From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 19 15:36:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E834516A420 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5912A13C4A3 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 28so1169428hub for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:36:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N2OO0r/Xac232fz9VvW6nVEAUMN5d8fnx0m8EQhgm+aFwfklVX6NhOLwhrtyaus2O0U3NxPIpRyY+4Z1iHukrbrrDgSEOEFutZ9pIyVUDE3cqu4hndOs8cKpn6etEzl8fHtRshgP4tJHnsVxSXI/ZU/RpFhuoVpJPdJmvyJTdF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IrrGA+zHcUuK07+HssNfZAhFJfYOdUUQGCun7z85lqjqAGg38zgIIu4p7i4SKS4DdE83Urm1aw1bVu83oW+ecPdP6fJYMcPKDguZhXW7NOwg7/DQ2ilPRQRbTw/5uBi2zn0E2i7oKQ1DvkoJRRnITvPZAUExkSnkMvb8omSiAE8= Received: by 10.86.98.18 with SMTP id v18mr3766067fgb.1187537806265; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.123.111? ( [84.0.102.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d13sm7876325fka.2007.08.19.08.36.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46C863A6.5010404@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:37:10 +0200 From: deeptech71@gmail.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: filesystem timestamps and their usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:36:49 -0000 Let's talk about file system timestamps. What kind of timestamps are there currently, and what are they used for? (or what new timestamps would be needed/beneficial, or whatever.) Currently I can think of only two: 1. data_time: The last time the file was written to. 2. file_time: The last time the file was moved or written to. If a directory is moved, all files within are also time-updated. It should be considered invalid, if data_time > file_time, but can happen if, for example, a file is copied from somewhere, like an FTP server, and ?therefore not be automatically corrected? (it does not imply filesystem corruption). Some basic usage for compiling. Here's func.x86's dependency tree: common.h } (func.c includes func.h, which includes common.h) func.h } func.c } -> func.o } (func.x86 is generated } -> func.x86 from func.o and main.o) common.h } -> main.o } main.h } main.c } (main.c includes main.h, which includes common.h) We have compiled everything already. Now let's do something. As a requirement, the data_time of a derived file must be later in time, for it to be considered up to date. That is, if I edit func.h, it's timestamp will be higher than func.c's timestamp, meaning that I have to recompile func.c, and link the executable. Generally, a file's (like func.x86's) time must be higher than every other file it depends on (func.o, main.o). Next, if I replace common.h with a different file (because I want to recompile with someone else's common.h), the data_time of common.h may be lower than main.h. So all the data_time and file_time of main.o and func.o must be higher than the ones of common.h. Generally both of the file's times should be higher than any of its dependencies' times. If a bad time (data_time > file_time) is detected, and its file depends on something, it's remade. If it does not depend on anything, I don't know, maybe the compiler should warning or use the file_time only. If I want to replace the .o (wtf for?), then I'll have to build, replace, then link only. OK that would be the basic usage of these two timestamps in compiling. If I'm wrong, or something would be more practical maybe, please tell. And, what about other timestamps? THX From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 05:14:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2281116A468 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2BC13C46C for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1311097fka for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hoU81LlexCGCuKWuRFF7WjHKZmFkzfqcQ3/0tO9HIUK1TTPjg4RvklXv9jBouXUPw725OMjIga2be/G14clVwIJ53irpJL/I4UY8YNNoFjxFriCqlwzVqU+0+LIYyuTk31Guq9S5HpPFYw9rUdR1NUa57OyugXpjGTcJp06aP4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qfZGZg8A8ZlTpY65MQq2q9hJMok/Iec4cugoCoYmUS5/iXzFNIH5hxjlCLSqNOJKumgOTJvg7f1TtTs+NBAscF+KzOFDUli/Fy1bysCnTLLCnUOQ4X+TaUh3DCHkB0vrcMbU3E5uIxPoNSdka5wG3JMKbkvxQMs2O9AQEkF+ejI= Received: by 10.82.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr3190234buc.1187585135251; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:45:35 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Dan Langille" In-Reply-To: <46C5B389.28097.B59755D@dan.langille.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46C5B389.28097.B59755D@dan.langille.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: death of a mountain bike X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:14:29 -0000 On 17/08/07, Dan Langille wrote: > The bike isn't really dead. I realised after Dru Lavigne thought I'd > already written about the USA trip during which I bought this > bike.... the bike pre-dates my BSD involvement by about 2 years. > > http://dan.langille.org/2007/08/13/proflex-957-death-of-a-bike/ > Get a cheap, suspension-corrected, rigid (Ican't- believeIhavetomakethatqualification) fork, stuff some big apples on it and, violin!, a coffee-shop cruiser! -- -- From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 09:54:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3287616A41B for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7855C13C45D for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (vader.bytemobile.ondsl.gr [83.235.244.135]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-8) with ESMTP id l7K9asnp013748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:37:06 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7K9aVwZ001718; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:36:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l7JKbMmN010307; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:37:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:37:22 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: deeptech71@gmail.com Message-ID: <20070819203721.GA10057@kobe.laptop> References: <46C863A6.5010404@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46C863A6.5010404@gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.431, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.02, BAYES_00 -2.60, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 0.99) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem timestamps and their usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:54:29 -0000 On 2007-08-19 17:37, deeptech71@gmail.com wrote: > Let's talk about file system timestamps. What kind of timestamps are > there currently, and what are they used for? (or what new timestamps > would be needed/beneficial, or whatever.) > > Currently I can think of only two: > 1. data_time: The last time the file was written to. > 2. file_time: The last time the file was moved or written to. > > [snip discussion about fictitious timestamp values] It would be more interesting, educating and useful to discuss the usefulness of the current 'ctime', 'mtime' and 'atime' attributes implemented by most UNIX file systems (as opposed to, say, a discussion of the usefulness and merits of a pair of imaginary timestamp attributes). Try searching for 'ctime', 'mtime' and 'atime' in the source tree of FreeBSD. The most interesting place (but the most 'technical' too) is, naturally, the implementation of the UFS file system itself: /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/dinode.h If you go through this header file, looking for 'time', you will see many useful bits and pieces of information. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 04:43:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB2A16A419 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0667113C459 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7L4Ud8N008406 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <46CA6A6F.3070307@highperformance.net> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:30:39 -0700 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Managing/Cataloging Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:43:01 -0000 I would like to employ a system to store and maintain metadata about computer files. It is clear to me that plain old file system hierarchies have serious shortcomings when you must consider long term retrievability. I am looking for a glorified "card catalog" system. I've read about a bunch of content management systems in sourceforge, but they mostly sound like web specific tools (Lenya?). I need to manage HTML as well as spreadsheets, a variety of text documents, and engineering models. The software I have in mind should manage files better than a hierarchy and it's got to manage better than arbitrary search and index. It should use the filesystem that the host computer system uses (UFS, OpenAFS). It should make a user's life better, especially when long term maintenance and retrievel are considered. What are the leading open source applications for this sort of card catalog software? What is the geek-speak for this sort of software? Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 12:40:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3486316A41B for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.movaqar@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83C813C459 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.movaqar@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so2667490pyb for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Kn8/8eb0VQhKXF1R/fhaI5dvPWMErN1D9e0tumaN90Mg5YM3L7pakOxuxOwyPdryz32YXpJAGAilX4ldO6Df5hZnA8Hq2XuUGzvK/ffF09mn3z3OJh/F2RpKwgYaZuIye+PqgtOtRo6bYZCOnxHQnoZaL662GKUzHrsUqsYosns= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jqR2EWL0bCzdMwIBDB8ut477OD9JVvQJxtebUIMblEO7gXXCx5xhEUrUlfb2uRR6Kg0MJ5LfPt++GbIQh68IW3vt++nCdjoJBZUGwcY3x18NIZIQLZfU/QvYmQm7YO9qSBTqPvqOKA4llbffNxbYm0leL2laO8UvEqrof7O1vIs= Received: by 10.114.148.1 with SMTP id v1mr19047wad.1187698370634; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.132.13 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6d62f69a0708210512s7b157546w5af5aa7d1bcfc2a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:50 +0330 From: "Bahman M." To: jcw@highperformance.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: RE: Managing/Cataloging Files X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:40:35 -0000 > I would like to employ a system to store and maintain metadata about > computer files. It is clear to me that plain old file system > hierarchies have serious shortcomings when you must consider long term > retrievability. I am looking for a glorified "card catalog" system. > I've read about a bunch of content management systems in sourceforge, > but they mostly sound like web specific tools (Lenya?). I need to > manage HTML as well as spreadsheets, a variety of text documents, and > engineering models. > The software I have in mind should manage files better than a hierarchy > and it's got to manage better than arbitrary search and index. It > should use the filesystem that the host computer system uses (UFS, > OpenAFS). It should make a user's life better, especially when long > term maintenance and retrievel are considered. > What are the leading open source applications for this sort of card > catalog software? What is the geek-speak for this sort of software? Alfresco is a J2EE based document management software using Tomcat as the application server and MySQL as the database. It supports document versioning and accepts documents (spreadsheets, word, presentations) in OpenOffice format -not sure about engineering models. See http://alfresco.org for more information. Hope it helps. Bahman From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 21:47:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDF16A418 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cthunes@tqhosting.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CBE13C45E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cthunes@tqhosting.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so1065581nfb for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.206.9 with SMTP id d9mr3081024hug.1187731310598; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.26.13 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:21:50 -0400 From: "Chris Thunes" Sender: cthunes@tqhosting.com To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a4da2b67ee3c2ec2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RootBSD.net - Free VPS/jails for projects X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:47:30 -0000 Hey everyone, My name's Chris and I'm with a new hosting provider offering BSD dedicated hosting and FreeBSD virtual hosting. We are looking to sponsor some community projects by providing our Lambda VPS package, pro bono, to anyone with a project in need. All we hope for in return is feedback on our services, but this is really no strings attached and you are welcome to use the VPS as long as you like. If anyone is interested just drop me an email and I'll be glad to answer any questions or you can check out our website at http://www.rootbsd.net. Thanks, Chris -- Lead Developer RootBSD.net From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 22 11:03:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DAE16A41A for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdworld@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2158F13C474 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdworld@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so10459anc for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:03:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=aDB9z9gozj/AkTrKj6r10TzdHQvSIEct6zGMXDopOnA7c69KFCUfTGODQuKe2VF4TvHDjvvQKfcRixihtvMaf4QnluxWmvUc0wBC6Pv7bxggHr+eZqOyYHX8hiveT7j87a7VNVeeu0wMFRT/1wqLdejSSv6OZiPLr+dQF8Y917M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=DwZ7Y8WYZ1hwdwo5rI1DuOJstFKwTCdN7pz7oKOIy52D2kPt0/EWRGSjXxrZvCgRbKshe6WoYXSE28MFo/0QEox2M8BKOAjlJveNGgmEnkYRo7swVPeIwPjCFC3QLmofQBr+mj7QIQgCnnRFu3TQ5m9iuXBD5y8FmnDHvxK6TM8= Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr4082174agb.1187779071933; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop.FreeBSD-World.com ( [74.74.226.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm3389754agc.2007.08.22.03.37.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46CC11F7.2020705@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:37:43 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070805) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Benjamin D Adams Subject: PostgreSQL scaling on 6.2 and 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:03:54 -0000 I came across this benchmark. Very nice performance increase from 6.2 to 7.0. http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0 -------------------- Ben Adams