From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 19 01:20:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902F216A420 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dewey@hyltown.com) Received: from tuxpro.hyltown.com (dns1.dhcp-inc.com [206.74.59.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF18743D45 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:20:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dewey@hyltown.com) Received: from localhost (webmail.hyltown.com [10.0.0.247]) by tuxpro.hyltown.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id k1IHbbg22047 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:37:37 -0500 Received: from 41.sub-70-192-149.myvzw.com (41.sub-70-192-149.myvzw.com [70.192.149.41]) by webmail.hyltown.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:50 -0500 Message-ID: <1140277610.43f7416aefff4@webmail.hyltown.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:50 -0500 From: Dewey Hylton To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 70.192.149.41 Subject: ucom0 device file not being created in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:20:15 -0000 with appropriate kernel modules loaded, and plugging my lg vx8100 phone into my laptop via usb: freebsd54 - dmesg shows ucom0 reference, /dev/ucom0 is created and is functions with ppp. freebsd60 - dmesg shows ucom0 reference, no device file is created. creating one manually does not work (fails to create in /dev, creates but is non-functional outside /dev). i've been unable to figure out where the problem lies, and have had no luck googling either. am i missing something simple, or has support somehow become missing or broken between 5.x and 6? -- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?