From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 02:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414C16A41F; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C2C43D45; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:16:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0G2GWcJ023222; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:16:32 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id k0G2GWrH023221; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:16:32 -0800 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:16:32 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060116021632.GB22516@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <43C97EB0.4090306@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C97EB0.4090306@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should ntpdate REQUIRE named? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:16:33 -0000 --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 02:44:00PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Question came up on -stable yesterday about a user who has ntp servers by= =20 > hostname in ntp.conf, and because of an unrelated ordering problem=20 > ntp[date] started before named, so they failed. On all the systems I've= =20 > examined, named starts right after SERVERS, and ntpdate right after that.= =20 > While there are theoretically good reasons why one might want it the othe= r=20 > way around, I think for the vast majority of our users named should start= =20 > first. >=20 > Any comments, objections? Overall, I'd say moving it would be fine. One concern I might have is if named's internal timers are confused by having the clock stepped. I'm not enough of a bind expert to have any idea if that's an issue, though I suspect there wouldn't be serious problems. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDywH/XY6L6fI4GtQRAizCAKCog9wY9YzvHgyAOqQt9GZnbUYTGwCgrrpe 5JHF/cMIa7c4nJk21jU2KYo= =s6JK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ-- From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 05:59:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA49016A41F for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4279C43D46 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 88909 invoked by uid 399); 16 Jan 2006 05:59:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 05:59:38 -0000 Message-ID: <43CB3649.40704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:59:37 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <43C97EB0.4090306@FreeBSD.org> <20060116021632.GB22516@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060116021632.GB22516@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should ntpdate REQUIRE named? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:59:40 -0000 Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 02:44:00PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> Question came up on -stable yesterday about a user who has ntp servers by >> hostname in ntp.conf, and because of an unrelated ordering problem >> ntp[date] started before named, so they failed. On all the systems I've >> examined, named starts right after SERVERS, and ntpdate right after that. >> While there are theoretically good reasons why one might want it the other >> way around, I think for the vast majority of our users named should start >> first. >> >> Any comments, objections? > > Overall, I'd say moving it would be fine. One concern I might have is > if named's internal timers are confused by having the clock stepped. > I'm not enough of a bind expert to have any idea if that's an issue, > though I suspect there wouldn't be serious problems. If the name server were acting as a resolver (local and otherwise) and had a pending query during a big step it would probably discard the result, but the worst that could happen there is a requery. The other case where I could think off hand where you'd want ntp to run first is in a situation where timestamps on the logs were critical. However, in that scenario the user is free to alter the ordering themselves. Thanks for the feedback, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 11:02:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CB216A422 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C1143D55 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GB2dhQ084988 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:39 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0GB2c6J084982 for freebsd-rc@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:38 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:38 GMT Message-Id: <200601161102.k0GB2c6J084982@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:50 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2005/02/10] conf/77340 rc awk used in /etc/rc.d/nsswitch when not a 1 problem total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/06/30] conf/68525 rc Loader's verbose boot mode has rc.d/local o [2004/11/11] conf/73834 rc Bad dependencies for /etc/rc.d/savecore o [2004/11/13] conf/73909 rc [patch] rc.d/sshd does not work with port o [2005/02/18] conf/77663 rc Suggestion: add /etc/rc.d/addnetswap afte o [2005/05/14] kern/81006 rc ipnat not working with tunnel interfaces o [2005/08/27] conf/85363 rc syntax error in /etc/rc.d/devfs o [2005/11/02] conf/88383 rc [PATCH]: etc/rc.d/ldconfig:does not prope o [2005/11/14] conf/88974 rc autoconfigured vlans confuse rc.d/netif o [2005/12/25] conf/90893 rc stock ftpd rcNG script 9 problems total. From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 07:58:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1555916A41F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch (mailhub03.unibe.ch [130.92.9.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BE643D45 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:58:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from localhost (scanhub01-eth0.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C29128FCD for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.70]) by localhost (scanhub01.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01910-01-11 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974C91E369 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from droopy.unibe.ch (droopy [130.92.64.20]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0H7wI8Z004684 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:18 +0100 (MET) Received: (from roth@localhost) by droopy.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id k0H7wHUH008514 for freebsd-rc@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:17 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:58:17 +0100 From: Tobias Roth To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060117075817.GA8473@droopy.unibe.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Warning! Using Outlook is insecure and promotes virus distribution. Please use a different email client. X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne Subject: rc.d/ike broken. retire it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:58:22 -0000 Hi /etc/rc.d/ike is broken. Something along the lines of load_rc_config $name +command="${ike_program}" run_rc_command "$1" fixed it for me. Although now that we have ports rcordering with the base rc.d/ scripts, should rc.d/ike be retired, and the various ike startup scripts be fixed/adapted? Those that come to mind are security/racoon2 security/ipsec-tools security/isakmpd cheers, Tobias From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 08:13:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4F816A41F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 206B143D4C for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:13:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 97107 invoked by uid 399); 17 Jan 2006 08:13:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 08:13:47 -0000 Message-ID: <43CCA738.20601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:13:44 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Roth References: <20060117075817.GA8473@droopy.unibe.ch> In-Reply-To: <20060117075817.GA8473@droopy.unibe.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sumikawa@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, vanhu@netasq.com, simon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rc.d/ike broken. retire it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:13:49 -0000 Tobias Roth wrote: > Hi > > /etc/rc.d/ike is broken. Something along the lines of > > load_rc_config $name > +command="${ike_program}" > run_rc_command "$1" > > fixed it for me. Although now that we have ports rcordering with the > base rc.d/ scripts, should rc.d/ike be retired, and the various ike > startup scripts be fixed/adapted? Those that come to mind are > > security/racoon2 > security/ipsec-tools > security/isakmpd This was fixed in HEAD, but I haven't merged the fix because I too would prefer that the script be retired from the base, and the ports be fixed. I would be glad to assist with this effort, as would the fine folks at freebsd-rc@freebsd.org. I've cc'ed the maintainers of those 3 ports for their feedback. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 09:20:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98216A41F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mischa.peters@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B0B43D46 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mischa.peters@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so181075uge for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:20:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=plPB8J4HhHv90+1P0G/AvdQyjtIsDJPAK+cTtf1n1g6aU8/rtUT6OTyVrgyKq1v/20E1MY5WF4/D0h6cTWRL4IvDC+m/YrGSv3woGiIaw0DVVyY90A2wszLuHqKZ4waMt2jMEPl5DXG1wrtDLzaILc+ExQnoU9m+QOFyQD/jWZY= Received: by 10.49.7.17 with SMTP id k17mr321459nfi; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:20:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.43.6 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:20:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <25e9cd010601170120u7b9b204cvb47d1f4e95ff2be6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:20:51 +0100 From: Mischa Peters To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Jails and rc.subr X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:20:53 -0000 Hi All, I have a couple of jails running on FreeBSD 6 at the moment. And whenever I restart a jail, non of the rc scripts that depend on rc.subr are started. Only scripts, that don't use rc.subr, are started. Is there something that needs configured or changed to make that work? Is there a way to figure out why that is? Have other people seen this as well? Thanx!! From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 09:45:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B4F16A420 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:45:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B1C643D45 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:45:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 78851 invoked by uid 399); 17 Jan 2006 09:45:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 09:45:29 -0000 Message-ID: <43CCBCB7.4000701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:45:27 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mischa Peters References: <25e9cd010601170120u7b9b204cvb47d1f4e95ff2be6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <25e9cd010601170120u7b9b204cvb47d1f4e95ff2be6@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails and rc.subr X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:45:33 -0000 Mischa Peters wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a couple of jails running on FreeBSD 6 at the moment. > And whenever I restart a jail, non of the rc scripts that depend on > rc.subr are started. > > Only scripts, that don't use rc.subr, are started. Try the following patch to /etc/rc: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/rc-jail.diff -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 10:13:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACD416A41F; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@eddie.nitro.dk) Received: from eddie.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E0043D46; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@eddie.nitro.dk) Received: by eddie.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D904B119C4F; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:13:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:13:25 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060117101325.GB938@eddie.nitro.dk> References: <20060117075817.GA8473@droopy.unibe.ch> <43CCA738.20601@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43CCA738.20601@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: sumikawa@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, vanhu@netasq.com Subject: Re: rc.d/ike broken. retire it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:13:28 -0000 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006.01.17 00:13:44 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Tobias Roth wrote: > > Hi > >=20 > > /etc/rc.d/ike is broken. Something along the lines of > >=20 > > load_rc_config $name > > +command=3D"${ike_program}" > > run_rc_command "$1" > >=20 > > fixed it for me. Although now that we have ports rcordering with the > > base rc.d/ scripts, should rc.d/ike be retired, and the various ike > > startup scripts be fixed/adapted? Those that come to mind are > >=20 > > security/racoon2 > > security/ipsec-tools > > security/isakmpd >=20 > This was fixed in HEAD, but I haven't merged the fix because I too would > prefer that the script be retired from the base, and the ports be fixed. I > would be glad to assist with this effort, as would the fine folks at > freebsd-rc@freebsd.org. I think it should be removed since there is no use for it. isakmpd will get an rc.d script as soon as I get around to it. Hopefully within a not too distant future (it is more or less done, mainly needs testing to make sure it really works as intended). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDzMNFh9pcDSc1mlERAkqzAJ9VlL+fn2X/BQsjnaomfgqqUO4S5gCfacz/ WuYusuJrW3vmcdzagy+g07w= =mCh8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 07:44:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E416516A420; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF01343D6B; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0I7imWb077130; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:48 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0I7imeQ077126; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:48 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:48 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200601180744.k0I7imeQ077126@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/90163: [patch] Easily launch non-forking daemons like logsurfer via rcNG X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:55 -0000 Old Synopsis: Easily launch non-forking daemons like logsurfer via rcNG New Synopsis: [patch] Easily launch non-forking daemons like logsurfer via rcNG Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-rc Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 07:44:04 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90163 From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 07:59:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD116A420; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4D143D4C; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (dougb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0I7xI88077725; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 GMT (envelope-from dougb@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from dougb@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0I7xIYq077721; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 GMT (envelope-from dougb) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 GMT From: Doug Barton Message-Id: <200601180759.k0I7xIYq077721@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rand@meridian-enviro.com, dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/90163: [patch] Easily launch non-forking daemons like logsurfer via rcNG X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:18 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] Easily launch non-forking daemons like logsurfer via rcNG State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: dougb State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 07:56:14 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: The way to do what you are suggesting here is: command=/usr/sbin/daemon command_args="/usr/local/sbin/logsurfer $logsurfer_flags" While the idea you present here is creative, I don't think that it happens often enough in practice to warrant inclusion in rc.subr. In the future, you may find it useful to submit ideas like this to the freebsd-rc@freebsd.org mailling list before sending them as a PR. Doug Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-rc->dougb Responsible-Changed-By: dougb Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 07:56:14 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I closed this PR. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90163 From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 08:31:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9F516A41F; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB73443D45; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (yar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0I8Vf5Z080529; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:41 GMT (envelope-from yar@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from yar@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0I8VfB6080525; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:41 GMT (envelope-from yar) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:41 GMT From: Yar Tikhiy Message-Id: <200601180831.k0I8VfB6080525@freefall.freebsd.org> To: yar@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, yar@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/90893: stock ftpd rcNG script X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:31:42 -0000 Synopsis: stock ftpd rcNG script Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-rc->yar Responsible-Changed-By: yar Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 08:29:48 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I've recently been interested in both ftpd and rc.d. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90893 From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 13:02:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F73B16A420; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5933743D49; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (matteo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0LD2I0F000215; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:18 GMT (envelope-from matteo@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from matteo@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0LD2F66000211; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:15 GMT (envelope-from matteo) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:15 GMT From: Matteo Riondato Message-Id: <200601211302.k0LD2F66000211@freefall.freebsd.org> To: laszlof@vonostingroup.com, matteo@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, matteo@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/88383: [PATCH]: etc/rc.d/ldconfig:does not properly handle ld{-elf}.so.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:02:18 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH]: etc/rc.d/ldconfig:does not properly handle ld{-elf}.so.conf State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: matteo State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 21 13:01:26 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: The current version of ldconfig works as expected. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-rc->matteo Responsible-Changed-By: matteo Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 21 13:01:26 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: The current version of ldconfig works as expected. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=88383