From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 18:20:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13416A469 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844A913C45D for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IRu3G-0001Dt-8l for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:20:02 +0200 Received: from 78-1-119-74.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.119.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:20:02 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-119-74.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:20:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:59:31 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <20070901074803.GM85633@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig71163B03B56C142875DFE08D" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-119-74.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20070901074803.GM85633@comp.chem.msu.su> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Sender: news Subject: Re: New option for newfs(3) to make life with GEOM easier X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:20:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig71163B03B56C142875DFE08D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Any comments or objections? Thanks! Why not go a bit further and reserve 1 sector by default? I mean: keep the option, but if the GEOM people agree that only the last sector is in question here (and I think all current GEOM classes behave this way), reserve the 1 sector by default. Nobody will notice but some foot shooting will be avoided. The reason for this is that in some cases people will change their mind about whether they want to do mirroring or not, and then it's too late. --------------enig71163B03B56C142875DFE08D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG2hkDldnAQVacBcgRAl0qAKDbNGrGKpaMOHOwJyGTd0x+d1YwxgCeL+wi C9snVWCVWKBziDzuFIS/+Zk= =UsX2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig71163B03B56C142875DFE08D--