From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 17:16:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9AE16A404 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC1E13C448 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id DAA11394; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:15:58 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:15:57 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <461A84BC.1040308@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testers: olsrd and IP_ONESBCAST X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:16:11 -0000 On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > For a while now I have had a patch available to teach olsrd to use > IP_ONESBCAST instead of using libnet/bpf just to send broadcast > datagrams in FreeBSD, which has had IP_ONESBCAST for a few years now. Would 'a few years' likely include 5.5-STABLE? Which file/s will tell? > If anyone is using olsrd on FreeBSD I would greatly appreciate testing > and feedback for this patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/olsrd-onesbcast.diff I've no reachable neighbours so far, but I've set it up and run it once or twice in anticipation of both geekier neighbours and better kit .. suppose you'll have come across https://www.open-mesh.net/batman ? If so, have you any thoughts on their rather savage dissing of olsrd as it stands, and apparent greater success with seeming raw, seat-of-pants, scarcely documented but possibly real-world-practical algorithms? Cheers, Ian