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-September/028247.html > > [2] > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011767.html > > > -- > Att., > > Marcelo Gardini > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 06:33:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9461F16A412 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from bay0-omc2-s25.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s25.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB3F43D5C for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.38.46]) by bay0-omc2-s25.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:33:21 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:33:20 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.38.200 by by116fd.bay116.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:33:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.144.135.54] X-Originating-Email: [coolfire@live.fr] X-Sender: coolfire@live.fr In-Reply-To: <455481D4.7070800@free-4ever.net> From: "cool fire" To: silencer@free-4ever.net, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:33:18 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2006 06:33:20.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[47CCB7B0:01C7055B] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:25:49 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:33:21 -0000 Hi silencer, i have 50+ 2900/3500 switches in my cacti, under every devices, i have all 24/48 ports monitored. BR coolfire >From: Guillaume >To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: cacti system tuning >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:44 +0100 > >Eric Anderson a 閏rit : > > On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote: > >> hi all, > >> i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM, > >> the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD > >> 6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as > >> follows: > >> > >> 3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, 1.95 > >> > >> what should i do to turn this up? > > > > You'll need to start with some additional information. If you have > > bsdsar installed, a quick output of bsdsar -a might help. Also, you > > should try to find out if the load is due to CPU utilization, or I/O > > (like disk) usage. top/iostat/gstat may help you in these cases. > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > > > >Hi, > >How much devices do you have in Cacti ? and how much graph per device ? > >Do you use Cactid as poller ?? > >Regards >Guillaume > > >-- >Guillaume >E-mail: silencer__free-4ever__net >Blog: http://guillaume.free-4ever.net >---- >Site: http://www.free-4ever.net >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ 与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 06:34:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A2016A49E for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AB543D60 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coolfire@live.fr) Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.38.27]) by bay0-omc2-s2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:10 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:10 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.38.200 by by116fd.bay116.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:34:09 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.144.135.54] X-Originating-Email: [coolfire@live.fr] X-Sender: coolfire@live.fr In-Reply-To: <45547860.8010508@centtech.com> From: "cool fire" To: anderson@centtech.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:34:09 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2006 06:34:10.0394 (UTC) FILETIME=[655A7BA0:01C7055B] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:26:05 +0000 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:34:12 -0000 thanks eric, i am gonna report these infos to you in three days. BR coolfire >From: Eric Anderson >To: cool fire >CC: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: cacti system tuning >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:02:24 -0600 > >On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote: >>hi all, >> >>i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM, >>the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD >>6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as >>follows: >> >> 3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, >>1.95 >> >>what should i do to turn this up? > >You'll need to start with some additional information. If you have >bsdsar installed, a quick output of bsdsar -a might help. Also, you >should try to find out if the load is due to CPU utilization, or I/O >(like disk) usage. top/iostat/gstat may help you in these cases. > > >Eric > > > > >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur >Technology >Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ 享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统— MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 15:09:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C7E16A412 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drechsau@Geeks.ORG) Received: from mail.geeks.org (jacobs.Geeks.ORG [204.153.247.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC4343D55 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:09:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drechsau@Geeks.ORG) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B1F3159064; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:09:16 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:09:16 -0600 From: Mike Horwath To: cool fire Message-ID: <20061111150916.GA37154@Geeks.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: cool fire , silencer@free-4ever.net, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org References: <455481D4.7070800@free-4ever.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Fingerprint: D8 24 CC E6 47 5F E4 60 BF B7 6E FA BF C7 6E C5 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6A89 E78A B8B1 69D9 8CDB E966 4A5A C3F9 A1B0 C381 User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, silencer@free-4ever.net Subject: Re: cacti system tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:09:17 -0000 On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:33:18PM +0800, cool fire wrote: > Hi silencer, > > i have 50+ 2900/3500 switches in my cacti, > > under every devices, i have all 24/48 ports monitored. So, ~1800 ports? I am monitoring 1893 ports with FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, 1GB RAM, Xeon 3.0Ghz with HTT off. I am *not* using cactid - it doesn't work so well for me and I drop 'data'. 11/11/2006 08:02:29 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:29.6655 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:07:28 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:27.7050 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:12:35 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:34.6148 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:17:30 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:29.5253 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:22:29 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:28.4852 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:27:30 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:29.5853 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:32:32 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:31.5250 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:37:39 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:38.6926 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:42:30 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:29.5354 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:47:32 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:31.8550 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:52:46 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:45.8723 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 08:57:32 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:32.4250 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 09:02:34 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:33.6650 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 11/11/2006 09:07:31 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:31.6741 Method:cmd.php Processes:8 Threads:N/A Hosts:56 HostsPerProcess:7 DataSources:2042 RRDsProcessed:1107 -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG