Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 02:23:41 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DPS Initial Ideas Message-ID: <f25lqg$ik$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070512222435.GA28981@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070512004209.GA12218@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <17989.8202.624522.136573@bhuda.mired.org> <20070512090935.GA13929@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20070512193302.GA24673@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070512214422.GA88480@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20070512222435.GA28981@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8BA5732858CAA00DAB10578A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > It seems to me that you do not appreciate the reasons behind this > conservatism. A very important one is that we have two students who > have committed to spending their summer working on improving the > existing pkg_tools in ways that will solve some of the real problems > we are facing, and the project we have agreed upon is that they will > be using existing tools rather than rewriting from scratch as part of > a not-yet-defined larger project. So change their project :) I'm only half-serious but SoC hasn't officialy started yet and Google's ok with projects' goals being modified. Of course, the students should decide. --------------enig8BA5732858CAA00DAB10578A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGRlqNldnAQVacBcgRAnt6AKDHWVoh/drJf6v3JZykCutybk7z3ACcCzF6 qsmhOS4e3Y7QpyRcalBTDcI= =xdjV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8BA5732858CAA00DAB10578A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f25lqg$ik$1>