Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:02:48 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using shell commands versus C equivalents Message-ID: <4674B268.4030502@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <46703EE9.1030804@freebsd.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0706131018120.25469@hymn01.u.washington.edu> <46703EE9.1030804@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Kientzle wrote:
> As Joerg said, though, you're not likely to gain much from
> this. pkg_install is almost entirely disk bound.
Going back to this particular comment, has anybody really looked
into the speed of mtree(3)? That was the next stop that I planned on
looking at after I make my changes, in terms of fchown(2) and friends.
Also, were the bottlenecks seen in pkg_delete and pkg_add, or does
it appear to be distributed across the board?
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4674B268.4030502>