From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 10:35:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EA516A417 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA85713C461 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2007 10:08:34 -0000 Received: from p54A7EFAC.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [84.167.239.172] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 26 Aug 2007 12:08:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18xIkgC6XwxDraVnmEqzI7OQTVjti4BRozYLdskU6 a6iA/c7YLuVKzr Message-ID: <46D15117.90706@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:08:23 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20070805184359.GD21980@rot26.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070805184359.GD21980@rot26.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ports-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-amd64@freebsd.org: freehdl-0.0.4_1 failed on amd64 7] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:35:15 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers? If > you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix, > please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate case, so that users do > not unexpectedly encounter it. > > See http://pointyhat.freebsd.org for the full log. > > Thanks, > Kris I cannot find a PR about this. So I'm just replying to the mail. The problem only appears when the gcc4 branch is used. The freehdl developers as well as me are mystified, because the gcc output does not contain any hints about the nature of the problem. I didn't find a way to check the gcc version in bsd.gcc.mk, so I don't know how to mark it broken properly. I had something like: .if GCC_VERSION >= 40 BROKEN= gcc3 branch required .endif in mind.