From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 07:02:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE1316A400 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D860B13C4B9 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 07:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4E72PUs012830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 May 2007 09:02:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.14.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l4E72PJQ012829; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:02:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:02:25 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka To: Cristian KLEIN Message-ID: <20070514070225.GA8051@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <4631170E.7060309@net.utcluj.ro> <20070504140812.GA98624@fit.vutbr.cz> <46433138.80709@net.utcluj.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46433138.80709@net.utcluj.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 147.229.8.12 Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rsync synchronization problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:02:29 -0000 Cristian KLEIN wrote (2007/05/10): > > However, if you have timeouts from both ftp-master.cz.freebsd.org and > > ftp.freebsd.cz, it is weird and I would expect that there is some > > connectivity problem outside Czech region. > Is there any way we could test this? I can't remember having this > problem while using cvsup. Should I switch to cvsup. Is there a way to > do this switch while keeping the currently downloaded archive? It is a question what to test. You are right that I see rsync timeouts much more, that cvsup timeouts. Maybe you can try to increase --timeout=n on the client side. I had to set timeout = 15000 on the server, so you can try to go up to this time on the client side too. I think that you can switch directly from rsync to cvsup, because cvsup checks all files physically during first run (first run of cvsup is even worse that rsync runs, its gain is only with repeated runs). Then it is good idea to check the repository using cvsupchk for deletion of extra files not controlled by cvsup. > > Just to know, there is currently 3ware PATA with 6 x 120 GB and > > I have plans to switch to 3ware SATA controller freed from another > > server with 4 x 500 GB WD RE2 new disks in the future. Good news, I have prepared one SATA 3ware RAID 8506-12 with six 320 GB disks on the desk. I hope that I would be able to switch to the new RAID during this weekend, so please do not be surprised, if ftp-master.cz.freebsd.org will be inaccessible for some time. Currently, all hosts seem to be up to date and the load of the server is minimal. Regards. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic