From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 25 16:49:01 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BB816A402
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com)
Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6715013C471
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com)
Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1])
	by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B778CC316
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:49:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 58)
	id 45526C2E9; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:49:00 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zoraida.natserv.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=4.0 tests=RCVD_IN_FIVETENSRC,SPF_PASS 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
	* 1.0 RCVD_IN_FIVETENSRC RBL: Received via a relay in Five Ten block
	list *      [66.114.65.147 listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147])
	by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2771C2AF;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:48:57 -0500 (EST)
References: <cone.1171556679.453588.55347.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<i2hat2l2ml6q1bfhv1t8ja63ghu5jdkocv@4ax.com>
	<cone.1171743956.652183.78181.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<200702172201.l1HM1BnR009915@lava.sentex.ca>
	<cone.1171915729.745199.41200.5001@35st.simplicato.com>
	<200702192021.l1JKLAkQ021489@lava.sentex.ca>
	<cone.1171921551.955158.41200.5001@35st.simplicato.com>
	<200702192231.l1JMVoWG022055@lava.sentex.ca>
Message-ID: <cone.1172422137.380925.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/
From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:48:57 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:49:01 -0000

Mike Tancsa writes:

> Strange, our daemons dont grow that large. Are you using LDAP lookups 
> or something like that compiled against it ?  Looking at one box, 
> running a dev version

Again this is my frustration with ClamAv.
Some versions behave great, but as we upgrade some versions had serious 
problems like growing over 512MB in memory usage.

 
> and a version .90 started last Friday shows 74MB of mem usage.

Tried .90 shortly after the port was done and had nothing but problems.
Going to try it with the alternate threading library suggested earlier in 
the thread.