From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 28 00:51:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE19316A420 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EDA713C4AC for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25219 invoked by uid 399); 28 Oct 2007 00:51:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO slave.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2007 00:51:17 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:51:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <4722F2E5.9020800@icyb.net.ua> Message-ID: References: <4722F2E5.9020800@icyb.net.ua> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: avahi and avahi-autoipd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:51:18 -0000 On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > It seems that if net/avahi port is config-ed with WITH_AUTOIPD then > there is a some sort of circular dependency between the two port which > may affect some port management tools. avahi has a run dependency on > avahi-autoipd and the latter has a build dependency on the former. > I am not sure if this is legal from port infrastructure perspective but > it is certainly troublesome for me personally. This is an interesting issue from the tools perspective, as you pointed out. In order to properly support the recent Xorg update I split installation of the build dependencies and run dependencies, but for some reason I am still doing the install of the master port after checking the run dependencies. I'm working on some bug fix/regression testing stuff in portmaster now, so I'll make the change to do run depends after install of the master port and see if it breaks anything. I certainly don't see what would be wrong with the dependencies that you describe, and if it's "legal" as you put it, portmaster should support it. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection