From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 12:59:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB13416A418 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beto@octantis.com.au) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FD213C458 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beto@octantis.com.au) Received: (qmail 3022 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2007 07:32:09 -0500 Received: from 124-170-76-14.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (124.170.76.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Sep 2007 07:32:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:32:01 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Charlie Message-ID: <20070902223201.641dc576@localhost> In-Reply-To: <72d64df10709011204y316d2f2bic47b801e2398d6d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <72d64df10709011204y316d2f2bic47b801e2398d6d1@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Octantis Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:18:39 +0000 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus-daemon using 100% of cpu on xfce4 & 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:59:17 -0000 On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:04:47 -0400 Charlie wrote: > I am fairly new to xfce, and googling the issue hasn't helped me out. Any > ideas? How can I fix dbus so it doesn't use so much CPU, or how can I > disable it completely? I know it is used for inter-application > communication, but I'm not entirely sure I need it (I don't see any adverse > effects when I kill it manually). Hi Charlie, (I think this should really go to questions@... but maybe i'm wrong) I run dbus, hald and XFCE4 on 6.2 STABLE (have been for a while). I haven't seen any of the problems you describe. My relevant rc.conf bits are : ---- # Hardware Abstraction Layer ## supported by XFCE 4.4 and Thunar hald_enable="YES" polkitd_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" ----- You can change them to NO and they'll be disabled in the next boot. Any messages in ~/.xsession-errors ? or /var/log/messages ? B _________________________ Norberto Meijome Octantis Pty Ltd "The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." Oscar Wilde NOTICE: The contents of this email and its attachments are confidential and intended only for the individuals or entities named above. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without using, copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 13:50:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7899316A417 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409913C461 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 5728 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2007 08:23:35 -0500 Received: from 124-170-76-14.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (124.170.76.14) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Sep 2007 08:23:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:23:29 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Charlie Message-ID: <20070902232329.75480f66@localhost> In-Reply-To: <72d64df10709011204y316d2f2bic47b801e2398d6d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <72d64df10709011204y316d2f2bic47b801e2398d6d1@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus-daemon using 100% of cpu on xfce4 & 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:50:38 -0000 On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:04:47 -0400 Charlie wrote: > I am fairly new to xfce, and googling the issue hasn't helped me out. Any > ideas? How can I fix dbus so it doesn't use so much CPU, or how can I > disable it completely? I know it is used for inter-application > communication, but I'm not entirely sure I need it (I don't see any adverse > effects when I kill it manually). Hi Charlie, (I think this should really go to questions@... but maybe i'm wrong) I run dbus, hald and XFCE4 on 6.2 STABLE (have been for a while). I haven't seen any of the problems you describe. My relevant rc.conf bits are : ---- # Hardware Abstraction Layer ## supported by XFCE 4.4 and Thunar hald_enable="YES" polkitd_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" ----- You can change them to NO and they'll be disabled in the next boot. Any messages in ~/.xsession-errors ? or /var/log/messages ? B _________________________ Norberto Meijome Octantis Pty Ltd "The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." Oscar Wilde NOTICE: The contents of this email and its attachments are confidential and intended only for the individuals or entities named above. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without using, copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness... This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." Plato I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 15:30:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED59516A417 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 15:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cdubfx@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABBB13C45B for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 15:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cdubfx@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k4so991938nfd for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=uBDN/aQi/Ca1k+KBtFr9TzHoXMBHKA/1yFUhyaSi2QZlwj0BbjHirKMbEeBiojhrxKoiMZYZzKAuYXjxlj5m4GL8a/3AcPMkTFoZ6yUB6VVN14kTfQuRW3mtKPPK6ItNdUyVSOByQlIOguTWGonJOzW1R5UY5477S3ibZ9K8ipE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TVtHy8axYfmT/pM+n+7odnUJM1sSf+GmMzxTLIpsaK5xfU3v3e3yBvcS/gepI0bONJoDFLMpAi+jSXjgxgymYyPI/8waTasB06bW7JTLqEXn3tg1CROmOWb1Y/RxmvOCjGfs4DnQJUg/y1t1rffoZR2YmG2RwkGaUpLloqU27Zo= Received: by 10.86.71.1 with SMTP id t1mr2626871fga.1188747014566; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.99.18 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72d64df10709020830t6956818au1c1bd7a85002683a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:30:14 -0400 From: Charlie To: "Norberto Meijome" In-Reply-To: <20070902232329.75480f66@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <72d64df10709011204y316d2f2bic47b801e2398d6d1@mail.gmail.com> <20070902232329.75480f66@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dbus-daemon using 100% of cpu on xfce4 & 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:30:26 -0000 Thanks for the reply. Still not having any luck. The rc.conf options you mentioned were not in my rc.conf file at all. I added them in, trying it both ways, with all options set to YES and NO. Dbus-daemon is still using all my cpu. I don't see anything unusual in /var/log/messages, and I don't have an .xsession-errors file. On 9/2/07, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:04:47 -0400 > Charlie wrote: > > > I am fairly new to xfce, and googling the issue hasn't helped me out. > Any > > ideas? How can I fix dbus so it doesn't use so much CPU, or how can I > > disable it completely? I know it is used for inter-application > > communication, but I'm not entirely sure I need it (I don't see any > adverse > > effects when I kill it manually). > > Hi Charlie, > (I think this should really go to questions@... but maybe i'm wrong) > I run dbus, hald and XFCE4 on 6.2 STABLE (have been for a while). I > haven't seen any of the problems you describe. > > My relevant rc.conf bits are : > ---- > # Hardware Abstraction Layer > ## supported by XFCE 4.4 and Thunar > hald_enable="YES" > polkitd_enable="YES" > dbus_enable="YES" > ----- > > You can change them to NO and they'll be disabled in the next boot. > > Any messages in ~/.xsession-errors ? or /var/log/messages ? > > B > > _________________________ > Norberto Meijome > Octantis Pty Ltd > > "The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that > every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." > Oscar Wilde > > > > > NOTICE: The contents of this email and its attachments are confidential > and intended only for the individuals or entities named above. If you have > received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and > immediately delete the message and any attachments without using, copying or > disclosing the contents. Thank you. > > _________________________ > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > > "The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse > into greatness... > This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first > appears he is a protector." > Plato > > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when > wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have > been Warned. >