From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 10 08:26:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C320916A4DD for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F406243D55 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so591108wri for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:26:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tNm064l6iHGz4FK2ECSyqJfCMcRoPkSga0ONt7Jtv31ojWkumjjrwFCit7iDi52GmrjFGAYb06l/Xjk+X80hpfwdcA6Jck1zVuuxuhtADXZRR8O7C7cvIEvmyXWweJ6HpkVV4RUnC/qkf+x2VJS+v1Onq9eotKtqcitv91DwaIc= Received: by 10.65.97.17 with SMTP id z17mr4135370qbl; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.225.9 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:26:21 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Norbert Koch" In-Reply-To: <44AD01C8.2040704@demig.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060703101554.Q26325@fledge.watson.org> <200607032020.10993.davidxu@freebsd.org> <44AD01C8.2040704@demig.de> Cc: threads@freebsd.org, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:26:23 -0000 Is there any reason that exporting the process real time scheduling functionality via the pthread api through libthr would not suffice? -Kip On 7/6/06, Norbert Koch wrote: > > I don't need hard real-time, but would like to be able to use > > FreeBSD for soft real-time. > > me too. > > Norbert Koch > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >