From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 01:38:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D5D16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA3713C428 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so6999232wxc for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:38:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Hr1hXmuEZq5xCHuO8jcaQaHtrUKMoXExAddxAQTVDWN0Jvp9per9uJVKyj08RSgJL5CXLpUX53A4yhw0n5eox5g0NDaN1ERmoLnuCLQGqWtRsLevkr3+/wf2v8PT3fFsL3tqgmjknoIGx4FJK2+AZNI/IMK2/wpQNVO9ny6t2OY= Received: by 10.70.91.11 with SMTP id o11mr46062826wxb.1168133904630; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:38:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:38:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:38:24 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20070104065038.ff351b0f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070104065038.ff351b0f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Juha Saarinen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stuck on win32-codecs compilation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:38:25 -0000 Hi Bill,Juha , Josh and pabola Thanks for all your feedback, It gave the best insight and understanding. This is what I did , because even after I had removed the quick time using make config on win32-codecs directory It was giving me some more errors it it could not find file while downloading(when I issued make install in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs), so I went ahead and downloaded manually download win32-codecs.tar.gz file from ports directory http://freebsd.org/ports/multimedia website, replaced with this new win32-codecs. That made the rest of mplayer successful. Then I bumped into the issue of sound /dev/dsp error I fixed with reading the http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html( this I felt is the good help for anyone having sound issues) did that # sysctl hw.snd.pcm0.vchans=4 # sysctl hw.snd.maxautovchans=4 took care of the sound issue. (does anyone know how automatically download the current specific port, I know portupgrade -a runs, but it runs endlessly forever) Thanks Dak On 1/4/07, Bill Moran wrote: > > "Juha Saarinen" wrote: > > > > On 1/4/07, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > > > Dear Freebsd > > > > > > I was trying to make mplayer and it spat me on error, win32 > -codecs, > > > and went on trying the clean up the win32-codecs and try to make the > codecs, > > > it still errored out > > > > > > Has anyone faced the same issue, Please share your thoughts. > > > > > > I am scratching my head, what I should doing about this. > > > > Waiting until the remote code execution security hole is plugged would > > seem to be a sensible thing: > > > > "The Apple Security Team reports that there are multiple > > vulnerabilities within QuickTime (one of the plugins for > > win32-codecs). A remote attacker capable of creating a malicious SGI > > image, FlashPix, FLC movie, or a QuickTime movie can possibly lead to > > execution of arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (application > > crash). > > > > Users who have QuickTime (/win32-codecs) as a browser plugin may be > > vulnerable to remote code execution by visiting a website containing a > > malicious SGI image, FlashPix, FLC movie or a QuickTime movie." > > You can get mplayer installed safely by deselecting the quicktime codec > during the installation process. To change it now, do the following: > cd /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs && make config > Then deselect quicktime from the menu and save your change. Then go > back to building mplayer and it should succeed. > > -Bill > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 02:33:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CEB16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 02:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B9613C44B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 02:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id m7so3821192nzf for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:33:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=oOgbE3v3zCieW1eFPGuVGoEyoE6VI+9Am4siUOXXHIy6xLKkufaKCjn/nybAzmm1mSLD+DC9WdSmmi45peIi7FZW0BBXs2mT6T/FbgzYlwott3lY3MvGP/WXydplcwzT/NtfNi9EJcGWq7h7pngdAFUjN+UtCWuBHq1Ymgg7GjU= Received: by 10.65.133.8 with SMTP id k8mr555198qbn.1168137217561; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.250.1 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:33:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:33:37 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: dlink ehome wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:33:38 -0000 Hi, I wonder has anybody tried ehome wireless PCI card on freebsd? I tried to look for ehome info but is not listed in dlink website, why?? thanks!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 03:43:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB8816A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC61B13C428 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8374077nfc for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=kbERZTY2vdQz5KoDhX1Zl1u1Q7NK9VZiDxECpc2sgSxkC8t+MvDgDLZmlXowGqAGJPBmj+LF7++UBOJTNe9EYorE3Zzpb0K8BHi9exaikPz7nwtR/UAZMQ7YBkLiybltRL/3aqUOfvQrfGwFEGXbGdKsh3kbjXc16kLlwx6HLpU= Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr2896222bue.1168141410373; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:43:30 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: d41723558ea3d031 Subject: ipmon group and rule X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:43:32 -0000 I'm trying to understand the logs that ipmon is generating. Looking at the ipmon manpage, I see that the group and rule line are given. Jan 6 22:39:42 kanga ipmon[182]: 22:39:41.827406 tun0 @0:5 b 216.98.226.44,1335 -> 216.106.102.70,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN So, this is coming in the tun0 interface, and it matches group @0, rule 5? Looking at the output of "ipfstat -ni", there is no group zero. So, it's a rule without a group, such as this one? block in quick all I'm trying to understand why this is being blocked. Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 03:56:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911FE16A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skeptikos@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EABA13C441 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skeptikos@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8376977nfc for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:56:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=WUqhVAI78xrvIlc4XBMVQc1XLWQcbPNZxkS7DB985S0TOmEQQhTd8SbEVo+jy/6sPV3A97giGpA+pyvb6b9/tAFpMl2iQ4HelbU9GWIgJX2EJDSgRgymq+k1UAOMGbVQsfLHnIy0icRH+AigXUqwl9wLJCJXauJqhfCJWlV+65k= Received: by 10.48.48.13 with SMTP id v13mr16399490nfv.1168142216845; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.32.20 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:56:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:56:56 -0700 From: "christopher floess" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: obtaining kernel.debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:56:58 -0000 I'm trying to debug some panics on my system, and the section in the handbook that goes over kernel debugging points to /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL as the location of kernel.debug. But I don't have this file there. I only have 'kernel'. There is another section in the faq, that addresses getting a kernel.debug by using the 'old method' of recompiling the kernel. It's the one that involves using /usr/sbin/config, make depend, make, make install, which I don't even think is covered in the current handbook anymore. Is this section of the faq out of date? (here's the link http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/advanced.html#KERNEL-PANIC-TROUBLESHOOTING ) I've obtained a vmcore file, and now I just need kernel.debug. Is there a way to get this file using the new make procedure for kernels? Can I just use the 'kernel' file, or is there a difference between 'kernel' and 'kernel.debug'? Thanks for any help ~ Chris -- I can hire one half the working class to kill the other half. ~ Jay Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 04:00:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B4616A416 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A886413C45B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8377764nfc for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:00:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=q3rs7RZ+rgKS/MDYTtVCluKDPAQJaN+40vnk0xqxzlXfr+wzQeTt430DJd9CXnT+JPxyeqBvFCQMAV3x5dWvCqOjhAzWR6nMqzpTpa/xYMJBitJHNO5wPYqvUF61XAQMfV5ZfCoGbpRFfMyzB7MvdZb4WHahhnHMjjxy7c9r+p4= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr2466451buc.1168142447409; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:00:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:00:47 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: fd801f793724ec4f Subject: debugging ipnat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:00:51 -0000 I have a simple port-forwarding rule that I want to work from my gateway to a box on my LAN, but it doesn't seem to be working. [msoulier@kanga ~]$ sudo ipnat -l Password: List of active MAP/Redirect filters: rdr tun0 0.0.0.0/32 port 6882 -> 192.168.1.3 port 6882 tcp Trying to telnet to port 6882 on the public interface from outside, I just get a connection refused. The port is open in the firewall. tcpdump shows the traffic arriving, and a reset packet in response. tcpdump on the private interface shows nothing, so no attempt to forward the traffic is made. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 04:49:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9BA16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF6B13C455 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l074nLUx024774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:49:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l074nLrK024773; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:49:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10755; Sat, 6 Jan 07 20:37:40 PST Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:40:28 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: skeptikos@gmail.com Message-Id: <45a079bc.YFKSvvGvMoJzOpm3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: obtaining kernel.debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:49:22 -0000 > I'm trying to debug some panics on my system, and the section > in the handbook that goes over kernel debugging points to > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL as the location of kernel.debug. > But I don't have this file there. I only have 'kernel'. Just in case this was not obvious, "KERNEL" there is meta-linguistic. Yours might be in GENERIC, MYKERNEL, etc. -- the same place where you built the currently-running kernel. If you're running the original CD-installed kernel, I suppose the corresponding place would be GENERIC (but I don't know offhand whether the standard install includes GENERIC/kernel.debug -- if not, perhaps it should). > Can I just use the 'kernel' file, or is there a difference > between 'kernel' and 'kernel.debug'? The code and data are the same, but 'kernel.debug' also contains debugging records (symbols, source line references, etc). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 06:01:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF1B16A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AE513C457 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l0761AdK038974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:01:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l0761AAb038973; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10916; Sat, 6 Jan 07 21:56:16 PST Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:59:05 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: skeptikos@gmail.com Message-Id: <45a08c29.+fZow2gPPBbcY2c8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <45a079bc.YFKSvvGvMoJzOpm3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <45a079bc.YFKSvvGvMoJzOpm3%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: obtaining kernel.debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:01:11 -0000 > Yours might be in GENERIC, MYKERNEL, etc. -- the same place where > you built the currently-running kernel. If you're running the > original CD-installed kernel, I suppose the corresponding place > would be GENERIC (but I don't know offhand whether the standard > install includes GENERIC/kernel.debug -- if not, perhaps it should). BTW, the kernel build is not necessarily somewhere under /usr/obj -- mine (6.1) is in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC/kernel.debug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 06:46:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA77416A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from exiaf_radar_guy38@yahoo.co.in) Received: from web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com [203.84.221.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E64A613C455 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from exiaf_radar_guy38@yahoo.co.in) Received: (qmail 92264 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2007 06:46:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=MlodmXoIWQUjn8MD4taWMOeLX68L8RBApRzBJ+vVOYbVg9os+Mmzipyk+EebebpmAPkM0Efv1SPxguIN5snesn1MtUHTkDovV+s1EVHcITVlcd+h/CBDUKCmHc74dX9CltWRtyiDnBhPZjZOpS43I6jJGbnOWBjt/rH1fQGDRYA=; X-YMail-OSG: Gh.shnMVM1lC58NuJettBS5Z1pL2COJ8vLQT2clvvpL4OPAItJD8HEaxZ_nqpogydQ-- Received: from [59.94.210.83] by web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:46:13 GMT Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:46:13 +0000 (GMT) From: dharam paul To: Josh Paetzel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200701041242.44359.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <465066.92083.qm@web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com> Cc: dharam paul Subject: Re: Error Installing FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:46:16 -0000 I have given the command: #pkg_add -f vcsup-without-gui I get the message that it is already installed. Does it mean that now I am ready to use CVSup? Regards --- Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Thursday 04 January 2007 09:08, dharam paul > wrote: > > After I issue the make install command, the > following > > error appears while installing cvsup-without-gui: > > > > ===> cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 depends on file: > > /usr/local/lib/m3/pkg/tcp/Free > > BSD4/libm3tcp.a - not found > > ===> Verifying install for > > /usr/local/lib/m3/pkg/tcp/FreeBSD4/libm3tcp.a in / > > > > usr/ports/lang/ezm3 > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not > found > > ===> Extracting for ezm3-1.2 > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2. > > => No SHA256 checksum recorded for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2. > > => MD5 Checksum OK for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-FreeBSD4-boot.tar.bz2. > > => No SHA256 checksum recorded for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-FreeBSD4-boot.tar.bz2. > > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2 > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not > found > > => ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in > > /usr/ports/distfiles/ezm3. > > => Attempting to fetch from > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CVSup/ > > ezm3/. > > fetch: > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CVSup/ezm3/ezm3-1.2-s > >rc.tar.bz2: No address record > > => Attempting to fetch from > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/ezm3/. > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not > found > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2. > > => No SHA256 checksum recorded for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2. > > => MD5 Checksum OK for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-FreeBSD4-boot.tar.bz2. > > => No SHA256 checksum recorded for > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-FreeBSD4-boot.tar.bz2. > > ===> Giving up on fetching files: > > ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2 > > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > > (/usr/ports/lang/ezm3/distinfo) > > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you > want > > to override this > > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > ------ > > > > Please help. > > > > Regards > > > > I'd pkg_add -r csup, which is a drop in replacement > for cvsup that > doesn't have the ezm3 dependancy, or, if you really > do need cvsup > then pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 06:50:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0470316A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA5F13C45E for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 01:50:48 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTA57400; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:50:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-237-238-104.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO [207.237.238.104]) ([207.237.238.104]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 01:50:45 -0500 Message-ID: <45A09841.8070306@tandon.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:50:41 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <465066.92083.qm@web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <465066.92083.qm@web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090206.45A09689.0048,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: Error Installing FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:50:48 -0000 dharam paul wrote: > I have given the command: > #pkg_add -f vcsup-without-gui [...] > Does it mean that now I am ready to use CVSup? Issue a cvsup command and see if it works. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 07:07:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E6A16A47C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155513C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070107070745015004smb5e>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:07:45 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: dharam paul Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:07:44 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <465066.92083.qm@web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <465066.92083.qm@web8902.mail.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701070107.44279.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error Installing FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:07:46 -0000 On Sunday 07 January 2007 00:46, dharam paul wrote: > I have given the command: > #pkg_add -f vcsup-without-gui > > I get the message that it is already installed. > > Does it mean that now I am ready to use CVSup? > > Regards > Sounds like it to me. :) -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 07:09:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E407616A416 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82A3313C4A6 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 66192 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 06:42:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To; b=2ezWd1M+gVFl7z0IyuVpXeAXQTs4SX0je/gWuAoqDy72vvqo/iYEP+YJuqmz1C4KEIqE8W24oaLvpRawy4jjFPgow1/KVz4NRCKczvpUqW5IcDfv0YxILv9oQzuluouL/5Xd2J4DseQAx00r3X1d2UQr6sbQjducenKibdlUalo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@74.104.205.212 with login) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2007 06:42:46 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: WOPbAWgVM1nH50rB5UKo91PlQSnLFrhDxEXkzpL8qbIiGkhFP9sQJ79x_shk4svvew-- From: "Tamouh H." To: "'David Banning'" , Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:42:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: Accx0Zrlk9BsvA0JSRqd/6RiZMbliQAVUc8Q In-Reply-To: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <20070107070926.82A3313C4A6@mx1.freebsd.org> Cc: Subject: RE: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:09:27 -0000 >=20 > I have been blacklisted for spamming and I am attempting to=20 > ascertain the source. >=20 > I have a few networked windows boxes which route through a=20 > FBSD server. I also have around ten off-site users who send=20 > mail via my port > 26 - using smtp password authentication. How do I determine=20 > which email going through the server is spam, and therefore=20 > identify the source? This is more of a question geared towards your mail server application = than FreeBSD. You should check your mail logs. If you want better = advise, you may want to provide more information on what mail server are = you running, and what did you do to prevent SMTP relay. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 10:56:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD5F16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from G.V.Tjong-A-Hung@student.TUDelft.NL) Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl (mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDD913C45A for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from G.V.Tjong-A-Hung@student.TUDelft.NL) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavis (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7054222F11 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:36:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tudelft.nl X-Spam-Score: -3.882 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.882 tagged_above=-99 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PROLO_LEO3=0.01, PROLO_LEO5=0.01] Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tudelft.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EY2whrdUuv23 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:35:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from srv028.tudelft.net (srv028.tudelft.net [131.180.0.83]) by mx0.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57078222F28 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:35:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from SRV602.tudelft.net ([131.180.6.17]) by srv028.tudelft.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:35:26 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: <7179262C99DD344EBE01B432F63614770E6D4E@SRV602.tudelft.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Translation from English to Dutch bug Thread-Index: AccyR4tCUDGoNeLlTzinedvLMyaIig== From: "Tjong-A-Hung" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2007 10:35:26.0536 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B5A3480:01C73247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Translation from English to Dutch bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:56:07 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/nl/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html = Section 6.2.4 differs from = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html = Section 6.2.4 Fix: Change=20 # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so \ /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/flashplayer.xpt \ /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ INTO # ln -s /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so \ /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/ # ln -s /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/flashplayer.xpt \ /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 11:48:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D6816A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from tur.go2.pl (tur.go2.pl [193.17.41.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F5313C44B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx10.go2.pl [193.17.41.74]) by tur.go2.pl (o2.pl Mailer 2.0.1) with ESMTP id 1D471230115 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx10.go2.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BB358059 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from xdsl-5405.zgora.dialog.net.pl (xdsl-5405.zgora.dialog.net.pl [84.40.169.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:00 +0100 (CET) From: cblasius To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:22:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701071222.56717.cblasius@o2.pl> Subject: Scilab error to get help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:48:17 -0000 Hello! I obtain the following error wen I type in Scilab 4-1: -->help printf !--error 999 TCL_EvalFile, at line 3 of file /usr/local/lib/scilab/tcl/sciGUI/sciEditVar.tcl at line 9 of function sciGUI_init called by : line 14 of function sciGUIhelp called by : line 23 of function run_help called by : line 20 of function browsehelp called by : line 25 of function help called by : help printf How to repair this? Thanks in advance. I work on 6.2-PRERELEASE. Best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 11:50:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C6E16A412 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2715C13C474 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2014866ana for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:50:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rJAbsMnEOJrGMvdFJSVYvCrU5ZKVnBc5xKSwHU6etgbyHQqNjD/8PaVeLacOWHMbqAJUGSKsf72mHa0eEPyuvKMNUUeH9M9ZQ6ctDTzhb9Bxeh9udJ7+XujZivZZUh//ZkcIbmsgs7AeHQiscIAF+76uRyq2GSTRlEQaIpbzk/c= Received: by 10.100.166.14 with SMTP id o14mr9256157ane.1168170634495; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:50:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701070350s2237f410ib79ef4c5fd73d5d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:50:34 +0100 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com, mysql@lists.mysql.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD chroot problem...Please help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:50:35 -0000 Hello there I was wondering if someone having great knowledge of FreeBSD chroot system could give me some help. I trying to run MySQL and Apache under a chroot envoirnment. But I am getting these errors. Could you please help me to solve these problems. I have googled a lot but did't find any solution. Please help! 1. When running MySQL 5.0 in a chroot envoirnment, I get following error: # chrootuid /chroot/mysql mysql /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld & [1] 599 # /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld: Can't create/write to file '/var/tmp/ibPM3e0d' (Errcode: 13) 070107 10:43:49 InnoDB: Error: unable to create temporary file; errno: 13 070107 10:43:49 [Note] /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '5.0.27' socket: '/tmp/mysql.sock' port: 0 FreeBSD port: mysql-server-5.0.27 2. When running Apache in chroot envoirnment, I get following error: # chroot /chroot/httpd /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd fopen: Operation not supported httpd: could not open document config file /dev/null I will really appreciate your kind help! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:05:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB3116A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5A013C44C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2015595ana for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:05:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=PJnRFMw8zaihtKFFJMjDrRjpA0qOv9W4oJzns6+LGuruLlk2WU8+Fj+VzCU4/eyTVvrYNL63KerzWW7G9YRem792Mpvnfsc9kq9A6P57u/DMDkjRYY/N5rHCK9LJEh6MGatMeAyg7yW+LHruO39ljCpiY7UMWDQqOWGEs55I97M= Received: by 10.100.164.14 with SMTP id m14mr9263770ane.1168171504173; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:05:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:05:04 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: rc.conf Where to put DNS Servers addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:05:05 -0000 Hello friends During installation, we provide DNS server address, Defaultrouter address, machin's IP address and Netmask address. I can find and change the IP, Netmask and Defaultrouter addresses in /etc/rc.conf. But where to find & change DNS1 & DNS2 servers IP's? In which file and what location, I can find the DNS Server IP address I gave during installation? Thanks for the help! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:13:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843FB16A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22C8613C465 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 44658 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 11:46:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2007 11:46:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 71909 invoked by uid 98); 7 Jan 2007 11:46:17 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.024753 secs); 07 Jan 2007 11:46:17 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.024753 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2007 11:46:11 -0000 (Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:31:11 +0545) Received: (qmail 55881 invoked by uid 1009); 7 Jan 2007 11:46:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 7 Jan 2007 11:46:07 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:31:07 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070107173107.9dc3702a.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.1 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 Cc: Subject: FreeRadius 1.1.3 segmentation problem in Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:13:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear All, Just today, I have installed FreeRadius 1.1.3 from FreeBSD 6.0 (i386) ports. I am posting this question in FreeBSD mailing list. I am finding it hard to run FreeRadius on my FreeBSD 6.0 machine. Could the following segmentation fault be a FreeBSD issue? I am following this material from: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/excerpt/radius_5/index1.html However when I try to start it using: radiusd -X, I get the following errors: Starting - reading configuration files ... reread_config: reading radiusd.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/proxy.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/clients.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/eap.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/sql.conf main: prefix = "/usr/local" main: localstatedir = "/var" main: logdir = "/var/log" main: libdir = "/usr/local/lib" main: radacctdir = "/var/log/radacct" main: hostname_lookups = no main: snmp = no main: max_request_time = 30 main: cleanup_delay = 5 main: max_requests = 1024 main: delete_blocked_requests = 0 main: port = 0 main: allow_core_dumps = no main: log_stripped_names = no main: log_file = "/var/log/radius.log" main: log_auth = no main: log_auth_badpass = no main: log_auth_goodpass = no main: pidfile = "/var/run/radiusd/radiusd.pid" main: user = "(null)" main: group = "(null)" main: usercollide = no main: lower_user = "no" main: lower_pass = "no" main: nospace_user = "no" main: nospace_pass = "no" main: checkrad = "/usr/local/sbin/checkrad" main: proxy_requests = no proxy: retry_delay = 5 proxy: retry_count = 3 proxy: synchronous = no proxy: default_fallback = yes proxy: dead_time = 120 proxy: post_proxy_authorize = no proxy: wake_all_if_all_dead = no security: max_attributes = 200 security: reject_delay = 1 security: status_server = no main: debug_level = 0 read_config_files: reading dictionary read_config_files: reading naslist Using deprecated naslist file. Support for this will go away soon. read_config_files: reading clients Using deprecated clients file. Support for this will go away soon. read_config_files: reading realms radiusd: entering modules setup Module: Library search path is /usr/local/lib Module: Loaded exec exec: wait = yes exec: program = "(null)" exec: input_pairs = "request" exec: output_pairs = "(null)" exec: packet_type = "(null)" rlm_exec: Wait=yes but no output defined. Did you mean output=none? Module: Instantiated exec (exec) Module: Loaded expr Module: Instantiated expr (expr) Module: Loaded PAP pap: encryption_scheme = "crypt" Module: Instantiated pap (pap) Module: Loaded CHAP Module: Instantiated chap (chap) Module: Loaded MS-CHAP mschap: use_mppe = yes mschap: require_encryption = no mschap: require_strong = no mschap: with_ntdomain_hack = no mschap: passwd = "(null)" mschap: ntlm_auth = "(null)" Module: Instantiated mschap (mschap) Module: Loaded System unix: cache = no unix: passwd = "/etc/passwd" unix: shadow = "/etc/shadow" unix: group = "/etc/group" unix: radwtmp = "/var/log/radwtmp" unix: usegroup = no unix: cache_reload = 600 Module: Instantiated unix (unix) Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) Can somebody shed some light on this issue? - -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFoN1/VrOl+eVhOvYRAmqgAJ9ImJea2un1Slul85B/0bdV9+wqtQCfWl+P buHIiLYbd92ivdiRpRplN3M= =8FJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:23:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDE316A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949E513C428 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from ariel.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0050A05 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ariel.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by ariel.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l07CNmZS004859 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:48 GMT (envelope-from njm@ariel.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by ariel.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l07CNl2L004852 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:48 GMT (envelope-from njm) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:23:47 +0000 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070107122347.GA3730@ariel.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: rc.conf Where to put DNS Servers addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:23:50 -0000 On Sunday, 7 January, 2007 at 13:05:04 +0100, VeeJay wrote: > > During installation, we provide DNS server address, Defaultrouter > address, machin's IP address and Netmask address. > > I can find and change the IP, Netmask and Defaultrouter addresses in > /etc/rc.conf. But where to find & change DNS1 & DNS2 servers IP's? > > In which file and what location, I can find the DNS Server IP address I gave > during installation? /etc/resolv.conf Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:42:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9485A16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from rekin23.go2.pl (rekin23.go2.pl [193.17.41.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B05113C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from o2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.37]) by rekin23.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP id 8447112884F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:42:08 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?Q?"cblasius"?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <316a03ad.44e501e2.45a0eaa0.6b144@o2.pl> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:42:08 +0100 X-Originator: 84.40.169.29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Scilab error to get help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:42:10 -0000 Hello! I=20obtain=20the=20following=20error=20wen=20I=20type=20in=20Scilab=204-1= : -->help=20printf =20!--error=20999=20 TCL=5FEvalFile,=20at=20line=203=20of=20 file=20/usr/local/lib/scilab/tcl/sciGUI/sciEditVar.tcl at=20line=20=20=20=20=20=20=209=20of=20function=20sciGUI=5Finit=20called=20= by=20:=20=20 line=20=20=20=2014=20of=20function=20sciGUIhelp=20called=20by=20:=20=20 line=20=20=20=2023=20of=20function=20run=5Fhelp=20called=20by=20:=20=20 line=20=20=20=2020=20of=20function=20browsehelp=20called=20by=20:=20=20 line=20=20=20=2025=20of=20function=20help=20called=20by=20:=20=20 help=20printf How=20to=20repair=20this?=20Thanks=20in=20advance. I=20work=20on=206.2-PRERELEASE. Best=20regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:43:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8150216A416 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.com [82.201.5.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF3313C441 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H3WwU-000JkN-QT; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:16:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:16:02 +0100 From: Riemer Palstra To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20070107121602.GB75786@rb1.palstra.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701070350s2237f410ib79ef4c5fd73d5d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701070350s2237f410ib79ef4c5fd73d5d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com, FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD chroot problem...Please help!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:43:09 -0000 On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:50:34PM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > I trying to run MySQL and Apache under a chroot envoirnment. But I am > getting these errors. [ ... ] > # /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld: Can't create/write to file > '/var/tmp/ibPM3e0d' (Errcode: 13) [ ... ] > fopen: Operation not supported > httpd: could not open document config file /dev/null Are these files/directories/device nodes present in their respective chroot environment? -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:43:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB516A412 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.com [82.201.5.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D58913C44B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H3Wuj-000Jje-8Q; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:14:13 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:14:13 +0100 From: Riemer Palstra To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20070107121413.GA75786@rb1.palstra.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: rc.conf Where to put DNS Servers addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:43:10 -0000 On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:05:04PM +0100, VeeJay wrote: > In which file and what location, I can find the DNS Server IP address > I gave during installation? /etc/resolv.conf, like on most Unix-like systems. You might want to try reading the Handbook though, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:47:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BA516A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unixvn@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CF913C455 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unixvn@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8495204nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:47:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cD70sVuwU+TkxANeUkrK+49i2nEFJShBVHqQ0FV7FVxXxSLl9vgHz0MfUBEQsTtlrtcu54SEhpIEuJOahly2jo2ky1xTQPb0fGB35D84NbET6lMVlgrqlucw7/21qRsUzU4vdXdX5aawFA2jNu7GHCKjQgyFmN5eM2E3Fi7LEbE= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr2586138buc.1168172346568; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.136.19 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:19:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <64b284310701070419w6c63be3rf59cc8d43e0a026e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:19:05 +0300 From: "Nguyen Tam Chinh" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: rc.conf Where to put DNS Servers addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:47:42 -0000 Hello, You can change these parameters in /etc/resolv.conf. The man page resolver(5) would help you with the syntax. On 1/7/07, VeeJay wrote: > Hello friends > > During installation, we provide DNS server address, Defaultrouter > address, machin's IP address and Netmask address. > > I can find and change the IP, Netmask and Defaultrouter addresses in > /etc/rc.conf. But where to find & change DNS1 & DNS2 servers IP's? > > In which file and what location, I can find the DNS Server IP address I gave > during installation? > > Thanks for the help! > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- With best regards, | The Power to Serve Nguyen Tam Chinh | http://www.FreeBSD.org Loc: sp.cs.msu.su From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 12:53:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6044B16A412 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail0.ifxnetworks.com [200.110.128.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B79213C44B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 23997 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 12:26:24 -0000 X-Spam-DCC: : qmail0.ifxnetworks.com 1113; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on qmail0.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from host131.200.73.82.dynamic.ifxnw.cl (HELO daemon) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.82.131]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Jan 2007 12:26:23 -0000 From: Daniel Molina Wegener Organization: DMW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:26:31 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701070405h4c08150l5822f7e7d611b6bf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701070926.31316.dmw@unete.cl> Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: rc.conf Where to put DNS Servers addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:53:06 -0000 On Sunday 07 January 2007 09:05, VeeJay wrote: > Hello friends Hello > During installation, we provide DNS server address, > Defaultrouter address, machin's IP address and Netmask > address. > > I can find and change the IP, Netmask and Defaultrouter > addresses in /etc/rc.conf. But where to find & change DNS1 & > DNS2 servers IP's? > > In which file and what location, I can find the DNS Server IP > address I gave during installation? Try looking at /etc/resolv.conf and resolver(5) manual page. > > Thanks for the help! Best regards, -- . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl 0 0 0 | FreeBSD User From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 13:21:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7478516A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E207D13C469 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:21:51 -0500 id 0005642D.45A0F3EF.00016771 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:21:50 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Tek Bahadur Limbu Message-Id: <20070107082150.deb1e14c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070107173107.9dc3702a.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> References: <20070107173107.9dc3702a.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeRadius 1.1.3 segmentation problem in Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:21:53 -0000 Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > Dear All, > > Just today, I have installed FreeRadius 1.1.3 from FreeBSD 6.0 (i386) > ports. I am posting this question in FreeBSD mailing list. I am finding > it hard to run FreeRadius on my FreeBSD 6.0 machine. > > Could the following segmentation fault be a FreeBSD issue? > > > I am following this material from: > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/excerpt/radius_5/index1.html Try installing from the port instead. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 14:09:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8209816A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (45-0.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.1.0.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CD513C459 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l07DojqX005800; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l07DoXLo005799; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:33 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070107135033.GH270@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070101111727.GB66605@ns2.wananchi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QXAv++6zoyBcX2gv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070101111727.GB66605@ns2.wananchi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Cc: Subject: Re: Nightmares installing kde-3.5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:09:15 -0000 --QXAv++6zoyBcX2gv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Odhiambo I had some similar issues while I'm installed 3.5.4. I the first removed al= l=20 packages by pkg_delete kde* (realy all!). Afterwoods I started the=20 installation again with make reinstall (or make install). Hope this helps. Am Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:17:27PM +0300 Odhiambo Washington schrieb: > Bon Anee! >=20 > I have been trying to install kde-3.5.5 onto my box for 4 days now=20 > without success. I have even wiped out 3.5.3 (which is what I was=20 > running before) but still 3.5.5 wouldn't install. The problem is=20 > somewhere around kdelibs3 and cups but I cannot figure out how to go=20 > around it. > I'd appreciate some help on what I need to do. I'd like to start the new= =20 > year with brand new kde! >=20 > Here is where it fails: >=20 >=20 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/k= deprint/cups/cupsdconf2' > gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/= kdeprint/cups' > if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=3DCXX --mode=3Dcompile c= ++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../dcop -I../../kdecore -I../../kio/ > kssl -I../../kjs -I../.. -I../../kio -I../../kfile -I../../kdeprint -I../= ../kdeprint/management -I../../kdecore/network -I../../dcop -I../../libl > tdl -I../../kdefx -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore/network= -I../../kdeui -I../../kio -I../../kio/kio -I../../kio/kfile -I../.. -I > /usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_KDEPRINT_= COMPILE -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/inclu > de -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE = -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O > 2 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -f= no-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_N > O_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -MT ipprequest.lo -MD -MP -MF "= .deps/ipprequest.Tpo" -c -o ipprequest.lo ipprequest.cpp; \ > then mv -f ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo" ".deps/ipprequest.Plo"; else rm -f ".de= ps/ipprequest.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > ipprequest.cpp: In static member function `static QString IppRequest::ass= embleURI(const QString&, int, const QString&)': > ipprequest.cpp:573: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name spe= cifier > ipprequest.cpp:577: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name spe= cifier > gmake[4]: *** [ipprequest.lo] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/k= deprint/cups' > gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/k= deprint/cups' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/k= deprint' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3. > *** Error code 1 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -Wash >=20 >=20 > DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php >=20 > -- > +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ > |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington > Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com > |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 > +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ >=20 > No violence, gentlemen -- no violence, I beg of you! Consider > the furniture! > -- Sherlock Holmes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Regards Gruss Mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; --QXAv++6zoyBcX2gv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFoPqpwa4WkdMP0jkRAgFbAJ4yotlzhoJ16OEZ+TpeThYSoGfCFQCg6oxT XEjrBQXvbODo1+conL0Ymyk= =FUA4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QXAv++6zoyBcX2gv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 14:20:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771A216A417 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B7F13C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so3444746nzh for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:20:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Hs7kYTioJxqrcHkYhrFemuNKPvngevvdncskrpzH0ajMz5GBnooql3zZqUBoIYY37sYdM8OpgSIDuzovebc+4p1dHCUIgLySyG+zMjzFeub5q7XUqeN1UVhD0JzJ4nynhZG8AGzx3KkXzX06vesTnM1Dp8dvWcDZtN+VSMfXhcs= Received: by 10.65.219.17 with SMTP id w17mr3668929qbq.1168179628319; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.250.1 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:20:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:20:28 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: change port dependent... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:20:29 -0000 hi, how can i change port dependent "again" ? i first make a change by doing pkgdb -F and switched to another dependent, but now i want to change it back, but since it's already been corrected, pkgdb -F didn't ask any question, thanks!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 14:56:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285EA16A575 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3249A13C46B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FE7350A12; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:10:01 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070107051002.0FE7350A12@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:10:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-12-17 - 2007-01-06 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:56:06 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 15:25:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7735516A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268F513C455 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:25:17 -0500 id 0005643F.45A110DD.00016E88 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:25:16 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" Message-Id: <20070107102516.65c9ff38.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: change port dependent... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:25:18 -0000 "Tsu-Fan Cheng" wrote: > > hi, > how can i change port dependent "again" ? i first make a change by doing > pkgdb -F and switched to another dependent, but now i want to change it > back, but since it's already been corrected, pkgdb -F didn't ask any > question, thanks!! I recommend using portupgrade with the -o option. See the man page for details. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 15:53:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78C416A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410B413C459 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8539842nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:53:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=EkCqVHopuMWd9t4ekQAUdCm8fKuICAmSj9ad5v7TrlttrFhv9RUHXmUT29JDI1aHaedjrP0Bo3u1A58uU8dGoLmOvWNBbNVU6vicamsK902hOFBZtkcFlHqB4iRcBpWPxfKyh8U3+bFrIYBfZwdE2CKriWXrgfY8565FuTMq5fo= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr2516397buc.1168185207882; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:53:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:53:27 +0100 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5615b5deaf0b7b32 Subject: /dev/null in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:53:29 -0000 I chrooted apache to /www. In order to run a java program from a web page, java needs a /dev/null inside the chroot. I don't want to create another whole /dev/ dir with all the disk raw devices there to be read for anyone who cracks root. I just want a /www/dev/null file. I tried creating a node with mknod exactly like the node in /dev but it doesn't work in freebsd 6. /dev/ is special now and you can't just create nodes anywhere like the old days. Is there a way to create a /www/dev/null which acts just like /dev/null? Michael Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 15:54:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FDB16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7667F13C455 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8540228nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uA6Vh9xTDNW0X3DQX8V0JG0wFZW/ZBHp75t9DPJGY3c/098cEMc+VnejxUzGQUR48CwxncnnQgLcX2wNxF3bv2+P0zubS6mCnBKZUMKmQA0MJPxuknmUZtKIP6AQxv/vLUg091lYMSMRvE5UjgLTywPSTosdPWjGcU8YsnLEECA= Received: by 10.82.182.8 with SMTP id e8mr2086880buf.1168185295381; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.3 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90701070754r33ba9ae8q6b22f96be0ab6ea0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:54:55 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "Giorgos Keramidas" , "FreeBSD Users Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070107031750.GA5828@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <539c60b90701060908o460d1d98wab2f2514a3a9d1e2@mail.gmail.com> <20070106202147.GB2532@kobe.laptop> <539c60b90701061849u35ddc61ch16a49484bd3baf12@mail.gmail.com> <20070107031750.GA5828@kobe.laptop> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cf7ece14ca6f448f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: no ath0 on new system with good card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:54:57 -0000 Apologies on not hitting the list. Alyays forget to reply-all. So, I figured I'd try to fix the safe-mode end of things on my own, and I found a post several years old (looked like it even could have been yours) about safemode, which doesn't show up anywhere on the freebsd site. So I did what it said and grep'd boot/beastie.4th for safemode, which came up with this suprisingly total solution: add apic.0.disabled="1" to boot/device.hints. Not only does my system come up in regular boot mode, but, as you suspected, the pccard works too, so all appears well. I'm sorry for the confusion - origonally, I was running i386/6.1 on the system which booted normially if the serial ports (sio) were disabled. Halfway thru the conversation, I realized I could upgrade to amd64/6.1, which would only boot safemode, even with sio disabled. So my final question, what in all the land is an "apic", and why isn't apic or safemode mentioned in the handbook, manpages, or even on the freebsd site? Further, I'd like to write a handbook page on "freebsd and laptops", because we're on my third one here now, and I'm starting to get the drift of what could usefully be added to the handbook, namely a thourough discussion of booting and device.hints. I presume someone 'peer-reviews' handbook submissions for correctness and format? I recall reading somewhere about contributing, but I get the impression you are involved enough to tell me whether it's a bad idea or not. Thanks again, Steve On 1/6/07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Please don't top post :( > > It would also be nice if you copied the mailing list to any > replies, but I don't know if I should copy this reply to the list > too, so I am sending it privately. > > On 2007-01-06 19:49, Steve Franks wrote: > >On 1/6/07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >>On 2007-01-06 10:08, Steve Franks wrote: > >>> I have an ath0 card working fine in one system. I put it in > >>> the other, kldload if_ath, but no ath0. kldload appears > >>> sucessful, because if you try it again, if says file already > >>> present. I notice my pcmcia appears to show up sucesfully > >>> when I boot, but I get no output on tty0 when I plug in the > >>> ath card, like you do on the other system. > >> > >> Are the two systems the same FreeBSD version? If not, can you > >> show us dmesg output from the two systems, and then "pciconf > >> -lv" output after the card has been plugged in? > > > > dmesg gives the following interesting info: > > > > cbb0: .... > > pccard0: <16 bit...>... on cbb > > cbb: Unable to map IRQ... > > device_attatch: cbb0 attatch returned 12 > > > > nothing seems amiss in pciconf -lv (no net on that system - broadcom :( > , > > although I don't see entries I'd expect for the cbb0... > > > > Note, I neglected to mention I the computer won't start unless > > it's in safe mode, otherwise, it freezes after the line > > "module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, > > 0) error 6". The line before that is "Timecounters tick every > > 1.000 msec", and the line after (in safe-mode) is "ad0: > > 57231MB...." > > The amr(4) driver is the driver for MegaRAID SCSI/ATA/SATA RAID > controllers. Can you try disabling this controller and see if > the kernel boots normally in normal mode? > > I still don't know about thee following: > > - Are the two computers the same? (The one where the > PC-CARD works, and the one where it doesn't) > > - What FreeBSD version is this? > > In "safe mode" ACPI is disabled, and this may be why your cbb0 > PCI-CardBus bridge fails to work properly. > > -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 16:02:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C615D16A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7575913C45D for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:02:28 -0500 id 0005643F.45A11994.00017136 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:02:27 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Michael Grant" Message-Id: <20070107110227.c379e216.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> References: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: /dev/null in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:02:29 -0000 "Michael Grant" wrote: > > I chrooted apache to /www. > > In order to run a java program from a web page, java needs a /dev/null > inside the chroot. > > I don't want to create another whole /dev/ dir with all the disk raw > devices there to be read for anyone who cracks root. I just want a > /www/dev/null file. > > I tried creating a node with mknod exactly like the node in /dev but > it doesn't work in freebsd 6. /dev/ is special now and you can't just > create nodes anywhere like the old days. > > Is there a way to create a /www/dev/null which acts just like /dev/null? devfs does this now. You can mount a second devfs under /www/dev/, or anywhere else for that matter. Controlling which device nodes show up is done by devfs rulsets. See the man page for devfs for details. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 16:05:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B849B16A40F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A3F13C46B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8542759nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:05:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=UuDx8xh0+mq2/Ty/HAfJ5v+8naB1nKqJl53rD8BCm4rybLT3KmdErEERC7ZLFDnIGEflkkfLsJgYBGHyG+OB5+xSltnV+KMEGxeTGgJ3I0E4B13VYo55QA/+mEKh5n//IffDXYQRNPYqjziucDGtUYFGoZLT84EKkFOHtmAbrTM= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr2425579bud.1168185908818; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:05:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <62b856460701070805l2e557025l89d40e7b53ec59c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:05:08 +0100 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 78fda63288423d48 Subject: /dev/null in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:05:10 -0000 I chrooted apache to /www. In order to run a java program from a web page, java needs a /dev/null inside the chroot. I don't want to create another whole /dev/ dir with all the disk raw devices there to be read for anyone who cracks root. I just want a /www/dev/null file. I tried creating a node with mknod exactly like the node in /dev but it doesn't work in freebsd 6. /dev/ is special now and you can't just create nodes anywhere like the old days. Is there a way to create a /www/dev/null which acts just like /dev/null? Michael Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 16:26:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD2016A416 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF7C13C46B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l07GPhC7014864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:25:50 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l07GPbd0002357; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:25:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l07GPb0c002356; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:25:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:25:37 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Steve Franks Message-ID: <20070107162537.GB2261@kobe.laptop> References: <539c60b90701060908o460d1d98wab2f2514a3a9d1e2@mail.gmail.com> <20070106202147.GB2532@kobe.laptop> <539c60b90701061849u35ddc61ch16a49484bd3baf12@mail.gmail.com> <20070107031750.GA5828@kobe.laptop> <539c60b90701070754r33ba9ae8q6b22f96be0ab6ea0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539c60b90701070754r33ba9ae8q6b22f96be0ab6ea0@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.466, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.73, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Contributing to FreeBSD documentation (was: Re: no ath0 on new system with good card) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:26:21 -0000 On 2007-01-07 08:54, Steve Franks wrote: > Apologies on not hitting the list. Alyays forget to reply-all. No problem. I just didn't copy the list because I wasn't sure I should. > So, I figured I'd try to fix the safe-mode end of things on my own, > and I found a post several years old (looked like it even could have > been yours) about safemode, which doesn't show up anywhere on the > freebsd site. So I did what it said and grep'd boot/beastie.4th for > safemode, which came up with this suprisingly total solution: > > add apic.0.disabled="1" to boot/device.hints. Not only does my system > come up in regular boot mode, but, as you suspected, the pccard works > too, so all appears well. Excellent news! Thanks for sharing the answer :) > So my final question, what in all the land is an "apic", "Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller". This is the part of your system which assigns priorities to interrupt lines of a device. The full details are probably too technical for some percentage of our user base, but more details can be found at the following pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Programmable_Interrupt_Controller http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_Interrupt_Controller http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8259 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_APIC_Architecture > and why isn't apic or safemode mentioned in the handbook, manpages, or > even on the freebsd site? IIRC it is mentioned in the Developer's Handbook, but you are right that it should be in the main Handbook too. > Further, I'd like to write a handbook page on "freebsd and laptops", > because we're on my third one here now, and I'm starting to get the > drift of what could usefully be added to the handbook, namely a > thourough discussion of booting and device.hints. That would be great! If you can help writing such a section for the Handbook, a lot of users will be highly indebted to you, for sure :) > I presume someone 'peer-reviews' handbook submissions for correctness > and format? I recall reading somewhere about contributing, but I get > the impression you are involved enough to tell me whether it's a bad > idea or not. Yes, you are right. We have peer reviews. A lot of the documentation changes are filtered through the freebsd-doc mailing list, where documentation people hang out. Patches are mailed back and forth; edited; fixed for technical accuracy, syntax and grammar correctness; adapted to our writing style; expanded as necessary; and eventually committed to our documentation source code. You can definitely contribute as much as you feel, whenever you feel you have the time, and in any way you consider appropriate. We have a short article which describes how you can contribute to the FreeBSD Project, in general: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/ Most of it applies directly to documentation too. Please skim through this article; it should be a good start. About your last question now... Yes, it's a good idea. Not just a good idea, though. It's an *excellent* idea. One of the "chicken and egg" problems documentation writing usually has to face is that: * New users don't know enough about the system, so they frequently pose good questions. These questions would result in higher quality documentation if properly channeled through experienced documentation writers, but you have to convince the new users that they can actually *help* by not knowing it all. * Once new users step over the thin line between being newcomers to the system and being experienced in some area, we have lost all the "insight" they can provide about how a new user thinks. As a result, it's easier to write documentation if we are targetting a very experienced, very technical audience. But, IMHO, the contributions of new users -- in the form of "interesting" questions" -- are at least as valuable, if not more :) Regards, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 17:17:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE3116A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (rwcrmhc15.comcast.net [216.148.227.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F1913C44C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([68.55.97.199]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070107170716m1500qf391e>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:07:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3505C3B for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:15:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uniquestrength.net Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyRb1WPZt3qI for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:15:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (unknown [10.10.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48605C38 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:15:49 -0500 (EST) From: Derrick Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:19:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701071219.00660.derrick@uniquestrength.net> Subject: Nvidia Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:17:19 -0000 Hi, I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct resolution. Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My max resolution is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Layout0" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "extmod" Load "type1" Load "freetype" Load "glx" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Unknown" ModelName "Unknown" HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Device0" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Device0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection EndSection Please help Thanks Derrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 17:34:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6669916A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C8813C442 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l07HYWUc024521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:34:32 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l07HYWK6024011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:34:32 -0800 Message-ID: <45A12F28.4090607@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:34:32 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200701071219.00660.derrick@uniquestrength.net> In-Reply-To: <200701071219.00660.derrick@uniquestrength.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.7.91933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE 0.1, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Nvidia Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:34:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derrick Edwards wrote: > Hi, > I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct resolution. > Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My max resolution > is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" > (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" > (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 > > I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. > > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "Layout0" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > EndSection > > Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > EndSection > > Section "Module" > Load "dbe" > Load "extmod" > Load "type1" > Load "freetype" > Load "glx" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > > # generated from default > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > > # generated from default > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "keyboard" > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Unknown" > ModelName "Unknown" > HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 > VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 > Option "DPMS" > EndSection > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Device0" > Driver "nvidia" > VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Device0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > DefaultDepth 24 > SubSection "Display" > Depth 24 > Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" > EndSubSection > EndSection > > Please help > Thanks Derrick Monitor horizontal and vertical sync set correctly? That seems the only viable explanation other than your card doesn't support that resolution. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoS8nEnKyINQw/HARArjxAKCaXwTBkrpBSx9yUHOZseIcchU4WwCdFqoC MC28IgXGLrfsio5l9ieuK9E= =ICWo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 18:27:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEAE16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petko@studnet.sk) Received: from studnet.sk (ns.studnet.sk [194.160.208.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2417913C44B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petko@studnet.sk) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (nr-par-217-144-28-122.satronet.sk [217.144.28.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by studnet.sk (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l07IREd7059516 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:27:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from petko@studnet.sk) Message-ID: <45A13B7D.5080504@studnet.sk> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:27:09 +0100 From: petko User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <459969AF.7040301@studnet.sk> <459A70AE.3070106@studnet.sk> <459ADCBA.1060004@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <459ADCBA.1060004@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2419/Sun Jan 7 16:27:13 2007 on kripel.studnet.sk X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: freebsd ban X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:27:20 -0000 yeah, old /etc/hosts file (nice heritage) thanks for help p. Kevin Kinsey wrote: > petko wrote: >> I am sure, that there is no connectivity issue. Why I have ban? The >> devil have to serve... :( >> >> # tcptraceroute www.freebsd.org >> Selected device fxp0, address 194.160.208.44, port 54794 for outgoing >> packets >> Tracing the path to www.freebsd.org (216.136.204.117) on TCP port 80, >> 30 hops max > > Stale DNS? Here, ATM, www.freebsd.org is at 69.147.83.33...... > > KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 19:30:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9538116A509 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525BA13C467 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7C220979A for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:01:33 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id slflMNmZyfcr for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:01:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D2A207F35 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:01:29 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:01:22 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:30:45 -0000 --nextPart1259854.V8Dn41d0Ya Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have an hourly job that converts our legacy Foxpro database into PostgreSQL tables so that our web applications, etc. can run reports off the data in a reasonable amount of time. Believe it or not, this has been running perfectly in production for over a year. The only problem I'd still like to solve is that loading the data pegs the filesystem at 100% for many minutes at a time. The biggest table we have holds about 800MB of data in about 8 million rows. My program loads the Foxpro table files and generates another file that looks like the following, which then gets piped into the psql command: =2D---------------------- begin; drop table ln; create table ln (invid integer, ln integer, charge text, servcode varchar(1= 0), odn varchar(1), itemcode varchar(6), qty1 varchar(10), uom1 varchar(2),= qty2 varchar(10), uom2 varchar(2), aw integer, bw integer, rate text, perc= integer, miles integer, loc1qual varchar(3), loc1id integer, loc2qual varc= har(3), loc2id integer); \copy ln from stdin 1078987 1 518.73 LHS N LHS 0 = 0 785 785 66.0800 100 0 = PW -1049 DA 16736 =2E.. [snip 8 million lines] =2E.. \. create index ln_invid on ln(invid); create index ln_uom1 on ln(uom1); commit; =2D---------------------- The /usr/local/pgsql/data filesystem is on two SCSI 320 drives via a geom_stripe with a 128KB stripe size. The drives are of unequal size. I've had a new set of four matched drives on order from our purchasing department for about size months now - yes, Mike, I'm looking at you - but I'm doing the best I can with what I have. The filesystem itself has soft updates enabled but was otherwise newfs'ed with the defaults. So, given that I'd like to throw more hardware at the problem but can't yet, is there anything I could do to make these imports go faster, short of running it async (which is far more dangerous than we're willing to risk)? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1259854.V8Dn41d0Ya Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFoUOH5sRg+Y0CpvERAlKFAJ4j2qlyfJFpXaczEE2H10nb9llKDwCfU+or uhpzm6uUJoEzq4pKXyIGlxQ= =+Pnp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1259854.V8Dn41d0Ya-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 19:46:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DBE16A412 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCEA13C45E for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([68.55.97.199]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20070107194639m1200sppm1e>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:46:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C85C42 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:22:21 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uniquestrength.net Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ek0W0K6XMBse for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:22:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (unknown [10.10.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C3E5C3B for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:22:18 -0500 (EST) From: Derrick Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:58:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701071219.00660.derrick@uniquestrength.net> <45A12F28.4090607@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A12F28.4090607@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701071458.15275.derrick@uniquestrength.net> Subject: Re: Nvidia Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:46:40 -0000 On Sunday 07 January 2007 12:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Derrick Edwards wrote: > > Hi, > > I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct resolution. > > Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My max resolution > > is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. > > > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 > > > > I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. > > > > Section "ServerLayout" > > Identifier "Layout0" > > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Files" > > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Module" > > Load "dbe" > > Load "extmod" > > Load "type1" > > Load "freetype" > > Load "glx" > > EndSection > > > > Section "InputDevice" > > > > # generated from default > > Identifier "Mouse0" > > Driver "mouse" > > Option "Protocol" "auto" > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > > EndSection > > > > Section "InputDevice" > > > > # generated from default > > Identifier "Keyboard0" > > Driver "keyboard" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Unknown" > > ModelName "Unknown" > > HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 > > Option "DPMS" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Device" > > Identifier "Device0" > > Driver "nvidia" > > VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Screen" > > Identifier "Screen0" > > Device "Device0" > > Monitor "Monitor0" > > DefaultDepth 24 > > SubSection "Display" > > Depth 24 > > Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" > > EndSubSection > > EndSection > > > > Please help > > Thanks Derrick > > Monitor horizontal and vertical sync set correctly? > > That seems the only viable explanation other than your card doesn't > support that resolution. > > -Garrett > _________ Thanks for the reply. My card supports up to 1600x1200 and the freqs are correct. > _____________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 20:08:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF62016A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E28813C4BC for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5409525uge for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:08:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rXgGUVgjHz1W12IIcOimbdmVt8MVdN+zLTYHQn8m3g+CWF0DmzAx7xEU0bkj3kXVrYmxUTh/Evs8k11pl+NziQLgakNIa0Igr14U/Lvn3AFJaJwHAwi/R/GYn4hQH4i+jMsUeBbm36HmnzhHjLTCG9sanxiDgf1S+CSfUpTee/A= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr32485193ugg.1168200485282; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:08:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701071208y5022d162s20ec3259210fc07@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:08:05 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Can't install tcl84 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:08:06 -0000 Hello, This is my server uname -a FreeBSD sms.wearab.net 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 28 19:25:02 UTC 2006 I can't install tcl84 from the ports I don't know why, has anyone faced this problem too? pkg.test : Total 139 Passed 138 Skipped 1 Failed 0 pkgMkIndex.test platform.test proc-old.test proc.test pwd.test reg.test regexp.test regexpComp.test registry.test rename.test resource.test result.test safe.test scan.test security.test set-old.test set.test socket.test ==== socket-2.10 close on accept, accepted socket lives FAILED ==== Contents of test case: set done 0 set timer [after 20000 "set done timed_out"] set ss [socket -server accept 0] proc accept {s a p} { global ss close $ss fileevent $s readable "readit $s" fconfigure $s -trans lf } proc readit {s} { global done gets $s close $s set done 1 } set cs [socket [info hostname] [lindex [fconfigure $ss -sockname] 2]] puts $cs hello close $cs vwait done after cancel $timer set done ---- Test generated error; Return code was: 1 ---- Return code should have been one of: 0 2 ---- errorInfo: couldn't open socket: connection refused while executing "socket [info hostname] [lindex [fconfigure $ss -sockname] 2]" invoked from within "set cs [socket [info hostname] [lindex [fconfigure $ss -sockname] 2]]" ("uplevel" body line 17) invoked from within "uplevel 1 $script" ---- errorCode: POSIX ECONNREFUSED {connection refused} ==== socket-2.10 FAILED ==== socket-5.1 byte order problems, socket numbers, htons FAILED ==== Contents of test case: set x {couldn't open socket: not owner} if {![catch {socket -server dodo 0x1} msg]} { set x {htons problem, should be disallowed, are you running as SU?} close $msg } set x ---- Result was: htons problem, should be disallowed, are you running as SU? ---- Result should have been (exact matching): couldn't open socket: not owner ==== socket-5.1 FAILED ==== socket-5.3 byte order problems, socket numbers, htons FAILED ==== Contents of test case: set x {couldn't open socket: not owner} if {![catch {socket -server dodo 21} msg]} { set x {htons problem, should be disallowed, are you running as SU?} close $msg } set x ---- Result was: htons problem, should be disallowed, are you running as SU? ---- Result should have been (exact matching): couldn't open socket: not owner ==== socket-5.3 FAILED ==== socket-7.4 testing socket specific options FAILED ==== Contents of test case: set s [socket -server accept 0] proc accept {s a p} { global x set x [fconfigure $s -sockname] close $s } set listen [lindex [fconfigure $s -sockname] 2] set s1 [socket [info hostname] $listen] set timer [after 10000 "set x timed_out"] vwait x after cancel $timer close $s close $s1 set l "" lappend l [expr {[lindex $x 2] == $listen}] [llength $x] ---- Test generated error; Return code was: 1 ---- Return code should have been one of: 0 2 ---- errorInfo: couldn't open socket: connection refused while executing "socket [info hostname] $listen" invoked from within "set s1 [socket [info hostname] $listen]" ("uplevel" body line 9) invoked from within "uplevel 1 $script" ---- errorCode: POSIX ECONNREFUSED {connection refused} ==== socket-7.4 FAILED -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 21:15:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED08716A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F1813C457 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3fMl-0001F1-Ry for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:15:43 +0100 Received: from 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.46.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:15:43 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:15:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:15:05 +0100 Lines: 56 Message-ID: References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB3C3CDB3E1E0BB55F6F7B7E5" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:15:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB3C3CDB3E1E0BB55F6F7B7E5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kirk Strauser wrote: > I have an hourly job that converts our legacy Foxpro database into > PostgreSQL tables so that our web applications, etc. can run reports of= f > the data in a reasonable amount of time. Believe it or not, this has b= een > running perfectly in production for over a year. The only problem I'd > still like to solve is that loading the data pegs the filesystem at 100= % > for many minutes at a time. There's a dedicated mailing list for PostgreSQL performance: pgsql-performance/at/postgresql.org, which can give you really good advice, but here's some tips: - have you tuned pgsql away from the (very conservative) defaults? increased shared_buffers, effective_cache_size, temp_buffers and work_mem= ? - What might help you is to keep the WAL (write-ahead-log, i.e. journal) files on a completely separate (and fast) drive from the rest of the database, to allow parallelism and speed. For best results, format it with 32k blocks/8k fragments. - If you don't specifically need the atomicity of transactions, you might divide your import into many small transactions, for example one for every 100,000 rows instead of doing 8 million at once. If you want to be somewhat adventurous (but still within data safety limits), you can try fiddling with increasing wal_buffers, commit_delay and checkpoint_timeout. Also, what version of PostgreSQL are you using? As a general rule, the newer the version, the faster it is. This is especially true if you're using 7.x - go to 8.1.5 immediately (but don't use 8.2 until 8.2.1 gets out). --------------enigB3C3CDB3E1E0BB55F6F7B7E5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoWLjldnAQVacBcgRAnSgAJ9/TvTR4yP4vY8+LZrgfiprLHj6GACgztWr G8ZBbUw0HnsHZot3lz6v6dg= =96dd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB3C3CDB3E1E0BB55F6F7B7E5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 21:52:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACF816A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bnawrock@umich.edu) Received: from kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu (kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu [141.211.144.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0DC13C43E for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bnawrock@umich.edu) Received: (from www@localhost) by kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) id l07LNQqJ014236 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:23:26 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-255-233-91.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-255-233-91.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.255.233.91]) by web.mail.umich.edu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:23:26 -0500 Message-ID: <20070107162326.vtgdvxjcgo4swck0@web.mail.umich.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:23:26 -0500 From: bnawrock@umich.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5) X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061208 Firefox/2.0.0.1 X-IMP-Server: 141.211.144.244 X-Originating-IP: 68.255.233.91 X-Originating-User: bnawrock Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:52:55 -0000 I know of a few EDID issues with the current nvidia driver. are you using freebsd-7-CURRENT? Try adding Option "UseEDID" "FALSE" to the Screen section in your X configuration file. Hopefully future NVIDIA X driver versions should do a better job of detecting invalid EDIDs. Let me know if that solves the issues. -nawcom On Sunday 07 January 2007 12:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Derrick Edwards wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct resolution. >> > > Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My max resolution >> > > is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. >> > > >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 >> > > >> > > I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. >> > > >> > > Section "ServerLayout" >> > > Identifier "Layout0" >> > > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 >> > > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" >> > > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Files" >> > > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Module" >> > > Load "dbe" >> > > Load "extmod" >> > > Load "type1" >> > > Load "freetype" >> > > Load "glx" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" >> > > >> > > # generated from default >> > > Identifier "Mouse0" >> > > Driver "mouse" >> > > Option "Protocol" "auto" >> > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" >> > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" >> > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" >> > > >> > > # generated from default >> > > Identifier "Keyboard0" >> > > Driver "keyboard" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Monitor" >> > > Identifier "Monitor0" >> > > VendorName "Unknown" >> > > ModelName "Unknown" >> > > HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 >> > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 >> > > Option "DPMS" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Device" >> > > Identifier "Device0" >> > > Driver "nvidia" >> > > VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Screen" >> > > Identifier "Screen0" >> > > Device "Device0" >> > > Monitor "Monitor0" >> > > DefaultDepth 24 >> > > SubSection "Display" >> > > Depth 24 >> > > Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" >> "640x480" >> > > EndSubSection >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Please help >> > > Thanks Derrick > > > > Monitor horizontal and vertical sync set correctly? > > > > That seems the only viable explanation other than your card doesn't > > support that resolution. > > > > -Garrett > > _________ Thanks for the reply. My card supports up to 1600x1200 and the freqs are correct. > > _____________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 21:52:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221B116A412 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bnawrock@umich.edu) Received: from kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu (kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu [141.211.144.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013E813C442 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bnawrock@umich.edu) Received: (from www@localhost) by kickapoo.web.itd.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) id l07LO3pt014333 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:24:03 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-255-233-91.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-255-233-91.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.255.233.91]) by web.mail.umich.edu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:24:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20070107162403.vlw2v0hgkk0o8sgg@web.mail.umich.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:24:03 -0500 From: bnawrock@umich.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5) X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061208 Firefox/2.0.0.1 X-IMP-Server: 141.211.144.244 X-Originating-IP: 68.255.233.91 X-Originating-User: bnawrock Subject: Re: Nvidia Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:52:55 -0000 I know of a few EDID issues with the current nvidia driver. are you using freebsd-7-CURRENT? Try adding Option "UseEDID" "FALSE" to the Screen section in your X configuration file. Hopefully future NVIDIA X driver versions should do a better job of detecting invalid EDIDs. Let me know if that solves the issues. -nawcom On Sunday 07 January 2007 12:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Derrick Edwards wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct resolution. >> > > Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My max resolution >> > > is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. >> > > >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 >> > > >> > > I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. >> > > >> > > Section "ServerLayout" >> > > Identifier "Layout0" >> > > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 >> > > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" >> > > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Files" >> > > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Module" >> > > Load "dbe" >> > > Load "extmod" >> > > Load "type1" >> > > Load "freetype" >> > > Load "glx" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" >> > > >> > > # generated from default >> > > Identifier "Mouse0" >> > > Driver "mouse" >> > > Option "Protocol" "auto" >> > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" >> > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" >> > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" >> > > >> > > # generated from default >> > > Identifier "Keyboard0" >> > > Driver "keyboard" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Monitor" >> > > Identifier "Monitor0" >> > > VendorName "Unknown" >> > > ModelName "Unknown" >> > > HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 >> > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 >> > > Option "DPMS" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Device" >> > > Identifier "Device0" >> > > Driver "nvidia" >> > > VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Section "Screen" >> > > Identifier "Screen0" >> > > Device "Device0" >> > > Monitor "Monitor0" >> > > DefaultDepth 24 >> > > SubSection "Display" >> > > Depth 24 >> > > Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" >> "640x480" >> > > EndSubSection >> > > EndSection >> > > >> > > Please help >> > > Thanks Derrick > > > > Monitor horizontal and vertical sync set correctly? > > > > That seems the only viable explanation other than your card doesn't > > support that resolution. > > > > -Garrett > > _________ Thanks for the reply. My card supports up to 1600x1200 and the freqs are correct. > > _____________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:18:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072BC16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B887713C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0780D2099E2 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:18:16 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5eBTAz-45-ub for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:18:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B40208200 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:18:12 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:18:06 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:18:17 -0000 --nextPart1795280.xDvRYJSnzX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:15, Ivan Voras wrote: > There's a dedicated mailing list for PostgreSQL performance: > pgsql-performance/at/postgresql.org, which can give you really good > advice, but here's some tips: I've read, read, and re-read the general tuning tips, and done as much as=20 seemed reasonable. I was sort of hoping for a FreeBSD-specific=20 magic "go-fast switch". > - What might help you is to keep the WAL (write-ahead-log, i.e. journal) > files on a completely separate (and fast) drive from the rest of the > database, to allow parallelism and speed. For best results, format it > with 32k blocks/8k fragments. Thanks for the idea. Assuming I actually get my wish of a matched set of 4= =20 high speed drives, would I be better off setting one aside for the journal,= =20 or striping them all together so everything benefits? > - If you don't specifically need the atomicity of transactions, you > might divide your import into many small transactions, for example one > for every 100,000 rows instead of doing 8 million at once. Would that actually make a difference in total elapsed time spent importing? > Also, what version of PostgreSQL are you using? As a general rule, the > newer the version, the faster it is. This is especially true if you're > using 7.x - go to 8.1.5 immediately (but don't use 8.2 until 8.2.1 gets > out). We're already running 8.2 because it fixed some problems we were having wit= h=20 8.1.5. Other than the excessively long import times, it's absolutely=20 screaming and we couldn't be more pleased. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1795280.xDvRYJSnzX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFoXGj5sRg+Y0CpvERAgv6AKCP4zG4AOqen3WC9Vd0SdguQkur8QCdGRVL UxAkM66Iy+44TOLMBUZaJtE= =TZNE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1795280.xDvRYJSnzX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:36:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6173D16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from excelblue@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0079C13C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from excelblue@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8640563nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:36:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=sxF0JvbOGR38UvWEMp5jVv/TcSQ+9pwYb3QDnDPWueu7JUbwGyjzSiTVs1KnURl7OaGfUL9MYOjFClKxnIKnUey0ran0JcUDV4/KjNXP1iEsompK9s4KhEFK6CPzQcxwxeKdSbZJQUHAZBfnw+zpy1AWzRkZG6gwAUkPIGG+H0M= Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr3858839hue.1168207802458; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.155.13 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 From: "Mark Lu" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:36:47 -0000 I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the reasons or rationale behind this. Even today, sysinstall seems to work extremely well as an easy-to-use, simple, and stable tool for the installation of FreeBSD. None of the features seem limiting or outdated to me. So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old if it works, right? -- Mark Lu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:47:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333C516A407 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:47:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C336613C44C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5428237uge for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eSQpqAu/MnEJg1y1+fapxcwBssMa9Hfuurzb5I4Rh7oZONhXhLFuzWQIUdLnf0f78988UquhXusITeuOMlyUZuRPyaLCRE2C3OH2Tq3p1D0I5v62ds+cVKj8J4e99ftvdYFDwErogLdAx4De7zwDYIpCmO5szFx3Bj5yHKpamtw= Received: by 10.78.146.11 with SMTP id t11mr5282652hud.1168210029699; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.13.3 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:47:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:47:09 -0800 From: patrick To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: Which version of BIND to use on FreeBSD 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:47:11 -0000 I think I'll rephrase my question. What real advantage is there for me running BIND 9 over BIND 8? Version 9 seems to require a lot more memory and is still giving me this really annoying problem of using all my CPU time when it hits the max_cache_size. I'm not using DNSSEC or IPV6... Patrick On 1/3/07, patrick wrote: > I'm trying to figure out which is the best version of BIND to use on > FreeBSD 6.1? I've always stuck with FreeBSD's base version, and since > upgrading from FreeBSD 4.x to 6.1, that meant moving from BIND 8.3.x > to 9.3.2. I've encountered numerous problems since moving to 9.3.2 > which primarily revolve around exponential increases in memory and CPU > usage. > > On our BIND 8.3.x setup, we have 750 master domains. Memory usage is > just shy of 70MBs. On our new server with BIND 9.3.2, we have > currently 140 master domains, and memory usage continually grows until > FreeBSD cuts it off. I have discovered the "max-cache-size" option > which allows me set an upper limit, but when the named process hits > that limit, it starts eating up all available CPU cycles. I've seen > some similar reports from other users, but haven't found any real > solutions. > > While browsing the ports tree, I found I have my pick of BIND 8.3.x, > 8.4.x, and a ports version of 9.3.x (not sure exactly how this differs > from base -- more current?). Our needs are fairly basic -- we have a > few DNS servers, and each are masters and slaves, helping one another > out. We're not using DNSSEC or anything. I'm wondering what other > people are generally using, and which version works best for them? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:59:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA1516A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09DA13C46B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 17:59:58 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,158,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="383271226:sNHT26746192" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IBK42659; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:59:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 17:59:55 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:59:42 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090204.45A179AB.00B1,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:59:58 -0000 Mark Lu writes: > So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? > Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old > if it works, right? As I understand the discussion: among others, because there are features people want to add that don't fit in the current model. (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user behavior is not intuitively obvious.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 23:10:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1A416A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (avn41.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.47.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700BB13C441 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l07MwabJ001526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:58:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <45A17B2D.9090200@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:58:53 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (X11/20070106) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: christopher floess References: <45A107A0.5020401@orchid.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig662D878AF1F903DDEF4A866F" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: obtaining kernel.debug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:10:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig662D878AF1F903DDEF4A866F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable christopher floess wrote: > On 1/7/07, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: >> >> christopher floess wrote: >> > I've obtained a vmcore file, and now I just need kernel.debug. >> > >> > Is there a way to get this file using the new make procedure for >> kernels? >> > Can I just use the 'kernel' file, or is there a difference between >> 'kernel' >> > and 'kernel.debug'? Thanks for any help ~ Chris >> >> I'm also new to this so take it with a grain of salt. >> >> You'll need kernel with debug symbols (kernel.debug). Add this line to= >> your kernel config (it is included in 6.2 GENERIC): >> >> makeoptions DEBUG=3D-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols= >> >> The 'new make procedure' will produce both kernel and kernel.debug fil= es >> in obj/usr/src/sys/YOUR_KERNEL_NAME >=20 >=20 > Sounds good, Karol. Will my current core file work with the recompiled > kernel? Or will I have to generate a new one? I've got no idea, cc'ing @freebsd-questions, someone here may have one. Cheers, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig662D878AF1F903DDEF4A866F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoXs2ezeoPAwGIYsRCCrTAJ9bW4mD5pw0w+feWn8nTYkO5wGKuQCcCwTU gZl/EQJJnQ2aQLuzCCNdFeg= =HCR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig662D878AF1F903DDEF4A866F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 23:16:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCD516A415 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A308513C442 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3hF1-0008TR-SH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:15:52 +0100 Received: from 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.46.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:15:51 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:15:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:15:22 +0100 Lines: 81 Message-ID: References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig00ECDF92C285B46F597CD921" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:16:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig00ECDF92C285B46F597CD921 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:15, Ivan Voras wrote: >> - What might help you is to keep the WAL (write-ahead-log, i.e. journa= l) >> files on a completely separate (and fast) drive from the rest of the >> database, to allow parallelism and speed. For best results, format it >> with 32k blocks/8k fragments. >=20 > Thanks for the idea. Assuming I actually get my wish of a matched set = of 4=20 > high speed drives, would I be better off setting one aside for the jour= nal,=20 > or striping them all together so everything benefits? Everything is first written to the WAL, and then copied to the "normal" database. So, speed is important, but maybe striping all 4 drives would be an overkill, though. The logs are written sequentially so seek times are not that important. What are your current IO rates? Since you have only two drives you might be restricted by available disk bandwidth... >> - If you don't specifically need the atomicity of transactions, you >> might divide your import into many small transactions, for example one= >> for every 100,000 rows instead of doing 8 million at once. >=20 > Would that actually make a difference in total elapsed time spent impor= ting? It will certainly lower the final "commit" time and avoid copying large chunks between the WAL and the database, but I don't have my own measurements. Do you have a SMP machine? If so, you can try importing NCPU of the big transactions in parallel. This could help you almost linearly, if your disks allow it. (see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-wal.html : you can increase commit_delay and decrease commit_siblings to achieve sort of localized-async operation across several (parallel) transactions)= I've just remembered - do you run VACUUM ANALYZE after your big imports? You should (to get performance on SELECTs afterwards, but it won't help the imports themselves). >> Also, what version of PostgreSQL are you using? As a general rule, the= >> newer the version, the faster it is. This is especially true if you're= >> using 7.x - go to 8.1.5 immediately (but don't use 8.2 until 8.2.1 get= s >> out). >=20 > We're already running 8.2 because it fixed some problems we were having= with=20 > 8.1.5. Other than the excessively long import times, it's absolutely=20 > screaming and we couldn't be more pleased. Ok. Be careful not to use SELECT ... LIMIT ALL ;) --------------enig00ECDF92C285B46F597CD921 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoX8QldnAQVacBcgRAvKjAKD7JUUai6aglWT+r0FyyVZfVvWNyACg6a3A JgbKfyIDMTI7XGREDDnORhI= =4sNE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig00ECDF92C285B46F597CD921-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 23:16:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6517716A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) Received: from srv.exchange.net24.net.nz (srv.exchange.net24.net.nz [210.55.4.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82C013C468 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:17:02 +1300 Message-ID: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA313@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose. Thread-Index: AccwSkh++K0wLRo2RIe/yHMT3gUu9wCW7wYg From: "Brett Davidson" To: Cc: Subject: RE: Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:16:54 -0000 Thanks to everyone who responded. It looks like pfsense will do the job nicely. Cheers, Brett. =20 -----Original Message----- From: Eric [mailto:heli@mikestammer.com]=20 Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 10:52 a.m. To: Brett Davidson Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose. Brett Davidson wrote: > Before I start, I'm familiar with IPTables from Linux but am wanting=20 > to use FreeBSD as a firewalling router after seeing it in action on a=20 > heavily-loaded webserver. I like the efficiency of the TCP stack. > > Upon reading the handbook I found that I can have my choice of three=20 > firewalls; pf, iptables and ipfw. > > What would be the most useful (and easiest) package to use given the=20 > following scenario: > > A FreeBSD router comprising of four physical interfaces - > Eth0 is the outside 10Mbyte/s cable connection to the Internet. > Eth1 is a 100Mbit DMZ housing a webserver. > Eth2 is a 100Mb DMZ housing a 802.11g Wireless Access Router.=20 > (My normal preference is to isolate Wireless LANs from physical=20 > LANS). > Eth3 is the inside LAN.=20 > > Software-based VPN connections out from both the Inside LAN and=20 > Wireless DMZ are required. (Allowing VPN tunnels through the firewall; > not tunnels terminated at the firewall). > > Against prudence, they wish to allow torrent connections to the inside > lan and ICQ connections to both the Inside LAN and the Wireless DMZ.=20 > The torrent and ICQ connections will need to be bandwidth-managed so=20 > that is a major consideration for the choice of which firewall to use. > Is there an equivalent to HTB on FreeBSD? > > I look forward to your answers... > > Regards, > Brett. > =20 i believe pf is the most modern and cleanest/easiest syntax to use. it is actively developed and lots of people use it. You can set up priority on bandwidth in pf as well, so it should meet all your requirements nicely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 23:20:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C00F16A417 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D636C13C45B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3hJ4-0000Uv-1u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:20:02 +0100 Received: from 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.46.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:20:02 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:20:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:18:54 +0100 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig20D318DAD068A68CECC9A856" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-46-216.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:20:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig20D318DAD068A68CECC9A856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Lu wrote: > I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its > end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the > reasons or rationale behind this. Even today, sysinstall seems to work > extremely well as an easy-to-use, simple, and stable tool for the > installation of FreeBSD. None of the features seem limiting or > outdated to me. So, why is there a move to find a replacement or > something? Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being > old if it works, right? Two reasons AFAIK: 1. it simply doesn't even know how deal with the more modern features like GEOM & RAID, more advanced authentication mechanisms (nsswitch), and devices like sound cards (there are many more in this list...) 2. it's way past what's currently considered "user friendly" --------------enig20D318DAD068A68CECC9A856 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoX/eldnAQVacBcgRAqi6AJ9O1+6oO73/0v9l7eLyP325l9gI5ACeLMmF s9e4fV91s17xCbvTW8LXIfk= =OJ+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig20D318DAD068A68CECC9A856-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 00:03:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8320C16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8613C46C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95DB118B421; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:03:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00742-03; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:03:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63951118B417; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:03:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541053B05F; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:03:40 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:03:40 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Michael Grant , FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <8A1292FC91669855CE9C3403@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> References: <62b856460701070753p62a3c531g63f08b164d23e6eb@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: /dev/null in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:03:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 #!/bin/sh /sbin/devfs -m $1 rule apply hide /sbin/devfs -m $1 rule apply path null unhide where $1 == the dev directory you mount within the chroot environment ... - --On Sunday, January 07, 2007 16:53:27 +0100 Michael Grant wrote: > I chrooted apache to /www. > > In order to run a java program from a web page, java needs a /dev/null > inside the chroot. > > I don't want to create another whole /dev/ dir with all the disk raw > devices there to be read for anyone who cracks root. I just want a > /www/dev/null file. > > I tried creating a node with mknod exactly like the node in /dev but > it doesn't work in freebsd 6. /dev/ is special now and you can't just > create nodes anywhere like the old days. > > Is there a way to create a /www/dev/null which acts just like /dev/null? > > Michael Grant > - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFoYpc4QvfyHIvDvMRAsKNAKCBQL1HfW0XiDQlWTQ7SMYxBOD7rwCeMPYk sZ45tw01yqCImIhanmHTtEQ= =YMRb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 00:36:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5AE16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from mail44.e.nsc.no (mail44.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE4B13C45A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from [62.16.183.69] (062016183069.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.183.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail44.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l07NktAQ013925 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:46:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:45:25 +0100 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-nextmail-Metrics: mail44.nsc.no 10044; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 Cc: Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:36:03 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user > behavior is not intuitively obvious.) An understatement. There are situations where sysinstall is positively quixotic. I don't mind the simple character-based interface. But I do find it worrying that I sometimes cannot know what sysinstall will do next. In any case, this is bad publicity for FreeBSD since sysinstall is the first bit of FreeBSD they encounter. Time and again we hear rumors about a new installation program. Is it actually nearing completion? Keep in mind that many of us do not even consider getting involved as long as we believe a better program is under way. -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 01:07:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71D916A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB8813C46C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB651B19E1 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:07:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 28108-01 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:07:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [209.104.162.225]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D081B1807 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:07:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A19938.5020704@bobmc.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:07:04 -0500 From: bobmc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:07:08 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Mark Lu wrote: > >> I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its >> end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the >> reasons or rationale behind this. Even today, sysinstall seems to work >> extremely well as an easy-to-use, simple, and stable tool for the >> installation of FreeBSD. None of the features seem limiting or >> outdated to me. So, why is there a move to find a replacement or >> something? Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being >> old if it works, right >> Two reasons AFAIK: >> >> --------------- A previous reply said: As I understand the discussion: among others, because there are features people want to add that don't fit in the current model. (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user behavior is not intuitively obvious.) ---Robert Huff -------------- Then Ivan said.... >> 1. it simply doesn't even know how deal with the more modern features >> like GEOM & RAID, more advanced authentication mechanisms (nsswitch), >> and devices like sound cards (there are many more in this list...) >> 2. it's way past what's currently considered "user friendly" >> >> >> The "end-of-life" phrase appears in one of the article pages and even in the sysinstall man-page. Perhaps someone started a rumour which became gospel to someone else. This page -> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html mentions a desired improvement (not replacement!) for sysinstall. Since replacement is not imminent, perhaps issue tracking should be used to encourage and manage modest improvements that would enhance it's appeal. It is said to be a monolithic program.. perhaps it is trying to do too much. -Bob- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 01:22:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBB316A501 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFC813C458 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 23840 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 12:22:48 +1100 Received: from 203-217-81-135.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.81.135) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 12:22:48 +1100 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:22:45 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20070108122245.53e3140b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:22:50 -0000 On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:18:06 -0600 Kirk Strauser wrote: > > There's a dedicated mailing list for PostgreSQL performance: > > pgsql-performance/at/postgresql.org, which can give you really good > > advice, but here's some tips: > > I've read, read, and re-read the general tuning tips, and done as much as > seemed reasonable. I was sort of hoping for a FreeBSD-specific > magic "go-fast switch". Hi Kirk, I haven't touched PGSQL for a little while...but I remember some comments in the pgsql lists about disabling ACID features / WAL while big imports are happening - I could be wrong and this only apply to generating indexes ? Of course this is a no goer if you still need to you use your DB server for other tasks during the import. Something also to consider is , do you *have* to import all that data every time? ie., can you create data partitions, assign a new table to each day ,create the appropriate rules, and then only dump from FoxPro the last day's info? It may not be possible, but it helped me loads when I had to import 60 mill new rows/day. Indexing becomes somewhat easier too (as you should only have to regenerate index for the new partition) if cpu is hitting to hard, you can always run nice pgsql while importing this - it will still take 100% cpu, but yield as soon as something else needs to do some work . Of course, this wont help if you are IO bound (i think? ). *are* you CPU bound ? Let us know what solution you come up with, and good luck :) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." Hunter S. Thompson I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 01:29:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC15016A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5E313C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l081TlCo016171; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:29:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: Robert Fitzpatrick Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:29:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <459FDB85.1040002@webtent.net> In-Reply-To: <459FDB85.1040002@webtent.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Connecting to a USB serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:29:48 -0000 On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:25:25 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >I have a Keyspan USB serial port on my FreeBSD 6.1 box and trying to=20 >connect from a Linux box to the machine. I'm using minicom and not sure=20 >of the settings that should be used. I see the following in dmesg... >That seems to do the trick with my other BSD servers that have regular=20 >serial ports, but minicom doesn't want to find it using 9600 8N1 = settings. Hi, Not sure if the keyspan is suported or not. But if it is recognized, it should show up via=20 usbdevs=20 e.g. % usbdevs=20 addr 1: OHCI root hub, ATI addr 1: OHCI root hub, ATI addr 2: USB FAST SERIAL ADAPTER, FTDI addr 1: EHCI root hub, ATI Take a look at the man pages for ucom and the various drivers that support it. =20 ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 01:49:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9380216A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5943113C44B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 01:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so2530077wri for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:49:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=umvDUMJLKrQSEdGHiUdMpZNcFOMkNHjbhqzRVPbPzKTnllOebr92Da1zXvRtsI6JZjhBdKDA+dSukGXCxlPri86Rjb335YJbND13S7yUGeYDJNM4YIzRJo1FQkcloSY6qT39zbTFw7bwPF5v3K5Bq3o0LHmNkeRulaFcIn6lsIE= Received: by 10.90.78.9 with SMTP id a9mr1736550agb.1168219465758; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:24:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.50.14 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:24:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b80000701071724g7ada06v15816147bff0e879@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:24:25 +0200 From: "tethys ocean" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: apache2.2 php5.1 mysql5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:49:06 -0000 Hi I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed Apache 2.2 Mysql5 and also PHP5.1 but PHP5 doesnt work Are there anybody works together it? I did it such kinds of setting. apache22_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 02:00:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A1416A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.hawranke@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate04.web.de (fmmailgate04.web.de [217.72.192.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225D513C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.hawranke@web.de) Received: from web.de by fmmailgate04.web.de (Postfix) with SMTP id B13853F8B7D for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [84.137.69.199] by freemailng1606.web.de with HTTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:28:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:28:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1545237273@web.de> X-Priority: 1 Priority: Urgent Importance: high MIME-Version: 1.0 From: manfred hawranke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: fm-user Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: zcom xi325hp+ 300mw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:00:32 -0000 Hi together, I found this message and I need help for this card to with all docs and firmware updates!! Thanks Manfred Hawranke " Re: Teletronics wlan 200mW card supported under 5.x? Nikolas Britton Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:36:46 -0700 On 10/16/06, Gordon Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has anyone got the Teletronics XI-325HP 200mW PRISM 2.5-based PCMCIA card to work under freebsd 5.4, which I currently run? or 6.x? The Teletronics XI-325HP 200mW PRISM 2.5-based PCMCIA card is high on my list of possible cards with external antenna jacks to buy. Older reports say they had to flash firmware back to 1.5.6 on the card to get it working under Freebsd 4.x. Current firmware as sold now appears to be 1.8.4 or higher. Seems like a big jump backwards to take. Thats a rebranded zcom card, should have RP-MMCX antenna connector. It depend what you want to do with the card?, IIRC secondary firmware 1.8.4 / primary 1.1.1 doesn't support hostap mode... IIRC you'll have to reflash it with secondary 1.7.4 ~ 1.4.9 (I forget which is best) to get hostap mode working. I have all the firmware, utilites, and docs if you need them. Secondary firmware 1.7.4 and up supports WPA and 1.3.7 and up supports Prism 3 chipsets. I forget which firmwares supports 802.11d but I know 1.8.4 does. I think I have the secondary firmware changelog up to 1.4.9, primary firmware changelog up to 1.1.0 and a 2003 version of the driver programmers manual." _____________________________________________________________________ Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 02:01:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4995916A494 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA8513C467 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0821PQI002800 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:01:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:01:25 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <235b80000701071724g7ada06v15816147bff0e879@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <235b80000701071724g7ada06v15816147bff0e879@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701072001.25573.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: apache2.2 php5.1 mysql5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:01:28 -0000 On Sunday 07 January 2007 19:24, tethys ocean wrote: > Hi > > I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed Apache 2.2 Mysql5 and also PHP5.1 but PHP5 > doesnt work Are there anybody works together it? > > > I did it such kinds of setting. > > apache22_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php > AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps did you add to DirectoryIndex index.php ? hth, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 02:44:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F46A16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F513C44C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4823220867A for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:44:55 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PU2LgWmbdwQU for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:44:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6B720679F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:44:50 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:44:40 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:44:56 -0000 --nextPart3228807.ruG0a6YjMV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 January 2007 17:15, Ivan Voras wrote: > What are your current IO rates? Since you have only two drives you might = be > restricted by available disk bandwidth...=20 So says gstat. According to top, the import only takes about 40% of one CP= U,=20 but both of the drives are saturated. I'm contemplating mounting that filesystem async and letting PostgreSQL dec= ide=20 when to sync it. Although I'm sort of allergic to the idea, this seems lik= e=20 it might be relatively safe since no other process touches that data. Any= =20 thoughts? The biggest benefit I'm getting from SMP right now is that I can run the=20 =46oxpro->PostgreSQL conversion on one processor while postmaster grinds aw= ay=20 on the other. > I've just remembered - do you run VACUUM ANALYZE after your big imports? > You should (to get performance on SELECTs afterwards, but it won't help > the imports themselves). Actually, I've been letting the vacuum daemon make that decision for the la= st=20 few months with no perceptible ill effects. > Ok. Be careful not to use SELECT ... LIMIT ALL ;) LOL! Duly noted. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart3228807.ruG0a6YjMV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFobAf5sRg+Y0CpvERAvygAJ0YAZ68Mb4/hW422Gbr1Cs56kOvkQCeO1Qj zva1cztYriLGrR+VWhOZHRY= =JRSv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3228807.ruG0a6YjMV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 02:54:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287A16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD4313C455 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCB920679F for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:54:54 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JUaOGNSATaz for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:54:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637E2205C9C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:54:50 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:54:47 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <200701071618.11242.kirk@strauser.com> <20070108122245.53e3140b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070108122245.53e3140b@localhost> X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:54:55 -0000 --nextPart3671080.6uiMXo8huO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 January 2007 19:22, Norberto Meijome wrote: > I could be wrong and this only apply to generating indexes? That's what we're doing now. By dropping the table and recreating it, all = the=20 index maintenance gets deferred until one batch at the end (which is vastly= =20 faster in practice). We also wrap the whole thing in a transaction so that= =20 select queries still have access to the old data until the instant the comm= it=20 is finished, assuming that the import doesn't fail for some reason and get= =20 rolled back. > Something also to consider is , do you *have* to import all that data eve= ry > time? ie., can you create data partitions, assign a new table to each > day ,create the appropriate rules, and then only dump from FoxPro the last > day's info? I wish. First, we run the import hourly (more or less). I save the output= of=20 the last hour's Foxpro->PostgreSQL conversion, and run a hand-written=20 optimized diff against it. If nothing has changed, that table gets skipped= =2E =20 If a reasonably small percentage of rows have changed (which is almost alwa= ys=20 the case), then I re-write it as a serious of deletes followed by a bulk=20 import. Basically, I patch the table. It's nice to see a twenty million r= ow=20 table update reduced to a patch file 100 lines long. Oh, for the record, m= y=20 diff algorithm is written in Python and is still IO limited, even when=20 several copies are running in parallel. > if cpu is hitting to hard, you can always run nice pgsql while importing > this - it will still take 100% cpu, but yield as soon as something else > needs to do some work . Of course, this wont help if you are IO bound (i > think? ). *are* you CPU bound ? {Un,}fortunately, no. The CPUs are still idle enough to get a lot of other= =20 processing done without slowing the import process. > Let us know what solution you come up with, and good luck :) Will do, and thanks! =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart3671080.6uiMXo8huO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFobJ45sRg+Y0CpvERAg+cAJ4gfRM7Cdk2zags461NGEvIf1F6cQCgiTCc XGyAPB3D22NgKYiNsfxHAKI= =0kVj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3671080.6uiMXo8huO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 03:03:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E5716A415 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.packetdesign.com [65.192.41.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C3913C44C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Received: from packetdesign.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l08331hE032574; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:03:02 -0800 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:16:12 -0800 (PST) From: Stephen Casner Sender: casner@kao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070107190804.J6882@kao> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: System hang on laptop suspend/resume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:03:04 -0000 I was running FreeBSD 4.8 on my Sony PCG-505TR laptop for about three years until I recently upgraded to 6.1 with a clean install on a new disk drive. One aspect of FreeBSD that I really liked was that suspend-to-memory and resume worked perfectly and quickly every time, whereas when I had previously tried this with Windows it usually failed. I did not even need to run apmd or configure any suspend or resume scripts other than the normal configuration in pccard.conf for the an0 802.11 network card. Sadly, with FreeBSD 6.1, the result is often a system hang requiring a power cycle to recover. I have found that I can avoid the hang if I do two things before suspend: - switch the display from X to the console vty (which I have automated using vidcontrol as suggested in the laptop article) - manually unplug the 802.11 network card and wait for dhclient to exit before suspending, and leave the card unplugged until after resuming My question is this: How can I programmatically power down or detach the network card? "ifconfig an0 down" is not sufficient. I'm worried about wearing out my PC Card slot by frequently unplugging the card. On 4.8, I used "pccardc power 0 0" to power down the card, but on 6.1 it results in the error message: pccardc: /dev/card0: No such file or directory In the mail archive, I saw that pccardc is not supported in NEWCARD, but the binary and man page are still included in the 6.1 release. Or is there something else I should be doing instead? Here are additional details -- - This laptop BIOS supports APM but not ACPI. - I am running apmd and have it configured to invoke rc.suspend and rc.resume, which in turn run vidcontrol. - I have two network cards: an0 and ath0. For an0, the hang occurs on resume about half the time. With ath0, it aways hangs. - The hang is indicated by a timeout on ad0 (see below). At that point, I can switch vtys among 1-8, but going to vty9 (X server) will hang. Ctrl-Alt-Delete does nothing. Return just echoes return, no login prompt (will echo more than once). - Pulling Aironet card and replugging results in: Interrupt storm detected on "irq9:"; throttling interrrupt source Messages on the console vty (manually copied): Dec 2 00:57:56 kao root: Received USERSUSPENDREQ Dec 2 00:57:56 kao apm: suspend an0: detached Dec 2 14:32:20 kao root: Received NORMRESUME Dec 2 14:32:20 kao apm: resumed from suspend Dec 2 14:32:20 kao dhclient[3365]: send_packet: Device not configured an0: at port 0x100-0x13f irq 9 function 0 config 5 on pccard0 an0: got RSSI <-> dBM map an0: supported rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps an0: Ethernet address: 00:40:96:32:05:b7 an0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=68041200 Messages from /var/log/messages: Dec 2 00:57:56 kao apmd[412]: apmevent 000a index 7 Dec 2 00:57:56 kao root: Received USERSUSPENDREQ Dec 2 00:57:56 kao apm: suspend Dec 2 14:32:20 kao kernel: an0: detached Dec 2 14:32:20 kao kernel: wakeup from sleeping state (slept 13:34:17) Dec 2 14:32:19 kao apmd[412]: apmevent 0003 index 8 Dec 2 14:32:20 kao root: Received NORMRESUME Dec 2 14:32:20 kao apm: resumed from suspend Dec 2 14:32:20 kao dhclient[3365]: send_packet: Device not configured Dec 2 14:54:13 kao syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Note that some log messages are written after resuming and before the hang, so ad0 is working up to the point where it gets the timeout. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 04:00:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACF416A412 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmeek@russellmeek.net) Received: from a.mx.rem1tech.com (tron.rem1tech.com [72.232.64.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B683C13C468 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmeek@russellmeek.net) Received: (qmail 85032 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2007 03:33:30 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 84503, pid: 84721, t: 0.0196s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.7/m:42/d:2417 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (rmeek@russellmeek.net@72.232.64.195) by a.mx.rem1tech.com with ESMTPA; 8 Jan 2007 03:33:30 -0000 Received: from rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com (rrcs-67-79-176-182.se.biz.rr.com [67.79.176.182]) by secure.rem1tech.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:33:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20070107223330.m6zrmucf8kwgowk0@secure.rem1tech.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:33:30 -0500 From: "Russell E. Meek" To: Jonathan Horne References: <235b80000701071724g7ada06v15816147bff0e879@mail.gmail.com> <200701072001.25573.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200701072001.25573.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache2.2 php5.1 mysql5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:00:12 -0000 Quoting Jonathan Horne : > On Sunday 07 January 2007 19:24, tethys ocean wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed Apache 2.2 Mysql5 and also PHP5.1 but PHP5 >> doesnt work Are there anybody works together it? >> >> >> I did it such kinds of setting. >> >> apache22_enable="YES" >> mysql_enable="YES" >> >> AddType application/x-httpd-php .php >> AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps > > did you add to DirectoryIndex > > index.php ? > > hth, > jonathan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you built php5 from ports did you remember to select the Apache option to include the apache module? /usr/ports/lang/php5 make config Apache - Build Apache module From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 04:14:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C3616A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3788D13C44B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7289470wxc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:14:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eRr2z1EUNymC24GJ/OgD0ka+5Lc6lqVuTV43uIXvdpamfhEUWv8WnnimybPUDP68N2T9FypagzMMhWB+noW3euLACVBjJaspH0VpkSp9tZWc0/7s1/XOCotElAyT2QKXuqV/YLn30JSJpIquFH5QxChXKm9QbCRETz9nYgX9Sd8= Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr1957066agb.1168228137057; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.78.13 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:48:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:48:57 -0500 From: "Michael M. Press" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: USB drive is a CDROM drive and is not writable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:14:03 -0000 I have a 2 gigabyte USB memory stick from made by PNY. When I plug it in, I get the following: umass0: vendor 0x0930 USB Flash Memory, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 1901MB (3894975 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 242C) cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 cd1: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present I want to be able to mount the device read-write, so I use the following command: mount -t cd9660 -o rw /dev/cd1 /media/flashdrv The command runs without spitting any errors at me, but it does a read-only mount. I can see files on the drive, but (of course) I can't change them. Does my problem have anything to do with the device being detected as a CD-ROM drive? If that is what's wrong I don't really know where to start looking to fix it. Any ideas? -- I have 'device pass' in my kernel -- I am using 6.2 prerelease From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 04:25:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D15616A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F39F13C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l084PPDB030473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:25:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l084PP15030472; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA12376; Sun, 7 Jan 07 20:22:24 PST Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:25:11 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: robert@webtent.com Message-Id: <45a1c7a7.+g475MEh8QT+//b2%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <459FDB85.1040002@webtent.net> In-Reply-To: <459FDB85.1040002@webtent.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Connecting to a USB serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:25:26 -0000 > I have a Keyspan USB serial port on my FreeBSD 6.1 box and trying > to connect from a Linux box to the machine. I'm using minicom and > not sure of the settings that should be used. I see the following > in dmesg... > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 > flags 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > > Is this the USB serial port? There is no other serial port avaialble > on the server, but could be something in the board, not sure. I doubt it. That looks like a normal board-resident serial port, esp. with the "on acpi0" notation (which suggests that it is part of an ACPI-controlled device, and ACPI is ordinarily aware of only motherboard devices). It's likely part of the "super-io" chip, and it may possibly be connected to a 10-pin Berg header on the motherboard (or it may not be connected to the outside world at all). The motherboard manual, if available, might provide a clue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 04:56:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F74D16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A78813C44C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l084uePS096047; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:56:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:56:40 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "Michael M. Press" Message-ID: <20070108045640.GB41724@dan.emsphone.com> References: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB drive is a CDROM drive and is not writable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:56:41 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 07), Michael M. Press said: > I have a 2 gigabyte USB memory stick from made by PNY. When I plug it > in, I get the following: > > umass0: vendor 0x0930 USB Flash Memory, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 1901MB (3894975 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 242C) > cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 > cd1: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > > I want to be able to mount the device read-write, so I use the > following command: > > mount -t cd9660 -o rw /dev/cd1 /media/flashdrv > > The command runs without spitting any errors at me, but it does a > read-only mount. I can see files on the drive, but (of course) I > can't change them. Does my problem have anything to do with the > device being detected as a CD-ROM drive? If that is what's wrong I > don't really know where to start looking to fix it. Any ideas? Very interesting! cd1 and da0 look like the same device, with cd1 just on LUN 1. I bet if you were to examine /dev/da0 you'd see the real writable FAT filesystem there. I wonder if it is doing fat->cd9660 filesystem emulation on the fly? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 05:14:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553E816A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 05:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220B213C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 05:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l085E5nR040161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:14:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l085E5u0040159 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA12515; Sun, 7 Jan 07 21:12:23 PST Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:15:09 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <45a1d35d.4bEc3ED+dOKSmi62%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Vivitar USB camera support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:14:08 -0000 Does anyone happen to know where I would find a how-to for downloading and displaying images from a Vivitar ViviCam 3825? I see several digital-camera utilities of one sort or another in the ports, but none whose index entry mentions Vivitar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 06:37:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F6C16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com (nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB2D13C43E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [75.28.106.108] Received: from [192.168.4.2] (adsl-75-28-106-108.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [75.28.106.108]) by nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l086MeWv006662 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:22:42 -0600 Message-ID: <45A1E35F.4020401@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:23:27 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Linux Kernel Drivers in Under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 06:37:09 -0000 Is it possible to get Linux kernel drivers working under FreeBSD? If so, how? (Specifically Garmin_USB) -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 07:51:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B0916A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1BE13C458 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5487345uge for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:51:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sVQ2rzZk2TZAiEfRVh5iXRbZ3qLT2oukGr9VnjR82/aSSA0aoU4kSOa7kRzH++c+qoTB3i0tQiraia9mcJdrqD2IqazlNXjfzZkA4slkJBjvfZJrRHEyU0cxPvPoiPHqhnnf9x0FpkHfAfOQFk97GCcJWR4qNaiRSX65HUeJhII= Received: by 10.67.19.20 with SMTP id w20mr21299991ugi.1168242678863; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:51:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:51:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701072351k114119e5kc4d9864fcc651cd7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:51:18 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "Ivan Voras" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:51:22 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: > I have an hourly job that converts our legacy Foxpro database into > PostgreSQL tables so that our web applications, etc. can run reports off > the data in a reasonable amount of time. Believe it or not, this has been > running perfectly in production for over a year. The only problem I'd > still like to solve is that loading the data pegs the filesystem at 100% > for many minutes at a time. Why did you choose PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0.x? Is the latest PostgreSQL release performance much better than MySQL 5.0.x in RELENG_6 with SMP and 2 GB of ram now? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 07:57:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23FD16A40F; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (mail.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128A813C45D; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3546650725A; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [172.16.0.64] (ip-net-212-85-220-6.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.6]) by mail.africaonline.co.sz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AEE507259; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:08 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online Zimbabwe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:39:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701080939.41124.petern@africaonline.co.zw> Cc: David Banning , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:57:40 -0000 On Saturday 06 January 2007 22:02, David Banning wrote: > I have been blacklisted for spamming and I am attempting to ascertain the > source. > > I have a few networked windows boxes which route through a FBSD > server. I also have around ten off-site users who send mail via my port > 26 - using smtp password authentication. How do I determine which > email going through the server is spam, and therefore identify the > source? Hi what MTA are you using and are you running any mailscanning software ie MailScanner/Clamav/Spamd etc > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Peter Nyamukusa Systems Administrator Africa Online Zimbabwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 07:57:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23FD16A40F; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (mail.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128A813C45D; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3546650725A; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [172.16.0.64] (ip-net-212-85-220-6.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.6]) by mail.africaonline.co.sz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AEE507259; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:08 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online Zimbabwe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:39:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701080939.41124.petern@africaonline.co.zw> Cc: David Banning , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:57:40 -0000 On Saturday 06 January 2007 22:02, David Banning wrote: > I have been blacklisted for spamming and I am attempting to ascertain the > source. > > I have a few networked windows boxes which route through a FBSD > server. I also have around ten off-site users who send mail via my port > 26 - using smtp password authentication. How do I determine which > email going through the server is spam, and therefore identify the > source? Hi what MTA are you using and are you running any mailscanning software ie MailScanner/Clamav/Spamd etc > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Peter Nyamukusa Systems Administrator Africa Online Zimbabwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 09:25:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECFD16A416 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from tassgroup.com (po.tassgroup.com [202.146.195.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F9C913C467 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: (qmail 1029 invoked by uid 512); 8 Jan 2007 09:02:33 -0000 Date: 8 Jan 2007 09:02:33 -0000 From: "System Anti-Virus Administrator" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Tnz-Problem-Type: 40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Cc: Subject: Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Re: details" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:25:49 -0000 Attention: questions@freebsd.org A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: EXE files not allowed per Company security policy Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: questions@freebsd.org RCPT TO: sms@tassgroup.com ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: questions@freebsd.org Received: from 250-66-109-203.static.iqara.net (HELO tassgroup.com) (203.109.66.250) by tassgroup.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 09:02:25 -0000 From: questions@freebsd.org To: sms@tassgroup.com Subject: Re: details Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:18:57 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: mail.bootham.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'EXE files not allowed per Company security policy' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948/details.exe ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'EXE files not allowed per Company security policy' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948/details.exe --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 09:52:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610DD16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednaught.net) Received: from exedra.zednaught.net (cpc2-cbly3-0-0-cust101.glfd.cable.ntl.com [86.13.152.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF4B13C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednaught.net) Received: from webmail.zednaught.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exedra.zednaught.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337E5C40 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:52:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 204.104.55.243 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kelvin) by webmail.zednaught.net with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:52:06 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <18530.204.104.55.243.1168249926.squirrel@webmail.zednaught.net> In-Reply-To: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> References: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:52:06 -0000 (GMT) From: "Kelvin Woods" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: USB drive is a CDROM drive and is not writable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:52:08 -0000 On Mon, January 8, 2007 03:48, Michael M. Press wrote: > I have a 2 gigabyte USB memory stick from made by PNY. When I plug it > in, I > get the following: > > umass0: vendor 0x0930 USB Flash Memory, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 1901MB (3894975 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 242C) > cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 > cd1: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not > present > > I want to be able to mount the device read-write, so I use the > following command: > > mount -t cd9660 -o rw /dev/cd1 /media/flashdrv > > The command runs without spitting any errors at me, but it does a > read-only > mount. I can see files on the drive, but (of course) I can't change > them. Does > my problem have anything to do with the device being detected as a > CD-ROM > drive? If that is what's wrong I don't really know where to start > looking to fix it. > Any ideas? This sounds like a "Smart" drive - can you confirm? It this is the case it's designed to work this way. You won't be able to write to the CD partition of this flash drive. Smart isn't supported under *nix so the functionality it provides isn't available to FreeBSD users. I have one of these devices myself and simply removed the Smart partition to reclaim the space it takes up. -- Kelvin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 11:03:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D8A16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF47213C45D for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 178883658BB; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:44:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C473658B5; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:44:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76339398CF; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:36:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:44:41 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:03:37 -0000 Hello Is there a possibility to use as a standalone software the adduser feature that generate "random" passwd. I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. Thank you Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 11:26:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCF216A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64C013C43E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 06:26:09 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,159,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="383515969:sNHT23232916" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IBL96942; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:26:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-237-238-104.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO [207.237.238.104]) ([207.237.238.104]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 06:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: <45A22A4C.4050600@tandon.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 06:26:04 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090202.45A2288C.00B6,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:26:10 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Is there a possibility to use as a standalone software > the adduser feature that generate "random" passwd. > > I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. /usr/sbin/pw usermod -w random -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 11:27:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAC716A47C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6FA13C45E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3seZ-0000Ja-4M for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:26:59 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:26:59 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:26:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:26:51 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Sender: news Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:27:11 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. Here's an idea: $ head -c 64 /dev/random | md5 | head -c 10 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 11:31:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4966516A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAAA13C45B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 507443658EF; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:31:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9E23658A2; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:31:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5EB398CF; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:23:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A22B8C.9070300@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:31:24 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sahil Tandon References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> <45A22A4C.4050600@tandon.net> In-Reply-To: <45A22A4C.4050600@tandon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:31:26 -0000 Sahil Tandon wrote: > Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> Is there a possibility to use as a standalone software >> the adduser feature that generate "random" passwd. >> >> I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. > > /usr/sbin/pw usermod -w random > thanks a lot :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 12:01:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD1916A47B; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at (omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.59.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA78713C4A8; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.59.3.158] (fwswe.rise-s.com [83.65.168.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l08C1H7R012744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:01:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070105134858.65f3e082@tania.servebbs.org> References: <20070105134858.65f3e082@tania.servebbs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <4DC65D3F-33FE-4455-A119-11981BDF29CD@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tilman Linneweh Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:01:41 +0100 To: Bob X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Tilman Linneweh , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Koffice Compile Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:01:40 -0000 On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Bob wrote: > > In file included from /usr/local/include/wv2/olestream.h:22, > from graphicshandler.cpp:23: > > /usr/local/include/wv2/olestorage.h:26:21: gsf/gsf.h: No such file or > directory Reinstall your devel/libgsf port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 12:06:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5E616A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tamara-b.org) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C49C13C45B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tamara-b.org) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96307CACF6 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:06:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from tania.servebbs.org (pool-71-247-37-145.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.37.145]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B1A10594A5 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:06:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:06:57 -0500 From: Bob To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070108070657.3fde2ede@tania.servebbs.org> In-Reply-To: <20070105134858.65f3e082@tania.servebbs.org> References: <20070105134858.65f3e082@tania.servebbs.org> Organization: Tamara B X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Koffice Compile Error fixed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:06:18 -0000 Greetings: Let me preface this by saying that I am not C programmer. I am running on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10, and my ports and source trees are up to date. While attempting to compile koffice-1.6.1 I ran into this error: In file included from /usr/local/include/wv2/olestream.h:22, from graphicshandler.cpp:23: The offending code is in the file /usr/local/include/wv2/olestorage.h and reads: #include I have libgsf-1.14.1 installed and it installs gsf.h at: /usr/local/include/libgsf-1/gsf/gsf.h I also have wv2-0.2.3 Installed To fix this error, I edited the file /usr/local/include/wv2/olestorage.h and changed: #include to #include This fixed the error. There seems to be a discrepancy between WV2 and LIBGSF as to the proper location of gsf.h Either that, or my installation is not correct. Can someone either tell me who to report this to, or go ahead and report this to the proper maintainer? Perhaps the maintainer of koffice should add a patch? What is strange, and bothers me is that koffice 1.6.1 has been released for a while now, and nobody has run into this? Surely I am not the first to build koffice from sources. Best Regards Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 12:51:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DFC16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E464C13C45A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FC2209C0E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:51:02 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLqUwu7dolc3 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:50:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D0E20679F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:50:58 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:50:52 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <499c70c0701072351k114119e5kc4d9864fcc651cd7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701072351k114119e5kc4d9864fcc651cd7@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701080650.56113.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:51:03 -0000 --nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 1:51 am, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > Why did you choose PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0.x? We value our data, ruling out MyISAM. PostgreSQL is much faster than InnoD= B=20 for many concurrent reads and complex queries. > Is the latest PostgreSQL release performance much better than MySQL > 5.0.x in RELENG_6 with SMP and 2 GB of ram now? This has been true for our workload for several years. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFoj4w5sRg+Y0CpvERAmxiAJ9SnE7QeC7RVXrtFxcBlJtlYoR89wCdFCN/ 8aBPTBb9CJ7Sxv69ooEs6/Q= =0Xsd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 12:54:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB9216A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD3913C457 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FB2209C15 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:54:50 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7ZT+Vannn-C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:54:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645B2206215 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:54:47 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:54:45 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1549858.aULDDBLNkL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701080654.45757.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:54:53 -0000 --nextPart1549858.aULDDBLNkL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 5:26 am, Ivan Voras wrote: > Here's an idea: > > $ head -c 64 /dev/random | md5 | head -c 10 Hugely bad idea. Since md5 outputs hex, you're only getting 4 bits of=20 entropy per character. Much better to use something like sysutils/pwgen to= =20 generate good random passwords. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1549858.aULDDBLNkL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFoj8V5sRg+Y0CpvERAvZ6AJ0W4LKIjks9pV/cc1zLFtShBMvxBACfRjmZ HJeLqUXtoGCm9KMBSX5YqU8= =I5mg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1549858.aULDDBLNkL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 13:26:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF0116A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6113C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070108125738.OSFM3634.mxfep01.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:57:38 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 13:57:37 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:50:54 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: proftpd update error Thread-Index: AcczI6I2TclFWGXAQWaiIEEDtK6oEg== From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: proftpd update error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:26:45 -0000 Hi, =20 I have a problem when I run portupdate for port proftpd. Log will be = applied in the end of this email. I am running as root. My uname -a prints FreeBSD tentor.xxx.local 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #1: Sat Mar 5 = 21:45:37 UTC 2005 = gk@tentor.xxx.local:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TENTOR = i386 My portscollegtion is up to date. =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim =20 =20 ---> Upgrading 'proftpd-1.2.10_1' to 'proftpd-1.3.1.r1' (ftp/proftpd) ---> Building '/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd' =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for mysql-client-4.1.22 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.22_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for ldconfig_compat-1.0_8 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_2 =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for proftpd-1.2.10_1 =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for proftpd-1.3.1rc1.tar.bz2. =3D=3D=3D> Patching for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 =3D=3D=3D> proftpd-1.3.1.r1 depends on executable in : gmake - found =3D=3D=3D> proftpd-1.3.1.r1 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.14 = - found =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 =3D=3D> Configuring with = mod_ratio:mod_readme:mod_rewrite:mod_wrap2:mod_sql:mod_sql_mysql:mod_ifse= ssion configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables...=20 checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g = wheel checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-g++... c++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-g77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-f77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-xlf... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-frt... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-pgf77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-fort77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-fl32... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-af77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-f90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-xlf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-pgf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-epcf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-f95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-fort... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-xlf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-ifc... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-efc... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-pgf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-lf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-gfortran... no checking for g77... no checking for f77... f77 checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... yes checking whether f77 accepts -g... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 65536 checking command to parse nm output from cc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking if cc static flag works... yes checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared = libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd5.3 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking for shl_load... no checking for shl_load in -ldld... no checking for dlopen... yes checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes configure: creating libtool appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool checking for ld used by c++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared = libraries... yes checking for c++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if c++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared = libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd5.3 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking for shl_load... (cached) no checking for shl_load in -ldld... (cached) no checking for dlopen... (cached) yes checking whether a program can dlopen itself... (cached) yes checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... = (cached) yes appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for f77 option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if f77 PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if f77 supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the f77 linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared = libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd5.3 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no checking whether the C compiler accepts -Wall... yes checking for getopt... yes checking for getopt_long... yes checking getopt.h usability... yes checking getopt.h presence... yes checking for getopt.h... yes checking for standalone crypt... no checking for crypt in -lcrypt... yes checking for standalone gethostbyname... yes checking for standalone inet_aton... yes checking for standalone nsl functions... yes checking for standalone socket functions... yes checking for _pw_stayopen variable... no checking krb.h usability... no checking krb.h presence... no checking for krb.h... no checking prot.h usability... no checking prot.h presence... no checking for prot.h... no checking hpsecurity.h usability... no checking hpsecurity.h presence... no checking for hpsecurity.h... no checking for hpsecurity.h workaround... no checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes checking for library containing opendir... none required checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes checking fcntl.h usability... yes checking fcntl.h presence... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking junistd.h usability... no checking junistd.h presence... no checking for junistd.h... no checking for memory.h... (cached) yes checking shadow.h usability... no checking shadow.h presence... no checking for shadow.h... no checking security/pam_appl.h usability... yes checking security/pam_appl.h presence... yes checking for security/pam_appl.h... yes checking security/pam_modules.h usability... yes checking security/pam_modules.h presence... yes checking for security/pam_modules.h... yes checking pam/pam_appl.h usability... no checking pam/pam_appl.h presence... no checking for pam/pam_appl.h... no checking for pam_start in -lpam... yes checking whether to enable mod_cap... no checking bstring.h usability... no checking bstring.h presence... no checking for bstring.h... no checking crypt.h usability... no checking crypt.h presence... no checking for crypt.h... no checking ctype.h usability... yes checking ctype.h presence... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking execinfo.h usability... no checking execinfo.h presence... no checking for execinfo.h... no checking iconv.h usability... yes checking iconv.h presence... yes checking for iconv.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes checking langinfo.h usability... yes checking langinfo.h presence... yes checking for langinfo.h... yes checking limits.h usability... yes checking limits.h presence... yes checking for limits.h... yes checking locale.h usability... yes checking locale.h presence... yes checking for locale.h... yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking for strings.h... (cached) yes checking stropts.h usability... no checking stropts.h presence... no checking for stropts.h... no checking sys/file.h usability... yes checking sys/file.h presence... yes checking for sys/file.h... yes checking sys/mman.h usability... yes checking sys/mman.h presence... yes checking for sys/mman.h... yes checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes checking sys/uio.h usability... yes checking sys/uio.h presence... yes checking for sys/uio.h... yes checking for sys/param.h... yes checking for sys/mount.h... yes checking netdb.h usability... yes checking netdb.h presence... yes checking for netdb.h... yes checking netinet/in.h usability... yes checking netinet/in.h presence... yes checking for netinet/in.h... yes checking whether netdb.h requires _USE_IRS... no checking for netinet/in_systm.h... yes checking for netinet/ip.h... yes checking netinet/tcp.h usability... yes checking netinet/tcp.h presence... yes checking for netinet/tcp.h... yes checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes checking for arpa/inet.h... yes checking libintl.h usability... yes checking libintl.h presence... yes checking for libintl.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes checking errno.h usability... yes checking errno.h presence... yes checking for errno.h... yes checking sys/socket.h usability... yes checking sys/socket.h presence... yes checking for sys/socket.h... yes checking sys/termios.h usability... yes checking sys/termios.h presence... yes checking for sys/termios.h... yes checking sys/termio.h usability... no checking sys/termio.h presence... no checking for sys/termio.h... no checking sys/statvfs.h usability... yes checking sys/statvfs.h presence... yes checking for sys/statvfs.h... yes checking sys/un.h usability... yes checking sys/un.h presence... yes checking for sys/un.h... yes checking sys/vfs.h usability... no checking sys/vfs.h presence... no checking for sys/vfs.h... no checking sys/select.h usability... yes checking sys/select.h presence... yes checking for sys/select.h... yes checking dirent.h usability... yes checking dirent.h presence... yes checking for dirent.h... yes checking ndir.h usability... no checking ndir.h presence... no checking for ndir.h... no checking sys/ndir.h usability... no checking sys/ndir.h presence... no checking for sys/ndir.h... no checking sys/dir.h usability... yes checking sys/dir.h presence... yes checking for sys/dir.h... yes checking vmsdir.h usability... no checking vmsdir.h presence... no checking for vmsdir.h... no checking ucontext.h usability... yes checking ucontext.h presence... yes checking for ucontext.h... yes checking utime.h usability... yes checking utime.h presence... yes checking for utime.h... yes checking utmpx.h usability... no checking utmpx.h presence... no checking for utmpx.h... no checking regex.h usability... yes checking regex.h presence... yes checking for regex.h... yes checking syslog.h usability... yes checking syslog.h presence... yes checking for syslog.h... yes checking curses.h usability... yes checking curses.h presence... yes checking for curses.h... yes checking ncurses.h usability... yes checking ncurses.h presence... yes checking for ncurses.h... yes checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes checking for inline... inline checking for uid_t in sys/types.h... yes checking for pid_t... yes checking for size_t... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for off_t... yes checking type of array argument to getgroups... gid_t checking for timer_t... yes checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h checking for short... yes checking size of short... 2 checking for int... yes checking size of int... 4 checking for long... yes checking size of long... 4 checking for long long... yes checking size of long long... 8 checking for off_t... (cached) yes checking size of off_t... 8 checking for size_t... (cached) yes checking size of size_t... 4 checking for time_t... yes checking size of time_t... 4 checking for umode_t... no checking for ino_t... yes checking for intptr_t... yes checking for socklen_t... yes checking utmp.h usability... yes checking utmp.h presence... yes checking for utmp.h... yes checking whether your struct utmp has ut_user... no checking whether your struct utmp has ut_host... yes checking whether your struct utmp has ut_exit... no checking whether your syslog.h defines LOG_CRON... yes checking whether your syslog.h defines LOG_FTP... yes checking for d_fd in DIR structure... no checking for dd_fd in DIR structure... yes checking for working alloca.h... no checking for alloca... yes checking for alloca in -lucb... no checking whether cc needs -traditional... no checking whether setpgrp takes no argument... no checking return type of signal handlers... void checking for vprintf... yes checking for _doprnt... no checking for bcopy... yes checking for crypt... yes checking for fdatasync... no checking for fgetgrent... no checking for fgetpwent... no checking for flock... yes checking for freeaddrinfo... yes checking for iconv... no checking for nl_langinfo... yes checking for gai_strerror... yes checking for getaddrinfo... yes checking for getcwd... yes checking for getenv... yes checking for gethostbyname2... yes checking for gethostname... yes checking for getnameinfo... yes checking for gettimeofday... yes checking for hstrerror... yes checking for inet_aton... yes checking for inet_ntop... yes checking for inet_pton... yes checking for memcpy... yes checking for mempcpy... no checking for mkdir... yes checking for mkstemp... yes checking for mlock... yes checking for mlockall... yes checking for munlock... yes checking for munlockall... yes checking for rmdir... yes checking for select... yes checking for setgroups... yes checking for socket... yes checking for statfs... yes checking for strchr... yes checking for strcoll... yes checking for strerror... yes checking for strsep... yes checking for strtol... yes checking for strtoull... yes checking for setprotoent... yes checking for setspent... no checking for endprotoent... yes checking for vsnprintf... yes checking for snprintf... yes checking for setsid... yes checking for setgroupent... yes checking for seteuid... yes checking for setegid... yes checking for setenv... yes checking for siginterrupt... yes checking for setpgid... yes checking for regcomp... yes checking for tzset... yes checking for unsetenv... yes checking for pathconf... yes checking for fpathconf... yes checking for fgetspent... no checking for setpassent... yes checking for struct sockaddr_in.sin_len... yes checking whether struct addrinfo is defined... yes checking whether struct sockaddr_storage is defined... yes checking whether ss_family is defined... yes checking whether ss_len is defined... yes checking sys/acl.h usability... yes checking sys/acl.h presence... yes checking for sys/acl.h... yes checking acl/libacl.h usability... no checking acl/libacl.h presence... no checking for acl/libacl.h... no checking which POSIX ACL implementation to use... BSD checking whether setgrent returns void... no checking for initscr in -lcurses... yes checking for initscr in -lncurses... yes checking for setproctitle... yes checking libutil.h usability... yes checking libutil.h presence... yes checking for libutil.h... yes checking for setproctitle in -lutil... yes checking whether printf supports %llu format... yes checking for default transfer buffer sizes... 32768 checking checking for duplicate module requests... no checking whether cc accepts -Wno-long-double... no configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating include/Makefile config.status: creating lib/Makefile config.status: creating locale/Makefile config.status: creating modules/Makefile config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: creating src/ftpdctl.8 config.status: creating src/proftpd.8 config.status: creating src/xferlog.5 config.status: creating utils/Makefile config.status: creating utils/ftpcount.1 config.status: creating utils/ftpshut.8 config.status: creating utils/ftptop.1 config.status: creating utils/ftpwho.1 config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating Make.rules config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing default commands configure: configuring in contrib/mod_wrap2 configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --prefix=3D/usr/local = '--localstatedir=3D/var/run' = '--sysconfdir=3D/usr/local/share/examples/proftpd/etc' = '--disable-sendfile' '--disable-ipv6' = '--with-modules=3Dmod_ratio:mod_readme:mod_rewrite:mod_wrap2:mod_sql:mod_= sql_mysql:mod_ifsession' = '--with-includes=3D:/include:/usr/local/include' = '--with-libraries=3D:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/mysql' = '--prefix=3D/usr/local' 'i386-portbld-freebsd5.3' 'CFLAGS=3D-O -pipe = -march=3Dpentiumpro' 'CXX=3Dc++' 'host_alias=3Di386-portbld-freebsd5.3' = 'build_alias=3Di386-portbld-freebsd5.3' = 'target_alias=3Di386-portbld-freebsd5.3' 'CC=3Dcc' 'CXXFLAGS=3D-O -pipe = -march=3Dpentiumpro' 'LIBS=3D' --enable-ltdl-convenience = --cache-file=3D/dev/null --srcdir=3D. configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating mod_wrap2.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/local/share/examples/proftpd:/usr/local:' = /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/config.h /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's: -lnsl::' = /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/Make.rules /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:' -e = 's:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:' = /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/src/proftpd.8 = /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/utils/ftpshut.8 = /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/utils/ftpcount.1 =3D=3D=3D> Building for proftpd-1.3.1.r1 echo \#define BUILD_STAMP \"`date`\" >include/buildstamp.h cd lib/ && gmake lib gmake[1]: Entering directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = pr_fnmatch.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = sstrncpy.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = strsep.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = vsnprintf.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = glibc-glob.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = glibc-hstrerror.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = glibc-mkstemp.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = pr-syslog.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = pwgrent.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = getopt.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = getopt1.c ar rc libsupp.a pr_fnmatch.o sstrncpy.o strsep.o vsnprintf.o = glibc-glob.o glibc-hstrerror.o glibc-mkstemp.o pr-syslog.o pwgrent.o = getopt.o getopt1.o ranlib libsupp.a gmake[1]: Leaving directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib' cd src/ && gmake src gmake[1]: Entering directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/src' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = main.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = timers.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = sets.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = pool.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = table.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = regexp.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = dirtree.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = support.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = netaddr.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = inet.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = child.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = parser.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = log.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = lastlog.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = xferlog.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = bindings.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = netacl.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = class.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = scoreboard.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = help.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = feat.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = netio.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = response.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = ident.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = data.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = modules.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = display.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = auth.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = fsio.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mkhome.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = ctrls.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = event.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = var.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = trace.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = utf8.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = ftpdctl.c gmake[1]: Leaving directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/src' cd modules/ && gmake static gmake[1]: Entering directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/modules' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_core.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_xfer.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_auth_unix.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_auth_file.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_auth.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_ls.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_log.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_site.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_delay.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_auth_pam.c /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:57: warning: 'pam_sm_acct_mgmt' = declared `static' but never defined /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:65: warning: 'pam_sm_authenticate' = declared `static' but never defined /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:73: warning: 'pam_sm_chauthtok' = declared `static' but never defined /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:81: warning: 'pam_sm_close_session' = declared `static' but never defined /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:89: warning: 'pam_sm_open_session' = declared `static' but never defined /usr/include/security/pam_modules.h:97: warning: 'pam_sm_setcred' = declared `static' but never defined cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_ratio.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_readme.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_rewrite.c mod_rewrite.c: In function `rewrite_expand_var': mod_rewrite.c:241: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 4) mod_rewrite.c:241: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 4) cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_sql.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_sql_mysql.c cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = mod_ifsession.c srcdir=3D. ./glue.sh mod_core.o mod_xfer.o mod_auth_unix.o = mod_auth_file.o mod_auth.o mod_ls.o mod_log.o mod_site.o mod_delay.o = mod_auth_pam.o mod_ratio.o mod_readme.o mod_rewrite.o mod_wrap2.o = mod_sql.o mod_sql_mysql.o mod_ifsession.o cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I.. -I../include = -I/usr/local/include -I/include -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c = module_glue.c gmake[2]: Entering directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD5_3 -DFREEBSD5 -I. -I../.. -I../../include = -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -c mod_wrap2.c gmake[2]: Leaving directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' gmake[1]: Leaving directory = `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/modules' test -z """" -a -z """" || (cd modules/ && gmake shared) test -z """" || (cd locale/ && gmake locale) /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=3Dlink cc -L./lib -L/usr/local/lib/mysql = -L/usr/local/lib -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o = src/pool.o src/table.o src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o = src/netaddr.o src/inet.o src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o = src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o = src/scoreboard.o src/help.o src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o = src/ident.o src/data.o src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o = src/mkhome.o src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o = modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o = modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o = modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o = modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_sql_mysql.o = modules/mod_sql.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o = modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o -lsupp = -lcrypt -lutil -lm -lmysqlclient -lz -lpam=20 mkdir .libs cc -o proftpd src/main.o src/timers.o src/sets.o src/pool.o src/table.o = src/regexp.o src/dirtree.o src/support.o src/netaddr.o src/inet.o = src/child.o src/parser.o src/log.o src/lastlog.o src/xferlog.o = src/bindings.o src/netacl.o src/class.o src/scoreboard.o src/help.o = src/feat.o src/netio.o src/response.o src/ident.o src/data.o = src/modules.o src/display.o src/auth.o src/fsio.o src/mkhome.o = src/ctrls.o src/event.o src/var.o src/trace.o src/utf8.o = modules/mod_core.o modules/mod_xfer.o modules/mod_auth_unix.o = modules/mod_auth_file.o modules/mod_auth.o modules/mod_ls.o = modules/mod_log.o modules/mod_site.o modules/mod_delay.o = modules/mod_auth_pam.o modules/mod_ifsession.o modules/mod_sql_mysql.o = modules/mod_sql.o modules/mod_wrap2.o modules/mod_rewrite.o = modules/mod_readme.o modules/mod_ratio.o modules/module_glue.o = -L/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib = -L/usr/local/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/lib -lsupp -lcrypt -lutil -lm = -lmysqlclient -lz -lpam /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x5e8): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x6a9): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x6da): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x786): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x89b): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.tex= t+0x8cd): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow gmake: *** [proftpd] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa = /tmp/portupgrade29559.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=3Dproftpd-1.2.10_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D1.2.10_1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! ftp/proftpd (proftpd-1.2.10_1) (linker error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 13:28:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21F716A407; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AA613C458; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l08DRxnB046926; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:28:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:27:59 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C73331.31AE7780" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D1692@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PHP 5.2.0 Curl module compiled but unavailable? Thread-Index: AcczJJTbwhzbPjxqReiEgEEesZX4zQAApdnA From: "Philippe Lang" To: X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Cc: ale@freebsd.org Subject: PHP 5.2.0 Curl module compiled but unavailable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:28:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C73331.31AE7780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm trying to add CURL support to PHP 5.2.0. I installed Apache modules like always, with the /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions port. But the module does not show up in phpinfo(). I tried adding the --with-curl flag to the Makefile of the /usr/ports/lang/php5 port, but then compilation fails. Does anyone have the same problem maybe? FreeBSD 6.0 curl-7.16.0_1 php5-5.2.0 php5-curl-5.2.0_1 Thanks! --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C73331.31AE7780 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEC8Je+Ow3zDljd2KGv8eMAswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MTEwODA4MzExMFoXDTA3MTEwODA4MzEx MFowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBALFgsNFBDNSzuJ9Tzidkc2hmcNzRhtL+wpGd9BPqKLadWud9 6aKmbIa5/ryArThLKdcKHjZioIg6Iz7hkWm2smF9sHr6/8hafxduylFDAl2uLDMDcuor6qWuUguD YA4nbcXsw24kLKDfRJTsbqs88CA8H6To/5Vc+P5ZVDSCgQyTAgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOBgQBVxKn4EeDnovZ/I+XNRoa4dI47JEssSeZgNo4dqgvsABfM68lc5rb6yAOUZsJCLTDIldIC albrmMED/yYLED4p/LjCrFpQ1NI1e5KD+oMJz2ln+HPo+G5jqbWUjWX4wWDhbGH0iJA1h0mNlvnD Tue7yAVfzkf7AlX6Da0YYy8JAjCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEC8Je+Ow3zDljd2KGv8eMAswCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDcwMTA4MTMyNzU4WjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUg0d0wkn2We00gsO00pwvWHflxzAwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhAvCXvjsN8w5Y3dihr/HjALMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhAvCXvjsN8w 5Y3dihr/HjALMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAdgZJp1Q5L9rVQKBKJMbcAtmXcWKoptD10Hp69dQI Xprutt96P7es5oCVpJ6OePyHR+9X9TGYXhIYIZau3IqHj7olGx9aEi1MZwE63JQb64D8IdfDQ3Qk oGkWpYYImy10QozUux2sR5jTN7RnS7a2kw41/Iz4HXeKr2bVeTHQKJcAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C73331.31AE7780-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 13:28:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3385B16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1D613C461 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp125-203.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.125.203]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 23:43:34 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,159,1167571800"; d="scan'208"; a="71123128:sNHT23513231" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:43:33 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701082343.33324.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: "Michael M. Press" Subject: Re: USB drive is a CDROM drive and is not writable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:28:59 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:18 pm, Michael M. Press wrote: > I have a 2 gigabyte USB memory stick from made by PNY. When I > plug it in, I get the following: > > umass0: vendor 0x0930 USB Flash Memory, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 > device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 1901MB (3894975 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 242C) > cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 > cd1: < USB Flash Memory 6.50> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium > not present > > I want to be able to mount the device read-write, so I use the > following command: > > mount -t cd9660 -o rw /dev/cd1 /media/flashdrv > You cannot mount even a conventional CD drive as a writable cd9660 filesystem. Creating a cd9660 fs is normally a one hit prossess in which the fs is created fully populated and can't then normally be changed except on RW media by overwriting the entire fs. I don't know the device you are using but would expect that you can write a populated cd9660 file system directly using cdrecord (or perhaps burncd) without attempting to mount; just as you would on a conventional ATAPI or SCSII CD drive. Malcolm > The command runs without spitting any errors at me, but it > does a read-only mount. I can see files on the drive, but (of > course) I can't change them. Does my problem have anything to > do with the device being detected as a CD-ROM drive? If that > is what's wrong I don't really know where to start looking to > fix it. > Any ideas? > > -- I have 'device pass' in my kernel > -- I am using 6.2 prerelease > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 14:29:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0485C16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD52113C441 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2093576ana for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AEBFOr9sg5kExjJ+lRjOQ8W6M+T93rvsz0qfknjIDIqCO+cp4bS8kH9HVpnKa1qaRQ/Jd31B6OqFK/GLaEIKzijZhzaq1D6QRcuXV8lPV7sCls4Jp51flCemyRzMzIP6XMENRZhQR2Z20t9YYhMqOuOme3wlS/I1UNy08O4CM9w= Received: by 10.100.125.5 with SMTP id x5mr19032601anc.1168266594165; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:29:54 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:29:55 -0000 Hello my friends 1. How to get the Files listing of "Recently Changed" files under a File System based on date... for example Root / 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD System.. meaning how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD Server? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 14:46:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130D16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep03.bredband.com (mxfep03.bredband.com [195.54.107.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EB413C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep03.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070108144642.QQXV2708.mxfep03.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:46:42 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 15:46:42 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:38:59 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD File System, please help Thread-Index: AcczMN0zGBaHgwKuSnaDncA9TUc8dQAAd6s6 References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: "VeeJay" , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: SV: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:46:44 -0000 Hi =20 1. ls -t =20 man ls =20 -t Sort by time modified (most recently modified first) before = sort- ing the operands by lexicographical order. -u Use time of last access, instead of last modification of = the file for sorting (-t) or printing (-l). =20 2. cat /etc/passwd & cat /etc/groups =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim Nilimaa ________________________________ Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org genom VeeJay Skickat: m=E5 2007-01-08 15:29 Till: maanjee@gmail.com; FreeBSD-Questions =C4mne: FreeBSD File System, please help Hello my friends 1. How to get the Files listing of "Recently Changed" files under a File System based on date... for example Root / 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD System.. = meaning how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD Server? -- Thanks! BR / vj _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 14:55:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37ECF16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4A713C457 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 09:55:25 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,159,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="383625542:sNHT371295634" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IBN16232; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:55:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 09:55:04 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17826.23332.240822.587622@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:54:28 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A09020A.45A25997.00BB,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: >> I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its >> end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the >> reasons or rationale behind this. > > Two reasons AFAIK: > > 1. it simply doesn't even know how deal with the more modern > features like GEOM & RAID, more advanced authentication > mechanisms (nsswitch), and devices like sound cards (there are > many more in this list...) There's a strong argument often made it behaves correctly in this regard. The job of sysinstall is to bring a basic system up and running (thus enabling the use of more conventional tools), not to be tha all-singing, all-dancing, fill-out-the-taxes-and-change- the-baby's-diaper installation program. Should you want one of those, I'm sure you could talk to MicroSoft. :-) Even if you accept that position, there are things it could do differently, do better, and even do at all. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 14:57:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B430416A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5096E13C458 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 09:57:47 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTD23786; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:57:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 09:57:38 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17826.23487.564492.142014@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:57:03 -0500 To: FreeBSD-Questions In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A09020B.45A25A25.00BC,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:57:46 -0000 VeeJay writes: > 1. How to get the Files listing of "Recently Changed" files under > a File System based on date... for example Root / man find > 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD > System.. meaning how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD > Server? The information is in /etc/passwd and /etc/group. You can get a count with the "wc" command. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 15:33:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE25A16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=05211987c2@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE2BD13C459 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=05211987c2@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 9061 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 15:05:44 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 Jan 2007 15:05:44 -0000 Date: 8 Jan 2007 15:05:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20070108150544.11006.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200701080650.56113.kirk@strauser.com> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:33:46 -0000 >> Why did you choose PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0.x? > >We value our data, ruling out MyISAM. Huh? I thought you said that the SQL database is just a mirror of the stuff from Foxpro. R's, John k From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 15:48:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028BD16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidernest@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0A213C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidernest@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so89044nfc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:48:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rMLOzzEFicIiY7uLKbHG90S/HwgMDdghObUhxBr2lgh6EedRI85t7kqPoU5mYFtipCivbrtLhJbSe3MTHNqajcJWfOHyThMEVyquJpXwpwvY0hZfh6gDzC8oY8N1zQkPrARlw91x430ce2b/ARkzMtE3ruuzoKDB//ti6cXbUmE= Received: by 10.49.57.12 with SMTP id j12mr2478680nfk.1168271324155; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.162.14 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:48:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6db0aaaa0701080748g7b9f8f43naaadea4942611ba4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:48:43 -0500 From: "David Banning" To: "Tamouh H." , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45a09666.30c59e1a.7415.771bSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> <45a09666.30c59e1a.7415.771bSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Cc: Subject: Re: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:48:46 -0000 > This is more of a question geared towards your mail server application than FreeBSD. You should check your mail logs. If you want better advise, you may want to provide more information on what mail server are you running, and what did you do to prevent SMTP relay. I am using sendmail. It will not allow open relaying. What I would like to know is how I can separate legitimate emails in the log from spam. All that appears is the from: and the to:. In the past I have seen separate SMTP servers installed by viruses on windows boxes which are spamming away -independent- of sendmail. I have blocked port 25 from all my connected windows boxes, but will that take care of it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 15:53:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5279916A504 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F310D13C459 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:53:26 -0500 id 000564D9.45A268F6.00006B7C Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:53:25 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "David Banning" Message-Id: <20070108105325.b2628280.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <6db0aaaa0701080748g7b9f8f43naaadea4942611ba4@mail.gmail.com> References: <6db0aaaa0701061202r1bec87a3g526268964185b0c5@mail.gmail.com> <45a09666.30c59e1a.7415.771bSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <6db0aaaa0701080748g7b9f8f43naaadea4942611ba4@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tamouh H." , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:53:27 -0000 In response to "David Banning" : > > This is more of a question geared towards your mail server application than FreeBSD. You should check your mail logs. If you want better advise, you may want to provide more information on what mail server are you running, and what did you do to prevent SMTP relay. > > I am using sendmail. It will not allow open relaying. What I would > like to know is > how I can separate legitimate emails in the log from spam. All that > appears is the from: > and the to:. Look at one of the spam emails and review the headers to see how it's getting delivered. > In the past I have seen separate SMTP servers installed by viruses on > windows boxes > which are spamming away -independent- of sendmail. I have blocked port > 25 from all > my connected windows boxes, but will that take care of it? Who knows. You first have to determine how the problem is occurring. The block you've implemented is a good idea -- I think everyone should do it as a matter of course, but there's no guarantee that it will fix your particular problem until you know what that problem is. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 16:00:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F310916A549 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE49013C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 6A8517F566 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:02:59 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at webtent.net Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (esmtp.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3co5-k70-ay for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-43.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.43]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 13C7A7F31A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:02:49 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:00:47 -0500 Message-Id: <1168272047.9367.23.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Setting up ucom serial device for tty communications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:00:54 -0000 I have a Keyspan USB serial adapter identified by FreeBSD 6.1 as shown below. I was wondering if it is possible, and how to, set this device up to receive COM communications from another Linux box using minicom. Can someone suggest or point to some helpful docs possibly to setup in /etc/ttys? esmtp# dmesg | grep Keyspan ugen0: Keyspan, a division of InnoSys Inc. Keyspan USA-19H, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 esmtp# grep Keyspan /var/log/messages Jan 6 10:48:02 esmtp kernel: ugen0: Keyspan, a division of InnoSys Inc. Keyspan USA-19H, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 Thanks -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 16:15:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F7616A47C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp1.freeserve.com (smtp1.wanadoo.co.uk [193.252.22.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AE013C46B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp1.freeserve.com (mwinf3012 [172.22.159.36]) by mwinf3005.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6B9501004E1B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:47:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3012.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 56FF61C00081 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:47:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from brian5vgqrbw1x (user-514f307a.l2.c3.dsl.pol.co.uk [81.79.48.122]) by mwinf3012.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F0B211C00084 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:47:11 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070108154711986.F0B211C00084@mwinf3012.me.freeserve.com From: "Brian Levie" To: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:47:54 -0000 Message-ID: <000201c7333c$5c9e48c0$ba01a8c0@brian5vgqrbw1x> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: unable to load kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:15:09 -0000 After installing FreeBSD 6.1, I get the error message =91Unable to load kernel=92 and it goes to an OK prompt. I suspect the problem is in the geometry, when installing I get the message =92Geometry of 238316/16/63 for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry=92. And appears to use 14946/255/63. However the BIOS shows 58853/16/255, but attempting to use this produces the same error message. The system has a 200Gb hard disk, all but the last 1.5Gb is Windows XP, and it is the last 1.5Gb I have tried to install FreeBSD. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. =20 Brian Levie --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/619 - Release Date: 07/01/2007 18:29 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 17:11:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBCE16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C01C13C44C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D8A20A570 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:11:06 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBc-+HcqGE8g for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:11:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8EA206215 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:11:03 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:10:57 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070108150544.11006.qmail@simone.iecc.com> In-Reply-To: <20070108150544.11006.qmail@simone.iecc.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2162554.XGHC2GeoXp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701081111.01673.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:11:07 -0000 --nextPart2162554.XGHC2GeoXp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 9:05 am, John Levine wrote: > >> Why did you choose PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0.x? > > > >We value our data, ruling out MyISAM. > > Huh? I thought you said that the SQL database is just a mirror of the > stuff from Foxpro. Not *all* of it. We're migrating over to it as the native backend for new= =20 applications, so the Foxpro stuff is loaded into its own schema inside the= =20 same database as the production data. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2162554.XGHC2GeoXp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFonsl5sRg+Y0CpvERApuUAJ9hocOy7eI9/aEtys5p5g+qobybnACgiZw9 /gMMC9JRKqeykRdKzwWNIwE= =4BF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2162554.XGHC2GeoXp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 17:39:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A2416A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from puck@volunteerwireless.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BC2F13C457 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from puck@volunteerwireless.net) Received: (qmail 22255 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Jan 2007 17:13:06 -0000 Received: from puck@volunteerwireless.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(0.0/100.0):. Processed in 3.663804 secs); 08 Jan 2007 17:13:06 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.6) by -v with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 17:13:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 10019 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 17:12:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.241?) (puck@72.173.0.35) by -v with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 17:12:56 -0000 Message-ID: <45A27B5C.9000101@volunteerwireless.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:11:56 -0600 From: Jack Schneider User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061224) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Boot error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:39:47 -0000 Hi, Folks I got this systemic error on a new install of PCBSD 1.3. Below: Jan 8 09:54:58 Growler kernel: acd0: FAILURE - unknown CMD (0x03) ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 Jan 8 09:55:29 Growler last message repeated 15 times Jan 8 09:57:31 Growler last message repeated 60 times Jan 8 10:07:33 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:17:35 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:27:37 Growler last message repeated 296 times Jan 8 10:37:39 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:47:40 Growler last message repeated 295 times Growler# Any ideas about the cause? I read that hald may give qurky results, but I don't know where to look.... Thanks in advance... Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 17:57:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D2C16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from puck@volunteerwireless.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D448213C46A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from puck@volunteerwireless.net) Received: (qmail 6608 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Jan 2007 17:57:01 -0000 Received: from puck@volunteerwireless.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(0.0/100.0):. Processed in 2.672039 secs); 08 Jan 2007 17:57:01 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.4) by -v with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 17:56:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14679 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2007 17:56:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.241?) (puck@72.173.0.35) by -v with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 17:56:43 -0000 Message-ID: <45A285C5.4080700@volunteerwireless.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:56:21 -0600 From: Jack Schneider User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061224) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Boot error ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:57:03 -0000 Hi, Folks I got this systemic error on a new install of PCBSD 1.3. Below: Jan 8 09:54:58 Growler kernel: acd0: FAILURE - unknown CMD (0x03) ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 Jan 8 09:55:29 Growler last message repeated 15 times Jan 8 09:57:31 Growler last message repeated 60 times Jan 8 10:07:33 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:17:35 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:27:37 Growler last message repeated 296 times Jan 8 10:37:39 Growler last message repeated 295 times Jan 8 10:47:40 Growler last message repeated 295 times Growler# It just seems to hang around... Eating up about 20% of cpu time.. Any ideas about the cause? I read that hald may give quirky results, but I don't know where to look.... Thanks in advance... Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:04:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A7F16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DAF13C441 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.237.85] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.64) (envelope-from ) id 1H3yN3-000JWT-HI; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:33:17 -0800 Message-ID: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:33:18 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena Organization: City Centre Stores Ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (85) Subject: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:04:57 -0000 http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions ----------------------------------------------------------------- Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The big license mess, part 2 http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 -------------------------------------------------- Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:08:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C88616A417 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0924F13C459 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF089C14E9; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:08:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id n1LHlBpiEtXz; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:08:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AAC9C14C0; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:08:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A288AB.6030806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:08:43 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> In-Reply-To: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:08:53 -0000 Jim Pazarena schrieb: > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The big license mess, part 2 > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 > > -------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues No, Gentoo/FreeBSD is an another project from Gentoo to port their infratructure to the FreeBSD kernel. That project is developed by the Gentoo people not by us. Regards, Gabor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:14:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABBB16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B75913C459 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l08IEOtb022017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:14:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l08IEFsN022016; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA13416; Mon, 8 Jan 07 10:01:41 PST Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:04:25 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: roberthuff@rcn.com Message-Id: <45a287a9.xX+LU9dejjQRQovE%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> <17826.23487.564492.142014@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17826.23487.564492.142014@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, maanjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:14:26 -0000 > > 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD > > System.. meaning how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD > > Server? > > The information is in /etc/passwd and /etc/group. You can > get a count with the "wc" command. Such a report will be incomplete if the system in question is an NIS client. For starters, see yp(8). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:25:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C0216A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5021F13C44C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2781710516 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:53:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76485199A; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:53:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:53:14 +0000 From: RW To: questions@freebsd.org, oddbjorn@tricknology.org Message-ID: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:25:38 -0000 Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I don't like the look of its PRNG initialization: #ifdef RAND48 srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0)>>11)); #else srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); #endif If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just leaves getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and globally, so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much about getpgrp(), but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any better. Unless getpgrp() is a better source of entropy than I give it credit for, I think this port should perhaps be marked as vulnerable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:35:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573DE16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4342813C43E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FBB2E73A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:07:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:07:11 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:35:59 -0000 Sorry for the dumb question this morning-- caffeine hasn't yet worked its wondrous magic upon my person. I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? I've considered allowing him to run a local copy of the praliases command, but that chokes on the /etc/mail/aliases permissions... To complicate things, the file /etc/mail/aliases is actually an NFS mounted file shared between all our mx boxes, and he only needs to access it from a designated machine. Thoughts? My apologies if this is unclear... -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: I'm sorry a pentium won't do, you need an SGI to connect with us. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:36:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DC216A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA3513C45E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l08IajgL071106; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:36:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:36:45 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: RW Message-ID: <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, oddbjorn@tricknology.org Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:36:48 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 08), RW said: > Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user > passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I > don't like the look of its PRNG initialization: > > > #ifdef RAND48 > srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0)>>11)); > #else > srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); > #endif > > If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be > inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just leaves > getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and globally, > so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much about getpgrp(), > but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any better. Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand(), and initialize the rng with srandomdev(). Another random password generator is in security/apg, and that one already uses /dev/random as a seed. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:39:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAF316A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7878E13C458 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l08IdBW7017150; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:39:12 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A28FCF.5070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:39:11 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061223) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Chandler References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF99E93351CD0D0B0BD42D154" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:39:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2424/Mon Jan 8 16:46:49 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:39:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF99E93351CD0D0B0BD42D154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay Chandler wrote: > I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases > file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual > heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? Hand him some sheets of printout? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF99E93351CD0D0B0BD42D154 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFoo/P8Mjk52CukIwRCAWSAJ9cIFYBcYLC/1TNPnHhasJVYi2P6wCgkQXG geWYzOJ2j+0UiPN4/aHvxaQ= =hUA0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF99E93351CD0D0B0BD42D154-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:41:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A266C16A508 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383DE13C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5628127uge for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dK7ZiW9XdVqjpFTz2H93Nj0TapwzlMPJEH30naOHw2pKtBDeQQSsZIgIBBf2EuxicxAE7KCU6H+GPbTaNwP+s5OqZu04FKU74gsGlSfGSx7+uxgBisERS4BkT7IJnp5TZOJ1Kdzl9/ITB1FjoyAAg3+ebiHJ21jDzygZadjCe1M= Received: by 10.82.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr2687758buf.1168281705925; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:41:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:41:45 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2dfb97ccc463ea31 Subject: Re: debugging ipnat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:41:47 -0000 On 1/6/07, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > I have a simple port-forwarding rule that I want to work from my > gateway to a box on my LAN, but it doesn't seem to be working. > > [msoulier@kanga ~]$ sudo ipnat -l > Password: > List of active MAP/Redirect filters: > rdr tun0 0.0.0.0/32 port 6882 -> 192.168.1.3 port 6882 tcp What I was doing wrong is that the rule should have been this. rdr tun0 0.0.0.0/0 port 6882 -> 192.168.1.3 port 6882 tcp Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:42:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CED316A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC1A13C459 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08IgEE1006868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:42:14 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.102] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08IgEY6020102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:42:14 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:42:12 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.8.102933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:42:15 -0000 On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:53 AM, RW wrote: > Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user > passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I don't > like the look of its PRNG initialization: > > > #ifdef RAND48 > srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0) > >>11)); > #else > srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); > #endif > > > If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be > inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just > leaves > getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and globally, > so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much about getpgrp(), > but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any better. > > Unless getpgrp() is a better source of entropy than I give it credit > for, I think this port should perhaps be marked as vulnerable. It's not spectacular looking at that output, but it seems like a typical hash. As long as getpgrp() and getpid() don't always fall in the same range (thus producing the same sets of numbers) and getpid() doesn't return a multiple of getpgrp() << 8, I don't see any particular problems with the above setup. pwgen would do better on a system with a lot more processes though, or one that's been up longer though, since PIDs increase over time. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:45:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F816A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFD713C45B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6910520B402 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:45:15 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rpH7hJ1f1qWN for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:45:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A870E205840 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:45:12 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:45:10 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> <17826.23487.564492.142014@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45a287a9.xX+LU9dejjQRQovE%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <45a287a9.xX+LU9dejjQRQovE%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6461839.kyFVTBadSU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701081245.11217.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:45:16 -0000 --nextPart6461839.kyFVTBadSU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 12:04 pm, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Such a report will be incomplete if the system in question is an > NIS client. For starters, see yp(8). Would "getent passwd" and "getent group" be more definitive? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart6461839.kyFVTBadSU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFopE35sRg+Y0CpvERAmlHAKCZne1hotbQ+a6Ns0wrLu2WyX7H3ACeMuig swp/5yr2QNuwbjdwI77v/lI= =korE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6461839.kyFVTBadSU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:47:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B334716A412 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7140813C45E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEC720B402 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:47:57 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39PwMVoDt5Lr for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:47:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696C3205840 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:47:55 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:47:53 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1524492.kd9GRDAO67"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701081247.53999.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:47:59 -0000 --nextPart1524492.kd9GRDAO67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 12:07 pm, Jay Chandler wrote: > I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases > file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual > heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? You could configure sudo to give him access to run that one command as root. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1524492.kd9GRDAO67 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFopHZ5sRg+Y0CpvERAmeHAJ4oHW/Y99GJNdDuGQ6dVUbhLu6khQCfQD2M 0/22aFaAALuzlgtDniNTGB8= =Ki++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1524492.kd9GRDAO67-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:56:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772AA16A5D7 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6E13C457 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08IupkZ021767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:56:51 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.102] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08IupeK026433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:56:51 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:56:50 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.8.104432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:56:52 -0000 On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 08), RW said: >> Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user >> passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I >> don't like the look of its PRNG initialization: >> >> >> #ifdef RAND48 >> srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0) >> >>11)); >> #else >> srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); >> #endif >> >> If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be >> inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just >> leaves >> getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and >> globally, >> so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much about getpgrp(), >> but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any better. > > Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand(), and > initialize the rng with srandomdev(). > > Another random password generator is in security/apg, and that one > already uses /dev/random as a seed. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com Not all architectures support random number generation though IIRC and random number generation can be removed from the kernel, so I think that the dev was playing it safe by using another, less random seed source than /dev/random or /dev/urandom. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 18:57:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B132C16A494 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CB913C469 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i22so1366147wra for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:57:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=icaw+hV6TDxxCSisedJbUoANDCmHQz7hu54yi/Pq0AKQh2tvQBurZkByTNJKGlEKwwLj0oyu3STnZt6B1ET9iuhBbAs4TH2x0cGsfhrVKha25GZ1jj6MkqYP2Z9vI49/6MRBv1HeNeTO/wRf5bNsV2XcYOdzUD6sg0Kdj7eOO4I= Received: by 10.78.150.7 with SMTP id x7mr6867345hud.1168282667734; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.135.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:57:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710701081057qf6ee21aw8e0f8b417a5130ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:57:47 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Kirk Strauser" In-Reply-To: <200701081247.53999.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <200701081247.53999.kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:57:49 -0000 I've never used them, but wasn't ACL written just for this scenario? On 1/8/07, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 12:07 pm, Jay Chandler wrote: > > > I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases > > file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual > > heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? > > You could configure sudo to give him access to run that one command as root. > -- > Kirk Strauser > > > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:07:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3979516A505 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E970813C43E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3zq7-0002cS-D4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:07:23 +0100 Received: from 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.37.249]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:07:23 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:07:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:07:01 +0100 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> <200701080654.45757.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDF169B019E49F655B3199585" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <200701080654.45757.kirk@strauser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:07:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDF169B019E49F655B3199585 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 5:26 am, Ivan Voras wrote: >=20 >> Here's an idea: >> >> $ head -c 64 /dev/random | md5 | head -c 10 >=20 > Hugely bad idea. Since md5 outputs hex, you're only getting 4 bits of = > entropy per character. =20 Yes, with 10 characters that's 5 bytes of practically pure random data, i.e. 40 bits. You're somewhat right: I don't know about pwgen but usually such utilities generate passwords from a set that looks like [0-9a-zA-Z-,], i.e. 6 bits per character. For a password of 8 characters, that's 48 bits, so 8 bits stronger than 10 hexadecimal characters. For equal entropy, 12 hex characters should be used. But hex characters are easier to remember :) --------------enigDF169B019E49F655B3199585 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFopZcldnAQVacBcgRAhz+AJ49gQ94I22P/WzZvf+BLVULu5zdKACg9Lba YY1dcHd3g6Uj1DpHZF9IdDk= =dodg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDF169B019E49F655B3199585-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:13:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EFB16A600 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D5813C4AF for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E582E861; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:13:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A297CF.4000108@chapman.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:13:19 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <45A28FCF.5070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <45A28FCF.5070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:13:22 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Jay Chandler wrote: > > >> I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases >> file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual >> heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? >> > > Hand him some sheets of printout? > Sadly, the data change too often for this to be effective. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: I'm sorry a pentium won't do, you need an SGI to connect with us. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:14:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5187816A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0E913C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l08JEB9b048544; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:14:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:14:11 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20070108191411.GG41724@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:14:12 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 08), Garrett Cooper said: > On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > >Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand(), and > >initialize the rng with srandomdev(). > > > >Another random password generator is in security/apg, and that one > >already uses /dev/random as a seed. > > Not all architectures support random number generation though IIRC > and random number generation can be removed from the kernel, so I > think that the dev was playing it safe by using another, less random > seed source than /dev/random or /dev/urandom. Luckily, if srandomdev() can't open /dev/random, it falls back to seeding with gettimeofday() (so more variability than just time()), getpid(), and some random data off the stack, so it's always safe to use. I just noticed that there's also a sranddev, so fixing pwgen is really as simple as replacing the srand() call with sranddev(). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:14:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7464316A508 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C6713C458 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H3zwi-0003d7-OZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:12 +0100 Received: from 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.37.249]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:12 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:00 +0100 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig378E74721C2038F4641D0B66" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-37-249.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:14:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig378E74721C2038F4641D0B66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ivan Voras wrote: > Frank Bonnet wrote: >=20 >> I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. >=20 > Here's an idea: >=20 > $ head -c 64 /dev/random | md5 | head -c 10 =2E.. or, following the upthread discussion, a preferable alternative: > openssl rand -base64 6 This will generate a strong password of 8 characters[*] with 6 bits of entropy each (48 bits total), which is as strong as it gets. [*] literally: 6 random bytes encoded with base64 to 8 ASCII characters --------------enig378E74721C2038F4641D0B66 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFopf4ldnAQVacBcgRApmjAJwPwcgdTM4YY8aWs8Xry5A7u9rINQCg7VX/ gaCOTfSTUxbrq+QVGQbKWIQ= =fOhg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig378E74721C2038F4641D0B66-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:25:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A123B16A417 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CCD13C44B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C97520B402 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-1eIW3mRA5N for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:25:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB3E209EC8 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:25:04 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:24:58 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <200701081247.53999.kirk@strauser.com> <3ee9ca710701081057qf6ee21aw8e0f8b417a5130ff@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710701081057qf6ee21aw8e0f8b417a5130ff@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5466515.1SES2HX4fr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701081325.02399.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:25:08 -0000 --nextPart5466515.1SES2HX4fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 12:57 pm, Andy Greenwood wrote: > I've never used them, but wasn't ACL written just for this scenario? Perhaps, but that seems like a lot more effort to accomplish a relatively=20 easy job. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart5466515.1SES2HX4fr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFopqO5sRg+Y0CpvERAkBlAJ95OIWPB1vCd+ORrHvUyPsVzwYu4ACfd01b RtjMJBALJ9U2W+hGohitcoc= =MHug -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5466515.1SES2HX4fr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:36:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940F216A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtriende@wisc.edu) Received: from medmicro.wisc.edu (listserv.medmicro.wisc.edu [128.104.10.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F8D13C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtriende@wisc.edu) Received: from [128.104.10.240] (unknown [128.104.10.240]) by medmicro.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A83302839; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:36:24 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20070105212225.4BB9A16A57B@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20070105212225.4BB9A16A57B@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Riendeau Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:36:23 -0600 To: juan13@sbcglobal.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 159, Issue 43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:36:25 -0000 Run sysinstall as root (sudo sysinstall). Select Configure. Select Startup. Check the box next to Linux (you will have to scroll down). Hit OK. If prompted to install Linux compatible binaries, select the affirmative response (yes or continue). The install should modify your /ect/fstab file to include a line that looks like: linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 It may not look exactly like that, but something close. When you ran the install, it should have asked you if you wanted to install Linux binary compatibility and you selected no. This is usually a bad idea unless you know you won't run any software written for the linux kernel. James Riendeau MMI Computer Support Technician 1300 University Ave Rm. 436, Dept. of MedMicro Madison, WI 53706 Phone: (608) 262-3351 After-hours Phone: (608) 260-2696 Fax: (608) 262-8418 Email: jtriende@wisc.edu On Jan 5, 2007, at 3:22 PM, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Message: 27 > Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:55:17 -0800 (PST) > From: Juan Ortega > Subject: alittle help > To: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20070105205517.88075.qmail@web81501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi, I have freeBSD 6.2-RC2 > I installed vmware3 from the ports tree but I get an > error when I run it. > > ************************************************** > It seems linux procfs is not mounted on > /compat/linux/proc. > VMware does not work without Linux procfs mounted. > > For details, see linprocfs(5) manpage. > *************************************************** > > I read the linprocfs and linux handout put I'm still > having problems with it. > Is linprocfs a command? or something to mount it, > because I cant find it on xterm. > > can u plz help me out with this From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:52:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9660416A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F7F213C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 20829 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2007 19:51:41 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 19:51:41 -0000 Message-ID: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:52:36 -0000 We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI without much success. We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target host will be a third party vendor) I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am also interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. Thank you, DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:55:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388DE16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) Received: from srv.exchange.net24.net.nz (srv.exchange.net24.net.nz [210.55.4.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F0013C46A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:43:11 +1300 Message-ID: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Permissions advice needed. Thread-Index: AccvZyrdAXwE7yfhSGmoz14hj+x9XgD9SZYg From: "Brett Davidson" To: Subject: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:55:12 -0000 I have a curious problem. I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they can run it. HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability to change permissions. I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) but the modifying program does not recognise this flag and will thus fail to modify the file. (I have no control over the modifying program). Any ideas? I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm starting to think I may have too just to be able to prevent the user from modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could implement this using MAC anyway). Cheers, Brett. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 19:57:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EFE16A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C03913C455 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0556351931 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:57:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:57:32 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070108195732.7b4a4b2b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:57:36 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:42:12 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:53 AM, RW wrote: > > > Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user > > passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I > > don't like the look of its PRNG initialization: > > > > > > #ifdef RAND48 > > srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0) > > >>11)); > > #else > > srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); > > #endif > > > > > > If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be > > inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just > > leaves > > getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and > > globally, so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much > > about getpgrp(), but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any > > better. > > > > Unless getpgrp() is a better source of entropy than I give it credit > > for, I think this port should perhaps be marked as vulnerable. > > It's not spectacular looking at that output, but it seems like a > typical hash. > > As long as getpgrp() and getpid() don't always fall in the same > range (thus producing the same sets of numbers) and getpid() doesn't > return a multiple of getpgrp() << 8, I don't see any particular > problems with the above setup. > My concern is that an unprivileged attacker could log pids created by his own processes and virtually eliminate entropy from getpid(). I'm wondering if something similar can be done with getpgrp(). If it can then entropy may fall to a handfull of bits, and bruteforce may not be all that brutal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:08:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D934516A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A83213C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 15:08:08 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTE46753; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:07:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2007 15:07:44 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17826.42085.881078.64703@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:07:01 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45A297CF.4000108@chapman.edu> References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <45A28FCF.5070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> <45A297CF.4000108@chapman.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=36/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(1), refid=str=0001.0A090206.45A2A2E1.004C,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:08:07 -0000 Jay Chandler writes: > >> I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases > >> file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual > >> heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? > >> > > > > Hand him some sheets of printout? > > > Sadly, the data change too often for this to be effective. Copy the file evey N minutes, then change ownership and permissions? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:14:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A37516A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3213C45D for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08KE7Sd027893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:14:07 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08KE7VG011923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:14:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45A2A60F.3080500@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:14:07 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> <20070108191411.GG41724@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20070108191411.GG41724@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.8.115932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:14:08 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 08), Garrett Cooper said: > >> On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: >> >>> Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand(), and >>> initialize the rng with srandomdev(). >>> >>> Another random password generator is in security/apg, and that one >>> already uses /dev/random as a seed. >>> >> Not all architectures support random number generation though IIRC >> and random number generation can be removed from the kernel, so I >> think that the dev was playing it safe by using another, less random >> seed source than /dev/random or /dev/urandom. >> > > Luckily, if srandomdev() can't open /dev/random, it falls back to > seeding with gettimeofday() (so more variability than just time()), > getpid(), and some random data off the stack, so it's always safe to > use. I just noticed that there's also a sranddev, so fixing pwgen is > really as simple as replacing the srand() call with sranddev() Interesting--I didn't know that. That sounds a lot better than what's in place by a long shot and it would be nice to have that in the program considering that random number generators are quite ubiquitous in Unix nowadays. I'll CC the project devs later on today with this thread then. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:23:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972FA16A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C67113C428 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l08KB14o035921; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:11:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:08:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: DAve Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:23:24 -0000 On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote: > We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I > have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI > without much success. > > We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the > queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the > production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target > host will be a third party vendor) > > I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am also > interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with > FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. I just started using the latest iSCSI initiator[1] on my 6-STABLE desktop to access some volumes on a LeftHand Networks SAN. It's a bit lacking in polish, but it works quite well. The one big missing feature is that it doesn't handle network disconnections. No panics or anything though, and performance was what I expected. I'd be interested in what Danny tells you about the initiator's readiness for production use, but in any case you'll probably just have to do some stability and stress testing on your own. [1] ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2 JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:35:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D82C16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96213C45A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H40iU-0003fu-B4; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:03:34 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H40kS-0009os-7f; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:05:36 +0300 To: DAve References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:05:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> (DAve's message of "Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500") Message-ID: <00292463@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:35:57 -0000 On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500 DAve wrote: > We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I > have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and > iSCSI without much success. > We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the > queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the > production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target > host will be a third party vendor) I didn't use them myself but I'll second for hearing about them: http://ixsystems.com/storageiSCSI.php > I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am > also interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with > FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:40:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B3E16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 151CA13C455 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 21255 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2007 20:39:47 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 20:39:47 -0000 Message-ID: <45A2AC2C.9030807@pixelhammer.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:40:12 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:40:41 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote: >> We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I >> have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI >> without much success. >> >> We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the >> queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the >> production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target >> host will be a third party vendor) >> >> I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am also >> interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with >> FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. > > I just started using the latest iSCSI initiator[1] on my 6-STABLE desktop to > access some volumes on a LeftHand Networks SAN. It's a bit lacking in polish, > but it works quite well. The one big missing feature is that it doesn't > handle network disconnections. No panics or anything though, and performance > was what I expected. > > I'd be interested in what Danny tells you about the initiator's readiness for > production use, but in any case you'll probably just have to do some > stability and stress testing on your own. > > [1] ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2 > > JN > > Thanks for the feedback. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:41:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6916A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C417113C45A for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08KfdFN028770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:41:39 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l08Kfdph017375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:41:39 -0800 Message-ID: <45A2AC83.4090506@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:41:39 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> <20070108191411.GG41724@dan.emsphone.com> <45A2A60F.3080500@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A2A60F.3080500@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.8.122933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:41:40 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Dan Nelson wrote: >> In the last episode (Jan 08), Garrett Cooper said: >> >>> On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: >>> >>>> Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand(), and >>>> initialize the rng with srandomdev(). >>>> >>>> Another random password generator is in security/apg, and that one >>>> already uses /dev/random as a seed. >>>> >>> Not all architectures support random number generation though IIRC >>> and random number generation can be removed from the kernel, so I >>> think that the dev was playing it safe by using another, less random >>> seed source than /dev/random or /dev/urandom. >>> >> >> Luckily, if srandomdev() can't open /dev/random, it falls back to >> seeding with gettimeofday() (so more variability than just time()), >> getpid(), and some random data off the stack, so it's always safe to >> use. I just noticed that there's also a sranddev, so fixing pwgen is >> really as simple as replacing the srand() call with sranddev() > Interesting--I didn't know that. That sounds a lot better than > what's in place by a long shot and it would be nice to have that in > the program considering that random number generators are quite > ubiquitous in Unix nowadays. > I'll CC the project devs later on today with this thread then. > -Garrett Hmm.. it seems that the project hasn't been updated in eons (2001): . I'll still try to get a hold of the dev, but I'm not sure if they are still administering the project. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 20:55:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB4416A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD67E13C45B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 21373 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2007 20:54:12 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 20:54:12 -0000 Message-ID: <45A2AF8D.5050201@pixelhammer.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:54:37 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <00292463@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <00292463@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:55:11 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500 DAve wrote: > >> We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I >> have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and >> iSCSI without much success. > >> We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the >> queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the >> production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target >> host will be a third party vendor) > > I didn't use them myself but I'll second for hearing about them: > http://ixsystems.com/storageiSCSI.php > >> I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am >> also interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with >> FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. > > > WBR iSCSI Target and iSCSI initiator are two different animals. The above is for hosting a iSCSI system, providing a target(I believe), we need to connect to it, using an initiator. Thanks, DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:01:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F3A16A415 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6C413C43E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l08L1nAl056217 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:01:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id l08L1nSD056214 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:01:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:01:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:01:53 -0000 could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN (with encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows machines as clients and FreeBSD as servers. i used VPN's many times but always with unix on both sides and used vtun which works great. unfortunately there is no vtun for windows. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:13:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDBE16A47B for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0FA13C441 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE0B5D7F; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:13:39 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJJz0Nr8Untw; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:13:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865835C39; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:13:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:13:35 -0500 To: Wojciech Puchar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:13:40 -0000 On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN > (with encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows > machines as clients and FreeBSD as servers. > > i used VPN's many times but always with unix on both sides and used > vtun which works great. unfortunately there is no vtun for windows. Try OpenVPN. It's in the ports, and it also has a fancy Windows GUI client available, similar to the Cisco or SonicWall VPN clients... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:17:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242C616A40F for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from public.aci.on.ca (aci.on.ca [205.207.148.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC2913C465 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from (invalid client hostname: host address literal does not match remote client address)[192.168.15.100] (xtreme-33-61.dyn.aci.on.ca[24.137.192.61] port=2019) by public.aci.on.ca([205.207.148.252] port=25) via TCP with esmtp (1733 bytes) (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:17:13 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.122-Pre 2005-Nov-17 #1 built 2006-Feb-21) Message-ID: <45A2B555.3030808@qwirky.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:19:17 -0500 From: Jeff Royle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:17:18 -0000 There are various VPN solutions available depending on your needs for the network so no one answer will cover everything. Currently I am using OpenVPN with great success and resonable security as well. Homepage: http://www.openvpn.org One of the nice things about this solution is you can customize the OpenVPN GUI (http://openvpn.se/). Even my most computer cluess employee's can use this. There are various IPSEC solutions but you run into a client issue in a lot of cases for the Windows side. Wojciech Puchar wrote: > could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN > (with encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows > machines as clients and FreeBSD as servers. > > i used VPN's many times but always with unix on both sides and used > vtun which works great. unfortunately there is no vtun for windows. > > thanks > Cheers, Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:18:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF66816A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B866313C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD7F51980 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:18:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:18:23 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070108211823.4c4b51c9@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070108175314.27ce391f@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070108183645.GF41724@dan.emsphone.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:18:29 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:56:50 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > In the last episode (Jan 08), RW said: > >> Someone recently recommended sysutils/pwgen for generating user > >> passwords. Out of curiosity I had a look at how it works, and I > >> don't like the look of its PRNG initialization: > >> > >> > >> #ifdef RAND48 > >> srand48((time(0)<<9) ^ (getpgrp()<<15) ^ (getpid()) ^ (time(0) > >> >>11)); > >> #else > >> srand(time(0) ^ (getpgrp() << 8) + getpid()); > >> #endif > >> > >> If pwgen is called from an account creation script, time(0) can be > >> inferred from timestamps, e.g. on a home-directory, so that just > >> leaves > >> getpid() and getpgrp(). PIDs are allocated sequentially and > >> globally, > >> so getpid() is highly predictable. I don't know much about > >> getpgrp(), but from the manpage it doesn't appear to be any better. > > > > Even better: make RANDOM() call random() instead of rand() I wasn't suggesting the use of getpgrp(), it's one of the existing three sources of entropy . The other two sources are can be inferred by any user (assuming that pwgen is run close to the point at which the account is created). What I was wondering is how much secure entropy there is in getpgrp() alone. I just wrote a little test program, and getpgrp() seems to return the same number as getpid. If I haven't screwed-up and that is generally correct, then any user can log PIDs verses time and find the password of a newly created account from the datestamp of its home directory, within a few attempts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:18:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072E516A56D for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Adam.Cormany@scientificgames.com) Received: from ussmtp02.scientificgames.com (ussmtp02.scientificgames.com [65.5.3.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8E913C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Adam.Cormany@scientificgames.com) Received: from usalpmg01.sgi.net [172.30.3.23] by ussmtp02.scientificgames.com with XWall v3.38g ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:35 -0500 Received: from USALPEVS01.sgi.net ([172.30.3.126]) by usalpmg01.sgi.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:34 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes Thread-Index: AcczZlzmCCjHiavhRHODskH32D6v1g== From: "Cormany, Adam" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:34 -0500 X-Assembled-By: XWall v3.38g Message-ID: <8A874F1363D67A42A309F48BD435BDD309159CA2@USALPEVS01.sgi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:18:37 -0000 We have a few older FreeBSD systems running 3.4 and 4.5. Are there patches for the 2007 daylight savings time US change for these FreeBSD versions? If so, where can I find them? =20 Thanks, =20 Adam Cormany UNIX Systems Engineer Scientific Games International Office 678.297.5465 Cell 678.315.2763 Fax 770.772.7680 Adam.Cormany@Scientificgames.com =20 This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of th= e intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is confidentia= l, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of= this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this commun= ication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail mess= age and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your = cooperation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:19:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C6816A407 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7F713C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4792F2E9BA for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:19:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A2B564.3070804@chapman.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:19:32 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <45A28FCF.5070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> <45A297CF.4000108@chapman.edu> <17826.42085.881078.64703@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17826.42085.881078.64703@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:19:34 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Jay Chandler writes: > > >> >> I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases >> >> file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual >> >> heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this? >> >> >> > >> > Hand him some sheets of printout? >> > >> Sadly, the data change too often for this to be effective. >> > > Copy the file evey N minutes, then change ownership and > permissions? > > > Robert Huff > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Probably the simplest way to do it-- just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking something silly. Thanks! -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Our POP server was kidnapped by a weasel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:38:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C7F16A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [63.240.77.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8BF13C442 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([68.55.97.199]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070108213850015005212ge>; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:38:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B5C5C3E; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:39:04 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uniquestrength.net Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFags8Y2DzIU; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (unknown [10.10.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341685C1E; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:39:01 -0500 (EST) From: Derrick Edwards To: bnawrock@umich.edu User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070107162113.3rne53u6wwcw0osw@web.mail.umich.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070107162113.3rne53u6wwcw0osw@web.mail.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:50:36 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701081650.36787.derrick@uniquestrength.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nvidia Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:38:52 -0000 On Sunday 07 January 2007 16:21, bnawrock@umich.edu wrote: I am using 6_STABLE(FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE). I created another xorg.conf adding your suggested option. Below is what I get from /var/log/Xorg.0.log. (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: DFP-0 (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1024x768"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): (WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to validate any modes; falling back to the default mod e (WW) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select". (WW) NVIDIA(0): (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: (II) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select" (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 800 x 600 (WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to get display device DFP-0's EDID; cannot compute DPI (WW) NVIDIA(0): from DFP-0's EDID. (==) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (75, 75); computed from built-in default xorg.conf snippet: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" Option "UseEDID" "FALSE" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" EndSubSection EndSection > I know of a few EDID issues with the current nvidia driver. are you > using freebsd-7-CURRENT? > > Try adding Option "UseEDID" "FALSE" to the Screen section in your X > configuration file. Hopefully future NVIDIA X driver versions should do > a better job of detecting invalid EDIDs. Let me know if that solves the > issues. > > -nawcom > > On Sunday 07 January 2007 12:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > Derrick Edwards wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > I cant seem to get my new nvidia card to dispaly the correct > >> > > resolution. Looking at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see these entries. My > >> > > max resolution is "1600x1050" but it is not letting me use it. > >> > > > >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1600x1050"; removing. > >> > > (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1280x1024"; removing. > >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: > >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768" > >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600" > >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480" > >> > > (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768 > >> > > > >> > > I configured Xorg using nvidia-settings. > >> > > > >> > > Section "ServerLayout" > >> > > Identifier "Layout0" > >> > > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > >> > > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > >> > > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "Files" > >> > > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" > >> > > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "Module" > >> > > Load "dbe" > >> > > Load "extmod" > >> > > Load "type1" > >> > > Load "freetype" > >> > > Load "glx" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" > >> > > > >> > > # generated from default > >> > > Identifier "Mouse0" > >> > > Driver "mouse" > >> > > Option "Protocol" "auto" > >> > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > >> > > Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" > >> > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "InputDevice" > >> > > > >> > > # generated from default > >> > > Identifier "Keyboard0" > >> > > Driver "keyboard" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "Monitor" > >> > > Identifier "Monitor0" > >> > > VendorName "Unknown" > >> > > ModelName "Unknown" > >> > > HorizSync 30.0 - 110.0 > >> > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0 > >> > > Option "DPMS" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "Device" > >> > > Identifier "Device0" > >> > > Driver "nvidia" > >> > > VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Section "Screen" > >> > > Identifier "Screen0" > >> > > Device "Device0" > >> > > Monitor "Monitor0" > >> > > DefaultDepth 24 > >> > > SubSection "Display" > >> > > Depth 24 > >> > > Modes "1600x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" > >> > >> "640x480" > >> > >> > > EndSubSection > >> > > EndSection > >> > > > >> > > Please help > >> > > Thanks Derrick > > > > > > Monitor horizontal and vertical sync set correctly? > > > > > > That seems the only viable explanation other than your card doesn't > > > support that resolution. > > > > > > -Garrett > > > _________ > > Thanks for the reply. My card supports up to 1600x1200 and the freqs > are correct. > > > > _____________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 22:39:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B24A16A416 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E644113C480 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from [172.24.24.102] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l08Md73o066946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Message-ID: <45A2C800.2060607@enabled.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:38:56 -0800 From: Noah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: lab equipment reservation system - web based X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:39:08 -0000 Hi there, I know there are a lot of various reservation systems out there. I can google for them. I am looking for recommendations from users that use res systems. I am looking for a lab equipment reservation system - something simple, with a good amount of capabilities, open source, and hopefully web based. Anybody got a good recommendation please. Cheers, noah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 22:54:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCF416A4C8 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eol1@yahoo.com) Received: from web51902.mail.yahoo.com (web51902.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E60F913C4B3 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eol1@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 56303 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2007 22:27:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=hsGOnaSKwEOs6xVDHNRIF3dKt19vDqbCxwBGhGmOhP00QQRRrt60if22K/t6sR4IiJ64aOosmgvENwaTvZE/E/WlSnf4ZyVA5uh/mvAll919JR2IbsDCl/TS6U1B/galQLK7ikN+NHBWDGtJ2DI/XGhRakl5TapyteFVNlkirZk=; X-YMail-OSG: ktulIEgVM1lRH3BbyB6q.G.P28jr9CsjFr4TGVCixv7II_sbp_51ZYGNu2oW52wBA1TiaONe8P.Z6AJDd8uXG6lPAwSsc18.8XGtP48_j3B36sLY8_C8T4k.jhARKoCrsyA2xZ.pqsbnH8c- Received: from [81.169.183.71] by web51902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:27:15 PST Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:27:15 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Thoenen To: DAve , Free BSD Questions list In-Reply-To: <459D2195.5040504@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <470134.51008.qm@web51902.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Sun Fire x2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: eol1@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:54:03 -0000 --- DAve wrote: > Is anyone running FreeBSD on a Sun Fire X2100? Any caveats I should > know > about? I don't recommend them if you plan to use as a file server. They have an issue with randomly rebooting under a large network load with thousands of open connections. Have seen this on my system and have have had a dozen or so folk email me with the identical problem. -Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 23:30:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9E516A403 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E5313C448 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1428884wri for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:30:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CfkurPrupuYX/e0eTDPVBqcDc9JwCnwZnMM/pr8qHAU9wdQzBInoiLYa8HxZOPASij0MbOAtryj6fJmbdLxQwV6wKy+3M1MvW7C2IiYEK0wROyHW7H3Gxqc5zDJsO7CGCqibc1fIH5Y8ZfpAjC6DDOYxBncTjBKXU7RSlredYgc= Received: by 10.90.51.17 with SMTP id y17mr2639079agy.1168299009026; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:30:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.78.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44b564930701081530k5602084bg339641e977f887d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:30:08 -0500 From: "Michael M. Press" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200701082343.33324.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44b564930701071948n4defad59u142b8b6c3d4650f8@mail.gmail.com> <200701082343.33324.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: USB drive is a CDROM drive and is not writable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:30:10 -0000 > This sounds like a "Smart" drive - can you confirm? I plugged it into a Windows system and it also recognized a CD drive. In addition, it vomited out a few popup windows and started something in the system tray. This is so ingenious that I think it must be a 'smart' drive. An article from the following URL tells me it is a 'U3 smart drive': http://www.everythingusb.com/u3.html I didn't know such a thing existed before today. > I have one of these devices myself and simply removed the Smart > partition to reclaim the space it takes up. Apparently there is a U3 uninstaller: http://www.u3.com/uninstall/default.aspx Thanks for the responses everyone. My confusion is gone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 00:55:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E503A16A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from quokka.dot.net.au (humvee.dot.net.au [202.147.68.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDC413C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Received: from [203.129.46.133] (helo=freebsd.connect-a.com.au) by quokka.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1H45HG-0008MG-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:55:46 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.connect-a.com.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l090tbvo004504; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:55:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from rob@coombs.anu.edu.au) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:55:37 +1100 (EST) From: Rob Hurle X-X-Sender: rob@freebsd.connect-a.com.au To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> Message-ID: <20070109114313.G1380@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> References: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, J_CHICKENPOX_37,MR_DIFF_MID autolearn=no version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on freebsd.connect-a.com.au Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:55:49 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN (with > encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows machines as > clients and FreeBSD as servers. > > i used VPN's many times but always with unix on both sides and used vtun > which works great. unfortunately there is no vtun for windows. I have used poptop (AKA pptpd) - in the ports collection, but the really useful information is at: http://www.pingle.org/2006/04/11/getting-poptop-to-run-under-freebsd-5-6 However, two points: 1. pptpd is built for Linux. For FreeBSD user-land ppp is used, no matter what you specify, and so the config file is /etc/ppp/ppp.conf. Anything you say about this setting in /usr/local/etc/pptpd.conf is ignored, and the ppp.conf file used instead. Also, some settings are repeated in both ppp.conf and pptpd.conf - the ppp.conf settings take precedence. The ppp.conf needs to specify a label for pptpd to use, and it is: pptp: (normal ppp directives follow this) 2. You need to set your FreeBSD system to be a gateway (gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf) and some routing and ARP stuff enabled in rc.conf: arpproxy_all="YES" forward_sourceroute="YES" accept_sourceroute="YES" I have it working at a fairly large site where people use XP at home and access the Windows stuff through a FreeBSD 6.1 gateway. Cheers, Rob Hurle ----------------------------------------------------- Rob Hurle Faculty of Asian Studies, ANU Home address and contacts: Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 PO Box 4013 Fax: +61 2 6247 2397 Ainslie Cell phone: 0417 293 603 Australia e-mail: rob@coombs.anu.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 02:11:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E3416A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 7509107@mail.ru) Received: from mx33.mail.ru (mx33.mail.ru [194.67.23.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2756613C471 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 7509107@mail.ru) Received: from [195.5.26.136] (port=39554 helo=136-26-5-195.ip.ukrtel.net) by mx33.mail.ru with asmtp id 1H46Sy-0006uH-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:11:56 +0300 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:11:47 +0200 (EET) From: dima <7509107@mail.ru> X-X-Sender: dima@iced.no-ip.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070107130954.K10963@iced.no-ip.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Pine Organization: ~Sans~logique~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: acd0, error=0x00 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:11:58 -0000 Hello. Can anybody tell me why that may happens?: acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 P.S. FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p13, acd0 - TEAC CD-RW. -- dima <7509107*mail,ru> <2:550/112> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 02:43:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE1016A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1168741471.eb2ad3@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DEB13C457 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1168741471.eb2ad3@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l092OVHM065817 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:24:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1168741471.eb2ad3@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l092OVl7065816 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:24:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1168741471.eb2ad3@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1168741471.eb2ad3@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:24:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:24:30 -0500 To: Garrett Cooper , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070109022428.GA63703@skytracker.ca> References: <20070106194117.GA8958@skytracker.ca> <45A00376.9040501@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A00376.9040501@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: Re: stopping my server from spamming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:43:08 -0000 I think I located the problem. I discovered through one of the blacklist hosters when exactly they received the spam and that helped me track it to a virus infected windows box. > > Using nmap / tcpdump / snort to find rogue SMTP hosts is the next step I > would pursue. Remember though, your hosts may not be causing the spam > and it could instead be spoofing of some kind. For that, you can't do > anything except talk to the mail providers that blacklisted your domain > and get things cleared up. These utilities where the direction of what I was looking for. Thanks for that - I will look at the use of each and how I can trace what is going on for future reference. > Ultimately, I suggest switching to entirely AUTH based SMTP though to > prevent this issue from occurring. You can either block port 25 from > being routed or use net/smtptrapd (see ). done. Thanks Garret From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 03:39:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A349716A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 03:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6480513C465 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 03:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deathjestr@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so258145wra for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:39:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GeBgUiP6p1lOC38qH/d/UXLVCN6B48rueLqGdGNB8ebcGxF8Gjy+ecRZVZawJ4j/xsLwQK4ux+IuWEp+Gei6M1As+aG754DevYk4FSylH656lqhIyH/S2OdxJjhjU50skTrILmmRvJYwfqmkCqaV4YzV6tBp0SP8TYh1SN5Lce8= Received: by 10.90.120.13 with SMTP id s13mr537321agc.1168313990769; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.78.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:39:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44b564930701081939s5d16b3b4he73a07c8b7805861@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:39:50 -0500 From: "Michael M. Press" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45A1E35F.4020401@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A1E35F.4020401@chrismaness.com> Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Drivers in Under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:39:51 -0000 > Is it possible to get Linux kernel drivers working under FreeBSD? If > so, how? (Specifically Garmin_USB) I have never heard of anything that would allow a Linux binary driver to be loaded by FreeBSD, and I doubt it exists. Linux binary applications certainly can be run on FreeBSD, but not drivers. The only way would be to get the source code and port it over, and you'd probably have to make major changes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 04:12:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3216A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366E13C469 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so3805665nzh for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:12:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iW5YepPeSHuQq6Zu66ZiRU7femLS+UxCP072tGxK1Gf9YWriz5MF0NM656PGPiDD/NkacH33q/rHvJOFLwToKuJSrzB5BwkLzelS0TIhkw68OrZ6Igcyp1rHDQpSP1TLcU34Yc512TQPeXKrI19kKCqq5oGwpeiDXOEgmeAuigo= Received: by 10.65.59.20 with SMTP id m20mr120877qbk.1168314254171; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.156.16 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:44:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:44:14 -0600 From: "Noel Jones" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070109114313.G1380@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20070109114313.G1380@freebsd.connect-a.com.au> Subject: Re: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:12:19 -0000 On 1/8/07, Rob Hurle wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN (with > > encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows machines as > > clients and FreeBSD as servers. > > OpenVPN gets my vote as an easy to use cross-platform VPN. Runs on just about everything. Compression is available, password or certificate based authentication, high level encryption, NAT and firewall friendly. The add-on windows GUI makes installation and setup easy for non-unix types. /usr/ports/security/openvpn docs and good sample configs: http://openvpn.net/ windows gui: http://openvpn.se/ -- Noel Jones From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 04:19:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C52216A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFCF13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp125-203.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.125.203]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 14:49:03 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,161,1167571800"; d="scan'208"; a="71466182:sNHT18780407422" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:49:01 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091449.01739.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Jay Chandler Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:19:13 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:37 am, Jay Chandler wrote: > Sorry for the dumb question this morning-- caffeine hasn't yet > worked its wondrous magic upon my person. > > I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the > aliases file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after > the eventual heat-death of the universe, so how would you all > go about doing this? > > I've considered allowing him to run a local copy of the > praliases command, but that chokes on the /etc/mail/aliases > permissions... I am confused (or someone is). On all the FreeBSD systems I have immediate access to the file /etc/mail/aliases has the default permissions -rw-r--r--, in other words is readable by anyone. On the other hand /etc/mail/aliases.db is sometimes -rw-r----- and sometimes -rw-r--r-- but since it is only an encoded version of aliases and additional restrictions would seem useless. I can imagine some might object to reason setting either of these o+r, but this does seem to be the norm. Perhaps someone else has other views. Or perhaps this is some variation when using profix, qmail etc. in place of sendmail. Malcolm > > To complicate things, the file etc/mail/aliases is actually > an NFS mounted file shared between all our mx boxes, and he > only needs to access it from a designated machine. > > Thoughts? My apologies if this is unclear... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 04:28:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7806A16A416 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1461013C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7621809wxc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=fSIBbqCDjICa2t6K7j3ZIRPZwRBCMOA16r5BGX3RbpPCJixsjkek8Ra/74KEcOT7qdDrLyWAwaaioCeORzN2EHC5Qu8vuNhZdUwpXmEwtJfZnqC/Q8nYBxvjRi4/C7xITkqzor8zPTUkuZmADzqw8TboJLVLEK4C4w/GZF0AKz4= Received: by 10.70.31.6 with SMTP id e6mr6769090wxe.1168316901471; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:28:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:28:21 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Sierra Wireless Card AC860 how to get the working in freebsd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:28:22 -0000 Hi Freebsd I have been breaking my head intermittently over this for months, so far I had no success getting this Sierra Wireless card , to Cingular ISP This card is 3G card works on my other winXP partition, I have become very uneasy to continue to use this only in windows because of reliability/security concerns I want this card working in my Freebsd OS, I wanted to wean away from windows XP as soon as possible. which I using now to access just to connect while travelling, which is too much pain. My buddy Paul Pathiakis told to post this issue here as someone of you may have been in same situation. I added the quircks for the kernel and had rebuild the kernal successfully, looking as /var/log/messages, makes sense it is detecting the card. now I am puzzled how to get this dialled and get it working. he also said we may need a device driver. When I called Cingular they said me to use Tel# to dial : *99***1 username: ispda@cingulargprs.com password: CINGULAR1 As you see below I tried putting them up these entries in ppp.conf file. default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) # Ensure that "device" references the correct serial port # for your modem. (cuad0 = COM1, cuad1 = COM2) # #set device /dev/cuad1 set device /dev/cuad4 set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 180 # 3 minute idle timer (the default) #enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf) cingular: # # edit the next three lines and replace the items in caps with # the values which have been assigned by your ISP. # set phone *99***1# set authname ispda@cingulargprs.com set authkey CINGULAR1 set login "TIMEOUT 10 \"\"\"\" gin:--gin: \\U ispda@cingulargprs.com: \\P col: CINGULAR1" set timeout 300 #APN:ISP.CINGULAR #set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.255 add default HISADDR # Add a (sticky) default route ----------------------------------------------------------- kernel log /var/log/messages Jan 8 19:28:04 DAK kernel: sio4: at port 0x3e8-0x3ee ir q 22 function 0 config 32 on pccard0 Jan 8 19:28:04 DAK kernel: sio4: type 8250 or not responding Jan 8 19:28:04 DAK kernel: sio4: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - us ing normal mode ====----------------------------- # ppp congular congular: Configuration label not found # ppp cingular Working in interactive mode Using interface: tun0 Warning: Add route failed: 0.0.0.0/0 already exists ppp ON DAK> connect cingular Warning: connect: Invalid command Warning: connect: Failed 1 ppp ON DAK> ok connect Warning: ok: Invalid command Warning: ok: Failed 1 ppp ON DAK> at Warning: at: Invalid command Warning: at: Failed 1 ppp ON DAK> help (o) = Optional context, (c) = Context required accept(o) : accept option request add : add route allow : Allow ppp access bg : Run a background command clear(o) : Clear throughput statistics clone(c) : Clone a link close(o) : Close an FSM delete : delete route deny(o) : Deny option request dial(o) : Dial and login disable(o) : Disable option down(o) : Generate a down event enable(o) : Enable option ident(c) : Set the link identity iface : interface control link : Link specific commands load(o) : Load settings log(o) : log information nat : NAT control open(o) : Open an FSM quit : Quit PPP program remove(c) : Remove a link rename(c) : Rename a link resolv : Manipulate resolv.conf save : Save settings sendident(c): Transmit the link identity set(o) : Set parameters shell : Run a subshell show(o) : Show status and stats term(c) : Enter terminal mode help : Display this message ppp ON DAK> show Use ``show ?'' to get a list. ppp ON DAK> show ? (o) = Optional context, (c) = Context required bundle : bundle details ccp(o) : CCP status compress : VJ compression stats escape(c) : escape characters filter : packet filters hdlc(c) : HDLC errors iface : Interface status ipcp : IPCP status ipv6cp : IPV6CP status layers(o) : Protocol layers lcp(c) : LCP status link(c) : (high-level) link info links : available link names log : log levels mem : mbuf allocations ncp : NCP status physical(c): (low-level) link info mp : multilink setup proto(o) : protocol summary route : routing table stopped(c) : STOPPED timeout timers : alarm timers version : version string who : client list help : Display this message ppp ON DAK> show link Name: deflink State: closed Peer name: N/A Discriminator: Null Class Defaults: Phone List: *99***1 Dial tries: 1, delay 3s/30s Reconnect tries: 0, delay 3s Callback requested: none Dial Script: ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 "" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \dATDT\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT Login Script: TIMEOUT 10 """" gin:--gin: \U ispda@cingulargprs.com: \P col: CINGULAR1 Logout Script: Hangup Script: ppp ON DAK> ------------------ $ ifconfig fwe0: flags=108802 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 06:e4:0a:19:50:37 ch 1 dma -1 rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::20a:e4ff:fed7:bb00%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.1.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:0a:e4:d7:bb:00 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1412 Opened by PID 1271 $ ------------------------------------- tun0 is the one I expecting to have the connecting be made, rl0 is the physical etherney connection I have on me from the cable modem/router. file I added the QUirks I addded before rebuilding the kernel /src/sys/dev/pccard/pccard_cis_quirks.c,v 1.16 2005/09/20 1 0:25:51 glebius Exp $"); Please advise how to get this card working if you have faced before. Thanks Dak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 04:46:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF8316A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7090E13C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7625607wxc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:46:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MZXlzN/7ppLhGHD4HtQVlwgJ6y2yaOll5hJiC/nSdjrL8FGSspriVifFa78004Rd3aK6xfko0IqGhxLnpkRGKsbJQG4JXFJw50IFerv4crbk8u55qtYFe1u+/fPN9CVlgB6cx1aEE5U/iPTCWY0nUYt0Vfwp+bZHtHi2+2ss8ko= Received: by 10.70.32.10 with SMTP id f10mr255989wxf.1168317974954; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:46:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:46:14 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070108220016.K55690@chylonia.3miasto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a bit OT - VPN+Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:46:15 -0000 I am using a vpnc which came along with freebsd6.1 which is using IPSEC and Xauth I found using the vpnc along with rdesktop to access remote windows servers is real fast. vpnc is no frills, straight command line and just a single config file. On 1/8/07, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > could You put me to some manual about configuring any king of VPN (with > encryption at least, preferable compression too) with windows machines as > clients and FreeBSD as servers. > > i used VPN's many times but always with unix on both sides and used vtun > which works great. unfortunately there is no vtun for windows. > > thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 04:57:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501B916A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1498B13C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7628005wxc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:57:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mVza+Grt18T26D9l/66/0Kan5A22L7ZLoNsh38dLoiboPguGSDchU0UKqtEv8ocHMeuerCURWvJ5ZNb88rKutv4BPYZ3drv7HIDuSjHWqEzDMwEYvJQNNJXD6pxsqJyOZN1T3XFODIe4Zt/6ER9uBOXNC7vnS2tiOino8CCemXA= Received: by 10.70.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr23689616wxq.1168318642556; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:57:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:57:22 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Shell recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:57:23 -0000 Hi Freebsd I am using ksh93 shell as my login shell each and everytime I do set -o vi and perform some commands it simply dumps ksh93.core file and crashed whole terminal session, I have been having this problem everrsince I changed my login shell from /bin/sh to /bin/ksh which is symbolic link of ksh93 executable I compiled off the freebsd /usr/ports/ I wonder if anyone has similar issues with this ksh or am I doing something stupid I love using ksh due to the fact you can edit and scroll back and forth as in vi commands, if you have had this issue, what did you go about doing. Any suggestion here would be great help Thanks Dak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 05:02:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B813716A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B99C13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp125-203.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.125.203]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 15:32:42 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,161,1167571800"; d="scan'208"; a="71486903:sNHT42738094" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:32:40 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091532.40944.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Brett Davidson Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:02:44 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote: > I have a curious problem. > > I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid > so they can run it. A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they need is execute permission. So what is the real problem? > HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the > file and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. Deleting or creating a file requires write access in the directory containg the file reference -- it has nothing to do with the permissions on the file itself. Malcolm > > This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) > > ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability > to change permissions. > > I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) > but the modifying program does not recognise this flag and > will thus fail to modify the file. > (I have no control over the modifying program). > > Any ideas? > > I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm > starting to think I may have too just to be able to prevent > the user from modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could > implement this using MAC anyway). > > Cheers, > Brett. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 05:32:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2B216A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791AD13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l095WESY016973 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:32:15 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l095WEAh028787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:32:14 -0800 Message-ID: <45A328DE.6000209@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:32:14 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> <200701091532.40944.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200701091532.40944.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.8.211433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:32:15 -0000 Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote: > >> I have a curious problem. >> >> I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid >> so they can run it. >> > > A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they > need is execute permission. So what is the real problem? > > >> HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the >> file and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. >> > > Deleting or creating a file requires write access in the > directory containg the file reference -- it has nothing to do > with the permissions on the file itself. > > Malcolm > > >> This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) >> >> ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability >> to change permissions. >> >> I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) >> but the modifying program does not recognise this flag and >> will thus fail to modify the file. >> (I have no control over the modifying program). >> >> Any ideas? >> >> I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm >> starting to think I may have too just to be able to prevent >> the user from modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could >> implement this using MAC anyway). >> >> Cheers, >> Brett. Make a specialized setuid script or program to do that, and set the sticky bit appropriately if you don't want them to have direct access to the file. Just make sure that others don't have access to the file. Why does he need access to aliases though? For mail program purposes? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 05:36:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB20A16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E713C45E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so268395wra for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:36:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fQlzxha3eRFSS9K+lm6wTxY87E1D6gjDbluBYcUlaelbyzqBrVLFpu7bh5AH9If6i7dKWBz3uljB92p0Lwu8AVxFT4cwjHnqy6wAT0WNyHXM9MoxoPURkXzyvJcUj93FJ14YkJge6hDGdwWEvvKEZ+lvvtJmgB2YpjJW1ciinD4= Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr2781685aga.1168319406756; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.106.4 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:10:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <39ed86f90701082110i14e19b60sc3c18c060eff63c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:10:06 -0800 From: "Greg Albrecht" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: process states revisited X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:36:34 -0000 while searching for 'freebsd process states' on google i came across this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-December/138024.html i'm a new subscriber, so i can't reply to the original thread. i'm guessing fr0zen@sbcglobal.net's original question was something more like: "that do the values in the STATE column in top mean?" here's an example of what i'm talking about: ## bad 'top' formatting to come PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 95698 mysql 20 0 388M 349M kserel 0 266.7H 0.63% 0.63% mysqld 98237 jffnms 8 0 21224K 14412K nanslp 0 0:02 0.59% 0.59% php 98239 jffnms 96 0 22124K 15292K select 1 0:02 0.49% 0.49% php 98596 root 96 0 4124K 2560K CPU1 1 0:00 0.51% 0.05% top 1263 root 4 0 1408K 708K accept 0 0:07 0.00% 0.00% vsftpd 3405 galbrecht 8 0 4876K 2676K wait 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% bash 94414 root 4 0 3284K 1968K sbwait 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mysql ## end of bad formatting this snippet of top shows the following values for STATE: kserel, nanslp, select, CPU1, accept, wait, sbwait this thread has already cleared up these states: nanslp: "Waiting for < 1 second." -grog@freebsd.org select: "Waiting for a select() to complete" -grog@freebsd.org wait: "Waiting for something to happen, possibly time limited (>= 1 second)" -grog@fbsd top(1) tells us: "STATE is the current state (one of "sleep", "WAIT", "run", "idl", "zomb", or "stop")" eh, not so much. man clears up some of these states: sleep: "The sleep command suspends execution for a minimum of seconds." - sleep(1) accept: "accept a connection on a socket" - accept(2) i bet i can answer with: run: process is running? zomb: zombie process, terminated but not removed from memory that leaves us with: kserel? sbwait? idl? stop? does the previous answer still apply ("ask the developers of those programs")? -g -- Greg Albrecht (gregoryba@gmail.com) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 05:47:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FEF16A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=pr74Nt=GS=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout06.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout06.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7728C13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=pr74Nt=GS=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from scan01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.1.231] helo=scan01.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout06.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1H49Xe-0005fH-0v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:28:58 -0500 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] ident=exim) by scan01.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1H49Xd-0002J2-TH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:28:57 -0500 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] helo=authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com) by scan01.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1H49Xd-0002Iz-Ic for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:28:57 -0500 Received: from [69.92.217.33] (helo=vixen42) by authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1H49Xd-00019U-32; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:28:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:28:56 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: dima <7509107@mail.ru> Message-ID: <20070108232856.570ddba6@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <20070107130954.K10963@iced.no-ip.org> References: <20070107130954.K10963@iced.no-ip.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acd0, error=0x00 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:47:17 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:11:47 +0200 (EET) dima <7509107@mail.ru> wrote: > Hello. > > Can anybody tell me why that may happens?: > acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 > acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 > acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 > acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 > acd0: READ_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 > > P.S. FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p13, acd0 - TEAC CD-RW. It is most likely a bad disk, but can also mean you have a issue with the CD drive, cable, or controller. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 05:52:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD08C16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6447813C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp125-203.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.125.203]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 16:22:50 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,161,1167571800"; d="scan'208"; a="71510955:sNHT612980333" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:22:49 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> <200701091532.40944.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <45A328DE.6000209@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A328DE.6000209@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091622.49355.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:52:54 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:02 pm, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Malcolm Kay wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote: > >> I have a curious problem. > >> > >> I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and > >> gid so they can run it. > > > > A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All > > they need is execute permission. So what is the real > > problem? > > > >> HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete > >> the file and/or it's permissions. Another program will do > >> that. > > > > Deleting or creating a file requires write access in the > > directory containg the file reference -- it has nothing to > > do with the permissions on the file itself. > > > > Malcolm > > > >> This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. > >> :-) > >> > >> ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the > >> ability to change permissions. > >> > >> I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg > >> flag) but the modifying program does not recognise this > >> flag and will thus fail to modify the file. > >> (I have no control over the modifying program). > >> > >> Any ideas? > >> > >> I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm > >> starting to think I may have too just to be able to prevent > >> the user from modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I > >> could implement this using MAC anyway). > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Brett. > > Make a specialized setuid script or program to do that, and > set the sticky bit appropriately if you don't want them to > have direct access to the file. Just make sure that others > don't have access to the file. > > Why does he need access to aliases though? For mail program > purposes? -Garrett I think you may have mixed up two threads with very similar subject lines. I see no reference to aliases in this thread. (Confusing isn't it) Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 06:09:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED9C16A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.oxygen.az (mail.oxygen.az [212.47.128.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E0813C428 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.oxygen.az (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.oxygen.az (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C1B3D21F; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:45 +0359 (AZT) Received: from webmail.oxygen.az (mail.oxygen.az [212.47.128.37]) by mail.oxygen.az (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFA23D057; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:23 +0400 (AZT) Received: from 85.132.14.38 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user tofik); by webmail.oxygen.az with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:45 +0400 (AZT) Message-ID: <46560.85.132.14.38.1168321387.squirrel@85.132.14.38> In-Reply-To: <20070102105723.GA53671@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <459A2F2C.3090706@oxygen.az> <20070102105723.GA53671@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:45 +0400 (AZT) From: tofik@oxygen.az To: "Erik Trulsson" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: -= ClamAV =- Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmstat -i weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:09:39 -0000 > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:08:44PM +0400, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> looks like `vmstat -i` acts weird on my machine after being 12-15 hours >> uptime.Here is the iutput of `vmstat -i`: >> >> > vmstat -i >> interrupt total rate >> irq1: atkbd0 6813 0 >> irq9: acpi0 5397 0 >> irq12: psm0 73782 1 >> irq14: ata0 74209 1 >> irq15: ata1 47 0 >> irq18: uhci2 1 0 >> irq19: uhci3 ehci0 1 0 >> irq21: iwi0 35139 0 >> cpu0: timer 105315537 1999 >> Total 105510926 2003 >> > >> >> Strange is that for example atkbd0 has rate of 0, but total interrupts >> count of atkbd0 is growing. >> Machine runs FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE p11 with pretty common kernel. >> >> Is this known behaviour ? > > That is known and expected behaviour. It is just a round-off error due to > the use of integer division. > 'rate' is the average number of interrupts/second calculated over the > whole uptime of the machine. > Since you probably press a key on the keyboard less than once per second > (on > average) this means that rate < 1 for atkbd0 and gets displayed as 0. > > If floating point values were used to display the rate you should see a > value of maybe 0.13 for atkbd0. > > > -- > > Erik Trulsson > ertr1013@student.uu.se > Erik, that makes sense :) Many thanks for explanation, Tofig. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 06:38:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4A516A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE8313C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7649622wxc for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:38:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GihryLjYGcUddAeBgpilyOFIXDc3FmoR7UgKFZG84PmVQOxHG6DZ2dVX+EAoFU0e4kHDW9VtrghUfWMYDkW+Tiw4mYqxHwEREYFkZcakdE0yTmBkQ/X3xQe4KIAnYUNXxGOmhLtsDnCssa5pA+ZIJdk82UrILVdzBFCKQMd0+Q8= Received: by 10.70.130.19 with SMTP id c19mr50362228wxd.1168324707886; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.15 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:38:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0701082238j6fc6f819h156f68fd058a6472@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:38:27 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Dak Ghatikachalam" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:38:28 -0000 On 09/01/07, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > Hi Freebsd > > I am using ksh93 shell as my login shell > each and everytime > > I do set -o vi > > and perform some commands > > it simply dumps ksh93.core > file and crashed whole terminal session, > > I have been having this problem everrsince I changed my login shell from > /bin/sh to /bin/ksh which is symbolic link of ksh93 executable I compiled > off the freebsd /usr/ports/ > > I wonder if anyone has similar issues with this ksh or am I doing something > stupid [...] It doesn't matter what you do with your shell, it simply shouldn't crash. if you like it, and you would like continue using it, I suggest you try to get a working binary. ksh93 hasn't changed since 20060214 (according to freshports.org), so I guess you're working with the most recent version already. What you should try is to rebuild this port without any optimization set in /etc/make.conf. Please comment any CFLAGS= and CPUTYPE= and do a make reinstall. This should result in a i386 binary without any optimization. Try using it, maybe the core dump is gone. There are several ports out there that don't like being built with optimization. HTH Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 06:52:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11D816A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DC213C448 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id l096pgx60167; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:51:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <003301c733ba$61b3dea0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" , "Steve Franks" References: <539c60b90701060908o460d1d98wab2f2514a3a9d1e2@mail.gmail.com><20070106202147.GB2532@kobe.laptop><539c60b90701061849u35ddc61ch16a49484bd3baf12@mail.gmail.com><20070107031750.GA5828@kobe.laptop><539c60b90701070754r33ba9ae8q6b22f96be0ab6ea0@mail.gmail.com> <20070107162537.GB2261@kobe.laptop> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:49:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD documentation (was: Re: no ath0 on newsystem with good card) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:52:20 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "Steve Franks" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:25 AM Subject: Contributing to FreeBSD documentation (was: Re: no ath0 on newsystem with good card) > On 2007-01-07 08:54, Steve Franks wrote: > > Apologies on not hitting the list. Alyays forget to reply-all. > > No problem. I just didn't copy the list because I wasn't sure I should. > > > So, I figured I'd try to fix the safe-mode end of things on my own, > > and I found a post several years old (looked like it even could have > > been yours) about safemode, which doesn't show up anywhere on the > > freebsd site. So I did what it said and grep'd boot/beastie.4th for > > safemode, which came up with this suprisingly total solution: > > > > add apic.0.disabled="1" to boot/device.hints. Not only does my system > > come up in regular boot mode, but, as you suspected, the pccard works > > too, so all appears well. > > Excellent news! Thanks for sharing the answer :) > > > So my final question, what in all the land is an "apic", > > "Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller". This is the part of your > system which assigns priorities to interrupt lines of a device. The > full details are probably too technical for some percentage of our user > base, but more details can be found at the following pages: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Programmable_Interrupt_Controller > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_Interrupt_Controller > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8259 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_APIC_Architecture > > > and why isn't apic or safemode mentioned in the handbook, manpages, or > > even on the freebsd site? > > IIRC it is mentioned in the Developer's Handbook, but you are right that > it should be in the main Handbook too. > > > Further, I'd like to write a handbook page on "freebsd and laptops", > > because we're on my third one here now, and I'm starting to get the > > drift of what could usefully be added to the handbook, namely a > > thourough discussion of booting and device.hints. > > That would be great! If you can help writing such a section for the > Handbook, a lot of users will be highly indebted to you, for sure :) > I'll throw my $0.02 in here on this. Years ago on the CD distributions there was a file in the root of the distro labeled "hints" or some such. It was also on the website. It contained all the little workarounds for SPECIFIC pieces of hardware. I know as I wrote several entries for it. That apic problem was listed in there as were several others, I know some for laptops specifically. Sometime during the FreeBSD 4.X series one of the developers got a bug up their ass that somehow this was the wrong place for problems to be listed. Something along the lines of these problems aren't FreeBSD problems they are sucky hardware problems and it makes FreeBSD look bad to have the workarounds even listed at all, and we have the bug database and these icky ugly things really ought to go into the bug database. So this file disappeared. As did every other easily recognizable place for submitting hints. As did the specific e-mail address for hints to go to. These installation problems IMHO PROPERLY belong in the README for the distribution. That is the FIRST place that someone BRAND NEW to FreeBSD is going to look for them. No FreeBSD newbie who has oddball hardware that has bugs in it, is going to take the time spending hours reading the Handbook or searching the questions mailing list archives for tidbits, or querying the bug database for PR's for their gear. Any newbie to FreeBSD is going to do the same thing that they do to any other OS, they are going to stick the CD in their oddball hardware and boot it, and if it doesen't come up they will look at the README file that came with the ISO image they downloaded, and if the hardware-specific workarounds for their machine aren't there, they will discard the ISO cd and move on to some other Open Source OS. For all the huffing-and-puffing on peer-review for the Handbook, well that is fine for that. But an install hints file's very usefulness is junk if a committee is reviewing it. Hardware-specific install hints are, by their very nature, NOT guarenteed to work. They may even make things worse. All they are is user-developed workarounds that may or may not be The FreeBSD Way of doing things. The only thing that can be said about them is that at one time, one year, with one particular piece of gear, someone tried some off-the-wall thing and it worked. It might not ever work again in any future version of FreeBSD. There might be manufacture-specific BIOS updates that fix things. There might be a driver update in a later FreeBSD version that fixed that specific thing. But, it is a last-ditch suggestion to try when the 'normal' way of installing something doesen't work. I don't see much support for recreating the install hints file, so I really feel little incentive to contribute workarounds at this point, even though I have a whole collection of them for the specific systems I've installed FreeBSD on over the years. Submitting them to the PR database is worse then useless, because they invariably involve 2-3 year old hardware (or older) and the developers have ZERO incentive to work on them. So the PR's just get stale and then do-gooders come along 2-3 years later asking the original poster to verify if the problem still exists in current FreeBSD, and when the OP says how the hell do I know, they get closed. Sure, it might look strange to have a hint about installing on an old HP Netserver to make an EISA change, in this day and age, in an install hints file. But, goddammit, where the hell else are you going to see that? And you just know that somewhere, there's some young pup that has dragged one of those out of a Dumpster somewhere and is going to try loading FreeBSD on it. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 07:25:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBF916A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EC13C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id l097Opx60391; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:24:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tore Lund" , References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com><17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:21:27 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:25:01 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tore Lund" To: Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? > Robert Huff wrote: > > (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user > > behavior is not intuitively obvious.) > > An understatement. There are situations where sysinstall is positively > quixotic. I don't mind the simple character-based interface. But I do > find it worrying that I sometimes cannot know what sysinstall will do > next. In any case, this is bad publicity for FreeBSD since sysinstall > is the first bit of FreeBSD they encounter. > All of this is true. > Time and again we hear rumors about a new installation program. Is it > actually nearing completion? Keep in mind that many of us do not even > consider getting involved as long as we believe a better program is > under way. There is no new installation program underway. This comes up every year or so on the various discussion lists, everyone bashes sysinstall and claims it makes FreeBSD look bad and when are we going to get a replacement, etc. The arguments die away when faced with the following cold realities: 1) You can probably get consensus from everyone that sysinstall is ugly and needs replacement. But your never going to get any consensus on what the replaement should look like. And any replacement is going to have places where the user cannot know what it's going to do next, that is just the nature of install programs - it is due to the fact that different people interpret things differently. What is obvious to you isn't obvious to someone else. And, when is the install program going to cross the line between acting as a install program and acting as a training video? Review the steps needed to install a self-signed SSL certificate into Microsoft Internet Explorer 7, and then come back and tell me that those steps are more intuitive than sysinstall. Yeah, right. Face the facts, boys. Every year, computers get more complex to operate, and every year, the Average User is paying more and more to have a tech set the computer up for them. Open your eyes and look around. People think nothing of paying $30 to have a tech install Microsoft Office on their new Windows PC for God's sake. Who really is sysinstall's audience? The average l-user? Or the average technician? If it's the average tech, then who the hell cares how ugly sysinstall is? You think sysinstall is bad, you ought to see the diagnostic interface the average auto mechanic has to use to troubleshoot your car. If you are not the ultimate end-user for the FreeBSD system your installing, then you don't have any moral ground to make a call for pussifying the FreeBSD install program. I can tell you that for myself, every FreeBSD system I've installed in the last year and a half has been for OTHERS to use, NOT ME. 2) There's an immense amount of effort that has gone into sysinstall and it's libraries. Your talking about taking on an old, established program that is pretty throughly debugged, a program that is like an octopus in the amount of icky, ugly mucking around with config files and such that it does, and replacing this with a new program that is going to have all of the intelligence and institutional knowledge in it that the old program does. And furthermore if this replacement is to ever get traction among the userbase it's going to have to work PERFECTLY in the FIRST version that is released, otherwise everyone is just going to turn their back on it and keep using the existing sysinstall. 3) The largest complaint about sysinstall is that it's not graphical. The problem is that a graphical installation program has some -severe- constraints on it. First, it has to work in ALL instances. That means, 640x480x16 colors VGA screen. You have a lot of people out there installing on systems that have, for example, monitors with inadequate horizontal/vertical frequency ranges and very capabable video cards, unless you force the X-server to use the original VGA resolution, it's going to overdrive those monitors and the user is going to see a black screen when the installation program comes up. And the only way FreeBSD is going to get a graphical anything is by using Xorg, and FreeBSD does not maintain that distribution - so we are now dependent on the Xorg group writing their code with no bugs for our installation program to work. 4) Installation programs by and large are not "fun" programs to work on. Most developers avoid them. They are thankless tasks - you don't hear squat for thanks from anyone when they work, but you make the least mistake and everyone is on your neck. 5) Finally, sysinstall is a one-shot program. You use it once, the system is installed, and you never have to touch it again. There's lots of other things in FreeBSD that are critical things that will stop an installation cold. Such as lack of device support for some new piece of hardware. These things are much higher on the priority list than replacing sysinstall, a working program. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 08:33:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9B16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@tca-cable-connector.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE70B13C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@tca-cable-connector.com) Received: from [218.16.58.208] (helo=munin.tcaportal.com) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1H4CDH32Le-000709; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:20:20 +0100 Received: from [10.0.1.102] (bofh.tcaportal.com [10.0.1.102]) by munin.tcaportal.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF42A6C2E; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:19:23 +0800 (HKT) In-Reply-To: <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com><17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Schulz Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:19:56 +0800 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:1405312fe15d228f5bad0d2fcbb6dc17 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Tore Lund Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:33:39 -0000 to be honest, i actually like the sys-install program. i did it so many times, that i just fly trough the sys-install installation in like a minute to do a plain basic installation. i also like the fact that i can just use it via ssh from a remote location without a hassle. David On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tore Lund" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:45 PM > Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? > > >> Robert Huff wrote: >>> (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user >>> behavior is not intuitively obvious.) >> >> An understatement. There are situations where sysinstall is >> positively >> quixotic. I don't mind the simple character-based interface. But >> I do >> find it worrying that I sometimes cannot know what sysinstall will do >> next. In any case, this is bad publicity for FreeBSD since >> sysinstall >> is the first bit of FreeBSD they encounter. >> > > All of this is true. > >> Time and again we hear rumors about a new installation program. >> Is it >> actually nearing completion? Keep in mind that many of us do not >> even >> consider getting involved as long as we believe a better program is >> under way. > > There is no new installation program underway. > > This comes up every year or so on the various discussion lists, > everyone > bashes sysinstall and claims it makes FreeBSD look bad and when are > we going to get a replacement, etc. The arguments die away when faced > with the following cold realities: > > 1) You can probably get consensus from everyone that sysinstall is > ugly > and needs replacement. But your never going to get any consensus on > what the replaement should look like. And any replacement is going to > have places where the user cannot know what it's going to do next, > that > is just the nature of install programs - it is due to the fact that > different people > interpret things differently. What is obvious to you isn't obvious to > someone > else. And, when is the install program going to cross the line > between > acting as a install program and acting as a training video? > > Review the steps needed to install a self-signed SSL certificate into > Microsoft Internet Explorer 7, and then come back and tell me that > those steps are more intuitive than sysinstall. Yeah, right. Face > the > facts, boys. Every year, computers get more complex to operate, and > every year, the Average User is paying more and more to have a tech > set the computer up for them. Open your eyes and look around. People > think nothing of paying $30 to have a tech install Microsoft Office > on their > new Windows PC for God's sake. > > Who really is sysinstall's audience? The average l-user? Or the > average > technician? If it's the average tech, then who the hell cares how > ugly > sysinstall is? You think sysinstall is bad, you ought to see the > diagnostic > interface > the average auto mechanic has to use to troubleshoot your car. If > you are > not the ultimate end-user for the FreeBSD system your installing, then > you don't have any moral ground to make a call for pussifying the > FreeBSD > install program. I can tell you that for myself, every FreeBSD > system I've > installed in the last year and a half has been for OTHERS to use, > NOT ME. > > 2) There's an immense amount of effort that has gone into > sysinstall and > it's libraries. Your talking about taking on an old, established > program > that > is pretty throughly debugged, a program that is like an octopus in the > amount of icky, ugly mucking around with config files and such that > it does, > and replacing this with a new program that is going to have all of the > intelligence and institutional knowledge in it that the old program > does. > And furthermore if this replacement is to ever get traction among the > userbase it's going to have to work PERFECTLY in the FIRST version > that is released, otherwise everyone is just going to turn their > back on it > and keep using the existing sysinstall. > > 3) The largest complaint about sysinstall is that it's not > graphical. The > problem is that a graphical installation program has some -severe- > constraints on it. First, it has to work in ALL instances. That > means, > 640x480x16 colors VGA screen. You have a lot of people out there > installing on systems that have, for example, monitors with inadequate > horizontal/vertical frequency ranges and very capabable video cards, > unless you force the X-server to use the original VGA resolution, > it's going > to overdrive those monitors and the user is going to see a black > screen > when the installation program comes up. And the only way FreeBSD > is going to get a graphical anything is by using Xorg, and FreeBSD > does > not maintain that distribution - so we are now dependent on the Xorg > group writing their code with no bugs for our installation program > to work. > > 4) Installation programs by and large are not "fun" programs to work > on. Most developers avoid them. They are thankless tasks - you > don't hear squat for thanks from anyone when they work, but you make > the least mistake and everyone is on your neck. > > 5) Finally, sysinstall is a one-shot program. You use it once, the > system > is > installed, and you never have to touch it again. There's lots of > other > things > in FreeBSD that are critical things that will stop an installation > cold. > Such > as lack of device support for some new piece of hardware. These > things > are much higher on the priority list than replacing sysinstall, a > working > program. > > Ted > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 08:39:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2351116A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043EB13C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l098dAmF034142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:39:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l098dAqe034140; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14750; Tue, 9 Jan 07 00:32:05 PST Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:34:48 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kirk@strauser.com Message-Id: <45a353a8.0BHW+IfRuDsamdPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> <17826.23487.564492.142014@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45a287a9.xX+LU9dejjQRQovE%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200701081245.11217.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200701081245.11217.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:39:11 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 12:04 pm, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > Such a report will be incomplete if the system in question is an > > NIS client. For starters, see yp(8). > > Would "getent passwd" and "getent group" be more definitive? No idea. There is no manpage for getent on my (6.1) system, so I don't know what it might do. ("apropos getent" finds cgetent(3), kgetent(3), and tgetent(3), which do not seem likely to be applicable since they have to do with termcap-style databases.) Did you maybe mean getpwent(3) and getgrent(3)? Those don't seem all that promising either, if you believe the BUGS parts of their manpages. For example, from getgrent(3): The functions getgrent(), ... are fairly useless in a networked environment and should be avoided, if possible. I would guess that "ypcat passwd" and "ypcat group" might be useful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 09:38:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3055616A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B0A613C45D for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jan 2007 09:11:49 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.2.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2007 10:11:49 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25365336 Message-ID: <45A35C68.1040505@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:12:08 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE and nfe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:38:31 -0000 Hey, I am running a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE machine with a MSI K8N SLI-F mainboard, it has problems with the nve driver so I searched around on the internet and found this site about the nfe driver: http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html . Allthough there were no files for 6.1-RELEASE. Are there specific files or instructions for installing on 6.1-RELEASE. I'm not too fond of upgrading my system at this point and when I tried using the 6.2-PRERELEASE files I came upon these errors during the 'make' when rebuilding my kernel: -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../dev/mii/dcphy.c cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: In function `e1000phy_attach': ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: `MII_ANEGTICKS_GIGE' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: for each function it appears in.) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:136: error: `fast_ether' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:137: error: `esc' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:146: error: `MII_ANEGTICKS' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:119: warning: unused variable `id' ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: In function `e1000phy_service': ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:298: warning: passing arg 1 of `e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' from incompatible pointer type ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:398: warning: passing arg 1 of `e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' from incompatible pointer type ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: At top level: ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: error: conflicting types for 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: error: previous declaration of 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' was here ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: error: conflicting types for 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: error: previous declaration of 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' was here ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: warning: 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' declared `static' but never defined ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: warning: 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/PFSERVERKERNEL. root@FStaals$ I hope anyone can help me. If it is not possible to install nfe on 6.1-RELEASE would upgrading to 6-STABLE allow me to install the driver ? Regards, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 09:42:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C5116A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (hermes-tres.uned.es [62.204.192.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EA013C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55C098224; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:16:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from stargate-2.unedbizkaia.es (ca6200-010-200-062-202.uned.es [10.200.62.202]) by hermes-tres.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54449821E; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:16:22 +0100 (CET) From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:16:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <459A5A45.4080309@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <459A5A45.4080309@wmptl.com> X-Face: 1Ap'j*2\*m:5K9|Z3(3hw}>e7y}bKl>WsTt:A%1stWDEm9`D?s("Bk-4(uS((PR|BJ|^+)=?utf-8?q?=0A=099rL=26=251*N1v57h=5E+/7=2E=5E?=<|jyu`lrfTXqiA5.*wrD0kx@J\Qbd[Ik3GF+av(g. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091016.27589.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Cc: Nathan Vidican Subject: Re: sshd break-in attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:42:32 -0000 El Martes, 2 de Enero de 2007 14:12, Nathan Vidican escribi=F3: > In our 'periodic daily' report/email, (only the list goes on for hundreds > of attempts). Anyhow, long story short; is there not an easy way to make > sshd block or deny hosts temporarily if X number of invalid login attempts > are made within a minute's time? Must I use an external wrapper to > accomplish this, or can it be done with options to sshd on it's own? I'm using security/bruteforceblocker with success, it's easy to install and= =20 run and works with pf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:08:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA8216A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F37B13C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (yrozoh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l099kYtk095512 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l099kYd9095511; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:34 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:46:39 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE question (nacona vs. pentium4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:08:52 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to write an appropriate CPUTYPE entry for /etc/make.conf for the following machine: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2799.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x441d> Logical CPUs per core: 2 I've read the appropriate sections in the make.conf(5) manpage, /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf and even /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, but they don't really help. So far I've been using "CPUTYPE=pentium4", but I wonder if "nocona" would be better, however I'm not sure if my CPU above qualifies as a nocona one. I think the main difference is that nocona supports SSE3, and SSE3 is indeed listed in the CPU features above, so ... Does anybody know for sure? Thank you very much in advance! Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:08:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6491D16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ACA13C457 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (clejqd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l099cAqR094548; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:38:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l099cADE094524; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:38:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:38:10 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701090938.l099cADE094524@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, dghatikachalam@gmail.com In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:38:16 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Shell recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, dghatikachalam@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:08:53 -0000 Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > I am using ksh93 shell as my login shell > each and everytime > > I do set -o vi > > and perform some commands > > it simply dumps ksh93.core > file and crashed whole terminal session, If you can't solve your problem otherwise, I recommend you install zsh (also from /usr/ports), and then make a symlink zsh -> ksh. When zsh is invoked with the name ksh, it emulates the behaviour of ksh. I just tried it, "set -o vi", and it seems to work perfectly well. (zsh also has a lot of additional features, far beyond what you can do with ksh.) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. Passwords are like underwear. You don't share them, you don't hang them on your monitor or under your keyboard, you don't email them, or put them on a web site, and you must change them very often. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:17:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B6816A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D6B13C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (slghcx@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09AH4oC096771; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:17:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09AH4aq096770; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:17:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:17:04 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091017.l09AH4aq096770@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, dghatikachalam@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <200701090938.l099cADE094524@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:17:09 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Shell recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, dghatikachalam@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:17:11 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > If you can't solve your problem otherwise, I recommend > you install zsh (also from /usr/ports), and then make a > symlink zsh -> ksh. I'm sorry, that should be the other way round, of course, the symlink must be ksh -> zsh (i.e. "ln -s zsh ksh"). Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. PI: int f[9814],b,c=9814,g,i;long a=1e4,d,e,h; main(){for(;b=c,c-=14;i=printf("%04d",e+d/a),e=d%a) while(g=--b*2)d=h*b+a*(i?f[b]:a/5),h=d/--g,f[b]=d%g;} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:23:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AEF16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com [68.99.120.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103C413C46A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:23:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03 ([172.18.22.61]) by dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with SMTP id <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:23:42 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16 (webedge20-101-1106-20040809) From: Vizion Organization: vizion Communications To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 2:23:41 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Subject: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:23:43 -0000 Hi Can someone please tell me what package installs libkrb5.so.8 for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? Thanks in advance David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:44:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D51816A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17B0D13C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 42649 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 10:44:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 10:44:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 99865 invoked by uid 98); 9 Jan 2007 10:44:42 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.032914 secs); 09 Jan 2007 10:44:42 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.032914 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2007 10:44:24 -0000 (Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:29:24 +0545) Received: (qmail 4698 invoked by uid 1009); 9 Jan 2007 10:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 10:44:22 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:29:22 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070109162922.9549fa55.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.1 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 Subject: Using IPFW to bypass hotmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:44:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear All, I run a transparent squid proxy using IPFW below: ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via bge0 Now I want the IP: 192.168.55.22 to bypass Squid when requesting www.hotmail.com. How do I go about doing this using IPFW? Can somebody shed some light on this issue? Thanks. - -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFo3IGVrOl+eVhOvYRAliLAJsEHVzJ/5517Jh4VO89dncftAU6GACgqsXo cBxfF4URRL+dh5jiqaxZQAE= =KwVZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:59:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4057116A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com [68.99.120.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FAC13C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dukecmmtao03 ([172.18.22.61]) by dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with SMTP id <20070109105947.LPAX60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03>; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:59:47 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16 (webedge20-101-1106-20040809) From: Vizion Organization: vizion Communications To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 2:59:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20070109105947.LPAX60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Cc: niclas.zeising@gmail.com Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:59:47 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Niclas Zeising [mailto:niclas.zeising@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:41 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing > > > On 1/9/07, Vizion wrote: > > Hi > > > > Can someone please tell me what package installs > libkrb5.so.8 for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > David > > It's kerberos5. If i remember correctly it's installed by default if > you havent added NO_KERBEROS to make.conf, see make.conf(5) > Umph well somehow I have lost libkrb5.so.8. Any idea of correct way to re-install? Thanks david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 11:08:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA94016A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE313C46A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:08:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so299957wra for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:08:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZzeBen9JGhjvERvopx1XVy2777YRuOZyPG0OewAhL+d/zvZcPhUgzoB8/XrtkgtkdrSp/WLnyozwzV8aIHqfAhwHcICh7HJtifCVs1r2Ud8rBELTWh51NngFuVrLMLD/jITTxua/m8E5EPD+GFe2ZiQe7V1o+Bu9mA+wylJEaF4= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr4428620hue.1168339266368; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:41:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.29.12 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:41:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:41:06 +0100 From: "Niclas Zeising" To: Vizion In-Reply-To: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:08:27 -0000 On 1/9/07, Vizion wrote: > Hi > > Can someone please tell me what package installs libkrb5.so.8 for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? > > Thanks in advance > > David It's kerberos5. If i remember correctly it's installed by default if you havent added NO_KERBEROS to make.conf, see make.conf(5) HTH //Niclas -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 11:15:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F516A494 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFB313C45E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5823904uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:15:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HhKhfLuqBzSczrNrZKyNAZ8G1g3vD5Zvy0sQO3Z/P9ckDibI+CxiN38EMWmdwjGOviVtCBG3iVWf5TDf74bAPIdJ3alJ/A1abSBJvAHYdVbDjK1157MlQ9tOIcnP74nZ1xFnbl9cKfyuxNHNxtW8v16jSXzDSBDk9NhUKdAu8Wg= Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr7717458huf.1168341310083; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.29.12 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 03:15:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:15:10 +0100 From: "Niclas Zeising" To: Vizion In-Reply-To: <20070109105947.LPAX60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070109105947.LPAX60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:15:11 -0000 On 1/9/07, Vizion wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Niclas Zeising [mailto:niclas.zeising@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:41 AM > > To: Vizion > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing > > > > > > On 1/9/07, Vizion wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Can someone please tell me what package installs > > libkrb5.so.8 for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > David > > > > It's kerberos5. If i remember correctly it's installed by default if > > you havent added NO_KERBEROS to make.conf, see make.conf(5) > > > Umph well somehow I have lost libkrb5.so.8. > > Any idea of correct way to re-install? > > Thanks > david > The best way is to rebuild the entire FreeBSD world + maybe kernel. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html For documentation on how to to that. You can also try to only rebuild the kerberos5 part of the soruce tree, but that's not supported and might not work. HTH //Niclas -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 11:25:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C78B16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3126513C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A0D28AE2 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:52:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.4 (20061120) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id W+lPphm5N4Y0 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9887228A4E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:52:12 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Liste FreeBSD From: bsd Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:52:07 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: CLI to migrate WMA files to MP3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:25:29 -0000 Hello, I have 1200 files to migrate from WMA to MP3, I was wondering if you =20 knew any Command Line Interface (aka program !) that will handle the =20 task smoothly. Sincerly your. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 12:29:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C3F16A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042213C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5840665uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:29:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=d9eS8/8HxRG1OI+3CDvutaTVgTUQmIlYDUR3KVnaaE+Oj/WjLSfc8pY5GotmSlG5S6ov29iyvreO4ZHNsbSawizo2KdZ8HuawLcJW/i0U08G7VLevnmu5d7I5KKoLeeALtvd8Wkv1gJYclKcm/EHsXnudUCXJ9zMI2W+34C46Bc= Received: by 10.78.172.20 with SMTP id u20mr4447859hue.1168345786207; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:29:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:29:46 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: bsd In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: bd6afe598d3a6660 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: CLI to migrate WMA files to MP3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:29:47 -0000 On 1/9/07, bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have 1200 files to migrate from WMA to MP3, I was wondering if you > knew any Command Line Interface (aka program !) that will handle the > task smoothly. audio/pacpl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 07:19:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334C16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scaligeracarni@libero.it) Received: from smtp0.libero.it (smtp0.libero.it [193.70.192.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147B413C469 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scaligeracarni@libero.it) Received: from localhost (172.16.1.8) by smtp0.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 453F56EF04D2435A for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:54:35 +0100 Received: from smtp2.libero.it ([172.16.1.225]) by localhost (asav9.libero.it [193.70.192.87]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10216-20-3 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:54:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from libero.it (192.168.17.5) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 458C423E002AD1DC for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:54:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:54:34 +0100 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "scaligeracarni" To: "freebsd-questions" X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.3 (R1) (B3pl17) X-SenderIP: 85.46.57.2 X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:40:36 +0000 Cc: Subject: diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:19:26 -0000 I made : pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need = libz.so.2! How can resolve my problem?=0A=0A=0A-------------------------------------= -----------------=0APassa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e se= nza canone Telecom=0Ahttp://click.libero.it/infostrada09gen07=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 08:17:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EDC16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: from web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.101.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEF1013C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27322 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2007 08:17:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20070109081748.27320.qmail@web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=sf+TI0+JaM6HTdLdsvlSvUJX59B5ekEjbdivZDaXwhKPhoGrMeyns8zouUm/yirDn15OISvgJZJnIbD8wSpxVIrln959iOhaMlNB1NcI/WP9p9Mmu0hMS5st006DQAXpTm7D8Kr7dq7LdBPedgEcvZfc21hUJbAXTppI374kD1Q=; X-YMail-OSG: urLGLZMVM1kfmxNMJj8UMU0DNalrdY4cYLt.vjvSZ4m1Ku.JP8oMcBrHv7UVxCPV4SGGVQhgK38NBDN5xJHayc3GRgJNFjjMUXfLNGTfykfnrVAkCeHJhsHZ4u5HV6U51Fo.C.x4gAYBPZ_6lVaWtPv_HR2yCbtfW1cgmOyrKZHH Received: from [219.95.201.42] by web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:17:47 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:17:47 -0800 (PST) From: linux quest To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:40:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Nmap Scan from FreeBSD OS - Coding Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:17:49 -0000 I am currently doing a simple penetration testing for my company in a LAN environment. Yes, I have already downloaded NMap by using the 'make install' command... and it did fetched the required files from insecure.org successfully. My question will be, how can I create a Network Program in .c that will invoke the nmap capabilities to scan the network or computers? Example, lets say, I want an automated nmap scan to run on FreeBSD to scan 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11 , every morning at 10am - may I know how do I achieve that? I hope someone can show me a simple coding to invoke nmap scan, thanks :) Thanks :) Regards, Linux Quest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 12:59:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42DA16A417 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E2913C478 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [195.72.130.92] (195-72-130-92.wifi.datahop.it [195.72.130.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l09D045O022362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:00:04 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A391C6.5060403@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:59:50 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux quest References: <20070109081748.27320.qmail@web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109081748.27320.qmail@web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nmap Scan from FreeBSD OS - Coding Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:59:56 -0000 linux quest wrote: > I am currently doing a simple penetration testing for my company in a LAN environment. Yes, I have already downloaded NMap by using the 'make install' command... and it did fetched the required files from insecure.org successfully. > > My question will be, how can I create a Network Program in .c that will invoke the nmap capabilities to scan the network or computers? Example, lets say, I want an automated nmap scan to run on FreeBSD to scan 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11 , every morning at 10am - may I know how do I achieve that? I hope someone can show me a simple coding to invoke nmap scan, thanks :) > you dont really need c for this, a simple shell script run from cron would do fine. something like ===========start============== #!/bin/sh TARGETS="192.168.1.10 192.168.1.11" NMAP="/usr/local/bin/nmap" NMAPOPTIONS="" RECEPIENTS="someone@somewhere.com" SUBJECT="namp scan results" $NMAP $NMAPOPTIONS $TARGETS | /usr/bin/mail -s "$SUBJECT" $RECEPIENTS ===========end================= save that somewhere and remember to chmod it to be executable add a line like 1 10 * * * /path/to/script to the appropriate users crontab (change /path/to/script to the location of the script) and you should get the output emailed to you every morning. Vince > Thanks :) > > Regards, > Linux Quest > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 13:10:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4793616A492 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC1B13C467 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:10:34 -0500 id 000564EC.45A3944A.00011378 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:10:33 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: linux quest Message-Id: <20070109081033.07d51b9a.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109081748.27320.qmail@web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <20070109081748.27320.qmail@web59210.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nmap Scan from FreeBSD OS - Coding Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:10:35 -0000 In response to linux quest : > I am currently doing a simple penetration testing for my company in a LAN > environment. Yes, I have already downloaded NMap by using the 'make install' > command... and it did fetched the required files from insecure.org > successfully. > > My question will be, how can I create a Network Program in .c that will > invoke the nmap capabilities to scan the network or computers? Example, > lets say, I want an automated nmap scan to run on FreeBSD to scan > 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11 , every morning at 10am - may I know how > do I achieve that? I hope someone can show me a simple coding to invoke > nmap scan, thanks :) [Please wrap your lines around 72 chars or so] It seems to me that C would be overkill for such a task. You could easily use cron + a shell/perl/python/etc script to get the task done. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 13:33:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059FF16A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBEB213C461 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 28279 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2007 13:32:54 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 13:32:54 -0000 Message-ID: <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:33:49 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:33:55 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote: >> We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I >> have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI >> without much success. >> >> We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the >> queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide the >> production level of iSCSI initiator we will require. (The iSCSI target >> host will be a third party vendor) >> >> I am sending a request for information to the project lead but I am also >> interested in knowing if anyone is currently using any iSCSI with >> FreeBSD and what your success failures might be. > > I just started using the latest iSCSI initiator[1] on my 6-STABLE desktop to > access some volumes on a LeftHand Networks SAN. It's a bit lacking in polish, > but it works quite well. The one big missing feature is that it doesn't > handle network disconnections. No panics or anything though, and performance > was what I expected. > > I'd be interested in what Danny tells you about the initiator's readiness for > production use, but in any case you'll probably just have to do some > stability and stress testing on your own. > > [1] ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2 > > JN The developers response, for those who are interested. hi Dave, the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now. that was the good news, now for the down side: what was missing all along was recovery from network disconnects, so while I think I have it almost worked out, I've come across a major flow in the iscsi design: when the targets crashes, and comes back, there is no way to tell the client to run an fsck. This is not a problem if the client is mounting the iscsi partition read only. danny Thanks everyone who responded on and off list to me. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:22:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F53816A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6148D13C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5866034uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=iJChMH+jkgPcgY6tn17cly4ZOcHpOIvO9fBA7wCXsx/QchmJyJ/u4H2w8PDvouG2JphDUqXnP5GgA8yGCdYOO/mNJpCZrLMYzg6PqpkYlWo+EQhWfmf/b861W1N1Tqk8jGIvMOYRqGSW5kXmiM92gM5UYDGyVyA4+esvha6VIKw= Received: by 10.78.150.7 with SMTP id x7mr7153377hud.1168350960890; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.3 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:56:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:56:00 +0200 From: "George Vanev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:22:49 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box for a gateway. It connects to ISP via pppoe. In /etc/ppp/ppp.conf i have this line: enable dns so I have the necessery nameserver-s in /etc/resolv.conf So far, so good... I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box to get the nameservers automatically. Can you tell me how this may be done?! Regerds -- George Vanev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:28:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D9F16A416 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E6713C457 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (uzyroz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09ESiYb011053; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09ESiAR011052; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:44 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091428.l09ESiAR011052@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, teklimbu@wlink.com.np In-Reply-To: <20070109162922.9549fa55.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:28:50 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Using IPFW to bypass hotmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, teklimbu@wlink.com.np List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:28:52 -0000 Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > I run a transparent squid proxy using IPFW below: > > ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via bge0 That's not the rule for transparent proxying. For that you need a "forward" (or "fwd") rule, not an "allow" rule. (Of course, the "allow" rule above might still be needed, but it's not the one that actually enables the transparent proxying). > Now I want the IP: 192.168.55.22 to bypass Squid when requesting > www.hotmail.com. > > How do I go about doing this using IPFW? Can somebody shed some light > on this issue? Simply add an "allow" rule for that IP, and place it _before_ the "forward" (or "fwd") rule in your rule set: allow tcp from 192.168.55.22 to www.hotmail.com Note that the hostname is not resolved dynamically, but at the time the rule is added to teh rule set. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "To this day, many C programmers believe that 'strong typing' just means pounding extra hard on the keyboard." -- Peter van der Linden From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:31:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A46016A417 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC27313C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (abufwd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09EVWnd011374; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:31:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09EVWLI011373; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091431.l09EVWLI011373@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, scaligeracarni@libero.it In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:31:38 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, scaligeracarni@libero.it List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:31:39 -0000 scaligeracarni wrote: > I made : > pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz > > on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need libz.so.2! > How can resolve my problem? Install the compat5x package. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. (On the statement print "42 monkeys" + "1 snake":) By the way, both perl and Python get this wrong. Perl gives 43 and Python gives "42 monkeys1 snake", when the answer is clearly "41 monkeys and 1 fat snake". -- Jim Fulton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:36:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3104816A5B1 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCF713C461 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8E220B402; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:36:11 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cn5G6cVxonZc; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:36:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255FD20628A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:36:05 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:35:57 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2cd0a0da0701080629k274d8ac2h97addec1391e4932@mail.gmail.com> <200701081245.11217.kirk@strauser.com> <45a353a8.0BHW+IfRuDsamdPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <45a353a8.0BHW+IfRuDsamdPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4081109.hzG8fejn6H"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701090836.03608.kirk@strauser.com> Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD File System, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:36:12 -0000 --nextPart4081109.hzG8fejn6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 January 2007 2:34 am, you wrote: > No idea. There is no manpage for getent on my (6.1) system, so > I don't know what it might do. Maybe it's new (to FreeBSD) as per 6.2. Anyway: =2D---------------------- SYNOPSIS getent database [key ...] DESCRIPTION The getent program retrieves and displays entries from the=20 administrative database specified by database, using the lookup order specified in nsswitch.conf(5). The display format for a given database is as per=20 the ``traditional'' file format for that database. =2D---------------------- Example: $ getent passwd root:*:0:0:System Administrator:/root:/usr/local/bin/zsh rootcsh:*:0:0:Charlie &:/root:/bin/csh daemon:*:1:1:Owner of many system processes:/root:/usr/sbin/nologin operator:*:2:5:System &:/:/usr/sbin/nologin bin:*:3:7:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/usr/sbin/nologin This has the huge benefit of fully supporting nsswitch, so the same command= =20 fetches *all* of your accounts, including those in NIS/YP and LDAP. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart4081109.hzG8fejn6H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFo6hT5sRg+Y0CpvERAgGUAJ4v4VBleZf/jIjB62mh1d51/AJ8hACaAmSy 9HX1fZUq+YrWI0MvVi1sC20= =TNxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4081109.hzG8fejn6H-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:38:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0161E16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61713C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262F020B400 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:38:28 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gQWlRQYQn5v for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:38:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74498205941 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:38:22 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?iso-8859-1?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dA?= =?iso-8859-1?q?J*9f+mX=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Length: 1991 X-UID: 954 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:38:20 -0600 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2153959.4qlQksAjhq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701090838.21274.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:38:29 -0000 --nextPart2153959.4qlQksAjhq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 January 2007 7:56 am, George Vanev wrote: > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > to get the nameservers automatically. > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > Regerds I think the best solution would be to configure the FreeBSD box as a cachin= g=20 nameserver, then point all your windows boxes to it. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2153959.4qlQksAjhq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFo6jd5sRg+Y0CpvERAsLSAJ9InvUtqcHB7cH1U3eu4k3SswojqgCff9fF 6+Oi6s7/3CxvluqjzcoUSsI= =+Y+5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2153959.4qlQksAjhq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:43:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B416A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:43:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3067113C459 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (apqbqj@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09Eh6nR012959; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09Eh6Jx012958; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:06 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091443.l09Eh6Jx012958@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, George.Vanev@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:43:12 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:43:15 -0000 George Vanev wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box for a gateway. > It connects to ISP via pppoe. > In /etc/ppp/ppp.conf i have this line: > enable dns > so I have the necessery nameserver-s in /etc/resolv.conf > So far, so good... > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > to get the nameservers automatically. > Can you tell me how this may be done?! There are several ways to do it. Personally I have simply set up an own nameserver on the FreeBSD machine (just named_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf) and enabled "forward only" in /etc/namedb/named.conf. Then I wrote a small /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup script that writes the nameserver addresses into "forwarders" entries in /etc/namedb/named.conf and restarts the named process ("/etc/rc.d/named restart"). That's it. If your ISP's nameservers never change (mine never did), you can probably also just hardcode them. :-) Another option, if you don't absolutely have to use your ISP's nameservers for some reason, then you can also just ignore them, i.e. letting your own nameserver resolve everything itself, without forwarding. (Of course that's not possible if your ISP blocks port 53.) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "Python tricks" is a tough one, cuz the language is so clean. E.g., C makes an art of confusing pointers with arrays and strings, which leads to lotsa neat pointer tricks; APL mistakes everything for an array, leading to neat one-liners; and Perl confuses everything period, making each line a joyous adventure . -- Tim Peters From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 13:15:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7586416A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: from web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.101.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2894C13C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 5216 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2007 13:15:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=EMWBw0e/hIzAcYjzDh6iZ8kvw4Re1mSiN+6GURkNozBgByafFkBV0bTloEGUJmTnhlPhXPq3WbRXayRn/KRpgTDisv+o3aGxlm5H0+nTiwS35xef2QbrzuYlHzNSF7KyAhZp0rC8saj76rc4s+CEsAqR4Bez2LjC6TZERmEryWE=; X-YMail-OSG: _NHUwLQVM1lwzzHkTo22_1y_hNUoT6RUMNy06cDCdoFOaKEyz2CIzI3v6xFJnJ0TNQ-- Received: from [219.95.201.42] by web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:15:33 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:15:33 -0800 (PST) From: linux quest To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <516870.3173.qm@web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:45:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: NMap Installation Problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:15:34 -0000 After running nmap for some time, I have got problem running a simple command of nmap ... like nmap 192.168.1.2 nmap: Command not found I think there is something wrong with my installation procedures. I type in "make install clean" command in /usr/local/bin/nmap and /usr/ports/security/nmap - but somehow I still see the "command not found" message. I have also typed in "make deinstall clean" on both of the directory location, restart the OS, and install everything again using the "make install clean" command (on both of the directory location) - but I still receive the same "nmap: Command not found" message. Thanks for the help :) Regards, Linux Quest __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:27:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7DE16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Taharni@bigpond.com) Received: from qsrv03sl.mx.bigpond.com (qsrv03sl.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.92.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEFC13C459 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Taharni@bigpond.com) Received: from oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com ([58.165.104.218]) by omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070109125844.JGJV2480.omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:58:44 +0000 Received: from your8abc512da0 ([58.165.104.218]) by oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with SMTP id <20070109125844.CCRY5602.oaamta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@your8abc512da0> for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:58:44 +0000 Message-ID: <000501c733e5$6c959c20$0100000a@your8abc512da0> From: "Taharni Duggan" To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:58:01 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:46:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: arplookup 192.168.1.254 failed: host is not on local network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:27:34 -0000 how do i host custom game on warcraft 3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:38:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C7516A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: from web54101.mail.yahoo.com (web54101.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D9C013C46A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 2363 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2007 14:11:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=UJ0+ZUYQWETqH8qrncUWYyqLDlTWPhI0nLphu4xbHWz363Ni4srslVxdaZyFDXPE3P0p2S6Mrwr3oFSIuWXUQ0aYZ4wkQAcQGaOoOvO7LkMtqVyUk3maqBhHq/Dqi2/c5B08iCKeh0LXKolFISzbhVpl9EKe7tVEoQi8Gef7LJI=; X-YMail-OSG: 885jnL8VM1nHt2zokrWwwFgr0bRKhyK5vGB4PRiFmPmPYZ1peCh3E.vERGQJ9KqXhV.ySaHWZ_av7v9.SdgqWizgZmGX9co7xb_KMJCmtx0h3nmsB46cV7NPGYyof76uJIiYcB65IFsJ Received: from [222.124.158.148] by web54101.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:11:21 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:11:21 -0800 (PST) From: anto jayanto To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <243969.2162.qm@web54101.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:46:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: isatap on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:38:03 -0000 I try to implement ipv6/ipv4 tunneling using ISATAP,but its was not sucecssfull, when i re-compile my kernel using pseudo-device "ist", and error,if kernel can not know pseudo-device "ist". any one can help me? i try to follow mr suzzuki paper at http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20041201/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:39:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919D016A416 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: from web54109.mail.yahoo.com (web54109.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 261E713C467 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 98017 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2007 14:13:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20070109141316.98015.qmail@web54109.mail.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=tACruTnhnNK/hxyPCAw0mFO2zV3ubp6T+Xrv4wx7KzaT9qVFloxKw7wopMxqQW9xdActq+UAsX6q73uZqfGCwnbNSExS9NsXAUgVfjlLnbjtpgSz4nXure3goNIHWhiOHbzvlref2DBGq5MJlT5hJotojAOwq5e8WVIPd8FMOTM=; X-YMail-OSG: 3Vg8HAsVM1l6tEdWt2v.Iswd7Uc2bQIbtS2VCyo2QbriGJOESehL1xLfKQwNUmMOhB4uBya2nQSv7MUs2U6TkK9Z53Ehd780y.JQJRepAmaSQqcrj8vg.YEUKYfB3ocAw56fttGVjSMAWQ-- Received: from [222.124.158.148] by web54109.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:13:16 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13:16 -0800 (PST) From: anto jayanto To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:46:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: isatap on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:39:58 -0000 I try to implement ipv6/ipv4 tunneling using ISATAP,but its was not sucecssfull, when i re-compile my kernel using pseudo-device "ist", and error,if kernel can not know pseudo-device "ist". any one can help me? i try to follow mr suzzuki paper at http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20041201/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:47:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD70516A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8F213C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 31215 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 14:47:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Jan 2007 14:47:33 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 48EF52842F; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:47:32 -0500 (EST) To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <45a1d35d.4bEc3ED+dOKSmi62%perryh@pluto.rain.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:47:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45a1d35d.4bEc3ED+dOKSmi62%perryh@pluto.rain.com> (perryh@pluto.rain.com's message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:15:09 -0800") Message-ID: <44irfgtfy3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vivitar USB camera support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:47:33 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com writes: > Does anyone happen to know where I would find a how-to for downloading > and displaying images from a Vivitar ViviCam 3825? I see several > digital-camera utilities of one sort or another in the ports, but > none whose index entry mentions Vivitar. That camera seems to support umass(4), so just plug it in and use it like a USB hard drive... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:51:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7016A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B760B13C45D for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28321 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 14:51:10 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Jan 2007 14:51:10 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id ABE7E28430; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:51:09 -0500 (EST) To: "Cormany, Adam" References: <8A874F1363D67A42A309F48BD435BDD309159CA2@USALPEVS01.sgi.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:51:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8A874F1363D67A42A309F48BD435BDD309159CA2@USALPEVS01.sgi.net> (Adam Cormany's message of "Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:34 -0500") Message-ID: <44ejq4tfs2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:51:22 -0000 "Cormany, Adam" writes: > We have a few older FreeBSD systems running 3.4 and 4.5. Are there > patches for the 2007 daylight savings time US change for these FreeBSD > versions? If so, where can I find them? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/zoneinfo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 14:56:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A215616A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630CC13C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] ([10.0.0.11]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09Eu646035145; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:56:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:56:10 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George.Vanev@gmail.com References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:56:08 -0000 George Vanev wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box for a gateway. > It connects to ISP via pppoe. > In /etc/ppp/ppp.conf i have this line: > enable dns > so I have the necessery nameserver-s in /etc/resolv.conf > So far, so good... > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > to get the nameservers automatically. > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > Regerds I think what you're looking for is DHCP, (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol), which will enable you to serve your windows clients on the network with all of their network configuration, including but not limited to: ip address, gateway, subnet mask, dns servers, netbios name servers, etc. You can install a dhcpd server from within the ports collection, or via package if you'd prefer. A DHCP server will allow the FreeBSD machine you've setup as an internet gateway to act almost identically to the commercially available dsl/cable routers. I'd suggest isc-dhcp3-server, available in the ports collection under the 'net' category, you can install using the following commands on a >= 6.1-RELEASE machine, (assuming you have the ports collection installed): cd /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server/ && make install cp /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf.sample /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf && vi /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf mv /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh echo 'dhcpd_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh start Good-luck, read up and come back with any further questions if need be, but it seems like DHCP will solve your problem adequately. All you'll have to do from the windows machines, is set them to automatically configure themselves via DHCP (which is the default setting). -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:14:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D8616A4D2 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7CF13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2288892ana for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:14:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AWWAx/zMB24LT+bX/j6yAB96j3jvuoOJUkP5qsQRVr302OgiR66ZfSR8CV1BTqTi8E0EW87Ct74Tgd7/U1VYxOB8jcdJVUkfucBXP4TPI7DIVFnjmnqiL0n+85mu9xbVyYwgsRqMT3uKi2lVdlzT1LPE4OiDWRkHMOgn3t2A7GE= Received: by 10.100.122.8 with SMTP id u8mr10783950anc.1168355650139; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:14:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:14:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701090714q45032eb0q7160d77ba9807628@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:14:10 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: User Security Question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:14:11 -0000 Hello Friends Just had a debate with a collegue at office, but still lack knowledge on FreeBSD security :( I have few questions..... 1. What previligies a "standard" user (NOT member of Wheel Group) has on a FreeBSD Box? 2. How can he/she damages the systems or make a breach? 3. If that particular user is willing to damage the FreeBSD box, so which "locations" OR "files" are more likely to be damaged or affected? 4. How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? 5. What sort of possible methods he/she can apply to hack the system and create a breach into the system? 6. How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? I would really appreciate your comments in this regard.... Cheers!!! -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:16:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EE616A4B3 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0759513C465 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5879088uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:16:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nwvPpknoIt4DeqnMHsT4HPTaOkhLaUPNt5nkds5UqhZobay6Xwc5rk5t0w/qKLO7IXsbrUb29rwKO6+8q/ueia3E6zZXLD4Gkx3oMWhza40FoQ5ra7cm5poKpBUNzINa9Qi6szqKGldQyl9qu4Fz5focx6R1LKpeB02W3b7sWjE= Received: by 10.78.170.17 with SMTP id s17mr5926988hue.1168355813745; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:16:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.29.12 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:16:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:16:53 +0100 From: "Niclas Zeising" To: "linux quest" In-Reply-To: <516870.3173.qm@web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <516870.3173.qm@web59208.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NMap Installation Problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:16:55 -0000 On 1/9/07, linux quest wrote: > After running nmap for some time, I have got problem running a simple command of nmap ... like > > nmap 192.168.1.2 > nmap: Command not found > > I think there is something wrong with my installation procedures. I type in "make install clean" command in /usr/local/bin/nmap and /usr/ports/security/nmap - but somehow I still see the "command not found" message. > > I have also typed in "make deinstall clean" on both of the directory location, restart the OS, and install everything again using the "make install clean" command (on both of the directory location) - but I still receive the same "nmap: Command not found" message. > > Thanks for the help :) > > Regards, > Linux Quest > __________________________________________________ Have you tried running "rehash" after the install? If you're using [t]csh this is nessesary to make the shell discover new commands. You only need to do "make install clean" in ports/security/nmap, not in local/bin/nmap. HTH //Niclas -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:19:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C44416A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D1613C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 10:19:28 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTH10242; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:19:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 10:19:25 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17827.45657.453976.967102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:18:49 -0500 To: Liste FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090209.45A3B0B5.009C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: CLI to migrate WMA files to MP3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:19:30 -0000 bsd writes: > I have 1200 files to migrate from WMA to MP3, I was wondering if > you knew any Command Line Interface (aka program !) that will > handle the task smoothly. audio/sox? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:29:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB8B16A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (mail.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA0913C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BA08750E8DC; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:29:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [172.16.0.64] (ip-net-212-85-220-6.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.6]) by mail.africaonline.co.sz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FAB50E8B7; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:29:08 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online Zimbabwe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:28:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <200701090838.21274.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200701090838.21274.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091728.39012.petern@africaonline.co.zw> Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:29:14 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 16:38, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 7:56 am, George Vanev wrote: > > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > > to get the nameservers automatically. > > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > > Regerds > > I think the best solution would be to configure the FreeBSD box as a > caching nameserver, then point all your windows boxes to it. I think you will need to have DHCP running in your network as DHCP is the o= nly=20 way to automatically get nameservers regardless of the OS you are using Hope this helps Regards =2D-=20 Peter Nyamukusa Systems Administrator Africa Online Zimbabwe Tel: =C2=A0 =C2=A0+263-4-250890 =46ax: =C2=A0 =C2=A0+263-4-702203 E-mail: petern@africaonlineco.zw AIM: =C2=A0 petenya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:51:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2798816A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586A813C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [195.72.130.92] (195-72-130-92.wifi.datahop.it [195.72.130.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l09FpIGt024390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:51:19 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A3B9E8.1070803@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:51:04 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux quest , Freebsd Questions References: <864708.55036.qm@web59209.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <864708.55036.qm@web59209.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: NMap Installation Problem - Thanks for the coding help :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:51:11 -0000 Hmm you shouldnt have a /usr/local/bin/nmap/ directory. whats the output of ls -l /usr/local/bin/nmap if it is a directory delete the directory, then try cd /usr/ports/security/nmap make deinstall clean make install clean which nmap cheers, Vince linux quest wrote: > Hi Vince, > > Thanks for the automated emailing code guide. However, after running > nmap for some time, I have got problem running a simple command of nmap > ... like > > nmap 192.168.1.2 > nmap: Command not found > > I think there is something wrong with my installation procedures. I type > in "make install clean" command in /usr/local/bin/nmap and > /usr/ports/security/nmap - but somehow I still see the command not found. > > I have also typed in "make deinstall clean" on both of the directory > location, restart the OS, and install everything again using the "make > install clean" command (on both of the directory location) - but I still > receive the same "nmap: Command not found" message. > > Thanks for the help :) > > Regards, > Linux Quest > > */Vince /* wrote: > > linux quest wrote: > > I am currently doing a simple penetration testing for my company > in a LAN environment. Yes, I have already downloaded NMap by using > the 'make install' command... and it did fetched the required files > from insecure.org successfully. > > > > My question will be, how can I create a Network Program in .c that > will invoke the > nmap capabilities to scan the network or computers? Example, lets say, I > want an automated nmap scan to run on FreeBSD to scan 192.168.1.10 and > 192.168.1.11 , every morning at 10am - may I know how do I achieve that? > I hope someone can show me a simple coding to invoke nmap scan, > thanks :) > > > you dont really need c for this, a simple shell script run from cron > would do fine. > something like > ===========start============== > #!/bin/sh > > TARGETS="192.168.1.10 192.168.1.11" > NMAP="/usr/local/bin/nmap" > NMAPOPTIONS="" > RECEPIENTS="someone@somewhere.com" > SUBJECT="namp scan results" > > $NMAP $NMAPOPTIONS $TARGETS | /usr/bin/mail -s "$SUBJECT" $RECEPIENTS > ===========end================= > save that somewhere and remember to chmod it to be executable > > > > add a line like > 1 10 * * * /path/to/script > > to the appropriate users crontab > (change /path/to/script to the location of the script) > > and you should get the output emailed to you every morning. > > Vince > > Thanks :) > > > > Regards, > > Linux Quest > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 15:57:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5618716A505 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ECB13C44B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (iforgf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09FvWVb017495; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:57:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09FvVpU017494; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:57:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:57:31 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091557.l09FvVpU017494@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, petern@africaonline.co.zw In-Reply-To: <200701091728.39012.petern@africaonline.co.zw> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:57:38 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:57:49 -0000 Peter Nyamukusa wrote: > Kirk Strauser wrote: > > George Vanev wrote: > > > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > > > to get the nameservers automatically. > > > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > > > Regerds > > > > I think the best solution would be to configure the FreeBSD box as a > > caching nameserver, then point all your windows boxes to it. > > I think you will need to have DHCP running in your network as DHCP is the only > way to automatically get nameservers regardless of the OS you are using No, you don't need DHCP in the case George described. As Kirk explained you can simply set up a name server on the FreeBSD machine (just one line in /etc/rc.conf), then let the Windows machines use that name server. No DHCP required at all. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. I suggested holding a "Python Object Oriented Programming Seminar", but the acronym was unpopular. -- Joseph Strout From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:03:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8758016A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B6813C469 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (jqdovs@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09G3Lv9019961; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:03:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09G3LuG019960; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:03:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:03:21 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091603.l09G3LuG019960@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, maanjee@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701090714q45032eb0q7160d77ba9807628@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:03:27 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: User Security Question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, maanjee@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:03:28 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Just had a debate with a collegue at office, but still lack knowledge on > FreeBSD security :( For a start, I recommend you read the security(7) manual page. It should give at least rough answer to most of your questions. Another good reading is chapter 14 of the FreeBSD Handbook, titled "Security". Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > Can the denizens of this group enlighten me about what the > advantages of Python are, versus Perl ? "python" is more likely to pass unharmed through your spelling checker than "perl". -- An unknown poster and Fredrik Lundh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:06:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521FD16A4A0 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA7B13C459 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 15832 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2007 16:06:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp6.knology.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 16:06:49 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id E9C512841F; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:06:48 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:06:48 -0600 From: David Kelly To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, petern@africaonline.co.zw Message-ID: <20070109160648.GC35137@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <200701091728.39012.petern@africaonline.co.zw> <200701091557.l09FvVpU017494@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701091557.l09FvVpU017494@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:06:51 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:57:31PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Peter Nyamukusa wrote: > > Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > George Vanev wrote: > > > > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > > > > to get the nameservers automatically. > > > > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > > > > Regerds > > > > > > I think the best solution would be to configure the FreeBSD box as a > > > caching nameserver, then point all your windows boxes to it. > > > > I think you will need to have DHCP running in your network as DHCP is the only > > way to automatically get nameservers regardless of the OS you are using > > No, you don't need DHCP in the case George described. > As Kirk explained you can simply set up a name server > on the FreeBSD machine (just one line in /etc/rc.conf), > then let the Windows machines use that name server. > No DHCP required at all. But for the Windows machines to "get the nameservers automatically" one has to set up DHCP somewhere. On the FreeBSD machine. Or on a SOHO router. Somewhere. It Just So Happens(sm) that if you do this the Windows machines will also get IP addresses automatically. The problem gets a little harder if you do not want just anyone who connects to your network to be given an address. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:21:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8078F16A503 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2FF13C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from webmail.dfwlp.org (localhost.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l09GLP8e006582 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:21:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:21:25 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:21:25 -0600 (CST) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:21:28 -0000 i am finally looking at make.conf and how editing it could improve my system(s). 1) does specifying a cpu architecture really help? 2) if i am building for a p4-540 (nacona?), a p3, and a p4-xeon, what problems am i setting myself up for by specifying a cpu type on my build box? at this point, im wondering how to go about building for more than one architecture effectively. right now, i build one world, and 3 different kernels, but they are all build with generic options. just wondering how i can effectivly leverage my build server to have the best compile options for my target boxes. any suggestions? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:23:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8016A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F3613C465 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (dapatm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09GN7w6020920; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:23:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l09GN70g020919; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:23:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:23:07 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701091623.l09GN70g020919@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, petern@africaonline.co.zw, dkelly@hiwaay.net In-Reply-To: <20070109160648.GC35137@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:13 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, petern@africaonline.co.zw, dkelly@hiwaay.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:23:21 -0000 David Kelly wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Peter Nyamukusa wrote: > > > Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > > George Vanev wrote: > > > > > I want Windows client machines, connected to the FreeBSD box > > > > > to get the nameservers automatically. > > > > > Can you tell me how this may be done?! > > > > > Regerds > > > > > > > > I think the best solution would be to configure the FreeBSD box as a > > > > caching nameserver, then point all your windows boxes to it. > > > > > > I think you will need to have DHCP running in your network as DHCP is the only > > > way to automatically get nameservers regardless of the OS you are using > > > > No, you don't need DHCP in the case George described. > > As Kirk explained you can simply set up a name server > > on the FreeBSD machine (just one line in /etc/rc.conf), > > then let the Windows machines use that name server. > > No DHCP required at all. > > But for the Windows machines to "get the nameservers automatically" one > has to set up DHCP somewhere. On the FreeBSD machine. Or on a SOHO > router. Somewhere. No, the FreeBSD machine (which acts as a PPPoE client) already receives the addresses of the name servers via the PPP protocol. There's really no need for DHCP. I have exactly that setup at home, and I definitely do not use DHCP. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs." -- Robert Firth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:26:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407ED16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D179413C457 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [80.171.54.55] (helo=[192.168.178.27]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1H4Jbc1gBG-0000QI; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:13:44 +0100 Message-ID: <45A3BF37.2010504@janh.de> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:13:43 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:d7781a442c21a226569d6437949909a2 Subject: 6.1 to 6.2-RC2: iwi-firmware-kmod and monitor/ibbs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:26:28 -0000 I could not find documentation about iwi-firmware-kmod and things do not work the way I expect them. If this is not the right place to ask this question, please, point me to an appropriate mailing list or forum. How do I use the ibbs and monitor mode with iwi-firmware-kmod (6.2-RC2)? If I try to go to "mediaopt ibbs", I always get "Device not configured". I would like to use kismet. My configuration file, which seemed to work with iwi-firmware (6.1), contains "source=radiotap_bsd_b,iwi0,iwikismet". I only ever got a few packages with iwi-firmware (6.1), before it stopped working and sometimes crashed. With iwi-firmware-kmod (6.2-RC2), Kismet always immediately stops with a FATAL error, seemingly because promiscuous mode is not available. If I manually load iwi_monitor, dmesg gives me firmware_get: failed to load firmware image iwi_monitor iwi0: could not load firmware iwi0: promiscuous mode disabled -- I guess I should not do that. Without manually loading iwi_monitor, I get iwi0: could not allocate firmware DMA memory iwi0: promiscuous mode disabled -- something seems to be wrong here, too. How are ibbs and monitor supposed to work? Should I manually load the firmware or not? How do I invoke ibbs at all? Trying to switch between bbs, ibbs, and monitor, I noticed a few oddities: janh# ifconfig iwi0 down janh# ifconfig iwi0 mediaopt ibbs ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured janh# ifconfig iwi0 mediaopt monitor janh# ifconfig iwi0 mediaopt bbs ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured janh# ifconfig iwi0 -mediaopt monitor janh# kldstat | grep iwi 30 1 0xc383a000 d000 if_iwi.ko janh# kldload iwi_monitor janh# kldstat | grep iwi 30 1 0xc383a000 d000 if_iwi.ko 32 1 0xc4843000 2f000 iwi_monitor.ko janh# kldunload iwi_monitor janh# kldstat | grep iwi 30 1 0xc383a000 d000 if_iwi.ko janh# kldload iwi_bbs kldload: can't load iwi_bbs: No such file or directory janh# kldload iwi_ibbs kldload: can't load iwi_ibbs: No such file or directory janh# ls /boot/modules iwi_bss.ko iwi_ibss.ko iwi_monitor.ko kqemu.ko linker.hints Something is wrong here, I guess. With iwi-firmware (6.1), I used to load the required firmware with iwicontrol and set the mediaopt with ifconfig. Many reboots were required to get back to a defined state. I had many crashes using "ifconfig iwi0 [...]" even without ibbs or monitor mode involved. With iwi-firmware-kmod (6.2-RC2), I had not a single crash, but sometimes lost the bbs connection for a few seconds and I could not get ibbs and monitor to work at all. I guess it is an improvement (stability over functionality). Oh, btw, is there any way to check the status of the radio button as with "iwicontrol iwi0 -r" on 6.1? A change usually shows up at dmesg, but I would like to get the current state. Thanks Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:26:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6CD16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821D313C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A1B20B403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:26:52 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nXwfgDdI1IX for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:26:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8557D20B402 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:26:43 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:26:40 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <200701090838.21274.kirk@strauser.com> <200701091728.39012.petern@africaonline.co.zw> In-Reply-To: <200701091728.39012.petern@africaonline.co.zw> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2244149.TLJo9Sis6p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701091026.41288.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:26:53 -0000 --nextPart2244149.TLJo9Sis6p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 January 2007 9:28 am, Peter Nyamukusa wrote: > I think you will need to have DHCP running in your network as DHCP is the > only way to automatically get nameservers regardless of the OS you are > using Depends on how many clients you're setting up. If there are only a handful= ,=20 just hardcode them and be done with it. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2244149.TLJo9Sis6p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFo8JB5sRg+Y0CpvERAmOKAJ9LDSj6D+zd1+a0wZvxr6cPTXb17QCgnb7O cr3ouHumtKz0X9dYBwriIZc= =GY7v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2244149.TLJo9Sis6p-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:29:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A009716A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@ircgnet.net) Received: from ws6-8.us4.outblaze.com (ws6-8.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8239B13C480 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@ircgnet.net) Received: (qmail 10653 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 16:02:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (michael@ircgnet.net@67.168.235.146) by ws6-8.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 16:02:53 -0000 Message-ID: <45A3BC39.1050503@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:00:57 -0800 From: Michael User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <45A22099.3060208@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Adduser utility to generate "random" passwds ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:29:33 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > Is there a possibility to use as a standalone software > the adduser feature that generate "random" passwd. > > I want to generate new "strong" password for existing users. > > Thank you > > Frank > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Another good choice for separate password generation is apg which is also in the ports. What I like about apg is that it also provides a basic phonic for each password you can generate that helps you to remember your password. As you may already know, having completely ambiguous random passwords isn't necessarily the best thing to use since most users will tend to write them down on paper somewhere and defeat the real purpose for generating good secure passwords in the first place. Here is a small script that can generate these passwords via a web interface which is quite nice. It does require that you have a ksh shell however since it was written with this shell in mind. #!/usr/local/bin/ksh93 PATH=/bin:/user/bin:/usr/local/bin:/; export PATH umask 077 a=/tmp/apg.$RANDOM b=/tmp/apg.$RAMDOM cat << EOF Content-type: text/html Help generating a new password

Help generating a new password

These passwords should be reasonably safe. Feel free to use one, or reload the page for a new batch.

 
EOF

apg -q -m 4 -x 4 -M NC -E '!@#$%^&*()\\' -n 10 > $a
apg -q -m 4 -x 4 -M S  -E '!@#$%^&*()\\' -n 10 > $b

# tr command is for bug workaround; apg is not supposed to
# include characters specified after -E option

paste $a $b |   
    tr 'l' 'L' |
    awk '
      BEGIN {
        printf "Password\tRough guess at pronunciation\n
"
        }
        {
        printf "%s%s\t%s %s\n", $1, $3, $2, $4
        }'

cat << EOF
EOF rm $a $b exit 0 This script is from the book BSD Hacks, enjoy! Michael Lawver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:36:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CE016A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0801C13C465 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l09GZvgi097949; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:35:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:35:57 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: DAve Message-ID: <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:36:19 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said: > The developers response, for those who are interested. > > hi Dave, > the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now. > that was the good news, now for the down side: > what was missing all along was recovery from network disconnects, so > while I think I have it almost worked out, I've come across a major > flow in the iscsi design: > when the targets crashes, and comes back, there is no way > to tell the client to run an fsck. This is not a problem if the > client is mounting the iscsi partition read only. > > danny Why should the client need to do an fsck? From its point of view it should just look like the target had the iSCSI equivalent of a bus reset. It should resend any queued requests and continue. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:59:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0C916A416 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.network-i.net (antigua.network-i.net [212.21.121.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B77913C469 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 85681 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 16:32:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by post1.network-i.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 16:32:47 -0000 Message-ID: <45A3C343.3010807@thingy.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:30:59 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Management techiniques for multiple FreeBSD servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:59:31 -0000 Hi, I'm looking around for any articles/docs regarding techniques for managing groups of FreeBSD servers - things like running a local package mirror or build server, standardised installs, update management - all the usual boring stuff. I know that people like Yahoo use thousands of *BSD systems, but does anyone have any pointers on tools to make day-to-day management of them scale? Best Regards, Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:04:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903C116A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws2.cnweb.com (ws2.cnweb.com [69.50.194.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CA913C45E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 29026 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 10:42:20 -0600 Received: from p245n23.ruraltel.net (HELO darryl) (24.225.23.245) by ws2.cnweb.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 10:42:20 -0600 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:38:40 -0600 Message-ID: <002201c7340c$9f25b950$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal Subject: New Dell -Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:04:46 -0000 Greetings, I am going to be building a new server to do the following: * email server (office use) * webserver (office use) * dhcp server * samba pdc. I would like to buy a basic Dell box as the hardware and use FreeBSD. I would like to avoid issue with Freebsd not working with the hardware. Can someone point me to Dell hardware that works with Freebsd, or share their personal experiences with Freebsd and Dell hardware ? thanks, Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:10:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E5116A5EC for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175B313C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 4151 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2007 17:10:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp7.knology.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 17:10:12 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 993C62841F; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:10:12 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:10:12 -0600 From: David Kelly To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, petern@africaonline.co.zw Message-ID: <20070109171012.GA35853@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20070109160648.GC35137@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200701091623.l09GN70g020919@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701091623.l09GN70g020919@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:10:29 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:23:07PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > David Kelly wrote: > > But for the Windows machines to "get the nameservers automatically" one > > has to set up DHCP somewhere. On the FreeBSD machine. Or on a SOHO > > router. Somewhere. > > No, the FreeBSD machine (which acts as a PPPoE client) > already receives the addresses of the name servers via > the PPP protocol. There's really no need for DHCP. > > I have exactly that setup at home, and I definitely do > not use DHCP. Yes, the FreeBSD machine can get *its* nameserver addresses from the upstream connection via PPPoE. But the original poster asked how could his Windows machines connected thru the FreeBSD machine *automatically* get nameservice. Some have suggested configuring the FreeBSD machine as a caching nameserver. That is an option, but the Windows machines still do not *automatically* know who to use for nameservice. Also its a bit harder for the caching nameserver to be updated when/if PPPoE changes the nameservice addresses. This is something SOHO routers do fairly easily, altho most simply pass the same addresses they are given. Some will act as a nameserver, possibly caching. Once again I repeat, for the Windows machines to automatically get nameserver addresses someone has to be running a DHCP server. Otherwise someone has to type the addresses into a dialog box on each Windows machine. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:14:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB87216A494 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6595513C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 30196 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2007 17:13:20 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 17:13:20 -0000 Message-ID: <45A3CD67.6000108@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:14:15 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:14:21 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said: >> The developers response, for those who are interested. >> >> hi Dave, >> the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now. >> that was the good news, now for the down side: >> what was missing all along was recovery from network disconnects, so >> while I think I have it almost worked out, I've come across a major >> flow in the iscsi design: >> when the targets crashes, and comes back, there is no way >> to tell the client to run an fsck. This is not a problem if the >> client is mounting the iscsi partition read only. >> >> danny > > Why should the client need to do an fsck? From its point of view it > should just look like the target had the iSCSI equivalent of a bus > reset. It should resend any queued requests and continue. > That was my thought as well. I have my pop toasters all mounting a NFS mail store and when NFS goes away I don't have my NFS clients doing a fsck when the mount returns. Not sure if that is important as iSCSI is all new to me, still reading up on it. Does FreeBSD do anything special to a NFS mount when it returns? Should I subscribe to the SCSI list to continue this thread? DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:24:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB95316A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97CAD13C468 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 30362 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2007 17:23:01 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 17:23:01 -0000 Message-ID: <45A3CFAC.5020501@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:23:56 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <470134.51008.qm@web51902.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <470134.51008.qm@web51902.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sun Fire x2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:24:06 -0000 Peter Thoenen wrote: > --- DAve wrote: >> Is anyone running FreeBSD on a Sun Fire X2100? Any caveats I should >> know >> about? > > I don't recommend them if you plan to use as a file server. They have > an issue with randomly rebooting under a large network load with > thousands of open connections. Have seen this on my system and have > have had a dozen or so folk email me with the identical problem. > > -Peter > > Nope, outbound smtp only, with AV scanning. Thanks for the response. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:29:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F7F16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (mail.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283DC13C448 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.zw) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 19F4E50F03A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:29:43 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [172.16.0.64] (ip-net-212-85-220-6.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.6]) by mail.africaonline.co.sz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1251850F038; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:29:43 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online Zimbabwe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:29:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20070109160648.GC35137@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <200701091623.l09GN70g020919@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070109171012.GA35853@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> In-Reply-To: <20070109171012.GA35853@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091929.12583.petern@africaonline.co.zw> Cc: David Kelly Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.zw List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:29:47 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 19:10, David Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:23:07PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > David Kelly wrote: > > > But for the Windows machines to "get the nameservers automatically" > > > one has to set up DHCP somewhere. On the FreeBSD machine. Or on a SOHO > > > router. Somewhere. > > > > No, the FreeBSD machine (which acts as a PPPoE client) > > already receives the addresses of the name servers via > > the PPP protocol. There's really no need for DHCP. > > > > I have exactly that setup at home, and I definitely do > > not use DHCP. > > Yes, the FreeBSD machine can get *its* nameserver addresses from the > upstream connection via PPPoE. But the original poster asked how could > his Windows machines connected thru the FreeBSD machine *automatically* > get nameservice. > > Some have suggested configuring the FreeBSD machine as a caching > nameserver. That is an option, but the Windows machines still do not > *automatically* know who to use for nameservice. Also its a bit harder I agree here for any device to automatically receive DNS servers then DHCP has to be running and the device has to act as a DHCP client otherwise you would have to specify them statically. Unless we mis-understood the question Regards -- Peter Nyamukusa Systems Administrator Africa Online Zimbabwe Tel: +263-4-250890 Fax: +263-4-702203 E-mail: petern@africaonlineco.zw AIM: petenya > for the caching nameserver to be updated when/if PPPoE changes the > nameservice addresses. This is something SOHO routers do fairly easily, > altho most simply pass the same addresses they are given. Some will act > as a nameserver, possibly caching. > > Once again I repeat, for the Windows machines to automatically get > nameserver addresses someone has to be running a DHCP server. Otherwise > someone has to type the addresses into a dialog box on each Windows > machine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:38:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C872A16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hl700@cc.usu.edu) Received: from ironport2.usu.edu (ironport2.usu.edu [129.123.1.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EBC13C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hl700@cc.usu.edu) Received: from buffy.ncs.usu.edu (HELO [129.123.104.140]) ([129.123.104.140]) by ironport2.usu.edu with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 10:09:49 -0700 X-SBRS: None X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,164,1167634800"; d="scan'208"; a="14920889:sNHT27599110" In-Reply-To: References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <49B2C73B-2D53-43BE-AB0A-FD47CAD12B81@cc.usu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: hal Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:09:48 -0700 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:38:42 -0000 On Jan 9, 2007, at 1:19 AM, David Schulz wrote: > to be honest, i actually like the sys-install program. i did it so > many times, that i just fly trough the sys-install installation in > like a minute to do a plain basic installation. i also like the > fact that i can just use it via ssh from a remote location without > a hassle. Likewise, sysinstall was never that difficult to use and now is nearly automatic. There are some places that could be tuned/cleaned up but nothing to get excited about. hal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 18:01:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563BA16A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242EB13C44C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <200701091801210150053or1e>; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:01:21 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:18 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45A35C68.1040505@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <45A35C68.1040505@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091201.18242.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Frank Staals Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE and nfe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:01:22 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:12, Frank Staals wrote: > Hey, > > I am running a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE machine with a MSI K8N SLI-F > mainboard, it has problems with the nve driver so I searched around > on the internet and found this site about the nfe driver: > http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html > . Allthough there were no files for 6.1-RELEASE. Are there specific > files or instructions for installing on 6.1-RELEASE. I'm not too > fond of upgrading my system at this point and when I tried using > the 6.2-PRERELEASE files I came upon these errors during the 'make' > when rebuilding my kernel: > > > -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common > -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param > large-function-growth=1000 -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone > -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror > ../../../dev/mii/dcphy.c > cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall > -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. > -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter > -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath > -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm > -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param > inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 > -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables > -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: In function `e1000phy_attach': > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: `MII_ANEGTICKS_GIGE' > undeclared (first use in this function) > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: (Each undeclared identifier > is reported only once > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:133: error: for each function it > appears in.) ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:136: error: `fast_ether' > undeclared (first use in this function) > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:137: error: `esc' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:146: error: `MII_ANEGTICKS' undeclared > (first use in this function) > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:119: warning: unused variable `id' > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: In function `e1000phy_service': > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:298: warning: passing arg 1 of > `e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' from incompatible pointer type > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:398: warning: passing arg 1 of > `e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' from incompatible pointer type > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c: At top level: > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: error: conflicting types for > 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: error: previous declaration of > 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' was here > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: error: conflicting types for > 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: error: previous declaration of > 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' was here > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:91: warning: 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' > declared `static' but never defined > ../../../dev/mii/e1000phy.c:484: warning: 'e1000phy_mii_phy_auto' > defined but not used > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/PFSERVERKERNEL. > root@FStaals$ > > I hope anyone can help me. If it is not possible to install nfe on > 6.1-RELEASE would upgrading to 6-STABLE allow me to install the > driver ? > > Regards, It says it needs 6.2-PRERELEASE or higher for a reason. Not a big shock that it didn't build on your 6.1 box. Upgrading to RELENG_6_2 or RELENG_6 will get you to a point where you can build the driver. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 18:18:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB82D16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70EE13C469 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABC42E9EB for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:18:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A3DC60.7090209@chapman.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:18:08 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2884F.7010405@chapman.edu> <200701091449.01739.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200701091449.01739.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Permissions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:18:18 -0000 Malcolm Kay wrote: > I am confused (or someone is). > On all the FreeBSD systems I have immediate access to the file > /etc/mail/aliases has the default permissions -rw-r--r--, in > other words is readable by anyone. On the other > hand /etc/mail/aliases.db is sometimes -rw-r----- and sometimes > -rw-r--r-- but since it is only an encoded version of aliases > and additional restrictions would seem useless. > > I can imagine some might object to reason setting either of these > o+r, but this does seem to be the norm. > > Perhaps someone else has other views. Or perhaps this is some > variation when using profix, qmail etc. in place of sendmail. > > Malcolm > > Postfix is the MTA, but the file itself is NFS shared between all the mailservers, and furthermore is used as part of a script that expects things to be "just so." I inherited this setup, and don't dare start changing the permissions on key files until I understand what every part of the equation expects to see-- an example would be the user mailboxes, wherein the permissions were set incorrectly causing Sendmail to choke (dontblamesendmail has more on this for the curious). -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: user to computer ratio too high. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 18:23:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1516A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1570613C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A222E84A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:23:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A3DD92.4000902@chapman.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:23:14 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA320@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> <200701091532.40944.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <45A328DE.6000209@u.washington.edu> <200701091622.49355.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200701091622.49355.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:23:27 -0000 Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:02 pm, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> Why does he need access to aliases though? For mail program >> purposes? -Garrett >> > > I think you may have mixed up two threads with very similar > subject lines. I see no reference to aliases in this thread. > (Confusing isn't it) > > Malcolm > Yeah, I pick interesting times to start threads it would seem. :-) We're doing some group membership stuff through the aliases file, and this guy helps administer some of them in a tertiary sense. The correct way to do this is of course through our LDAP directory, but that would of course make entirely too much sense... -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: user to computer ratio too high. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 18:26:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E5416A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA7D13C44B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:26:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5925501uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:26:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JHIp6kYzmvd1/60EPxBeY+bIH4mnwUNVIASITUI0gAv343zyqWJKpSvRjbuBxWdL6b8zKUCnREhKl+87tg2JhwsG+YHIUK82Wd3BmtJfmdb6oLl9ZCDVssmAk/XERfuoz9K3bfPcxKlVx/u4pHDTtQHzhm0LUsmb0w3It2COh3I= Received: by 10.82.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr3280924buc.1168366172720; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:09:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:09:32 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Dan Nelson" , DAve , "Free BSD Questions list" In-Reply-To: <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:26:47 -0000 That only works if the target comes up within the 2min window that SCSI allows for. It won't wait forever. On 1/9/07, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said: > > The developers response, for those who are interested. > > > > hi Dave, > > the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now. > > that was the good news, now for the down side: > > what was missing all along was recovery from network disconnects, so > > while I think I have it almost worked out, I've come across a major > > flow in the iscsi design: > > when the targets crashes, and comes back, there is no way > > to tell the client to run an fsck. This is not a problem if the > > client is mounting the iscsi partition read only. > > > > danny > > Why should the client need to do an fsck? From its point of view it > should just look like the target had the iSCSI equivalent of a bus > reset. It should resend any queued requests and continue. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 18:54:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD78216A417 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from schrodinger.com (thermidore.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D32213C46C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from [192.156.98.12] (ithi.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.12]) by schrodinger.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09IsVGH023258 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:54:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Message-ID: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:54:17 -0800 From: Simon Gao User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:54:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:54:47 -0000 Hi, What's largest filesystem size supported by FreeBSD 5.2.1 i386? Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:01:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A292816A417 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321D813C43E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l09J15vb003666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:01:05 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l09J14bo002193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:01:05 -0800 Message-ID: <45A3E66F.8080008@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:01:03 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000501c733e5$6c959c20$0100000a@your8abc512da0> In-Reply-To: <000501c733e5$6c959c20$0100000a@your8abc512da0> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.9.104933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: arplookup 192.168.1.254 failed: host is not on local network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:01:06 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Taharni Duggan wrote: > how do i host custom game on warcraft 3 You aren't on the same subnet as your other machine. You need to configure your network for all machines properly. BTW, this isn't a warcraft 3 support group and your information you provided was lacking at best. /sbin/ifconfig and /usr/bin/netstat -nr output would be helpful, to say the least. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFo+ZuEnKyINQw/HARAtzjAKCrFhSgF+IOQYPJS/DSB8/zDIBrjgCeI7kd Qph/dqoEMwv9u2gOdM0LtYA= =wEKo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:01:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C7E16A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437ED13C45A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5934239uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:01:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dpZro6UcqzjHuXo04pXuX764JyQO22CTnfmwoHlwNFmyYdK9aDiegQXjMQBmsnI0wwi7L9Y2tTaLTfhE6GNSIOhfSw2WFFmE5Se8MvI39sN7MSP5PWtKBT/SwwEU1ckw1ejp/4LDcIBsKZOWzvk1i8Q3m7Kfts2TIetoJuSfKIY= Received: by 10.82.167.5 with SMTP id p5mr3282366bue.1168369308014; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:01:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.135.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:01:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710701091101q32ae0cafxeb0656f9076764f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:01:47 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Simon Gao" In-Reply-To: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:01:49 -0000 On 1/9/07, Simon Gao wrote: > Hi, > > What's largest filesystem size supported by FreeBSD 5.2.1 i386? You might want to read this: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:03:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A7D16A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com (outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com [64.136.20.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F2BA13C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail23.nyc.untd.com (webmail23.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.163]) by smtpout06.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABC4H3ZUAQJ3M5S for (sender ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:03:14 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRGOXcQnyJZu5YvSxrDEpNfN0tO0XZIBJHw== Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail23.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id MBNSW4NU; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:02:56 PST Received: from [10.141.30.38] by webmail23.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [10.141.30.38] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:41 GMT To: chandler@chapman.edu, brett@net24.co.nz, roberthuff@rcn.com X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20070109.110256.14368.1628204@webmail23.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 31:15:2296245232 X-MAIL-INFO: 1d6e8e2f3e3f3e4b879f37efe3c32ebb9b97ceefbe877e2a1e77abd3b73e0ebb1a974adb2bb7c373abf36a3af37b9af36a279f77fa0b1e736aae6e17ce17c77eebc7573b0bd77a2b8afa9e6ed76e477a47b3bf63fe67fe4e8f7b1fab02029b776e8e2f8f3f3e33779ecfe39ff38b93839f4fbedb X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.141.27.163|webmail23.nyc.untd.com|webmail23.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions Question & Re: Permissions advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:03:54 -0000 The following suggestion should work for both problems and avoid the difficulties I saw with the other solutions. Write an executable (Korn shell) script owned by the owner of the files to be examined (thus he should have all the access he needs) which checks the user-id of its caller [effective and/or original] (to make sure unauthorized users don't get access) and the current date against an end-date (to shut off access at the desired date automatically), probably use the julian date to make checking easier. While I have your attention, does anybody know of jobs for any or all of the following: C/C++, Korn shell scripts, and SQL (Sybase) = programmers. I live in the NYC suburbs area (Rockland Cty) and I'm willing to telecommute and maybe even relocate. My resume can be sent by email upon request. On 1/8/2007, "Andy Greenwood" wrote >On 1/8/07, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 12:07 pm, Jay Chandler wrote: > >> I've got a user who needs to be able to view (read only) the aliases >> file. We'll grant him root access a few weeks after the eventual >> heat-death of the universe, so how would you all go about doing this?= >> >> You could configure sudo to give him access to run that one >> command as root. One has to be very careful about giving out such access! root has much power. On 8 Jan 2007 13:24:58, Kirk Strauser wrote > On Monday 08 January 2007 12:57 pm, Andy Greenwood wrote: >> I've never used them, but wasn't ACL written just for this scenario? > Perhaps, but that seems like a lot more effort to accomplish a > relatively easy job. Would work, but it doesn't take into account the time limitation (>> We'll grant him root access a few weeks). On 8 Jan 2007 15:07:01, Robert Huff wrote > Jay Chandler writes: (snip) >> Hand him some sheets of printout? Waste of paper (and trees). Also, one can't use UNIX tools on the data (e.g., grep , editors) to put some of the data in other docs. >> = >> Sadly, the data change too often for this to be effective. > Copy the file evey N minutes, then change ownership and > permissions? Again, too much work for the owner. On 08 Jan 2007 13:19:32 Jay Chandler wrote >Robert Huff wrote: >> Jay Chandler writes: >> >>(snip) >> Copy the file evey N minutes, then change ownership and >> permissions? >>(snip) > Probably the simplest way to do it-- just wanted to make sure I wasn't= > overlooking something silly. > Thanks! Too much work for the one copying unless he has a script do it maybe as a cron job. On 9 Jan 2007 08:43:11, "Brett Davidson" wrote (on Subject: Permissions advice needed.) > = > I have a curious problem. > = > I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they > can run it. A user can run a script/binary file whose uid and gid differ from his (Just give "other" 'rx' permission.) If you want to give such access only to one user, put him in an ACL. Give him 'rx' permission; he won't be able to modify the file. Anyway, why must the executable file be owned by the user running it? > HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file > and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. > This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) "difficult"??? I don't see that. > ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability to = > change permissions. > I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) but the > modifying program does not recognise this flag and will thus fail to > modify the file. > (I have no control over the modifying program). > Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:09:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748A16A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B31813C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l09J9TN4088757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:09:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l09J9TjM088756; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:09:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA15673; Tue, 9 Jan 07 10:58:11 PST Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:00:53 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com Message-Id: <45a3e665.6cOWFLmMZNQbz0bF%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> In-Reply-To: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:09:30 -0000 Vizion wrote: > Can someone please tell me what package installs libkrb5.so.8 > for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? On my 6.1 system, /usr/ports/INDEX contains an entry for krb5-1.5_1 but my /usr/ports/security/krb5/pkg-plist lists lib/libkrb5.so.3 rather than libkrb5.so.8. To make matters even more interesting, my /usr/lib does include a libkrb5.so.8 (dated May 6 2006). I do not pretend to understand the discrepancy :) I'll send it separately, since the list does not like attachments. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:18:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692B616A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: from web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.101.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14FB013C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linuxquest7570@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 98744 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2007 17:18:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20070109171839.98742.qmail@web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=a4H0bZQp8N+Zx9+XF0J/Pp+WDkh1SiOF3wjahlUDF09JvOb25nSKC2QF2eUrpw4U2OPoDsnHPXZSMBQbSqoLVoHQWuKR1IUuK73sjO7nIxTf5sAtptbV1jVRmRrENkXPZa/evMT8bvIHjHQ/Iv5UyEyS0QKzfBzut+j3T1pTaHU=; X-YMail-OSG: XW0uUg8VM1ncKjfj6LT17Hf50jHSQR7UZs83dvpZQULjrsBOnjdJZGsvUnntHWLEVRoBOH9AmqoH4eccNeZqHuVYiV34na7d1evWcXSQmwOBZIajNjrcD6zum1tUxfHgwxyNiBK01WBuNhHrr6GYfEbLOBzEeTrJhk2MXXqQS8kk Received: from [219.95.201.42] by web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:18:39 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:18:39 -0800 (PST) From: linux quest To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:17:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: NMap in FreeBSD Problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:18:40 -0000 Thanks ... I think the 'rehash' command does help a bit... at least now, when I type 'nmap', I can see the help manual (before this, there was just error msg). However, now, when I type 'nmap 192.168.1.10', (where 192.168.1.10 is the PC that I wanted to scan) ... I got the message ... 'Limiting closed port RST response from 283 to 200 packets/sec' May I know how do I get nmap to scan the 192.168.1.10 computer? Thanks. Regards, Linux Quest Niclas Zeising wrote: On 1/9/07, linux quest wrote: > After running nmap for some time, I have got problem running a simple command of nmap ... like > > nmap 192.168.1.2 > nmap: Command not found > > I think there is something wrong with my installation procedures. I type in "make install clean" command in /usr/local/bin/nmap and /usr/ports/security/nmap - but somehow I still see the "command not found" message. > > I have also typed in "make deinstall clean" on both of the directory location, restart the OS, and install everything again using the "make install clean" command (on both of the directory location) - but I still receive the same "nmap: Command not found" message. > > Thanks for the help :) > > Regards, > Linux Quest > __________________________________________________ Have you tried running "rehash" after the install? If you're using [t]csh this is nessesary to make the shell discover new commands. You only need to do "make install clean" in ports/security/nmap, not in local/bin/nmap. HTH //Niclas -- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:53:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676E716A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) Received: from srv.exchange.net24.net.nz (srv.exchange.net24.net.nz [210.55.4.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E759813C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:53:03 +1300 Message-ID: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA34D@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Permissions advice needed. Thread-Index: AcczqygaL2XBwhx+RL20YRVv28Tb5wAeoD4gAACF3SA= From: "Brett Davidson" To: Subject: FW: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:53:06 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Malcolm Kay [mailto:malcolm.kay@internode.on.net] Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 6:03 p.m. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Brett Davidson Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote: > I have a curious problem. > > I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they=20 > can run it. Malcolm: A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they need is execute permission. So what is the real problem? Brett: This file is being run via suexec in Apache, so yes, both uid and gid need to match in order for the file to be run.=20 This particular system is running a shared-hosting webserver and utilising php-cgi and suexec appears to be the easiest way of providing inter-site isolation. The only problem with that is that you need a wrapper in order to provide customised php.ini settings for each site via the PHPRC environment variable. That wrapper is the file I am concerned about here. > HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file=20 > and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. Malcolm: Deleting or creating a file requires write access in the directory containg the file reference -- it has nothing to do with the permissions on the file itself. Brett:I only want one particular file in the directory to be untouchable so directory permissions aren't helpful. Directory permissions only go part of the way as the file has to be read-only as well. Anyway, for what it's worth, I have found a fix; in FreeBSD 6.2 the MAC_BSDEXTENDED filesystem firewall has been enhanced. If I use that, make the file suid (harmless since it's already owned by the user), then the ugidfw rule below all works well : "ugidfw add subject not uid 0 object suid rx" This works well as this is the only non-root suid file on the system. In other systems where this may not be the case the rule should still be harmless as these suid files SHOULD only have rx permissions for non-root users anyway. :-) The only gotcha to that would be during program upgrades performed via a non-root user; the rule will either need to be relaxed or an additional specific rule could be placed above it to allow suid modifications to any specific non-root owned programs that may be in place.=20 Cheers, Brett. > > This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) > > ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability to change > permissions. > > I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) but the=20 > modifying program does not recognise this flag and will thus fail to=20 > modify the file. > (I have no control over the modifying program). > > Any ideas? > > I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm starting to=20 > think I may have too just to be able to prevent the user from=20 > modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could implement this using=20 > MAC anyway). > > Cheers, > Brett. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 19:55:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA22516A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) Received: from srv.exchange.net24.net.nz (srv.exchange.net24.net.nz [210.55.4.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6340B13C442 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:55:37 +1300 Message-ID: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA34E@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Permissions advice needed. Thread-Index: AcczuQW3tJHTUXItQASK8W6YmfPXsgAbt8Cw From: "Brett Davidson" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:55:41 -0000 Unfortunately, as I expounded to Malcolm Lay, in this application (a shared-hosting webserver) suexec is being used which does not traverse symbolic links. :-( =20 MAC_BSDEXTENDED in Bsd6.2 solves the problem very nicely. =20 Cheers, Brett. =20 =20 ________________________________ From: George Vanev [mailto:george.vanev@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 7:42 p.m. To: Brett Davidson Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. Brett, =20 Why don't you make a symbolic link to that file. You may set read, write and execute permissions if you wish... doesn't matter. The users will be able to run your executable via the link, but they won't be able to modify it. =20 On 1/8/07, Brett Davidson wrote:=20 I have a curious problem. =09 I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they=20 can run it. HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. =09 This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-)=20 =09 ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability to change permissions. =09 I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) but the modifying program does not recognise this flag and will thus fail to=20 modify the file. (I have no control over the modifying program). =09 Any ideas? =09 I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm starting to think I may have too just to be able to prevent the user from modifying=20 ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could implement this using MAC anyway). =09 Cheers, Brett. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " =09 --=20 George Vanev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 20:03:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D0016A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de (mail.smartterra.de [195.225.132.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7A413C467 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de) Received: from mail.liberty-hosting.de ([195.225.132.203]) by localhost (liberty-mail [195.225.132.203]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76637-08 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:42:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.alpha-tierchen.de (port-212-202-170-218.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.170.218]) by mail.liberty-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F60B1AC769 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:42:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.alpha-tierchen.de (sirkka.local [192.168.1.65]) by smtp.alpha-tierchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56D05087C for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bkoenig) by www.alpha-tierchen.de with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:42:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <65159.192.168.1.2.1168371738.squirrel@www.alpha-tierchen.de> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:42:18 +0100 (CET) From: bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.smartterra.de Subject: problems while setting up faithd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:03:35 -0000 Hello, I try to set up faithd and read the instructions in faithd(8) and src/usr.sbin/faithd/README. It is necessary to route the packets to the faith0 interface. Everytime I run route change -inet6 -prefixlen 96 -ifp faith0 I get the error message "route: writing to routing socket: Network is unreachable". What did I wrong? Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 20:07:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C6D16A415 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) Received: from srv.exchange.net24.net.nz (srv.exchange.net24.net.nz [210.55.4.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB8D13C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@net24.co.nz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:11 +1300 Message-ID: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA352@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Permissions advice needed. Thread-Index: AcczqygaL2XBwhx+RL20YRVv28Tb5wAeoD4gAACF3SAAAHBdYA== From: "Brett Davidson" To: Subject: RE: Permissions advice needed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:07:13 -0000 To clarify a point, the following line,=20 This works well as this is the only non-root suid file on the system should be replaced with=20 This works well as this is the only "non-root accessable" suid file on the system. Cheers, Brett. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Brett Davidson Sent: Wednesday, 10 January 2007 8:53 a.m. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FW: Permissions advice needed. -----Original Message----- From: Malcolm Kay [mailto:malcolm.kay@internode.on.net] Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 6:03 p.m. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Brett Davidson Subject: Re: Permissions advice needed. On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:13 am, Brett Davidson wrote: > I have a curious problem. > > I need an executable file to be owned by a user's uid and gid so they=20 > can run it. Malcolm: A user does not need to own a file to be able to run it. All they need is execute permission. So what is the real problem? Brett: This file is being run via suexec in Apache, so yes, both uid and gid need to match in order for the file to be run.=20 This particular system is running a shared-hosting webserver and utilising php-cgi and suexec appears to be the easiest way of providing inter-site isolation. The only problem with that is that you need a wrapper in order to provide customised php.ini settings for each site via the PHPRC environment variable. That wrapper is the file I am concerned about here. > HOWEVER, I don't want them to be able to modify or delete the file=20 > and/or it's permissions. Another program will do that. Malcolm: Deleting or creating a file requires write access in the directory containg the file reference -- it has nothing to do with the permissions on the file itself. Brett:I only want one particular file in the directory to be untouchable so directory permissions aren't helpful. Directory permissions only go part of the way as the file has to be read-only as well. Anyway, for what it's worth, I have found a fix; in FreeBSD 6.2 the MAC_BSDEXTENDED filesystem firewall has been enhanced. If I use that, make the file suid (harmless since it's already owned by the user), then the ugidfw rule below all works well : "ugidfw add subject not uid 0 object suid rx" This works well as this is the only non-root suid file on the system. In other systems where this may not be the case the rule should still be harmless as these suid files SHOULD only have rx permissions for non-root users anyway. :-) The only gotcha to that would be during program upgrades performed via a non-root user; the rule will either need to be relaxed or an additional specific rule could be placed above it to allow suid modifications to any specific non-root owned programs that may be in place.=20 Cheers, Brett. > > This, under standard Unix permissions, is a tad difficult. :-) > > ACL's don't help here as the owner of a file has the ability to change > permissions. > > I could set the immutable bit (Linux term for the schg flag) but the=20 > modifying program does not recognise this flag and will thus fail to=20 > modify the file. > (I have no control over the modifying program). > > Any ideas? > > I don't want to go down the line of using BSD MAC but I'm starting to=20 > think I may have too just to be able to prevent the user from=20 > modifying ONE file! (I'm not even sure I could implement this using=20 > MAC anyway). > > Cheers, > Brett. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 20:27:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E487C16A40F for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250E13C448 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so1607438wri for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:27:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=NW3xf/efkGXHHWOwT3He8ZX9u3mecJ6r3wudcIvcQzLuGZEy44LiqSthMJeRscToMydSjoQ/i4QgXQJn6nkNDvDCAIQLm0kHBL3lGmcUM7m/lR3O6+qzeQ9mYVXSesYl3qeRt8/xKEKeBgTtXUV4+ZXnqHtiPyv3jOrG/26RycU= Received: by 10.82.179.9 with SMTP id b9mr2969175buf.1168374450593; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.175.3 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:27:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90701091227k718896f0yebd62d8e153e0c9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:27:30 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "FreeBSD Users Questions" In-Reply-To: <003301c733ba$61b3dea0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <539c60b90701060908o460d1d98wab2f2514a3a9d1e2@mail.gmail.com> <20070106202147.GB2532@kobe.laptop> <539c60b90701061849u35ddc61ch16a49484bd3baf12@mail.gmail.com> <20070107031750.GA5828@kobe.laptop> <539c60b90701070754r33ba9ae8q6b22f96be0ab6ea0@mail.gmail.com> <20070107162537.GB2261@kobe.laptop> <003301c733ba$61b3dea0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 06e9e5f4cb341575 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD documentation (was: Re: no ath0 on newsystem with good card) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:27:33 -0000 Yes, and in today's world, it is likely to be some young sub-saharan african pup who can't just go down to the local retailer and drop $400 on a new system if his won't install... Steve On 1/8/07, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > To: "Steve Franks" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:25 AM > Subject: Contributing to FreeBSD documentation (was: Re: no ath0 on > newsystem with good card) > > > > On 2007-01-07 08:54, Steve Franks wrote: > > > Apologies on not hitting the list. Alyays forget to reply-all. > > > > No problem. I just didn't copy the list because I wasn't sure I should. > > > > > So, I figured I'd try to fix the safe-mode end of things on my own, > > > and I found a post several years old (looked like it even could have > > > been yours) about safemode, which doesn't show up anywhere on the > > > freebsd site. So I did what it said and grep'd boot/beastie.4th for > > > safemode, which came up with this suprisingly total solution: > > > > > > add apic.0.disabled="1" to boot/device.hints. Not only does my system > > > come up in regular boot mode, but, as you suspected, the pccard works > > > too, so all appears well. > > > > Excellent news! Thanks for sharing the answer :) > > > > > So my final question, what in all the land is an "apic", > > > > "Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller". This is the part of your > > system which assigns priorities to interrupt lines of a device. The > > full details are probably too technical for some percentage of our user > > base, but more details can be found at the following pages: > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Programmable_Interrupt_Controller > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_Interrupt_Controller > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8259 > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_APIC_Architecture > > > > > and why isn't apic or safemode mentioned in the handbook, manpages, or > > > even on the freebsd site? > > > > IIRC it is mentioned in the Developer's Handbook, but you are right that > > it should be in the main Handbook too. > > > > > Further, I'd like to write a handbook page on "freebsd and laptops", > > > because we're on my third one here now, and I'm starting to get the > > > drift of what could usefully be added to the handbook, namely a > > > thourough discussion of booting and device.hints. > > > > That would be great! If you can help writing such a section for the > > Handbook, a lot of users will be highly indebted to you, for sure :) > > > > I'll throw my $0.02 in here on this. > > Years ago on the CD distributions there was a file in the root of the > distro > labeled "hints" or some such. It was also on the website. It contained > all > the little workarounds for SPECIFIC pieces of hardware. I know as I wrote > several entries for it. That apic problem was listed in there as were > several > others, I know some for laptops specifically. > > Sometime during the FreeBSD 4.X series one of the developers got a bug > up their ass that somehow this was the wrong place for problems to be > listed. Something along the lines of these problems aren't FreeBSD > problems > they are sucky hardware problems and it makes FreeBSD look bad to have > the workarounds even listed at all, and we have the bug database and these > icky ugly things really ought to go into the bug database. So this file > disappeared. > As did every other easily recognizable place for submitting hints. As did > the > specific e-mail address for hints to go to. > > These installation problems IMHO PROPERLY belong in the README for the > distribution. That is the FIRST place that someone BRAND NEW to FreeBSD > is going to look for them. No FreeBSD newbie who has oddball hardware > that has bugs in it, is going to take the time spending hours reading the > Handbook > or searching the questions mailing list archives for tidbits, or querying > the bug > database for PR's for their gear. Any newbie to FreeBSD > is going to do the same thing that they do to any other OS, they are going > to stick > the CD in their oddball hardware and boot it, and if it doesen't come up > they > will look at the README file that came with the ISO image they downloaded, > and if the hardware-specific workarounds for their machine aren't there, > they will > discard the ISO cd and move on to some other Open Source OS. > > For all the huffing-and-puffing on peer-review for the Handbook, well > that is fine for that. But an install hints file's very usefulness is > junk > if a > committee is reviewing it. > > Hardware-specific install hints are, by their very nature, NOT guarenteed > to work. They may even make things worse. All they are is user-developed > workarounds that may or may not be The FreeBSD Way of doing things. > The only thing that can be said about them is that at one time, one year, > with > one particular piece of gear, someone tried some off-the-wall thing and > it worked. It might not ever work again in any future version of FreeBSD. > There might be manufacture-specific BIOS updates that fix things. There > might be a driver update in a later FreeBSD version that fixed that > specific > thing. But, it is a last-ditch suggestion to try when the 'normal' way of > installing > something doesen't work. > > I don't see much support for recreating the install hints file, so I > really > feel little incentive to contribute workarounds at this point, even though > I > have a whole collection of them for the specific systems I've installed > FreeBSD > on over the years. Submitting them to the PR database is worse then > useless, > because they invariably involve 2-3 year old hardware (or older) and the > developers have ZERO incentive to work on them. So the PR's just get > stale and then do-gooders come along 2-3 years later asking the original > poster to verify if the problem still exists in current FreeBSD, and when > the OP says how the hell do I know, they get closed. > > Sure, it might look strange to have a hint about installing on an old HP > Netserver to make an EISA change, in this day and age, in an install hints > file. But, goddammit, where the hell else are you going to see that? And > you just know that somewhere, there's some young pup that has dragged > one of those out of a Dumpster somewhere and is going to try loading > FreeBSD > on it. > > Ted > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 20:47:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD56216A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7493A13C465 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B7E20B408 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:03 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiD5c1rwYGJP for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188D820B403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:00 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:46:52 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070109.110256.14368.1628204@webmail23.nyc.untd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109.110256.14368.1628204@webmail23.nyc.untd.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2021165.hS2T5Vz0c2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701091446.56873.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Permissions Question & Re: Permissions advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:47:04 -0000 --nextPart2021165.hS2T5Vz0c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 January 2007 1:01 pm, gs_stoller@juno.com wrote: > On 1/8/07, Kirk Strauser wrote: >> You could configure sudo to give him access to run that one >> command as root. > One has to be very careful about giving out such access! > root has much power. Hence "sudo", where you're giving them exactly one permission: the ability= =20 to execute one specific read-only command. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2021165.hS2T5Vz0c2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFo/9A5sRg+Y0CpvERAscKAJ9/fQS1/XWHMhnfk/+atxFjBMt7ngCfVX9Q 7OEqpWCubBxdzI5JALBlo+o= =cX6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2021165.hS2T5Vz0c2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 21:15:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEAD16A50E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy) Received: from demokritos1.cytanet.com.cy (demokritos1.cytanet.com.cy [195.14.130.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE5113C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy) Received: from cytanet.com.cy (webmail.cytanet.com.cy [195.14.130.184]) by demokritos1.cytanet.com.cy (Postfix) with SMTP id 6417747F11 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:51:06 +0200 (EET) Received: from 213.7.4.22 by HTTP From: "stefanos sofroniou" To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CYTANET Webmail X-Originating-IP: 213.7.4.22 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:51:06 +0100 Priority: normal Message-id: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" X-Virus-Scanned: By virus scanner at Cytanet Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:15:23 -0000 Dear Sirs, I just wanted to ask you since FreeBSD 6.2 is going to be released, sooner or later I will be forced to upgrade my system from 6.1 to 6.2. Well my question goes like this: what is the best way for me to do it? By downloading the ISO images or by doing it with cvsup stable-supfile? Waiting for your reply. Best Regards, Stefanos Sofroniou From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 21:32:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C820016A641 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D87F13C428 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so4002588nzh for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TLHRwgCRIvSsbHtzKfhFL7t3C27cBRbVkNsjWk8VGDF6CeJ46/66B92LtVe+7g0Au/Nj5iR1lD8sQM0vDdogI+N9lQNylP226JRSEwvXx85xsV6P6R5HIaC0c9qEU/S0OYsNqJ1pDbaDhykan7/qsstbJSdJQGS+YiULHiBxFTw= Received: by 10.64.204.19 with SMTP id b19mr1382924qbg.1168378377664; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.250.1 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:32:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:32:57 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy In-Reply-To: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:32:58 -0000 I use cvsup stable source, and upgrade the system according to README (?) in /usr/src, it suits me fine for a couple fo upgrades. TFC On 1/9/07, stefanos sofroniou wrote: > > Dear Sirs, > > I just wanted to ask you since FreeBSD 6.2 is going to be > released, sooner or later I will be forced to upgrade my > system from 6.1 to 6.2. > Well my question goes like this: what is the best way for me > to do it? By downloading the ISO images or by doing it with > cvsup stable-supfile? > > Waiting for your reply. > > Best Regards, > > Stefanos Sofroniou > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 21:43:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1EE16A47E for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824113C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445E2E73A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:43:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:43:54 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> In-Reply-To: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:43:55 -0000 stefanos sofroniou wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > I just wanted to ask you since FreeBSD 6.2 is going to be > released, sooner or later I will be forced to upgrade my > system from 6.1 to 6.2. > Well my question goes like this: what is the best way for me > to do it? By downloading the ISO images or by doing it with > cvsup stable-supfile? > > On a semi-related note, are there installation instructions for upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2? On that vein, are there instructions for the same upgrade if you don't have console access-- namely, no single-user mode? Regards, -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: user to computer ratio too high. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 21:57:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FD816A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650AD13C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2378623ana for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NaBmpXM48Ghbe/SVM4tfkMXNJoDauzOnkl2rsuJkOZrMfK5YpCVNSxlsO4xlT4Zabh1n9UZxmbU7qta56SBuGmmwEw53aDqx/6lBIpS9EnHwSBXamh0s4+EMH9xM0LwASiiurTLbX6qhMJ4w9K7QONEONPsYiI9keERdj3f3HpU= Received: by 10.100.37.4 with SMTP id k4mr11023622ank.1168379868733; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:57:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701091357v3e8d0eck17db267b101f0d6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:57:48 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701090714q45032eb0q7160d77ba9807628@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0701090714q45032eb0q7160d77ba9807628@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: User Security Question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:57:49 -0000 On 1/9/07, VeeJay wrote: > > > Hello Friends > > Just had a debate with a collegue at office, but still lack knowledge on > FreeBSD security :( > > > I have few questions..... > > 1. What previligies a "standard" user (NOT member of Wheel Group) has on a > FreeBSD Box? > > 2. How can he/she damages the systems or make a breach? > > 3. If that particular user is willing to damage the FreeBSD box, > so which "locations" OR "files" are more likely to be damaged or affected? > > 4. How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? > > 5. What sort of possible methods he/she can apply to hack the system and > create a breach into the system? > > 6. How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? > > I would really appreciate your comments in this regard.... > > Cheers!!! > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:07:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0357C16A416 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD40F13C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [172.23.170.141] (helo=anti-virus02-08) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H4P7Z-0007Cr-Nn; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:07:05 +0000 Received: from [82.35.115.93] (helo=[192.168.10.60]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1H4P7W-0003Ze-5r; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:07:02 +0000 Message-ID: <45A41204.6090802@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:07:00 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <45A35C68.1040505@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <45A35C68.1040505@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE and nfe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:07:07 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Hey, > > I am running a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE machine with a MSI K8N SLI-F > mainboard, it has problems with the nve driver so I searched around on > the internet and found this site about the nfe driver: > http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html . > Allthough there were no files for 6.1-RELEASE. Are there specific files > or instructions for installing on 6.1-RELEASE. I'm not too fond of > upgrading my system at this point and when I tried using the > 6.2-PRERELEASE files I came upon these errors during the 'make' when > rebuilding my kernel: I have -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1756 30 Oct 09:13 e1000phy.patch -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15730 30 Oct 09:13 nfe-20060905.tar.gz which I think are for 6.1 which i can email you if you want to risk 1) I am bad and will hack your box 2) there is some innate stupidity in using them. The e10000phy.patch is for Marvell 88E1000 PHY variants, don't know what's on your board. I use i386 but I don't think there were separate versions for 64 bit Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:08:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FD516A50B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: from smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8690E13C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heli@mikestammer.com) Received: (qmail 11004 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 22:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mikestammer.com) (mikestammer@sbcglobal.net@70.142.209.106 with login) by smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 22:08:16 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ZoX3EyAVM1m_cEYRmDW42QXr_I6dFubVdNHUCNTyleJBo8muOFGc3OMzGdLDgHZdFjBq0AZqpdJm5gccWFY3wIRXBkqbggXvXJ3tgbVX.iZSv9arKSVVHRFR7EuP54lCfygRJirgsEbUHik- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340361146A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:08:16 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mikestammer.com Received: from mail.mikestammer.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gondolin.middleearth.mikestammer.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id blUqWeZ128os; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:08:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (adsl-70-142-209-106.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [70.142.209.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.mikestammer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAEE1141B; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:08:07 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <45A41244.2060903@mikestammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:08:04 -0600 From: Eric User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Chandler References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:08:17 -0000 Jay Chandler wrote: > stefanos sofroniou wrote: >> Dear Sirs, >> >> I just wanted to ask you since FreeBSD 6.2 is going to be >> released, sooner or later I will be forced to upgrade my >> system from 6.1 to 6.2. Well my question goes like this: what is the >> best way for me >> to do it? By downloading the ISO images or by doing it with >> cvsup stable-supfile? >> >> > On a semi-related note, are there installation instructions for > upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2? > > On that vein, are there instructions for the same upgrade if you don't > have console access-- namely, no single-user mode? > > Regards, > try this page for easy, step by step instructions on how to upgrade. this doesnt address your second question, only the first. Hope it helps! http://mikestammer.com/dokuwiki/bsd:updateos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:15:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6CD16A4D0 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAC513C45B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H4PFJ-0001Cr-1Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:15:05 +0100 Received: from 89-172-49-221.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.49.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:15:05 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-49-221.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:15:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:14:40 +0100 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0E27FCD0473DBCCEDA207D8D" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-49-221.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:15:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0E27FCD0473DBCCEDA207D8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay Chandler wrote: > On a semi-related note, are there installation instructions for > upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2? Upgrading between minor version of FreeBSD is always the same - run cvsup, recompile, install - it's also the same between 6.1 and 6.2. (see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html =2E.. chapter "The Canonical Way to Update Your System") > On that vein, are there instructions for the same upgrade if you don't > have console access-- namely, no single-user mode? With some care, it can be done the same way and without problems in multiuser mode. While it's NOT recommended, I've frequently done updates from multiuser (sometimes even in hot production) without any issues. There's really little that can go wrong, and if you follow procedure and there are no unusual events, nothing that can't be fixed relatively easil= y. Note that things are different when upgrading from one major version to another (e.g. 6.x to 7.x), though I even managed to update 5.x to 6.x while the machine was "live" the whole time with only minor glitches, solved by recompiling ports. I doubt this would work with 6.x->7.x because of the many changes. --------------enig0E27FCD0473DBCCEDA207D8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpBPWldnAQVacBcgRAjHLAJ9FR7vbq06whXKrmFAgb+xD8iKu4QCg6iht mmMNJmj9u95isDnXfZpBHHg= =Kwed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0E27FCD0473DBCCEDA207D8D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:26:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97AD16A569 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3575813C458 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1232A1A3C19; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:26:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 39F4D52189; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:25:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:25:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jim Pazarena Message-ID: <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:26:01 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies= -upon-all-bsd-distributions > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause >=20 > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebs= d-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The big license mess, part 2 >=20 > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-licen= se-mess-part-2 > -------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues No. Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpBZ2Wry0BWjoQKURAh0SAJ0b0c7g4kfRmSxSshCa+iknPhRowQCfXhR/ 5xCvcdoTE3UYQ/JFqfaIbwE= =MCYj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 22:28:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04F016A4AB for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD07213C457 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2541A3C1A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9C4852189; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:28:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:28:21 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andy Greenwood Message-ID: <20070109222821.GB75695@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> <3ee9ca710701091101q32ae0cafxeb0656f9076764f4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710701091101q32ae0cafxeb0656f9076764f4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Simon Gao , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:28:22 -0000 --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:01:47PM -0500, Andy Greenwood wrote: > On 1/9/07, Simon Gao wrote: > >Hi, > > > >What's largest filesystem size supported by FreeBSD 5.2.1 i386? >=20 > You might want to read this: > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html And update to a modern release of FreeBSD, if large filesystem support is important to you. Kris --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpBcEWry0BWjoQKURAiAfAKDMgH05ewzvM4RZi4LtAR0n1CqcswCaAiSV hG56TimSCUAc6bKg+P2Bj1M= =KzUJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 23:01:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3DC16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6996D13C441 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40A5C1A7; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:01:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:57:30 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Howard Jones , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <62C92A865D28EB0555D76AA3@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A3C343.3010807@thingy.com> References: <45A3C343.3010807@thingy.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========FA163316AFD3842A418A==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Management techiniques for multiple FreeBSD servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:01:09 -0000 --==========FA163316AFD3842A418A========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, January 09, 2007 16:30:59 +0000 Howard Jones=20 wrote: > > I'm looking around for any articles/docs regarding techniques for > managing groups of FreeBSD servers - things like running a local package > mirror or build server, standardised installs, update management - all > the usual boring stuff. I know that people like Yahoo use thousands of > *BSD systems, but does anyone have any pointers on tools to make > day-to-day management of them scale? > Check out Richard Bejtlich's blog - Taosecurity Here's some topics that might be of particular interest to you: Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========FA163316AFD3842A418A==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 23:03:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DF116A4C9 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from schrodinger.com (thermidore.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6A513C44B for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from [192.156.98.12] (ithi.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.12]) by schrodinger.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l09N3gjn060819; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Message-ID: <45A41F41.6020203@schrodinger.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:03:29 -0800 From: Simon Gao User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> <3ee9ca710701091101q32ae0cafxeb0656f9076764f4@mail.gmail.com> <20070109222821.GB75695@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070109222821.GB75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:03:42 -0800 (PST) Cc: Andy Greenwood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:03:43 -0000 I looked at the link. It seems that it's not desirable to make a filesystem larger than 2TB with 5.2.1. How about 6.1/6.2? Are those remaining issues resolved with 6.1/6.2? Simon Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:01:47PM -0500, Andy Greenwood wrote: > >> On 1/9/07, Simon Gao wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What's largest filesystem size supported by FreeBSD 5.2.1 i386? >>> >> You might want to read this: >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html >> > > And update to a modern release of FreeBSD, if large filesystem support > is important to you. > > Kris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 23:32:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE41016A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EE513C428 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so295582nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:32:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=fgsTwJvFGXjSVsJCZvHrp4LLKZXmAtHhhFpbUPhqyALmM9jIoFQnsUEqZ6m3GDxpRCgbJNjSfDzAxzM1Ls74X1d6kfjB/InScE+DOs5fi/cHZTGppJhS9fPX47x/nkvlJ1BMe3caLRskZuEiv6kzvIlIaH+PtX5aLJcPOKbnWH8= Received: by 10.49.26.18 with SMTP id d18mr706684nfj.1168384075241; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.67.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:07:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:07:55 -0700 From: "Ross Penner" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Natd is not working as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:32:36 -0000 I've configured my freebsd computer to be the gateway for my home network using the guidelines in the handbook. All the required kernel options are enabled and the entries in /etc/rc.conf have been added. I'm unsure what the problem could be and I'm hoping somebody can give me some advice on where to look to diagnose this issue. the bind9 server is functioning correctly as I'm able to resolve IP address, but no packets seem to be getting through. Thanks ahead of time for any help you can give, Ross Penner From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 23:37:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB3A16A407 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EAF13C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2388536ana for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:37:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ww28/KuI6cSCfR8fODQSIxM/uR3wkAk6jHF9zBdmDIk5uwEpNW+NuFJIHK51S6fc2z3eCmup1kNpjG+F0+copWdlkCDvjJVTBqTict789IAB28cF9FA1i2yNUnOZgSBk5umArkw9aLi039mPRB5wub7Kxhvbg40P4aUpz0bRJmw= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr2650838hub.1168384125812; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:08:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:08:45 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:37:53 -0000 On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause > > > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The big license mess, part 2 > > > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues > > No. > > Kris > > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: 1. Xen Dom0 support? 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? 4. ZFS support? 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load problems, packet processing speed, etc? 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on it promises? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 23:53:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9577C16A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:53:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C02A13C448 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5999079uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:53:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=jQ7X3VOxV7Kir+8QPrY9+xlfZdovO3Vm47qpqaKrcKaP3aeEz5VEcx6JZXA1ggzEmWjD5//NzEkNj1w6U1e+7S2WfqyaBlBL+t1zUfqEVt/08lmu6LbyQoYrEMq5V/e5oBW7j3yW1CteAZ7ymWdJJlgLl7d2/7zukQsC6Mq+3TE= Received: by 10.82.162.14 with SMTP id k14mr2673267bue.1168386821445; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:53:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.151.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:53:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:53:40 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:53:43 -0000 Hi, all.....i suffer a blackout today when my freebsd was running, and when i start up again i run fsck and it reports that 5 files areUNREF......this happens during Phase 4 - Check Reference Count UNREF FILE I=94324 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Jan 9 20:30 2007 CLEAR? no and a few more with same owner and mode; the only thing that changes is the I,(inode, i guess).... Is there a way to fix this?!? thanxs and greetzz to all From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:01:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A3E16A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35A913C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0A01u7A016116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:01:56 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.5.99] (nilakantha.cs.washington.edu [128.208.5.99]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0A01uaa003920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:01:56 -0800 Message-ID: <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:01:55 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.9.154932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:57 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions >> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause >> > >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > The big license mess, part 2 >> > >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 >> >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues >> >> No. >> >> Kris >> >> > > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > 1. Xen Dom0 support? > 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? > 4. ZFS support? > 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? > 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load > problems, packet processing speed, etc? > 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > it promises? Don't know about some of the items, but... -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's ActionScript Engine: . So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will be interesting though. -Isn't Xen handled by the Xen project and not FreeBSD? Seems like your comment (was related) but off-topic. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:06:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804DF16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6E313C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail022-S [10.13.128.22]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout10/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l09Nkxjj026302; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:46:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail022 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail022/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l09NkvtT026848; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:46:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:46:57 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <5D85F408-0110-1000-948B-AE501311BEDA-Webmail-10020@mac.com> in-reply-to: references: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:46:57 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:06:14 -0000 On Tuesday, January 09, 2007, at 02:38PM, "Nikolas Britton" wrote: >Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM >for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: Why is another project's problems FreeBSD's problem? Xorg isn't even in the base system. If you install a port, that is your problem, but my server runs great without Xorg and Xorg is not part of FreeBSD. It will run on FreeBSD, but that is like blaming Apple for Windows Media Player problems on Mac OS X. >2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? If you buy a quality SATA Raid card, with quality support, this isn't an issue. 3ware regularly updates the drivers for their cards and regularly commits their updates back into the base system. Buy a cheep card, get cheep support, buy a quality card, get quality support. >Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on >it promises? Why do you blame FreeBSD for other project's problems? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:07:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5EB16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1613C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB437E2A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:07:31 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:07:00 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: ?}"PdpzgE21new9:7Y0wvn}&5&s8%^+O2Ve?@.ODc?''\G5BYij$FhT2-S5y9Ak[NW>v,=?utf-8?q?5=0A=09BGI+=60o=3DS=7Ds1/xd=5D?=@R4'6Y=P^\tQL@=?utf-8?q?ePwPM=25186jCgJiC=5ChdK5sy1=7DfoWRO5=3B=27Y+3b8=5C0zH=0A=09Y?="bo7~_0RNxvHh6uk^5%7kRp@E>'71; )$MQ2_@=?utf-8?q?=3DmZJye=7C/2V/=3B=2ErvXpT=5Cv=7CsJj=26SuO5/hH=0A=09x*?=>d?r>2b=^){n``sXL4G0"kh~9:GFT">P3y5F/x\,Hh0>u4R*Cw<5#gh9X!):*hf5^tV,=?utf-8?q?=0A=09PjL=2E+/*fZ=5C*TYKV=24HdRJI?=)Dq+1!q{z<9mv5S*7S85.!&)0F=qo2*z~|; 4X?vi6o3<@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1658456.O1iT3grGrj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701091507.26951.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Agus Subject: Re: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:07:32 -0000 --nextPart1658456.O1iT3grGrj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 January 2007 14:53, Agus wrote: > Hi, all.....i suffer a blackout today when my freebsd was running, and wh= en > i start up again i run fsck and it reports that 5 files areUNREF......this > happens during > Phase 4 - Check Reference Count > > UNREF FILE I=3D94324 OWNER=3Dmysql MODE=3D100600 > SIZE=3D0 MTIME=3DJan 9 20:30 2007 > CLEAR? no > > and a few more with same owner and mode; the only thing that changes is t= he > I,(inode, i guess).... > > Is there a way to fix this?!? Boot into single-user and run "fsck -y". Cheers, Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1658456.O1iT3grGrj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFpC4+R5sEeCt9j00RAg7TAJ0bJD7Mo2cr8f2iiwIFPOHs/XR5xQCgirOF ljjFnECOTV77KC3yXeLu0xQ= =WKq+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1658456.O1iT3grGrj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:27:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4DC16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2998E13C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54591337BE; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:57:31 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 96E819C92A; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:57:31 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:57:31 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+DRhDX4TDhSuvTBU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:33 -0000 --+DRhDX4TDhSuvTBU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 17:08:45 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: >>> >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause >>> >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> The big license mess, part 2 >>> >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues >> >> No. > > Why then? > [bitch and moan session removed] > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers > on it promises? You shouldn't. You obviously don't understand the issues. We don't owe you anything. Play an active part or go away. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --+DRhDX4TDhSuvTBU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpDLzIubykFB6QiMRAqYpAJ933OZgJRgm59bw3YCJSaWHC6x7nQCglMVY PKPANGaHeAGZyat65/afk6M= =lNVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+DRhDX4TDhSuvTBU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:28:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388CA16A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (omr8.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E0813C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr8.mgt.netsol.com [10.49.6.71]) by omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l0A0IGXD026009 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:18:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 22055 invoked by uid 78); 10 Jan 2007 00:18:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.200?) (racerx@makeworld.com@71.113.184.83) by ns-omr8.lb.hosting.dc2.netsol.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 00:18:16 -0000 Message-ID: <45A430D6.50201@makeworld.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:18:30 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061229) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030305060306090909070701" Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:28:26 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030305060306090909070701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions >> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause >> > >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > The big license mess, part 2 >> > >> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 >> >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues >> >> No. >> >> Kris >> >> > > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > 1. Xen Dom0 support? > 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? > 4. ZFS support? > 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? > 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load > problems, packet processing speed, etc? > 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > it promises? You shouldn't! If you are that taken back - you certainly don't need the issues of a project that does not deliver on it's promises. On the other hand - feel free to use Microsoft's products because we all know that they tend to keep promises AND, as a extra bonus, create an ultra secure OS that never fails. And as an extra extra bonus - you have the luxury of paying a poop-load for all that ... and more! So - with such an obvious choice (as mentioned above), you really don't need the failed promises that this project routinely makes to you, Nikolas Britton! -- Best regards, Chris Everything is revealed to he who turns over enough stones. (Including the snakes that he did not want to find.) --------------ms030305060306090909070701 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJDzCC AuIwggJLoAMCAQICED5yXrU0zFHzWG+pfEwVyF0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MTIxMDA1NDkxMloX DTA3MTIxMDA1NDkxMlowRjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEjMCEG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYUcmFjZXJ4QG1ha2V3b3JsZC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB DwAwggEKAoIBAQC36D3ytaLTlJBYCYC8no4GDfA/PFhueOBg4IJXetluxi0o6MmfsOqw5esN 9AJ4HBEc7KQFomWmIFVVDkGrF1vKSUWFDkjqhn4sISMLT//pqsj9mT6Wolpk5rwpu1fJmNWI gSF5Cx/VRnHZnRmaPdO6h6/hv9pMVKPjgZCGe9JU9fomxWUpDpki7XN+Usf4Cq+anM1qA+tn NTKX0dn7+awDk7str1e8E7Xkk9Y6eMn+Agm9nXCuSH8qq903fCM/gTzJTLeIq9Gt8J4Bksqq 6Pucpz1Ok8QH5+6gjxAMoxPCQ1hcuoTjfkuAAMDjssUMvbpfyJIZ7Gr1YAhuy0UbKEGjAgMB AAGjMTAvMB8GA1UdEQQYMBaBFHJhY2VyeEBtYWtld29ybGQuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAbixCkJ3X0YqT9rDGyyKfa3tv21yik0+t6yZ6HzdZAPBgoK7b fbtd/XwKh6AdXBWYASSYLLVApNaGnFJw3WQRKeDnGhBqoBWaKekwus6hc1G1oLemRvPMgy7j o/7ltrpboYROizesu9ndhtYcJR3Yd82Ymq0RFxcMvK0AnlQ9C6AwggLiMIICS6ADAgECAhA+ cl61NMxR81hvqXxMFchdMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQK ExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29u YWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNjEyMTAwNTQ5MTJaFw0wNzEyMTAwNTQ5MTJa MEYxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIxIzAhBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFHJh Y2VyeEBtYWtld29ybGQuY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAt+g9 8rWi05SQWAmAvJ6OBg3wPzxYbnjgYOCCV3rZbsYtKOjJn7DqsOXrDfQCeBwRHOykBaJlpiBV VQ5BqxdbyklFhQ5I6oZ+LCEjC0//6arI/Zk+lqJaZOa8KbtXyZjViIEheQsf1UZx2Z0Zmj3T uoev4b/aTFSj44GQhnvSVPX6JsVlKQ6ZIu1zflLH+AqvmpzNagPrZzUyl9HZ+/msA5O7La9X vBO15JPWOnjJ/gIJvZ1wrkh/KqvdN3wjP4E8yUy3iKvRrfCeAZLKquj7nKc9TpPEB+fuoI8Q DKMTwkNYXLqE435LgADA47LFDL26X8iSGexq9WAIbstFGyhBowIDAQABozEwLzAfBgNVHREE GDAWgRRyYWNlcnhAbWFrZXdvcmxkLmNvbTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAG4sQpCd19GKk/awxssin2t7b9tcopNPresmeh83WQDwYKCu2327Xf18CoegHVwVmAEk mCy1QKTWhpxScN1kESng5xoQaqAVminpMLrOoXNRtaC3pkbzzIMu46P+5ba6W6GETos3rLvZ 3YbWHCUd2HfNmJqtERcXDLytAJ5UPQugMIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF ADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2Fw ZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNh dGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4X DTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25h bCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxV c1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J 8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9I BH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0f BDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1h aWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRl TGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aU nX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3d qZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCA2Qw ggNgAgEBMHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQ dHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENB AhA+cl61NMxR81hvqXxMFchdMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggHDMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA3MDExMDAwMTgzMFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFLPX MwXQ/sOcoILbAIyv/VlRAOWyMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGFBgkr BgEEAYI3EAQxeDB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWlu ZyBDQQIQPnJetTTMUfNYb6l8TBXIXTCBhwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxeKB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYT AlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNU aGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQPnJetTTMUfNYb6l8TBXIXTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBN/daa7I2XzJwzc+xdhzERgqhuIErX6y+sdtPRPPu8vcrCxk1k GPXV3H9dxgN8i5Qd3OMnb0bbOCk0REo0gQIHs5JFvDhKXTDnr11NusyL46M+qhQFPE2PBLuu M8/Y/NovIQzpu32hixO5De8ruCmCGskzZzz+mIKD6SLA/dasaLIxUkWPYpVDW6lo+zy/4sj6 hcxaPHx6QWPDeKa162IOe1jqV/fpvrlkaNFIvFyQ8OWPijfQeEpifari97KFzKLNpCCA7upj IACEedKPwOPPNfcBXZvxqKqa2N+Fxe3KtLmGuZsU1wZNHnYHOqR6WvZX1l2ZY24PJRqrJe8k 2/DtAAAAAAAA --------------ms030305060306090909070701-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:40:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6858B16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAA4313C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2007 00:13:58 -0000 Received: from pD952CE81.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO core2duo) [217.82.206.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 01:13:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:13:57 +0100 To: "Nikolas Britton" , "FreeBSD Questions" From: "Andreas Rudisch" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:40:41 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:08:45 +0100, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: Since when is Xorg a part of FreeBSD? Java ports / Java-diablo anyone? > 1. Xen Dom0 support? > 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? > 4. ZFS support? > 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? > 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load > problems, packet processing speed, etc? > 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... ? > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > it promises? Noone is forcing you to do so. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:42:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9140716A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4994E13C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0A0bUvT094731; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:37:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0A0bUoN094730; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:37:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:37:30 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:42:08 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:08:45PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > >> > >http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause > >> > >> > >http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> The big license mess, part 2 > >> > >> > >http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues > > > >No. > > > >Kris > > > > > > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > 1. Xen Dom0 support? > 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? > 4. ZFS support? > 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? > 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load > problems, packet processing speed, etc? > 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > it promises? Don't. FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. Seems like you just posted a nice list of things for you to get busy and contribute. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:46:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475D316A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [217.160.200.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071E213C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C785CDE; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claire.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2FNKfTSURPGW; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [195.28.169.201] (jwh.lon.rewt.org.uk [195.28.169.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61B65C62; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45A432F9.6000703@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:37 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:03 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Note that things are different when upgrading from one major version to > another (e.g. 6.x to 7.x), though I even managed to update 5.x to 6.x > while the machine was "live" the whole time with only minor glitches, > solved by recompiling ports. I doubt this would work with 6.x->7.x > because of the many changes. > I'd just like to add for future reference, that upgrading to 7.x from 6.x is possible, only problems I personally encountered was the above problems with ports needing to be recompiled, which is to be expected anyway. Ta, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:05:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AAA16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31DF13C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F94118B421; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:05:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76575-02; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:05:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B35118B40A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:05:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBBF3BCEA; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:05:10 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:05:10 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: DAve , Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <898F3915436B3C86F366BA37@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <45A3CD67.6000108@pixelhammer.com> References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> <45A3CD67.6000108@pixelhammer.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:08 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:14:15 -0500 DAve wrote: > That was my thought as well. I have my pop toasters all mounting a NFS mail > store and when NFS goes away I don't have my NFS clients doing a fsck when > the mount returns. > > Not sure if that is important as iSCSI is all new to me, still reading up on > it. Does FreeBSD do anything special to a NFS mount when it returns? 'k, maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but iSCSI != NFS ... iSCSI is just removing your SCSI drives from your local server and putting them in a different location (over an ethernet connection) ... with NFS, you have one server to which multiple clients can connect ... with iSCSI, you have a one-to-one mapping of a file system on the 'target' to the server in question ... so, again, it was my understanding that stuff like an fsck is the responsibility of the server, not the target, same as if the SCSI drives were local to the server ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpDvG4QvfyHIvDvMRAhLCAKDXPvQB2ZVn3oZ42wt7su+nKmLrVgCgpyy2 UIyUtRnJy52ftxXgdoAKGT0= =AR/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:05:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0956E16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976F313C468 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so319230nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:05:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Uq1IzScick1iztXqzjWHAsPCQVmWKDDgUTibCCn5LBVK29RiIrVRd6CNILWjQKm1MX2MvJT2Lir5m6WoJf70EPLUGV0aRnHyUfzeVTCPXtePCBTGBWTsaqxnko4UtDSmTXSJ2F1EM0nMkfEBP+dF1pxo4iLbmRaHJBi+XeBIkO4= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr182118buc.1168380476286; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:07:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:07:55 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy In-Reply-To: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:05:55 -0000 > Dear Sirs, > > I just wanted to ask you since FreeBSD 6.2 is going to be > released, sooner or later I will be forced to upgrade my > system from 6.1 to 6.2. > Well my question goes like this: what is the best way for me > to do it? By downloading the ISO images or by doing it with > cvsup stable-supfile? > > Waiting for your reply. > > Best Regards, > > Stefanos Sofroniou You should take a look at: http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-11-26-freebsd-6.1-to-6.2-binary-upgrade.html ...if you have no objections to a stock (GENERIC) kernel. -David -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:29:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2841916A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C4913C45E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so324770nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:29:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nR9kwbsx68NuVl7nx7gfX3zW0+waGHtvhAVkpo5ZJIggqOAAwbz5iwfiy2pQaOZx8P+0huSIYbUsK9DZ8gNkAEATTrBoRcM0xodYrhPbHjkflTEQimA24rJaALtiAgar8cjsDuFniRcKqzrw3FB9zgrAlp4rz6KcQJ6MjB+47Fk= Received: by 10.82.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr3061128bud.1168392548273; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.151.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:29:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:29:08 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd@alaskaparadise.com In-Reply-To: <200701091507.26951.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200701091507.26951.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:29:10 -0000 Ok..done it.....now, can u explain me or point me a link to the why i have to doit in single mode and what this does?? i've done it and now when i restart in normal mode i got the same UNREF erros plus some Phase 5 - Check Cyl Groups errors. FREE BLK COUNT WRONG IN SUPERBLK Salvage? no BLK MISSING IN BIT MAPS Salvage?no then i did a fsck in normal mode and this last errors disappear but still get the first ones.... thanx..... 2007/1/9, Beech Rintoul : > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 14:53, Agus wrote: > > Hi, all.....i suffer a blackout today when my freebsd was running, and > when > > i start up again i run fsck and it reports that 5 files > areUNREF......this > > happens during > > Phase 4 - Check Reference Count > > > > UNREF FILE I=94324 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > > SIZE=0 MTIME=Jan 9 20:30 2007 > > CLEAR? no > > > > and a few more with same owner and mode; the only thing that changes is > the > > I,(inode, i guess).... > > > > Is there a way to fix this?!? > > Boot into single-user and run "fsck -y". > > Cheers, > > Beech > > -- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel > \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 > X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 > / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:30:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB99416A4A7 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@trancegeek.net) Received: from jet14.hasweb.com (jet14.hasweb.com [72.29.75.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D5713C480 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@trancegeek.net) Received: from pool-70-19-210-99.bos.east.verizon.net ([70.19.210.99] helo=doomserver) by jet14.hasweb.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4RoN-0005f3-1j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:59:27 -0500 From: "Tom Norris" To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:59:24 -0500 Message-ID: <001501c73452$9281a100$b784e300$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acc0UpGvRgfwF9GEQry6WvwrnaxOMA== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - jet14.hasweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - trancegeek.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Question on roaming VPNs using mpd, NAT, and FreeBSD6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:30:56 -0000 Hello everyone, (sorry if this double-posts, I sent from my unsubscribed work-email account the first time around...) I have a machine running FreeBSD6 happily humming along in a (remote) datacenter. I managed to get mpd running thanks to this ( http://web.archive.org/web/20050507010741/http://freebsdaddicts.org/forum/vi ewtopic.php?id=253 ) guide, and now I'm trying to set up NAT/DHCP on the server. I am doing this because I am trying to encrypt my network traffic over my school's network, because my tinfoil hat has been a lot thicker lately ;) The best visualization I can make of what I am trying to achieve is this: Windows2003 Laptop (school) ==> tunnel over internet ==> FreeBSD (datacenter) ==> whatever-part-of-the-internet-my-laptop-asked-for I can manage to make my laptop connect to my FreeBSD machine, but I can't contact any sites other than that FreeBSD Machine. Meaning, on my laptop, if I type: C:\Documents and Settings\Tom>ping google.com Pinging google.com [72.14.207.99] with 32 bytes of data: Control-C ^C I get nothing, but if I do: C:\Documents and Settings\Tom>ping a.b.c.190 Pinging a.b.c.190 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from a.b.c.190: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=49 Reply from a.b.c.190: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for a.b.c.190: Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 2, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 76ms, Maximum = 101ms, Average = 88ms Control-C ^C I get a reply. (63.246.146.190 being the FBSD Machine) Is enabling internet access for the laptop just a case of adding gateway_enable="YES" and natd_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf then adding "/usr/sbin/dhcpd (network-alias) -q" to my startup scripts on the FreeBSD machine? If this is true, will natd work with only one network card with multiple IP addresses aliased to it(for example: vr0_alias0=a.b.c.190, vr0_alias1=a.b.c.191, vr0_alias2=a.b.c.192 ... vr0_alias9=a.b.c.199) Also, is it possible to assign the laptop one of the external IPs, so if user foo connects to a.b.c.194 (for the sake of argument), traffic gets forwarded to the laptop? Thank You for Your Time, Tom Norris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:42:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBB216A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B02413C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6172E9AD for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:42:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A444AD.8060708@chapman.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:43:09 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200701091507.26951.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:42:38 -0000 Agus wrote: > Ok..done it.....now, can u explain me or point me a link to the why i > have > to doit in single mode and what this does?? You can't fsck a filesystem effectively when it's mounted. In order to access it unmounted, you have to be in single-user mode. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: You did wha... oh _dear_.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:48:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB77416A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EEA13C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A717E2A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:48:41 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: Agus Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:48:29 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701091507.26951.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> In-Reply-To: X-Face: ?}"PdpzgE21new9:7Y0wvn}&5&s8%^+O2Ve?@.ODc?''\G5BYij$FhT2-S5y9Ak[NW>v,=?utf-8?q?5=0A=09BGI+=60o=3DS=7Ds1/xd=5D?=@R4'6Y=P^\tQL@=?utf-8?q?ePwPM=25186jCgJiC=5ChdK5sy1=7DfoWRO5=3B=27Y+3b8=5C0zH=0A=09Y?="bo7~_0RNxvHh6uk^5%7kRp@E>'71; )$MQ2_@=?utf-8?q?=3DmZJye=7C/2V/=3B=2ErvXpT=5Cv=7CsJj=26SuO5/hH=0A=09x*?=>d?r>2b=^){n``sXL4G0"kh~9:GFT">P3y5F/x\,Hh0>u4R*Cw<5#gh9X!):*hf5^tV,=?utf-8?q?=0A=09PjL=2E+/*fZ=5C*TYKV=24HdRJI?=)Dq+1!q{z<9mv5S*7S85.!&)0F=qo2*z~|; 4X?vi6o3<@ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091648.35111.freebsd@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:48:42 -0000 > 2007/1/9, Beech Rintoul : > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 14:53, Agus wrote: > > > Hi, all.....i suffer a blackout today when my freebsd was running, and > > > > when > > > > > i start up again i run fsck and it reports that 5 files > > > > areUNREF......this > > > > > happens during > > > Phase 4 - Check Reference Count > > > > > > UNREF FILE I=94324 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 > > > SIZE=0 MTIME=Jan 9 20:30 2007 > > > CLEAR? no > > > > > > and a few more with same owner and mode; the only thing that changes is > > > > the > > > > > I,(inode, i guess).... > > > > > > Is there a way to fix this?!? > > > > Boot into single-user and run "fsck -y". > > > Ok..done it.....now, can u explain me or point me a link to the why i have > to doit in single mode and what this does?? > i've done it and now when i restart in normal mode i got the same UNREF > erros plus some Phase 5 - Check Cyl Groups errors. > FREE BLK COUNT WRONG IN SUPERBLK > Salvage? no > > BLK MISSING IN BIT MAPS > Salvage?no > > then i did a fsck in normal mode and this last errors disappear but still > get the first ones.... > > thanx..... Running single user starts with the slices unmounted, that is the preferable way to run fsck manually. If you are answering yes to those questions and it doesn't fix things, could be your HD is failing. Search the mailing list and Google. There was an extensive thread on a similar problem a couple of months ago. I had a problem like yours a couple of years ago and ended up creating new filesystems and restoring from backup. You may be able to mount read only and salvage the data if you don't have backups. But, do a search first, this comes up from time to time. BTW, please don't top post. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 02:02:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159A816A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dj@djcustom.com) Received: from mail.djcustom.com (mail.djcustom.com [71.39.14.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC93513C474 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dj@djcustom.com) Received: from C1052266A ([192.168.101.50]) by mail.djcustom.com (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0A1kTCc091879 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:46:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dj@djcustom.com) From: "Dale Johnston" To: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:40:07 -0800 Message-ID: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 thread-index: Acc0WEIvwA1GXnYDQw6w+dMnqZNjuw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Release info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:02:32 -0000 Hey, so where's the release notes. what's been done/fixed/added in 6.2 vs 6.1, what was done from 6.1RC to 6.1R, etc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 01:58:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712DC16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: from web54105.mail.yahoo.com (web54105.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11F9213C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herry_pam2@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1419 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2007 01:31:52 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=sKskYygCTANyrJ+5HIiKCIyFWG0IKyoAK5sBuu5DKhmIgr4yVrj5XkDxofYf2rMLZdZCUNmUAcDiio9iVLjDAo/zJMx0C47Hu0sALn+j9frVd6S5oYRJjGo1h4F9Se6m0x45Rs11Q4Q+enB7r0A4iR9tr9qAQrRT1A2Eo/YA6fg=; X-YMail-OSG: acQSPSgVM1ndsxn65rRegJqLm667O7zD4jMovT3IWIQMy7iKP6FT56eX73L52UAyBXjdFYGvpfGffnVR2TDS5GVCGPdNdWa6F7s9dtfqCN_q9nddjxcxJ6SHK9lclsLw3vZzkRT27Ma9NE8- Received: from [222.124.158.148] by web54105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:31:52 PST Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:31:52 -0800 (PST) From: anto jayanto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <425035.1202.qm@web54105.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:06:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Isatap on FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:58:34 -0000 I try to implement ipv6/ipv4 tunneling using ISATAP,but its was not sucecssfull, when i re-compile my kernel using pseudo-device "ist", and error,if kernel do not know pseudo-device "ist". any one can help me? I was try in my FreeBSD 6.2 Release and FreeBSD 4.3 Release. i try to follow mr suzzuki paper at http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20041201/ thanks to all __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 02:12:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5770F16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B02E13C455 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 21:12:38 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,165,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="385026139:sNHT22992904" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IBZ73543; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:12:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-237-238-104.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO [207.237.238.104]) ([207.237.238.104]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 21:12:36 -0500 Message-ID: <45A44B93.4020508@tandon.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:12:35 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> In-Reply-To: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090209.45A449C9.0097,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: Re: Release info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:12:39 -0000 Dale Johnston wrote: > Hey, so where's the release notes. what's been done/fixed/added in 6.2 vs > 6.1, what was done from 6.1RC to 6.1R, etc http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 02:20:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2859416A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1B013C455 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so6029969uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:20:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=frPAJ7jIXUMOtlxcQDHAZZSLAxVGNChkD4nBHrNN2rAMuA9qlo48f+kdOyPG12jnI6PJylGV0hNypK65k0Rz8kmD8YcyMtVhaS1VNE+VfcR4/0L4q4dnzrMTXCN+wuBY+W68z/Lo/NjUosIWabTZqaWCH40E4B74IuQ3UfGbwac= Received: by 10.78.20.13 with SMTP id 13mr64594hut.1168395636338; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.162.12 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:20:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000701091820r1006331an399f9a10ebd6a827@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:20:36 -0800 From: "pete wright" To: "Dale Johnston" In-Reply-To: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:20:38 -0000 On 1/9/07, Dale Johnston wrote: > Hey, so where's the release notes. what's been done/fixed/added in 6.2 vs > 6.1, what was done from 6.1RC to 6.1R, etc once 6.2RELEASE is out you should be able to find them here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/relnotes.html -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 02:40:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75316A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1F713C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so7934974wxc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:40:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZngHxRSBZof+IPsEm+uGjo6UkjjBRGJSkg7jdzNHOIxCsXi9po141/QrafDmzTPMt35jYX6gRBL4LhYU2T4JznKUOMamxCCcuLB0NQcyB996LV9QpJRPP71Xn0BlR7bIFr799tUlk/cq6uV+qAUPn+NWVLjGOvjTSV6lWE20SPs= Received: by 10.70.129.4 with SMTP id b4mr52288989wxd.1168396839761; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:40:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:40:39 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Christian Walther" , olli@lurza.secnetix.de In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0701082238j6fc6f819h156f68fd058a6472@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <14989d6e0701082238j6fc6f819h156f68fd058a6472@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shell recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:40:40 -0000 Thanks everyone for the great input and Feedback, I read some great capabilities about Zsh( completion capabilities) and pdksh For now I have compiled and made pdksh and I will try this to see how that works. so far it works great did not dump the core, Thanks DAk On 1/9/07, Christian Walther wrote: > > On 09/01/07, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > > Hi Freebsd > > > > I am using ksh93 shell as my login shell > > each and everytime > > > > I do set -o vi > > > > and perform some commands > > > > it simply dumps ksh93.core > > file and crashed whole terminal session, > > > > I have been having this problem everrsince I changed my login shell from > > /bin/sh to /bin/ksh which is symbolic link of ksh93 executable I > compiled > > off the freebsd /usr/ports/ > > > > I wonder if anyone has similar issues with this ksh or am I doing > something > > stupid > [...] > It doesn't matter what you do with your shell, it simply shouldn't crash. > if you like it, and you would like continue using it, I suggest you > try to get a working binary. ksh93 hasn't changed since 20060214 > (according to freshports.org), so I guess you're working with the most > recent version already. > What you should try is to rebuild this port without any optimization > set in /etc/make.conf. > Please comment any CFLAGS= and CPUTYPE= and do a make reinstall. > This should result in a i386 binary without any optimization. Try > using it, maybe the core dump is gone. There are several ports out > there that don't like being built with optimization. > > HTH > Christian > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 02:51:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888B316A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D7C13C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791D4C2E9 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3669BC2E3; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:51:27 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1013FC2AF for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:51:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Free BSD Questions list Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:51:22 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: How to prevent a filesystem from getting checked by fsck? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:51:28 -0000 Have a server with 3 large filesystems. I would like to have only one checked by fsck and mounted. The other two I want to fsck and mount manually. Is it enough to change options to "rw,noauto" and pass to 0 for the two I don't want mounted or fscked? This is so in case of a crash, like we had today, the machine will be up sooner. The two filesystem that I will set to noauto, are used by cron jobs which can wait. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 03:03:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEFE16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C2F13C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 22:03:23 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTJ58801; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:03:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-237-238-104.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO [207.237.238.104]) ([207.237.238.104]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 22:03:16 -0500 Message-ID: <45A45773.8020604@tandon.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:03:15 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090205.45A455AC.009B,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: How to prevent a filesystem from getting checked by fsck? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:03:24 -0000 Francisco Reyes wrote: > Have a server with 3 large filesystems. > I would like to have only one checked by fsck and mounted. > The other two I want to fsck and mount manually. > > Is it enough to change options to "rw,noauto" and pass to 0 for the two > I don't want mounted or fscked? See "man 5 fstab": If the option ``noauto'' is specified, the file system will not be auto-matically mounted at system startup. and If the sixth field is not present or is zero, a value of zero is returned and fsck(8) will assume that the file system does not need to be checked. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 03:31:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C7916A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFFD613C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 35051 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2007 03:30:13 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 03:30:13 -0000 Message-ID: <45A45DFD.5090008@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:31:09 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD Questions list References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> <45A3CD67.6000108@pixelhammer.com> <898F3915436B3C86F366BA37@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <898F3915436B3C86F366BA37@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:31:21 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > - --On Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:14:15 -0500 DAve > wrote: > >> That was my thought as well. I have my pop toasters all mounting a NFS mail >> store and when NFS goes away I don't have my NFS clients doing a fsck when >> the mount returns. >> >> Not sure if that is important as iSCSI is all new to me, still reading up on >> it. Does FreeBSD do anything special to a NFS mount when it returns? > > 'k, maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but iSCSI != NFS I never said it was, my rather poor example (I said I was new to iSCSI) was if a remote file system crashes, who should fsck it? The server (Target) or the client (Initiator)? > ... iSCSI is just > removing your SCSI drives from your local server and putting them in a > different location (over an ethernet connection) ... with NFS, you have one > server to which multiple clients can connect ... with iSCSI, you have a > one-to-one mapping of a file system on the 'target' to the server in question > ... so, again, it was my understanding that stuff like an fsck is the > responsibility of the server, not the target, same as if the SCSI drives were > local to the server ... As I thought. However, I clearly don't know much about iSCSI, though I know more with every page I read. I will always defer to those with experience, which is why I ask (sometimes stupid) questions ;^) DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 03:36:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB3916A417 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCB313C468 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so354717nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:36:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qQJrPg8yG1gMCuPcLc4asEFr6VSOmb46lZ5d8fEV8rPSsuBYuIwon9/insiWDRFzux9afQVuqyqi+sSJ5qF3xozouWP8KJgGen1vFvraKS9Uqu1ou5el317Lnqg9G3odxHYo9r2aEz1VDcvuPQHahYzTq8SIRd3njqL4ZXFNwuI= Received: by 10.82.111.8 with SMTP id j8mr3089104buc.1168400182351; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:36:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:36:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:36:21 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: DAve In-Reply-To: <45A45DFD.5090008@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2A0E6.7090202@pixelhammer.com> <200701081508.20632.lists@jnielsen.net> <45A399BD.9080707@pixelhammer.com> <20070109163557.GH41724@dan.emsphone.com> <45A3CD67.6000108@pixelhammer.com> <898F3915436B3C86F366BA37@ganymede.hub.org> <45A45DFD.5090008@pixelhammer.com> Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:36:24 -0000 > I never said it was, my rather poor example (I said I was new to iSCSI) > was if a remote file system crashes, who should fsck it? The server > (Target) or the client (Initiator)? --- Clearly, the initiator. It owns the filesystem. Its just a big anonymous file on the target with no relevant structure that it cares about. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 04:32:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071E516A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5E13C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so6055874uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rbEEYn+552w5dqPw9YyVbxI/uKe3//FEGg8HBq2j18Tyd+xjH9oX+XjYYzBGYahJg490JFzbplD2qTce2M6SWcRLEyPgxMJMkcyHfuzc1+xdWUk3+a3BYGpEDvmbdO0wn9JTVCxBXOdk4SJvkyT4VCPS7E/WmVBE5TE6wF9OOE8= Received: by 10.78.172.20 with SMTP id u20mr4592727hue.1168403552300; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:32:32 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Peter Giessel" In-Reply-To: <5D85F408-0110-1000-948B-AE501311BEDA-Webmail-10020@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <5D85F408-0110-1000-948B-AE501311BEDA-Webmail-10020@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:32:34 -0000 On 1/9/07, Peter Giessel wrote: > On Tuesday, January 09, 2007, at 02:38PM, "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > >Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > >for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > > Why is another project's problems FreeBSD's problem? > Xorg isn't even in the base system. > It's FreeBSD's problem because Xorg doesn't hard lock the system on other systems. It's FreeBSD's problem because other systems don't have these problems. It's FreeBSD's problem because DRM/DRI is a part of the kernel. > >2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > > If you buy a quality SATA Raid card, with quality support, this isn't an > issue. 3ware regularly updates the drivers for their cards and > regularly commits their updates back into the base system. Buy > a cheep card, get cheep support, buy a quality card, get quality > support. > I agree that if you buy a cheap RAID card you get cheap support, which is why I buy $800 SATA RAID cards. I'm primarily talking about on motherboard RAID 1 solutions. Native SATA RAID 1 support in FreeBSD is in such disarray I not sure where to begin. How about reading and writing metadata and failing gracefully, without a system panic, when a drive momentary doesn't respond to commands. inband rebuilding after a failure would be nice as well... I'm tired of fucking around with this shit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 04:53:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804BB16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjah@hicom.net) Received: from ns1.hicom.net (ns1.hicom.net [208.245.180.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248EA13C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjah@hicom.net) Received: from [192.168.2.162] (pool-68-239-218-104.nwrk.east.verizon.net [68.239.218.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.hicom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0A4d5S9036963 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:39:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:39:02 -0500 From: Juergen Heberling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:53:52 -0000 Hi all Please suggest some way of diagnosing this problem: System freezes after being up in production and apparently stable for several weeks, no dump, no error message, nothing on the console - so I suspect hardware. See dmesg below but it's a Supermicro (X6DA3-G2) with 2xXeon (Nocona) processors, onboard AIC9410 ("SAS") - each channel of the SCSI "card" handles 4 drives. The drives are mirrored using GEOM on the other channel (NOT using the hardware mirroring). Right after placing system into production I needed to increase the SCSI tags (via camcontrol) on the devices in one of the mirrors ("homea") because of utterly poor performance which had resulted in several reboots: gstat showed queue lengths generally about 150 deep with spikes to 400 deep. After setting the tags to "32" performance on the mirror was adequate. I then tried to increase the tags to "64" but "camcontrol tags da4 -v" never showed more that "54" 1. So I dont understand why "camcontrol tags da4 -N 64" never goes above "54" (and why shouldn't I try to set the tags to even 128 (512 tags per channel, I believe, 4 drives per channel)). The following shows the initial tags setting and the "reduction" (to "50" in this case). The commands were issued all within a few minutes. # camcontrol tags da4 -v -N 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): tagged openings now 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_openings 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_active 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_openings 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_queued 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): held 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): mintags 2 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): maxtags 255 # camcontrol tags da4 -v (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_openings 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_active 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_openings 64 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_queued 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): held 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): mintags 2 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): maxtags 255 # camcontrol tags da4 -v (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_openings 50 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): dev_active 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_openings 50 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): devq_queued 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): held 0 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): mintags 2 (pass2:ahd0:0:4:0): maxtags 255 2. Why dont I see any bus or device error messages (or indication of a dump) in the log and what can I do to turn the error messages on? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Juergen Here is my dmesg, long lines were wrapped: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.13-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf4a Stepping = 10 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x641d> AMD Features=0x20100000 AMD Features2=0x1 Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 3489071104 (3327 MB) avail memory = 3414409216 (3256 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: irq 16 at device 3.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 0.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 ahd0: port 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdd200000-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0 on pci3 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xdd202000-0xdd203fff irq 33 at device 2.1 on pci3 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci2: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib4: at device 0.2 on pci2 pci4: on pcib4 em0: port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xdd300000-0xdd31ffff irq 54 at device 2.0 on pci4 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:68:84:32 em1: port 0x3040-0x307f mem 0xdd320000-0xdd33ffff irq 55 at device 2.1 on pci4 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:68:84:33 pci2: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib5: irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 uhci0: port 0x1400-0x141f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1420-0x143f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: port 0x1420-0x143f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1440-0x145f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0x1460-0x147f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xdd001000-0xdd0013ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 pci7: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x14a0-0x14af at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 1 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 1 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc9000-0xd2fff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DVDROM at ata0-master UDMA33 Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle da1 at ahd1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da3 at ahd1 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da3: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da3: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da5 at ahd1 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da5: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da5: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da5: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da2 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da2: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da4 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da4: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da4: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da6 at ahd0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da6: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da6: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da6: 35046MB (71775284 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4467C) da7 at ahd1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da7: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da7: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da7: 35046MB (71775284 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4467C) SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0 created (id=1170997708). GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da0 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail created (id=4084922715). GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail: provider da2 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea created (id=3543800137). GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea: provider da4 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb created (id=2383534711). GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb: provider da6 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider mirror/gm0 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider da0. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider mirror/gm0 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider da0. GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail: provider da3 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail: provider da3 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail: provider mirror/mail launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device mail: rebuilding provider da2. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea: provider da5 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea: provider da5 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea: provider mirror/homea launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homea: rebuilding provider da4. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb: provider da7 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb: provider da7 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb: provider mirror/homeb launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device homeb: rebuilding provider da6. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gm0s1a ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 04:54:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA91E16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E7313C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so6060131uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:54:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ul0ZMkPHXTZEpFT/I02qMgMhkn3bxEn/3EoahXh867LBesRmBuoLZmG/KOZJUn4+GmH02u5UiajEvmidkJdLbl6yz9asD34NVdGkCoYhR/Rw92KwteBRza/8q2TI0LshRjTDSAITswoiWmiT0A5OoLCadArqFz0HgpT8aXzCSlo= Received: by 10.78.178.5 with SMTP id a5mr8088035huf.1168404851116; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:54:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:54:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:54:11 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:54:12 -0000 On 1/9/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Don't know about some of the items, but... > -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's > ActionScript Engine: > . > So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported > on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will > be interesting though. But I use Opera?? And It needs to work with youtube, without crashing and without install headaches. 'cd /usr/ports/www/flash; make install clean; exit;' then open browser to youtube.com and go. No library shuffle or libmap configuring. > -Isn't Xen handled by the Xen project and not FreeBSD? Yes, and they have done their part. Now it's FreeBSD's turn to integrate the changes needed to the kernel into the kernel to make Dom0 support work. Linux has it, Solaris has it. NetBSD has it. Mac has it? FreeBSD does not have it. Server virtualization is the next big thing and FreeBSD has nothing going for it in this respect... Not even VMware or any of the other big players works with FreeBSD as a host OS. > Seems like your comment (was related) but off-topic. It is off-topic... don't really care at this point. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 05:07:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7FF16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC2D13C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so6062603uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:07:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e9Fn1BqA4dMaNmOwEOv+w8w2A7FQ3zHyj9WcPOM0q76n5ZuVWZ9HMr+/5Iv0isk5rtORZVdI17zQBZBqJPEiiXQytfPy5HCnTOZH8xKjoLN6oPM76Nm3fcyp/OEtCNY+2Em84V1jYRLkvpDoJx9AYz4tB/ULEju0hOLXG7T8wjE= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr4583547hub.1168405675406; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:07:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:07:55 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Andreas Rudisch" , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:07:56 -0000 On 1/9/07, Andreas Rudisch wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:08:45 +0100, Nikolas Britton > wrote: > > > Why then? Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > > Since when is Xorg a part of FreeBSD? > Java ports / Java-diablo anyone? > Java has come a long way as of late. Does FreeBSD still have that stupid click through thing to download java?... That needs to go if it's still there. > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > > it promises? > > Noone is forcing you to do so. > Let me restate that... I want to use FreeBSD, but the lack of progress is driving me and others away. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 05:08:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B8E16A571 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1473113C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so376338nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:08:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sm2cYf98avrxMSsKy/nvvb6DuU5M3SSXknRxMxnGSRvSbktZjc7kXRFyS1mL0sEQ25zXaB4QD0+uR55vMIbkv5EevjgZsP9isZjtj9W7+cv2fakSX+ZSntkMhwTxdzEZ/0dDRZpZLc4Wb4//x7pUhBb4WlaMF1/H+Uh7hArM8mY= Received: by 10.82.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr3095505buf.1168405683801; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:08:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:08:03 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Nikolas Britton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:08:06 -0000 Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. In ten years at Network Appliance..wanna know exactly how many FreeBSD host installs ive seen besides Yahoo? 2. How many -non- Linux SAN configurations? Probly 80% of all SAN I see and work with are Linux based. Fbsd NFS client performance is 1/3'd that of a tuned linux box, can you say ../..? If you can, you know what its like to never have a valid directory attr cache on your mounts. (ick) Automount...dont even go there. Im in this for the long haul..I like Fbsd, and as long s lynx and apache still work on it, im happy. As for the future..I just dont see much serious future there unless it grows up. Rememer when Linux couldnt do _crap_ and Fbsd 2.5 was the bomb? I do...I want like to see that again. On 1/9/07, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > Don't know about some of the items, but... > > -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's > > ActionScript Engine: > > . > > So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported > > on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will > > be interesting though. > > But I use Opera?? And It needs to work with youtube, without crashing > and without install headaches. 'cd /usr/ports/www/flash; make install > clean; exit;' then open browser to youtube.com and go. No library > shuffle or libmap configuring. > > > -Isn't Xen handled by the Xen project and not FreeBSD? > > Yes, and they have done their part. Now it's FreeBSD's turn to > integrate the changes needed to the kernel into the kernel to make > Dom0 support work. Linux has it, Solaris has it. NetBSD has it. Mac > has it? FreeBSD does not have it. Server virtualization is the next > big thing and FreeBSD has nothing going for it in this respect... Not > even VMware or any of the other big players works with FreeBSD as a > host OS. > > > Seems like your comment (was related) but off-topic. > > It is off-topic... don't really care at this point. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 05:36:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD45B16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30EF513C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 6650 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 06:05:31 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 06:05:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:39:13 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070110063913.acef6dfe.coolzone@io.dk> In-Reply-To: References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:36:53 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:07:55 -0600 "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > > > it promises? > > > > Noone is forcing you to do so. > > > > Let me restate that... I want to use FreeBSD, but the lack of progress > is driving me and others away. Then just go away! If you have a problem with FreeBSD, then start working on the issue, pay someone else to do it, or just shut up! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 05:50:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A55F16A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A9313C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so3012uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:50:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lTrwgwRz91F6G1YMCfrBVW2CheJKvKS7zdtRDVQouqi074yYRLSgMsG09HLr5/TPM0AH0J0VBrmS8a5+Ux7PDH8UG6nA2JKQ5aH9NqoXhlc3HSBXc02IgTFudxZsRa6K1E07KAMX1AjuqnsujkuDi/o30roDroJE3QFTWBaOw/s= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr4603534hud.1168408240668; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:50:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:50:40 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: racerx@makeworld.com In-Reply-To: <45A430D6.50201@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A430D6.50201@makeworld.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:50:42 -0000 On 1/9/07, Chris wrote: > > You shouldn't! If you are that taken back - you certainly don't need the > issues of a project that does not deliver on it's promises. > > On the other hand - feel free to use Microsoft's products because we all > know that they tend to keep promises AND, as a extra bonus, create an > ultra secure OS that never fails. And as an extra extra bonus - you have > the luxury of paying a poop-load for all that ... and more! > Well... I already did this about 2 months back. After 2 years of continuous desktop use (primary desktop) I ran into a problem (Xorg DRI) that just completely burned me out corrupted file system through multiple hard locks trying to debug FreeBSD). I broke down and installed XP. The project has lost me as a desktop user. I do really miss KDE, ports system, and the FreeBSD user tool chain but I cannot come back, I've already upgraded my desktop hardware beyond that of FreeBSD's capabilities. My servers are still 100% FreeBSD though... But I am not sure how much longer this will be true. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 05:54:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBC516A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7633413C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so3559uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:54:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uDJOfW+Cnqre/kfKUbZDGHkPCXKp5vloXTkD1uJlmVXwepcNqnkG6r21ZvrQpkJmV34F4sqljwbX33Fmua0WmRTKoAlT2NdNzHwjmmG6kxpNh5L6Fxqdv1Zckz2k6LAG14GWinRNGhtcUfx71qHGRVsDppOsQ5HTO9k5Foiglck= Received: by 10.78.123.4 with SMTP id v4mr99555huc.1168408442506; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:54:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:54:02 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" In-Reply-To: <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:54:03 -0000 On 1/9/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 17:08:45 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > >>> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause > >>> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> The big license mess, part 2 > >>> > >> http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 > >>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>> Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues > >> > >> No. > > > > Why then? > > [bitch and moan session removed] > > > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers > > on it promises? > > You shouldn't. You obviously don't understand the issues. We don't > owe you anything. Play an active part or go away. > Fuck off Greg, Sincerely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:01:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A6116A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B416313C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so4844uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:01:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N+zkwqQHlEx8Ge5jxYn8NCiP528ewj5yhDZ/s1Ep5/IAk415t17pvEPbemo5mvNMDJqF6hTlnrdZdaw6CL4ohzdpp12rlZ3DMQKcAtjvI6WvzJERQ/fTjKDAHITPa1T2QrcRdnXjSzsW47qbCjH/d5CzSQNprXWah2EZ27W18G8= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr100259hue.1168408911516; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:01:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Jerry McAllister" In-Reply-To: <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:01:53 -0000 On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > for you to get busy and contribute. > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just work... so I can get real things done. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:28:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEC916A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20FBD13C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 4640 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 06:57:25 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 06:57:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:31:06 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> In-Reply-To: References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:28:44 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > work... so I can get real things done. So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you want it to!? So you can get real things done!? If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? Now just shut up and go away!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:29:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9533C16A506 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C53013C45D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so8065ugc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:29:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HhUaWEejD8TmJlR+zwERdLp/Bg/BJh4Yq836/tPynfImAdySCbzV24MyjhcJ68yhJgyLQbWWbsL2Cgg666UKhiI3KBZSdrevRXZ+ZwJNrq62FWIddpuxRN1uxMh158lLJOG6ldo18CbfCa/F/XKzKHcoeGeVnvnCWop7xv7MjCc= Received: by 10.78.146.11 with SMTP id t11mr5949hud.1168410542993; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:29:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:29:02 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Jeff Mohler" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:29:04 -0000 On 1/9/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. > > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. > > In ten years at Network Appliance..wanna know exactly how many FreeBSD > host installs ive seen besides Yahoo? > > 2. > > How many -non- Linux SAN configurations? Probly 80% of all SAN I see > and work with are Linux based. > > Fbsd NFS client performance is 1/3'd that of a tuned linux box, can > you say ../..? If you can, you know what its like to never have a > valid directory attr cache on your mounts. (ick) Automount...dont > even go there. > > Im in this for the long haul..I like Fbsd, and as long s lynx and > apache still work on it, im happy. As for the future..I just dont see > much serious future there unless it grows up. > > Rememer when Linux couldnt do _crap_ and Fbsd 2.5 was the bomb? I > do...I want like to see that again. > I'd like to see FreeBSD on top too, I really love and care for it but I'm very disappointed and ambivalent with the projects current state of affairs. I think one project that should be attempted is to get FreeBSD running on top of a Linux kernel. This could potently solve FreeBSD's biggest problems.... We could mold it (the Linux kernel) into are own kernel while still maintaining compatibility with the real Linux kernel tree. anyhow... it's something to think about. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:48:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509F816A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE5513C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so12866uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:48:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NEZUoL9osy0KIb8rzgpnftHZQU1h7Ut81EFFCva17ifQ045UxZ9uCL9Ge31dRUsZ4QMchkMuU1HTLiMr5L4EDj14/7U0VjWxBvbyiBfwIt33IWUfJ8V9pXdyE1pm+uQyWKoiUVeRPFe7fpHaIkNyxblvxsVDO2OfcT0w8JUyqdQ= Received: by 10.78.183.15 with SMTP id g15mr4614744huf.1168411719471; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:48:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:48:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:48:39 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070110051608.GB80575@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110051608.GB80575@xor.obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:48:41 -0000 On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:07:08PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > Why then? > > Various administrative delays, mostly. e.g. the main ftp distribution > server had hardware failure for a few weeks. > Shit happens and we did just change out the core team, specifically the release engineering team... so that's understandable... I guess my comment was mainly targeted at the general state of affairs for the last two years. > > Are you guys ever going to do something about Xorg DRI/DRM > > for Radeon cards, Java, and Flash support? More importantly: > > 1. Xen Dom0 support? > > 2. Fix SATA RAID driver problems? > > 3. Better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems? > > 4. ZFS support? > > 5. Better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays: (fsck, etc.)? > > 6. Speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff? checksum offloading, Interrupt load > > problems, packet processing speed, etc? > > 7. Better SMP support, GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers, etc... > > Some of these are already there, some are in progress, etc. > I haven't been keeping track lately but that's good if true. Will see what happens when I upgrade my servers. > > Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers on > > it promises? > > If you're unhappy, there's the door. Pandering to complainers isn't > high on my personal list of interests. > I am unhappy but I care too much about FreeBSD to just up and leave, it may be time for a sabbatical though... And I complain because I care... like a parent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:52:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C95D16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569313C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so400960nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:52:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=izWQezs3ecqsZM0ZbEL4uV3J11gG2v8/tvLzeRdR+iK88LqmNrGbq62klKYoAVJV6Bx/NtFCrsv9pp/oFMQlEsrG5THwdRpPwKksEDSHn0eKx7eu4rrhTjZJMj3psteT8rLsiq6b6lAfbuAihAdHGoUzq2kW11pORfSZUUKcNRQ= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr6426buc.1168411952481; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:52:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:52:32 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Nikolas Britton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:52:34 -0000 If I could program my way out of a _paper bag_ I would. But I cant. But ive helped drive some wonderful gifting Fbsd's way in my time..im still a believer. On 1/9/07, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. > > > > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. > > > > In ten years at Network Appliance..wanna know exactly how many FreeBSD > > host installs ive seen besides Yahoo? > > > > 2. > > > > How many -non- Linux SAN configurations? Probly 80% of all SAN I see > > and work with are Linux based. > > > > Fbsd NFS client performance is 1/3'd that of a tuned linux box, can > > you say ../..? If you can, you know what its like to never have a > > valid directory attr cache on your mounts. (ick) Automount...dont > > even go there. > > > > Im in this for the long haul..I like Fbsd, and as long s lynx and > > apache still work on it, im happy. As for the future..I just dont see > > much serious future there unless it grows up. > > > > Rememer when Linux couldnt do _crap_ and Fbsd 2.5 was the bomb? I > > do...I want like to see that again. > > > > I'd like to see FreeBSD on top too, I really love and care for it but > I'm very disappointed and ambivalent with the projects current state > of affairs. I think one project that should be attempted is to get > FreeBSD running on top of a Linux kernel. This could potently solve > FreeBSD's biggest problems.... We could mold it (the Linux kernel) > into are own kernel while still maintaining compatibility with the > real Linux kernel tree. anyhow... it's something to think about. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 06:59:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BD816A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A2C13C469 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so402712nfc for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:59:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s/IhmxyP0fmtlX+70MLXpY9dp6AiiaTB9KfVA+/KjJRQlClZIFJgsEUx8RLDpcd1z2qk4X0A8XxxMnA7Ovhk4z2zAslBnH/folTQd0DNftvyJcivMfz4rn9FJVqRafrauXv8zy3gvIE0FXQcP3SPHdlz88X7JZC0EtuaPZc98NA= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr6974buc.1168412360705; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:59:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:59:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:59:20 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Rico Secada" In-Reply-To: <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:59:24 -0000 Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question. Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead? Granted I'll take ports over RPM's and such any day, but..ports hasnt sucked up all of the Fbsd oxygen by itself in the last handful of years. On 1/9/07, Rico Secada wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 > "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > > for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > work... so I can get real things done. > > So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work > for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you > want it to!? So you can get real things done!? > > If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by > people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? > > Now just shut up and go away!!! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:01:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46F116A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339BF13C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A71BLr030539; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:01:12 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:01:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <000201c7333c$5c9e48c0$ba01a8c0@brian5vgqrbw1x> In-Reply-To: <000201c7333c$5c9e48c0$ba01a8c0@brian5vgqrbw1x> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701100801.11519.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Brian Levie Subject: Re: unable to load kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:01:17 -0000 On Monday 08 January 2007 16:47, Brian Levie wrote: > After installing FreeBSD 6.1, I get the error message =91Unable to load > kernel=92 and it goes to an OK prompt. I suspect the problem is in the > geometry, when installing I get the message =92Geometry of 238316/16/63 > for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry=92. And appears to > use 14946/255/63. However the BIOS shows 58853/16/255, but attempting > to use this produces the same error message. The system has a 200Gb > hard disk, all but the last 1.5Gb is Windows XP, and it is the last > 1.5Gb I have tried to install FreeBSD. Any suggestions would be much > appreciated. No, the problem is that you do not have a kernel installed. When you come t= o=20 the distribution part in sysinstall (FreeBSD's installation program), make= =20 sure you have selected at least one of the two available kernels in "Binary= =20 kernel distributions (required)". Good Luck! Cheers, Pieter PS. Although you certainly _can_ install FreeBSD on a 1.5GB partition, I wo= uld=20 recommend more than 1.5GB for FreeBSD (for a fully configured system, 8+ GB= =20 would be apropriate) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:07:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B9D16A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C464813C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so15743uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:07:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mi/Az5JZqHlhqg7Bfy4sQ+8iuZ5t/o8AAwcHtUkClQRQxWWb20VzP6AkjrTdA3GYiaaiSPZJIbQomL9sqZeQqlPuPnoBPOvMQt2DqZsknggIZTLD6LLZVDmfHbaPK6U7tLB0QPKDXhoRNuCBH6WCrjWbpOuoUyukQDz2uL3tJPU= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr10212hub.1168412835771; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:07:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:07:15 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Colin Percival" In-Reply-To: <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:07:17 -0000 On 1/10/07, Colin Percival wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > work... so I can get real things done. > > In other words, you want us to hurry up and do more unpaid work, so that > you can make more money? > > Colin Percival > PS. http://www.freebsd.org/donations/ > PPS. http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/ > I'm more then willing to pay real money to support the sub-projects that are of interest to me. I need to see some real progress being made in return though. Feel free to start working on any of the problems I listed. When you have something to show me I'll send some cash. Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible expense. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:08:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC9216A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E953113C45D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 10876 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 07:37:03 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:37:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:10:43 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070110081043.b1b0a73a.coolzone@io.dk> In-Reply-To: References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110051608.GB80575@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:08:24 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:48:39 -0600 "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > I am unhappy but I care too much about FreeBSD to just up and leave, > it may be time for a sabbatical though... And I complain because I > care... like a parent. Trolling. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:12:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C30116A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC513C46B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so16665uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:12:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pJ0AcQZiZq2e/M+CRvURTe2vvJHHRwe1giub+kj4uRBA1Uh6bPWmvDmnXIIP+owkINinyWTLCGsjJUIG77TUSjQ15PDv9fOwZjZ6I6LCz/Gmh+Zm5SKAQv9qvn2MrUkDVMALeuGi0hz3gi7eLLQiidHNdRwxasbXCDdzEN1Hpg0= Received: by 10.78.118.19 with SMTP id q19mr7032huc.1168413166900; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:12:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:12:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:12:46 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Rico Secada" In-Reply-To: <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:12:48 -0000 On 1/10/07, Rico Secada wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 > "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > > for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > work... so I can get real things done. > > So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work > for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you > want it to!? So you can get real things done!? > > If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by > people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? > Repost: I'm more then willing to pay real money to support the sub-projects that are of interest to me. I need to see some real progress being made in return though. Feel free to start working on any of the problems I listed. When you have something to show me I'll send some cash. Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible expense. > Now just shut up and go away!!! > No. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:13:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FAB16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7562F13C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd5mr8so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr8so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.184]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JBN009PE2MCPX60@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:13:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.152]) by pd5mr8so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JBN009502MB6L60@pd5mr8so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:13:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0JBN00EVS2MBLAF0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:13:23 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 51999 invoked from network); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:13:40 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:13:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:13:40 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: To: Nikolas Britton Message-id: <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:13:23 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > work... so I can get real things done. In other words, you want us to hurry up and do more unpaid work, so that you can make more money? Colin Percival PS. http://www.freebsd.org/donations/ PPS. http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:16:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD8216A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8486813C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so17273uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:16:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jGn5wW3oKkPr3hL9welOf6/W37Rmg0YIYFzDCJYN9cnrGQW+Q9Mxx9fH9tZA4mgsEQ/T8bHXHWOpNGKwWXTLGQFsPwuMLOh1aSkKo1BYEUFDubjNgJDrYc5IJTVcZ/6U7Z90EbNN8I0fuA4GIvfjjcqXtjYRZB8sXLk8MvWz1kk= Received: by 10.78.164.13 with SMTP id m13mr250hue.1168411774882; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:49:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.3 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:49:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:49:34 +0200 From: "George Vanev" To: "Nathan Vidican" In-Reply-To: <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:31 -0000 Thanks to all of you! I installed isc-dhcpd and it is working fine. But I don't want to hardcode the nameservers in the dhcpd.conf, because my ISP is changing them sometimes. It would be perfect if there is a way dhcpd to read the nameservers from /etc/resolv.conf Regards -- George Vanev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:25:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D180616A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8AD13C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so18657uge for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:25:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uKe5pVusWgYtj3f9Wn2Q6ziu9SRWVxqerePU3xQoTJRyNraNDqnJ7JCeL7jiizUAn1wF02FRgkKBVz32iBf9Va2ABMukfOz87TKjHL1qgKKnOSauwa54uedRjAwYAXDbWysiolRXPruRMO6w5COLO896LmKggUg5RW2hZGPt7vM= Received: by 10.78.180.16 with SMTP id c16mr22457huf.1168413926567; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:25:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:25:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:25:21 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Rico Secada" In-Reply-To: <20070110081043.b1b0a73a.coolzone@io.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110051608.GB80575@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110081043.b1b0a73a.coolzone@io.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:25:27 -0000 On 1/10/07, Rico Secada wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:48:39 -0600 > "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > I am unhappy but I care too much about FreeBSD to just up and leave, > > it may be time for a sabbatical though... And I complain because I > > care... like a parent. > > Trolling. > Activism. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:35:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF31216A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DC8013C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 72106 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 9827 invoked by uid 98); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.062557 secs); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.062557 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:24 -0000 (Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:20:24 +0545) Received: (qmail 63129 invoked by uid 1009); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:20:20 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, teklimbu@wlink.com.np Message-Id: <20070110132020.ca39af02.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200701091428.l09ESiAR011052@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20070109162922.9549fa55.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <200701091428.l09ESiAR011052@lurza.secnetix.de> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.1 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 Cc: olli@lurza.secnetix.de, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using IPFW to bypass hotmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:44 +0100 (CET) Oliver Fromme wrote: > Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > I run a transparent squid proxy using IPFW below: > > > > ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via > > bge0 > > That's not the rule for transparent proxying. For that you > need a "forward" (or "fwd") rule, not an "allow" rule. > (Of course, the "allow" rule above might still be needed, > but it's not the one that actually enables the transparent > proxying). > > > Now I want the IP: 192.168.55.22 to bypass Squid when requesting > > www.hotmail.com. > > > > How do I go about doing this using IPFW? Can somebody shed some > > light on this issue? > > Simply add an "allow" rule for that IP, and place it > _before_ the "forward" (or "fwd") rule in your rule set: > > allow tcp from 192.168.55.22 to www.hotmail.com > > Note that the hostname is not resolved dynamically, but > at the time the rule is added to teh rule set. > > Best regards > Oliver > > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing > Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > > "To this day, many C programmers believe that 'strong typing' > just means pounding extra hard on the keyboard." > -- Peter van der Linden > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Dear Oliver Fromme, Thanks for your input. I really appreciate it. I have rechecked my firewall and I do have the following rule: $IPFW add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in I have place your rule on top of the above rules like this: ipfw -q allow tcp from 192.168.55.22 to www.hotmail.com ipfw -a add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via bge0 Are the above rules correct ? Once again, thanks alot. -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpJc4VrOl+eVhOvYRAigpAJ9WDSsy7CsXtCI9qKwXLqsujnmHXQCcDstb wwjEiMWm0P280aBFuhDsq+0= =Vcsn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:35:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D63316A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC4D13C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 72111 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 9839 invoked by uid 98); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.216 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.077426 secs); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:30 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.216):. Processed in 0.077426 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.216] (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:24 -0000 (Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:20:24 +0545) Received: (qmail 63129 invoked by uid 1009); 10 Jan 2007 07:35:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teklimbu.wlink.com.np) (202.79.36.216) by teklimbu.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 07:35:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:20:20 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, teklimbu@wlink.com.np Message-Id: <20070110132020.ca39af02.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200701091428.l09ESiAR011052@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20070109162922.9549fa55.teklimbu@wlink.com.np> <200701091428.l09ESiAR011052@lurza.secnetix.de> Organization: Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.1 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 Cc: olli@lurza.secnetix.de, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using IPFW to bypass hotmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:35:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:44 +0100 (CET) Oliver Fromme wrote: > Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote: > > I run a transparent squid proxy using IPFW below: > > > > ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via > > bge0 > > That's not the rule for transparent proxying. For that you > need a "forward" (or "fwd") rule, not an "allow" rule. > (Of course, the "allow" rule above might still be needed, > but it's not the one that actually enables the transparent > proxying). > > > Now I want the IP: 192.168.55.22 to bypass Squid when requesting > > www.hotmail.com. > > > > How do I go about doing this using IPFW? Can somebody shed some > > light on this issue? > > Simply add an "allow" rule for that IP, and place it > _before_ the "forward" (or "fwd") rule in your rule set: > > allow tcp from 192.168.55.22 to www.hotmail.com > > Note that the hostname is not resolved dynamically, but > at the time the rule is added to teh rule set. > > Best regards > Oliver > > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing > Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > > "To this day, many C programmers believe that 'strong typing' > just means pounding extra hard on the keyboard." > -- Peter van der Linden > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Dear Oliver Fromme, Thanks for your input. I really appreciate it. I have rechecked my firewall and I do have the following rule: $IPFW add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in I have place your rule on top of the above rules like this: ipfw -q allow tcp from 192.168.55.22 to www.hotmail.com ipfw -a add fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 in ipfw -q add allow tcp from 192.168.55.0/24 to any 3128 in via bge0 Are the above rules correct ? Once again, thanks alot. -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpJc4VrOl+eVhOvYRAigpAJ9WDSsy7CsXtCI9qKwXLqsujnmHXQCcDstb wwjEiMWm0P280aBFuhDsq+0= =Vcsn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:39:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25BA16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s9.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s9.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2F413C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.83]) by bay0-omc2-s9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:27:13 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:27:12 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:27:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:27:10 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2007 07:27:12.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF017990:01C73488] Cc: Subject: MediaWiki Problem : compile --with-mysql OR install mysql.so in FreeBSD6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:39:15 -0000 Helo friends, 1. I have installed Mysql 5 and media wiki 1.7 in FreeBSD 6.0 version. but forgot to install PHP before media wiki installation. but while installing mediawiki (through ports collection) some PHp packages its installed automatically. 2 . after the mediawiki installation I used ports collection (/usr/ports/lang/php5) to install php5 but I haven't selected any options from the menu . after installation of php and modifications in httpd.conf , I pointed my browser to my media wiki installation , I got the mediawiki setup link , but when I clicked the link its showing the error message as follows * PHP 5.2.0 installed Could not find a suitable database driver! o For MySQL, compile PHP using --with-mysql, or install the mysql.so module o For PostgreSQL, compile PHP using --with-pgsql, or install the pgsql.so module 3 .So I returned to /usr/ports/lang/PHP5 and tried make reinstall but its showing an error already Php5.2.0 installed so I can't move further. 4 . the I tried /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions (make install clean) and selected from the menu Mysql support & zlib support and continued its completed .. then tried the mediawiki setup link but got another error php-xml support was not ther , so returned to /usr/ports/lang/php5 / php5-extensions but when i have given the make reinstall again both ports not showing the menu frame to select any of the mysql driver or xml support If any body ther who familiar with these , I will be very thankfull to you , as this is an urgent requirement for me Thanks in Advance dhanesh. Pls help me to solve this _________________________________________________________________ Movie reviews, previews, news and gossips all here! http://content.msn.co.in/Entertainment/Default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 07:52:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A7D16A47E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17BF13C471 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A7qfox015286; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:52:41 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:52:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <39ed86f90701082110i14e19b60sc3c18c060eff63c9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <39ed86f90701082110i14e19b60sc3c18c060eff63c9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701100852.41045.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Greg Albrecht Subject: Re: process states revisited X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:47 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 06:10, Greg Albrecht wrote: > while searching for 'freebsd process states' on google i came across > this thread: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-December/138024.h >tml i'm a new subscriber, so i can't reply to the original thread. > > i'm guessing fr0zen@sbcglobal.net's original question was something more > like: "that do the values in the STATE column in top mean?" here's an > example of what i'm talking about: > > ## bad 'top' formatting to come > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU > COMMAND 95698 mysql 20 0 388M 349M kserel 0 266.7H 0.63% > 0.63% mysqld 98237 jffnms 8 0 21224K 14412K nanslp 0 0:02 > 0.59% 0.59% php 98239 jffnms 96 0 22124K 15292K select 1 0:02 > 0.49% 0.49% php 98596 root 96 0 4124K 2560K CPU1 1 > 0:00 0.51% 0.05% top 1263 root 4 0 1408K 708K accept 0 > 0:07 0.00% 0.00% vsftpd 3405 galbrecht 8 0 4876K 2676K wait > 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% bash 94414 root 4 0 3284K 1968K > sbwait 1 0:00 0.00% 0.00% mysql ## end of bad formatting > > this snippet of top shows the following values for STATE: kserel, > nanslp, select, CPU1, accept, wait, sbwait > > this thread has already cleared up these states: > nanslp: "Waiting for < 1 second." -grog@freebsd.org > select: "Waiting for a select() to complete" -grog@freebsd.org > wait: "Waiting for something to happen, possibly time limited (>= 1 > second)" -grog@fbsd > > top(1) tells us: "STATE is the current state (one of "sleep", "WAIT", > "run", "idl", "zomb", or "stop")" > > eh, not so much. > > man clears up some of these states: > sleep: "The sleep command suspends execution for a minimum of > seconds." - sleep(1) > accept: "accept a connection on a socket" - accept(2) > > i bet i can answer with: > run: process is running? > zomb: zombie process, terminated but not removed from memory > > that leaves us with: > kserel? The process is waiting for some event to occur in one of its threads. see kse(2). Please someone correct me if I'm wrong. > sbwait? "Wait for data to arrive at/drain from a socket buffer." (see sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c:363). So, it is essentially waiting for network I/O. > idl? > stop? I've never seen a process in one of these states. > > does the previous answer still apply ("ask the developers of those > programs")? The states are set in the kernel, so the (userland) program developers wouldn't be able to answer these questions. Hope this helps, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 08:03:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A4C16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C89413C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so418291nfc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:03:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gvIusv8NWXlsXiDcChAM+bDjMXYMD7cJwXWBF3zRW/3gWdNQATG3EhaYGGGqnDg7bjpzdTE35uH9NdTsWmZkIdxKK2NzqvgfjHD9ggt9OcJkTTqicCrl4+en4w0vf7GmlP3DsrY9uzIaRwd+K3857eiy6sGz9vlxKnFT2z8gV3Y= Received: by 10.78.170.17 with SMTP id s17mr24977hue.1168416180261; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:03:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:03:00 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20070110072838.GA32694@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <20070110072838.GA32694@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:03:02 -0000 On 1/10/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:12:46AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 1/10/07, Rico Secada wrote: > > >On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 > > >"Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > > > >> > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > >> > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > >> > for you to get busy and contribute. > > >> > > > >> > > >> I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > >> well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > >> work... so I can get real things done. > > > > > >So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work > > >for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you > > >want it to!? So you can get real things done!? > > > > > >If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by > > >people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? > > > > > > > Repost: > > I'm more then willing to pay real money to support the sub-projects > > that are of interest to me. I need to see some real progress being > > made in return though. Feel free to start working on any of the > > problems I listed. When you have something to show me I'll send some > > cash. Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the > > sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible > > expense. > > You know how unconvincing that sounds, right? What successful > projects have you paid the authors for after the fact, in the past? > Ok then. Start with a written plan with measurable goals and milestones. As far as passed sub-projects I've helped fund... not many as it's not tax deductible. And If I send money to the main project (this is tax deductible) I have no control over the distribution of my funds to the people or sub-projects I want to support. It's a no win situation. Solve it and you'll solve your funding problems. How does Linux handle these types of funding issues? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 08:13:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE51716A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5396E13C45D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A8D1ox018828; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:13:01 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:13:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701100913.00920.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Oliver Fromme Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE question (nacona vs. pentium4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:13:04 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 10:46, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to write an appropriate CPUTYPE entry for > /etc/make.conf for the following machine: > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2799.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf41 Stepping =3D 1 > Features=3D0xbfebfbff SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH, > DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=3D0x441d> > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > I've read the appropriate sections in the make.conf(5) > manpage, /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf and even > /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, but they don't really help. > > So far I've been using "CPUTYPE=3Dpentium4", but I wonder > if "nocona" would be better, however I'm not sure if my > CPU above qualifies as a nocona one. I think the main > difference is that nocona supports SSE3, and SSE3 is > indeed listed in the CPU features above, so ... =46rom what I found on the Internet it seems that "Nocona" is the name of t= he=20 first Xeon CPU that supports long mode (x86-64). Your CPU definately doesn'= t=20 support long mode, so nocona isn't "right". (S)SSE3 adds only a few=20 instructions but they are really useful (in my opinion). GCC(1) suggests: prescott Improved version of Intel Pentium4 CPU with MMX, SSE, SSE2 a= nd SSE3 instruction set support. Cheers, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 08:27:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7AA16A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB6813C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47B01337D7; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:56:59 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B558B9C929; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:56:59 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:56:59 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110082659.GI39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h0beEpl++jFtFN5A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:01 -0000 --h0beEpl++jFtFN5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [irrelevant cruft removed] On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 23:54:02 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 17:08:45 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers >>> on it promises? >> >> You shouldn't. You obviously don't understand the issues. We don't >> owe you anything. Play an active part or go away. > > Fuck off Greg, You've proved my assumptions. Clearly you don't want to play an active part. Go away. You may learn to grow up elsewhere, though I wouldn't bet on it. > Sincerely. You've got to be joking. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --h0beEpl++jFtFN5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpKNTIubykFB6QiMRAkXDAJ0W5RKisypSvvlWKXKeKk6h6FrsQwCePdzf k/Fd9uAUGew18pFR5xge0to= =rEih -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h0beEpl++jFtFN5A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 08:40:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFA716A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0707013C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A8ePLr014477; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:40:25 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:40:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070109171839.98742.qmail@web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109171839.98742.qmail@web59203.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701100940.25384.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: linux quest Subject: Re: NMap in FreeBSD Problem ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:40:30 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 18:18, linux quest wrote: > Thanks ... I think the 'rehash' command does help a bit... at least now, > when I type 'nmap', I can see the help manual (before this, there was just > error msg). However, now, when I type 'nmap 192.168.1.10', (where > 192.168.1.10 is the PC that I wanted to scan) ... I got the message ... > > 'Limiting closed port RST response from 283 to 200 packets/sec' This is not a message from nmap, but from FreeBSD. It means that the system is sending more than 200 ICMP packets/per second. I reckon you see this line on the machine you're scanning. Your scan will continue as normal but will be slowed down by this cool safety feature of FreeBSD :). If you want to turn this off set sysctl net.inet.icmp.icmplim_output=0. Please keep in mind that a scan will take a long time to complete with nmap's default options. Hope this helps, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 08:41:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A77D16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s40.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s40.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7515313C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.27]) by bay0-omc3-s40.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:41:45 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:41:45 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:40 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.107.34] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Marwan Sultan" To: agus.262@gmail.com, freebsd@alaskaparadise.com Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:40 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2007 08:41:45.0425 (UTC) FILETIME=[28E48410:01C73493] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck report after crash... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:45 -0000 Okay try this, >From single user mode, # umount -a # fsck -y # reboot and check if any error still present, You can run fsck again to make sure filesystm is clean now. but this time use mount -a instead of umount. Have fun Marwan Sultan. >Ok..done it.....now, can u explain me or point me a link to the why i have >to doit in single mode and what this does?? >i've done it and now when i restart in normal mode i got the same UNREF >erros plus some Phase 5 - Check Cyl Groups errors. >FREE BLK COUNT WRONG IN SUPERBLK >Salvage? no > >BLK MISSING IN BIT MAPS >Salvage?no > >then i did a fsck in normal mode and this last errors disappear but still >get the first ones.... > >thanx..... > >2007/1/9, Beech Rintoul : >> >>On Tuesday 09 January 2007 14:53, Agus wrote: >> > Hi, all.....i suffer a blackout today when my freebsd was running, and >>when >> > i start up again i run fsck and it reports that 5 files >>areUNREF......this >> > happens during >> > Phase 4 - Check Reference Count >> > >> > UNREF FILE I=94324 OWNER=mysql MODE=100600 >> > SIZE=0 MTIME=Jan 9 20:30 2007 >> > CLEAR? no >> > >> > and a few more with same owner and mode; the only thing that changes is >>the >> > I,(inode, i guess).... >> > >> > Is there a way to fix this?!? >> >>Boot into single-user and run "fsck -y". >> >>Cheers, >> >>Beech >> >>-- >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com >>/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel >>\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 >>X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 >>/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 09:04:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6521716A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019E13C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A94NLr019194; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:04:24 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:04:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Jonathan Horne Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:04:39 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 17:21, Jonathan Horne wrote: > i am finally looking at make.conf and how editing it could improve my > system(s). > > 1) does specifying a cpu architecture really help? It depends, but generally: yes. (although the perceived speed increase is probably marginal) It really helps when you are using programs which use a lot of floating point operations. gcc is then able to use the faster sse2 instructions instead of plain x87 instructions. > 2) if i am building for a p4-540 (nacona?), a p3, and a p4-xeon, what > problems am i setting myself up for by specifying a cpu type on my build > box? You should choose the lowest common denominator: the p3 in this case. You'll run into trouble if you build programs for a new processor and then run them on an old one. > > at this point, im wondering how to go about building for more than one > architecture effectively. right now, i build one world, and 3 different > kernels, but they are all build with generic options. > > just wondering how i can effectivly leverage my build server to have the > best compile options for my target boxes. > > any suggestions? The kernel probably won't be any faster, but in any case here's how: #make CPUTYPE=pentium4 buildkernel > > thanks, > jonathan Cheers, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 09:07:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A474916A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689EB13C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so8159ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=R1UQ/8PsaGmEHv2sUAtyl/iKr+KDUeQ+Z0cIGKMKxoiU009zIFCyyC1CjxrNfrPWdm4fddpOC3ciILDQr7dTGe3Ezu5mlUkQipAth4GDfZPOnqGaMnaQRL/TOWWdbtI1M0VWFiYDEZh33NAkQ0qZIXQoOkhg3GRZbXlX/fMiILg= Received: by 10.100.5.17 with SMTP id 17mr55869ane.1168420019631; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701100106r6d2c98fblc8d8b89f5ad68726@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:06:59 +0100 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:00 -0000 Hello Friends How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? -- Thanks! BR / vj -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 09:11:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155D616A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88C13C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0A9BJLr020443; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:19 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A3E4D9.7060703@schrodinger.com> <20070109222821.GB75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A41F41.6020203@schrodinger.com> In-Reply-To: <45A41F41.6020203@schrodinger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701101011.19417.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Simon Gao , Andy Greenwood , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:11:32 -0000 On Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:03, Simon Gao wrote: > I looked at the link. It seems that it's not desirable to make a > filesystem larger than 2TB with 5.2.1. How about 6.1/6.2? Are those > remaining issues resolved with 6.1/6.2? > > Simon I have no idea if this is up-to-date but see this: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html Regards, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 09:23:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83E716A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A753513C471 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l0A9N9C9098415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:23:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l0A9N9Bg098414; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16998; Wed, 10 Jan 07 00:11:32 PST Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:14:13 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: nikolas.britton@gmail.com Message-Id: <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:23:11 -0000 "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the > sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible > expense. For accounting/tax purposes, aren't salary and benefits just as deductible as "contributions"? Hire someone qualified as your own full- or part-time employee, and assign them to work on the projects that you want to support. As just one example, that's effectively Red Hat's entire operation AFAIK. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 09:27:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9489916A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE1B813C461 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 32500 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 09:55:52 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 09:55:52 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:29:30 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070110102930.95c1d4e6.coolzone@io.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problems using autoconf/automake X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:27:08 -0000 Hi I am using autoconf/automake to try to build portable makefiles for some software I wrote. I am a newbie in makefiles. If I don't add my man page, all works out fine. But as soon as I add my man page 2 problems arises. 1. I can't use make distcheck, I get the following error: make: don't know how to make myprg.1. Stop *** Error code 2 2. When I do "make", the man page gets installed in /usr/local/share/man/man1, and not in /usr/local/man/man1. How do I deal with this issue and at the same time maintain portability? My Makefile.am looks like this: bin_PROGRAMS = myprg salahtime_SOURCES = myprg.hpp myprg.cpp man_MANS = myprg.1 My configure.ac looks like this: AC_INIT(myprg.cpp) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(myprg,0.1) AC_PROG_CC AC_PROG_CXX AC_PROG_INSTALL AC_OUTPUT(Makefile) Any help would be appreciated. Best and kind regards, Rico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:11:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BBB16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27BBB13C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@io.dk) Received: (qmail 8380 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 10:40:09 -0000 Received: from 85233229074.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO dansknet.dk) (85.233.229.74) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 10:40:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:13:45 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070110111345.e76e7626.coolzone@io.dk> In-Reply-To: <20070110102930.95c1d4e6.coolzone@io.dk> References: <20070110102930.95c1d4e6.coolzone@io.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems using autoconf/automake (SOLVED) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:23 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:29:30 +0100 Rico Secada wrote: Hmm, ./configure --mandir=/usr/local/man, when installed on freebsd. Didn't think of that. > Hi > > I am using autoconf/automake to try to build portable makefiles for some software I wrote. I am a newbie in makefiles. > > If I don't add my man page, all works out fine. But as soon as I add my man page 2 problems arises. > > 1. I can't use make distcheck, I get the following error: > > make: don't know how to make myprg.1. Stop > *** Error code 2 > > 2. When I do "make", the man page gets installed in /usr/local/share/man/man1, and not in /usr/local/man/man1. How do I deal with this issue and at the same time maintain portability? > > My Makefile.am looks like this: > > bin_PROGRAMS = myprg > salahtime_SOURCES = myprg.hpp myprg.cpp > man_MANS = myprg.1 > > My configure.ac looks like this: > > AC_INIT(myprg.cpp) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(myprg,0.1) > AC_PROG_CC > AC_PROG_CXX > AC_PROG_INSTALL > AC_OUTPUT(Makefile) > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Best and kind regards, > Rico > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:22:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4C516A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC7E13C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AAORnG018793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:24:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168424667; bh=t9MeqlL8HNdCUwss80tL4tKsabo=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TvPkHNRuFtJLfxsBUCtWiusggKAGIxSA0W6G+i LIMMnpbBwtZPrecDt01kYhfUxELg2jZTBBI+QY0vCcE9eDoA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=r+VANznFASH0A0EK2+VJ4x39MnhGtOPppNN2mcKHXQElltfLjMud/pz5kFigOuOXQ RCLAyf3Lj/J4fXh7NMA+Q== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AAOQTe018785; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:24:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:24:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> Message-ID: <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:22:04 -0000 On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: Apologies for top-posting. I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on "namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the loadable doesn't help, either. It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using the driver source from the 3ware site. Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? I've already emailed Scott Long asking about the possibility of the inclusion of the new twa driver in the next FreeBSD, but I fear we're too far down the release process, so it could be a YEAR before there's a RELEASE that supports it. -Dan >> You were on the right track with the emergency shell, but the "Fixit" mode >> (now included on disk 1 for your convenience) gives you a lot more >> flexibility (inclusion of "ls" is just the start!). Have you tried >> something like this? >> >> 1) Boot to complete install CD >> 2) Go into "Fixit" mode (not just the emergency shell) >> 3) # sysctl kern.module_path="/dist/boot/kernel" >> 4) # kldload twa >> 5) # exit >> 6) proceed with installation >> >> This shouldn't be necessary though, since twa is included in GENERIC for >> both FreeBSD 6.1 and 6.2 (did you say what version you were trying to >> install?). >> >> Now, if your controller is too new to be included in the shipping version >> of twa then that's another matter. If you have a binary kernel module that >> uses a different driver name from the vendor you could use the same general >> approach, but you'd want to configure your network interface and set up >> your NFS mount prior to step 3, and include the appropriate NFS path in the >> sysctl command in step 3. > > Forgot to mention you'd also need to manually copy the vendor driver and > modify /boot/loader.conf on the newly installed system so it could actually > boot.. you could easily take care of that from the fixit mode shell after the > installation, though. > -- "And, a special guest, from the future, miss Ria Pischell. Miss Pischell, as you all know, is the inventor of the Statiophonic Oxygenetic Amplifiagraphaphonadelaverberator, and it's pretty hard to imagine life without one of those. -Rufus, Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:28:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D320E16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9868613C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so12804ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:28:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=J9YRXvUxekzFz6h2PmkfzaXJEEjW5OQZH7YSl7wNMqLL8Q0jefIYRidSNHOq8IcZBl7zL7ntb+whP3U8EtjWKQd421ul1XK5dYI+S5f5h9li99cW+pcpGijFIkdpvQfr1bgZG+Mxvf86azox6V6i95gN/iF+SrbYLedeXkt0aDk= Received: by 10.100.191.5 with SMTP id o5mr126657anf.1168424913927; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:28:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701100228i4cb1c1e6vdce50f2c3c9f767c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:28:33 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?How_to_check_how_many_prcesses/d=E6mons_are_runni?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ng=3F?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:36 -0000 Hallo there How to check how many prcesses/d=E6mons are running? --=20 Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:32:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B11C16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6A313C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:51803 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4alK-0004yy-8e for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 38222 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 11:32:52 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 11:32:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 49459 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jan 2007 11:32:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:52 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-ID: <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" , John Nielsen , questions@freebsd.org References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H4alK-0004yy-8e. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H4alK-0004yy-8e 892a5e551c6a4340c605aa0229a19ae7 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:32:58 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:24:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > > Apologies for top-posting. > > I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on > "namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that > supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not > support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the > loadable doesn't help, either. > > It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using > the driver source from the 3ware site. > > Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? Might some of the following information from 3ware be of help? http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15003 http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=14850 > > I've already emailed Scott Long asking about the possibility of the > inclusion of the new twa driver in the next FreeBSD, but I fear we're too > far down the release process, so it could be a YEAR before there's a > RELEASE that supports it. > > -Dan > > >>You were on the right track with the emergency shell, but the "Fixit" mode > >>(now included on disk 1 for your convenience) gives you a lot more > >>flexibility (inclusion of "ls" is just the start!). Have you tried > >>something like this? > >> > >>1) Boot to complete install CD > >>2) Go into "Fixit" mode (not just the emergency shell) > >>3) # sysctl kern.module_path="/dist/boot/kernel" > >>4) # kldload twa > >>5) # exit > >>6) proceed with installation > >> > >>This shouldn't be necessary though, since twa is included in GENERIC for > >>both FreeBSD 6.1 and 6.2 (did you say what version you were trying to > >>install?). > >> > >>Now, if your controller is too new to be included in the shipping version > >>of twa then that's another matter. If you have a binary kernel module that > >>uses a different driver name from the vendor you could use the same > >>general > >>approach, but you'd want to configure your network interface and set up > >>your NFS mount prior to step 3, and include the appropriate NFS path in > >>the > >>sysctl command in step 3. > > > >Forgot to mention you'd also need to manually copy the vendor driver and > >modify /boot/loader.conf on the newly installed system so it could actually > >boot.. you could easily take care of that from the fixit mode shell after > >the > >installation, though. > > > -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:35:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA91616A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8E13C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so55967uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:35:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TfiTV0HThJCpujQWxBrvVnah+08ptldIbLT99wZ/3cWlq0X6N5/vfhGca/K5o3GA1Fyr/YY+8VXZWbX53PKafH+vsDRrIR/6D52HLd09bx0c7bt38CuEp/4LluSGaKygS59QFNF6pQMN/F7KeybO9PhazjGi/Zh+ufi1UXgby+I= Received: by 10.78.81.20 with SMTP id e20mr54719hub.1168425318001; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:35:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:35:12 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" In-Reply-To: <20070110082659.GI39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20070110082659.GI39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:35:21 -0000 On 1/10/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > [irrelevant cruft removed] > > On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 23:54:02 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 17:08:45 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > >>> Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers > >>> on it promises? > >> > >> You shouldn't. You obviously don't understand the issues. We don't > >> owe you anything. Play an active part or go away. > > > > Fuck off Greg, > > You've proved my assumptions. Clearly you don't want to play an > active part. Go away. You may learn to grow up elsewhere, though I > wouldn't bet on it. > > > Sincerely. > > You've got to be joking. > I'm going to answer why I said what I said above with a parallel example that hopefully points out one of the problems with some, conservative, members of the FreeBSD community... Why Won't God Heal Amputees? It's a simple question, isn't it? We all know that amputated legs do not spontaneously regenerate in response to prayer. Amputees get no miracles from God. If you are an intelligent person, you have to admit that it's an interesting question: - On the one hand, you believe that God answers prayers and performs miracles. - On the other hand, you know that God completely ignores amputees when they pray for miracles. How do you deal with this discrepancy? As an intelligent Christian, you have to deal with it, because it makes no sense. In order to handle it, notice that you have to create some kind of rationalization. You have to invent an excuse on God's behalf to explain this strange fact of life. You might say: "Well God must have some kind of special plan for amputees." So you invent your excuse, whatever it is, and then you stop thinking about it because it is uncomfortable. Here's another example. As a Christian, you believe that God cares about you and answers your prayers. So the second question is: Why are there so many starving people in our world? Look out at are world and notice that millions of children are dieing of starvation, It really is horrific. Why would God be worried about you getting a raise, while at the same time ignoring the prayers of these desperate, innocent little children? It really doesn't make any sense, does it? Why would a loving god do this? To explain it, you have to come up with some sort of very strange excuse for God. Like: "God wants these children to suffer and die for some divine, mysterious reason". Then you push it out of your mind because it absolutely does not fit with your view of a loving, caring God. Do you see what has happened here? When we assume that God exist, the answers to these questions make absolutely no sense. But if we assume that God is imaginary, our world makes complete sense. It's interesting, isn't it? Actually, it's more than interesting. It is incredibly important. Our world only makes sense when we understand that God is imaginary. This is how intelligent, rational people know that God is imaginary. When you use your brain, and when you think logically about your religious faith, you can reach only one possible conclusion... The "god" that you have heard about since you were an infant is completely imaginary. You have to willfully discard rationality, and accept hundreds of bizarre rationalizations to believe in your "god." Why should you care? What difference does it make if people want to believe in a "god", even if he is imaginary? It matters because people who believe in imaginary beings are delusional. It matters because people who talk to imaginary beings are delusional. It matters because people who believe in imaginary superstitions like prayer are delusional. It's that simple, and that obvious. Your religious beliefs hurt you personally and hurt us as a species because they are delusional. As Carl Sagan once said: "It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:38:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C9716A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3C913C455 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AAeWt0029811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:40:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168425633; bh=XzE44xCNXAF0Y6XppaNiDLVKyYM=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0aWX5yz6gRvMncefL4jxXb5FGE2ayq4I9GD2Ka 6Z9HAPVVHs6MGbFznFYYA5COg0c283oLGf5dSHIcrc5j0K5w== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=b4bpLPjyd5d7AyMkNPBH8xy1wUOPjFYdUZHWMmj7w0TxD7BLhEMhST687Hm2vrFii T4NOTtGvmaqHunpPqQXHw== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AAeWgP029798; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:40:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:40:32 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20070110053722.D57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:38:09 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:24:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: >> >> Apologies for top-posting. >> >> I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on >> "namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >> supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >> support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >> loadable doesn't help, either. >> >> It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using >> the driver source from the 3ware site. >> >> Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? > > Might some of the following information from 3ware be of help? > > http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15003 > http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=14850 I saw (and tried) an earlier version of these instructions, basically the issue was that I couldn't LOAD a module because said module was already in the kernel. In this case I don't think such a module is so it might work better, not 100 percent sure. Well, I'll have to modify them somewhat -- no floppy support here (lame, I know), but perhaps it'll work, I'll give it a try tomorrow. Thanks for the tip. -Dan > > >> >> I've already emailed Scott Long asking about the possibility of the >> inclusion of the new twa driver in the next FreeBSD, but I fear we're too >> far down the release process, so it could be a YEAR before there's a >> RELEASE that supports it. >> >> -Dan >> >>>> You were on the right track with the emergency shell, but the "Fixit" mode >>>> (now included on disk 1 for your convenience) gives you a lot more >>>> flexibility (inclusion of "ls" is just the start!). Have you tried >>>> something like this? >>>> >>>> 1) Boot to complete install CD >>>> 2) Go into "Fixit" mode (not just the emergency shell) >>>> 3) # sysctl kern.module_path="/dist/boot/kernel" >>>> 4) # kldload twa >>>> 5) # exit >>>> 6) proceed with installation >>>> >>>> This shouldn't be necessary though, since twa is included in GENERIC for >>>> both FreeBSD 6.1 and 6.2 (did you say what version you were trying to >>>> install?). >>>> >>>> Now, if your controller is too new to be included in the shipping version >>>> of twa then that's another matter. If you have a binary kernel module that >>>> uses a different driver name from the vendor you could use the same >>>> general >>>> approach, but you'd want to configure your network interface and set up >>>> your NFS mount prior to step 3, and include the appropriate NFS path in >>>> the >>>> sysctl command in step 3. >>> >>> Forgot to mention you'd also need to manually copy the vendor driver and >>> modify /boot/loader.conf on the newly installed system so it could actually >>> boot.. you could easily take care of that from the fixit mode shell after >>> the >>> installation, though. >>> >> > > > > -- "I'll commit ritual suicide before I whore myself out to Disney." --Emi Bryant April 26, 2004 On the animation industry --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 10:48:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1607A16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD6113C4AC for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so11467wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:48:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZSf+pydkKKC+gD8PEAedRXrNkTwbk1lExcASjL8F3ddpEsPmaGs7I4JYv1nZfbBbrJxbhgT8tcU4zNbdaHniHUo0GJaN8VCeXApIA6GeMO/N9NgIAn1sBNYURi5qE/KnrED6gbRT4s0UT6lJPXQbX7Ww59qlFHOzWn8Jv3473KU= Received: by 10.78.17.4 with SMTP id 4mr47953huq.1168426126664; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:48:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:48:46 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "perryh@pluto.rain.com" In-Reply-To: <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:48:48 -0000 On 1/10/07, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > "Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the > > sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible > > expense. > > For accounting/tax purposes, aren't salary and benefits just as > deductible as "contributions"? Hire someone qualified as your > own full- or part-time employee, and assign them to work on the > projects that you want to support. As just one example, that's > effectively Red Hat's entire operation AFAIK. > Interesting... I'm not sure the owner would go for it though. Maybe a 1099 contractor. Would anyone in the group at large be interested in arrangements such as this? What kind of money (rate) would you expect if you got payed to work on stuff your already working on in your spare time? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:05:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2210716A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890A413C4A5 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0AB5QLr012445; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:05:27 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:05:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2cd0a0da0701100228i4cb1c1e6vdce50f2c3c9f767c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100228i4cb1c1e6vdce50f2c3c9f767c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701101205.26328.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: How to check how many =?iso-8859-1?q?prcesses/d=E6mons_are?= running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:33 -0000 On Wednesday 10 January 2007 11:28, VeeJay wrote: > Hallo there > > How to check how many prcesses/d=E6mons are running? Total number of processes: ps ax | wc -l =46or a specific user: ps xU | wc -l Hope this helps, Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:05:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEC016A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DC113C4B0 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so62371uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:05:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=taP3iYq747JRzES+8m2RldLgXmcUDZKWvzQ94tFHBIZvdp1HjouJBVT9+ss+R2TvQSpS4i1iZ4e819JPwPFlFxaXpQND/xPaNXMtozjO4IgPAxpMTNebYfkU5AHwHeSwFp1VWfRYRP5YLDanwkTP4J++75qxdI1YD1OoBoA4KDU= Received: by 10.78.139.1 with SMTP id m1mr53507hud.1168427157494; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:05:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:05:57 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Oliver Fromme" In-Reply-To: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE question (nacona vs. pentium4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:59 -0000 On 1/9/07, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to write an appropriate CPUTYPE entry for > /etc/make.conf for the following machine: > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2799.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > Features=0xbfebfbff SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH, > DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x441d> > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > I've read the appropriate sections in the make.conf(5) > manpage, /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf and even > /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, but they don't really help. > > So far I've been using "CPUTYPE=pentium4", but I wonder > if "nocona" would be better, however I'm not sure if my > CPU above qualifies as a nocona one. I think the main > difference is that nocona supports SSE3, and SSE3 is > indeed listed in the CPU features above, so ... > > Does anybody know for sure? Thank you very much in advance! > > Best regards > Oliver > nocona I believe added 64-bit extensions to the processor. Does your processor have 64-bit extensions? A better make.conf would be something like this though: CPUTYPE?=pentium3 CFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona or CPUTYPE?=pentium3 CFLAGS+= -mtune=prescott COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=prescott then use an if endif block to override system wide settings, such as with this example: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*} BROKEN=yes .endif From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:09:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421016A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3932413C474 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0ABCGor051748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:12:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168427536; bh=byKliwmU92FDT2xuiNc8qEiD730=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FJunnlX76twhfhnEbJaSSdKKxZpbKtFmbXg0Kn XUjqUZ4RPkKvdzKG2d8wK61Owp1NZuV1VLgPOuSWmNhMGChw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=kc+4eF/gysoKIeVxC5da+AeEr5d/PCQpmTXRffgd1uzccNjUaG+IxSVYLeuWjq9K9 EHvJwSysBHoCablUpAoHA== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0ABCGBh051747; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:12:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:12:16 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Dimitar Vasilev In-Reply-To: <59adc1a0701100305w708e3767p3d08db82daa96c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070110061053.H57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20070110053722.D57194@prime.gushi.org> <59adc1a0701100305w708e3767p3d08db82daa96c9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:09:53 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Dimitar Vasilev wrote: > Dan, > comment out the twa lines in the kernel. > Rebuild it and include the new modules. > should be easy. the module in the kernel it's conflicting with is on an INSTALL CD. But I don't think I'll have the namespace conflicts with the NEW module. -Dan -- "It's like GTA, except you pay for it, and you're allowed to use the car." -Josh, on Zipcar on-demand car-rental, 3/20/05 --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:28:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122DE16A417 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanhalprin@yahoo.com) Received: from web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC77E13C45D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanhalprin@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 79872 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2007 11:28:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xLrrNP8sXNxWz5jS5V/7Mdgcm2/l20TfRcbF9Wop+9Po/OTYSwP2GWJ/b1vq4yVs6S8bdFhk0yEn5fRQcCuDUzxJDLpsC9FyLSVH5MSXoIbsWlYACoOvBVBXA9rucjP4gti/fcVNPm+qDj28QCsLm0zkEYrH/xNuWBcDJbBL7BU= ; Message-ID: <20070110112843.79870.qmail@web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.79] by web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:28:43 PST Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:28:42 -0800 (PST) From: Stan Halprin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: MySQL Port Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:28:44 -0000 Hello;=0AI'm trying to build MySQL 5.0 (server) on FBSD 6.1 from port. I ra= n "make install clean" but now I'm lost. mysqld is not up. What is my usern= ame? Never asked me for one in the install. Tried this:=0A=0A# /usr/local/l= ibexec/mysqld -umysql=0A070109 16:39:30 InnoDB: Operating system error num= ber 13 in a file operation.=0AInnoDB: The error means mysqld does not have = the access rights to=0AInnoDB: the directory.=0AInnoDB: File name ./ibdata1= =0AInnoDB: File operation call: 'create'.=0AInnoDB: Cannot continue operati= on.=0A=0ALooks like there's probably more that needs to be done to get an o= ut-of-the-box MySQL port installation working. Please advise.=0AStan=0A=0A= =0A=0A__________________________________________________=0ADo You Yahoo!?= =0ATired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around =0Ahttp:= //mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:32:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898A16A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB6E13C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so20017wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:32:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=B4qOBei+ZjOo3hGgLxe/p9wrb7GBOHP8QfIc+8ZBM1HzIlVUzrsU/YVSYsVC5RRok+CbDB98wEGFB0ppBWdqgfFDapaZR7I8R5gyRtZfP6GqzeinH9hhmzLpNH7e8UFoECfPcO+R50vHjlrDbJlFJt+hc5oaJgTwF32G/GKp6cY= Received: by 10.78.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr50670hud.1168427144800; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:05:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.179.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:05:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59adc1a0701100305w708e3767p3d08db82daa96c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:05:44 +0100 From: "Dimitar Vasilev" To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" In-Reply-To: <20070110053722.D57194@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20070110053722.D57194@prime.gushi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:04 -0000 RGFuLApjb21tZW50IG91dCB0aGUgdHdhIGxpbmVzIGluIHRoZSBrZXJuZWwuClJlYnVpbGQgaXQg YW5kIGluY2x1ZGUgdGhlIG5ldyBtb2R1bGVzLgpzaG91bGQgYmUgZWFzeS4KCgotLSAK0JTQuNC8 0LjRgtGK0YAg0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C10LIKRGltaXRhciBWYXNzaWxldgoKR251UEcga2V5IElEOiAw eDRCOERCNTI1CktleXNlcnZlcjogcGdwLm1pdC5lZHUKS2V5IGZpbmdlcnByaW50OiBEODhBIDNC OTIgREVENSA5MTdFIDM0MUUgRDYyRiA4QzUxIDVGQzQgNEI4RCBCNTI1Cg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:35:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C4616A4C8 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B70E13C46A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so20457wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:35:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ks1GbxZTcN8SCghPmV21H2fLBFpdG9hiyWHKXEGEjRRLAkcY90pFkQ+wdh6F0lXHREN1PQ0gN7CM7DTVMDzpwtR3KHsMh07inx6jLwvrPh7z/RhncDQb9isV2mNQ8jSNRT+DSogb7BqSSorFvm8FLCAhB41LM5OeYoHgL2yEHNg= Received: by 10.78.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr50780hud.1168428920667; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:35:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:35:20 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Stan Halprin" In-Reply-To: <20070110112843.79870.qmail@web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070110112843.79870.qmail@web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 037428aa8ab269e1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL Port Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:35:22 -0000 On 1/10/07, Stan Halprin wrote: > Hello; > I'm trying to build MySQL 5.0 (server) on FBSD 6.1 from port. I ran "make install clean" but now I'm lost. mysqld is not up. What is my username? Never asked me for one in the install. Tried this: > > # /usr/local/libexec/mysqld -umysql > 070109 16:39:30 InnoDB: Operating system error number 13 in a file operation. > InnoDB: The error means mysqld does not have the access rights to > InnoDB: the directory. > InnoDB: File name ./ibdata1 > InnoDB: File operation call: 'create'. > InnoDB: Cannot continue operation. > > Looks like there's probably more that needs to be done to get an > out-of-the-box MySQL port installation working. Please advise. > Stan # echo 'mysql_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 11:42:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB6116A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3B513C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so70231uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:42:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IYR3MAwMX0DPB1062JnikOwSQ6Pq0AYFdTv1XYahEEABwtLrDErW59Cza/708cDfeBtlAde55MvM9XPfX/gvqChQUCckN7RP/FJLyK7a2eHofSuWy/Gl+9Gv4LPmr8iscmEC6FRQJPJ10AT74JnfdcaUfffFiFyEPxf66sAHPr0= Received: by 10.78.193.19 with SMTP id q19mr68503huf.1168429336489; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.3 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:42:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f4f57f60701100342j6a08187k9a605eba1a39853c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:42:15 +0200 From: "George Vanev" To: "Stan Halprin" In-Reply-To: <20070110112843.79870.qmail@web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070110112843.79870.qmail@web58911.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL Port Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:42:18 -0000 Check if user mysql exists. If it doesn't - create it. # echo 'mysql_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf #cd /usr/local/mysql #bin/mysql_install_db --user=mysql #chown -R root . #chown -R mysql var #chgrp -R mysql . #bin/mysqld_safe --user=mysql & #bin/mysqladmin -u root password '' #bin/mysql grant all privileges on *.* to 'your_user'@'host' identified by 'password' with grant option; exit; On 1/10/07, Stan Halprin wrote: > > Hello; > I'm trying to build MySQL 5.0 (server) on FBSD 6.1 from port. I ran "make > install clean" but now I'm lost. mysqld is not up. What is my username? > Never asked me for one in the install. Tried this: > > # /usr/local/libexec/mysqld -umysql > 070109 16:39:30 InnoDB: Operating system error number 13 in a file > operation. > InnoDB: The error means mysqld does not have the access rights to > InnoDB: the directory. > InnoDB: File name ./ibdata1 > InnoDB: File operation call: 'create'. > InnoDB: Cannot continue operation. > > Looks like there's probably more that needs to be done to get an > out-of-the-box MySQL port installation working. Please advise. > Stan > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- George Vanev Information Systems Specialist tel.: +359 898 44 25 37 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:24:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AA716A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE0B13C461 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so20510ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:24:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=poJ2t+EJA2dqpXinUuC3ufCHhInXS/y2VHofhi3tUfbHiOPtQo7EKQeV5bUXwMklRQQAwNLFVe2VpwaQtgzsn6ElUMNjmMA2HYl6OHdSPTd91DZwLIvWlXZtgJl1dJBXz0OMVFVXQxfAzXmp+ewGlehqkOImlhyUz3LmDSQf2oE= Received: by 10.100.132.16 with SMTP id f16mr193752and.1168431862733; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:24:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:24:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:24:22 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:24:23 -0000 Hi How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:34:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D45C16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2CB13C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACY6NZ031652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:34:07 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACY6DT023656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:34:06 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4DD3D.3040607@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:34:05 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.41933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE question (nacona vs. pentium4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:34:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to write an appropriate CPUTYPE entry for >> /etc/make.conf for the following machine: >> >> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2799.95-MHz 686-class CPU) >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 >> Features=0xbfebfbff> SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH, >> DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> >> Features2=0x441d> >> Logical CPUs per core: 2 >> >> I've read the appropriate sections in the make.conf(5) >> manpage, /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf and even >> /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, but they don't really help. >> >> So far I've been using "CPUTYPE=pentium4", but I wonder >> if "nocona" would be better, however I'm not sure if my >> CPU above qualifies as a nocona one. I think the main >> difference is that nocona supports SSE3, and SSE3 is >> indeed listed in the CPU features above, so ... >> >> Does anybody know for sure? Thank you very much in advance! >> >> Best regards >> Oliver >> > > nocona I believe added 64-bit extensions to the processor. Does your > processor have 64-bit extensions? A better make.conf would be > something like this though: > > CPUTYPE?=pentium3 > CFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona > COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona > > or > > CPUTYPE?=pentium3 > CFLAGS+= -mtune=prescott > COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=prescott > > then use an if endif block to override system wide settings, such as > with this example: > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*} > BROKEN=yes > .endif Oliver, It appears that there may be some confusion as to which processor you are running in your machine. You can better determine what processor you have by looking at the Intel processor number site: . By looking at both the frequency and the cache size, you can determine what your CPU is and what support you should enable. If you know the purchase / build date for your CPU you can also determine what the model is for the processor as well much better. If your CPU does support nocona, you might want to try enabling the support, but as others have said you may want to strictly add support like Nikolas showed, just to be on the safe side. I'm not sure how well supported the nocona P4 architecture is with the version of GCC used by FreeBSD. Nikolas, You are correct. The nocona CPUs are dual-core (only?) 32/64bit capable EM64T processors. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpN09EnKyINQw/HARAtFhAJ0bwguE3KaeajJWjN/rhsI3zBpSLQCdHBVm WcKhstnftKsEI4dhfe1fVfI= =yb3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:43:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58916A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFFA13C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AChWgL016122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:43:32 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AChVcJ030143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:43:32 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4DF73.4000408@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:43:31 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.42933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:43:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? Depends on a number of different factors. For example: 1. What you're running. 2. The number of users who have access to the machine. 3. The data being held. 4. How up-to-date the computer is, in particular whether or not any of the programs on the computer have vulnerability issues. 5. What point the computer may serve in a cluster of machines. etc, etc. So, assuming that no vulnerabilities exist or privilege escalation doesn't occur; this can be solved by rebuilding the system when security issues occur--subscribing to security@freebsd.org can solve that, along with directions given in the handbook , auditing your ports regularly with portaudit, and just updating your ports semi-regularly. Also, assuming that the user doesn't use up all available resources on the machine ( limits(1) holds the answers for that question there along with modifying /etc/login.conf ), they should only be able to affect users in their associated groups (assuming group access to data is allowed) or merely themselves. Please be more specific with your questions as they are a bit too open ended. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpN9zEnKyINQw/HARAjMkAKCiOe2IPdtuDi47AqqHw6tPk7ayQACdHwPy JBlZ20e86iJYsiTZ66Y1LnU= =zG/3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:44:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8460D16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635D413C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACidd6018025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:44:40 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACidPl030191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:44:39 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4DFB7.8030103@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:44:39 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701100228i4cb1c1e6vdce50f2c3c9f767c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100228i4cb1c1e6vdce50f2c3c9f767c@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.42933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_HIGHBIT 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: How to check how many =?iso-8859-1?q?prcesses/d=E6mons_are_ru?= =?iso-8859-1?q?nning=3F?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:44:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: > Hallo there > > How to check how many prcesses/dæmons are running? Read man ps. sockstat and netstat are good items to use as well if your daemons are network dependent. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpN+3EnKyINQw/HARAgPqAKCiss6C/onWhpJpmz04LZMb7LvOoQCgpBqp MdPL67hmOfcDhhWYu92cCfk= =4XcM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:45:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF21B16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E15313C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACjcnY013882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:45:38 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACjbYV000802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:45:37 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4DFF1.5090107@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:45:37 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701100106r6d2c98fblc8d8b89f5ad68726@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100106r6d2c98fblc8d8b89f5ad68726@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.43433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_419_INTRO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: > Hello Friends > > How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? Define/clarify the question made above. There are many ways that a system can be "affected" by a "bad user" :). - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpN/xEnKyINQw/HARAmmPAKCvhdvfdqPSvcHEW5kGkc7fSKVZ9wCgpE05 DQ1v1b1Ch7x+zKCTTCpLMbc= =Xby1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:47:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8FB16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D3C13C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACl90v000949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:47:09 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ACl8TN000846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:47:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:47:08 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.43433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:47:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 17:21, Jonathan Horne wrote: >> i am finally looking at make.conf and how editing it could improve my >> system(s). >> >> 1) does specifying a cpu architecture really help? > It depends, but generally: yes. (although the perceived speed increase is > probably marginal) > It really helps when you are using programs which use a lot of floating point > operations. gcc is then able to use the faster sse2 instructions instead of > plain x87 instructions. > >> 2) if i am building for a p4-540 (nacona?), a p3, and a p4-xeon, what >> problems am i setting myself up for by specifying a cpu type on my build >> box? > You should choose the lowest common denominator: the p3 in this case. You'll > run into trouble if you build programs for a new processor and then run them > on an old one. > >> at this point, im wondering how to go about building for more than one >> architecture effectively. right now, i build one world, and 3 different >> kernels, but they are all build with generic options. >> >> just wondering how i can effectivly leverage my build server to have the >> best compile options for my target boxes. >> >> any suggestions? > The kernel probably won't be any faster, but in any case here's how: > #make CPUTYPE=pentium4 buildkernel > >> thanks, >> jonathan > Cheers, > Pieter In this case you may want to setup different /etc/make.conf files beforehand and just set /etc/make.conf as a symlink to the relevant make.conf for the architecture you are compiling for. There is also distcc to look into though for compiling across multiple machines (it's in ports). - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpOBMEnKyINQw/HARAnf+AKCcpy9qqrzCjRnmRxUJAkoK41UnJwCeMvz6 7UrCHtaXN9CMTlRXGHUDuJA= =tCOQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 12:52:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327C16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4982913C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so29796wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.113.18 with SMTP id l18mr166978agc.1168433526807; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 20sm438495agd.2007.01.10.04.52.06; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB97B844; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F22FB831; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:52:15 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070110075041.086E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.30 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:52:07 -0000 On Wednesday January 10, 2007 at 07:24:22 (AM) VeeJay wrote: > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? Well, with a BFH and a sufficient supply of C-4 (cyclotrimethylene-trinitramine), he/she could be quite dangerous. -- Gerard Mail from '@gmail' is rejected and/or discarded here. Don't waste your time! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:12:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCF616A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE5513C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so26656ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:12:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pqiH3cgMNU8CXCiblH5/QffKr5MXUgQx8+4AXM0CyoPQYIwq5I7MGKgzkeuVqengWRCgqX5c35t8wpU5hCTjVijgnQox3YURzgYVIodUrVnIt90OK9YBApPAfzrS8LWuuKdzUrcOrivxcu0qSOPsjwf01/Mo004G2d2W1cTvda0= Received: by 10.100.9.19 with SMTP id 19mr214518ani.1168434773567; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:12:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701100512m6a5dc858se959da9dd725d069@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:53 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Process List & Security?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:54 -0000 Hi Can some good one at security side look into these running process? And see if there is a Process some is dangerous/ security breach which a Bad User has put? Thanks $ ps xa PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 0 ?? WLs 0:00.00 [swapper] 1 ?? ILs 0:00.00 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:02.90 [g_event] 3 ?? DL 0:02.87 [g_up] 4 ?? DL 0:03.04 [g_down] 5 ?? DL 0:00.00 [thread taskq] 6 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_0] 7 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_1] 8 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_2] 9 ?? DL 0:00.00 [kqueue taskq] 10 ?? RL 2775:10.56 [idle] 11 ?? WL 0:59.34 [swi4: clock sio] 12 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi3: vm] 13 ?? WL 0:00.10 [swi1: net] 14 ?? DL 0:02.65 [yarrow] 15 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi5: +] 16 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi2: cambio] 17 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: task queue] 18 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: Giant taskq] 19 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq9: acpi0] 20 ?? WL 0:00.22 [irq16: bce0 em0+] 21 ?? WL 0:00.32 [irq78: mfi0] 22 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq17: em1] 23 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq21: uhci0 uhci+] 24 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb0] 25 ?? DL 0:00.00 [usbtask] 26 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq20: uhci1] 27 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb1] 28 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb2] 29 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb3] 30 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq14: ata0] 31 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq15: ata1] 32 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi0: sio] 33 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq1: atkbd0] 34 ?? DL 0:00.07 [pagedaemon] 35 ?? DL 0:00.00 [vmdaemon] 36 ?? DL 0:01.11 [pagezero] 37 ?? DL 0:00.30 [bufdaemon] 38 ?? DL 0:59.50 [syncer] 39 ?? DL 0:00.29 [vnlru] 40 ?? DL 0:00.43 [softdepflush] 41 ?? DL 0:01.41 [schedcpu] 151 ?? Is 0:00.00 adjkerntz -i 644 ?? Is 0:00.00 /sbin/devd 688 ?? Ss 0:00.14 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s 761 ?? Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/usbd 809 ?? Is 0:00.06 /usr/sbin/sshd 815 ?? Ss 0:00.90 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) 819 ?? Is 0:00.02 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) 825 ?? Is 0:00.22 /usr/sbin/cron -s 1007 ?? Ss 0:01.10 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1008 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1009 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1010 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1011 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1012 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 1037 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd 7862 ?? Is 0:00.01 sshd: digill7b [priv] (sshd) 7866 ?? S 0:00.01 sshd: digill7b@ttyp0 (sshd) 866 v0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 867 v1 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 868 v2 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 869 v3 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 870 v4 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 871 v5 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 872 v6 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 873 v7 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 7867 p0 Ss 0:00.00 -sh (sh) 7928 p0 R+ 0:00.00 ps xa 1015 p2- I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld_safe 1033 p2- S 0:11.97 /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld --basedir=/usr/local/mysql --datadir=/var/db/mysql --user=mysql --pid-file=/var/db/mysql/localhost.maanjee.pid --port=33 $ -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:16:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B036D16A4FC for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AED13C4A9 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so71989nzh for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:16:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=bhqy9LGagNT+ELHTlijnYlfhM5BW4Rp/rHuElxBGQ2l8t3XYCRwMksGVwk5HaWkQ+x1aOy9wd60n3ATiZct+mdPgErsGtQFR9P1pnc5JkEf8BfIYt8sTSWUVCalEmVqiy0kC04jZbUeTrKOd8o02rSEYp2SdQ858pqLyNfe0dVY= Received: by 10.65.153.10 with SMTP id f10mr399355qbo.1168434973496; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:16:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.250.1 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:16:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:16:13 -0500 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: azureus abort X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:15 -0000 Hi, my azuresu aborts when i try to add new torrent, i don't remember if i did anything but only that i might have played with swt version during make, but i have rebuild it with swt3.2.1, here is the error log: # # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x280da4ef, pid=19121, tid=0x805c000 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0-p3-tfcheng_13_nov_2006_09_55mixed mode) # Problematic frame: # C [libc.so.6+0x214ef] realpath+0xbf # --------------- T H R E A D --------------- Current thread (0x0805cc00): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, id=134594560] siginfo:si_signo=11, si_errno=0, si_code=12, si_addr=0x00000000 Registers: EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x28185d80, ECX=0x00000001, EDX=0x0eadd440 ESP=0xbfbfc978, EBP=0xbfbfd620, ESI=0x0eadd440, EDI=0x00000000 EIP=0x280da4ef, EFLAGS=0x00210246 Top of Stack: (sp=0xbfbfc978) 0xbfbfc978: 363ff9d4 0805c000 bfbfc9d0 280a5e05 0xbfbfc988: 08542800 0805c048 0000000f 280b23d1 0xbfbfc998: 00000000 00000000 08542800 00000001 0xbfbfc9a8: 363ff9d4 0805c000 bfbfca00 280a5e05 0xbfbfc9b8: 08542800 0805c048 0000000f 363ff9d4 0xbfbfc9c8: 08542800 0805c048 08542800 280b23d1 0xbfbfc9d8: 0b9542d8 0805c048 bfbfca10 00000001 0xbfbfc9e8: 0805c000 363ff9d4 bfbfca30 280a7ca2 Instructions: (pc=0x280da4ef) 0x280da4df: 00 00 31 c0 8d 65 f4 5b 5e 5f c9 c3 90 8b 45 0c 0x280da4ef: c6 00 2f c6 40 01 00 80 7e 01 00 8b 45 0c 74 e4 Stack: [0xbfa00000,0xbfc00000), sp=0xbfbfc978, free space=2034k Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code) C [libc.so.6+0x214ef] realpath+0xbf C [libswt-pi-gtk-3314.so+0x433e4] Java_org_eclipse_swt_internal_gtk_OS_realpath+0x78 j org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.realpath([B[B)I+0 j org.eclipse.swt.widgets.FileDialog.presetChooserDialog()V+166 j org.eclipse.swt.widgets.FileDialog.openChooserDialog ()Ljava/lang/String;+82 J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent (Lorg/eclipse/swt/widgets/Event;)V J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents()Z J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch()Z J org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread .(Lcom/aelitis/azureus/ui/IUIIntializer;)V v ~OSRAdapter j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.createInstance (Lcom/aelitis/azureus/ui/IUIIntializer;)V+34 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.Initializer .(Lcom/aelitis/azureus/core/AzureusCore;Lorg/gudy/azureus2/ui/swt/StartServer;[Ljava/lang/String;)V+76 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.([Ljava/lang/String;)V+460 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V+5 v ~StubRoutines::call_stub V [libjvm.so+0x255788] V [libjvm.so+0x344b08] V [libjvm.so+0x25589f] V [libjvm.so+0x260b71] V [libjvm.so+0x26ebb1] C [java+0x39f1] _init+0x2b95 C [java+0x12a6] _init+0x44a Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code) j org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.realpath([B[B)I+0 j org.eclipse.swt.widgets.FileDialog.presetChooserDialog()V+166 j org.eclipse.swt.widgets.FileDialog.openChooserDialog ()Ljava/lang/String;+82 j org.eclipse.swt.widgets.FileDialog.open()Ljava/lang/String;+24 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.OpenTorrentWindow$2.handleEvent (Lorg/eclipse/swt/widgets/Event;)V+83 J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent (Lorg/eclipse/swt/widgets/Event;)V J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents()Z J org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch()Z J org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread .(Lcom/aelitis/azureus/ui/IUIIntializer;)V v ~OSRAdapter j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.createInstance (Lcom/aelitis/azureus/ui/IUIIntializer;)V+34 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.Initializer .(Lcom/aelitis/azureus/core/AzureusCore;Lorg/gudy/azureus2/ui/swt/StartServer;[Ljava/lang/String;)V+76 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.([Ljava/lang/String;)V+460 j org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V+5 v ~StubRoutines::call_stub --------------- P R O C E S S --------------- Java Threads: ( => current thread ) 0x0eb23400 JavaThread "DHTControl:externallookups[2371]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=141617664] 0x0eb23000 JavaThread "DHTControl:externallookups[2370]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142219776] 0x0e0c4000 JavaThread "NATTraverser[1607]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145890304] 0x0ea5fa00 JavaThread "NATTraverser[1606]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145438208] 0x0ea5f800 JavaThread "Simple Timer[11847]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=144019968] 0x0eb23200 JavaThread "DHTControl:externallookups[2369]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142969344] 0x0ea5f400 JavaThread "NATTraverser[1605]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=141615616] 0x0ea5fc00 JavaThread "Simple Timer[11845]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145247232] 0x0ea5fe00 JavaThread "Simple Timer[11843]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=138806272] 0x082c5200 JavaThread "Simple Timer[11836]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145888256] 0x0e0c4e00 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1187]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142968832] 0x0e0c4c00 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1186]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=143038976] 0x0e0c4a00 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1185]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=148426752] 0x0e0c4800 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1184]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=148427776] 0x0e0c4600 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1183]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=137676288] 0x0e0c4200 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1182]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145439232] 0x0b665e00 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1180]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=144947200] 0x0b665800 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1179]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145244160] 0x0962f200 JavaThread "DHTControl:internallookups[1178]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=138652672] 0x0b325e00 JavaThread "Simple Timer[11833]{DHTDB:cp}" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=137027584] 0x09732e00 JavaThread "DiskAccessController:requestDispatcher[0]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=138651648] 0x09c16000 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3038]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=144020992] 0x09c16600 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3037]" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=138650624] 0x0adbc800 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3035]" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=144434688] 0x0b325800 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3033]" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=137530880] 0x09ea5800 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3031]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145246720] 0x09732a00 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3030]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145889280] 0x0adbc600 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3028]" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=138301952] 0x0b2fe600 JavaThread "TrackerStatus[3026]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=145887232] 0x08a3b200 JavaThread "PeerControlScheduler" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=144946176] 0x08818800 JavaThread "CuncurrentHasher:scheduler" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142707200] 0x08818400 JavaThread "DiskAccessController:requestDispatcher[0]" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142706176] 0x0836c600 JavaThread "PRUDPPacketHandler:receiver" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=137807872] 0x08ae5400 JavaThread "DMC:DiskListenAgregatorDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142747648] 0x08959000 JavaThread "DiskM:ListenAggregatorDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142876672] 0x082bac00 JavaThread "Timer:Tracker Timer" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=141616640] 0x082ba000 JavaThread "DM:ListenAggregatorDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=141615104] 0x082c5a00 JavaThread "PRUDPPacketHandler:sender" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=141618688] 0x0864c000 JavaThread "AWT-XAWT" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=140820992] 0x083b1600 JavaThread "Java2D Disposer" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=138091008] 0x0816f400 JavaThread "GUI updater" [_thread_blocked, id=142878720] 0x08239600 JavaThread "Timer:Process Data Sources" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142695424] 0x08214400 JavaThread "Timer:Process Data Sources" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142748672] 0x08842400 JavaThread "TRHost:ListenDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142878208] 0x08869400 JavaThread "Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)::SSDP:queryLoop" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=143037952] 0x08869000 JavaThread "MCGroup:CtrlListener" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=143036928] 0x08858c00 JavaThread "MCGroup:MCListener" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=142970368] 0x08858200 JavaThread "MCGroup:CtrlListener" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=142967808] 0x08815e00 JavaThread "MCGroup:MCListener" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=142966784] 0x08815200 JavaThread "MagnetURIHandler" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=142693376] 0x087e8a00 JavaThread "HostNameToIPResolver" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142511104] 0x087e8600 JavaThread "StatsWriter" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142510080] 0x087e8200 JavaThread "Global Status Checker" [_thread_blocked, id=142509056] 0x08796200 JavaThread "TRHost::stats.loop" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142220800] 0x087c5e00 JavaThread "Tracker Scrape" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=142508032] 0x085e5a00 JavaThread "FMFileManager::closeQueueDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=140401664] 0x085c1c00 JavaThread "GM:ListenDispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=140254720] 0x0851c000 JavaThread "Start Server" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139575808] 0x084f9800 JavaThread "NetworkGlueUDP" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=139434496] 0x084f9400 JavaThread "PRUDPPacketReciever:56324" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139433472] 0x084dde00 JavaThread "WriteController:WriteSelector" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139431936] 0x084dda00 JavaThread "ReadController:ReadSelector" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139320320] 0x084dd600 JavaThread "VServerSelector:port56324" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139319296] 0x084dd200 JavaThread "ConnectDisconnectManager" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=139318272] 0x084d1e00 JavaThread "ReadController:ReadProcessor" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=139317248] 0x084d1600 JavaThread "WriteController:WriteProcessor" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=139271168] 0x084a4600 JavaThread "Timer:Simple Timer" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=139085824] 0x084a4200 JavaThread "SystemTime" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=139084800] 0x0813cc00 JavaThread "Low Memory Detector" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=135515648] 0x0813c800 JavaThread "CompilerThread0" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=135514624] 0x0813c400 JavaThread "Signal Dispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=135513600] 0x0813c000 JavaThread "Finalizer" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=135512576] 0x08067c00 JavaThread "Reference Handler" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=134643200] =>0x0805cc00 JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, id=134594560] Other Threads: 0x08056f00 VMThread [id=134642176] 0x08056a00 WatcherThread [id=135721472] VM state:not at safepoint (normal execution) VM Mutex/Monitor currently owned by a thread: None Heap def new generation total 3520K, used 1928K [0x2d560000, 0x2d930000, 0x2da40000) eden space 3136K, 49% used [0x2d560000, 0x2d6e2928, 0x2d870000) from space 384K, 99% used [0x2d870000, 0x2d8cfaa8, 0x2d8d0000) to space 384K, 0% used [0x2d8d0000, 0x2d8d0000, 0x2d930000) tenured generation total 46204K, used 26441K [0x2da40000, 0x3075f000, 0x31560000) the space 46204K, 57% used [0x2da40000, 0x2f4127f0, 0x2f412800, 0x3075f000) compacting perm gen total 17664K, used 17523K [0x31560000, 0x326a0000, 0x35560000) the space 17664K, 99% used [0x31560000, 0x3267cc70, 0x3267ce00, 0x326a0000) No shared spaces configured. Dynamic libraries: 0x08048000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/java 0x28083000 /lib/libz.so.3 0x28094000 /lib/libpthread.so.2 0x280b9000 /lib/libc.so.6 0x281a8000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so 0x285ef000 /lib/libm.so.4 0x28606000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so 0x28617000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so 0x28624000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so 0x28643000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so 0x35cd7000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libnet.so 0x35ddc000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libnio.so 0x35de3000 /usr/local/lib/libswt-pi-gtk-3314.so 0x35e36000 /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 0x3613a000 /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 0x3613e000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so.6 0x36143000 /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 0x36157000 /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 0x361d3000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 0x361d7000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 0x361df000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 0x361e2000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 0x361ef000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 0x361f7000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 0x362b8000 /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 0x362c0000 /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 0x362e9000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 0x36316000 /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 0x3637a000 /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 0x363b2000 /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 0x363cb000 /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 0x36400000 /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 0x36403000 /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 0x365d4000 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.6 0x365e6000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 0x365ef000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfixes.so.3 0x365f4000 /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 0x36612000 /usr/local/lib/libglitz.so.1 0x36638000 /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 0x3665a000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 0x36662000 /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 0x36678000 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcUTF8Load.so.2 0x3667a000 /usr/local/lib/libswt-gtk-3314.so 0x366a4000 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/gtk-im-oxim.so 0x366aa000 /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 0x366c8000 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/ximcp.so.2 0x37638000 /usr/local/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so 0x376bc000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so 0x37758000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so 0x37816000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so 0x3784d000 /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanager.so 0x378d2000 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 0x28052000 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 VM Arguments: jvm_args: -Djava.library.path=/usr/local/lib -Dos.name=FreeBSD - Dazureus.config.path=/home/tfcheng/.Azureus - Duser.dir=/home/tfcheng/.Azureus java_command: org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main Environment Variables: JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0 PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/tfcheng/bin LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386/client:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/../lib/i386 SHELL=/bin/tcsh DISPLAY=:0.0 HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=i386 --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- OS:FreeBSD uname:FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Tue Dec 26 11:59:34 EST 2006 tfcheng@:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TFCHENG i386 rlimit: STACK 65536k, CORE 0k, NOFILE 11095 CPU:total 1 family 15, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx Memory: 4k page, physical 839752k vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0-p3-tfcheng_13_nov_2006_09_55) for freebsd-x86, built on Nov 13 2006 10:51:13 by root with gcc 3.4.4 [FreeBSD] 20050518 sorry about this long email, any help is appreciated! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:22:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236B316A50B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FCF13C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ADMO4B007396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:22:24 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0ADMN0h002294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:22:24 -0800 Message-ID: <45A4E88F.8020303@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:22:23 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701100512m6a5dc858se959da9dd725d069@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100512m6a5dc858se959da9dd725d069@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.50933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Process List & Security?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:22:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Can some good one at security side look into these running process? And see > if there is a Process some is dangerous/ security breach which a Bad User > has put? Thanks > > $ ps xa > PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND > 0 ?? WLs 0:00.00 [swapper] > 1 ?? ILs 0:00.00 /sbin/init -- > 2 ?? DL 0:02.90 [g_event] > 3 ?? DL 0:02.87 [g_up] > 4 ?? DL 0:03.04 [g_down] > 5 ?? DL 0:00.00 [thread taskq] > 6 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_0] > 7 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_1] > 8 ?? DL 0:00.00 [acpi_task_2] > 9 ?? DL 0:00.00 [kqueue taskq] > 10 ?? RL 2775:10.56 [idle] > 11 ?? WL 0:59.34 [swi4: clock sio] > 12 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi3: vm] > 13 ?? WL 0:00.10 [swi1: net] > 14 ?? DL 0:02.65 [yarrow] > 15 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi5: +] > 16 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi2: cambio] > 17 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: task queue] > 18 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: Giant taskq] > 19 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq9: acpi0] > 20 ?? WL 0:00.22 [irq16: bce0 em0+] > 21 ?? WL 0:00.32 [irq78: mfi0] > 22 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq17: em1] > 23 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq21: uhci0 uhci+] > 24 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb0] > 25 ?? DL 0:00.00 [usbtask] > 26 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq20: uhci1] > 27 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb1] > 28 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb2] > 29 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb3] > 30 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq14: ata0] > 31 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq15: ata1] > 32 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi0: sio] > 33 ?? WL 0:00.00 [irq1: atkbd0] > 34 ?? DL 0:00.07 [pagedaemon] > 35 ?? DL 0:00.00 [vmdaemon] > 36 ?? DL 0:01.11 [pagezero] > 37 ?? DL 0:00.30 [bufdaemon] > 38 ?? DL 0:59.50 [syncer] > 39 ?? DL 0:00.29 [vnlru] > 40 ?? DL 0:00.43 [softdepflush] > 41 ?? DL 0:01.41 [schedcpu] > 151 ?? Is 0:00.00 adjkerntz -i > 644 ?? Is 0:00.00 /sbin/devd > 688 ?? Ss 0:00.14 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s > 761 ?? Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/usbd > 809 ?? Is 0:00.06 /usr/sbin/sshd > 815 ?? Ss 0:00.90 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > 819 ?? Is 0:00.02 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for > /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > 825 ?? Is 0:00.22 /usr/sbin/cron -s > 1007 ?? Ss 0:01.10 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1008 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1009 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1010 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1011 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1012 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 1037 ?? I 0:00.00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > 7862 ?? Is 0:00.01 sshd: digill7b [priv] (sshd) > 7866 ?? S 0:00.01 sshd: digill7b@ttyp0 (sshd) > 866 v0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 > 867 v1 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 > 868 v2 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 > 869 v3 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 > 870 v4 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 > 871 v5 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 > 872 v6 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 > 873 v7 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 > 7867 p0 Ss 0:00.00 -sh (sh) > 7928 p0 R+ 0:00.00 ps xa > 1015 p2- I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld_safe > 1033 p2- S 0:11.97 /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld > --basedir=/usr/local/mysql --datadir=/var/db/mysql --user=mysql > --pid-file=/var/db/mysql/localhost.maanjee.pid --port=33 Nothing out of the ordinary. Just make sure you have sendmail setup properly so people can't send mail from the box without authentication and effectively spam hordes of people. See saslauth about that in the handbook. - -Garrett PS We (the list subscribers) aren't your sysadmins, and you should know what these processes are if you're administering the box :)... manpages reveal what you need to know about each process and Google searches _may_ reveal further information.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpOiPEnKyINQw/HARAlzwAJ4jmga5IPQ3NqjfGQlG9LHk9Aor/gCgpFBJ iGaBODnu6KBcXDhZp96H2Bw= =5Mgs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:23:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9FC16A4C9 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA91013C4BD for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 38971 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2007 13:22:01 -0000 Received: from 208-70-43-96.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@208.70.43.96) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 13:22:01 -0000 Message-ID: <45A4E8B4.6070401@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:23:00 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:16 -0000 Jeff Mohler wrote: > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. > > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. Sorry for wasting your time. I'll neither post nor respond on the iSCSI thread any longer. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:24:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE8916A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanhalprin@yahoo.com) Received: from web58909.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web58909.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B60913C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanhalprin@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 47265 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2007 12:10:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=05RIoWlCmKLEZFAVuKeGko5odsyRhLoj21ZxOW/9bOjV/y2sSNRaCR9EkNOqUU6DxnF9pxGM27KHKqV4W+STEGFym20JdWyuB0clMWF6I5skAG44TrwTZDbLWrdVAwzuOrNzKPyX8FBSNP/FSZuBf2FUxaeIda8dTuXhcU+BL5o= ; Message-ID: <20070110121039.47263.qmail@web58909.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.82.9.79] by web58909.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:10:39 PST Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:10:38 -0800 (PST) From: Stan Halprin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: MySQL Port Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:24:28 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: George Vanev = =0A&&=0AFrom: Andrew Patyukhin=0A=0AAndrew:=0A>/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-se= rver start=0AWorked. MySQL up! Thanks!=0A=0AGeorge:=0ASince MySQL is up, I = don't know if the following matters any more, nonetheless...=0A>Check if us= er mysql exists. If it doesn't - create it.=0A=0AExists=0A=0A># echo 'mysql= _enable=3D"YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf=0A=0Aok.=0A>#cd /usr/local/mysql=0A>#bin/m= ysql_install_db --user=3Dmysql=0A=0A# cd /usr/local/mysql=0A/usr/local/mysq= l: No such file or directory.=0A# mkdir -p /usr/local/mysql=0A# cd /usr/loc= al/mysql=0A# bin/mysql_install_db --user=3Dmysql=0A=0ABTW, do I want to use= the same user "mysql"? I'm wondering if that's a user that the installatio= n itself uses. Should I set up another user?=0A=0A# bin/mysql_install_db --= user=3Dmysql=0A=0Abin/mysql_install_db: Command not found.=0A# find / -name= mysql=0A/usr/bin/mysql=0A/usr/local/bin/mysql=0A/usr/local/include/mysql= =0A/usr/local/lib/mysql=0A/usr/local/libdata/ldconfig/mysql=0A/usr/local/sh= are/mysql=0A/usr/local/mysql=0A/var/db/mysql=0A/var/mail/mysql=0A# ls /var/= db/mysql/=0A#=0ATIA,=0AStan=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A______________________________= ____________________=0ADo You Yahoo!?=0ATired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the= best spam protection around =0Ahttp://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:32:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B6416A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B58813C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 18752 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 00:32:20 +1100 Received: from 203-214-137-5.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.214.137.5) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 00:32:20 +1100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:32:13 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20070111003213.70c1c2fa@localhost> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100512m6a5dc858se959da9dd725d069@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701100512m6a5dc858se959da9dd725d069@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: Process List & Security?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:32:21 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:53 +0100 VeeJay wrote: > if there is a Process some is dangerous/ security breach which a Bad User > has put? Thanks VJ, if you suspect a "bad user", then follow standard procedures to determine whether your security has been breached - the name of the process is *EASILY* modify by anyone who has got root access to your box (you will definitely not see "hacker_process_here" listed :). "standard procedures" - search the web and list archives for them. But to make it short : if there's nothing of value in your box, just reinstall it (including a complete reformat of all disks involved). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Ninety percent of the time things turn out worse than you thought they would. The other ten percent of the time you had no right to expect that much." Augustine I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 13:39:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6FD16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2800D13C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:39:04 -0500 id 0005641B.45A4EC78.0000845E Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:39:03 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20070110083903.85ce8032.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100106r6d2c98fblc8d8b89f5ad68726@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701100106r6d2c98fblc8d8b89f5ad68726@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:39:05 -0000 In response to VeeJay : > Hello Friends > > How can we check that if a system is affected by a Bad User? http://www.la-samhna.de/samhain/index.html It's in ports in various incarnations. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 14:12:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A6116A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2988213C46B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2007 09:12:26 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTK55151; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:12:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2007 09:12:19 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17828.62521.79645.780656@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:12:09 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090206.45A4F27A.00E7,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:27 -0000 George Vanev writes: > It would be perfect if there is a way dhcpd to read the nameservers > from /etc/resolv.conf Check the "prepend" and "supercede" directives. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 14:50:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF08E16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9713C46A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so49038ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:50:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Dv8D4Ud/GOCk1OxGKtnJGHz3l0x4hZ/SX3Sr2xZ1gROanqEtLP2mpQkmodu9fGC5hsI4TZ1M4h9N0FiHdw8S8eeZ494fZ4ifCYNOTo/+n5NN7/iY5zfM1McKJ0b8VQQEuZLEQgBYPTnKiC8pEIFFptgulqCHeOJHA6HnjD0UTbA= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr101986hud.1168440622362; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.29.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:50:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:50:22 +0100 From: "Niclas Zeising" To: perryh@pluto.rain.com In-Reply-To: <45a3e665.6cOWFLmMZNQbz0bF%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070109102342.JWKD60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> <45a3e665.6cOWFLmMZNQbz0bF%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com Subject: Re: libkrb5.so.8 - missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:23 -0000 On 1/9/07, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Vizion wrote: > > > Can someone please tell me what package installs libkrb5.so.8 > > for FREEBSD-6.1-RELEASE #0? > > On my 6.1 system, /usr/ports/INDEX contains an entry for krb5-1.5_1 > but my /usr/ports/security/krb5/pkg-plist lists lib/libkrb5.so.3 > rather than libkrb5.so.8. To make matters even more interesting, > my /usr/lib does include a libkrb5.so.8 (dated May 6 2006). > I do not pretend to understand the discrepancy :) > > I'll send it separately, since the list does not like attachments. Kerberos 5, the KTH/Heimdal implementation is included in the base distribution. The bort /usr/ports/security/krb5 is the MIT implementation of the Kerberos5 portocol suite. As far as I know the KTH/Heimdal and the MIT are not compatible with each other. HTH //Niclas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 14:50:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849C616A501 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483B913C45E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8A4209FC1 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:50:36 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek+7jlDVpw0N for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:50:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD37F206582 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:50:29 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:50:22 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: &'; cS03F?rr_w2Qce.d2f7xmwXfcJWDs>}CkpDw.c]ZJJ_)i0Nx Subject: Is this homework? (was Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:50:37 -0000 --nextPart9594789.QV5CXk9H0j Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 January 2007 06:24, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? VeeJay, I may be wrong (and hope that I am), but your questions are starting to sma= ck=20 of the sort of questions a teacher would ask at the beginning of a class on= =20 operating systems. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart9594789.QV5CXk9H0j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFpP0z5sRg+Y0CpvERAoqeAJ4pyCd2pdCuMU8fLcy48m80OHHkVgCgiHbp n7WO9nHF8T81rL1UAgP3zf0= =uhP0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9594789.QV5CXk9H0j-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:18:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6DC16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from svarun.infrax.si (84-255-241-13.static.dsl.t-2.net [84.255.241.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580B513C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B221CDA83C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from svarun.infrax.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Svarun.infrax.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48049-02 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:53:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.12.5] (unknown [192.168.12.5]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B714DDA867 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:53:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:53:14 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030706060001020402080101" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at infrax.si X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Simple DoS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:18:10 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030706060001020402080101 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000509080603040806050006" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000509080603040806050006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, yesterday one of our clients did something interesting (stupid): they connected both ends of an UTP cable to the same switch, to which our FreeBSD server was also connected. The server was immediately completely unresponsive from yesterday evening until this morning, when our tech guy went there to see what the problem was. Even when they rebooted the FreeBSD machine, it wouldn't boot normally - disk I/O was very busy and everything was happening unusably slow. After the disconnect from that switch, everything went back to normal. Any ideas how to prevent such situations in the future? (I would like to do it on the server side, not on the "user side".) Thanks, Nejc --------------000509080603040806050006-- --------------ms030706060001020402080101 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILJDCC BY4wggR2oAMCAQICBDs9SfgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwPTELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kxGzAZBgNV BAoTEnN0YXRlLWluc3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2EwHhcNMDMwOTIzMjAy MzA0WhcNMDgwOTIzMjA1MzA0WjCBgTELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kxGzAZBgNVBAoTEnN0YXRlLWlu c3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2ExFDASBgNVBAsTC2luZGl2aWR1YWxzMSww FAYDVQQDEw1ORUpDIFNLT0JFUk5FMBQGA1UEBRMNMjQ1NzExMzMxMjAxNDCBnzANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA0LYrr3KrEMlye3H9j8KGvFx66+btGh7I/XXA/Pmog4+HMqqq MZZNmfbkKfC3D6NdXroteJSAwxoO3BU0HuCzyjHeaaZ63ayz7OAbYY3rwTN9rWTkRTAoghLk eA+R+0GA5gEbdudT4eV0vmYsfmKkpnnsQ+u13R9IgWPFT6zWoucCAwEAAaOCAtMwggLPMAsG A1UdDwQEAwIFoDArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDAzMDkyMzIwMjMwNFqBDzIwMDgwOTIzMjA1MzA0 WjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBaAwLwYJYIZIAYb4QgECBCIWIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNpZ2Vu LWNhLnNpL2NkYS1jZ2kvMEQGCWCGSAGG+EIBAwQ3FjVjbGllbnRjZ2k/YWN0aW9uPWNoZWNr UmV2b2NhdGlvbiYmQ1JMPWNuPUNSTDYmc2VyaWFsPTBRBglghkgBhvhCAQ0ERBZCU3BsZXRu byBrdmFsaWZpY2lyYW5vIGRpZ2l0YWxubyBwb3RyZGlsbyB6YSBmaXppY25lIG9zZWJlIFNJ R0VOLUNBMEAGA1UdIAQ5MDcwNQYKKwYBBAGvWQICAjAnMCUGCCsGAQUFBwIBFhlodHRwOi8v d3d3Lmdvdi5zaS9jYS9jcHMvMBwGA1UdEQQVMBOBEW5lamNAc2tvYmVybmUubmV0MIHvBgNV HR8EgecwgeQwVKBSoFCkTjBMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0 dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQLEwhzaWdlbi1jYTENMAsGA1UEAxMEQ1JMNjBdoFugWYZXbGRhcDov L3g1MDAuZ292LnNpL291PXNpZ2VuLWNhLG89c3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zLGM9c2k/Y2Vy dGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlMC2gK6AphidodHRwOi8vd3d3LnNpZ2VuLWNh LnNpL2NybC9zaWdlbi1jYS5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUcXuKBh8xBVWrYBJ3RyAeA4gY7Ikw HQYDVR0OBBYEFKUx7r6WtsjLZjxoX3P5SYCz81a+MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EA BAwwChsEVjUuMAMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBADMu+PVcF5ovn1zrG9w6wwijCHRe X3UbRRPDcUyDHMeTGVqEP1RqmbwZ9eiPF+5MDuQQF6BxHk4CCGj0mIjP7Ont871EkWiBR7KM ooDSbad7kXJzO2reAi4qKnbnbGu8NrRm6G5h4fy7yHn+jG02IggZRE725bAoGqzs6YZeoiHi lR+hVTQgpaxAtAGbzBrlzbmNwouw64afEFVij91vMGrydit6CTOj+Tg6cqgkqGi9fhOprV/q iEYjchG2LegcUg+jHuJ633N/ZWtkYdmFTlvVVxzgHujetTe6hFdVNc7p8W4Hv+9xiYxXo5f4 WGJfDdFmXcVKKDRy8zlpxExY8rMwggWOMIIEdqADAgECAgQ7PUn4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA MD0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMxETAPBgNVBAsT CHNpZ2VuLWNhMB4XDTAzMDkyMzIwMjMwNFoXDTA4MDkyMzIwNTMwNFowgYExCzAJBgNVBAYT AnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMxETAPBgNVBAsTCHNpZ2VuLWNhMRQw EgYDVQQLEwtpbmRpdmlkdWFsczEsMBQGA1UEAxMNTkVKQyBTS09CRVJORTAUBgNVBAUTDTI0 NTcxMTMzMTIwMTQwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANC2K69yqxDJcntx/Y/C hrxceuvm7RoeyP11wPz5qIOPhzKqqjGWTZn25Cnwtw+jXV66LXiUgMMaDtwVNB7gs8ox3mmm et2ss+zgG2GN68Ezfa1k5EUwKIIS5HgPkftBgOYBG3bnU+HldL5mLH5ipKZ57EPrtd0fSIFj xU+s1qLnAgMBAAGjggLTMIICzzALBgNVHQ8EBAMCBaAwKwYDVR0QBCQwIoAPMjAwMzA5MjMy MDIzMDRagQ8yMDA4MDkyMzIwNTMwNFowEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgWgMC8GCWCGSAGG+EIB AgQiFiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5zaWdlbi1jYS5zaS9jZGEtY2dpLzBEBglghkgBhvhCAQMENxY1 Y2xpZW50Y2dpP2FjdGlvbj1jaGVja1Jldm9jYXRpb24mJkNSTD1jbj1DUkw2JnNlcmlhbD0w UQYJYIZIAYb4QgENBEQWQlNwbGV0bm8ga3ZhbGlmaWNpcmFubyBkaWdpdGFsbm8gcG90cmRp bG8gemEgZml6aWNuZSBvc2ViZSBTSUdFTi1DQTBABgNVHSAEOTA3MDUGCisGAQQBr1kCAgIw JzAlBggrBgEFBQcCARYZaHR0cDovL3d3dy5nb3Yuc2kvY2EvY3BzLzAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFu ZWpjQHNrb2Jlcm5lLm5ldDCB7wYDVR0fBIHnMIHkMFSgUqBQpE4wTDELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kx GzAZBgNVBAoTEnN0YXRlLWluc3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2ExDTALBgNV BAMTBENSTDYwXaBboFmGV2xkYXA6Ly94NTAwLmdvdi5zaS9vdT1zaWdlbi1jYSxvPXN0YXRl LWluc3RpdHV0aW9ucyxjPXNpP2NlcnRpZmljYXRlUmV2b2NhdGlvbkxpc3Q/YmFzZTAtoCug KYYnaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zaWdlbi1jYS5zaS9jcmwvc2lnZW4tY2EuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FHF7igYfMQVVq2ASd0cgHgOIGOyJMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSlMe6+lrbIy2Y8aF9z+UmAs/NWvjAJ BgNVHRMEAjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY1LjADAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IB AQAzLvj1XBeaL59c6xvcOsMIowh0Xl91G0UTw3FMgxzHkxlahD9Uapm8GfXojxfuTA7kEBeg cR5OAgho9JiIz+zp7fO9RJFogUeyjKKA0m2ne5Fycztq3gIuKip252xrvDa0ZuhuYeH8u8h5 /oxtNiIIGURO9uWwKBqs7OmGXqIh4pUfoVU0IKWsQLQBm8wa5c25jcKLsOuGnxBVYo/dbzBq 8nYregkzo/k4OnKoJKhovX4Tqa1f6ohGI3IRti3oHFIPox7iet9zf2VrZGHZhU5b1Vcc4B7o 3rU3uoRXVTXO6fFuB7/vcYmMV6OX+FhiXw3RZl3FSig0cvM5acRMWPKzMYICTjCCAkoCAQEw RTA9MQswCQYDVQQGEwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQL EwhzaWdlbi1jYQIEOz1J+DAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBXzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcN AQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNzAxMTAxNDUzMTRaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRD4ZlZ raZSIZW3BC7S/oSSZwn7JDBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDBUBgkrBgEE AYI3EAQxRzBFMD0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMx ETAPBgNVBAsTCHNpZ2VuLWNhAgQ7PUn4MFYGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMUegRTA9MQswCQYDVQQG EwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQLEwhzaWdlbi1jYQIE Oz1J+DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgB6nK7UTlQgKunwgaeZzLYJWDBg99opdLfdXqsP/6Tr6 yZ522Q8Zm7Yt/e80faf479lys15HJvBUO3H+YqyFiVtzGDZDtAlMY4w0f/A9QEX+lXCIl3qG +L701dBMXr62hJoBglSy5Fu9eD3iYRScoo2jJEEuyV+t1zC9aBtMm6ckAAAAAAAA --------------ms030706060001020402080101-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:31:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A02816A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD9413C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H4fPd-0006S3-UG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:49 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:49 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:31 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: Simple DoS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:05 -0000 Nejc Å koberne wrote: > Hello, > > yesterday one of our clients did something interesting (stupid): they > connected both ends of an UTP cable to the same switch, to which our > FreeBSD server was also connected. The server was immediately completely > unresponsive from yesterday evening until this morning, when our tech > guy went there to see what the problem was. Even when they rebooted > the FreeBSD machine, it wouldn't boot normally - disk I/O was very > busy and everything was happening unusably slow. After the disconnect > from that switch, everything went back to normal. > > Any ideas how to prevent such situations in the future? (I would like > to do it on the server side, not on the "user side".) First you need to identify what really happened. The story as you tell it has much unknown. What does the server do? Is it forwarding packets so they got stuck in a loop? High disk I/O suggests you have firewall enabled with logging, so every discarded (?) packet generated a log message. If you're using syslog you can tell it not to sync after every message and thus lower the I/O load. If you don't need to inspect the logs, disable the logging. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:39:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCBF16A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E4213C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0AFcwk8067093; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:38:58 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070110093718.02639c38@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:38:51 -0600 To: Nejc =?iso-8859-1?Q?=8Akoberne?= , questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> References: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Simple DoS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:39:29 -0000 Your client caused their own DOS by making it impossible to route network= =20 traffic. Basically causing an arp storm. In simple terms, don't do that. Not much you can do with dumb clients, except reward them with a bill for= =20 their actions. -Derek At 08:53 AM 1/10/2007, Nejc =8Akoberne wrote: >Hello, > >yesterday one of our clients did something interesting (stupid): they >connected both ends of an UTP cable to the same switch, to which our >FreeBSD server was also connected. The server was immediately completely >unresponsive from yesterday evening until this morning, when our tech >guy went there to see what the problem was. Even when they rebooted >the FreeBSD machine, it wouldn't boot normally - disk I/O was very >busy and everything was happening unusably slow. After the disconnect >from that switch, everything went back to normal. > >Any ideas how to prevent such situations in the future? (I would like >to do it on the server side, not on the "user side".) > >Thanks, >Nejc > > --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:49:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB4E16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBF213C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AFiaJT097735; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:44:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AFia0x097734; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:44:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:44:36 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:14 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > >FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > >Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > >for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > work... so I can get real things done. Yah, well the people doing it are also busy and working at things which are supposed to make them a living. Most make their FreeBSD contribution work on the side - in addition to their paying jobs although some are in the fortunate position of working for someone who recognizes it as also contributing to their productivity on the job. There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such things as servers and test machines and network access. So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone to work in the project, at least part time. If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live in the wrong world. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:49:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DBA16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.network-i.net (antigua.network-i.net [212.21.121.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7101B13C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 66813 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 15:22:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by post1.network-i.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 15:22:57 -0000 Message-ID: <45A50465.3030906@thingy.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:21:09 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= References: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> In-Reply-To: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple DoS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:39 -0000 Nejc Škoberne wrote: > Any ideas how to prevent such situations in the future? (I would like > to do it on the server side, not on the "user side".) Get a switch that runs Spanning Tree Protocol. I don't think there's much you can do on the server about a problem in the switch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:51:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D343016A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08FA13C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AFkpNk097759; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AFkpYF097758; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:51 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Jeff Mohler Message-ID: <20070110154651.GB97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:51:28 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:59:20PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: > Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question. > > Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead? It isn't. People in the know like FreeBSD as a server which is where it is mostly targeted - to the professional environment as apposed to being a playtop. ////jerry > Granted I'll take ports over RPM's and such any day, but..ports hasnt > sucked up all of the Fbsd oxygen by itself in the last handful of > years. > > On 1/9/07, Rico Secada wrote: > >On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 > >"Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > >> > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > >> > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > >> > for you to get busy and contribute. > >> > > >> > >> I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > >> well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > >> work... so I can get real things done. > > > >So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work > >for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you > >want it to!? So you can get real things done!? > > > >If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by > >people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? > > > >Now just shut up and go away!!! > >_______________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:54:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5645416A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF2F13C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from webmail.dfwlp.org (localhost.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AFsCdp013482 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:54:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:54:12 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <2883.192.168.125.134.1168444452.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:54:12 -0600 (CST) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:54:18 -0000 gentlmen, thank you for these answers, i think ill find them useful. i did a some much needed reading into the names of the pentium processors, and apparently my p4-540 is a Prescott, and my xeon is a Prestonia. i dont see anything in the eample-make.conf that mentions Prestonia.. what would the best choice for that one be? just plain "pentium4" ? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 15:57:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3CD16A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6148013C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AFrDLu097792; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:53:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AFrDbv097791; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:53:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:53:13 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110155312.GC97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:57:50 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:12:46AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/10/07, Rico Secada wrote: > >On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:01:51 -0600 > >"Nikolas Britton" wrote: > > > >> > FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > >> > Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > >> > for you to get busy and contribute. > >> > > >> > >> I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > >> well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > >> work... so I can get real things done. > > > >So you need people to work freely, without any pay, to make things work > >for you, so you can complain when something isn't working like you > >want it to!? So you can get real things done!? > > > >If you have a business to manage, and just need this to work, made by > >people who contribute for free, maybe its time you start to pay someone!? > > > > Repost: > I'm more then willing to pay real money to support the sub-projects > that are of interest to me. I need to see some real progress being > made in return though. Feel free to start working on any of the > problems I listed. When you have something to show me I'll send some > cash. Maybe core needs to make it easier to direct are funds to the > sub-projects of are choice and still qualify it as a deductible > expense. Then maybe you need to spend that money getting something you need done. Hire someone or assign one of your better employees to work part of their time on some aspect that is important to see done. Some of the people who work on the FreeBSD project may do contract work, but the project in itself, in general does not do contract work. It does not work from a list of demands from customers, but from things that the people who are both using it and working on it take the time and effort to get done - primarily because they want/need to have that thing done. This leave you lots of room to do something positive. ////jerry > > >Now just shut up and go away!!! > > > > No. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:00:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA49316A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: from gdead.mooseriver.com (gdead.mooseriver.com [205.166.121.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C67F13C457 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 2010) id D60E53C842C; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:40:24 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on gdead.mooseriver.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from mooseriver.com (h-66-166-146-73.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.146.73]) by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C343C844D; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 8DBE02EB666; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:40:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:40:22 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: Jeff Mohler Message-ID: <20070110154022.GA67438@mooseriver.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Moose River, LLC Cc: Garrett Cooper , Nikolas Britton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:00:24 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:08:03PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. >=20 > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. >=20 > In ten years at Network Appliance..wanna know exactly how many FreeBSD > host installs ive seen besides Yahoo? >=20 > 2. >=20 > How many -non- Linux SAN configurations? Probly 80% of all SAN I see > and work with are Linux based. >=20 > Fbsd NFS client performance is 1/3'd that of a tuned linux box, can > you say ../..? If you can, you know what its like to never have a > valid directory attr cache on your mounts. (ick) Automount...dont > even go there. >=20 > Im in this for the long haul..I like Fbsd, and as long s lynx and > apache still work on it, im happy. As for the future..I just dont see > much serious future there unless it grows up. >=20 > Rememer when Linux couldnt do _crap_ and Fbsd 2.5 was the bomb? I > do...I want like to see that again. While I do agree that FreeBSD does need work, the big pebble in my shoe right now is a journaling file system (try doing a fsck on a 1TB file system), FreeBSD does do SAN right now. At work (Juniper Networks), I have a FreeBSD 6.1-p10 system with a Qlogic card talking to a Hitachi SAN through a Brocade fiber switch. Works like a charm. We have done tests where we compared compiling all of our product on my SAN setup with compiling on local SCSI disk in a RAID 10. The SAN is only 6% to 10% slower. Considering how much easier it is to manage a farm of servers talking to a SAN instead of each server having it's own disk array, a 10% hit in disk performance is considered acceptable. I have a meeting setup for Thursday to talk to your people, Network Appliance, about SAN attaching to our new 6030 filers. The answer we keep getting, and I'm sure this is right, is this should work like a charm.=20 SAN on FreeBSD does work. The only problems we have is 1) There is only 1 card that really works. We tried LSI cards but they were dodgy 2) can't seem to get dual channel working.=20 Josef --=20 Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFpQjky8prLS1GYSERAncsAKDRSc6boGRbRfH8FcjZWGFsWKHS7gCgqIz0 U282G3qjVvRRzhXyc429+JI= =whPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:17:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706F416A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: from gdead.mooseriver.com (gdead.mooseriver.com [205.166.121.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E1213C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 2010) id 3E2D03C8622; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:17:27 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on gdead.mooseriver.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from mooseriver.com (h-66-166-146-73.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.146.73]) by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A575E3C7E52; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 6EE052EB4FB; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:17:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:17:21 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Moose River, LLC Cc: Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:17:27 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >=20 > > >FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > >Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > >for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > >=20 > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > work... so I can get real things done. >=20 > Yah, well the people doing it are also busy and working at things > which are supposed to make them a living. Most make their > FreeBSD contribution work on the side - in addition to their > paying jobs although some are in the fortunate position of working > for someone who recognizes it as also contributing to their > productivity on the job. >=20 > There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. > Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although > it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such=20 > things as servers and test machines and network access. >=20 > So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is > so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone > to work in the project, at least part time. >=20 > If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live > in the wrong world. Hear, hear. Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do not require programming. As a Christian here is a saying that I'm sure you are familiar with, "It's better to light one candle than to curse the darkness". So brother Nikolas, what candles have you lit today? You certainly have produced a lot of smoke. One of the things you could have done instead of wasting your and our time on this thrash is to sit down a write a detailed description of some of the things you find lacking in FreeBSD. By detailed I mean a series of bullet points that describe what is the problem, what you tried, what your setup was, OS version, hardware configuration, etc. This would be a whole lot more helpful than standing on a street corner and screaming, "FreeBSD is FUCKED! Linux is taking over!" Many hands make lite work. Are you going to lend a hand or are you going to stand on the sidelines and tell us how we are screwing up. If it is going to be the latter please go away, we have more than our fair share of Monday morning quarterbacks. Josef --=20 Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFpRGQy8prLS1GYSERAg+WAJ9RJIEDcPinC/nxv26ygmPPKo4w9gCg6Fu8 5EX+iCCIYy5hpTH9UxWCoXo= =Zwfj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:20:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773E316A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C5613C45E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from webmail.dfwlp.org (localhost.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AFkNVL013425 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:46:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:46:23 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:46:23 -0600 (CST) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:20:45 -0000 gentlmen, thank you for these answers, i think ill find them useful. i did a some much needed reading into the names of the pentium processors, and apparently my p4-540 is a Prescott, and my xeon is a Prestonia. i dont see anything in the eample-make.conf that mentions Prestonia.. what would the best choice for that one be? just plain "pentium4" ? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:28:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAF016A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from tiltup.nepinc.com (tiltup.nepinc.com [66.207.136.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DD213C47E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.97.132] (dhcp132.eng.nepinc.com [192.168.97.132] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by tiltup.nepinc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0AG0i7t009945 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:00:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <45A50DA7.7060908@voidmain.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:00:39 -0500 From: Tom Grove User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061225) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:44 -0000 We have an employee who spends quite a bit of time on the net and currently have no way of analyzing where they go. Are there any decent proxy servers that I can put them on to see where they are going? -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:30:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89B916A417 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702FB13C46A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AGPfPx098014; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AGPeNc098013; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:40 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Dale Johnston Message-ID: <20070110162540.GG97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:20 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:40:07PM -0800, Dale Johnston wrote: > Hey, so where's the release notes. what's been done/fixed/added in 6.2 vs > 6.1, what was done from 6.1RC to 6.1R, etc I don't think it has been "released" yet, so the release notes are probably not completely available yet. There might be notes in the ISO. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:36:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9A416A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5612C13C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from webmail.dfwlp.org (localhost.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AGamJt013765 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <2940.192.168.125.134.1168447008.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <20070110162540.GG97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <007b01c73458$455911a0$3265a8c0@C1052266A> <20070110162540.GG97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:48 -0600 (CST) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Release info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:36:50 -0000 > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:40:07PM -0800, Dale Johnston wrote: > >> Hey, so where's the release notes. what's been done/fixed/added in 6.2 >> vs >> 6.1, what was done from 6.1RC to 6.1R, etc > > I don't think it has been "released" yet, so the release notes > are probably not completely available yet. > > There might be notes in the ISO. > > ////jerry ive noticed that the cvs tags page in the handbook is updated, to reflect: RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2 im not sure when that data was added to the handbook, but hopefully we'll see 6.2 soon! cheers, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:46:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C804B16A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C0513C45B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so142608uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:46:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RTA1KFRLUY8YSDamYKhL5r6aAfKOzZw+Hw0iFQwaCp5bJktKeL8m7OTzdtVPPhaqdhG6DehXQqF8TOdK2xq24h5TuBsGZynbFvE1OTyz8pJ4ozeLa/D2/lEApP/tvuxiFzRbacU/RY2Ufu7Sm4hrLbauLcWn59Xbjsk5nT3SZpE= Received: by 10.67.96.14 with SMTP id y14mr667681ugl.1168447577966; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:46:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:46:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:46:17 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:46:24 -0000 On 1/10/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > gentlmen, thank you for these answers, i think ill find them useful. > > i did a some much needed reading into the names of the pentium processors, > and apparently my p4-540 is a Prescott, and my xeon is a Prestonia. i > dont see anything in the eample-make.conf that mentions Prestonia.. what > would the best choice for that one be? just plain "pentium4" ? > > thanks, > jonathan > Sadly there is no good explination in the example when it comes to server apps like apache, mysql, and other apps. I mean what is the usage of using P4 of P3 when I compile mysql server? isn't prescott better even my cpu is xeon which is nocona. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:51:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E011016A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC8813C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2007 11:51:14 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTL15632; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:51:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2007 11:51:07 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17829.6508.373404.263832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:50:52 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail: UCE(50) X-Junkmail-Status: score=50/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=bulk(0), refid=str=0001.0A09020A.45A517B1.00CF,ss=3,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:51:14 -0000 Nikolas Britton writes: > > For accounting/tax purposes, aren't salary and benefits just as > > deductible as "contributions"? Hire someone qualified as your > > own full- or part-time employee, and assign them to work on the > > projects that you want to support. As just one example, that's > > effectively Red Hat's entire operation AFAIK. > > Interesting... I'm not sure the owner would go for it > though. Maybe a 1099 contractor. Would anyone in the group at > large be interested in arrangements such as this? Consider looking up the developers who most recently worked on the projects of interest; if they're not available, perhaps they can recommend someone. > What kind of money (rate) would you expect if you got payed to > work on stuff your already working on in your spare time? Unless you have a fairy godparent, expect to pay standard commercial rates based on the task and the qualifications of the programer. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 16:52:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A692016A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8004C13C46B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AGloSD098219; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:47:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AGlojM098218; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:47:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:47:50 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110164750.GH97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110002731.GC39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20070110082659.GI39029@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:52:28 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:35:12AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/10/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >[irrelevant cruft removed] > > > >On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 23:54:02 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > >> On 1/9/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 9 January 2007 at 17:08:45 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > >>>> Why should I continue using FreeBSD when the project never delivers > >>>> on it promises? > >>> > >>> You shouldn't. You obviously don't understand the issues. We don't > >>> owe you anything. Play an active part or go away. > >> > >> Fuck off Greg, > > > >You've proved my assumptions. Clearly you don't want to play an > >active part. Go away. You may learn to grow up elsewhere, though I > >wouldn't bet on it. > > > >> Sincerely. > > > >You've got to be joking. > > > > I'm going to answer why I said what I said above with a parallel > example that hopefully points out one of the problems with some, > conservative, members of the FreeBSD community... > > Why Won't God Heal Amputees? Sorry for top posting this part of the rant, but it works out easier. This is first of all, irrelevant to the topic, just a private rant. Second, it completely either misrepresents or misunderstands the Christian concept of God or a god and of prayer - although, I admit, some people do cherish such immature ways of thinking/believing. Even if it was complete and accurate, it still does not negate your responsibility for making whatever contribution you can toward the project you use so freely and claim that you need and love and that needs some serious work done. Nothing in prayer relieves a person of personal responsibility. ////jerry > > It's a simple question, isn't it? We all know that amputated legs do > not spontaneously regenerate in response to prayer. Amputees get no > miracles from God. If you are an intelligent person, you have to admit > that it's an interesting question: > > - On the one hand, you believe that God answers prayers and performs > miracles. > > - On the other hand, you know that God completely ignores amputees > when they pray for miracles. > > How do you deal with this discrepancy? As an intelligent Christian, > you have to deal with it, because it makes no sense. In order to > handle it, notice that you have to create some kind of > rationalization. You have to invent an excuse on God's behalf to > explain this strange fact of life. You might say: "Well God must have > some kind of special plan for amputees." So you invent your excuse, > whatever it is, and then you stop thinking about it because it is > uncomfortable. > > Here's another example. As a Christian, you believe that God cares > about you and answers your prayers. So the second question is: Why are > there so many starving people in our world? > > Look out at are world and notice that millions of children are dieing > of starvation, It really is horrific. Why would God be worried about > you getting a raise, while at the same time ignoring the prayers of > these desperate, innocent little children? It really doesn't make any > sense, does it? Why would a loving god do this? To explain it, you > have to come up with some sort of very strange excuse for God. Like: > "God wants these children to suffer and die for some divine, > mysterious reason". Then you push it out of your mind because it > absolutely does not fit with your view of a loving, caring God. > > Do you see what has happened here? When we assume that God exist, the > answers to these questions make absolutely no sense. But if we assume > that God is imaginary, our world makes complete sense. It's > interesting, isn't it? Actually, it's more than interesting. It is > incredibly important. Our world only makes sense when we understand > that God is imaginary. This is how intelligent, rational people know > that God is imaginary. When you use your brain, and when you think > logically about your religious faith, you can reach only one possible > conclusion... The "god" that you have heard about since you were an > infant is completely imaginary. You have to willfully discard > rationality, and accept hundreds of bizarre rationalizations to > believe in your "god." > > Why should you care? What difference does it make if people want to > believe in a "god", even if he is imaginary? It matters because people > who believe in imaginary beings are delusional. It matters because > people who talk to imaginary beings are delusional. It matters because > people who believe in imaginary superstitions like prayer are > delusional. It's that simple, and that obvious. Your religious beliefs > hurt you personally and hurt us as a species because they are > delusional. > > As Carl Sagan once said: "It is far better to grasp the Universe as it > really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and > reassuring." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:00:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E3E16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009C413C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:50:35 -0500 id 0005641B.45A5195B.0000A99E Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:50:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: nocturnal In-Reply-To: <4586930C.5030904@swehack.se> Message-ID: <20070110114830.C18382@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <4586930C.5030904@swehack.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-788279280-1168447820=:18382" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSI MegaRAID 1068 mfi(4) 6.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:39 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-788279280-1168447820=:18382 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT mfi(4) is the SAS driver for newer LSI/AMI controllers in the 9th gen Dell and probably some stand-alone boards on the market. It's relatively new. Be sure you're running a new RELENG_6 snapshot for quality support. Also, let me know if you can get the Linux Emulation based CLI in ports/sysutils to work. It doesn't work for me and I don't have a lot of free time to punt around with it (ktrace). ~BAS On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, nocturnal wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to boot up a Dell PE 860 with what dell claims to be a LSI > MegaRAID 1068 controller using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. I've found listposts > claiming that this worked as soon as FreeBSD 4.11 using the mpt driver. It > seems as if the mfi driver is the one to use these days. > > I can't get it working though, it constantly says no disks were found. This > driver should be compiled into GENERIC right? Has anyone else on the list > tried using this driver for the LSI card? > -- > > > > Med vänliga hälsningar > > Stefan Midjich aka nocturnal > [Swehack] http://swehack.se > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." --0-788279280-1168447820=:18382-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:01:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F0C16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF7113C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AGuMvJ098277; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:56:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AGuLZ9098276; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:56:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:56:21 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Josef Grosch Message-ID: <20070110165621.GI97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:00 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:17:21AM -0800, Josef Grosch wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > >FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > > >Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > > >for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > > work... so I can get real things done. > > > > There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. > > Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although > > it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such > > things as servers and test machines and network access. > > > > If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live > > in the wrong world. > > Hear, hear. > > Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do > not require programming. As a Christian here is a saying that I'm sure you > are familiar with, "It's better to light one candle than to curse the > darkness". So brother Nikolas, what candles have you lit today? You > certainly have produced a lot of smoke. > > One of the things you could have done instead of wasting your and our time > on this thrash is to sit down a write a detailed description of some of the > things you find lacking in FreeBSD. By detailed I mean a series of bullet > points that describe what is the problem, what you tried, what your setup > was, OS version, hardware configuration, etc. Yes, for sure. Making a _well documented_ list of things that could be improved in or added to FreeBSD is another good way of contributing. Just remember that not everyone may agree with your list of needs. Some of those items may be seen by others as a step in the wrong direction, regardless of how well documented. But, at least a thorough description of a perceived need will be a worthy contribution and a starting point for serious discussion. Whining about people not doing your work for you for free will not lead to serious useful discussion. ////jerry > This would be a whole lot > more helpful than standing on a street corner and screaming, "FreeBSD is > FUCKED! Linux is taking over!" > > Many hands make lite work. Are you going to lend a hand or are you going to > stand on the sidelines and tell us how we are screwing up. If it is going > to be the latter please go away, we have more than our fair share of Monday > morning quarterbacks. > > > > Josef > > -- > Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 > jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:01:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2829016A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC2713C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AH4Mwc026413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:04:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168448663; bh=k/w2xrdWllQK+ieYzCppECeZcW4=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P55L3MUJbbpXUohdI1pNxSZxjqqoHBwiALQL8V S3wnWlNalgUmslYYTfbLmjaLzee/1QuULsDqXCg0BFtGuZEA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=YIHj37p4BYVc5uYVnnui2iusDNQr8wczoI/cB2wvbC8Tmga76Hu91Cd/Vp0etFeng r+ni/hvaCyEx//vClTBZA== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AH4Mxt026411; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:04:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:04:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Peter Giessel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070110120357.S57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:59 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Peter Giessel wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 01:22AM, "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: >> I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >> supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >> support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >> loadable doesn't help, either. > > P.S. 6.1 on AMD64 and i386 supports the 9550: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-amd64.html > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-i386.html > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=twa&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE It's the 9650SE I'm having trouble with, as I realized. -Dan -- "I can feel it, comin' back again...Like a rolling thunder chasin' the wind..." -Dan Mahoney, JS, JB & SL, May 10th, 1997, Approx 1AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:04:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5E616A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CB513C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:54:14 -0500 id 00056440.45A51A36.0000AA23 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:53:59 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070110115218.U18382@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell DRAC 5 cards and 6.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:04:30 -0000 Dell bumbed the DRAC5 like a shark. We use them on handful of 9th-gen PEs. The client support for Console and Remote Media completely sucks and requires VMWare + IE6. See linux-poweredge@lists.dell.com for more detail. Specifically the firefox drac5 threads. ~BAS On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Is anyone using the Dell DRAC 5 cards on 6.1-RELEASE? I played with it over > the weekend and couldn't seem to get it working. Then, last night, it > suddenly started working. (I can access the web admin interface now.) For > some reason, I couldn't ping the card at all, even though I used STATIC and > assigned known good IP, netmask and gateway. Then, for no apparent > reason,it started working, after another reboot. (Needless to say, my > confidence in the card isn't exactly soaring.) > > The native card has enough functionality for what I need, but what I'm > wondering is if anyone has managed to get the extra functionality working > under linux emulation. If so, how did you install the rpm? And which > emulation did you use? > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:06:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E978516A494 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F6013C4A6 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail017-S [10.13.128.17]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AGxM4r011925; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:59:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail017 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail017/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AGxIWG014954; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:59:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:59:18 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-ID: in-reply-to: <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> references: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:59:18 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:06:16 -0000 On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 01:22AM, "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: >I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >loadable doesn't help, either. P.S. 6.1 on AMD64 and i386 supports the 9550: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-amd64.html http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-i386.html http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=twa&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:11:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BF616A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (mail.geekisp.com [216.168.135.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ECE13C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 17532 invoked by uid 1003); 10 Jan 2007 16:44:18 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 16:44:18 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0AGiHZJ005568; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:44:17 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id l0AGiHM0001270; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:44:17 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:44:17 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: VeeJay , FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20070110164417.GB579@ayvali.org> References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:11:00 -0000 * VeeJay [2007-01-10 13:24:22 +0100]: > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? Like another poster mentioned, it depends on a variety of factors. Three things I can suggest to help you minimize security risks from local users: - keep your machine and software packages updated - have policies and procedures in place detailing an Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) and the consequences of violating them; and use it when you have to (a lot of places have a ton of elaborate and well-written AUPs which are never enforced) - keep your user "shell" machines completely separate from your other servers (web, imap, et al.), separate boxes, separate subnet, separate passwords, etc.; this should be obvious, but a lot of people run a lot of critical services on the same machines that they allow users access to and then they are surprised when a fork bomb takes down their mail infrastructure hth, Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:21:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD2716A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1494813C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail017-S [10.13.128.17]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AGt403010373; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:55:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail017 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail017/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AGt2ks014826; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:55:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:55:02 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-ID: in-reply-to: <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> references: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:55:02 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:30 -0000 On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 01:22AM, "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > >Apologies for top-posting. > >I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on >"namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >loadable doesn't help, either. > >It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using >the driver source from the 3ware site. > >Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? > >I've already emailed Scott Long asking about the possibility of the >inclusion of the new twa driver in the next FreeBSD, but I fear we're too >far down the release process, so it could be a YEAR before there's a >RELEASE that supports it. When I was dealing with this issue on my own server, the solution I used (which may or may not work for you) is that I took a cheep old IDE drive and plugged it into the built in IDE controller on my motherboard. I installed to and booted off this drive, installed the updated .ko to the IDE drive's installation. Now the 9550's arrays showed up, so I used dump/restore to move the working installation onto the 9550's partitions, shutdown, pulled the IDE drive out, and booted off the 9550's partitions and all was well. Like I say, it may or may not work for you depending on if you have an IDE controller someplace or an empty PCI slot that you could use to set things up with. hth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:24:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB48116A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ADD13C47E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AHO3c1012671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:24:03 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AHO2it017865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:24:03 -0800 Message-ID: <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:24:02 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.90932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__C230066_P3_5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:24:04 -0000 Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > On 1/10/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: >> gentlmen, thank you for these answers, i think ill find them useful. >> >> i did a some much needed reading into the names of the pentium >> processors, >> and apparently my p4-540 is a Prescott, and my xeon is a Prestonia. i >> dont see anything in the eample-make.conf that mentions Prestonia.. what >> would the best choice for that one be? just plain "pentium4" ? >> >> thanks, >> jonathan >> > > Sadly there is no good explination in the example when it comes to > server apps like apache, mysql, and other apps. > > I mean what is the usage of using P4 of P3 when I compile mysql > server? isn't prescott better even my cpu is xeon which is nocona. Some Prescott processors were only 32-bit capable where a select few were 64-bit capable. See: . As for the prestonia chips, I *think* (not sure because IA64 was released quite a few years back), that they are strictly 32-bit chips. So, just to be safe I'd stick with pentium4, but be sure to enable SMP and apic in the kernel as well in order to get hyperthreading. CNET PR: . -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:27:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285BF16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB65813C4A8 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so564795nfc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:27:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=orK+yu3VMN/1Iv1aQLTzjIYDXVNiz5fgQihRBbA76lEude6MhxT4urkR/GmFy8SqX6gKNE0VaDDgUynlPhzrEN9QGryIjl7UV8GjPjsEczS+Hy5/l6LKoBImR4KN+hdbBwbx67iuHqxrKKbcQdvOAMYNQJq/4hS6YKeHI2W8GVQ= Received: by 10.82.165.1 with SMTP id n1mr112271bue.1168448495432; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.135.17 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:01:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:35 +0000 From: Chris To: jgrosch@mooseriver.com In-Reply-To: <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> Cc: Jerry McAllister , Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:27:05 -0000 On 10/01/07, Josef Grosch wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > >FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > > >Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > > >for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > > > > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > > work... so I can get real things done. > > > > Yah, well the people doing it are also busy and working at things > > which are supposed to make them a living. Most make their > > FreeBSD contribution work on the side - in addition to their > > paying jobs although some are in the fortunate position of working > > for someone who recognizes it as also contributing to their > > productivity on the job. > > > > There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. > > Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although > > it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such > > things as servers and test machines and network access. > > > > So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is > > so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone > > to work in the project, at least part time. > > > > If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live > > in the wrong world. > > > Hear, hear. > > Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do > not require programming. As a Christian here is a saying that I'm sure you > are familiar with, "It's better to light one candle than to curse the > darkness". So brother Nikolas, what candles have you lit today? You > certainly have produced a lot of smoke. > > One of the things you could have done instead of wasting your and our time > on this thrash is to sit down a write a detailed description of some of the > things you find lacking in FreeBSD. By detailed I mean a series of bullet > points that describe what is the problem, what you tried, what your setup > was, OS version, hardware configuration, etc. This would be a whole lot > more helpful than standing on a street corner and screaming, "FreeBSD is > FUCKED! Linux is taking over!" > > Many hands make lite work. Are you going to lend a hand or are you going to > stand on the sidelines and tell us how we are screwing up. If it is going > to be the latter please go away, we have more than our fair share of Monday > morning quarterbacks. > > > > Josef > > -- > Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 > jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. > > > What I think freebsd needs. 1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one such example is NFS. 2 - A better installer, this is probably the biggest single thing that puts people of freebsd, the less people using freebsd the less funds likely to be recieved. 3 - Better hardware compatability, freebsd has poor hardware support, worst then both linux and windows, one such example is realtek cards have no problems in windows and linux but do in freebsd, sata support is very poor as well. Often when people say anything the response is go out and buy premium hardware. 4 - Better attitude to bug fixing, not always possible to provide backtraces as such from remote servers but can tell the devs how to repeat problem so they can do on their own local machines. 5 - journaling filesystem. Ultimately I think freebsd is in real danger of losing its stable tag, more and more things are not stable on freebsd as they get ignored, some of the network drivers appear to be poorly maintained, and its lagging behind in the performance charts. All this considering it used to be ahead in the game is a sad state of affairs. Would I pay for freebsd? yes but in the right circumstances I fully understand its voluntary work in many cases but the worst it gets the less inclined people will be to pay. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:29:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B61716A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FAD13C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AHTwf5000495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:29:58 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AHTwKE019074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:29:58 -0800 Message-ID: <45A52296.3070804@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:29:58 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <20070110165621.GI97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070110165621.GI97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.91433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:29:59 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:17:21AM -0800, Josef Grosch wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. >>>>> Seems like you just posted a nice list of things >>>>> for you to get busy and contribute. >>>>> >>>> I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as >>>> well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just >>>> work... so I can get real things done. >>>> >>> There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. >>> Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although >>> it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such >>> things as servers and test machines and network access. >>> >>> If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live >>> in the wrong world. >>> >> Hear, hear. >> >> Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do >> not require programming. As a Christian here is a saying that I'm sure you >> are familiar with, "It's better to light one candle than to curse the >> darkness". So brother Nikolas, what candles have you lit today? You >> certainly have produced a lot of smoke. >> >> One of the things you could have done instead of wasting your and our time >> on this thrash is to sit down a write a detailed description of some of the >> things you find lacking in FreeBSD. By detailed I mean a series of bullet >> points that describe what is the problem, what you tried, what your setup >> was, OS version, hardware configuration, etc. >> > > Yes, for sure. Making a _well documented_ list of things that > could be improved in or added to FreeBSD is another good way of > contributing. Just remember that not everyone may agree with > your list of needs. Some of those items may be seen by others > as a step in the wrong direction, regardless of how well documented. > But, at least a thorough description of a perceived need will be > a worthy contribution and a starting point for serious discussion. > Whining about people not doing your work for you for free will not > lead to serious useful discussion. > > ////jerry > > >> This would be a whole lot >> more helpful than standing on a street corner and screaming, "FreeBSD is >> FUCKED! Linux is taking over!" As for the comments made in regard to Linux, I think it's just because of the widespread use in various distros and the range of use for individuals--from newbies to tech savvy admins / hackers. FreeBSD is mainly designed for those who are more into diving into manuals (which is a plus I've noticed over Linux when I started using FreeBSD 3 years ago). FreeBSD has improved, but as many have mentioned there is a long way to go with many things. Making a centralized list of things which should be changed and submitting it to the FreeBSD folks would be helpful. Furthermore, some of the goals/milestones can be made available for several projects, one of which is Google's Summer of Code project (this will be the third year running). Various changes were made by "volunteers" and by having a list of things which should be modified, FreeBSD can be better made into a finalized product. So, instead of fighting one another--personally and otherwise, why don't we combine our thinking in order to make a good OS even better :)? Cheers, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:33:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609116A595 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:33:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCC713C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so155246uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:33:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gLGVsZpgef2s9Csr0IwWJADCWgugz6fPGcMiITEtukl7unTd85tTlW80xUhXSGbSg3tqWS2yjbeCb578kUSkm3GZeOyX7FNglSlj0yok4wloMJNInHTCJk0wPnxbj+aW8QOsx9LhaUA3OSPBIqbKlHgTaqmpaQcfvc+ctwj5Ntk= Received: by 10.67.99.1 with SMTP id b1mr734858ugm.1168450426065; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:33:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701100933g395016dasf90f41ef315e7dd7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:33:45 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:33:48 -0000 On 1/10/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > > On 1/10/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > >> gentlmen, thank you for these answers, i think ill find them useful. > >> > >> i did a some much needed reading into the names of the pentium > >> processors, > >> and apparently my p4-540 is a Prescott, and my xeon is a Prestonia. i > >> dont see anything in the eample-make.conf that mentions Prestonia.. what > >> would the best choice for that one be? just plain "pentium4" ? > >> > >> thanks, > >> jonathan > >> > > > > Sadly there is no good explination in the example when it comes to > > server apps like apache, mysql, and other apps. > > > > I mean what is the usage of using P4 of P3 when I compile mysql > > server? isn't prescott better even my cpu is xeon which is nocona. > Some Prescott processors were only 32-bit capable where a select few > were 64-bit capable. See: . > As for the prestonia chips, I *think* (not sure because IA64 was > released quite a few years back), that they are strictly 32-bit chips. > So, just to be safe I'd stick with pentium4, but be sure to enable SMP > and apic in the kernel as well in order to get hyperthreading. CNET PR: > . > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Mine is EMT64, but I use i386. Could you please tell me why P4 would be better for MySQL server or apache? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:34:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E18616A47E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E4113C4BB for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.217] (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AHYsc1047316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:34:57 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A523AC.9090608@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:34:36 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry McAllister , Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:34:54 -0000 havent much to contribute here but... > 5 - journaling filesystem. > This exists in current, patches are available for 6-stable. I've not stress tested it too much but its been nicely stable for me so far on 6-stable (non root partition as i havent yet had time to set that up) see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-November/030803.html for links. Vince > Ultimately I think freebsd is in real danger of losing its stable tag, > more and more things are not stable on freebsd as they get ignored, > some of the network drivers appear to be poorly maintained, and its > lagging behind in the performance charts. All this considering it > used to be ahead in the game is a sad state of affairs. > > Would I pay for freebsd? yes but in the right circumstances I fully > understand its voluntary work in many cases but the worst it gets the > less inclined people will be to pay. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 17:57:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A2716A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anna@etecsa.cu) Received: from imx2.etecsa.cu (imx2.etecsa.cu [200.55.152.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863F113C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anna@etecsa.cu) Received: (qmail 5546 invoked by uid 508); 10 Jan 2007 17:29:47 -0000 Received: from 192.168.91.10 by imx2.tel.etecsa.cu (envelope-from , uid 502) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.7/2430. Clear:RC:1(192.168.91.10):. Processed in 0.032302 secs); 10 Jan 2007 17:29:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO etecsa.cu) (192.168.91.10) by imx2.etecsa.cu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 17:29:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 32058 invoked by uid 509); 10 Jan 2007 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from 192.168.94.17 by mail.etecsa.cu (envelope-from , uid 502) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1217. Clear:RC:1(192.168.94.17):. Processed in 0.098583 secs); 10 Jan 2007 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.94.17?) (192.168.94.17) by etecsa.cu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 17:29:46 -0000 Message-ID: <45A52233.1020803@etecsa.cu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:28:19 -0500 From: Anna Vazquez Nikonova User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: amarok lyrics: proxy and ruby? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:57:23 -0000 Have some one resolve this problem with amarok lyrics with ruby behind a proxy? I need help.I have this same problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:04:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E20416A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A54613C46B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AHxAnp012306; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AHx1S7002533; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:59:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A50DA7.7060908@voidmain.net> References: <45A50DA7.7060908@voidmain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:59:01 -0800 To: Tom Grove X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:04:06 -0000 On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Tom Grove wrote: > We have an employee who spends quite a bit of time on the net and > currently have no way of analyzing where they go. Are there any > decent proxy servers that I can put them on to see where they are > going? Squid is a popular proxy server, although mod_proxy for Apache is another choice. However, you can analyze where someone is "going" on the net much more easily using a packet sniffer like tcpdump. However, this sort of issue is a management issue, not a technology problem. If the employee is getting their work done and meeting their deadlines, there probably isn't a problem worth pursuing. Otherwise, the issue is that this person isn't getting the work done, and whether they are surfing random pages or wasting time in some other fashion doesn't particularly matter.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:05:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAA416A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C8513C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AI5VB4016753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:05:31 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AI5UBV026976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:05:30 -0800 Message-ID: <45A52AEA.7070008@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:05:30 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> <499c70c0701100933g395016dasf90f41ef315e7dd7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701100933g395016dasf90f41ef315e7dd7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.95432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:31 -0000 Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > Mine is EMT64, but I use i386. > > Could you please tell me why P4 would be better for MySQL server or > apache? Crap, I can't find the article where Intel was comparing the Opterons to the Xeons that I was reading last night. It mentioned what the Intel guys used for GCC with -march on a Core 2 Duo system. However, I did find a Gentoo Wiki page where it says that safe CFLAGS / CPUTYPE values for EM64T CPUs is nocona: . The only thing is that they use gcc-3.4 by default as well as gcc-4.1 / gcc-4.2, so processor support may be better with the later versions of gcc. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:12:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1446216A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007DC13C43E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout15/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AHpIRJ026511; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AHpFSP028793; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:51:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> References: <45A4FDDA.8040909@skoberne.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <528B65CB-C5C5-42E7-9380-6EFA83339268@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:51:14 -0800 To: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple DoS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:25 -0000 On Jan 10, 2007, at 6:53 AM, Nejc =8Akoberne wrote: > yesterday one of our clients did something interesting (stupid): they > connected both ends of an UTP cable to the same switch, to which our > FreeBSD server was also connected. [ ... ] > Any ideas how to prevent such situations in the future? (I would like > to do it on the server side, not on the "user side".) This isn't a FreeBSD-specific issue, but a matter of controlling =20 access to the central networking hardware to only those qualified to =20 deal with it. However, if you purchase higher-quality smart =20 switches, they implement the spanning tree protocol to detect and =20 break loops like the one you've described. --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:18:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FE416A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davek@saturn5.com) Received: from atari.saturn5.com (atari.saturn5.com [209.237.231.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F8D13C461 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davek@saturn5.com) Received: (qmail 18994 invoked by uid 479); 10 Jan 2007 09:51:35 -0800 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 09:51:35 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:51:35 -0800 (PST) From: David Nicholas Kayal X-X-Sender: davek@atari To: matthias.andree@gmx.de Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: /usr/ports/databases/db42 >sudo make install clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:20 -0000 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for db42-4.2.52_4 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bdb/db-4.2.52.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bdb/db-4.2.52.tar.gz. => MD5 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.1. => SHA256 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.1. => MD5 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.2. => MD5 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.3. => SHA256 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.3. => MD5 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.4. => SHA256 Checksum OK for bdb/patch.4.2.52.4. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: bdb/db-4.2.52.tar.gz bdb/db-4.2.52.tar.gz ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => db-4.2.52.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/bdb. => Attempting to fetch from http://downloads.sleepycat.com/. fetch: http://downloads.sleepycat.com/db-4.2.52.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 4073147, actual 3919271 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/bdb/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/bdb/db-4.2.52.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 4073147, actual 3919271 => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/bdb and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/db42. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/db42. FreeBSD intextual.switch.wordnetworks.net 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 I'm actually trying to install subversion, but am running into this problem that prevents me from accomplishing that. Any help would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:20:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E0F16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77DE13C469 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0AI9j4F007851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:52 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AI9Rui009299; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0AI9Qx5009298; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:26 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110180926.GA9040@kobe.laptop> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110051608.GB80575@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.731, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.67, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:20:53 -0000 On 2007-01-10 00:48, Nikolas Britton wrote: >On 1/9/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:07:08PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> Why then? >> >> Various administrative delays, mostly. e.g. the main ftp distribution >> server had hardware failure for a few weeks. > > Shit happens and we did just change out the core team, specifically > the release engineering team... so that's understandable... You are mixing the Core team with the Release Engineering team. They are two separate entities, even though they work closely together. > I guess my comment was mainly targeted at the general state of affairs > for the last two years. By following the thread, I can see that you have been having serious problems with your FreeBSD installations. It is understandable that a fair amount of aggravation has resulted from the problems you are describing, and it is more than understandable that you feel "Someone Ought to(TM)" fix these problems. Several of the posted messages have come out as very wrong though, not because you don't have a point, but because it's hard to discern from what you write what the point really *is*. You wrote, for example, that 6.2-RELEASE has been delayed, and assumed that this was because of the Gentoo/FreeBSD blog post you have read. There _is_ a reason why 6.2-RELEASE has been delayed, but it is *not* related to Gentoo/FreeBSD -- as you already know by now. The rest of the bullet items you posted about (Xen Dom0 support; SATA RAID driver problems; better chipset support for new 51xx Xeon and Core 2 Duo systems; ZFS support; better support for 2TB, or greater, RAID arrays; speed up GigE and 10GigE stuff; better SMP support; GIANT lock in RAID/LAN drivers) are not really *blockers* for pushing out 6.2-RELEASE, right? There are literally hundreds of improvements going in the HEAD of the CVS tree every month, but not all of them can be easily backported to the RELENG_6 branch. As you know (being a long-time FreeBSD user), the developer team tries to merge changes from HEAD to the STABLE branch, but the team tries to keep a pretty thin balance between two fairly divergent lines of development: * Merging useful and cool new stuff, but, at the same time, * Avoid breaking backwards compatibility on STABLE branches A lot of the bullet items you have mentioned have been the subject of a great deal of work, and some of them are giving extremely fruitful results in the HEAD branch of CVS (what is going to become 7.0-RELEASE). Not all of them _can_ be ported to RELENG_6 without breaking API and ABI compatibility in one or more ways though. Even so, the 6.2-RELEASE includes a lot of improvements from 6.1. More improvements, are scheduled for later releases. For example, some of the areas of 7.0-CURRENT which have seen an outstanding set of fixes, speed improvements, locking & SMP support improvements, and feature enhancements are: * ZFS support (feature). Pawel Jakub Dawidek has successfully ported ZFS to FreeBSD, and he delivered an imporessive demo at EuroBSD Con 2006, in November 2006. * FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT includes already an astounding set of locking and SMP improvements over STABLE, and it performs quite nicely on some of the Intel Core 2 Duo systems which I have tested. * The network stack of 7.0-CURRENT has been improved even more, with many drivers being updated to support a larger array of NIC hardware, with performance and throughput improvements, and a lot more changes which I can't even remember off-hand. Projects in progress include: * Support for Xen. * Netperf: The netperf team targets performance monitoring and throughput performance analyses of FreeBSD. The project maintains parts of the official FreeBSD web site, at http://www.freebsd.org/projects/netperf/, where you can find out more about what the team is doing, get progress reports, etc. * Java on FreeBSD, http://www.freebsd.org/java/index.html The FreeBSD Java project and the FreeBSD Foundation have been working on delivering Java support on FreeBSD for a long time. The FreeBSD Foundation has successfully negotiated a license with Sun, and they can now deliver binary Java distributions[1]. Patch sets for Java 1.5.X have been announced too. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/java/newsflash.html The active projects are al listed at http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ and that list isn't even complete! So the comment by Kris Kennaway below is the best way to phrase it, IMHO: >> Some of these are already there, some are in progress, etc. > > I haven't been keeping track lately but that's good if true. Will see > what happens when I upgrade my servers. Great! :) > I am unhappy but I care too much about FreeBSD to just up and leave, it > may be time for a sabbatical though... Or, alternatively, it may be the time to sit down and think which parts of FreeBSD you have an interest in, and really consider helping improve them. You already know that we can use all the help we can get, so if you can offer any substantial amount of help, feel free to get more actively involved :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:27:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC7A16A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B998113C45B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so168697uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:27:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EI63SnwTVHZTKLahMrru1PRUIrmfaLFAPVAZMnUxjV8FkmNktwTyAJymHrJxHVXgd71H7BgxEKiHGjIWtHXDJzsqupd6uKdzb9VSuqRyPzD3f20zH8HmwY7GCd92BXdCRsqJ7cENu2unosUVDv5/bJozYPv2nsXphg9a2TqtFo8= Received: by 10.67.20.3 with SMTP id x3mr784159ugi.1168453643654; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:27:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701101027i154d4ca5x941f6b440deb6e30@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:27:23 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <45A52AEA.7070008@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> <499c70c0701100933g395016dasf90f41ef315e7dd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A52AEA.7070008@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:27:25 -0000 On 1/10/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > > Mine is EMT64, but I use i386. > > > > Could you please tell me why P4 would be better for MySQL server or > > apache? > Crap, I can't find the article where Intel was comparing the Opterons to > the Xeons that I was reading last night. It mentioned what the Intel > guys used for GCC with -march on a Core 2 Duo system. > > However, I did find a Gentoo Wiki page where it says that safe CFLAGS / > CPUTYPE values for EM64T CPUs is nocona: > . > The only thing is that they use gcc-3.4 by default as well as gcc-4.1 / > gcc-4.2, so processor support may be better with the later versions of gcc. > > -Garrett So for i386 I should use prescott, right? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:28:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89516A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE6613C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AISpGl006349; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AISjgC016080; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:44 -0800 To: David Nicholas Kayal X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: /usr/ports/databases/db42 >sudo make install clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:28:53 -0000 On Jan 10, 2007, at 9:51 AM, David Nicholas Kayal wrote: [ ... ] > FreeBSD intextual.switch.wordnetworks.net 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1- > RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/ > usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > > I'm actually trying to install subversion, but am running into this > problem that prevents me from accomplishing that. > > Any help would be appreciated. Have you updated your ports tree? IIRC, Oracle acquired SleepyCat (who wrote the BDB software), and the URLs to download the tarballs have changed... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 18:36:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25FF16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9B713C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AIafBu024720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:41 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AIaeKm001229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:40 -0800 Message-ID: <45A53238.9010606@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:40 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1439.192.168.125.134.1168359685.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <200701101004.23651.pieter@degoeje.nl> <45A4E04C.5020902@u.washington.edu> <2831.192.168.125.134.1168443983.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <499c70c0701100846h60111c35lafea7cd0b7b402c2@mail.gmail.com> <45A52132.60303@u.washington.edu> <499c70c0701100933g395016dasf90f41ef315e7dd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A52AEA.7070008@u.washington.edu> <499c70c0701101027i154d4ca5x941f6b440deb6e30@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701101027i154d4ca5x941f6b440deb6e30@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.102432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: make.conf and building multiple kernels and worlds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:36:41 -0000 Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > On 1/10/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: >> > Mine is EMT64, but I use i386. >> > >> > Could you please tell me why P4 would be better for MySQL server or >> > apache? >> Crap, I can't find the article where Intel was comparing the Opterons to >> the Xeons that I was reading last night. It mentioned what the Intel >> guys used for GCC with -march on a Core 2 Duo system. >> >> However, I did find a Gentoo Wiki page where it says that safe CFLAGS / >> CPUTYPE values for EM64T CPUs is nocona: >> . >> >> The only thing is that they use gcc-3.4 by default as well as gcc-4.1 / >> gcc-4.2, so processor support may be better with the later versions >> of gcc. >> >> -Garrett > > So for i386 I should use prescott, right? prescott should be a safe bet, yes. However, I don't see why nocona support couldn't be used. CPUTYPE in freebsd's make.conf is a "soft alias" to -march, which adds CPU support for the target architecture, but doesn't force the binary to only work in the target architecture IIRC. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 19:25:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1544016A4A7 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B893C13C480 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6128820A002 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:25:17 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NN8UpdQT5hOp for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:25:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CE920594C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:25:08 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:25:03 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A52233.1020803@etecsa.cu> In-Reply-To: <45A52233.1020803@etecsa.cu> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1483923.KAWz30u097"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701101325.06900.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: amarok lyrics: proxy and ruby? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:25:19 -0000 --nextPart1483923.KAWz30u097 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 January 2007 11:28 am, Anna Vazquez Nikonova wrote: > Have some one resolve this problem with amarok lyrics with ruby behind a > proxy? > I need help.I have this same problem. Which problem? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1483923.KAWz30u097 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFpT2S5sRg+Y0CpvERAi8hAKCN9TrOhnKHtypjG+CpSnRmDry4EACdHRHO qBr2gYQOZpOkisMy01LIx6c= =go0u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1483923.KAWz30u097-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 19:58:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4763516A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B0113C4A7 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 13850 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 19:58:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2007 19:58:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 44FFA28430; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:58:01 -0500 (EST) To: "Ross Penner" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:58:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Ross Penner's message of "Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:07:55 -0700") Message-ID: <443b6izmba.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Natd is not working as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:58:03 -0000 "Ross Penner" writes: > I've configured my freebsd computer to be the gateway for my home network > using the guidelines in the handbook. All the required kernel options are > enabled and the entries in /etc/rc.conf have been added. I'm unsure what the > problem could be and I'm hoping somebody can give me some advice on where to > look to diagnose this issue. > > the bind9 server is functioning correctly as I'm able to resolve IP address, > but no packets seem to be getting through. There isn't enough information here to work with. Can you give more detail on what you did, and what the results were? I think every sentence could use some expansion. You may find it helpful to refer to the "How to get the best results from freebsd-questions" article, now part of the official FreeBSD documentation (and regularly posted to this list by its author). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 20:09:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2783D16A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0521313C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4810 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 20:09:36 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2007 20:09:36 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BAD402842F; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:34 -0500 (EST) To: George.Vanev@gmail.com References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> (George Vanev's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:49:34 +0200") Message-ID: <44y7oay77l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:39 -0000 "George Vanev" writes: > I installed isc-dhcpd and it is working fine. > But I don't want to hardcode the nameservers in the dhcpd.conf, > because my ISP is changing them sometimes. > It would be perfect if there is a way dhcpd to read the nameservers > from /etc/resolv.conf Not exactly, but you can have the dhclient rewrite the dhcpd.conf when it gets new nameservers. I used to do this; I ran it from dhclient-exit-hooks, and it was a simple sed(1) command. For a long time, I've been running my own local caching nameserver, and directing the DHCP clients to that, but I could dig out my old script if you have trouble with it. Although I would suggest you also consider setting up your own local caching nameserver; the caching behaviour can be a noticeable speed boost. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 20:29:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843CC16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s9.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s9.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C2113C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.48]) by bay0-omc1-s9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:25:20 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:25:19 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:25:19 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.107.34] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <443b6izmba.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: "Marwan Sultan" To: ross.penner@gmail.com Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:25:19 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2007 20:25:19.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[728D6750:01C734F5] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Natd is not working as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:04 -0000 Hello Ross, FreeBSD as a gateway is very easy and simple to setup, but a very small mistake could stop your box from acting as a gateway, 1) Please send the follow : the output of #ifconfg -a 2) output of #uname -a 3) copy of rc.conf file 4) Whats the lines you have changed in your kernel ? you wrote "no packets seem to be getting through" do you mean your freebsd having an Internet but not giving clients and not acting as a gateway? Marwan Sultan. >"Ross Penner" writes: > > > I've configured my freebsd computer to be the gateway for my home >network > > using the guidelines in the handbook. All the required kernel options >are > > enabled and the entries in /etc/rc.conf have been added. I'm unsure what >the > > problem could be and I'm hoping somebody can give me some advice on >where to > > look to diagnose this issue. > > > > the bind9 server is functioning correctly as I'm able to resolve IP >address, > > but no packets seem to be getting through. _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 20:29:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7802F16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: from sun.schedom-europe.net (sun.schedom-europe.net [193.109.184.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC3B913C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni@brinckman.info) Received: (qmail 8179 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 20:53:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (83.101.7.39) by sun.schedom-europe.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 20:53:33 -0000 From: Beni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:29:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> In-Reply-To: <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> X-Face: %*c?V7%A[c.}s2rI*TaRWm-[I-, ZLpBKmmC-@)J}KGbr)=a, TsXSA=:ArC(<=?utf-8?q?v=5C/=5F=25BaB=24K=0A=09=24=60E=7D6=7EyjIqu/SN=3A=24Pb=7DGngR+8=3D?= =?utf-8?q?dE=60?=)V~48zl6) =?utf-8?q?BhEtfQ2=3D=7ChScx=3Frn30d!QMd=3F=2E=60/hR!l+=0A=09x?=(]+zXesMf?'W[>46aPKMAAwd7eT{X_O9besb[u]'Y(DAe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701102129.06130.beni@brinckman.info> Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:29:09 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 08:21, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tore Lund" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:45 PM > Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? > > > Robert Huff wrote: > > > (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user > > > behavior is not intuitively obvious.) > > > > An understatement. There are situations where sysinstall is positively > > quixotic. I don't mind the simple character-based interface. But I do > > find it worrying that I sometimes cannot know what sysinstall will do > > next. In any case, this is bad publicity for FreeBSD since sysinstall > > is the first bit of FreeBSD they encounter. > > All of this is true. > > > Time and again we hear rumors about a new installation program. Is it > > actually nearing completion? Keep in mind that many of us do not even > > consider getting involved as long as we believe a better program is > > under way. > > There is no new installation program underway. > > This comes up every year or so on the various discussion lists, everyone > bashes sysinstall and claims it makes FreeBSD look bad and when are > we going to get a replacement, etc. The arguments die away when faced > with the following cold realities: > > 1) You can probably get consensus from everyone that sysinstall is ugly > and needs replacement. But your never going to get any consensus on > what the replaement should look like. And any replacement is going to > have places where the user cannot know what it's going to do next, that > is just the nature of install programs - it is due to the fact that > different people > interpret things differently. What is obvious to you isn't obvious to > someone > else. And, when is the install program going to cross the line between > acting as a install program and acting as a training video? > > Review the steps needed to install a self-signed SSL certificate into > Microsoft Internet Explorer 7, and then come back and tell me that > those steps are more intuitive than sysinstall. Yeah, right. Face the > facts, boys. Every year, computers get more complex to operate, and > every year, the Average User is paying more and more to have a tech > set the computer up for them. Open your eyes and look around. People > think nothing of paying $30 to have a tech install Microsoft Office on > their new Windows PC for God's sake. > > Who really is sysinstall's audience? The average l-user? Or the average > technician? If it's the average tech, then who the hell cares how ugly > sysinstall is? You think sysinstall is bad, you ought to see the > diagnostic interface > the average auto mechanic has to use to troubleshoot your car. If you are > not the ultimate end-user for the FreeBSD system your installing, then > you don't have any moral ground to make a call for pussifying the FreeBSD > install program. I can tell you that for myself, every FreeBSD system I've > installed in the last year and a half has been for OTHERS to use, NOT ME. > > 2) There's an immense amount of effort that has gone into sysinstall and > it's libraries. Your talking about taking on an old, established program > that > is pretty throughly debugged, a program that is like an octopus in the > amount of icky, ugly mucking around with config files and such that it > does, and replacing this with a new program that is going to have all of > the intelligence and institutional knowledge in it that the old program > does. And furthermore if this replacement is to ever get traction among the > userbase it's going to have to work PERFECTLY in the FIRST version that is > released, otherwise everyone is just going to turn their back on it and > keep using the existing sysinstall. > > 3) The largest complaint about sysinstall is that it's not graphical. The > problem is that a graphical installation program has some -severe- > constraints on it. First, it has to work in ALL instances. That means, > 640x480x16 colors VGA screen. You have a lot of people out there > installing on systems that have, for example, monitors with inadequate > horizontal/vertical frequency ranges and very capabable video cards, > unless you force the X-server to use the original VGA resolution, it's > going to overdrive those monitors and the user is going to see a black > screen when the installation program comes up. And the only way FreeBSD > is going to get a graphical anything is by using Xorg, and FreeBSD does > not maintain that distribution - so we are now dependent on the Xorg > group writing their code with no bugs for our installation program to work. > > 4) Installation programs by and large are not "fun" programs to work > on. Most developers avoid them. They are thankless tasks - you > don't hear squat for thanks from anyone when they work, but you make > the least mistake and everyone is on your neck. > > 5) Finally, sysinstall is a one-shot program. You use it once, the system > is > installed, and you never have to touch it again. There's lots of other > things > in FreeBSD that are critical things that will stop an installation cold. > Such > as lack of device support for some new piece of hardware. These things > are much higher on the priority list than replacing sysinstall, a working > program. > > Ted Ok, but why not have the two ? Keep sysinstall text-based and have the possibility to have a (more) graphical install ? Desktopbsd and PC-bsd seem to manage it not so badly. That could keep everybody happy, from the tech installer to the curious newbie :-) Just a thought... Beni. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:16:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728AE16A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1126513C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so206839uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=VGGVgbx43Ayj6tpSurAse9GmPp1KXrOo1WGJc96qCH1r7nYx2uIpATzsjFo1zBT/vGhKObVfgrTZT0B762K4QFr211oA04ILR+8VH5IoqweALKR3TJRifJB0g1wucKcKCw5up+f+jCm3nUJB//KhxhR+iFpFGyEpIIlmEdEQXNQ= Received: by 10.67.101.10 with SMTP id d10mr954807ugm.1168463798676; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.102.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27sm42722530ugp.2007.01.10.13.16.37; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:16:38 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd ORG From: eoghan Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:16:36 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:16:40 -0000 Hi Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. I have installed: diablo-jdk-5.0 diablo-jre1.5.0 linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with the plugin missing page... I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of java... Im not sure what i have to do next... Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:19:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795E416A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0495D13C46C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-161-214.51-151.net24.it [151.51.214.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0ALRo0P084551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:27:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0ALL12c053978; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:21:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:19:20 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juergen Heberling References: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> In-Reply-To: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:19:33 -0000 Juergen Heberling wrote: > Hi all > > Please suggest some way of diagnosing this problem: > > System freezes after being up in production and apparently stable for > several weeks, no dump, no error message, nothing on the console - so I > suspect hardware. > ... > Here is my dmesg, long lines were wrapped: > ... > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 > cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 > ... > ahd0: port > 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff > mem 0xdd200000-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0 on pci3 > ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > ahd1: port > 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff > mem 0xdd202000-0xdd203fff irq 33 at device 2.1 on pci3 > ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs I've had freezes as you describe on two different servers with ahd and SMP. The solution was to turn SMP off, unfortunately :( bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:24:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B14716A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5CA13C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-161-214.51-151.net24.it [151.51.214.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AL9dq1082268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:09:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AL2plp050615 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:02:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:01:10 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:24:51 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: Well, I'll make my statement too... > Two reasons AFAIK: > > 1. it simply doesn't even know how deal with the more modern features > like GEOM & RAID, more advanced authentication mechanisms (nsswitch), > and devices like sound cards (there are many more in this list...) Apart from that, I used to be able to sysinsall a machine booting via PXE. This doesn't work anymore in recent versions :-( Or maybe it is just my incompetence, but then, if someone managed this, I'd like to hear about it. > 2. it's way past what's currently considered "user friendly" Please don't get any graphics bloatware in the way. :-) ... just my two eurocents. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:26:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47B16A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B23813C46A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so140970ana for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:26:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ke385KDS/BsPAGLZZfJ4WN8MWC5xURk6IngrKvr1KpyTVWsNaYQZQ3Kv4jVnpB6xeozvT900mru3wk7a7g2F88WgEvTUSiPTAYpCL5qp4fZVSRq4JO2uY9aMBhlEq0SbR1Vu1Wo0jsHIBjmyXffONsA6mXfESe5AeL0W5sprJTw= Received: by 10.78.139.1 with SMTP id m1mr259321hud.1168462837386; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:00:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.159.15 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:00:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:00:36 +0000 From: Freminlins To: Chris In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jerry McAllister , Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:26:28 -0000 On 10/01/07, Chris wrote: > > > What I think freebsd needs. > > 1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one > such example is NFS. I don't actually have a problem with FreeBSD and NFS. This is using about 20+ clients and 2 NetApp filers. What problem are you having, rather than just "goes to crap"? 2 - A better installer, this is probably the biggest single thing that > puts people of freebsd, the less people using freebsd the less funds > likely to be recieved. Do you really think this puts people off? How do you know this? I find that FreeBSD has the fastest installer for a complete OS. It may not look very pretty, but it's logical and I can use it over serial console. 3 - Better hardware compatability, freebsd has poor hardware support, > worst then both linux and windows, one such example is realtek cards > have no problems in windows and linux but do in freebsd, sata support > is very poor as well. Often when people say anything the response is > go out and buy premium hardware. Well, everything has worse hardware support than Windows, so that's a pointless comparison. Linux has more hardware support, this is true. But some of this "support" is very bad. I have only had one box out of about 100 over the years which I couldn't make work to my liking with FreeBSD. Then I went to Linux. I use Linux on a couple of large storage systems deliberately because of the lack of a journalling FS in FreeBSD. Realtek network cards, I am afraid to say, are cheap and nasty. Some, at least, do work in FreeBSD. But I wouldn't consider them professional cards for use with any OS. They are OK for home users with low end network needs. Nothing mor than that. SATA support was definitely a bid dodgy the last time I looked (about a year), but I nearly always use SCSI so it's not usually a problem. 4 - Better attitude to bug fixing, not always possible to provide > backtraces as such from remote servers but can tell the devs how to > repeat problem so they can do on their own local machines. That's asking a tiny bit too much IMHO. To get the best help you have to offer the best information yourself. You are expecting someone else to repeat your problems on hardware which they not have. 5 - journaling filesystem. Yes, definitely this is needed and long overdue. Ultimately I think freebsd is in real danger of losing its stable tag, > more and more things are not stable on freebsd as they get ignored, > some of the network drivers appear to be poorly maintained, and its > lagging behind in the performance charts. All this considering it > used to be ahead in the game is a sad state of affairs. > > Would I pay for freebsd? yes but in the right circumstances I fully > understand its voluntary work in many cases but the worst it gets the > less inclined people will be to pay. The simple truth is, of course, that Linux has a large number of fully paid developers. RedHat, for example, employs numerous programmers who fix bugs, and these fixes end up in free distros of Linux. Chris > Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:36:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A316A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from public.aci.on.ca (aci.on.ca [205.207.148.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFAE13C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from (invalid client hostname: host address literal does not match remote client address)[127.0.0.1] (xtreme-156-171.dyn.aci.on.ca[69.17.156.171] port=1938) by public.aci.on.ca([205.207.148.252] port=25) via TCP with esmtp (2851 bytes) (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:35:55 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.122-Pre 2005-Nov-17 #1 built 2006-Feb-21) Message-ID: <45A55C39.50405@qwirky.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:35:53 -0500 From: Jeff Royle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0702-0, 09/01/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Juergen Heberling Subject: Re: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lists@qwirky.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:36:01 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Juergen Heberling wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Please suggest some way of diagnosing this problem: >> >> System freezes after being up in production and apparently stable for >> several weeks, no dump, no error message, nothing on the console - so >> I suspect hardware. > > ... >> Here is my dmesg, long lines were wrapped: >> ... >> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs >> cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 >> cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 >> cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 >> cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 >> ... >> ahd0: port >> 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff >> mem 0xdd200000-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0 on pci3 >> ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs >> ahd1: port >> 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff >> mem 0xdd202000-0xdd203fff irq 33 at device 2.1 on pci3 >> ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs > > I've had freezes as you describe on two different servers with ahd and > SMP. The solution was to turn SMP off, unfortunately :( > > bye > av. > _______________________________________________ Are these Xeon's? If so you might want to try disabling Hyper-threading in the bios. I have noticed some strange behavior on 6.2-RC1 with a IBM x336 server here. It never crashed but the throughput "felt" off, so I disabled Hyper-threading and things seemed to perform the way I expected it to should. I would have more details when I actually have time to work on the server itself, however in the meantime give it a shot. If you have 2 CPU's you shouldn't see the CPU2/CPU3 listed just the 2 aftewards. FYI - I have used that particular controller successfully on several servers recently so I don't think that should be a overall issue for you. Cheers, Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 21:53:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01C316A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tamara-b.org) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C94613C45B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@tamara-b.org) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42813A7AF for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:53:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from tania.servebbs.org (pool-71-247-39-214.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.39.214]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A51C687508 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:53:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:54:00 -0500 From: Bob To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070110165400.2e505f4f@tania.servebbs.org> In-Reply-To: <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> References: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> Organization: Tamara B X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:08 -0000 I also have had the EXACT same problem. I have suspected the SCSI system as well. I have played with all the hardware settings IE transfer rate etc.... to no avail. I am not willing to disable the SMP, as this is my workstation, and I need the extra speed. ======= FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #2 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ahc0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xfcfff000-0xfcffffff irq 30 at device 6.0 on pci1 ahc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7880: Ultra Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs aac0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 31 at device 2.1 on pci0 aac0: [FAST] aac0: Adaptec Raid Controller 2.0.0-1 ======== Why/what is the [GIANT-LOCKED]? I read somewhere that "GIANT" was removed in 6.1. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:04:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B26E16A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from mail.thingy.com (wotsit.thingy.com [212.21.100.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736A413C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 74363 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jan 2007 21:37:31 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.13?) (howie@thingy.com@212.21.124.49) by wotsit3.thingy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 21:37:31 +0000 Message-ID: <45A55C93.3020402@thingy.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:37:23 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:04:15 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Apart from that, I used to be able to sysinsall a machine booting via > PXE. This doesn't work anymore in recent versions :-( > Or maybe it is just my incompetence, but then, if someone managed > this, I'd like to hear about it. This definitely works with 6.1-RELEASE, as I've just had the nice experience of taking delivery of a dozen Dell servers and had them all up and running with my own customisations and package selection in one afternoon with one keypress. They are installed as quick as I can press F12. > 2. it's way past what's currently considered "user friendly" > > Please don't get any graphics bloatware in the way. :-) Amen. Really, if you are put off by the installer, then once that has completed., the rest of the "management tools" (i.e. vi) are not going give you the warm fuzzies either. If you need the graphical management, and nice installer, isn't that what PCBSD is for? Having a graphical installer would be like having a super luxury limo with bar and pool, but which stops in the desert and leaves you by a phone box. Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:12:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53C916A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882AA13C459 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so12435wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=k/Iz0vYDPllnMDADhthKXHZTOANjWyFufl8jebTQ8GEcYKxbM3My4O1UkLFVqdmre+5hoZvXSpHZtEtBuBFFUoxLBOkysQsB6v/jj5P1MrsFm+3r2goVq4RgIR5bDMvZysHl/b00kAsiMwKrrWE/h8SJZXCXx3HKNJjNyGgWPNU= Received: by 10.90.34.3 with SMTP id h3mr599040agh.1168465634043; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.70.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:47:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:47:13 -0500 From: "Jeff MacDonald" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:12:51 -0000 Hi, I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG 786432k above 4GB ignored Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. Jeff. -- Unless otherwise indicated, anything I write is either garnered from experience or pulled out of my ass, depending on situational needs.. Jeff MacDonald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:26:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D4316A4B3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C73613C474 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.100] (crayfish.unsane.co.uk [10.0.0.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AMR01U002466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:27:00 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:03 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd ORG Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:24 -0000 eoghan wrote: > Hi > Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working for > firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. > I have installed: > diablo-jdk-5.0 > diablo-jre1.5.0 > linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 > linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 > when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with > the plugin missing page... > I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of java... > Im not sure what i have to do next... sounds like you may not have the correct files/links in your plugin directory. whats the output of ls -l /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ if /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins doesnt have a symlink like libjavaplugin_oji.so@ -> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so then try cd /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins && ln -s /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.solibjavaplugin_oji.so and restart firefox and look at about:plugins Vince > Thanks > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:28:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCF016A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E6513C471 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4lw8-0001Va-06; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:28:48 +0100 Received: from p54a55057.dip.t-dialin.net (Xds5FQZZ8eW2aWrQ102UfVC5zzcCrrVBb4ASd8ESkbs1MINUCcuO6+@[84.165.80.87]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4lw6-1pOkSm0; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:28:46 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:30:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701102330.32778.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: Xds5FQZZ8eW2aWrQ102UfVC5zzcCrrVBb4ASd8ESkbs1MINUCcuO6+ X-TOI-MSGID: 5e2afebd-0d17-49ca-b2d5-78cd014c1fb8 Subject: competing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:28:50 -0000 Hello list, portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. Two days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from the ports? With regards Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:29:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D5516A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from outgoing.holservices.gr (outgoing.holservices.gr [62.38.2.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D01DE13C442 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: (qmail 17161 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 22:01:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deliver.mail.dc.hol.net) (192.168.20.70) by arete.mail.dc.hol.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 22:01:33 -0000 Received: from auth-smtp.hol.gr (takeit02.mail.dc.hol.net [192.168.20.72]) by deliver.hol.gr (8.12.11/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l0AM1IfG018065 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:01:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (ppp074-170.dsl.hol.gr [89.210.74.170]) by auth-smtp.hol.gr (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0AM1Io5023601 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:01:19 +0200 Message-ID: <45A56232.6020407@yahoo.gr> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:01:22 +0200 From: Apatewna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2433/Wed Jan 10 20:28:34 2007 on takeit02.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: apatewna@yahoo.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:29:26 -0000 The only real drawback I see in sysinstall is that at several stages you cannot perceive what the previous part was and what the next step is. There are times that you have to "exit" in order to continue. Maybe an overall progress bar in plain text (eg Welcome - Select disk - Select partitions - Boot loader....), highlighting the appropriate field according to where you are, will sched some light to the naive. Other than that, I fully support text mode, it's the only guaranteed way to install a system and FreeBSD has done its job quite nicely there. As for DesktopBSD and PCBSD, I can tell you at least for the PCBSD part that it has been VERY difficult to create the installer specifically the disk detection and the partitioning scheme. At some times, I just wish people stop creating new things and just find ways to beutify what is already there and working solid for years. Rizoulis Thanasis IT Technician Greece From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:32:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3364916A5F5 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B824113C46B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AMWhF6030072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:32:43 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AMWgpw027669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:32:43 -0800 Message-ID: <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:32:41 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> In-Reply-To: <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.141932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:32:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:54:11PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: >> On 1/9/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> Don't know about some of the items, but... >>> -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's >>> ActionScript Engine: >>> . >>> So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported >>> on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will >>> be interesting though. >> But I use Opera?? And It needs to work with youtube, without crashing >> and without install headaches. 'cd /usr/ports/www/flash; make install >> clean; exit;' then open browser to youtube.com and go. No library >> shuffle or libmap configuring. > > I'm not sure how it's FreeBSD's problem that Flash doesn't work in Opera, > but anyway - the latest Opera release (9.10, in ports now) works very well > with the Linux Flash 7 plugin, or at least the beta I tried a few weeks ago > did, and I assume they didn't break it since. YouTube worked fine, apart > from some loss of sync between the audio & video, but that is apparently > not a FreeBSD-specific problem. > > There was a thread about this on -questions about a month ago explaining > what was needed to make it work, although the real 9.10 release, or the > port, might make this easier. > > Cheers, > > Scott Scott and Nikolas, I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have much choice but to get it working. Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpWmJEnKyINQw/HARAk27AJ40v+igyCubET0EkTq5rUj+XsRxKwCgjmE6 NZtQqJrlCuoXzONgPdgo4no= =gasn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:36:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E3916A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5322813C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AMa6Xk031555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:36:07 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0AMa1Sv028399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:36:05 -0800 Message-ID: <45A56A4F.2000601@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:35:59 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.141932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:36:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 eoghan wrote: > Hi > Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working for > firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. > I have installed: > diablo-jdk-5.0 > diablo-jre1.5.0 > linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 > linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 > when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with > the plugin missing page... > I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of java... Im > not sure what i have to do next... > Thanks > Eoghan Not sure why you're encountering the issue with Java and FF because it works perfectly fine for me. Do you have the linuxplugin-wrapper port installed by chance? Also, are the following files present in the following locations: [gcooper@sprsd /usr/local]$ for i in `find . -name libjavaplugin_oji.so`; do ls -l $i; done lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67 Dec 19 20:32 ./lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 143280 Jun 13 2006 ./diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpWpHEnKyINQw/HARAgrUAJ491WbNvngQosuHJlrlRCnfBlaitACeNcEZ tdlHIvQxvHYQaXoVhl4cmtM= =caPO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:37:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971A816A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7BF13C44B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so647655nfc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:37:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KciEVRou/8dwzr1ceyYuCX34cOmTOH2aG0FkqslgBTD2TCYIYXP+nI/6kdUxLPlmpLuOPQelX3+idHZgtLzK0Dow0hbgQHmaQrs0knnu2c6YEUAQSV0l1dKpZxj0oQtq7ITyNhrn5ZGLdwJU0CmyImuFlWTpunNt6MfUc4R8bpI= Received: by 10.82.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr188539bue.1168468630879; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.135.17 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:37:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0701101437h703b70aauf6e605ea460fe621@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:37:10 +0000 From: Chris To: Freminlins In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Jerry McAllister , Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:37:12 -0000 On 10/01/07, Freminlins wrote: > > On 10/01/07, Chris wrote: > > > > What I think freebsd needs. > > > > 1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one > > such example is NFS. > > I don't actually have a problem with FreeBSD and NFS. This is using about > 20+ clients and 2 NetApp filers. What problem are you having, rather than > just "goes to crap"? > > > 2 - A better installer, this is probably the biggest single thing that > > puts people of freebsd, the less people using freebsd the less funds > > likely to be recieved. > > Do you really think this puts people off? How do you know this? I find that > FreeBSD has the fastest installer for a complete OS. It may not look very > pretty, but it's logical and I can use it over serial console. > > > 3 - Better hardware compatability, freebsd has poor hardware support, > > worst then both linux and windows, one such example is realtek cards > > have no problems in windows and linux but do in freebsd, sata support > > is very poor as well. Often when people say anything the response is > > go out and buy premium hardware. > > Well, everything has worse hardware support than Windows, so that's a > pointless comparison. Linux has more hardware support, this is true. But > some of this "support" is very bad. I have only had one box out of about 100 > over the years which I couldn't make work to my liking with FreeBSD. Then I > went to Linux. I use Linux on a couple of large storage systems deliberately > because of the lack of a journalling FS in FreeBSD. > > Realtek network cards, I am afraid to say, are cheap and nasty. Some, at > least, do work in FreeBSD. But I wouldn't consider them professional cards > for use with any OS. They are OK for home users with low end network needs. > Nothing mor than that. > > SATA support was definitely a bid dodgy the last time I looked (about a > year), but I nearly always use SCSI so it's not usually a problem. > > > 4 - Better attitude to bug fixing, not always possible to provide > > backtraces as such from remote servers but can tell the devs how to > > repeat problem so they can do on their own local machines. > > That's asking a tiny bit too much IMHO. To get the best help you have to > offer the best information yourself. You are expecting someone else to > repeat your problems on hardware which they not have. > > > 5 - journaling filesystem. > > Yes, definitely this is needed and long overdue. > > > Ultimately I think freebsd is in real danger of losing its stable tag, > > more and more things are not stable on freebsd as they get ignored, > > some of the network drivers appear to be poorly maintained, and its > > lagging behind in the performance charts. All this considering it > > used to be ahead in the game is a sad state of affairs. > > > > Would I pay for freebsd? yes but in the right circumstances I fully > > understand its voluntary work in many cases but the worst it gets the > > less inclined people will be to pay. > > The simple truth is, of course, that Linux has a large number of fully paid > developers. RedHat, for example, employs numerous programmers who fix bugs, > and these fixes end up in free distros of Linux. > > > Chris > > > > > Frem. A reason why you have less problems is I expect you using premium hardware such as scsi, currently I am lucky enough to not be using realtek lan cards although I am still having problems with intel nics. the specific nfs issues are related to mounting linux filesystems, I am not the only one there is dozens of posts on these mailing lists from users with the same problems, usually livelocks or panics caused by mounting nfs filesystems on freebsd most seem to have no resolution. realtek isnt great hardware but is that a good reason for realtek performing significantly worse then on linux, shouldnt it be on par? issues of performance been worse, the biggest example is probably mysql and uniprocessor performance, I understand with ule 2.0 mysql performance is signficantly better so there is hope there, I would like to see more performance from uniprocessor and the mp safe support on nics set to disabled by default to put stability first. The installer well that comes down to using a variety of datacentres, quite often datacentre staff are not too well trained and mainly used to redhat and windows gui installers, so when it comes to freebsd there is many datacentres who dont even support freebsd when I ask is because they say it wont install, the ones that do support freebsd the feedback I get off them is often related to both the installer been a pain for them and hardware compatibility. How much testing goes into heavy workloads such as heavy apache loads and DDOS attacks? I expect my server to not livelock and come back to responsiveness after such loads without having to reboot it. Freebsd 4.x was incredibly stable under heavy ddos attacks, freebsd 5.x held out but of course was very slow on UP, freebsd 6.x is faster but has suffered stability problems. On the performance side get the sata and raid problems sorted for improved hd performance tagged ququeing etc. Is there a sort of hire a dev button on the freebsd website? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:40:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8401916A412 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from queue04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queue04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FB413C47E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070110222305.GNIW1865.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:23:05 +0000 Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.101.128.185]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070110222305.ZRBN17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:23:05 +0000 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]:62097) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4lqZ-000LDt-98; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:23:03 +0000 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AMN1hd001500; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:23:01 GMT (envelope-from scott) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:23:01 +0000 From: Scott Mitchell To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-SECURITY i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:40:31 -0000 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:54:11PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/9/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > >Don't know about some of the items, but... > > -Flash support with Mozilla products is being done through Mozilla's > >ActionScript Engine: > >. > >So, I expect the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player to be supported > >on all Unix platforms to some extent in the future. Sound support will > >be interesting though. > > But I use Opera?? And It needs to work with youtube, without crashing > and without install headaches. 'cd /usr/ports/www/flash; make install > clean; exit;' then open browser to youtube.com and go. No library > shuffle or libmap configuring. I'm not sure how it's FreeBSD's problem that Flash doesn't work in Opera, but anyway - the latest Opera release (9.10, in ports now) works very well with the Linux Flash 7 plugin, or at least the beta I tried a few weeks ago did, and I assume they didn't break it since. YouTube worked fine, apart from some loss of sync between the audio & video, but that is apparently not a FreeBSD-specific problem. There was a thread about this on -questions about a month ago explaining what was needed to make it work, although the real 9.10 release, or the port, might make this easier. Cheers, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:42:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F245916A53E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8183113C45D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H4m90-0006NI-Pl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:42:06 +0100 Received: from 89-172-47-125.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.47.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:42:06 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-47-125.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:42:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:41:42 +0100 Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig343A95737B28C14A24E5A1A2" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-47-125.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:42:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig343A95737B28C14A24E5A1A2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff MacDonald wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. >=20 > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG >=20 > 786432k above 4GB ignored >=20 > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this >=20 > real memory =3D 3489300480 (3327 MB) > avail memory =3D 3414659072 (3256 MB) >=20 > Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. You're using the 32-bit version, right? The design of x86 architecture (i.e. it's not FreeBSD's problem) is such that a part of memory addresses needs to be set aside for hardware uses, such as the PCI bus, AGP memory & others. This manifests as "holes" in memory that are not accessible to OS. There are two possible solutions: you may try compiling a 32-bit kernel with PAE (but not all drivers support PAE), or install the 64-bit version of FreeBSD. --------------enig343A95737B28C14A24E5A1A2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpWusldnAQVacBcgRAklWAKDmQ18OdqGb3Rb6+ZitXL5fSp+VfwCgj2ZR T6RfJobfc/fG7s/GaTxBdow= =Irmg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig343A95737B28C14A24E5A1A2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:43:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4164116A47C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBA113C471 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E022E9F2; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:43:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A56BF3.40209@chapman.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:42:59 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff MacDonald References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:43:01 -0000 Jeff MacDonald wrote: > Hi, > > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > 786432k above 4GB ignored > > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > Jeff. > Same platform, same error. Anyone else have a clue for me? -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Our POP server was kidnapped by a weasel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:44:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8063B16A51F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3E413C45A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308DB2E5BC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:44:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A56C3B.4070908@chapman.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:44:11 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Jones References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> <45A55C93.3020402@thingy.com> In-Reply-To: <45A55C93.3020402@thingy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:44:16 -0000 Howard Jones wrote: > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> Apart from that, I used to be able to sysinsall a machine booting via >> PXE. This doesn't work anymore in recent versions :-( >> Or maybe it is just my incompetence, but then, if someone managed >> this, I'd like to hear about it. >> > This definitely works with 6.1-RELEASE, as I've just had the nice > experience of taking delivery of a dozen Dell servers and had them all > up and running with my own customisations and package selection in one > afternoon with one keypress. They are installed as quick as I can press F12. > > >> 2. it's way past what's currently considered "user friendly" >> >> Please don't get any graphics bloatware in the way. :-) >> > Amen. > > Really, if you are put off by the installer, then once that has > completed., the rest of the "management tools" (i.e. vi) are not going > give you the warm fuzzies either. If you need the graphical management, > and nice installer, isn't that what PCBSD is for? Having a graphical > installer would be like having a super luxury limo with bar and pool, > but which stops in the desert and leaves you by a phone box. > > I've been trying to script an install for FreeBSD since I just had a bunch of servers dropped on me-- may I ask how you did yours? -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Our POP server was kidnapped by a weasel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:45:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBA116A4C2 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC70113C4A8 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout12/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AMUD9a006022; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:30:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.214.13.96] (a17-214-13-96.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AMU944003008; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:30:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8D4A9630-A77A-44D1-8FD6-441975D683B1@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:30:09 -0800 To: Jeff MacDonald X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:45:38 -0000 On Jan 10, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > 786432k above 4GB ignored > > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) Unless you compile a kernel with PAE, which extends the addressable physical memory, or have a EM64T capable CPU, the system is limited to only addressing 4GB of memory. However, the system also needs to make the various PCI devices and the AGP aperture accessible in memory space, so they typically reserve 512MB or 768MB at the top of the address space for that purpose; that memory is being remapped above 4GB, causing the message you see. It's probably reasonable to either live with it, or move 1GB to some other machine, if you can't run a 64-bit system or you have issues enabling PAE. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:47:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B144216A417 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762D613C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd26.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4mE6-0006mo-05; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:47:22 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (rPOiGTZVoeP0THsFAzFlijWmPp8hW-iIVckNvyJuc1F5UXH+9xcggn@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd26.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4mDx-1wdFEO0; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:47:13 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:49:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: rPOiGTZVoeP0THsFAzFlijWmPp8hW-iIVckNvyJuc1F5UXH+9xcggn X-TOI-MSGID: 684d38ca-aa97-478c-9fa1-19b02586ca35 Subject: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:47:23 -0000 Hello list, portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. Two days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from the ports? With regards Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:51:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0610516A4C2 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9031113C45B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so227329uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:51:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=j9ypqpNyJatWgWxzawnB3I/nP0jK2+F15MUxJnRssIM0DsUk2pey1bzop3jqSI0QmQXj4kpEUisLJ51ndDSSS6zCRkhnDIhtWOzsG2YmkG32g1qq2OB66ZvydzPaGTz0g1uX0ik1wATFsg9RYPU0RZ8oQd7fPXtlDm5eyep14Mk= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr1052330ugl.1168469468317; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:51:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.102.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1sm70219uge.2007.01.10.14.51.07; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:51:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:51:06 +0000 To: Vince Hoffman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd ORG Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:51:10 -0000 On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> Hi >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working >> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. >> I have installed: >> diablo-jdk-5.0 >> diablo-jre1.5.0 >> linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 >> linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 >> when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented >> with the plugin missing page... >> I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of >> java... Im not sure what i have to do next... > sounds like you may not have the correct files/links in your plugin > directory. > whats the output of > ls -l /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins > > and > > ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ > > if /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins doesnt have a symlink like > libjavaplugin_oji.so@ -> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ > ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > then try > cd /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins && ln -s /usr/local/diablo- > jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.solibjavaplugin_oji.so > > and restart firefox and look at > about:plugins Hi I have tried this (neither output shows the java plugin). When i go to the actual folder it has jre and libjavaplugin_oji.so in there but with a red x beside them (Im using gnome)... I also cannot browse to the folder... i dont see a plugin folder under jdk1.5.0 Any ideas? Thanks for your help Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:54:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAA816A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6891613C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-161-214.51-151.net24.it [151.51.214.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0AMjURE094357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:45:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0AMcdoS068443; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:38:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45A56A8A.1030900@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:36:58 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lists@qwirky.net References: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> <45A55C39.50405@qwirky.net> In-Reply-To: <45A55C39.50405@qwirky.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Juergen Heberling , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:54:50 -0000 Jeff Royle wrote: >> I've had freezes as you describe on two different servers with ahd and >> SMP. The solution was to turn SMP off, unfortunately :( > > Are these Xeon's? If so you might want to try disabling Hyper-threading No. In my case one is an Athlon64 and the other an Opteron. > FYI - I have used that particular controller successfully on several > servers recently so I don't think that should be a overall issue for you. In my case the controller is slightly different (29320), but I think the driver is the problem. It used to work flawlessly as long as I run 5.x, but started freezing as soon as I upgraded to 6.1. Notice, however, that I don't have data to support my thesis yet. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 22:58:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE85016A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4787613C441 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070110225825.XACJ18673.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:25 +0000 Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.101.128.185]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070110225825.JDV17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:25 +0000 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]:51219) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4mOl-000LKZ-7q; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:23 +0000 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0AMwLvZ002269; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:21 GMT (envelope-from scott) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:21 +0000 From: Scott Mitchell To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-SECURITY i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:28 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Scott and Nikolas, > I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 > for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I > too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have > much choice but to get it working. > Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if > it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). Garrett, That would be cool - I've not tried anything newer than Flash 7, although I guess there wasn't anything newer until recently, for Linux anyway. Would be great if you could get it to work. I've just noticed that there's a www/opera-linuxplugins port that appears to install Opera 9.10 with the necessary configuration tweaks to use Linux plugins. It should just be a matter of installing that, then adding the install dirs of the various plugins to Opera's plugin path... Cheers, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:09:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A4516A526 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B204A13C465 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail017-S [10.13.128.17]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AN9Xkq019611; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail017 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail017/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0AN9Wwb025942; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:32 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: eoghan Message-ID: in-reply-to: <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> references: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:32 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:33 -0000 On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 02:04PM, "eoghan" wrote: >On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote: > >> eoghan wrote: >>> Hi >>> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working >>> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. out of curiosity, did you install diablo-jdk before or after installing Firefox? I had trouble getting java working when I installed diablo after the fox. Reinstalling firefox (make deinstall clean install) and all was once again good. I think the firefox installer detects that java is not installed and disables it if you don't install java first. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:09:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EDE16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE1F13C45B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2007 22:43:03 -0000 Received: from p50910A7B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO m2a2.dyndns.org) [80.145.10.123] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 23:43:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #428038 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CE22015FD for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:43:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emma.line.org Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIsEOp4xsdh7 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:43:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 06F72201892; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:43:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:43:01 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070110224301.GA18693@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-11-21) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: /usr/ports/databases/db42 >sudo make install clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:09:46 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, David Nicholas Kayal wrote: > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Extracting for db42-4.2.52_4 Once and for all: 4.2.52_4 is a hint your ports tree isn't up to date. Can people please get used (and be prodded) to update their ports tree as a first attempt to remedy their port problems? This issue got fixed on April 14 last year... -- Matthias Andree From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:10:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D90C16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923CC13C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so231411uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=YWpvVIUdrktbx0WodNPSSo3WenKE9M9JtdVdBFj7QQocew7q4ze/h8wBQ3MCCYJw2oZig5IWtNKgD9bxkzijYY/gl0Y8OerHo/Mbzg+VJ9OKz5mRXiSqEweCWME/4d7/KSxSEEcBjtGMJT8YdJ6RHEcVolGNIOeSXLpvhPZUgKQ= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr1057234ugg.1168470602485; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.102.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39sm75982ugb.2007.01.10.15.10.01; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:10:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A56A4F.2000601@u.washington.edu> References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> <45A56A4F.2000601@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4E056C9B-10C4-4982-A524-4737E7C23DD7@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:00 +0000 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:04 -0000 On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:35, Garrett Cooper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > eoghan wrote: >> Hi >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working >> for >> firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. >> I have installed: >> diablo-jdk-5.0 >> diablo-jre1.5.0 >> linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 >> linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 >> when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with >> the plugin missing page... >> I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of >> java... Im >> not sure what i have to do next... >> Thanks >> Eoghan > > Not sure why you're encountering the issue with Java and FF because it > works perfectly fine for me. Do you have the linuxplugin-wrapper port > installed by chance? Also, are the following files present in the > following locations: > > [gcooper@sprsd /usr/local]$ for i in `find . -name > libjavaplugin_oji.so`; do ls -l $i; done > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67 Dec 19 20:32 > ./lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 143280 Jun 13 2006 > ./diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > - -Garrett Hi Output is: $ for i in `find . -name libjavaplugin_oji.so`;do ls -l $i;done lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67 Jan 10 22:41 ./libjavaplugin_oji.so -> / usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so I dont have that plugin installed... Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:15:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ACA16A403 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DAB13C46A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eoghanj@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so232832uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=WqN1txQXUiJKD8xzyoSXb3Vk9n3uY5QiSLPppx7ZW53uZVMlyyWopRArH0TUd+3dCO4otzsw6JqoPTWJzNRdroXWDsr5Wp05FSmzINsmnT96Hy7eB+TzhQbO/LEklGalVClGokNhnJebUT/kvj17NnkHRYF+4dZVWqzCOCFN6nA= Received: by 10.67.22.2 with SMTP id z2mr1066607ugi.1168470958411; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [194.125.102.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3sm76450ugd.2007.01.10.15.15.57; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:15:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:56 +0000 To: Peter Giessel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:59 -0000 On 10 Jan 2007, at 23:09, Peter Giessel wrote: > On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 02:04PM, "eoghan" > wrote: >> On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote: >> >>> eoghan wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working >>>> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. > > out of curiosity, did you install diablo-jdk before or after > installing Firefox? > > I had trouble getting java working when I installed diablo after > the fox. > Reinstalling firefox (make deinstall clean install) and all was once > again good. I think the firefox installer detects that java is not > installed > and disables it if you don't install java first. yeah installed java after... thanks ill give that a go and see what happens... Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:30:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AC216A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from mail.thingy.com (wotsit.thingy.com [212.21.100.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F3113C428 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 81208 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jan 2007 23:30:33 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.13?) (howie@thingy.com@212.21.124.49) by wotsit3.thingy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 23:30:33 +0000 Message-ID: <45A5770F.6060404@thingy.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:30:23 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Chandler References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> <45A55C93.3020402@thingy.com> <45A56C3B.4070908@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A56C3B.4070908@chapman.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:30:35 -0000 Jay Chandler wrote: > I've been trying to script an install for FreeBSD since I just had a > bunch of servers dropped on me-- may I ask how you did yours? Roughly speaking, I started with this document: http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml and this document: http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/pxe/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/article.html and the example install.cfg in /usr/src/(wherever it is)/sysinstall and used pkgmaker.sh to make my own post-install package. The package is essentially my own copies of rc.conf.local, plus any extra config files, and a 'post' shell-script that uses sed & friends to make modify the other mods I want (mainly things like enabling serial console, remote syslog, disabling ssh password logins). The install.cfg pulls any standard packages you want from the central server. You might need to "make package" or download additional packages for some stuff, and update the INDEX appropriately. I also had to mess around a little to make myself a qmail package, since that's actually not allowed to be distributed. Mostly though, it's just a copy of the -RELEASE CD with the INDEX run through some basic awk. What I have now is a DHCP/TFTP/NFS server with a list of MAC addresses and IPs that it's allowed to install to (so it doesn't accidently re-install a machine that gets it's BIOS boot order screwed up). When we get new systems, boot them once to get the MAC address, then a second time to start the PXE install. They're ready to go in about 6 minutes, and mail me to tell me they've completed their first boot. It wouldn't be much harder to add machine-specific scripts, although I don't bother. It helps to standardise hardware, so that it's always em0 and da0s1 that you want to configure/format. The most annoying parts were finding good PXE support on the original servers I tried this with (HP LPrs), and getting my install.cfg *just right*. The first one was solved by EOLing our LPrs, and the latter by swearing and reading the source code for parts of sysinstall. My main wish for improving it is to be able to make my own sub-releases with current patches and current packages and still be able to use freebsd-update somehow, which I think is not possible. I could write it up, but it's very close to the two docs I mentioned up there. Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:41:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B966F16A47B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6381913C471 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so260823wxc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:41:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=M+Mki4mliYT+aFYiN7d+n56ImSFQWXtkzAaMN0bEFY7u2rNX+ArtQ5wA64lDV+OKD9lvmdKSA5AJXEr/QEq4XQAH/rpkeHcjXympFFVsg/KK3/0XKZLzbsimpnFzf+p9fntVMczYKxt4N4RZ6FqdEpB1HjA084+lMw15tHztsrc= Received: by 10.70.33.10 with SMTP id g10mr1586782wxg.1168472469634; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:41:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:41:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:41:09 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Sierra Wireless Card AC860 or any Sierra Wireless card ! Any help there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:41:10 -0000 Hi Freebsd > > I have been trying to get this card working, reading at the ppp log out > put appears my card and ports are responding and the carrier is established, > appears I am not dialing it with right chat scripts, I need some help how to write use and execute the chat scripts Do we need device driver for this SIerra Wireless card AC860 ? > > When I called Cingular they said me to use > > Tel# to dial : *99***1 > username: ispda@cingulargprs.com > password: CINGULAR1 > > > Please advise if anyone had success in similar card, it should be about > the same when it comes to chat scripts. > > > Thanks > Dak > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:48:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFF716A407 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBEB13C44C for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so262722wxc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:48:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tI7x++G05D1qtYUPpMpMaSqPK7fuT6Qa0dXkyh4/y+Gd1I2JzqGaY5eTROQoghQhB5ZR2oyRZr3oP1U3fx3w2scte2jqGSY9pYDJxPZ+dKPgbkolPcGyvA8nN1WbTw2ChpzQcXXS6d3yS7PIZROYVvCmuHFoDFpzYGx7P2QO+bo= Received: by 10.70.84.6 with SMTP id h6mr1591105wxb.1168472908918; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:48:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:48:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:48:28 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Sierra Wireless Card AC860 or any Sierra Wireless card ! Any help there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:29 -0000 Hi Asking this over and over because I am really tired of Bicrosoft Windoze crashing on me in BaMicromacrosoft Wokred and Extecel, I want move all and in complete to FreeBSD I want to wean myself off from that piece of junk. Thanks Dak On 1/10/07, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > > > > Hi Freebsd > > > > I have been trying to get this card working, reading at the ppp log out > > put appears my card and ports are responding and the carrier is established, > > appears I am not dialing it with right chat scripts, > > > > I need some help how to write use and execute the chat scripts > > Do we need device driver for this SIerra Wireless card AC860 ? > > > > > When I called Cingular they said me to use > > > > Tel# to dial : *99***1 > > username: ispda@cingulargprs.com > > password: CINGULAR1 > > > > > > Please advise if anyone had success in similar card, it should be about > > the same when it comes to chat scripts. > > > > > > Thanks > > Dak > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:50:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1C716A415 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A813C448 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:63520 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4nD7-0002uR-51 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:50:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 44039 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 00:50:22 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 00:50:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 54529 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jan 2007 00:50:22 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:50:22 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Jay Chandler Message-ID: <20070110235022.GA54481@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jay Chandler , Jeff MacDonald , FreeBSD Questions References: <45A56BF3.40209@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A56BF3.40209@chapman.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H4nD7-0002uR-51. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1H4nD7-0002uR-51 8f8dbdaa9e830f369c5bf9deca676320 Cc: Jeff MacDonald , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:50:26 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:42:59PM -0800, Jay Chandler wrote: > Jeff MacDonald wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > >It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > > >However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > > >786432k above 4GB ignored > > > >Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > > >real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > >avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > > >Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > > >Jeff. > > > Same platform, same error. Anyone else have a clue for me? > Part of the 32-bit address space is reserved for various I/O-devices. This means that a 32-bit OS will not be able to use all 4 GB of RAM but only a smaller amount (usually around 3.5 GB.) If you were to use a 64-bit OS it would probably be able to access all of the RAM if some of it is remapped to above the 4 GB line. (There is usually an option in the BIOS to do this remapping.) (This information is provided by most motherboard manufacturers and many computer manufacturers (including Dell) in some FAQ. ) -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:52:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C3116A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05E513C458 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so263811wxc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:52:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IY/qQ05Ry2OsBeOkTvwVOUUZMj8TsrHz47Yqii9y1wHT+qVmul8U54e5qSu5X+cloMggzhy+SLJX/8mJAoGV2gN0+c2xuwKk3Wwi7ukFJojNlyQN2H/d2TDGdc28ed53Lr/jBN15aqO8lsUMhcplPDbnlaRatI4THWIPqcyS07g= Received: by 10.70.84.6 with SMTP id h6mr1598104wxb.1168473169113; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:52:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:52:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:52:48 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Jeff MacDonald" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:52:50 -0000 How about running top. do sysctl -a|grep shm or grep sem or all memory related configs and look into /etc/sysctl.conf may be something in configs is stealing away your 4G Apologies if you already knew this and if I am stating the obvious. regards Dak On 1/10/07, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > Hi, > > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > 786432k above 4GB ignored > > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > Jeff. > > -- > Unless otherwise indicated, anything I write is either garnered from > experience or pulled out of my ass, depending on situational needs.. > > Jeff MacDonald > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 23:57:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE216A416 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B3613C469 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0ANuK0A028783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:56:26 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0ANu2mU012174; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:56:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0ANu2wC012172; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:56:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:56:01 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: VeeJay Message-ID: <20070110235601.GB12093@kobe.laptop> References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.572, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.83, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:57:31 -0000 On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to 'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 00:39:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6016A494 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdwicker@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CEB13C471 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdwicker@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so251894uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:39:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sRK/Kpo8BMhE9e9nw3qe/DNfrmiPfbUm+9oXo4+BFqSyjxyLI2d7fvv7R1RyycYekOyophZg/Ww0OQApsaxzzP2AxvhvYAg0oRcpVNKLGOxoZbiPlg8J3CW6zEfeXjIURtfJ2H9q/zxyC1fP5nXbb0lVomD0FtAkf8cUIRqCC0g= Received: by 10.78.149.13 with SMTP id w13mr302512hud.1168475943014; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:39:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.58.4 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:39:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d19405f0701101639x2da3e27bvfcb8b1fc5c6ee924@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:39:02 -0800 From: "FreeBSD WickerBill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:39:04 -0000 On 1/10/07, Scott Mitchell wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > > Scott and Nikolas, > > I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 > > for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I > > too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have > > much choice but to get it working. > > Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if > > it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). > > Garrett, > > That would be cool - I've not tried anything newer than Flash 7, although > I > guess there wasn't anything newer until recently, for Linux anyway. Would > be great if you could get it to work. > > I've just noticed that there's a www/opera-linuxplugins port that appears > to install Opera 9.10 with the necessary configuration tweaks to use Linux > plugins. It should just be a matter of installing that, then adding the > install dirs of the various plugins to Opera's plugin path... > > Cheers, > > Scott > > -- > > =========================================================================== > Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels > Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet > engines" > scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" For those of you that don't know what's in the works I've found this page to be a handy reference for what is in the near future. http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd7.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 00:47:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC5716A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBCB13C455 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0B0JjNv031164; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:19:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:19:45 +1100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:18:44 +1100 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F1267192@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes Thread-Index: AcczZlzmCCjHiavhRHODskH32D6v1gBr5oGg From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Cormany, Adam" , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:47:05 -0000 check ports .. there is a port now in misc (?) that does the=20 tzfile updating for you... =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Cormany, Adam > Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 7:49 AM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: FreeBSD 3.4 / 4.5 - 2007 DST Changes >=20 > We have a few older FreeBSD systems running 3.4 and 4.5. Are there > patches for the 2007 daylight savings time US change for these FreeBSD > versions? If so, where can I find them? >=20 > =20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > =20 >=20 > Adam Cormany >=20 > UNIX Systems Engineer >=20 > Scientific Games International >=20 > Office 678.297.5465 > Cell 678.315.2763 >=20 > Fax 770.772.7680 >=20 > Adam.Cormany@Scientificgames.com >=20 > =20 >=20 > This communication (including any attachments) is intended=20 > for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain=20 > information that is confidential, privileged or legally=20 > protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this=20 > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received=20 > this communication in error, please immediately notify the=20 > sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the=20 > original communication. Thank you for your cooperation. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:00:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708F316A47E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877EA13C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so256438uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OV3bd/WoXBLpiQMDxICjwvfIbwEED4vdZ+xV4iAIbSSmrSRckC79d4xXiuScPvm6EIbie09SOr6dr7m20TZ0+nmNQ4t1zc8XjJQkjz8iXudPycTGNjZtaOrvIrlVX8mf7CEbXbve91IfcZQQXC/UDQzc2/USmNM07rD5ktXW324= Received: by 10.82.120.15 with SMTP id s15mr209222buc.1168477210330; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:10 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: Freminlins In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Chris , Jerry McAllister , Nikolas Britton , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:00:29 -0000 > > 1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one > > such example is NFS. > > > I don't actually have a problem with FreeBSD and NFS. This is using about > 20+ clients and 2 NetApp filers. What problem are you having, rather than > just "goes to crap"? --- If for example you do a make buildworld or a kernel build (anything that uses a lot of ../.. to walk the dir structure) you will find that it is way slower than the same builds on local disk. The basic reason is that a ../.. walk invalidates cached metadata, and you end up with a pipe full of getattr's all of the time. Freebsd-fs has discussed this a bit, but no fixing is coming soon. We use linux to compile builds, we'd like to use Freebsd, but linux on Filers via NFS is about 3x faster than the same builds on Fbsd to the same filer. ../.. baby. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:38:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA1A16A417 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E9F13C467 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so288620wxc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:38:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ojv9brmPKbRuO5Wqe9GVgC2ZjHh+Um0cPz0rBFiHxrbQw21S93z+bBc710MIFypNN7VR00W5X+zl706IJOKrmY0hKvtpJyCNkLQHHY9lkSh50822H++qze0speIABLpT3shd18eYwbODn6X6bsiFO+AeBinTQdA6rX6E0bJTxl4= Received: by 10.70.92.12 with SMTP id p12mr1835064wxb.1168479498622; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:38:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:38:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:38:18 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Jay Chandler" , "Jeff MacDonald" , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070110235022.GA54481@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A56BF3.40209@chapman.edu> <20070110235022.GA54481@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:38:19 -0000 if you calculate the 32bit addressing capability 2^32 -1 = 4294967296 - 1 = 4GB -1 you could counter I/O space, IRQ space for all the devices attached. I have heard something like parity interleave(I may be misspelling that word, but sounds close), you can knock off some more memory for this, and something like memory hole, you should knock off some more memory for this., sometimes video card also steal memory for acceleration, how much of it all depends. regards Dak On 1/10/07, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:42:59PM -0800, Jay Chandler wrote: > > Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > > >It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > > > > >However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > > > > >786432k above 4GB ignored > > > > > >Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > > > > >real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > > >avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > > > > >Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > > > > >Jeff. > > > > > Same platform, same error. Anyone else have a clue for me? > > > > Part of the 32-bit address space is reserved for various > I/O-devices. This means that a 32-bit OS will not be > able to use all 4 GB of RAM but only a smaller amount (usually > around 3.5 GB.) > > If you were to use a 64-bit OS it would probably be able to access > all of the RAM if some of it is remapped to above the 4 GB > line. (There is usually an option in the BIOS to do this remapping.) > > > (This information is provided by most motherboard manufacturers > and many computer manufacturers (including Dell) in some FAQ. ) > > > > -- > > Erik Trulsson > ertr1013@student.uu.se > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:44:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C892516A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D14813C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so266136uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:44:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fJLLFqd8qRyV9GRGaxlj4TVLqzPHD6SFmzoFOXaPwwvKWFireglN/LuTqD0K+akYWdUBQry0NbLRLDk/gY42bwdo0tqvkjUe+sW1wzqwW1gsEejirNdUIdTdXBe4LZWhacwTjIs/njovMmVS273XhgCsQaMmxXEroHjTGvYKRIc= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr308013huf.1168479865052; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:44:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:44:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:44:24 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Robert Huff" In-Reply-To: <17829.6508.373404.263832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <17829.6508.373404.263832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:44:26 -0000 On 1/10/07, Robert Huff wrote: > > Nikolas Britton writes: > > > > For accounting/tax purposes, aren't salary and benefits just as > > > deductible as "contributions"? Hire someone qualified as your > > > own full- or part-time employee, and assign them to work on the > > > projects that you want to support. As just one example, that's > > > effectively Red Hat's entire operation AFAIK. > > > > Interesting... I'm not sure the owner would go for it > > though. Maybe a 1099 contractor. Would anyone in the group at > > large be interested in arrangements such as this? > > Consider looking up the developers who most recently worked on > the projects of interest; if they're not available, perhaps they > can recommend someone. > > > What kind of money (rate) would you expect if you got payed to > > work on stuff your already working on in your spare time? > > Unless you have a fairy godparent, expect to pay standard > commercial rates based on the task and the qualifications of the > programmer. > > Well that's just it... No way we could afford full rates, If we could we would hire someone off the street to program x, y, and z to are liking. I was talking about supporting someone who is already working on x, y, and z because they have an itch to scratch... To help them scratch that itch faster... What kind of funding would this type of person need? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:46:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F17C16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E034513C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF342E988; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:46:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A596FC.8040907@chapman.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:46:36 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dak Ghatikachalam References: <45A56BF3.40209@chapman.edu> <20070110235022.GA54481@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Jeff MacDonald , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:46:38 -0000 Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > if you calculate the 32bit addressing capability > > 2^32 -1 = 4294967296 - 1 = 4GB -1 you could counter I/O space, IRQ > space > for all the devices attached. > > I have heard something like parity interleave(I may be misspelling that > word, but sounds close), you can knock off some more memory for this, and > something like memory hole, you should knock off some more memory > for this., sometimes video card also steal memory for acceleration, how > much of it all depends. > > regards > Dak > > On 1/10/07, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:42:59PM -0800, Jay Chandler wrote: >> > Jeff MacDonald wrote: >> > >Hi, >> > > >> > >I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. >> > >It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. >> > > >> > >However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG >> > > >> > >786432k above 4GB ignored >> > > >> > >Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this >> > > >> > >real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) >> > >avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) >> > > >> > >Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. >> > > >> > >Jeff. >> > > >> > Same platform, same error. Anyone else have a clue for me? >> > >> >> Part of the 32-bit address space is reserved for various >> I/O-devices. This means that a 32-bit OS will not be >> able to use all 4 GB of RAM but only a smaller amount (usually >> around 3.5 GB.) >> >> If you were to use a 64-bit OS it would probably be able to access >> all of the RAM if some of it is remapped to above the 4 GB >> line. (There is usually an option in the BIOS to do this remapping.) >> >> >> (This information is provided by most motherboard manufacturers >> and many computer manufacturers (including Dell) in some FAQ. ) >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Erik Trulsson >> ertr1013@student.uu.se >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> On a related note for this hardware platform, has anyone gotten past the "randomly decides not to reboot when told to" issue? Requires a hard shutdown by hand, as the console becomes completely non-responsive. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Our POP server was kidnapped by a weasel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:47:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341416A417 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D69613C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F99A1A4D8D; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AC4265125A; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:47:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:47:46 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stevan Tiefert Message-ID: <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:47 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello list, >=20 > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. Two = days=20 > later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package=20 > de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I had= n't=20 > stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... >=20 > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from the= =20 > ports? No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands you tried so we can try to help. Kris --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpZdCWry0BWjoQKURAj7PAJ9ev+JY+cwfmgTHgh4zkhoJSNz18QCfRLyE uJEKJZhqrP4MHwcWjMgmgKg= =dLnP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:47:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843ED16A52F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEB813C4A5 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13372E735; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A59748.4010301@chapman.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:52 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> <20070110235601.GB12093@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20070110235601.GB12093@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:47:53 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay wrote: > >> Hi >> How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? >> > > Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to > 'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind? > > Standard user with the root password, a bag of explosives, a .45 magnum, and a chip on his shoulder, say? -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Our POP server was kidnapped by a weasel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 01:52:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AAE16A4C9 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C813C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so56363wra for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:52:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UOOoSQhiKzgSLyXzNyfnoBPGhfKobXQsoV7XSCv6r97C8eEACFP86GSk+GcQuPRvn9b2S/EtfxaMZPW2UaoVLn443bMml+4GyZ74qWuTRKQJDd9gtRT6qJf/v6Y3EEikI+AHdY0PmBEJpWw8r51DbipI1NLf7Am3R9OADd2Q3cQ= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr307329hud.1168480350656; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:52:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:52:29 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: Chris In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Jerry McAllister , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:52:32 -0000 On 1/10/07, Chris wrote: > On 10/01/07, Josef Grosch wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > > > > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > > > >FreeBSD is created and supported by volunteers. > > > > >Seems like you just posted a nice list of things > > > > >for you to get busy and contribute. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have time to contribute work, I have a business to manage as > > > > well as other obligations that come first... I need this stuff to just > > > > work... so I can get real things done. > > > > > > Yah, well the people doing it are also busy and working at things > > > which are supposed to make them a living. Most make their > > > FreeBSD contribution work on the side - in addition to their > > > paying jobs although some are in the fortunate position of working > > > for someone who recognizes it as also contributing to their > > > productivity on the job. > > > > > > There are many ways to contribute. Not all are writing code. > > > Some are in documentation and in other services. And, although > > > it is a volunteer project, it does require money to support such > > > things as servers and test machines and network access. > > > > > > So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is > > > so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone > > > to work in the project, at least part time. > > > > > > If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live > > > in the wrong world. > > > > > > Hear, hear. > > > > Nikolas, there are many things that FreeBSD need, a large number of them do > > not require programming. As a Christian here is a saying that I'm sure you > > are familiar with, "It's better to light one candle than to curse the > > darkness". So brother Nikolas, what candles have you lit today? You > > certainly have produced a lot of smoke. > > > > One of the things you could have done instead of wasting your and our time > > on this thrash is to sit down a write a detailed description of some of the > > things you find lacking in FreeBSD. By detailed I mean a series of bullet > > points that describe what is the problem, what you tried, what your setup > > was, OS version, hardware configuration, etc. This would be a whole lot > > more helpful than standing on a street corner and screaming, "FreeBSD is > > FUCKED! Linux is taking over!" > > > > Many hands make lite work. Are you going to lend a hand or are you going to > > stand on the sidelines and tell us how we are screwing up. If it is going > > to be the latter please go away, we have more than our fair share of Monday > > morning quarterbacks. > > > > > > > > Josef > > > > -- > > Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 > > jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. > > > > > > > > What I think freebsd needs. > > 1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one > such example is NFS. > 2 - A better installer, this is probably the biggest single thing that > puts people of freebsd, the less people using freebsd the less funds > likely to be recieved. Could you articulate on point 2?... I don't really see that as a problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 02:18:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B7016A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A9213C45A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd31.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4pW5-00026o-00; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:18:09 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (r1YR26ZSZePTvt2zycEuC78vFcLBMuq358P-j8x4dOKzLIfBEo3w4m@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd31.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4pW5-1BtTqS0; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:18:09 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:19:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701110320.00382.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: r1YR26ZSZePTvt2zycEuC78vFcLBMuq358P-j8x4dOKzLIfBEo3w4m X-TOI-MSGID: 2556c8b0-ed80-47f5-a344-21372d154c16 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:18:11 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. Two > > days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package > > de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I > > hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from the > > ports? > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands you > tried so we can try to help. > > Kris That is what I did: vagabund# cd /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 vagabund# make install >& ~/kdelibs3-install.log vagabund# And here are the last few raws of kdelibs3-install.log: ... Making all in lpdunix gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/lpdunix' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/lpdunix' Making all in cups gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' Making all in cupsdconf2 gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups/cupsdconf2' gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups/cupsdconf2' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../dcop -I../../kdecore -I../../kio/kssl -I../../kjs -I../.. -I../../kio -I../../kfile -I../../kdeprint -I../../kdeprint/management -I../../kdecore/network -I../../dcop -I../../libltdl -I../../kdefx -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore/network -I../../kdeui -I../../kio -I../../kio/kio -I../../kio/kfile -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_KDEPRINT_COMPILE -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -MT ipprequest.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo" -c -o ipprequest.lo ipprequest.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo" ".deps/ipprequest.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo"; exit 1; fi ipprequest.cpp: In static member function `static QString IppRequest::assembleURI(const QString&, int, const QString&)': ipprequest.cpp:573: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name specifier ipprequest.cpp:577: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name specifier gmake[4]: *** [ipprequest.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. Maybe it will help? Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 02:28:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ACE16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEA513C465 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4pgE-0004s8-00; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:28:38 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (XjqHaqZcweWo9D0xKzR+gkhIB6ohGOTmY2bTIfBCQDVmWdg+ve6yED@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4pg4-09D8a00; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:28:28 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:30:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: XjqHaqZcweWo9D0xKzR+gkhIB6ohGOTmY2bTIfBCQDVmWdg+ve6yED X-TOI-MSGID: 923bdde8-0e88-46e7-9c23-29621aa380a2 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:28:40 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. Two > > days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package > > de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I > > hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from the > > ports? > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands you > tried so we can try to help. > > Kris Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my country... That is the right log: vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Lates t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All/k delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) or -f to f orce installation pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! vagabund# Thanks for your help!!! Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 02:34:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C39F16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED9213C428 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0B2Y7Ot017110 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:34:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:34:06 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701102034.07101.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: kernel config file for amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:34:13 -0000 im building a system with the amd64, version of freebsd, but the system is a xeon nacona. the GENERIC kernel config files reads: machine amd64 cpu HAMMER ident GENERIC does cpu HAMMER have a bad effect on a EM64 cpu? should that line be changed, and if so, to what? thanks, Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 02:38:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939A216A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBC813C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607221A3C1A; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D6B4517E2; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:38:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:38:35 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stevan Tiefert Message-ID: <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111014746.GA32781@xor.obsecurity.org> <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:38:37 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. = Two > > > days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The package > > > de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I > > > hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from= the > > > ports? > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands you > > tried so we can try to help. > > > > Kris >=20 > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my country... >=20 > That is the right log: >=20 > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > Fetching=20 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Lates > t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > Fetching=20 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All/k > delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) or = -f to=20 > f > orce installation > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > vagabund# That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups support. Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpaMqWry0BWjoQKURAhp/AJ9Pijp/JiJ015QLSSBaibduQKrUpgCg7+D7 EMhVyBQczAzAAiB6PolFWAo= =4ZpQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 02:45:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6216A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6282413C428 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd29.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4px0-00039I-00; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:45:58 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (E4x1q-ZlreYIo1TWL9g672LzYBfV1DkN2Te+TKzSgqVSx9ZP9IjuwT@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd29.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4pwm-1oGu2a0; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:45:44 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:47:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701110347.35215.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: E4x1q-ZlreYIo1TWL9g672LzYBfV1DkN2Te+TKzSgqVSx9ZP9IjuwT X-TOI-MSGID: bb9edfbb-5bbf-4527-9ca1-82e5dd88e158 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:45:59 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 03:38 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via ports. > > > > Two days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The > > > > package de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs > > > > again, if I hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my > > > > harddrive... > > > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions from > > > > the ports? > > > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands you > > > tried so we can try to help. > > > > > > Kris > > > > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my country... > > > > That is the right log: > > > > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > > Fetching > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Lates > > t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > > Fetching > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All/k > > delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 > > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) or > > -f to f > > orce installation > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > vagabund# > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > support. > > Kris Hello Kris, that is the problem... The other mail I sent before handles abaout the kdelibs-upgrade I did two days ago. And you will see, that the building stopped where cups should be integrated. You see also, that it failed and that was the reason I installed the kdelibs-nocups port. The kdelibs don't want to be installed. I don't understand why... Stevan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:01:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AD116A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E5013C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odilist@sonic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (69-12-157-6.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [69.12.157.6]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0B31XDL009222 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:01:33 -0800 From: Oliver Iberien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:01:33 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20070110161737.25F3116A576@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070110161737.25F3116A576@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701101901.33645.odilist@sonic.net> Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:01:34 -0000 At least this thread got me (desktop user, not especially technically sophisticated) to go make a little donation to the FreeBSD Foundation, as it is the one way I can help out, and show that I'm grateful for FreeBSD. On Wednesday 10 January 2007 08:17, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is > so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone > to work in the project, at least part time. > > > If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live > > in the wrong world. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:05:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3159E16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B40613C448 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E218F1A4D8C; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7778517C9; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:05:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:05:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stevan Tiefert Message-ID: <20070111030506.GA7237@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> <200701110347.35215.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701110347.35215.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:05:08 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:47:34AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 03:38 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via por= ts. > > > > > Two days later I wanted to add the package de-koffice-i18n. The > > > > > package de-koffice-i18n tried to install also my unsecure kdelibs > > > > > again, if I hadn't stopped it I would now have two kdelibs on my > > > > > harddrive... > > > > > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions = from > > > > > the ports? > > > > > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands y= ou > > > > tried so we can try to help. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my country= ... > > > > > > That is the right log: > > > > > > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > > > Fetching > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Lat= es > > > t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > > > Fetching > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All= /k > > > delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 > > > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s)= or > > > -f to f > > > orce installation > > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > > vagabund# > > > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with > > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > > support. > > > > Kris >=20 > Hello Kris, >=20 > that is the problem... The other mail I sent before handles abaout the=20 > kdelibs-upgrade I did two days ago. And you will see, that the building= =20 > stopped where cups should be integrated. You see also, that it failed and= =20 > that was the reason I installed the kdelibs-nocups port. The kdelibs don'= t=20 > want to be installed. I don't understand why... OK, that's what you need to solve. You can either post your errors here so we can try to solve them, or just delete the nocups port and go with the package. Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpaliWry0BWjoQKURAhnAAJ43W0eJHaIiGDk6gJQASzENnW//ggCg67Cj bD/mCaRCf2FNKs6DFuegvZo= =tnEd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:09:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00EB16A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568A413C468 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd32.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H4qJf-0006DQ-00; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:09:23 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (GW5jTTZfre2iq4XplVDylj-xtV5GZfpc0gVscF2rJXuWjJid3+ZPov@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd32.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H4qJR-1PyH4q0; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:09:09 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: Kris Kennaway Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:10:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110347.35215.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111030506.GA7237@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111030506.GA7237@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701110411.00479.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: GW5jTTZfre2iq4XplVDylj-xtV5GZfpc0gVscF2rJXuWjJid3+ZPov X-TOI-MSGID: 5618a396-1f83-49b8-a0ee-8edbd2787c2d Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:09:27 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 04:05 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:47:34AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 03:38 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via > > > > > > ports. Two days later I wanted to add the package > > > > > > de-koffice-i18n. The package de-koffice-i18n tried to install > > > > > > also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I hadn't stopped it I would > > > > > > now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > > > > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versions > > > > > > from the ports? > > > > > > > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the commands > > > > > you tried so we can try to help. > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my > > > > country... > > > > > > > > That is the right log: > > > > > > > > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > > > > Fetching > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/L= at > > > >es t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > > > > Fetching > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/A= ll > > > >/k delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with > > > > kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove > > > > conflicting package(s) or -f to f > > > > orce installation > > > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > > > vagabund# > > > > > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with > > > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > > > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > > > support. > > > > > > Kris > > > > Hello Kris, > > > > that is the problem... The other mail I sent before handles abaout the > > kdelibs-upgrade I did two days ago. And you will see, that the building > > stopped where cups should be integrated. You see also, that it failed a= nd > > that was the reason I installed the kdelibs-nocups port. The kdelibs > > don't want to be installed. I don't understand why... > > OK, that's what you need to solve. You can either post your errors > here so we can try to solve them, or just delete the nocups port and > go with the package. > > Kris Hello again, this is the log of kdelibs3: vagabund# cd /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 vagabund# make install >& ~/kdelibs3-install.log vagabund# And here are the last few raws of kdelibs3-install.log: =2E.. Making all in lpdunix gmake[3]: Entering directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/lpdunix' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/lpdunix' Making all in cups gmake[3]: Entering directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' Making all in cupsdconf2 gmake[4]: Entering directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups/cupsdconf2' gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[4]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups/cupsdconf2' gmake[4]: Entering directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=3DCXX --mode=3Dcompile=20 c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../dcop -I../../kdecore -I../../ki= o/kssl -I../../kjs -I../.. -I../../kio -I../../kfile -I../../kdeprint -I../= =2E./kdeprint/management -I../../kdecore/network -I../../dcop -I../../liblt= dl -I../../kdefx -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore -I../../kdecore/network -I= =2E./../kdeui -I../../kio -I../../kio/kio -I../../kio/kfile -I../.. =A0-I/u= sr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_KDEPRINT_COMP= ILE -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT =A0 -I/usr/local/include -I= /usr/local/include =A0-I/usr/X11R6/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE =A0 -= Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 = =2Dfno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-che= ck-new -fno-common =A0-DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -= DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION =A0-MT=20 ipprequest.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo" -c -o ipprequest.lo=20 ipprequest.cpp; \ =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0then mv -f ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo" ".deps/ipprequest= =2EPlo"; else=20 rm -f ".deps/ipprequest.Tpo"; exit 1; fi ipprequest.cpp: In static member function `static QString=20 IppRequest::assembleURI(const QString&, int, const QString&)': ipprequest.cpp:573: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name=20 specifier ipprequest.cpp:577: error: incomplete type `KURL' used in nested name=20 specifier gmake[4]: *** [ipprequest.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint/cups' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory=20 `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5/kdeprint' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.5.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. Maybe it will help? Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:13:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1C616A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BD413C471 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170301A4D8C; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4DCE1517C9; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:13:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:13:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stevan Tiefert Message-ID: <20070111031338.GA9583@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110347.35215.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111030506.GA7237@xor.obsecurity.org> <200701110411.00479.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701110411.00479.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:13:40 -0000 --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:10:59AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 04:05 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:47:34AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 03:38 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via > > > > > > > ports. Two days later I wanted to add the package > > > > > > > de-koffice-i18n. The package de-koffice-i18n tried to install > > > > > > > also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I hadn't stopped it I would > > > > > > > now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer versi= ons > > > > > > > from the ports? > > > > > > > > > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the comman= ds > > > > > > you tried so we can try to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > > > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my > > > > > country... > > > > > > > > > > That is the right log: > > > > > > > > > > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > > > > > Fetching > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release= /Lat > > > > >es t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > > > > > Fetching > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release= /All > > > > >/k delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > > > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with > > > > > kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remo= ve > > > > > conflicting package(s) or -f to f > > > > > orce installation > > > > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > > > > vagabund# > > > > > > > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built w= ith > > > > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > > > > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > > > > support. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > Hello Kris, > > > > > > that is the problem... The other mail I sent before handles abaout the > > > kdelibs-upgrade I did two days ago. And you will see, that the buildi= ng > > > stopped where cups should be integrated. You see also, that it failed= and > > > that was the reason I installed the kdelibs-nocups port. The kdelibs > > > don't want to be installed. I don't understand why... > > > > OK, that's what you need to solve. You can either post your errors > > here so we can try to solve them, or just delete the nocups port and > > go with the package. > > > > Kris >=20 > Hello again, >=20 > this is the log of kdelibs3: >=20 > vagabund# cd /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 > vagabund# make install >& ~/kdelibs3-install.log > vagabund# >=20 > And here are the last few raws of kdelibs3-install.log: OK, make sure everything required by kdelibs is up-to-date (with portupgrade -R kdelibs or similar). It is buildable on a clean 4.x system, although since 4.x is EOL in a couple of weeks you might prefer to spend your time on an upgrade to a supported version like 6.2. Kris --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpatiWry0BWjoQKURAkP+AJ46GalBNIJLEpRo/JjcpUVDhqvc+ACfSQ3g CQ7+JbAIvkzhiV8Gs9b1cOE= =z3Ya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:29:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AFB16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5E413C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0B3T9Hf011458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:29:09 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0B3T8E1025734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:29:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45A5AF03.6030308@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:29:07 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> In-Reply-To: <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.10.191432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Porting Acrobat 9 to FBSD Mozilla / Opera and OT: installer promotion (was "Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ?") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:29:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Scott and Nikolas, >> I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 >> for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I >> too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have >> much choice but to get it working. >> Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if >> it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). > > Garrett, > > That would be cool - I've not tried anything newer than Flash 7, although I > guess there wasn't anything newer until recently, for Linux anyway. Would > be great if you could get it to work. > > I've just noticed that there's a www/opera-linuxplugins port that appears > to install Opera 9.10 with the necessary configuration tweaks to use Linux > plugins. It should just be a matter of installing that, then adding the > install dirs of the various plugins to Opera's plugin path... > > Cheers, > > Scott Yup, I know. I'll take a look into the opera linuxplugin wrapper port too so I can get both Mozilla and Opera sync'ed. I should start work sometime this weekend because I need to finish off another project (Javascript / HTML-based installer and package updater for work) before I move to California. Speaking of which, any Windows admins on this list want me to post the source for the installer / updater / package manager on sourceforge? It may come in handy. I don't expect anyone to use it for Unix since scripting in Unix is excellent already, but I'm going to automatically add in Windows support and maybe Mac OSX support as well, but that's iffy.. I'm only going to working for my IT firm for a while, so support would be beer-based funding, if anyone's interested :D. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpa8DEnKyINQw/HARAtEGAJ4tKn0wA9VjttQK4WO3xDpwNGXJOgCfV23U sVzMixzcti0ss4J9nUTv9lg= =dOMI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 03:54:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C53016A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bocha@academ.org) Received: from mail.academ.org (mail.academ.org [81.1.226.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0CB13C448 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bocha@academ.org) Received: from bocha.solink.office (solink.academ.org [85.118.228.14]) (Authenticated sender: solink@academ.org) by mail.academ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B7FEBE89 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:54:04 +0600 (NOVT) From: Bachilo Dmitry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:54:10 +0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45A50DA7.7060908@voidmain.net> In-Reply-To: <45A50DA7.7060908@voidmain.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701110954.11311.bocha@academ.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on mail.academ.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Flag: SKIP X-Spam-Yversion: academ.org X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.academ.org [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:54:04 +0600 (NOVT) Subject: Re: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:54:09 -0000 =F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 =F3=D2=C5=C4=C1 10 =D1=CE=D7=C1=D2= =D1 2007 22:00 Tom Grove =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(a): > We have an employee who spends quite a bit of time on the net and > currently have no way of analyzing where they go. Are there any decent > proxy servers that I can put them on to see where they are going? > > -Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Nothing can be easier. You will have to recompile your kernel to be able to forward all traffic of= =20 your employees to squid, even if they don't use proxy in their browser.=20 Compile it with Options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD Then install squid and add a rule to a firewall like this:=20 fwd 192.168.1.1,3128 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 via xl0 Where 192.168.1.1 is a router, 3128 - squid port and xl0 is an outer=20 interface. This will make all your network users go through squid and all their moves= =20 will be recorded. You will just need to install SARG, which will draw nice= =20 HTML tables with IPs and sites visited by them. I use it myself and it works just fine. I also use squid to deny downloadin= g=20 of avi and mpeg files, and also to deny some sites that are not work-relate= d=20 and should not be visited from office. Also Squid and SARG can count traffic, so you can see who spends how much, = if=20 you don' have an unlimited internet. =2D-=20 =2D----------------------- =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =E2=C1=DE=C9=CC=CF =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =F2=D5=CB=CF=D7=CF=C4=C9=D4=C5=CC=D8 =CF=D4=C4=C5=CC=C1 =D3=C9=D3=D4=C5=CD= =CE=CF=CA =C9=CE=D4=C1=C7=D2=C1=C3=C9=C9 =EF=EF=EF "=EB=CF=CD=D0=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F3=CF=CC=C9=CE=CB" =2D- With Best Regards, Bachilo Dmitry Head of systems integration dept Solink Company Ltd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 04:07:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE9A16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E805413C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so323131wxc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:07:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GkEAl23mQ0z6/17vxuZCwRGsEKT/4Sq5o0IsRoew1GxVNWOAd1NbNjjFxnVyCV2X29L+ESJwPQNvVabSBRlTTz4aKOZdTfzHlnIoMQ1eDSNYOPth9SPRwAnUNFgyQ3eJksOSAhQZHiOFfwbs3R99A92qEckSqAE2YwUAM8Yzi4o= Received: by 10.70.32.2 with SMTP id f2mr2072316wxf.1168488424430; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:07:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:07:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:07:04 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Garrett Cooper" In-Reply-To: <45A5AF03.6030308@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A5AF03.6030308@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting Acrobat 9 to FBSD Mozilla / Opera and OT: installer promotion (was "Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ?") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:07:05 -0000 I think it is about time that FREEBSD OS gets the act together by integrating all the plugins for firefox. I have been trying to make these plugins work, not sure what more we need countering all plugins for firefox which could make work all, right now I could only view the video in cnn.com. Others like ABC news, google video, youtube, msnbc.ocm, and so many other news networks, in general anything the videos from web browser are not working either it is expecting the flash player ( I configured this but does not seem to work) or shockwave player I found this linux tutorial giving some insight http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialMozillaConfiguration.html#PLUGINS This is such a big deal, that we could not view any videos in firefox, I have compiled the mplayer, but that makes he cnn.com work not sure the same mplayer can be used in the place of all those plugins out here. and then there is that big discussion I see in freebsd last month http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-December.txt.gz regards Dak On 1/10/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Scott Mitchell wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> Scott and Nikolas, > >> I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 > >> for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I > >> too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have > >> much choice but to get it working. > >> Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if > >> it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). > > > > Garrett, > > > > That would be cool - I've not tried anything newer than Flash 7, > although I > > guess there wasn't anything newer until recently, for Linux > anyway. Would > > be great if you could get it to work. > > > > I've just noticed that there's a www/opera-linuxplugins port that > appears > > to install Opera 9.10 with the necessary configuration tweaks to use > Linux > > plugins. It should just be a matter of installing that, then adding the > > install dirs of the various plugins to Opera's plugin path... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Scott > > Yup, I know. I'll take a look into the opera linuxplugin wrapper port > too so I can get both Mozilla and Opera sync'ed. I should start work > sometime this weekend because I need to finish off another project > (Javascript / HTML-based installer and package updater for work) before > I move to California. > > Speaking of which, any Windows admins on this list want me to post the > source for the installer / updater / package manager on sourceforge? It > may come in handy. I don't expect anyone to use it for Unix since > scripting in Unix is excellent already, but I'm going to automatically > add in Windows support and maybe Mac OSX support as well, but that's > iffy.. I'm only going to working for my IT firm for a while, so support > would be beer-based funding, if anyone's interested :D. > > - -Garrett > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFFpa8DEnKyINQw/HARAtEGAJ4tKn0wA9VjttQK4WO3xDpwNGXJOgCfV23U > sVzMixzcti0ss4J9nUTv9lg= > =dOMI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 04:15:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5B116A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjah@hicom.net) Received: from ns1.hicom.net (ns1.hicom.net [208.245.180.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF8913C45A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjah@hicom.net) Received: from [192.168.2.162] (pool-68-239-218-104.nwrk.east.verizon.net [68.239.218.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.hicom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0B4Fbwi024964; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A5B9E6.5090802@hicom.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:15:34 -0500 From: Juergen Heberling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A46DE6.6000806@hicom.net> <45A55858.7000909@netfence.it> <45A55C39.50405@qwirky.net> <45A56A8A.1030900@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <45A56A8A.1030900@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lists@qwirky.net Subject: Re: 6.1 Freezes - Suspect SCSI Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:15:40 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Jeff Royle wrote: > >>> I've had freezes as you describe on two different servers with ahd >>> and SMP. The solution was to turn SMP off, unfortunately :( I don't think I'm ready to turn SMP off just yet. >> >> Are these Xeon's? If so you might want to try disabling Hyper-threading .. but I'll try disabling Hyper-threating. And yes they are Xeon's, the Nocona version. > > No. In my case one is an Athlon64 and the other an Opteron. > > > >> FYI - I have used that particular controller successfully on several >> servers recently so I don't think that should be a overall issue for you. Thank you for your vote of confidence on this. I really think this is a drive issue or a drive/drive compatibility issue due to the weird results I'm getting on "camcontrol tags" command. BTW camcontrol defects shows 0 defects. > > In my case the controller is slightly different (29320), but I think the > driver is the problem. I'm running a 29160 on a 4.9FB (dual Xeon) machine and it has been rock solid for 1.5years. > It used to work flawlessly as long as I run 5.x, but started freezing as > soon as I upgraded to 6.1. > Notice, however, that I don't have data to support my thesis yet. > > > bye > av. > > Thanks again Juergen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 04:22:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249C616A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF31613C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so300587uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:22:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=O6z5IompNnYumKNVRYUf6AdZdeUoXjW8tA0bytmKFhnOxTtM24fOn6e/UrtVpaz5lDUpaqFlQGKnNRmYek2U1/uyHQ5q9IgIqltEdFoZM+Tsu8YjEGXWW5Bza2U9TXtL/GoOZE9f8dzrd2t9tdvGN/lY+7BQisjoeeAbcBT18+4= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr237507buc.1168489322495; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:22:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:22:02 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: Brian In-Reply-To: <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> Cc: Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:22:04 -0000 I dunno..Linux got _somewhere_ before big money came into it. Like I said..when Fbsd 2.5 was light _years_ ahead of Linux..sometime after that, focus was lost. Perhaps chosing to emulate instead of innovate (work smart not hard) didnt pay off as well as everyone hoped. ..not that nobody worked hard..just that perhaps a decision was made to let the linux community write the new code and Fbsd community would polish it and/or emulate it once it was complete. On 1/10/07, Brian wrote: > Jeff Mohler wrote: > > Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question. > > > > Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead? > > > http://news.com.com/2100-1001-825723.html > > Brian > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 04:35:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC716A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from entwistle.sonicboom.org (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5D513C455 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p3.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.235]) by entwistle.sonicboom.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0B43a8r075549; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:04:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Message-ID: <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:03:35 -0800 From: Brian User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Mohler References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:35:35 -0000 Jeff Mohler wrote: > Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question. > > Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead? > http://news.com.com/2100-1001-825723.html Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:02:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF5C16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329FE13C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D14F1B1836 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:02:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 03765-05 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:02:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [209.104.171.253]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132561B1725 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:02:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A5C46E.9070907@bobmc.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:30 -0500 From: Bob McIsaac User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:02:27 -0000 ------> Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? <----- This is a tired old thread Please put it to bed Don't keep it fed Think positive instead Cheers, - BobMc - From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:25:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12DC16A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C958013C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D761B17BD for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 05543-03 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:25:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [209.104.171.253]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7691B172A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:25:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A5C9F3.4030601@bobmc.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:24:03 -0500 From: Bob McIsaac User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: UDP ok but TCP delayed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:25:55 -0000 Hi: Got helpful replies before but still have a mystery 10 second delay on a TCP connection. Slashdot takes with all it's links takes about 30 seconds to load in any browser. One tiny email displays a 10sec progress bar. Yet ping, FTP, or pkg_add seems normal. I get the same result on 2 different computers. Both work fine with Linux. My interest in FreeBSD is as an alternative for embedded projects where Linux would typically be an automatic choice. I confirmed with tcpdump that my ISP nameserver replies with an IP address and nothing happens for 10 seconds until my browser makes the connection. Here are my configuration files. I am hoping someone spots something amiss. # ---- loader.conf ----------- snd_via8233_load="YES" # ---- /etc/rc.conf. -------- linux_enable="NO" moused_enable="YES" moused_port="/dev/psm0" moused_type="intellimouse" usbd_enable="YES" tcp_keepalive="NO" ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" hostname="buffy.feline.cat" apache_enable="YES" # -- /etc/resolv.conf --- nameserver 192.168.1.254 # --- /etc/hosts --- ::1 localhost.home.com localhost 127.0.0.1 localhost.home.com localhost 127.0.0.1 buffy.feline.cat buffy # --- /etc/hosts.allow ALL : ALL : allow From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:33:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D69316A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E820513C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so746538nfc for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:33:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OJKOXWa2vRMJ1oOIpy3GG+29VEmIimVAw+lMO1dsEDDbdn3feM+KCuPhhmjKTCtwkGKuCLHrijZ5JPAQeO6fhPefOR0NmSNzVkNrPAOg7m/LBXdSJgKKGUdD9KyCdazorN1Dc1V4qy6mNBzT8X0LM5IhwjPB2If7cqiRpZLGVMw= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr243492bud.1168492053631; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:07:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:07:33 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Bob McIsaac" In-Reply-To: <45A5C46E.9070907@bobmc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> <45A5C46E.9070907@bobmc.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:33:06 -0000 Most of us are, understanding how we/it got here, IS positive. What to do about it..is progress. On 1/10/07, Bob McIsaac wrote: > ------> Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? <----- > > This is a tired old thread > Please put it to bed > Don't keep it fed > Think positive instead > > Cheers, > - BobMc - > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:41:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A0416A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s38.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s38.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45EA13C4A7 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.233.111]) by bay0-omc1-s38.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:29:47 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:29:47 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 18.97.7.63 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:29:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [18.97.7.63] X-Originating-Email: [liontanker@hotmail.com] X-Sender: liontanker@hotmail.com From: "Lion G." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:29:45 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2007 05:29:47.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[82085900:01C73541] Subject: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:41:47 -0000 Hi all, I have a weird question. In my previous many laptops, whenever I plug in the earphone, the laptop speaker would stop (and I would only hear music through the earphone) With my newest laptop (Acer Aspire 5050), the laptop speaker stays on no-matter-what. I would hear the same music in both the speaker and the earphone. I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. The driver reports: pcm0: mem 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 pcm0: pcm0: Another piece of info: The microphone hole has both the microphone symbol and the SPDIF symbol on it. Apparently the laptop uses the same hole for both plugging in a stereo microphone and plugging in a SPDIF device. Also, none of the items in the mixer helps: they raise or drop both the speaker+earphone volume simultaneously. I'm out of ideas. Has any one seen something like this? Thanks all! _________________________________________________________________ Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:48:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E4216A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CF913C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0B5lvBo031548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:47:57 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l0B5mrkO055630; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:48:53 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:48:53 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200701110548.l0B5mrkO055630@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: liontanker@hotmail.com In-reply-to: (liontanker@hotmail.com) References: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:48:48 -0000 > I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. > The driver reports: > pcm0: mem 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff > irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 > pcm0: > pcm0: I'd tend to that that the thing that stop the speaker when you plug in the earphone is purely mechanical/analog electornic, it is not even at the digital electronic level, your OS cannot detect that an earphone has been pluged in, it is like your home stereo. It ust be a feature of Acer! Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:54:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EEE16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B3313C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id QAA27266; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:54:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:54:44 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: eoghan In-Reply-To: <20070110234838.2FDC916A57A@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:54:59 -0000 > Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 160, Issue 12 > Message: 28 > Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:00 +0000 > From: eoghan > On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:35, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working > >> for > >> firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. > >> I have installed: > >> diablo-jdk-5.0 > >> diablo-jre1.5.0 > >> linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 > >> linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 > >> when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with > >> the plugin missing page... > >> I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of > >> java... Im > >> not sure what i have to do next... > >> Thanks > >> Eoghan > > > > Not sure why you're encountering the issue with Java and FF because it > > works perfectly fine for me. Do you have the linuxplugin-wrapper port > > installed by chance? Also, are the following files present in the > > following locations: > > > > [gcooper@sprsd /usr/local]$ for i in `find . -name > > libjavaplugin_oji.so`; do ls -l $i; done > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67 Dec 19 20:32 > > ./lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> > > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 143280 Jun 13 2006 > > ./diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > > > - -Garrett > > Hi > Output is: > $ for i in `find . -name libjavaplugin_oji.so`;do ls -l $i;done > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67 Jan 10 22:41 ./libjavaplugin_oji.so -> / > usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > I dont have that plugin installed... > Thanks > Eoghan It's not clear what directory '.' refers to there, but anyway .. Having installed the jre the other day, running into the same problem, perhaps the notes I made at the end of installing may be of some help. First caveats: this on 5.5-STABLE and using Mozilla not Firefox, but I doubt that either of those things matter. Yes moz was installed first. =========== [..] Running post-install for diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01.. Attempting to record package into /var/db/pkg/diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01.. Trying to record dependency on package 'xorg-libraries-6.9.0' with 'x11/xorg-libraries' origin. Trying to record dependency on package 'javavmwrapper-2.0_6' with 'java/javavmwrapper' origin. pkg_add: warning: package 'diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01' requires 'javavmwrapper-2.0_6', but 'javavmwrapper-2.3' is installed Package diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01 registered in /var/db/pkg/diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01 ( to get the manuals, had to add to /etc/manpath.config: OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/man ) also see /var/db/pkg/diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01/+INSTALL .. says it should have installed the plugin in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins but this dir doesn't exist .. so: paqi$ mkdir /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins paqi# ln -sf /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so paqi# ll /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins total 0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 63 Dec 27 17:39 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so But still the plugin doesn't turn up in mozilla about:plugins :( Later .. worked it out from data on mozilla 'plugins for linux' page: paqi# pwd /usr/local/lib/mozilla/plugins paqi# ll total 20 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18768 Nov 16 04:14 libnullplugin.so paqi# ln -s /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so libjavaplugin_oji.so paqi# ll total 20 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18768 Nov 16 04:14 libnullplugin.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 63 Dec 27 17:51 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so .. and mozilla about:plugins happily sees it! =========== And modulo some funny font effects sometimes, its running fine. So find your firefox plugin directory (wherever libnullplugin.so lives) and put the link to the jre library there. Don't know about the jdk. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 05:59:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC19216A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FF213C428 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426E61B184A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:59:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 06230-01 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [209.104.171.253]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4B41B176C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:59:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A5D1C2.3090002@bobmc.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:57:22 -0500 From: Bob McIsaac User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <200701110548.l0B5mrkO055630@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200701110548.l0B5mrkO055630@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:59:16 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >> I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. >> The driver reports: >> pcm0: mem 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff >> irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 >> pcm0: >> pcm0: >> > > I'd tend to that that the thing that stop the speaker when you plug in > the earphone is purely mechanical/analog electornic, it is not even at > the digital electronic level, your OS cannot detect that an earphone > has been pluged in, it is like your home stereo. > > It ust be a feature of Acer! > > Olivier > > A headphone plugged into a speaker line would blast your ears because of the extreme difference in sensitivity unless the jack switches in a series resistor to reduce the level. If you notice poor low-freq response in your phones, that implies it is a line jack intended for an external speaker amplifier.. -BobMc- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:10:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D826C16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s5.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s5.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8813C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.233.112]) by bay0-omc3-s5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:19 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:18 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 18.97.7.63 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:10:13 GMT X-Originating-IP: [18.97.7.63] X-Originating-Email: [liontanker@hotmail.com] X-Sender: liontanker@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <200701110548.l0B5mrkO055630@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: "Lion G." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:10:13 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2007 06:10:18.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B1E61B0:01C73547] Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:10:18 -0000 Bob McIsaac wrote: >A headphone plugged into a speaker line would blast >your ears because of the extreme difference >in sensitivity unless the jack switches in a series >resistor to reduce the level. If you notice poor low-freq >response in your phones, that implies it is a line jack >intended for an external speaker amplifier.. Unfortunately that was not the cause this time. :( I did see separate "line in" and "line out" symbols on other plugs. The plug I was trying had a graphics of a microphone on it, and SPDIF written next to it also. (In any case, I did try putting earphone into each plug, and none of it stopped the speaker) I really appreciate the rapid response so far; the user community of FreeBSD is truly awesome! _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:11:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98D316A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAC013C448 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67D2C2F6 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:11:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 4A0DCC2E9; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:11:18 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FBDC163; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:11:15 -0500 (EST) References: <45A45773.8020604@tandon.net> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Sahil Tandon Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:11:14 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: How to prevent a filesystem from getting checked by fsck? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:19 -0000 Sahil Tandon writes: > Francisco Reyes wrote: > >> Have a server with 3 large filesystems. >> I would like to have only one checked by fsck and mounted. >> The other two I want to fsck and mount manually. >> >> Is it enough to change options to "rw,noauto" and pass to 0 for the two >> I don't want mounted or fscked? > > See "man 5 fstab": > > If the option ``noauto'' is specified, the file system will not > be auto-matically mounted at system startup. > > and > > If the sixth field is not present or is zero, a value of zero is > returned and fsck(8) will assume that the file system does not > need to be checked. Thanks for the reply. I read both fsck and fstab pages.. I just wanted to make sure that I was reading the man pages correctly.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:11:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0784B16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8E613C465 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so321474uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:11:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Wit6O82edcZzPbGt/9UGxwpjGG/5ryDS/oy+jeHul8LgiQcY8bZoRlYdqTa7LUKWbWcbYRz7Uqa+Mpcl/QYjnTSy5q8zkrpx2py7/B9DgOYQBnGH/4aeGQP7ClnnKKJOOByPQXU0DYmlcnjKLF2ockeOXfn6lSSQvxAvJ4+A4WE= Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr341343huf.1168495909362; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:11:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:11:49 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Jeff Mohler" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> Cc: Brian , Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:11:51 -0000 On 1/10/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > I dunno..Linux got _somewhere_ before big money came into it. > > Like I said..when Fbsd 2.5 was light _years_ ahead of Linux..sometime > after that, focus was lost. > USL v. BSDi happened. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:19:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909F116A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9931D13C428 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0B6J75b032545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:19:07 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l0B6K2In059898; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:20:02 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:20:02 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200701110620.l0B6K2In059898@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: liontanker@hotmail.com In-reply-to: (liontanker@hotmail.com) References: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:19:59 -0000 > on other plugs. The plug I was trying had a graphics of > a microphone on it, and SPDIF written next to it also. According to a quick google at SPDIF, it is a digital signal plug, so noting where you can connect earphone... Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:21:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A4716A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EF113C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0B6Kx4j048106 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:20:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0B6KxPK048105 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:20:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:20:58 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:21:02 -0000 > Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:52 -0800 > From: Jay Chandler > Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? > To: Giorgos Keramidas > Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay > > Message-ID: <45A59748.4010301@chapman.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? > >> > > > > Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to > > 'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind? > > > > > Standard user with the root password, a bag of explosives, a .45 magnum, > and a chip on his shoulder, say? Yeah, and even a user with no account or password, a screwdriver, and a Mountain Dew. Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:25:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051D916A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY0-OMC3-S10.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D760313C45E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.233.90]) by BAY0-OMC3-S10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:25:05 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:25:05 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 18.97.7.63 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:25:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [18.97.7.63] X-Originating-Email: [liontanker@hotmail.com] X-Sender: liontanker@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <200701110620.l0B6K2In059898@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: "Lion G." To: on@cs.ait.ac.th Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:25:02 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2007 06:25:05.0291 (UTC) FILETIME=[3BA51DB0:01C73549] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:25:06 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >According to a quick google at SPDIF, it is a digital signal plug, so >noting where you can connect earphone... I know... but earphone sounded great when plugging into it. (And it does have a earphone graphical symbol right on it) Also, I don't have the user manual with me (I formatted the harddrive to get rid of Windows, and I put away the Windows CD and user manual long ago...), but I think it may have said it was a dual use plug, for plugging in either earphone or a digital external multimedia system (using I guess the SPDIF convention I guess) _________________________________________________________________ The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:27:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E7616A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10BD13C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1C01A3C1A; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:27:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5F6651753; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:27:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:27:45 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: scaligeracarni Message-ID: <20070111062745.GA94155@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:27:46 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:54:34AM +0100, scaligeracarni wrote: > I made : > pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz >=20 > on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need = libz.so.2! > How can resolve my problem? Are you absolutely sure you are running the freebsd 6 binary and not the freebsd 5? libz.so.2 is the version present in FreeBSD 5. Kris --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpdjhWry0BWjoQKURAqEBAKCyur6npLPderhwUhARmwXB+rDTXwCfdxiv ukBimizM8h8DvX8lk3xWKxs= =RNBf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:39:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918B816A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B4E13C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id RAA28566; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:38:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:38:56 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Bob McIsaac In-Reply-To: <20070111052605.1A3EA16A52F@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP ok but TCP delayed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:39:11 -0000 Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 160, Issue 13 > Message: 29 > Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:24:03 -0500 > From: Bob McIsaac > Got helpful replies before but still have a mystery 10 second delay > on a TCP connection. Slashdot takes with all it's links takes about > 30 seconds to load in any browser. One tiny email displays a 10sec > progress bar. Yet ping, FTP, or pkg_add seems normal. I get the > same result on 2 different computers. Both work fine with Linux. > > My interest in FreeBSD is as an alternative for embedded projects > where Linux would typically be an automatic choice. > > I confirmed with tcpdump that my ISP nameserver replies with > an IP address and nothing happens for 10 seconds until my > browser makes the connection. I responded in some detail before re your tcpdump. It clearly showed that the nameserver you were using at 192.168.1.254 was *failing* to respond to 1) AAAA queries and 2) queries for its own reverse address. > tcp_keepalive="NO" The default is YES .. any particular reason for using NO? > ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" > hostname="buffy.feline.cat" > # -- /etc/resolv.conf --- > nameserver 192.168.1.254 > > # --- /etc/hosts --- > ::1 localhost.home.com localhost > 127.0.0.1 localhost.home.com localhost > 127.0.0.1 buffy.feline.cat buffy Hmm. Maybe remove the IPv6 entry, you said you weren't using IPv6 but the tcpdump did show your box amaking AAAA queries. I'm still curious as to where 192.168.1.254 lives? In most cases this would be your local ADSL router, say. It doesn't *look* like it'd be the address of your upstream provider's DNS, but then there are some funny ISPs out there I guess. Is 192.168.1.254 also your defaultrouter? It's not in your rc.conf, but perhaps that's being assigned by DHCP? So should be, perhaps, upstream DNS server address/es? If 192.168.1.254 is local, it's misconfigured. I *still* must suggest putting the address/es of known good upstream nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf to see if that doesn't deal with your delay, which seems almost certainly a DNS issue from everything you've posted so far. If that doesn't help, show us 'netstat -finet -ra' and 'ifconfig'? Cheers, Ian (please cc me; getting the next digest can take up to half a day) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:56:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F26916A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:56:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2743C13C467 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so328942uge for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:56:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=deKjz3UcOGkdIf5fCuD7s/6oHfvqw8YukLAI2olcywr4T1XiS6GPHA8agTdH0Tu5pFuXLoWbY8i1WDs2Fe+jh/3+qMCBY9orq2GoEx6uUbbmqbPDxPCxL4b1cGsyxnlbr6gToAcMG3BfsUeRhuEvuNxKGYLnK3z2ZF0RVnRmRok= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr349622hub.1168498579791; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:56:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.3 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:56:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f4f57f60701102256o36adba6ap9617c787ed3242c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:56:19 +0200 From: "George Vanev" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44y7oay77l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6f4f57f60701090556v35b55b2cn9bbcd363c588b002@mail.gmail.com> <45A3AD0A.1090600@vidican.com> <6f4f57f60701092249p65cc4a2bn40af47d6096f5918@mail.gmail.com> <44y7oay77l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Automatically get nameservers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:56:21 -0000 I set up my own caching nameserver. I used djbdns (dnscache). Some guys like it some not. Any opinion which is best (or at least very good) to use for caching dns On 1/10/07, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > "George Vanev" writes: > > > I installed isc-dhcpd and it is working fine. > > But I don't want to hardcode the nameservers in the dhcpd.conf, > > because my ISP is changing them sometimes. > > It would be perfect if there is a way dhcpd to read the nameservers > > from /etc/resolv.conf > > Not exactly, but you can have the dhclient rewrite the dhcpd.conf when > it gets new nameservers. I used to do this; I ran it from > dhclient-exit-hooks, and it was a simple sed(1) command. For a long > time, I've been running my own local caching nameserver, and directing > the DHCP clients to that, but I could dig out my old script if you > have trouble with it. Although I would suggest you also consider > setting up your own local caching nameserver; the caching behaviour > can be a noticeable speed boost. > -- George Vanev Information Systems Specialist tel.: +359 898 44 25 37 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 06:58:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2C316A416 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6E513C467 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id RAA28885; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:56 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:58:10 -0000 Hi Kris, I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 07:00:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0A16A492; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423AA13C468; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D711A4D89; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8784517C9; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:00:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:00:08 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20070111070008.GA94580@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:00:32 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > Hi Kris, >=20 > I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that > the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and > at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now. Mark, what is the status of the upload of these packages? Kris --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpeB4Wry0BWjoQKURAj6CAKCFM+ceTR6GOrfji69/2qkz7jSKVQCg9FX+ tGDIrALEy9h9R/U3UYEAPs0= =BlWJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 07:02:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A57916A417 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ir.perm.ru) Received: from ir.perm.ru (ir.perm.ru [89.250.212.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CAB13C44B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ir.perm.ru) Received: from backup.ir.local (backup.ir.local [10.100.10.19]) by ir.perm.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0B6q5kl099207 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:08 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from andrew@ir.perm.ru) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:05 +0500 From: "Andrew A. Khlebutin" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1674411575.20070111115205@ir.perm.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: 45A2A60F.3080500@u.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2434/Thu Jan 11 05:47:38 2007 on ir.perm.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: pwgen's seeding looks insecure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew A. Khlebutin" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:02:17 -0000 Hello, Mon Jan 8 12:41:40 PST 2007 your wrote: > Hmm.. it seems that the project hasn't been updated in eons (2001): > . I'll still try to get a hold of > the dev, but I'm not sure if they are still administering the project. see here - http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=28391 and here - /usr/ports/sysutils/pwgen2 ;) last pwgen (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pwgen) version is 2.05 (from January 15, 2006). -- Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 07:43:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A7616A51C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CE013C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0B7h6mK076753 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D16B3@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SuperMicro 2U servers? Thread-Index: Acc1TosmYUmBkte2RACp9OLBn9g8NAABQBqw References: <20070111062745.GA94155@xor.obsecurity.org> From: "Philippe Lang" To: "freebsd-questions" X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Subject: SuperMicro 2U servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:14 -0000 Hi, Is anyone using FreeBSD 6.X in production on SuperMicro 2U servers? http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/ Thanks for the info, Philippe Lang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 07:43:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA5616A601 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from mail5.ukrtel.net (mail5.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FCA13C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 43-61-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.61.43] helo=host.my.domain) by mail5.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4ub4-0005NA-A8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:43:38 +0200 Received: from host.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0B7hNiQ000737 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:43:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id l0B7hN0P000736 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:43:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:43:22 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070111074322.GA702@host.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: Strange Emacs autoloaded library X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:43:53 -0000 I have removed the files menu-bar.el.gz menu-bar.elc from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp. But load-history variable still shows me /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/menu-bar.elc loaded and menu-bar appeared at emacs startup. What is this? Any other library from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/ does not load being deleted. Elisej Babenko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 07:58:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D71116A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46C6F13C4A9 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from liam.billschoolcraft.com ([71.141.72.46]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:31 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:31 -0800 (PST) From: Bill-Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@liam.billschoolcraft.com To: Nikolas Britton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> System-ID: [en] (Athlon i686 GNU/Linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Brian , Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jeff Mohler Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:43 -0000 At Thu, 11 Jan 2007 it looks like Nikolas Britton composed: > On 1/10/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > I dunno..Linux got _somewhere_ before big money came into it. > > > > Like I said..when Fbsd 2.5 was light _years_ ahead of Linux..sometime > > after that, focus was lost. > > > > USL v. BSDi happened. I'm not that informed historically and was glad to get this little tidbit a while ago when tracking down the history of Unix/Linux... http://wiliweld.com/history.jpg -- Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com ~ "When a fly lands on the ceiling, does it do a half roll or a half loop?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:11:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18AC16A584 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.sz) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (mail.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6EF13C471 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petern@africaonline.co.sz) Received: from mail.africaonline.co.sz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D6FD484C8F; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:40 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [172.16.0.64] (ip-net-212-85-220-6.africaonline.co.sz [212.85.220.6]) by mail.africaonline.co.sz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A8B51AEA4; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:37 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Nyamukusa Organization: Africa Online Swaziland To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <89F5D83C-6827-499E-89EB-EAAAEBD03FCE@gmail.com> <45A567FB.3080603@unsane.co.uk> <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5DBE08DD-3F58-4373-B675-F13DCB8F28E6@gmail.com> X-Face: %46qm11o9p3#q5~mqj.OBN:J"j{I`SWYIJiZa9$t\%KcS&; l}c=6Lj+0/6LgO6L>=?utf-8?q?J=60k=26S=5E=0A=09?=bLTqA,=?utf-8?q?=7B*i!it4=23lH=26G=7E=60=60D8L=5C=3DyRa=27ilEW3hNc=3FjQIJR=252e?= =?utf-8?q?=7DO=0A=09=7EoIB/t=3Dqhb-ZUUK=5B0=7B+qP=23bl2=5E11fQ4?=):Qg)Y^; [F"TH$,l7I Cc: Vince Hoffman , eoghan Subject: Re: java plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petern@africaonline.co.sz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:11:01 -0000 On Thursday 11 January 2007 00:51, eoghan wrote: > On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote: > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hi > >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working > >> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd. > >> I have installed: > >> diablo-jdk-5.0 > >> diablo-jre1.5.0 > >> linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8 > >> linux-sun-jdk1.4.2 > >> when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented > >> with the plugin missing page... > >> I had it working on i386 before with just the installation of > >> java... Im not sure what i have to do next... > > > > sounds like you may not have the correct files/links in your plugin > > directory. > > whats the output of > > ls -l /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins > > > > and > > > > ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ > > > > if /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins doesnt have a symlink like > > libjavaplugin_oji.so@ -> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ > > ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > then try > > cd /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins && ln -s /usr/local/diablo- > > jdk1.5.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.solibjavaplugin_oji.so > > > > and restart firefox and look at > > about:plugins > > Hi > I have tried this (neither output shows the java plugin). > When i go to the actual folder it has jre and libjavaplugin_oji.so in > there but with a red x beside them (Im using gnome)... > I also cannot browse to the folder... i dont see a plugin folder > under jdk1.5.0 > Any ideas? > Thanks for your help > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Why don't you install from source some thing like this create a folder /usr/local/java download the java source from the sun microsystems website=20 (https://sdlc1d.sun.com/ECom/EComActionServlet;jsessionid=3D4EDB4987ECCEBC4= C4488D18F24CA7D84) eg jre-1_5_0_09-linux-i586-rpm.bin and move it to /usr/local/java make the file executable chmod 0777 jre-1_5_0_09-linux-i586-rpm.bin then run ./jre-1_5_0_09-linux-i586-rpm.bin to install the rest is all interactive at some stage it will ask the path of your browsers and you can patch the=20 plug-ins for as many browsers as you have hope this helps Regards =2D-=20 Peter Nyamukusa Technical Manager Africa Online Swaziland Tel: =A0 =A0+268-404-4705 =46ax: =A0 =A0+268-404-4783 Cell: +268-647-6448 E-mail: petern@africaonline.co.sz AIM: =A0 petenya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:14:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEA016A580 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4955F13C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l0B8ERAu039285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:14:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l0B8EPj0039284; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA19146; Wed, 10 Jan 07 22:28:59 PST Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:31:37 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: jerrymc@msu.edu Message-Id: <45a5d9c9.jJmad7eY0Nskstdt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <20070110154651.GB97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070110154651.GB97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: coolzone@io.dk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, speedtoys.racing@gmail.com Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:14:29 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:59:20PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > > Not all of us can program..but let me ask this question. > > > > Linux is all volunteer, how did it get so far ahead? > > It isn't. People in the know like FreeBSD as a server which > is where it is mostly targeted - to the professional environment > as apposed to being a playtop. Linux sure isn't all volunteer*, but it is certainly ahead in terms of available commercial applications, else why would anyone have gone to the trouble of building FreeBSD's Linux API support? * Until Red Hat went to 'EL, all of their technical folks were working full-time on free Linux. It's now less than 100% -- some effort goes into their payware versions -- but still considerably more than 0% last I heard. Then we have Novell supporting SuSE, IBM supporting Yellow Dog, Intel and IBM supporting OSDL (which employs Linus himself, among others), and that's probably not a complete list of even the major commercial players. On the BSD side, we have Apple (Darwin); and maybe a few others although none come to mind immediately. So why is Linux ahead in commercial support? I'm sure I don't have a clue as to most of the factors, but the fact that Linux has somehow managed to avoid schisms in its kernel development can't help but be an advantage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:19:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA82B16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from jan.ukrtel.net (jan.ukrtel.net [195.5.6.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D9413C45E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from 43-61-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.61.43] helo=host.my.domain) by jan.ukrtel.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4v9D-0007cD-0E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:19:21 +0200 Received: from host.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0B8Ie5W001010 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:18:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: (from elisej@localhost) by host.my.domain (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id l0B8IeUX001009 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:18:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:18:40 +0200 From: a@zeos.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070111081840.GA965@host.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070111074322.GA702@host.my.domain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111074322.GA702@host.my.domain> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Subject: Strange Emacs autoloaded library X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:19:24 -0000 > I have removed the files > menu-bar.el.gz > menu-bar.elc > from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp. > But load-history variable still shows me > /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/menu-bar.elc > loaded and menu-bar appeared at emacs startup. > > What is this? > > Any other library from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/ > does not load being deleted. > > Elisej Babenko I was wrong with the last thesis: startup.el.gz startup.elc and may be some other libraries behave in the same strange manner. They are loaded being deleted from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/. My question is the same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:38:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A536216A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3C113C455 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so348770uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:38:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ELAu/Jrsi0CkKjCF/3G/OtUXLhc6qbtEvQcKKkAEuzby0gR6jN92o8eD+DrrDDnRXXBIts1+SOpoKeCIxYfEVb5UmHX3t7cjagC2G75bK2eAYhZXwKqgHXzaJUeEM22B+s/N8O+3utz58Fvnz2tB/5k6VqWMJSbrWeewJQw5TF0= Received: by 10.78.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr350820hud.1168504679872; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:37:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.118.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:37:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:37:59 -0600 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: Bill-Schoolcraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110073106.89d726a8.coolzone@io.dk> <45A5B717.4080505@sonicboom.org> Cc: Brian , Rico Secada , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jeff Mohler Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:38:01 -0000 On 1/11/07, Bill-Schoolcraft wrote: > At Thu, 11 Jan 2007 it looks like Nikolas Britton composed: > > > On 1/10/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > > I dunno..Linux got _somewhere_ before big money came into it. > > > > > > Like I said..when Fbsd 2.5 was light _years_ ahead of Linux..sometime > > > after that, focus was lost. > > > > > > > USL v. BSDi happened. > > I'm not that informed historically and was glad to get this little > tidbit a while ago when tracking down the history of Unix/Linux... > > http://wiliweld.com/history.jpg > The differences between the GPL and BSD licenses come into play as well. I'm sure it was a combination of the lawsuit, license, and marketing at the right moments that gave Linux the huge lead it has now... and had nothing to do with it being better. With all the code locked up in the GPL license today it will be impossible for the BSD's to ever out code Linux... We lost this battle... Guerrilla tactics are needed now, but the old crusties in the group still think we have a chance using the antiquated ones. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:45:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64CE16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82C13C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so207193ana for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:45:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LDQ9n33Ox8fFoicfORmP4GdmzYXz4tF68ct7UIG5K/lqhdt9D1pPsQYNfoQh95wg6SusOKOYJElW4t4Smt9jGLmrjk7tv8wCRbfsJ4WbXMXAzCcNhHiDXuCQ+DOZzc5G+33qQVxfxfHb5wHebip/9K/WssaC49a47+WA8+A7rUQ= Received: by 10.100.8.18 with SMTP id 18mr837787anh.1168505125801; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:45:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701110045x49c8fc90g8174dd12d0d90325@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:45:25 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are modified on a specifict date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:45:26 -0000 Hi Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are modified on a specifict date? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 08:51:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DF516A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from mail.thingy.com (wotsit.thingy.com [212.21.100.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0873513C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 17707 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2007 08:51:33 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.12?) (howie@thingy.com@212.21.124.49) by wotsit3.thingy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 08:51:33 +0000 Message-ID: <45A5FAB1.1020008@thingy.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:52:01 +0000 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <45A48414.5080009@freebsd.org> <45a4a055.ENGhBM9hyCZ7EPyt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <17829.6508.373404.263832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:51:35 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote > Well that's just it... No way we could afford full rates, If we could > we would hire someone off the street to program x, y, and z to are > liking. I was talking about supporting someone who is already working > on x, y, and z because they have an itch to scratch... To help them > scratch that itch faster... What kind of funding would this type of > person need? § But presumably the reason they aren't working fast enough for your liking is that they *are* doing it in their spare time. So anything beyond that is giving up the day job, which means paying as much as the day job did for that time... a man-hour is a man-hour, really. If you want to pay someone for *literally* what they are already doing, then I'm sure they would be happier, but it wouldn't make anything happen quicker, because it's still the same amount of time spent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 09:29:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF3D16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD06C13C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so359906uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:29:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Y4Q9n2zbVAXOvDJau8KUPDMrjcYwJnf5tKBZPtcMD7NZg+vQJQqOQ4FyYbzxN2LI9q4B7IcBVHI6hXyx6ka7rE1YRxdjNhfNv/2fxqu32LOzEQX8yv2468H4+sIZ+CNFR1RkixQp07YHL9Mnu1yYQ7h54PTSmKAEFyx+E9BSWXo= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr369456huf.1168507747671; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.159.15 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:29:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:29:06 +0000 From: Freminlins To: Chris In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0701101437h703b70aauf6e605ea460fe621@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> <3aaaa3a0701101437h703b70aauf6e605ea460fe621@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:29:11 -0000 On 10/01/07, Chris wrote: > > > A reason why you have less problems is I expect you using premium > hardware such as scsi, currently I am lucky enough to not be using > realtek lan cards although I am still having problems with intel nics. I wouldn't term SCSI as premium. Maybe it used to be, but these days machines are so cheap anyway. Nearly all our x86 boxes have Intel NICs. I haven't had problems with them. the specific nfs issues are related to mounting linux filesystems, I > am not the only one there is dozens of posts on these mailing lists > from users with the same problems, usually livelocks or panics caused > by mounting nfs filesystems on freebsd most seem to have no > resolution. Funnily enough, I thought you were going to say you were mounting a Linux NFS server. It is not surprising that Linux client to Linux server goes together better than FreeBSD client to Linux server. It could of course be the Linux NFS server implementation that is buggy, rather than the FreeBSD client. As I've said, mounting NetApp filers I have no problems at all. realtek isnt great hardware but is that a good reason for realtek > performing significantly worse then on linux, shouldnt it be on par? I don't know. I haven't compared them. They are simply not high performance network cards. I issues of performance been worse, the biggest example is probably > mysql and uniprocessor performance, I understand with ule 2.0 mysql > performance is signficantly better so there is hope there, I would > like to see more performance from uniprocessor and the mp safe support > on nics set to disabled by default to put stability first. Well, I agree with you on this. MySQL performance on FreeBSD is acceptable for my purposes (not usually intensive), but it is not as good as Linux. I've read as much about this as possible, and tried using options and thread libraries. But this has not fixed the problem. But, on many other things I don't see a performance problem at all. I think it's important to give exact examples rather than saying "performance has been worse". If you said "MySQL performance is worse". I've seen a performance problem with ClamAV. Funnily enough, both ClamAV and MySQL are threaded applications, so I'm guessing that the FreeBSD threading is the source (cause) of the performance problem for these apps. The installer well that comes down to using a variety of datacentres, > quite often datacentre staff are not too well trained and mainly used > to redhat and windows gui installers, so when it comes to freebsd > there is many datacentres who dont even support freebsd when I ask is > because they say it wont install, the ones that do support freebsd the > feedback I get off them is often related to both the installer been a > pain for them and hardware compatibility. One of our Windows techies learned how to do a FreeBSD install in fifteen minutes. If someone really cannot learn it, they shouldn't be anywhere near datacentres. If they can't handle the FreeBSD install, I have no idea how they would handle Solaris, which is much less friendly and definitely belongs in datacentres. And Solaris on non-Sun hardware has less compatibiltiy than FreeBSD. How much testing goes into heavy workloads such as heavy apache loads > and DDOS attacks? I don't know. But you are free to vounteer to do this! I expect my server to not livelock and come back to > responsiveness after such loads without having to reboot it. Freebsd > 4.x was incredibly stable under heavy ddos attacks, freebsd 5.x held > out but of course was very slow on UP, freebsd 6.x is faster but has > suffered stability problems. I agree that the 4.x series was (is) very stable - we still have some in use. On the performance side get the sata and raid problems sorted for > improved hd performance tagged ququeing etc. > > Is there a sort of hire a dev button on the freebsd website? I guess you could make a contribution to the foundation. Chris > Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 09:31:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0175C16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E30813C44B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so360469uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:31:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IdbUtqtA8wxsD4hNNybBAA/bYcq6hn1qIH3mm+oaK2bZTgRiTxDoXJag4poTiRVvuVT7yLQ2AscfV3KDI9gi6iysxgaFejIljCgg8L+exZnlsp3hpavaZRfDNvHIfGfj0kBJxnY69aZYNEg8GSTjTYMgW2tGzPOAJhDngB/kiog= Received: by 10.78.185.15 with SMTP id i15mr360218huf.1168507917084; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.159.15 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:31:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:31:56 +0000 From: Freminlins To: "Jeff Mohler" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:31:59 -0000 On 11/01/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > > The basic reason is that a ../.. walk invalidates cached metadata, and > you end up with a pipe full of getattr's all of the time. Freebsd-fs > has discussed this a bit, but no fixing is coming soon. We use linux > to compile builds, we'd like to use Freebsd, but linux on Filers via > NFS is about 3x faster than the same builds on Fbsd to the same filer. > ../.. baby. > Did you try different mount options on the FreeBSD clients. I have no idea, but Linux may have different defaults. Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 10:03:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C029816A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811A613C455 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-161-214.51-151.net24.it [151.51.214.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BABxaG082501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:12:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BA5AEl097062; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:05:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <45A60B6E.6010506@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:03:26 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: howie@thingy.com References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <45A55416.4060203@netfence.it> <45A55C93.3020402@thingy.com> <45A56C3B.4070908@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A56C3B.4070908@chapman.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:03:52 -0000 Jay Chandler wrote: >>> Apart from that, I used to be able to sysinsall a machine booting via >>> PXE. This doesn't work anymore in recent versions :-( >>> Or maybe it is just my incompetence, but then, if someone managed >>> this, I'd like to hear about it. >>> >> This definitely works with 6.1-RELEASE, as I've just had the nice Hmm, I had problems setting the tmp filesystem up. I'll have a look at the docs you suggested and try again. >>> Please don't get any graphics bloatware in the way. :-) >>> >> Amen. >> >> Really, if you are put off by the installer, then once that has >> completed., the rest of the "management tools" (i.e. vi) are not going >> give you the warm fuzzies either. If you need the graphical management, Really, you might have understood me wrong. I do *NOT* want a graphic installer. And I'm not using any graphic management tool thereafter either. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 10:05:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED01016A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from arwen.teledomenet.gr (arwen.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5149813C45E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by arwen.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l0B9LUm1031130; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:30 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:24:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <2cd0a0da0701110045x49c8fc90g8174dd12d0d90325@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701110045x49c8fc90g8174dd12d0d90325@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111124.09298.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are modified on a specifict date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:05:49 -0000 On Thursday 11 January 2007 10:45, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are > modified on a specifict date? > Yes, read find(1) man. In short: find ${DIRECTORY} -mtime 8 This will give you the files which were modified 8 days before in directory ${DIRECTORY}. find ${DIRECTORY} -mtime -8 This will give you the files which were modified 8 days ago and afterwards in directory ${DIRECTORY}. There is also -newerXY option which might be interesting. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 10:43:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C770E16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE7013C4AC for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 79776523; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:17:21 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:17:21 -0600 To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20070111101721.GA18448@soaustin.net> References: <20070111070008.GA94580@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111070008.GA94580@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Ian Smith , linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:43:18 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > Hi Kris, > > > > I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that > > the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and > > at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now. > > Mark, what is the status of the upload of these packages? The past 9 days I was sitting at various pay-fer internet cafes and thus have not dealt with i386-5 (I had hoped it was going to be finished while I was still in Munich and had the wireless). I had thought of 'sending the reminder mails' and 'uploading the packages' as one unit, but I suppose I should have split them up. The former was not feasible from the cafes. I am now back but suffering from jet-lag so it will be another more 12 hours or so before I can look at the reminder-mails. (I had a 25-hour travel marathon between Koln and Houston.) mcl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 10:51:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6D16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B31D13C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so378218uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qytGmkTaC2E2Lwj5hc8EbwmnFHk7Zwy835lsaAjr+pgt3AjZruYjg0cCO1bBwsTgUs4eRq5b2zyaH8XtKzdQ/ntyY468SKjyorAyuIZBOCPrwAAlQcfzIw4nIySKqkP3Mg0JyzX1iJkmGnnUgNt+s0iIP79zBgNjuZsHmY1xlHc= Received: by 10.67.91.6 with SMTP id t6mr1389847ugl.1168512711937; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:51:51 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "FreeBSD Questions" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: [SOLVED] re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:51:53 -0000 Hi lists, ifconfig re0 -txcsum -rxcsum solved the problem.... Anyway, is this a bug in the driver or in the interface itself? Thanx, regards ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pietro Cerutti Date: Jan 11, 2007 11:29 AM Subject: re(4) incorrect checksum To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Hi lists, FreeBSD gahrtop.localhost 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Tue Jan 9 19:34:13 CET 2007 root@gahrtop:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GAHRTOP i386 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2000.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Cores per package: 2 re0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xff2ff000-0xff2fffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 ($FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c,v 1.46.2.20 2006/09/21 11:08:28 yongari Exp $) I get checksum errors on every packet I send, example: Checksum: 0x0bc5 [incorrect, should be 0x78fe (maybe caused by checksum offloading?)] I think this could be the cause of some web pages (e.g. Gmail in standard view [html view works well]) not to be displayed. I tracked down the problem to the re(4) driver just because wlan works good... Any ideas? Thanx, -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 10:55:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A716A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB68513C428 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so379050uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:55:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=K49NFJJj4QVhYH3Z+tCwDaiDgb7jgGwIanmV1hs911hsL6iJ8KCw2gNC8YlxtPNsiMuPWqATvXNSFy8qlpi1WltrOF6mfdFwAtcw2CcW56R425kvDq5Iktdog8gJeAtOyf/fDGP4+apdHei/HQ3bwcHt2Wt+iUF5NCwVvNwneok= Received: by 10.67.22.14 with SMTP id z14mr1515667ugi.1168511386754; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:29:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:29:46 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:55:34 -0000 Hi lists, FreeBSD gahrtop.localhost 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Tue Jan 9 19:34:13 CET 2007 root@gahrtop:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GAHRTOP i386 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2000.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Cores per package: 2 re0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xff2ff000-0xff2fffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 ($FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c,v 1.46.2.20 2006/09/21 11:08:28 yongari Exp $) I get checksum errors on every packet I send, example: Checksum: 0x0bc5 [incorrect, should be 0x78fe (maybe caused by checksum offloading?)] I think this could be the cause of some web pages (e.g. Gmail in standard view [html view works well]) not to be displayed. I tracked down the problem to the re(4) driver just because wlan works good... Any ideas? Thanx, -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 11:02:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6781B16A5D9 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC01413C469 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george.vanev@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so380631uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:02:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jzmFGyhFwFjIomgxYnrts2b6xCWJI5oAT/kkjEtkmpmpwMf7VBSTOVG+Hm6Mfey+ns9ziH6o9dpKstAEECXY0nTpar0MQs2SHDl6VXRS886zVdGdVe6Dg3Mdh0BsTuKpFcecOAS3voEjUvDomrZSDgTMBSC/SPjZeNGsywZwNjU= Received: by 10.78.201.15 with SMTP id y15mr386712huf.1168513323930; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.3 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:02:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f4f57f60701110302m684efea9yee8d103623a0a056@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:02:03 +0200 From: "George Vanev" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701110045x49c8fc90g8174dd12d0d90325@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0701110045x49c8fc90g8174dd12d0d90325@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are modified on a specifict date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: George.Vanev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:02:05 -0000 Here is an example with todays date find / -exec stat -f "%N %Sm" -t "%m-%d-%Y" {} \; | grep 01-11-2007 | cut -d' ' -f1 On 1/11/07, VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > Is there a way to get List of Only those files in a filesystem which are > modified on a specifict date? > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- George Vanev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:00:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40C516A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5153D13C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so394045uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:00:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PORLn2gpO80d6pCkWvSlQML1Mwb4eyiL1p/dS7rTerg8sqUoqGYLIHna+7TUojof99ViOc2LvHrppY9PqlXDmoCSPIwvQHD19Sj6elcvQ1hqpjVtlqnmfjSYp/5nBLURbMT8jBoZdNctAGhM400QztdaZ+YyXOyKErKXzdoH/QQ= Received: by 10.67.106.3 with SMTP id i3mr1595562ugm.1168516818192; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:00:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:00:18 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "FreeBSD Questions" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070111114402.GX80390@cicely12.cicely.de> Cc: Subject: Fwd: [SOLVED] re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:00:20 -0000 On 1/11/07, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > Hi lists, > > ifconfig re0 -txcsum -rxcsum solved the problem.... > > > > Anyway, is this a bug in the driver or in the interface itself? > > That is how checksum offloading works. > tcpdump can't see a correct checksum, because it is not calculated > by the kernel and left for the hardware. Yes, I got it. > However checksum offloading is broken for re(4) based cards, therefor > it is disabled by default. I don't think so.... at least, I did nothing to enable it, but it were indeed enabled (RXCSUM,TXCSU showed up in the options field shown by ifconfig) > > -- > B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de > bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de > -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:08:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BB616A47B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D231013C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (vkbczg@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BC8dj7084843; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l0BC8dZj084842; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:39 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701111208.l0BC8dZj084842@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, chrcoluk@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0701101437h703b70aauf6e605ea460fe621@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:44 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, chrcoluk@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:47 -0000 Just a few small notes ... Chris wrote: > realtek isnt great hardware but is that a good reason for realtek > performing significantly worse then on linux, shouldnt it be on par? Mu old notebook (2001) has a realtek rl(4) card. It's not rocket fast, but it just works with FreeBSD. There's also an rl(4) card that came with my DSL modem, and it "just works" in my FreeBSD router box, too. When I buy a NIC for any purpose, I try to avoid realtek cards, though. > issues of performance been worse, the biggest example is probably > mysql and uniprocessor performance, I understand with ule 2.0 mysql > performance is signficantly better so there is hope there, I would > like to see more performance from uniprocessor and the mp safe support > on nics set to disabled by default to put stability first. With the latest FreeBSD RELENG_6, libthr and optimized time counter settings (TSC), I get the same mysql performance under FreeBSD as under Linux. > The installer well that comes down to using a variety of datacentres, > quite often datacentre staff are not too well trained and mainly used > to redhat and windows gui installers, so when it comes to freebsd > there is many datacentres who dont even support freebsd when I ask is > because they say it wont install, the ones that do support freebsd the > feedback I get off them is often related to both the installer been a > pain for them and hardware compatibility. To be honest, I like the installer from DragonFly BSD. It's easier and more intuitive to use. However, FreeBSD's sysinstall is _far_ better than NetBSD's or OpenBSD's installers (at least when I last had to deal with them, about one year ago). Actually, as far as I know, DragonFly BSD's installer is intended to be fairly portable, and I seem to remember that someone was working on porting it to FreeBSD. But I have now idea what the status of that effort is. > Is there a sort of hire a dev button on the freebsd website? There's a donate "button", though you can't select a sepcific developer or area of interest that way. If you want to hire a dev, it might be helpful to post a message to one of the more specialist lists (e.g. if you want to hire someone for improving, say, the file system code, then post to the freebsd-fs list). If you're very lucky, someone might be interested in your problem and even do it for free because it's an interesting challenge, or he could use a solution for that problem himself. If you're even more lucky, someone who had the same problem already did a fix and shares it with you. Somewhere on the web site there's also a list of companies providing commercial support, some of which also offer development/programming services (including the company I work for). Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "It combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript." -- Jamie Zawinski, when asked: "What's wrong with perl?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:11:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7A316A47B; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9B113C455; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BBiGus082266; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [10.1.1.14]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BBi37i032320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l0BBi3di091139; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id l0BBi3ao091138; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:44:03 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20070111114402.GX80390@cicely12.cicely.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.4-STABLE alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on cicely12.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: [SOLVED] re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:11:57 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Hi lists, > ifconfig re0 -txcsum -rxcsum solved the problem.... > > Anyway, is this a bug in the driver or in the interface itself? That is how checksum offloading works. tcpdump can't see a correct checksum, because it is not calculated by the kernel and left for the hardware. However checksum offloading is broken for re(4) based cards, therefor it is disabled by default. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:14:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAE316A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A1413C468 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id XAA07759; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:13:51 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:13:50 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20070111101721.GA18448@soaustin.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:14:16 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 at 04:17:21 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > > Hi Kris, > > > > > > I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that > > > the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and > > > at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now. > > > > Mark, what is the status of the upload of these packages? > > The past 9 days I was sitting at various pay-fer internet cafes and thus > have not dealt with i386-5 (I had hoped it was going to be finished while > I was still in Munich and had the wireless). > > I had thought of 'sending the reminder mails' and 'uploading the packages' > as one unit, but I suppose I should have split them up. The former was > not feasible from the cafes. > > I am now back but suffering from jet-lag so it will be another more 12 > hours or so before I can look at the reminder-mails. (I had a 25-hour > travel marathon between Koln and Houston.) Hey, get some sleep, have a day off .. you're worth more to us alive :) Thanks guys, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:36:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC66916A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niek@bigfoot.com) Received: from smtp-2.orange.nl (smtp-2.orange.nl [193.252.22.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673F613C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niek@bigfoot.com) Received: from smtp-2.orange.nl (mwinf6103 [172.22.153.25]) by mwinf6105.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ADFFD2000592 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6103.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 332AA1C00088 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.250.2] (s5591888a.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.136.138]) by mwinf6103.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DA2861C00084 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:48 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070111120848893.DA2861C00084@mwinf6103.orange.nl Message-ID: <45A628CF.5020504@bigfoot.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:08:47 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:36:25 -0000 On Tuesday 09 January 2007 08:21, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > > 3) The largest complaint about sysinstall is that it's not graphical. The > > problem is that a graphical installation program has some -severe- > > constraints on it. First, it has to work in ALL instances. That means, > > 640x480x16 colors VGA screen. You have a lot of people out there > > installing on systems that have, for example, monitors with inadequate > > horizontal/vertical frequency ranges and very capabable video cards, > > unless you force the X-server to use the original VGA resolution, it's > > going to overdrive those monitors and the user is going to see a black > > screen when the installation program comes up. And the only way FreeBSD > > is going to get a graphical anything is by using Xorg, and FreeBSD does > > not maintain that distribution - so we are now dependent on the Xorg > > group writing their code with no bugs for our installation program to work. > > While I admit that sysinstall could be polished at the rough edges, I vote for a non-graphical installer for server aimed installations. I see no practical reason to have an X based installer for a server installation at all, with all the heavy stuff that's necessary for it. Please leave that to the desktop oriented BSD distributions. I wonder how many server admins would like to see an X based installer. I rather would propose a clear distinction (communicated to new users) between desktop aimed distributions and server based ones, where the first category would be the current distribution of FreeBSD, with a nice graphical installer, a window manager, drivers for most sound, usb, wireless and video devices, and desktop applications added to it. I am not familiar with desktopBSD and Freesbie, but I can imagine that these are already working in that direction. (I am using FreeBSD-current as a desktop OS on a laptop, but it required some days of tweaking to get sound, touchpad & usb mouse, 1280x800 resolution and wireless networking running.) Niek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:37:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EF416A47E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lekshmanp1@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DC613C478 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lekshmanp1@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so198232pyh for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:37:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; b=k5Xh9WHGU03K2kP6UhFBK33sgPNC5QF6OjVqjMyCS34RCGfgiTUhxT242Z3q/6mIdzEMBgtz71ZXP+/FmMJ9K/4orvNz4PMGuPAUJ8hkz4gGM7PYHhhVDzq0lZ65ajROtDfh54C3+/Qh6WY79hztAeAvhTn7hRDVSQuzWYYLbec= Received: by 10.35.21.1 with SMTP id y1mr2446833pyi.1168517309561; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.113.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:08:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:38:29 +0530 From: "lekshmanan prabhakaran" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: msmith@freebsd.org Subject: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:37:47 -0000 hi my name is lekshman i did a fresh installation of FreeBSD 6.1 on my Travelmate laptop 2420, the installation was fine but i am getting these errors on TTY0 console . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_TZ_.TZSV._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE These two errors happens in the same minute and every few minutes: May 31 00:07:52 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE May 31 00:07:52 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_TZ_.TZSV._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE May 31 00:08:12 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE May 31 00:08:12 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_TZ_.TZS0._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020)AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE May 31 00:08:22 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE May 31 00:08:22 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_TZ_.TZS1._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is keep on repeating but there is no problem with other consoles from tty1 to tty8 and KDE GUI is working fine.Please help me with this ,is it going to bring my computer down. Thanking you Lekshman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 12:46:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6914516A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A0A13C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so447140wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:46:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=eOoBJLd5FMPLSFKN1+t7zNx/phmqgkAljTcjW/kHAXTO44+KbyobHGMO0zBMxQgAgqzD5QI1XpqFLISYafl9FOUPqDqlMeR1IO9fvNG3DBhNIGJs04/dWTtMAa2naNcNJWqSZT7i8WnlR/tsgLrrBV/y5y8MdnMO2/XZA0nb5Co= Received: by 10.70.27.18 with SMTP id a18mr2823961wxa.1168517854224; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7sm988942wrl.2007.01.11.04.17.31; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:17:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l0BCJ416040472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:19:04 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l0BCJ44W040471; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:19:04 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:19:04 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20070111121904.GD33964@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: [SOLVED] re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:46:37 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Hi lists, > ifconfig re0 -txcsum -rxcsum solved the problem.... > In if_re.c, rev 1.46.2.18 wpaul@ fixed a long standing checksum offload issue by padding. Does re(4) work when you disable only Tx checksum offload?(i.e. ifconfig re0 -txcsum) > Anyway, is this a bug in the driver or in the interface itself? > > Thanx, regards > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pietro Cerutti > Date: Jan 11, 2007 11:29 AM > Subject: re(4) incorrect checksum > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > > > Hi lists, > > FreeBSD gahrtop.localhost 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: > Tue Jan 9 19:34:13 CET 2007 > root@gahrtop:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GAHRTOP i386 > > CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2000.15-MHz 686-class > CPU) > Cores per package: 2 > > re0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff > mem 0xff2ff000-0xff2fffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > ($FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c,v 1.46.2.20 2006/09/21 11:08:28 yongari > Exp $) > > I get checksum errors on every packet I send, example: > > Checksum: 0x0bc5 [incorrect, should be 0x78fe (maybe caused by > checksum offloading?)] > > I think this could be the cause of some web pages (e.g. Gmail in > standard view [html view works well]) not to be displayed. > > I tracked down the problem to the re(4) driver just because wlan works > good... > > Any ideas? > > > Thanx, > > -- > Pietro Cerutti > ICQ: 117293691 > PGP: 0x9571F78E > > - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - > against HTML e-mail and > proprietary attachments > www.asciiribbon.org > > > -- > Pietro Cerutti > ICQ: 117293691 > PGP: 0x9571F78E > > - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - > against HTML e-mail and > proprietary attachments > www.asciiribbon.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:14:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51816A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from svarun.infrax.si (84-255-241-13.static.dsl.t-2.net [84.255.241.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3846313C465 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7472DA860 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from svarun.infrax.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Svarun.infrax.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55991-02 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:48:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.12.5] (unknown [192.168.12.5]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DA5DA859 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:48:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A63219.10309@skoberne.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:48:25 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A628CF.5020504@bigfoot.com> In-Reply-To: <45A628CF.5020504@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050400010804020200060300" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at infrax.si X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:14:49 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050400010804020200060300 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010403080007090108030804" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010403080007090108030804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey, > Please leave that to the desktop oriented BSD distributions. I wonder > how many server admins would like to see an X based installer. Not me. Bye, Nejc --------------010403080007090108030804-- --------------ms050400010804020200060300 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILJDCC BY4wggR2oAMCAQICBDs9SfgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwPTELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kxGzAZBgNV BAoTEnN0YXRlLWluc3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2EwHhcNMDMwOTIzMjAy MzA0WhcNMDgwOTIzMjA1MzA0WjCBgTELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kxGzAZBgNVBAoTEnN0YXRlLWlu c3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2ExFDASBgNVBAsTC2luZGl2aWR1YWxzMSww FAYDVQQDEw1ORUpDIFNLT0JFUk5FMBQGA1UEBRMNMjQ1NzExMzMxMjAxNDCBnzANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA0LYrr3KrEMlye3H9j8KGvFx66+btGh7I/XXA/Pmog4+HMqqq MZZNmfbkKfC3D6NdXroteJSAwxoO3BU0HuCzyjHeaaZ63ayz7OAbYY3rwTN9rWTkRTAoghLk eA+R+0GA5gEbdudT4eV0vmYsfmKkpnnsQ+u13R9IgWPFT6zWoucCAwEAAaOCAtMwggLPMAsG A1UdDwQEAwIFoDArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDAzMDkyMzIwMjMwNFqBDzIwMDgwOTIzMjA1MzA0 WjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBaAwLwYJYIZIAYb4QgECBCIWIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNpZ2Vu LWNhLnNpL2NkYS1jZ2kvMEQGCWCGSAGG+EIBAwQ3FjVjbGllbnRjZ2k/YWN0aW9uPWNoZWNr UmV2b2NhdGlvbiYmQ1JMPWNuPUNSTDYmc2VyaWFsPTBRBglghkgBhvhCAQ0ERBZCU3BsZXRu byBrdmFsaWZpY2lyYW5vIGRpZ2l0YWxubyBwb3RyZGlsbyB6YSBmaXppY25lIG9zZWJlIFNJ R0VOLUNBMEAGA1UdIAQ5MDcwNQYKKwYBBAGvWQICAjAnMCUGCCsGAQUFBwIBFhlodHRwOi8v d3d3Lmdvdi5zaS9jYS9jcHMvMBwGA1UdEQQVMBOBEW5lamNAc2tvYmVybmUubmV0MIHvBgNV HR8EgecwgeQwVKBSoFCkTjBMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0 dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQLEwhzaWdlbi1jYTENMAsGA1UEAxMEQ1JMNjBdoFugWYZXbGRhcDov L3g1MDAuZ292LnNpL291PXNpZ2VuLWNhLG89c3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zLGM9c2k/Y2Vy dGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlMC2gK6AphidodHRwOi8vd3d3LnNpZ2VuLWNh LnNpL2NybC9zaWdlbi1jYS5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUcXuKBh8xBVWrYBJ3RyAeA4gY7Ikw HQYDVR0OBBYEFKUx7r6WtsjLZjxoX3P5SYCz81a+MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EA BAwwChsEVjUuMAMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBADMu+PVcF5ovn1zrG9w6wwijCHRe X3UbRRPDcUyDHMeTGVqEP1RqmbwZ9eiPF+5MDuQQF6BxHk4CCGj0mIjP7Ont871EkWiBR7KM ooDSbad7kXJzO2reAi4qKnbnbGu8NrRm6G5h4fy7yHn+jG02IggZRE725bAoGqzs6YZeoiHi lR+hVTQgpaxAtAGbzBrlzbmNwouw64afEFVij91vMGrydit6CTOj+Tg6cqgkqGi9fhOprV/q iEYjchG2LegcUg+jHuJ633N/ZWtkYdmFTlvVVxzgHujetTe6hFdVNc7p8W4Hv+9xiYxXo5f4 WGJfDdFmXcVKKDRy8zlpxExY8rMwggWOMIIEdqADAgECAgQ7PUn4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA MD0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMxETAPBgNVBAsT CHNpZ2VuLWNhMB4XDTAzMDkyMzIwMjMwNFoXDTA4MDkyMzIwNTMwNFowgYExCzAJBgNVBAYT AnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMxETAPBgNVBAsTCHNpZ2VuLWNhMRQw EgYDVQQLEwtpbmRpdmlkdWFsczEsMBQGA1UEAxMNTkVKQyBTS09CRVJORTAUBgNVBAUTDTI0 NTcxMTMzMTIwMTQwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANC2K69yqxDJcntx/Y/C hrxceuvm7RoeyP11wPz5qIOPhzKqqjGWTZn25Cnwtw+jXV66LXiUgMMaDtwVNB7gs8ox3mmm et2ss+zgG2GN68Ezfa1k5EUwKIIS5HgPkftBgOYBG3bnU+HldL5mLH5ipKZ57EPrtd0fSIFj xU+s1qLnAgMBAAGjggLTMIICzzALBgNVHQ8EBAMCBaAwKwYDVR0QBCQwIoAPMjAwMzA5MjMy MDIzMDRagQ8yMDA4MDkyMzIwNTMwNFowEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgWgMC8GCWCGSAGG+EIB AgQiFiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5zaWdlbi1jYS5zaS9jZGEtY2dpLzBEBglghkgBhvhCAQMENxY1 Y2xpZW50Y2dpP2FjdGlvbj1jaGVja1Jldm9jYXRpb24mJkNSTD1jbj1DUkw2JnNlcmlhbD0w UQYJYIZIAYb4QgENBEQWQlNwbGV0bm8ga3ZhbGlmaWNpcmFubyBkaWdpdGFsbm8gcG90cmRp bG8gemEgZml6aWNuZSBvc2ViZSBTSUdFTi1DQTBABgNVHSAEOTA3MDUGCisGAQQBr1kCAgIw JzAlBggrBgEFBQcCARYZaHR0cDovL3d3dy5nb3Yuc2kvY2EvY3BzLzAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFu ZWpjQHNrb2Jlcm5lLm5ldDCB7wYDVR0fBIHnMIHkMFSgUqBQpE4wTDELMAkGA1UEBhMCc2kx GzAZBgNVBAoTEnN0YXRlLWluc3RpdHV0aW9uczERMA8GA1UECxMIc2lnZW4tY2ExDTALBgNV BAMTBENSTDYwXaBboFmGV2xkYXA6Ly94NTAwLmdvdi5zaS9vdT1zaWdlbi1jYSxvPXN0YXRl LWluc3RpdHV0aW9ucyxjPXNpP2NlcnRpZmljYXRlUmV2b2NhdGlvbkxpc3Q/YmFzZTAtoCug KYYnaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zaWdlbi1jYS5zaS9jcmwvc2lnZW4tY2EuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FHF7igYfMQVVq2ASd0cgHgOIGOyJMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSlMe6+lrbIy2Y8aF9z+UmAs/NWvjAJ BgNVHRMEAjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY1LjADAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IB AQAzLvj1XBeaL59c6xvcOsMIowh0Xl91G0UTw3FMgxzHkxlahD9Uapm8GfXojxfuTA7kEBeg cR5OAgho9JiIz+zp7fO9RJFogUeyjKKA0m2ne5Fycztq3gIuKip252xrvDa0ZuhuYeH8u8h5 /oxtNiIIGURO9uWwKBqs7OmGXqIh4pUfoVU0IKWsQLQBm8wa5c25jcKLsOuGnxBVYo/dbzBq 8nYregkzo/k4OnKoJKhovX4Tqa1f6ohGI3IRti3oHFIPox7iet9zf2VrZGHZhU5b1Vcc4B7o 3rU3uoRXVTXO6fFuB7/vcYmMV6OX+FhiXw3RZl3FSig0cvM5acRMWPKzMYICTjCCAkoCAQEw RTA9MQswCQYDVQQGEwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQL EwhzaWdlbi1jYQIEOz1J+DAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBXzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcN AQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNzAxMTExMjQ4MjVaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBTEaKLA 8pxdF5i7FWQS9t0nV04JczBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDBUBgkrBgEE AYI3EAQxRzBFMD0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAnNpMRswGQYDVQQKExJzdGF0ZS1pbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMx ETAPBgNVBAsTCHNpZ2VuLWNhAgQ7PUn4MFYGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMUegRTA9MQswCQYDVQQG EwJzaTEbMBkGA1UEChMSc3RhdGUtaW5zdGl0dXRpb25zMREwDwYDVQQLEwhzaWdlbi1jYQIE Oz1J+DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgFPvO/BqOlj9AfDgj8TGYMJ26NCIBGeTYC2VFfN0HggA +cB4oS6fGZuvP1I9/rYc4bvr89dS0rkivmajpYU2Q1n++BMB7Ga1sxiazhyIip8q/cT8MFim RlmXE0k+kuawTElw+IdX2/73qLhrDbh5ViGbjMOaTFrlyPieyi03xoQpAAAAAAAA --------------ms050400010804020200060300-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:30:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A2316A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp3.freeserve.com (smtp3.wanadoo.co.uk [193.252.22.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929C213C4A7 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@levie.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3212.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EB4D63C0008B; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:30:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from brian5vgqrbw1x (user-5441c2a3.lns3-c7.dsl.pol.co.uk [84.65.194.163]) by mwinf3212.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 821043C00086; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:30:03 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070111133003536.821043C00086@mwinf3212.me.freeserve.com From: "Brian Levie" To: "'Pieter de Goeje'" Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:30:44 -0000 Message-ID: <000401c73584$b2ce05b0$ba01a8c0@brian5vgqrbw1x> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200701100801.11519.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: unable to load kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:30:06 -0000 Many thanks, that solved the problem Brian=20 -----Original Message----- From: Pieter de Goeje [mailto:pieter@degoeje.nl]=20 Sent: 10 January 2007 07:01 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Brian Levie Subject: Re: unable to load kernel On Monday 08 January 2007 16:47, Brian Levie wrote: > After installing FreeBSD 6.1, I get the error message =91Unable to = load > kernel=92 and it goes to an OK prompt. I suspect the problem is in = the > geometry, when installing I get the message =92Geometry of = 238316/16/63 > for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry=92. And appears = to > use 14946/255/63. However the BIOS shows 58853/16/255, but attempting > to use this produces the same error message. The system has a 200Gb > hard disk, all but the last 1.5Gb is Windows XP, and it is the last > 1.5Gb I have tried to install FreeBSD. Any suggestions would be much > appreciated. No, the problem is that you do not have a kernel installed. When you come to=20 the distribution part in sysinstall (FreeBSD's installation program), make=20 sure you have selected at least one of the two available kernels in "Binary=20 kernel distributions (required)". Good Luck! Cheers, Pieter PS. Although you certainly _can_ install FreeBSD on a 1.5GB partition, I would=20 recommend more than 1.5GB for FreeBSD (for a fully configured system, 8+ GB=20 would be apropriate) --=20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.8/621 - Release Date: 09/01/2007 13:37 =20 --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 10/01/2007 14:52 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:35:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A3E16A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED81E13C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so459650wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:35:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q5AzBObTqCUVq1b20r8uE16XLOl/33GE3F5gwu+JFiNwiDG6gYLGgUKnrXc4/96Zs7EuKzi913HloX/SsLWEO4lzn06RQ5Xvjgf+ZYNBnH4F1ACCE706U2177UfJkb18/I89q0bZCk5eTMnMF8F2U6CARus9uu1MzZahQHtO0Ww= Received: by 10.90.79.6 with SMTP id c6mr1037149agb.1168522556390; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.70.13 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:35:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:35:56 -0500 From: "Jeff MacDonald" To: "Ivan Voras" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:35:57 -0000 > Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > > > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > > > 786432k above 4GB ignored > > > > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > > > real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > > avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > > > Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > You're using the 32-bit version, right? The design of x86 architecture > (i.e. it's not FreeBSD's problem) is such that a part of memory > addresses needs to be set aside for hardware uses, such as the PCI bus, > AGP memory & others. This manifests as "holes" in memory that are not > accessible to OS. > > There are two possible solutions: you may try compiling a 32-bit kernel > with PAE (but not all drivers support PAE), or install the 64-bit > version of FreeBSD. Well I hate when people say this, but I'm going to say it.. :) When I did a default install of ubuntu, it saw all 4 gigs without a hitch. So does that mean it already includes PAE, or something else ? Aside, I will read up on PAE. I'll read up about 64 bit as well, I've been hesitant to make the jump only cause any word of mouth i've heard said that it's not ready for production. Maybe that's off base, it's only what "i've heard" Thanks ! Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:44:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4383D16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8A13C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:44:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:44:54 -0500 id 0005644C.45A63F56.000167A8 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:44:54 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Jeff MacDonald" Message-Id: <20070111084454.0ba4c327.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:44:56 -0000 In response to "Jeff MacDonald" : > > Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I put a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE on a dell poweredge 1950 server. > > > It's configured with 4 gigs of ram. > > > > > > However when I boot i get the following right before DMESG > > > > > > 786432k above 4GB ignored > > > > > > Which is strange, but then dmesg shows this > > > > > > real memory = 3489300480 (3327 MB) > > > avail memory = 3414659072 (3256 MB) > > > > > > Soo I'm at a bit of a loss. > > > > You're using the 32-bit version, right? The design of x86 architecture > > (i.e. it's not FreeBSD's problem) is such that a part of memory > > addresses needs to be set aside for hardware uses, such as the PCI bus, > > AGP memory & others. This manifests as "holes" in memory that are not > > accessible to OS. > > > > There are two possible solutions: you may try compiling a 32-bit kernel > > with PAE (but not all drivers support PAE), or install the 64-bit > > version of FreeBSD. > > Well I hate when people say this, but I'm going to say it.. :) > > When I did a default install of ubuntu, it saw all 4 gigs without a > hitch. So does that mean it already includes PAE, or something else ? One of those two. You sure you didn't install a 64-bit version of Ubuntu? > Aside, I will read up on PAE. I'll read up about 64 bit as well, I've > been hesitant to make the jump only cause any word of mouth i've heard > said that it's not ready for production. Maybe that's off base, it's > only what "i've heard" We're deploying a lot of 64 bit stuff around here. Our experience has been that the OS is as solid on amd64 as it is on i386. Server applications are the same. There are, however, a lot of desktop applications that are still flaky on 64-bit -- mostly non-mainstream ones. We got in a crunch and had to reinstall a workstation back to i386 because of it, or I would have filed some bug reports. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:52:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C1F16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1474D13C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] ([10.0.0.11]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BDqex4082585; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:52:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nathan@vidican.com) Message-ID: <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:52:44 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Long , chandler@chapman.edu, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, maanjee@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:52:52 -0000 James Long wrote: >> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:52 -0800 >> From: Jay Chandler >> Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? >> To: Giorgos Keramidas >> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay >> >> Message-ID: <45A59748.4010301@chapman.edu> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> >>> On 2007-01-10 13:24, VeeJay wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi >>>> How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? >>>> >>>> >>> Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to >>> 'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind? >>> >>> >>> >> Standard user with the root password, a bag of explosives, a .45 magnum, >> and a chip on his shoulder, say? >> > > Yeah, and even a user with no account or password, a screwdriver, and > a Mountain Dew. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it still managed to kill the server ;) -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:55:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC15516A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E40113C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bignose@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so465114wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:55:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nNiigDKpZakofyrU0dMDU4jy0EhrvkZf+sgiNgTVXYD0MmyKOu/1u5LfgBuOtVUGBmwI9K1Doi1jI9RPwemW4c6CW2XtLQFVlpm6y+srRVOTWoUu2/wNJj0lZnAaWPcYZnaE+nlEhdMEdMDuXCjKw5/4zy+qa4ru5QoNx98sMA8= Received: by 10.90.32.14 with SMTP id f14mr1044053agf.1168523756939; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.70.13 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:55:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:55:56 -0500 From: "Jeff MacDonald" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20070111084454.0ba4c327.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070111084454.0ba4c327.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:55:57 -0000 > > Well I hate when people say this, but I'm going to say it.. :) > > > > When I did a default install of ubuntu, it saw all 4 gigs without a > > hitch. So does that mean it already includes PAE, or something else ? > > One of those two. You sure you didn't install a 64-bit version of Ubuntu? Fairly sure :) > > Aside, I will read up on PAE. I'll read up about 64 bit as well, I've > > been hesitant to make the jump only cause any word of mouth i've heard > > said that it's not ready for production. Maybe that's off base, it's > > only what "i've heard" > > We're deploying a lot of 64 bit stuff around here. Our experience has > been that the OS is as solid on amd64 as it is on i386. Server applications > are the same. There are, however, a lot of desktop applications that are > still flaky on 64-bit -- mostly non-mainstream ones. We got in a crunch > and had to reinstall a workstation back to i386 because of it, or I would > have filed some bug reports. Yeah, that's likly true what you say about server vs desktop. I'm going to slap a 64 bit copy on now and see how it does. Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 13:58:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABA916A417 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252F813C465 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB8220B403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:18 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmBQxXnWZJt8 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2882320B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:12 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:58:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2623195.4HOXyxjHuc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701110758.09434.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:19 -0000 --nextPart2623195.4HOXyxjHuc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 January 2007 8:38 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Fetching > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All/k > > delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 > > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) > > or -f to f > > orce installation > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > vagabund# > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > support. Well, that and he's trying to install -RELEASE packages on a -RELEASE syste= m=20 with -STABLE ports. How does one tell ports to install -STABLE packages -= =20 is that uname-dependent? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2623195.4HOXyxjHuc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFpkJx5sRg+Y0CpvERAlh2AJ4/RnQ++tI/YwgHJZlNc02HtO1A4ACgj9DL CVQ4qMRLGdfo3j8gzUzak4I= =IYM5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2623195.4HOXyxjHuc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 14:20:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E3C16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BF013C46B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23707 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 14:20:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jan 2007 14:20:58 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A5AB52842F; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:20:57 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070111074322.GA702@host.my.domain> <20070111081840.GA965@host.my.domain> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:20:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070111081840.GA965@host.my.domain> (a.'s message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:18:40 +0200") Message-ID: <44tzyx1w6u.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Strange Emacs autoloaded library X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:20:59 -0000 a@zeos.net writes: >> I have removed the files >> menu-bar.el.gz >> menu-bar.elc >> from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp. >> But load-history variable still shows me >> /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/menu-bar.elc >> loaded and menu-bar appeared at emacs startup. >> >> What is this? >> >> Any other library from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/ >> does not load being deleted. >> >> Elisej Babenko > > I was wrong with the last thesis: > startup.el.gz > startup.elc > and may be some other libraries behave in the same strange manner. > They are loaded being deleted from /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/. > > My question is the same. Some libraries are dumped with the executable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 14:25:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B8C16A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B817A13C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H50s0-0006XB-0R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:25:32 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:25:31 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:25:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:25:12 +0100 Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:25:55 -0000 Jeff MacDonald wrote: > When I did a default install of ubuntu, it saw all 4 gigs without a > hitch. So does that mean it already includes PAE, or something else ? Yes, AFAIK some newer Linuxes (and Windows SP2) include PAE by default. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 14:29:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386DD16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C87113C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (vqlwxk@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BETJMX096129; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:29:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l0BETJ1t096128; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:29:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:29:19 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701111429.l0BETJ1t096128@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, niek@bigfoot.com In-Reply-To: <45A628CF.5020504@bigfoot.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:29:25 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, niek@bigfoot.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:29:41 -0000 Niek wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > > > > > 3) The largest complaint about sysinstall is that it's not graphical. The > > > problem is that a graphical installation program has some -severe- > > > constraints on it. First, it has to work in ALL instances. That means, > > > 640x480x16 colors VGA screen. You have a lot of people out there > > > installing on systems that have, for example, monitors with inadequate > > > horizontal/vertical frequency ranges and very capabable video cards, > > > unless you force the X-server to use the original VGA resolution, it's > > > going to overdrive those monitors and the user is going to see a black > > > screen when the installation program comes up. And the only way FreeBSD > > > is going to get a graphical anything is by using Xorg, and FreeBSD does > > > not maintain that distribution - so we are now dependent on the Xorg > > > group writing their code with no bugs for our installation program to work. > > > While I admit that sysinstall could be polished at the rough edges, > I vote for a non-graphical installer for server aimed installations. Nobody is going to put a graphical-only installer in FreeBSD. How do people get that idea? Currently, FreeBSD's installer runs on standard VGA graphics cards, on monochrome Hercules cards, on serial VT100 terminals, maybe even on hardcopy terminals and everything else that you could imagine. Not to mention the scriptability for easy installation of a larger number of headless machines. And all of that won't change. If the installer -- sysinstall or other -- will support graphical mode one day, it will be an addition, not a replacement. For example, look at the "BSD installer" that's used by DragonFly BSD: It consists of the actual code that performas the various installation actions (and is also scriptable), and supports a number of front- ends. The standard front-end is curses-based and will run in text mode on any VGA and serial terminal. But you could as well have a graphical front-end or a web- based front-end. Or one that communicates with your cell-phone. Or whatever else you could think of. All based on the same installer code (back-end). If FreeBSD grows a new installer, I' sure it will use similar concepts. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. Python is executable pseudocode. Perl is executable line noise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 14:35:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF93816A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E9B13C448 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9C71A4D89; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E98651433; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:35:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:35:12 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20070111143511.GB29188@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110330.19381.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111023834.GA50897@xor.obsecurity.org> <200701110758.09434.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MW5yreqqjyrRcusr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701110758.09434.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:35:13 -0000 --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:58:08AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 8:38 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: >=20 > > > Fetching > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/All= /k > > > delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 > > > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) > > > or -f to f > > > orce installation > > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > > vagabund# > > > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built with > > WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use packages > > you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of including cups > > support. >=20 > Well, that and he's trying to install -RELEASE packages on a -RELEASE sys= tem=20 > with -STABLE ports. How does one tell ports to install -STABLE packages = -=20 > is that uname-dependent? Yeah, if uname =3D *-STABLE it gets the stable packages. You can just set PACKAGESITE if you want to use the poorly-tested but updated stable packages on a release system. Kris --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpksfWry0BWjoQKURAiYWAKCFnR+t68evEly0GxtMKkg0Rwo09ACfTMsW aBipydJfuFNSiR2ajlaJLiw= =5AyX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 14:49:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1F716A494 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DDB13C469 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (juzmjk@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BEmraC099464; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:48:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l0BEmrR1099463; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:48:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:48:53 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701111448.l0BEmrR1099463@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, nathan@vidican.com In-Reply-To: <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:48:59 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, nathan@vidican.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:49:01 -0000 Nathan Vidican wrote: > James Long wrote: > > Yeah, and even a user with no account or password, a screwdriver, and > > a Mountain Dew. > > Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call > me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > still managed to kill the server ;) Reminds me of this one ... http://www.secnetix.de/~olli/fun/bruteforce-cat.jpg Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 15:33:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FB516A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD41013C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BFSgsZ003707; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:28:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0BFSfRj003706; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:28:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:28:41 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20070111152841.GA3657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:33:23 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:52:29PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 1/10/07, Chris wrote: > >On 10/01/07, Josef Grosch wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:44:36AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:51AM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > >> > > >> > > On 1/9/07, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >> > > > ... much excised ... > >Monday > >> morning quarterbacks. > >> > >> Josef > >> > >> -- > >> Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 > >> jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. > >> > > > >What I think freebsd needs. > > > >1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one > >such example is NFS. > >2 - A better installer, this is probably the biggest single thing that > >puts people of freebsd, the less people using freebsd the less funds > >likely to be recieved. > > > Could you articulate on point 2?... I don't really see that as a problem. Well, for me, I find that the installer problems are that some of the wording for some of the choices seems unclear and sometimes you seem to have to go back to go forward and things like that. I know that there is an intent to allow you to back up any time (as long as you haven't passed a point of no return like writing the disklabel) and make changes and add or subtract things, but still, it could make it more clear what stage you are at, what is finished and what is next to do, etc. But, as others have said, I have found it to be quite functional and installation really quite easy outside of some of the awkwardnesses. As for his point on funds, I am not sure, but I suppose he is presuming that if people get turned off by the installer, then they won't be FreeBSD enthusiasts who make donations or something. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 15:44:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DD016A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF45F13C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BFdhQZ003763; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:39:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0BFdhvc003762; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:39:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:39:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Dak Ghatikachalam Message-ID: <20070111153943.GB3657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110222301.GA1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A56989.2060607@u.washington.edu> <20070110225821.GB1233@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <45A5AF03.6030308@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting Acrobat 9 to FBSD Mozilla / Opera and OT: installer promotion (was "Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ?") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:44:24 -0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:07:04PM -0500, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > I think it is about time that FREEBSD OS gets the act together by > integrating all the plugins for firefox. > > I have been trying to make these plugins work, Really, isnt't that a Firefox/Mozilla thing, plus possibly the creaters/maintainers of the plugins? FreeBSD does not create or maintain Firefox or the plugins. FreeBSD only accepts the port[s] to be in the FreeBSD ports collection. That's the way ports work. So, maybe you should get on the horn to the Firefox people. and maybe some people who support some of the plugins. ////jerry > not sure what more we need countering all plugins for firefox > > which could make work all, right now I could only view the video in cnn.com. > > Others like ABC news, google video, youtube, msnbc.ocm, and so many other > news networks, in general anything the videos from web browser are not > working > > either it is expecting the flash player ( I configured this but does not > seem to work) or shockwave player > > I found this linux tutorial giving some insight > http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialMozillaConfiguration.html#PLUGINS > > This is such a big deal, that we could not view any videos in firefox, > > I have compiled the mplayer, but that makes he cnn.com work not sure the > same mplayer can be used in the place of all those plugins out here. > > and then there is that big discussion I see in freebsd last month > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-December.txt.gz > > > regards > Dak > > > > > On 1/10/07, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Scott Mitchell wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>> Scott and Nikolas, > >>> I'll try to get the linuxplugin-wrapper port to work with Flash9 > >>> for Linux and then I'll submit the change upstream to the maintainer. I > >>> too am tired of the fact that Flash is so ubiquitous, but don't have > >>> much choice but to get it working. > >>> Aw well.. when in Rome, one must do as the Romans do.. even if > >>> it involves "hideous" plugins/content :). > >> > >> Garrett, > >> > >> That would be cool - I've not tried anything newer than Flash 7, > >although I > >> guess there wasn't anything newer until recently, for Linux > >anyway. Would > >> be great if you could get it to work. > >> > >> I've just noticed that there's a www/opera-linuxplugins port that > >appears > >> to install Opera 9.10 with the necessary configuration tweaks to use > >Linux > >> plugins. It should just be a matter of installing that, then adding the > >> install dirs of the various plugins to Opera's plugin path... > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Scott > > > >Yup, I know. I'll take a look into the opera linuxplugin wrapper port > >too so I can get both Mozilla and Opera sync'ed. I should start work > >sometime this weekend because I need to finish off another project > >(Javascript / HTML-based installer and package updater for work) before > >I move to California. > > > >Speaking of which, any Windows admins on this list want me to post the > >source for the installer / updater / package manager on sourceforge? It > >may come in handy. I don't expect anyone to use it for Unix since > >scripting in Unix is excellent already, but I'm going to automatically > >add in Windows support and maybe Mac OSX support as well, but that's > >iffy.. I'm only going to working for my IT firm for a while, so support > >would be beer-based funding, if anyone's interested :D. > > > >- -Garrett > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) > >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > >iD8DBQFFpa8DEnKyINQw/HARAtEGAJ4tKn0wA9VjttQK4WO3xDpwNGXJOgCfV23U > >sVzMixzcti0ss4J9nUTv9lg= > >=dOMI > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 15:58:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B336316A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4BC13C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BFrWaa003830; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0BFrWsL003829; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:32 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Lion G." Message-ID: <20070111155332.GC3657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:58:13 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:29:45AM -0500, Lion G. wrote: > Hi all, I have a weird question. > > In my previous many laptops, whenever I plug in > the earphone, the laptop speaker would stop > (and I would only hear music through the earphone) > > With my newest laptop (Acer Aspire 5050), > the laptop speaker stays on no-matter-what. > I would hear the same music in both > the speaker and the earphone. > > I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. > The driver reports: > pcm0: mem > 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 > pcm0: > pcm0: > > Another piece of info: > The microphone hole has both the microphone symbol > and the SPDIF symbol on it. Apparently the laptop > uses the same hole for both plugging in a stereo microphone > and plugging in a SPDIF device. > > Also, none of the items in the mixer helps: > they raise or drop both the speaker+earphone volume simultaneously. This is not a software issue. Some jacks are built with a make-and-break setup. With that, when the plug goes in, it presses back a contact that functions as a switch for some other circuit - in this case, one that drives the onboard speaker - thus disconnecting it whil the plug is in. Apparently your new piece of hardware does not have that feature. Probably they were cheaping out by a few cents. The only fix is to replace the jack. Unfortunately it is probably built in, in such a way as to be very difficult to replace. ////jerry > > I'm out of ideas. Has any one seen something like this? > > Thanks all! > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page > www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:32:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC37716A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC20C13C459 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.217] (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BGWWfU052846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:32:34 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <45A66672.1090704@unsane.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:31:46 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry McAllister References: <20070111155332.GC3657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070111155332.GC3657@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Lion G." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:32:00 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:29:45AM -0500, Lion G. wrote: > >> Hi all, I have a weird question. >> >> In my previous many laptops, whenever I plug in >> the earphone, the laptop speaker would stop >> (and I would only hear music through the earphone) >> >> With my newest laptop (Acer Aspire 5050), >> the laptop speaker stays on no-matter-what. >> I would hear the same music in both >> the speaker and the earphone. >> >> I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. >> The driver reports: >> pcm0: mem >> 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 >> pcm0: >> pcm0: >> >> Another piece of info: >> The microphone hole has both the microphone symbol >> and the SPDIF symbol on it. Apparently the laptop >> uses the same hole for both plugging in a stereo microphone >> and plugging in a SPDIF device. >> >> Also, none of the items in the mixer helps: >> they raise or drop both the speaker+earphone volume simultaneously. > > This is not a software issue. > Some jacks are built with a make-and-break setup. With that, when > the plug goes in, it presses back a contact that functions as a > switch for some other circuit - in this case, one that drives > the onboard speaker - thus disconnecting it whil the plug is in. > Apparently your new piece of hardware does not have that feature. > Probably they were cheaping out by a few cents. > The only fix is to replace the jack. Unfortunately it is probably > built in, in such a way as to be very difficult to replace. Actually i had this same problem with the first version of Ariff's driver which went away when I used a later version. I would have thought it a hardware issue as Jerry suggests if I didnt have my system as a dual boot (it worked fine in windows.) are you using the latest version from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ if not then its worth a try. it could be worth asking on freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org (the link listed suggests the the information you should supply. Vince > > ////jerry > >> I'm out of ideas. Has any one seen something like this? >> >> Thanks all! >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page >> www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:34:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454CA16A417 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC7813C45D for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so468663uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:34:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fg9b6zMtNFIHonlcuah0OuEagm/cBG07yDMJzTHf7u0u3BMLCwx84y6s8N7dPNZImOg9C2NSeJ7G+0T7IBpKGUevZXbA9YKhY9UTeC/vH9YEktiOviQmEVxzEH+HrdbvjtY2UMgu4NKEP7/bpAFew5iMFc3O+euMEFv3+E1bhgs= Received: by 10.67.93.6 with SMTP id v6mr1950835ugl.1168533259525; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:34:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:34:19 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: pyunyh@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20070111121904.GD33964@cdnetworks.co.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070111121904.GD33964@cdnetworks.co.kr> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: [SOLVED] re(4) incorrect checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:34:21 -0000 On 1/11/07, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > In if_re.c, rev 1.46.2.18 wpaul@ fixed a long standing checksum > offload issue by padding. Does re(4) work when you disable only Tx > checksum offload?(i.e. ifconfig re0 -txcsum) yes, because -txcsum also disables Rx checksum on my NIC. # ifconfig re0 .... options=1b .... # ifconfig re0 -txcsum .... options=18 .... > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon > -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:41:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1422116A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9771113C468 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0BGfOnx080424 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:23 +0100 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D16B6@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SuperMicro 2U servers? Thread-Index: Acc1TosmYUmBkte2RACp9OLBn9g8NAABQBqwABLte9A= References: <20070111062745.GA94155@xor.obsecurity.org> <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D16B3@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> From: "Philippe Lang" To: "freebsd-questions" X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Subject: RE: SuperMicro 2U servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:41:26 -0000 I wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is anyone using FreeBSD 6.X in production on SuperMicro 2U servers? >=20 > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/ More specifically: The motherboard of the server I'm interested in is: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/5000P/X7DBE.cfm In the OS compatibility list, Super Micro does not mention anything regarding FreeBSD 6.0... http://www.supermicro.com/support/resources/OS/5000PCompatibility.cfm Does that mean "untested", or "uncompatible"? Bye Philppe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:45:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A316A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B206F13C45E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liontanker@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.233.104]) by bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:45:06 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:45:06 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 18.97.7.63 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:45:04 GMT X-Originating-IP: [18.97.7.63] X-Originating-Email: [liontanker@hotmail.com] X-Sender: liontanker@hotmail.com From: "Lion G." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:45:04 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2007 16:45:06.0129 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9128410:01C7359F] Subject: RESOLVED (RE: Laptop speaker vs earphone) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:45:06 -0000 Thanks everyone, and especially a big thank to awesome Ariff Abdullah who solved it and confirmed it was software-based on this laptop! Lion Tanker wrote: >In my previous many laptops, whenever I plug in the earphone, the laptop >speaker >would stop (and I would only hear music through the earphone) >With my newest laptop (Acer Aspire 5050), the laptop speaker stays on >no-matter-what. >I would hear the same music in both the speaker and the earphone. Ariff Abdullah wrote: >Yes, it is done purely in software i.e the driver. >Basically the hardware will notify the driver whether >it can sense anything that is plug in or out, and the driver >must be made ready to handle such situation: mute/unmute >specific pin that connect to headphone plug or speakers. Ariff will commit the extra check into 7-CURRENT, so other users with Acer Aspire 5050 (or laptops like it) won't have to suffer the confusion I did. :) _________________________________________________________________ Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series.  Who will win? http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:56:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF9A16A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwc@shell01.TheWorld.com) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE30813C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwc@shell01.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BGj0fX027821; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:45:02 -0500 Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0BGidVg5287170; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0BGicb05272011; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0500 (EST) From: Ken Cochran Message-Id: <200701111644.l0BGicb05272011@shell01.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on pcls6.std.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2436/Thu Jan 11 06:48:19 2007 on pcls6.std.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: 4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:37 -0000 Hi: How I "refresh" a system binary? More specifically, I think I may have a compromised(?) named in /usr/sbin but what I have in /usr/obj should be fine; if not I still have it in /usr/src and can rebuild/reinstall it. So how would I do the "named only" part of an installworld? Or, to take it another step back, how to do the "named only" part of a buildworld, followed by the "named only part of an installworld? I have the dead-tree versions of both the Handbook & Lehey's book. Or, where might I find this/these procedures documented? Actually, what has really happened is a "wierdness" I'm trying to correct: (Maybe my named has been compromised somehow but there have been no messages in the nightly security runs.) In the wee hours of the morning, my upstream cablemodem provider dhcp'ed me a new ip-address. Ok, fine... (Dhclient seems working fine from what the system log & tcpdump are showing.) I can ping/traceroute (to) my system from outside (proper stuff shows up in tcpdump too) but I can't ping/traceroute *from* my system to anywhere (not even by ip-address). I can ping "myself" (the newly assigned ip-address just fine. Hmm, name service isn't working correctly (I run a local cache-only DNS, BIND 8.3.7, ya, old but someday...), so I kill & restart named. The appropriate named startup messages appear in the messages-log, e.g. "listening on [new ip-address]. Here's the wierd part: tcpdump shows DNS "priming" requests (to the various *.root-servers.net addresses) with a *source* ip of my *previous* ip-address, not the new one. So far, *no* NS requests show the proper source address; they all show the old ip-address & not the new one. Also, so far, behavior survives reloading, restarting & completely killing & restarting named. Umm... what else can I think of... No external IPs are in the named config and/or zone files, only local 192.168 & 127 things. I can't find any zombie processes so far(?) OS is: 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 28 03:17:35 CST 2004 Yes, I know, very old... I do plan to upgrade... This system is very creaky nowadays & I'm very reluctant to reboot it; might not come back up. :( Ideas? Many thanks, -kc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 16:59:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2063916A416 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36EA13C46C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BH1nOU038837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:01:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168534909; bh=Ek23tmI6nnUDg6vrLR2ws6cZo6k=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FccZE4BnSVRCQsBfCwHJcUlF5QK+ZiStIa0c2L muIlqYhqGwX2mxBFC1qxmizFaf6x1uvKRFmO0Bqp1RxB3lsA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=AoVF0kiD5XiBl8t9CfVaOd3CEeJK0sCinC/2t6zhgElONdVY8M6SsI31MMmog6qi6 ELazCiVTQr3qTEY0e04sw== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0BH1mB9038823; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:01:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:01:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20070111120113.A57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:59:24 -0000 yOn Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:24:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: >> >> Apologies for top-posting. >> >> I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on >> "namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >> supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >> support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >> loadable doesn't help, either. >> >> It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using >> the driver source from the 3ware site. >> >> Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? > > Might some of the following information from 3ware be of help? > > http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15003 This details exactly what I need to do. However, the drivers that SHOULD be attached to the article are NOT. -Dan Mahoney -- "GO HOME AND COOK!!!" Donielle Cocossa, Taco Bell, 2:30 AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:14:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4504516A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EF413C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2007 12:14:25 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTO42452; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:14:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2007 12:14:18 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17830.28730.65008.456825@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:13:30 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200701111644.l0BGicb05272011@shell01.TheWorld.com> References: <200701111644.l0BGicb05272011@shell01.TheWorld.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090207.45A66E9B.00E2,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: 4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:14:26 -0000 Ken Cochran writes: > How I "refresh" a system binary? Assuming your source tree is the same version as installed system ... I have been able to just go to the appropriate directory, type "make && make install". This _not_ the canonical way, and I wouldn't bet the rent money on it. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:27:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE616A47B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: from web54304.mail.yahoo.com (web54304.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D97C213C45D for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: (qmail 56389 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2007 17:01:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.hk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=EFluuXKmT8KK4efeccHdOT36WDE/tLvakJYo5qiOfaXujLmkHkwTwpTo1IOZcqZk5tCsImPGPYbnw51GQK2gf/qw9IC1keGyC7ntUnXRrLArX9PPrr3aWbnfbqCQPYyOnrnv7cG4RFNzvGVlL9fBU6Q8qa9Up0oKb+bG6U8ubFk=; X-YMail-OSG: M.Dp.nkVM1kLvyVBejpAkYMonXqOt6N0oJKa6RZfFnwPU4hgCnOJ1pMzAmDlJwvoAWNy0NYxosHWg3PizSWSeSvL.foGNoFWlU_Ye7sFKZjj3w-- Received: from [61.15.61.52] by web54304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:09 PST Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:09 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Dung To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <639923.56141.qm@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:50 -0000 Hi Suppose I have mistype a command: # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless reboot: 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0 Any ideas? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:27:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4873916A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: from web54311.mail.yahoo.com (web54311.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9E0813C46B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: (qmail 94362 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2007 17:01:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.hk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fdUwtre0wpBMAkm6a0MHp/+KljOaWRR9MU73sIQATc1/yxOxYBPjDt2wweMjUF8SxMLOq/6ASKWyzRs0fdQuFIXMmIBB1CKvTHwcIJ8aPMTR2JJmjuCFnITF8YMBIZ4Sz+lCV1HfXUrhuQrt9QbpBGxRovx36unDtfUkmCPrVxE=; X-YMail-OSG: RVHSKwkVM1ntJBzciqUuUvEdbmOIbLEuz7sMVo9QBRgWk.3d.urFUgbWSLqH2nt2wj6H.JCvfXmmXeqWsKbJ7fdN6DG0X0c1tlJb3f17Ptk9yYKzavE9xF4m9zj304pbIcevDB9M9gDmAJ4- Received: from [61.15.61.52] by web54311.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:14 PST Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:14 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Dung To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <755188.94085.qm@web54311.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:27:56 -0000 Hi Suppose I have mistype a command: # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless reboot: 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0 Any ideas? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:51:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6597A16A59A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD4113C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from p4223e3d4.np.schlund.de ([212.227.35.66] helo=nero.net.schlund.de) by pubbox.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H545N-000C76-Sx; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:51:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:54:32 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: Ken Cochran Message-Id: <20070111185432.4e58ba54.armin@pubbox.net> In-Reply-To: <200701111644.l0BGicb05272011@shell01.TheWorld.com> References: <200701111644.l0BGicb05272011@shell01.TheWorld.com> Organization: PUBBOX X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.10-stable nameserver strange behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:51:37 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0500 (EST) Ken Cochran wrote: > Hi: > > How I "refresh" a system binary? > > More specifically, I think I may have a compromised(?) named > in /usr/sbin but what I have in /usr/obj should be fine; > if not I still have it in /usr/src and can rebuild/reinstall it. > > So how would I do the "named only" part of an installworld? I would try something like: cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named make install Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer, free email address at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:57:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872F116A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from pubbox.net (pubbox.net [81.169.167.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ADE13C471 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arminius@pubbox.net) Received: from p4223e3d4.np.schlund.de ([212.227.35.66] helo=nero.net.schlund.de) by pubbox.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H54Ba-000Ct3-5f; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:57:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:00:57 +0100 From: Armin Arh To: Patrick Dung Message-Id: <20070111190057.0bb0bda5.armin@pubbox.net> In-Reply-To: <755188.94085.qm@web54311.mail.yahoo.com> References: <755188.94085.qm@web54311.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: PUBBOX X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: arminius@pubbox.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:59 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:14 -0800 (PST) Patrick Dung wrote: > Hi > > Suppose I have mistype a command: > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 > What is the output of "netstat -nrf inet" ? Does "route delete 192.168.3.0" help? Armin -- PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer, free email address at http://pubbox.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:58:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B30316A4FF for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2778213C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E881A4D93; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A7E45156B; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:58:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:58:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20070111175832.GA33734@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070111070008.GA94580@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111070008.GA94580@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:58:35 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > Hi Kris, > >=20 > > I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that > > the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and > > at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now. >=20 > Mark, what is the status of the upload of these packages? OK, I've uploaded the packages now and they'll begin propagating out to the mirrors. Kris --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpnrIWry0BWjoQKURAqcWAJkBhK8IL69fyJRql4J7wHe5ivZLQwCgtav3 SP9rmCGTIMGiiKGbQSynW60= =IkPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 17:59:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38B016A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C8E13C46B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so954366nfc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:59:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oWc1AAhBCyKT9cOzKm1Me/p363wL6pHagMCgYK6IF0XvQ3R5TzPZcmOxonelB3fF9+5d8VfgA2fkj7uy1KbXRsqPOcJ71bavQALuJQOUhbKxIaa9mMq41LpZD40mmCmIDglxt5vMrSgtl6x0RtMUJ2Lfbu+ofdXdL2gx2Ra6UP8= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr375434buc.1168538396989; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.134.19 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:59:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:59:56 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: Freminlins In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070110003730.GA94711@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110154436.GA97702@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070110161721.GA68022@mooseriver.com> <3aaaa3a0701100901j119e2566yf1718f140027f7d1@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:59:58 -0000 Yes, they dont solve this whatsoever. Its a severely broken code issue in the attr caching mechanism. Honest..give it a shot. Even with very very slow ATA, local builds of the kernel or world are faster than over 1G NFS to an F6000 series filer, and the filer will still thrash on WAFL metadata requests for the client, cuz everytime ../.. walks somewhere the client knows nothing and it's all sent over the wire again. Over and over and over. Thats as much as I understand about it, freebsd-fs has great detail on this "bug". On 1/11/07, Freminlins wrote: > On 11/01/07, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > > > The basic reason is that a ../.. walk invalidates cached metadata, and > > you end up with a pipe full of getattr's all of the time. Freebsd-fs > > has discussed this a bit, but no fixing is coming soon. We use linux > > to compile builds, we'd like to use Freebsd, but linux on Filers via > > NFS is about 3x faster than the same builds on Fbsd to the same filer. > > ../.. baby. > > > > > Did you try different mount options on the FreeBSD clients. I have no idea, > but Linux may have different defaults. > > Frem. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 18:12:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1373616A55A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B8413C441 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (jchobm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BICZBt017316; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:12:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l0BICZm0017315; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:12:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:12:35 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701111812.l0BICZm0017315@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk In-Reply-To: <639923.56141.qm@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:12:41 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:12:43 -0000 Patrick Dung wrote: > Suppose I have mistype a command: > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 So you swapped gateway and netmask. Nasty mistake. :-) It's usually better to use CIDR notation (with a slash followed by the number of network bits), to avoid any confusion. It's also less typing. # route add 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.3.1 > There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless > reboot: > > 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0 How did you try to remove it (exact comand line, please), and what was the error message that you got? You should enter exactly the same line you used to add the route, only replace "add" with "delete". It works fine for me, so I assume you did a syntax error when trying to remove it. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "The last good thing written in C was Franz Schubert's Symphony number 9." -- Erwin Dieterich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 18:13:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC15416A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DB613C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id FAA16779; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:13:28 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:13:27 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070111175832.GA33734@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:13:40 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > OK, I've uploaded the packages now and they'll begin propagating out > to the mirrors. Thanks again. Now I'm right out of excuses, eh? Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 18:40:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849EA16A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B1E13C45B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@t-online.de) Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H54qi-0006di-09; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:40:28 +0100 Received: from p54a562db.dip.t-dialin.net (GEB2AuZcoeocmUzHcObdq9IuZdS2THSj5hT7JRA-wMey0HzPuVSB41@[84.165.98.219]) by fwd33.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H54qY-07JAbA0; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:40:18 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:42:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200701102349.05260.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <200701110411.00479.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> <20070111031338.GA9583@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070111031338.GA9583@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111942.07479.stevan-tiefert@t-online.de> X-ID: GEB2AuZcoeocmUzHcObdq9IuZdS2THSj5hT7JRA-wMey0HzPuVSB41 X-TOI-MSGID: b0254064-51e1-4b98-9bd0-29e00c5c0f84 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: general question about packages and ports working together [solved] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:40:32 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 04:13 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:10:59AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 04:05 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:47:34AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 03:38 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 02:47 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > portaudit suggested me to update kdelibs. Ok I've done it via > > > > > > > > ports. Two days later I wanted to add the package > > > > > > > > de-koffice-i18n. The package de-koffice-i18n tried to install > > > > > > > > also my unsecure kdelibs again, if I hadn't stopped it I > > > > > > > > would now have two kdelibs on my harddrive... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May it be that the packages are not accepting the newer > > > > > > > > versions from the ports? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, this should not be it. Post the exact output of the > > > > > > > commands you tried so we can try to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > > > > > Excuse me! It seems that I need sleep :-( It is 3:30 am in my > > > > > > country... > > > > > > > > > > > > That is the right log: > > > > > > > > > > > > vagabund# pkg_add -r de-koffice-i18n > > > > > > Fetching > > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release > > > > > >/Lat es t/de-koffice-i18n.tbz... Done. > > > > > > Fetching > > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release > > > > > >/All /k delibs-3.5.1_1.tbz... Done. > > > > > > pkg_add: package 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' conflicts with > > > > > > kdelibs-nocups-3.5.5 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to > > > > > > remove conflicting package(s) or -f to f > > > > > > orce installation > > > > > > pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'kdelibs-3.5.1_1' failed! > > > > > > vagabund# > > > > > > > > > > That's the problem, you have a conflicting package (kdelibs built > > > > > with WITHOUT_CUPS set) installed. If you really want to use > > > > > packages you'll need to revert that to the standard setting of > > > > > including cups support. > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > Hello Kris, > > > > > > > > that is the problem... The other mail I sent before handles abaout > > > > the kdelibs-upgrade I did two days ago. And you will see, that the > > > > building stopped where cups should be integrated. You see also, that > > > > it failed and that was the reason I installed the kdelibs-nocups > > > > port. The kdelibs don't want to be installed. I don't understand > > > > why... > > > > > > OK, that's what you need to solve. You can either post your errors > > > here so we can try to solve them, or just delete the nocups port and > > > go with the package. > > > > > > Kris > > > > Hello again, > > > > this is the log of kdelibs3: > > > > vagabund# cd /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 > > vagabund# make install >& ~/kdelibs3-install.log > > vagabund# > > > > And here are the last few raws of kdelibs3-install.log: > > OK, make sure everything required by kdelibs is up-to-date (with > portupgrade -R kdelibs or similar). It is buildable on a clean 4.x > system, although since 4.x is EOL in a couple of weeks you might > prefer to spend your time on an upgrade to a supported version like > 6.2. > > Kris ... many hours and a "portupgrade -R kdelibs" later ... It works now... And the lessons learned today: "I forgot one small argument on the command line..." what a pity... Thanks honestly for this help. With regards Stevan Tiefert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 18:57:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846E716A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in08.adhost.com (mail-in07.adhost.com [216.211.128.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E58213C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in08.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB538FC33 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:57:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:56:51 -0800 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160187E451@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Kernel Config Recommendations for AMD Chip thread-index: Acc1skDL9gQq6BbwR1SsQ8G0Y7wWbw== From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: Subject: Kernel Config Recommendations for AMD Chip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:57:10 -0000 Hello All: I've spent my entire FreeBSD life in /sys/i386 using Intel chips. We have a new server with the AMD processor listed below and I'm wondering if: 1) I should stay in /sys/i386 with different configuration variables; or 2) Compile out of /sys/amd64 Any insights would be greatly appreciated. CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240 EE (1396.03-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0xf5a Stepping =3D 10 =20 Features=3D0x78bfbff AMD Features=3D0xe0500800 Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 18:58:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B56A16A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C00713C44C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BIw9pC029993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:58:09 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BIw8Gp011555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:58:08 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.11.104432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:58:10 -0000 Just wondering if anyone has IPFilter / nfsd setup properly on their boxes with any beta versions of FBSD. I am having loads of issues transferring large files (~300MB apiece) or issues transferring a large number of smaller files (3MB ~ 10MB apiece) from a FBSD 6.1 client to a FBSD 6.1 server, where it transfers part of the files, then cp / mv get stuck indefinitely on the client system. The stuck cp / mv processes cause the client to hang on reboot, and then terminate before all of the buffers are written to disk (which forces fsck on next boot). Also if you suggest 7-CURRENT, what's the CVS tag for that version? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 19:40:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EF516A619 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED5413C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail015-S [10.13.128.15]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0BJeW7x016321; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail015 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail015/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0BJeVwd012390; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:40:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:40:31 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" Message-ID: in-reply-to: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160187E451@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> references: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D5203160187E451@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:40:31 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Config Recommendations for AMD Chip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:40:33 -0000 On Thursday, January 11, 2007, at 10:20AM, "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" wrote: >Hello All: > >I've spent my entire FreeBSD life in /sys/i386 using Intel chips. We >have a new server with the AMD processor listed below and I'm wondering >if: > >1) I should stay in /sys/i386 with different configuration variables; or >2) Compile out of /sys/amd64 This question has been asked about a bazillion times on this mailing list. Try starting here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?db=irt&id=45768F34.8020705@esiee.fr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 19:52:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64D316A506 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC3C13C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0BJJpvD098914; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:19:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:57:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111257.54988.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:19:58 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2436/Thu Jan 11 06:48:19 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Ma Subject: Re: Fatal trap 30: reserved (unknown) fault while in kernel mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:52:44 -0000 On Sunday 17 December 2006 23:17, Ma wrote: > I'm using the newest FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE on our web server (compiled at > last friday, 06-12-15). But it always crashes these days. > The following information displayed on the screen with system crashed. > ==================================================== > Fatal trap 30: reserved (unknown) fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0b9bed1 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xdc95fcd8 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xdc95fcd8 > code segment = base 0x0, limit oxfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflag = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 > current process = 10 (idle: cpu1) > trap number = 30 > panic: reserved (unknown) fault > cpuid = 1 > uptime: 3m52s > ahc0: WARNING no command for scb 79 (cmdcmplt) > QOUTPOS = 235 You need to put 'ddb' in your kernel and run 'show lapic' and 'show apic' and provide a verbose dmesg. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 19:56:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238DE16A4A0 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B1513C4AA for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (static-66-15-37-137.bdsl.verizon.net [66.15.37.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0BJZfeQ000674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: Doug Hardie Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:35:38 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/2436/Thu Jan 11 03:48:19 2007 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:56:18 -0000 I have a medium sized application where the source is all in a CVS repository. Basically it works great as I am able to retrieve any previous version of a module when needed. Most of the changes to the application are quickly resolved, CVS committed and the production system updated in less than a day. Recently, I made a fairly large update to the application that took about 4 weeks to complete. During that time I was not able to fix small problems as there was no way to update the production system without incorporating a large number of changes from the new update that were just not working yet. Basically all small corrections were made to the new system but not incorporated into the production system until the new stuff was completed. There were no real problems from this, but it was not really convenient. Now I am going to be embarking on a revision that will take about 6 months to complete. Obviously I will not be able to wait till the completion to fix minor problems. So I am going to need to do something with branches. I have dug through the man pages and believe that is the best approach. However, given that I need to maintain the current version with a probably small number of fixes during the development process what is the best approach? Should I branch off the production version as a new branch and keep the main one for the new development or the other way around. Will it be easier to merge the fixes to the production branch back in to the new system later or should those fixes be made to both branches at the same time? Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. Thanks, -- Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 19:58:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FD816A492 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [216.148.227.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F7013C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net (c-69-180-171-46.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[69.180.171.46]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070111194551m11001novae>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:45:51 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gw.veldy.net [192.168.1.3]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656A917023 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:45:50 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <45A693EF.7070009@veldy.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:45:51 -0600 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Which build to use for Intel Core 2 Duo 64-bit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:58:26 -0000 Which build should I use to build a native 64-bit installation on an Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600)? Can I use the AMD64 build? Is there anything I should be careful when rebuilding from source after a cvsup? Can I just use the AMD64 build and CPUTYPE=nocona in /etc/make.conf ? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 20:08:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E8A16A416 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkhavkine@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED513C442 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkhavkine@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so993690nfc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Zt+GFOrrlvNz+wzT/yYOqqh/NKlYCBS9oqJMj9iGpNchoyZLIZC3V7rfuX2nG2CDMRcQS0Nxo7lmF3SWLxGA2dHQHrrkRa87SZntthBlkTS38vlymHDH7N10ZuiG//f4JAyBTqkggRj7kycI/9w8t4sVLhWVSee8x1rOVf4ZcDU= Received: by 10.82.183.19 with SMTP id g19mr397712buf.1168544325802; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.165.18 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:38:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:38:45 -0500 From: "Paul Khavkine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: EDT time zone change in 2007 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:03 -0000 Hi. There's has been changes to how Daylight Saving Time is observed in eastern canada in 2007: http://www.timetemperature.com/tzca/daylight_saving_time_canada.shtml Is there anything that needs to be done to FreeBSD to reflect the changes ? Thanx Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 20:08:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABD216A415 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F137113C46A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so993690nfc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cJDoO1OvbRJOP5FmQ/UN4bKs+VdJk/5/O9rF3s/bYR3sQKqm8YWA4Wwoy6z6kOnHFdAtW3a1MGsP9dWlZ/gKlQ+Gu5B+QrpTbROPR0pLO0aLHDMvVsvMfSS3u8Z7TVCTlZJHKXWZDIu74wcJQwks+q6b8jtdJUjZk1CuQ3h9nsk= Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr403129bud.1168546092572; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:08:06 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: "Doug Hardie" In-Reply-To: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5c70ab66176c8378 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:08:14 -0000 On 1/11/07, Doug Hardie wrote: > one for the new development or the other way around. Will it be > easier to merge the fixes to the production branch back in to the new > system later or should those fixes be made to both branches at the > same time? Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. > Thanks, This is really a basic stream management question, not specific to freebsd, or CVS for that matter. Perhaps you should reference one of numerous texts on stream management, and find a development model that is most comfortable for you. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 20:41:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B02116A412 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4113C461 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (a17-128-113-37.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BJqBEh015947; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 61E513006A; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:11 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807125-a4252bb000006e4c-c5-45a6956ba0a0 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 4F7D530065; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:10 -0800 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:41:06 -0000 On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has IPFilter / nfsd setup properly on > their boxes with any beta versions of FBSD. It is typically not useful to implement firewall rules between NFS servers and legitimate NFS clients. The large number of RPC services using randomly assigned ports needed by NFS and the fact that machines which trust each other enough to permit filesharing and generally utilize a common set of directory services to keep the user/group mappings synced mean that the NFS server & clients should be considered in the same "trust domain" in most cases. > Also if you suggest 7-CURRENT, what's the CVS tag for that version? The HEAD of the CVS tree (aka "."). Updating the 7-CURRENT won't have any affect upon firewall configuration for NFS, however. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 20:54:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0248416A40F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B1913C45D for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BKs8MS005946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:54:08 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BKs854002061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:54:08 -0800 Message-ID: <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:54:07 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.11.123933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Firewalls and RPC (was "Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?)") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:54:09 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Just wondering if anyone has IPFilter / nfsd setup properly on their >> boxes with any beta versions of FBSD. > > It is typically not useful to implement firewall rules between NFS > servers and legitimate NFS clients. > > The large number of RPC services using randomly assigned ports needed > by NFS and the fact that machines which trust each other enough to > permit filesharing and generally utilize a common set of directory > services to keep the user/group mappings synced mean that the NFS > server & clients should be considered in the same "trust domain" in > most cases. Right, ok. I suppose I was just being lazy/trying to blanket support all machines on my subnet without having to delve into individual hosts, but that makes perfect sense. rpcbind (and RPC in general) strictly uses ports under 1023--assuming that there are enough allocatable ports available for each RPC service in the port range 1-1023--if running as root, does it not? Does the same rationale apply for Samba? That's part of the reason why I'm concerned with running a firewall.. I run smbd/nmbd on the server machine. Either that, or I could switch to another firewall setup (albeit it'd be sort of a pain). Does ipfw / pf work better with RPC than IPFilter? >> Also if you suggest 7-CURRENT, what's the CVS tag for that version? > > The HEAD of the CVS tree (aka "."). Updating the 7-CURRENT won't have > any affect upon firewall configuration for NFS, however. Right. I was just going to see if there was any improvement in how things were implemented in 7-CURRENT, because maybe the issues that I'm encountering had been 'solved' in 7-CURRENT (although I would probably have more issues with core kernel items as they're under heavy development it appears given traffic on the current@ list). Thanks Chuck! -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 21:32:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAD216A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B3613C457 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BLWtta007133; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:32:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id E63064004D; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:32:54 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807126-a5e89bb000000245-07-45a6ad060ddf Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id D8F3440098; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:32:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1BB74CBD-0BEA-43C7-8635-01AFB790A5AA@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:32:54 -0800 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewalls and RPC (was "Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?)") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:32:55 -0000 On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> It is typically not useful to implement firewall rules between NFS >> servers and legitimate NFS clients. >> >> The large number of RPC services using randomly assigned ports >> needed by NFS and the fact that machines which trust each other >> enough to permit filesharing and generally utilize a common set of >> directory services to keep the user/group mappings synced mean >> that the NFS server & clients should be considered in the same >> "trust domain" in most cases. > Right, ok. I suppose I was just being lazy/trying to blanket > support all machines on my subnet without having to delve into > individual hosts, but that makes perfect sense. rpcbind (and RPC in > general) strictly uses ports under 1023--assuming that there are > enough allocatable ports available for each RPC service in the port > range 1-1023--if running as root, does it not? Actually, no. While rpcbind/portmap/portmapper is assigned to 111/ tcp & udp, most other RPC services get assigned high port numbers in the 327xx range, but that varies considerably from platform to platform. > Does the same rationale apply for Samba? That's part of the reason > why I'm concerned with running a firewall.. I run smbd/nmbd on the > server machine. Somewhat, yes. Samba/CIFS filesharing can require less trust between server and client as accessing a Samba share does not require superuser permissions, just limited user access, but Samba does require root access to start up and bind to the low ports it uses, and it also involves the "network browse master" (which nmbd can do) and so forth which involve subnet-oriented broadcast traffic. Samba/CIFS is a chatty protocol. > Either that, or I could switch to another firewall setup (albeit > it'd be sort of a pain). Does ipfw / pf work better with RPC than > IPFilter? No, not really. What you probably want to focus on is protecting your entire subnet, including the fileserver and clients, from malicious traffic via your Internet link(s), and then worry about egress filtering, dividing your machines into a trusted internal LAN and a semi-trusted DMZ, and so forth. A firewall system should not be running any kind of filesharing; while you can run PF, IPFW, etc on your fileserver, that ought to be a secondary line of protection for "defense in depth", and your Internet connection ought to have a dual-homed or multihomed firewall machine which is dedicated to that role and which runs zero services. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 21:50:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4793416A47E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2325613C458 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BLonf5023890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:50:49 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BLomcb016071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: <45A6B138.7000409@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:50:48 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> <1BB74CBD-0BEA-43C7-8635-01AFB790A5AA@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1BB74CBD-0BEA-43C7-8635-01AFB790A5AA@mac.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.11.133932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Firewalls and RPC (was "Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?)") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:50:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Actually, no. While rpcbind/portmap/portmapper is assigned to 111/tcp & > udp, most other RPC services get assigned high port numbers in the 327xx > range, but that varies considerably from platform to platform. True. NFS is port 2049 by default, anyhow.. > Somewhat, yes. Samba/CIFS filesharing can require less trust between > server and client as accessing a Samba share does not require superuser > permissions, just limited user access, but Samba does require root > access to start up and bind to the low ports it uses, and it also > involves the "network browse master" (which nmbd can do) and so forth > which involve subnet-oriented broadcast traffic. > > Samba/CIFS is a chatty protocol. No kidding. The funny thing is that smbclient (Xbox Media Center runs smbclient) I've learned requires more open ports than regular CIFS enabled Windows XP hosts to RPC services, which has caused more issues than it's worth in the past. > No, not really. What you probably want to focus on is protecting your > entire subnet, including the fileserver and clients, from malicious > traffic via your Internet link(s), and then worry about egress > filtering, dividing your machines into a trusted internal LAN and a > semi-trusted DMZ, and so forth. > > A firewall system should not be running any kind of filesharing; while > you can run PF, IPFW, etc on your fileserver, that ought to be a > secondary line of protection for "defense in depth", and your Internet > connection ought to have a dual-homed or multihomed firewall machine > which is dedicated to that role and which runs zero services. Right. However, I don't trust the rest of the clients on my subnet other than the ones I maintain, so that's why I have setup the firewall rules I have. Sorry for not more clearly defining the situation earlier, but here's the reasoning / rationale for what I'm doing.. - -I live in a house with a shared LAN with a total of around 50 hosts connected / disconnected at various times of the day. - -I don't trust any of the Windows clients devoid a small handful because I have had a variety of connectivity problems caused by improperly managed personal machines, virii, and spyware on machines here. - -There isn't a real means of properly controlling IP distribution and people are free to change their IP addresses to whatever they choose (host information is set statically, not dynamically). - -I have 5 machines which have access to the network--2 serving machines and 3 clients which aren't always attached to the network. I have set the IP addresses up so they all lie in a range, but I don't trust whether someone will IP squat my address and do whatever they want to my serving machines (whether they mean to or it happens by accident). - -Some of the machines on the network have access to the machine serving via Samba, but that's a limited number. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFprE4EnKyINQw/HARAjwyAKCY9F8O2rkdet2/gxNNqCQXij0xgwCfSF3/ tswDC5ovt0A5r3Tg7s7BSqE= =iVhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 21:58:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5842416A403 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED8913C44B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BLwmDG019765; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 0C7CB30048; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:48 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807125-a3250bb000006e4c-e5-45a6b3170f62 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id E8D5D30012; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A6B138.7000409@u.washington.edu> References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> <1BB74CBD-0BEA-43C7-8635-01AFB790A5AA@mac.com> <45A6B138.7000409@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:47 -0800 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewalls and RPC (was "Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?)") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:58:50 -0000 On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Actually, no. While rpcbind/portmap/portmapper is assigned to 111/ >> tcp & >> udp, most other RPC services get assigned high port numbers in the >> 327xx >> range, but that varies considerably from platform to platform. > > True. NFS is port 2049 by default, anyhow.. Good example, yet this is true on some platforms but not on others. >> A firewall system should not be running any kind of filesharing; >> while >> you can run PF, IPFW, etc on your fileserver, that ought to be a >> secondary line of protection for "defense in depth", and your >> Internet >> connection ought to have a dual-homed or multihomed firewall machine >> which is dedicated to that role and which runs zero services. > > Right. However, I don't trust the rest of the clients on my subnet > other > than the ones I maintain, so that's why I have setup the firewall > rules > I have. You really don't want to mix machines which are trusted with machines which are not trusted on the same subnet. If you can't control which client machines get which IPs, you pretty much cannot use firewall rules to restrict filesharing only to the legit clients. > Sorry for not more clearly defining the situation earlier, but here's > the reasoning / rationale for what I'm doing.. > > > > - -I live in a house with a shared LAN with a total of around 50 hosts > connected / disconnected at various times of the day. > > - -I don't trust any of the Windows clients devoid a small handful > because > I have had a variety of connectivity problems caused by improperly > managed personal machines, virii, and spyware on machines here. > > - -There isn't a real means of properly controlling IP distribution > and > people are free to change their IP addresses to whatever they choose > (host information is set statically, not dynamically). > > - -I have 5 machines which have access to the network--2 serving > machines > and 3 clients which aren't always attached to the network. I have set > the IP addresses up so they all lie in a range, but I don't trust > whether someone will IP squat my address and do whatever they want > to my > serving machines (whether they mean to or it happens by accident). > > - -Some of the machines on the network have access to the machine > serving > via Samba, but that's a limited number. Perhaps you should consider setting up your own private subnet for your machines, and having a firewall guarding access to your machines which performs static NAT for the set of five IP addresses you've made claim to. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 22:06:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1864116A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C0B13C45A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BM4pcU028913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:26 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0BM4Qw6030404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:04:45 -0800 Message-ID: <45A6B464.5080107@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:04:20 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> <45A6A3EF.5030101@u.washington.edu> <1BB74CBD-0BEA-43C7-8635-01AFB790A5AA@mac.com> <45A6B138.7000409@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.11.134932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Firewalls and RPC (was "Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?)") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:06:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Swiger wrote: > You really don't want to mix machines which are trusted with machines > which are not trusted on the same subnet. If you can't control which > client machines get which IPs, you pretty much cannot use firewall rules > to restrict filesharing only to the legit clients. Excellent point. > Perhaps you should consider setting up your own private subnet for your > machines, and having a firewall guarding access to your machines which > performs static NAT for the set of five IP addresses you've made claim to. I'm really starting to think that'd be a good idea. Thanks again for the comments--it really helps. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFprRBEnKyINQw/HARAo8cAJ4sHIowqgCRbFMv6JDufsowxEDGGACePLKj NqyrOFDj6gbTQscMws0q6zg= =mDqk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 22:39:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B764016A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734A813C46C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H58Zc-0002j1-AR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:39:04 +0100 Received: from 83-131-104-224.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([83.131.104.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:39:04 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 83-131-104-224.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:39:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:38:34 +0100 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <45A693EF.7070009@veldy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-104-224.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <45A693EF.7070009@veldy.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: Which build to use for Intel Core 2 Duo 64-bit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:39:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Which build should I use to build a native 64-bit installation on an > Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600)? =20 AMD64 kernel, SMP variant. Specific compiler optimizations will not yield high enough benefits to be generally useful but it probably[*] won't hurt you. [*] There was a period when there was a bug in gcc which caused it to generate bad code for certain processor optimizations such as CPUTYPE=3DP= 4. --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFprxwldnAQVacBcgRAl9IAJsFrYHgyuXkMeuLp0ZuHhpLbfVEFgCg/g0j yD7DFcsA71BbAWqGpgRYqRU= =KAy3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 22:53:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701BC16A407; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr (postfix2-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5D313C441; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by postfix2-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334108DCADC; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:30:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF6627A9B; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:30:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665559D3DA; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41F6E405D; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:31:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:31:26 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Vishal Patil Message-ID: <20070111223126.GJ2616@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vpnc problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:53:33 -0000 Hi Vishal, First of all you should avoid cross-posting. Additionaly, I don't think this is a question for -hackers@. On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:50:26PM -0500, Vishal Patil wrote: > I have found the answer to this question. I basically had to edit the > vpnc-script and replace the body of the function "get_default_gw" with > > netstat -r -n | sed 's/default/0.0.0.0/' | grep '^0.0.0.0' | awk '{print > $2}' > > So now I have vpnc-0.3.3 working on FreeBSD. The port stands in security/vpnc, you should use it. It guess the maintainer has tried it before updating the port and pushed the appropriate patch into the ports tree. Regards -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 11 23:45:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EC916A407 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:45:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B0413C43E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:45:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H59bR-0002RR-Uo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:45:02 +0100 Received: from a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt ([81.84.41.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:45:01 +0100 Received: from nh by a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:45:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Nuno Henriques Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:37:00 +0000 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <20070110161737.25F3116A576@hub.freebsd.org> <200701101901.33645.odilist@sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061215) In-Reply-To: <200701101901.33645.odilist@sonic.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:45:21 -0000 Oliver Iberien wrote: > At least this thread got me (desktop user, not especially technically > sophisticated) to go make a little donation to the FreeBSD Foundation, as it > is the one way I can help out, and show that I'm grateful for FreeBSD. > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 08:17, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org > wrote: > >> So, if you cannot contribute time and effort and your business is >> so valuable, then consider contributing money - to support someone >> to work in the project, at least part time. >> >>> If you only want to get something for nothing, then you live >>> in the wrong world. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I bought a FreeBSD Subscription (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdsub6.2?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=70) and the FreeBSD Handbook Set (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdhandbk3.set?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=187), and to this day, I'm still patiently awaiting for FreeBSD to support the 590SLI Nforce chipset. Both OpenBSD and NetBSD support this chipset FYI. :) BTW, there are no replies to my emails from freebsdmall.com. What's going on here? :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 00:18:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7498D16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894D13C461 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0C0HpWF026063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:17:58 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C0HW69023740; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:17:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0C0HW8V023739; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:17:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:17:32 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20070112001732.GC23256@kobe.laptop> References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.475, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.72, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:18:24 -0000 On 2007-01-11 11:35, Doug Hardie wrote: > I have a medium sized application where the source is all in a CVS > repository. Basically it works great as I am able to retrieve any > previous version of a module when needed. Most of the changes to the > application are quickly resolved, CVS committed and the production > system updated in less than a day. Recently, I made a fairly large > update to the application that took about 4 weeks to complete. During > that time I was not able to fix small problems as there was no way to > update the production system without incorporating a large number of > changes from the new update that were just not working yet. Basically > all small corrections were made to the new system but not incorporated > into the production system until the new stuff was completed. There > were no real problems from this, but it was not really convenient. > > Now I am going to be embarking on a revision that will take about 6 > months to complete. Obviously I will not be able to wait till the > completion to fix minor problems. So I am going to need to do > something with branches. I have dug through the man pages and believe > that is the best approach. Indeed. Branching and inter-branch merges can be a huge pain in the ass with CVS though. It may be worth investigating if one of the more modern SCM systems -- with better support for merges and merge tracking -- can help you keep the two 'branches' in sync. If you plan to heavily use branches, my personal preference would be Mercurial[1]. It takes a short while to get acquainted with a _distributed_ SCM, if you have been using CVS for a long time, but IMHO the benefits of offline development and excellent merging support (including merge-history tracking, rename tracking, and a few other goodies), far outweighs the cost of migration. [1] http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/ > However, given that I need to maintain the current version with a > probably small number of fixes during the development process what > is the best approach? Should I branch off the production version as > a new branch and keep the main one for the new development or the > other way around. There are two 'models' of work you can use with CVS: * The mainline model. * The promotion model. In the "mainline" model, all development happens in the "HEAD" branch of CVS, and when you are about to release a production version you spin off a 'release branch' off the main trunk of development. In the "feature branch" model, you branch early, and develop features *within* a feature branch. Some time later, these features branches get 'promoted' from feature branch, to testing branch, and eventually to release branch. Which model you will use depends on a lot of factors, not the least of which is how often you will be developing many features in parallel, how long you will have to maintain 'release branches' after you have shipped from them, etc. > Will it be easier to merge the fixes to the production branch back in > to the new system later or should those fixes be made to both branches > at the same time? Any suggestions on these approaches will be > appreciated. In general, with CVS it's a lot easier to use the "mainline" model, where all development happens in HEAD. This doesn't mean that you cannot or that you should not evne consider the "promotion" model of feature branches though. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 00:48:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776BB16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F6413C428 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so648994wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:48:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ixjyfF95WKA6xqpxjjtfqY1ZoAbCeDSaajDfsZmHfsSKlKRtWluerITaGJTfwMQfVKYIaFHuuwcmkwUbB5eirgAdJMuLbyA7Ven6kewd5xHhxT3474mO65TYcCbXMg4yT9jiYV2zNrac/W5Z0sRi2qMwxrrZiDFktCeizLiAwp0= Received: by 10.70.130.8 with SMTP id c8mr143329wxd.1168562913379; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:48:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:48:32 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Jeremie Le Hen" In-Reply-To: <20070111223126.GJ2616@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070111223126.GJ2616@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vishal Patil Subject: Re: vpnc problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:48:34 -0000 I am successfully using vpnc that came with freebsd 6.1 able to connect into cisco 3000 concentrator all i had was vpnc.conf file On 1/11/07, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Hi Vishal, > > First of all you should avoid cross-posting. Additionaly, I don't > think this is a question for -hackers@. > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:50:26PM -0500, Vishal Patil wrote: > > I have found the answer to this question. I basically had to edit the > > vpnc-script and replace the body of the function "get_default_gw" with > > > > netstat -r -n | sed 's/default/0.0.0.0/' | grep '^0.0.0.0' | awk '{print > > $2}' > > > > So now I have vpnc-0.3.3 working on FreeBSD. > > The port stands in security/vpnc, you should use it. It guess the > maintainer has tried it before updating the port and pushed the > appropriate patch into the ports tree. > > Regards > -- > Jeremie Le Hen > < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 00:56:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F07C16A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CF613C45B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so650523wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fmSl2JsbAveHf8D/4h6bAWgEKt+F1bS9K8g2HV139IKZjAfANcNFuMI1Z0EwniMav/P1rDiD5nK1Z3QTDUXAJ6VJyvCX7vZD/kbECdhmoZI6jkG/ckOpdfsMnBrNiJbDCJ1JBElYVP4wxog3jseLJXQQqf8Zqt2K7eVTNh4YHDI= Received: by 10.70.66.18 with SMTP id o18mr150758wxa.1168563399024; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:56:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:56:33 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0701100424y1f15717es81a7536c1e1e5a9a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:56:40 -0000 this is a funny thread. On 1/10/07, VeeJay wrote: > > Hi > > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 00:57:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1445C16A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB18513C468 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C0XGsp038256; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:33:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0C0XF0p038255; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:33:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:33:15 -0800 From: James Long To: Nathan Vidican , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, chandler@chapman.edu, maanjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:57:59 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > > > > > How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? > > > > Depending on local setup, this could range from 'not at all' to > > > > 'extremely'. Do you have a *specific* setup in mind? > > > Standard user with the root password, a bag of explosives, a .45 magnum, > > > and a chip on his shoulder, say? > > Yeah, and even a user with no account or password, a screwdriver, and > > a Mountain Dew. > Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call > me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > still managed to kill the server ;) Ah yes, the infamous cat(1) ppp(8) exploit. Much harder to clean up than cat(1) dump(8), too. Fortunately, the worst problem I've had with mine is occassional race conditions with mouse(4). Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:01:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B512316A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5699513C459; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-40-34.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.40.34]) by ms-smtp-03.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l0C09f0G027904; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:09:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000301c735de$195d5f70$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:10:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: ezjail and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:01:28 -0000 Hello, I've created three jails with ezjail on a 6.1 machine. When i did so i did not need ports, now i do in one of the jails. I've tried nullfs mounting the host system's /usr/ports tree, but it didn't automount on jail startup. So, i fetched a new copy of the ports tree in to /var/ports, but when i tried to install a port, bash3 in this case, the ports are referencing /usr/ports/share/MK which it can not find, that's a read-only symlink to the basejail filesystem. A side question, pinging the jail works fine from the host system, but nmapping it does not show anything even though i have running services. I've tried with and without the -P0 option. Does anyone have this working? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:02:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2DE16A513 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22D013C428 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so651507wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:02:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Y3RbnE02Ab6iQhuGDLYUphHxZpXQnee4agR1qZ3cVmxPdjdOHgtx2JJYtS7WQprxokEgd1oVyPv6/hH4F4rldhe4G0Nak4gvN7IyBvlA7BtXwr0wpX8bhpnX2/m4uVx1dvxJgApL8xOQTSCdlJxNKmbWXZ/jGstRZUkIfE5O2QQ= Received: by 10.70.90.12 with SMTP id n12mr127908wxb.1168563731064; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:02:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:02:11 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "lekshmanan prabhakaran" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, msmith@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:02:12 -0000 just your devices attached for power management module is not responding, this may not bring down anything. On 1/11/07, lekshmanan prabhakaran wrote: > > hi > my name is lekshman i did a fresh installation of FreeBSD 6.1 on my > Travelmate laptop 2420, the installation was fine but i am getting these > errors on TTY0 console . > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_TZ_.TZSV._TMP] > (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned > AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > > These two errors happens in the same minute and every few minutes: > May 31 00:07:52 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for > [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > May 31 00:07:52 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution > failed [\_TZ_.TZSV._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > May 31 00:08:12 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for > [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > May 31 00:08:12 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution > failed [\_TZ_.TZS0._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020)AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > May 31 00:08:22 Scarface kernel: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for > [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > May 31 00:08:22 Scarface kernel: ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution > failed [\_TZ_.TZS1._TMP] (Node 0xc214b020), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is keep on repeating but there is no problem with other consoles from > tty1 to tty8 and KDE GUI is working fine.Please help me with this ,is it > going to bring my computer down. > > Thanking you > > Lekshman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:04:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB9E16A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AED13C467 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so592766uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:04:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FyHkRNTCekhF8z9EdUfV2bFuIJMOJakRgkx6aM+ev4nhk+e8apC5e56+3B8/y9E2gkf12wI0LqB2G59x8hiwtkjQpWkPajXhF1/80J10oIVHGQNUAwHBP6n72SgXfrRRH3lprMVGHOpDPxXx8y+kxnBhi5EvqFHWhGGzSrNtTCM= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr15506huf.1168563847226; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:04:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:04:06 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Nuno Henriques" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070110161737.25F3116A576@hub.freebsd.org> <200701101901.33645.odilist@sonic.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c3aa114657f744ba Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:04:09 -0000 On 1/12/07, Nuno Henriques wrote: > I bought a FreeBSD Subscription > (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdsub6.2?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=70) > and the FreeBSD Handbook Set > (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdhandbk3.set?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=187), > and to this day, I'm still patiently awaiting for FreeBSD to support the > 590SLI Nforce chipset. Both OpenBSD and NetBSD support this chipset FYI. :) > BTW, there are no replies to my emails from freebsdmall.com. What's > going on here? :( It's a scam! You pay for a subscription and a handbook and all you get is (surprise!) a subscription and a handbook. ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:06:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E4A16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [63.240.77.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E013C428 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <2007011201063001500s6qcre>; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:06:30 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:06:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070111084454.0ba4c327.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111906.26196.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Jeff MacDonald Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:06:31 -0000 On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:55, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > > Well I hate when people say this, but I'm going to say it.. :) > > > > > > When I did a default install of ubuntu, it saw all 4 gigs > > > without a hitch. So does that mean it already includes PAE, or > > > something else ? > > > > One of those two. You sure you didn't install a 64-bit version > > of Ubuntu? > > Fairly sure :) > > > > Aside, I will read up on PAE. I'll read up about 64 bit as > > > well, I've been hesitant to make the jump only cause any word > > > of mouth i've heard said that it's not ready for production. > > > Maybe that's off base, it's only what "i've heard" > > > > We're deploying a lot of 64 bit stuff around here. Our > > experience has been that the OS is as solid on amd64 as it is on > > i386. Server applications are the same. There are, however, a > > lot of desktop applications that are still flaky on 64-bit -- > > mostly non-mainstream ones. We got in a crunch and had to > > reinstall a workstation back to i386 because of it, or I would > > have filed some bug reports. > > Yeah, that's likly true what you say about server vs desktop. I'm > going to slap a 64 bit copy on now and see how it does. > > Jeff. For what it's worth I've been running 6.1-R AMD64 on a PE 1950 very successfully as a web/mysql/mail/dns server. If you have the broadcom or intel NICs you're going to want to use the drivers from 6-STABLE or 6.2-RC2. Other than that it's been relatively painless. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:07:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB44516A415 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFC113C45B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so652203wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TQN396mtCBK6Ah7rmolqcO/LiHMZfBGlsEjshLvIqAG4N5sqnEG0hpE/1gFCVbR0Q1FuzDtg+H1HlEDgsQa/qcRVlZh95n1Pe2u8UY0NV2BugppW/OIhCCy4NmLk13gty6lw09t5+0cJjUC/robiIiHqo0+GL5T9MB0JlFe7oGs= Received: by 10.70.125.11 with SMTP id x11mr178758wxc.1168564026314; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:07:06 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Doug Hardie" In-Reply-To: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:07:08 -0000 afaik, branching off for the minor changes would be thest way to go. so you could merge back these changes into main line easily. that is the way normal devel cycle or you could establish minor and major and merge them upon completion. On 1/11/07, Doug Hardie wrote: > > I have a medium sized application where the source is all in a CVS > repository. Basically it works great as I am able to retrieve any > previous version of a module when needed. Most of the changes to the > application are quickly resolved, CVS committed and the production > system updated in less than a day. Recently, I made a fairly large > update to the application that took about 4 weeks to complete. > During that time I was not able to fix small problems as there was no > way to update the production system without incorporating a large > number of changes from the new update that were just not working > yet. Basically all small corrections were made to the new system but > not incorporated into the production system until the new stuff was > completed. There were no real problems from this, but it was not > really convenient. > > Now I am going to be embarking on a revision that will take about 6 > months to complete. Obviously I will not be able to wait till the > completion to fix minor problems. So I am going to need to do > something with branches. I have dug through the man pages and > believe that is the best approach. However, given that I need to > maintain the current version with a probably small number of fixes > during the development process what is the best approach? Should I > branch off the production version as a new branch and keep the main > one for the new development or the other way around. Will it be > easier to merge the fixes to the production branch back in to the new > system later or should those fixes be made to both branches at the > same time? Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. > Thanks, > > -- Doug > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:09:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333316A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (rwcrmhc15.comcast.net [216.148.227.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8115E13C45D for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070112010956m15005ral2e>; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:09:57 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:09:52 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45A596FC.8040907@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A596FC.8040907@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111909.52695.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Jay Chandler Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:09:57 -0000 On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:46, Jay Chandler wrote: > > On a related note for this hardware platform, has anyone gotten > past the "randomly decides not to reboot when told to" issue? > Requires a hard shutdown by hand, as the console becomes completely > non-responsive. I've heard of this problem, some people have it all the time and others don't have it at all on the PE 1950. I suspect it has something to do with the way Dell will occassionally change hardware mid-run and not tell anyone. :) The solution is to enable the IPMI board and use that to reboot it. (Dell calls it a BMC but you can access it with standard IPMI utilities) -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:47:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1416A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A92B13C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H5BVw-0001BL-2F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:47:28 +0100 Received: from a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt ([81.84.41.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:47:28 +0100 Received: from nh by a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:47:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Nuno Henriques Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:48:33 +0000 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <20070110161737.25F3116A576@hub.freebsd.org> <200701101901.33645.odilist@sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a81-84-41-117.cpe.netcabo.pt User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061215) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:47:38 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 1/12/07, Nuno Henriques wrote: >> I bought a FreeBSD Subscription >> (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdsub6.2?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=70) >> and the FreeBSD Handbook Set >> (http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdhandbk3.set?id=Ja6Hth8u&mv_pc=187), >> >> and to this day, I'm still patiently awaiting for FreeBSD to support the >> 590SLI Nforce chipset. Both OpenBSD and NetBSD support this chipset >> FYI. :) >> BTW, there are no replies to my emails from freebsdmall.com. What's >> going on here? :( > > It's a scam! You pay for a subscription and a > handbook and all you get is (surprise!) > a subscription and a handbook. > > ;) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > LOL :D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:49:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5E516A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD6213C448 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0C1mn9M030914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:48:55 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C1mU2L041512; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:48:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0C1mUOv041511; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:48:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:48:30 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Lion G." Message-ID: <20070112014829.GB41417@kobe.laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.737, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.66, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop speaker vs earphone X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:49:14 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-01-11 00:29, "Lion G." wrote: > Hi all, I have a weird question. >=20 > In my previous many laptops, whenever I plug in the earphone, the > laptop speaker would stop (and I would only hear music through the > earphone) Which is what *should* happen. After all, when you plug headphones into the proper jack, it's a sort of 'signal' that you want to hear something without disturbing all the people around with it too :) When I asked: "Is automute of headphone/speakers always handled by the snd_hda driver?" Ariff explained why this happens to me by writing: "It all depends on the internal wiring, codecs, vendor preferences, etc, but mostly yes, it is handled by the driver itself: cheaper, flexible." > With my newest laptop (Acer Aspire 5050), the laptop speaker stays on > no-matter-what. I would hear the same music in both the speaker and > the earphone. >=20 > I'm using Ariff Abdullah's snd_hda driver on 6.2-RC2. > The driver reports: > pcm0: mem=20 > 0xc0000000-0xc0003fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 > pcm0: > pcm0: Try contacting Ariff. He is pretty responsive and he will most probably reply with a patch that fixes the problem for you. This is *exactly* what happened when I asked him about my own laptop, a Toshiba Satellite U200, which had the same 'bug'. The fix for my laptop is now part of FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/sound/pci/hda/hdac.c?rev= =3D1.21&content-type=3Dtext/x-cvsweb-markup Before contacting Ariff, it will be helpful (and will save you at least one round-trip of email exchanges), if you boot in ``verbose mode'', and save a copy of ``/var/run/dmesg.boot''. Then, make sure you include this file and the output of ``pciconf -lv'' in your report. Good luck, Giorgos --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFpujs1g+UGjGGA7YRApNcAJ0aFivc9eOQB7bOQW8Pw1Nt/3tNQQCgp6Fk KTsjX5FVLohvPoBakAPDzmg= =o8sl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 01:57:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD1816A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF0413C457 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so661529wxc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jbAFwMOjnXFYWnZquux5nJifAmmQ4JabVtRl05bwvzCoayzAXjWKHKn0n5QutBELHlh8v/+lZ05rIRDotzCaI9hcib8qmHXrNDfTGyx4nwZs09tGIGMWTJCOiHrX/Mgf38H/QBA4o6e2T/cp8bW5f8PUBZI3xb/jPP9XPRSrQcg= Received: by 10.70.9.4 with SMTP id 4mr265126wxi.1168567056878; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.52.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:57:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:57:36 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "Jim Pazarena" In-Reply-To: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:57:37 -0000 Hi FreeBSD I am looking to know how to use perform the dialup using the chatscript for the wireless card Ac850. Is t this right place to ask this question. Wow this is longest thread I have seen in my entire life about 73 people replying about same topic and nearly he the same email. over and over. Thanks Dak On 1/8/07, Jim Pazarena wrote: > > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/08/a-shadow-lies-upon-all-bsd-distributions > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD: license problems require a development pause > > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/gentoo-freebsd-license-problems-requires-a-development-pause > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The big license mess, part 2 > > > http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2007/01/07/the-big-license-mess-part-2 > -------------------------------------------------- > Gentoo/FreeBSD On Hold Due To Licensing Issues > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 02:05:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D60516A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7541013C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C1fQpX007273; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 115B23006A; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:26 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807125-a5a55bb000006e4c-2d-45a6e7464e46 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 077DE30043; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:26 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:25 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: Nathan Vidican , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:05:57 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client > call > me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > still managed to kill the server ;) That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the same time. [ Standard computer PSUs use a high-voltage switching power supply design that really should not be peed upon, although I suppose the flyback transformer inside a CRT would be considerably more dangerous. ] -- -Chuck PS: I betcha the client thought the whole matter was a "catastrophe"... :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 02:14:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B0416A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DD913C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0C2DvPj077012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:13:57 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l0C2ErI3036305; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:14:53 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:14:53 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200701120214.l0C2ErI3036305@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: cvsup'dating several machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:14:48 -0000 Hi, I will soon update FreeBSD on several machines from 4.11 to 5.5, they are all at the same level of 4.11. I would like to save network bandwidth, would it be OK/enough if I cvsup one machine and then copy /usr/src from that opne to the others? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 02:26:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB1B16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [216.9.132.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1FF13C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1C47E8C5 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:26:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqL81PEPpSO8 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:26:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (74-130-30-11.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.130.30.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A457E8B8 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:26:17 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: freebsd-questions Questions Message-Id: <64E75F45-4672-4388-B9DE-DD531E438085@netmusician.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-12--864459666" From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:26:24 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Gpgmail-State: signed X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: startup script for poppassd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:26:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-12--864459666 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hello, Does anybody have a startup script or experience with how to get the poppassd port to listen on port 106? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org --Apple-Mail-12--864459666 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFpvHRCgdfeCwsL5ERAlbwAJ42wHJnWUMQxtxPsu04qWHHFpkVAwCfXTTc aHFc6rQ2OjaSZPnQtihVlCY= =DikW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-12--864459666-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 02:28:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B2116A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4E013C480 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 13421 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2007 13:28:26 +1100 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (203.14.171.231) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 13:28:26 +1100 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:28:21 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20070112132821.17286c49@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:28:28 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:35:38 -0800 Doug Hardie wrote: > Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. > Thanks, I suggest you read the CVS Red book, in particular the section on branch management and merging. http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html I agree with other posters, you may want to move to newer SCM systems... I've been using SVN for a while now, and couldn't be happier. There's also a SVN red book , with sections for current CVS users to understand the differences. good luck :) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." Sam Brown I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 02:30:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA3916A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067C513C468 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from c-68-59-28-54.hsd1.sc.comcast.net (jn@c-68-59-28-54.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.59.28.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l0C2TxWt098466; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:29:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:29:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <64E75F45-4672-4388-B9DE-DD531E438085@netmusician.org> In-Reply-To: <64E75F45-4672-4388-B9DE-DD531E438085@netmusician.org> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701112129.58438.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Joe Auty Subject: Re: startup script for poppassd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:30:00 -0000 On Thursday 11 January 2007 21:26, Joe Auty wrote: > Does anybody have a startup script or experience with how to get the > poppassd port to listen on port 106? You run it from inetd, so all you have to do is add a line to /etc/inetd.conf (and enable inetd if it isn't already). There are examples in the poppassd manpage. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 03:01:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2226616A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70C413C457 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:01:04 -0500 id 0005648D.45A6F9F0.0000548C Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:00:48 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Josh Paetzel Message-Id: <20070111220048.a26c6bc5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200701111909.52695.josh@tcbug.org> References: <45A596FC.8040907@chapman.edu> <200701111909.52695.josh@tcbug.org> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jay Chandler Subject: Re: Dell PE 1950 - Only seeing 3.2 gigs of ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:01:06 -0000 Josh Paetzel wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:46, Jay Chandler wrote: > > > On a related note for this hardware platform, has anyone gotten > > past the "randomly decides not to reboot when told to" issue? > > Requires a hard shutdown by hand, as the console becomes completely > > non-responsive. > > I've heard of this problem, some people have it all the time and > others don't have it at all on the PE 1950. I suspect it has > something to do with the way Dell will occassionally change hardware > mid-run and not tell anyone. :) It's a bizarre timing problem involving the shutdown of drivers. We were trying to track it down, but any time we changed anything in the code, the problem disappeared (i.e. just adding a printf()). Our conclusion was that it was an extremely sensitive timing issue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 03:04:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDBA16A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [216.9.132.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC6D13C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD39E7E8CA; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:04:49 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MnFdsq1QhAQb; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:04:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (74-130-30-11.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.130.30.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B7F7E8C7; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:04:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200701112129.58438.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <64E75F45-4672-4388-B9DE-DD531E438085@netmusician.org> <200701112129.58438.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3FDEFE1A-9C5F-494A-92E9-0864DB65A225@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:04:53 -0500 To: John Nielsen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup script for poppassd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:04:51 -0000 Thank you! Works great.... On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:29 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Thursday 11 January 2007 21:26, Joe Auty wrote: >> Does anybody have a startup script or experience with how to get the >> poppassd port to listen on port 106? > > You run it from inetd, so all you have to do is add a line > to /etc/inetd.conf (and enable inetd if it isn't already). There are > examples in the poppassd manpage. > > JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 03:15:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7AB16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0C13C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l0C3FRcY024108; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:15:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:15:27 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Olivier Nicole Message-ID: <20070112031527.GB46272@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200701120214.l0C2ErI3036305@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701120214.l0C2ErI3036305@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup'dating several machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:15:38 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 12), Olivier Nicole said: > I will soon update FreeBSD on several machines from 4.11 to 5.5, they > are all at the same level of 4.11. > > I would like to save network bandwidth, would it be OK/enough if I > cvsup one machine and then copy /usr/src from that opne to the > others? You don't need to copy. Just NFS-mount /usr/src from your master onto all the others. In fact, if you also share /usr/obj (or set MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX appropriately so they all point to the same place), you can even buildworld on one, and just run "installworld" on all the others and skip the extra compiles. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 04:35:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8A616A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6673213C46A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (cpe-75-82-205-15.socal.res.rr.com [75.82.205.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0C4ZfNR016198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) In-Reply-To: <20070112132821.17286c49@localhost> References: <3C109E4B-5636-498F-A7C2-0C728ED0E81D@lafn.org> <20070112132821.17286c49@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:35:43 -0800 To: Norberto Meijome X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/2437/Thu Jan 11 15:59:09 2007 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Use of CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:35:43 -0000 On Jan 11, 2007, at 18:28, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:35:38 -0800 > Doug Hardie wrote: > >> Any suggestions on these approaches will be appreciated. >> Thanks, > > I suggest you read the CVS Red book, in particular the section on > branch > management and merging. > http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html > > I agree with other posters, you may want to move to newer SCM > systems... I've > been using SVN for a while now, and couldn't be happier. There's > also a SVN red > book , with sections for current CVS users to understand the > differences. Thanks. I have started reading them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 06:12:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C44016A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5358313C44B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1581B1741 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:12:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 22709-09 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:12:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [209.104.163.58]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56A61B173A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:12:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A726C0.5070403@bobmc.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:12:16 -0500 From: bobmc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: UDP ok but TCP delayed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:12:21 -0000 Hi Ian: (I post to the list because your's bounced? The Postfix program : host gaia.nimnet.asn.au[203.41.52.131] said: 550 Access denied (in reply to MAIL FROM command) ---------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your reply. Compared to Linux tcpdump, FreeBSD is issuing extra packets, those "AAAA" you mentioned. I have a Netopia modem with RJ45 to a router or optical modem in the condo basement. From there is an optical link to my ISP about 10km away who provides nothing but email forwarding, a DHCP lease, and an internet connect. I have included dumps from Linux and FreeBSD but I have not yet finished all the tests you suggested. IPv6 is not enabled according to the /etc/defaults. I tinkered with various options without making a difference. Thank you, -Bob- whois fcibroadband.com Domain Name: FCIBROADBAND.COM Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: DNS-01.FUTUREWAY.COM Name Server: DNS-03.FUTUREWAY.COM Status: clientTransferProhibited Domain servers in listed order: DNS-01.FUTUREWAY.COM 64.119.104.2 DNS-03.FUTUREWAY.COM 64.119.104.130 +++++++++++++++++++ Linux tcpdump ++++++++++++++++++++++++ uname -a Linux buffy 2.6.15-26-386 #1 PREEMPT Wed Jul 19 12:14:26 EDT 2006 i686 GNU/Linux root@3[bobmc]# tcpdump -v tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 21:44:49.547037 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 13665, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: UDP (17), length: 61) 192.168.1.100.1032 > 192.168.1.254.domain: 44611+ A? www.freebsd.org. (33) 21:44:49.567857 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 13670, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: UDP (17), length: 72) 192.168.1.100.1033 > 192.168.1.254.domain: 16632+ PTR? 254.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (44) 21:44:49.633987 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 240, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 173) 192.168.1.254.domain > 192.168.1.100.1032: 44611 1/4/0 www.freebsd.org. A www.freebsd.org (145) 21:44:49.644775 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 31888, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 52) 192.168.1.100.3587 > www.freebsd.org.www: S, cksum 0xc114 (correct), 3828632041:3828632041(0) win 5840 21:44:49.726336 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 56, id 27781, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 48) www.freebsd.org.www > 192.168.1.100.3587: S, cksum 0x7cc5 (correct), 3180712628:3180712628(0) ack 3828632042 win 57344 21:44:49.726416 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 31889, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 40) 192.168.1.100.3587 > www.freebsd.org.www: ., cksum 0x82a2 (correct), ack 1 win 1460 21:44:49.726516 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 31890, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 578) 192.168.1.100.3587 > www.freebsd.org.www: P 1:539(538) ack 1 win 1460 ...etc --------------- FreeBSD version ---------------- $ uname -a FreeBSD buffy.feline.cat 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ ifconfig -a vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::240:63ff:fee6:41ba%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.102 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 ether 00:40:63:e6:41:ba media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 lease { interface "vr0"; fixed-address 192.168.1.102; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option routers 192.168.1.254; option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.254; option broadcast-address 255.255.255.255; option dhcp-lease-time 3600; option dhcp-message-type 5; option dhcp-server-identifier 192.168.1.254; option dhcp-renewal-time 1800; option dhcp-rebinding-time 3150; renew 4 2007/1/11 04:57:09; rebind 4 2007/1/11 05:19:39; expire 4 2007/1/11 05:27:09; } buffy# tcpdump -vv tcpdump: listening on vr0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 22:29:06.250801 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 81, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 61) 192.168.1.102.50460 > 192.168.1.254.domain: [udp sum ok] 53280+ A? www.freebsd.org. (33) 22:29:06.257223 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 761, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 205) 192.168.1.254.domain > 192.168.1.102.50460: 53280 q: A? www.freebsd.org. 1/4/2 www.freebsd.org. A www.freebsd.org ns: freebsd.org.[|domain] 22:29:06.260101 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 82, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 61) 192.168.1.102.55466 > 192.168.1.254.domain: [udp sum ok] 53281+ AAAA? www.freebsd.org. (33) 22:29:07.086122 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 83, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 72) 192.168.1.102.62917 > 192.168.1.254.domain: [udp sum ok] 18530+ PTR? 254.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (44) 22:29:11.259943 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 84, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 61) 192.168.1.102.64085 > 192.168.1.254.domain: [udp sum ok] 53281+ AAAA? www.freebsd.org. (33) 22:29:12.085771 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 85, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 72) 192.168.1.102.55092 > 192.168.1.254.domain: [udp sum ok] 18530+ PTR? 254.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (44) 22:29:21.259891 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 86, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 64) 192.168.1.102.58074 > www.freebsd.org.http: S, cksum 0xdcdf (correct), 2006030925:2006030925(0) win 65535 22:29:21.341876 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 56, id 60954, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 60) www.freebsd.org.http > 192.168.1.102.58074: S, cksum 0x6633 (correct), 722492724:722492724(0) ack 2006030926 win 57344 ... etc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 07:31:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C746016A522 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8948013C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C7YJGL054389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:34:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168587259; bh=3P7ulkEstoZxskjXRDpmudWaBXo=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CR9TEQ4TelYL0+9FLQF6fpyLFXxJEi357Sb9vU yh7c6AKQS0m6vserlEHObqzUhpf7OtbJaN1vPSoh1BO4sw5g== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=D6/GjqxCyTbavNFsKdJEdVPPzqch6rIR7yk1gqv8eJ8VdlwrWfXyDC1HOHKDkeJOh XUOXn0kW1962x6qZ5Og+g== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0C7YIef054387; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:34:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:34:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Peter Giessel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070112023346.U57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:31:52 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Peter Giessel wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 01:22AM, "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: >> I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >> supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >> support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >> loadable doesn't help, either. > > P.S. 6.1 on AMD64 and i386 supports the 9550: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-amd64.html > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/relnotes-i386.html > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=twa&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+6.1-RELEASE Yeah, this is the 9650SE. I've emailed Scott Long to ask about its inclustion. No reply thusfar. -Dan -- "One...plus two...plus one...plus one." -Tim Curry, Clue --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 08:42:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC7516A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF77213C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (yburah@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0C8gce5070927; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:42:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l0C8gbka070926; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:42:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:42:37 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701120842.l0C8gbka070926@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, list@museum.rain.com In-Reply-To: <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:42:43 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, list@museum.rain.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:42:45 -0000 James Long wrote: > Nathan Vidican wrote: > > Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call > > me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > > expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > > heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > > still managed to kill the server ;) > > Ah yes, the infamous cat(1) ppp(8) exploit. Much harder to clean up > than cat(1) dump(8), too. > > Fortunately, the worst problem I've had with mine is occassional > race conditions with mouse(4). You mean like this one? http://www.secnetix.de/~olli/fun/cat_and_mouse.jpg (cat(1) performing a DoS attack on mouse(4).) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "C++ is over-complicated nonsense. And Bjorn Shoestrap's book a danger to public health. I tried reading it once, I was in recovery for months." -- Cliff Sarginson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 11:25:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4677016A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsds+questions@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (lamaiziere.net [213.41.172.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E279A13C458 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsds+questions@davenulle.org) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (unknown [192.168.0.59]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A96BA6CC6 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:58:59 +0100 (CET) From: Patrick =?iso-8859-1?q?Lamaizi=E8re?= Organization: >/dave/nulle To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:58:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A688C0.2020506@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121158.58342.patfbsds+questions@davenulle.org> Subject: Re: Improvement to IPFilter / nfsd in FBSD (6.2+?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:25:09 -0000 Garrett Cooper : Hello, > Just wondering if anyone has IPFilter / nfsd setup properly on their > boxes with any beta versions of FBSD. > > I am having loads of issues transferring large files (~300MB apiece) or > issues transferring a large number of smaller files (3MB ~ 10MB apiece) > from a FBSD 6.1 client to a FBSD 6.1 server, where it transfers part of > the files, then cp / mv get stuck indefinitely on the client system. The > stuck cp / mv processes cause the client to hang on reboot, and then > terminate before all of the buffers are written to disk (which forces > fsck on next boot). Did you try to use tcp transport with NFS ? See the '-T' option of mount_nfs(8). See also the -i option (Make the mount interruptible). Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 13:17:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F39616A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@evolve-news.co.uk) Received: from eddie.fcpl.com (eddie.fcpl.com [217.158.168.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F81413C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@evolve-news.co.uk) Received: from 57-66.dsl.data.net.uk ([80.68.57.66] helo=CHRISP-LAP) by eddie.fcpl.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H5Lwy-0000ub-IB for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:56:05 +0000 Organization: FCP Internet Ltd Message-ID: From: "News from Evolve" To: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:54 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=SPLITOR00A_001_8052388D" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Why buy Recruitment Software? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:17:13 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=SPLITOR00A_001_8052388D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" [1]3D"" [2]3D"" Don't buy=20 Recruitment Software. . . Evolve In=20 today=92s World it=92s very much about On-Demand services; we all = pay monthly=20 subscriptions for many things including our phones, internet = connections=20 and TV. =20 So why=20 buy Recruitment Software when you can benefit from a complete = Managed=20 Service? Instead=20 of purchasing expensive hardware and software licences, which you = have to=20 install, maintain and back-up, let us manage your = recruitment=20 database for you. What does = this mean=20 for your company? * No IT Burden=20 * Instant = Scalability=20 * Unlimited = Capacity=20 * Guaranteed = Security=20 * Your consultants access your = database=20 using the Internet from anywhere = * Upgrades and updates are managed by us=20 * Maintenance and data back up is = managed=20 by us * 99.999% guaranteed uptime and bandwidth=20 available Evolve offers unique=20 functionality including . . . * Unique=20 searchable Raw CV Pool. * Unique background automatching = of=20 candidates and vacancies. * Unique workflow modeller =96 = this allows=20 you to tailor Evolve to work the way that you want to=20 work. * Unique Compliance=20 Wizard * Unique Global Management=20 reporting . . . all the benefits of a = database=20 that you can customise to your company=92s requirements =96 without = the=20 associated costs. For = more=20 information or to book a demonstration please call = Chris = Pawsey on=20 01252 333344 or e-mail our sales = department at sales@evolvedb.co.uk If you do not wish to receive = regular=20 updates on Evolve and issues facing recruitment companies=20 please e-mail: info@evolve-news.co.uk Website:[3]www.evolvedb.co.uk Telephone : 01252 333344 3D"" FCP is dedicated to = the=20 Recruitment industry and are the only company that offer a full = Managed=20 Service to our customers. We are committed to respecting your privacy. = We do=20 not share your information with any third party. If you feel you = have=20 received this e-mail in error or wish to be removed from this list = then=20 simply e-mail info@evolve-news.co.uk Any views = or opinions=20 presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily = represent=20 those of FCP Internet or its subsidiaries. [4]3D"" References Visible links 1. 3D"http://www.evolvedb.co.uk/htdocs/index.php" 2. 3D"http://www.evolvedb.co.uk/htdocs/index.php" 3. 3D"http://www.evolvedb.co.uk/htdocs/index.php" 4. 3D"http://www.evolvedb.co.uk/htdocs/index.php" Hidden links: 5. 3D"mailto:unsubscribe@evolvedb.co.uk?subject=3DUnsubscribe" ------=SPLITOR00A_001_8052388D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 13:40:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB58416A416 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CFE13C442 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport2.bredband.com ([195.54.107.84] [195.54.107.84]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070112133957.IQQA2832.mxfep02.bredband.com@ironport2.bredband.com> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:57 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport2.bredband.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 14:39:55 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: fortune Thread-Index: Acc2TjJLHvyOpvp+SWepdqtwp5V9IA== From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:40:02 -0000 Hi, =20 Im not able to run fortune on my freeBSD 5.3 installation, and I know = why - since its not installed and thats where I step into trouble. Im = not able to install it. I've searched the portscollection and asked Mr. = Google but none of them knows it (in other words I don't know how to ask = the question right since Mr. Google and the (holy) handbook knows it = all). =20 Any ideas? =20 Additional info: -bash-3.00$ uname -prs FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE i386 bash-3.00# ls /var/db/pkg/ ./ mysql-server-4.1.22/ ../ nano-1.2.5/ apache-2.0.59/ ncftp-3.1.8/ autoconf-2.53_3/ netpbm-10.26.4/ autoconf-2.59_2/ oidentd-2.0.7_8/ automake-1.5_2,1/ openldap-client-2.3.32/ bash-3.0_5/ p5-Mail-Ezmlm-0.05.1/ bind9-base-9.3.3/ p5-Mail-Tools-1.74/ bind9-dlz+postgres-9.2.2+0.7.0/ p5-gettext-1.03/ cups-base-1.1.23.0_3/ pcre-7.0/ cvsup-without-gui-16.1h/ pdflib-7.0.0p3/ daemontools-0.76_11/ pecl-pdflib-2.0.4/ db4-4.0.14_1,1/ perl-5.6.2_2/ eggdrop-1.6.18/ perl-5.8.8/ exim-mysql-4.65/ php4-4.4.4_1/ expat-1.95.8/ php4-bz2-4.3.10_2/ expat-2.0.0_1/ php4-gd-4.3.10_2/ ezm3-1.2/ php4-gettext-4.3.10_2/ ezmlm-idx-0.40_4/ php4-mbstring-4.4.4_1/ fontconfig-2.2.3,1/ php4-mcrypt-4.4.4_1/ freebsd-games-5.1.1_4/ php4-mysql-4.3.10_2/ freetype2-2.2.1_1/ php4-openssl-4.3.10_2/ gallery-1.4.4.6/ php4-pcre-4.3.10_2/ gettext-0.14.5_2/ php4-session-4.3.10_2/ glib-1.2.10_12/ php4-xml-4.3.10_2/ glib-2.4.8/ php4-zlib-4.3.10_2/ glib-2.8.6/ phpMyAdmin-2.9.1.1/ gmake-3.80_2/ phpSysInfo-2.5.1/ gnutls-1.0.24_1/ pisg-0.70/ gtk-1.2.10_15/ pkg_cutleaves-20061113/ help2man-1.34.2/ pkgconfig-0.15.0_1/ ipcheck-0.233,1/ pkgdb.db irssi-0.8.10_3/ png-1.2.8_1/ jbigkit-1.6/ popt-1.7/ jed-0.99.16_1/ portaudit-0.5.11/ jhead-2.2/ portupgrade-2.2.2,2/ jpeg-6b_3/ proftpd-1.3.1.r1_3/ jpgtn-2.06/ python-2.4.3,1/ ldconfig_compat-1.0_8/ python24-2.4.3_3/ libgcrypt-1.2.1/ rsync-2.6.9/ libgpg-error-1.0_1/ ruby-1.8.4_5,1/ libgpg-error-1.4/ ruby18-bdb4-0.5.7/ libiconv-1.9.2_1/ samba-3.0.23d,1/ libltdl-1.5.22/ screen-4.0.3/ libmcrypt-2.5.7_2/ sudo-1.6.8.12_1/ libslang-1.4.9/ t1lib-5.0.1,1/ libtool-1.3.5_2/ tcl-8.4.7,1/ libtool-1.5.22_2/ texinfo-4.8_3/ libtool-1.5.8/ tiff-3.8.2_1/ lynx-2.8.5_2/ ucspi-tcp-0.88_2/ lzo-1.08_1/ unzip-5.52_2/ m4-1.4.1/ vim-6.4.6_1/ mc-4.6.0_14/ wget-1.10.2/ miracl-4.85_3/ xorg-libraries-6.8.1_1/ mysql-client-4.1.10/ =20 Kind regards =20 Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 13:51:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DC216A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists.gms@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F281713C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists.gms@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so718007uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:50:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=C3K7MBwDAOrtEAqkf8PQ/u267jD0uBOwHw1NsmCwcJQirJi9YXEiwHnH73ShhbDcW0lafpYadxPzgdvytozTR7BtiCFHUEOrQ3SggZYaBxGp2aunN8m/AZo+qqYZKMbO58MjnO2t36dZp5HGnIKgIPSzw4wIXbceKggXE498U3c= Received: by 10.78.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr236203hud.1168608275195; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:24:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.32.1 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:24:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:24:35 +0100 From: "Guill. Moreno-Socias" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:51:01 -0000 Hello. I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as soon as it is released. I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to find instructions on freebsd.org (please forgive me if I have missed something). Thanks in advance. --=20 Guillermo Moreno-Soc=EDas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 13:54:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A269F16A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9E313C469 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0CDsOJN093439; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:54:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0CDsOm8093438; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:54:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:54:24 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <200701121354.l0CDsOm8093438@casselton.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tim@nilimaa.se In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:54:25 -0000 fortune is distributed with FreeBSD in the games directory. You can install from sysinstall or manually by mounting your CD, cd to the binary games directory and install: cat games.?? | tar --unlink -zxpf - -C / usr/share/man/man6/fortune.6.gz usr/share/man/cat6/fortune.6.gz usr/share/games/fortune usr/games/fortune execute "/usr/games/fortune". --Mark. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:00:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67FB16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4B513C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 36so605214wra for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.65.11 with SMTP id n11mr526179aga.1168610452734; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7sm3540467agb.2007.01.12.06.00.52; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FC3B860; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:00:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF52B83E; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:00:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:01:07 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: References: X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070112085335.5F13.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.30 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:00:53 -0000 On Friday January 12, 2007 at 08:33:08 (AM) Tim Nilimaa wrote: > Im not able to run fortune on my freeBSD 5.3 installation, and I know > why - since its not installed and thats where I step into trouble. Im > not able to install it. I've searched the portscollection and asked Mr. > Google but none of them knows it (in other words I don't know how to ask > the question right since Mr. Google and the (holy) handbook knows it all). OK, I think I can assist you. First, I assume you have tried which fortune to insure that it is not actually installed. It is usually in '/usr/games/fortune'. I thought that the files were installed it with the base system. The files are located in /usr/src/games/fortune -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:07:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B416A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC6D13C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ppp125-203.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net (HELO alpha.home) ([121.44.125.203]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2007 00:37:30 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,178,1167571800"; d="scan'208"; a="73043311:sNHT24627064" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:37:29 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701130037.29250.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Tim Nilimaa Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:07:33 -0000 On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:03 am, Tim Nilimaa wrote: > Hi, > > Im not able to run fortune on my freeBSD 5.3 installation, and > I know why - since its not installed and thats where I step > into trouble. Im not able to install it. I've searched the > portscollection and asked Mr. Google but none of them knows it > (in other words I don't know how to ask the question right > since Mr. Google and the (holy) handbook knows it all). > > Any ideas? I believe 'fortune' is part of the 'games' installation and when installed is part of the core distribution -- not a port. As I recall during a normal installation 'games' are offered as an option. You could try /stand/sysinstall Malcolm > > Additional info: > -bash-3.00$ uname -prs > FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE i386 > > bash-3.00# ls /var/db/pkg/ > ./ mysql-server-4.1.22/ > ../ nano-1.2.5/ > apache-2.0.59/ ncftp-3.1.8/ > autoconf-2.53_3/ netpbm-10.26.4/ > autoconf-2.59_2/ oidentd-2.0.7_8/ > automake-1.5_2,1/ openldap-client-2.3.32/ > bash-3.0_5/ p5-Mail-Ezmlm-0.05.1/ > bind9-base-9.3.3/ p5-Mail-Tools-1.74/ > bind9-dlz+postgres-9.2.2+0.7.0/ p5-gettext-1.03/ > cups-base-1.1.23.0_3/ pcre-7.0/ > cvsup-without-gui-16.1h/ pdflib-7.0.0p3/ > daemontools-0.76_11/ pecl-pdflib-2.0.4/ > db4-4.0.14_1,1/ perl-5.6.2_2/ > eggdrop-1.6.18/ perl-5.8.8/ > exim-mysql-4.65/ php4-4.4.4_1/ > expat-1.95.8/ php4-bz2-4.3.10_2/ > expat-2.0.0_1/ php4-gd-4.3.10_2/ > ezm3-1.2/ php4-gettext-4.3.10_2/ > ezmlm-idx-0.40_4/ php4-mbstring-4.4.4_1/ > fontconfig-2.2.3,1/ php4-mcrypt-4.4.4_1/ > freebsd-games-5.1.1_4/ php4-mysql-4.3.10_2/ > freetype2-2.2.1_1/ php4-openssl-4.3.10_2/ > gallery-1.4.4.6/ php4-pcre-4.3.10_2/ > gettext-0.14.5_2/ php4-session-4.3.10_2/ > glib-1.2.10_12/ php4-xml-4.3.10_2/ > glib-2.4.8/ php4-zlib-4.3.10_2/ > glib-2.8.6/ phpMyAdmin-2.9.1.1/ > gmake-3.80_2/ phpSysInfo-2.5.1/ > gnutls-1.0.24_1/ pisg-0.70/ > gtk-1.2.10_15/ pkg_cutleaves-20061113/ > help2man-1.34.2/ pkgconfig-0.15.0_1/ > ipcheck-0.233,1/ pkgdb.db > irssi-0.8.10_3/ png-1.2.8_1/ > jbigkit-1.6/ popt-1.7/ > jed-0.99.16_1/ portaudit-0.5.11/ > jhead-2.2/ portupgrade-2.2.2,2/ > jpeg-6b_3/ proftpd-1.3.1.r1_3/ > jpgtn-2.06/ python-2.4.3,1/ > ldconfig_compat-1.0_8/ python24-2.4.3_3/ > libgcrypt-1.2.1/ rsync-2.6.9/ > libgpg-error-1.0_1/ ruby-1.8.4_5,1/ > libgpg-error-1.4/ ruby18-bdb4-0.5.7/ > libiconv-1.9.2_1/ samba-3.0.23d,1/ > libltdl-1.5.22/ screen-4.0.3/ > libmcrypt-2.5.7_2/ sudo-1.6.8.12_1/ > libslang-1.4.9/ t1lib-5.0.1,1/ > libtool-1.3.5_2/ tcl-8.4.7,1/ > libtool-1.5.22_2/ texinfo-4.8_3/ > libtool-1.5.8/ tiff-3.8.2_1/ > lynx-2.8.5_2/ ucspi-tcp-0.88_2/ > lzo-1.08_1/ unzip-5.52_2/ > m4-1.4.1/ vim-6.4.6_1/ > mc-4.6.0_14/ wget-1.10.2/ > miracl-4.85_3/ xorg-libraries-6.8.1_1/ > mysql-client-4.1.10/ > > > Kind regards > > Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:29:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47D016A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep04.bredband.com (mxfep04.bredband.com [195.54.107.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABF313C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport2.bredband.com ([195.54.107.84] [195.54.107.84]) by mxfep04.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070112142916.IFHO2732.mxfep04.bredband.com@ironport2.bredband.com> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:29:16 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport2.bredband.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 15:26:26 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C73654.B24EA600" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:19:40 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: fortune Thread-Index: Acc2UUXSt8NzW+JZTMuzDFwbFbpLygAATQLq References: <20070112085335.5F13.GERARD@seibercom.net> From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: "User Questions" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SV: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:29:19 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73654.B24EA600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 okey I have: -bash-3.00$ locate fortune /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/Makefile /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/distinfo /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/pkg-descr /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/pkg-plist /usr/ports/distfiles/wmfortune-0.241.tar.gz /usr/ports/games/wmfortune /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/Makefile /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/distinfo /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files/patch-Makefile /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files/patch-wmfortune.c /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/files /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/files/pkg-message.in /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/pkg-plist /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-message /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-plist /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/Makefile.fortune /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/files /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/files/pkg-message.in /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/Makefile /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/distinfo /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/pkg-descr /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/pkg-plist /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/Makefile /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/distinfo /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/pkg-descr /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/pkg-plist /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/Makefile /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/distinfo /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/files /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/files/pkg-message.in /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-descr /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-install /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-plist /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/Makefile /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/distinfo /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/files /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/files/patch-aa /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/pkg-descr /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/Makefile /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/distinfo /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/pkg-descr /usr/share/games/fortune [End Of Locate] =20 Nice I thought, "fortune lies under /usr/share/games" and so I tried to = run it. -bash-3.00$ /usr/share/games/fortune -bash: /usr/share/games/fortune: is a directory "Do'h a la Homer".. well well better look inside... -bash-3.00$ ls -la /usr/share/games/fortune/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 5 2005 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Mar 5 2005 ../ -bash-3.00$ do'h again. =20 okey, lets look at the src-path.. nothing there =3D/ =20 Installed the src with sysinstall.. Wee =3D) =20 but then ->=20 bash-3.00# whoami root bash-3.00# pwd /usr/src/games/fortune bash-3.00# make install =3D=3D=3D> fortune install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 fortune /usr/games install: fortune: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/src/games/fortune/fortune. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/games/fortune. bash-3.00# Any ideas? =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim ________________________________ Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org genom Gerard Seibert Skickat: fr 2007-01-12 15:01 Till: User Questions =C4mne: Re: fortune On Friday January 12, 2007 at 08:33:08 (AM) Tim Nilimaa wrote: > Im not able to run fortune on my freeBSD 5.3 installation, and I know > why - since its not installed and thats where I step into trouble. Im > not able to install it. I've searched the portscollection and asked = Mr. > Google but none of them knows it (in other words I don't know how to = ask > the question right since Mr. Google and the (holy) handbook knows it = all). OK, I think I can assist you. First, I assume you have tried which fortune to insure that it is not actually installed. It is usually in '/usr/games/fortune'. I thought that the files were installed it with the base system. The files are located in /usr/src/games/fortune -- Gerard _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73654.B24EA600-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:34:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AAA16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404EE13C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-186-172.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.186.172]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <2007011214344401500s97die>; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:34:44 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:34:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701120834.39414.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: "Guill. Moreno-Socias" Subject: Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:34:45 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 07:24, Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote: > Hello. > I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as > soon as it is released. > I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to > find instructions on freebsd.org (please forgive me if I have > missed something). Thanks in advance. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html If you csup/cvsup to RELENG_6_2 you'll end up with 6.2-RELEASE :) -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:39:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D91316A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145BF13C4A9 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from webmail.dfwlp.org (localhost.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0CEdspx028013; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:39:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:39:54 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <1374.192.168.125.134.1168612794.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:39:54 -0600 (CST) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "Tim Nilimaa" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:57 -0000 your problem lies here: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE i never have fortune until i rebuild the world on my systems (which, i then immediatly 'chmod -x /usr/games/fortune', since it annoys me on login and i cant find where its called from). hth, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:44:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB1B16A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: from web54304.mail.yahoo.com (web54304.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD5DB13C4A5 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: (qmail 13950 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2007 14:44:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.hk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=hpW8EsugscQ6emiaav10cY9cnXfh2uEwmts128U1JI2xgn/3lHIWy5Ip6UOx14ReK6QV/SOd+LrTBuU6vryxGK/SR/ClOXW68OB3530Vjz3StF/xqXB5ujYWRakhlR0MQlq+6/4RGOXpbO6PlbBIpfDH05lylrtgsCbWLWpicaE=; X-YMail-OSG: 5L8j3C8VM1lYMtIzflkhpq3pmOnsCGNEBbvIIjFGmKTNVDPovrkZ.uw2j5uzwomBpwiD6tDBaxROFSuog2cLlowSnK1.KAhpQpqyynK6K54KT3NZlUo4JGzfKxGE18hZfcQ3iNhQP9.gdyr47KBCeYt5RaxY9ZqbEGcpsQCRjv3yfjrZQw4- Received: from [61.15.61.52] by web54304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:44:24 PST Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:44:24 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Dung To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200701111812.l0BICZm0017315@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <947766.12441.qm@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:44:26 -0000 [root@fbsd2 ~]# ifconfig -a lnc0: flags=108843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fec4:3bd3%lnc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 172.16.21.62 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.21.255 ether 00:0c:29:c4:3b:d3 lnc1: flags=108802 mtu 1500 ether 00:0c:29:c4:3b:dd plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 [root@fbsd2 ~]# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.1 add net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0 [root@fbsd2 ~]# netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 172.16.21.1 UGS 1 338 lnc0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 426 lo0 128.0.1&0xac101501 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 0 lnc0 172.16.21/24 link#1 UC 0 0 lnc0 172.16.21.1 00:50:56:c0:00:08 UHLW 2 11381 lnc0 1152 172.16.21.62 00:0c:29:c4:3b:d3 UHLW 1 26 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%lnc0/64 link#1 UC lnc0 fe80::20c:29ff:fec4:3bd3%lnc0 00:0c:29:c4:3b:d3 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHL lo0 ff01:1::/32 link#1 UC lnc0 ff01:4::/32 ::1 UC lo0 ff02::%lnc0/32 link#1 UC lnc0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0: not in table [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.1 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0: not in table [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete -net 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.1 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0: not in table [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete "128.0.1&0xac101501" 255.255.255.0 route: bad address: 128.0.1&0xac101501 [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete 128.0.1 255.255.255.0 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete host 128.0.1: gateway 255.255.255.0: not in table --- Oliver Fromme wrote: > Patrick Dung wrote: > > Suppose I have mistype a command: > > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 > > So you swapped gateway and netmask. Nasty mistake. :-) > > It's usually better to use CIDR notation (with a slash > followed by the number of network bits), to avoid any > confusion. It's also less typing. > # route add 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.3.1 > > > There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it > unless > > reboot: > > > > 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 > fxp0 > > How did you try to remove it (exact comand line, please), > and what was the error message that you got? You should > enter exactly the same line you used to add the route, > only replace "add" with "delete". > > It works fine for me, so I assume you did a syntax error > when trying to remove it. > > Best regards > Oliver > > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing > Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > > "The last good thing written in C was > Franz Schubert's Symphony number 9." > -- Erwin Dieterich > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 14:57:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681C116A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FEC13C468 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so811571wxc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr572526aga.1168613465184; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7sm3607529aga.2007.01.12.06.51.04; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BABB860 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FB0B83E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:50:46 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20070112095036.R25189@scorpio.seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: AC_PACKAGE_NAME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:57:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - From time to time while compiling a program an error message will display regarding "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" with a notation to report this to the 'AC_PACKAGE_NAME'. First, is this really necessary since the package does compile and secondly, who or what is this 'AC_PACKAGE_NAME'? - -- Gerard The Supreme Court does it with all deliberate speed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFp6BQs3R1WQUU6lgRAjfrAJ9UtoWYYB+WUrE20A1J8ZBFli5/XgCeLsyB Yf9hmtGc8W6gqogg9EVsBKo= =BZf1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 15:07:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145D216A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C746B13C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so814163wxc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:07:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SHFZQcmFqX8HuBq2Euz3bAa9NlzPMiS0Wp6sG9y24ekgZsV9SM+cu+t7zVa/eVgmvSw4fuQv1SbFtkiCx3vQykCrhXofxLm/QdwC7gMrMVHSkNvnhy3+yBpvjeZ+rPZXzPYn8CJURvM93Wpfg6evBEuvfkRtrP5KAMzb5sEEwnA= Received: by 10.70.74.1 with SMTP id w1mr1545321wxa.1168614470106; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.15 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:07:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0701120707n4b36cc22icf572e67ea57994f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:07:50 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Gerard Seibert" In-Reply-To: <20070112095036.R25189@scorpio.seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070112095036.R25189@scorpio.seibercom.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: AC_PACKAGE_NAME X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:07:51 -0000 On 12/01/07, Gerard Seibert wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > - From time to time while compiling a program an error message will display > regarding "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" with a notation to report this > to the 'AC_PACKAGE_NAME'. > > First, is this really necessary since the package does compile and > secondly, who or what is this 'AC_PACKAGE_NAME'? "AC_PACKAGE_NAME" is a macro that is defined by autoconf. AFAIK, if such a message appears during compilation, the wrong version of autoconf is being used. It would be interesting to know if you compile a port, because in this case the dependency is wrong. If you downloaded a source tarball from a website, you should check the requirements what the package needs to compile successfully. autoconf and automake should be listed there, too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 15:19:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D7516A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from arwen.teledomenet.gr (arwen.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF09713C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by arwen.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l0CFJIm1007074; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:19:18 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:21:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <755188.94085.qm@web54311.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <755188.94085.qm@web54311.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121721.51917.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Patrick Dung Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:19:21 -0000 On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:01, Patrick Dung wrote: > Hi > > Suppose I have mistype a command: > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 > > There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless > reboot: > > 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0 > > Any ideas? Use "route flush". And add your static routes again either by hand or with the help of "/etc/rc.d/routing start" Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 15:45:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86ED16A415 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583BB13C45D for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so743403uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:45:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CN9bZ+6j+FPOtAFAAqQ3Zj0DV5jxDPlk80tSLTi8Z65YVn8U58zjT4v+DYIAUg22snv5SJD185ooYrykZzR1ykzxb+0HP5e1N7brq6pxQIVs/TclbJv65iaVjkGoA7seZW1TCfd6KTYU4vCbJmr+aLmx+wW7P+tetTLzHPl2rJc= Received: by 10.82.120.14 with SMTP id s14mr133880buc.1168615045282; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.118.14 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:17:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0701120717r61964365k56a62a80f4f98422@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:17:25 -0800 From: "Kevin Downey" To: "Tim Nilimaa" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070112085335.5F13.GERARD@seibercom.net> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:45:33 -0000 T24gMS8xMi8wNywgVGltIE5pbGltYWEgPHRpbUBuaWxpbWFhLnNlPiB3cm90ZToKPiBIaSwKPgo+ IG9rZXkgSSBoYXZlOgo+IC1iYXNoLTMuMDAkIGxvY2F0ZSBmb3J0dW5lCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9j aGluZXNlL2ZvcnR1bmV0dwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvY2hpbmVzZS9mb3J0dW5ldHcvTWFrZWZpbGUK PiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL2NoaW5lc2UvZm9ydHVuZXR3L2Rpc3RpbmZvCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9jaGlu ZXNlL2ZvcnR1bmV0dy9wa2ctZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL2NoaW5lc2UvZm9ydHVuZXR3L3Br Zy1wbGlzdAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvZGlzdGZpbGVzL3dtZm9ydHVuZS0wLjI0MS50YXIuZ3oKPiAv dXNyL3BvcnRzL2dhbWVzL3dtZm9ydHVuZQo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvZ2FtZXMvd21mb3J0dW5lL01h a2VmaWxlCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9nYW1lcy93bWZvcnR1bmUvZGlzdGluZm8KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRz L2dhbWVzL3dtZm9ydHVuZS9maWxlcwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvZ2FtZXMvd21mb3J0dW5lL2ZpbGVz L3BhdGNoLU1ha2VmaWxlCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9nYW1lcy93bWZvcnR1bmUvZmlsZXMvcGF0Y2gt d21mb3J0dW5lLmMKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL2dhbWVzL3dtZm9ydHVuZS9wa2ctZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNy L3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYmlibGUKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1t b2QtYmlibGUvTWFrZWZpbGUKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYmlibGUvZGlz dGluZm8KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYmlibGUvZmlsZXMKPiAvdXNyL3Bv cnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYmlibGUvZmlsZXMvcGtnLW1lc3NhZ2UuaW4KPiAvdXNyL3Bv cnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYmlibGUvcGtnLWRlc2NyCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2Zv cnR1bmUtbW9kLWJpYmxlL3BrZy1wbGlzdAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0dW5lLW1vZC1i b2ZoCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmUtbW9kLWJvZmgvTWFrZWZpbGUKPiAvdXNyL3Bv cnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtYm9maC9kaXN0aW5mbwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0 dW5lLW1vZC1ib2ZoL3BrZy1kZXNjcgo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0dW5lLW1vZC1ib2Zo L3BrZy1tZXNzYWdlCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmUtbW9kLWJvZmgvcGtnLXBsaXN0 Cj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmUtbW9kLWN1bG1lYS1jdWxtaWxvcgo+IC91c3IvcG9y dHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0dW5lLW1vZC1jdWxtZWEtY3VsbWlsb3IvTWFrZWZpbGUKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRz L21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtY3VsbWVhLWN1bG1pbG9yL01ha2VmaWxlLmZvcnR1bmUKPiAvdXNy L3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtY3VsbWVhLWN1bG1pbG9yL2Rpc3RpbmZvCj4gL3Vzci9w b3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmUtbW9kLWN1bG1lYS1jdWxtaWxvci9wa2ctZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNyL3Bv cnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZmVyZW5naV9ydWxlc19vZl9hY3F1aXNpdGlvbgo+IC91c3Iv cG9ydHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0dW5lLW1vZC1mZXJlbmdpX3J1bGVzX29mX2FjcXVpc2l0aW9uL01ha2Vm aWxlCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmUtbW9kLWZlcmVuZ2lfcnVsZXNfb2ZfYWNxdWlz aXRpb24vZGlzdGluZm8KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZmVyZW5naV9ydWxl c19vZl9hY3F1aXNpdGlvbi9wa2ctZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2Qt ZnV0dXJhbWEKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZnV0dXJhbWEvTWFrZWZpbGUK PiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZnV0dXJhbWEvZGlzdGluZm8KPiAvdXNyL3Bv cnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZnV0dXJhbWEvZmlsZXMKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9y dHVuZS1tb2QtZnV0dXJhbWEvZmlsZXMvcGtnLW1lc3NhZ2UuaW4KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2Mv Zm9ydHVuZS1tb2QtZnV0dXJhbWEvcGtnLWRlc2NyCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmVp dAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbWlzYy9mb3J0dW5laXQvTWFrZWZpbGUKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2Mv Zm9ydHVuZWl0L2Rpc3RpbmZvCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9taXNjL2ZvcnR1bmVpdC9wa2ctZGVzY3IK PiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL21pc2MvZm9ydHVuZWl0L3BrZy1wbGlzdAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcG9saXNo L2ZvcnR1bmVwbAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcG9saXNoL2ZvcnR1bmVwbC9NYWtlZmlsZQo+IC91c3Iv cG9ydHMvcG9saXNoL2ZvcnR1bmVwbC9kaXN0aW5mbwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcG9saXNoL2ZvcnR1 bmVwbC9wa2ctZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3BvbGlzaC9mb3J0dW5lcGwvcGtnLXBsaXN0Cj4g L3Vzci9wb3J0cy9ydXNzaWFuL2ZvcnR1bmVydQo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcnVzc2lhbi9mb3J0dW5l cnUvTWFrZWZpbGUKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3J1c3NpYW4vZm9ydHVuZXJ1L2Rpc3RpbmZvCj4gL3Vz ci9wb3J0cy9ydXNzaWFuL2ZvcnR1bmVydS9maWxlcwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcnVzc2lhbi9mb3J0 dW5lcnUvZmlsZXMvcGtnLW1lc3NhZ2UuaW4KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3J1c3NpYW4vZm9ydHVuZXJ1 L3BrZy1kZXNjcgo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvcnVzc2lhbi9mb3J0dW5lcnUvcGtnLWluc3RhbGwKPiAv dXNyL3BvcnRzL3J1c3NpYW4vZm9ydHVuZXJ1L3BrZy1wbGlzdAo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMvc3lzdXRp bHMvZm9ydHVuZWxvY2sKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3N5c3V0aWxzL2ZvcnR1bmVsb2NrL01ha2VmaWxl Cj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9zeXN1dGlscy9mb3J0dW5lbG9jay9kaXN0aW5mbwo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMv c3lzdXRpbHMvZm9ydHVuZWxvY2svZmlsZXMKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3N5c3V0aWxzL2ZvcnR1bmVs b2NrL2ZpbGVzL3BhdGNoLWFhCj4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9zeXN1dGlscy9mb3J0dW5lbG9jay9wa2ct ZGVzY3IKPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3gxMS10aGVtZXMvZTE3LXNwbGFzaC1mb3J0dW5lCj4gL3Vzci9w b3J0cy94MTEtdGhlbWVzL2UxNy1zcGxhc2gtZm9ydHVuZS9NYWtlZmlsZQo+IC91c3IvcG9ydHMv eDExLXRoZW1lcy9lMTctc3BsYXNoLWZvcnR1bmUvZGlzdGluZm8KPiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL3gxMS10 aGVtZXMvZTE3LXNwbGFzaC1mb3J0dW5lL3BrZy1kZXNjcgo+IC91c3Ivc2hhcmUvZ2FtZXMvZm9y dHVuZQo+IFtFbmQgT2YgTG9jYXRlXQo+Cj4gTmljZSBJIHRob3VnaHQsICJmb3J0dW5lIGxpZXMg dW5kZXIgL3Vzci9zaGFyZS9nYW1lcyIgYW5kIHNvIEkgdHJpZWQgdG8gcnVuIGl0Lgo+IC1iYXNo LTMuMDAkIC91c3Ivc2hhcmUvZ2FtZXMvZm9ydHVuZQo+IC1iYXNoOiAvdXNyL3NoYXJlL2dhbWVz L2ZvcnR1bmU6IGlzIGEgZGlyZWN0b3J5Cj4KPiAiRG8naCBhIGxhIEhvbWVyIi4uIHdlbGwgd2Vs bCBiZXR0ZXIgbG9vayBpbnNpZGUuLi4KPiAtYmFzaC0zLjAwJCBscyAtbGEgL3Vzci9zaGFyZS9n YW1lcy9mb3J0dW5lLwo+IHRvdGFsIDQKPiBkcnd4ci14ci14ICAyIHJvb3QgIHdoZWVsICA1MTIg TWFyICA1ICAyMDA1IC4vCj4gZHJ3eHIteHIteCAgMyByb290ICB3aGVlbCAgNTEyIE1hciAgNSAg MjAwNSAuLi8KPiAtYmFzaC0zLjAwJAo+Cj4gZG8naCBhZ2Fpbi4KPgo+IG9rZXksIGxldHMgbG9v ayBhdCB0aGUgc3JjLXBhdGguLiBub3RoaW5nIHRoZXJlID0vCj4KPiBJbnN0YWxsZWQgdGhlIHNy YyB3aXRoIHN5c2luc3RhbGwuLiBXZWUgPSkKPgo+IGJ1dCB0aGVuIC0+Cj4gYmFzaC0zLjAwIyB3 aG9hbWkKPiByb290Cj4gYmFzaC0zLjAwIyBwd2QKPiAvdXNyL3NyYy9nYW1lcy9mb3J0dW5lCj4g YmFzaC0zLjAwIyBtYWtlIGluc3RhbGwKPiA9PT0+IGZvcnR1bmUKPiBpbnN0YWxsIC1zIC1vIHJv b3QgLWcgd2hlZWwgLW0gNTU1ICAgZm9ydHVuZSAvdXNyL2dhbWVzCj4gaW5zdGFsbDogZm9ydHVu ZTogTm8gc3VjaCBmaWxlIG9yIGRpcmVjdG9yeQo+ICoqKiBFcnJvciBjb2RlIDcxCj4gU3RvcCBp biAvdXNyL3NyYy9nYW1lcy9mb3J0dW5lL2ZvcnR1bmUuCj4gKioqIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQo+IFN0 b3AgaW4gL3Vzci9zcmMvZ2FtZXMvZm9ydHVuZS4KPiBiYXNoLTMuMDAjCj4KPiBBbnkgaWRlYXM/ Cj4KPgo+IEtpbmQgcmVnYXJkcwo+Cj4gVGltCj4KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXwo+Cj4gRnLDpW46IG93bmVyLWZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIGdl bm9tIEdlcmFyZCBTZWliZXJ0Cj4gU2tpY2thdDogZnIgMjAwNy0wMS0xMiAxNTowMQo+IFRpbGw6 IFVzZXIgUXVlc3Rpb25zCj4gw4RtbmU6IFJlOiBmb3J0dW5lCj4KPgo+Cj4gT24gRnJpZGF5IEph bnVhcnkgMTIsIDIwMDcgYXQgMDg6MzM6MDggKEFNKSBUaW0gTmlsaW1hYSB3cm90ZToKPgo+Cj4g PiBJbSBub3QgYWJsZSB0byBydW4gZm9ydHVuZSBvbiBteSBmcmVlQlNEIDUuMyBpbnN0YWxsYXRp b24sIGFuZCBJIGtub3cKPiA+IHdoeSAtIHNpbmNlIGl0cyBub3QgaW5zdGFsbGVkIGFuZCB0aGF0 cyB3aGVyZSBJIHN0ZXAgaW50byB0cm91YmxlLiBJbQo+ID4gbm90IGFibGUgdG8gaW5zdGFsbCBp dC4gSSd2ZSBzZWFyY2hlZCB0aGUgcG9ydHNjb2xsZWN0aW9uIGFuZCBhc2tlZCBNci4KPiA+IEdv b2dsZSBidXQgbm9uZSBvZiB0aGVtIGtub3dzIGl0IChpbiBvdGhlciB3b3JkcyBJIGRvbid0IGtu b3cgaG93IHRvIGFzawo+ID4gdGhlIHF1ZXN0aW9uIHJpZ2h0IHNpbmNlIE1yLiBHb29nbGUgYW5k IHRoZSAoaG9seSkgaGFuZGJvb2sga25vd3MgaXQgYWxsKS4KPgo+IE9LLCBJIHRoaW5rIEkgY2Fu IGFzc2lzdCB5b3UuIEZpcnN0LCBJIGFzc3VtZSB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0cmllZAo+ICAgICAgICAgd2hp Y2ggZm9ydHVuZQo+IHRvIGluc3VyZSB0aGF0IGl0IGlzIG5vdCBhY3R1YWxseSBpbnN0YWxsZWQu IEl0IGlzIHVzdWFsbHkgaW4KPiAnL3Vzci9nYW1lcy9mb3J0dW5lJy4KPgo+IEkgdGhvdWdodCB0 aGF0IHRoZSBmaWxlcyB3ZXJlIGluc3RhbGxlZCBpdCB3aXRoIHRoZSBiYXNlIHN5c3RlbS4gVGhl Cj4gZmlsZXMgYXJlIGxvY2F0ZWQgaW4KPiAgICAgICAgIC91c3Ivc3JjL2dhbWVzL2ZvcnR1bmUK Pgo+Cj4gLS0KPiBHZXJhcmQKPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fXwo+IGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdAo+ IGh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rp b25zCj4gVG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gImZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25z LXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIgo+Cj4KPgo+Cj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KPiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9y ZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKPiBodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m by9mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucwo+IFRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZW5kIGFueSBtYWlsIHRvICJm cmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucy11bnN1YnNjcmliZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyIKPgo+CnJ1biBtYWtlIGNs ZWFuIGluIHRoZSBmb3J0dW5lIGJ1aWxkIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBhbmQgdGhlbiB0cnkgYWdhaW4uCgot LSAKVGhlIGJpZ2dlc3QgcHJvYmxlbSB3aXRoIGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gaXMgdGhlIGlsbHVzaW9u IHRoYXQgaXQgaGFzIG9jY3VycmVkLgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 15:56:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA16F16A52E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE2F13C4E9 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 10:56:05 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTR32125; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 10:55:55 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17831.44930.819031.51321@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:55:46 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090207.45A7ADBA.003A,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: mapping inode to file name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:56:10 -0000 Is there a program (or a standard function) that, provided the inode #, returns the associated filename? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 15:58:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43B116A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:58:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E5313C442 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 10:58:53 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTR33151; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:58:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 10:58:48 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17831.45103.444603.422280@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:58:39 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090206.45A7AE61.00A5,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: fsck operation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:58:58 -0000 Let's say fsck is examining a filesystem, and determines the block count is wrong for file FOO. When it adjusts the value, does it leave a trace (e.g. changed modification time for the file) or would one have to not such changes by hand? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 16:17:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F2B16A416 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D5E13C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0CGHXox024843; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:17:34 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:17:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <17831.44930.819031.51321@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17831.44930.819031.51321@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121717.33472.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mapping inode to file name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:17:39 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 16:55, Robert Huff wrote: > Is there a program (or a standard function) that, provided the > inode #, returns the associated filename? find / -inum - Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 16:26:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675FE16A47B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2E313C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from dagobah.vindaloo.com (vpn-03.vindaloo.com [172.24.144.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF965C10; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:03:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.vindaloo.com (localhost.vindaloo.com [IPv6:::1]) by dagobah.vindaloo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CG382j001574; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:03:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:03:07 -0500 Message-Id: <1168617787.1471.8.camel@dagobah.vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: iwi + 802.11b X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:26:26 -0000 I'm having problems getting a good connection from my laptop to my 802.11b network via the iwi interface. The ath interface does this well and the iwi interface works great with my 802.11g network but it's unhappy with 802.11b. -- Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 16:47:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1C316A51E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0A913C461 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so757684uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:47:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pjvNKteLYc7IBjYUD3dObxD1mMpr94Oic6S85xQuD//PnCtrSCAFv+QW92jPP9/+ZioZXE55tiB/KClj5JsQ3Gl425WG+YNJU4IualOjqcVvqAnNYL+HIhjd0qCpWdalBmuGHxtrnr+Ddm9ubk4sTdRJIdmvZVO7TtVxufVJxbM= Received: by 10.78.18.3 with SMTP id 3mr456926hur.1168620417728; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:46:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.199.9 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:46:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60701120846g4a19d2d0k141377905a717e7b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:46:57 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: cvsup'dating several machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:14 -0000 > I will soon update FreeBSD on several machines from 4.11 to 5.5, they > are all at the same level of 4.11. > > I would like to save network bandwidth, would it be OK/enough if I > cvsup one machine and then copy /usr/src from that opne to the others? Hi Olivier, If you run an infrastructure of multiple FreeBSD machines, then you should consider building a local CVSup mirror. This way, you'll prevent the error-prone and tedious process copying /usr/src from one machine to the others by hand. Plus, with a local update server, you make sure all your machines have the exact same FreeBSD sources. You can also use this machine not only for CVSup, but for all your ports repository, thus saving even more bandwith. Not to mention the speed increase every time you run cvsup. It's way faster to cvsup on the local LAN then from the internet. To get you started, check out this article from O'Reilly ONLamp's author Michael Lucas at http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Now, we've made several modifications to the above article to include a generic update user on our machines which uses scponly(8) and sudo(8) with ssh keys to encrypt all of our CVS and porteasy(8) updates. It also permits you to delegate the cvsup(1) of the machines to other admins without giving them the root password. If you're interested, I can send you the documentation. Have fun! David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 16:47:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F7216A589 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA5F13C44B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0CGHXox024843; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:17:34 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:17:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <17831.44930.819031.51321@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17831.44930.819031.51321@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121717.33472.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mapping inode to file name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:29 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 16:55, Robert Huff wrote: > Is there a program (or a standard function) that, provided the > inode #, returns the associated filename? find / -inum - Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:02:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id C730416A417; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070112170200.C730416A417@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:02:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id CF45416A47C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070112170200.CF45416A47C@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:26:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB1F16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F3413C428 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:26:04 -0500 id 00056417.45A7C4AC.0000B9D9 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:25:49 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: patrick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070112122512.J66207@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: BIND 9.3.2 on FreeBSD 6.1-release-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:26:04 -0000 Did you run it in foregroun debug mode or ktrace(1) it yet? Turn on querylog and see if you're getting worked? ~BAS On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, patrick wrote: > I'm running BIND 9.3.2 on FreeBSD 6.1, and am noticing that it gets > out of control after running for a while. > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND > 60480 53 1 132 0 195M 194M RUN 41.7H 75.54% named > > After restarting it, its CPU usage goes back down to what it should > be, as does its memory usage. I really don't want to babysit this > process, so I'm trying to find the cause of this. I have > "max-cache-size" set to "150M", as before I turned this on, this > process would just grow and grow until it hit FreeBSD's limit and > would stop responding all together, not to mention eating up as much > CPU time as it could. > > I never had this problem at all with BIND 8, and am wondering if > there's something I'm doing wrong with BIND 9 to have this problem? > Has anyone else experienced this? > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:28:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EC416A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5939113C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:28:37 -0500 id 00056492.45A7C545.0000BA69 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:28:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Jim Stapleton In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20606260213i4099d67at88de253bc07290b2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070112122751.T66207@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <80f4f2b20606251811q35afdf6cof9d1208b51a78e23@mail.gmail.com> <20060626021535.GG83209@dan.emsphone.com> <80f4f2b20606260213i4099d67at88de253bc07290b2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which options/files/chunks of the kernel source define xpt_done and xpt_release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:28:37 -0000 In general: $ egrep -ir "xpt_done" /usr/src/sys/* ~BAS On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Jim Stapleton wrote: > Thank you, > > -Jim Stapleton > > On 6/25/06, Dan Nelson wrote: >> In the last episode (Jun 25), Jim Stapleton said: >> > I am trying to work on some stuff, and it references those functions, >> > but I can't seem to find where they are in the kernel. >> >> xpt_done and a lot of xpt_release_* functions are in /sys/cam/cam_xpt.c >> >> -- >> Dan Nelson >> dnelson@allantgroup.com >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:30:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEF916A416 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E28F13C467 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:30:05 -0500 id 00056426.45A7C59D.0000BA82 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:29:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060525082959.GB1045@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20070112122905.P66207@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <447561D7.60108@aaronholmes.net> <20060525082959.GB1045@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aaron Holmes , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Constant segmentation faults with freebsd 6.1-release and -stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:30:06 -0000 Memtst86+ ISO images you can boot. Also any good ACPI hardware sensor info. You may be running hot; but segmentation means memory. Memtest86+ >:} On Thu, 25 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:50:47AM -0700, Aaron Holmes wrote: >> Am i the only one who gets this with most port installations? >> I'm trying to narrow it down to a hardware fault or a 6x fault. >> >> I get signal 4's and segmentation faults on nearly every compilation >> >> any ideas? > > Yep, hardware. > > Kris > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:37:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33BA16A4D2 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0A413C448 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from arbitor.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:27:37 -0500 id 0005642B.45A7C509.0000BA07 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:27:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Bryan Bonifacio In-Reply-To: <20060730015722.52939.qmail@web55110.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20070112122707.V66207@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <20060730015722.52939.qmail@web55110.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org, Stojance Subject: Re: Can I Make my own CD ROM bootable from this ftp server: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.1-RELEASE ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:42 -0000 Or use bittorrent if you're way out in the cut.... ~BAS On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Bryan Bonifacio wrote: > Why don't you just download the CD image and burn that > onto a CD? > > Go to > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.1/ > > > --- Stojance wrote: > >> Dear FreeBSD >> Can I make my own bootable CD from FreeBSD, actually >> from the ftp >> server: >> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.1-RELEASE >> ? >> I really need it. I can't pay for your CD ROM so any >> help would be very >> much appreciated. >> I'll download everything and put it on a CD and burn >> it under Nero as a >> bootable CD. >> Please Help ME >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:21:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684B016A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b0ntrict0r@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp4.yandex.ru (smtp4.yandex.ru [213.180.223.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20BD13C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b0ntrict0r@yandex.ru) Received: from pat-pppoe.krasnet.ru ([195.112.231.127]:62932 "EHLO [127.0.0.1]" smtp-auth: "b0ntrict0r" TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S7768058AbXALREs (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:04:48 +0300 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp4.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: b0ntrict0r Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:05:23 +0700 From: Arseny Solokha X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.95.6) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1386494739.20070113000523@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:40:12 +0000 Subject: program kill X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Arseny Solokha List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:21:27 -0000 Hello! How can I kill the program at the defined time? For example, I need to kill mpg321 at 21.00 if it works. Arseny. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 17:51:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C27816A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EA013C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CHpPpE003201; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1470A29C003; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:25 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807123-a3b5bbb0000039f2-16-45a7ca9dd2c9 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 08F3A30400B; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1386494739.20070113000523@yandex.ru> References: <1386494739.20070113000523@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6350AC70-F0CA-46E5-82A1-509031368B8E@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:51:24 -0800 To: Arseny Solokha X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: program kill X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:25 -0000 On Jan 12, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Arseny Solokha wrote: > How can I kill the program at the defined time? For example, I need to > kill mpg321 at 21.00 if it works. Set up a cron job to run "pkill mpg321" at the appropriate time, or use an "at" job if this is a one-shot deal. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 18:11:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBDE16A505 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: from web54310.mail.yahoo.com (web54310.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87C7113C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: (qmail 8827 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2007 18:11:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.hk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Uikhz88nM4uq4f6cRG2jUUt+HvdgUfA/9xqV3FJx/PYPuGK0ynxCMzMhWLZ83JyFBsvjk+VMf0yvzhkXT8Iev5bnyUtUAz2Qx+rEkPfQpqCEIU1itqB8wBlWGv6xYOMuJIk1XNRZNc/0MPugcD9WqNJJxaJpAi5lz2lUHKwaAHo=; X-YMail-OSG: _d1zrsoVM1lT9J8UZJ.LvKxOt4AItGm6IJouuez6shlXUICxZn3hAi5104YYkZ1HGU3ZpSGjpGN4wker0C8VxGwYfKJdF0VYC4kxi5WjEYyN.BEACo62_TuMPUxb9mE.QFRFqz05XSDT7rzUUYWkeEWwj0iwk2wZIIkK7fiN.TdJ8YEPhdQEIYPe Received: from [202.134.67.165] by web54310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:11:26 PST Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:11:26 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Dung To: Nikos Vassiliadis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200701121721.51917.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <820695.8033.qm@web54310.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: Patrick Dung Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:11:32 -0000 Thanks Nikos for reply I have figure out how to remove that route It was consider 192.168.3.0 as host instead of net [root@fbsd2 ~]# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 add net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0 [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete -net 192.168.3.0 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net 192.168.3.0: not in table [root@fbsd2 ~]# route delete -host 192.168.3.0 delete host 192.168.3.0 --- Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:01, Patrick Dung wrote: > > Hi > > > > Suppose I have mistype a command: > > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 > > > > There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it > unless > > reboot: > > > > 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 > fxp0 > > > > Any ideas? > > Use "route flush". And add your static routes again > either by hand or with the help of "/etc/rc.d/routing start" > > Nikos > ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 18:16:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D583B16A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626B313C45B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 75062 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2007 18:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.251?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 18:20:25 -0000 Message-ID: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:53:44 -0600 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CUPS + X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:16:49 -0000 Hi list, have you ever installed cups + samba for a print server? That is what I am trying to do, the print server box set up is as the following: - FreeBSD 6.1 release - cups-1.2 - samba 3 - hpijs-2.1.4 - foomatic-db-20061214 - cups-samba-5.0.r3 I have installed and tested the printer properly via web interface of cups. The problem comes when I try to push the Windows printer drivers with cups, I get a error message # cupsaddsmb -H localhost -U root -h localhost -a -v Password for root required to access localhost via SAMBA: No Windows printer drivers are installed! No Windows printer drivers are installed! No Windows printer drivers are installed! ... I have already download the respective drivers. Any one knows how to fix this? Thanks in advance!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 18:22:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C036B16A506 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849B613C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0CI8oYT008882; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:08:51 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:09:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <1374.192.168.125.134.1168612794.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <1374.192.168.125.134.1168612794.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121009.01786.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Jonathan Horne Subject: Re: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:22:51 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 06:39, Jonathan Horne wrote: > your problem lies here: > > FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE > > i never have fortune until i rebuild the world on my systems (which, > i then immediatly 'chmod -x /usr/games/fortune', since it annoys me > on login and i cant find where its called from). > Do a grep fortune .* It is called from the profile used by your shell when you login. On my systems, I see "freebsd-tips". Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ "I am Andean project". http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 18:38:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54E416A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andras@gelanyi.hu) Received: from mail.info2k1.hu (info2k1.hu [193.202.88.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130F13C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andras@gelanyi.hu) Received: from catv-50629158.catv.broadband.hu ([80.98.145.88] helo=[192.168.1.3]) by mail.info2k1.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5RHy-000FFu-9q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:38:12 +0100 Message-ID: <45A7D598.2060405@gelanyi.hu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:38:16 +0100 From: Andras GELANYI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010203040707090607010704" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) Subject: SSH connection from within a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:38:39 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010203040707090607010704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Do you know how can I initaite a SSH connection from within a jail? I always get the "Host key verification failed." message. Starting the ssh session with -v it seems that the problem is with tty allocation. debug1: read_passphrase: can't open /dev/tty: Device busy The jail has devfs mounted with the default ruleset. (As seen in /usr/share/examples/etc/defaults/devfs.rules) Andras --------------ms010203040707090607010704 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJiTCC Ax8wggKIoAMCAQICEEl1PeQE/ft3QHl3rZqUnxowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MTAxMDAwNTM0MFoX DTA3MTAxMDAwNTM0MFowYjERMA8GA1UEBAwIR2Vsw6FueWkxEDAOBgNVBCoMB0FuZHLDoXMx GTAXBgNVBAMMEEFuZHLDoXMgR2Vsw6FueWkxIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEWFuZHJhc0BnZWxh bnlpLmh1MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvrwWZJKtIPbeJRwwX342 lqK1rz1b6uhmXhJXzobfxGsdVY+F6wArY/uKlw4V/QpQ9DqiDMIR/tGEVIoeHGfh2c3hez7o cReQ6AD5ZwdZbHiwc95XHei5ceHg+YqGX7fQB8Nt3DZiH3ffnu8JvxoEAJJFNC98P6kKM8JA pwexLtSP9eBxPoYJJsSoXgP5Lq4/C16jcqxDTeW2uDmjFgIoKtTCCeS2iIXBGOkNIOfwusZE 2zOOt4nnT152TdsdF/YKjGZXZj8z4bLQEJIKYCMuWJ4i2mRAFxaPjBPSLhjvgJs+0XAExrN3 thDPkUBwZIoT5BlODEZIdMP+WZWIMaxqaQIDAQABo1IwUDAPBgNVHQ8BAf8EBQMDB/mAMBEG CWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFoDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFhbmRyYXNAZ2VsYW55aS5odTAMBgNVHRMB Af8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAKmGe9dCoRvm6ULM0aT9BDOBjt6UpKvpNQmmKR5X tiydCfliWgDj32QbiK4nVnvUJCYPBkex3uHsi0vyFpRehVmnZczaFQRethaGJQ12DerARlu4 gySHDmM5TnfuIIIbl/4C75y0kVYIgKMzisoEFe2IBldba83j699H4X8HkzoBMIIDHzCCAoig AwIBAgIQSXU95AT9+3dAeXetmpSfGjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEl MCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3Rl IFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMDEwMDA1MzQwWhcNMDcxMDEw MDA1MzQwWjBiMREwDwYDVQQEDAhHZWzDoW55aTEQMA4GA1UEKgwHQW5kcsOhczEZMBcGA1UE AwwQQW5kcsOhcyBHZWzDoW55aTEgMB4GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYRYW5kcmFzQGdlbGFueWkuaHUw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+vBZkkq0g9t4lHDBffjaWorWvPVvq 6GZeElfOht/Eax1Vj4XrACtj+4qXDhX9ClD0OqIMwhH+0YRUih4cZ+HZzeF7PuhxF5DoAPln B1lseLBz3lcd6Llx4eD5ioZft9AHw23cNmIfd9+e7wm/GgQAkkU0L3w/qQozwkCnB7Eu1I/1 4HE+hgkmxKheA/kurj8LXqNyrENN5ba4OaMWAigq1MIJ5LaIhcEY6Q0g5/C6xkTbM463iedP XnZN2x0X9gqMZldmPzPhstAQkgpgIy5YniLaZEAXFo+ME9IuGO+Amz7RcATGs3e2EM+RQHBk ihPkGU4MRkh0w/5ZlYgxrGppAgMBAAGjUjBQMA8GA1UdDwEB/wQFAwMH+YAwEQYJYIZIAYb4 QgEBBAQDAgWgMBwGA1UdEQQVMBOBEWFuZHJhc0BnZWxhbnlpLmh1MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAqYZ710KhG+bpQszRpP0EM4GO3pSkq+k1CaYpHle2LJ0J+WJa AOPfZBuIridWe9QkJg8GR7He4eyLS/IWlF6FWadlzNoVBF62FoYlDXYN6sBGW7iDJIcOYzlO d+4gghuX/gLvnLSRVgiAozOKygQV7YgGV1trzePr30fhfweTOgEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgEN MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBl MRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYD VQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUg UGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWls QHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQG EwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMj VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD gY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTl UAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIAC ZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgw BgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3Rl UGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAY BgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2j ZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguC dJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4k sdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDZDCCA2ACAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEl1PeQE/ft3QHl3rZqUnxowCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAcMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDcwMTEyMTgzODE2WjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU8MgKCKlCV0VX5oqpHjMOUn16XTEwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggq hkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICASgwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBJdT3kBP37d0B5d62alJ8aMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzF4 oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBJdT3k BP37d0B5d62alJ8aMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAEvpIGTky8kKlOA5kX32AZAxVaevTuFe HwgjHmXoflcFv2NS4BUDeJOSXhKLG1GPddlKQY3iyKV2KGQy+miuLYwwDgOdThQKZQ0rgaiC 0He9u2VTN6b6u3x6Fy6I4+j+0qGBbb/WNhEp1UMqZthsUpDNDa6lJb5pIXaceVLm7NKMXCtL ZdurOKHSeRS1ZMeSlM8COVQsqirAjUeKgf2TUoJBIpnUzQmXG2jScitwDe2TsOefI4iKUMyM INeBhOP0m5vDjONKlvPmbUoRhIyVaD+8o0rSxwp+S50iam1fFB7fS0wnl8JHIZZYsYtHNf7x 2KDD1dh5lGKiK+xIeBgK8N8AAAAAAAA= --------------ms010203040707090607010704-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:05:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA4816A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep03.bredband.com (mxfep03.bredband.com [195.54.107.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4428113C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep03.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070112190506.MPHX2708.mxfep03.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:05:06 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 20:05:06 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: fortune Thread-Index: Acc2Z7ZNk/D6df7KRs689lwGRPYR0gAE+INO References: <20070112085335.5F13.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1d3ed48c0701120717r61964365k56a62a80f4f98422@mail.gmail.com> From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SV: fortune X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:05:10 -0000 Hi =20 I had to run make clean twice and the run make, not make install.. and = after make I could run make install =3D/ =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim ________________________________ Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org genom Kevin Downey Skickat: fr 2007-01-12 16:17 Till: Tim Nilimaa Kopia: User Questions =C4mne: Re: fortune On 1/12/07, Tim Nilimaa wrote: > Hi, > > okey I have: > -bash-3.00$ locate fortune > /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw > /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/Makefile > /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/distinfo > /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/chinese/fortunetw/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/distfiles/wmfortune-0.241.tar.gz > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/Makefile > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/distinfo > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files/patch-Makefile > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/files/patch-wmfortune.c > /usr/ports/games/wmfortune/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/files > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/files/pkg-message.in > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bible/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-message > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-bofh/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/Makefile.fortune > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/files > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/files/pkg-message.in > /usr/ports/misc/fortune-mod-futurama/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit > /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/Makefile > /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/distinfo > /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/misc/fortuneit/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl > /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/Makefile > /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/distinfo > /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/polish/fortunepl/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/Makefile > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/distinfo > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/files > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/files/pkg-message.in > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-install > /usr/ports/russian/fortuneru/pkg-plist > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/Makefile > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/distinfo > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/files > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/files/patch-aa > /usr/ports/sysutils/fortunelock/pkg-descr > /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune > /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/Makefile > /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/distinfo > /usr/ports/x11-themes/e17-splash-fortune/pkg-descr > /usr/share/games/fortune > [End Of Locate] > > Nice I thought, "fortune lies under /usr/share/games" and so I tried = to run it. > -bash-3.00$ /usr/share/games/fortune > -bash: /usr/share/games/fortune: is a directory > > "Do'h a la Homer".. well well better look inside... > -bash-3.00$ ls -la /usr/share/games/fortune/ > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 5 2005 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Mar 5 2005 ../ > -bash-3.00$ > > do'h again. > > okey, lets look at the src-path.. nothing there =3D/ > > Installed the src with sysinstall.. Wee =3D) > > but then -> > bash-3.00# whoami > root > bash-3.00# pwd > /usr/src/games/fortune > bash-3.00# make install > =3D=3D=3D> fortune > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 fortune /usr/games > install: fortune: No such file or directory > *** Error code 71 > Stop in /usr/src/games/fortune/fortune. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src/games/fortune. > bash-3.00# > > Any ideas? > > > Kind regards > > Tim > > ________________________________ > > Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org genom Gerard Seibert > Skickat: fr 2007-01-12 15:01 > Till: User Questions > =C4mne: Re: fortune > > > > On Friday January 12, 2007 at 08:33:08 (AM) Tim Nilimaa wrote: > > > > Im not able to run fortune on my freeBSD 5.3 installation, and I = know > > why - since its not installed and thats where I step into trouble. = Im > > not able to install it. I've searched the portscollection and asked = Mr. > > Google but none of them knows it (in other words I don't know how to = ask > > the question right since Mr. Google and the (holy) handbook knows it = all). > > OK, I think I can assist you. First, I assume you have tried > which fortune > to insure that it is not actually installed. It is usually in > '/usr/games/fortune'. > > I thought that the files were installed it with the base system. The > files are located in > /usr/src/games/fortune > > > -- > Gerard > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > run make clean in the fortune build directory and then try again. -- The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has = occurred. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:07:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0739B16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep04.bredband.com (mxfep04.bredband.com [195.54.107.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EF913C458 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep04.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070112190750.MNVD2732.mxfep04.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:07:50 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 20:07:49 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:01:04 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Upgrade apache Thread-Index: Acc2fAH5QyNmiobJRCOIPn3rZgmaAw== From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrade apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:07:54 -0000 Hi, =20 How do I upgrade apache-2.0.59 to apache22? Do I have to do make = uninstall for port apache20 and then make install for apache22? I do have php installed - wouldnt that be a problem if I uninstall = apache20? Also - upgrading php43 to php51, is it the same thing with = that? =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:10:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA8C16A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7522C13C474 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] ([10.0.0.11]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0CJ9WjW018185; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <45A7DCF4.3050509@wmptl.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:09:40 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= References: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serving windows print drivers with Samba+CUPS (Was: CUPS +) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:10 -0000 César Amaya wrote: > Hi list, have you ever installed cups + samba for a print server? That > is what I am trying to do, the print server box set up is as the > following: > > - FreeBSD 6.1 release > - cups-1.2 > - samba 3 > - hpijs-2.1.4 > - foomatic-db-20061214 > - cups-samba-5.0.r3 > > I have installed and tested the printer properly via web interface of > cups. The problem comes when I try to push the Windows printer drivers > with cups, I get a error message > > # cupsaddsmb -H localhost -U root -h localhost -a -v > Password for root required to access localhost via SAMBA: > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > ... > I have already download the respective drivers. > > Any one knows how to fix this? > Thanks in advance!!! > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Firstly, I changed your subject to something a little more specific; you really should read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/ for details on getting better results from this mail list. A vague or generic subject such as your's frequently gets skipped and your chances of solving your problem lessen. That said, herein I contradict myself by trying to answer your initial problem, but I have some experience with what you are apparently trying to do and would like to help. Unfortunately, acting as a print server for windows clients isn't always cut-and-dry.. The key with Samba+CUPS, is to NOT use any filters or drivers on the CUPS end of things. This is very important, as it will change your output if you're also using the windows drivers. You must add your printers via CUPS as 'RAW' queues, no driver. The process is outlined very well in the Samba documentation, and that too I would strongly recommend you do some more reading up on, but in the interest of sparking the desire to do so, here's an outline of the basic process required: 1 - Setup CUPS, add printers using RAW queues, Setup Samba, tell it to use cups for printing 2 - Setup a shared location for printer drivers from Samba, the share can be pretty much anywhere on your local FreeBSD filesystem, and can use all the options of any other file-share, but must be shared from Samba with the name 'print$'. Something similar to this inside your smb.conf should suffice: [print$] comment = Windows Client Printer Drivers path = /var/db/windows_printers browseable = yes guest ok = yes read only = yes write list = root Administrator @"Domain Admins" @"Printer Admins" 3 - Login from a Windows client, to the Samba server using an administrator login (as specified in the write list for print$). Goto the 'Printers' section, NOT the direct queue mapping, for example: \\samba1\Printers NOT \\samba1\some_printer. When in the printers folder, right-click the printer you wish to add the drivers to, and you can add them from the windows properties dialog like you would any printer. This will upload the drivers to the samba [print$] share for other clients to use. 4 - From another samba client running windows, goto \\samba1\some_printer and it will prompt if you wish to 'Connect to printer', simply say yes - and that client should use the windows drivers directly from the samba [print$] share without further prompting. There are some issues, and it's not just as simple as 4 easy steps... but this is the general process to go through, with a little reading from the Samba website/documentation you should be able to get it going. Feel free to drop another message back to the list if you run into more questions from there. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:10:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6413416A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A60A13C461 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so571043ana for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dl8JAPfmlf+2gW+Uy1vnfUXZi4RPpXcjh3r5RahRANl7GONUMh22uUbOtj493lZSdkhT3HxvmG4oLyCb6KFP8Ib/Dh1MaLkio/EutLph8PYE4m0aioKfHGeOjF88qhVU7QryvE/6+SSc3KB9kna7il+9f6qBa/kWGAL9rHxo4j8= Received: by 10.100.164.14 with SMTP id m14mr539699ane.1168629010973; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:10:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:10:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:10:10 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:12 -0000 Hi Can anyone tell? Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? If yes, where can one find them? -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:17:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5401916A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from public.aci.on.ca (aci.on.ca [205.207.148.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34CE13C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@qwirky.net) Received: from (invalid client hostname: host address literal does not match remote client address)[127.0.0.1] (xtreme-156-171.dyn.aci.on.ca[69.17.156.171] port=1294) by public.aci.on.ca([205.207.148.252] port=25) via TCP with esmtp (1390 bytes) (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:17:36 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.122-Pre 2005-Nov-17 #1 built 2006-Feb-21) Message-ID: <45A7DED4.5050802@qwirky.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:17:40 -0500 From: Jeff Royle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions References: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0702-1, 11/01/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: VeeJay Subject: Re: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lists@qwirky.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:17:40 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Can anyone tell? > > Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and > when? If yes, where can one find them? > The file /var/log/auth.log should contain all the information you are looking for. man syslog.conf and man syslogd for more information on customizing what you are logging. Cheers, Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:18:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7022F16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A413C461 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@nilimaa.se) Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070112191824.OHRM2832.mxfep02.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:18:24 +0100 Received: from c-a165e253.310-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO mail.nilimaa.se) ([83.226.101.161]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2007 20:18:24 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:11:09 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD boxand when? Thread-Index: Acc2fNndpA+AoXpLQz2laVjrPfVYQQAAJEmn References: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> From: "Tim Nilimaa" To: "FreeBSD-Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SV: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD boxand when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:28 -0000 Hi, =20 cat /var/log/auth.log or tail -f /var/log/auth.log =20 =20 Kind regards =20 Tim ________________________________ Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org genom VeeJay Skickat: fr 2007-01-12 20:10 Till: maanjee@gmail.com; FreeBSD-Questions =C4mne: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD = boxand when? Hi Can anyone tell? Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? If yes, where can one find them? -- Thanks! BR / vj _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:18:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893216A504 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andras@gelanyi.hu) Received: from mail.info2k1.hu (info2k1.hu [193.202.88.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78A313C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andras@gelanyi.hu) Received: from catv-50629158.catv.broadband.hu ([80.98.145.88] helo=[192.168.1.3]) by mail.info2k1.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5Ruo-000Fxe-H3; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:18:18 +0100 Message-ID: <45A7DF05.60105@gelanyi.hu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:18:29 +0100 From: Andras GELANYI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:18:44 -0000 hi, have a look at /var/log/auth.log (and also on utmp) VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Can anyone tell? > > Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and > when? If yes, where can one find them? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:19:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F4916A501 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3F913C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CJJ2iH011851; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 6937F40090; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:19:02 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807126-a5e89bb000000245-ec-45a7df26a1ee Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 4E1554008D; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:19:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <51090C7A-5250-4BCE-8BEF-C7008CAC7D87@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:17:31 -0800 To: VeeJay X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:19:03 -0000 On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:10 AM, VeeJay wrote: > Can anyone tell? > > Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box > and > when? If yes, where can one find them? Yes, see the "last" command or "man wtmp"... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:23:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1011616A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEEB13C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1284520nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:23:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=jcrGAkBTFUzYbdVe8nGFqx8ZZLTnybYi/PmQ05Wg3CJTqBLzVe9uBIzKpA/qnwlrToPV/QAraZMEsASAkW+i4Ob9A7//OvSUD7PEiZ3eP/QM/ZYNjGG7iVSgHKpUK62K4oYwxwd+jkUvGvOvnhkTy40Pru6hZpRr5O/ThH65ly8= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr189371bud.1168629774327; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:22:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:22:54 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 26fb8f7f8c1a68a2 Subject: man page synopsis syntax reference X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:23:02 -0000 Hello, Is there an authoritative reference of what manpage syntax should look like? ie. foo [optional arg] ... I can't seem to find a reference that explains this syntax. Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:36:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B6E16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F4C13C480 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1287392nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=P5qyUfVxRccZnNkbCncU0YAIQZ8pxzMF5yGf+35H4gqiEixSmcRBY80t9wO4lBGOh7vwyVkae8z3O2UP1C3DXd9sqxc8EyszyLH+8FsQAO/ZiUiAT+Zc8051Zl0B0id0+97+5eJxSFZ5+cgLzJr/wsbX7+45VoV7znGTVgnzM9I= Received: by 10.49.29.2 with SMTP id g2mr971899nfj.1168630582418; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.223.12 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <39ed86f90701121136g38763448uc35d3a495d27b532@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:22 -0800 From: "Greg Albrecht" To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd0a0da0701121110t18fcfc00oc75f8721c729b017@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:24 -0000 login errors and successful logins are going to be in /var/log/auth.log to see who is currently or has ever logged in from the command line, try: finger(1) last(1) w(1) who(1) -g On 12/01/07, VeeJay wrote: > Hi > > Can anyone tell? > > Are there any log files which shows who is logging to a FreeBSD box and > when? If yes, where can one find them? > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Greg Albrecht (gregoryba@gmail.com) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:36:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237F916A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80B13C428 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so793838uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LJqcdJPiYUYSJYte0vfXCOAXVYBFmuVHSmv2vWNbY8D7mqTwKGfd1wjlhEtWIm/jFWokb6odWZoHHtJ+QlvkgiTJ+4ml8nFWuKSwk/1fKz1ErvBC/KE0P8+7esbV3Tdi3JbD/u7vUMlOlRisfWBfzYIVnBgMcCj9SaJGnf7Ko2o= Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr1393868ugg.1168630617602; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:36:57 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "Michael P. Soulier" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: man page synopsis syntax reference X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:59 -0000 On 1/12/07, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hello, > > Is there an authoritative reference of what manpage syntax should look like? There's a section on style(9) which explains the synapsis of typical usage() functions, asserting that such a syntax should be similar to the one used in man pages, so maybe you can get some info there.. > > Thanks, > Mike > -- > Michael P. Soulier > "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a > touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." > --Albert Einstein Regards, -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:40:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B416A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C92313C46B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1288216nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:40:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=As6il+I/zgZqHMrYF6T38CjwH+eXb0JHQ1oYLZVYC+IOnGrKk0RBrXF6gsAEvvGUWFZ37NEksGvW1ndgtGuf6vYNCbgAlWVuKn8ZxgndJfujL4iMqISKDf20zZ9szPqwGyBdpw/Qo+51j63GSE/plLoAx+fuXNWIaYvlMV+JgIY= Received: by 10.48.242.19 with SMTP id p19mr984715nfh.1168630825780; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:40:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.223.12 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:40:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <39ed86f90701121140r4ce520b1x6b235b255f8fc184@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:40:25 -0800 From: "Greg Albrecht" To: "Tim Nilimaa" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:40:27 -0000 from memory... for apache: $ cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 $ make deinstall $ cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 $ make install you might need to upgrade your /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf as some of the directives have changed between 20 and 22. when you try to start apache it will let you know what's wrong. for php: $ cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 $ make install make sure you select 'apache' in the menu list, otherwise you'll be stuck with php5 as a cgi (who wants that?) of course, upgrading to php5 introduces it's own problems, aside from syntax changes in the language, you'll also need to upgrade all of your php5 and pecl modules: $ cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions $ make install -g On 12/01/07, Tim Nilimaa wrote: > Hi, > > How do I upgrade apache-2.0.59 to apache22? Do I have to do make uninstall for port apache20 and then make install for apache22? > I do have php installed - wouldnt that be a problem if I uninstall apache20? Also - upgrading php43 to php51, is it the same thing with that? > > > Kind regards > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Greg Albrecht (gregoryba@gmail.com) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:41:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0850A16A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82A413C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail038-S [10.13.128.38]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout10/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0CJfl2S017116; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:41:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail038 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail038/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0CJfk5i029422; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:41:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:41:46 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: Tim Nilimaa Message-ID: <01314817-0110-1000-9A7A-DD339BE18D06-Webmail-10012@mac.com> in-reply-to: references: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:41:46 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:41:49 -0000 On Friday, January 12, 2007, at 10:09AM, "Tim Nilimaa" wrote: >Hi, > >How do I upgrade apache-2.0.59 to apache22? Do I have to do make uninstall for port apache20 and then make install for apache22? >I do have php installed - wouldnt that be a problem if I uninstall apache20? Also - upgrading php43 to php51, is it the same thing with that? I did this upgrade early last year. IIRC, you'll have to change the apache configuration files. IIRC, they are not compatible. make deinstall apache20 make install apache22 rewrite your apache config files (they are even in a different folder than the "old" apache20 config files. New location: /usr/local/etc/apache22). You could add your LoadModules for php43 to apache22 or you could upgrade php after apache, and the installer scripts will add the correct LoadModule lines to your apache22 config files for you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:42:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CD716A504 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D101F13C458 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1288535nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:42:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fOuOWjyaIKYZR8ttcAWY49le/kzLyNcSiSiyMVmiLQT2l8RClA3f+H8++QAj5dgVdeIypFrLQJod3xy1rg0w4gotZIrs+Tir8kKYhgGC4m8oNPAEiD7xByLqOYH+Oqnlv8jsrSQf8MKrUfhcjykpUbdK2wdFuMNipHdZ/ZWfInE= Received: by 10.48.48.1 with SMTP id v1mr986137nfv.1168630928247; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.223.12 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:42:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <39ed86f90701121142j3594e180t5a04f01993299809@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:42:07 -0800 From: "Greg Albrecht" To: "Andras GELANYI" In-Reply-To: <45A7D598.2060405@gelanyi.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A7D598.2060405@gelanyi.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSH connection from within a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:42:12 -0000 are you using the default /etc/ssh/sshd_config? i'm currently running jails with ssh and don't recall having this problem. the only thing i remember explicitly having to do is tell sshd to bind to the jail's IP. -g On 12/01/07, Andras GELANYI wrote: > Do you know how can I initaite a SSH connection from within a jail? > > I always get the "Host key verification failed." message. Starting the > ssh session with -v it seems that the problem is with tty allocation. > debug1: read_passphrase: can't open /dev/tty: Device busy > > The jail has devfs mounted with the default ruleset. (As seen in > /usr/share/examples/etc/defaults/devfs.rules) > > Andras > > > -- Greg Albrecht (gregoryba@gmail.com) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:43:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCBE16A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4E313C45D for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryba@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1288742nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XDKLfdrBsx80GlnM4+dB3mN+u6BweTph1zBUmcHcdAm06/zBbBpadjGAB01QR+7WzIg1gBtpg2HjFP9y4oGqKEYuem9hwc3CQ+Jj0ojgmPGTHIyYRudQXTGWv8cuzHdspH6P2QtpCkRgqECuUJBEr+4Af4qZ/TvdOdil6VhJCOA= Received: by 10.49.27.17 with SMTP id e17mr31329nfj.1168630982696; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.223.12 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <39ed86f90701121143i1bd0b1a5q1bcfb6a8875ad1e9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:43:02 -0800 From: "Greg Albrecht" To: "Patrick Dung" In-Reply-To: <639923.56141.qm@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <639923.56141.qm@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to clear strage route in routing table? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:43:04 -0000 i did this once too! the quickest way to fix the problem is: /etc/rc.d/routing restart -g On 11/01/07, Patrick Dung wrote: > Hi > > Suppose I have mistype a command: > # route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1 > > There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless > reboot: > > 192.168.0&0xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0 > > Any ideas? > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Greg Albrecht (gregoryba@gmail.com) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:53:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C303D16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6777213C45E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so577651wra for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:53:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jJUZDJ8+ZM75+eWFMntPgT/VYaWwOMOrH9nP7/LkP8BqLZMKhIDRCsSZjw9wKraf27v/ikUBu3SvNErmldq1P1ANHXYduAIi6QTLkp/JXH9r5RuOgefoOcnDybsk7nFUcsM9uCaDJ2cxiFJfRuwNKObON7Vx2/ZPEY8+fYHsNzk= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr637173huf.1168631581230; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:53:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.107.2 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:53:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000701121153p77d332a9x10efb3a8342ee102@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:53:01 -0800 From: "pete wright" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: iSCSI hardware HBA status X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:53:03 -0000 hi all, i have tried googling for the current status of iSCSI software and hardware HBA support in FreeBSD. A lot of the hit's seem pretty stale. Is there active development going on with support hardware iSCSI HBA's in current by any chance? I have not been able to find any listed cards. For example I have a Qlogic 1gig 2port HBA with a ISP4022 chipset. Is any work being done on this? I would be willing to do some testing if time permits on my end. thanks! -pete -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:56:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645BB16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:56:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4927E13C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:56:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CJuL3g018435; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 02E764004D; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:56:21 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807126-a5e89bb000000245-8d-45a7e7e474e8 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id DFB5F4001D; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:56:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <45CAAA55-946F-4DAB-B9CE-CF77BCDC36EE@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:56:20 -0800 To: Lamont Granquist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: Nathan Vidican , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:56:21 -0000 On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Lamont Granquist wrote: >> That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the >> same time. > > I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to > 'spray' rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would > not be established from the PSU to the cat? Um. While I grew up with a pair of cats, I must admit that I've never paid sufficiently close attention to know one way or the other. I wouldn't like my cat to test either spraying or streaming a live PSU unit... :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:57:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B9016A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rchisholm@southlandonline.com) Received: from coyote.southlandonline.com (i216-58-31-88.cybersurf.com [216.58.31.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB2A13C4A5 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rchisholm@southlandonline.com) Received: from Spooler by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) ID MO001123; 12 Jan 2007 14:57:45 -0500 Received: from spooler by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b); 12 Jan 2007 14:27:26 -0500 Received: from blackdog.southlandonline.com (192.168.1.113) by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) with ESMTP ID MG001122; 12 Jan 2007 14:27:20 -0500 Received: from blackdog.southlandonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D37F1170E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (chavez.wolf.southlandonline.com [192.168.1.22]) by blackdog.southlandonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B05114C2 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A7E0EB.2010307@southlandonline.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:35 -0500 From: Rick Chisholm User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CC-Diagnostic: Sender contains "rchisholm@southlandonline.com" (-500) Subject: traditional upgrade trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:57:01 -0000 I am trying to get from 5.4 to 6.1 and for the most part, the process seems fairly straight forward. Unfortunately, I keep getting an error when running 'make buildworld' - which essentially is a bunch of errors preceding the error code 1 in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipftest I've removed /usr/obj and /usr/src/sbin/ipf on separate iterations, yet buildworld dies everytime at the same spot. last error referencing ipftest is error: prototype declaration -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rick Chisholm Manager Information Technology Southland Insurance http://www.southlandonline.com http://www.swougas.org http://brokertech.parallel42.ca/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:58:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECED916A49E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414F213C45B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l0CJvdcG064013; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:57:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:54:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121454.12652.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= Subject: Re: CUPS + X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:58:03 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 12:53, C=E9sar Amaya wrote: > Hi list, have you ever installed cups + samba for a print server? That > is what I am trying to do, the print server box set up is as the followin= g: > > - FreeBSD 6.1 release > - cups-1.2 > - samba 3 > - hpijs-2.1.4 > - foomatic-db-20061214 > - cups-samba-5.0.r3 > > I have installed and tested the printer properly via web interface of > cups. The problem comes when I try to push the Windows printer drivers > with cups, I get a error message > > # cupsaddsmb -H localhost -U root -h localhost -a -v > Password for root required to access localhost via SAMBA: > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > No Windows printer drivers are installed! > ... > I have already download the respective drivers. I don't have any experience pushing Windows printer drivers out through Sam= ba,=20 but I do know that cups clients (Windows or otherwise) don't need=20 printer-specific drivers. They should just use a PS driver (the one you can= =20 download from Adobe or one of the ones that ships with Windows) with the=20 appropriate ppd. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 19:59:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB85516A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rchisholm@southlandonline.com) Received: from coyote.southlandonline.com (i216-58-31-88.cybersurf.com [216.58.31.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E58713C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rchisholm@southlandonline.com) Received: from Spooler by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) ID MO001162; 12 Jan 2007 15:00:41 -0500 Received: from spooler by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b); 12 Jan 2007 15:00:37 -0500 Received: from blackdog.southlandonline.com (192.168.1.113) by coyote.southlandonline.com (Mercury/32 v4.01b) with ESMTP ID MG001161; 12 Jan 2007 15:00:30 -0500 Received: from blackdog.southlandonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 771F01195F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:59:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (chavez.wolf.southlandonline.com [192.168.1.22]) by blackdog.southlandonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560EF1195E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:59:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A7E8B1.6050104@southlandonline.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:59:45 -0500 From: Rick Chisholm User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CC-Diagnostic: Sender contains "rchisholm@southlandonline.com" (-500) Subject: traditional upgrade trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:59:56 -0000 I am trying to get from 5.4 to 6.1 and for the most part, the process seems fairly straight forward. Unfortunately, I keep getting an error when running 'make buildworld' - which essentially is a bunch of errors preceding the error code 1 in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipftest I've removed /usr/obj and /usr/src/sbin/ipf on separate iterations, yet buildworld dies everytime at the same spot. last error referencing ipftest is error: prototype declaration -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 20:06:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71DD16A416 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lamont@scriptkiddie.org) Received: from sploit.scriptkiddie.org (sploit.scriptkiddie.org [216.231.47.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4AA13C468 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lamont@scriptkiddie.org) Received: from sploit (sploit [216.231.47.214]) by sploit.scriptkiddie.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0CJmJdq007542; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:48:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:48:19 -0800 (PST) From: Lamont Granquist To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Nathan Vidican , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:06:50 -0000 On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: >> Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call >> me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical >> expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, >> heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it >> still managed to kill the server ;) > > That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the same time. I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to 'spray' rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would not be established from the PSU to the cat? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 20:37:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672AD16A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2498613C44B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 94350 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2007 20:40:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 20:40:52 -0000 Message-ID: <45A7EC4B.6050607@123.com.sv> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:15:07 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: how to make an init script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:37:15 -0000 Hi, the handbook doesnt show an example for a custom init script, i want to make one for wildfie jabber server, any tutorial? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:10:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F66D16A47C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christias@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE4113C45E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christias@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so812524uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:10:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UJSJkmlKjz8dz8Peq4DRmbVOpVgWEtEA68jisLEuVFqaIFrttSTF/tJS1bXa/P+3FdpJucMb11NMHqYTqcvS9yCCeYokLpVsbwRIWbpE6WWV3tS4zEhHMleE/TXK1+xJ8lM2/wqb+Zp+5AgqZBF4z9L2kcCz08tSlCxTKW/rGMI= Received: by 10.82.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr209529bue.1168634690871; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.135.3 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:44:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:44:50 +0200 From: "Panagiotis Christias" To: "Josh Paetzel" In-Reply-To: <200701120834.39414.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200701120834.39414.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: "Guill. Moreno-Socias" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:10:31 -0000 On 1/12/07, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Friday 12 January 2007 07:24, Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote: > > Hello. > > I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as > > soon as it is released. > > I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to > > find instructions on freebsd.org (please forgive me if I have > > missed something). Thanks in advance. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > If you csup/cvsup to RELENG_6_2 you'll end up with 6.2-RELEASE :) I am wondering if freebsd-update (for 6.2) would be happy with the system.. Regards, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:19:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294A616A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054CB13C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CLJ17q023063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:19:01 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CLJ1Bf029343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:19:01 -0800 Message-ID: <45A7FB43.40208@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:18:59 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.12.130433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Recovering select files from a failing hard disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:19:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I know similar questions have been asked on the list, but this one has a slight twist to it. I have a failing hard disk that I want to recover only a few directories from, so I was wondering.. 1. Can I bypass mounting or reading certain sections of the filesystem? 2. Can I force part of a drive to be remapped to other sectors? 3. Is there a backup superblock on the disk and what would it be? I know this feature exists on some filesystems, but I'm not sure if UFS is one of those filesystems. The reason for these questions is that I believe that the portion of my failing hard disk is involved with the statistics portion for the data slice or a series of directories. So, I want to grab the files off my disk and just dump the thing asap. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFp/s2EnKyINQw/HARApW/AKCrllZjQ9vuXLPph7C3o/E/kJDYnwCgmyz4 giR+Y1EakuM4s2PJfQ/Ngfk= =kDwK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:21:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD18616A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rottweilertje@rottnic.nl) Received: from rottnic.nl (rottnic.demon.nl [83.160.164.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971F113C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rottweilertje@rottnic.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rottnic.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E753F48C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:03:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rottnic.nl Received: from rottnic.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rottnic.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2JSqsx6A2o7 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:03:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.1.128] (unknown [10.0.1.128]) by rottnic.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FAF3F460 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:03:54 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Guido Demmenie Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:03:51 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: ntpd crashes every once in a while X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:21:46 -0000 Hello, ntpd crashes every once in a while, sometimes with days in between sometimes within a few hours. And the error I see in my /var/log/messages is: Jan 12 14:21:34 rottnic kernel: pid 516 (ntpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) My server is in the pool of pool.ntp.org and there is mentioned that I might have to raise my ulimit, but as shown below it is already unlimited as far as I can see. rottnic# csh rottnic# limit cputime unlimited filesize unlimited datasize 524288 kbytes stacksize 65536 kbytes coredumpsize unlimited memoryuse unlimited vmemoryuse unlimited descriptors 3463 memorylocked unlimited maxproc 1731 sbsize unlimited rottnic# sh rottnic# ulimit unlimited uname -a FreeBSD rottnic.nl 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Mar 8 19:48:39 CET 2006 rottweilertje@:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ ROTTKERNELv3 i386 I added this to my kernel: options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 options IPDIVERT options IPSEC options IPSEC_ESP options DUMMYNET options QUOTA # Wireless AP support wlan_wep # 802.11 WEP support wlan_ccmp # 802.11 CCMP support wlan_tkip # 802.11 TKIP support wlan_xauth # 802.11 external authenticator support wlan_acl # 802.11 MAC ACL support Thanks in advance, Guido From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:27:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE3216A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CFA13C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CLR2OM036023 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:27:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0CLR2Hu036022 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:27:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:27:02 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070112212701.GA34217@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: server-side PPPoE: how to get ppp to automatically assign IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:27:05 -0000 I'm working with PPPoE. I have one client and a provider working. I'm using pppoed to spawn ppp instances on the provider: /usr/libexec/pppoed -F -p t30 fxp0 The provider's ppp.conf: default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device /dev/cual0 set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" ATZ OK-AT-OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 1200 set server +3000 pppass t30: # this is pppoe server-side set device PPPoE:fxp0:t30 set ifaddr 192.168.255.1 192.168.0.128/25 255.255.255.255 enable proxy enable pap enable passwdauth The client's ppp.conf is: default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device /dev/cual0 set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" ATZ OK-AT-OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 1200 set server +3000 pppass t30: # this is ppp over ethernet # set ifaddr mine/0 his/0 255.255.255.255 set ifaddr 10.0.0.2/0 10.0.0.1/0 255.255.255.255 add default HISADDR set timeout 0 set dial set device PPPoE:fxp0:t30 set authname ppp set authkey xxxxxxxxxxxx I can connect the first client no problem, and it is assigned 192.168.0.128. When the second client tries to connect, it fails. Actually, the "ppp -background t30" on the client goes well, and says "PPP enabled" but then the client ppp dies, I presume because the server side ppp closed the connection. It appears that the problem is client IP number conflict. The server-side ppp.log shows that it tries to assign the first client's IP to the second client, and though ppp detects the conflict, it does not try to assign a different IP, even though a /25 is provided in the server's ppp.conf, and the client is configured to accept any IP. How can I get the pppoe provider to automatically assign a unique IP to each client that requests service? Also, what if my pool of available IPs has discontinuities, such as a.b.c.d/24 and then i.j.k.l/25 and w.x.y.z/22? I don't see how that can be accomodated in the "set ifaddr" line. Is there a more extensible mechanism for assigning client IPs? How many tun devices is a low-end P4 machine likely to support? Thank you! Jim When the second client attempts to connect, the server ppp.log shows: Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: LCP: deflink: LayerFinish Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Closing --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Initial Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 1 secs: 373 octets in, 400 octets out Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: deflink: 16 packets in, 17 packets out Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: total 773 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Fri Jan 12 12:59:16 2007 Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: deflink: lcp -> closed Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Dead Jan 12 12:59:17 t30 ppp[2513]: tun1: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal). Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: Phase: Using interface: tun1 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed state Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: set device /dev/cual0 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: set speed 115200 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: set dial ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 "" ATZ OK-AT-OK \dATDT\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: set timeout 1200 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: default: set server +3000 ******** Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: Listening at port 3001. Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: t30: set device PPPoE:fxp0:t30 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: t30: set ifaddr 192.168.255.1 192.168.0.128/25 255.255.255.255 Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: t30: enable proxy Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: t30: enable pap Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Command: t30: enable passwdauth Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: PPP Started (direct mode). Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Establish Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Link is a netgraph node Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: opening -> carrier Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: carrier -> lcp Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: FSM: Using "deflink" as a transport Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Initial --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:50 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Stopped Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: LayerStart Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Warning: deflink: Reducing configured MRU from 1500 to 1492 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state = Stopped Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACFCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: PROTOCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACCMAP[6] 0x00000000 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MRU[4] 1492 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM[6] 0x7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: AUTHPROTO[4] 0xc023 (PAP) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Stopped --> Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACFCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: PROTOCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACCMAP[6] 0x00000000 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MRU[4] 1492 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM[6] 0x81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendConfigAck(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACFCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: PROTOCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACCMAP[6] 0x00000000 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MRU[4] 1492 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM[6] 0x81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvConfigAck(1) state = Ack-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACFCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: PROTOCOMP[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: ACCMAP[6] 0x00000000 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MRU[4] 1492 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM[6] 0x7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: AUTHPROTO[4] 0xc023 (PAP) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Ack-Sent --> Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: LayerUp Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(0) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Jan 10 2007) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Authenticate Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: his = none, mine = PAP Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvIdent(0) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Dec 11 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: Pap Input: REQUEST (ppp) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Warning: OpenSecret: Can't open /etc/ppp/ppp.secret. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: Pap Output: SUCCESS Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Warning: OpenSecret: Can't open /etc/ppp/ppp.secret. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: FSM: Using "deflink" as a transport Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Initial --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: LayerStart. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: MPPE: Not usable without CHAP81 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state = Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: PRED1[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: lcp -> open Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Network Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: FSM: Using "deflink" as a transport Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Initial --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: LayerStart. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state = Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 192.168.255.1 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: COMPPROTO[6] 16 VJ slots with slot compression Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: PRED1[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: SendConfigRej(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: PRED1[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(1) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Jan 10 2007) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 192.168.0.128 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: COMPPROTO[6] 16 VJ slots with slot compression Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: PRIDNS[6] 10.0.0.1 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: SECDNS[6] 255.255.255.255 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: SendConfigRej(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: PRIDNS[6] 10.0.0.1 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: SECDNS[6] 255.255.255.255 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(2) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Jan 10 2007) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: RecvConfigRej(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(3) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Jan 10 2007) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: PRED1[2] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: MPPE: Not usable without CHAP81 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(2) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvIdent(1) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Dec 11 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigAck(1) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 192.168.255.1 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: COMPPROTO[6] 16 VJ slots with slot compression Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Req-Sent --> Ack-Rcvd Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvIdent(2) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Dec 11 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(2) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: SendConfigAck(2) state = Req-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvIdent(3) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 81bad0e2 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Dec 11 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(2) state = Ack-Rcvd Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 192.168.0.128 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: COMPPROTO[6] 16 VJ slots with slot compression Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: SendConfigAck(2) state = Ack-Rcvd Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 192.168.0.128 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: COMPPROTO[6] 16 VJ slots with slot compression Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Ack-Rcvd --> Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: LayerUp. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: myaddr 192.168.255.1 hisaddr = 192.168.0.128 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR, 192.168.255.1 -> 192.168.0.128): File exists Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Error: ipcp_InterfaceUp: unable to set ip address Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: LayerDown: 192.168.255.1 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: SendTerminateReq(2) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Opened --> Closing Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(4) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: MAGICNUM 7893e875 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.4.2 (built Jan 10 2007) Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: RecvConfigAck(2) state = Ack-Sent Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: DEFLATE[4] win 15 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Ack-Sent --> Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: LayerUp. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: Deflate: Input channel reset Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: Deflate: Output channel reset Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: Out = DEFLATE[26], In = DEFLATE[26] Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: RecvTerminateAck(2) state = Closing Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: LayerFinish. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: Connect time: 0 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Fri Jan 12 12:59:51 2007 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Closing --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Terminate Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: LayerDown. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Opened --> Starting Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: LayerFinish. Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: CCP: deflink: State change Starting --> Initial Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: LayerDown Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: SendTerminateReq(4) state = Opened Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Opened --> Closing Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: open -> lcp Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: IPCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Initial Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: RecvTerminateAck(4) state = Closing Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: LayerFinish Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Closing --> Closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: LCP: deflink: State change Closed --> Initial Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 1 secs: 373 octets in, 400 octets out Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: 16 packets in, 17 packets out Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: total 773 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Fri Jan 12 12:59:50 2007 Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: deflink: lcp -> closed Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Dead Jan 12 12:59:51 t30 ppp[2516]: tun1: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:32:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE44816A416 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F25713C468 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.64 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5U0l-0001g7-02; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:32:31 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:32:30 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Josef Grosch Message-ID: <20070112213230.GA910@submonkey.net> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <20070110154022.GA67438@mooseriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070110154022.GA67438@mooseriver.com> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Garrett Cooper , Nikolas Britton , Jeff Mohler Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:32:37 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:40:22AM -0800, Josef Grosch wrote: > While I do agree that FreeBSD does need work, the big pebble in my shoe > right now is a journaling file system (try doing a fsck on a 1TB file > system) If you want journalling file system then the thing to do is to check out -current, try out the journalling file system that it's had for the last couple of months and send bug reports when it misbehaves. Failing that it will eventually find its way into -stable when we assume that the lack of bug reports means that it works ok for people, whereupon you can all come here and bitch about how shit it is. Your call, people. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFp/5uocfcwTS3JF8RAh8WAKC47NAnF19FE91mGlj4hOT/japvcACfSEs9 l0VGPFtZOP7928iy57G4TcU= =J1xg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:39:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7878116A415 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D595413C44C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77887E29; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:39:07 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:39:00 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121239.04811.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Nathan Vidican , Lamont Granquist , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:39:11 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 10:48, Lamont Granquist wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > >> Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call > >> me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > >> expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > >> heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > >> still managed to kill the server ;) > > > > That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the same > > time. > > I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to 'spray' > rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would not be > established from the PSU to the cat? While spray(8) may protect the cat, it is likely to invoke crash(8). When combined with dumpon(8) permanent damage may result. :-) Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:43:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF83816A415 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535BF13C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so603134ana for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LESpDOpDi07HB8vZzzesMO5T3wR+eMnEtslk46z0Voj+Nr/GdyBVlHjWZOi3SPsYkZKR2g/WG/ZBoUTY+D6l/Xytem4TtaaEmJHV2ax8mFir6UGdIyZcIQSykCVWApgvqwAu6sIY83Vbxfzv1fFB6ItjVG3TvJbrFqL1Ar0xdFM= Received: by 10.100.163.12 with SMTP id l12mr637077ane.1168638189001; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:43:08 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:10 -0000 I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more secure? Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from 218.189.179.83 -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:43:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902E116A517 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B03413C45D for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so818382uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t87OI8xwFsag9OnLt/vTSPcE57j85/SFnJBbnJ3GU/tfiu1E29RisaIrkvh4PLFybL25t/6NHBUXAAHJCD2LZeJoImJaxL5YefrSKdm0XGuXJwnx22tz1/7WE+nggq4/eSBlCZ3i0PJ90CDhNa1piWKfnK2oPbW9SS1L5929INQ= Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr599303ugm.1168638227881; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.23.8 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:43:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:43:47 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: Miguel In-Reply-To: <45A7EC4B.6050607@123.com.sv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45A7EC4B.6050607@123.com.sv> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to make an init script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:43:49 -0000 On 1/12/07, Miguel wrote: > Hi, the handbook doesnt show an example for a custom init script, i want > to make one for wildfie jabber server, any tutorial? Doesn't wildfire provide an rc.d script by itself? If it doesn't, read man rc(8) and the scripts in /etc/rc.d/ and /usr/local/etc/rc.d -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 21:48:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B824616A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D9F13C44B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:48:04 -0500 id 00056425.45A80214.000113F1 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:48:04 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: VeeJay Message-Id: <20070112164804.c1130071.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:48:05 -0000 In response to VeeJay : > I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more secure? > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - POSSIBLE > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > 218.189.179.83 Somebody is trying to break in to your system: In order to stop the messages, disconnect the system from the Internet, the attacker will then be unable to reach it. There are, however, less drastic workarounds. An exercise with google will turn up a number of programs that will reduce the problem to a manageable level. This topic comes up about once a week on this list alone. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:02:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBsd-Questions@FreeBsd.Org Delivered-To: FreeBsd-Questions@FreeBsd.Org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E5216A4B3 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swtpete@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E0A13C480 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swtpete@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so821569uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:02:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=c8Y7cwyZSQYRk1EDFyyVRA2LT7sysuFTeL7Mun3KnXeU77UTqi/NNe1TwWDSj2scc6Yum4y7vzzpYO/lcPaTJ2guH55GySFVgsSSLomPs2IlylwQZCmQ2BPS042vrAWFOCpGX4tlioUEpDRk2X80MgAYYnwGiVf43BId7aPtYvI= Received: by 10.82.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr220491bud.1168639339163; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.150.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:02:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:02:18 -0800 From: "Peter aka SweetPete" To: "FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:02:23 -0000 I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...), and I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in order to search and display only processes which match a certain keyword/search term. For example, a user running top could hit '/' and enter "fire", which would display processes related to "firefox." What is the best way to get (such) a feature added to "top?!" I know I know, I'm always causing mayhem. *grin* -- Peter aka SweetPete! La Jolla San Diego, CA, 92039, USA, EARTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:05:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1883616A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001A113C448 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay6.apple.com (a17-128-113-36.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CM5r2U008578; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 909C21009C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:05:53 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807124-a4cefbb000006d75-3f-45a806415b57 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 7D11E10081; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:05:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:05:52 -0800 To: Guido Demmenie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpd crashes every once in a while X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:05:54 -0000 On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Guido Demmenie wrote: > ntpd crashes every once in a while, sometimes with days in between > sometimes within a few hours. > > And the error I see in my /var/log/messages is: > Jan 12 14:21:34 rottnic kernel: pid 516 (ntpd), uid 0: exited on > signal 11 (core dumped) > > My server is in the pool of pool.ntp.org and there is mentioned > that I might have to raise my ulimit, but as shown below it is > already unlimited as far as I can see. I've been running ntpd as part of the pool for years on FreeBSD 4.11 & 5.5; ntpd will stay running for at least months at a time if your hardware is OK. Seeing segfaults suggests a RAM problem; try running a memory tester like Memtest86. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:17:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBsd-Questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBsd-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3692716A415 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA08B13C478 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.8) id l0CMGxS8086111; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:16:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:16:59 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Peter aka SweetPete Message-ID: <20070112221658.GE46272@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:17:02 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 12), Peter aka SweetPete said: > I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...), and > I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in order to > search and display only processes which match a certain keyword/search > term. For example, a user running top could hit '/' and enter "fire", > which would display processes related to "firefox." > > What is the best way to get (such) a feature added to "top?!" I know > I know, I'm always causing mayhem. *grin* Submit a patch :) It's a useful idea, though. Usually filtering on username ("u" "myuser"), or sorting by size ("o" "size") works for me. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:18:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F9A16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69A713C45A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CMIK4E010394; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A05FD29C003; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:18:20 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807123-a2358bb0000039f2-ea-45a8092cb85c Received: from [17.214.13.96] (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 93B2130400B; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:18:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45A7FB43.40208@u.washington.edu> References: <45A7FB43.40208@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:18:19 -0800 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recovering select files from a failing hard disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:18:21 -0000 On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > 1. Can I bypass mounting or reading certain sections of the > filesystem? Sure, if you boot off some other device or a CD-ROM. > 2. Can I force part of a drive to be remapped to other sectors? Yes, but it is likely that modern drives will have automatically reassigned failing sectors already, until it ran out of spare sectors. If you've got an older SCSI system, you might try running your adaptor's BIOS utility and having it do a device verify; that will encourage the drive to remap problematic sectors. > 3. Is there a backup superblock on the disk and what would it be? I > know > this feature exists on some filesystems, but I'm not sure if UFS is > one > of those filesystems. There are many backup superblocks kept on the disk; "fsck -b 32" will try using the first alternate, but there will be others scattered about. You can run "dumpfs" to locate more, I believe. > The reason for these questions is that I believe that the > portion of my failing hard disk is involved with the statistics > portion > for the data slice or a series of directories. So, I want to grab the > files off my disk and just dump the thing asap. OK. You might try doing a block-copy with dd to a new drive, and then trying to fsck or repair the data on that copy rather than trying to fix the filesystem on the failing drive... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:19:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8D216A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954613C43E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so609055ana for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:19:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=bjHbINQDHc0ivJelKETmUjxcsRpJUBZDKj7zhyYHDPqM77LYUxu/mirUbvCfdWvola70/THy/jFr07EPJ8LEt5Oj/GcCArIuuCFeFc+ZZjot3hcXeRSITzvtmiHwla6CIcxLYiyT+J88SSrnBk1oWQ8iMkQfdmWr0x9SMtVFTQA= Received: by 10.100.132.16 with SMTP id f16mr673385and.1168640378795; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:19:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:19:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701121419y3df54b21me2bf8bfb3a1658d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:19:38 +0100 From: VeeJay To: maanjee@gmail.com, FreeBSD-Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: What to write in a secure hosts.allow file? Please advise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:19:40 -0000 This is a sample file... What to REMOVE and What to ADD or KEEP? # cat /etc/hosts.allow # # hosts.allow access control file for "tcp wrapped" applications. # $FreeBSD: src/etc/hosts.allow,v 1.19.8.1 2006/02/19 14:57:01 ume Exp $ # # NOTE: The hosts.deny file is deprecated. # Place both 'allow' and 'deny' rules in the hosts.allow file. # See hosts_options(5) for the format of this file. # hosts_access(5) no longer fully applies. # _____ _ _ # | ____| __ __ __ _ _ __ ___ _ __ | | ___ | | # | _| \ \/ / / _` | | '_ ` _ \ | '_ \ | | / _ \ | | # | |___ > < | (_| | | | | | | | | |_) | | | | __/ |_| # |_____| /_/\_\ \__,_| |_| |_| |_| | .__/ |_| \___| (_) # |_| # !!! This is an example! You will need to modify it for your specific # !!! requirements! # Start by allowing everything (this prevents the rest of the file # from working, so remove it when you need protection). # The rules here work on a "First match wins" basis. ALL : ALL : allow # Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you # need to do it, here's how #sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny # Protect against simple DNS spoofing attacks by checking that the # forward and reverse records for the remote host match. If a mismatch # occurs, access is denied, and any positive ident response within # 20 seconds is logged. No protection is afforded against DNS poisoning, # IP spoofing or more complicated attacks. Hosts with no reverse DNS # pass this rule. ALL : PARANOID : RFC931 20 : deny # Allow anything from localhost. Note that an IP address (not a host # name) *MUST* be specified for rpcbind(8). ALL : localhost 127.0.0.1 : allow # Comment out next line if you build libwrap with NO_INET6=yes. ALL : [::1] : allow ALL : my.machine.example.com 192.0.2.35 : allow # To use IPv6 addresses you must enclose them in []'s ALL : [fe80::%fxp0]/10 : allow ALL : [fe80::]/10 : deny ALL : [2001:db8:2:1:2:3:4:3fe1] : deny ALL : [2001:db8:2:1::]/64 : allow # Sendmail can help protect you against spammers and relay-rapers sendmail : localhost : allow sendmail : .nice.guy.example.com : allow sendmail : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny sendmail : ALL : allow # Exim is an alternative to sendmail, available in the ports tree exim : localhost : allow exim : .nice.guy.example.com : allow exim : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny exim : ALL : allow # Rpcbind is used for all RPC services; protect your NFS! # (IP addresses rather than hostnames *MUST* be used here) rpcbind : 192.0.2.32/255.255.255.224 : allow rpcbind : 192.0.2.96/255.255.255.224 : allow rpcbind : ALL : deny # NIS master server. Only local nets should have access ypserv : localhost : allow ypserv : .unsafe.my.net.example.com : deny ypserv : .my.net.example.com : allow ypserv : ALL : deny # Provide a small amount of protection for ftpd ftpd : localhost : allow ftpd : .nice.guy.example.com : allow ftpd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny ftpd : ALL : allow # You need to be clever with finger; do _not_ backfinger!! You can easily # start a "finger war". fingerd : ALL \ : spawn (echo Finger. | \ /usr/bin/mail -s "tcpd\: %u@%h[%a] fingered me!" root) & \ : deny # The rest of the daemons are protected. ALL : ALL \ : severity auth.info \ : twist /bin/echo "You are not welcome to use %d from %h." -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:22:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9AD16A417 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6400F13C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from rivendell (c-980471d5.019-61-68617010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.113.4.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CC9555C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:54:23 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: "VeeJay" , "FreeBSD-Questions" References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:54:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:22:56 -0000 From: "VeeJay" To: ; "FreeBSD-Questions" Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:43 PM Subject: Please Help! How to STOP them... >I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more > secure? > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - > POSSIBLE > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > 218.189.179.83 It's basically just script kiddies trying to get in using some ready made user/password pairs. Lots of info covering this has been posted in these newsgroups previously, but some things you might consider Moving your sshd port somewhere else than 22 - the prepackaged "cracking" programs don't scan ports, just blindly try out the default port - with determined/skilled attacker it's different matter entirely though. Use some kind of portblocker (lots in ports tree) which closes the port after predetermined number of attempts - or as an alternative, use PF to close the port for IP's in question after predetermined number of connection attempts in given time. Use key based authentication and stop using passwords altogether. Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh from the ssh config file. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:25:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A54A16A40F for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FC013C448 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so609751ana for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:25:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dJuC+w1Nl1as+w8yDl2jlevIyDVSHOwh9ZJ9sIVFTbmp2Bn16gMEY6O4XjJI4Q9hGjdlzcraZagW9zWvHJPQA+orfGK30Va1kVgbvfOcZ/EmMcgCcTpRTvgfdsewqnr42lhJRKeV9Y52VtPJQIF0R6ulv/TAj5GHANFkWFgbvb8= Received: by 10.100.93.5 with SMTP id q5mr700361anb.1168640706738; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:25:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:25:06 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Reko Turja" In-Reply-To: <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:25:08 -0000 Thanks Reko.... Just couple of more questions... On 1/12/07, Reko Turja wrote: > > From: "VeeJay" > To: ; "FreeBSD-Questions" > > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:43 PM > Subject: Please Help! How to STOP them... > > > >I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more > > secure? > > > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking > > getaddrinfo > > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - > > POSSIBLE > > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > > 218.189.179.83 > > It's basically just script kiddies trying to get in using some ready > made user/password pairs. > > Lots of info covering this has been posted in these newsgroups > previously, but some things you might consider > > Moving your sshd port somewhere else than 22 - the prepackaged > "cracking" programs don't scan ports, just blindly try out the default > port - with determined/skilled attacker it's different matter entirely > though. How to change the port from 22 to something other and in what range should I choose a number? Use some kind of portblocker (lots in ports tree) which closes the > port after predetermined number of attempts - or as an alternative, > use PF to close the port for IP's in question after predetermined > number of connection attempts in given time. Can you suggest such port which I should install to block these attempts? Use key based authentication and stop using passwords altogether. What do you mean here? Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh > from the ssh config file. How to disable SSH1 and How to stop direct root access into ssh, where to change? -Reko > > -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:26:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E92A16A513 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D0F13C459 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 7210 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2007 22:29:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.251?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 22:29:51 -0000 Message-ID: <45A805D6.7020205@123.com.sv> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:04:06 -0600 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9sar_Amaya?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Vidican References: <45A7CB28.7010107@123.com.sv> <45A7DCF4.3050509@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <45A7DCF4.3050509@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serving windows print drivers with Samba+CUPS (Was: CUPS +) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:26:15 -0000 > 1 - Setup CUPS, add printers using RAW queues, Setup Samba, tell it to > use cups for printing > > 2 - Setup a shared location for printer drivers from Samba, the share > can be pretty much anywhere on your local FreeBSD filesystem, and can > use all the options of any other file-share, but must be shared from > Samba with the name 'print$'. Something similar to this inside your > smb.conf should suffice: > > [print$] > comment = Windows Client Printer Drivers > path = /var/db/windows_printers > browseable = yes > guest ok = yes > read only = yes > write list = root Administrator @"Domain Admins" @"Printer Admins" > > 3 - Login from a Windows client, to the Samba server using an > administrator login (as specified in the write list for print$). Goto > the 'Printers' section, NOT the direct queue mapping, for example: > \\samba1\Printers NOT \\samba1\some_printer. When in the printers > folder, right-click the printer you wish to add the drivers to, and > you can add them from the windows properties dialog like you would any > printer. This will upload the drivers to the samba [print$] share for > other clients to use. > > 4 - From another samba client running windows, goto > \\samba1\some_printer and it will prompt if you wish to 'Connect to > printer', simply say yes - and that client should use the windows > drivers directly from the samba [print$] share without further prompting. > > There are some issues, and it's not just as simple as 4 easy steps... > but this is the general process to go through, with a little reading > from the Samba website/documentation you should be able to get it > going. Feel free to drop another message back to the list if you run > into more questions from there. > > -- > Nathan Vidican It does not worked for me. This is my smb.conf file and my cupsd.conf printserver# cat smb.conf [global] workgroup = AmnetDatos server string = Print Server printcap name = cups load printers = yes printing = cups browseable = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 hosts allow = 192.168.10. 127. security = share encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = no log level = 4 [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /usr/local/share/cups/drivers browseable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes write list = root Administrator @"Domain Admins" @"Printer Admins" [HPDatos] comment = HP Laser Jet 4000 printable = yes path = /var/spool/samba guest ok = yes public = yes printable = yes printer admin = root [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes public = yes writable = no printable = yes printer admin = root printserver# cat cupsd.conf LogLevel info # Administrator user group... SystemGroup wheel # Only listen for connections from the local machine. Listen *:631 Listen /var/run/cups.sock # Show shared printers on the local network. Browsing On BrowseOrder allow,deny #BrowseAllow @LOCAL BrowseAllow 192.168.10.* # Default authentication type, when authentication is required... DefaultAuthType Basic # Restrict access to the server... Order allow,deny Allow localhost Allow 192.168.10.* Allow 192.168.101.* # Restrict access to the admin pages... Encryption Required Order allow,deny Allow localhost Allow 192.168.10.251 # Restrict access to configuration files... AuthType Basic Require user @SYSTEM Order allow,deny Allow localhost # Set the default printer/job policies... # Job-related operations must be done by the owner or an adminstrator... Require user @OWNER @SYSTEM Order deny,allow # All administration operations require an adminstrator to authenticate... AuthType Basic Require user @SYSTEM Order deny,allow # Only the owner or an administrator can cancel or authenticate a job... Require user @OWNER @SYSTEM Order deny,allow Order deny,allow do you see something wrong in my configuration? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:32:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6261F16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4058B13C4B0 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CMWZCx005958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:32:35 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CMWZkQ014334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:32:35 -0800 Message-ID: <45A80C81.1080202@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:32:33 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701121419y3df54b21me2bf8bfb3a1658d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121419y3df54b21me2bf8bfb3a1658d@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.12.141932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: What to write in a secure hosts.allow file? Please advise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:32:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: Uhm... a) Why did you include the example file? b) Didn't you understand the examples? I think you need to sit down with a Unix book and figure out what's going on.. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFqAyBEnKyINQw/HARAvfaAJ9NuOhIBH8nkfQmgAcqllN6/KmGOACdHehT MfQhrcLXhKXdSK62atI2U94= =m0yj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:39:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E3516A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F42713C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CMd4ga008586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:04 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0CMd4j4000692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:04 -0800 Message-ID: <45A80E06.8030405@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:02 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.12.142432 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_SUBJ_9 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 VeeJay wrote: > Thanks Reko.... > > Just couple of more questions... > > > On 1/12/07, Reko Turja wrote: >> >> From: "VeeJay" >> To: ; "FreeBSD-Questions" >> >> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:43 PM >> Subject: Please Help! How to STOP them... >> >> >> >I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? >> > >> > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more >> > secure? >> > >> > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking >> > getaddrinfo >> > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - >> > POSSIBLE >> > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! >> > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from >> > 218.189.179.83 >> >> It's basically just script kiddies trying to get in using some ready >> made user/password pairs. >> >> Lots of info covering this has been posted in these newsgroups >> previously, but some things you might consider >> >> Moving your sshd port somewhere else than 22 - the prepackaged >> "cracking" programs don't scan ports, just blindly try out the default >> port - with determined/skilled attacker it's different matter entirely >> though. > > > How to change the port from 22 to something other and in what range > should I > choose a number? > > > Use some kind of portblocker (lots in ports tree) which closes the >> port after predetermined number of attempts - or as an alternative, >> use PF to close the port for IP's in question after predetermined >> number of connection attempts in given time. > > > Can you suggest such port which I should install to block these attempts? > > Use key based authentication and stop using passwords altogether. > > > What do you mean here? > > Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh >> from the ssh config file. > > > How to disable SSH1 and How to stop direct root access into ssh, where to > change? > > -Reko Read man sshd_config. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFqA4GEnKyINQw/HARAvRYAJ9f84lZRiAGAU66CtsvaSaKjvgHBwCfYnHY kQ04KF5kowf+AdX6SGF2Uic= =S546 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:39:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB31916A4FE for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F9513C441 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so611519ana for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SUUIn8fUumz6J37GNxfFyQofi/3J7qgszVmgT5ep3oTbNjSrLWP1zLu0ITQ6t63kjxpgwqBVlRoGGJUQiX2DqzgeOM35IPatACPkYlLa6sxsv2TwB3hAbjHJw57xSPjv6ZHGHzS5GbCeCzoD2IDxVTBs+YNaNU3FPMtJpjJdUto= Received: by 10.100.37.4 with SMTP id k4mr701046ank.1168641577061; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.33.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:39:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0701121439m3660773eh96352826a3cb01b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:39:36 +0100 From: VeeJay To: "Reko Turja" In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:39:39 -0000 What should be ENABLED and what should be DISABLED? # $OpenBSD: sshd_config,v 1.74 2006/07/19 13:07:10 dtucker Exp $ # $FreeBSD: src/crypto/openssh/sshd_config,v 1.42.2.4 2006/11/11 00:51:28 des Exp $ # This is the sshd server system-wide configuration file. See # sshd_config(5) for more information. # This sshd was compiled with PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin # The strategy used for options in the default sshd_config shipped with # OpenSSH is to specify options with their default value where # possible, but leave them commented. Uncommented options change a # default value. # Note that some of FreeBSD's defaults differ from OpenBSD's, and # FreeBSD has a few additional options. #VersionAddendum FreeBSD-20061110 #Port 22 #Protocol 2 #AddressFamily any #ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 #ListenAddress :: # HostKey for protocol version 1 #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key # HostKeys for protocol version 2 #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key # Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key #KeyRegenerationInterval 1h #ServerKeyBits 768 # Logging # obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging #SyslogFacility AUTH #LogLevel INFO # Authentication: #LoginGraceTime 2m #PermitRootLogin no #StrictModes yes #MaxAuthTries 6 #RSAAuthentication yes #PubkeyAuthentication yes #AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys # For this to work you will also need host keys in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts #RhostsRSAAuthentication no # similar for protocol version 2 #HostbasedAuthentication no # Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for # RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication #IgnoreUserKnownHosts no # Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files #IgnoreRhosts yes # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. #PasswordAuthentication no #PermitEmptyPasswords no # Change to no to disable PAM authentication #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes # Kerberos options #KerberosAuthentication no #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes #KerberosTicketCleanup yes #KerberosGetAFSToken no # GSSAPI options #GSSAPIAuthentication no #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes # Set this to 'no' to disable PAM authentication, account processing, # and session processing. If this is enabled, PAM authentication will # be allowed through the ChallengeResponseAuthentication and # PasswordAuthentication. Depending on your PAM configuration, # PAM authentication via ChallengeResponseAuthentication may bypass # the setting of "PermitRootLogin without-password". # If you just want the PAM account and session checks to run without # PAM authentication, then enable this but set PasswordAuthentication # and ChallengeResponseAuthentication to 'no'. #UsePAM yes #AllowTcpForwarding yes #GatewayPorts no #X11Forwarding yes #X11DisplayOffset 10 #X11UseLocalhost yes #PrintMotd yes #PrintLastLog yes #TCPKeepAlive yes #UseLogin no #UsePrivilegeSeparation yes #PermitUserEnvironment no #Compression delayed #ClientAliveInterval 0 #ClientAliveCountMax 3 #UseDNS yes #PidFile /var/run/sshd.pid #MaxStartups 10 #PermitTunnel no # no default banner path #Banner /some/path # override default of no subsystems Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/sftp-server # Example of overriding settings on a per-user basis #Match User anoncvs # X11Forwarding no # AllowTcpForwarding no # ForceCommand cvs server What steps need to follow? On 1/12/07, VeeJay wrote: > > Thanks Reko.... > > Just couple of more questions... > > > On 1/12/07, Reko Turja wrote: > > > > From: "VeeJay" > > To: < maanjee@gmail.com>; "FreeBSD-Questions" > > > > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:43 PM > > Subject: Please Help! How to STOP them... > > > > > > >I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > > > > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more > > > secure? > > > > > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking > > > getaddrinfo > > > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - > > > POSSIBLE > > > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > > > 218.189.179.83 > > > > It's basically just script kiddies trying to get in using some ready > > made user/password pairs. > > > > Lots of info covering this has been posted in these newsgroups > > previously, but some things you might consider > > > > Moving your sshd port somewhere else than 22 - the prepackaged > > "cracking" programs don't scan ports, just blindly try out the default > > port - with determined/skilled attacker it's different matter entirely > > though. > > > How to change the port from 22 to something other and in what range should > I choose a number? > > > Use some kind of portblocker (lots in ports tree) which closes the > > port after predetermined number of attempts - or as an alternative, > > use PF to close the port for IP's in question after predetermined > > number of connection attempts in given time. > > > Can you suggest such port which I should install to block these attempts? > > Use key based authentication and stop using passwords altogether. > > > What do you mean here? > > Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh > > from the ssh config file. > > > How to disable SSH1 and How to stop direct root access into ssh, where to > change? > > -Reko > > > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > BR / vj -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:40:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5239916A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159FA13C480 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0CMgvsD019004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:42:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168641777; bh=/jQ2I1yekvgadcJ5Axse0SW2u0Y=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=L+ks+kiBsrGy0Ik/qCIca8TJZ+7iYMN86TJOQRp9p5MI5Pnn6jD INomWGf0QHOYKYIwkyPgd+33RenzTaCbRAA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=jmqgGk0+Bi8iQKSFJXl+5B5VcQFjo8mYMhJ3JIDN8Th34Sbh4oJPBdHG8SiG62kAP 1UHgBGAip23uOi3b7U2rg== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0CMguFl018987; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:42:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:42:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070112174148.B17854@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Sysinstall: No Floppy Devices Found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:40:30 -0000 Hey all, I'm getting the message when I try to load a KLD in Sysinstall, even though I KNOW my floppy drive works. In fact, I can load the KLD from the loader prompt just fine. Is there a difference/advantage to one way of doing this over the other? -Dan Mahoney -- "Hitler, Satan, those Hanson kids, anything. Just not the curious anteater." -Peter Scolari, as Wayne Szalinki in "Honey, I Shrunk The Kids--The Series" --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:45:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E27C16A49E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2826413C4D5 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (webmail038-S [10.13.128.38]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout10/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0CMjM3Q012459; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:45:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail038 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mac.com (8.13.8/webmail038/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l0CMjLcT004507; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:45:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:45:21 -0800 From: Peter Giessel To: VeeJay Message-ID: <01314817-0110-1000-BC88-DD339BE18D06-Webmail-10012@mac.com> in-reply-to: <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> references: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <2cd0a0da0701121425r2db393b0n8f21289c0bd48970@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 158.145.111.202 Received: from [158.145.111.202] from webmail.mac.com with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:45:21 -0800 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes Cc: Reko Turja , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:45:24 -0000 On Friday, January 12, 2007, at 01:34PM, "VeeJay" wrote: >What do you mean here? > >Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh >> from the ssh config file. > > >How to disable SSH1 and How to stop direct root access into ssh, where to >change? Sounds like you have some reading to do. Start here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/securing-freebsd.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/openssh.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 22:51:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E0F16A407 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F68813C44B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so917885wxc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:51:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.84.17 with SMTP id h17mr1108503agb.1168642277143; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:51:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm4096669aga.2007.01.12.14.51.15; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD1FB860; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC0CB83E; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:51:32 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> <01f401c73694$417d7830$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070112174744.37AD.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.30 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:51:19 -0000 On Friday January 12, 2007 at 04:54:37 (PM) Reko Turja wrote: > >I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more > > secure? > > > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking > > getaddrinfo > > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - > > POSSIBLE > > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > > 218.189.179.83 > > It's basically just script kiddies trying to get in using some ready > made user/password pairs. > > Lots of info covering this has been posted in these newsgroups > previously, but some things you might consider > > Moving your sshd port somewhere else than 22 - the prepackaged > "cracking" programs don't scan ports, just blindly try out the default > port - with determined/skilled attacker it's different matter entirely > though. Security through Obscurity is not true security at all. You are simply assuming that other ports are not being scanned. > > Use some kind of portblocker (lots in ports tree) which closes the > port after predetermined number of attempts - or as an alternative, > use PF to close the port for IP's in question after predetermined > number of connection attempts in given time. > > Use key based authentication and stop using passwords altogether. A very secure method. I would recommend this along with making sure your firewall is properly configured and all unnecessary ports closed, etc. > > Remember to keep ssh1 disabled as well as direct root access into ssh > from the ssh config file. -- Gerard For GOOGLE (L)Users: "RAM Disk" is not an installation procedure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 23:53:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D8516A403 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D09D13C455 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7070E2EAFA; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:53:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A81F60.70401@chapman.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:53:04 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:53:09 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? > > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more > secure? > > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking > getaddrinfo > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - POSSIBLE > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > 218.189.179.83 > VeeJay, you've asked several questions now to this list that are very simple to solve with even a minimal amount of reading through Google. Some people more generous than I have given you the answers, which are are immediately met with further questions, most of which are answered in the first part of the man page for the relevant program. I, and I suspect other posters on this list, have little interest in reading Unix for Dummies to you. Technical questions about specific failures are one thing, but you're asking things that are covered in any decent Unix / FreeBSD book. Heck, you can even get the FreeBSD Handbook for free online. Please, please, PLEASE RTFM. If that's too much to ask, try taking a class, hiring a consultant, or using a more user-friendly OS. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:43:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFAD16A412 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3475A13C461 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1346485nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:43:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=m5XTXPUWZf7WIrIf0pWbNptUIIlPkZnVS1MPziXbpHszvBDrjPZAz6RWQ/LY5aUoS99KRqdFNoTG3GPOmOpLwdP3xJIEFDiWQ5/Ykj4zgFFtbfSDP0z0zaE0HDlsxLbOIPSIZ6keI2kvacymOzMNpIOLZu7K6/fU/n71HUE7QAs= Received: by 10.82.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr243382bud.1168649001060; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.170.18 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:43:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:43:20 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 45368e4d74e1d1ac Subject: who's using that port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:43:23 -0000 I came home tonight to find my server with a full /var partition due to httpd-error.log being very full of error messages. I cleaned it up, and restarted apache to find that it wouldn't bind to ports 80 and 443 as they were in use. netstat -na confirmed that they were, but not by who. There's no -p argument to track the pid of the process using the port. How do you track that on BSD? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:46:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEE216A415 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from daisy2.compar.com (daisy2.compar.com [216.208.38.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B1713C45E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.compar.com [127.0.0.1]) by daisy2.compar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E4A13C424; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:38:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at compar.com Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id 6jds4ZPmuSBQ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:38:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (CPE00062566c7bb-CM0011e6ede298.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [74.109.12.188]) by daisy2.compar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA2E13C417; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:38:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DF76113; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:33:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-55T7BRJH; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:33:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by gabby.gsicomp.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C7C610F; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:33:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <008501c736ac$8ef08270$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Michael P. Soulier" , "freebsd-questions" References: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:48:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gsicomp.on.ca Cc: Subject: Re: who's using that port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:46:54 -0000 > I came home tonight to find my server with a full /var partition due > to httpd-error.log being very full of error messages. I cleaned it up, > and restarted apache to find that it wouldn't bind to ports 80 and 443 > as they were in use. > > netstat -na confirmed that they were, but not by who. There's no -p > argument to track the pid of the process using the port. > > How do you track that on BSD? See sockstat(1). -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:47:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA816A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066A013C442 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1347186nfc for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=egCzrj8QdueCVxALJdMTFI6QSE7+c/gT78tdmfP84u4x3EsK+OHEMK2bDImf0gXfDVlw7Re45ff1tBJxxIBqV3Pge8lWP7I5JUCN0xGaxlE8URqRHAllQz2aX2PyRxeIuSe6lKKBLr32YtvUoKbW7O7do6i/htgc8sarOCBrZIU= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr244895buc.1168649238601; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.163.14 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0701121647x606ea175h43fefae576752e56@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:17 -0800 From: "Josh Carroll" To: "Michael P. Soulier" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: who's using that port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@psualum.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:47:20 -0000 > netstat -na confirmed that they were, but not by who. There's no -p > argument to track the pid of the process using the port. > > How do you track that on BSD? sockstat -4 -p Josh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:49:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E916A47B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6674A13C455 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0D0nExR024867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:49:15 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l0D0nE0B004813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:49:14 -0800 Message-ID: <45A82C89.1030505@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:49:13 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.2.2.285561, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.1.12.163433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: who's using that port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:49:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > I came home tonight to find my server with a full /var partition due > to httpd-error.log being very full of error messages. I cleaned it up, > and restarted apache to find that it wouldn't bind to ports 80 and 443 > as they were in use. > > netstat -na confirmed that they were, but not by who. There's no -p > argument to track the pid of the process using the port. > > How do you track that on BSD? > > Thanks, > Mike sysutils/lsof is helpful in this case. Just grep for the port number you are looking for. Make sure to run it as root though or it will only show a limited number of open filehandles. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFqCyJEnKyINQw/HARAv/xAKCrodPnZo1E0RbZxlrAl5scOEBbyQCfSNVr yF85leoq+J2yCendJHvbuEo= =AdFg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:56:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDDB16A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9453A13C442 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup186.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.186]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0D0tBRV020670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:20 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D0t3LG001859; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0D0t3Yw001858; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:55:03 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Miguel Message-ID: <20070113005502.GB1715@kobe.laptop> References: <45A7EC4B.6050607@123.com.sv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A7EC4B.6050607@123.com.sv> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: how to make an init script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:56:12 -0000 On 2007-01-12 14:15, Miguel wrote: > Hi, the handbook doesnt show an example for a custom init script, i > want to make one for wildfie jabber server, any tutorial? Does the ``Practical rc.d scripting in BSD'' article help? http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/rc-scripting/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:59:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E67216A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551F213C43E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D12OmK044119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168650145; bh=GTJ0Bubkxp6pasuQGESe6RzWfEs=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=JQ/5WMHVxoy8YB4t0B+oe7MGXm6RCECKhkkKGMSQQ8TTT8Pu6g9 TXfnocRgNT+y+sLIHEeqNyoKvviDkMkPyIA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=gWnK+lTKhFxkfC3WJtOGGRWaxhCuu3kv3WUeL6zKfWVEzZL/0Tp7o0F6UcMF0xs9l q5LfzvkpCJ4jPRzdoA7eQ== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0D12Ov8044116; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070112200126.Q43183@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:59:57 -0000 Hey all, I have a Transport GT24 (B3992 Motherboard), and while it has one intel nic which works well, I'd like to be able to use the onboard broadcom network cards. Is there a known way of making them work? I seem to recall some dealy where you could use a windows driver? -Dan -- "I love you forever eternally." -Connaian Expression --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 01:08:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495F816A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1B313C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup186.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.186]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0D17m5o022333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:07:58 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D17e63002077; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:07:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0D17cMn002073; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:07:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:07:37 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Peter aka SweetPete Message-ID: <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.157, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.24, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:08:30 -0000 On 2007-01-12 14:02, Peter aka SweetPete wrote: > I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...), > and I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in > order to search and display only processes which match a certain > keyword/search term. For example, a user running top could hit '/' > and enter "fire", which would display processes related to > "firefox." That's an excellent idea :) Should we also allow for limiting by other stuff too, i.e. like the 'l' command in the mail/mutt mailer accepts a 'limit pattern' with a syntax like: Limiting by PID ~p minpid-maxpid only show pids in [minpid...maxpid] ~p minpid only show pids greater than minpid Limiting by username or user ID ~u username only show processes of user `username' ~U uid only show processes of user uid ~U uidmin-uidmax only show processes of users minuid-maxuid Limiting by number of threads ~t minthr-maxthr only show processes with minthr-maxthr threads ~t minthr only show processes with more than minthr threads Limiting by priority ~P minpri-maxpri only show processes with minpri-maxpri priority ~P minpri [...] You get the idea... > What is the best way to get (such) a feature added to "top?!" I know > I know, I'm always causing mayhem. *grin* If you have a patch to submit, I'm sure we can find people who are interested in reviewing, testing and committing it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 01:45:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1C116A417; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EB513C441; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734EE13C972; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:27:31 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28EEB13C83C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:27:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2748213C82C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:27:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:27:31 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop> Message-ID: <20070112192639.Q67707@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Peter aka SweetPete , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:45:10 -0000 > On 2007-01-12 14:02, Peter aka SweetPete wrote: >> I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...), >> and I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in >> order to search and display only processes which match a certain >> keyword/search term. For example, a user running top could hit '/' >> and enter "fire", which would display processes related to >> "firefox." > > That's an excellent idea :) > > Should we also allow for limiting by other stuff too, i.e. like the > 'l' command in the mail/mutt mailer accepts a 'limit pattern' with a > syntax like: ... > > Limiting by username or user ID > > ~u username only show processes of user `username' > ~U uid only show processes of user uid > ~U uidmin-uidmax only show processes of users minuid-maxuid username is already there... u Display only processes owned by a specific username (prompt for username). If the username specified is simply "+", then processes belonging to all users will be displayed. -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 02:12:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8F016A415 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlabadi@hadara.ps) Received: from mail2.palnet.com (mail2.palnet.com [217.66.226.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA9B13C43E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlabadi@hadara.ps) Received: from a93-220.adsl.paltel.net ([213.6.93.220] helo=palestine2) by mail2.palnet.com with smtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5SrX-0003P3-OQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:18:56 +0200 Message-ID: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> From: "Mahmoud Labadi" To: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:26:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: automake19: texinfo error during build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:12:34 -0000 Dear ALL, I got the same problem... any news plz I'm trying to upgrade my automake from 1.8.5_2 to 1.9.6 (in order to install Subversion, which seems to require this). During the build, I get a screenful of errors like ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }. ./automake19.texi:9090: Unknown command `tie'. [...] before dying with --- makeinfo: Removing output file `./automake19.info' due to errors; use = --force to preserve. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6/doc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa = /tmp/portupgrade39976.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/automake19 (automake-1.8.5_2) (texinfo error) --- Regards Mahmoud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 02:54:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EB216A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [63.105.30.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE57113C47E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D2semn065513; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:54:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0D2sdWF065512; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:54:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:54:39 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070113025439.GA63533@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: rushani@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/null in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:41 -0000 > Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:03:40 -0400 > From: "Marc G. Fournier" > Subject: Re: /dev/null in a chroot > To: Michael Grant , FreeBSD Questions > > Message-ID: <8A1292FC91669855CE9C3403@ganymede.hub.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > #!/bin/sh > /sbin/devfs -m $1 rule apply hide > /sbin/devfs -m $1 rule apply path null unhide > > where $1 == the dev directory you mount within the chroot environment ... This issue is currently biting users of /usr/ports/security/scponly also, I believe. I'm finding that recently-created scponlyc chroots do not permit sftp login, although they do allow ftp login. The client symptom is just: $ sftp newuser@www Connecting to www... Password: Connection closed $ The cause appears to be that recent versions of /usr/libexec/sftp-server will complain about of lack of access to /dev/null and exit, resulting in the closed connection witnessed by the remote client. The solution appears to be to create a devfs in the scponlyc chroot. This is a little disappointing, as scponlyc used to be delightfully lightweight and low-maintenance. At this point, my understanding is that the devfs requirement means that now I must run a script at boot time that iterates through a list of chroot'ed users and create dev nodes within each jail. scponlyc jails were previously a set-and-forget type of setup. What is the proper mechanism for setting up an arbitrary number of scponlyc chroots at boot time? /usr/share/examples/etc/devfs.conf doesn't show an example of how to apply these rules to a non-default dev path. I have chosen to put a script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. In case other scponly users are reading this in the archives, the manual method that works for me with 6.2-PRE and scponly-4.6_1 is: # cd ~user # mkdir -p dev # mount_devfs devfs dev # devfs -m dev rule -s 1 applyset # devfs -m dev rule -s 2 applyset One then sees: # ls -l dev total 0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 6 Jan 12 17:15 null crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 12 Jan 10 07:57 random lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Jan 12 16:54 urandom@ -> random crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 7 Jan 10 15:57 zero which is more than enough to appease /usr/libexec/sftp-server. chroots created some months ago contain lib versions with numbers typically one less, such as ./usr/lib/libssh.so.2 in the older chroot, versus ./usr/lib/libssh.so.3 in the newer. The older scponly chroots do net require devfs nodes! I suspect they will eventually break though, given enough time. Given that scponlyc provides a setup_chroot.sh script that provides hooks for OS-specific chroot setup steps, would it help the port maintainer to provide the shell script below? I have it installed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/scponlyc.sh. Jim #!/bin/sh # script to create devfs filesystems at boot time for scponlyc # chroot'ed users. We will read /etc/shells to determine # where scponlyc is installed. Then we'll iterate through # each user in /etc/passwd to find users whose shell is set to # scponlyc. For each such user found, we will create a # minimal devfs under ~/dev. SCPONLYC=$(/usr/bin/grep "/scponlyc$" /etc/shells 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/tail -1) make_devfs() { # $1 is the user name whose home directory needs a minimal # devfs created. If ~/dev is not a directory, it will be # deleted and replaced with a directory. eval DEV="~$1/dev" while /sbin/umount ${DEV} 2>/dev/null; do :; done [ -h "${DEV}" ] && rm "${DEV}" [ -f "${DEV}" ] && rm "${DEV}" mkdir -p "${DEV}" if /sbin/mount_devfs devfs "${DEV}"; then /sbin/devfs -m "${DEV}" rule -s 1 applyset || /sbin/umount ${DEV} 2>/dev/null /sbin/devfs -m "${DEV}" rule -s 2 applyset || /sbin/umount ${DEV} 2>/dev/null fi } scponly_startup() { # $1 is the path to the /etc/passwd file if [ "x${SCPONLYC}" = "x" ]; then echo scponlyc is not defined in /etc/shells >&2 exit 1 fi /usr/bin/grep -v "^[ ]*#" "$1" | /usr/bin/awk -F: {'print $1 " " $7'} | while read USER SHELL; do if [ "x${SHELL}" = "x${SCPONLYC}" ]; then make_devfs "${USER}" fi done } case "$1" in start) scponly_startup "/etc/passwd" echo -n ' scponlyc' ;; *) echo "Usage: `basename $0` start" >&2 ;; esac exit 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 02:54:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C55B16A570 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939D713C45B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77887E29; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:39:07 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:39:00 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701121239.04811.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Nathan Vidican , Lamont Granquist , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:54:48 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 10:48, Lamont Granquist wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:52:44AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > >> Gotcha all beat, screw the 'standard user' issue... I had a client call > >> me once cause the office cat peed onto/into the server; no technical > >> expertise required whatsoever, no password, no re-wiring of network, > >> heck no opposable digits even or anything else for that matter, yet it > >> still managed to kill the server ;) > > > > That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the same > > time. > > I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to 'spray' > rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would not be > established from the PSU to the cat? While spray(8) may protect the cat, it is likely to invoke crash(8). When combined with dumpon(8) permanent damage may result. :-) Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 03:01:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C594816A4A0 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcgovern@spoon.beta.com) Received: from spoon.beta.com (spoon.beta.com [199.165.180.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4B13C4A5 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcgovern@spoon.beta.com) Received: from spoon.beta.com (localhost.beta.com [127.0.0.1]) by spoon.beta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D2dMRA085594 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:39:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mcgovern@spoon.beta.com) Message-Id: <200701130239.l0D2dMRA085594@spoon.beta.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:39:22 -0500 From: "Brian J. McGovern" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2437/Thu Jan 11 18:59:09 2007 on spoon.beta.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on spoon.beta.com Cc: Subject: Mapping USB ugen 802.11g adapter to ndis X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:01:03 -0000 All, I have a USB 802.11g (DLINK) adapter that I would like to use to access a wireless network. I've been able to download the Windows drivers, convert them in to the kernel module, and load the module. However, when I plug the adapter in, the ugen driver picks it up. Historically, when I've had a new device, I had to tweak the USB driver to recognize the manufacturer and model. However, in the case of ndis, I've only found /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_usb.c, which doesn't seem to have such a list. Can anyone point me to how I can get the ndis driver to take ownership for the USB device in question? Or is USB NDIS support just not there yet? -Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 03:11:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993D416A415 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DE213C457 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so862398uge for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:11:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r8QrindCp6U5aDWonFSW8AXE6PSdvN2cXqJlE1rCcUwvvBeB09tvaggG6smm+/eS7H4m2+l2UU6QFEjq8OEyCsuLdxE3j4irNvIBnBEXdlXomAOHg7y8ntSokwdkaXKw0JsHzpRi7Of8Fi0e2N6+xnLXm2jN7blXeO/zAo7dbyk= Received: by 10.78.185.16 with SMTP id i16mr640254huf.1168632413464; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:06:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.135.13 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:06:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710701121206k7556f331s69272e072510e613@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:06:53 -0500 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Chuck Swiger" In-Reply-To: <45CAAA55-946F-4DAB-B9CE-CF77BCDC36EE@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070111052604.BAC5D16A575@hub.freebsd.org> <20070111062058.GA44045@ns.umpquanet.com> <45A6412C.308@vidican.com> <20070112003315.GA37679@ns.umpquanet.com> <45CAAA55-946F-4DAB-B9CE-CF77BCDC36EE@mac.com> Cc: Nathan Vidican , FreeBSD Questions , Lamont Granquist Subject: Re: How dangerous a Standard User could be to a FreeBSD box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:11:39 -0000 On 1/12/07, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Lamont Granquist wrote: > >> That cat is rather fortunate the server didn't kill the cat at the > >> same time. > > > > I haven't lived with a cat in awhile, but don't they tend to > > 'spray' rather than 'stream' so that a direct line of current would > > not be established from the PSU to the cat? male (non-neutered) cats spray to mark territory, but as for normal urination, it would be a stream. > > Um. While I grew up with a pair of cats, I must admit that I've > never paid sufficiently close attention to know one way or the > other. Nah, you don't have to watch them or anything. Just scoop the litterbox. > I wouldn't like my cat to test either spraying or streaming a > live PSU unit... :-) > > -- > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 03:22:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B0816A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6376F13C457 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup120.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.120]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0D3MNFY029165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:22:31 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D3MEpB040394; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:22:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0D3MEvk040393; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:22:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:22:14 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Philip Hallstrom Message-ID: <20070113032213.GA40355@kobe.laptop> References: <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop> <20070112192639.Q67707@bravo.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070112192639.Q67707@bravo.pjkh.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.077, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.32, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Peter aka SweetPete , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:22:55 -0000 On 2007-01-12 19:27, Philip Hallstrom wrote: >>On 2007-01-12 14:02, Peter aka SweetPete wrote: >>>I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...), >>>and I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in >>>order to search and display only processes which match a certain >>>keyword/search term. For example, a user running top could hit '/' >>>and enter "fire", which would display processes related to >>>"firefox." >> >> That's an excellent idea :) >> >> Should we also allow for limiting by other stuff too, i.e. like the >> 'l' command in the mail/mutt mailer accepts a 'limit pattern' with a >> syntax like: >> >> >> Limiting by username or user ID >> >> ~u username only show processes of user `username' >> ~U uid only show processes of user uid >> ~U uidmin-uidmax only show processes of users minuid-maxuid > > username is already there... > > u Display only processes owned by a specific username (prompt for > username). If the username specified is simply "+", then processes > belonging to all users will be displayed. I know. I was "thinking loudly" of a way to extend this without having to hijack the entire keyboard. If/when we have a more featureful limiting mechanism, we can certainly leave 'u' as a key binding that works exactly the same as before, for compatibility reasons. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 03:39:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0B516A417 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewgould@yahoo.com) Received: from web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7462B13C455 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewgould@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 31502 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2007 03:39:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oIcc832rC2hzh1AjdTVPY7GLsAOOA2Pq07qxFhNwDJO4tdCSncVpnUE7Ii0lC4BMx9ER8EGlC1bsdWan4pkoIXY1lz+NSYetGLKlmSTru6zDjB/ou69p8GtO1ErR4UX0BCCOHSBo+PhYNJfQC6Edaf5/8kE1b0kre8wC8IpwiuA= ; Message-ID: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [206.255.31.21] by web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:39:40 PST Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:39:40 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Gould To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [OT] advice on wikis and bulletin boards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:39:42 -0000 Strategic planning will be starting soon at my new place of employment, and= I'd like to setup a place on our intranet to facilitate discussions and pl= anning prior to meetings to reduce meeting times and make meetings more pro= ductive. This would be a new activity for this organization, so we'll star= t with just our own office. User permissions will be needed for security.= =0A=0AI've used bulletin boards before (phpbb); but they don't seem to be w= ell designed for group editing of documents. I've noticed that wiki's have= become very popular; but I'm not sure how well they facilitate discussions= .=0A=0ADoes anyone have any advice or suggestions?=0A=0AThanks,=0A=0AAndrew= L. Gould=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 03:45:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243AD16A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EF013C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup120.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.120]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0D3j0ac029843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:45:09 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D3ipiI040516; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:44:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0D3iptt040515; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:44:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:44:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mahmoud Labadi Message-ID: <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> References: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.121, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.20, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, INFO_TLD 1.27) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automake19: texinfo error during build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:45:36 -0000 On 2007-01-12 22:26, Mahmoud Labadi wrote: > Dear ALL, > I got the same problem... any news plz > > I'm trying to upgrade my automake from 1.8.5_2 to 1.9.6 (in > order to install Subversion, which seems to require > this). During the build, I get a screenful of errors like > > ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. > ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. > ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }. > ./automake19.texi:9090: Unknown command `tie'. > [...] > > before dying with > > --- > makeinfo: Removing output file `./automake19.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6/doc. > *** Error code 1 FYI, I think you are attacking the problem the wrong way: 1. Don't use the devel/automake19 port for development work with automake. AFAIK, this port is not a full automake19 package, but a special port of automake, which provides just barely enough automake support for the Ports tree. For local automake-based development, you should either use the devel/gnu-automake port instead, or roll your own installation of automake and friends, from a clean source tarball of automake-1.9.6 2. Why do you have to install automake19 for Subversion? Does the devel/subversion port require it? I don't see a dependency for automake in `ports/devel/subversion/Makefile'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 04:32:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15B116A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (smtp-out.fcibroadband.com [64.119.104.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71AE13C428 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobmc@bobmc.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014391B1759 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:32:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp-out1 ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with SMTP id 25081-08 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:32:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [209.104.162.97]) by smtp-out.fcibroadband.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3791B1742 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:32:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A860D7.9080103@bobmc.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:32:23 -0500 From: bobmc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [OT] advice on wikis and bulletin boards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:32:30 -0000 Andrew Gould wrote: > Strategic planning will be starting soon at my new place of employment, and I'd like to setup a place on our intranet to facilitate discussions and planning prior to meetings to reduce meeting times and make meetings more productive. This would be a new activity for this organization, so we'll start with just our own office. User permissions will be needed for security. > > I've used bulletin boards before (phpbb); but they don't seem to be well designed for group editing of documents. I've noticed that wiki's have become very popular; but I'm not sure how well they facilitate discussions. > > Does anyone have any advice or suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Andrew L. Gould > I installed Apache and http://www.oddmuse.org/cgi-bin/wiki on FreeBSD. You have to install it in cgi-bin, create group www, and look at httpd.conf to see where files should be. I also used it to create a website.... http://www.bobmc.net/cgi-bin/Goalie.pl/WikiVerse There are tons of wikis available. The most famous is MediaWiki for Wikipedia. But oddmuse is only one Perl script that works anywhere. MoinMoin has a nice balance between eyecandy and ease of use. You see it on some open-source sites. I also like DokuWiki Since it is so easy to create wiki pages, the challenge is to prevent a spaghetti-ball forming. Read all about it starting at http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WelcomeVisitors where it all started Also, a wiki is social software which some people are shy about using. Setting one up is like boiling a frog, you have to do it slowly. For minutes of meetings you can setup a mailing list like this one but in notification mode. For documentation, several dedicated wikis can be setup. Think about a page naming scheme that is consistent for your purpose. Cheers, -BobMc- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 04:56:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16AE16A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF5C13C45B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8942EC15 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:56:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A86674.1000106@chapman.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:56:20 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Subject: [Semi OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:56:23 -0000 Installed /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror/ I've got a couple dozen servers here, and waiting for cvsupdates is always onerous-- wish I'd thought of this ages ago. In any case, I wait for the update script to kick itself off, and get this in my logs: CVSup update begins at 2007-01-12 20:53:42 Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org" in "/home/cvsupin/.cvsup/auth" CVSup update ends at 2007-01-12 20:53:42 Did I forget something basic? My apologies if this is too severely off topic... -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 05:17:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D8216A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=052600b77d@iecc.com) Received: from tom.iecc.com (tom.iecc.com [208.31.42.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 059CA13C43E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=052600b77d@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 13767 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2007 04:50:49 -0000 Received: from mail.iecc.com (208.31.42.99) by mail.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Jan 2007 04:50:49 -0000 Date: 13 Jan 2007 04:50:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20070113045049.9956.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: andrewgould@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [OT] advice on wikis and bulletin boards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:17:31 -0000 >for group editing of documents. I've noticed that wiki's have become very >popular; but I'm not sure how well they facilitate discussions. > >Does anyone have any advice or suggestions? I've found them very useful. If you already have PHP and mysql installed, I encourage you to use Mediawiki. I resisted installing it because it does so much stuff that I assumed it would be a pain to set up, but it turns out to be one of the easiest packages I have ever installed, stick it in a directory visible to the web server, point your browser at the startup page, answer a few questions, and poof! you have your wiki. Someone else noted that wikis can turn into "spaghetti balls" which is true. It definitely helps if there is someone whose job it is to impose order on the wiki and reorganize it when it gets too messy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 05:59:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D0416A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A0013C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0D5wmNl011819; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:58:49 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:58:55 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45A86674.1000106@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45A86674.1000106@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701122158.55616.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Jay Chandler Subject: Re: [Semi OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:59:03 -0000 On Friday 12 January 2007 20:56, Jay Chandler wrote: > Installed /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror/ > > I've got a couple dozen servers here, and waiting for cvsupdates is > always onerous-- wish I'd thought of this ages ago. > > In any case, I wait for the update script to kick itself off, and get > this in my logs: > > CVSup update begins at 2007-01-12 20:53:42 > Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org > Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org > No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org" in > "/home/cvsupin/.cvsup/auth" CVSup update ends at 2007-01-12 20:53:42 > > > Did I forget something basic? Yes, if you are not a major mirror, you are supposed to use a mirror such as cvsup1.freebsd.org. Kent > > My apologies if this is too severely off topic... -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ "I am Andean project". http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 07:45:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BE516A412 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A92113C46A for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id l0D7jox94982; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:45:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <017101c736e6$a5173cd0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" , References: <20070112200126.Q43183@prime.gushi.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:44:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:45:55 -0000 Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in 6.1 release is buggy. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM Subject: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) > Hey all, I have a Transport GT24 (B3992 Motherboard), and while it has one > intel nic which works well, I'd like to be able to use the onboard > broadcom network cards. Is there a known way of making them work? I seem > to recall some dealy where you could use a windows driver? > > -Dan > > -- > > "I love you forever eternally." > > -Connaian Expression > > --------Dan Mahoney-------- > Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek > Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC > ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM > Site: http://www.gushi.org > --------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 07:57:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08D716A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlabadi@hadara.ps) Received: from mail2.palnet.com (mail2.palnet.com [217.66.226.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E6E13C448 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlabadi@hadara.ps) Received: from dogbert.palnet.com ([192.116.17.51] helo=[10.0.0.251]) by mail2.palnet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5ddv-000IRP-7C; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:49:35 +0200 Message-ID: <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:31:45 +0200 From: Mahmoud Labadi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automake19: texinfo error during build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:57:35 -0000 thank for your quick response.. I did that because I got this error during making install for mutt package so I tried to check automake please advise ===> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on executable in : sgmlfmt - found ===> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake19 - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/automake19 in /usr/ports/devel/automake19 ===> Building for automake-1.9.6 Making all in . Making all in doc restore=: && backupdir=".am$$" && am__cwd=`pwd` && cd . && rm -rf $backupdir && mkdir $backupdir && if (makeinfo --no-split --version) >/dev/null 2>&1; then for f in ./automake19.info ./automake19.info-[0-9] ./automake19.info-[0-9][0-9] ./automake19.i[0-9] ./automake19.i[0-9][0-9]; do if test -f $f; then mv $f $backupdir; restore=mv; else :; fi; done; else :; fi && cd "$am__cwd"; if makeinfo --no-split -I . -o ./automake19.info ./automake19.texi; then rc=0; cd .; else rc=$?; cd . && $restore $backupdir/* `echo "././automake19.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; fi; rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }. ./automake19.texi:9090: Unknown command `tie'. ./automake19.texi:9090: Misplaced {. ./automake19.texi:9090: Misplaced }. ./automake19.texi:9310: Unknown command `tie'. ./automake19.texi:9310: Misplaced {. ./automake19.texi:9310: Misplaced }. ./automake19.texi:9318: Unknown command `tie'. ./automake19.texi:9318: Misplaced {. ./automake19.texi:9318: Misplaced }. makeinfo: Removing output file `./automake19.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6/doc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/mutt. / Regards/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ *Eng. Mahmoud AL-Labadi* /Network Department Palnet Communications Ltd. Hadara Technologies http://www.palnet.com mahmoudl@palnet.com //Tel.02/2403434. Fax.02/2403430/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-01-12 22:26, Mahmoud Labadi wrote: > >> Dear ALL, >> I got the same problem... any news plz >> >> I'm trying to upgrade my automake from 1.8.5_2 to 1.9.6 (in >> order to install Subversion, which seems to require >> this). During the build, I get a screenful of errors like >> >> ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. >> ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. >> ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }. >> ./automake19.texi:9090: Unknown command `tie'. >> [...] >> >> before dying with >> >> --- >> makeinfo: Removing output file `./automake19.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6/doc. >> *** Error code 1 >> > > FYI, I think you are attacking the problem the wrong way: > > 1. Don't use the devel/automake19 port for development work with automake. > > AFAIK, this port is not a full automake19 package, but a special port > of automake, which provides just barely enough automake support for > the Ports tree. > > For local automake-based development, you should either use the > devel/gnu-automake port instead, or roll your own installation of > automake and friends, from a clean source tarball of automake-1.9.6 > > 2. Why do you have to install automake19 for Subversion? > > Does the devel/subversion port require it? I don't see a dependency > for automake in `ports/devel/subversion/Makefile'. > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 10:11:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789F216A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA94F13C4C4 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so887099uge for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:11:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; b=TQnYsSHiaM8XW0fL2DsP0wX0nOKDauJbi6yvzQY2iSjZgl+tOtgRqw38rOb4P2p9phE8hgEeI+VPhUzYjBrCPj7ideJIo8E1L90JbgWuqAin2Oq4liwujoRnK52m5Oq3bb61PhSAr3834kJK+sv8BYev9Nw6VCcHc+JODaRrI1g= Received: by 10.66.248.5 with SMTP id v5mr2198473ugh.1168681463353; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.sanabria.es ( [84.77.135.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1sm3522102uge.2007.01.13.01.44.10; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by gauss.sanabria.es (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 784634062; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:43:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:43:41 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_G=2E?= Juanino To: Mahmoud Labadi Message-ID: <20070113094341.GA886@gauss.sanabria.es> Mail-Followup-To: Mahmoud Labadi , Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automake19: texinfo error during build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:11:29 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El s=E1bado 13 de enero a las 09:31:45 CET, Mahmoud Labadi escribi=F3: > > ( .............. ) > > =3D=3D=3D> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on executable in : sgmlfmt - found > =3D=3D=3D> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake19 - no= t found > =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/automake19 in=20 > /usr/ports/devel/automake19 > =3D=3D=3D> Building for automake-1.9.6 > Making all in . > Making all in doc > restore=3D: && backupdir=3D".am$$" && am__cwd=3D`pwd` && cd . && rm -rf= =20 > $backupdir && mkdir $backupdir && if (makeinfo --no-split --version)=20 > >/dev/null 2>&1; then for f in ./automake19.info=20 > ./automake19.info-[0-9] ./automake19.info-[0-9][0-9] ./automake19.i[0-9]= =20 > ./automake19.i[0-9][0-9]; do if test -f $f; then mv $f $backupdir;=20 > restore=3Dmv; else :; fi; done; else :; fi && cd "$am__cwd"; if=20 > makeinfo --no-split -I . -o ./automake19.info ./automake19.texi; =20 > then rc=3D0; cd .; else rc=3D$?; cd . && $restore $backupdir/* `ech= o=20 > "././automake19.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; fi; rm -rf $backupdir; exit = $rc > ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. > ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. > > ( .............. ) > Maybe I am wrong also, but I suspect you are using makeinfo binary from print/texinfo port instead from base system, and you have /usr/local/bin in your PATH before /usr/bin (bad idea in that case). Regards --=20 http://personales.ya.com/banach --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFqKnNFOo0zaS9RnIRAo61AJ98bH4X0u7hlzUUUV+TrXzIv8NYLwCeOsnA pEG5Pf8jwD1QrJo1sn9XrVs= =jN8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 12:42:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C2D16A416 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anujhere@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C5C13C442 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anujhere@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1065149wxc for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:42:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=lSpzzAPHjFGCWtXUb1cRLgzvAsDfBXM0JbobTbCpplWg9NtzRTTPi78ULeZTBhTNk2Lr3JCYzOMEpN/EOwCl8lvQlWlBjjaCrabD9zfI3bCImeDzP3tlmDr3y6dn3CEMnqH2w1olSduABElo5SJMb79GzZTM9H5QvDbAIbkeDPU= Received: by 10.90.118.12 with SMTP id q12mr1399371agc.1168690446071; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:14:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?59.94.131.189? ( [59.94.131.189]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm4827208agc.2007.01.13.04.13.59; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:14:05 -0800 (PST) From: Anuj Singh To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0701121343g7fa2535fv4a7b201f5a03aff2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bE2ymV4HBcPqOrjMXL4S" Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:43:31 +0530 Message-Id: <1168690412.9059.10.camel@fedora.linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:42:02 -0000 --=-bE2ymV4HBcPqOrjMXL4S Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hiee, Greetings,=20 I tried port knocking thing with Linux box, Port knocking is a technique whereby attempting to connect to port A enables access to port B from that same host. Port knocking can be the solution for this. Tried with Linux iptables only, I wonder if the similar thing can be done on beastie IPF, I am very new with FreeBSD. But port knocking on Linux I tried and worked well. For a basic layout I am giving this link(this is based on Iptables - but can give a basic layout for implementing the same thing on Beastie). http://www.soloport.com/iptables.html =20 Anuj On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 22:43 +0100, VeeJay wrote: > I am reading many hundred lines similar to below mentioned? >=20 > Could you please advise me what to do and how can I make my box more secu= re? >=20 > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinf= o > for bbs-83-179.189.218.on-nets.com [218.189.179.83] failed - POSSIBLE > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > Jan 9 17:54:42 localhost sshd[5130]: Invalid user sysadmin from > 218.189.179.83 >=20 --=-bE2ymV4HBcPqOrjMXL4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFqMzrKJKFPNVb52QRAk36AJ9JsMvTwAP5ZiBt6WeHLihcz/m1uACfQJEq ZKItttZfGysIHqJBjoEQz+w= =fx7T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bE2ymV4HBcPqOrjMXL4S-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 12:46:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2A616A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF06F13C441 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-174-60.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.174.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:46:57 -0500 id 000564A9.45A8D4C1.0000678A Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:46:55 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070113074655.c928d749.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20070113033940.31500.qmail@web35311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OT] advice on wikis and bulletin boards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:46:58 -0000 Andrew Gould wrote: > > Strategic planning will be starting soon at my new place of employment, > and I'd like to setup a place on our intranet to facilitate discussions > and planning prior to meetings to reduce meeting times and make > meetings more productive. This would be a new activity for this > organization, so we'll start with just our own office. User permissions > will be needed for security. > > I've used bulletin boards before (phpbb); but they don't seem to be > well designed for group editing of documents. I've noticed that wiki's > have become very popular; but I'm not sure how well they facilitate > discussions. > > Does anyone have any advice or suggestions? Please wrap your lines around 72 chars or so. Wikis are good for group-developed documentation and similar. We used one extensively when we used a committee to rewrite the local LUG's bylaws and it was very helpful. I don't think Wikis are good for group discussion, however. For that I would fall back on a mailing list. Use something like Mailman that has archiving capability. For that same committee work, we also had a dedicated mailing list -- the two went hand in hand, and I don't think the wiki would have been nearly as useful without the mailing list. -Bill From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 12:51:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DD216A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from skapet.datadok.no (skapet.datadok.no [194.54.107.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5734A13C45D for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from thingy.bsdly.net ([10.168.103.11] helo=thingy.datadok.no.bsdly.net ident=peter) by skapet.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H5iLl-0006iY-0j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:51:09 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45A81F60.70401@chapman.edu> From: peter@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:51:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45A81F60.70401@chapman.edu> (Jay Chandler's message of "Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:53:04 -0800") Message-ID: <87mz4nw0n8.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Please Help! How to STOP them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:51:10 -0000 Jay Chandler writes: > Please, please, PLEASE RTFM. If that's too much to ask, try taking a > class, hiring a consultant, or using a more user-friendly OS. FreeBSD *is* user friendly. The simple (and fun to watch!) solution involves using PF (not sure if this can be easily done with the other firewalls FreeBSD has on tap) with 'overload' rules, ie http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 13:32:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16BB16A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FBD13C459 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DDYplZ016425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:34:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168695291; bh=xRK/uEoNje8dv+OroK6DYucQzvQ=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r6Gl65uOfX8BvUBizAp29j3raBhSCBwPH531p/ r/57mNvi/yvc6GEs+EfyhRFEDZGxdbvmn8S8gvTHnbfSL/Dg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=vJuLMG/oaixbBMEYqvbjRMeDiDLP2wcX1fWazmi0uZfqGAh82Aj0pZix1dJ1lsw0+ WQjSbkfEdwoFqemcKOSdA== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0DDYp7X016406; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:34:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:34:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: <017101c736e6$a5173cd0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> Message-ID: <20070113082709.G57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070112200126.Q43183@prime.gushi.org> <017101c736e6$a5173cd0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:32:23 -0000 On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in 6.1 > release is buggy. Which driver is that? My 6.1 install won't see them at all: pci4: on pcib4 pci4: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci4: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) Also, I'm running 6.1-RELEASE, will the cvs drivers from CURRENT work? -Dan > > Ted > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM > Subject: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) > > >> Hey all, I have a Transport GT24 (B3992 Motherboard), and while it has one >> intel nic which works well, I'd like to be able to use the onboard >> broadcom network cards. Is there a known way of making them work? I seem >> to recall some dealy where you could use a windows driver? >> >> -Dan >> >> -- >> >> "I love you forever eternally." >> >> -Connaian Expression >> >> --------Dan Mahoney-------- >> Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek >> Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC >> ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM >> Site: http://www.gushi.org >> --------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > -- "You're not normal!" -Michael G. Kessler, referring to my modem online time. --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 13:56:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B9516A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CC413C44C for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so906035uge for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:56:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rn5PoXUdjPU2AMTRhiG62LuL6mXUbu/5ii4EM00ASJ1Z427u5CFRDcvVPz6ZRuwgcTPHvEUOcOUS+gi2bUik6djgn+L0VjSiptoRnBogmIu0CpIR9bUlQmyjWUNmPik1UcGkZCg7C1k9bnemymFY8XyeyurgJEh/wQ4ceLjCU4g= Received: by 10.78.17.4 with SMTP id 4mr1177214huq.1168694867749; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.2 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:27:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:27:47 -0300 From: "Roberto Pereyra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: load balancing with multiple pppoe sessions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:56:56 -0000 Hi all!!! A simple question ? Does freebsd pppoe support multiple sessions ? I need to configure a two adsl load balancing server using pf (pools setup) but I don't have adsl routers only modems. Can I can do it with freebsd ? Thanks in advance. roberto -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline Looking for Linux Virtual Private Servers ? Click here: http://www.spry.com/hosting-affiliate/scripts/t.php?a_aid=426&a_bid=56 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 15:30:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695FC16A412 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E030213C46A for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:64152 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H5kqH-00018O-87 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:30:50 +0100 Received: (qmail 71126 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2007 16:30:46 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2007 16:30:46 +0100 Received: (qmail 25966 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2007 16:30:46 +0100 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:30:46 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-ID: <20070113153046.GA25950@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" , John Nielsen , questions@freebsd.org References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20070111120113.A57194@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070111120113.A57194@prime.gushi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H5kqH-00018O-87. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H5kqH-00018O-87 e03000f6b59cc6c828209e7fc5c646aa Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:30:51 -0000 On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:01:48PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > yOn Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:24:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > >>On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > >> > >>Apologies for top-posting. > >> > >>I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on > >>"namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that > >>supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not > >>support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the > >>loadable doesn't help, either. > >> > >>It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using > >>the driver source from the 3ware site. > >> > >>Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? > > > >Might some of the following information from 3ware be of help? > > > >http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15003 > > This details exactly what I need to do. However, the drivers that SHOULD > be attached to the article are NOT. No, they were not. The people at 3ware seem to have noticed that mistake however and now the attachments seem to actually be attached to that article. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 17:11:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4DE16A47C for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4D313C46B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup108.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.108]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l0DHAxwH010570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:11:13 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DHAmMf001887; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:10:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l0DHAmDk001886; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:10:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:10:48 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mahmoud Labadi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070113171047.GA1825@kobe.laptop> References: <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> <20070113094341.GA886@gauss.sanabria.es> <01b101c73687$f9a937d0$0301a8c0@palestine2> <20070113034450.GB40355@kobe.laptop> <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070113094341.GA886@gauss.sanabria.es> <45A898F1.7040902@hadara.ps> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.099, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.17, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, INFO_TLD 1.27) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: automake19: texinfo error during build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:11:38 -0000 On 2007-01-13 10:31, Mahmoud Labadi wrote: > thank for your quick response.. > I did that because I got this error during making install for mutt > package so I tried to check automake > please advise > > ===> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on executable in : sgmlfmt - found > ===> mutt-1.4.2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake19 - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/automake19 in > /usr/ports/devel/automake19 > ===> Building for automake-1.9.6 > Making all in . > Making all in doc > restore=: && backupdir=".am$$" && am__cwd=`pwd` && cd . && rm -rf > $backupdir && mkdir $backupdir && if (makeinfo --no-split --version) > >/dev/null 2>&1; then for f in ./automake19.info > ./automake19.info-[0-9] ./automake19.info-[0-9][0-9] ./automake19.i[0-9] > ./automake19.i[0-9][0-9]; do if test -f $f; then mv $f $backupdir; > restore=mv; else :; fi; done; else :; fi && cd "$am__cwd"; if > makeinfo --no-split -I . -o ./automake19.info ./automake19.texi; > then rc=0; cd .; else rc=$?; cd . && $restore $backupdir/* `echo > "././automake19.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; fi; rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc > ./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'. > ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {. > ./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }. > [...] That's odd. I have automake19 installed here, and it doesn't fail with this error message, when I rebuild it: keramida@kobe:/home/keramida$ pkg_info | grep automake automake-1.9.6 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (1.9) keramida@kobe:/home/keramida$ On 2007-01-13 10:43, "Jos? G. Juanino" wrote: > Maybe I am wrong also, but I suspect you are using makeinfo binary > from print/texinfo port instead from base system, and you have > /usr/local/bin in your PATH before /usr/bin (bad idea in that case). That's possible. Mahmoud, can you show us your PATH and other environment settings? This should be easy to do with: root# env | sort From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 17:42:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959CE16A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5892913C44C for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DHitYM038497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:44:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1168710295; bh=0Jm4sLSQZATmQ8JW7Ki6BsTVS1U=; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kgCSTaefNWQ3nfavywdcdxwwkyQvrIE7M3JP0F 9+SjbUJnCz1pNBFDztZm1o0rYpcorVGVkJLTKLNEWDC+Gyag== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-type; b=NtEiR1Ag+LiJ0iNDeAujrN6YREIp7ADIoxwE7sVHGqgb1PfLEhcnDgTnWIIW2pPwG gMrDOSlm5sj/kLhDKi0Aw== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l0DHirSC038487; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:44:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:44:53 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20070113153046.GA25950@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20070113124138.N57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070103024752.J35175@prime.gushi.org> <20070103123155.V52719@prime.gushi.org> <200701031418.13125.lists@jnielsen.net> <200701031423.17415.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070103153916.S52719@prime.gushi.org> <20070110103252.GA49447@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20070111120113.A57194@prime.gushi.org> <20070113153046.GA25950@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, John Nielsen Subject: Re: Easier way to install on 3ware 9550 card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:42:26 -0000 On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:01:48PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> yOn Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:24:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >>>> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, John Nielsen wrote: >>>> >>>> Apologies for top-posting. >>>> >>>> I've made some progress with this, but as I suspected, I'm screwed on >>>> "namespace collision". I.e. I am unable to load a version of twa.ko that >>>> supports my 3ware card because a previous version of twa.ko that does not >>>> support it is already in the generic kernel. Changing the name of the >>>> loadable doesn't help, either. >>>> >>>> It looks like I might have to make my own release, and my own ISO, using >>>> the driver source from the 3ware site. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have an easier way of doing this? >>> >>> Might some of the following information from 3ware be of help? >>> >>> http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15003 >> >> This details exactly what I need to do. However, the drivers that SHOULD >> be attached to the article are NOT. > > No, they were not. The people at 3ware seem to have noticed that mistake > however and now the attachments seem to actually be attached to that > article. Yes, I also need to state for the record that their support people are incredibly knowledgeable and responsive. I'm up and running now (thought I wasn't for a bit because the card takes a few MINUTES to probe during boot). What is the likelyness (read that as: who would I have to ask) of getting the driver source added to 6.2-R, or to CURRENT? While this has been an overall good experience for me, it would be decidedly nice if I could have just booted from the CD and run with it. -Dan -- "No mowore webooting!!!" -Paul, 10-16-99, 10 PM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 19:05:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF6016A47B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca) Received: from keymaster.look.ca (delta2.look.ca [207.136.100.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D2713C45B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com ([209.161.205.12]) by keymaster.look.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1H5nIg-0008Fa-FW for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:08:18 +0000 Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l0DI8IxF010209 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:08:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:08:18 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:08:17 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070113180815.GA7980@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) From: David Banning X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on chi.look.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=8.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Tue Feb 24 05:09:27 GMT 2004) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Cc: Subject: question on smtp AUTH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:05:06 -0000 I am still pouring over logs to check how my server has been spamming. I am wondering about the possibility of someone using a working login and password to send spam through my server. So here is my question; I look at my maillog and see the following spam; maillog.0:Jan 11 02:14:17 3s1 sm-mta[3540]: l0B7EGO6003540: from=, size=478, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200701110714.l0B7 EGMu003539@3s1.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=3s1.com [209.161.205.12] www@3s1.com does not exist as a user on my system, but the relay is mine (3s1.com), and 209.161.205.12 is mine. How can I find out or log when a user sends mail, what authentication was used? If they have to login to send through my server, who did they login as? - how would I find that out? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 19:56:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C80816A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743413C455 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so1551970nfc for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:56:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=N+VniWIgvOMt2FUZXSbezEnE9UohwYyPY9L5Eso0dznz9EZ+/XvWDrLJijSjdVE/pOH6tN5uEhLM3E+lxjGZaOdADBEfYnVdVJuB8IKNcJPITgMoM11ZlrfqZLj2Fkp+yO/pp7AyVK9OfnpL24xgkR7ONcgTTFsktZobTB1YZys= Received: by 10.49.55.13 with SMTP id h13mr1983603nfk.1168716586310; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.72.8 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:29:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:29:46 -0300 From: "Pablo Mora" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Clamav Antivirus install failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:56:48 -0000 # uname -r 5.5-STABLE # cd /usr/ports/security/clamav # cat Makefile ... LIB_DEPENDS= gmp.7:${PORTSDIR}/math/libgmp4 ... # make install ... /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib ===> Registering installation for libgmp-4.1.4_2 ===> Returning to build of clamav-0.88.7_1 Error: shared library "gmp.7" does not exist *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. ... # pkg_info | grep libgmp libgmp-4.1.4_2 A free library for arbitrary precision arithmetic # pkg_info -Lx libgmp Information for libgmp-4.1.4_2: Files: /usr/local/include/gmp.h /usr/local/include/gmpxx.h /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a /usr/local/lib/libgmp.la /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.6 /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.a /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.la /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.so /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.so.3 /usr/local/info/gmp.info gmp.7 does not exists. Anybody know that it happens? -- Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 20:03:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE6F16A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [216.9.132.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B33213C45A for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55DF7E8C7 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:03:01 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFBmTo7HV1P9 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (74-130-30-11.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.130.30.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2937E8BF for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:03:00 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: freebsd-questions Questions Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-12--714656526" From: Joe Auty Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:03:07 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Gpgmail-State: signed X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: filtercmd, krb5, heimdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:03:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-12--714656526 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hello, Working with this guide: http://perlstalker.amigo.net/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=serversidefilter %20on%20FreeBSD First of all, I'm having the same problem described here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-June/ 124454.html where the Heimdal port conflicts with krb5 and therefore won't install. I'm assuming that Heimdal is built into krb5 and that I won't need it, so moving along... My initial problem was this build-time error: # make gcc -c filtercmd.c -DSQUIRRELMAILCONFIGFILE='"/usr/local/www/ squirrelmail/config/config.php"' gcc -c checkcreds_cclient.c checkcreds_cclient.c:12:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or checkcreds_cclient.c: In function `checkcredentials': checkcreds_cclient.c:28: error: `MAILTMPLEN' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:28: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once checkcreds_cclient.c:28: error: for each function it appears in.) checkcreds_cclient.c:29: error: `MAILSTREAM' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:29: error: `stream' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:30: error: syntax error before "mb" checkcreds_cclient.c:31: error: `DRIVER' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:31: error: `d' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:38:18: #include expects "FILENAME" or checkcreds_cclient.c:41: error: syntax error before ')' token checkcreds_cclient.c:54: error: `NIL' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:54: error: `SET_MAXLOGINTRIALS' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c: At top level: checkcreds_cclient.c:78: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c: In function `mm_login': checkcreds_cclient.c:80: error: `mb' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:84: error: `user' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:84: error: `MAILTMPLEN' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:85: error: `pwd' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c: In function `mm_log': checkcreds_cclient.c:90: error: `NIL' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:91: error: `PARSE' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:92: error: `WARN' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:93: error: `ERROR' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c: At top level: checkcreds_cclient.c:100: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c: In function `mm_notify': checkcreds_cclient.c:101: error: `string' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c:101: error: `errflg' undeclared (first use in this function) checkcreds_cclient.c: At top level: checkcreds_cclient.c:106: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:107: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:108: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:109: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:110: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:111: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:112: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:114: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:115: error: syntax error before '*' token checkcreds_cclient.c:116: error: syntax error before '*' token *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/plugins/serversidefilter/script. The include in question that it doesn't like appears to be this: // c-client library #include MAIL_H (this is line 12) I changed this to the complete path to mail.h: #include "/usr/local/include/c-client/mail.h" I did the same for linkage.h, which it also complained about: #include "/usr/local/include/c-client/linkage.c" My remaining problem is this: # make gcc -o filtercmd filtercmd.o checkcreds_cclient.o -lc-client4 -lssl - lpam -lcrypt -lcom_err -L /usr/local/lib -lz -lcrypto -L /usr/lib - static -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lgssapi -lopie -lradius -lskey -ltacplus - lutil -lmd -static /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lk5crypto *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/plugins/serversidefilter/script. Is this due to my missing Heimdal port? What would you suggest trying? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org --Apple-Mail-12--714656526 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFqTr8CgdfeCwsL5ERAjoTAKCS54RF8MYJ0bOm+7Xb3Z7amOphKACeOKh3 SGVUX3KCTMer4khFAkMBfI0= =lzuw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-12--714656526-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 20:18:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEC616A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098F713C448 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-69-140-8.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.69.140.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDE3114314 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:12:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:50:42 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070113082709.G57194@prime.gushi.org> References: <20070112200126.Q43183@prime.gushi.org> <017101c736e6$a5173cd0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <20070113082709.G57194@prime.gushi.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========48BE5808BBAE640B9790==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:07 -0000 --==========48BE5808BBAE640B9790========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On January 13, 2007 8:34:50 AM -0500 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"=20 wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in >> 6.1 release is buggy. > > Which driver is that? My 6.1 install won't see them at all: > > pci4: on pcib4 > pci4: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) > > Also, I'm running 6.1-RELEASE, will the cvs drivers from CURRENT work? > They're working for me. grep bce /var/run/dmesg.boot bce0: mem=20 0xf4000000-0xf5ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci9 bce0: ASIC ID 0x57081010; Revision (B1); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus0: on bce0 bce0: Ethernet address: 00:13:72:fb:2a:ad bce1: mem=20 0xf8000000-0xf9ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci5 bce1: ASIC ID 0x57081010; Revision (B1); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz miibus1: on bce1 bce1: Ethernet address: 00:13:72:fb:2a:ab You have to get the if_bce.c source that has this in it: /**************************************************************************= **/ /* BCE Driver Version=20 */ /**************************************************************************= **/ char bce_driver_version[] =3D "v0.9.6"; and then recompile your kernel. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========48BE5808BBAE640B9790==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 20:18:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5567016A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3064313C467 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-69-140-8.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.69.140.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E75114333; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:12:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:17:58 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: David Banning , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9F7B3DEC0E5C38DF44E9AE3A@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <20070113180815.GA7980@skytracker.ca> References: <20070113180815.GA7980@skytracker.ca> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========C6F0692ED5C65B562C00==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: question on smtp AUTH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:18:08 -0000 --==========C6F0692ED5C65B562C00========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On January 13, 2007 1:08:17 PM -0500 David Banning=20 wrote: > I am still pouring over logs to check how my server has been spamming. > > I am wondering about the possibility of someone using a working login > and password to send spam through my server. So here is my question; > > I look at my maillog and see the following spam; > > maillog.0:Jan 11 02:14:17 3s1 sm-mta[3540]: l0B7EGO6003540: > from=3D, size=3D478, class=3D0, nrcpts=3D1, = msgid=3D<200701110714.l0B7 > EGMu003539@3s1.com>, proto=3DESMTP, daemon=3DMTA, relay=3D3s1.com > [209.161.205.12] > > www@3s1.com does not exist as a user on my system, but the relay is mine > (3s1.com), and 209.161.205.12 is mine. > Your system appears to be working as expected: telnet 209.161.205.12 25 Trying 209.161.205.12... Connected to 3s1.com. Escape character is '^]'. EHL220 3s1.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.6/8.13.6; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:51:12=20 -0500 (EST) ^R EHLO testing 250-3s1.com Hello www.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP MAIL FROM: testing@bogus.com 250 2.1.0 testing@bogus.com... Sender ok RCPT TO: pauls@utdallas.edu 550 5.7.1 pauls@utdallas.edu... Relaying denied. Proper authentication=20 required. That would seem to suggest that the spam is being sent using an authorized = account, however, is it possible that a host inside your network is=20 sending the spam? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========C6F0692ED5C65B562C00==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 20:43:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874DC16A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FF813C43E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2007 15:43:00 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,184,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="387830546:sNHT333068350" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id ICN97817; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:42:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2007 15:42:59 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17833.17454.957523.621129@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:42:22 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090202.45A94273.0054,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: question about Intel NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:43:00 -0000 I have a machine that's getting re-purposed, and - based on comments made here - I'd like to replace the RealTek-based NIC with Intel. However ... I've never dealt with Intel cards before, and I'm not certain which model is the right choice. A search of the Intel web site suggests either the PRO/1000 MT or the PRO/1000 GT. Given the machine is vanilla PCI and will be mostly a workstation with some light server functionality, I'm open to counsel. (Preferably with data, but anecdote will do. :-) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 21:05:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06C616A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharazjek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDBD13C455 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharazjek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1161788wxc for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:05:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AXW8xlmVEqeDKKlwr7z7eiSnozEhy4bDIFRDupGkZO0/qyNAcBXR8mcUBG8NKYIs7/j0AoIbJnZkrH9QdfM1JMO3G41/XXK+h3qoAbcFlg3O1U6P9eVGd4kfGk8hQDDd3ksjo+kBakZqXZ80W0hx/JBIvSimeUvEvofI+ay2yIY= Received: by 10.70.131.20 with SMTP id e20mr4160179wxd.1168720676604; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.113.1 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:37:56 -0600 From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: nfs server not working with 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:05:38 -0000 updated my NFS server to 6.2-RELEASE last night. today, i find that freebsd or linux clinets alike, are all getting: athena:/usr/src: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Timed out i cant think of what to check. the nfs server has this in the /etc/rc.conf: rpcbind_enable="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" mountd_flags="-r" my uname: FreeBSD athena.dfwlp.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 19:53:23 CST 2007 root@athena.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ATHENA i386 my /etc/exports: [root@athena ~]# cat /etc/exports /usr -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 /opt -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 frustrating as all get out, as im troubleshooting another totally enigmatic problem on both of my linux servers (which i wont bother to post about here). but since my BSD box is my file server, im needing to get into those NFS mounts, so one problem is preventing the other from being solved. if anyone can help me shed light on this, i would really appreciated it. thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 21:11:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D28816A412 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0970213C457 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-29-241.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.29.241]:59426 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H5qA1-0001It-6f for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:11:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 72767 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2007 22:11:30 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2007 22:11:30 +0100 Received: (qmail 28639 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2007 22:11:30 +0100 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:11:30 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20070113211130.GA28558@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org References: <17833.17454.957523.621129@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17833.17454.957523.621129@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H5qA1-0001It-6f. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H5qA1-0001It-6f 0f605a2f61c67e2256a5529a8789fee2 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about Intel NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:11:34 -0000 On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:42:22PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > I have a machine that's getting re-purposed, and - based on > comments made here - I'd like to replace the RealTek-based NIC with > Intel. > However ... I've never dealt with Intel cards before, and I'm > not certain which model is the right choice. A search of the Intel > web site suggests either the PRO/1000 MT or the PRO/1000 GT. Given > the machine is vanilla PCI and will be mostly a workstation with > some light server functionality, I'm open to counsel. (Preferably > with data, but anecdote will do. :-) You probably want the PRO/1000 GT. The PRO/1000 MT is a somewhat older design and the desktop version of the MT is probably a bit difficult to get hold of today. (The server version of the pro/1000 mt has a 64-bit connector which would not confer any extra benefit to you if you just have a normal 32-bit PCI slot.) Both the MT and GT NICs should work fine for you but the GT model is probably both easier and cheaper to find in stores today. FWIW I have a PRO/1000 GT card in one of my machines and it works just fine. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 21:31:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FA616A415 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=052600b77d@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0273713C461 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=052600b77d@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 13993 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2007 21:31:37 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Jan 2007 21:31:37 -0000 Date: 13 Jan 2007 21:31:37 -0000 Message-ID: <20070113213137.52669.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070113180815.GA7980@skytracker.ca> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: david+dated+1169143698.53a39d@skytracker.ca Subject: Re: question on smtp AUTH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:31:38 -0000 >I am wondering about the possibility of someone using a working login >and password to send spam through my server. So here is my question; That's depressingly common. Look for abandoned or unused accounts like guest/guest. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 21:32:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC2B16A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6735713C45B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5qTy-0007jP-Qh; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:32:10 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H5qWG-000F61-8N; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:34:32 +0300 To: "Pablo Mora" References: From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:34:32 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Pablo Mora's message of "Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:29:46 -0300") Message-ID: <78786551@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Clamav Antivirus install failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:32:12 -0000 On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:29:46 -0300 Pablo Mora wrote: > # uname -r > 5.5-STABLE > # cd /usr/ports/security/clamav > # cat Makefile > ... > LIB_DEPENDS= gmp.7:${PORTSDIR}/math/libgmp4 > ... > # make install > ... > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > ===> Registering installation for libgmp-4.1.4_2 Current version is libgmp-4.2.1_1 ... > ===> Returning to build of clamav-0.88.7_1 > Error: shared library "gmp.7" does not exist > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > ... > # pkg_info | grep libgmp > libgmp-4.1.4_2 A free library for arbitrary precision arithmetic > # pkg_info -Lx libgmp > Information for libgmp-4.1.4_2: > Files: > /usr/local/include/gmp.h > /usr/local/include/gmpxx.h > /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a > /usr/local/lib/libgmp.la > /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so > /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.6 > /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.a > /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.la > /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.so > /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.so.3 > /usr/local/info/gmp.info > gmp.7 does not exists. Anybody know that it happens? ... and libgmp.so.7 is there. Try to update your ports tree and math/libgmp4 port. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 22:50:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A945B16A4CE for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: from gdead.mooseriver.com (gdead.mooseriver.com [205.166.121.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA3413C4A9 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 2010) id 69C6E3C92E5; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:50:20 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on gdead.mooseriver.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from mooseriver.com (h-66-166-146-73.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.146.73]) by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEB83C92DF; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:50:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 6F7CF2F06AD; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:50:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:50:18 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: Philippe Lang Message-ID: <20070113225018.GA22396@mooseriver.com> References: <20070111062745.GA94155@xor.obsecurity.org> <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D16B3@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D16B3@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Moose River, LLC Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: SuperMicro 2U servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:50:20 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Philippe Lang wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is anyone using FreeBSD 6.X in production on SuperMicro 2U servers? >=20 > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/ >=20 > Thanks for the info, >=20 > Philippe Lang Yep, We are using them at Juniper Networks. We have had very good luck with them. However we use SCSI disk instead of SATA so I don't know how well SATA works with FreeBSD 6.x. Our setup is 2 - dual core CPUs, 4 gig of ram, a pair of Adaptec SCSI RAID controllers. The OS disk is a pair of 72 gig SCSI mirrored and the other 6 bays have some configuration of SCSI disk in RAID 10. We use FreeBSD 6.2-RC2 because these motherboards use the Intel network chips and there was a problem with the em device. The patch to fix this got committed sometime in late October.=20 Josef --=20 Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFqWIpy8prLS1GYSERAqTuAJ0RsFhDeh4fdlo2hNHvoVO4ewEDLwCgxwZE VFnXnJB6euEwYAiVIIis7jA= =2dnQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 23:28:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8AD16A40F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2362513C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471B2E95A; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:28:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A96B22.9030506@chapman.edu> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:28:34 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server not working with 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:28:40 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > updated my NFS server to 6.2-RELEASE last night. today, i find that > freebsd > or linux clinets alike, are all getting: > > athena:/usr/src: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Timed out > > i cant think of what to check. the nfs server has this in the > /etc/rc.conf: > > rpcbind_enable="YES" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > mountd_flags="-r" > > my uname: > FreeBSD athena.dfwlp.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 > 19:53:23 CST 2007 root@athena.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ATHENA > i386 > > my /etc/exports: > [root@athena ~]# cat /etc/exports > /usr -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 > /opt -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 > > frustrating as all get out, as im troubleshooting another totally > enigmatic > problem on both of my linux servers (which i wont bother to post about > here). but since my BSD box is my file server, im needing to get into > those > NFS mounts, so one problem is preventing the other from being solved. > > if anyone can help me shed light on this, i would really appreciated it. > > thanks, > jonathan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Check /var/log./messages and /var/log/dmesg for anything irregular. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: dynamic software linking table corrupted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 23:36:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B216A412 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C21213C43E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so551759pyh for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:36:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ltq2RmLUG70obJmydx1iQFSQmFWQ2Ki1L3qm4KIDR0yi54Ew0GAQmVFkun8Kajfp442oAJYrVJg6eewpcNbPMV9gX1ggaWpoxWD3He/O1WiJ1T6Hoa15Ajah0FLGh7DJsgnYlnLnbA3RctP7FPz0U7/sk0+8WnNvTCPkpyb1YE4= Received: by 10.35.65.17 with SMTP id s17mr4088289pyk.1168729694126; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.76.15 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:08:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550701131508t2922edccw5c4ff5c769012aa7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:08:13 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Put /usr on a different drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:36:24 -0000 Hi, I'm wondering if someone could point me in the right direction of moving the entire /usr partition to a second hard disk, given that I am on an existing (newly installed) install of FreeBSD. Also, is it possible to specify something like this during the installation itself? Any possible google queries, links, articles, et cetera are warmly welcomed. I've tried throwing a few keywords at google, but it all returns off topic pages. Sincerely, Daniel A. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 23:47:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA8E16A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharazjek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFF213C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sharazjek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1194829wxc for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:47:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nvAumHNCDya+hHo+5afQsVgpQmzhZ+uT9V/Tv1pQOFNPpeu5sFPFn66xu279H3AOgIOvOJDvQX5P2gS9SUVMhE+h1Bn0OJimGGRQPPwVzCcBv4jstvIfMEzW6w/q4yOvigNpenaI/dtogbjX9vzcKOthsU2wq+plmQfcSi1FC3I= Received: by 10.70.125.2 with SMTP id x2mr4581950wxc.1168732057717; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.113.1 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:47:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:47:37 -0600 From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "Jay Chandler" In-Reply-To: <45A96B22.9030506@chapman.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A96B22.9030506@chapman.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server not working with 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:47:50 -0000 On 1/13/07, Jay Chandler wrote: > > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > updated my NFS server to 6.2-RELEASE last night. today, i find that > > freebsd > > or linux clinets alike, are all getting: > > > > athena:/usr/src: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Timed out > > > > i cant think of what to check. the nfs server has this in the > > /etc/rc.conf: > > > > rpcbind_enable="YES" > > nfs_server_enable="YES" > > mountd_flags="-r" > > > > my uname: > > FreeBSD athena.dfwlp.com 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 > > 19:53:23 CST 2007 root@athena.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ATHENA > > i386 > > > > my /etc/exports: > > [root@athena ~]# cat /etc/exports > > /usr -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 > > /opt -alldirs -maproot=root -network=192.168.1 -mask=255.255.255.0 > > > > frustrating as all get out, as im troubleshooting another totally > > enigmatic > > problem on both of my linux servers (which i wont bother to post about > > here). but since my BSD box is my file server, im needing to get into > > those > > NFS mounts, so one problem is preventing the other from being solved. > > > > if anyone can help me shed light on this, i would really appreciated it. > > > > thanks, > > jonathan > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Check /var/log./messages and /var/log/dmesg for anything irregular. > > -- > Jay Chandler > Network Administrator, Chapman University > 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu > Today's Excuse: dynamic software linking table corrupted > > well i may have come up with one possibility, my temporary dns server only has copied of my forward domains, and not my reverse. as soon as i have my main DNS servers back online again, ill be retesting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 23:55:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFC016A403 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4492C13C467 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so968341uge for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:55:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=LoKHu6vfRPwn34SzerwMyYO6KQfBB35XikQ9px/jDDWkFhLmymRCv1RYdyLw0Z9OzSz5Tu+5DSLHVD4HatWRGgikbyH99ToAFij3Q5fomnRqvTdk684i+gxoFJq8ECNnQNRXNZRP6HJUCd7guNhggpRAVx4MuUb5Wa7cTjbKmBc= Received: by 10.78.136.9 with SMTP id j9mr1476722hud.1168732534872; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:55:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:55:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:55:34 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Daniel A." In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550701131508t2922edccw5c4ff5c769012aa7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ceb5d550701131508t2922edccw5c4ff5c769012aa7@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c9b0328b1be0c334 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Put /usr on a different drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:55:36 -0000 On 1/14/07, Daniel A. wrote: > Hi, > I'm wondering if someone could point me in the right direction of > moving the entire /usr partition to a second hard disk, given that I > am on an existing (newly installed) install of FreeBSD. First, you need to copy all the stuff over. You can use dump(8)/restore(8), or mount /usr read-only, new /usr read-write (under a temporary mount point like /mnt) and use tar(1), cpio(1L), or cp(1). Then it's just a matter of unmounting /usr and mounting your new device under this mount point. Don't forget to edit the fstab(5) entry. > Also, is it possible to specify something like this during the > installation itself? Just partition your second drive and define any mount point on any of it's partitions - everything will be fine.