From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 18 16:00:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5224C16A402 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0416E13C46A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2IG0HWj078747 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l2IG0HS7078746; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:17 GMT Message-Id: <200703181600.l2IG0HS7078746@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Remko Lodder Cc: Subject: Re: misc/110426: rpc.rstatd returns bad info X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Remko Lodder List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:00:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/110426; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Remko Lodder To: Bruce Becker Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/110426: rpc.rstatd returns bad info Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:01:13 +0100 Bruce Becker wrote: >> Environment: > FreeBSD infra-gw 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #3: Wed Feb 7 16:21:26 EST 2007 root@infra-gw:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW-YQ i386 > >> Description: > 4.x & 3.x seem to have issues with opackets systcl mib (always returns 0) > > this fix uses the kmem interface as well as fixes some code botches > Hello, Both for this PR and the other one you submitted: can you confirm that this is fixed in 5.X already? We are -not- supporting <= 4.x anymore, so if someone wants to commit it, that's OK, but I dont want to keep 4.X specific PR's open (especially not new ones that were created after the EoL date for 4.X). Thanks, Remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */