From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 06:14:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: perl@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB3F16A41F for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C704443D45 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:14:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (rke75-1-87-88-108-35.dsl.club-internet.fr [87.88.108.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FF84A9CA5; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:14:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:14:45 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Forrest Aldrich , perl@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4BD4DD519B4C6456A62CC83F@[192.168.1.5]> In-Reply-To: <43C963E9.5090009@forrie.com> References: <43C963E9.5090009@forrie.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: AWL.pm errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:14:48 -0000 +-Le 14/01/2006 15:49 -0500, Forrest Aldrich a dit : | There's a fix for this in the bugs database somewhere - which I applied | and it appears to work. I just updated Spamassassin from the port, and | here we go again: | Jan 14 15:48:41 forrie spamd[40521]: Can't call method "finish" on an | undefined value at | /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AWL.pm line | 397, line 182. | | I'm curious why this hasn't been fixed in the port... ? If there's a fix, and it has not been applied, it may be because it's not necessary. In that case, the error lies in an eval, which makes it non fatal, so, there's no need for it. Regards, -- Mathieu Arnold