From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:08:48 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDF516A642
for <freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874A743D8F
for <freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:33 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8PB8XZ5090697
for <freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:33 GMT
(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from linimon@localhost)
by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8PB8WLu090693
for freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:32 GMT
(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:32 GMT
Message-Id: <200609251108.k8PB8WLu090693@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to
owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f
From: FreeBSD bugmaster <bugmaster@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:48 -0000
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o sparc/71729 sparc64 printf in kernel thread causes panic on SPARC
o sparc/72962 sparc64 [sysinstall] Sysinstall panics on sparc64 if /dev/cd0
o sparc/80410 sparc64 [netgraph] netgraph is causing crash with mpd on sparc
o sparc/80890 sparc64 [panic] kmem_malloc(73728): kmem_map too small running
o sparc/91882 sparc64 [mouse] Ultra 10 mouse/keyboard
o sparc/92033 sparc64 [dc] dc(4) issues on Ultra10
o sparc/95297 sparc64 vt100 term does not work in install
o sparc/95892 sparc64 [hme] MAC address of hme interfaces is ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:
o sparc/98269 sparc64 Fresh 6.1 installation fails to boot
9 problems total.
Non-critical problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o sparc/72998 sparc64 [kernel] [patch] set_mcontext() change syscalls parame
s sparc/82681 sparc64 [dc] dc state messages
o sparc/90316 sparc64 [kbd] Keyboard "lock" key lights not working properly
f sparc/91334 sparc64 FreeBSD 6.0 don't support tftp boot from remot tftp se
o sparc/94190 sparc64 hw.physmem tunable does not work on sparc
o sparc/94483 sparc64 [ath] ath_hal does not work on 6-release/sparc64
o sparc/97707 sparc64 mkskel.sh has bogus timestamp, causing buildworld on s
7 problems total.
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 02:54:01 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B61616A403;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C7843D45;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:00 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30])
by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8R2rxKw037688;
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca
[64.7.128.98])
by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8R2rxr4071338;
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 93C617302F; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>
From: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>
To: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, <current@freebsd.org>,
<sparc64@freebsd.org>
Precedence: bulk
Message-Id: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3,
clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on clamscanner2
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1,
clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on clamscanner4
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc:
Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:01 -0000
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - cd /src
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> World build started on Wed Sep 27 02:30:04 UTC 2006
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2.3: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4.1: building includes
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries
[...]
===> lib/libalias (all)
===> lib/libalias/libalias (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias.c
cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c
cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c
/src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c: In function `ProxyEncodeIpHeader':
/src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:524: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
/src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:529: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/lib/libalias/libalias.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/lib/libalias.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/lib.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - ERROR: failed to build world
TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.00 user 5.18 system 1856.30 real
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 10:32:58 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6EF16A416;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru)
Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CCF43D5D;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:57 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru)
Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5C95E63;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:55 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108])
by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72E15E28;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:55 +0400 (MSD)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) id k8RAWvhU006311;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:57 +0400
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To: piso@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20060927103257.GA4598@rambler-co.ru>
References: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:58 -0000
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Should be "fixed" now, by adding NO_WERROR=3D back to libalias/Makefile.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:53:59PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sen=
tex.ca
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/spar=
c64
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - checking out the source tree
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -P=
d -A src
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - building world (CFLAGS=3D-O2 -pipe)
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - cd /src
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
> >>> World build started on Wed Sep 27 02:30:04 UTC 2006
> >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
> >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
> >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
> >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
> >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
> >>> stage 2.3: build tools
> >>> stage 3: cross tools
> >>> stage 4.1: building includes
> >>> stage 4.2: building libraries
> [...]
> =3D=3D=3D> lib/libalias (all)
> =3D=3D=3D> lib/libalias/libalias (all)
> cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus=
ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret=
urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse=
d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -=
c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias.c
> cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus=
ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret=
urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse=
d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -=
c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c
> cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus=
ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret=
urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse=
d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -=
c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c
> /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c: I=
n function `ProxyEncodeIpHeader':
> /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:52=
4: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
> /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:52=
9: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src/lib/libalias/libalias.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src/lib/libalias.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src/lib.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src.
> *** Error code 1
>=20
> Stop in /src.
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1=
=20
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - ERROR: failed to build world
> TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - tinderbox aborted
> TB --- 1.00 user 5.18 system 1856.30 real
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFGlNZqRfpzJluFF4RAo/KAKCXBEZntHTGxEUxeC3pD+ku/FwTsgCghyyn
/W2w97LNRuH8zMO8VglQmX0=
=96sl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:28:24 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B5B16A412
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:24 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9D843D58
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:23 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RJRSMd006168
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:27:29 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:26:10 -0700
Message-Id: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Subject: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:24 -0000
I am seeing terrible network throughput on my Ultra 1E+ (a "fast" 1E
clone). It uses the hme interface; throughputs using scp on a large
file are about 1.3MB/s. Transferring the same file using scp between
two different, faster computers gives me a throughput of about 8-9MB/s.
This is a 100MB/s network, so that seems OK.
ifconfig shows that hme is set properly (as far as I can tell):
hme0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU>
inet6 fe80::240:dcff:fe3b:21d8%hme0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 192.168.0.103 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 00:40:dc:3b:21:d8
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
and the MTUs are the same for all machines (and all are FreeBSD 6.1).
Yes, I know that scp has overhead, but I find it hard to believe that
the box could not keep up with it (it is a blazing 300MHz, after all),
particularly for the throughput reduction I see.
Any suggestions on how I can increase the network performance of my 1E+?
Frank
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:55:14 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA2816A403
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:13 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC26A43D4C
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:12 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89532FF62
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405)
id 1E84212FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's
message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:26:10 -0700")
Message-ID: <oq7izpgk4h.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4
(alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:14 -0000
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com> writes:
fj> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s.
try an scp to localhost.
1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built
into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is
a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't
compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is
probably the difference.
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUARRrXHonCBbTaW/4dAQJifgQAlSFPkmOzdfUjH6V9QSCP9fGWyN44l9Zm
5N8YwWjiXWtGuykeESjIBeQi667WFrUQYigwd39W5z0IUzjhIJ0Tzpe2qTZgoKyy
glHRlEEcPC5rmcFNbb0y9h/SyH/s0QrmMCkFQAFdFl6FYFWI439fR8mDUwB0Ru15
P43CujP5zzk=
=8bmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1--
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:45:04 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB3816A403
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5627443D53
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RKi8W6029082
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:44:09 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:42:50 -0700
Message-Id: <1159389770.850.244.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 -0000
I forgot to cc: the list, so here it is.
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:01 -0400, Lucas Holt wrote:
> A few suggestions come to mind. Try another protocol and see what
> type of transfer speeds you get.
It there one you might suggest?
> Test the performance of your hard
> drive reads/writes. Its possible the drive controller is not using
> udma for example. Some of the sun machines only support wdma which
> limits transfers to 16MB/s if it happens to use IDE. Granted, this
> doesn't explain the performance entirely but if there are a lot of
> interrupts for disk IO, it may slow down your network performance.
It is a SCSI drive using 20MB/s transfers at the controller. It has
been tested and it works properly (about 15MB/s speeds). Though not
fast, that should be plenty for a 100Mb/s network (typo in original
post).
Frank
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:52:25 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E93616A47E
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:25 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8631443D58
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:24 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RKpDd8031110;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:51:13 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com>
In-Reply-To: <655D1BFE-663E-43FA-823A-580D1C750C1C@foolishgames.com>
References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
<7C3C28AA-2F03-4767-B480-8E1C499F0F94@foolishgames.com>
<1159387883.850.243.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
<655D1BFE-663E-43FA-823A-580D1C750C1C@foolishgames.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:49:54 -0700
Message-Id: <1159390194.850.252.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:25 -0000
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:40 -0400, Lucas Holt wrote:
> >> A few suggestions come to mind. Try another protocol and see what
> >> type of transfer speeds you get.
> >
> > It there one you might suggest?
>
> You could always try ftp. In my experience its much faster than sftp
> although not secure. Just to test it might be interesting.
That would be the usual candidate; I'll have to enable it and then try
it. This is all using computers behind a firewall that are inaccessible
from the Internet. So security is of no concern for these tests.
> > It is a SCSI drive using 20MB/s transfers at the controller. It has
> > been tested and it works properly (about 15MB/s speeds). Though not
> > fast, that should be plenty for a 100Mb/s network (typo in original
> > post).
> I'll get my sparc out later and do a little testing.
I'd appreciate that. Mine is not a Sun (it was made by Tritec) but any
low-end SPARC of the era ought to do. Even if it is an Ultra 5 with the
slow IDE controller. I just can't see the controller making the big
difference for this application.
I would also appreciate it if you would copy the list so we can keep the
thread in tact.
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:24:57 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7609416A588
for <Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D59F43DF4
for <Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:21:48 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RLKZPk007163;
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:20:38 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: carton@Ivy.NET
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:19:16 -0700
Message-Id: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Cc: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0000
fj>> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s.
>
> try an scp to localhost.
>
> 1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built
> into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is
> a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't
> compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is
> probably the difference.
Well, I get about 0.9MB/s using scp to copy from the original file to
localhost. The overhead on both ends of the transfer undoubtedly explains
the (slightly) lower transfer rates.
*Sheesh*
OTOH, I recall that people are using this level of hardware as routers, and
I recall them getting about 30Mb/s (or 4MB/s) through them. Is there really
that much overhead with scp?
Frank
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:32:41 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1326B16A416
for <Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:41 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org)
Received: from noop.in-addr.com (noop.in-addr.com [208.58.23.51])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFB443DAA
for <Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:15 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org)
Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
id 1GSh0O-000Mxs-41
for Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:48 -0400
From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060927213148.GB60529@in-addr.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
References: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:41 -0000
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:19:16PM -0700, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> fj>> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s.
> >
> > try an scp to localhost.
> >
> > 1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built
> > into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is
> > a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't
> > compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is
> > probably the difference.
>
> Well, I get about 0.9MB/s using scp to copy from the original file to
> localhost. The overhead on both ends of the transfer undoubtedly explains
> the (slightly) lower transfer rates.
>
> *Sheesh*
>
> OTOH, I recall that people are using this level of hardware as routers, and
> I recall them getting about 30Mb/s (or 4MB/s) through them. Is there really
> that much overhead with scp?
>From memory, back in the dim and murky past when I was a Solaris admin,
I heard co-workers comment that the math involved in SSL/SSH encryption
was not particularly nice to SPARC/UltraSPARC CPUs. Or rather, the
CPUs were not particularly fast when faced with that math. End result -
booming business for SSL offloaders.
I've seen an Ultra II push > 20MBit/sec with Firewall 1 loaded doing
hme<->hme routing, so I strongly suspect its related to ssh/scp/sftp
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:03:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0366616A40F
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210B743D93
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:26 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0CF2FF62
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405)
id B1BBB12FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
References: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's
message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:19:16 -0700")
Message-ID: <oqven9ezmb.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4
(alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:34 -0000
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com> writes:
fj> Is there really that much overhead with scp?
well, like I said, for me 'scp file localhost:file0' is about 2.3x
faster on Solaris than FreeBSD.
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUARRr1LInCBbTaW/4dAQJ+fAP/VBoi6yoc0bRLyhf4djGitlkAWPRDSNR6
XJXMQxOIJhFj+JnVgVm1hShPhOLmAqGHF8dGSAjFbXGMA6jtRv0DpgLXgVW5zowp
SkvNWhbiwavMLUb2aXe6PGGUBK9J2Pw1Z4p4liMOASqNRbLZj5jzr3bdgGOr/Wnf
I8T7IoDSPp4=
=tA0h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1--
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:29:09 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289A16A40F
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0527743D5E
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:08 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RMSRVS026720
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:28:27 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: 1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0700
Message-Id: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Subject: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 -0000
> well, like I said, for me 'scp file localhost:file0' is about 2.3x
> faster on Solaris than FreeBSD.
Sure, that's the first factor of two. There's one or two factors of two
left to be found. Maybe it is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of
calculations cited earlier. Must be heavy in integer math...
Frank
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:51:59 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4C516A403
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5853643D4C
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:57 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET)
Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id B310E2FF62
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405)
id F153412FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
References: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's
message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0700")
Message-ID: <oqr6xwgbxw.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4
(alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:59 -0000
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com> writes:
fj> There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it
fj> is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations
no, I don't think there are any more factors of two to find.
300MHz Pentium, Linux with gcc: 1.5MByte/s
440MHz UltraSPARC II, Solaris with Sun C compiler: 2.3MByte/s
500MHz UltraSPARC II, FreeBSD with gcc: 1.0MByte/s
try a slow PeeCee and see if you get similar results. I think it's
about right: divide performance in half as penalty for trying to use
gcc on anything but i386.
My friend who makes big ftp servers with dm_crypt encrypted disks
reports results roughly in the same ballpark: 40MByte/s throughput
IDE-RAID<->GigEthernet with encryption, 90MByte/s without, on modern
2 - 3GHz PeeCees. In that case it's just decryption rather than
ssh+sshd running on the same CPU, so divide that throughput in half,
and you are in the same MB per MHz ballpark as the other results. I
think it is probably working properly.
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUARRsAi4nCBbTaW/4dAQIyvQP/XnsEDlBoHNuhZxmx+P+W1tRWOfndjNX8
u0a1Qm+3jHmcTkN0ERR7YQG/V88kLtlHdJDB+Lo8njJKf1WXFoSj+Oq9djWY3pRJ
HaJQQgeZZtM0przSjbS3owUDXTeiEwOIA5vmue9NxdKPaR6GYZR2HR5wOB2dvz06
x5v/3RbIkh4=
=5k2+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1--
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:43:40 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B266816A40F
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:40 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A943D45
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:39 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com
[209.218.101.53])
by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8S0gBxZ002791
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:42:11 -0700
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:40:49 -0700
Message-Id: <1159404049.5199.31.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com
Subject: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:40 -0000
> fj> There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it
> fj> is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations
>
> no, I don't think there are any more factors of two to find.
>
> 300MHz Pentium, Linux with gcc: 1.5MByte/s
> 440MHz UltraSPARC II, Solaris with Sun C compiler: 2.3MByte/s
> 500MHz UltraSPARC II, FreeBSD with gcc: 1.0MByte/s
>
> try a slow PeeCee and see if you get similar results. I think it's
> about right: divide performance in half as penalty for trying to use
> gcc on anything but i386.
I had no idea that there was so much overhead with scp. I tried scp to
localhost on my main workstation (dual Athlons, 15K SCSIs, FreeBSD) and
got about 7MB/s. That is a hit of about a factor of 10 for using scp
from the native disk rate.
I will indeed try it on a slow PC soon: I am bring up a dual Pentium III
server in a week so so.
>
> My friend who makes big ftp servers with dm_crypt encrypted disks
> reports results roughly in the same ballpark: 40MByte/s throughput
> IDE-RAID<->GigEthernet with encryption, 90MByte/s without, on modern
> 2 - 3GHz PeeCees. In that case it's just decryption rather than
> ssh+sshd running on the same CPU, so divide that throughput in half,
> and you are in the same MB per MHz ballpark as the other results. I
> think it is probably working properly.
I think you are right. Getting about 1MB/s on a 300MHz UltraSPARC II with
gcc seems pretty good, actually. I figured I would get about half the disk
rate, so about 7MB/s, give or take. Clearly that will not happen.
Sorry that I can't keep the thread going, but I don't subscribe to the list,
and I've not been copied on the messages.
Frank
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 06:28:39 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15B916A40F
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bel@orel.ru)
Received: from mail.orel.ru (relay.orel.ru [89.113.48.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B3D43D5C
for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:33 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from bel@orel.ru)
Received: from [192.168.99.99] (pix.net.orel.ru [89.113.48.75])
by mail.orel.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8S6SS1v073125;
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru)
Message-ID: <451B6B8C.9040502@orel.ru>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:28 +0400
From: Andrew Belashov <bel@orel.ru>
Organization: ORIS
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060123)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
In-Reply-To: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on mail.orel.ru host
X-Antivirus-Code: 100000
X-Zombi-Check: on netra2.orel.ru
Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:40 -0000
Hello, Frank!
Frank Jahnke wrote:
> Any suggestions on how I can increase the network performance of my 1E+?
Try my patch for hme(4) device polling(4):
<http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=17147+0+archive/2006/freebsd-sparc64/20060423.freebsd-sparc64>
I use this patch without problems by two production machines from the moment
of the publication. Network performance is very good on Ultra 60 (2x450MHz).
FTP transfer rate more than 11 MB/s.
scp transfer rate 2.5 MB/s.
scp -c blowfish transfer rate 3.6 MB/s.
--
With Best Regards,
Andrew Belashov.
From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 11:57:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ADA16A407;
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868CC43D55;
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:33 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8UBvWbp040793;
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca
[64.7.128.98])
by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8UBvWXl098058;
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666)
id 93DE17302F; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>
From: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>
To: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, <current@freebsd.org>,
<sparc64@freebsd.org>
Precedence: bulk
Message-Id: <20060930115732.93DE17302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1,
clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on clamscanner4
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc:
Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:34 -0000
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - cd /src
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> World build started on Sat Sep 30 11:48:51 UTC 2006
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2.3: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4.1: building includes
[...]
===> gnu/lib/libregex/doc (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libreadline (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history/doc (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline/doc (buildincludes)
===> gnu/lib/libstdc++ (buildincludes)
make: don't know how to make /src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/include/ext/demangle.h. Stop
*** Error code 2
Stop in /src/gnu/lib.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/gnu.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/gnu.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src.
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - ERROR: failed to build world
TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.06 user 5.28 system 942.01 real