From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 00:21:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA0816A402 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7891F13C45B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1356 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Apr 2007 00:21:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=yQyktGDYqUG6bkaZwVDfhCNOmVhESOCt8S4V99Ou8Tyaai7ncRjlikmGlPedTHqzww/uiqge8tfm1m4Dp4iv4QKLR2e5WkOhHlKltgKpSa1CVDvbLg3BhJ7DMgo7194GzHYcU9SkfwPym5yuzLGH8GdzE09W0e7hql2pLtVlhC0=; X-YMail-OSG: LW084e4VM1larFyhhcfznOXiLR89VyNg8x8kZMOqRq6kch6.BaLPsy0TfBcrz3LnwVw3kUhaRBRMOGB7v_YDzNDthQ-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:21:41 PDT Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:21:41 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <907596.95892.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: bsdlabel editing to create a single partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:21:42 -0000 I want to dedicate the entire disk to a single FreeBSD partition ("da1s1a"), and am a little confused about editing partitions via "bsdlabel -e ". Prior to editing, it looks like this: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # /dev/da1s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 17908300 16 unused 0 0 c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I gather that I should change the following field values for "c:": fstype: 4.2BSD fsize: 2048 bsize: 16384 Questions: 1) Do I change the "size" value for "a:" or leave at current size? 2) Do I leave the "c:" line alone (in place) and if YES does its "size" and "offset" values need to be edited? If someone could show me what it should look like when done, I'd appreciate it. When I leave the "c:" entry in place, I get /dev/da1s1a and /dev/da1s1c in /dev/. Should I delete the "c:" entry? Here's what I have now: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # /dev/da1s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 17908300 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks! --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 02:05:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E7116A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A995A13C45A for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1270964wra for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:05:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HxCIqSq6ahCI1n6DHPGm6pn9+cvvdZnoC6mfxEvDrMMtIiTSjsmrss/6Aa/R9aI8f6Uao+UeVEzc9g6JGfFpNbTns+8AgIaSSIQEKxQbQTyCTYkux9N11GUmTzXCwrABSiwrtm73NKt8C81B5z10busVlklp1Y62tHxutl1BKQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=K0dKYCxUrJyXSWKN3ibvlifNAlO1ve6EpVrBQpaYVhZ98im/LaRtQr1a9QxJbXk0I1fFq79lKE21R/TABu+NoUd+8DD9XBo+H7iD6TkgmiXgGFq0hFJll2aG3iz0F7/gV3fAfbkrl5zqwR/sNMOg8fyOcfw5xzV8i3hrgLscmKU= Received: by 10.114.106.1 with SMTP id e1mr1872278wac.1177205802302; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.54.16 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:36:42 -0400 From: "Spiros Papadopoulos" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Linksys wireless pcmcia card / FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:05:20 -0000 Hi, I am running FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and I have the above card in my DELL's latitude c810 cardbus. I followed the instructions on the page below and configure the kernel accordingly: http://www.freebsdmall.com/~loader/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/wireless/article.html i get the message about: cardbus0: CIS pointer is 0 cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS which takes me to the post below...: http://freebsd.monkey.org/freebsd-stable/200607/msg00449.html I guess i need to tweak the windows driver or anyway hack it somehow. The problem is that i 've never done anything similar before but i would like to get involved and make it work. Anybody can point me to the right direction ? If the above is not the best solution i would really appreciate pointing me to the best alternative. thanks in advance Spiros P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 02:28:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B41016A404 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1790F13C459 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E11A4D84; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C23751387; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:28:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:28:13 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rajkumar S Message-ID: <20070422022813.GA87874@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <64de5c8b0704210224n809dac9ybdc8b831e3431b06@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64de5c8b0704210224n809dac9ybdc8b831e3431b06@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting a driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:28:14 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:54:54PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a Marvell Yukon 88E8050 Gigabit Ethernet which came with my > motherboard. When looking for it's driver I found that RELENG_6 > supports it, and the driver is located at sys/dev/msk/ But I am using > RELENG_6_2. >=20 > Is it advisable to take this driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2? Is > there some established method to get a diff of this driver alone and > apply it to RELENG_6_2? There is a good chance that you can just copy the files in this directory from RELENG_6 and it will work on RELENG_6_2 (since those two versions are still close together). You will also need some of the changes in sys/conf/ to "glue" it into the kernel build, which you can extract from the CVS (see e.g. cvsweb). Or you can copy the sys/modules/${whatever} directory too and it should be buildable as a standalone module. If you are unlucky then the driver may rely on changes made after the release of 6.2 and you will have to either back-port those changes too (or just run RELENG_6). Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGKsg8Wry0BWjoQKURAvZqAKD6x7c8pXOoZYU8xClodnY4PAiUBACfWwBl HPnTlDowv0sZXPDIWH+ZnfA= =8YuC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 02:58:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3AF16A404 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BEE13C468 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1016576ugh for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:58:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SshR201x/vQlwAoP1LKgWscHvpuQ7yGICWo8K6zLIhLjrax6xYm/h06to8iXuEwZmge8f3aSeJwmWrfgDYa0kBmYvMkCe5MeWlWTZliY6+EmKJh2O/4sXbsjfFU2B6MQunCvX4CW/jWL6s4IV8BN3Nxy631kP9ne6CYpdFAmK3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NV7efJmBlB3OkevLSgGrF9go3X+3Dq15fyi0gxABTf86fYV0/j5MY+HlRGU39UUwNBGjOBSMCD9rn+dSkWpY/n7s4U5CHHWxW3hrqMJgSxg1PhwIHXgv4br69tkfDZ0Xu4IU+cAIMDZxgFIglefftXsjgavnbRXKxn8csmLmPMs= Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr7016466bue.1177210691857; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.149.2 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:58:11 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "L Goodwin" In-Reply-To: <907596.95892.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <907596.95892.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel editing to create a single partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:58:13 -0000 On 21/04/07, L Goodwin wrote: > I want to dedicate the entire disk to a single FreeBSD partition ("da1s1a"), and > am a little confused about editing partitions via "bsdlabel -e ". > > Prior to editing, it looks like this: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # /dev/da1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 17908300 16 unused 0 0 > c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I gather that I should change the following field values for "c:": > fstype: 4.2BSD > fsize: 2048 > bsize: 16384 > > Questions: > 1) Do I change the "size" value for "a:" or leave at current size? NO > 2) Do I leave the "c:" line alone (in place) and if YES does > its "size" and "offset" values need to be edited? Leave it alone. > > If someone could show me what it should look like when done, I'd appreciate it. > > When I leave the "c:" entry in place, I get /dev/da1s1a and /dev/da1s1c in /dev/. > Should I delete the "c:" entry? Here's what I have now: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # /dev/da1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 17908300 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 > c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Don't edit the bsdlabel at all, just: # newfs -U /dev/da1s1a and it will automatically fill out the fsize, bsize, and bps/cpg fields. You can then add a line to fstab, mount it, fill it with text files containing the word "corn" ever and over. c: should nearly never be touched, and definitely never in the course of simply setting up a disk for use. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 04:10:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CC716A402 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976513C44C for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8ECDE508C5; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070422041003.8ECDE508C5@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-04-01 - 2007-04-21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:10:04 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 04:47:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7C716A404 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 910E213C45B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 40104 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Apr 2007 04:47:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ammfq22DowI1YWWNgLVy5Ydw4DiQT17e4UhWnZqCE92chTag575O2FPra379Pe1OE1bw0/1DAAU+OJVl1rNePIXeSPoWFqP18Pu+WgmvXuMmnl2SZwtWKoyq0qzqmaNL7lNbpSMd/JqxGeyVQriTpbBeRC3sLBwxarNvivpPa4Y=; X-YMail-OSG: I3bmyPEVM1loZzsFsKL.kxHW7m_OauUjy0IrO7mG.7vubBzmNFGDoNIDIR2Lvk.ZqNv5QEpdg0y0RNyJeqWVueNHvqC3W_c.J0Uo Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:47:12 PDT Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:47:12 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Oliver Iberien , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704150923.25792.odilist@sonic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <996620.31871.qm@web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Grep and --exclude? or, finding a text string that might be anywhere X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:47:14 -0000 Oliver, the error is due to incorrect syntax ("-e" flag omitted). Try this: grep -R /usr -e "any2dvd" L Goodwin Oliver Iberien wrote: I need to find a reference to an obscure delete port that is in some file somewhere (in /usr/ports/? somewhere in /usr?) as it is messing up make and, among other things, preventing me from running the gnome upgrade script. So, I do what little I know to do: grep -R /usr/* "any2dvd" This brings out a few valid discoveries (mostly in mailfiles when I posted about this) and lots of "operation not supported" and "No such file or directory" errors before grep spits out a "memory exhausted" error. If I could at least stop it from looking at */tmp/* and ~/.kde it might have a chance to get somewhere, but I can't figure out how --exclude or --exclude-dir work, despite googling over and over for examples. Can this be made to work? Or is there a better way? Thanks, Oliver Previous post about the weird make error follows: On Sunday 08 April 2007 21:24, you wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 09:30:14AM -0700, Oliver Iberien wrote: > > I seem to have messed something up somewhere, and peculiar instructions > > seem to have found their way in. An example is below: > > > > ---> Checking for the latest package of 'devel/gettext' > > ---> Fetching the package(s) for 'gettext-0.16.1' (devel/gettext) > > ---> Fetching gettext-0.16.1 > > /var/tmp/portupgradeJwjg3x7H/gettext-0.16.1.tb100% of 2093 kB 248 kBps > > ---> Downloaded as gettext-0.16.1.tbz > > ---> Identifying the package > > /var/tmp/portupgradeJwjg3x7H/gettext-0.16.1.tbz ---> Saved as > > /usr/ports/packages/All/gettext-0.16.1.tbz > > ---> Skipping libiconv-1.9.2_2 (already installed) > > ---> Found a package > > of 'devel/gettext': /usr/ports/packages/All/gettext-0.16.1.tbz > > (gettext-0.16.1) > > ---> Located a package version 0.16.1 > > (/usr/ports/packages/All/gettext-0.16.1.tbz) > > ---> Upgrading 'gettext-0.14.5_2' to 'gettext-0.16.1' (devel/gettext) > > using a package > > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/any2dvd > > "Makefile", line 54: Could not > > find /usr/ports/print/cups-lpr/../../print/cups/Makefile.common > > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > ^C---> Backing up the old version > > ---> Uninstalling the old version > > > > The section > > > > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/any2dvd > > "Makefile", line 54: Could not > > find /usr/ports/print/cups-lpr/../../print/cups/Makefile.common > > > > appears often when installing both from packages and ports. I just stop > > it and the install continues. What could be going on here? > > Check carefully for local changes you made referring to this file (in > /usr/ports or /etc/make.conf, maybe elsewhere_. It no longer exists > in the ports tree so it is unreferenced in a standard install of it. > > Kris _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 05:11:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E689116A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553613C48A for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D66968621E69; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ePqhSHgLywrV; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 3803768600414; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Oliver Iberien Message-ID: <20070422051155.GA13501@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Oliver Iberien References: <200704150923.25792.odilist@sonic.net> <996620.31871.qm@web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <996620.31871.qm@web58102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Grep and --exclude? or, finding a text string that might be anywhere X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:11:47 -0000 On Sat, Apr 21, 2007, L Goodwin wrote: >Oliver, the error is due to incorrect syntax ("-e" flag omitted). Try this: > >grep -R /usr -e "any2dvd" > >L Goodwin > >Oliver Iberien wrote: I need to find a reference to an obscure delete port that is in some file >somewhere (in /usr/ports/? somewhere in /usr?) as it is messing up make and, >among other things, preventing me from running the gnome upgrade script. So, >I do what little I know to do: > >grep -R /usr/* "any2dvd" > >This brings out a few valid discoveries (mostly in mailfiles when I posted >about this) and lots of "operation not supported" and "No such file or >directory" errors before grep spits out a "memory exhausted" error. If I >could at least stop it from looking at */tmp/* and ~/.kde it might have a >chance to get somewhere, but I can't figure out how --exclude >or --exclude-dir work, despite googling over and over for examples. Can this >be made to work? Or is there a better way? I generally use find, xargs, and grep for things like this: find /usr -type f | xargs grep -l 'any2dvd' OR find /usr -type f | egrep -v '/.kde|/tmp/' | xargs grep -l 'any2dvd' Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 ``If we got one-tenth of what was promised to us in these acceptance speeches there wouldn't be any inducement to go to heaven.'' Will Rogers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 06:03:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ED416A402 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1453313C45B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 15598 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Apr 2007 06:03:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=bdL5V39BkuesG6Wbv8Essoh+lefxE/FsivwumWOUgIJeMrlEbUx9RaJ7mGF1ULGzG2oaOSOTBiT5Td/pIvSwqz85donE2vjLu/0WjOjc6oDLgDrshnAhl68m6ngqK0WGO1i42AzgKiyXDQuLoBcLU6s5DPelqjyaPJ9L5UyBw+w=; X-YMail-OSG: x_whhfgVM1nptwqjlKsVj1..uM.htCesmPY09Sek7zo5_M_fDrL_Qh2rxJ4ObBXZHVkOoH6f_ZX9pAVp_dRBUtyDi1gOg17qEB.Yv2KEEd502nbVZt1T5i4OgEhpTegL Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:03:26 PDT Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:03:26 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <463388.15571.qm@web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel editing to create a single partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:03:27 -0000 Got it, thanks! "illoai@gmail.com" wrote: On 21/04/07, L Goodwin wrote: > I want to dedicate the entire disk to a single FreeBSD partition ("da1s1a"), and > am a little confused about editing partitions via "bsdlabel -e ". > > Prior to editing, it looks like this: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # /dev/da1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 17908300 16 unused 0 0 > c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I gather that I should change the following field values for "c:": > fstype: 4.2BSD > fsize: 2048 > bsize: 16384 > > Questions: > 1) Do I change the "size" value for "a:" or leave at current size? NO > 2) Do I leave the "c:" line alone (in place) and if YES does > its "size" and "offset" values need to be edited? Leave it alone. > > If someone could show me what it should look like when done, I'd appreciate it. > > When I leave the "c:" entry in place, I get /dev/da1s1a and /dev/da1s1c in /dev/. > Should I delete the "c:" entry? Here's what I have now: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # /dev/da1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 17908300 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 > c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Don't edit the bsdlabel at all, just: # newfs -U /dev/da1s1a and it will automatically fill out the fsize, bsize, and bps/cpg fields. You can then add a line to fstab, mount it, fill it with text files containing the word "corn" ever and over. c: should nearly never be touched, and definitely never in the course of simply setting up a disk for use. -- -- --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 08:46:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F26216A408 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112D913C484 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=p6KrXXvtqVCR13r54ZO01W92S8nannEWyJnZQhlRgM3kbpcaFyxVGaPq1gFfBmzX; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [208.127.11.96] (helo=wednesday) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HfXic-0001N7-FP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:46:50 -0400 Message-ID: <051801c784ba$c859f2b0$0225a8c0@wednesday> From: "jdow" To: References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <72cf361e0704210758u5f877e3fx279ec9642798a2c1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:46:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120954aadb7e6ff2b68c02e291bb11b6335f0dc0b2615eb44cc350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 208.127.11.96 Subject: Re: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:46:51 -0000 I'd also add to your remarks, Martin, that the list has people who serve as few as one person to one fellow who is mostly quiet these days who quite literally worked on a setup handling over a million addresses. Martin is one of the stalwarts on the group. (I've mostly been quiet for the last several months due to lack of time.) Martin's advice is well worth the reading. {^_^} Joanne ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Hepworth" > Grant > > I'd look at your SA setup, make sure you're running v 3.1.8 abd have > saupdate-ed recently. > > Also make sure you're running the URI-RBLs, dcc and razor2. > > Third party rules from www.rulesemporium.com are a must are as is the the > imageinfo plugin. > > You could always ask on the spamassassin users list for advice on tuning > you > setup and get some of the spam you get analysed by those of us running > well > tuned SA setups so you know which extra rulesets will help. > > Go on as on the SA users list, we're a friendly bunch and will help you > with > your problem. > > -- > Martin > > On 4/20/07, Grant Peel wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs >> using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either >> directly >> to me or to the list. >> >> We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have >> been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam >> servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by. >> >> We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda. >> Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is >> Easyantispam. >> Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of these? Usability? >> Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration issues? >> >> Any thoughts will be appreciated, >> >> -Grant >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 08:50:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FF916A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au (relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au [202.136.32.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6F213C4BD for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from [58.163.90.10] (helo=[10.100.6.5]) by relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HfXlg-0004OS-Sj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:50:01 +1000 From: Warren Liddell Organization: Blackthorne PTY LTD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:48:04 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704221848.04368.shinjii@maydias.com> Subject: Azureus Build Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:50:03 -0000 Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. Azureus as always fials with the following (any ideas/suggestions welcomed) --------------- ===> Building for azureus-3.0.1.0 Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build compile: [javac] Compiling 2510 source files to /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build [javac] /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/org/gudy/azureus2/pluginsimpl/local/utils/resourcedownloader/ResourceDownloaderFactoryImpl.java:66: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : method toURI () [javac] location: class java.net.URL [javac] return( new ResourceDownloaderFileImpl( null, new File( url.toURI()))); [javac] ^ [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. [javac] 1 error BUILD FAILED /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build.xml:22: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. Total time: 1 minute 7 seconds *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 09:49:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E958016A40D for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C935813C45B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.178]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JGW00KCC8LC72D0@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:48:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JGW000U78LCU4J0@pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:48:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from s01060014bf5ee711.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.71.220]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JGW002KM8LBWK90@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:48:47 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:48:45 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy In-reply-to: <20070421120018.EEC8816A46C@hub.freebsd.org> To: Rajkumar S Message-id: <200704220248.46213.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <20070421120018.EEC8816A46C@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Porting a driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:49:01 -0000 > I have a Marvell Yukon 88E8050 Gigabit Ethernet which came with my > motherboard. When looking for it's driver I found that RELENG_6 > supports it, and the driver is located at sys/dev/msk/ But I am using > RELENG_6_2. > > Is it advisable to take this driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2? Is > there some established method to get a diff of this driver alone and > apply it to RELENG_6_2? Have you tried searching http://www.marvell.com/ for the driver? They provide the binary i386 driver for their Gigabit Ethernet Cards (myk), though I'm not sure about the card you mentioned. Regards, Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 10:34:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D3E16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E5613C458 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBF04C9576 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:34:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05459-18 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:34:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (215.101.85.218.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [218.85.101.215]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D524C8EE5 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:34:23 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <462B39DB.8@realss.com> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:32:59 +0800 From: Zhang Weiwu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:34:08 -0000 Dear list This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar with javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions and features of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being frustrated for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like mantis or bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either start from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I used for years. 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her rather than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who is starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please let me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software like G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. 2. If I start my own, I think I'll be using a console widget library (ncurse? because it's famous), an SQL database (no problem) and a programming language. I never developed console application before, so here asking for suggestions on what programming language to choose. Non of my known language php/javascript/awk are suitable so I guess I have to learn a new language anyway. The language better be easy to learn and work with (C++ is out), not necessarily have complicated calculation feature (like the graphical report mantis makes), not necessarily OOP. I have perl and tcl in my head now, can you make some recommendations? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 14:10:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E82E16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C44513C45E for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3ME7scd079036; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:07:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3ME7sCf079035; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:07:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:07:54 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20070422140753.GA78978@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <907596.95892.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel editing to create a single partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:10:16 -0000 On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:58:11PM -0500, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 21/04/07, L Goodwin wrote: > >I want to dedicate the entire disk to a single FreeBSD partition > >("da1s1a"), and > > am a little confused about editing partitions via "bsdlabel -e > > ". > > > >Prior to editing, it looks like this: > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ># /dev/da1s1: > >8 partitions: > ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > >a: 17908300 16 unused 0 0 > >c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >I gather that I should change the following field values for "c:": > > fstype: 4.2BSD > > fsize: 2048 > > bsize: 16384 > > > >Questions: > >1) Do I change the "size" value for "a:" or leave at current size? > > NO > > > 2) Do I leave the "c:" line alone (in place) and if YES does > >its "size" and "offset" values need to be edited? > > Leave it alone. > > > > >If someone could show me what it should look like when done, I'd > >appreciate it. > > > >When I leave the "c:" entry in place, I get /dev/da1s1a and /dev/da1s1c in > >/dev/. > >Should I delete the "c:" entry? Here's what I have now: > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # /dev/da1s1: > > 8 partitions: > > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > > a: 17908300 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 > > c: 17908316 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > > edit > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Don't edit the bsdlabel at all, just: > # newfs -U /dev/da1s1a > and it will automatically fill out the fsize, bsize, and bps/cpg > fields. You can then add a line to fstab, mount it, fill it with > text files containing the word "corn" ever and over. Almost, but not quite right, if I understand what is being said. You do want to do a bsdlabel and some minor editing as indicated below. First, did you do an 'fdisk -I da1' or 'fdisk -IB da1' if you want it bootable. The presence of the 16 in the offset field of the a: line makes me think that you did not. So, do the fdisk. (If you do not do the fdisk, then the bsdlabel must be done to da1 and not da1s1 plus the newfs would be 'newfs /dev/da1a and not /dev/da1s1a which will make it one of those "dangerously dedicated" disks, which I don't recommend) > > c: should nearly never be touched, and definitely never in > the course of simply setting up a disk for use. That is true. Do not change anything on the c: line. In your case you might want to dup that c: line and then change it to an a: line, change the type to BSD4.2 and put in the fsize, bsize and bps/cpg, though I think the system plugs in reasonable values if you don't put anything for them. If you intend to make the file system use all the space, then make the offset on that a: partition be '0' and the size be the same as the full size in the c: line. On the other hand you could just put '*' in the size and offset fields for the a: line. Then it will make the one partition that covers all the usable space. Then, when you get that bsdlabel -e done, you go ahead and do the newfs. newfs /dev/da1s1a NOTE, if you want to make the partition bootable, then after doing the fdisk -IB da1 you must do bsdlabel -w -B da1s1 before doing the bsdlabel -e da1s1. So, the order is: fdisk -I da1 or fdisk -IB da1 for a bootable slice bsdlabel -w da1s1 or bsdlabel -w -B da1s1 for bootable partition bsdlabel -e da1s1 newfs /dev/da1s1a ////jerry > > -- > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 14:50:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A121E16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from p28.ich-19.com (fa.ea.5646.static.theplanet.com [70.86.234.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8003013C455 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.122.145.219] (helo=Unknown-00-13-d4-de-87-6f.lan) by p28.ich-19.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HfdNP-0005u8-Cz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:49:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:50:28 +0300 From: Ghirai X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - p28.ich-19.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ghirai List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:50:01 -0000 Hello, Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications in the ports collection? I don't need anything as complex as gimp, i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. I wanted to install kolourpaint; i found out that it was included in kdegraphics, which has quite a few rather big dependencies. Thanks. -- Best regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 15:06:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CE616A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10BE13C448 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3MF5wnq087476; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:05:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 60A9FB854; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:05:58 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Ghirai Message-ID: <20070422150558.GA43846@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Ghirai , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:06:01 -0000 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:50:28PM +0300, Ghirai wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, > i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications > in the ports collection? >=20 > I don't need anything as complex as gimp, > i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc > on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. ImageMagick will do that, but from the command line.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGK3nWEnfvsMMhpyURAgeFAJ4oEBeE/S/U4A4eidD2peVAtMdDQwCeKPwp imEnxQj9VjCNqnmF3SitJgc= =WMLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 15:37:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ABE16A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBA313C4B8 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfe7Z-0000OE-Ln for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:37:01 +0200 Received: from 89-172-244-220.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.244.220]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:37:01 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-244-220.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:37:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:36:41 +0200 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <1678.64.134.71.136.1177116302.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47F2CA26123F17E72163FC85" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-244-220.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <1678.64.134.71.136.1177116302.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Proliant G5 and E200i controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:37:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47F2CA26123F17E72163FC85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > I have purchased a new Proliant G5 server with the E200i RAID controlle= r. >=20 > FreeBSD is not recognizing the the drives. The ciss module for the > controller is not loaded. Do I need to do something special to make > FreeBSD recognize the controller? Which version of FreeBSD? I had it running fine with 6.2-release. --------------enig47F2CA26123F17E72163FC85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGK4EOldnAQVacBcgRApeaAJ94sK/cwIOKKbapwlbAzq70PRSnvwCgmRFq DjyiwgjJY00+2rkU9ewAyzs= =mXGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47F2CA26123F17E72163FC85-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 15:45:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AACE16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B23ED13C44B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 62302 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2007 15:19:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=SGPrDr4qqczr2SBGDWDqpCbGH+STq/Ro0CW0W/SUoFSY8AT3QUsx+QjnMZHm2rlzRLBJcCC4dU9HXdgOTdHlLgE4pQBOkDAh3445+ADHO5R/xgPrCWhsZj/UyUao0GofR8aaDYIp4neYUQmn8Jd90qN1uW4ZklpfEG3tL1DxdME= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (mike.jeays@rogers.com@74.104.218.93 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2007 15:19:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: KzsAe6QVM1k9rDDhDxP9fWZ_LdgI5gq3TOhxncO1U7KOAnXu.MEJb8Z7RCRMqJejRw-- From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:19:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <462B39DB.8@realss.com> In-Reply-To: <462B39DB.8@realss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704221119.01927.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:45:44 -0000 On Sunday 22 April 2007 06:32, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Dear list > > This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar with > javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions and features > of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being frustrated > for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like mantis or > bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either start > from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I used for > years. > > 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her rather > than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who is > starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please let > me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is > working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software like > G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. > 2. If I start my own, I think I'll be using a console widget library > (ncurse? because it's famous), an SQL database (no problem) and a > programming language. I never developed console application > before, so here asking for suggestions on what programming > language to choose. Non of my known language php/javascript/awk > are suitable so I guess I have to learn a new language anyway. The > language better be easy to learn and work with (C++ is out), not > necessarily have complicated calculation feature (like the > graphical report mantis makes), not necessarily OOP. I have perl > and tcl in my head now, can you make some recommendations? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I would recommend any of Perl, Python and Ruby. Python is excellent for writing clean, self-documenting code, and is my current favourite. TCL is more verbose, and does not have the excellent OO features to be found in Python and Ruby. Python is very easy to learn - it even seems a bit naive to begin with, but it is actually very powerful. OT as you said, and the stuff of flamewars! -- Mike Jeays http://www.jeays.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 16:43:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98716A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rknebel@suddenlink.net) Received: from que02.suddenlink.net (queue02.suddenlink.net [208.180.40.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D6813C48C for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rknebel@suddenlink.net) Received: from [192.168.2.6] (really [75.108.232.177]) by omta02.suddenlink.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070422161947.ZUIB2117.omta02.suddenlink.net@[192.168.2.6]> for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:19:47 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: From: Richard Knebel Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:19:28 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Monitor and X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:43:23 -0000 Hi, I am trying to set up m y computer to use X in 6.2 I edited the xorg.conf file with my monitors Horiz and Vert freq, but whenever I try and do startX I get this message Out of Range Hfreq 81 khz VFreq 65 hz Thanks Rick Rick Knebel rknebel@suddenlink.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:04:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A340716A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4250E13C44C for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3MH3XJV016033; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:03:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070422120147.025ea5e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:02:43 -0500 To: Richard Knebel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Monitor and X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:04:14 -0000 At 11:19 AM 4/22/2007, Richard Knebel wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to set up m y computer to use X in 6.2 >I edited the xorg.conf file with my monitors Horiz and Vert freq, but >whenever I try and do startX >I get this message > >Out of Range Hfreq 81 khz > VFreq 65 hz > >Thanks >Rick > >Rick Knebel >rknebel@suddenlink.net You need to post back with at least the monitor settings you have in your xorg.conf file. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:06:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7376016A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from p28.ich-19.com (fa.ea.5646.static.theplanet.com [70.86.234.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F5213C487 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.122.145.219] (helo=Unknown-00-13-d4-de-87-6f.lan) by p28.ich-19.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HffW4-0001DG-UN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:06:25 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:07:36 +0300 From: Ghirai X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1247735752.20070422200736@ghirai.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - p28.ich-19.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Disassembler for freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ghirai List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:06:29 -0000 Hello list, Has anyone tried to use ldasm and/or lida on FreeBSD? Are there any alternatives, besides hte? Thanks. -- Best regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:09:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B456C16A408 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B63413C4AD for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6961451950 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:09:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:09:27 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070422180927.5cefe3c6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200704221848.04368.shinjii@maydias.com> References: <200704221848.04368.shinjii@maydias.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Azureus Build Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:31 -0000 On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:48:04 +1000 Warren Liddell wrote: > Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. Azureus as always fials with the > following (any ideas/suggestions welcomed) I had this problem. It went away when I updated my java version to 1.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:11:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A5816A402 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C787213C483 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2007 17:11:33 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (EHLO [192.168.5.5]) [62.59.173.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 22 Apr 2007 19:11:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #25365336 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+dm0FQqMedoy/KhWjGcqylyyK93AXU03lR/IOZ4O Dze6tV4jerQrAD Message-ID: <462B9745.5060308@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:11:33 +0200 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ghirai References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:11:35 -0000 Ghirai wrote: > Hello, > > Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, > i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications > in the ports collection? > > I don't need anything as complex as gimp, > i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc > on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. > > I wanted to install kolourpaint; i found out that it > was included in kdegraphics, which has quite a few rather big > dependencies. > > Thanks. > > You might want to try xpaint, allthough I dislike working with it ( but then again I also dislike(d) working in M$ paint .... ) -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:16:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B0416A407 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0441213C480 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3724368621E63; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Lof6LVZAQMq0; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 10BAC68600414; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:16:36 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070422171635.GA16903@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> <462B9745.5060308@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462B9745.5060308@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:16:25 -0000 On Sun, Apr 22, 2007, Frank Staals wrote: >Ghirai wrote: >>Hello, >> >>Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, >>i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications >>in the ports collection? >> >>I don't need anything as complex as gimp, >>i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc >>on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. >> >>I wanted to install kolourpaint; i found out that it >>was included in kdegraphics, which has quite a few rather big >>dependencies. >> >>Thanks. >> >> >You might want to try xpaint, allthough I dislike working with it ( but >then again I also dislike(d) working in M$ paint .... ) There's ``gimp'' which provides extensive image processing capabilities. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software, LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 ``But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.'' -- Frederic Bastiat, The Law From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 18:38:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8441C16A407 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rknebel@suddenlink.net) Received: from omta02.suddenlink.net (omta02-pub.suddenlink.net [208.180.40.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5952D13C468 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rknebel@suddenlink.net) Received: from [192.168.2.6] (really [75.108.232.177]) by omta02.suddenlink.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070422183825.JQP2117.omta02.suddenlink.net@[192.168.2.6]>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:38:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070422120147.025ea5e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20070422120147.025ea5e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Message-Id: From: Richard Knebel Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:38:06 -0400 To: Derek Ragona X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monitor and X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:38:26 -0000 here is the xorg.conf file. It almost seems that the message is coming from my monitor. Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor Model" HorizSync 24-81 VertRefresh 48-75 EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "HWcursor" # [] #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "UseFBDev" # [] #Option "Rotate" # [] #Option "VideoKey" # #Option "FlatPanel" # [] #Option "FPDither" # [] Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection IW /etc/X11/xorg.conf (Read only) Row 108 Col 1 2:35 Ctrl-K H for help Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor Model" HorizSync 24-81 VertRefresh 48-75 EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "HWcursor" # [] #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "UseFBDev" # [] #Option "Rotate" # [] #Option "VideoKey" # #Option "FlatPanel" # [] #Option "FPDither" # [] #Option "CrtcNumber" # #Option "FPScale" # [] #Option "FPTweak" # Identifier "Card0" Driver "nv" VendorName "nVidia Corporation" BoardName "NV25 [GeForce4 Ti 4200]" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Rick Knebel rknebel@suddenlink.net On Apr 22, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Derek Ragona wrote: > At 11:19 AM 4/22/2007, Richard Knebel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to set up m y computer to use X in 6.2 >> I edited the xorg.conf file with my monitors Horiz and Vert freq, but >> whenever I try and do startX >> I get this message >> >> Out of Range Hfreq 81 khz >> VFreq 65 hz >> >> Thanks >> Rick >> >> Rick Knebel >> rknebel@suddenlink.net > > You need to post back with at least the monitor settings you have > in your xorg.conf file. > > -Derek > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 18:44:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E3916A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iqgrande@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAB013C46E for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iqgrande@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1476453wxc for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:44:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NSnhpEdu2krolpadGoGWXEsekA+BcU8kB4CZLkzBR26fZdjBlKGd9HDPJjw0sRGZMJyTsS/U7J+mkYf1l2+Dn6/JUHKoim4AXKzdL3inSbFQxWBcktOfuhXLDL6ClA19u2OGCjwRTmy5n6NSS6ahYYTWNUiFkeKsgfE2CgPsd9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=p6OK34QUmGK/cAUiLmixepc8cRjErK/1eFMBO3P01hOS+USVsySOHxOOTw3mRa5mcme7/l4dW85muWH1kcwbpaihxGGi8tcsBrMy8PGK0KFnH0WPh0B3RbdD5fCwbcFQpiVJT1mWUY9mrj9Q8UU8hUL92G+AkHOMmvdy3BWmaLQ= Received: by 10.70.115.17 with SMTP id n17mr8833365wxc.1177265955750; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [76.97.252.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i20sm11052599wxd.2007.04.22.11.19.14; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony Michael Agelastos Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:19:10 -0400 To: Ghirai X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:44:54 -0000 On Apr 22, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Ghirai wrote: > Hello, > > Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, > i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications > in the ports collection? > > I don't need anything as complex as gimp, > i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc > on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. Depending on your "quick edits", you may also want to look at graphics/xfig (www.xfig.org) graphics/inkscape (www.inkscape.org) > > I wanted to install kolourpaint; i found out that it > was included in kdegraphics, which has quite a few rather big > dependencies. Xfig does not have too many dependencies. I hope this helps. > > Thanks. > > -- > Best regards, > Ghirai. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 18:51:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1DB16A419 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E806513C4E8 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3MIohgg016872; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:50:43 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070422134518.025c1360@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:49:50 -0500 To: Richard Knebel From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20070422120147.025ea5e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monitor and X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:51:21 -0000 At 01:38 PM 4/22/2007, Richard Knebel wrote: >here is the xorg.conf file. It almost seems that the message is coming >from my monitor. > >Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" >EndSection > >Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" >EndSection > >Section "Module" > Load "dbe" > Load "dri" > Load "extmod" > Load "glx" > Load "record" > Load "xtrap" > Load "freetype" > Load "type1" >EndSection > >Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" >EndSection > >Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" >EndSection > >Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName "Monitor Model" > HorizSync 24-81 > VertRefresh 48-75 > > >EndSection > >Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "SWcursor" # [] > #Option "HWcursor" # [] > #Option "NoAccel" # [] > #Option "ShadowFB" # [] > #Option "UseFBDev" # [] > #Option "Rotate" # [] > #Option "VideoKey" # > #Option "FlatPanel" # [] > #Option "FPDither" # [] >Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" >EndSection > >Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" >EndSection > >Section "Module" > Load "dbe" > Load "dri" > Load "extmod" > Load "glx" > Load "record" > Load "xtrap" > Load "freetype" > Load "type1" >EndSection > >Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" >EndSection > >Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" >EndSection > IW /etc/X11/xorg.conf (Read > only) > Row 108 Col 1 2:35 Ctrl-K H for help > >Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName "Monitor Model" > HorizSync 24-81 > VertRefresh 48-75 > > >EndSection > >Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "SWcursor" # [] > #Option "HWcursor" # [] > #Option "NoAccel" # [] > #Option "ShadowFB" # [] > #Option "UseFBDev" # [] > #Option "Rotate" # [] > #Option "VideoKey" # > #Option "FlatPanel" # [] > #Option "FPDither" # [] > #Option "CrtcNumber" # > #Option "FPScale" # [] > #Option "FPTweak" # > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "nv" > VendorName "nVidia Corporation" > BoardName "NV25 [GeForce4 Ti 4200]" > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" >EndSection > >Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > Modes "1280x1024" > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > EndSubSection >EndSection > > The only resolution you have defines is 1280x1024. You need to verify your monitor will handle the max refresh rates at that resolution. Usually at higher resolution, you need to drop the refresh rates. Look for a table in your monitor manual that has the refresh rate AND resolutions too. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 19:10:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345A316A402 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E726213C44B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so1146732nza for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:10:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=V1wwtqPKickNp7rzIO01/EEtw3mvDzrPy5KV/9NGRP0O8mbvaMJweG7+6dR186ku3XlOQ4c9MVLJcJzmHJ7UNXKk7CxHyyq/BLkTWUGMugMMhYvJbTCg993AibRedUFbX3pCKtTjpr4QgbphfBiiFJgqgL9Yh84sbxHJKHeeAv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=afFcjzBVn7WlAyOkHgug2X8f1uBegPuF1hgEwR6JnAh53HJeyfuxtIS3ygzJ1kOjByN12nCPHsxez3Iy6B7vD34nbcG0Jpv9H03OgI8kJHcwO2eomycyR5Edv5KohfFFG6pKxBV2kNlXGXqU6UAaDNSCMJa0cI8kVFL5czvU/t4= Received: by 10.114.137.2 with SMTP id k2mr2158445wad.1177269018611; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.194.5 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:10:18 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: Ghirai In-Reply-To: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 048aea244139296e Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:10:21 -0000 On 4/22/07, Ghirai wrote: > Hello, > > Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, > i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications > in the ports collection? > > I don't need anything as complex as gimp, > i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc > on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. > > I wanted to install kolourpaint; i found out that it > was included in kdegraphics, which has quite a few rather big > dependencies. These have just been ported: http://www.freshports.org/graphics/mtpaint/ http://www.freshports.org/graphics/rgbpaint/ Very basic, but so is MS Paint. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 20:02:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705AA16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from p28.ich-19.com (fa.ea.5646.static.theplanet.com [70.86.234.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BD513C468 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.122.145.219] (helo=Unknown-00-13-d4-de-87-6f.lan) by p28.ich-19.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HfiGH-0007Jv-E7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:02:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:03:30 +0300 From: Ghirai X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1618818814.20070422230330@ghirai.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1247735752.20070422200736@ghirai.com> References: <1247735752.20070422200736@ghirai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - p28.ich-19.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Disassembler for freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ghirai List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:02:29 -0000 > Hello list, > Has anyone tried to use ldasm and/or lida on FreeBSD? > Are there any alternatives, besides hte? > Thanks. It seems that objdump is linked statically with bfdlib, and it doesn't support pe files. My question would be how to get objdump to diassemble pe files? I've searched around and i've only found log discussions/rants about why the gnu people statically link libraries and such... I'd appreciate if anyone could point me in the right direction. Thanks. -- Best regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 21:17:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC7A16A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A705813C44C for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 772 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2007 21:17:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Apr 2007 21:17:21 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B99528426; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:17:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F24371CC97; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:17:16 -0400 (EDT) To: Ghirai References: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:17:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1272385475.20070422175028@ghirai.com> (ghirai@ghirai.com's message of "Sun\, 22 Apr 2007 17\:50\:28 +0300") Message-ID: <44slaskt2b.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mspaint-like application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:17:21 -0000 Ghirai writes: > Even though this is not necessarily a pure FreeBSD question, > i'd like to know if there are any mspaint-like applications > in the ports collection? > > I don't need anything as complex as gimp, > i just want to make quick edits, adding arrows, etc > on images, then saving in a couple popular formats. There are many such programs, but they lack the "layers" capability, which I find helpful for annotating photos as you describe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 21:38:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF35416A401; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A006513C45E; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BC31B11453; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:38:12 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Vittorio De Martino Message-ID: <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Vittorio De Martino , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200704071924.06189.vittorio@de-martino.it> <200704091439.50156.vittorio@de-martino.it> <20070415221112.GW43410@graf.pompo.net> <200704182300.39737.vittorio@de-martino.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704182300.39737.vittorio@de-martino.it> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeMat 3.0 doesn't call functions and help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:38:18 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Jeu 19 avr 07 =E0 1:00:38 +0200, Vittorio De Martino =E9crivait=A0: > > I have just upgraded FreeMAT to 3.1, which fixes the inv() problem, and > > which should fix this "Help on line" bug too; could you please check it? > > >=20 > Yes, with the new version 3.1 inv now works fine. Unfortunately the "Help= on=20 > line" still doesn't work. I think that something worsened because with th= is=20 > new port now I cannot use the help on line even as root (in the previous= =20 > version "Help online" as root worked quite well). Could you please script (1) a session with only `truss FreeMat', just calling the help and exiting? Then please send me the compresed log of this session. If you had created some symlinks, please don't forget to remove them. Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGK9XEc95pjMcUBaIRAlZBAJ9HmS4Ctw5zfK6NlFkncj5sKkStuQCffqyL RUB+mFKTNb2ougbDSqaiydA= =YaEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 23:35:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2C516A401 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dlt@mebtel.net) Received: from bilbo.mebtel.net (bilbo.mebtel.net [64.40.67.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADC213C455 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dlt@mebtel.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bilbo.mebtel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97F1444FE for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bilbo.mebtel.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bilbo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25135-10 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (66-79-79-171.dsl.mebtel.net [66.79.79.171]) by bilbo.mebtel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41184444E for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:13 -0400 From: Derek Tattersall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070422230913.GA2459@lorne.arm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mebtel.net Subject: A slicing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dlt@mebtel.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:35:15 -0000 I have a machine with a large hard drive which is not completely partioned (in the MSDOS sense). I would like to take some of this unallocated space and make it a slice, label it and newfs it, but I am not sure if I can do this without screwing up the existing slice scheme. Are there any suggestions for the _RIGHT_ way to do this so I don't kill the existing scheme? -- Best regards, Derek Tattersall dlt@mebtel.net dlt666@yahoo.com dtatters@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 01:06:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE80716A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9ED13C43E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfmpa-0004Xu-IU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:55:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-225-112-17.mc.at.cox.net ([68.225.112.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:55:02 +0200 Received: from jvk-list by ip68-225-112-17.mc.at.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:55:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joe Kraft Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:09:57 -0400 Lines: 17 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-225-112-17.mc.at.cox.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Sender: news Subject: What to backup for named? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:06:11 -0000 After a recent disk failure, I left myself a note to add the DNS/DHCP info to my backup. I have a small, over-engineered for my education, network of 10 computers in my house. I run BIND with dynamic zones on my FreeBSD server, I also use the DNS service on my Win2k-AD server. They both are designated as slaves for each other. What do I need to backup? Are just the configuration files from /var/namedb/etc/namedb enough to recreate everything if my FBSD server dies? Or are there some database files I should be keeping also? I tried googling, but either this is way to easy of a question or I'm not looking in the right places. Thanks for any insight, Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 01:14:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B4216A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [204.119.0.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598DD13C45D for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3N1EKbV011180 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3N1EKuX011179 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns.umpquanet.com: james set sender to list@museum.rain.com using -f Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:14:20 -0700 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423011419.GA10619@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Subject: Problem with OpenVPN and ethernet bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:14:20 -0000 I'm trying to get my feet wet with an ethernet bridging setup under OpenVPN. I have two hosts on a 10.0.0.0/24 network that I want to connect: dl360 is the server, and t30 is the client. These hosts are resolvable by /etc/hosts. TLS seems to be working from certs I created at cacert.org. The goal is to bridge the t30 client to the second ethernet NIC of the dl360 server. The client is assigned an IP from the bridged LAN correctly, but the client cannot ping the 172.16.16.1 IP on the server's ethernet interface. tcpdump shows traffic going out the tap0 interface on the client (ARP traffic, that is, trying to ARP for 172.16.16.1). tcpdump on the server's physical bge0 shows incoming traffic destined for UDP port 1194 on the server, but no traffic on the server's tap0 or bridge0 interfaces. The OpenVPN docs, examples, and instructions are highly linux- centric, so I'm having to read between the lines a lot. Based on http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/papers/FreeBSD-OpenVPN-Bridging.html I am not assigning IPs to the server's tap and bridge interfaces, as that page claims that such is unnecessary under FreeBSD. So my troubleshooting is focusing on the server side, since I can see that VPN traffic is reaching the public interface, but OpenVPN is not mapping that traffic onto the ethernet bridge. For now, I am creating the tap and bridge interfaces manually. Despite having: openvpn_enable="YES" openvpn_if="tap bridge" in /etc/rc.conf, I find that OpenVPN does not create the bridge interface. I am running this script by hand, followed by running "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/openvpn start": ifconfig tap0 create ifconfig bridge0 create ifconfig bridge0 addm bge1 addm tap0 up Here's ifconfig on the server: bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:08:02:a0:c6:9d inet 10.0.0.22 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active bge1: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=98 ether 00:08:02:a0:c6:9e inet 172.16.16.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.16.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tap0: flags=8942 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:bd:87:77:8b:00 Opened by PID 49835 bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether b6:1d:6a:ae:be:a4 id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 0 ifcost 0 port 0 member: tap0 flags=143 member: bge1 flags=143 Here's the openvpn.conf on the server: local dl360 port 1194 proto udp dev tap0 ca cacert.org.crt cert dl360.crt key dl360.key # This file should be kept secret dh dh1024.pem ifconfig-pool-persist ipp.txt server-bridge 172.16.16.1 255.255.255.0 172.16.16.50 172.16.16.100 keepalive 10 120 persist-key persist-tun status openvpn-status.log log openvpn.log verb 3 - - - And here's the openvpn.conf on the client: client dev tap proto udp remote dl360 1194 resolv-retry infinite nobind persist-key persist-tun ca cacert.org.crt cert t30.crt key t30.key log-append openvpn.log verb 3 - - - I have set net.inet.ip.forwarding set to 1 on the server to ensure that packets are forwarded between interfaces. What am I missing on the server side that's preventing me from pinging from 172.16.16.50 to 172.16.16.1? The client is running 6.2-STABLE circa March 13, and the server is 7.0-CURRENT circa late April 21. Thank you! Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 01:33:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A96516A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B44913C483 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3N1V3n6080747; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:31:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3N1V3qP080746; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:31:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:31:03 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Derek Tattersall Message-ID: <20070423013103.GB80678@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070422230913.GA2459@lorne.arm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070422230913.GA2459@lorne.arm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A slicing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:33:27 -0000 Hi, > I have a machine with a large hard drive which is not completely > partioned (in the MSDOS sense). I would like to take some of this > unallocated space and make it a slice, label it and newfs it, but I am > not sure if I can do this without screwing up the existing slice scheme. > Are there any suggestions for the _RIGHT_ way to do this so I don't kill > the existing scheme? You should be able to use fdisk and allocate the remaining unallocated space - if it is truly unallocated - to a FreeBSD type slice. If you want to check this, boot to FreeBSD. If you don't already have a FreeBSD installed, then boot from the disc-2 install CD and choose the fixit option. Then do 'fdisk devname' where devname is the device name of the disk as it shows up in dmesg. It will give you a summary of what it thinks is on the disk - which part of allocated and to what and which part is unallocated. The information is mostly useful to make sure things are as you expect and as a confidence builder. Then, you can use fdisk manually to create a slice in unallocated space or it is probably easiest to use sysinstall. When you bring up and run sysinstall, it will allow you to turn than unallocated space in to a FreeBSD slice, make it bootable, write a FreeBSD MBR and then carve that newly created FreeBSD slice in to partitions and choose mount points and run the necessary newfs. You can go on to install from there or just leave it as empty FreeBSD type partitions. ////jerry > > -- > Best regards, > Derek Tattersall > dlt@mebtel.net dlt666@yahoo.com dtatters@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 02:00:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B1016A404 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE32413C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 11460 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 02:00:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=ts+zG34jON36pEc8hIxYdK+QiUpHCWh4/NT3nbWPKUCK4TEbD+dY1t3OtJZpGjvl3o6qf5hwZ5oXkst1joV+VgQDlE2L1GNLyoy7rb4CPJRFFtKLbcRN6wJI42K+V0fqgwSk3/s2cUgfs0qRAXwC7SSLxGX377jti3hhE50/knk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@74.104.205.212 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 02:00:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ySol4AsVM1lBhOaowAKDLJtGLMeYVy6xqYf.m44HNAYYrMePFEgn5ng534GTMWdsqA-- From: "Tamouh H." To: "'Joe Kraft'" , References: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: <016901c7854b$19501ab0$6600a8c0@tamouh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceFQ+LvcjopE0nxQ8eIimK2NqwZ6wABxoxQ Cc: Subject: RE: What to backup for named? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:00:12 -0000 >=20 > After a recent disk failure, I left myself a note to add the=20 > DNS/DHCP info to my backup. >=20 > I have a small, over-engineered for my education, network of=20 > 10 computers in my house. I run BIND with dynamic zones on=20 > my FreeBSD server, I also use the DNS service on my Win2k-AD=20 > server. They both are designated as slaves for each other. >=20 > What do I need to backup? Are just the configuration files=20 > from /var/namedb/etc/namedb enough to recreate everything if=20 > my FBSD server dies? Or are there some database files I=20 > should be keeping also? >=20 > I tried googling, but either this is way to easy of a=20 > question or I'm not looking in the right places. >=20 > Thanks for any insight, > Joe. >=20 Yup, that is what we backup. The named.conf and all records created = along. Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 04:00:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D745616A402; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4264F13C45B; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3N3c3gf045704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:38:04 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3N3c33m064369; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:38:03 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:38:03 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: Subject: PCIe NIC for FreeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:00:15 -0000 Hi, I have been askedto install FreeBSD on a server, but I had no saying on the procurement of the server. It ends up to be an HP 380G5, with onboard Broadcom based NIC that is not supported and only PCIe extension slots. I am wondering what NIC I could buy that would be PCIe, x4 or x8, and supported by FreeBSD 5.5. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 06:48:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A816A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Stephen.Willson@stjoe.org) Received: from sjsnt-twout.stjoe.org (twout.stjoe.org [66.121.52.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6122213C487 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Stephen.Willson@stjoe.org) Received: from 156.72.152.163 by sjsnt-twin.stjoe.org with ESMTP (SJHS SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.1.1)); Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:38:02 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 78F45507-486B-45B5-8C0F-E2106D3EB979 Received: from CLGWIA1-MTA by sjsnw-clgwia1.stjoe.org with Novell_GroupWise; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:37:39 -0700 Message-ID: <462BF1D30200003100010672@sjsnw-clgwia1.stjoe.org> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:37:09 -0700 From: "Stephen Willson" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MMS-Spam-Filter-ID: A2007042303_4.00.0003_2.0.4,4.0-7 X-TMWD-Spam-Summary: SEV=0.9; DFV=A2007042303; IFV=2.0.4,4.0-7; RPD=4.00.0003; RPDID=303030312E30413031303230362E34363243353433352E303031382D412D; ENG=IBF; TS=20070423063805; CAT=NONE; CON=NONE; X-WSS-ID: 6A328BC02O81056745-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Apache and PHP Packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:48:01 -0000 I have installed the latest Apache and PHP Packages. I can get Apache = working, but nothing is standing out as to why I can't get the PHP package = to work. Best I can figure is that this package was compiled without the = options to include apache support. -or- there is another package that adds = support for apache 2.2.3 i installed: php5-5.1.6_3 apache-2.2.3 (and dependencies). can't figure it out. i haven't installed /compiled with FreeBSD in a long = time so I thought the packages would be easy enough... Thank You, Stephen Willson Perot Systems at St. Josephs. Office: +1 714-937-6669 Notice from St.Joseph Health System: Please note that the information contained in this message may be privilege= d= and confidential and protected from disclosure.=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 06:56:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF24216A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from klein.pean.org (pean.org [195.24.165.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831B213C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [192.168.12.13] (trusted.jajja.com [217.118.217.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by klein.pean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA4DDE8C80; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:56:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462C5884.204@pean.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:56:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Willson References: <462BF1D30200003100010672@sjsnw-clgwia1.stjoe.org> In-Reply-To: <462BF1D30200003100010672@sjsnw-clgwia1.stjoe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache and PHP Packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:05 -0000 Stephen Willson wrote: > I have installed the latest Apache and PHP Packages. I can get Apache working, but nothing is standing out as to why I can't get the PHP package to work. Best I can figure is that this package was compiled without the options to include apache support. -or- there is another package that adds support for apache 2.2.3 > > i installed: > > php5-5.1.6_3 > apache-2.2.3 > > (and dependencies). > > can't figure it out. i haven't installed /compiled with FreeBSD in a long time so I thought the packages would be easy enough... > > > > I dont know whether or not the php-package are built with the apache module but have you configured your apache correctly? have you added AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps to your apache conf? My suggestion would be to compile the packages from the ports-collection to make sure the module is compiled and then make sure that the webserver is configured properly. You can read about the ports collection and how to use it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 06:56:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39CD16A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A9513C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HfsTa-0001Ki-A2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:56:42 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" Sender: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:56:31 -0700 Organization: Realty One Group Message-ID: <000b01c78574$86182ba0$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceFdF7zCMSZghg3TYabhqtYIiYS6w== Subject: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: don@buylv.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:56:43 -0000 I had a crash on a disk array last week that was severe enough that fsck wouldn't fix it, even in single user mode. So, I was forced to suck off the good data, and restore the bad stuff from backups. However there are 2 directories that contain files/directories which have bogus user & group ID's that the system just won't let me do anything to. I can delete them, cant rename them, cant move them, cant chmod/chown, cant cat to them, nothing... I just get "Operation not permitted". Here's a sample of one of them: ---xr----x 1 2761022747 1016642816 0 Apr 19 15:35 Video d--s---rw- 2 3251161791 726015594 512 Apr 19 15:41 .shrc Anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of these files? I've done an fsck from single user mode and that doesn't come up with anything. Short of copying all the data over to a new volume sans these files and then reformatting the old volume and then moving the good files back what can I do? Any assistance would be appreciated. I'd also like to thank everyone who browses this group and regularly posts responses... Without you guys some of us would never get the help and knowledge we need! Thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 07:04:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF3016A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from klein.pean.org (pean.org [195.24.165.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904D813C458 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [192.168.12.13] (trusted.jajja.com [217.118.217.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by klein.pean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A893FDE8C80; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462C5A71.9050006@pean.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= References: <462BF1D30200003100010672@sjsnw-clgwia1.stjoe.org> <462C5884.204@pean.org> In-Reply-To: <462C5884.204@pean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Stephen Willson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache and PHP Packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:04:17 -0000 Peter Ankerstål wrote: > Stephen Willson wrote: >> I have installed the latest Apache and PHP Packages. I can get Apache >> working, but nothing is standing out as to why I can't get the PHP >> package to work. Best I can figure is that this package was compiled >> without the options to include apache support. -or- there is another >> package that adds support for apache 2.2.3 >> >> i installed: >> >> php5-5.1.6_3 >> apache-2.2.3 >> >> (and dependencies). >> >> can't figure it out. i haven't installed /compiled with FreeBSD in a >> long time so I thought the packages would be easy enough... Just realized that php5-5.1.6_3 are quite old and does have some security problems. Another reason to install php5-5.2.1_3 from ports instead. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 07:12:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2E516A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF6113C45E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CCA1A4DB4; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAE7551583; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:12:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:12:53 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Don O'Neil Message-ID: <20070423071253.GA74834@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <000b01c78574$86182ba0$0300020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c78574$86182ba0$0300020a@mickey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:12:54 -0000 On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:56:31PM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote: > I had a crash on a disk array last week that was severe enough that fsck > wouldn't fix it, even in single user mode. So, I was forced to suck off the > good data, and restore the bad stuff from backups. > > However there are 2 directories that contain files/directories which have > bogus user & group ID's that the system just won't let me do anything to. I > can delete them, cant rename them, cant move them, cant chmod/chown, cant > cat to them, nothing... I just get "Operation not permitted". > > Here's a sample of one of them: > > ---xr----x 1 2761022747 1016642816 0 Apr 19 15:35 Video > d--s---rw- 2 3251161791 726015594 512 Apr 19 15:41 .shrc > > Anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of these files? > > I've done an fsck from single user mode and that doesn't come up with > anything. Short of copying all the data over to a new volume sans these > files and then reformatting the old volume and then moving the good files > back what can I do? It's unlikely to be due to the uid/gids, do a ls -lo to check for the schg flag (man chflags). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 07:18:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382916A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.engmark@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EE213C46A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.engmark@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so1770182ana for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:18:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ABEOiDHGDOt8f3lrO6KlkF+QeAu6jktSskmefRvrOQ3kJU+WVAZRjhlciHeS2rU1d5n4NjQTnShJVI35W+AxwkLtD2K4cPUOzzVwUBCfHzx8H9CidSEYzne7QArWN/Tv8AFgtIYZPVrxrgdwggZBikZ4bIaSm4CqHq/zKeGrzs8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TR4ea9Jd0Ntw1RddkllUxZ/b06KEeo3WBfa4UwDE5rCjklMhkWEqH9G75xdbi1dNr5BAOy4TmraQPZsM5+AC5wDHtQJ2TUwwUo77G7CJFks4E0fZQ2cWoUprm8IHtsU9MyUmstC8rHiuPz78rPzLfoL6gBpgAL2NqjjkyPNU4wE= Received: by 10.114.134.1 with SMTP id h1mr332211wad.1177312736566; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.79.14 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7d4f41f50704230018l3d13e640t10283fc341f439d9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:18:56 +0200 From: "Victor Engmark" To: "scuba@centroin.com.br" In-Reply-To: <20070420162623.H94542@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070420162623.H94542@trex.centroin.com.br> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD RSS feed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:18:59 -0000 On 4/20/07, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > Why the RSS feed of the security advisories does not work with > Fire Fox? > > http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories.rdf > > "This XML file does not appear to have any style information > associated with it. The document tree is shown below." That file is not an RSS feed, just a plain XML file. It's also served with the MIME type "text/xml". -- Victor Engmark Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - What is said in Latin, sounds profound From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 07:33:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6550416A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@buylv.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C1313C4AE for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@buylv.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HfsSW-0001Bz-Sv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:36 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:26 -0700 Organization: Realty One Group Message-ID: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceFdF7zCMSZghg3TYabhqtYIiYS6w== Subject: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: don@buylv.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:33:33 -0000 I had a crash on a disk array last week that was severe enough that fsck wouldn't fix it, even in single user mode. So, I was forced to suck off the good data, and restore the bad stuff from backups. However there are 2 directories that contain files/directories which have bogus user & group ID's that the system just won't let me do anything to. I can delete them, cant rename them, cant move them, cant chmod/chown, cant cat to them, nothing... I just get "Operation not permitted". Here's a sample of one of them: ---xr----x 1 2761022747 1016642816 0 Apr 19 15:35 Video d--s---rw- 2 3251161791 726015594 512 Apr 19 15:41 .shrc Anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of these files? I've done an fsck from single user mode and that doesn't come up with anything. Short of copying all the data over to a new volume sans these files and then reformatting the old volume and then moving the good files back what can I do? Any assistance would be appreciated. I'd also like to thank everyone who browses this group and regularly posts responses... Without you guys some of us would never get the help and knowledge we need! Thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 08:15:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3D116A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:15:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D66C13C457 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 038D83658D3; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:15:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1833658C7; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462C6B24.9080500@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:15:32 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: cannot compile thunderbird 2 and firefox 2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:15:35 -0000 Hello I'm in trouble to compile those two mozilla apps se below error messages which seems to come from the same origin Thanks for any infos Frank FIREFOX c++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libgtkxtbin.so -o libgtkxtbin.so gtk2xtbin.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/lib/nss -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/firefox -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXt -lX11 -Wl,-Bsymbolic -lc -lm -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -liconv gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x13): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x35): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5f): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x8a): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x9e): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xdf): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x11f): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x219): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x23a): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2d6): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2f7): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x314): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x335): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_geometry' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x376): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x399): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x3c5): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_flush' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x3df): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x440): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x451): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_colormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x459): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_colormap_get_xcolormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x468): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x470): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_visual_get_xvisual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x48f): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_free' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4ba): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_new' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4d7): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_priority' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4e2): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_can_recurse' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4ed): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_attach' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x52a): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_add_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x570): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x588): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_user_data' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5a3): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5bb): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5da): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x617): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x639): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x644): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_move' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x679): In function `gtk_xtbin_resize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x713): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x725): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x738): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x74e): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x783): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7c8): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7f7): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x818): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x832): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x873): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_remove_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x881): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_source_remove' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x8b3): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x959): In function `xt_client_init': : undefined reference to `gdk_get_display' gtk2xtbin.o(.data.rel+0xc): undefined reference to `g_free' gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 THUNDERBIRD c++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libgtkxtbin.so -o libgtkxtbin.so gtk2xtbin.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/lib/nss -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/thunderbird -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXt -lX11 -Wl,-Bsymbolic -lc -lm -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -liconv gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x13): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x35): In function `xt_event_prepare': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5f): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x8a): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x9e): In function `xt_event_check': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0xdf): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x11f): In function `xt_event_dispatch': : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_unlock' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x219): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x23a): In function `gtk_xtbin_class_init': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2d6): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x2f7): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x314): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x335): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_geometry' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x376): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x399): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x3c5): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `gdk_flush' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x3df): In function `gtk_xtbin_realize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x440): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x451): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_colormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x459): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_colormap_get_xcolormap' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x468): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_drawable_get_visual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x470): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_x11_visual_get_xvisual' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x48f): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_free' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4ba): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_new' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4d7): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_priority' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4e2): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_set_can_recurse' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x4ed): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_source_attach' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x52a): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_add_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x570): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x588): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_get_user_data' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5a3): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5bb): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x5da): In function `gtk_xtbin_new': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x617): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x639): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x644): In function `gtk_xtbin_set_position': : undefined reference to `gdk_window_move' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x679): In function `gtk_xtbin_resize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x713): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x725): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x738): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x74e): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x783): In function `gtk_xtbin_unrealize': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7c8): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x7f7): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_is_a' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x818): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_return_if_fail_warning' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x832): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_instance_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x873): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_main_context_remove_poll' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x881): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_source_remove' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x8b3): In function `gtk_xtbin_destroy': : undefined reference to `g_type_check_class_cast' gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x959): In function `xt_client_init': : undefined reference to `gdk_get_display' gtk2xtbin.o(.data.rel+0xc): undefined reference to `g_free' gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet // Machines MUST help // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 09:09:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6516A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@snap.co.nz) Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F913C480 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@snap.co.nz) Received: from [192.168.66.2] (102.109.124.202.static.snap.net.nz [202.124.109.102]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFA73DA4A1 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:38:53 +1200 (NZST) From: Peter Toth To: questions In-Reply-To: References: <1678.64.134.71.136.1177116302.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:38:53 +1200 Message-Id: <1177317533.17326.4.camel@octopus.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Proliant G5 and E200i controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:09:39 -0000 > jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > > I have purchased a new Proliant G5 server with the E200i RAID controller. > > > > FreeBSD is not recognizing the the drives. The ciss module for the > > controller is not loaded. Do I need to do something special to make > > FreeBSD recognize the controller? > > Which version of FreeBSD? I had it running fine with 6.2-release. > > I had 6.2-release running on Proliant G5 with E200i, it worked all right. RAID was recognized without any trouble. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 09:12:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F13D16A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145E413C45A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HfuKv-0006lz-Iz; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:56:00 +0100 Received: from cse-jg.cse.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.12.37]:62672) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HfuKQ-0000aO-Ld; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:55:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:55:22 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704221119.01927.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Message-ID: <20070423095405.W6506@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> References: <462B39DB.8@realss.com> <200704221119.01927.mike.jeays@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-ILRT-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ILRT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.011, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, AWL 1.43) X-ILRT-MailScanner-From: jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:12:04 -0000 On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Sunday 22 April 2007 06:32, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > > Dear list > > > > This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar with > > javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions and features > > of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being frustrated > > for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like mantis or > > bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either start > > from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I used for > > years. > > > > 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her rather > > than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who is > > starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please let > > me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is > > working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software like > > G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. Not sure it's quite what you're after, but have a look at request tracker. It is primarily web based, with an email gateway, but also supports command-line operation via its bin/rt. -- jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Whenever I see a dog salivate I get an insatiable urge to ring a bell. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 09:16:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78AD16A40A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD2213C455 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AD17FC8; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:16:05 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, don@buylv.com Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:16:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> In-Reply-To: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704230116.02849.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:16:08 -0000 On Sunday 22 April 2007, Don O'Neil said: > I had a crash on a disk array last week that was severe enough that > fsck wouldn't fix it, even in single user mode. So, I was forced to > suck off the good data, and restore the bad stuff from backups. > > However there are 2 directories that contain files/directories > which have bogus user & group ID's that the system just won't let > me do anything to. I can delete them, cant rename them, cant move > them, cant chmod/chown, cant cat to them, nothing... I just get > "Operation not permitted". > > Here's a sample of one of them: > > ---xr----x 1 2761022747 1016642816 0 Apr 19 15:35 Video > d--s---rw- 2 3251161791 726015594 512 Apr 19 15:41 .shrc > > Anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of these files? > > I've done an fsck from single user mode and that doesn't come up > with anything. Short of copying all the data over to a new volume > sans these files and then reformatting the old volume and then > moving the good files back what can I do? > > Any assistance would be appreciated. I'd also like to thank > everyone who browses this group and regularly posts responses... > Without you guys some of us would never get the help and knowledge > we need! Thanks in advance! Try doing: chflags -R noschg directory or chflags noschg file See: man(1) chflags Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 11:16:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAFB16A403; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3055013C4DE; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from icarus.home.lan (c-71-198-0-135.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.198.0.135]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070423110611m1400ilk04e>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:06:11 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE85C1FA03D; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:06:10 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20070423110610.GA13461@icarus.home.lan> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira , "Brian A. Seklecki" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3aaaa3a0704052217g67281716ge8a2d1a888025d0e@mail.gmail.com> <0D3D8201F40120DCE73AD00B@ganymede.hub.org> <3aaaa3a0704071212o3b4dce4dgd8def804e5b1156c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:33:12 +0000 Cc: Chris , "Brian A. Seklecki" , Thiago Esteves de Oliveira , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No buffer space available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:14 -0000 On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris wrote: > > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code, > > had to use it because of broadcom 5755 nic card, I plan to use large > > tcp window sizes so will be interesting to see if this also suffers > > from the problem. > > I've got 8 servers on the same network, 3 are almost identical, but one of them > (the one with the problem) is using software RAID vs hardware ... but, if you > are seeing it without using software RAID, then that is obviously not the > culprit :( May be a red herring... I'm able to reproduce the "No buffer space available" message when setting net.inet.tcp.(send|recv)space to non-default values. All I've tried is the following, with a kernel dated 2007/04/22: # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=131072 # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 Example session: $ su2 # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=131072 net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 32768 -> 131072 # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 65536 -> 262144 # logout $ ssh medusa socket: No buffer space available ssh: connect to host medusa port 22: No buffer space available $ su2 # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=32768 net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 131072 -> 32768 # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 262144 -> 65536 # logout $ ssh medusa Last login: Mon Apr 23 03:45:45 2007 from ... I assume this is because the maximum size of a TCP datagram is 65536 bytes, but as I'm not familiar enough with TCP on such a low level, this may be speculation on my part. Just something worth checking/tinkering with. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 11:55:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942D416A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-242.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6613B13C484 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NBtKCm025108 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:55:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:55:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704230655.20662.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: PCIe NIC for FreeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:55:27 -0000 On Sunday 22 April 2007 22:38:03 Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > I have been askedto install FreeBSD on a server, but I had no saying > on the procurement of the server. > > It ends up to be an HP 380G5, with onboard Broadcom based NIC that is > not supported and only PCIe extension slots. > > I am wondering what NIC I could buy that would be PCIe, x4 or x8, and > supported by FreeBSD 5.5. > > Best regards, > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" any particular reason why youre note going with 6.2? i have 6.2 running on several DL G4's and G5's (couple ML's in there too), and they all have no trouble with the broadcom nics. also, both my laptop and desktop have the broadcoms as well, and again, they work very nicely... in 6.2. but to field your question more directly, surely Intel has a pcie version of their nics. thats what i would choose if i were pressed to buy something other than what came on the system's board. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 12:17:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC6016A40A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F0E13C43E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1960511muf for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ua1XwYGpfPx1sPW6AFHVGV/U5FO5D+ZGrsKPEaVbSOXFy17xm683Bt5bFyRTz6MFavKN/D5Cn27FXV52CPqa+vwQzuutlvw2tZ7g7KJFYFDyHxDRZ8AoR6HKpT2utmIf/I0zm89d3sK6E4da9brFOqc7GnbIfaQxe6Gt6qLA2QY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rBynBMDAT2EgzvkbGQvlmCaSLjKDYHf9ssOY0s79HaKfSid8GkwxEk22VDbkRzf6CYj8CMojNYPHZOqKpYZCSfyistcFr+ROG11Cfp95JWBv8nibr4cwsk93RP8BqYEA/l51z+MZ30cUrD6ergeez46XSIMFZM212w8F2F+WxAw= Received: by 10.82.191.3 with SMTP id o3mr9006086buf.1177330656091; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.191.16 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20704230517t69e9fc31v97451e40abe9dcec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:17:36 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: mailinglists@bsdcertification.com In-Reply-To: <462BE82E.7080601@bsdcertification.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <80f4f2b20704201508x457f947ck203a9266eb51f157@mail.gmail.com> <462BE82E.7080601@bsdcertification.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CUPS + FreeBSD 6.2 + HP Laserjet 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:17:38 -0000 Thanks. My printer is attached straight to the network (RJ-45), but I check /var/db/pkg, and saw no mention of cups-pdf or cups-pstoraster, so I am installing those... I'll try setting up my printer when I get home. Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 4/22/07, Jared Barneck wrote: > Jim Stapleton wrote: > > I'm trying to print a test page for my printer using cups and I get > > the following error: > > Unsupported format 'application/postscript'! > Funny you should post about this problem... I have an HP Laserjet 5L. > It connects via parallel port to my wifes windows XP box. I was trying > to point to it and I kept getting that same error. > > I only had cups-base installed and no other cups ports. > > To attempt to fix it I did the following: > > 1. I made sure these three ports were installed. > > cups-base-1.2.2 The Common UNIX Printing System > cups-pdf-2.4.5 A virtual printer for CUPS to produce PDF files > cups-pstoraster-8.15.4 Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to > non-PS printers > > 2. I added the windows box to the host file > > 3. I restarted cupsd. > > 4. Deleted the printer and readded it. > > It started working. I am not sure which step fixed it. > > > > I couldn't find anything when googling with FreeBSD in my search. When > > I took out FreeBSD, I got something for debian referencing lines 103 > > and 109 in the config being uncommented to get it to work. 103 in the > > default is blank, 109 is blank except for teh '#'. > > > > I uncommented this line, and restarted CUPS: > > application/vnd.cups-postscript application/vnd.cups-raster > > 100 pstoraster > > > > It didn't fix anything. > > I added this line, and restarted: > > application/postscript application/vnd.cups-raster 100 > > pstoraster > > > > And I still get the same error. > > > > I know CUPS worked fine from an install maybe 6 months ago (it had a > > completely different printer setup than now, it wasn't as easy to > > setup, but at least it worked). > > > > My question > > (1) Anyone know how to fix this issue with the current version > > (cvsup'ed and built today via 'sudo portupgrade -f > > print/cups-pstoraster print/cups-base print/ghostscript-gnu* > > print/ghostscript-gpl*' > > (2) How do I get csup/cvsup to match one port or a group of ports by > > name? I put *default date=2006.08.01.00.00.00 in my supfile > > (etc/supfile-ports) and tried: > > sudo csup -i '*cups*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports > > sudo csup -i 'print/cups*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports > > sudo cvsup -g -i '*cups*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports > > sudo cvsup -g -i 'print/cups*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports > > > > and none of the above updated any files according to the output (I > > usually see a list of files updated). Since ports were updated this > > morning, without the date line (so to today's ports layout), I should > > have seens something. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jim Stapleton > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 12:42:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821A16A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [208.70.104.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A27513C45E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 13428 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Apr 2007 12:42:51 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(208.70.107.100):. Processed in 6.507654 secs); 23 Apr 2007 12:42:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.210?) (steve@ibctech.ca@208.70.107.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 12:42:44 -0000 Message-ID: <462CA9CD.7040705@ibctech.ca> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:42:53 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:42:52 -0000 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 11:43 AM 4/20/2007, Grant Peel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs >> using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either >> directly to me or to the list. >> >> We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we >> have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party >> Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the >> weeks go by. >> >> We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda. >> Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is >> Easyantispam. Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of >> these? Usability? Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration >> issues? >> >> Any thoughts will be appreciated, > > If your volume of mail is >50000 per day don't use the baracuda. It > won't keep up. I agree that this statement depends on the unit(s) and setup. We use two clustered 400's, and we realize 500,000 - 1,000,000 emails every day, and it keeps up just perfectly fine. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 13:07:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E382916A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rajkumars@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D8A13C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rajkumars@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so1312625nza for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kfxOQdfJiF9IqdRyuYkTMmu9LhqCz0AVAQa02LhXv/gXiz5waDzkrvwGxypAenmfN1UBNGycJzKEKbSTrGbPmCIAGyYFw+4SJMwqFD0QlEZInVe4qhrfutWFD1q7nac3nxC3gmv9qlzc/HTmo4LKHXUfWe1Fb9q+5jZ0XN/eSwA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k1BbLPPxk5/Ws/mpRRyeQycNfDQYoeOWS/CYmJs7pCxn1MyHdx7j/9GKYQ098n0n58fBxF2UgVzJJG/MoIVE+KJEJFMKRgzXHd9A1pA6KdaFBQ93In0A7V0toT/lvFkTNfoQaTfKx/FOJ2mRY0q6Kx4UuhTugF0QmD3exvFW6lg= Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr267848waf.1177333632377; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.255.4 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64de5c8b0704230607w41672d9ek690ed18f336352c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:37:12 +0530 From: "Rajkumar S" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070422022813.GA87874@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64de5c8b0704210224n809dac9ybdc8b831e3431b06@mail.gmail.com> <20070422022813.GA87874@xor.obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Porting a driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:07:16 -0000 On 4/22/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > If you are unlucky then the driver may rely on changes made after the > release of 6.2 and you will have to either back-port those changes too > (or just run RELENG_6). I am unlucky here :( The driver is has a dependency on one MFC, relating to PCI_FIND_EXTCAP. Is it possible to get the full patchset for that particular commit? cvsweb is file oriented, ie you get a diff of this MFC for each file, not the entire diff. raj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 13:09:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A7516A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rajkumars@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DD813C44B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rajkumars@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so1313228nza for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:09:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Orqh+A0WZKzoy5rucSxqVJZy14gDPPD0dupKQbhlhl/ybFDplfZyhn9T2IyJ2sHbn0nsv2ZZOYBIqpus0rcvN5GOfV6/OczpGlYoWifItp5RYjD9Edu8Apm9x5eCWG4BCj3rY66HFDgxafyjt/P01jzm+UYgRj5zgWDY2cwQeSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xzz5RcRNvLcKYYtfKPFLkSuIiYmBSZafuIZguEb2JS7apzZFvbuO0KTzp9bWeuhToYyoPjwMrTLHBTiquESM8PNieE4A5xYtCPdYmbeLysaTBcxiWf6FtWBNpORxHJ1Y3fawS3ZkCWeDs8Eifo8N06iqcdFdPku6dclwl1zn9vw= Received: by 10.115.18.1 with SMTP id v1mr2502652wai.1177333766394; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.255.4 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64de5c8b0704230609o5ffa4d8ar6544524d46f25a56@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:39:26 +0530 From: "Rajkumar S" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704220248.46213.ABabiy@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070421120018.EEC8816A46C@hub.freebsd.org> <200704220248.46213.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Subject: Re: Porting a driver from RELENG_6 to RELENG_6_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:09:27 -0000 On 4/22/07, Andriy Babiy wrote: > Have you tried searching http://www.marvell.com/ for the driver? Yes, they have this driver, but i am trying to see if I can get the maintained driver in FreeBSD working. raj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 14:38:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9572516A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5CA13C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3NEZh8d083108; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:35:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3NEZhYm083107; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:35:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:35:43 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Don O'Neil" Message-ID: <20070423143543.GB83014@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <000b01c78574$86182ba0$0300020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c78574$86182ba0$0300020a@mickey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:38:25 -0000 On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:56:31PM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote: > I had a crash on a disk array last week that was severe enough that fsck > wouldn't fix it, even in single user mode. So, I was forced to suck off the > good data, and restore the bad stuff from backups. > > However there are 2 directories that contain files/directories which have > bogus user & group ID's that the system just won't let me do anything to. I > can delete them, cant rename them, cant move them, cant chmod/chown, cant > cat to them, nothing... I just get "Operation not permitted". > > Here's a sample of one of them: > > ---xr----x 1 2761022747 1016642816 0 Apr 19 15:35 Video > d--s---rw- 2 3251161791 726015594 512 Apr 19 15:41 .shrc > > Anyone have any ideas on how to get rid of these files? > > I've done an fsck from single user mode and that doesn't come up with > anything. Short of copying all the data over to a new volume sans these > files and then reformatting the old volume and then moving the good files > back what can I do? I am not sure why you couldn't read/copy them if you have tried that. As for writing to them or changing permissions or ownership, it could be that the files have some flags set on them. Then, not even root can modify them without removing the flag[s]. See man chflags. If that doesn't help, are you ready to just leave that data behind and move on? If so, you will probably want to rebuild the partitioning on the array. You might want to wipe out enough stuff to make sure to avoid any possible conflicts (probably none, but...) To do that use dd and overwrite the first few hundres sectors or the logical device. If you address the array as ad1, for example, do: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1 bs=512 count=1024 Then fdisk it and bsdlabel it and newfs partitions you create with bsdlabel and if it is all happy, then you have a cleaned out working 'drive' again. ////jerry > > Any assistance would be appreciated. I'd also like to thank everyone who > browses this group and regularly posts responses... Without you guys some of > us would never get the help and knowledge we need! Thanks in advance! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:09:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AB916A406 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7244F13C465 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1218 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 15:09:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Apr 2007 15:09:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8F5322842D; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:09:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Drew Sanford References: <4628E19E.405@wilderness.homeip.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:09:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4628E19E.405@wilderness.homeip.net> (Drew Sanford's message of "Fri\, 20 Apr 2007 10\:51\:58 -0500") Message-ID: <44ejmbjff8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing, portsdb error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:09:33 -0000 Drew Sanford writes: > I get the following error: > > root@drew(/usr/ports)# portupgrade gnome-vfs > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 16885 > port entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000........ ..... done] > [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in > /usr/ports ... - 16885 port entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000........ ..... done] > missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb! > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:548:in `open_db': > database file error (PortsDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:702:in `port' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:890:in > all_depends_list' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:809:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:823:in `sort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:827:in `sort_build!' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:721:in `main' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:755:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 > > I've got Index up to date, I've run portsdb -u, and it seems to think > everything is good. Any recommendations? I've not seen this error > before. Thanks in advance. "portsdb -F"? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:25:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF83716A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE2513C45A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id BAA11652; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:25:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:25:34 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Peter Ankerst?l In-Reply-To: <20070423081545.7D09416A409@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Willson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache and PHP Packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:46 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:56:04 +0200 Peter Ankerst?l wrote: > Stephen Willson wrote: > > I have installed the latest Apache and PHP Packages. I can get > > Apache working, but nothing is standing out as to why I can't get > > the PHP package to work. Best I can figure is that this package was > > compiled without the options to include apache support. -or- there > > is another package that adds support for apache 2.2.3 > > > > i installed: > > > > php5-5.1.6_3 > > apache-2.2.3 > > > > (and dependencies). > > > > can't figure it out. i haven't installed /compiled with FreeBSD in > > a long time so I thought the packages would be easy enough... > > I dont know whether or not the php-package are built with the apache module but > have you configured your apache correctly? have you added > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php > AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps > > to your apache conf? > > My suggestion would be to compile the packages from the ports-collection to make > sure the module is compiled and then make sure that the webserver is configured > properly. > > You can read about the ports collection and how to use it here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html Unless it's changed quite recently (always possible), installing PHP5 from a package does not get you mod_php5 / libphp5.so, unlike PHP4. As packages are built with default options, and as building the apache module is not enabled by default (without/before running make config), you now HAVE to use the port for PHP5, selecting the module in config. I don't know why this became the default, assuming the majority of php users are installing it for the apache module, but there it is. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:49:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10B516A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFC113C484 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [192.168.1.10]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8789C28F876; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:29:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Drew Sanford In-Reply-To: <4628E19E.405@wilderness.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20070423152356.P46466@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <4628E19E.405@wilderness.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing, portsdb error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:49:16 -0000 On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Drew Sanford wrote: > I get the following error: > > root@drew(/usr/ports)# portupgrade gnome-vfs > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 16885 port > entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000........ > ..... done] > [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in > /usr/ports ... - 16885 port entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000.........16000........ > ..... done] > missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb! > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:548:in `open_db': database file > error (PortsDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:702:in `port' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:890:in > `all_depends_list' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:809:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:823:in `sort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:827:in `sort_build!' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:721:in `main' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:755:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 > > I've got Index up to date, I've run portsdb -u, and it seems to think > everything is good. Any recommendations? I've not seen this error before. > Thanks in advance. I saw this when I didn't have the portupgrade port upgraded properly. It has changed the location. >From /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20070205: AFFECTS: everybody AUTHOR: pav@FreeBSD.org New ports category was created - /usr/ports/ports-mgmt Most significant port moved to this new category is portupgrade. So don't be alarmed, it was not deleted. You can find it now in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:50:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4049016A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26B013C4B7 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1656355wra for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:50:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gb9hPNqNiW2OZGJ9oIfYzXWCsIby4AegDw3+mIw3iWUKwki47C5CZ+4Gpctp49W+NJNBsXTIqyWW/9dHE/mBNlnrO1odXGYtAVBNsuUHBKdLCp5GWof88s57b0mTWnWtLaaucu//sQuE9uY5u3QXzSBeFyTd8h+/0MnfRBPpVB8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dAyoG+/HHvvWGIiq59ffgBikmWHSXbfgr+XbD4RIzL7LZiQFrFQZNHoEzc+gIuas/5NIR0UqloEePp8Nsr/nc5IJ86/RQ8TJbeg1Hi1SnlXNPHRiDsd/oUaTt/aAIsEkC4eSVQzRUdDI4h0wQzgKzrPGI6ZCnjN/24+Ou7Us5iA= Received: by 10.114.173.15 with SMTP id v15mr2595943wae.1177343407295; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.54.16 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:50:07 -0400 From: "Spiros Papadopoulos" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Linksys wireless pcmcia card / FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:50:11 -0000 Allthough i have set to yes the option about "receiving your messages to the list" I didn't receive it. In addition i haven't received any reply so far. Could somebody confirm that my message was sent properly to the list. Thanks, Spiros On 21/04/07, Spiros Papadopoulos wrote: > > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and I have the above card in my DELL's > latitude c810 cardbus. > > I followed the instructions on the page below and configure the kernel > accordingly: > > http://www.freebsdmall.com/~loader/en_US.ISO8859-1 > /articles/wireless/article.html > > i get the message about: > > cardbus0: CIS pointer is 0 > cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS > > which takes me to the post below...: > > http://freebsd.monkey.org/freebsd-stable/200607/msg00449.html > > I guess i need to tweak the windows driver or anyway hack it somehow. The > problem is that i 've never done anything similar before > but i would like to get involved and make it work. > > Anybody can point me to the right direction ? If the above is not the best > solution i would really appreciate pointing me to > the best alternative. > > thanks in advance > Spiros P. -- Spiros P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:55:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B68116A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203EC13C45B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1242240ugh for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=V9gcZoBd5Kd0VeA6iFuEeuxzMiR+QbA8nkU/DH4n2adprI3unllixZqHAEqx7Qp1RAE9n4Acw7H4823s2z6W0DsXu+6nR4tSWvySPjEC6pHmcDOC7rQQB0rsII0FEm9mU6DLPO5207TY07bvG3Bke64gPgNDpPqnQRYnvoEm9r8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=Cu43N0YEelVNLmM+ivkDFo2ipAC1xmY2w7q2jeZ6bz+uQ106z3b02VpUkn2xl40o/Utp1obzweg8mpQTgptfKtIuZDF0M+lo31QybXcrsCZRFmZ/3OFTrry3Kteh+ZtSJcOMHAN3gH+BT9Z9qMie8WMbMrHR4MgTt9izjsDzP/E= Received: by 10.67.71.15 with SMTP id y15mr5224219ugk.1177343731870; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monju-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com ( [86.18.88.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1sm12288656uge.2007.04.23.08.55.30; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462CD6EF.7070006@crackmonkey.us> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:55:27 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <462C6B24.9080500@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <462C6B24.9080500@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam J Richardson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot compile thunderbird 2 and firefox 2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:55:33 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I'm in trouble to compile those two mozilla apps se below > error messages which seems to come from the same origin > > Thanks for any infos > > Frank > > FIREFOX > > c++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/nss > -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith > -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy > -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 > -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs > -Wl,-h,libgtkxtbin.so -o libgtkxtbin.so gtk2xtbin.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib > -L/usr/local/lib/nss -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/firefox > -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk-x11-2.0 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXt -lX11 > -Wl,-Bsymbolic -lc -lm -pthread -L/usr/local/lib -liconv > gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x13): In function `xt_event_prepare': > : undefined reference to `gdk_threads_lock' > gtk2xtbin.o(.text+0x959): In function `xt_client_init': > : undefined reference to `gdk_get_display' > gtk2xtbin.o(.data.rel+0xc): undefined reference to `g_free' > gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/widget/src/gtkxtbin' > gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla' > gmake: *** [default] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > Hi Frank. Just wanted to let you know the two ports, thunderbird-2.0.0.0 and firefox-2.0.0.3,1 are not broken because I've installed them myself. Thunderbird sure takes a long time to compile though. I did a "sudo portupgrade thunderbird" yesterday and it took 8 hours on my 750MHz laptop. I think my distcc cluster, such as it is, is broken. Hope you fix your problem. Perhaps gtk2 needs an upgrade? Regards, Adam J Richardson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 15:57:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A0616A485 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7EC13C455 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1659709wra for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=OaUjqO7p7Fw8Zr2AH82bnkN/nN4omXZqzUzEV1nXUowS73ldbhC33S/EHdulmaJzLHJDqPTRqg9OV3bK+K//djHa25AR5X6HQqoeWqNHrbMkOt016crWkWcALJ2WFGfkVXY5y+HlDA0J5cVZPJT0qjIdDU1TJkhOEKUShb3ZNMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=S+ojnveCYF/K2dwvvKEGsyksh+/WV0SHyAKPuOzfwVv9IdgCFOu8ErDRk9T5UjroI7PPgPRIyjpcVvDX7DXa0Br14oWB9sIJk3OtVkE5TIuSR4IbHKP6E6Vhc3w/yoWPb3PHHX88juhnq0wvKBqP7M21CyqjDVIXWWNhwBWnJr4= Received: by 10.78.149.15 with SMTP id w15mr1112294hud.1177343867883; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monju-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com ( [86.18.88.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39sm8646216ugb.2007.04.23.08.57.47; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462CD779.8010609@crackmonkey.us> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:57:45 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: don@buylv.com References: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> In-Reply-To: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam J Richardson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:57:55 -0000 Don O'Neil wrote: > bogus user & group ID's Hi Don. Could you create the bogus user and group in /etc/passwd and /etc/group and thus log in with rights to those files? Regards, Adam J Richardson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 16:17:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3F816A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C07F13C457 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652101A4DC1; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72AF3512CF; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:17:56 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us Message-ID: <20070423161756.GA55066@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <000901c78574$5f1990c0$0300020a@mickey> <462CD779.8010609@crackmonkey.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462CD779.8010609@crackmonkey.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: don@buylv.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to delete files/directories - bogus user/group ID's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:17:57 -0000 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:57:45PM +0100, Adam J Richardson wrote: > Don O'Neil wrote: > >bogus user & group ID's > > Hi Don. > > Could you create the bogus user and group in /etc/passwd and /etc/group > and thus log in with rights to those files? Not necessary, see my previous reply. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 16:01:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400B116A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quetzal@zone3000.net) Received: from mx1.sitevalley.com (sitevalley.com [209.67.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E491813C48C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quetzal@zone3000.net) Received: from zone3000.kharkov.ua (HELO localhost) (217.144.69.37) by 209.67.61.254 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 15:34:43 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:34:16 +0300 From: Nikolay Pavlov To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira , "Brian A. Seklecki" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423153416.GA26026@zone3000.net> Mail-Followup-To: Nikolay Pavlov , "Marc G. Fournier" , Chris , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira , "Brian A. Seklecki" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3aaaa3a0704052217g67281716ge8a2d1a888025d0e@mail.gmail.com> <0D3D8201F40120DCE73AD00B@ganymede.hub.org> <3aaaa3a0704071212o3b4dce4dgd8def804e5b1156c@mail.gmail.com> <20070423110610.GA13461@icarus.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423110610.GA13461@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:33:22 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: No buffer space available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:01:25 -0000 On Monday, 23 April 2007 at 4:06:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris wrote: > > > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code, > > > had to use it because of broadcom 5755 nic card, I plan to use large > > > tcp window sizes so will be interesting to see if this also suffers > > > from the problem. > > > > I've got 8 servers on the same network, 3 are almost identical, but one of them > > (the one with the problem) is using software RAID vs hardware ... but, if you > > are seeing it without using software RAID, then that is obviously not the > > culprit :( > > May be a red herring... > > I'm able to reproduce the "No buffer space available" message when > setting net.inet.tcp.(send|recv)space to non-default values. All I've > tried is the following, with a kernel dated 2007/04/22: > > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=131072 > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 > > Example session: > > $ su2 > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=131072 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 32768 -> 131072 > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 65536 -> 262144 > # logout > $ ssh medusa > socket: No buffer space available > ssh: connect to host medusa port 22: No buffer space available > $ su2 > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.sendspace=32768 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 131072 -> 32768 > # sysctl net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 262144 -> 65536 > # logout > $ ssh medusa > Last login: Mon Apr 23 03:45:45 2007 from ... > > I assume this is because the maximum size of a TCP datagram is 65536 > bytes, but as I'm not familiar enough with TCP on such a low level, > this may be speculation on my part. > > Just something worth checking/tinkering with. > Try to adjust kern.ipc.maxsockbuf value. -- ====================================================================== - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<----------------------------------- ====================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 17:32:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB56A16A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2A113C45B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg2OR-000J2Y-9u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:32:03 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:31:57 -0700 Message-ID: <01a201c785cd$4aea2fc0$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceFzUq8h4eq9UedSOOxfIsWJ5kBog== Subject: Problem with Quotacheck after crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:32:08 -0000 This question is related to my recent question about not being able to delete files after a disk crash... I solved that problem with the chflags (the no-delete flag was set!).. Thanks for all who suggested it. Now that I've deleted the files, I thought this problem would go away, but its not: quotacheck: /home/quota.user: seek failed: Invalid argument THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: /dev/twed0s1d (/home) I've run an fsck on the volume from single user mode, after deleting the files, and it was clean, but I still get this error. I deleted the quota.user & quota.group files because they were corrupted when the crash happened. I'm at a loss as to what to do next, any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 17:52:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BFB16A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vittorio@de-martino.it) Received: from smtp4.aruba.it (smtpd2.aruba.it [62.149.128.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C98013C487 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vittorio@de-martino.it) Received: (qmail 5177 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2007 17:52:26 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 5121, pid: 5165, t: 0.1203s scanners: clamav: 0.88.4/m:40/d:1722 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.155.100.8?) (ml-vic@de-martino.it@87.6.220.178) by smtp4.aruba.it with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 17:52:26 -0000 From: Vittorio De Martino To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:52:01 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704071924.06189.vittorio@de-martino.it> <200704182300.39737.vittorio@de-martino.it> <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704231952.01830.vittorio@de-martino.it> X-Spam-Rating: smtp4.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N Cc: Subject: Re: FreeMat 3.0 doesn't call functions and help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:52:33 -0000 Il Sunday 22 April 2007 21:38:12 Thierry Thomas ha scritto: > Le Jeu 19 avr 07 =E0 1:00:38 +0200, Vittorio De Martino > > > =E9crivait=A0: > > > I have just upgraded FreeMAT to 3.1, which fixes the inv() problem, a= nd > > > which should fix this "Help on line" bug too; could you please check > > > it? > > > > Yes, with the new version 3.1 inv now works fine. Unfortunately the "He= lp > > on line" still doesn't work. I think that something worsened because wi= th > > this new port now I cannot use the help on line even as root (in the > > previous version "Help online" as root worked quite well). > > Could you please script (1) a session with only `truss FreeMat', just > calling the help and exiting? Then please send me the compresed log of > this session. > > If you had created some symlinks, please don't forget to remove them. > > Regards, I cannot truss anything victor# truss /bin/echo "hello" truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory any other solution or workaround? Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:03:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FE416A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E0D13C489 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2007 14:02:57 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFI24594; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2007 14:02:51 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17964.62669.952951.149327@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:02:53 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <462CD6EF.7070006@crackmonkey.us> References: <462C6B24.9080500@esiee.fr> <462CD6EF.7070006@crackmonkey.us> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: cannot compile thunderbird 2 and firefox 2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:03:01 -0000 Adam J Richardson writes: > Thunderbird sure takes a long time to compile though. I did a > "sudo portupgrade thunderbird" yesterday and it took 8 hours on > my 750MHz laptop. I think my distcc cluster, such as it is, is > broken. For comparison: on a 2.25g P4 it takes 3-4 hours. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:03:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9216A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surg@poczta.fm) Received: from smtp4.poczta.interia.pl (smtp35.poczta.interia.pl [80.48.65.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85713C487 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surg@poczta.fm) Received: by smtp4.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id E57AD41831D; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poczta.interia.pl (f29.poczta.interia.pl [10.217.2.29]) by smtp4.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id 84446418325 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by poczta.interia.pl (Postfix, from userid 502) id 498BF46149B; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.interia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.interia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAC4461496 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: 23 Apr 2007 19:36:13 +0200 From: surg@poczta.fm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-ORIGINATE-IP: 81.168.171.199 IMPORTANCE: Normal X-MSMAIL-PRIORITY: Normal X-PRIORITY: 3 X-Mailer: PSE3 Message-Id: <20070423173613.EBAC4461496@poczta.interia.pl> X-EMID: e6840acc Subject: Can't build kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:03:12 -0000 =0ASince 3 days i can't compile kernel with success. After cvsup stable-sup= file on fresh 6.2 and make depend:=0A=0Amake: don't know how to make ../../= ../crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c. Stop=0A=0AI cant find any errors in = my KERNfile. Any ideas?=0A=0A-- =0ARegards=0As. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Masz plan? Potrzebujesz motywacji ? wejdz na >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a40 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:09:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A8016A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from tiltup.nepinc.com (tiltup.nepinc.com [66.207.136.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6EE13C45B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.97.16] (dhcp16.it.nepinc.com [192.168.97.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by tiltup.nepinc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3NI9ndg011112 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:09:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <462CF64F.6050308@voidmain.net> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:09:19 -0400 From: Tom Grove User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Mail Switcher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:09:50 -0000 Does anyone have any ideas on how I would solve the following problem? I have two mail servers. One is running cyrus imap and the other courier. I am in the process of moving users over one at a time and would like to put some kind of proxy box in front of the mail servers. I would like to have the proxy listen on port 143 for connections and grab the usernames. Once this happens I want the users connection routed to the appropriate mail server. Any ideas? -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:14:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70AC16A409 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3689413C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: (qmail 2463 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 17:53:50 -0000 Received: from 85233228239.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO workp4) (85.233.228.239) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 17:53:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:47:30 +0200 From: Rico Secada To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070423194730.482ca62b.coolzone@it.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Help needed with server setup at work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:14:08 -0000 Hi. At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the home directories for all the employees client machines. Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, but some are mounted using scripts. Employee John knows he belongs to NFS server 1, and emplyoee Britney knows she belongs to NFS server 3 and so on. Now due to new conditions I have to set up a new system from which ALL employees are able to mount their home directories from their homes (where they live). Since I only have one IP address at my disposal, I need to set up some kind of union system in which all home directories apear as they live on just one server. Besides that I have to figure out what kind of security I need to use. I have been thinking about AFS. About the union thing I first thought of somehow union mouting all the different home directories on a single machine which then serves as the access point, but I am affraid if that particular machine crashes, then no one can get to their files. Good ideas and experiences are greatly appreciated! -- Best and kind regards Rico Secada From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:15:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACFF16A403; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from mail45.e.nsc.no (mail45.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F82413C46C; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from [84.202.202.208] (084202202208.customer.alfanett.no [84.202.202.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail45.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3NHKBLL024025; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462CEACA.2010902@next.online.no> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:20:10 +0200 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Spiros Papadopoulos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linksys wireless pcmcia card / FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:15:05 -0000 Spiros Papadopoulos wrote: > Allthough i have set to yes the option about "receiving your messages to the > list" I didn't receive it. > In addition i haven't received any reply so far. > > Could somebody confirm that my message was sent properly to the list. Yes, I got your original message on freebsd-questions yesterday. I think the problem is with Google mail. I have problems receiving mail from a neighbor of mine who is on Gmail. -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:16:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DD216A408 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F32813C484 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1713916wra for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=PBuQ7hKGFY1ZuYa2sM7j8g9zOS8USKWe4HpxjMuHDZAf3QoIVp0PqcoY36VvOt0lsmJVv2uEpnNu8J5+UoPfejLORHskp9UciLc8Dxl8OI36Eldqrg/DdXG8tFXLjgHzX6JsVqs6uPaQy5aDPf6IR0+KTyN5JdeZFhcfQEB7org= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=efHGuOXDkqEv2lMfX5JBK6fYPypSIDw27fXUFRTrsBZ00o0siWbTTk38MyLAPh9Iqq/7yN9ewSdyvHcmUAQSGkOSXSzt3DJ4ajbhB48QQAtwhQIRrg/fhk/jkB6PRqDsgfCSvNI0GZxp4Rzv57qelPh3WNaRKUFV62yFTbdkq1U= Received: by 10.67.15.15 with SMTP id s15mr5325918ugi.1177352199232; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monju-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com ( [86.18.88.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1sm30771ugf.2007.04.23.11.16.37; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462CF804.8010405@crackmonkey.us> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:16:36 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam J Richardson Subject: Re: SMP only detects one CPU - help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:16:41 -0000 > Message: 11 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:58:32 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger Subject: Re: SMP only detects one CPU - help? To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3ADB2E8D-32FE-432E-922F-D38C62B63F42@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Adam J Richardson wrote: >> > Finally, mptable shows what's really going on: >> > "MP Config Base Table Entries: >> > -- >> > Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags >> > 3 0x11 BSP, usable 6 8 3 0x387fbff >> > 0 0x11 AP, unusable 6 8 3 0x387fbff" >> > >> > Apparently the "application processor" is "unusable", whatever that >> > means. I am now stuck. >> > >> > Is there a software fix for this, or do I have a broken CPU, >> > unlikely as it seems? Any help is appreciated. >> > >> > Does it seem likely that upgrading both CPUs to the highest Pentium- >> > IIIs I can find, which I was thinking about doing anyway, would fix >> > the problem? > > It's more likely that updating the system BIOS and trying to tweak > any settings related to SMP or ACPI might help. You might also try > enabling or toggling the "PnP OS installed", to avoid having the BIOS > configure stuff it doesn't need to boot, and leaving FreeBSD to > assign IRQs itself... > > If that doesn't help, I believe there's a freebsd-acpi list which > contain people who can look at the dump of your BIOS and fix the > broken IRQ assignments it is doing. > > -- -Chuck Thanks Chuck. I'll give these suggestions a try and post feedback when I'm done. Might not be for two weeks though, as I'm just about to go on a trip to the US. :) Regards, Adam J Richardson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:21:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5BE16A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml-vic@de-martino.it) Received: from smtp5.aruba.it (smtpd2.aruba.it [62.149.128.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7721D13C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml-vic@de-martino.it) Received: (qmail 32307 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2007 17:54:40 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 32295, pid: 32304, t: 0.1187s scanners: clamav: 0.88.4/m:40/d:1722 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.155.100.8?) (ml-vic@de-martino.it@87.6.220.178) by smtp5.aruba.it with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 17:54:40 -0000 From: ml-vic To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:54:20 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704071924.06189.vittorio@de-martino.it> <200704182300.39737.vittorio@de-martino.it> <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704231954.20886.ml-vic@de-martino.it> X-Spam-Rating: smtp5.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N Cc: Subject: Re: FreeMat 3.0 doesn't call functions and help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:21:25 -0000 Il Sunday 22 April 2007 21:38:12 Thierry Thomas ha scritto: > Le Jeu 19 avr 07 =E0 1:00:38 +0200, Vittorio De Martino > > > =E9crivait=A0: > > > I have just upgraded FreeMAT to 3.1, which fixes the inv() problem, a= nd > > > which should fix this "Help on line" bug too; could you please check > > > it? > > > > Yes, with the new version 3.1 inv now works fine. Unfortunately the "He= lp > > on line" still doesn't work. I think that something worsened because wi= th > > this new port now I cannot use the help on line even as root (in the > > previous version "Help online" as root worked quite well). > > Could you please script (1) a session with only `truss FreeMat', just > calling the help and exiting? Then please send me the compresed log of > this session. > > If you had created some symlinks, please don't forget to remove them. > > Regards, I cannot truss anything victor# truss /bin/echo "hello" truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory any other solution or workaround? Vittorio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:23:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA2D16A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB39C13C455 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A54C1A4DBE; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 208E95138E; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:23:49 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: surg@poczta.fm Message-ID: <20070423182349.GA97039@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070423173613.EBAC4461496@poczta.interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423173613.EBAC4461496@poczta.interia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't build kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:23:49 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:36:13PM +0200, surg@poczta.fm wrote: >=20 > Since 3 days i can't compile kernel with success. After cvsup stable-supf= ile on fresh 6.2 and make depend: >=20 > make: don't know how to make ../../../crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c.= Stop >=20 > I cant find any errors in my KERNfile. Any ideas? Go back to GENERIC or put back the bits you removed until you spot the error you made :) Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLPm0Wry0BWjoQKURAvY3AJ44zg9TQ3JXDWGjVNcvq/4EqqR9MwCZAbLE 9Wo1+t45BvLHZ0MDL+BKL5M= =8I0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:36:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4502016A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D195213C46E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman.uk@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so5777ugh for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=fgjQpPeIe3qHiHkg6VTfDqJg4R0D2S2HeFogrBIaB5K8QfQrtgZ0nQKMe6EvvBC7ksLVsaRxvX9HGHOQRWzozox9F8PxhuQ356S3GkqRMp58E4uZr50bMZf2VuRQtNfqsVJGG+08c/xni7iJzYlrQrPRCjDxq4yuzxGkxN0RQ2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=oe95XGYY37H4TdREq6MrzBeVYHKjT2mtnXNqNkPHCRilkb3qGC5HWYUDz6yOyAFmZu2Y+GKI2nmo9GepmOa7R8/+EuOO8/wlLJr4fzI6j9foTIgQCO1zjLfna1/SrEfLV/D+aYC1gdwoXAeYvUP2BI2CkxAcvCAaYL65UbFvRwc= Received: by 10.67.117.18 with SMTP id u18mr5341636ugm.1177353381651; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monju-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com ( [86.18.88.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j34sm42431ugc.2007.04.23.11.36.20; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462CFCA3.9070106@crackmonkey.us> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:19 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam J Richardson Subject: Re: SMP only detects one CPU - help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:36:23 -0000 > Message: 15 > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:11:58 +0300 > From: Apatewna > Subject: Re: SMP only detects one CPU - help? > To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4628F45E.1010909@yahoo.gr> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed > > Maybe you should use FreeBSD more often :) Absolutely. I'm using it more and more. It's my goal to become completely free of certain operating systems beginning with W and other commercial software. I haven't had the guts to plunge straight into FreeBSD, but I'm gradually achieving my goal by parallel upgrades. > As of FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE, SMP systems are correctly detected and the > SMP kernel is used, no need to rebuild kernel. I have such an old > hardware arround (Dual P3@500) and 6.2 RELEASE loaded the SMP kernel as > expected. Same thing on shiny new Core2Duo machines. > > Try a reinstall, if this a testing machine and you'll notice that the > SMP kernel is loaded by default, unless some other strange hardware > problem exists. I didn't know that. How handy. Actually I'm not sure how "options SMP" got in my kernel config file. It's not an old kernel config file and this is my first SMP system. Oh well. so I like to have several kernels in my /boot anyway - kernel, kernel.old, kernel.generic and kernel.debug. I don't like to run kernel.generic knowing there's lots of stuff in there I'm just not using, and I like having kernel.debug around so I can backtrace kernel panics. I'll have a go with all my kernels, see if one of them boots the unusable AP. I'm off for a couple of weeks though, so I might not respond for a while. Thanks, Adam J Richardson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:37:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B87516A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB6213C4AE for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 15847 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 18:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.167.107]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Apr 2007 18:10:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:10:44 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Vittorio De Martino Message-ID: <20070423201044.195adc8e@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200704231952.01830.vittorio@de-martino.it> References: <200704071924.06189.vittorio@de-martino.it> <200704182300.39737.vittorio@de-martino.it> <20070422213812.GN85436@graf.pompo.net> <200704231952.01830.vittorio@de-martino.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_itrBbv+jYo5R.48FFQY47aD; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeMat 3.0 doesn't call functions and help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:37:33 -0000 --Sig_itrBbv+jYo5R.48FFQY47aD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vittorio De Martino wrote: > Il Sunday 22 April 2007 21:38:12 Thierry Thomas ha scritto: > > Le Jeu 19 avr 07 =E0 1:00:38 +0200, Vittorio De Martino > > > > > > =E9crivait=A0: > > > > I have just upgraded FreeMAT to 3.1, which fixes the inv() problem,= and > > > > which should fix this "Help on line" bug too; could you please check > > > > it? > > > > > > Yes, with the new version 3.1 inv now works fine. Unfortunately the "= Help > > > on line" still doesn't work. I think that something worsened because = with > > > this new port now I cannot use the help on line even as root (in the > > > previous version "Help online" as root worked quite well). > > > > Could you please script (1) a session with only `truss FreeMat', just > > calling the help and exiting? Then please send me the compresed log of > > this session. > > > > If you had created some symlinks, please don't forget to remove them. > > > > Regards, >=20 > I cannot truss anything >=20 > victor# truss /bin/echo "hello" > truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory >=20 > any other solution or workaround? truss needs procfs: mount_procfs /dev/mem /proc Fabian --Sig_itrBbv+jYo5R.48FFQY47aD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLPakBYqIVf93VJ0RAsKfAKCUiAUIBU64M/OtFYmHH5+iST2L1QCgivYZ F13MB42G3386OquCDpGAOGA= =7Tqt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_itrBbv+jYo5R.48FFQY47aD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:44:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C0F16A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4F13C4AE for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NIVMh9049442; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:31:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704191736.l3JHad0E057895@casselton.net> <86y7ko2n8b.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86y7ko2n8b.fsf@dwp.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704231428.26118.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:31:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3151/Mon Apr 23 12:11:26 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , Mark Tinguely , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au Subject: Re: IBM / FreeBSD Install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:44:17 -0000 On Thursday 19 April 2007 03:11:32 pm Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Mark Tinguely writes: > > I suggested that in email too, but looking closer, I think the MAXCPU > > needs to be increased because the cpu number uses the apic_id. Or could > > that be changed with a logical CPU to APIC ID lookup? > > > > Isn't the APIC IDs programmable? not that I am suggesting that, I > > can think of headaches of all the places (like interrupt tables) > > where it needs to be changed, not to mention the worry that the > > lower APIC IDs were assigned to IOAPICs. >=20 > I don't know, you'd have to ask jhb@ about the details. APIC IDs are not programmable (well, they are on I/O APICs, but not local=20 APICs). However, I am working on patches to support all valid APIC IDs for= =20 both mptable and MADT. Bumping up NLAPICS as a temporary workaround should= =20 suffice for now. =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:48:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF65216A409 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1F013C4BB for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3352D13C7C3; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1798F13C7C0; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E3D13C404; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Tom Grove In-Reply-To: <462CF64F.6050308@voidmain.net> Message-ID: <20070423112751.P28449@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <462CF64F.6050308@voidmain.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Switcher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:48:33 -0000 > Does anyone have any ideas on how I would solve the following problem? > > I have two mail servers. One is running cyrus imap and the other courier. I > am in the process of moving users over one at a time and would like to put > some kind of proxy box in front of the mail servers. I would like to have > the proxy listen on port 143 for connections and grab the usernames. Once > this happens I want the users connection routed to the appropriate mail > server. > > Any ideas? I've never used it myself, but perdition comes up when this gets asked... http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:01:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA82116A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06A713C4B7 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B765C2C6 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:10 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========409D1D7B5662175584BC==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:01:13 -0000 --==========409D1D7B5662175584BC========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, but a=20 single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what command would = you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I need to use some sort of = pseudo block device? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========409D1D7B5662175584BC==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:05:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF3516A40A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04DC13C4D3 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A081A4DC5; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78EDD513DD; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:05:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:05:14 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20070423190514.GA97741@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:17 -0000 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 02:01:10PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, but a > single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what command would > you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I need to use some sort of > pseudo block device? Use mdconfig with -t vnode, then mount_cd9660 Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:09:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBDE16A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4657513C44C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg3uT-0007ic-5Z; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:09:13 +0400 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg3ut-000Jyj-GY; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:09:39 +0400 To: Paul Schmehl References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:09:39 +0400 In-Reply-To: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> (Paul Schmehl's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:10 -0500") Message-ID: <13146892@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:09:15 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:10 -0500 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, but > a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what > command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I need > to use some sort of pseudo block device? Seems that you need "18.6.2 mkisofs": http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html HTH, WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:19:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFD716A404 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: from mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (carpetsmoker.xs4all.nl [82.93.23.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB1513C44C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: by mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 649886D461; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:18:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:18:55 +0200 From: Martin Tournoij To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:19:41 -0000 On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what command > would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ To mount a iso image: mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere If you want to mount multiple ISO images then you will have to use md1, md2, ect. Don't forget to unmount and detach the memory disk: umount /somewhere mdconfig -ud 0 0 should be replaced with the appropiate device number Note that this will only mount standard iso images (iso9660, usually .iso or .bin), if you want to mount Nero/Alcohol/PowerISO/ect images then you must first convert them, iat is a great tool for doing this: Ports collection: sysutils/iat Website: http://iat.berlios.de/ -- Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:36:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D494F16A406 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD1213C45D for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449C551931 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:36:40 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:36:45 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:18:55 +0200 Martin Tournoij wrote: > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, > > but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what > > command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I > > need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > > Senior Information Security Analyst > > The University of Texas at Dallas > > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > To mount a iso image: > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > I notice no-one is recommending it be mounted read-only. Is it implicit for cd9960, or can an iso be modified this way? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:39:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0923116A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB28D13C489 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B2B1A4DBD; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 42F50513DD; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:39:55 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: RW Message-ID: <20070423193955.GA98313@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:39:58 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:36:40PM +0100, RW wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:18:55 +0200 > Martin Tournoij wrote: >=20 > > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, > > > but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what > > > command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I > > > need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > >=20 > > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > > > Senior Information Security Analyst > > > The University of Texas at Dallas > > > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > >=20 > > To mount a iso image: > > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > >=20 >=20 > I notice no-one is recommending it be mounted read-only. Is it implicit > for cd9960, or can an iso be modified this way? It's implicit. Kris --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLQuLWry0BWjoQKURAqG1AKD8dKrdhd2irgxG55zGdR74Wx+26gCg5OhJ uJzo4OavVIIrCsPebf3oZeo= =Lcx7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:44:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640E716A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: from mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (carpetsmoker.xs4all.nl [82.93.23.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A3C13C44B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: by mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FDD96D461; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:44:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:44:10 +0200 From: Martin Tournoij To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:44:57 -0000 On Mon 23 Apr 2007 20:04, RW wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:18:55 +0200 > Martin Tournoij wrote: > > > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, > > > but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what > > > command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I > > > need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > > > > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > > > Senior Information Security Analyst > > > The University of Texas at Dallas > > > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > > > To mount a iso image: > > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > > > > I notice no-one is recommending it be mounted read-only. Is it implicit > for cd9960, or can an iso be modified this way? cd9660 can only mount read-only: $ mount_cd9660 -o rw /dev/md0 /mnt/md0/ $ mount | grep cd9660 $ dev/md0 on /mnt/md0 (cd9660, local, read-only) Note that I made a typing error in my previous email, 'nvode' should be 'vnode' --Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:54:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FBD16A484; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4F113C45D; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NJrnV3049908; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:53:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Mark Tinguely Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:02:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704231851.l3NIpJ7H071370@casselton.net> In-Reply-To: <200704231851.l3NIpJ7H071370@casselton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704231502.16968.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:53:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3151/Mon Apr 23 12:11:26 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: IBM / FreeBSD Install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:54:14 -0000 On Monday 23 April 2007 02:51:19 pm Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > John Baldwin says: > > > > APIC IDs are not programmable (well, they are on I/O APICs, but not local=20 > > APICs). However, I am working on patches to support all valid APIC IDs for= > > =20 > > both mptable and MADT. Bumping up NLAPICS as a temporary workaround should= > > =20 > > suffice for now. > > > > =2D-=20 > > John Baldwin > > IMO, the quick solution also requires that MAX_APICID in > [amd64/amd64 | i386/i386]/local_apic.c needs to be changed > because lapic_create() checks if the passed apic_id > MAX_APICID. > > Also in [amd64/amd64 | i386/i386]/mp_machdep.c checks in cpu_add() > if the passed apic_id >= MAXCPU. There are a couple other checks > in mp_machdep.c before converting to use the cpu_apic_ids[] array. > > I was curious, and wrote up a patch file with the potential minor changes > for -current at http://www.casselton.com/~tinguely/acpicid.patch . > I saw one more change needed to use on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. What I have so far is somewhat similar, but goes ahead and allows the full range of APIC IDs while trying to still honor MAXCPU correctly. I haven't ported it to i386 yet, nor compiled it yet, much less booted it. :) I hope to at least get it booted on amd64 today. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:21:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D429416A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from tiltup.nepinc.com (tiltup.nepinc.com [66.207.136.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA7E13C458 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.97.16] (dhcp16.it.nepinc.com [192.168.97.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by tiltup.nepinc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3NKLcdS012757; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:21:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <462D1533.6020906@voidmain.net> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:21:07 -0400 From: Tom Grove User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Philip Hallstrom References: <462CF64F.6050308@voidmain.net> <20070423112751.P28449@bravo.pjkh.com> In-Reply-To: <20070423112751.P28449@bravo.pjkh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Switcher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:21:37 -0000 Philip Hallstrom wrote: >> Does anyone have any ideas on how I would solve the following problem? >> >> I have two mail servers. One is running cyrus imap and the other >> courier. I am in the process of moving users over one at a time and >> would like to put some kind of proxy box in front of the mail >> servers. I would like to have the proxy listen on port 143 for >> connections and grab the usernames. Once this happens I want the >> users connection routed to the appropriate mail server. >> >> Any ideas? > > I've never used it myself, but perdition comes up when this gets asked... > > http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/ Perfect...it also seems to exist in ports /usr/ports/mail/perdition...works very well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:23:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42F816A40E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.127]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55E6C13C487 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46678 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2007 20:23:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Rtqu8r3vrsnjeFMWBJsf8vb0tB2Q7I/WMi23HE3dP5tWbX+tmEJJYSTRVMicbc1dXWW9tnlOG9zIAGnLMrwuzuERZOoVGnQ0wSeyYaNNGKVkfdqjFlDUpEGHe2/DaGo06eoz2FUtwsGu9jPU9V+lBkkKraAxiThKDwENPIcjkXE=; X-YMail-OSG: 9m47bi0VM1mcKmZoVuWPELkMMORrj5ht5_bs2beBZ1bh4JUDhM9FRzkio0UfabXSY_oQuJyDOATpbWieLOcuD1V6CcfmkeQ- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:23:16 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:23:16 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:17 -0000 Last night, I was starting to install Samba3, but wrong FreeBSD disc (2) in the CD-ROM drive (first package to install on disc 1). After placing the right disc in the drive, I accidentally pushed the POWER button instead of the CD-ROM door open/close button and turned the computer off. In my defense, the power button is right next to it AND has a hair trigger. :-( I turned the computer back on, and FreeBSD booted with no complaints, so I assumed all was well. I then proceeded to install Samba3 successfully, after which I shut down the system ("halt"). This morning when I booted FreeBSD to configure Samba, I got: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... /dev/da0s1f: UNALLOCATED I=5 OWNER=root MODE=0 /dev/da0s1f: SIZE=0 MTIME=Apr 22 17:28 2007 /dev/da0s1f: NAME=/lost+found UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: ufs: /dev/da0s1f (/usr) Automatic file system check failed; help! /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I assume I'll have to run fsck on /usr, but have 2 questions: 1) Is this problem caused by yesterday's accidental power-off? 2) What prompts should I expect from fsck, and how should I reply to each in order to resolve this problem correctly? Here's where I'm at now: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- fsck -y /usr Start /usr wait fsck_ufs /dev/da0s1f ** /dev/da0s1f ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames UNALLOCATED I=5 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Apr 22 17:28 2007 NAME=/lost+found UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? [yn] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:23:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AC216A408 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5192213C483 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61775C270 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:23:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:23:27 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========1B70C16B7F0807363B66==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:23:28 -0000 --==========1B70C16B7F0807363B66========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Monday, April 23, 2007 21:18:55 +0200 Martin Tournoij=20 wrote: > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, but a >> single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, what command >> would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. Do I need to use >> some sort of pseudo block device? >> >> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >> Senior Information Security Analyst >> The University of Texas at Dallas >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > To mount a iso image: > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > > If you want to mount multiple ISO images then you will have to > use md1, md2, ect. > > Don't forget to unmount and detach the memory disk: > umount /somewhere > mdconfig -ud 0 > > 0 should be replaced with the appropiate device number > > Note that this will only mount standard iso images (iso9660, usually > .iso or .bin), if you want to mount Nero/Alcohol/PowerISO/ect images > then you must first convert them, iat is a great tool for doing this: > Ports collection: sysutils/iat > Website: http://iat.berlios.de/ > Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create an iso.=20 I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD first. That works = perfectly. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========1B70C16B7F0807363B66==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:31:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9BE16A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECA413C45A for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (hymn03.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.169]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3NKVqT7031372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:31:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3NKVph5022498 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:31:51 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn03.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:31:51 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.23.131934 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RUS_SUBJ_ALL_UCASE_1251 0, __RUS_SUBJ_ALL_UCASE_KOI8R 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:31:52 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, L Goodwin wrote: [...] > I assume I'll have to run fsck on /usr, but have 2 questions: > 1) Is this problem caused by yesterday's accidental power-off? Yes, most likely. > 2) What prompts should I expect from fsck, and how should I reply to each in order to resolve this problem correctly? Just say yes to all the prompts, but backup any important data first. Or if you're afraid of any issues, reinstall. If this problem persists (near every time you reboot), it's time to get a new drive because it got toasted during a write phase. I wouldn't say that though until you install from scratch though and verify that that is or is not the case. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:42:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F0416A404 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from deliver.hol.gr (deliver.hol.gr [62.38.3.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F07E13C44B for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from auth-smtp.hol.gr (takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net [192.168.20.71]) by deliver.hol.gr (8.12.11/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3NKgFns010707 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified OK); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:15 +0300 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (ppp136-047.dsl.hol.gr [89.210.136.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.hol.gr (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3NKgBJx017578; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:12 +0300 Message-ID: <462D1A26.6030108@yahoo.gr> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:14 +0300 From: Apatewna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Tournoij References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> In-Reply-To: <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/3151/Mon Apr 23 19:11:26 2007 on takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: apatewna@yahoo.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:42:20 -0000 O/H Martin Tournoij Ýãñáøå: > cd9660 can only mount read-only: > $ mount_cd9660 -o rw /dev/md0 /mnt/md0/ > $ mount | grep cd9660 > $ dev/md0 on /mnt/md0 (cd9660, local, read-only) > > Note that I made a typing error in my previous email, 'nvode' should > be 'vnode' > So what is wrong with: mount -o loop freebsd.iso /mnt/cdrom It opens/mounts the iso as expected. -- RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens _________________________________________ Thanos Rizoulis Electronic Computing Systems Engineer Larissa, Greece FreeBSD/PCBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:44:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F7816A408 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F5A13C457 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FEB1A4DBE; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED568513E9; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:44:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:44:28 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Apatewna Message-ID: <20070423204428.GA99520@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <462D1A26.6030108@yahoo.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462D1A26.6030108@yahoo.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, Martin Tournoij , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:44:29 -0000 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:42:14PM +0300, Apatewna wrote: > O/H Martin Tournoij ??????: > > >cd9660 can only mount read-only: > >$ mount_cd9660 -o rw /dev/md0 /mnt/md0/ > >$ mount | grep cd9660 > >$ dev/md0 on /mnt/md0 (cd9660, local, read-only) > > > >Note that I made a typing error in my previous email, 'nvode' should > >be 'vnode' > > > > So what is wrong with: > mount -o loop freebsd.iso /mnt/cdrom > > It opens/mounts the iso as expected. That is a Linux command? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:45:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E1016A400 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7755313C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) id l3NKjEGm057171; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:45:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:45:14 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:45:30 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 23), Paul Schmehl said: > --On Monday, April 23, 2007 21:18:55 +0200 Martin Tournoij > > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, > >> but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, > >> what command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. > >> Do I need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > > > To mount a iso image: > > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > > > > If you want to mount multiple ISO images then you will have to use > > md1, md2, ect. > > > > Don't forget to unmount and detach the memory disk: > > umount /somewhere > > mdconfig -ud 0 > > > > 0 should be replaced with the appropiate device number > > > > Note that this will only mount standard iso images (iso9660, > > .usually iso or .bin), if you want to mount > > .Nero/Alcohol/PowerISO/ect images > > then you must first convert them, iat is a great tool for doing this: > > Ports collection: sysutils/iat > > Website: http://iat.berlios.de/ > > > Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create > an iso. I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD > first. That works perfectly. If that's all you need, there's an even easier way: "tar tvf mycd.iso", since libarchive understands the iso9660 filesystem format :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:46:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C17216A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA2913C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3NKkcjT068007; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:46:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l3NKkcjT068007 Message-ID: <462D1B2E.8000700@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:46:38 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:46:49 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3151/Mon Apr 23 17:11:26 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:46:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create an > iso. I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD first. > That works perfectly. > You can just use tar(1) to read the contents of an iso nowadays, no need to mount anything: lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar -tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso | head -20 drwx------ 0 0 0 6144 Jan 12 13:47 . dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 6144 Jan 12 07:41 bin dr-xr-xr-x 5 0 0 4096 Jan 12 11:33 boot dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:41 boot/defaults dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 61440 Jan 12 10:55 boot/kernel dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 boot/modules dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 dev dr-xr-xr-x 18 0 0 12288 Jan 12 07:42 etc dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/X11 dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/bluetooth dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/defaults dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/gnats dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/isdn dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mail dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mtree dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/ntp dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/pam.d dr-xr-xr-x 6 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/periodic dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/daily dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/monthly lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar --version bsdtar 1.2.53 - libarchive 1.2.53 Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLRsu8Mjk52CukIwRCKfuAJ9DblEUgpu5eCEsdBWVFX8TgOiY+wCgj0rQ tAlswF71TKS2CoEqs/kkqq0= =2ME7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 20:52:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095EF16A402 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECED913C44C for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651A71A4DBE; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18D9C513E9; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:52:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:52:12 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20070423205212.GA99749@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:52:14 -0000 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:45:14PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 23), Paul Schmehl said: > > --On Monday, April 23, 2007 21:18:55 +0200 Martin Tournoij > > > On Mon 23 Apr 2007 14:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > >> Is it possible to mount an iso image? I'm not referring to a cd, > > >> but a single file that has been created using mkisofs. If so, > > >> what command would you use? mount_cd9660 wants a block device. > > >> Do I need to use some sort of pseudo block device? > > > > > > To mount a iso image: > > > mdconfig -at nvode -f MYIMAGE.ISO > > > mount_cd9960 /dev/md0 /somewhere > > > > > > If you want to mount multiple ISO images then you will have to use > > > md1, md2, ect. > > > > > > Don't forget to unmount and detach the memory disk: > > > umount /somewhere > > > mdconfig -ud 0 > > > > > > 0 should be replaced with the appropiate device number > > > > > > Note that this will only mount standard iso images (iso9660, > > > .usually iso or .bin), if you want to mount > > > .Nero/Alcohol/PowerISO/ect images > > > then you must first convert them, iat is a great tool for doing this: > > > Ports collection: sysutils/iat > > > Website: http://iat.berlios.de/ > > > > > > Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create > > an iso. I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD > > first. That works perfectly. > > If that's all you need, there's an even easier way: "tar tvf mycd.iso", > since libarchive understands the iso9660 filesystem format :) That's a neat trick that is worth publicizing. Maybe the freebsd-tips fortune file? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 18:51:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEDD16A40A; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B1E13C4CC; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NIpJo8071371; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:51:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3NIpJ7H071370; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:51:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:51:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <200704231851.l3NIpJ7H071370@casselton.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jhb@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704231428.26118.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:05:09 +0000 Cc: des@des.no, tinguely@casselton.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au Subject: Re: IBM / FreeBSD Install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:51:26 -0000 > John Baldwin says: > > APIC IDs are not programmable (well, they are on I/O APICs, but not local=20 > APICs). However, I am working on patches to support all valid APIC IDs for= > =20 > both mptable and MADT. Bumping up NLAPICS as a temporary workaround should= > =20 > suffice for now. > > =2D-=20 > John Baldwin IMO, the quick solution also requires that MAX_APICID in [amd64/amd64 | i386/i386]/local_apic.c needs to be changed because lapic_create() checks if the passed apic_id > MAX_APICID. Also in [amd64/amd64 | i386/i386]/mp_machdep.c checks in cpu_add() if the passed apic_id >= MAXCPU. There are a couple other checks in mp_machdep.c before converting to use the cpu_apic_ids[] array. I was curious, and wrote up a patch file with the potential minor changes for -current at http://www.casselton.com/~tinguely/acpicid.patch . I saw one more change needed to use on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. --Mark Tinguely From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:09:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ED916A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from deliver.hol.gr (deliver.hol.gr [62.38.3.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE4413C457 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from auth-smtp.hol.gr (takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net [192.168.20.71]) by deliver.hol.gr (8.12.11/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3NL8upE008563 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified OK); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:08:56 +0300 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (ppp136-047.dsl.hol.gr [89.210.136.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.hol.gr (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3NL8tpA028766; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:08:56 +0300 Message-ID: <462D206A.5030204@yahoo.gr> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:08:58 +0300 From: Apatewna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <462D1A26.6030108@yahoo.gr> <20070423204428.GA99520@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070423204428.GA99520@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/3151/Mon Apr 23 19:11:26 2007 on takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, Martin Tournoij , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: apatewna@yahoo.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:09:00 -0000 O/H Kris Kennaway Ýãñáøå: > That is a Linux command? > > Kris Whoaaa, wasted bandwidth! You are right, I'll archive the correct commands for future reference. -- RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens _________________________________________ Thanos Rizoulis Electronic Computing Systems Engineer Larissa, Greece FreeBSD/PCBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:12:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A250916A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from defout.telus.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5706813C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from priv-edtnaa06.telusplanet.net ([216.232.62.60]) by priv-edtnes86.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070423191949.FKUV15806.priv-edtnes86.telusplanet.net@priv-edtnaa06.telusplanet.net> for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:19:49 -0600 Received: from [192.168.2.156] (s216-232-62-60.bc.hsia.telus.net [216.232.62.60]) by priv-edtnaa06.telusplanet.net (BorderWare MXtreme Infinity Mail Firewall) with ESMTP id DAE8WSMQDH for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:19:48 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:19:52 -0700 From: Andrew Fremantle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Invalid Global DNS name and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:12:39 -0000 Hello, I've got a machine on the local network, with a local DNS name (which is not a valid name in the global DNS). My problem is that I cannot kludge sendmail into behaving nicely and allow the periodic(8) mailings to get through. The machine is named psyche.local domain1.com is a domain that we own, but this machine has nothing to do with it. I want the emails delivered to andrew@domain1.com. This is not an email server in any way - All I care about it getting my periodic output. Here are the settings I'm trying : /etc/mail/psyche.local.mc define(`SMART_HOST', `mail.telus.net') define(`MAIL_HUB',`mail.telus.net') define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',`domain1.com') MASQUERADE_AS(domain1.com) MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(psyche.local psyche) FEATURE(`allmasquerade') FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope') /etc/mail/genericsdomain psyche.local /etc/mail/genericstable root andrew@domain1.com andrew andrew@domain1.com /etc/mail/aliases root : andrew@domain1.com /etc/hosts 192.168.2.10 psyche psyche.local With all the configurations I've tried, emails are rejected by my smarthost with an error like "sender address root@psyche.local invalid; domain does not exist". What I'd like to do is find a way to alter sendmail's perception of my hostname. Ideally, this would only affect sendmail and nothing else. I can't possibly be the only person running such a configuration. How have other people in the list worked past this? - Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:26:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C7D16A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3F13C43E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C525C177 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:26:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:26:26 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4204524346E06B04850B6972@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <462D1B2E.8000700@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <462D1B2E.8000700@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========D16ACD90E677F4BC98BE==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:26:26 -0000 --==========D16ACD90E677F4BC98BE========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Monday, April 23, 2007 21:46:38 +0100 Matthew Seaman=20 wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create an >> iso. I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD first. >> That works perfectly. >> > > You can just use tar(1) to read the contents of an iso nowadays, no > need to mount anything: > > lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar -tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso | head -20 > drwx------ 0 0 0 6144 Jan 12 13:47 . > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 6144 Jan 12 07:41 bin > dr-xr-xr-x 5 0 0 4096 Jan 12 11:33 boot > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:41 boot/defaults > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 61440 Jan 12 10:55 boot/kernel > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 boot/modules > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 dev > dr-xr-xr-x 18 0 0 12288 Jan 12 07:42 etc > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/X11 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/bluetooth > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/defaults > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/gnats > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/isdn > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mail > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mtree > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/ntp > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/pam.d > dr-xr-xr-x 6 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/periodic > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/daily > dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/monthly > > lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar --version > bsdtar 1.2.53 - libarchive 1.2.53 > Good to know. However, I didn't want to just list the contents. I also=20 wanted to view some of the files' contents. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========D16ACD90E677F4BC98BE==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:27:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2FB16A406 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71BF13C4B9 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so36057ugh for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:27:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=m89nivTrEJJ9rSESCpF39Pk0zkb4HcTAfoq/F6kL9RyjgJ5PA1JViy0jI5WyfHSJCy6gdJkw1G3+f4EW9aHFcBRB77XSX371DNaj55Yq87WB0vHbgpYImHPsk82DCzAnA/GsWqmN6aREphEmKuvcDZ0pIu0amZREKBAteUto36o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=edGqsGk1Fhf+K6Xpb9ysBhXMYhzv3WXgAv672JVdbHxeQTJHX5XCmwFrosOkk9TvGJ6D77yniCQPLOfnIQK21MmmLZ0BQkYQZusUBrPSUERxB4UQhPv5A/CK2zcXLhJuhiJCLm7mmHQGNnlDwlkx2BfAAwANkTuttytzJEmQeTA= Received: by 10.82.188.15 with SMTP id l15mr9976349buf.1177363640572; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.162.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20704231427p6cd8a592rc520bb14ce2c68d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:27:20 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 244255984bee6924 Subject: setting ENV VARs in make.conf/ports.conf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:27:22 -0000 hi, i've installed FreeBSD v6.2-RELEASE, plus 'portconf' & 'ccache' from ports. i've setup, /etc/make.conf ----------------------------- PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 USE_OPENSSL_PORT=true OPENSSLBASE=/usr/local USE_OPENSSH_PORT=true WITHOUT_X11=yes CPUTYPE?=pentium-mmx CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe ## Begin portconf settings ## Do not touch these lines .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports*) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/portconf) _PORTCONF!=/usr/local/libexec/portconf .for i in ${_PORTCONF:S/|/ /g} ${i:S/%/ /g} .endfor .endif ## End portconf settings .if !defined(NOCCACHE) CC=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc CXX=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/c++ CPP=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cpp .endif ----------------------------- so that i can turn OFF use of ccache for individual ports. i find that different ports 'respond' only to specific ways of setting the NOCCACHE var. e.g., in, cat /usr/local/etc/ports.conf ----------------------------- *:\ CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -s -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer | \ CXXFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -s -frename-registers databases/sqlite3-threads:NOCCACHE=true | \ WITHOUT_DEBUG=true|WITH_DOCS=true|WITH_FTS1=true|WITH_TCLWRAPPER=true|BATCH=Yes sysutils/pflogx:MAKE_ENV= NOCCACHE=true | \ WITH_EXPAT=true|BATCH=Yes ----------------------------- pflogx and sqlite3 require DIFFERENT specifications of NOCCACHE ... swapping formate, e.g., causes the conditional ".if !defined(NOCCACHE)" to fail; meaning, that the CC/CXX/CPP defs pointing to ccahce/* are oncorrectly used. is this expected/normal? i would've expected the same method of defining ENV VAR knobs ... is there a _consistent_ way of turning off NOCCACHE via the ports.conf? thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:28:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF8916A510 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4124213C469 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 7907 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2007 21:28:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=U46EJnGtyKXceefLZuNt4fdIQtKQW0aTzD6NFE25Wnr2GPVfckuT4fLsvRVSeLo1maNIOf42Vi+33uFAlOwAoaSDEXuW22Q08PIRdsWJpPNN77M9VfhYudFCqmCrG/cmpP5ziuMxPHVQBj2Vu+Kq6xkqOhCTJeKfzrKq31rtj14=; X-YMail-OSG: Ql0nIhUVM1ko3jJEMEuGEg75.1SxspqYPOrEJLCOq87FUVcAP6TpXwbC9qeA98RxRsI2HJ966yxMpgaLjPC5lySq682.9KGYoOeA Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:07 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:07 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: youshi10@u.washington.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <394807.7750.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:28:08 -0000 Thanks, Garrett. Ran "fsck -y /usr" ***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN ***** ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** Upon reboot, all is well EXCEPT for the following 2 warnings: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mounting local file systems: WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted WARNING: /sambavol was not properly dismounted --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Both /var and /sambavol are mounted (ufs, local, soft-updates). Rebooted again, and did not get these warnings. Thanks! youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, L Goodwin wrote: [...] > I assume I'll have to run fsck on /usr, but have 2 questions: > 1) Is this problem caused by yesterday's accidental power-off? Yes, most likely. > 2) What prompts should I expect from fsck, and how should I reply to each in order to resolve this problem correctly? Just say yes to all the prompts, but backup any important data first. Or if you're afraid of any issues, reinstall. If this problem persists (near every time you reboot), it's time to get a new drive because it got toasted during a write phase. I wouldn't say that though until you install from scratch though and verify that that is or is not the case. -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:30:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBAB16A408 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FDE313C46E for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com ([71.141.72.46]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:20:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:26:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill-S X-X-Sender: bill@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com To: Apatewna In-Reply-To: <462D206A.5030204@yahoo.gr> Message-ID: <20070423142118.E78318@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <20070423203640.21c494c7@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070423194410.GA50136@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <462D1A26.6030108@yahoo.gr> <20070423204428.GA99520@xor.obsecurity.org> <462D206A.5030204@yahoo.gr> System-ID: [en] (FreeBSD-6.2; i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1892950590-1177363613=:78318" Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, Martin Tournoij , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? (simplest way?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:58 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1892950590-1177363613=:78318 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE At Tue, 24 Apr 2007 it looks like Apatewna composed: > O/H Kris Kennaway =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5: > >> That is a Linux command? >>=20 >> Kris > > Whoaaa, wasted bandwidth! You are right, I'll archive the correct command= s=20 > for future reference. > Being on both systems alot, one wishes they had a "port" for that "module" whereas one could just type the shortest command. I see Linux ports everywhere else in FreeBSD-6.2, what's one more right? (giggle) ################################################ [bill@corten11-bsd ~]$ uname -r 6.2-RELEASE [bill@corten11-bsd ~]$ find /usr/ports/ -iname "*linux*" -print | wc -l 363 ################################################ --=20 Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com ~ "Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity." (Dennis Ritchie) --0-1892950590-1177363613=:78318-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:50:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB6416A404 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874BD13C457 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3NLnjSO033623; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:49:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070423163232.025e4570@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:48:53 -0500 To: Andrew Fremantle , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> References: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Invalid Global DNS name and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:50:23 -0000 At 02:19 PM 4/23/2007, Andrew Fremantle wrote: >Hello, > >I've got a machine on the local network, with a local DNS name (which is >not a valid name in the global DNS). > >My problem is that I cannot kludge sendmail into behaving nicely and allow >the periodic(8) mailings to get through. > >The machine is named psyche.local >domain1.com is a domain that we own, but this machine has nothing to do >with it. I want the emails delivered to andrew@domain1.com. This is not an >email server in any way - All I care about it getting my periodic output. > >Here are the settings I'm trying : > >/etc/mail/psyche.local.mc >define(`SMART_HOST', `mail.telus.net') >define(`MAIL_HUB',`mail.telus.net') > >define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',`domain1.com') > >MASQUERADE_AS(domain1.com) >MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(psyche.local psyche) >FEATURE(`allmasquerade') >FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope') > >/etc/mail/genericsdomain >psyche.local > >/etc/mail/genericstable >root andrew@domain1.com >andrew andrew@domain1.com > >/etc/mail/aliases >root : andrew@domain1.com > >/etc/hosts >192.168.2.10 psyche psyche.local > >With all the configurations I've tried, emails are rejected by my >smarthost with an error like "sender address root@psyche.local invalid; >domain does not exist". > >What I'd like to do is find a way to alter sendmail's perception of my >hostname. Ideally, this would only affect sendmail and nothing else. > >I can't possibly be the only person running such a configuration. How have >other people in the list worked past this? You don't need to go to such efforts. The stock sendmail mc file should do fine with just a couple modifications. The details are here: http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.22 Check your name resolution order in /etc/nsswitch.conf that you check files first. modify /etc/hosts 192.168.2.10 psyche psyche.local. so it is a fully qualified domain name. You can forward all mail in /etc/mail/virtualusertable with a line such as: @psyche.local andrew@domain1.com Be sure to recompile your virtualusertable.db -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 21:51:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21D016A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC1613C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A86051946 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:51:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:51:06 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423225106.63adb37a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:51:11 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:23:16 -0700 (PDT) L Goodwin wrote: > Last night, I was starting to install Samba3, but wrong FreeBSD disc > (2) in the CD-ROM drive (first package to install on disc 1). After > placing the right disc in the drive, I accidentally pushed the POWER > button instead of the CD-ROM door open/close button and turned the > computer off. In my defense, the power button is right next to it AND > has a hair trigger. :-( This shouldn't be a problem unless your pc is very old (8 years or so), and it's a real power switch. On modern PCs the power switch is just a low-voltage control line. A light touch is a signal to the OS to shutdown cleanly - you have to hold the button down for several seconds to force it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 22:25:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3798716A407 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F3B13C4BC for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay6.apple.com (a17-128-113-36.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3NMP0pC022987; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 8CB5910B43; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807124-a2ca1bb000000872-01-462d323c690e Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 79CC210097; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:25:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> References: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:24:59 -0700 To: Andrew Fremantle X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invalid Global DNS name and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:25:01 -0000 On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Andrew Fremantle wrote: > With all the configurations I've tried, emails are rejected by my > smarthost with an error like "sender address root@psyche.local > invalid; domain does not exist". > > What I'd like to do is find a way to alter sendmail's perception of > my hostname. Ideally, this would only affect sendmail and nothing > else. The reason emails from root are being exposed using the real hostname is because of this: # class E: names that should be exposed as from this host, even if we masquerade # class L: names that should be delivered locally, even if we have a relay # class M: domains that should be converted to $M # class N: domains that should not be converted to $M #CL root C{E}root ...in sendmail.cf. Remove root from this C{E} line and you should be all set. However, if you want to explicitly set your hostname in sendmail, change this: # my official domain name # ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically determine your domain #Dj$w.Foo.CO ...to: Djmyhost.example.com ...or whatever you like. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 22:28:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97B216A401 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F4A313C448 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 45973 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2007 22:28:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=FjLI43NdsMZkXnUDGm/u/z8AKByCAp1bTwOsOmtcW2fr0h9+UdPymGRJcfDvuvmbIDOz9iSnn7lf16jO6AkrKm8/Trx+bQWC8fzyXzJTt1FDAIE6SGkJ/+ZdKxRIMtXHV6a+77jC9sAr4m8X1JxYomh9dHNFoX2b/EuTmN9ikVY=; X-YMail-OSG: kCj14ZsVM1mPjo.W9DSOSYzi8HeRgjkOnsF7I9NIBF0DKrDYfTiQnCqLQ5A0.DuXrvNxUxwTNetjwdl3s5CeJMGuoL771SBmxO_K Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:28:00 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:28:00 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070423225106.63adb37a@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <979088.45268.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:28:02 -0000 Yes, it's a hardware switch and a very bad design. It's flush with the surface of the faceplate and is right next to the CD-ROM button. Also sensitive to the lightest touch. Replacement would require buying a new case (not in budget). Think I'll make a clear plexi "failsafe" cover. Reminds me of the times my toddler son found the big red toggle switch on the side of my IBM RT-PC workstation within seconds of sitting in my chair... RW wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:23:16 -0700 (PDT) L Goodwin wrote: > Last night, I was starting to install Samba3, but wrong FreeBSD disc > (2) in the CD-ROM drive (first package to install on disc 1). After > placing the right disc in the drive, I accidentally pushed the POWER > button instead of the CD-ROM door open/close button and turned the > computer off. In my defense, the power button is right next to it AND > has a hair trigger. :-( This shouldn't be a problem unless your pc is very old (8 years or so), and it's a real power switch. On modern PCs the power switch is just a low-voltage control line. A light touch is a signal to the OS to shutdown cleanly - you have to hold the button down for several seconds to force it. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 22:37:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CAA16A403 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcasey@debtresolve.com) Received: from debtresolve.com (ip175-18.wp-ny-us.debtresolve.com [66.236.175.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCD613C483 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcasey@debtresolve.com) Received: from dummy.name; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: <462D26B4.4040807@debtresolve.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:35:48 -0400 From: Dan Casey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NFS without rpcbind? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:37:44 -0000 It was my understanding that NFS worked off of RPC. I accidently stumbled upon some redhat docs that said you use TCP based NFS which will not require rpc? I think this is an NFSv4 feature, but I'm not sure. I would like to achieve this using FreeBSD 6.2. My goal that I'm trying to accomplish is to get nfs to work in an environment where all traffic is denied by default. Using rpcbind doesn't work well with that type of setup. I tried the following nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" nfs_server_flags="-t -n 4 -h 10.a.b.c" This spawned rpcbind which I didn't want. Does anyone know how to do a tcp only nfs implimentation? -dc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 23:07:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED9E16A408 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: from mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (carpetsmoker.xs4all.nl [82.93.23.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6015813C459 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: by mail.rwxrwxrwx.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 510A96D461; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:06:03 +0200 From: Martin Tournoij To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070423230602.GA50915@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <462D1B2E.8000700@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4204524346E06B04850B6972@utd59514.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4204524346E06B04850B6972@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:07:02 -0000 On Mon 23 Apr 2007 16:04, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Monday, April 23, 2007 21:46:38 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA256 > > > >Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > >>Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wasn't trying to create an > >>iso. I wanted to see what was inside one without burning a CD first. > >>That works perfectly. > >> > > > >You can just use tar(1) to read the contents of an iso nowadays, no > >need to mount anything: > > > >lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar -tvf 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso | head -20 > >drwx------ 0 0 0 6144 Jan 12 13:47 . > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 6144 Jan 12 07:41 bin > >dr-xr-xr-x 5 0 0 4096 Jan 12 11:33 boot > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:41 boot/defaults > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 61440 Jan 12 10:55 boot/kernel > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 boot/modules > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 dev > >dr-xr-xr-x 18 0 0 12288 Jan 12 07:42 etc > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/X11 > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/bluetooth > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/defaults > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/gnats > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/isdn > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mail > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/mtree > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/ntp > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/pam.d > >dr-xr-xr-x 6 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:38 etc/periodic > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 4096 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/daily > >dr-xr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 12 07:42 etc/periodic/monthly > > > >lack-of-gravitas:~/tmp:% tar --version > >bsdtar 1.2.53 - libarchive 1.2.53 > > > Good to know. However, I didn't want to just list the contents. I also wanted to view some of the files' contents. Very useful hint! Thank you! The tar manpage makes no mention of this by the way, it should be updated... You can also extract stuff (although mounting is probably faster in most situations) tar xf Unreal\ Tournament.iso -C /usr/local/share/linux-ut/ --Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:09:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6558816A406 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5084813C45D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:07:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 4708 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 00:01:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=HdZm/qlSBpw7nOGybdVZPMEhTm0GQ7ICz1MWQgCJG9b2132aAr0cLkTRc9D8FGe97k5DZ+TipfNLarMvWz6K3OndnQp6Hdgn7X+8oNHB1ZM+MDxP7nA3XrP7+vkubRp0HXve9BGK+zFCEA+LNUXIJ3uEHTYKXzeob4j4CVicOBs=; X-YMail-OSG: a.UpFaEVM1nSd1MFUkKWLAULHPtd2rTcl1ecAVJGKAHD6VyaelLDG2DTBHhga5IJkwIjdsfZ8Es_Mr4_S2yQE4asnqtcdIdGGWI- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:01:17 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:09:21 -0000 I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup Basics", but have some questions: Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the following formats: a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer FreeBSD? Handbook says dump is the only way to go. Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the answer is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) backup vs. a Windows-based one? Please add to my list of pros and cons: Windows Backup: PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. FreeBSD Backup: PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? These are some of my other considerations: 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several backups to same disc/tape preferred. 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a modest rate. 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not too spendy). 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" space. 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except if swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive that I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't have room for it. 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array is expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than implement a two-tiered backup process. Thanks! --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:20:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70EE16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59EE13C465 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2126715ana for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PZmDDmUXq6zZtfQibDGEZcZcqZis1RW5i2MYzOR6vvjv9B7IEBPyoMN6kv9c8JjE6RvUcXTBqoIkAEJ51y6BZD0SlmU77ltS1H8DIJ7EEWwDZCdkENbQTUpto6lgg/3Lzdu7bofAORoq5dGIIqDU7mhkpYEyugvVKgMqGjDI6mg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BWUU8WHtB3JZ72glP+7UazYnbiFYmTpXX8JpqvCQpHpETj8JBDUPojEyr5NmFfP8FCO0TeG/wLq2mhOmEAmZJKiC/aBbmkP4OWgCVxMNypSLV5/3pe0yiwGrqoWp4SqKwcSSiFAnJ0OmFxZz5Y+u+H4ny14Ee5UwkozLr+ZVG3I= Received: by 10.100.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr4162400and.1177374030916; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.41.13 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:20:30 +0800 From: "Daniel Marsh" To: "L Goodwin" In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:32 -0000 On 4/24/07, L Goodwin wrote: > > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista > Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system recovery > disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup > Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known > issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the following > formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) > > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer > FreeBSD? > Handbook says dump is the only way to go. > > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on the > Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the answer is YES, > what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) backup vs. a > Windows-based one? > Please add to my list of pros and cons: > > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being > fixed? > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. > > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? > > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive > solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change discs/tapes), so a > solution that permits storing several backups to same disc/tape preferred. > > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a modest > rate. > > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not too > spendy). > > 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" space. > > 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except if > swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > > 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive that > I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't have room for > it. > > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly or > ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array is > expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily backups. > Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than implement a two-tiered > backup process. > > Thanks! > Hey, We had a similar issue trying to figure out what type of media to backup to... Tapes are great when they work. You need to store them properly, make sure the tapes aren't old and worn either. I'd only do once off, for archiving purposes, backups to DVD. We tried to try a 16 tape LTO2 autoloader, but after three dead on arrivals we scrapped that idea. We use Bacula (it's open source and in the ports) to backup to hard drive mirrors, I think it's bloody wonderful in comparison to some of the windows based tape software thats out there. I'd use bacula to either do a backup to hard drive and use "virtual media" that gets rotated, or buy a new set of tapes and maybe a new tape drive and have bacula manage that... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:20:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284D616A40D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1499413C480 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3O0K88F034992; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:20:08 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070423191407.02611260@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:19:15 -0500 To: L Goodwin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:20:58 -0000 At 07:01 PM 4/23/2007, L Goodwin wrote: >I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file >server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 >Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista >Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system >recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. > >This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup >Basics", but have some questions: > >Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known >issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the >following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) > >Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer FreeBSD? >Handbook says dump is the only way to go. > >Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on the >Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the answer is YES, >what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) backup vs. a >Windows-based one? >Please add to my list of pros and cons: > >Windows Backup: >PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? >CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. > >FreeBSD Backup: >PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). >CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? > >These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive > solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change discs/tapes), so > a solution that permits storing several backups to same disc/tape preferred. > >2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data >occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a modest >rate. > >3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not too >spendy). > >4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" space. > >5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except if >swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > >6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive that >I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't have room for it. > >7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly or >ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array is >expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily backups. >Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than implement a >two-tiered backup process. > >Thanks! > You already have RAID 1 so you need more of an offline, removable media solution. You need to choose between CD, DVD, or tape. That is a cost and capacity issue, you need to do some price comparisons and choose what fits your budget. You can backup and restore all files UNIX and Samba/windows from the FreeBSD but not vice-versa. You would do well to setup some automated task, as in a cron job to do the backups. You will need a human to change whatever media you choose, and move it off-site occasionally too. For FreeBSD, be sure to backup /etc /usr/local/etc. You can use dump/restore, tar, pax, cpio, or one of the ports such as bacula. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:25:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E13716A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from maserati.rac.com.au (maserati.rac.com.au [61.88.37.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D902813C45B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Russell.Wood@rac.com.au) Received: from mazda.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.50]) by audi.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:25:06 +0800 Received: from mercury.rac.com.au ([172.16.5.42]) by mazda.rac.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:25:06 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:25:06 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers Thread-Index: AceGBoPJokx0ENu2QSGZOZqUY0NC+wAAEQyA References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> From: "Wood, Russell" Importance: normal Priority: normal To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2007 00:25:06.0173 (UTC) FILETIME=[021D82D0:01C78607] X-imss-version: 2.046 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scanInfo: M:P L:E SM:0 X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:0 TS:0.0000 TC:00 TRN:0 TV:3.6.1039(15134.001) X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.1500 0.1500) Subject: RE: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:25:09 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Marsh > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2007 8:21 AM > To: L Goodwin > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers >=20 > On 4/24/07, L Goodwin wrote: > > > > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista > > Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system > recovery > > disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. I dump (man dump) my array to a spare 250GB disk within my server. - Russell DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the = intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and = delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the = contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the = author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is = clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for = viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect = damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:41:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09216A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0521813C43E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3O06Eml019704; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id ED2CA29C002; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:06:13 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-a2dddbb0000013cb-fe-462d49f5f18b Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id D221A30400B; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:06:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <462D45DC.70508@skyhawk.ca> References: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> <462D45DC.70508@skyhawk.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <91707B8C-1C43-40BF-B944-6F3E377680A0@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:06:13 -0700 To: Andrew Fremantle X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Invalid Global DNS name and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:41:22 -0000 On Apr 23, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Andrew Fremantle wrote: > Are you aware of any way of doing this stuff in the .mc file? > Should the .cf ever be remade, these changes would be blown away.... Right-- seems to be for the .mc file (from /usr/share/sendmail/cf/ README): > There are always users that need to be "exposed" -- that is, their > internal site name should be displayed instead of the masquerade name. > Root is an example (which has been "exposed" by default prior to > 8.10). > You can add users to this list using > > EXPOSED_USER(`usernames') ...and to change hostname use: define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `hostname.example.com') -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 00:43:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5EA16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB4513C45B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2007 20:43:51 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFJ44798; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2007 20:43:45 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17965.21187.874053.371352@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:43:47 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <644792.46664.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:43:54 -0000 L Goodwin writes: > I accidentally pushed the POWER button instead of the CD-ROM door > open/close button and turned the computer off. In my defense, the > power button is right next to it AND has a hair trigger. :-( > > I turned the computer back on, and FreeBSD booted with no > complaints, so I assumed all was well. That was your second error. As I learned it: On anything other than a clean shutdown, you will need to fsck everything that was mounted at the time of the crash. (Remember to get the stuff that's "noauto" in fstab.) Run fsck on each partitions. Repeat until it reports no errors. (Not "MARKED CLEAN" but not errors. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 01:07:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A5F16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3440013C46C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 97389 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 01:07:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=pfughIqOzZxGL8D3E0KVKUf6RHAKByfWzyi8frq88BxCuQQpj4VVyARucFXSPpn0JGgRhn71W4qsW9FJ1EbLp4U5166EL6am6B785Bp7aJuPGgRRgkWeQZHYLNo9A5INq+FBcducU1SCdPXPIKNR92FWT870cKcck616V5YywxY=; X-YMail-OSG: c4eKAq8VM1kI3sg8v0KFMQXDqCJQSouhGA8mtyeoiti2iVEy0xqmFuXtnr_mYq1xa0oniD9wMwJv6j1cx.Gf4SG1ovUvofYNaGew Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:07:50 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:07:50 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Zhang Weiwu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <462B39DB.8@realss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <566366.97155.qm@web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:07:51 -0000 I co-developed a UNIX-based multi-product bug tracking system using an RDBMS (Informix, ISQL, Perform and ACE), bourne shell scripts, cron, and UNIX Mail. This solution also worked on PC clients (we used Reflection-X, but I'd recommend XWin32). Our design was selected over a PC-only solution that another faction was pushing (we had more UNIX clients than PC's at that time). It had some pretty sophisticated features for the time (some carried over from a previous version), including: Automated email notifications and summaries designed to support our software development methodology. Retrieve and display SCCS deltas to display code changed for a bug fix. Ability to store bug regression tests (manual and automated) in several different languages, and automatically generate automated regression tests based on several different criteria, including Product, Platform, Version Range, and Programming Language. This one was my baby (brag). I've also rewritten HPUX makefiles in bsh to permit execution on multiple UNIX platforms (HPUX make has some unique features not found in make on other UNIX platforms). Based on the above experience, I'd recommend shell scripts, though this will likely generate some opposition. In any case, if your system only needs to run on one platform, I'd use built-in tools. Since then, I've played around with using perl for CGI scripting (hated it), then PHP, which I love for this purpose. Zhang Weiwu wrote: Dear list This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar with javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions and features of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being frustrated for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like mantis or bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either start from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I used for years. 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her rather than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who is starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please let me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software like G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. 2. If I start my own, I think I'll be using a console widget library (ncurse? because it's famous), an SQL database (no problem) and a programming language. I never developed console application before, so here asking for suggestions on what programming language to choose. Non of my known language php/javascript/awk are suitable so I guess I have to learn a new language anyway. The language better be easy to learn and work with (C++ is out), not necessarily have complicated calculation feature (like the graphical report mantis makes), not necessarily OOP. I have perl and tcl in my head now, can you make some recommendations? Thanks! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 01:09:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2586016A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0A6B13C45D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 519 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 01:09:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fu9R46Ep6RFqOrdRQyzbXdZCgOc+ppk2l48DN7yXQ/o+mfJVGh9KvnqvD52AfHn8A4vog8mAeJO//SV+tKeAwVzMSbN1IduFP2MV+6Puoa9ayxDi1cJM26XtuZGKCvULYXwlmS+vh3O2sHcmsoxUU56kWWUdk49FTSsqbDdqOI8=; X-YMail-OSG: FrB8J9wVM1l6FRn7bsEbpyB6YwMC5UAoPO4EB9wn.2W3fHBOCF_wSLBykdP_Fxuhnw-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:09:19 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:09:19 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <17965.21187.874053.371352@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <351735.99369.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:09:20 -0000 Thanks, Robert. Robert Huff wrote: L Goodwin writes: > I accidentally pushed the POWER button instead of the CD-ROM door > open/close button and turned the computer off. In my defense, the > power button is right next to it AND has a hair trigger. :-( > > I turned the computer back on, and FreeBSD booted with no > complaints, so I assumed all was well. That was your second error. As I learned it: On anything other than a clean shutdown, you will need to fsck everything that was mounted at the time of the crash. (Remember to get the stuff that's "noauto" in fstab.) Run fsck on each partitions. Repeat until it reports no errors. (Not "MARKED CLEAN" but not errors. Robert Huff _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 01:42:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8680516A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6784013C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (hymn03.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.169]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3O1gAEO007045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:11 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3O1gAnS011990; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:10 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn03.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:10 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:10 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20704231427p6cd8a592rc520bb14ce2c68d7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.23.183034 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: schneecrash+freebsd@gmail.com Subject: Re: setting ENV VARs in make.conf/ports.conf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:42:11 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > hi, > > i've installed FreeBSD v6.2-RELEASE, plus 'portconf' & 'ccache' from ports. > > i've setup, [..] > is there a _consistent_ way of turning off NOCCACHE via the ports.conf? > > thanks! I'd direct this question to the ports@ mailing list. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 02:22:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCF016A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DF713C43E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so72793ugh for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Z3LFU+DiwL+I7oKhLjUqBx9R16Z4Fe4xcX7FflktY9LS3yFth5o81/xfqL+eoGVYPAOBM1v51UfXCBkjR+CaeI/7TnABnYZ1IAEu/BY2KsTShqYHfW9LZ/Wh+u1L0DmW82L9Z+Wf3EKF/6pSNdDFNZ5U83BZddAOPA9ieyJ7CkM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Tr4L4bFjwoydqDJDdowPWHXKWUJwxZhbPSAlkHBw+9B6M4UuVkNY90SmvnWAMlJ+LsrNddL+ln6myhTAxQabe4xw9dk1vW7jllyiPAitm49zshBBs9p25rBl+kt4zUHLhpEAMse4dQbmESCM1KY2IgxQb3vOEgx0j/bTiuq+byw= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr10115190bud.1177381363477; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.162.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20704231922x66a8be7bn41cc42ca8f1ad2b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:22:43 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: "youshi10@u.washington.edu" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70f41ba20704231427p6cd8a592rc520bb14ce2c68d7@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a9a4581f7eedb2de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting ENV VARs in make.conf/ports.conf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:22:45 -0000 > I'd direct this question to the ports@ mailing list. fair enough. thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 02:37:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC5A16A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2752913C457 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550E23B8032; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:37:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27002-10; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:37:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (154.18.61.59.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.61.18.154]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523FD3B8030; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:37:55 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: L Goodwin In-Reply-To: <566366.97155.qm@web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <566366.97155.qm@web58105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:34:09 +0800 Message-Id: <1177382049.7382.1.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:37:50 -0000 If this is a product you developed long time ago, and especially if it's no longer used or the old company quit this business, it's probably possible to ask them if they can opensource the old product, and someone may come up and make it better? P.S. I was thinking of an ncurse-style interface, so can shell script do this? I thought shell tools like dialog wasn't powerful enough to support an user interface required by a bug tracker. On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 18:07 -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I co-developed a UNIX-based multi-product bug tracking system using an > RDBMS (Informix, ISQL, Perform and ACE), bourne shell scripts, cron, > and UNIX Mail. This solution also worked on PC clients (we used > Reflection-X, but I'd recommend XWin32). Our design was selected over > a PC-only solution that another faction was pushing (we had more UNIX > clients than PC's at that time). > > It had some pretty sophisticated features for the time (some carried > over from a previous version), including: > > Automated email notifications and summaries designed to support our > software development methodology. > > Retrieve and display SCCS deltas to display code changed for a bug > fix. > > Ability to store bug regression tests (manual and automated) in > several different languages, and automatically generate automated > regression tests based on several different criteria, including > Product, Platform, Version Range, and Programming Language. This one > was my baby (brag). > > I've also rewritten HPUX makefiles in bsh to permit execution on > multiple UNIX platforms (HPUX make has some unique features not found > in make on other UNIX platforms). > > Based on the above experience, I'd recommend shell scripts, though > this will likely generate some opposition. In any case, if your system > only needs to run on one platform, I'd use built-in tools. > > Since then, I've played around with using perl for CGI scripting > (hated it), then PHP, which I love for this purpose. > > Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Dear list > > This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar > with > javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions > and features > of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being > frustrated > for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like > mantis or > bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either > start > from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I > used for years. > > 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her > rather > than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who > is > starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please > let > me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is > working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software > like > G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. > 2. If I start my own, I think I'll be using a console widget > library > (ncurse? because it's famous), an SQL database (no problem) > and a > programming language. I never developed console application > before, so here asking for suggestions on what programming > language to choose. Non of my known language > php/javascript/awk > are suitable so I guess I have to learn a new language anyway. > The > language better be easy to learn and work with (C++ is out), > not > necessarily have complicated calculation feature (like the > graphical report mantis makes), not necessarily OOP. I have > perl > and tcl in my head now, can you make some recommendations? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. -- Zhang Weiwu Real Softservice http://www.realss.com +86 592 2091112 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 04:11:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF77016A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FED13C458 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:11:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3O4Aqss022490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:10:52 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3O4Ap5j003924; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:10:51 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:10:51 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704240410.l3O4Ap5j003924@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd@dfwlp.com In-reply-to: <200704230655.20662.freebsd@dfwlp.com> (message from Jonathan Horne on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:55:20 -0500) References: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200704230655.20662.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe NIC for FreeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:11:05 -0000 Hi, > any particular reason why youre note going with 6.2? i have 6.2 running on > several DL G4's and G5's (couple ML's in there too), and they all have no > trouble with the broadcom nics. also, both my laptop and desktop have the > broadcoms as well, and again, they work very nicely... in 6.2. only reasons are: - 5.5 is the declared legacy version of FreeBSD, for a remote server, I tend to be conservative in my choices; - I never used version 6 yet, I prefer using something I am familiar with :) - when I was away trying to install the machine, downloading FreeBSD 6.2 was not possible, while buying a card could have been possible (if any was available on the market there). I'll look at version 6.2. Thanks, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 04:38:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B564F16A406 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E8A13C469 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3O4cTIf027504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:38:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3O4cSur004885; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:38:28 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:38:28 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704240438.l3O4cSur004885@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: xrayv19@yahoo.com In-reply-to: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> (message from L Goodwin on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT)) References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:38:32 -0000 > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows > Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create > system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows > client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup > Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known > issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the > following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) For years I have been using Amanda (in the ports) to backup any servers, including Samba server, as well as some disks from PC under Windows, saving the data on a SLR 100 (Tandberg) tape. Tape dirve is expensive (and maybe out of production), tapes are not cheap, but they are reliable. Now days I would choose LTO technology I beleive. At any cost I would avoid any kind of DAT format: it acheives the capacity by high compression of the data on the tape and so the reliability is really an issue, plus the rotating head wears the tape much uch faster than any linear reccording technology. > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer > FreeBSD? Handbook says dump is the only way to go. I never looked at that part. I am using tar because it is a very universal format: the next server could be a Linux box, the tapes would still be readable, compared to dump that tend to be specific for each operating system. > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on > the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the > answer is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file > only) backup vs. a Windows-based one? Please add to my list of pros > and cons: Of course it is possible: any file that the Windows machine can access through the network, it could back-it up. > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. > > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? Except if your tape drive is dead, fixing the server is really a matter of a couple of hours: at least fixing the server enough so you can restore something from a backup tape. I once was even able to restore something from booting the server from the recovery boot... I would consider it a highly bad luck that the server is dead and at the very same time you need to do a restore. > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a > 1) multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups > 1) (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several > 1) backups to same disc/tape preferred. Tape is expensive. My future choice, when I have to replace the existing backup server is virtual tapes on some big hard disk (500GB SATA type of disk). Only thing to be found is the way to swap the hard drives. > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > 2) occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at > 2) a modest rate. Then install one disk and use some kind of virtual tapes on it. But that would not allow off site storage unless your disk can be moved. According the size of the data, you may consider USB connection. > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not > 3) too spendy). > > 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" > 4) space. > > 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except > 5) if swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > > 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive > 6) that I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't > 6) have room for it. > > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or > 7) monthly or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The > 7) RAID 1 array is expected to provide some degree of protection in > 7) leieu of daily backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, > 7) rather than implement a two-tiered backup process. RAID 1 will not protect you against accidentally erasing a file. And even though you informed your customer that the back-up is there just in case of major system crash and does not cover the user mistakes, they will come back to you asking to restore a file that they deleted (Samba does not offer recycle-bin). So you can still think about daily incremental back-up. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 04:40:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AD716A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77A613C487 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 00:40:31 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFK02856; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 00:40:29 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17965.35390.760226.221870@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:40:30 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:40:32 -0000 L Goodwin writes: > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a > multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups > (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several > backups to same disc/tape preferred. > > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a > modest rate. Weird as it sounds to be saying this ... 1 Gbyte is _nothing_. Buy an external hard drive that connects via USB 2.0. (100 Gbyte would last three months.) Practical transfer speed of, say, 15 Mbytes/sec means a dump will take less than 15 minutes. As for inter-OS software operability - no idea. Robert huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 04:57:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1029916A417 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: from creto.quietwind.net (creto.quietwind.net [71.39.149.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED5C13C4CC for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: from creto.quietwind.net (localhost.quietwind.net [127.0.0.1]) by creto.quietwind.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3O4vsDe011427; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:57:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: (from chrisk@localhost) by creto.quietwind.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l3O4vrCu011426; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:57:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) X-Authentication-Warning: creto.quietwind.net: chrisk set sender to chriskot@quietwind.net using -f From: Chris Kottaridis To: L Goodwin In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:57:52 -0600 Message-Id: <1177390672.677.48.camel@creto.quietwind.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chriskot@quietwind.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:57:58 -0000 My decade old Loader Express with ten 40 GB tapes finally died a couple of months ago. So, I just switched over to a different style. I don't know how applicable it is to your situation. I have used amanda for years to manage tape drives. In the latest version they support backup to hard disk. They have a disk-chg script that acts like it's changing a tape in a tape changer when really it's just pointing at a different directory on the disk. It ends up writing what otherwise would be on a tape to a file in that directory. But, it looks like a tape to amanda. Since tapes get expensive and disks are relatively cheap I went out and bought a 300 GB USB disk drive for about $90.00. Right now I have amanda configured to back things up onto 6 "virtual tapes" each of about 40GB, which matches the tape capacities I was using. The virtual tapes exist on the 300 MB USB disk drive. That all seems to be working. So, I am backing up 5 days a week onto a backup cycle of 6 tapes. I could mount and unmount the USB disk before and after the backups to make them a little more inaccessible when not performing a backup, but at the moment I don't. I also have an unused 8 port Power control unit that can be controlled by network or serial port. So, eventually I plan on connecting the USB disk drive to this power control unit and then modifying the disk-chg script to turn on the power to the USB disk and then mount it. Once the backup is done I'll unmount the disk drive and turn the power to the USB disk drive off via the APC control. So, my backup device will only be on-line during the backup itself. I can grow this by adding more external USB devices and modifying the disk-chg script to turn on the correct USB drive and mount it so I can have up to 8 USB devices, assuming I use a 4 port USB adaptor since the hardware only has 2 USB ports. I can add disks depending on how far back I want to save data. Each 300 GB should be able to handle a weeks worth of data at the current capacities. Anyway, to just get the 1 week depth was an ~$90.00 solution for me, the best I could find for a refurbished tape drive for my old tape changer was ~$600.00, and I can store things in the way I have been used to for that last decade, using amanda. Since I have a spare APC controller around I can expand on this at ~ $90.00 per week of backup desired, once I've provided a little software glue. Just a thought. Thanks Chris Kottaridis (chriskot@quietwind.net) ======================================================================= On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:01 -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) > > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer FreeBSD? > Handbook says dump is the only way to go. > > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the answer is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) backup vs. a Windows-based one? > Please add to my list of pros and cons: > > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. > > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? > > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several backups to same disc/tape preferred. > > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a modest rate. > > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not too spendy). > > 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" space. > > 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except if swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > > 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive that I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't have room for it. > > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array is expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than implement a two-tiered backup process. > > Thanks! > > > --------------------------------- > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 05:08:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8779716A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E485F13C458 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3O58KB4032547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:20 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3O58JmQ005942; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:19 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:19 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704240508.l3O58JmQ005942@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: chriskot@quietwind.net In-reply-to: <1177390672.677.48.camel@creto.quietwind.net> (message from Chris Kottaridis on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:57:52 -0600) References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1177390672.677.48.camel@creto.quietwind.net> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:08:22 -0000 > Since tapes get expensive and disks are relatively cheap I went out and > bought a 300 GB USB disk drive for about $90.00. Right now I have amanda > configured to back things up onto 6 "virtual tapes" each of about 40GB, USB is a nice and cheap solution, as long as you don't have too much data to back-up every time. If you have 40GB per day, that would take 10 hours... a bit too much :) Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 05:35:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E885916A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429213C44B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so2207006ana for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eThN0WxIneUt7luxhOlTCDTDp8DyhyHP4Kqv4IbSF6NfQl89rSZr7u4OkXNf9pJ6Jx83NgyMuOVbLrFZy1kTnNGw/EgtZJWOZ6zm8RPJhmy2WnO6YMYBaZlsvSrHdSLmARrCflTziOHkJEh6GRvwXlM54e7IDkkySVuZor2Ohxw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NMywvohhWtfPl+/zyQfxFQcYlbd+ZZQLwKkjAcG78qtPpkFvygyyalqCLUpUlzOIz9MSckxRoYaMCOIpqvhNcFx27ZYk48V7y58GBdwB3u2AOXSa9qmICFdd26W99NHjVJZZQPac2K6aKlKb6UyPBSoH8jh3BqnpbBtmSYz6Ljo= Received: by 10.100.10.20 with SMTP id 20mr4304043anj.1177392942465; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0704232235n1a805c82k27dbf837cb4c2296@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:35:42 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0704162200s15b0bf28oa939100c19c34b44@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0704182059y41dbeb3aobf520522e94ee750@mail.gmail.com> <200704182140.05185.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MS, Adobe competition heats up, Will Adobe wake and port Flash to BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:35:44 -0000 On 4/20/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 19/04/07, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said: > > > On 4/18/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On 17/04/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > > > > wrote: . . . > > > > > > > > > Porting Flash to more OSes will sure will make adobe beats MS > > > > > when it comes to web media. > > > > > > > > I hope they kill each other and take the whole > > > > retch-media enhanced web experience with > > > > them flaming into the pit of hell from which > > > > they came. > > > > > > > > But that's just my opinion. > > > > > > > > References: > > > > http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=boiling_blood > > > > > > I'm sorry but rich media is a fact in the web, and you can't ignore > > > it. > > > > > > Flash is used with Yahoo! maps, and so with alot of useful apps > > > like stocks prices ..etc. > > > > > > Instead of ignoring it, we should see it ported to FreeBSD. > > > > I agree. As much as I personally dislike flash, I have business > > clients who would be willing to switch from Micro$oft to FreeBSD. The > > main stumbling block is the lack of stable flash support. > > > > Where I have deployed test versions of FreeBSD with either OO or KDE > > with Firefox, they were generally happy except for flash. This is one > > of the things we need to overcome if we're ever going to be seriously > > considered as a desktop os. Most clients expect the browser to at > > least work as well as Micro$oft, however misguided that is. > > Being taken seriously is over-rated. > Being taken seriously as a desktop OS would > be an excellent joke was the reality of it not so > horrifying. > Televisions are much better at providing the sort > of cacaphonic nonsense that flash users have > come to expect. > I am pleased clicking a link and coming across the > dreadful, "Must have MorkothMedia Flush Player > 45.6 or newer installed to use this site". Honestly, > I was expecting something jumbly but likely full of > information. The "download plugin" box tells me > that I have just saved the time of listening to some > irritating music while it dawns on me that I have hit > a dead end. > The primary use of flash, as I have seen it in such > places as you-tube and yahoo, is as a content slash > copyright management* frontend. That they, the > shadowy and sinister "They" in this case being > that loveable and fuzzy company named after dried > mud, even tried porting flash to linux was probably > widely regarded as a mistake, at least internally. > Porting it to even smaller-market operating systems, > as far as the desktop is concerned, sounds like a > losing proposition to me. Especially ones with users Quote: "What should the BSDs do? As I've said several times in the last five years, that depends on what the projects want. But if we want to be seen as a viable alternative for use by non-developers, my big issue is that we need to understand the end user perspective. We can't just say of any feature "If there's nobody there to support it, axe it." As long as there are people who want that feature, we need to support it. If we don't, BSD is gradually going to be usable only by software developers." Greg Lehey, 2004 http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200402/dadvocate.html Quote: "FreeBSD developer Scott Long told ZDNet UK on Thursday that the operating system, descended from the Unix derivative BSD, is "quickly approaching" feature parity with Linux. "Lots of work is going on to make FreeBSD more friendly on the desktop," Long said. "Within the year, we expect to have, or be near, parity with Linux." -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 06:24:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B806416A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbarczak@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A9B13C459 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbarczak@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1465279pyh for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=U7ZS9nBhmIYZPSrsDM0nXkMbQnwyvRIqijoFfJPMtxt23BnuAJh/eOdQWs4ISDUgAGX1HscNTPuj0MPkmIlPZN8/lO7zE5toA/6indPdKvNPrbYH6TaDP+BPiYTNrxmkQn1mQMgtdlMcStGnRrLhpwYR1sF4LPnp8XtqGnuTsuQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=ChdS/LmzZhXVad3MqZ2qK+k4XbiOkOs2McwY3bR+oEN2Fhe3RNry/7mQy20TH+0an4OpMu4tEyadH0xNjlaGzU0V1S1tQ9N+ktJR6bMHGl/Q7Q1/H07+tFFaECDqLNxsR+ulNZk0uek/F/wkR1RgobMqcaKWNFtP0xP7UtQ2Ktc= Received: by 10.35.102.1 with SMTP id e1mr12422543pym.1177394138512; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?203.34.175.52? ( [203.34.175.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v15sm7159346pyh.2007.04.23.22.55.32; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:55:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <499c70c0704232235n1a805c82k27dbf837cb4c2296@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0704162200s15b0bf28oa939100c19c34b44@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0704182059y41dbeb3aobf520522e94ee750@mail.gmail.com> <200704182140.05185.beech@alaskaparadise.com> <499c70c0704232235n1a805c82k27dbf837cb4c2296@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcus Barczak Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:55:27 +1000 To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MS, Adobe competition heats up, Will Adobe wake and port Flash to BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:24:49 -0000 On 24/04/2007, at 3:35 PM, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > If we don't, BSD is gradually going to be usable only by software > developers. *cough* OSX *cough* :) Marcus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 07:30:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B3316A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A2513C44C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 84FC43658A3; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:30:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2EB3658A2; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462DB20F.6020405@esiee.fr> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:30:23 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fatman@nospam.crackmonkey.nospam.us References: <462C6B24.9080500@esiee.fr> <462CD6EF.7070006@crackmonkey.us> In-Reply-To: <462CD6EF.7070006@crackmonkey.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot compile thunderbird 2 and firefox 2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:30:25 -0000 > > Hi Frank. > > Just wanted to let you know the two ports, thunderbird-2.0.0.0 and > firefox-2.0.0.3,1 are not broken because I've installed them myself. Yes it's surprising to me as I've installed them without noise on an AMD64 machine ... > > Thunderbird sure takes a long time to compile though. I did a "sudo > portupgrade thunderbird" yesterday and it took 8 hours on my 750MHz > laptop. I think my distcc cluster, such as it is, is broken. > > Hope you fix your problem. Perhaps gtk2 needs an upgrade? Mmh yes perhaps , I'm gonna try to upgrade it then Mozilla's products > > Regards, > Adam J Richardson -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet // Machines MUST help // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 07:45:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C135616A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F8613C44B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 95DA82E037; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AABD2E024; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:45:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Erik Norgaard To: Dan Casey In-Reply-To: <462D26B4.4040807@debtresolve.com> Message-ID: <20070424093748.M87543@strange.locolomo.org> References: <462D26B4.4040807@debtresolve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS without rpcbind? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:45:35 -0000 On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Dan Casey wrote: > It was my understanding that NFS worked off of RPC. I accidently > stumbled upon some redhat docs that said you use TCP based NFS which > will not require rpc? I think this is an NFSv4 feature, but I'm not > sure. I would like to achieve this using FreeBSD 6.2. My goal that I'm > trying to accomplish is to get nfs to work in an environment where all > traffic is denied by default. Using rpcbind doesn't work well with that > type of setup. > > I tried the following > nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > nfs_server_flags="-t -n 4 -h 10.a.b.c" > > This spawned rpcbind which I didn't want. Does anyone know how to do a > tcp only nfs implimentation? AFAIK nfs v4 is not done yet, the client side is but not the server side. But FBSD do have a tcp based nfs. This doesn't however change anything with respect to avoiding rpcbind. RPC is used to tell the client at which port the daemons bind. These may be assigned dynamically (I think mountd is dynamic but nfsd static to 2049). Basically the client connects to the rpcbind deamon to request which ports the mountd and nfsd are on. You can force both to bind to a static port. rpcbind_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (YES/NO). nfs_server_enable="YES" # This host is an NFS server (or NO). mountd_enable="YES" # Run mountd (or NO). mountd_flags="-r -p 59" # Force mountd to bind on port 59 will force mountd to bind to port 59. Then it should be possible to run the nfs server without rpcbind, but I don't remember how to configure the client side. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 08:13:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD9A16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igortolkunov@newmail.ru) Received: from relay.asv.org.ru (relay.asv.org.ru [212.74.236.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4CEF13C468 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igortolkunov@newmail.ru) Received: (qmail 15319 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 07:46:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO asv.org.ru) (10.9.105.12) by ns.asv.org.ru with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 07:46:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 6465 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 07:46:12 -0000 Received: from avp.asv.org.ru (10.9.105.11) by intmail.asv.org.ru with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 07:46:12 -0000 Received: from avp (root@localhost) by avp.asv.org.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id l3O7kCI4068559 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:46:12 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igortolkunov@newmail.ru) Received: from [10.2.10.21] (itolkunov.asv.org.ru [10.2.10.21]) by avp.asv.org.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3O7kBss068546 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:46:12 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igortolkunov@newmail.ru) Message-ID: <462DB5C3.2080403@newmail.ru> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:46:11 +0400 From: "Igor V. Tolkunov" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.2/RELEASE, bases: 24042007 #283743, status: clean X-Spam-Rating: ns.asv.org.ru 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Samba 3.0.23c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:13:01 -0000 Hi, *Timothy*! I had the same trouble! Try the next things: In //usr/src/kerberos5/ # make && make install And then rebuild samba! Do no forget run "make clean" before! In my case it was successful! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:33:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047E616A403 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knizek@volny.cz) Received: from smtp2.vol.cz (smtp2.vol.cz [195.250.128.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B661013C484 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knizek@volny.cz) Received: from webmail3.vol.cz (webmail3.vol.cz [195.250.155.196]) by smtp2.vol.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5642877B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail3.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail3.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3OBCc5D079371 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from knizek@volny.cz) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail3.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3OBCb2o079366; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from knizek@volny.cz) Received: from 62.40.72.2 (62.40.72.2 [62.40.72.2]) by www3.mail.volny.cz (www3.mail.volny.cz [195.250.155.196]) with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:37 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: knizek@volny.cz X-Originating-Account: knizek/volny.cz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:12:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7f1b46d01f7875aa63988f4e3df2da73@www3.mail.volny.cz> X-Mailer: Volny.cz Webmail2 2.72 X-Originating-Ip: 62.40.72.2 X-Originating-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.11) Gecko/20070312 Firefox/1.5.0.11 X-Webmail2-Origin: knizek/volny.cz [62.40.72.2] X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Which module for Garmin USB gps device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:33:24 -0000 Hello List! What is the appropriate module for accessing USB GPS devices like Garmin eTrex? When plugged in, dmesg shows ugen0 (which I guess is not a serial port emulation of usb). Manually loading "kldload ucom" does not create any new devices. Thanks, Milan -- JARNI HIT! Stihle nohy? Pekny zadek? S N-Dorfiny za par babek! Inline brusle Nike se systemem Air jiz od 1999 Kc! http://www.sportobchod.cz/in-line From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:57:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1109616A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE63513C458 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 07:57:30 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFK39157; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 07:57:27 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17965.61609.108887.344283@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:57:29 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704240508.l3O58JmQ005942@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1177390672.677.48.camel@creto.quietwind.net> <200704240508.l3O58JmQ005942@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:57:31 -0000 Olivier Nicole writes: > USB is a nice and cheap solution, as long as you don't have too > much data to back-up every time. > > If you have 40GB per day, that would take 10 hours... a bit too > much :) My setup (dump -> USB 2) processes 22.8 Gbytes in a hair over 5 hours. The average throughput is ~2 myytes/sec ... which is _way_ slower than it should be. (The problem has not been reporduced on other machines.) I'd prefer to be running of the 80 mbyte/sec LVD SCSI card. However, that configuration (tape drive, cartridges, cables) would start at $1500 and up. This has so far cost less than $200, with an incremental cost of < $50 per week of backup. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 13:33:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4557C16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcasey@debtresolve.com) Received: from debtresolve.com (ip175-18.wp-ny-us.debtresolve.com [66.236.175.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0714C13C489 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcasey@debtresolve.com) Received: from dummy.name; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:33:19 -0400 Message-ID: <462E06BA.4060001@debtresolve.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:31:38 -0400 From: Dan Casey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <462D26B4.4040807@debtresolve.com> <20070424093748.M87543@strange.locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070424093748.M87543@strange.locolomo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS without rpcbind? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:33:20 -0000 That makes more sense. Actually I do not care if it is tcp or udp, so long as the ports are not dynamically assigned. I'll have to give what you said a try. Up until now I thought there was now way to do this without dynamic ports. Erik Norgaard wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Dan Casey wrote: > >> It was my understanding that NFS worked off of RPC. I accidently >> stumbled upon some redhat docs that said you use TCP based NFS which >> will not require rpc? I think this is an NFSv4 feature, but I'm not >> sure. I would like to achieve this using FreeBSD 6.2. My goal that I'm >> trying to accomplish is to get nfs to work in an environment where all >> traffic is denied by default. Using rpcbind doesn't work well with that >> type of setup. >> >> I tried the following >> nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" >> nfs_server_enable="YES" >> nfs_server_flags="-t -n 4 -h 10.a.b.c" >> >> This spawned rpcbind which I didn't want. Does anyone know how to do a >> tcp only nfs implimentation? > > AFAIK nfs v4 is not done yet, the client side is but not the server > side. But FBSD do have a tcp based nfs. This doesn't however change > anything with respect to avoiding rpcbind. > > RPC is used to tell the client at which port the daemons bind. These > may be assigned dynamically (I think mountd is dynamic but nfsd static > to 2049). Basically the client connects to the rpcbind deamon to > request which ports the mountd and nfsd are on. > > You can force both to bind to a static port. > > rpcbind_enable="NO" # Run the portmapper service (YES/NO). > nfs_server_enable="YES" # This host is an NFS server (or NO). > mountd_enable="YES" # Run mountd (or NO). > mountd_flags="-r -p 59" # Force mountd to bind on port 59 > > will force mountd to bind to port 59. Then it should be possible to > run the nfs server without rpcbind, but I don't remember how to > configure the client side. > > Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 14:10:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D07D16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFB413C458 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from cube.dmz.bsd (a80-127-199-167.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.199.167]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3ODvKtI004864 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:57:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from clarke (internal.lan.bsd [192.168.1.1]) by cube.dmz.bsd (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OBLXku023801 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:21:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) From: "Jan L. Nauta" To: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:23:00 +0200 Message-ID: <035701c78662$ead7d9c0$6802a8c0@clarke> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGYuqeopjqwnfgRCqA1PmaL+xlAA== X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cube.dmz.bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: kernel trap 19/NMI messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:10:32 -0000 Hi, SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror. Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run output mails: +NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20 +8, +<2<>2N>MIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0 +NNIMSIA ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S +A 0 +NMI ISA N2M8I, ISEIA SA 0 +28, EISA 0 +NSAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8, E0I +S +A 0 +<2<>N2>NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMNSAM I ISA 28, +EISA2 08 Sometimes with message like this embedded: g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5 By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and what's causing it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2129216A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65A913C45D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from cube.dmz.bsd (a80-127-199-167.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.199.167]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OEBKAB061994 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:11:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from clarke (internal.lan.bsd [192.168.1.1]) by cube.dmz.bsd (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OEB6eU025759 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:11:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) From: "Jan L. Nauta" To: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: <045a01c7867a$9a654a50$6802a8c0@clarke> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGepo/sXdl7e+fS7uhypo09Eu78w== X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cube.dmz.bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: weird messages in daily security run output mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:22 -0000 Hi, SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror. Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run output mails: +NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20 +8, +<2<>2N>MIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0 +NNIMSIA ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S +A 0 +NMI ISA N2M8I, ISEIA SA 0 +28, EISA 0 +NSAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8, E0I +S +A 0 +<2<>N2>NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMNSAM I ISA 28, +EISA2 08 Sometimes with message like this embedded: g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5 By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and what's causing it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 14:15:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB0A16A403 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D6413C48C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from cube.dmz.bsd (a80-127-199-167.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.199.167]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3ODvKtG004864 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:57:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) Received: from clarke (internal.lan.bsd [192.168.1.1]) by cube.dmz.bsd (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OCES0V024311 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:14:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jln@magentammt.com) From: "Jan L. Nauta" To: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:15:55 +0200 Message-ID: <038801c7866a$4f7547d0$6802a8c0@clarke> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGak9Mti+D0Vf7Tbylxu21nnfSkw== X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on cube.dmz.bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: weird messages in daily security run output mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:15:07 -0000 Hi, SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror. Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run output mails: +NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20 +8, +<2<>2N>MIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0 +NNIMSIA ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S +A 0 +NMI ISA N2M8I, ISEIA SA 0 +28, EISA 0 +NSAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8, E0I +S +A 0 +<2<>N2>NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMNSAM I ISA 28, +EISA2 08 Sometimes with message like this embedded: g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5 By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and what's causing it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 14:18:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813A316A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from smtp.interstroom.nl (smtp1.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1B313C468 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180]:52916 helo=[192.168.1.133]) by smtp.interstroom.nl with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HgLcF-0001MR-4p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:03:35 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <38A9B70D-9BF1-4F29-8123-D82907AE07BA@axis.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Olaf Greve Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:03:33 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: How to manually patch/configure/compile Apache 2.2.4's mod_autoindex module? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:18:48 -0000 Hiya, I have run into a seemingly trivial, yet annoying issue. I used to use Apache 1.3.33 on my live server, and recently I upgraded to Apache 2.2.4, which apart from some hassles when upgrading the PHP4 extensions, went well. However, there is one small thingy that is different: there are exactly two directories on which I allow directory listings, and these listings are (also) called from an external W*nd*ws program that one of the users of my machine has made and has distributed. For this user, I had allowed directory listings, with fancyindexing enabled, and I thought everything would be fine, but.... Apache 1.3.33's mod_autoindex created listings using (uppercase) ... tags, and Apache 2.2.4's version outputs (lowercase) ... tags, and there ya go: the already widely distributed application solely checks for the uppercase version, and fails on the lowercase version. I had hoped that it would be easy to change this around, using some form of template, but after RTFM-ing on the mod_autoindex (and accompanying "options") documents, I am pretty certain that this is not the case (or I am overlooking it). In fact, it looks like the only place where this could be changed, is the mod_autoindex.c file, under the "work" directory in the proper "ports" directory. Now, I don't mind patching the C source to accomplish this, however, compiling it neatly into a properly working module may be more of a hassle, and as a further downside, this would have to be done each and every time I would possibly want to update Apache... Is there anyone who knows a better/easier way to achieve this? If not, is there anyone who can tell me an easy method to properly compile and link the mod_autoindex module (ideally using the provided Makefile)? Tnx in advance, and cheerz, Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 14:48:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DAA16A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292C013C43E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 38so7669494huc for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZnQsONLU933WrFesfWLXhq/FPfNs9S9gWH8YsUc0R7FRTS57F2GkguwGPEKacBlG1ueOYkPmEuyIqfhWmPKLEzghoMnqra+jFxUrJFXRTqM4P3P8bCmDwPuiDJ8Nna92v/LJ3e/uM4U9T0ZBNAHkCkpuSMuY2izhQP2v9LChEKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cgRuS+1jWxYvwJZQZb5DxMiGJKJbY91BEfvySEXLYd0JftqNGg1Waf0228/VxKCr8pfIWhH/1GaGUH2B10q51atUxtITMx2PNnBWgw0RaIC11wulEhX8jvJ/ZjoclYs0J3AIMZXcHPvfcfKtKBJAt1C6y5IkKplVSi4Se0v16tc= Received: by 10.78.122.16 with SMTP id u16mr794358huc.1177426113556; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.120.4 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <768631270704240748u2b77889cve459aea6e11b7d31@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:48:33 -0400 From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD Merch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:48:35 -0000 So again i am posting this email out to this list.. Does anyone know where i can get freebsd branded merchandise with the new logo? BSDMall and freebsdmall all seem to have the older stuff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 15:57:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403016A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0913C459 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OFvAHf015502; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7D8CDB854; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:10 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: L Goodwin Message-ID: <20070424155710.GA18380@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: L Goodwin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:57:13 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows > Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create > system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows > client. >=20 > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup > Basics", but have some questions: >=20 > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known > issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the > following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) Too small these days. > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) Usefull, but you have to store them correctly or they won't last very long. > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) No experience with that, sorry d) USB drive (disks are cheap) This is what I currently use to back up my system. After mounting the (geli encrpyted) disk I start a script that performs a dump(8) of all ufs filesystems, compresses them with bzip2 and writes them to the external drive. If you want a non-os specific data format you can use tar. Start with a full backup, and after that use the --newer option, so every subsequent backup only stores the files that have changed since the last backup.=20 > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer Free= BSD? > Handbook says dump is the only way to go. Dump works best for UFS filesystems. Tar handles normal files well, but might have issues with device files, flags and ACLs, things that dump does handle. Copying the data straight to a FAT32 filesystem and you'll loose things like ownership and permission. > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on > the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? Yes, if the client in question has access to all the data on the samba share. but automation on windows is much more difficult than on FreeBSD. > If the answer > is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) > backup vs. a Windows-based one? Please add to my list of pros and > cons: >=20 > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixe= d? Not if you're using dump. Winzip can handle gzipped tarfiles. > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical > drive. CON: cannot be automated properly. CON: windows programs won't handle things like UIDs and permissions prope= rly. > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). PRO: Can be don with minimal user intervention. PRO: Can store all the attributes of the native file system. > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? >=20 > These are some of my other considerations: > =20 > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive > solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change > discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several backups to > same disc/tape preferred. I think a detachable USB disk is very cost effective. A 500GB external Seagate drive is $153 at newegg. You'd buy a couple and rotate them. A tape drive alone would cost more. > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a > modest rate. In that case a 500 GB backup disk could hold years of weekly full backups. > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not > too spendy). Media durability is an issue. I've seen test in magazines where more than half the discs contained a lot of errors or were unusable after two years. I've also seen optical drives fail in under two years depending on the environment. =20 > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly > or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array > is expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily > backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than > implement a two-tiered backup process. Mount an external USB, and create a cron job to copy the data over to it every night. No user action whatsoever required. Make sure that the external disk is not visible as a Samba share. Swap out the external disk for another one every week or month (this requires user intervention, but it could be scripted) and store the one not in use in a safe or off-site. How often you back up depends on how much work you're willing to loose or redo, and how easy it is to replace/recreate the data . Too much backups fills up cheap disk or DVD space. Not enough backups can destroy your client's business.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLijWEnfvsMMhpyURAvIzAJ99O7qheQNS7dxJgXHs78upOfq8fACeK6tD zvKO6nNLFAyl8wQPgs5BL/c= =xIEV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 15:58:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF78D16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: from creto.quietwind.net (creto.quietwind.net [71.39.149.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F7A13C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: from creto.quietwind.net (localhost.quietwind.net [127.0.0.1]) by creto.quietwind.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3OFr6bZ013185; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:53:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) Received: (from chrisk@localhost) by creto.quietwind.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l3OFr0v5013184; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:53:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from chriskot@quietwind.net) X-Authentication-Warning: creto.quietwind.net: chrisk set sender to chriskot@quietwind.net using -f From: Chris Kottaridis To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <200704240508.l3O58JmQ005942@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1177390672.677.48.camel@creto.quietwind.net> <200704240508.l3O58JmQ005942@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:53:00 -0600 Message-Id: <1177429980.677.67.camel@creto.quietwind.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chriskot@quietwind.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:58:10 -0000 It's true, but amanda allows for a holding disk that the backups get sent to, so the dumps themselves don't take so long. So, the other machines that are being backed up, and do the real work in house, don't take any longer then when I had a tape drive on the backup host. From the holding disk on the backup machine they get dumped to the USB external disk drive and it's not real important how long that takes, it's true you would want it done before the next backup started though. I don't use the backup machine for too much more then just doing the backups. It's an old relatively slow desktop machine that was put out of use when we got some upgraded machines. The stats from amanda show that things have settled down to average backing up something like 10 GB a day and that seems to take anywhere from 3 to 5 hours which isn't a problem. Thanks Chris Kottaridis (chriskot@quietwind.net) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:08 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Since tapes get expensive and disks are relatively cheap I went out and > > bought a 300 GB USB disk drive for about $90.00. Right now I have amanda > > configured to back things up onto 6 "virtual tapes" each of about 40GB, > > USB is a nice and cheap solution, as long as you don't have too much > data to back-up every time. > > If you have 40GB per day, that would take 10 hours... a bit too much > :) > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 16:09:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EE216A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF02213C48C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3OG6mkp088218; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:06:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3OG6mhl088217; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:06:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:06:48 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: L Goodwin Message-ID: <20070424160647.GD87999@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:09:17 -0000 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) Generally, CD doesn't hold enough to be practical for any modern sizeable file system. DVD is a little better, but still only a drop in a many GB file system. My suggestion is to use either tape or a large external hard drive. Since you are mirroring, maybe the hard drive would be a good choice. You will be less concerned about recovery of immediate errors than about a systematic rotating archive. Buying about 5 large external drives is currently cheaper than buying a quality tape system, although handling the tapes can be easier and more flexible, plus easier to deal with continuation media if you have a very large filesystem. I would choose either LTO or DLT tape if you go that route. The DDS (DAT) tape just is not robust enough to handle a real server environment. It is OK for occasional copies to transfer data somewhere or save something off - providing you check if the tape is readable, but not hard core server backups. But, I have had no problem with either DLT or LTO. They are fast and reliable and have good capacity and can be set up so a dump can span more than one unit if necessary. If you are running a serious server, the increased cost will disappear in the the increased reliability and usability. I just noticed below that you indicated a 1GB backup that gradually grows. (They always grow faster than expected). Well, DLT or LTO would be overkill for that and also be very expensive. But it is too big already to be practical for CD. Although DVD would currently handle it, you would grow out of it soon. I think the large external hard drive on USB might be your best bet for now - see more comments below. > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer FreeBSD? > Handbook says dump is the only way to go. Dump is the way to go. It works well, is already on the system and handles all types of files, links and permissions, ownerships, flags, etc correctly. Almost every other system has something missing somewhere. You can use dump regardless of which media you choose. There is no prepreparation needed for tapes. If you use a large hard disk, then you do need to fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs on it to create a file system. Then you can write the dumps to an ordinary file on the filesystem you create on the disk. If it is large enough you can write more than one dump. You can just rm old/obsolete dumps without any other mucking around. > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the answer is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) backup vs. a Windows-based one? > Please add to my list of pros and cons: > > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. Sounds like that would be a separate issue. Do an extra backup from the Windows point of view if you want as some sort of interim support. But backup the whole system of data via the UNIX/FreeBSD side. That will allow you to put things completely back the way you want it most easily. > > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? > > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several backups to same disc/tape preferred. Since extra high capacity hard drives are almost as cheap now as one or two large DLT or LTO tapes (let alone the drives), that 'multi-drive' solution may be your most economical method. > > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a modest rate. Well, even a single extra large capacity USB hard drive will be less than buying an extra DVD writable drive and give you room for a couple of hundred 1GB size backups. ////jerry > > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not too spendy). > > 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" space. > > 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except if swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > > 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive that I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't have room for it. > > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array is expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than implement a two-tiered backup process. > > Thanks! > > > --------------------------------- > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:00:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D65B16A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from defout.telus.net (defout.telus.net [204.209.205.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCCE13C45B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from priv-edmwaa06.telusplanet.net ([216.232.62.60]) by priv-edmwes34.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070424170034.SAUI2416.priv-edmwes34.telusplanet.net@priv-edmwaa06.telusplanet.net>; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:00:34 -0600 Received: from [192.168.2.156] (s216-232-62-60.bc.hsia.telus.net [216.232.62.60]) by priv-edmwaa06.telusplanet.net (BorderWare MXtreme Infinity Mail Firewall) with ESMTP id 38AALA9LT3; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:00:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <462E37AD.30607@skyhawk.ca> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:00:29 -0700 From: Andrew Fremantle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <462D06D8.8060902@skyhawk.ca> <462D45DC.70508@skyhawk.ca> <91707B8C-1C43-40BF-B944-6F3E377680A0@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <91707B8C-1C43-40BF-B944-6F3E377680A0@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: derek@computinginnovations.com Subject: Re: Invalid Global DNS name and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:00:39 -0000 Thanks to everyone who replied, the solution is detailed below Copy /usr/share/sendmail/cf/domain/generic.m4 -> /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4 softlink /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4 -> /usr/share/sendmail/cf/domain/custom-domain.m4 Edit /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4 and remove the EXPOSED_USERS('root') line Edit .m4 and change the DOMAIN(generic) line to DOMAIN(custom-domain) Somehow this broke Make, so I ended up having to manually nuke .cf and .submit.cf to force it to rebuild them. Then a simple "make install" followed by "make stop; make start" and the mail began to flow. That allowed my previous masquerading configuration to work correctly, and I'm now getting my periodic emails. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:12:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16EB16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdwicker@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C8213C4AD for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdwicker@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so1756329nza for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HuTiFJxqlm8nrLyz5+P6jLOXhydgN+gRCs9gG1tyHeh4sNBGfToeDop2U7tzkp9FAEVus+oBymVOjwb/T4iQAPtjy63CfxgeJRMrfdbC+oXoZCLCJEDhh4lFa+eabvw1MHq3FK6jZ+F9PWtBZvJqSUJ2s3MbUwybSVqhalDJdLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kG5WxZFR7F3Kmnvhyy2teaaWjWpTbjwLZGKp2bx3ytKVsxcLlLM7V1egNaBveDrQDRwZCiYUyfcPM9jE6rjM6WupplDyiqXgL/FKxRfhvMQ/YMlHInq/6CxeeNGVd0zyriREhjdCWeX1+EwswEihqLL2TEvEKpdZ8tyOsL20GVo= Received: by 10.115.23.12 with SMTP id a12mr3252681waj.1177434726587; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.201.4 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d19405f0704241012y418f7491x2c88443968a62051@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700 From: "FreeBSD WickerBill" To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: Thunderbird 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:12:07 -0000 >from April 20 I portupgraded thunderbird today (6.1 p11, KDE 3.5.6_2) and while it's semi-functional, it does seg fault as it checks the pop server. Also has 3 lines/rows of Tag icons making the Toolbar height quite large. Each row grows progressively fainter (I'm pretty sure it's a group of icons but all show instead of just one row). TB 1.5 worked fine. Here's the error: Gtk-Qt theme engine warning: Could not open /proc/60384/cmdline This may cause problems for the GNOME window manager QSettings::sync: filename is null/empty Starting calendar alarm service observer added *** Calendar schema version is: 5 snooze time is:null considering alarm for item:Anniversary offset:-P1D, which makes alarm time:2007/04/12 07:00:00 UTC now is 2007/04/21 02:43:38 UTC Last ack was:2007/04/14 06:11:24 UTC Anniversary - alarm previously ackd2 thunderbird-bin in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense thunderbird-bin in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense Segmentation fault < These problems were fixed by uninstalling all broken extensions and removing the theme I was using and installing the default theme. -- --I'm not 'renting' my OS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:16:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87D16A408 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA6B13C483 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F191A4DD0; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 511E651428; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:16:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:16:24 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Jan L. Nauta" Message-ID: <20070424171623.GA36092@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <035701c78662$ead7d9c0$6802a8c0@clarke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <035701c78662$ead7d9c0$6802a8c0@clarke> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel trap 19/NMI messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:16:25 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:23:00PM +0200, Jan L. Nauta wrote: > Hi, > > > > SMP FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386), latest version via freebsd-update, on a > PentiumD based server with two ide drives running under gmirror. > > > > Recently I've been getting the following messages in my daily security run > output mails: > > > > > > +NMI INSAM I IS2A 8, EISA 20 > > +8, > > +<2<>2N>MIN MISI AI SA 38,3 8,E IESAIS A0 > > +NNIMSIA ISA 28,2 8EI, SEA I0S > > +A 0 > > +NMI ISA N2M8I, ISEIA SA 0 > > +28, EISA 0 > > +NSAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8, E0I > > +S > > +A 0 > > +<2<>N2>NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap > > +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMNSAM I ISA 28, > > +EISA2 08 > > > > > > Sometimes with message like this embedded: > > > > > > g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error = 5 > > > > > > By now the mail is about 40K. Does anybody have an idea what this means and > what's causing it? NMI errors are caused by hardware failure. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:18:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0C116A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sacchi@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03ED13C448 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sacchi@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so206686ugh for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lOIu30EY3laLKTI/rYT1ZqXgWk5kun5leoEDGKqlgcnU4E8UeIY89CW2mYGQ5m8casOgvgr1ZMylXhveVhVP2uTrr/P6PaqqRJ1H0GqfEPF3qQTxyRY+pDNs1HNk5+f7SK9+L5QAw5XNEHs4DH88tnPs5FihuBPq/YJ48kERFdo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T+PO1Y9g+MGgdpBWbzsHrHO1P336MwDlLtG+MO0C4r0d0/XNrZyZdBJICWqXacyZxtqtwuVA8/cpeFXHYkauCSMQNWmg7qXUw+KVwN7eMVBjs5Jq8exhde+nUiW6rNHK8odEt8FMhusIMut89JnrPoDpvnBcWGauG0E7/tnc21I= Received: by 10.78.178.5 with SMTP id a5mr557907huf.1177435127110; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.153.16 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:48:47 +0530 From: sac To: "Martin Tournoij" In-Reply-To: <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:18:49 -0000 > Don't forget to unmount and detach the memory disk: > umount /somewhere > mdconfig -ud 0 a slight modification mdconfig -du 0 0 should be replaced with the appropiate device number > -- Martin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, sac From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:36:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F4016A409 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (echo.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BC613C4BD for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F5F8101E3F8 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:27:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by echo.calarts.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECF9101935F for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:27:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [198.182.157.179] (dhcp7179.calarts.edu [198.182.157.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3OHaohd020808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <462E402C.9090607@calarts.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:36:44 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: Does FreeBSD support the 3600 MCP Chipset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:36:51 -0000 Does FreeBSD support the 3600 MCP Chipset? I was thinking about purchasing a Sun server that used the AMD CPU and the NVIDIA nForce Professional 3600 MCP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:56:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C71816A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D15E13C4AE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HgPFS-0008be-SV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:19 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700 Message-ID: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGmdZuanEBYiQbT/+mIhTpJmgLPQ== Subject: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:56:17 -0000 I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be ignored. Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:57:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B463D16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from spamfirewall.msdsky.com (spamfirewall.msdsky.com [64.18.66.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776F013C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177437425-33f400230000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://spamfirewall.msdsky.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Connect: unknown[64.18.67.9] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177437425 Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (unknown [64.18.67.9]) by spamfirewall.msdsky.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4CB595E7 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:57:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dell390 ([70.83.204.175]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with ASMTP id QRI44553 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:57:05 -0400 From: "Ian Lord" To: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Port marked as broken Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:55:48 -0400 Message-ID: <003f01c78699$ca296fe0$6400a8c0@msdi.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGmcoDX2ZY6mbFQWqxiwCf9Ad+qA== X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at msdsky.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Port marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:57:06 -0000 Hi, I just did a "cvsup" and a "pkg_version -v" to see that one of my port is outdated. pecl-memcache-2.1.0 < needs updating (port has 2.1.2) When I tried to "portupgrade -a" I got a message saying "pecl-memcache-2.1.2 is marked as broken: Configure fails." I though something was broken on my system so I went to /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache/ and did a "make deinstall" followed by a "make clean" and a "make" I get the same error message saying: ===> pecl-memcache-2.1.2 is marked as broken: Configure fails. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache. I did some research and found that tag "broken" is in the cvs so I guess the developer set it that way. 2 questions: 1- How come a broken port is in the cvs ? Shouldn't the developer do a rollback or something if something fails ? 2- Is there a way to reinstall an older version hoping to get the functionality back (since I deinstalled :-() Thanks a lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 17:59:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726DD16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from spamfirewall.msdsky.com (spamfirewall.msdsky.com [64.18.66.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21B13C4B9 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177437538-340a002b0000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://spamfirewall.msdsky.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Connect: unknown[64.18.67.9] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177437538 Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (unknown [64.18.67.9]) by spamfirewall.msdsky.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8ED2B194B; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dell390 ([70.83.204.175]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with ASMTP id QRI44553; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:58:59 -0400 From: "Ian Lord" To: "'Don O'Neil'" , References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Memory >3.5GB not used? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:57:41 -0400 Message-ID: <004401c7869a$0dc246f0$6400a8c0@msdi.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGmdZuanEBYiQbT/+mIhTpJmgLPQAAB+Sg In-Reply-To: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at msdsky.com Cc: Subject: RE: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:59:06 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Don O'Neil Sent: 24 avril 2007 13:56 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Memory >3.5GB not used? I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be ignored. Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. ~~~~ Either use the amd64 version of freebsd or activate PAE in your kernel Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:04:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4FA16A409 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510F913C4C5 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED681A4DD0; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A4EE51428; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:04:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:04:11 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Lord Message-ID: <20070424180411.GA37150@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <003f01c78699$ca296fe0$6400a8c0@msdi.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003f01c78699$ca296fe0$6400a8c0@msdi.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:04:12 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:55:48PM -0400, Ian Lord wrote: > Hi, > > > > I just did a "cvsup" and a "pkg_version -v" to see that one of my port is > outdated. > > > > pecl-memcache-2.1.0 < needs updating (port has 2.1.2) > > > > When I tried to "portupgrade -a" I got a message saying "pecl-memcache-2.1.2 > is marked as broken: Configure fails." > > > > I though something was broken on my system so I went to > /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache/ and did a "make deinstall" followed by a > "make clean" and a "make" > > > > I get the same error message saying: > > ===> pecl-memcache-2.1.2 is marked as broken: Configure fails. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache. > > > > > > > > I did some research and found that tag "broken" is in the cvs so I guess the > developer set it that way. > > > > 2 questions: > > > > 1- How come a broken port is in the cvs ? Shouldn't the developer do a > rollback or something if something fails ? They should *fix* it, but they've not done so yet. Email the maintainer to ask about their plans for fixing it. > 2- Is there a way to reinstall an older version hoping to get the > functionality back (since I deinstalled :-() You can use CVS or (maybe) the portdowngrade port. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:05:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C42116A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D356A13C45D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEECEBC78; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:05:28 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Don O'Neil" Message-Id: <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:05:35 -0000 In response to "Don O'Neil" : > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be > ignored. > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I > need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to > install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to > the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#PAE -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:11:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D925316A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-242.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153EB13C457 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (pollux.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.61]) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OIBlVe061219 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:11:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3OIBlhk061218; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:11:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pollux.dfwlp.com: www set sender to freebsd@dfwlp.com using -f Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:11:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <2271.192.168.125.134.1177438307.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:11:47 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:11:50 -0000 > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > >> I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a >> Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. >> >> When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be >> ignored. >> >> Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: >> >> real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) >> avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) >> >> Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I >> need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to >> install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to >> the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? >> >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#PAE > i have a system with 4GB memory, doing the same similar behavior. but, on top of not using the last few hundred megs of ram, even the POST shows like 3.6 or 3.7GB of ram. is PAE still a solution for my case? [jhorne@canopus ~]$ dmesg | grep memory real memory = 3958833152 (3775 MB) avail memory = 3875762176 (3696 MB) thanks, jonathan freebsd@dfwlp.com http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:20:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C05B16A407 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33D113C43E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C2CEBC78; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:20:08 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Jonathan Horne" Message-Id: <20070424142008.ae5645ff.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <2271.192.168.125.134.1177438307.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <2271.192.168.125.134.1177438307.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:20:15 -0000 In response to "Jonathan Horne" : > > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > >> I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > >> Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > >> > >> When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be > >> ignored. > >> > >> Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > >> > >> real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > >> avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > >> > >> Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I > >> need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to > >> install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to > >> the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > >> > >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#PAE > > > > i have a system with 4GB memory, doing the same similar behavior. but, on top > of not using the last few hundred megs of ram, even the POST shows like 3.6 or > 3.7GB of ram. is PAE still a solution for my case? > > [jhorne@canopus ~]$ dmesg | grep memory > real memory = 3958833152 (3775 MB) > avail memory = 3875762176 (3696 MB) As noted in the FAQ, this is hardware-dependent. Some crappy motherboards don't remap the memory, and it can not be used as a result. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:27:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCD716A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-242.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D5113C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (pollux.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.61]) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OIR7Yw061514 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:27:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3OIR7WZ061513; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:27:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pollux.dfwlp.com: www set sender to jhorne@dfwlp.org using -f Received: from 192.168.125.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:27:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <2287.192.168.125.134.1177439227.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <20070424180411.GA37150@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <003f01c78699$ca296fe0$6400a8c0@msdi.local> <20070424180411.GA37150@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:27:07 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Port marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:27:10 -0000 > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:55:48PM -0400, Ian Lord wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I just did a "cvsup" and a "pkg_version -v" to see that one of my port is >> outdated. >> >> >> >> pecl-memcache-2.1.0 < needs updating (port has 2.1.2) >> >> >> >> When I tried to "portupgrade -a" I got a message saying "pecl-memcache-2.1.2 >> is marked as broken: Configure fails." >> >> >> >> I though something was broken on my system so I went to >> /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache/ and did a "make deinstall" followed by a >> "make clean" and a "make" >> >> >> >> I get the same error message saying: >> >> ===> pecl-memcache-2.1.2 is marked as broken: Configure fails. >> >> *** Error code 1 >> >> >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/databases/pecl-memcache. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I did some research and found that tag "broken" is in the cvs so I guess the >> developer set it that way. >> >> >> >> 2 questions: >> >> >> >> 1- How come a broken port is in the cvs ? Shouldn't the developer do a >> rollback or something if something fails ? > > They should *fix* it, but they've not done so yet. Email the > maintainer to ask about their plans for fixing it. > >> 2- Is there a way to reinstall an older version hoping to get the >> functionality back (since I deinstalled :-() > > You can use CVS or (maybe) the portdowngrade port. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > you can get a past snapshot of the pots tree by using cvsup. on the supfile line: *default release=cvs tag=. append a date in this format: *default release=cvs tag=. date=2006.01.01.01.01 (year.month.day.hour.minute.second) check the http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports, and find the port. check the make file for the date the broken change was uploaded, and go with a day before that. add the date you want to your supfile, and pull down an older version of the ports tree. note that it will overwrite your current ports, and youll want to update them back to current again before doing anymore portupgrading. hth, jonathan horne freebsd@dfwlp.com http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:35:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5417C16A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4A5713C48C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2007 18:08:46 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 20:08:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19WSvAh5Z1WQmeFAaEIe+7y45RlrXBDjjYbji7kEF z7Ux2DvCBgug6E Message-ID: <462E47A0.20609@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:08:32 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don O'Neil References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> In-Reply-To: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:35:28 -0000 Don O'Neil wrote: > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there something I > need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? What if I want to > install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 GB... Do I need to go to > the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? You need a PAE kernel to access the whole 4g, for more you definitely need an amd64 install. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:39:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2816A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD7113C469 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HgPvg-000NU4-1l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:56 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:46 -0700 Message-ID: <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGmymjDVrAWKHYTBWIiG378gEkDQABH5xA In-Reply-To: <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Subject: RE: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:39:54 -0000 Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it commented out as a device? -----Original Message----- From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? In response to "Don O'Neil" : > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be > ignored. > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#PAE -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:44:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440C416A40E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA4213C483 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1621334pyh for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M5Qw95Y0WIqy6JqKngwuhSZs69K1gJqogjL5voraIa2WMenlH8Zml/8Evy5HoEX2QaxIB4QjV++Dud+AM1krKtobTYIWAJ75uUqyqp83hy+0NhZAbsWl8AZ16njgV6T7IX9QGyZPKyZuRPzyn3EgyEussbK5gca6Sr3gdlhoVu4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KOyctz1UTiCbY43X2Ww9gykapAMNahc2iegUVo1YN2iBq0qNz2mYN7DrNAdraDlpvKE9tau07Io/C7iHXkdfaiZk5xfL6rPzMnJ6eGGffxL3eS1Y/fAd2jaqQmSRorwkVHsXVP5i/TjSUduGdtJn3NLdfuIt9+raI3+E23/OLKA= Received: by 10.65.150.18 with SMTP id c18mr1563135qbo.1177440245028; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.47.5 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:44:04 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Don O'Neil" In-Reply-To: <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:44:06 -0000 On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil wrote: > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq > -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from pointer > to integer of different size > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it commented > out as a device? commenting it from the kernel config will only prevent it from being built staticlly in the kernel. If you want to prevent the module from being built, look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE or WITHOUT_MODULES options to make.conf. man 5 make.conf for more details. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will be > > ignored. > > > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#PAE > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:47:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7746B16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633C613C45E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HgQ32-0002xp-9Q; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:47:32 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Andy Greenwood'" References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:47:22 -0700 Message-ID: <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGoIsayVSEhi7+Qb2vgunzMWe1PAAAEZQQ In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:47:30 -0000 I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time. Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the kernel sources for 6.1? -----Original Message----- From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:44 AM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil wrote: > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq > -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from > pointer to integer of different size > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it > commented out as a device? commenting it from the kernel config will only prevent it from being built staticlly in the kernel. If you want to prevent the module from being built, look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE or WITHOUT_MODULES options to make.conf. man 5 make.conf for more details. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will > > be ignored. > > > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html > #PAE > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:54:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E33616A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2247713C48C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9964B1A4DD4; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25F535139A; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:54:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:54:15 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Don O'Neil Message-ID: <20070424185415.GA37795@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: 'Andy Greenwood' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:17 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:47:22AM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote: > I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time. > Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the > kernel sources for 6.1? When you built the kernel the first time you did not have PAE enabled. Just disable the module builds, as Andy said. Kris P.S. don't top-post, it is irritating and destroys context > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:44 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil wrote: > > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq > > -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from > > pointer to integer of different size > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it > > commented out as a device? > > commenting it from the kernel config will only prevent it from being built > staticlly in the kernel. If you want to prevent the module from being built, > look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE or WITHOUT_MODULES options to make.conf. > > man 5 make.conf for more details. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM > > To: Don O'Neil > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > > > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > > > > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will > > > be ignored. > > > > > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > > > > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > > > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > > > > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > > > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html > > #PAE > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > -- > I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:54:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB0F16A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664E113C457 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2C0EBC78; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:54:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:54:33 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Don O'Neil" Message-Id: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Andy Greenwood' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:40 -0000 In response to "Don O'Neil" : > I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time. > Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the > kernel sources for 6.1? Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel file for information. PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that performance sucks under PAE. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:44 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil wrote: > > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq > > -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from > > pointer to integer of different size > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it > > commented out as a device? > > commenting it from the kernel config will only prevent it from being built > staticlly in the kernel. If you want to prevent the module from being built, > look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE or WITHOUT_MODULES options to make.conf. > > man 5 make.conf for more details. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM > > To: Don O'Neil > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > > > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > > > > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will > > > be ignored. > > > > > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > > > > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) > > > avail memory = 3649908736 (3480 MB) > > > > > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > > > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html > > #PAE > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > -- > I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 18:57:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B80416A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ED413C4C1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HgQD5-0004Ix-8M; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:57:55 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Bill Moran'" References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey><20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com><021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey><3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com><021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:57:45 -0700 Message-ID: <022001c786a2$71cd6aa0$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceGogWXFKhACKjaRC61Vi2HswilVwAAEAYg In-Reply-To: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: 'Andy Greenwood' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:57:53 -0000 If it's a hack maybe I should just not worry about the extra .5GB then... I don't really need it, it was just a bit of an annoyance to see the message. When I need more RAM I'll just update to AMD64. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:55 AM To: Don O'Neil Cc: 'Andy Greenwood'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? In response to "Don O'Neil" : > I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time. > Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the > kernel sources for 6.1? Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel file for information. PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that performance sucks under PAE. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:44 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil wrote: > > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ > > -I@/contrib/altq -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from > > pointer to integer of different size > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it > > commented out as a device? > > commenting it from the kernel config will only prevent it from being > built staticlly in the kernel. If you want to prevent the module from > being built, look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE or WITHOUT_MODULES options to make.conf. > > man 5 make.conf for more details. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmoran@potentialtech.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:05 AM > > To: Don O'Neil > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? > > > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, 4GB Ram and a > > > Gigabyte/Nvidia motherboard. > > > > > > When I boot the system up it says on the console that 532888K will > > > be ignored. > > > > > > Of course it isn't put in any of the log files. Dmesg shows this: > > > > > > real memory = 3724476416 (3551 MB) avail memory = 3649908736 > > > (3480 MB) > > > > > > Any reason the extra 1/2 GB isn't showing up or usable? Is there > > > something I need to specify in the kernel to get to the other 1/2 GB? > > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to > > > 16 GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 i386 SMP kernel. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.ht > > ml > > #PAE > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > -- > I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 19:47:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D5716A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CD0113C4B7 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 61723 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 19:47:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=AwCHdRYj92i+HcX/8adMCxbugnU6cWK3LiHfMxNbcG0YUYJcl9y0o1OtBtbDnhu5ves3d52/fG/n5jRlllcwkD4qHGSUxHcnEl7vYs8jvWCUbykLpe2tbQ1UljyZjmjThb5+/hHFlCYmUY3pvsGR0GhwHj1dUKriTGbEY3dEFZc=; X-YMail-OSG: XCaQCgwVM1nMZo5VUnAOS2aMyAU1jMQTVw8Ez22pt.wtZOgHS1DGVPyTif9eGu3uXj6q5K.5RQs4lRwUKXGHNhk3bMqv0aPNh.uaQPbUo4xibKc0FS2D Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:47:08 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:47:08 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <200704240438.l3O4cSur004885@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <499733.61609.qm@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:47:09 -0000 Thanks, Olivier. The lack of a Recycle Bin for Samba shares had not occured to me. I guess I should have each Windows client backup of all files modified that day to a space on the local drive... Olivier Nicole wrote: > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows > Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create > system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows > client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup > Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known > issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the > following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) For years I have been using Amanda (in the ports) to backup any servers, including Samba server, as well as some disks from PC under Windows, saving the data on a SLR 100 (Tandberg) tape. Tape dirve is expensive (and maybe out of production), tapes are not cheap, but they are reliable. Now days I would choose LTO technology I beleive. At any cost I would avoid any kind of DAT format: it acheives the capacity by high compression of the data on the tape and so the reliability is really an issue, plus the rotating head wears the tape much uch faster than any linear reccording technology. > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer > FreeBSD? Handbook says dump is the only way to go. I never looked at that part. I am using tar because it is a very universal format: the next server could be a Linux box, the tapes would still be readable, compared to dump that tend to be specific for each operating system. > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on > the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? If the > answer is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file > only) backup vs. a Windows-based one? Please add to my list of pros > and cons: Of course it is possible: any file that the Windows machine can access through the network, it could back-it up. > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical drive. > > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? Except if your tape drive is dead, fixing the server is really a matter of a couple of hours: at least fixing the server enough so you can restore something from a backup tape. I once was even able to restore something from booting the server from the recovery boot... I would consider it a highly bad luck that the server is dead and at the very same time you need to do a restore. > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a > 1) multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups > 1) (change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several > 1) backups to same disc/tape preferred. Tape is expensive. My future choice, when I have to replace the existing backup server is virtual tapes on some big hard disk (500GB SATA type of disk). Only thing to be found is the way to swap the hard drives. > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > 2) occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at > 2) a modest rate. Then install one disk and use some kind of virtual tapes on it. But that would not allow off site storage unless your disk can be moved. According the size of the data, you may consider USB connection. > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not > 3) too spendy). > > 4) I have an external SCSI connection, but very little "shelf" > 4) space. > > 5) The server does not have room for another internal device (except > 5) if swapping out the existing ATAPI CD-ROM drive). > > 6) I have an Ecrix Corporation Model VXI-1A SCSI internal tape drive > 6) that I assume is obsolete (comments appreciated). Anyway, I don't > 6) have room for it. > > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or > 7) monthly or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The > 7) RAID 1 array is expected to provide some degree of protection in > 7) leieu of daily backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, > 7) rather than implement a two-tiered backup process. RAID 1 will not protect you against accidentally erasing a file. And even though you informed your customer that the back-up is there just in case of major system crash and does not cover the user mistakes, they will come back to you asking to restore a file that they deleted (Samba does not offer recycle-bin). So you can still think about daily incremental back-up. Olivier --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 19:54:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FCA16A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net (alnrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.225.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DA813C44C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-71-63-141-31.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[71.63.141.31]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070424194357b14008bsu0e>; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:43:57 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.1.254]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27B42384; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <462E5DF5.1060708@veldy.net> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:43:49 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <2271.192.168.125.134.1177438307.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <2271.192.168.125.134.1177438307.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:54:03 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > i have a system with 4GB memory, doing the same similar behavior. but, on top > of not using the last few hundred megs of ram, even the POST shows like 3.6 or > 3.7GB of ram. is PAE still a solution for my case? > > [jhorne@canopus ~]$ dmesg | grep memory > real memory = 3958833152 (3775 MB) > avail memory = 3875762176 (3696 MB) > My motherboard has a BIOS option as to how the memory is to be used. If it is remapped, then you can see 3.2GB from a 32-bit OS (like Windows XP or Vista x86). If I turn remapping off, then only 3.0GB will show in such a 32-bit OS. However, a 64-bit OS can see all the memory and use it accordingly. Check your BIOS. Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 20:03:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED6716A406 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E79C13C487 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 32470 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 20:03:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JOJc8vw5oA83Lybq9xTTASKAx+tV+aUEBATWJo8Rjyg7/Pu7o0CXtt4/O6tXfYLaa7Yl+xbJc9dZePm0PUxartGFomFyQDO4gpc0SYJAbORrrAI1vygtoE1qzSoZG1icN9KaZBQjqzkfehT21tVL+MNfUhP9zuwjlOAEwSwAuy8=; X-YMail-OSG: cQKzLNMVM1lBF9OMTYTWK1DE6MAcFWq4n83Z27NcZraano5Si4uYdfYvPJGhuwGtq1ALihHqP63GPQJPxp77K1.9yQ-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:03:34 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:03:34 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20070424155710.GA18380@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <799346.31945.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:03:36 -0000 Forgot to mention that off site storage is a priority. The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb drives are not considered a good long-term storage solution, but for daily backups, I could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB drives (until data grows too large). Thanks to all for your experience, ideas and suggestions! Roland Smith wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows > Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create > system recovery disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows > client. > > This leaves backing up user data on some schedule. I've read "Backup > Basics", but have some questions: > > Which is best backup media for a FreeBSD file server, based on known > issues (or lack of) with each format? I need to decide between the > following formats: > a) CD-R (or CD-RW?) Too small these days. > b) DVD-R (or CD-RW?) Usefull, but you have to store them correctly or they won't last very long. > c) Streaming tape (which format/standard?) No experience with that, sorry d) USB drive (disks are cheap) This is what I currently use to back up my system. After mounting the (geli encrpyted) disk I start a script that performs a dump(8) of all ufs filesystems, compresses them with bzip2 and writes them to the external drive. If you want a non-os specific data format you can use tar. Start with a full backup, and after that use the --newer option, so every subsequent backup only stores the files that have changed since the last backup. > Which is the best method for backing up data files on a Samba sharer FreeBSD? > Handbook says dump is the only way to go. Dump works best for UFS filesystems. Tar handles normal files well, but might have issues with device files, flags and ACLs, things that dump does handle. Copying the data straight to a FAT32 filesystem and you'll loose things like ownership and permission. > Is it possible to have a Windows client perform the backup files on > the Samba share to a local Re-Writable CD or DVD drive? Yes, if the client in question has access to all the data on the samba share. but automation on windows is much more difficult than on FreeBSD. > If the answer > is YES, what are the pros and cons of a UNIX-based (data-file only) > backup vs. a Windows-based one? Please add to my list of pros and > cons: > > Windows Backup: > PRO: Backup can be restored to a Windows drive while server is being fixed? Not if you're using dump. Winzip can handle gzipped tarfiles. > CON: Users might forget to replace backup disk after using optical > drive. CON: cannot be automated properly. CON: windows programs won't handle things like UIDs and permissions properly. > FreeBSD Backup: > PRO: Out of sight from users (server is in a storeroom). PRO: Can be don with minimal user intervention. PRO: Can store all the attributes of the native file system. > CON: Cannot restore backup to a Windows disk while server is being fixed? > > These are some of my other considerations: > > 1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a multi-drive > solution. Best if client does not handle backups (change > discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several backups to > same disc/tape preferred. I think a detachable USB disk is very cost effective. A 500GB external Seagate drive is $153 at newegg. You'd buy a couple and rotate them. A tape drive alone would cost more. > 2) I only want to back up user data (not the OS). Current user data > occupies less than 1GB of drive space, and is expected to grow at a > modest rate. In that case a 500 GB backup disk could hold years of weekly full backups. > 3) I do NOT have a writable CD or DVD drive (but can buy one if not > too spendy). Media durability is an issue. I've seen test in magazines where more than half the discs contained a lot of errors or were unusable after two years. I've also seen optical drives fail in under two years depending on the environment. > 7) Have not yet settled on a backup schedule. May be weekly or monthly > or ad-hoc, but daily is probably out of the question. The RAID 1 array > is expected to provide some degree of protection in leieu of daily > backups. Plan to back up all documents each time, rather than > implement a two-tiered backup process. Mount an external USB, and create a cron job to copy the data over to it every night. No user action whatsoever required. Make sure that the external disk is not visible as a Samba share. Swap out the external disk for another one every week or month (this requires user intervention, but it could be scripted) and store the one not in use in a safe or off-site. How often you back up depends on how much work you're willing to loose or redo, and how easy it is to replace/recreate the data . Too much backups fills up cheap disk or DVD space. Not enough backups can destroy your client's business. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 20:30:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F6916A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFBC13C457 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OKUJMT018670; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:30:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 63713B854; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:30:19 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: L Goodwin Message-ID: <20070424203019.GA26551@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: L Goodwin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070424155710.GA18380@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <799346.31945.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <799346.31945.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:30:21 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:03:34PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > Forgot to mention that off site storage is a priority.=20 Please don't top-post. =20 > The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb drives are not > considered a good long-term storage solution, but for daily backups, I > could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB drives (until data grows too large). I would get one with a real harddisk instead of a thumbdrive. More capacity and probably a longer life. Using USB drives, there might be a way to completely automate backups. Using devd(8) it should be possible to detect that one of your backup disks is being plugged in. This can then start a script to mount the disk, perform the backups, unmount it and give the user a signal on the console, or audible, that he can take the USB drive out. If you're going to use thumbdrives, think about security. Such small devices are easily lost or stolen. Either encrypt the individual backups with programs like ccrypt(1) or gnupg(1), or use an encrpyted filesystem layer like geli(8). > Thanks to all for your experience, ideas and suggestions! You're welcome. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLmjbEnfvsMMhpyURAtqdAJsGmZUJccvkTFLz+awIESD/grZgrwCeJn8p rSh4XwVX/AeQf7gKSp3tH/s= =tYch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 20:38:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F6B16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br) Received: from bigben.usina-de-imagens.com.br (201.20.204.240.corp.ajato.com.br [201.20.204.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8CC13C484 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br) Received: from kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (bigfoot.usina-de-imagens.com.br [192.168.0.5]) by bigben.usina-de-imagens.com.br (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3OKN6Pm028921 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:31 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF39834A6EE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:06 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A386334A6B1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:06 -0300 (BRT) Received: from kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bigfoot.usina-de-imagens.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87710-09 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:05 -0300 (BRT) Received: from bigcore.local (unknown [192.168.0.218]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5B934A5FE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:05 -0300 (BRT) From: "J.C. =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7a?=" Organization: Usina de Imagens Digiphoto To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:04 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070103171717.77E5B16A571@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070103171717.77E5B16A571@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704241723.05092.digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br Subject: raid controller intel 82801GR/GH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:32 -0000 greetings, does anyone know about freebsd 6.2 compatibility with intel controller 82801GR/GH, running RAID 10? cheers, joe karma From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 20:38:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487FE16A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F5CD13C458 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 45096 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 20:38:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Cme5Ib0bZ/tHcZvL7wqFptzrVOt8JWOhtgqK+7gNXwIZNf8sFJZqD94dTBKrwTNTXd9vBBMiWe+EYOw5mfEoJu0lMKGm3r+s8pf0JoRjjW+rO6C0Jh1XIdLquii+kh6pv3IH0eGEP3luHwqRPK/1SppjwCcHh0q2jqRgFlZ5W+Y=; X-YMail-OSG: W7EnIS0VM1m0AIMRh_B1TqINsSF.Cr39CNDUoQeb Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:38:43 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:38:43 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <299506.44768.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Samba connection fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:38:44 -0000 I installed the samba-3.0.23c_2,1 package on a server destined for a small office network running Windows clients. Have not yet configured the network settings. Am trying to test the Samba configuration "offline" before connecting it to the network (router connected to cable modem, clients connected to router via Cat-5e Ethernet). Issues/Questions (see Samba configuration details at end of email): 1) "smbclient -L " fails with "Connection to SERVER failed". Get same error for "smbclient //SERVER/sambavol". What does this mean? 2) What value to assign "netbios name" in smb.conf? 3) What degree of network configuration is necessary for "smbclient -L " to work? 4) How to verify that Samba3 package was installed successfully (other than lack of warnings/errors during install)? SAMBA CONFIGURATION DETAILS: 1) Create smb.conf file in /usr/local/etc: [global] workgroup = office netbios name = tbd (is this required, and how/where to get/set it?) security = share [sambavol] path = /sambavol browseable = yes writeable = yes printable = no 2) Add entry to start samba in /etc/rc.conf: samba_enable="YES" 3) Start Samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start (to stop samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh stop) Note: Need to keep the file server synced with Internet standard time (see NTPD(8) man page). Tests: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Verify that smb.conf file is in the right directory (gets read): which smbd # Get location of smbd (output: usr/local/sbin/smbd) cd /usr/local/sbin # cd to the directory containing smbd! smbd -b | grep smb.conf # Get location of smb.conf (verify path is correct) (output: CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/sbin/smb.conf) RESULT: OK 2) Test Samba configuration file: cd /usr/local/etc testparm smb.conf RESULT: OK 3) List shares available on server: smbclient -L RESULT: FAIL ("Connection to SERVER failed") Additional Samba Configuration Steps: 1) Uncommented the following lines in /etc/inetd.conf and rebooted: #netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/smbd smbd #netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/sbin/nmbd nmbd On reboot, get these boot messages: ... Removing stale Samba tdb files: ...... done Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. Starting usbd. ... RESULT: Still getting "Connection to SERVER failed". --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:06:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D226516A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58111.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58111.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74BE113C4B9 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60521 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 21:06:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=HDQyalVYLZPhWarLu/ToN527OHOcnC2xi50/DCVWo7G6rWxz12zkl7Y3dJek0BEi5CAAmVEp5YJDDkqwUtyZ5zQ3Ch74n0ilSTQCxOpVt6tkQAPTVm+qAWeJTJ3fQ0xIM6hLWxRNQs5EAaWVYZIxxuEL1HbXU2AdlqQ55GdVJNU=; X-YMail-OSG: nzELvBgVM1lcpDCcoWBMi6d.TdE3_.SqHvR6gJaoQyP25Fw3NI6pzJ0xKuwVP3xhBg-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58111.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:06:08 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:06:08 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: L Goodwin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <299506.44768.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <825349.59201.qm@web58111.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Samba connection fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:06:09 -0000 It looks like a network configuration issue (haven't done any net config on a UNIX box in 10-15 years). When I run "smbclient -L localhost", I get: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Password: (pressed ) Anonymous login successful Anonymous login successful Domain=[OFFICE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23c] Sharename Type Comment ---------------- ------- --------------- sambavol Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.23c) Anonymous login successful Domain=[OFFICE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23c] Server Comment --------- -------------- Workgroup Master --------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- What next? I want to get this server as ready as possible before carting it to client location. Thanks! L Goodwin wrote: I installed the samba-3.0.23c_2,1 package on a server destined for a small office network running Windows clients. Have not yet configured the network settings. Am trying to test the Samba configuration "offline" before connecting it to the network (router connected to cable modem, clients connected to router via Cat-5e Ethernet). Issues/Questions (see Samba configuration details at end of email): 1) "smbclient -L " fails with "Connection to SERVER failed". Get same error for "smbclient //SERVER/sambavol". What does this mean? 2) What value to assign "netbios name" in smb.conf? 3) What degree of network configuration is necessary for "smbclient -L " to work? 4) How to verify that Samba3 package was installed successfully (other than lack of warnings/errors during install)? SAMBA CONFIGURATION DETAILS: 1) Create smb.conf file in /usr/local/etc: [global] workgroup = office netbios name = tbd (is this required, and how/where to get/set it?) security = share [sambavol] path = /sambavol browseable = yes writeable = yes printable = no 2) Add entry to start samba in /etc/rc.conf: samba_enable="YES" 3) Start Samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start (to stop samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh stop) Note: Need to keep the file server synced with Internet standard time (see NTPD(8) man page). Tests: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Verify that smb.conf file is in the right directory (gets read): which smbd # Get location of smbd (output: usr/local/sbin/smbd) cd /usr/local/sbin # cd to the directory containing smbd! smbd -b | grep smb.conf # Get location of smb.conf (verify path is correct) (output: CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/sbin/smb.conf) RESULT: OK 2) Test Samba configuration file: cd /usr/local/etc testparm smb.conf RESULT: OK 3) List shares available on server: smbclient -L RESULT: FAIL ("Connection to SERVER failed") Additional Samba Configuration Steps: 1) Uncommented the following lines in /etc/inetd.conf and rebooted: #netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/smbd smbd #netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/sbin/nmbd nmbd On reboot, get these boot messages: ... Removing stale Samba tdb files: ...... done Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. Starting usbd. ... RESULT: Still getting "Connection to SERVER failed". --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:11:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825BB16A409 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from deliver.hol.gr (deliver.hol.gr [62.38.3.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B152713C4DD for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apatewna@yahoo.gr) Received: from auth-smtp.hol.gr (takeit02.mail.dc.hol.net [192.168.20.72]) by deliver.hol.gr (8.12.11/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l3OLBPQ0017091 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified OK); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:11:25 +0300 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (ppp117-137.dsl.hol.gr [89.210.117.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.hol.gr (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3OLBMew002838; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:11:22 +0300 Message-ID: <462E727D.6010301@yahoo.gr> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:11:25 +0300 From: Apatewna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Spiros Papadopoulos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90/3157/Tue Apr 24 23:25:13 2007 on takeit02.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linksys wireless pcmcia card / FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: apatewna@yahoo.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:11:29 -0000 O/H Spiros Papadopoulos Ýãñáøå: > Hi, > > I am running FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and I have the above card in my DELL's > latitude c810 cardbus. If the card is not directly supported you can always try "ndisgen" (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ndisgen&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE&format=html) -- RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens _________________________________________ Thanos Rizoulis Electronic Computing Systems Engineer Larissa, Greece FreeBSD/PCBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:14:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDF916A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62FF13C54A for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HgSKu-0004oC-Id for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:14:08 +0200 Received: from 89-172-244-19.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.244.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:14:08 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-244-19.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:14:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:13:59 +0200 Lines: 113 Message-ID: References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig467D812BFC4995C8D9DD98BF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-244-19.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:14:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig467D812BFC4995C8D9DD98BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill Moran wrote: > In response to "Don O'Neil" : >=20 >> I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time= =2E >> Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the= >> kernel sources for 6.1? >=20 > Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel file for > information. >=20 > PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that= > performance sucks under PAE. It greatly depends on the workload. For example, these are my results with unixbench: PAE: INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDE= X Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6404191.9 548.= 8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1444.6 262.= 7 Execl Throughput 43.0 2374.5 552.= 2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 47618.0 120.= 2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 41809.0 252.= 6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 58002.0 100.= 0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1018477.4 818.= 7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 32811.6 82.= 0 Process Creation 126.0 4491.9 356.= 5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 638.0 1063.= 3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 798137.5 532.= 1 =3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D FINAL SCORE 317.= 2 NO PAE: INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDE= X Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6673515.4 571.= 9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1475.1 268.= 2 Execl Throughput 43.0 2335.9 543.= 2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 43796.0 110.= 6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39474.0 238.= 5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 57819.0 99.= 7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 998089.5 802.= 3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25928.4 64.= 8 Process Creation 126.0 5043.9 400.= 3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 697.0 1161.= 7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 792628.3 528.= 4 =3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D FINAL SCORE 312.= 7 The final score is better in PAE case because IO performance measured better, but in this case I know this particular benchmark can be ignored, but the rest of the numbers should be fine. In short, PAE is worse, but not horribly so. --------------enig467D812BFC4995C8D9DD98BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLnMXldnAQVacBcgRAnncAJ9RdAu1oMraGnSnD5r8BqnxpJfSjgCgtZKb A09r5RGKAYWtPdKMqsmP1nE= =tWQ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig467D812BFC4995C8D9DD98BF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:45:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1648816A403 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B8713C46E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3OLif8j045373; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:44:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070424163717.02660ca0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:43:47 -0500 To: L Goodwin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <299506.44768.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <299506.44768.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Samba connection fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:45:18 -0000 At 03:38 PM 4/24/2007, L Goodwin wrote: >I installed the samba-3.0.23c_2,1 package on a server destined for a small >office network running Windows clients. Have not yet configured the >network settings. >Am trying to test the Samba configuration "offline" before connecting it >to the network (router connected to cable modem, clients connected to >router via Cat-5e Ethernet). > >Issues/Questions (see Samba configuration details at end of email): This is a bit off-topic here. There are samba lists that will better serve you. >1) "smbclient -L " fails with "Connection to SERVER failed". >Get same error for "smbclient //SERVER/sambavol". What does this mean? > >2) What value to assign "netbios name" in smb.conf? The netbios name is the server's name your client pc's will see for those shares. It will be case insensitive and needs to be a unique name for the LAN. >3) What degree of network configuration is necessary for "smbclient -L >" to work? You need a proper IP stack running that will hit the gateway for your LAN. >4) How to verify that Samba3 package was installed successfully (other >than lack of warnings/errors during install)? Use a client computer and test the connection. There are utilities to help, but they don't always completely test a windows client connecting. >SAMBA CONFIGURATION DETAILS: > >1) Create smb.conf file in /usr/local/etc: > >[global] >workgroup = office >netbios name = tbd (is this required, and how/where to get/set it?) It is the server name you will use on your LAN. Make it up. >security = share > >[sambavol] >path = /sambavol >browseable = yes >writeable = yes >printable = no > >2) Add entry to start samba in /etc/rc.conf: > samba_enable="YES" > >3) Start Samba: > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start >(to stop samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh stop) Or it will start on boot-up. >Note: Need to keep the file server synced with Internet standard time (see >NTPD(8) man page). > >Tests: >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >1) Verify that smb.conf file is in the right directory (gets read): > which smbd # Get location of smbd > (output: usr/local/sbin/smbd) > cd /usr/local/sbin # cd to the directory containing smbd! > smbd -b | grep smb.conf # Get location of smb.conf (verify path is > correct) > (output: CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/sbin/smb.conf) >RESULT: OK > >2) Test Samba configuration file: > cd /usr/local/etc > testparm smb.conf >RESULT: OK > >3) List shares available on server: > smbclient -L >RESULT: FAIL ("Connection to SERVER failed") > >Additional Samba Configuration Steps: >1) Uncommented the following lines in /etc/inetd.conf and rebooted: > #netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root > /usr/local/sbin/smbd smbd > #netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/sbin/nmbd > nmbd >On reboot, get these boot messages: >... >Removing stale Samba tdb files: ...... done >Starting nmbd. >Starting smbd. >Starting usbd. >... >RESULT: Still getting "Connection to SERVER failed". Depends on how you are trying to do your authentication. Check your smb.conf. If you are going to authenticat against an existing windows domain or active directory you need to compile windbind in your samba. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:46:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAB716A401 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A2F13C468 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3OLjnvY045396; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:45:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070424164414.02669b70@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:44:56 -0500 To: digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <200704241723.05092.digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br> References: <20070103171717.77E5B16A571@hub.freebsd.org> <200704241723.05092.digital@usina-de-imagens.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: raid controller intel 82801GR/GH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:30 -0000 At 03:23 PM 4/24/2007, J.C. Fran=E7a wrote: >greetings, > >does anyone know about freebsd 6.2 compatibility with intel controller >82801GR/GH, running RAID 10? Have you tried creating your RAID 10 array first and installing FreeBSD? -Derek --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 21:51:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6FF16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6D113C44B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 17:51:17 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFM51202; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2007 17:51:10 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17966.31696.836044.479917@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:51:12 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <799346.31945.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20070424155710.GA18380@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <799346.31945.qm@web58107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:51:19 -0000 L Goodwin writes: > The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb drives are not > considered a good long-term storage solution, but for daily > backups, I could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB drives (until data > grows too large). And if you've been retiring undersize IDE drives to a back room .... Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 22:20:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3FF16A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8740913C45A for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BF5EBC78; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:20:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:20:27 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Ivan Voras Message-Id: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:20:35 -0000 In response to Ivan Voras : > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to "Don O'Neil" : > > > >> I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time. > >> Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the > >> kernel sources for 6.1? > > > > Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel file for > > information. > > > > PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that > > performance sucks under PAE. > > It greatly depends on the workload. For example, these are my results > with unixbench: > > > PAE: > INDEX VALUES > TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX > > Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6404191.9 548.8 > Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1444.6 262.7 > Execl Throughput 43.0 2374.5 552.2 > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 47618.0 120.2 > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 41809.0 252.6 > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 58002.0 100.0 > Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1018477.4 818.7 > Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 32811.6 82.0 > Process Creation 126.0 4491.9 356.5 > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 638.0 1063.3 > System Call Overhead 15000.0 798137.5 532.1 > ========= > FINAL SCORE 317.2 > > > > NO PAE: > INDEX VALUES > TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX > > Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6673515.4 571.9 > Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1475.1 268.2 > Execl Throughput 43.0 2335.9 543.2 > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 43796.0 110.6 > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39474.0 238.5 > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 57819.0 99.7 > Pipe Throughput 12440.0 998089.5 802.3 > Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25928.4 64.8 > Process Creation 126.0 5043.9 400.3 > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 697.0 1161.7 > System Call Overhead 15000.0 792628.3 528.4 > ========= > FINAL SCORE 312.7 > > The final score is better in PAE case because IO performance measured > better, but in this case I know this particular benchmark can be > ignored, but the rest of the numbers should be fine. > > In short, PAE is worse, but not horribly so. Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my understanding that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G (which is the problem it's intended to solve) If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of it. At least, that's my understanding of the issue. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 22:36:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CEA16A403 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93713C469 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E685C8E; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:05:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:05:30 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <20070415200255.18e6ab3f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> In-Reply-To: <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Defending against SSH attacks with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:36:01 -0000 Erik Osterholm wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:02:55PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: >> There was some discussion on this list not too long ago, and someone >> asked if I was willing to make my pf config and the associated scripts >> I wrote for it public. I would have posted on the original thread, >> but I can't find it now. >> >> Here is the information: >> http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/16 >> >> First: I'm not sure if the group got to it and I'm posting to a very stale thread here but I've found that the best way to defeat these password scanning ssh bots is to disallow passwords allowing public/private key authentication in their stead. Unfortunately this isn't always possible. Bill's method is a very close second. Second: I love the simplicity of the stateless firewall rules in Bill's pf.conf. I may have to look at implementing that here. -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 22:49:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CCE16A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58108.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58108.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C57B13C448 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 96850 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2007 22:49:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=1oAER/J1EqgFKWhn0K7pqi2QYw2mjLDePsHqeWxZ6Fcll3FRGg1m/y/ThE9TqOL0tx/tOi48E8BNyvSA6l05Bbtg7vjIvEZPYGOr0Ag0+mD6EvFY/fG1kTRQkve0cougIlqvEI/TcW9bDLnxzLfLYovW/N3KpOpfuGNK3cz4qa4=; X-YMail-OSG: YOb6pyEVM1lAmlAElAiXXT8itWOhlqRhHOZ512vzFnkhiGNe5UTSn.GZFxz33JbpmJcRJ6etQ0UkwP7o0.gpHFTBNxsVjib5XDGOKD.AicpiU938czUMArH7acEbpnE4 Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58108.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:49:11 PDT Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:49:11 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Derek Ragona , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070424163717.02660ca0@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <276990.96279.qm@web58108.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Samba connection fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:49:12 -0000 Gee, it works a lot better once I add server name to /etc/hosts! 8-D Derek Ragona wrote: At 03:38 PM 4/24/2007, L Goodwin wrote: I installed the samba-3.0.23c_2,1 package on a server destined for a small office network running Windows clients. Have not yet configured the network settings. Am trying to test the Samba configuration "offline" before connecting it to the network (router connected to cable modem, clients connected to router via Cat-5e Ethernet). Issues/Questions (see Samba configuration details at end of email): This is a bit off-topic here. There are samba lists that will better serve you. 1) "smbclient -L " fails with "Connection to SERVER failed". Get same error for "smbclient //SERVER/sambavol". What does this mean? 2) What value to assign "netbios name" in smb.conf? The netbios name is the server's name your client pc's will see for those shares. It will be case insensitive and needs to be a unique name for the LAN. 3) What degree of network configuration is necessary for "smbclient -L " to work? You need a proper IP stack running that will hit the gateway for your LAN. 4) How to verify that Samba3 package was installed successfully (other than lack of warnings/errors during install)? Use a client computer and test the connection. There are utilities to help, but they don't always completely test a windows client connecting. SAMBA CONFIGURATION DETAILS: 1) Create smb.conf file in /usr/local/etc: [global] workgroup = office netbios name = tbd (is this required, and how/where to get/set it?) It is the server name you will use on your LAN. Make it up. security = share [sambavol] path = /sambavol browseable = yes writeable = yes printable = no 2) Add entry to start samba in /etc/rc.conf: samba_enable="YES" 3) Start Samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start (to stop samba: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh stop) Or it will start on boot-up. Note: Need to keep the file server synced with Internet standard time (see NTPD(8) man page). Tests: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Verify that smb.conf file is in the right directory (gets read): which smbd # Get location of smbd (output: usr/local/sbin/smbd) cd /usr/local/sbin # cd to the directory containing smbd! smbd -b | grep smb.conf # Get location of smb.conf (verify path is correct) (output: CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/sbin/smb.conf) RESULT: OK 2) Test Samba configuration file: cd /usr/local/etc testparm smb.conf RESULT: OK 3) List shares available on server: smbclient -L RESULT: FAIL ("Connection to SERVER failed") Additional Samba Configuration Steps: 1) Uncommented the following lines in /etc/inetd.conf and rebooted: #netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/sbin/smbd smbd #netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/sbin/nmbd nmbd On reboot, get these boot messages: ... Removing stale Samba tdb files: ...... done Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. Starting usbd. ... RESULT: Still getting "Connection to SERVER failed". Depends on how you are trying to do your authentication. Check your smb.conf. If you are going to authenticat against an existing windows domain or active directory you need to compile windbind in your samba. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 23:18:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0442F16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 959CD13C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 55909 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 22:52:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CtMum0q8OyH7yZlhiIYRN3QwfXm9Mls0xSvQvRlGcM/j20y8GdmpA/ArbFFYFrR7tOukA5x4z1r+arDwEGtvZM6HFyyqvLXootGJZ0QKgwfXkgDEcl5OIZsGnFkkoQa9pm+9UCIhNSLSgjeJ/sqNSx+kossb7afPRR4ECOAZwhk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.165?) (mikej@rogers.com@99.244.62.78 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 22:52:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: XvvnPEcVM1k3rt.lDcTgCuX.MDfIroHDXhM6KXXowXbz6DUFiQf.3m5t_kEHkSc80A-- Message-ID: <462E89B0.10703@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:50:24 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200704230338.l3N3c33m064369@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCIe NIC for FreeBSD 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:18:51 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > I have been askedto install FreeBSD on a server, but I had no saying > on the procurement of the server. > > It ends up to be an HP 380G5, with onboard Broadcom based NIC that is > not supported and only PCIe extension slots. > > I am wondering what NIC I could buy that would be PCIe, x4 or x8, and > supported by FreeBSD 5.5. > > Best regards, > Your NIC is most likely supported by FreeBSD 6.2. Any reason for not upgrading? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 23:54:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324EC16A402 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@friedemann.us) Received: from nocsmasher.site5.com (nocsmasher.horsepower.site5.com [216.118.97.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE9B13C483 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@friedemann.us) Received: from cpe-75-86-208-234.wi.res.rr.com ([75.86.208.234] helo=lnovo.friedemann.dom) by nocsmasher.site5.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HgTsa-000658-AK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:53:00 -0400 Message-ID: <462E8A51.2000502@friedemann.us> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:53:05 -0500 From: Scott D Friedemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: This message has been scanned by ClamAV. X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - nocsmasher.site5.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - friedemann.us X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Error from mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:54:07 -0000 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #0 I have run mount_smbfs for the last couple years without incident. Now I find the command no longer works, but gives this error. mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.100 //drogo/c /mnt/bsdstuff Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Cannot allocate memory Can anyone offer a clue? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 00:16:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A0016A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F4A13C46C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so38426nza for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:16:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=WqgYGcTUNwbZokMDOYhzj2CgHcf1svAPqnmhDY+WzZJPohCUijjIfKMusWnUnWin0yG2djj5NxSTgmwPrJ0E6uZGH7E90tDo6+1nl2s3kpcQOS/2YleHj+ujnBGpVf0aR6qBjUveemKuQ4kawQw/m81sDdDnSu5zrK+NnS+558s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=G6ifUNMLarShma7lGv3AR7+qfO/5dVew8L50Glb30RaYe+jRMcnt61NRZFZEcuaZNVO9tQfQkh+NYI58JZXFrGehcZH51CweotBTvC11SXHMKl3InKe7l6kLiEs/Ndq/q3zu0O1xLsFEmkkNYMdm62d+PVujptZkfO5sHKuUfk0= Received: by 10.114.110.1 with SMTP id i1mr29290wac.1177459799776; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.52.13 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860704241709l362416f9w768724e9c3722cf9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:09:59 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Sendmail Config Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:16:03 -0000 Hey, I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p3. I'm having some issues configuring sendmail. I'm new to sendmail, so please bear with me. I've read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html along with some docs on sendmail.org. I'm guessing I'm overlooking something, or missing something completely. I'm trying to sent up a sendmail config to send/receive mail locally, and run smtp. My asdf.mc file is located at: http://pastebin.ca/456745 and my asdf.submit.mc file is at: http://pastebin.ca/456757 SENDMAIL_MC and SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC are set in make.conf to the full path to those .mc files. I also made changes to aliases, access, local-host-names, and virtusertable in the /etc/mail dir. When I run make in the /etc/mail dir, I get the following error: --------------- # make /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi -OAliasFile=/etc/mail/aliases /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 279: Unknown address family inet6 in Family=option *** Error code 70 Stop in /etc/mail. --------------- I disabled IPv6 in my kernel config, and I commented out in both the normal mc file, and the submit file the information for ipv6, so I'm not sure what's doing this. Thanks in advance! If it wasn't for these mailing lists, I'd be back on windows :-D ~Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 00:21:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426E716A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solon@pyro.de) Received: from srv23.fsb.echelon.bnd.org (mail.pyro.de [83.137.99.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0466613C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solon@pyro.de) Received: from i577b73ba.versanet.de ([87.123.115.186] helo=FLASH) by srv23.fsb.echelon.bnd.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HgVGC-0008tv-Jp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:21:28 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:21:34 +0200 From: Solon Luigi Lutz X-Mailer: SecureBat! Lite (v2.12.4) Personal Organization: PyroDesign Berlin X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <488507560.20070425022134@pyro.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Solon Luigi Lutz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:21:29 -0000 Hello Bill, Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 12:20:27 AM, you wrote: >> > >> > Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel file for >> > information. >> > >> > PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that >> > performance sucks under PAE. >> BM> Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my understanding BM> that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G (which BM> is the problem it's intended to solve) BM> If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of it. BM> At least, that's my understanding of the issue. Don't mind - since you don't want to use PAE. There are a bunch of devices, namely network cards, who will cease to work properly on a SMP PAE kernel. Get a AMD64 motherboard or limit the amount of PCI cards to the absolute minimum; depending on how many/what cards you have installed, they allocate more or less memory out of the possible 4 GB PCI mem-space. Best regards, Solon Lutz +-----------------------------------------------+ | PyroDesign Berlin - Creativity for tomorrow | | Wasgenstrasse 75/13 - 14129 Berlin, Germany | | www.pyro.de - phone + 49 - 30 - 48 48 58 58 | | info@pyro.de - fax + 49 - 30 - 80 94 03 52 | +-----------------------------------------------+ mailto:solon@pyro.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 00:35:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2F316A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E3D13C46C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so43205nza for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:35:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=so87vwJWGz+a8fQtA3kHNwHuK0/h5VPpn5/S+RH9OXd/L//BIw3gFkwA9jqeC5tWrxm+q12cjx2Za2cqpK7xUOgGkz2JmAYc2kC/vKy2Hr9+zMuQlkGIFkaBBghQBAdEjpQRizifse0bs180+ze4XMRAZJfaN7XI5dDu7uM19zs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aFqAvLKrCAmkFcIMVmt6dTqip8zqZkosx+5ZniIick1WJZJsrYWPL7A/6Z+SIq/8PWSI5rwmAOyK91nRzqwyPdLeJigIeDMaUmdVFVQGH7snVrIGZdN4Yj3oQAVRZO79sG5jec/n+BZJw2/1tY6zdDbCM9WXV7/biJctOHXqBhg= Received: by 10.114.72.1 with SMTP id u1mr28165waa.1177461321730; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.26.17 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8efc42630704241735q389ff6bnb964d8bffc1a8c3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:35:21 -0400 From: "Simon Chang" To: "Dhananjaya hiremath" In-Reply-To: <942293.71020.qm@web39215.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <942293.71020.qm@web39215.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about FreeBSD debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:35:22 -0000 > I installed the FreeBSD but some of its packages are not working. For that we have to check debugging option.Please can u tell me how to debug. I dont know any thing about debugging Which package(s) are you referring to? There are thousands of packages available to FreeBSD. You have to be more specific if you want to get any more response to your questions. SC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 00:47:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD4A16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFC113C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so46549nza for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:47:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cJNlLTH1W7Jt1O70JlMeibLRonWQFPtQLyVQuD9pvibEr75kuCuOsnQyPpDv9/uO7yTqjVy1aQQ2riqKNsa9fa13KMWHiMbtZNX4/l2TOaik5kiVYbXKKpLEMByzX8K9QZMZ/dZJ8NNyh2tKWpc1RXm6LND7kK/6k3hv+dxEqhk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nLbDNHy5Gz5jyycWS/QtZ/LGQ1cE36F2ExZyBNSDkk4SXpYb8K8Qfqni7++ieYGi3dndqebIXVDIgtE3UnPm4k1x8Dh3HaPoQLO/vWgklUuJT5OmyLnn8WEQ/513LWJMGKRrjBiS6SYad2klzkr1hjRgV8Dq1DD8ynVCBtKuIDU= Received: by 10.114.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr29521wae.1177462038517; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.26.17 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8efc42630704241747y6b279a8ewb58e930c14c73bed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:47:18 -0400 From: "Simon Chang" To: "Andrea Venturoli" In-Reply-To: <4623B7D6.1070804@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4623B7D6.1070804@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yet another crash - help with interpreting dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:47:19 -0000 Hello, Regarding your crash dump, has anyone responded to you yet? You might want to try and post this in the developer's mailing list. FreeBSD-questions has many non-developers who may not know how to help with your situation. Good luck, SC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 02:39:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C9F16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelly.terry.jones@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180CC13C465 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelly.terry.jones@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so74838wxc for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jHx572lJb7x+zuc7FGA5G8joc0M8ZKI24KH1nUP+OynGFmS+/8+Q4+NPLFUzRPbwi4pMGjiEZLMSlnkqDXyEykfgK2SpDRqJ6iG+7Sad9ho4Zn6l0mT9BEhHeIzrIeO8ATD1ZiySpk1/Z63EFIxityEPBTetdRjsIOMhNDIsMrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YlI+uv8qWoGUNNR/yCPhMUvGtpq33W36GkbCy9CjhSqqGfn6OBnV7mHK7MnqsewCjzEIv8csMe4XjxbVKKoWWB/GG6lxKE5tJpKL8CgJoyPIlr7PQ6fORNj97ArhtfT5oxObcssTQB7adsFyGxWhsinZf+gAw6J/JDq23lj2UFk= Received: by 10.70.69.11 with SMTP id r11mr52070wxa.1177468790520; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.41.12 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26face530704241939x1acd5d6en56b26fe4bdf69d85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:39:50 -0700 From: "Kelly Jones" To: nmlug@nmlug.org, nmosug-l@mailman.swcp.com, linuxusersgroup@googlegroups.com, techtalk@linuxchix.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Using LD_PRELOAD to make date return a specific date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:39:55 -0000 I recently discovered LD_PRELOAD, a cool environment variable that lets a library "intercept" system calls. For example, setting LD_PRELOAD to /usr/lib/libtsocks.so lets tsocks intercept socket connections and redirect them to a SOCKS proxy. My question: how can I write a library that intercepts the gettimeofday() system call (or time() or whatever the 'date' command uses) and gets 'date' to return, say, "Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 1970"? I realize this involves a couple of steps (writing a C "library" for one), so any pointers are appreciated. My real intentions are more complex (and sinister ). -- We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that resistance to new ideas and technology is unwise and ultimately futile. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 02:59:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557E216A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1A213C45D for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgXjF-0007KD-9I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:59:37 +0100 Received: from esperance.zetnet.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id l3P2xaHU005845 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:59:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 13668 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Apr 2007 02:59:31 -0000 From: "Frank Shute" Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:59:31 +0100 To: Olaf Greve Message-ID: <20070425025931.GA13642@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <38A9B70D-9BF1-4F29-8123-D82907AE07BA@axis.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <38A9B70D-9BF1-4F29-8123-D82907AE07BA@axis.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:59:37 +0100 (BST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to manually patch/configure/compile Apache 2.2.4's mod_autoindex module? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:59:39 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Olaf Greve wrote: > > Hiya, Hi Olaf, > > I have run into a seemingly trivial, yet annoying issue. I used to > use Apache 1.3.33 on my live server, and recently I upgraded to > Apache 2.2.4, which apart from some hassles when upgrading the PHP4 > extensions, went well. > > However, there is one small thingy that is different: there are > exactly two directories on which I allow directory listings, and > these listings are (also) called from an external W*nd*ws program > that one of the users of my machine has made and has distributed. For > this user, I had allowed directory listings, with fancyindexing > enabled, and I thought everything would be fine, but.... > Apache 1.3.33's mod_autoindex created listings using (uppercase) > ... tags, and Apache 2.2.4's version outputs (lowercase) > ... tags, and there ya go: the already widely distributed > application solely checks for the uppercase version, and fails on the > lowercase version. As you say: annoying. > > I had hoped that it would be easy to change this around, using some > form of template, but after RTFM-ing on the mod_autoindex (and > accompanying "options") documents, I am pretty certain that this is > not the case (or I am overlooking it). > > In fact, it looks like the only place where this could be changed, is > the mod_autoindex.c file, under the "work" directory in the proper > "ports" directory. > > Now, I don't mind patching the C source to accomplish this, however, > compiling it neatly into a properly working module may be more of a > hassle, and as a further downside, this would have to be done each > and every time I would possibly want to update Apache... > > Is there anyone who knows a better/easier way to achieve this? > If not, is there anyone who can tell me an easy method to properly > compile and link the mod_autoindex module (ideally using the provided > Makefile)? Have a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html in particular: 4.5.2.1 Overriding the Default Ports Directories You basically copy the port wholesale to somewhere in your directory tree and build your "new" patched port with WRKDIRPREFIX set.....I think. Post back, if you have any problems. > > Tnx in advance, and cheerz, > Olafo HTH. -- Frank echo "f r a n k @ e s p e r a n c e - l i n u x . c o . u k" | sed 's/ //g' --->PGP keyID: 0x10BD6F4B<--- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 03:05:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550F416A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from ns.beach.net (ns.beach.net [12.130.64.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238A613C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from [192.168.1.227] (busarow [209.137.253.157]) by ns.beach.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l3P2TLDQ072070; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:29:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860704241709l362416f9w768724e9c3722cf9@mail.gmail.com> References: <8d23ec860704241709l362416f9w768724e9c3722cf9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Busarow Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:29:20 -0600 To: Schiz0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail Config Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:03 -0000 On Apr 24, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > Hey, > > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p3. I'm having some issues configuring > sendmail. I'm > new to sendmail, so please bear with me. I've read > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html > along > with some docs on sendmail.org. I'm guessing I'm overlooking > something, or > missing something completely. > > I'm trying to sent up a sendmail config to send/receive mail > locally, and > run smtp. My asdf.mc file is located at: http://pastebin.ca/456745 > and my > asdf.submit.mc file is at: http://pastebin.ca/456757 > SENDMAIL_MC and SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC are set in make.conf to the full > path to > those .mc files. > > I also made changes to aliases, access, local-host-names, and > virtusertable > in the /etc/mail dir. As a first step change DOMAIN(schiz0.securityexploits.com) to DOMAIN(schiz0.securityexploits.com) unless you happen to have created an M4 domain file named schiz0.securityexploits.com.m4. It is *not* a place you define your domain name. Dan > > When I run make in the /etc/mail dir, I get the following error: > --------------- > # make > /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi -OAliasFile=/etc/mail/aliases > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 279: Unknown address family inet6 in > Family=option > *** Error code 70 > > Stop in /etc/mail. > --------------- > > I disabled IPv6 in my kernel config, and I commented out in both > the normal > mc file, and the submit file the information for ipv6, so I'm not sure > what's doing this. > > Thanks in advance! If it wasn't for these mailing lists, I'd be > back on > windows :-D > > ~Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 03:05:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7AE16A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alvar_4786@yahoo.com) Received: from web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0099013C43E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alvar_4786@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 65612 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Apr 2007 02:38:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=N2poauGddZ/6ZVsBQWYjZhLfe3wtKeq2XOk2sWUATikiPR0V/20l2O+eTb+TKmbImZ2OPQ8LJ+2RA5wHZ8jkBG2brsgdBC8xKivqMIWgT1pLHbROXUvgHQkW2NyVlg9Ve+cDLqkRSlHzyggOA6RyiXW+UaM0bJSUNnIhoY4ULpU= ; Message-ID: <20070425023823.65610.qmail@web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: lyjVn5QVM1nfJraHcvHdpm4_8MwXONK87jMveDdLl.KoYXPc92lE92vec5JH70Zb4VO52gY41WbGNxazCrBPWnELDXlz4_bPH8i6hVW3eVrRqFrV6Kyk5IZ7Us19hw-- Received: from [202.84.20.62] by web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:38:23 BST Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:38:23 +0100 (BST) From: Jeff Alvar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:07:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:05 -0000 hello, I am a new to freebsd i encouterd same error below "recovering vi editor session" and the system halted. Is there a way to boot it again so ican remove the /var/tmp/ vi.recover I need to clean it so it wont hang again.. > While booting I get the message "recovering vi editor sessions" and > the booting process is halted for a couple of minutes. I'm new to > FreeBSD so I don't know where to look. Booting is resumed and some > time later I get a message that sendmail is starting -- again taking a > long time ... > > Any ideas how to fix this? The saved sessions are (by default) in "/var/tmp/vi.recover". If you don't need to recover the sessions, clean the directory out. thanks jeff Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 03:15:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D14D16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) Received: from mx1.otc.edu (mx1.otc.edu [198.209.160.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383FE13C48A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177470252-680b005c0000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://198.209.160.201:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Sender Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by mx1.otc.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4A9BB19198 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:04:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by mx1.otc.edu with ESMTP id WN7LVLtPMhlDt7gB for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:04:12 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Single Instance Service Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:04:12 -0500 Message-ID: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E632890@EXM1.otc.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Single Instance Service Thread-Index: AceG5mZGHQUq9TCmQBG6MFZzlANBJw== From: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." To: X-Barracuda-Connect: exn1.otc.edu[172.16.2.131] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177470252 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OTC E-Mail System at otc.edu Subject: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:15:41 -0000 I am looking for software that will run on FreeBSD that is similar to = Microsoft Single Instance Service. The Single Instance Storage Filter is a file system filter that manages = the duplicate copies of files on hard-disk volumes. This filter copies = one instance of the duplicate file into a central folder, and the = duplicates are replaced with a link to the central copy to improve disk = usage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 03:28:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D86016A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716B613C480 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so298155ugh for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:28:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TK4enTcliAPrpEFryykgotm5GwlJ5AKsdgV7LNvN7kpyTWyvR5dgUBv0Z8qiHTBS4E8+wRrQo2R4zSgIoJxbxhp0qWC4Nh73lhT9CUwKObuplLMItHHaW+zgW6cWON/w6IPwWyTfW5AW+7VGbftXeM/8DnPGbnknJ1TPLq4p7fU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rUCMVwhvonxn5vC4jfCDcnux8MkqN6hQqel5LR3S1YCw2a3WoYWedejY09SL6nBHWTCu4SFSn6mLk87JqkiUyO2kwuHIT2v8tZ9I+nKDLCQOuHU5+cvmh+wcrvQcyG94ICobh4RC4Xy7ES9OiSDk3OCwmd7svVEPsnZAuglgW0w= Received: by 10.82.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr328121bue.1177471716495; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.12 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:28:36 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Wood, Russell" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <879633.68756.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:28:42 -0000 On 23/04/07, Wood, Russell wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Marsh > > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2007 8:21 AM > > To: L Goodwin > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers > > > > On 4/24/07, L Goodwin wrote: > > > > > > I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file > > > server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 > > > Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows > Vista > > > Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create system > > recovery > > > disks (disk images) for the server and each Windows client. > > I dump (man dump) my array to a spare 250GB disk within my server. > Indeed. A few cheap (maybe even free) drives are probably at least as reliable as an 80usd DLT tape. Also faster. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 05:05:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E8516A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:05:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranoid.rat@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADA013C48C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranoid.rat@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so87487pyh for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=k3XOFbLzIYzkklvnrOzWAC3vEDsql9eLjb6W0OMP/zCcz07W25hcsI+ZmTL5GYn9gEgJ9oZenqOiEHpf6ybJEFbq2Z4rpwwdDHapKWVRGvHUk3IglPEI4iEXhHQiTI/y1W+as0GWM26ICos+5cJXmMpOv3QrrzLUc44FP0Tbbp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kPx99BarXklH5CvXksyw2TYpB8DzqUuHzpiOcKwJPEYtNRrDIO3YtOvAWD5V5JknjsGh1lPRKuxJxYz9nwajzkqk/1QCONieQ4Vi5gNxnnVaPFVcrKQGpO99Vw9fpvQGVOXYkD9e7h5g83Aa8g7OLHWk9/Oc045x7CU+PoEMc1k= Received: by 10.78.149.13 with SMTP id w13mr54496hud.1177476050992; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.132.18 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:40:50 -0400 From: "Rat Paranoid" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: GELI recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:05:42 -0000 Dear All, I badly need your help! I've used GELI encrypted partition on my notebook for 5 month but now I can't mount it on startup... it seems that I forgot the password (but how is it possible if I enter it each time I switch my notebook?!) or something is wrong with GELI anyway when I created that partition I also created "backup key" file as it was suggested by the manual... Now I've tried to mount the partition with that key but it keeps telling me that the password is wrong. %( Is it possible to recover the bloody thing with that "backup key"?! Your help would be much appreciated! Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 06:15:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBCC16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [204.119.0.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2E13C4BD for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3P6Fdnh073463 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:15:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3P6Fdjo073462 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:15:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns.umpquanet.com: james set sender to list@museum.rain.com using -f Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:15:39 -0700 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425061538.GA71770@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:15:42 -0000 I'm trying to mount a devfs inside a chroot jail, so that scponlyc with work with sftp. This problem seems to match kern/93423, but I have another 6.2-STABLE system which has no problem with the below. How can I get /sbin/devfs to cooperate? Thank you! Jim sys : 23:07:12 /root# mount_devfs devfs ~foo/dev sys : 23:07:21 /root# ls -l ~foo/dev total 1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 73 Apr 24 22:21 acd0 crw------- 1 root operator 0, 26 Apr 24 22:21 ata crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 33 Apr 24 22:21 atkbd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 25 Apr 24 22:42 console crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 51 Apr 24 22:21 consolectl crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 6 Apr 24 22:21 ctty crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 55 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 56 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0.init crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 57 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0.lock crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 5 Apr 24 22:21 devctl cr-------- 1 root wheel 0, 28 Apr 24 22:21 devstat dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Apr 24 23:07 fd/ crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 64 Apr 24 22:21 fd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 21 Apr 24 22:21 fido crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 4 Apr 24 22:21 geom.ctl crw------- 1 root operator 0, 27 Apr 24 22:21 ida0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 63 Apr 24 22:21 idad0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 65 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 67 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1a crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 68 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1b crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 69 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1c crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 70 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1d crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 71 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1e crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 72 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1f crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 66 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s3 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 16 Apr 24 22:21 io lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Apr 24 23:07 kbd0@ -> atkbd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 20 Apr 24 22:21 klog crw-r----- 1 root kmem 0, 23 Apr 24 22:21 kmem crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 62 Apr 24 22:21 mdctl crw-r----- 1 root kmem 0, 22 Apr 24 22:21 mem dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Apr 24 23:07 net/ lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Apr 24 23:07 net1@ -> net/fxp0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Apr 24 23:07 net2@ -> net/fxp1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Apr 24 23:07 net3@ -> net/lo0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 3 Apr 24 22:21 network crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 58 Apr 24 22:21 nfs4 crw------- 1 root kmem 0, 24 Apr 24 22:21 nfslock crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 7 Apr 24 23:00 null crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0, 9 Apr 24 22:21 pci crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 77 Apr 24 23:07 ptyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 79 Apr 24 23:07 ptyp1 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 18 Apr 24 15:21 random lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stderr@ -> fd/2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stdin@ -> fd/0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stdout@ -> fd/1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 17 Apr 24 22:21 sysmouse crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 52 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 53 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0.init crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 54 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0.lock crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 78 Apr 24 23:07 ttyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 80 Apr 24 23:07 ttyp1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 35 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 36 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 37 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv2 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 38 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv3 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 39 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv4 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 40 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv5 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 41 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv6 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 42 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv7 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 43 Apr 24 22:21 ttyv8 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 44 Apr 24 22:21 ttyv9 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 45 Apr 24 22:21 ttyva crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 46 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvb crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 47 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvc crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 48 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvd crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 49 Apr 24 22:21 ttyve crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 50 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Apr 24 23:07 urandom@ -> random crw------- 1 root operator 0, 61 Apr 24 22:21 xpt0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 8 Apr 24 22:21 zero sys : 23:07:27 /root# /sbin/devfs -m ~foo/dev rule -s 1 applyset devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process sys : 23:08:04 /root# ls -l ~foo/dev total 1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 73 Apr 24 22:21 acd0 crw------- 1 root operator 0, 26 Apr 24 22:21 ata crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 33 Apr 24 22:21 atkbd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 25 Apr 24 22:42 console crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 51 Apr 24 22:21 consolectl crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 6 Apr 24 22:21 ctty crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 55 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 56 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0.init crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 0, 57 Apr 24 22:21 cuad0.lock crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 5 Apr 24 22:21 devctl cr-------- 1 root wheel 0, 28 Apr 24 22:21 devstat dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Apr 24 23:07 fd/ crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 64 Apr 24 22:21 fd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 21 Apr 24 22:21 fido crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 4 Apr 24 22:21 geom.ctl crw------- 1 root operator 0, 27 Apr 24 22:21 ida0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 63 Apr 24 22:21 idad0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 65 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 67 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1a crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 68 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1b crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 69 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s1c crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 70 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1d crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 71 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1e crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 72 Apr 24 15:21 idad0s1f crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 66 Apr 24 22:21 idad0s3 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 16 Apr 24 22:21 io lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Apr 24 23:07 kbd0@ -> atkbd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 20 Apr 24 22:21 klog crw-r----- 1 root kmem 0, 23 Apr 24 22:21 kmem crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 62 Apr 24 22:21 mdctl crw-r----- 1 root kmem 0, 22 Apr 24 22:21 mem dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Apr 24 23:07 net/ lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Apr 24 23:07 net1@ -> net/fxp0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Apr 24 23:07 net2@ -> net/fxp1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Apr 24 23:07 net3@ -> net/lo0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 3 Apr 24 22:21 network crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 58 Apr 24 22:21 nfs4 crw------- 1 root kmem 0, 24 Apr 24 22:21 nfslock crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 7 Apr 24 23:00 null crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0, 9 Apr 24 22:21 pci crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 77 Apr 24 23:08 ptyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 79 Apr 24 23:08 ptyp1 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 18 Apr 24 15:21 random lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stderr@ -> fd/2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stdin@ -> fd/0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Apr 24 23:07 stdout@ -> fd/1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 17 Apr 24 22:21 sysmouse crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 52 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 53 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0.init crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 54 Apr 24 22:21 ttyd0.lock crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 78 Apr 24 23:08 ttyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 80 Apr 24 23:08 ttyp1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 35 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 36 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv1 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 37 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv2 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 38 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv3 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 39 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv4 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 40 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv5 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 41 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv6 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 42 Apr 24 22:22 ttyv7 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 43 Apr 24 22:21 ttyv8 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 44 Apr 24 22:21 ttyv9 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 45 Apr 24 22:21 ttyva crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 46 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvb crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 47 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvc crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 48 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvd crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 49 Apr 24 22:21 ttyve crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 50 Apr 24 22:21 ttyvf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Apr 24 23:07 urandom@ -> random crw------- 1 root operator 0, 61 Apr 24 22:21 xpt0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 8 Apr 24 22:21 zero From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 06:20:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0038E16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D2913C484 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so124549wxc for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R+45h0nVgim9Zmy2FcP8p8DbeEeTESKFwpKsMb7m8KQKJx9WrbRj7ZCMJn8F+s93fiklr/sVh4ZYA2Z3+v7ljafUdQXfJvJ10cRtro+t4EfdCxGQbbkJHFdNcakMeMNKCamQB40Gc+5HxBhW3/quEMRZZXEA2khlbJmdtNbAMFg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mwsi/v2Wt/A1BxCjx8UVZtFZnRE6uCHvZ+jleN1ot7jGHFVIHL6Lc4wqeLV6QlcJWLSCi35qTsi38DENvisqEGnhSBNlGy6TlCCCjTttWMguk1fet38yUiAIdNPCTuTMCAEscuCxBwuahFkU1FOUzTqJDA3cV1QJriYzhrVJdbY= Received: by 10.70.108.18 with SMTP id g18mr814668wxc.1177482010297; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0704242320u782a2eei1f1a1876c92f2440@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:20:10 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Spiros Papadopoulos" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linksys wireless pcmcia card / FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:20:12 -0000 On 4/23/07, Spiros Papadopoulos wrote: > Allthough i have set to yes the option about "receiving your messages to the > list" I didn't receive it. > In addition i haven't received any reply so far. > > Could somebody confirm that my message was sent properly to the list. > > Thanks, Spiros > > On 21/04/07, Spiros Papadopoulos wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am running FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and I have the above card in my DELL's > > latitude c810 cardbus. > > > > I followed the instructions on the page below and configure the kernel > > accordingly: > > > > http://www.freebsdmall.com/~loader/en_US.ISO8859-1 > > /articles/wireless/article.html > > > > i get the message about: > > > > cardbus0: CIS pointer is 0 > > cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS > > > > which takes me to the post below...: > > > > http://freebsd.monkey.org/freebsd-stable/200607/msg00449.html > > > > I guess i need to tweak the windows driver or anyway hack it somehow. The > > problem is that i 've never done anything similar before > > but i would like to get involved and make it work. > > > > Anybody can point me to the right direction ? If the above is not the best > > solution i would really appreciate pointing me to > > the best alternative. > > > > thanks in advance > > Spiros P. > > > > > -- > Spiros P. Please check my HOWTO http://blog.wearab.net/arab/2006/11/26/howto-linksys-wpc54g-with-pc-bsd-13-based-freebsd-61/ I hope it helps. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 07:27:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDCD16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E360C13C45A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3P7TFIQ065894 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3P7TF0G065893 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:29:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:29:14 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: Subject: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:16 -0000 Guys, This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), that's okay... I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This works to print $9 the filenames. ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any clues! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 07:27:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D7916A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0A413C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so184056nza for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=BCc70wG/9R9x5Jme1R5+CTWCO53ZA4DyxrNYerEGA7xsBsMVMt4TahvlsxCx7CnVh24R1uxKH9MarsE+4XcYsu9inHWSsMkv+mr+W6pHeAOdiNFEmfnzv5TkGnJbhfqfemuB8CBQ0q6XKLbCkLjP96zXiLEOkrwEIhIkAJZ8ouI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IS9AuImwJj/nPj3k8vb3dKGe4f0o4Sfu2Ksu/o19y52ys6WV2gP9hRso5ydHX3wd0iaMPnAPeLRlrbIHj9zQ8PTaeHyEViN6PobRx6qrst689olyVjnCa4fnByNK5gvECWa3fWeIF5oSN+WZVz61KyleLLyAMk3hUkbbPfzQ7sM= Received: by 10.114.111.1 with SMTP id j1mr136291wac.1177486068635; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.208.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:27:48 +0200 From: "n j" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:27:49 -0000 Hello, does anybody know is it possible with Postfix to "route" e-mail based on either the inet interface message came from or the sender of a message? I'm using Postfix v.2.3.8 on a multihomed machine and have two smtpd's defined in master.cf. What I would like is that mail submitted through smtpd that is listening on A.B.C.D goes out through the smtp client that binds to A.B.C.D and the rest of the mail go through the other smtp client. The problem as I see it is that, once messages arrive in the queue, it becomes irrelevant where they came from and the only "routing" that is available is recipient-based. Thanks for any suggestions! -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 07:50:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188E916A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A7313C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3P7nvct059723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:50:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l3P7nvct059723 Message-ID: <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:56 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:50:17 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3160/Wed Apr 25 06:28:45 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:50:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Gary Kline wrote: > Guys, > > This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I > need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), > that's okay... > > I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and > edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This > works to print $9 the filenames. > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 > == 26 ) print $9}' > > What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and > xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any > clues! > xargs(1) is your friend. Simply arrange for your awk script to print out the names of all the files you have selected to edit, then pipe the result into xargs. Like so: ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' | xargs vi This does assume that the file names you are using do not contain spaces, quote marks, brackets or other characters of syntactical significance to the shell. In that case you could use something like this: find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi where find's '-print0' and the '-0' flag to xargs make the commands produce and consume respectively a null separated list of filenames. Unfortunately with find(1) there doesn't seem to be a way of expressing an absolute date / time -- all you can do is the time difference between now and when you want (which defaults to 'number of days' but can be set to use various other time units. I can think of a couple of ways of calculating that, but personally I'd find it cleaner to just roll the whole thing into a small perl script which identified the files in question and forked off an instance of vi(1) to do the editing. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLwgk3jDkPpsZ+VYRAxaaAJ9H4q3vD4qqBo+FijEs+PqmaR0kaQCgidpA kXOmJIpsODutFhLIvIoJpEE= =fNoc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:02:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4021916A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A346913C4B8 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HgcSX-0006Ha-Fu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:02:41 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:02:41 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:02:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:02:24 +0200 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig412AFAC0DC1F9955F58D491F" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) In-Reply-To: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:02:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig412AFAC0DC1F9955F58D491F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill Moran wrote: > Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my=20 understanding > that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G=20 (which > is the problem it's intended to solve) > > If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of i= t. > At least, that's my understanding of the issue. I don't think that's how PAE works. AFAIK, it adds all the memory pages=20 it can find (including those above and below 4 GB) into the VM pool with = 64-bit addresses, so all of them can be used by the applications in an=20 uniform way. Kind of like swap works. --------------enig412AFAC0DC1F9955F58D491F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGLwsQldnAQVacBcgRAkHCAJwPhfKrew9dwxhRR5mboQg7WZ+FhQCbB8Cf 9JW7h7kdnBDCBkVwqmYeJpg= =ZWJk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig412AFAC0DC1F9955F58D491F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:18:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7D016A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9895613C45B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3P8II2t020554; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Justin Sullivan" , Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:19:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <50896.203.206.238.241.1175908570.squirrel@webmail.dialix.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: atacontrol rebuild on non-identical disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:18:21 -0000 I didn't see a response and this is an old one, you probably fixed it by now. You will need to dd the old disk to a new one then get an identical to the new one and raid them. Of course if the new one is larger you will still have the existing smaller partition table. If it was me I would build a new server and ship it UPS ground out there. Your existing disk is probably about ready to fail too, and both disks probably died due to overheating caused by one or more fan failures, and if your power supply fan gets choked with dust, it's a goner then the supply will burn up. I would guess the inside of that server is pretty filthy about now. Ted -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Justin Sullivan Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 6:16 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: atacontrol rebuild on non-identical disks We have a (very) remote FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE system running on Asus RS120 hardware and historically configured with 2 identical SATA drives using atacontrol RAID1 and the system installed on ar0. One of the drives has died, however no identical replacement drive could be easily sourced at the remote location. So, attempting to get things back to normal RAID1 operation as quickly as possible we have tried a same size but non-identical drive and attempted an atacontrol rebuild. However, this is stuck indefinitely at 0% rebuild progess. While I'm aware that some RAID1 mechanisms e.g. CCD seem to insist on identical disks, the documentation isn't so clear on ATA and I figured it was worth a try. Does anyone know if it is possible to overcome the non-identical disk issue and allow ata RAID1 to work again? I've also considered keeping the current ar0 setup on the single working disk and setting up a gmirror RAID1 copy on the second disk would work. Current config info is as follows: >From atacontrol list: ATA channel 2: Master: ad4 Serial ATA v1.0 ATA channel 3: Master: ad6 Serial ATA v1.0 >From the permanently going nowhere rebuild output of atacontrol status: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: REBUILDING 0% completed The WDC WD2000JD on ad4 is the functional system drive and orignial member of the RAID1 array. ad6 is the new "spare" and presumably is completely blank still at this stage. I realise that sourcing an identical drive is probably the right (or at least easy) answer. The original drives (WDC WD2000JD on ad4) are still available for purchase, just not anywhere near where the machine lives - so getting a replacement drive would be a logistically difficult and time-consuming exercise. Thanks, JS _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:27:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBBD16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s30.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s30.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B6213C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.100]) by bay0-omc1-s30.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:55:54 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:55:55 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:55:52 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:55:52 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2007 07:55:55.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[2744FBC0:01C7870F] Subject: PIL istallation In FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:27:23 -0000 Hi , I have a FreeBSD6.0 server machine running zope2.9 and plone . this m/c has python-2.4.4 but no PIL module , I have to install it to support the zope/plone application that I am running in this machine But in /usr/ports there is no such port for PIL OR I can't recoganize which port is it I made a serch like this /usr/ports]# make search name=py-pil but it retuns null So what steps I have to follow to install PIL ( PythonImageLibrary) in this machine , Please help me with your suggestions .. _________________________________________________________________ Free & easy posting . Yello Classifieds. http://www.yello.in/home.php?utm_source=hotmailtag&utm_medium=textlink&utm_content=in&utm_campaign=april From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:28:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDDB16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gattob@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3.tin.it [212.216.176.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AAC13C457 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gattob@tin.it) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (87.16.153.3) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.2.072.1) (authenticated as gattob) id 460BDDCF020495F8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:16:35 +0200 Message-ID: <462F0E99.6030607@tin.it> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:17:29 +0200 From: Gatto Carla User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cerca velocemente nuovi clienti X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:28:16 -0000 desidero maggiori informazioni sui vostri servizi con i relativi costi gattob@tin.it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:34:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045DB16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6434D13C465 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3P8Y7Sl026915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:07 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3P8Y72h053927; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:07 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:34:07 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704250834.l3P8Y72h053927@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com In-reply-to: (dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) References: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PIL istallation In FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:34:10 -0000 > this m/c has python-2.4.4 but no PIL module , I have to install it to > support the zope/plone application that I am running in this machine But > in /usr/ports there is no such port for PIL OR I can't recoganize which You have to get that directly from Python site. If I remember well, it installs without any problem. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:37:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F98416A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from smtp.interstroom.nl (smtp1.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466BB13C4BB for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180]:49451 helo=[192.168.1.134]) by smtp.interstroom.nl with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hgczw-0007ni-VJ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:37:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070425025931.GA13642@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <38A9B70D-9BF1-4F29-8123-D82907AE07BA@axis.nl> <20070425025931.GA13642@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <18654C7B-E1DC-4E3B-B884-F88487A0A1A9@axis.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Olaf Greve Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:37:10 +0200 To: Frank Shute X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to manually patch/configure/compile Apache 2.2.4's mod_autoindex module? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:19 -0000 Hi Frank, Tnx a lot for your answers! >Have a look at: >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports- using.html >in particular: >4.5.2.1 Overriding the Default Ports Directories > >You basically copy the port wholesale to somewhere in your directory >tree and build your "new" patched port with WRKDIRPREFIX set.....I >think. Hmmm, I read it, and though it looks somewhat promising, I wonder if that'll work... The issue is that when first patching the C file, and then just trying a "make" it does nothing. When doing a "make clean", it will get all sources freshly again (hence undoing the patches made to the C file). From what I gather from the section you refer to, it will simply use a different working directory and/or install directory. However, wouldn't that try to simply install a newly build entire Apache 2.2.4 version next to the existing one (be it in a different directory, or not), with the difference that it is freshly built out of a different working directory (but still using the same fresh new sources)? For obvious reasons, I'm somewhat apprehensive about trying this on my live server (though I could possibly (ab)use my fallback server for it), and was kind of hoping there would be an easy way to just compile the mod_autoindex module, using the patched source... It appears I may have to fiddle around somewhat more with this, unless someone knows of a good way to achieve just that...? Cheers! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:48:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393AA16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF92713C4BD for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: by nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3E6664B252C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:55 +0200 From: Oliver Peter To: Rat Paranoid Message-ID: <20070425084854.GJ1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pE2VAHO2njSJCslu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:57 -0000 --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:40:50AM -0400, Rat Paranoid wrote: > Dear All, Dear Mr. "Rat Paranoid", =20 > I badly need your help! I've used GELI encrypted partition on my > notebook for 5 month but now I can't mount it on startup... it seems > that I forgot the password (but how is it possible if I enter it each > time I switch my notebook?!) or something is wrong with GELI >=20 > anyway when I created that partition I also created "backup key" file > as it was suggested by the manual... Now I've tried to mount the > partition with that key but it keeps telling me that the password is > wrong. %( >=20 > Is it possible to recover the bloody thing with that "backup key"?! >=20 > Your help would be much appreciated! You can provide us your dmesg debug output by adding the following lines to /boot/loader.conf: kern.geom.eli.debug=3D3 GELI(8) says: Debug level of the ELI GEOM class. This can be set to a number between 0 and 3 inclusive. If set to 0, minimal debug informa- tion is printed. If set to 3, the maximum amount of debug infor- mation is printed. For yourself you can add: kern.geom.eli.visible.passphrase=3D1 GELI(8) says: If set to 1, the passphrase entered on boot (before the root file system is mounted) will be visible. This possibility should be used with caution as the entered passphrase can be logged and exposed via dmesg(8). This variable should be set in /boot/loader.conf. Good luck. --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkYvFfYACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI9sjwCfczzuvCJyNg7R1H/d51qn2KSa vd8AoM+JZpys1TUvxp9JZ8Rn+K1D73VZ =sv8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pE2VAHO2njSJCslu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:50:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5456516A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.network-i.net (antigua.network-i.net [212.21.121.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3F8213C487 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 61942 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 08:23:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by post1.network-i.net with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 08:23:26 -0000 Message-ID: <462F0FFE.70205@thingy.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:23:26 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:50:08 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > If that's all you need, there's an even easier way: "tar tvf mycd.iso", > since libarchive understands the iso9660 filesystem format :) > That's a useful trick! Is there an equivalent for ufs filesystems? I'd like to be able to extract files from a floppy image without needing root privs... I'm writing a script to prepare a PXE-install environment from a set of release ISOs. Best Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 08:53:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E3016A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3C713C489 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: by nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 027C44B2511; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:53:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:53:13 +0200 From: Oliver Peter To: n j Message-ID: <20070425085313.GK1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> References: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:15 -0000 --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, n j wrote: > Hello, Hello Nino, =20 > does anybody know is it possible with Postfix to "route" e-mail based > on either the inet interface message came from or the sender of a > message? I'm using Postfix v.2.3.8 on a multihomed machine and have > two smtpd's defined in master.cf. What I would like is that mail > submitted through smtpd that is listening on A.B.C.D goes out through > the smtp client that binds to A.B.C.D and the rest of the mail go > through the other smtp client. The problem as I see it is that, once > messages arrive in the queue, it becomes irrelevant where they came > from and the only "routing" that is available is recipient-based. >=20 > Thanks for any suggestions! Would it help to pimp your transport map? # In the case of delivery via SMTP, one may specify host- # name:service instead of just a host: # # example.com smtp:bar.example:2025 You can replace bar.example with the IP address of the other interface. It works with my DBmail configuration. --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkYvFvkACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI/PxACgr7S1cAFJiQ8IMyuYXsouvTQq 3tEAn0TTDJ0VvqyAMKboOntB6lZMZVrQ =SUXC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LiQwW4YX+w4axhAx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 09:39:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A5C16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B6F13C45A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so227374nza for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:38:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=iX+tcExr4s9JLl3Kg/81LNZ2oViH5ICoDlkXXi87+HfY2I4BV4/uSQ/DTF2AhGOFIX8gME17WtA0MyzTfrtNB+0eU+n/kVNxCmU/ZcyRtzxZwVGwZ3oF+8MSFE31WoGX8eP4Medc+WcPPU+3SlSV6TBmiMS1eukxevhxtjfuHcs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=oyRzPvAVZVINgHu+eimLLiETaGt4OSmO4EE5yTfvflgB/BZrXejGeLbOn4HOT2fIZMHSDVqaFTKtKrXehRFkV8HiTdV8lgh8tHHj1dTcTSNO4oUbAwgn+vlw3lZk/L7oYbsriP/UQrMhSLrrXPocxRqMI6qBO3tvYwQsIh+rX0I= Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr153962wal.1177492267475; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:11:07 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:39:01 -0000 Hi, On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the root mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail is forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me to send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without logging in through pop3/imap? A command line trick would be perfect. Thanks for your help! Best regards, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 09:50:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FA516A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AEF13C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.104]) by bay0-omc3-s13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:50:15 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:50:15 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:10 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2007 09:50:15.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[202A0870:01C7871F] Cc: on@cs.ait.ac.th Subject: PIL installation through Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:15 -0000 Hi , I have a FreeBSD6.0 server machine running zope2.9 and plone . this m/c has python-2.4.4 but no PIL module , I have to install it to support the zope/plone application that I am running in this machine But in /usr/ports there is no such port for PIL OR I can't recoganize which port is it I made a serch like this /usr/ports]# make search name=py-pil but it retuns null So what steps I have to follow to install PIL ( PythonImageLibrary) in this machine , I tried pkg_add -r PIL bu Error message as : FTP unable to get PIL so I used ftp -a ftp2.FreeBSD.org ftp> get PIL 1.x.x but error 550 PIL no such file or directory , please suggest the proper stpes to install PIL in my BSD box , Thanks in advance kk _________________________________________________________________ Marriage Simplified. Match chat marry. http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=23 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 09:56:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C0116A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C8113C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.2.126]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id l3P9foqU029605; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:41:50 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:41:50 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: "Don O'Neil" Message-ID: <20070425094150.GB87950@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:41:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.2, clamav-milter version 0.90.2 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:56:39 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 24/04/2007 à 11:39:46-0700, Don O'Neil a écrit > Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option... > > When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message: > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq > -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -g > -I/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c: In function `ahaaction': > /usr/src/sys/modules/aha/../../dev/aha/aha.c:848: warning: cast from pointer > to integer of different size > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/aha. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/KERMIT. > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Why would it be complaining about the aha module when I have it commented > out as a device? On attachement a config to compile on my AMD64 (on i386 FreeBSD) with 4 Go. Be carreful, I drop all device I don't need, check your NIC/SCSI card is in the config (well not in the file I give). Regards JAS -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Mer 25 avr 2007 11:41:05 CEST --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ISIS # # PAE -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 PAE # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/PAE,v 1.16.2.3 2006/03/12 16:39:40 scottl Exp $ include GENERIC ident PAE # To make a PAE kernel, the next option is needed options PAE # Physical Address Extensions Kernel # Compile acpi in statically since the module isn't built properly. Most # machines which support large amounts of memory require acpi. device acpi # Don't build modules with this kernel config, since they are not built with # the correct options headers. makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes # What follows is a list of drivers that are normally in GENERIC, but either # don't work or are untested with PAE. Be very careful before enabling any # of these drivers. Drivers which use DMA and don't handle 64 bit physical # address properly may cause data corruption when used in a machine with more # than 4 gigabytes of memory. nodevice ahb nodevice amd nodevice sym nodevice trm nodevice adv nodevice adw nodevice aha nodevice aic nodevice bt nodevice ncv nodevice nsp nodevice stg nodevice asr nodevice dpt nodevice mly nodevice hptmv nodevice ida nodevice mlx nodevice pst nodevice agp nodevice de nodevice txp nodevice vx nodevice nve nodevice pcn nodevice sf nodevice sis nodevice ste nodevice tl nodevice tx nodevice vr nodevice wb nodevice cs nodevice ed nodevice ex nodevice ep nodevice fe nodevice ie nodevice lnc nodevice sn nodevice xe nodevice wlan nodevice an nodevice awi nodevice ral nodevice wi nodevice uhci nodevice ohci nodevice ehci nodevice usb nodevice ugen nodevice uhid nodevice ukbd nodevice ulpt nodevice umass nodevice ums nodevice ural nodevice urio nodevice uscanner nodevice aue nodevice axe nodevice cdce nodevice cue nodevice kue nodevice rue nodevice wlan # 802.11 support nodevice wlan_wep # 802.11 WEP support nodevice wlan_ccmp # 802.11 CCMP support nodevice wlan_tkip # 802.11 TKIP support nodevice an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. nodevice ath # Atheros pci/cardbus NIC's nodevice ath_hal # Atheros HAL (Hardware Access Layer) nodevice ath_rate_sample # SampleRate tx rate control for ath nodevice awi # BayStack 660 and others nodevice ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. nodevice wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. # Rajout locaux options SMP # Enable Linux ABI emulation options COMPAT_LINUX # Enable i386 a.out binary support options COMPAT_AOUT # Enable the linux-like proc filesystem support (requires COMPAT_LINUX # and PSEUDOFS) options LINPROCFS --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 09:57:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4FD16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002A713C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: by nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8423E4B2370; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:57:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:57:14 +0200 From: Oliver Peter To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wider=F8e?= Andersen Message-ID: <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:57:16 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Widere Andersen wrote: > Hi, > On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the r= oot > mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail is > forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me to > send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without > logging in through pop3/imap? >=20 > A command line trick would be perfect. mutt is your friend. Open the mbox file with=20 # mutt -R -f /var/mail/root Then Tag all mails (press 'T' then enter '.') and bounce the tagged messages (press ';' and thenn 'b') to your personal email address. That's the easiest way I know. (Of course you need a running MTA, too) --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkYvJfkACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI/lQACfSVZ4kdZvtlGXMGBkBVDnfDq2 ELEAn34xuQeGzPOO5ewGp9vdway/RqZW =vO+Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 09:58:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B2116A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D8313C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so233575nza for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:58:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aTtbRrM9PkexPqQn5YVQUOa9g9XwWuiaFSwAEDU/s3+m0Z1RaoJg9dvOsPRS+GEE2hPNZ20KFC5JcHIjGhcj2Pu+DlhLKx16fG3prcBiEw3xjZnoTIzm8R5fs5LwCfClPOX3n2q8vi9jiLm8TBn2I8LoyklvqzAQkUeb/b8e59E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iZQig6wYG2+/QTQsWk2444IM+3c7HhqDcs16UdIey5WI+T2FiNUeTsrV1s8YFVnHT6GsgzObxMWJFTfLnaEGKTRpDoRQBeTXm3vx2leDV8GpOWCMRsTsO7MZZDf+R+3c/dfI8nhRf6hVkhiHP10o+lo/rtYIv0gFSrgBUvpAJoY= Received: by 10.114.171.1 with SMTP id t1mr134902wae.1177495108688; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.208.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92bcbda50704250258l7735cb39t2713d33b358de0e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:28 +0200 From: "n j" To: "Oliver Peter" In-Reply-To: <20070425085313.GK1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> <20070425085313.GK1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:58:30 -0000 Hello Oliver, > Would it help to pimp your transport map? > > # In the case of delivery via SMTP, one may specify host- > # name:service instead of just a host: > # > # example.com smtp:bar.example:2025 > > You can replace bar.example with the IP address of the other > interface. The way I understand, transport map selects messages based on recipient's address or domain. In the above example, only messages destined for example.com would get routed through the right interface. Once messages end up in the queue, qmgr uses trivial-rewrite to resolve recipient's address and selects a transport based on that. Or am I wrong? I need to route messages based on either sender's address/domain (this would suffice) or incoming interface (better). Thanks for the suggestion anyway! -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 10:36:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6716A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA48013C465 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so163972wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.119.15 with SMTP id r15mr401361agc.1177497417013; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31sm798485wri.2007.04.25.03.36.56; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:38:29 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> References: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070425063738.0E52.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:36:58 -0000 On Wednesday April 25, 2007 at 03:27:48 (AM) n j wrote: > Hello, > > does anybody know is it possible with Postfix to "route" e-mail based > on either the inet interface message came from or the sender of a > message? I'm using Postfix v.2.3.8 on a multihomed machine and have > two smtpd's defined in master.cf. What I would like is that mail > submitted through smtpd that is listening on A.B.C.D goes out through > the smtp client that binds to A.B.C.D and the rest of the mail go > through the other smtp client. The problem as I see it is that, once > messages arrive in the queue, it becomes irrelevant where they came > from and the only "routing" that is available is recipient-based. > > Thanks for any suggestions! You would probably get better assistance if you asked this question on the Postfix forum. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 10:48:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D82516A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2CE13C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3PAmT84021731 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "User Questions" Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:49:38 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20070425063738.0E52.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:31 -0000 Remember, UNIXes and suchlike use a single IP address route table. Your machine isn't trying to establish a connection to: username@somedomain.com It is trying to establish a connection to IP address x.y.z.a Machines don't speak domainese. They translate the human-friendly stuff like domain names and such into IP addresses. Once the system resolves the recipient e-mail address into a destination IP address, the choice of interface that it goes out on is entirely controlled by the route table. And due to the single route table in the system, that is going to be the interface that reaches your default gateway. Even if this box was a router, like a Cisco that supports route maps that allow you to bypass the single route table, since the mail is originating from the system, it would always follow the same map anyway. You need 2 mailservers to do what you want. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:38 AM > To: User Questions > Subject: Re: postfix question > > > On Wednesday April 25, 2007 at 03:27:48 (AM) n j wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > does anybody know is it possible with Postfix to "route" e-mail based > > on either the inet interface message came from or the sender of a > > message? I'm using Postfix v.2.3.8 on a multihomed machine and have > > two smtpd's defined in master.cf. What I would like is that mail > > submitted through smtpd that is listening on A.B.C.D goes out through > > the smtp client that binds to A.B.C.D and the rest of the mail go > > through the other smtp client. The problem as I see it is that, once > > messages arrive in the queue, it becomes irrelevant where they came > > from and the only "routing" that is available is recipient-based. > > > > Thanks for any suggestions! > > You would probably get better assistance if you asked this question on > the Postfix forum. > > -- > Gerard > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:12:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC6716A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344AB13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:12:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3PAXRZA021620; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:33:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Rico Secada" , Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:34:36 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20070423194730.482ca62b.coolzone@it.dk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: Help needed with server setup at work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:12:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Rico Secada > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:48 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Help needed with server setup at work > > > Hi. > > At work we have a bunch of NFS servers. The servers provide the > home directories for all the employees client machines. > > Most of the employees mount their home dirs manually, but some > are mounted using scripts. Employee John knows he belongs to NFS > server 1, and emplyoee Britney knows she belongs to NFS server 3 > and so on. > > Now due to new conditions Without saying what these new conditions are, you aren't giving much that anyone can give advice on. > I have to set up a new system from > which ALL employees are able to mount their home directories from > their homes (where they live). Since I only have one IP address > at my disposal, I need to set up some kind of union system in > which all home directories apear as they live on just one server. > Besides that I have to figure out what kind of security I need to > use. I have been thinking about AFS. > > About the union thing I first thought of somehow union mouting > all the different home directories on a single machine which then > serves as the access point, but I am affraid if that particular > machine crashes, then no one can get to their files. > Your going about it in exactly the wrong way and in a very insecure manner, in my opinion. If you have a situation going where the building that all these employees are working in that contains them, their workstations, and their servers, is going to be vacated, such as a kind of virtual company scenario, then ASSUMING that the employees ALL have high-speed connectivity (DSL, Cable, or whatever) of at least a megabit, then the safest and most trouble-free way of doing it is to have ALL employees setup with their ISP's to have static IP addresses, amd then put hardware VPN firewalls at each employee's home and setup dedicated lan2lan VPNs that are permanently up all of the time. Linksys sells a very nice VPN firewall, the RV042, that is fantastic for this job. This will allow you to manage all employee computers just as if they were all in the now-missing building. This is particularly important as you can install patches, monitor for intrusion attempts, etc. It also moves the ickyness of the VPN client software away from the employees computer, simplifying that system. At the central hub where all the servers remain, you can easily setup a firewall that only allows VPNs in from the designated remote IP addresses. If however the need is for only periodic access, then investigate a remote control solution. I would recommend setting up a bastion host that is on your single public IP address, and a VNC server on it. Employees can use one of many VNC clients (there's even one for palm OS I belive) and go from their homes to the bastion host, then from the bastion host, xterm to their desktop systems. Putting a union NFS server up is just asking for trouble, particularly if you aren't restricting access to it via IP address. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:23:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EBF16A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D751F13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so258277nza for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:23:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q2kpTABnzHLaW0sTEH71FuAtS/1LNFGDenu0cjVRGbMCA2feZ5tXSj/yzwbXkwJAX9dHoleAImSRBp+gpvdzpkuWx0SdLVoZwQ5Dn/dJzSDMaQ6KAyvSIM/198D4cq9cdy/VctOusMpaQ2EqHPWTTOBPPjE8feZ8L6UY/JMw3S8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k7bId4evWel9whuTa1mvE9QMTJ/vqUUSr0ki4AvfIOnpMxZAxNZEGNSuwYxqy6UclxG9bJaWbEQkJFE5PBykczOHIS7f2G1sUZAXrfhlBNbincEeVw9q/71dcXPLLK24BtKnuGbYM5xMIamyZjp846VEcQwcAJbXcm3noy5H8Aw= Received: by 10.114.89.1 with SMTP id m1mr135546wab.1177500187604; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704250423n21d5eaa1hc78ce1262d710959@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:23:07 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:09 -0000 On 4/25/07, Oliver Peter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Widere Andersen wrote: > > Hi, > > On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the > root > > mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail > is > > forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me > to > > send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without > > logging in through pop3/imap? > > > > A command line trick would be perfect. > > mutt is your friend. > > Open the mbox file with > # mutt -R -f /var/mail/root > > Then Tag all mails (press 'T' then enter '.') and bounce the tagged > messages (press ';' and thenn 'b') to your personal email address. > > That's the easiest way I know. > (Of course you need a running MTA, too) Thanks for your reply. I don't have mutt installed and I was hoping for a way of doing this without installing additional software. Also, I didn't mention that on one of the machines there are probably a year of emails so the box is quite large. Any other ways? I have sendmail installed and running. Cheers, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:23:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6889716A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C01B13C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3PBMl2M019545; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:22:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070425061655.0264d980@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:21:52 -0500 To: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:23:40 -0000 At 02:29 AM 4/25/2007, Gary Kline wrote: > Guys, > > This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I > need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), > that's okay... > > I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and > edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This > works to print $9 the filenames. > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 > == 26 ) print $9}' > > What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and > xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any > clues! I would use a simple approach incase you need to re-edit the list since editing will change file times: ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' > /tmp/myfilelist then you can: for i in `cat /tmp/myfilelist`;do vi $i;done if you don't want to use a file, you can do in one shell loop too, but again this will change your file modification times: for i in `ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}'`;do vi $i;done -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:28:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E7F16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A6713C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so18062ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j6HwPhXlgVLDbSkDiKX8cLq2hUkUeJ0q7MnEjD+gb9YydBzKO8wm28BplxDnMcBplyn2AVDAGMueYIBIoConOOCf9AaCTNO6rXFRG8AJVIy+KO1Vpa+TnQ4S9dQ/BhVjxQ5ayno0vZ8lTzERGT0ofUWSSndlv86fxxda/Ou28gE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tnhFcEHjRvvXqQkxCYS6SJnk3qPcYgZjllyjuFjqVkeGnxZyGDb6YuZSh0KWOuus0rr0VK6a38WkTgJ6XfqWSuLXrKISsU0wkyFXsN56/4KaPSTYATuO6JU63jovK1wRt+K3KfH/RxEbCeW4Usk0oTVO0LD/k9zWMpusFpfggME= Received: by 10.115.59.4 with SMTP id m4mr136447wak.1177500508126; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.208.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92bcbda50704250428m7e1e3902r9f1ba91f32c72099@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:28:28 +0200 From: "n j" To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070425063738.0E52.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <92bcbda50704250027m721e7115p4a30eff3a282946c@mail.gmail.com> <20070425063738.0E52.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> Subject: Re: postfix question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:28:29 -0000 > You would probably get better assistance if you asked this question on > the Postfix forum. True. However, I did google through a lot of Postfix resources (documentation, forums, mailing lists...) and didn't find what I was looking for. I posted this question here hoping that someone already ran into this problem, solved it somehow and was perhaps willing to help me. I mean, people reading this list are system admins with experience. > Your machine isn't trying to establish a connection to: username@somedomain.com, > it is trying to establish a connection to IP address x.y.z.a... That is not relevant in my case. What I want to do is define two different smtp services in master.cf (each bound to a different IP address with smtp_bind_address option) and have Postfix use one or the other based on incoming interface or sender's address/domain. > You need 2 mailservers to do what you want. That might be true with Postfix, although two instances on the same machine would suffice - I'm looking for a solution that doesn't include two instances. I know it can easily be done with Exim and I'm actually testing on my test machine Exim installation right now. Speaking of which, is FreeBSD with Exim a good combination for a mailserver, what are your experiences? Thanks, -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:36:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD7C16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anthonyh@korbitec.com) Received: from spool.korbitec.com (cptgw01.korbitec.com [196.31.10.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39D213C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anthonyh@korbitec.com) Received: from [10.4.2.10] (helo=cptisnmail01.korbitec.int) by spool.korbitec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HgfYG-0006L0-LJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:20:48 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:20:46 +0200 Message-ID: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3A6DBDD@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source Thread-Index: AceHK8T0LRZO6FjGQFKqPVtJ7E21TA== From: "Anthony Human" To: X-Spam-Score: X-Spam-Report: X-Spam-Flag: Subject: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0000 Hello, =20 Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror to serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both time and bandwidth when updating. =20 Please could someone assist me with configuring the supfile to only download the source for the above versions? Any other advice/tips would be much appreciated. =20 The default supfile looks so: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- # # Standard supfile for CVSup FreeBSD mirrors. # *default delete use-rel-suffix umask=3D002 cvs-all release=3Dcvs = prefix=3Dprefixes/FreeBSD.cvs gnats release=3Dcurrent prefix=3Dprefixes/FreeBSD-gnats.current www release=3Dcurrent = prefix=3Dprefixes/FreeBSD-www.current mail-archive release=3Dcurrent = prefix=3Dprefixes/FreeBSD-mail.current distrib release=3Dself = prefix=3Dprefixes/distrib.self ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- =20 Thanks, Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:43:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4473C16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F96D13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382910573 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:26:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6111851941 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:25:55 +0100 From: RW To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425122555.7714d39f@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: kqemu slower than qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:43:53 -0000 I've been playing with Windows 98SE on qemu on FreeBSD 6.2 i386. It's an AMD 64 cpu, but everything is 32-bit. I'm running qemu without any command-line options. If I load the kqemu kernel module, qemu runs significantly slower than without the module. Any idea what's going wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 11:49:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D2F16A47E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D27613C469 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3PBnGbf022044; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:49:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "RW" , Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:50:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20070425122555.7714d39f@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: kqemu slower than qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:49:18 -0000 what do they say on the qemu mailing list? Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of RW > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:26 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: kqemu slower than qemu > > > I've been playing with Windows 98SE on qemu on FreeBSD 6.2 i386. It's > an AMD 64 cpu, but everything is 32-bit. I'm running qemu without any > command-line options. > > > If I load the kqemu kernel module, qemu runs significantly slower than > without the module. Any idea what's going wrong? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:00:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775C516A410 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5373413C489 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C2451985 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:00:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:00:18 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425130018.6a2ca17f@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:24 -0000 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700 "Don O'Neil" wrote: > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, > > >... > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? AFAIK all the reasons for staying 32-bit are specific to desktop software - I don't think there is any reason not to go to AMD64. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:30:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386016A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from p28.ich-19.com (fa.ea.5646.static.theplanet.com [70.86.234.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0700413C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.122.145.219] (helo=Unknown-00-13-d4-de-87-6f.lan) by p28.ich-19.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hggdb-00020H-11; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:30:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:31:37 +0300 From: Ghirai X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2010466825.20070425153137@ghirai.com> To: "dhaneshk k" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - p28.ich-19.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Subject: Re: PIL installation through Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ghirai List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:30:25 -0000 Hello dhaneshk, Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 12:50:10 PM, you wrote: > Hi , > I have a FreeBSD6.0 server machine running zope2.9 and plone . > this m/c has python-2.4.4 but no PIL module , I have to install it to > support the zope/plone application that I am running in this machine But > in /usr/ports there is no such port for PIL OR I can't recoganize which > port is it > ... > please suggest the proper stpes to install PIL in my BSD box , > Thanks in advance > kk PIL is in /usr/ports/graphics/py-imaging So just do a "cd /usr/ports/graphics/py-imaging" and "make install clean" as root and you should be good to go. -- Best regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:32:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5EC16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB9213C48A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98403EBC78; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:31:53 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Ivan Voras Message-Id: <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:32:01 -0000 In response to Ivan Voras : > Bill Moran wrote: > > > Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my > understanding > > that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G > (which > > is the problem it's intended to solve) > > > > If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of it. > > At least, that's my understanding of the issue. > > I don't think that's how PAE works. AFAIK, it adds all the memory pages > it can find (including those above and below 4 GB) into the VM pool with > 64-bit addresses, so all of them can be used by the applications in an > uniform way. Kind of like swap works. I'm no expert, so I did a little research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension (of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of information and is infallible, right?) Anyway, based on that article, I would assume the performance hit comes from the fact that access to memory has to pass through three layers of pointers on PAE systems. Which means every time you access RAM, you have an extra lookup to find the address of the memory you want (compared to ia32) However, amd64 uses the same extra table: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amd64#Virtual_address_space_details so I'm unsure how amd64 manages to avoid the performance issue, if that is indeed the reason for it. PAE is still a 32 bit architecture. This means that somehow the operating system has to translate 32bit pointers in the application into 64 bit pointers for actual memory access. The Wikipedia article doesn't explain how this is done, but it's possible (likely?) that this is a reason for decreased performance as well. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:36:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA316A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EE713C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so281174nza for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:36:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KcxDhUv2Agb72CKhUkhAdTEGlVSGts3InUR2BBiL67LRy2VjUlYBxFiELcpFCvz8yqBqCgJr1Ff/kH9b3uTEKL/FIY2hW5f9/JcLNgsutDuSQFIzaIDPnURFH5l/ghBxP37CUFCt2mpompqWGUzX6ZVSZMdDPbDitEC5KyHbrlo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bQKGlohzaLEdRG3q8IOkfzyi2teW1ghB1rZRkleUnbAI3aH23sQGMIfIzNxZebfLqMuo7tySqlATYz1wZWmSULnzu2TlGl4lILBlcdn5hNnkrEk1+cq4zqWY4PQPzSRJ7afnNjmD6Pfis/yruxb+irZp1ib00ofvtN1a7zabHkg= Received: by 10.114.131.2 with SMTP id e2mr111598wad.1177504608515; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.52.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860704250536x76d0c2c7s55a4962dffcb3529@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:36:48 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: "Dan Busarow" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8d23ec860704241709l362416f9w768724e9c3722cf9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail Config Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:36:50 -0000 On 4/24/07, Dan Busarow wrote: > > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p3. I'm having some issues configuring > > sendmail. I'm > > new to sendmail, so please bear with me. I've read > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html > > along > > with some docs on sendmail.org. I'm guessing I'm overlooking > > something, or > > missing something completely. > > > > I'm trying to sent up a sendmail config to send/receive mail > > locally, and > > run smtp. My asdf.mc file is located at: http://pastebin.ca/456745 > > and my > > asdf.submit.mc file is at: http://pastebin.ca/456757 > > SENDMAIL_MC and SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC are set in make.conf to the full > > path to > > those .mc files. > > > > I also made changes to aliases, access, local-host-names, and > > virtusertable > > in the /etc/mail dir. > > As a first step change > > DOMAIN(schiz0.securityexploits.com) > > to > > DOMAIN(schiz0.securityexploits.com) > > unless you happen to have created an M4 domain file named > schiz0.securityexploits.com.m4. It is *not* a place you define your > domain name. > > Dan > > > > > > When I run make in the /etc/mail dir, I get the following error: > > --------------- > > # make > > /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi -OAliasFile=/etc/mail/aliases > > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 279: Unknown address family inet6 in > > Family=option > > *** Error code 70 > > > > Stop in /etc/mail. > > --------------- > > > > I disabled IPv6 in my kernel config, and I commented out in both > > the normal > > mc file, and the submit file the information for ipv6, so I'm not sure > > what's doing this. > > > > Thanks in advance! If it wasn't for these mailing lists, I'd be > > back on > > windows :-D > > > > ~Steve > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks! I looked at /usr/share/sendmail/domains and that got it for me. I misunderstood the DOMAIN() option. Sendmail is now up and running. Much appreciated! ~Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:45:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD5F16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B97613C469 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E48EBC78; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:45:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:44:54 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Christopher Hilton Message-Id: <20070425084454.165dd9d3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> References: <20070415200255.18e6ab3f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Defending against SSH attacks with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:45:02 -0000 In response to Christopher Hilton : > Erik Osterholm wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:02:55PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > >> There was some discussion on this list not too long ago, and someone > >> asked if I was willing to make my pf config and the associated scripts > >> I wrote for it public. I would have posted on the original thread, > >> but I can't find it now. > >> > >> Here is the information: > >> http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/16 > >> > > First: I'm not sure if the group got to it and I'm posting to a very > stale thread here but I've found that the best way to defeat these > password scanning ssh bots is to disallow passwords allowing > public/private key authentication in their stead. Unfortunately this > isn't always possible. Bill's method is a very close second. I'm a big fan of PKI, but PKI suffers from one major problem, and it's the same flaw that physical keys suffer from: you have to have the key with you. With a password, I'm always guaranteed to have access. Just give me any computer that has an SSH client available. With PKI, I'm hosed if I don't have a copy of my private key on a jump drive or something. I'm always torn because of this. I really like the added security of PKI, but history has taught me that I'll need access at a critical time when I _don't_ have a key with me. As a result, I've decided to use password auth on this particular server. > Second: I love the simplicity of the stateless firewall rules in Bill's > pf.conf. I may have to look at implementing that here. I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the disadvantage of the stateless approach is that pf can't do packet normalization without state. Thus a scrub statement will have no effect on stateless traffic. Again, in my case I have enough faith in FreeBSD's TCP stack that I've deemed this an acceptable risk. If you're using pf to protect a bunch of Windows servers, you may want to reconsider stateless rules. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:48:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EB816A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5213913C468 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3PCmllj022021; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3PCml7b022016; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:48:47 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:48:48 -0000 --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:31:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > (of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of > information and is infallible, right?) hardly. I'd expect that most intelligent readers would have encountered at least one wikipedia article which is inaccurate. Like any source of information, it's only a starting point. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGL03wtIqByHxlDocRAggwAKCLQgynGn90H0D2rXvAZm81BB4rJwCeL/X3 r4KKi2/NbwCE5bs1xgTAfys= =Zed9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:49:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FE516A409 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D6113C4AE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658B6EBC7C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:27 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: RW Message-Id: <20070425084927.3e57c771.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070425130018.6a2ca17f@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070425130018.6a2ca17f@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 -0000 In response to RW : > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700 > "Don O'Neil" wrote: > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, > > > > >... > > > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > AFAIK all the reasons for staying 32-bit are specific to desktop > software - I don't think there is any reason not to go to AMD64. I'll second that. We've got a lot of amd64 systems here. The only ones we've had problems with are desktop applications. Every server application we've dealt with has worked perfectly under amd64. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:55:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E0316A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B4C13C465 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF97EBC7C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:55:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:55:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Thomas Dickey Message-Id: <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:55:39 -0000 In response to Thomas Dickey : > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:31:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > (of course, everyone knows that Wikipedia is the ultimate source of > > information and is infallible, right?) > > hardly. I'd expect that most intelligent readers would have encountered > at least one wikipedia article which is inaccurate. Like any source > of information, it's only a starting point. Hmm ...I suppose I should have explicitly marked that comment as sarcasm. I simply expected that people would understand that such a ridiculous remark could only be tongue-in-cheek. A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy) describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research assignment that involved that information. Apparently the number of students who trusted the false information without verifying it was quite high. I should take that as a lesson that most people _don't_ know how to verify the validity of information and be more careful when I make sarcastic statements. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:04:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E983116A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [208.70.104.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727E813C468 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 49565 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Apr 2007 13:04:12 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(208.70.107.100):. Processed in 6.489558 secs); 25 Apr 2007 13:04:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.210?) (steve@ibctech.ca@208.70.107.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 13:04:05 -0000 Message-ID: <462F51D3.9010500@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:04:19 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wodfer@gmail.com References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> In-Reply-To: <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:04:14 -0000 Oliver Peter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Widere Andersen wrote: >> Hi, >> On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the root >> mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail is >> forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me to >> send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without >> logging in through pop3/imap? Perform the following command, assuming 'user' is the account you have with the alias to somewhere else: # mail -f /var/mail/root -F user ..which will merrily dump each message to the alias user, and from there forward it to your email account. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:27:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F147A16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarendra.godbole@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B115E13C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarendra.godbole@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so58162ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=mfYb5hfFT+4CQI3iQM8AOHjrRStA4R9vR8jJtrFrG5P3fcW9YrxgHTJgqBRL2ifwAr7nX0eeUDgwVU/QhzW6PfV/hVxmI2CxJT3Uw6xpXWPcRL0XvWtH2Q9zDrAHRQtBp2Xzji9YKUKzeCa3EMJv3Fob/tbFlTbuVp8TwovPDUM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VW0prem53dQKKRfPBTwP9XTvOxrOwp2VaI3lwPnhHKxsPctRkn2e1maleKiMpKYx3E80y12J/wZpG3I1Swm+akdtlNRV+BXSYtt9DG+uxGJuXxLi3BOApcN+5h5wf7/x7Sbh+XQfqvinxcuSMVLGNWQpaY2nKpLcUxaffjZ2dsg= Received: by 10.100.33.14 with SMTP id g14mr142600ang.1177507678900; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.58.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:57:58 +0530 From: "Amarendra Godbole" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:28:00 -0000 Hi, I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually classified? Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! -Amarendra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:40:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16616A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C0A13C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 530642E037; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EC32E024; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:40:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Erik Norgaard To: Amarendra Godbole In-Reply-To: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070425153431.S2486@strange.locolomo.org> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:40:26 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > Hi, > > I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > classified? > > Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! For gmail you can create filters that add a label depending on the to-address. I don't know how it works. I think that's what you want - and it is likely much easier than trying to take up the discussion... Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:42:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B597516A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1C613C4CC for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.145] (helo=anti-virus03-08) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Hghku-0000Sf-7G; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:00 +0100 Received: from [62.31.10.181] (helo=[192.168.23.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Hghkt-0007te-8s; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:41:59 +0100 Message-ID: <462F5AA6.1020906@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:41:58 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20070415200255.18e6ab3f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> <20070425084454.165dd9d3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070425084454.165dd9d3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Defending against SSH attacks with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:42:03 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >I'm a big fan of PKI, but PKI suffers from one major problem, and it's >the same flaw that physical keys suffer from: you have to have the key >with you. > > If I had to use SSH from random locations, I'd get a USB stick that attached to a (physical) keyring and just stick it with my (physical) keys since I already have to carry those everywhere. The SSH keys should be protected by decent passphrases so even losing the USB stick isn't the biggest deal. Imation seem to make one that has one of those climbing-style buckles: http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=247840&CatId=322 Probably you could fit the install file for PuTTY on there too, in case you had to use from a primitive windows environment. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:43:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D3116A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36B013C4B0 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so211066wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CbL42GXRSGY+09p/N1+w7nhe9ZuNkifXFszfs00plaa4oiOmaU7ZM5xDznuJWR8D/sbx/M+TnymuYBYibkpg71kJ0O4EOD325F+ajDnwZKCXMfNLnWBE3QTbFKuvp6k9+gXOsC1h9ZjNZo/Mktn1xbK92AhLk5EZ/KXBY3+Wxl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lOFWXDGRD8UznXnRtXersY0BcSKmxaxAfeGTP5lnaGuK1Vd3YIUKJW2TT5IF0Dl9fGD2Vcz4FaAtQpgJBfXisfBnWaoVOFZqXqnG0CHxNlAENMR/9TcEGvRBC5dsLTmeIJU+3AwXcZP1AuaXuVO1KLtXuwlosBj2oiWTyR56HbI= Received: by 10.115.46.9 with SMTP id y9mr177796waj.1177508581687; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704250643u40e836b5xff493e77c9c6da24@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:43:01 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <462F51D3.9010500@ibctech.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <462F51D3.9010500@ibctech.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:43:03 -0000 On 4/25/07, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > Oliver Peter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Widere Andersen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the > root > >> mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail > is > >> forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me > to > >> send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without > >> logging in through pop3/imap? > > Perform the following command, assuming 'user' is the account you have > with the alias to somewhere else: > > # mail -f /var/mail/root -F user > > ..which will merrily dump each message to the alias user, and from there > forward it to your email account. > > Steve > Sweet! Thank you all for helping out. Cheers, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:49:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AFE16A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lcapps@cteresource.org) Received: from gershwin.cteresource.org (mail.cteresource.org [206.136.187.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E3A13C45A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lcapps@cteresource.org) Received: by gershwin.cteresource.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id C29751CCB5; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (hank.cteresource.org [192.168.1.130]) by gershwin.cteresource.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B591CC4A; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:28:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lee Capps Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:30:45 -0400 To: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 Cc: Thomas Dickey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:49:05 -0000 On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Bill Moran wrote: > > A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME > guy) > describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false > information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research > assignment > that involved that information. Apparently the number of students who > trusted the false information without verifying it was quite high. I > should take that as a lesson that most people _don't_ know how to > verify > the validity of information and be more careful when I make sarcastic > statements. That's interesting, though, to pick a nit, it may just show that students were in a hurry, rather than that they necessarily trust the info or that they don't know _how_ to verify the info. --- Lee Capps Technology Specialist lcapps@cteresource.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:50:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24F516A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EBB13C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HghtW-0003OR-T5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:55 +0200 Received: from 65.213.7.6 ([65.213.7.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:54 +0200 Received: from scott by 65.213.7.6 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Scott I. Remick" Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:50:47 -0400 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> <2d19405f0704241012y418f7491x2c88443968a62051@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.213.7.6 User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Archive: encrypt Sender: news Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:50:59 -0000 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700, FreeBSD WickerBill wrote: > I portupgraded thunderbird today (6.1 p11, KDE 3.5.6_2) and while it's > semi-functional, it does seg fault as it checks the pop server. ... > These problems were fixed by uninstalling all broken extensions and removing > the theme I was using and installing the default theme. Hmm, I don't even get that far. TB 2.0 just immediately seg faults for me (after coming up and showing itself, apparently as it's checking but it's not "semi-functional" for me at all). Didn't have much time to look into it this morning before work but I do have a number of extensions so maybe my problem is similar to yours (I use IMAP though). I assume TB has a safemode switch similar to Firefox's... I'll have to look into it tonight or tomorrow. Anyone else seeing TB 2.0 crash on startup? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:53:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5029F16A40E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:53:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C6F13C48C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.137] (helo=anti-virus01-08) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HghwD-0000ye-IV; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:41 +0100 Received: from [62.31.10.181] (helo=[192.168.23.2]) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HghwC-0001r4-Jp; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:40 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amarendra Godbole References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:53:43 -0000 Amarendra Godbole wrote: > I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > classified? > > Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! All messages are already tagged with a List-ID e.g. List-Id: User questions Can gmail not filter on that? Visual tagging of subject lines is a poor solution. Either you tag at the front "[fbsd-questions] Really long subject line that gets truncated even earlier thanks to the tag" or at the end "Really long subject line where the tag disappears in a haze of ... [fbsd-questions]" Neither of which is satisfactory, and for most people with sensible email environments that can filter of Header lines, an unnecessary inconvenience. Not to mention the question of how on earth you co-ordinate unique tags across mailing lists. Since the List-ID isn't constrained by length it can contain the email address of the list, which is already unique. If you can't filter on the List-ID then filter on To and Cc lines which contain questions@freebsd.org or freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Not as good, but it would do. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:59:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC8516A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB5F13C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so194672pyh for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:59:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gA3ZL0KVNVt4Gn4nFc0w/45qMcjq6Us/Y1Ywff/HN6jtwy+wyTK22+Jow63RdguXDp32Yd5sBZIQE9dPdUWiVFJWTmeF+0P+fhVs1q5VKD43vwe6d3cgpuCRciabWI75NeZm/13he3Xa9c3oARAT0AnINcn2ME+ehG01RGVZf5A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MiSK1qH/QWCu8y509yqB0lpjIULdJvBYGPjidFHfvWB5lY2DVensTcTkIUlPfMhdtDY7PvVyxtDy4yqWZM5K5FmY1Jvr/EHSLdHpgs0wi3UVPpEtB2nd+4p2PqRAxUKLKatxHEiG4EqYuRSAJD/GJEGoG63rzRrszDtYlQHrlnk= Received: by 10.65.188.14 with SMTP id q14mr1503825qbp.1177509543910; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.47.5 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710704250659l3500f714gd780d69e4012b959@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:59:03 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" In-Reply-To: <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> Cc: Amarendra Godbole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:59:04 -0000 On 4/25/07, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > > I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > > visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > > possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > > or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > > classified? > > > > Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > > discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > > inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! > > All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > > e.g. > > List-Id: User questions > > Can gmail not filter on that? it's not documented, but you can filter like this listid:freebsd-questions.freebsd.org under the "has the words" section of the filter creation page. > > Visual tagging of subject lines is a poor solution. Either you tag at > the front > > "[fbsd-questions] Really long subject line that gets truncated even > earlier thanks to the tag" > > or at the end > > "Really long subject line where the tag disappears in a haze of ... > [fbsd-questions]" > > Neither of which is satisfactory, and for most people with sensible > email environments that can filter of Header lines, an unnecessary > inconvenience. > > Not to mention the question of how on earth you co-ordinate unique tags > across mailing lists. Since the List-ID isn't constrained by length it > can contain the email address of the list, which is already unique. > > If you can't filter on the List-ID then filter on To and Cc lines which > contain questions@freebsd.org or freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Not as > good, but it would do. > > --Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:10:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0063F16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0C13C4B7 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 323C12E037; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EA42E024; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:09:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Erik Norgaard To: "Scott I. Remick" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070425160748.D2486@strange.locolomo.org> References: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> <2d19405f0704241012y418f7491x2c88443968a62051@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:10:01 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Scott I. Remick wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700, FreeBSD WickerBill wrote: > >> I portupgraded thunderbird today (6.1 p11, KDE 3.5.6_2) and while it's >> semi-functional, it does seg fault as it checks the pop server. > ... >> These problems were fixed by uninstalling all broken extensions and removing >> the theme I was using and installing the default theme. > > Hmm, I don't even get that far. TB 2.0 just immediately seg faults for me > (after coming up and showing itself, apparently as it's checking but it's > not "semi-functional" for me at all). Didn't have much time to look into it > this morning before work but I do have a number of extensions so maybe my > problem is similar to yours (I use IMAP though). I assume TB has a safemode > switch similar to Firefox's... I'll have to look into it tonight or > tomorrow. Anyone else seeing TB 2.0 crash on startup? When I first started TB it would fade in a info window with a resumen of mails recieved - then crash. Disabling this feature solved the problem. I use IMAP too. Maybe you can edit the prefs.js to not check mail on startup and see if it will start up, then play around with settings. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:17:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E258916A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranoid.rat@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6153513C480 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranoid.rat@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so222675wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XHo65fVMZuME6+weDrCGyjmS2qIv4lfGbkV/lGC+K4JJU1YGdmhiXR7XBiUHVGJTnExGD5uUR0cRT6SyX+/7pSsb7zDrjh+YCF1KcVWr6nKUatdbvdubAdBWVn7Sk3Ws+n5d3Lp7A01GWq6t2aRjSQU1VHodEl1BLeyaCofHBPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SxCFDjg8Id5sJSBSiyuB4GRKn6RlawrRDXc7w1OEI6MerKpfyEOa0KnpIQjgmYUn0XS1RU7vpCnhmDwfYSwBZUCXRaZw+lMDXHimzXJaO9i8VTtbT9+zCtIrMNAbN7pqnGkQnceGqn7WFzmHd+HBnIz87PDXSvdXuiwfdpYuSBU= Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr190237huf.1177510645589; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.132.18 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:17:25 -0400 From: "Rat Paranoid" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070425082235.GA36858@www.photor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070425082235.GA36858@www.photor.de> Subject: Re: GELI recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:17:29 -0000 I can't attach the partition through geli attach. It keeps asking the password and teling that it is wrong On 4/25/07, Karsten Rothemund wrote: > is the key realy gone or can the encrypted partition just not be > mounted? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:18:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B8116A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D418513C489 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([71.178.107.244]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JH200IXU525FFX6@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:18:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3PEI5lR006997 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:18:05 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) id l3PEI5rf006996 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:18:05 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl) Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:18:05 -0400 From: Doug Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-followup-to: Doug Lee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> Organization: SSB + BART Group MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: USB console or other alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:18:14 -0000 I'm one of these guys running FreeBSD 4.11 on very old hardware (a Pentium 166, specifically), and I want to upgrade to FreeBSD 6 or 7 soon but with new hardware. Being blind, I need to use something other than the video card for a console. I've been using a serial console for a long time, but serial ports are getting scarce. I need the console to become active during the boot sequence in case of problems, as it can with a serial console. As I did with FreeBSD 3 and 4, I will also want to activate this console during FreeBSD installation if possible, so I don't have to have someone else be here when I install it. Can modern hardware and a modern FreeBSD version provide console access before the kernel loads via USB or via anything other than an actual on-board or PCI serial port? Please Cc answers. Thanks very much for any info. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org SSB + BART Group doug.lee@ssbbartgroup.com http://www.ssbbartgroup.com "Innovation is hard to schedule." -- Dan Fylstra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:23:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675D616A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mail.ecommerce.com (mail.ecommerce.com [80.121.204.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC59113C469 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: (qmail 8774 invoked by uid 399); 25 Apr 2007 13:57:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO drew.ecommerce.com) (80.121.204.1) by mail.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 13:57:13 -0000 Message-ID: <462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:52:28 -0500 From: Drew Sanford User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Scott I. Remick" References: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> <2d19405f0704241012y418f7491x2c88443968a62051@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:23:55 -0000 Scott I. Remick wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:06 -0700, FreeBSD WickerBill wrote: > >> I portupgraded thunderbird today (6.1 p11, KDE 3.5.6_2) and while it's >> semi-functional, it does seg fault as it checks the pop server. > ... >> These problems were fixed by uninstalling all broken extensions and removing >> the theme I was using and installing the default theme. > > Hmm, I don't even get that far. TB 2.0 just immediately seg faults for me > (after coming up and showing itself, apparently as it's checking but it's > not "semi-functional" for me at all). Didn't have much time to look into it > this morning before work but I do have a number of extensions so maybe my > problem is similar to yours (I use IMAP though). I assume TB has a safemode > switch similar to Firefox's... I'll have to look into it tonight or > tomorrow. Anyone else seeing TB 2.0 crash on startup? > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it starts up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a file on any start up, it crashes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:27:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2084016A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ED813C46A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4982F8C8C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [129.241.211.47] (baktus.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.47]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:43 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Capps References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> In-Reply-To: <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: Thomas Dickey , Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:27:24 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy) >> describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false >> information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research assignment >> that involved that information. Apparently the number of students who >> trusted the false information without verifying it was quite high. I >> should take that as a lesson that most people _don't_ know how to verify >> the validity of information and be more careful when I make sarcastic >> statements. Lee Capps wrote: > That's interesting, though, to pick a nit, it may just show that > students were in a hurry, rather than that they necessarily trust the > info or that they don't know _how_ to verify the info. And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform the students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the facts? And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? I hope this professor got some sort of reaction from his University due to his unethical attitude towards openness, knowledge and science. Svein Halvor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:30:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C33C16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1623113C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) id l3PEUYXH052397; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:30:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:30:34 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Howard Jones Message-ID: <20070425143034.GE50353@dan.emsphone.com> References: <48CA2894022F35F0D83C3AFD@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423191854.GD49993@glitch.rwxrwxrwx.net> <3EC8E3B8930912D6CD250E65@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070423204514.GD50353@dan.emsphone.com> <462F0FFE.70205@thingy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462F0FFE.70205@thingy.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Mount an iso image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:30:51 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 25), Howard Jones said: > Dan Nelson wrote: > > If that's all you need, there's an even easier way: "tar tvf > > mycd.iso", since libarchive understands the iso9660 filesystem > > format :) > > That's a useful trick! > > Is there an equivalent for ufs filesystems? I'd like to be able to > extract files from a floppy image without needing root privs... I'm > writing a script to prepare a PXE-install environment from a set of > release ISOs. You could try using a "dump -f - ufsfs.img | restore -if -" pipeline; dump to read the filesystem and restore -i to give you a simple navigation interface. Libarchive only handles the iso9660 format because it happens to be readable sequentially with no seeking. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 14:48:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D316A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-07.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-07.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8127E13C4C3 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-71-64-129-15.woh.res.rr.com [71.64.129.15]) by ms-smtp-07.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l3PEmuLx014942 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000901c78748$de2e9ba0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:49:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: lost+found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:49:00 -0000 Hello, What is lost+found? I've got one on all my filesystems and over the past few days i've had things being deleted from there. Do i have a problem? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:00:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A811F16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E63413C46C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF92AEBC7E; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:00:28 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Dave Message-Id: <20070425110028.a2690d32.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000901c78748$de2e9ba0$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <000901c78748$de2e9ba0$0200a8c0@satellite> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lost+found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:00:36 -0000 In response to "Dave" : > Hello, > What is lost+found? I've got one on all my filesystems and over the past > few days i've had things being deleted from there. Do i have a problem? When fsck finds problems with the filesystem, it saves any data that otherwise may have been lost to this directory. This is likely to happen if your system is powered off without a proper shutdown. If you use softupdates on your filesystems, this is not done because softupdates has other ways to deal with the problem. Don't shut off your system without properly unmounting the filesystems and you won't have this problem. If you aren't missing any data, you can delete the files in there. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:11:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BE116A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from menezes_marlon@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s24.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s24.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CFE13C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from menezes_marlon@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.155.96]) by bay0-omc3-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:58:18 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:58:17 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.155.123 by by144fd.bay144.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:58:12 GMT X-Originating-IP: [128.222.37.21] X-Originating-Email: [menezes_marlon@hotmail.com] X-Sender: menezes_marlon@hotmail.com From: "Marlon Menezes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:12 -0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2007 14:58:17.0895 (UTC) FILETIME=[286D9B70:01C7874A] Subject: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:11:21 -0000 Hi list, I am a newbie with FreeBSD and I am having problems in order to get my HBA Emulex LP9002 working on a FreeBSD version 6.2. Can you help me? Is there any one with experience with HBA setup on FreeBSD that can help me?" _________________________________________________________________ Chegou o Windows Live Spaces com rede social. Confira http://spaces.live.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:27:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F131916A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB5C13C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2007 11:27:36 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFO57222; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:27:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2007 11:27:23 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17967.29533.690659.185065@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:27:25 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070425110028.a2690d32.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <000901c78748$de2e9ba0$0200a8c0@satellite> <20070425110028.a2690d32.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: lost+found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:27:37 -0000 Bill Moran writes: > > What is lost+found? I've got one on all my filesystems and > > over the past few days i've had things being deleted from > > there. Do i have a problem? > > When fsck finds problems with the filesystem, it saves any data > that otherwise may have been lost to this directory. To elaborate a little: When fsck finds a file that no directory thinks belongs to it. it stores that file in the "lost+found" directory of that partition as "#". Robert huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:37:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DD16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarendra.godbole@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2216013C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarendra.godbole@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so111674ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lQ13yBLL/FUssRnlTmHDKH9brA9qwUGJVH1ljaFyPXAEcTBQnlHuFBVWAu59lF0Kv1nDAHMCq9/WAGQYjKeeTgx8ueOU4CkqQXTQnx2VQJRAuC0wl/H+oX1RZu5mTEOWKicSp0f9n7lGHs1VM8kzJhNtXDbojTHkt+lAAxFITl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bCorEKTi4tOJQDvN1lfcc6ze43NNxrvGEU9OyEp7ij1Al7tXw/TG8PReLfF+uurJ9QrSF0Ya4ZYCoEpM7tGg/S1PDtQI8adhkL5LniJueYvv2fpEKTORtDf0c7MLkSp24rHC79iZxpvaoHzO3LL3i+goltQX1fj7jI4Zg92SK8Y= Received: by 10.100.35.17 with SMTP id i17mr297249ani.1177515445023; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.58.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <294439d20704250837k525ddbd5n19ad4c220df0f281@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:07:24 +0530 From: "Amarendra Godbole" To: "Andy Greenwood" In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710704250659l3500f714gd780d69e4012b959@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <3ee9ca710704250659l3500f714gd780d69e4012b959@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alex Zbyslaw Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:26 -0000 On 4/25/07, Andy Greenwood wrote: > On 4/25/07, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > > > > I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > > > visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > > > possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > > > or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > > > classified? > > > > > > Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > > > discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > > > inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! > > > > All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > > > > e.g. > > > > List-Id: User questions > > > > Can gmail not filter on that? > > it's not documented, but you can filter like this > > listid:freebsd-questions.freebsd.org > > under the "has the words" section of the filter creation page. [...] Thanks all for your suggestions and clarifications. I do agree that visual tagging increases the length of the subject line a bit too much to fit in one screen properly. I will setup gmail filters, as suggested. -Amarendra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:42:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D333816A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B271E13C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 27495 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 15:42:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Apr 2007 15:42:54 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DBAF02842D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:42:52 -0400 (EDT) To: "Don O'Neil" References: <01a201c785cd$4aea2fc0$0300020a@mickey> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:42:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <01a201c785cd$4aea2fc0$0300020a@mickey> (Don O'Neil's message of "Mon\, 23 Apr 2007 10\:31\:57 -0700") Message-ID: <44y7kgv4sj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with Quotacheck after crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:54 -0000 "Don O'Neil" writes: > This question is related to my recent question about not being able to > delete files after a disk crash... I solved that problem with the chflags > (the no-delete flag was set!).. Thanks for all who suggested it. > > Now that I've deleted the files, I thought this problem would go away, but > its not: > > quotacheck: /home/quota.user: seek failed: Invalid argument > THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: > /dev/twed0s1d (/home) > > I've run an fsck on the volume from single user mode, after deleting the > files, and it was clean, but I still get this error. I deleted the > quota.user & quota.group files because they were corrupted when the crash > happened. > > I'm at a loss as to what to do next, any suggestions? Run fsck again (with, as always, the filesystem not mounted) and keep doing so until you get a run with no errors being corrected. Don't trust it if it tells you the filesystem is clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:44:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EB916A409 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: from schug.net (s0.schug.net [194.97.148.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1972B13C469 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: by schug.net (Postfix, from userid 10000) id AD600C59F4; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:44:06 +0200 From: Christoph Schug To: Andreas =?iso-8859-15?Q?Wider=F8e?= Andersen Message-ID: <20070425154406.GD32616@voodoo.schug.net> References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <23ed14b80704250423n21d5eaa1hc78ce1262d710959@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704250423n21d5eaa1hc78ce1262d710959@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SpaceNet AG User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 OpenPKG/2-STABLE (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:08 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I don't have mutt installed and I was hoping for a > way of doing this without installing additional software. Also, I didn't > mention that on one of the machines there are probably a year of emails so > the box is quite large. Well, this one requires additional software too, but maybe you've got formail(1) (which is part of the procmail(1) distribution) installed. # formail -f -s /usr/sbin/sendmail -oiee newaccount@example.com \ X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06C116A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F42213C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 13331 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 15:50:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Apr 2007 15:50:37 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 42E672842D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:50:37 -0400 (EDT) To: knizek@volny.cz References: <7f1b46d01f7875aa63988f4e3df2da73@www3.mail.volny.cz> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:50:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7f1b46d01f7875aa63988f4e3df2da73@www3.mail.volny.cz> (knizek@volny.cz's message of "Tue\, 24 Apr 2007 13\:12\:37 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: <44tzv4v4fm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which module for Garmin USB gps device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:50:38 -0000 knizek@volny.cz writes: > Hello List! Hello, Milan! > What is the appropriate module for accessing USB GPS devices like Garmin > eTrex? There may not be one. > When plugged in, dmesg shows ugen0 (which I guess is not a serial port > emulation of usb). Right. It's just a "generic USB" device node. > Manually loading "kldload ucom" does not create any new devices. Emulating a serial port isn't the only way to provide an interface. A quick search showed me the comms/garmin-utils port. Have you tried this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:55:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8416A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFB713C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 5219 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 15:55:18 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Apr 2007 15:55:18 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1A4AB2842D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:55:17 -0400 (EDT) To: "Anthony Human" References: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3A6DBDD@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:55:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3A6DBDD@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> (Anthony Human's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 13\:20\:46 +0200") Message-ID: <44ps5sv47u.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:55:19 -0000 "Anthony Human" writes: > Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release > or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror to > serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both time > and bandwidth when updating. > > Please could someone assist me with configuring the supfile to only > download the source for the above versions? Any other advice/tips would > be much appreciated. If you're running a local cvsup mirror, just grab the whole cvs tree for the sources (and the ports). You can leave out the bug database, and a few other distributions, but it's probably not worth your while to get the checked-out sources instead of the cvs files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:58:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1503E16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84DD13C480 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18194 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 15:58:27 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Apr 2007 15:58:27 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BAA3E2842D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:26 -0400 (EDT) To: "Marlon Menezes" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Marlon Menezes's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 11\:58\:12 -0300") Message-ID: <44lkggv42l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:28 -0000 "Marlon Menezes" writes: > I am a newbie with FreeBSD and I am having problems in order to get my > HBA Emulex LP9002 working on a FreeBSD version 6.2. > > Can you help me? Is there any one with experience with HBA setup on > FreeBSD that can help me?" HBA should be transparent, as far as I recall. You'll need to be more specific. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 15:59:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD38B16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CA213C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 06BB91CC21; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:10:30 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> Subject: Digital signed mail- certificate issuing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:59:07 -0000 Hi Can anyone please tell me the simplest way I can issue my customers a means of digitally signing emails they transmit to us via our server. I need the chosen method to be compatible with most popular email clients and popular webmail services. Every customer has their identity and email addresses stored on our mysql database. Essentially my target is , as far as possible, to ensure that emails purporting to come from my customers are indeed from them and noone else. Running freebsd 6.1 postfix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 16:07:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE5416A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (echo.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A9913C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from echo.calarts.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 092DD101E408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by echo.calarts.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA42F10191F8 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [198.182.157.179] (dhcp7179.calarts.edu [198.182.157.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3PG7nrH071373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <462F7CD0.2050401@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:44 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: 3600 MCP Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:07:51 -0000 I was thinking about purchasing a Sun server that used the AMD CPU and the NVIDIA nForce Professional 3600 MCP. Is the 3600 Supported? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 16:27:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B5116A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D6913C480 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10209 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 16:27:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Apr 2007 16:27:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 55E462842D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:27:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Sean Murphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <462F7CD0.2050401@calarts.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:27:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462F7CD0.2050401@calarts.edu> (Sean Murphy's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 09\:07\:44 -0700") Message-ID: <44abwwv2qy.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: 3600 MCP Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:27:02 -0000 Sean Murphy writes (for the second time in less than 24 hours): > I was thinking about purchasing a Sun server that used the AMD CPU and > the NVIDIA nForce Professional 3600 MCP. Is the 3600 Supported? Probably. I can't easily find information on exactly what hardware is in that system. You might need the nfe driver, which I don't believe is in the 6.x tree at this time, but has reportedly been added to HEAD. Try it out... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 16:34:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C7516A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6634513C43E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HgkRw-000ErI-DC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:34:36 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:34:25 -0700 Message-ID: <017701c78757$96435c90$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AceHV5X36rgjN4dwSjG9J82EuSj74Q== Subject: Quotacheck failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:34:32 -0000 I'm having a problem with quotacheck failing and giving this message: quotacheck: /home/quota.user: seek failed: Invalid argument THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: /dev/twed0s1d (/home) However, I have run a full fsck from single user mode on this volume and it comes up clean every time. I've removed the quota.user and had it re-generated, but that didn't help either. Anyone know how/why this is happening, and what do try to do to fix it? Is there possible some corrupt file somewhere on the volume that quotacheck doesn't like, but is technically fine according to fsck? Thanks for any suggestions! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 17:08:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF3116A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2786313C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so151140ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=atW9B7DRkWBCfPiU7BzyK9DCSTVkvGZvoMZFzVStw7MXm2G5vJ4tk3Ms3IbooAw3hvUVvJc4xky6TWI9bk3iJJVZYToqWBdAhmdZWaYq5iu8E+AaGPM9bxD6cFRX/qSD++rA5LmdEdoSUq7hmiYSy3ox9wH705dlNIJfvuXJV2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=V8/HBCpPA9IyBymsh0w3iVGQmj4WVQ6sPhNLT/nYWxNLAWJheHFPj3wPGVgH2WOYpPIEjZrRf2w8Ur8Ck9lfxusswFbgfVlF+t+l/7TbluKbnmcpd1eWWXwriwLzLFYER5Zj9sN9LmoliZv8kphbEC8cuLZ0L0v6g93DhFm1aEw= Received: by 10.100.207.16 with SMTP id e16mr367707ang.1177520931445; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.6 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:08:51 -0300 From: freenity To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:08:52 -0000 Hi. I have just installed the nvidia drivers on my FBSD6.2 i386. It work fine but I cant set my refresh rate at 75, it sets at 50 with a resolution 1280x1024. The monitor is LG Flatron L1740B and my video card is Geforce 6100. Here is my xorg.conf file: Thanks for any help. Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor Model" HorizSync 40-80 #60 VertRefresh 50-90 #75 EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [] #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [] Identifier "Card0" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "nVidia Corporation" BoardName "C51 PCI Express Bridge" BusID "PCI:0:5:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 Modes "1024x768" EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 Modes "1280x1024" EndSubSection EndSection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 17:43:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB0416A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B5813C45D for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3PHhh1x062330; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:43:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <462F9349.4070706@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:43:37 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freenity References: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:43:56 -0000 freenity wrote: > Hi. > I have just installed the nvidia drivers on my FBSD6.2 i386. It work fine > but I cant set my refresh rate at 75, it sets at 50 with a resolution > 1280x1024. The monitor is LG Flatron L1740B and my video card is Geforce > 6100. > Here is my xorg.conf file: > Thanks for any help. > I just allow DDC to do its thing; also, /var/log/Xorg.0.log might have some clues --- for example, what modelines are discovered for your hardware set? Kevin Kinsey > > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > EndSection > > Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > EndSection > > Section "Module" > Load "dbe" > Load "dri" > Load "extmod" > Load "glx" > Load "record" > Load "xtrap" > Load "freetype" > Load "type1" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName "Monitor Model" > > HorizSync 40-80 #60 > VertRefresh 50-90 #75 > > EndSection > > Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "ShadowFB" # [] > #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [] > #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [] > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "nvidia" > VendorName "nVidia Corporation" > BoardName "C51 PCI Express Bridge" > BusID "PCI:0:5:0" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > Modes "1024x768" > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > Modes "1280x1024" > EndSubSection > > EndSection -- To you I'm an atheist; to God, I'm the loyal opposition. -- Woody Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 17:54:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB8416A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0829A13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3PHswtW014447; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 9C89B40472; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:58 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-9f54ebb0000007ff-6f-462f95f29ed7 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 8C179400B5; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> References: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:54:57 -0700 To: David Southwell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital signed mail- certificate issuing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:54:59 -0000 On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:10 AM, David Southwell wrote: > Can anyone please tell me the simplest way I can issue my customers > a means of > digitally signing emails they transmit to us via our server. I need > the > chosen method to be compatible with most popular email clients and > popular > webmail services. The most commonly used solution for this is PGP (aka GnuPG, OpenPGP, etc). It's somewhat intrusive, but it is reasonably well supported by most clients. It can be used with webmail services using a local client to sign and/or encrypt the message before pasting it into the webmail's send form. Another less commonly used alternative is known as S/MIME. It doesn't work well with webmail, and some MUA clients have problems with it, too. > Every customer has their identity and email addresses stored on our > mysql > database. > > Essentially my target is, as far as possible, to ensure that emails > purporting to come from my customers are indeed from them and noone > else. You're never going to be able to prevent someone from forging emails which claim to be from a client. You might be able to convince motivated clients to always use PGP/ GnuPG for signing mail, so that forgeries can be readily identified by someone knowledgeable, but be aware that most normal computer users have significant problems dealing with PGP. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:10:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1323916A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from menezes_marlon@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s20.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s20.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A9813C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from menezes_marlon@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.155.105]) by bay0-omc3-s20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:24:21 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:24:21 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.155.123 by by144fd.bay144.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:24:17 GMT X-Originating-IP: [128.222.37.21] X-Originating-Email: [menezes_marlon@hotmail.com] X-Sender: menezes_marlon@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <44lkggv42l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: "Marlon Menezes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:24:17 -0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2007 17:24:21.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FD05820:01C7875E] Subject: Re: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:10:19 -0000 >From: Lowell Gilbert >To: "Marlon Menezes" >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:26 -0400 > >"Marlon Menezes" writes: > > > I am a newbie with FreeBSD and I am having problems in order to get my > > HBA Emulex LP9002 working on a FreeBSD version 6.2. > > > > Can you help me? Is there any one with experience with HBA setup on > > FreeBSD that can help me?" > >HBA should be transparent, as far as I recall. >You'll need to be more specific. > This is a Host Bus Adapter that uses the protocol Fibre Channel to communicate with Storage Arrays (Like Shark from IBM, Clariion from EMC..), I need to install it on a FreeBSD system, but I don't have the driver that allows the OS to communicate with the Storage array. On a Emulex website (The vendor of the HBA) there are drivers to Suse and RHEL, but there are no drivers to FreeBSD. _________________________________________________________________ Verificador de Segurança do Windows Live OneCare: verifique já a segurança do seu PC! http://onecare.live.com/site/pt-br/default.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:18:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C18016A474 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5960D13C45D for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so306525wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:18:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OYGp5y3qC0A/4N7RxII/easSzHMEvpebzhbpG994BbTxC5z+Z+scOgZdrJ/b9PWqh7XDLySwYV9XB3krD/YeCGM+Bbmu21GoEgI5xVTQvuDcOlJgy/EhR/HWcLRHd5fBOETqltTTzPd4bMaExnw4FRikaRapceFdCaVLhUsRugw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UyRMGOz7GZ/p4h+sS9chV52OsjFPaQmTwldXv2DiyPwmNAp7YwUJeFzjy4a/OJ0Lan4hyW57bUgaFr8AIQuJx+AyrVLSFNch7tOfhpAknsyZaBEvAAraw1rn+JZMi9Mg8w3addrF9lTVG0OC9XHngbLRrzmaZflWVGGzShhWuMI= Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr272472hud.1177525122930; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.120.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <768631270704251118t7f2a5f7y65b276473530135d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:18:42 -0400 From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: "Marlon Menezes" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44lkggv42l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:18:44 -0000 I do not believe they are supported http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware-i386.html On 4/25/07, Marlon Menezes wrote: > > > >From: Lowell Gilbert > >To: "Marlon Menezes" > >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Emulex LP9002 - FreeBSD 6.2 > >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:58:26 -0400 > > > >"Marlon Menezes" writes: > > > > > I am a newbie with FreeBSD and I am having problems in order to get m= y > > > HBA Emulex LP9002 working on a FreeBSD version 6.2. > > > > > > Can you help me? Is there any one with experience with HBA setup on > > > FreeBSD that can help me?" > > > >HBA should be transparent, as far as I recall. > >You'll need to be more specific. > > > > This is a Host Bus Adapter that uses the protocol Fibre Channel to > communicate with Storage Arrays (Like Shark from IBM, Clariion from > EMC..), > I need to install it on a FreeBSD system, but I don't have the driver tha= t > allows the OS to communicate with the Storage array. > On a Emulex website (The vendor of the HBA) there are drivers to Suse and > RHEL, but there are no drivers to FreeBSD. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Verificador de Seguran=E7a do Windows Live OneCare: verifique j=E1 a segu= ran=E7a > do seu PC! http://onecare.live.com/site/pt-br/default.htm > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:21:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F9116A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=DgxIxu=J4=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout03.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout03.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.254.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280B113C44B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=DgxIxu=J4=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan53.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.53] helo=mailscan53.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout03.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hgle7-0005WR-OW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:15 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] ident=exim) by mailscan53.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1Hgle7-00036Y-So for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:15 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] helo=authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan53.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hgle7-00036C-2x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:15 -0400 Received: from cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com ([65.185.51.114] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Hgle6-00088q-KQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:56:28 -0400 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425135628.5334ddf7@vixen42> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox X-EN-OrigIP: 65.185.51.114 X-EN-OrigHost: cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com Subject: LDAP and xscreensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:21:55 -0000 xscreensaver: couldn't get password of "kitsune" xscreensaver: 13:54:14: locking is disabled (error getting password). xscreensaver: 13:54:14: does xscreensaver need to be setuid? consult the manual. Is what I am getting on the console when I run it. It is setuid. The passwords and userinfo is stored in LDAP. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:52:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C9216A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from shoemasters.com (shoemasters.com [68.144.188.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C857213C46C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9352C7C46A5 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:32:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shoemasters.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32746-03 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:32:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECAE7C46A2 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:32:43 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <2395703.1801177525963776.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:32:43 -0700 (MST) From: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Apr 25 11:32:44 2007 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 462f9ecc38671222944467 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.124 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 autolearn=ham tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, DSPAM_HAM=-0.1, HTML_30_40=0.374, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Spam-Score: -4.124 X-Spam-Level: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: java build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:52:14 -0000 Hello all i am getting this error when trying to install java jdk15 from the ports. please help and thank you in advance acpi0_check: nexus0 attachedom/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.java:162: warning: non-varargs call of varargsacpi0_check: legacy0 not-presentpe for last parameter; cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call acpi0_check: npx0 attached cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning acpi0_check: acpi0 attachednewInstance(null); ^ Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. 21 errors 12 warnings gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. *** Error code 1 -- Computer King & CaN Mail - Sales Service Hosting Backup http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org NEW!!! Custom Service Packages Secure IMAP Email - Automated Remote Backups - Photo Blogs - Online Accounting Packages From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:57:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CFE16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@altpeter.de) Received: from canismajor.corpex-net.de (canismajor.corpex-net.de [62.67.202.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3766013C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@altpeter.de) Received: from pegasus.corpex.de ([194.6.192.248]) by canismajor.corpex-net.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HgmOp-000BNj-2b; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:39:31 +0200 Received: by pegasus.corpex.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:39:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:39:29 +0200 From: Frank Altpeter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425183929.GC1872@corpex.de> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Altpeter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: strange effect building large storage server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:57:34 -0000 [Please CC me in replies, since i'm not subscribed to the list...] Hi there, I was just hitting a quite strange problem with installing FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE on an x86 platform... The machine itself provides a SATA raid controller, which is equipped with 12x500G disks, making a total of about 5 TB space. So, because of the 2GB restriction of freebsd, i decided to create 4 partitions: da0s1 with 60G for the system, and da0s2 - da0s4 with ($rest / 3). Then, creating two partitions on da0s2 - da0s4 with each ($rest / 6) in size, making the system partitions and 6 x 816G partitions. After installation and startup, i see strange things happen, since /dev/da0s2d /dev/da0s2e /dev/da0s3e are working, but /dev/da0s3d /dev/da0s4d /dev/da0s4e give me errors: mount: /dev/da0s3d: Input/output error mount: /dev/da0s4d: No such file or directory mount: /dev/da0s4e: No such file or directory The partition table looks ok to me: ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=668656 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=668656 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 125821017 (61436 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 125821080, size 3537882495 (1727481 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 3 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 3663703575, size 3537882495 (1727481 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; end: cyl 1023/ head 165/ sector 59 The data for partition 4 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 2906618774, size 3537882495 (1727481 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; end: cyl 1023/ head 76/ sector 55 while the disklabel output looks a litte bit strange: # /dev/da0s2: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 3537882495 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 1767899136 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 1769983359 1767899136 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 # /dev/da0s3: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 3537882495 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 1767899136 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 e: 1769983359 1767899136 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 disklabel: /dev/da0s4: no valid label found Does anyone have a hint what problem i'm hitting here? Any input is greatly appreciated... Tìoraidh an-dràsda, Frank Altpeter -- *** FA-RIPE *** http://blog.foxalpha.de/ *** SIG at 11 *** Join the Open Business Club: http://www.openbc.com/go/invite/27666.e9249b Please use text based multi-IM messaging with http://www.centerim.org/ || If everything is coming your way, you're in the wrong lane. || From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:58:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DF816A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACB113C480 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3PJ0ixo071106; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3PJ0gxp071105; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:42 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20070425190042.GA70940@thought.org> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:58:39 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Gary Kline wrote: > > Guys, > > > > This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I > > need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), > > that's okay... > > > > I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and > > edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This > > works to print $9 the filenames. > > > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 > > == 26 ) print $9}' > > > > What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and > > xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any > > clues! > > > > xargs(1) is your friend. > > Simply arrange for your awk script to print out the names of all the > files you have selected to edit, then pipe the result into xargs. > Like so: > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) > print $9}' | xargs vi Doing a pipe thru "xargs vi" is the first thing that failed--with: ex/vi: Vi's standard input and output must be a terminal whereas ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' printed a slew of files to stdout. > > This does assume that the file names you are using do not contain > spaces, quote marks, brackets or other characters of syntactical > significance to the shell. In that case you could use something like > this: > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi No, no non-ASCII characters in the filenames. I'll try the -0 and see if that gets rid of the "must be a terminal" blurb... ph 11:47 [5133] ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' | xargs -0 vi ex/vi: Files with newlines in the name are unrecoverable ex/vi: Modifications not recoverable if the session fails ex/vi: Vi's standard input and output must be a terminal Ah, so vi sees "filename\n" ... perhaps. [?] > > where find's '-print0' and the '-0' flag to xargs make the commands > produce and consume respectively a null separated list of filenames. > > Unfortunately with find(1) there doesn't seem to be a way of expressing > an absolute date / time -- all you can do is the time difference between > now and when you want (which defaults to 'number of days' but can be set > to use various other time units. I can think of a couple of ways of > calculating that, but personally I'd find it cleaner to just roll the > whole thing into a small perl script which identified the files in > question and forked off an instance of vi(1) to do the editing. > You're probably right about the script. There are at least dozens of files around ... they could be /bin/mv'd or cp'd to a tmp and then run thru vi. --Or?? thanks much, Matthew. appreciate it, gary > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 > 7 Priory Courtyard > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW, UK > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGLwgk3jDkPpsZ+VYRAxaaAJ9H4q3vD4qqBo+FijEs+PqmaR0kaQCgidpA > kXOmJIpsODutFhLIvIoJpEE= > =fNoc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:14:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E1016A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexey.kuzmenko@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6439913C484 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexey.kuzmenko@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so324335wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:14:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OuaanlF2uXkRGfacownG1a5OA7RU7dgRm38zuOxA4YFyp9tmwfMashcEl5srIO/4h3z9s/iUlZOLxHq9CsQylnVRWH8ekqoV1Sdhe7UqY9KC/JnkV3pkrY7IiCsLoVSZPTWaP1f6i+MRpBhAgn6qIiZtGgqYENvIcxJjyw9zqKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IqiHVg2nacEJetZNCPoZDbHShhjC3Tp9CgbQo8mfUu4y/bwhR2OHOCQW35z/8jo6W/O/kKAZteBdwNUsV0YO2Do67gBr1wHDk5DZfZ3zloXXKO5EhROZJYmKSmcdgkY8nMI2/qlBpNOU4eWdt0xqFlH6Eb/ahRSmqqQ+5EOfw6E= Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr276734hud.1177526846345; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.201.8 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4a4bcf70704251147j7f915353l2254d1c1397b6548@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:47:26 -0400 From: "Alexey Kuzmenko" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070425084854.GJ1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070425084854.GJ1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> Subject: Re: GELI recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:14:54 -0000 I've turned on debugging and visible password with: kern.geom.eli.debug=3 kern.geom.eli.visible_passphrase=1 but have nothing in the dmesg concerning my ad0s2 partition and it keeps telling "Wrong key for ad0s2". May be I should fsck it before doing a geli attachment? -- Alexey S Kuzmenko [alexey.kuzmenko@gmail.com] GPG: 0x93AD13DD (C9ED F720 D693 E707 571A E49A 0173 2F04 93AD 13DD) nic-hdl - ASK1-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:15:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16DD16A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F74D13C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 2530 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 19:14:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 19:14:02 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PJF35T081950 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:15:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PJF3Pf081949 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:15:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:15:03 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:15:05 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > >>A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy) > >>describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false > >>information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research assignment > >>that involved that information. Apparently the number of students who > >>trusted the false information without verifying it was quite high. I > >>should take that as a lesson that most people _don't_ know how to verify > >>the validity of information and be more careful when I make sarcastic > >>statements. > > Lee Capps wrote: > >That's interesting, though, to pick a nit, it may just show that > >students were in a hurry, rather than that they necessarily trust the > >info or that they don't know _how_ to verify the info. > > And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform the > students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the facts? > And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his > misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more > important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned, and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal name. . . . -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:17:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40BF16A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D8713C465 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3PJJhhR071216; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:19:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3PJJgYP071215; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:19:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:19:42 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Derek Ragona Message-ID: <20070425191942.GB70940@thought.org> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20070425061655.0264d980@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070425061655.0264d980@mail.computinginnovations.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:17:40 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:21:52AM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: > At 02:29 AM 4/25/2007, Gary Kline wrote: > > Guys, > > > > This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I > > need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), > > that's okay... > > > > I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and > > edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This > > works to print $9 the filenames. > > > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 > > == 26 ) print $9}' > > > > What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and > > xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any > > clues! > > I would use a simple approach incase you need to re-edit the list since > editing will change file times: > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) > print $9}' > /tmp/myfilelist > then you can: > for i in `cat /tmp/myfilelist`;do vi $i;done > > if you don't want to use a file, you can do in one shell loop too, but > again this will change your file modification times: > for i in `ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == > 26 ) print $9}'`;do vi $i;done Yep; this is the simple kind of script I had in mind first but wasn't sure if/how it would work. Your one-liner works "as-advertized", but then as you note, the timestamp is changed!! (duh)... So it does make more sense to put the list into a /tmp/ file. Save typing when I re-edit. thanks much, indeed, gary > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:29:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0041F16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D0F13C48A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3PJT4lj018206 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3PJT46H018205 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:04 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:29:06 -0000 --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned, > and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I > don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal > name. . . . yawn. That sort of research has been going on for years. Less interesting is the sort of trash emitted by people who don't like knowing that whatever they've read on a webpage might not be completely accurate, and that they might have to do some of their own thinking. regards. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGL6v+tIqByHxlDocRAjz/AJ96+tmQ4QmCqAq5Fv7Y7rdbxKZ7kwCePXRZ RJaU7NGLkF5ZqIQvzIIjIz8= =lEB1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:30:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A245F16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: from schug.net (s0.schug.net [194.97.148.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B71B13C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: by schug.net (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 811E1C59F4; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:06 +0200 From: Christoph Schug To: Frank Altpeter Message-ID: <20070425193006.GA30162@voodoo.schug.net> References: <20070425183929.GC1872@corpex.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425183929.GC1872@corpex.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 OpenPKG/2-STABLE (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange effect building large storage server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:30:07 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Frank Altpeter wrote: > [Please CC me in replies, since i'm not subscribed to the list...] > > > Hi there, > > I was just hitting a quite strange problem with installing > FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE on an x86 platform... > > The machine itself provides a SATA raid controller, which is > equipped with 12x500G disks, making a total of about 5 TB space. > So, because of the 2GB restriction of freebsd, i decided to create 4 > partitions: da0s1 with 60G for the system, and da0s2 - da0s4 with ($rest / > 3). Then, creating two partitions on da0s2 - da0s4 with each ($rest / 6) > in size, making the system partitions and 6 x 816G partitions. > After installation and startup, i see strange things happen, since [...] I would rather guess you're encountering limitations of an MBR style partition table. Take a look at gpt(8) to overcome 2 GB limits. -cs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:31:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EED16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwmcelfresh@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326813C487 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwmcelfresh@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so205261ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:31:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lCdDgyr4XO+pRipSKg+0as21ITZJ+kia91WGWcezHnWFGgCJQZ9gc4ljlQ3sNZo9gsc4PWNbTTb4KcvLZONv1ewwm+xYi6RGvdUs1AZkQI4HvkNlPkbQhI6e27BWZm+SvhDfIS7OmVC7gO4mF0kc/u8+qM7/Oot7casKUj0nU/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FKPYyHq3TkaC5dxl7v9fcDrBr/Xy8ywGbxfM8ZJn2ozbFI0YYrfetywH6BgYnm4ln+80zvv47dyHx7tO6/bqqs2N+cfw4H1SxFUDVI9/I2Q6Vzeq55jofuiGk03V6fHUBONys+85wXcN2r+OKr3WINhbRuOp3gYBu9EP2VtGYQc= Received: by 10.100.127.1 with SMTP id z1mr499648anc.1177529514701; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.136.11 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44b41e4e0704251231x1358b123ma70550e0181d7dcd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:31:54 -0700 From: "Charlie McElfresh" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: can't add any new users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:31:58 -0000 Hi, I recently upgraded all my machines to 6.2 RELEASE. All my machines except one work fine. On one of my machines, I can log in from the console to the super user account, but I could not su to my user account. So, I backed up all my data, and I deleted my user account. Then, I added it back with adduser. When I look in /etc/passwd and /etc/group, I'm in there. When I try to su to my newly created account, I get this message: Bad system call (core dumped) I tried removing my account with rmuser, then adding it back again -- same problem. Any ideas? Charlie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:34:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C0916A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warrenhead@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A665013C45B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warrenhead@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so424309ugh for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YtWSskS4fhkZrnqaqlILgv2bvxAuxIE/nX07qI6QMaknMnvYiReeP/+bS9VCjp7Z4dlYEKU+Mfley3Dzif8baazT7A5ikxF6LnR6k4KWrfI2LDB5KPVptyvUidrlvInohD5TQhXgBQ8dodDdXJ5Acf1PvwoSsvi+ciwpV2MC7I0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V7HBNBupkbOrYbjBRFuhOh0sSxfLOXwChj8L/qtiNl4MGOYJ0SE0jDRNJzsDeWn4C2qlCD1I/vGxeRvaJqBjwD1E6QWEGcL5mK7m6Whdt9zu3T2gPYzW23/Jmky4opfJr1dEeW5BLvo2+kEfi0gIfQYOJvRHCylICiWcioPX+/Q= Received: by 10.82.155.10 with SMTP id c10mr1901340bue.1177529692100; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.179.11? ( [81.206.93.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22sm575309ika.2007.04.25.12.34.50; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462FAD5A.4090400@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:34:50 +0200 From: WarrenHead User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: remote x forwarding through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:34:54 -0000 Hi list, I'm trying to use ssh to forward X from a local FreeBSD server to my ubuntu machine. I'm unable to get X forwarded. (ssh is working) I set these options: ubuntu: /etc/ssh/ssh_config Host * ForwardX11 yes ForwardAgent yes FreeBSD /etc/ssh/sshd_config X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 X11UseLocalhost yes UseLogin no I didn't set the $DISPLAY variable, on purpose. After I log into the server and start xterm (for instance) I get this message: DISPLAY is not set. SSH should do that for me but I guess it doesn't. I don't know why. I logged into FreeBSD with these commands: ssh -v freebsd ssh -v -X freebsd ssh -v -X -A freebsd What could be the cause? Client or server? Cheers, Warren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:35:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8BF16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: from schug.net (s0.schug.net [194.97.148.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EBD13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cs@schug.net) Received: by schug.net (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 53518C59F8; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:35:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:35:51 +0200 From: Christoph Schug To: Frank Altpeter Message-ID: <20070425193551.GA30648@voodoo.schug.net> References: <20070425183929.GC1872@corpex.de> <20070425193006.GA30162@voodoo.schug.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425193006.GA30162@voodoo.schug.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 OpenPKG/2-STABLE (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange effect building large storage server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:35:52 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Frank Altpeter wrote: > > > [Please CC me in replies, since i'm not subscribed to the list...] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I was just hitting a quite strange problem with installing > > FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE on an x86 platform... > > > > The machine itself provides a SATA raid controller, which is > > equipped with 12x500G disks, making a total of about 5 TB space. > > So, because of the 2GB restriction of freebsd, i decided to create 4 > > partitions: da0s1 with 60G for the system, and da0s2 - da0s4 with ($rest / > > 3). Then, creating two partitions on da0s2 - da0s4 with each ($rest / 6) > > in size, making the system partitions and 6 x 816G partitions. > > After installation and startup, i see strange things happen, since > [...] > > I would rather guess you're encountering limitations of an MBR style > partition table. Take a look at gpt(8) to overcome 2 GB limits. Oops, s/GB/TB/ of course -cs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:51:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C686616A40A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp2.utdallas.edu (smtp2.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B9C13C487 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp2.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D015C513 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:51:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:51:30 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========BEDE98761166B7AD89A0==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:51:30 -0000 --==========BEDE98761166B7AD89A0========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey=20 wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: >> No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned, >> and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I >> don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal >> name. . . . > > yawn. That sort of research has been going on for years. > > Less interesting is the sort of trash emitted by people who don't like > knowing that whatever they've read on a webpage might not be completely > accurate, and that they might have to do some of their own thinking. > > regards. At one time I had high hopes that the internet would usher in a new era of=20 increased knowledge and reduced gullibility. Instead it seems to have=20 simply hastened the arrival to the wrong conclusions. --=20 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========BEDE98761166B7AD89A0==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 19:59:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32BC16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0A5A13C4BB for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 43164 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 19:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 19:57:57 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PJwuCi082122 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PJwuam082121 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:55 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425195855.GC81828@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:59:01 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:29:04PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account banned, > > and the head of his department should be informed of his vandalism. I > > don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his legal > > name. . . . > > yawn. That sort of research has been going on for years. The fact that some idiot professor takes leave of his senses every few months doesn't change the fact that these idiot professors should not be held accountable for vandalism. > > Less interesting is the sort of trash emitted by people who don't like > knowing that whatever they've read on a webpage might not be completely > accurate, and that they might have to do some of their own thinking. I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the printed page, though. I'm amused at the appropriateness of my randomly chosen sig to this topic, by the way. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "It's just incredible that a trillion-synapse computer could actually spend Saturday afternoon watching a football game." - Marvin Minsky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:02:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F037116A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patl+freebsd@volant.org) Received: from smtp.volant.org (gate.volant.org [207.111.218.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16B613C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patl+freebsd@volant.org) Received: from adsl-065-081-071-131.sip.gnv.bellsouth.net ([65.81.71.131] helo=[192.168.1.157]) by smtp.volant.org with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1HgnIr-000Hwa-Th for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:37:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:36:38 -0400 From: Pat Lashley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 36b95005dbefd494ace392bd2c13e160518c3c4f X-Spam-User: nobody X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Score-Int: -43 X-Spam-Report: This mail has matched the spam-filter tests listed below. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for details about the specific tests reported. In general, the higher the number of total points, the more likely that it actually is spam. (The 'required' number of points listed below is the arbitrary number above which the message is normally considered spam.) Content analysis details: (-4.4 points total, 5.0 required) 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.4 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Active Directory server on 6-STABLE ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:02:50 -0000 I'm looking for a good way to provide a single authentication/authorization database for multiple applications in an environment consisting of a FreeBSD server and a collection of primarily Windows (XP) clients. We do NOT want to use the old Windows Domain protocols; and it doesn't look easy to make Windows work with anything that isn't a Microsoft work-alike. Active Directory looks like a good choice; since it should be easy to access the database from just about any app that supports LDAP authentication. But so far, I haven't found an implementation of an AD-compatible server that will run on FreeBSD. (This could, in part, reflect my lack of Windows experience...) It looks like Samba4 is far enough along to provide the necessary functionality; but it doesn't build and run on FreeBSD; and I don't currently have the time available to do the porting work. So, have I completely missed some other solution? Does someone have Samba4 running on FreeBSD 6-STABLE? Do any of you have any other useful (on-topic) advice for me? Thanks, -Pat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:05:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D4A16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B30113C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 49200 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 20:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 20:04:21 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PK5MnR082169 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:05:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PK5LmI082168 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:05:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:05:21 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:05:24 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > >I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > >visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > >possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > >or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > >classified? > > > >Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > >discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > >inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! > > All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > > e.g. > > List-Id: User questions > > Can gmail not filter on that? Do you have any suggestions for how to do something similar with mutt or procmail? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "A script is what you give the actors. A program is what you give the audience." - Larry Wall From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:19:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731E916A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from omr4.networksolutionsemail.com (omr4.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3796E13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr4.mgt.netsol.com [10.49.6.67]) by omr4.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l3PKJh1n020365 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 25650 invoked by uid 78); 25 Apr 2007 20:19:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.15.200?) (racerx@makeworld.com@71.113.183.18) by ns-omr4.lb.hosting.dc2.netsol.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 20:19:42 -0000 Message-ID: <462FB7CC.1030903@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:19:24 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pat Lashley References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Active Directory server on 6-STABLE ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:44 -0000 Pat Lashley wrote: > I'm looking for a good way to provide a single authentication/authorization > database for multiple applications in an environment consisting of a > FreeBSD > server and a collection of primarily Windows (XP) clients. We do NOT want > to use the old Windows Domain protocols; and it doesn't look easy to make > Windows work with anything that isn't a Microsoft work-alike. > > Active Directory looks like a good choice; since it should be easy to > access > the database from just about any app that supports LDAP authentication. > But > so far, I haven't found an implementation of an AD-compatible server > that will > run on FreeBSD. (This could, in part, reflect my lack of Windows > experience...) > > It looks like Samba4 is far enough along to provide the necessary > functionality; > but it doesn't build and run on FreeBSD; and I don't currently have the > time > available to do the porting work. > > So, have I completely missed some other solution? Does someone have Samba4 > running on FreeBSD 6-STABLE? Do any of you have any other useful > (on-topic) > advice for me? Pat - your not going to find a good "fit" with FreeBSD and LDAP. The closest you will get to near-AD via Unix is here. http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation You may find this will better suit your needs. It has mine. -- Best regards, Chris BOFH excuse #54: Evil dogs hypnotised the night shift From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:19:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1571316A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30A213C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53072180CA; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:45 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: j1T1KSxOq3L+n+vzuCAWydDq/YWOJ350ZFirf08VGIxE 1177532384 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983B61A0C6; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:19:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> References: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0363BF5C-75AE-4A81-A1CB-D0A0F15E8AB3@goldmark.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:19:36 -0500 To: David Southwell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital signed mail- certificate issuing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:45 -0000 On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:10 AM, David Southwell wrote: > Can anyone please tell me the simplest way I can issue my customers > a means of > digitally signing emails they transmit to us via our server. I need > the > chosen method to be compatible with most popular email clients and > popular > webmail services. As someone said, PGP and S/MIME are really the two choices. Neither will be simple enough to go smoothly with all of your users, particular your webmail users. Both involve understanding some apparently tricky concepts, although your users (but not you) can be spared from many of them. Particularly if you wish to issue certificates (either client certificates or a self-signed server certificate) you need to develop a good understanding of how things are supposed to work. > Every customer has their identity and email addresses stored on our > mysql > database. > > Essentially my target is , as far as possible, to ensure that emails > purporting to come from my customers are indeed from them and noone > else. Do you need to know that it really is from such and such person, or can you get by with knowing that it really is from such and such email address? If the latter will be enough, then you can use the same sort of confirmation mechanism that is used by mailing list management systems. Simply require a response sent to a confirmation request sent to the email address you are trying to authenticate. Also, why does this have to be an email based system instead of a web based one? For the latter users can authenticate with a simple username and password. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:21:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D46816A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D75613C4AD for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3PKLllj015514 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:21:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3PKLltn015513 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:21:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:21:47 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425202147.GA8585@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425195855.GC81828@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425195855.GC81828@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:21:48 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other > sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this > particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the > printed page, though. I recall reading some interesting comments from studies (second hand, e.g., in Science News) which stated that people tended to believe things that were presented in a credible fashion, not questioning them - using the paper or page as an authority which amplified their own general beliefs on a topic. Aside from the circular referencing that occurs when believing that... It's certainly hard to see where/how to decide to stop and question the authority, given that premise (knowing that one is biased). But it's perhaps a good habit to get into - observing that reading things that one already agrees with are perhaps as problematic as those that one does not. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGL7hZtIqByHxlDocRAjJJAJ9QH1njzZ77ORvTNzcpegyUnLuLaQCcCnVB 3H2zIyYUbg4laQEorZfoZl4= =TIFH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:29:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C33216A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) Received: from MX1.otc.edu (mx1.otc.edu [198.209.160.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137813C45D for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177532940-657a00500000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://198.209.160.201:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Sender Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9156E2969A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu with ESMTP id ikXntCR74BIdokKm for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:00 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Single Instance Service Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:28:59 -0500 Message-ID: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A4AC@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E632890@EXM1.otc.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Single Instance Service Thread-Index: AceG5mZGHQUq9TCmQBG6MFZzlANBJwAkdqGw From: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." To: X-Barracuda-Connect: exn1.otc.edu[172.16.2.131] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177532940 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OTC E-Mail System at otc.edu Subject: RE: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:29:01 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of GARRISON, TRAVIS J. > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:04 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Single Instance Service >=20 >=20 > I am looking for software that will run on FreeBSD that is similar to > Microsoft Single Instance Service. >=20 > The Single Instance Storage Filter is a file system filter that manages > the duplicate copies of files on hard-disk volumes. This filter copies one > instance of the duplicate file into a central folder, and the duplicates > are replaced with a link to the central copy to improve disk usage. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" [GARRISON, TRAVIS J.]=20 Is this something that is not possible under FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:30:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5303A16A40B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60DD13C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id DB7BE1CC66; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:41:48 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:41:48 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704250910.30808.david@vizion2000.net> <0363BF5C-75AE-4A81-A1CB-D0A0F15E8AB3@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <0363BF5C-75AE-4A81-A1CB-D0A0F15E8AB3@goldmark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704251341.48692.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Digital signed mail- certificate issuing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:27 -0000 On Wednesday 25 April 2007 13:19:36 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:10 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > Can anyone please tell me the simplest way I can issue my customers > > a means of > > digitally signing emails they transmit to us via our server. I need > > the > > chosen method to be compatible with most popular email clients and > > popular > > webmail services. > > As someone said, PGP and S/MIME are really the two choices. Neither > will be simple enough to go smoothly with all of your users, > particular your webmail users. Both involve understanding some > apparently tricky concepts, although your users (but not you) can be > spared from many of them. Particularly if you wish to issue > certificates (either client certificates or a self-signed server > certificate) you need to develop a good understanding of how things > are supposed to work. > > > Every customer has their identity and email addresses stored on our > > mysql > > database. > > > > Essentially my target is , as far as possible, to ensure that emails > > purporting to come from my customers are indeed from them and noone > > else. > > Do you need to know that it really is from such and such person, or > can you get by with knowing that it really is from such and such > email address? If the latter will be enough, then you can use the > same sort of confirmation mechanism that is used by mailing list > management systems. Simply require a response sent to a confirmation > request sent to the email address you are trying to authenticate. > > Also, why does this have to be an email based system instead of a web > based one? We need to cater for communications from ships at sea that are able to use slow wireless email systems but are not able to access the web. Thanks david > For the latter users can authenticate with a simple > username and password. > > -j From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:30:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E1816A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9504E13C45A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173A352A17 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3PKUgQV081766 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3PKUgng081765 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:30:42 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:45 -0000 On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 14:05:21 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > > > >I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > > >visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > > >possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > > >or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > > >classified? > > > > > >Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > > >discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > > >inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! > > > > All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > > > > e.g. > > > > List-Id: User questions > > > > Can gmail not filter on that? > > Do you have any suggestions for how to do something similar with mutt or > procmail? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-procmail.html Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:42:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B1C16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAE5213C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 85854 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 20:41:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 20:41:33 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PKgZvK082367 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PKgYQB082366 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:34 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425204234.GG81828@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44b41e4e0704251231x1358b123ma70550e0181d7dcd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44b41e4e0704251231x1358b123ma70550e0181d7dcd@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: can't add any new users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:42:37 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:31:54PM -0700, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded all my machines to 6.2 RELEASE. All my machines except > one work fine. > > On one of my machines, I can log in from the console to the super user > account, but I could not su to my user account. > > So, I backed up all my data, and I deleted my user account. Then, I added > it back with adduser. > > When I look in /etc/passwd and /etc/group, I'm in there. > > When I try to su to my newly created account, I get this message: > > Bad system call (core dumped) > > I tried removing my account with rmuser, then adding it back again -- same > problem. > > Any ideas? That sounds more like a problem with su than with the account. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "There comes a time in the history of any project when it becomes necessary to shoot the engineers and begin production." - MacUser, November 1990 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:47:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FA116A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64B2813C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 90422 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 20:46:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 20:46:29 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PKlVIQ082404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:47:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PKlU64082403 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:47:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:47:30 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:47:32 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:30:42PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-procmail.html I wasn't referring to a desire for instructions on how to use procmail. I was hoping for some suggestion as to what to set up. It's usually not really polite to change subject lines on a mailing list, so using procmail to add [fbsdq] (or whatever) to the beginning of every subject line doesn't really strike me as a good solution to the problem. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Amazon.com interview candidate: "When C++ is your hammer, everything starts to look like your thumb." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:51:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1482416A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A6413C45E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so354620wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=i5bEuQioE4K1ZfybRHshiOTg8/a08AwAlq/Uyc5Gw6JZ4J5Dn9JmzokKgHzUHQpT9rwo8BjtEenYyG7hFioBw0EtFveEW4bZAcvcZVByOY5ERZzRMQj+PSt+wBnbiUa/MlrpgRxLIlkuiqNJV2F8YIdBfYxFA94ASw0lak/dCbI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qhD1qyW0cPO5Kcq6X8VnJQCw5Qi9mzDsXoo/UB16s0jRk6i3ZeorMDv8Hme3Qhh9xBzHzXAPBPooVCSZ6DKgAT2hQ2QbCKuMypXPy6FteiMD29A0BFsEydUXP4i+5HmueBifQaHHiu8dyDu+UyxjWCWgoO569jGA9k8lIRV3GzY= Received: by 10.78.18.3 with SMTP id 3mr293926hur.1177534312280; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.21.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:51:52 -0700 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" In-Reply-To: <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Amarendra Godbole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:51:55 -0000 I dont think subject tagging is poor at all. whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ] aint all that long. On 4/25/07, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > > I subscribe to many fbsd lists through gmail, and am not able to > > visually detect which email was sent to which fbsd list. Is it > > possible to add a tag in the subject line, something like, [fbsd-q], > > or [fbsd-questions], or similar so that emails can be visually > > classified? > > > > Given that these lists have been around for a long time, was there a > > discussion on this? If the idea of tagging was dropped, can someone > > inform me about the rationale behind this decision? Thanks in advance! > > All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > > e.g. > > List-Id: User questions > > Can gmail not filter on that? > > Visual tagging of subject lines is a poor solution. Either you tag at > the front > > "[fbsd-questions] Really long subject line that gets truncated even > earlier thanks to the tag" > > or at the end > > "Really long subject line where the tag disappears in a haze of ... > [fbsd-questions]" > > Neither of which is satisfactory, and for most people with sensible > email environments that can filter of Header lines, an unnecessary > inconvenience. > > Not to mention the question of how on earth you co-ordinate unique tags > across mailing lists. Since the List-ID isn't constrained by length it > can contain the email address of the list, which is already unique. > > If you can't filter on the List-ID then filter on To and Cc lines which > contain questions@freebsd.org or freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Not as > good, but it would do. > > --Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:58:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C21716A40A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from irsla42@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B493B13C4AE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from irsla42@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so377435muf for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HQBBwVP9ulv/I1mnIi2R4xGk/HnF9rr1S1+10g5BmU/BXYEac8LExso6Moxb5JUIIQX+5UVl8E3tFiNiQujhDUQUXmv+ZCsTnEKYDqqYiz7+VP+BP/W6oDf2Jkf/rREhsK4QSRu32UseEuVcc7EeYgj0vwBbf+ZXhI2Iq1s0LsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EiqgPKFFo/aNCOm9yMuOYVibJLGagd/NJDvDlnhf4Wgx4zjZ0sN4mKUOVWdc+tYHtQ2itcOBRBRng0gL1Pf9XmvIOK8eheHJHt0FMAMdPvxvPT5UZDj3IQmZZYHgt/ULGmk+jK2bz/QAL2Q/29zyiNgXkduIKSb1d7H7saNR6/M= Received: by 10.82.120.14 with SMTP id s14mr1982861buc.1177533105258; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.175.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:31:45 +0200 From: Irsla To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:58:10 -0000 Hi, On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi > what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't use it. find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -exec vi {} \; '{}" <= is the filename find found you need a ';" to tell find that the command stops here (in case you want to add more options to find) and the '\" is mandatory eitherwise your SHELL will interfear. btw don't forget the space between the '{}" and the '\;" Regards, -- A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? WAKIM Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:03:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9EE16A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0D513C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E665D52AC5 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3PL351g081950 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3PL35lE081949 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:05 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:09 -0000 On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 14:47:30 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:30:42PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-procmail.html > > I wasn't referring to a desire for instructions on how to use procmail. Sorry, but that is what I thought you were after. > I was hoping for some suggestion as to what to set up. It's usually > not really polite to change subject lines on a mailing list, so using > procmail to add [fbsdq] (or whatever) to the beginning of every subject > line doesn't really strike me as a good solution to the problem. Now I am totally confused. What exactly do you want? (If you want to add or remove something from the subject line during local mail delivery use formail.) Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:15:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A1816A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1289013C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 14997 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 21:13:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 21:13:59 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PLF0dR082545 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:15:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PLExto082544 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:59 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425211459.GA82525@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:15:02 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:03:05PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 14:47:30 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:30:42PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-procmail.html > > > > I wasn't referring to a desire for instructions on how to use procmail. > > Sorry, but that is what I thought you were after. > > > I was hoping for some suggestion as to what to set up. It's usually > > not really polite to change subject lines on a mailing list, so using > > procmail to add [fbsdq] (or whatever) to the beginning of every subject > > line doesn't really strike me as a good solution to the problem. > > Now I am totally confused. What exactly do you want? > > (If you want to add or remove something from the subject line during > local mail delivery use formail.) I'm looking for an easy way to visually mark messages as being from the freebsd-questions list so I can recognize them at a glance without screwing with the subject line if I reply. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to build programs out of the wrong concepts." - Paul Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:23:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF0C16A408 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B176C13C468 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3PLNIlj005701 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3PLNIMD005699 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:23:18 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20070425212318.GA5247@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:23:20 -0000 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote: > On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi > > >=20 > what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't us= e=20 > it. it's simpler but not necessarily as efficient. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGL8bEtIqByHxlDocRArPaAJ9nqJTjsIeE+PTpr+NLMEug4EsSRQCgiiQj C7b4U5CPTXvKMFewzICuPzM= =kQkN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:37:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26E216A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C0613C469 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3PLbfYZ012424; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l3PLbf2Z012421; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> Message-ID: <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:41 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:37:44 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: >> >> All messages are already tagged with a List-ID >> >> e.g. >> >> List-Id: User questions > > Do you have any suggestions for how to do something similar with mutt or > procmail? procmail can filter out duplicates and sort messages into "folders" (directories under ~/mail): PATH=$HOME/procmail:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/bin:/usr/local/bin:. MAILDIR=$HOME/mail # DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/mbox LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmaillog LOCKFILE=$HOME/.lockmail # Weed out duplicate messages. :0 Wh: msgid.lock | /usr/local/bin/formail -D 8192 $HOME/.msgid.cache # FreeBSD Questions Mailing list :0 * ^List-Id:.*freebsd-questions.freebsd.org $MAILDIR/FreeBSD-Questions This puts questions messages in a "folder" called FreeBSD-Questions (which you should probably create beforehand). You'll also need a .forward file or FEATURE(local_procmail) in your sendmail .mc file to use procmail. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:38:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322D216A40B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A975313C4B7 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9813E51F14 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:38:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3PLcqWL082070 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:38:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3PLcqeM082069 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:38:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:38:52 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425213852.GC70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425211459.GA82525@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425211459.GA82525@demeter.hydra> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:38:54 -0000 On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 15:14:59 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:03:05PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 14:47:30 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:30:42PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-procmail.html > > > > > > I wasn't referring to a desire for instructions on how to use procmail. > > > > Sorry, but that is what I thought you were after. > > > > > I was hoping for some suggestion as to what to set up. It's usually > > > not really polite to change subject lines on a mailing list, so using > > > procmail to add [fbsdq] (or whatever) to the beginning of every subject > > > line doesn't really strike me as a good solution to the problem. > > > > Now I am totally confused. What exactly do you want? > > > > (If you want to add or remove something from the subject line during > > local mail delivery use formail.) > > I'm looking for an easy way to visually mark messages as being from the > freebsd-questions list so I can recognize them at a glance without > screwing with the subject line if I reply. Right. In an earlier message you mentioned mutt and procmail, so here is a procmail/mutt solution. First off write a procmail recipe that matches the mail list(s) you wish to "flag". In the action line of said recipe use formail to add the header X-Status. Configure mutt to "high light" message which contain the X-Status header. If you want me to give you a step-by-step it will have to wait until tomorrow because it is time for me to hit the sack. If you can't wait that long look in the archives for the procmail users' mailing about 6 or so years ago - may be even longer: flagging is what this is called. Oh, just remembered, the above assumes you are using mbox format. If you are using maildir there is a solution, but the action is different. Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:44:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77B516A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8791E13C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 37535 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 21:43:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 21:43:19 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PLiKr3082714 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PLiKPW082713 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:20 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:44:22 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:37:41PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Chad Perrin wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > >> > >>All messages are already tagged with a List-ID > >> > >>e.g. > >> > >>List-Id: User questions > > > >Do you have any suggestions for how to do something similar with mutt or > >procmail? > > procmail can filter out duplicates and sort messages into "folders" > (directories under ~/mail): > > PATH=$HOME/procmail:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/bin:/usr/local/bin:. > MAILDIR=$HOME/mail > # DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/mbox > LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmaillog > LOCKFILE=$HOME/.lockmail > > # Weed out duplicate messages. > :0 Wh: msgid.lock > | /usr/local/bin/formail -D 8192 $HOME/.msgid.cache > > # FreeBSD Questions Mailing list > :0 > * ^List-Id:.*freebsd-questions.freebsd.org > $MAILDIR/FreeBSD-Questions > > This puts questions messages in a "folder" called FreeBSD-Questions > (which you should probably create beforehand). You'll also need a > .forward file or FEATURE(local_procmail) in your sendmail .mc file to > use procmail. If I wanted them in different "folders", I'd have sorted them that way. Unfortunately, what I'd like is a way to visually mark messages as originating from a specific mailing list. Separating them into a bunch of "folders" just reduces the likelihood I'll get to all my email in a given day. I appreciate the attempt to help, but it doesn't address my actual preferences. I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name or email of the original sender in the diplay. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Ben Franklin: "As we enjoy great Advantages from the Inventions of others we should be glad of an Opportunity to serve others by any Invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:47:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A821F16A404 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86D1613C468 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 40067 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 21:46:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 21:46:48 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PLlouS082741 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PLlnUU082740 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:49 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425214749.GB82659@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425211459.GA82525@demeter.hydra> <20070425213852.GC70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425213852.GC70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:47:51 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:38:52PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > Right. In an earlier message you mentioned mutt and procmail, so here > is a procmail/mutt solution. First off write a procmail recipe that > matches the mail list(s) you wish to "flag". In the action line of said > recipe use formail to add the header X-Status. Configure mutt to "high > light" message which contain the X-Status header. That's an excellent idea. Thank you. > > If you want me to give you a step-by-step it will have to wait until > tomorrow because it is time for me to hit the sack. If you can't wait > that long look in the archives for the procmail users' mailing about 6 > or so years ago - may be even longer: flagging is what this is called. I'm sure I can figure it out, now that I have a general approach in mind to research. > > Oh, just remembered, the above assumes you are using mbox format. If > you are using maildir there is a solution, but the action is different. I'm using mbox, so no worries. Again, thank you. I really appreciate it. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to build programs out of the wrong concepts." - Paul Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:50:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A2B16A406 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: from smtp814.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp814.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1416813C455 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: (qmail 4352 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 21:23:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=Kgwi1hJdsTzs1P9oYz3yHd5md8TyzwjphN88XWOLLTNMRIBugxlz1ngJ7ZLybaWumeGANKFypEgAb0OyWYzKTPsawwdH6PgLGeGDvyHMfQ7QGBCDzcKkgPaQzqopxOokb9eYlybfU2al7kNg4PQYhgRMGxC5cNUYRpIz0fl1Zbc= ; Received: from unknown (HELO w2fzz0vc03.aah-go-on.com) (thomas.sparrevohn@btinternet.com@86.134.25.153 with login) by smtp814.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 21:23:59 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: YwOB9moVM1mfdZ1_83pObJD4yswWv2TUGiqXJVfdoYbiwmALl7MNFQc1TdWvo0fVTov8swb6wA-- From: Thomas Sparrevohn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:23:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425195855.GC81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425202147.GA8585@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <20070425202147.GA8585@saltmine.radix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704252223.59691.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> Cc: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:50:44 -0000 On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:21:47 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other > > sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this > > particular brand of intellectually lazy person to realize that about the > > printed page, though. > > I recall reading some interesting comments from studies (second hand, e.g., > in Science News) which stated that people tended to believe things that > were presented in a credible fashion, not questioning them - using the > paper or page as an authority which amplified their own general beliefs > on a topic. > > Aside from the circular referencing that occurs when believing that... > > It's certainly hard to see where/how to decide to stop and question the > authority, given that premise (knowing that one is biased). But it's > perhaps a good habit to get into - observing that reading things that > one already agrees with are perhaps as problematic as those that one > does not. > If there was an easy answer to this quistion most con attists would be out of a job. Even high ranking universities has been known to employ a con man from time to time - so while the discussion is relevant - i don't see any reason that this thread should not be in chat ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:52:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34C216A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A38A713C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 43266 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 21:51:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 21:51:04 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PLq63O082793 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:52:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PLq5Gx082792 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:52:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:52:05 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425215205.GC82659@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:52:07 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:44:20PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's > list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name > or email of the original sender in the diplay. Color me surprised. N. J. Mann provided me with an idea for how to make it work that seems even more effective than I'd expected. I stand corrected, re: my expectation that there wasn't a good answer. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 21:53:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326B16A409 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:53:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112F213C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015B68621E6B; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gTS2Kewdc1Ma; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 8C111686003E5; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425215326.GA25614@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070425212318.GA5247@saltmine.radix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425212318.GA5247@saltmine.radix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:53:01 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote: >On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote: >> On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > >> > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi >> > >> >> what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't use >> it. > >it's simpler but not necessarily as efficient. How could it be as efficient as it executes the -exec for every thing that find finds? Xargs groups the output (except under rare circumstances where one might specify that it run the command for each argument). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software, LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:02:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786516A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51E513C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [192.168.1.10]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AD628F879; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Jeff Mohler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070425220220.J1379@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Amarendra Godbole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alex Zbyslaw Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:02:30 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jeff Mohler wrote: > I dont think subject tagging is poor at all. > > whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ] > aint all that long. Then you get someone who either doesn't a) trim the subject or b) the client response as such: Re: [FBSDQ] Re: [FBSDQ] bla bla bla From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:14:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFEB16A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D6113C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so18642ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Z4aQv5MlU9o5wJ2c30A3dnqHqBZldrx9bxIKiB05twdZDCAFZyc5cXd0n0aaEVM4MZ6KA6RsB5nXDkT79a30nGWnmDBwHD8VrBBgGEnh5XDbZ1wtt8WEufuY2Ypo/kngkWYImYgTiRGYfnrG7GTfhcm4fOHwV4N82r5rocGIe4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sWsqAeHEQJvc8P5zniVnmvi2aTXTUtw2T10MZ+q+Z8MPdN2iUbcMd5boconNk6vmHLfgcdHn+BeAmGHILw/pqIpjCGrqJ9TaxBFU+bSJv1gQhQC1HTeIRyprARMh8Xptp9KB11YG3RMkhU/7aMXvcXeJgD3xxNmoQxolYAAKim4= Received: by 10.100.111.16 with SMTP id j16mr625572anc.1177539290859; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.6 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1455a3d90704251514m40d09651mf125a5a530f713f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:14:50 -0300 From: freenity To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <462F9349.4070706@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> <462F9349.4070706@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:14:52 -0000 In Xorg.0.log what I found about graphical initialization was this: ================================================= (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) NVIDIA(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section "Screen0" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888 (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction ( 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling RENDER acceleration (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 6100 at PCI:0:5:0 (GPU-0) (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 262144 kBytes (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 05.51.22.26.08 (--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU (--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce 6100 at PCI:0:5:0: (--) NVIDIA(0): LG L1740B (CRT-0) (--) NVIDIA(0): LG L1740B (CRT-0): 350.0 MHz maximum pixel clock (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: CRT-0 (WW) NVIDIA(0): (WW) NVIDIA(0): No modes were requested; the default mode "nvidia-auto-select" (WW) NVIDIA(0): will be used as the requested mode. (WW) NVIDIA(0): (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes: (II) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select" (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1280 x 1024 (--) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (95, 96); computed from "UseEdidDpi" X config (--) NVIDIA(0): option (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp (II) do I need RAC? No, I don't. (II) resource ranges after preInit: [0] 0 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] [1] 0 0 0xd0000000 - 0xdfffffff (0x10000000) MX[B] [2] 0 0 0xfd000000 - 0xfdffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [4] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [5] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [6] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [7] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [8] -1 0 0xfebdc000 - 0xfebdcfff (0x1000) MX[B]E [9] -1 0 0xfebd8000 - 0xfebdbfff (0x4000) MX[B]E [10] -1 0 0xfebdd000 - 0xfebddfff (0x1000) MX[B]E [11] -1 0 0xfebdfc00 - 0xfebdffff (0x400) MX[B]E [12] -1 0 0xfebde000 - 0xfebdefff (0x1000) MX[B]E [13] -1 0 0xfebe0000 - 0xfebfffff (0x20000) MX[B](B) [14] -1 0 0xfc000000 - 0xfcffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) [15] -1 0 0xd0000000 - 0xdfffffff (0x10000000) MX[B](B) [16] -1 0 0xfd000000 - 0xfdffffff (0x1000000) MX[B](B) [17] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B](OprD) [18] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD) [19] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD) [20] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] [21] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] [22] -1 0 0x0000dc00 - 0x0000dcff (0x100) IX[B]E [23] -1 0 0x0000e000 - 0x0000e07f (0x80) IX[B]E [24] -1 0 0x0000e080 - 0x0000e0ff (0x80) IX[B]E [25] -1 0 0x0000e400 - 0x0000e47f (0x80) IX[B]E [26] -1 0 0x0000e480 - 0x0000e4ff (0x80) IX[B]E [27] -1 0 0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E [28] -1 0 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E [29] -1 0 0x00000700 - 0x000007ff (0x100) IX[B]E [30] -1 0 0x00000600 - 0x000006ff (0x100) IX[B]E [31] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B](OprU) [32] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B](OprU) (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "nvidia-auto-select" (II) Loading extension NV-GLX (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA 3D Acceleration Architecture Initialized (II) NVIDIA(0): Using the NVIDIA 2D acceleration architecture (==) NVIDIA(0): Backing store disabled (==) NVIDIA(0): Silken mouse enabled (II) Loading extension NV-CONTROL (==) RandR enabled (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP (II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY (II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA (II) Initializing built-in extension XFIXES (II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER (II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR (II) Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE (II) Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE (II) Initializing built-in extension XEVIE (II) Initializing extension GLX =============================================== I put this modeline generated by http://xtiming.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/xtiming.pl but it still the same 50hz Modeline "768x1024@75" 96.84 768 800 1160 1192 1024 1043 1056 1076 On 4/25/07, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > freenity wrote: > > Hi. > > I have just installed the nvidia drivers on my FBSD6.2 i386. It work > fine > > but I cant set my refresh rate at 75, it sets at 50 with a resolution > > 1280x1024. The monitor is LG Flatron L1740B and my video card is Geforce > > > 6100. > > Here is my xorg.conf file: > > Thanks for any help. > > > > I just allow DDC to do its thing; also, > /var/log/Xorg.0.log might have some clues --- > for example, what modelines are discovered for > your hardware set? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:19:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E983C16A482 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC8413C484 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3PMLd5B072441; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:21:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3PMLdxu072440; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:21:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:21:39 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Irsla Message-ID: <20070425222139.GA72351@thought.org> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:19:34 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi > > > > what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't use > it. > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -exec vi {} \; > > '{}" <= is the filename find found > you need a ';" to tell find that the command stops here (in case you > want to add more options to find) and the '\" is mandatory eitherwise > your SHELL will interfear. > > btw don't forget the space between the '{}" and the '\;" > Thanks, but I've known this "-exec foo {} \;" for several years. I found it on this -questions list that is about as savvy a list as exists! Thw -mtime N -o -mtime M stuff is uncommon enough, tho, to not be in my bag of tricks. :-) gary > > Regards, > > -- > A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. > Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > WAKIM Robert > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:24:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B96516A46C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553D113C483 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D845C67; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:24:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <462FD524.3010009@vindaloo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:24:36 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <007201c78401$79d75f60$6501a8c0@GRANT> In-Reply-To: <007201c78401$79d75f60$6501a8c0@GRANT> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Crist , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:24:51 -0000 Just my $0.02. Have you considered adding greylisting. I find the combination of greylisting and Spamassassin with the SA's bayes filter completely handles my spam problem. On my primary MX I use spamd on OpenBSD and on my secondary MX I use spamd on FreeBSD. As a very informal method of measurement my Inbox.spam folder, held an average of 400 messages per day in October before I started using spamd. It currently averages about 80 messages per day. If you don't know about greylisting it works as follows. A greylister monitors port 25 for inbound mail connections. When a server connects to this port to exchange mail the greylister predetermines the response based on whether or not this server has exchanged mail in the recent past. If it has it's allowed to exchange mail again and the server's timestamp is updated. If the server has not exchanged mail in the recent past the greylister responds: "45x - I'm too busy to talk to you right now. Please try to deliver this mail later". It then puts the server and information about the mail being delivered onto a list. If the same server tries the same message later it passes and the greylister promotes the server onto it's list of okay mail servers (mail servers that it has exchanged mail with in the recent past). Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs never retry message delivery. The best thing about greylisting is that combines well with filters like SA by reducing the amount of mail that they have to see. In my case something like 80% of the mail that Spamassassin used to process just never gets past the greylister today. The downsides to greylisting is that it delays the first message from a legitimate mailserver. In the most common case the incurred delay will be between 30 minutes and an hour. This assumes that then sending mail server retries queued mails every half hour or so. In an extreme case the delay may be longer. If the mail sender has a cluster for delivering outbound mails and that cluster features shared message storage and several processing units to handle the smtp transfer then the greylister will trap that message until the same server attempts redelivery. This is a problem with mail coming from very large internet companies like Google or AOL or very distributed corporations like General Electric, Unilever or United Technologies. Since you are in an ISP environment greylisting may not be something that you can do. I was extremely surprised when a client told me that the 1 hr delay in receiving mail from new and infrequent mail servers was too much to pay to stop the spam coming into his mailbox. I don't claim to know the political layer as much as I do the technical one. -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:57:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846AB16A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4679313C457 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: by nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D94F4B256D; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:57:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:57:13 +0200 From: Oliver Peter To: Alexey Kuzmenko Message-ID: <20070425225712.GC9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> References: <20070425084854.GJ1322@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <4a4bcf70704251147j7f915353l2254d1c1397b6548@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a4bcf70704251147j7f915353l2254d1c1397b6548@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:57:15 -0000 --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Alexey Kuzmenko wrote: > I've turned on debugging and visible password with: >=20 > kern.geom.eli.debug=3D3 > kern.geom.eli.visible_passphrase=3D1 Did you make a reboot? =20 > but have nothing in the dmesg concerning my ad0s2 partition and it > keeps telling "Wrong key for ad0s2". May be I should fsck it before > doing a geli attachment? No, of course not.=20 You have to attach the geli device before you can perform any action on it (in your example a fsck). Otherwise you will completely destroy your crypto device. If you really have forgotten your password nobody can help you. --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkYv3MgACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI/xBgCgwhw1UzxZ/Dwkq0zACNviwk+c RRQAnRyouFJTpUK3iQZrj+dhAzivoqKq =vpQq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 23:07:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D099816A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFFB913C458 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 94091 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 23:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 23:06:12 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3PN7EDv083114 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:07:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3PN7DAX083113 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:07:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:07:13 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070425230713.GA83094@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425220220.J1379@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425220220.J1379@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:07:17 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:03:59PM +0000, Duane Hill wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jeff Mohler wrote: > > >I dont think subject tagging is poor at all. > > > >whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ] > >aint all that long. > > Then you get someone who either doesn't a) trim the subject or b) the > client response as such: > > Re: [FBSDQ] Re: [FBSDQ] bla bla bla Since the list is what would attach [FBSDQ] to the subject, it would be the list that wasn't behaving itself if that happened. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "There comes a time in the history of any project when it becomes necessary to shoot the engineers and begin production." - MacUser, November 1990 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 23:37:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF0416A402 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78A813C46A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E23251947; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:37:16 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426003716.62ab4062@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070425215326.GA25614@ayn.mi.celestial.com> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070425212318.GA5247@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425215326.GA25614@ayn.mi.celestial.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@celestial.com Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:37:21 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700 Bill Campbell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote: > >> On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > > >> > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 > >> > vi > >> > > >> > >> what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people > >> don't use it. > > > >it's simpler but not necessarily as efficient. > > How could it be as efficient as it executes the -exec for every thing > that find finds? Xargs groups the output (except under rare > circumstances where one might specify that it run the command for > each argument). This is one of those things that isn't actually true, but has been repeated so many times that people have come to believe it. The -exec option can be made to pass multiple arguments if it's used correctly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 23:41:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7BC16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AFA13C45B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so456428ugh for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hZ5IZuuDc/MtFkkt6KF1BOqD+TmYURUG8jPNFIzlNhOr9jQFIIDQ0KYJ1p8TZwGtaibIn55ULz9z8k/rpGgDsW+9QixEsnkR6iTVGtPUwly7obBBJQg1FrfAgEBT6IbZmzodBfVEd7Gbo/7NbqNJBKcKToMlatoGmDOepQT0QnM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PiJo8xQIY583BKZkQJeE0Yk1OTBi0VIfcChygNpyTviDVkAxWL5KJtWmmkSPawBoyIIzW668vRL1ab4vrFLJKYZxxx8J2jl/iF6843yCmkY3hxNIkKinhxZdqhRT9JlTiGHCnV8JcXR8YEfpXmrI4n42VpwW9PLShWkVX/8wZ58= Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr345197hub.1177544509034; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.120.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <768631270704251641w778116fdx18f874101a91fbb6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:41:48 -0400 From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: "Pat Lashley" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Active Directory server on 6-STABLE ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:41:51 -0000 I have OpenLDAP running on FreeBSD 6.x. Simple, effective and reliable. You can do the same with Active Directory, but you will need Windows 2003. Msg me offlist if you want to talk about it more. On 4/25/07, Pat Lashley wrote: > > I'm looking for a good way to provide a single > authentication/authorization > database for multiple applications in an environment consisting of a > FreeBSD > server and a collection of primarily Windows (XP) clients. We do NOT want > to use the old Windows Domain protocols; and it doesn't look easy to make > Windows work with anything that isn't a Microsoft work-alike. > > Active Directory looks like a good choice; since it should be easy to > access > the database from just about any app that supports LDAP > authentication. But > so far, I haven't found an implementation of an AD-compatible server that > will > run on FreeBSD. (This could, in part, reflect my lack of Windows > experience...) > > It looks like Samba4 is far enough along to provide the necessary > functionality; > but it doesn't build and run on FreeBSD; and I don't currently have the > time > available to do the porting work. > > So, have I completely missed some other solution? Does someone have > Samba4 > running on FreeBSD 6-STABLE? Do any of you have any other useful > (on-topic) > advice for me? > > > > Thanks, > -Pat > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 00:21:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3442C16A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eternityos@free.fr) Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr (postfix2-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA9013C468 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eternityos@free.fr) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by postfix2-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AEF30ADA for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imp2-g19.free.fr (imp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E35F69595 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:56:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5AF2CFF86; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:56:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 200.149.220.90 ([200.149.220.90]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1177545372.462fea9c47194@imp.free.fr> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:56:12 +0200 From: eternityos@free.fr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 200.149.220.90 Subject: cacti lost it's images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:21:37 -0000 After my last cacti upgrade, I seen it totaly lost it's images and sounds like it also lost it's css... The strange... I mean _STRANGE_ thing is when analysing the HTML source... the images are not even called!!! No anywhere.... Any idea please ? Am I the only one in this case ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 00:29:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D49316A46F for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8346313C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 24340 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 00:03:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ESb/w87xWSoaxbHXLnIViHJ1ZNaXvY3+viRYjZNGqio2O7xJuj9gQUVPEmhASbGvTkYLz6vAhH0lhCThKuXZB2h/OAZo1YMR0li6iGnqlIcGaAM/2Qn6ljVu6EECYKls2F1Vfp+YA780WIdBHmSxCI/4oclrwLosM0A5IX/q13A= ; Received: from unknown (HELO vagabund.w33) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.89.82 with plain) by smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 00:03:08 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .VUGNdgVM1m79tFcdnsWGkZSH1Xz1fdA1dnTcetJlwRW2hLwJ4897zIT3LNkSO9uCpeFgp8_WhhwgcdpzOb1vRjM0RjdZ1oQS8e1NKFp4x_j__KBcPtq Message-ID: <462FEC41.50701@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:03:13 +0200 From: Stevan Tiefert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070423 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portinstall --batch something X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:29:51 -0000 Hello list, what will portinstall do if I give it the --batch argument? Will it compile the port with all options it knows or only the standard ones? I ask because "man 1 portinstall" or "man 7 ports" is not informative enough at this point. With regards Stevan Tiefert ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 00:55:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005B516A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A0E13C457 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: (qmail 31507 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 00:55:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.27.1.5?) (cms.kw@rogers.com@74.109.56.227 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 00:55:37 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: WkbplIAVM1kMhhbMMV_BMFileKv6fDR3IK4f.W9RggSqMmTayq0Rwdq0JFZu80CIfg-- Message-ID: <462FF88B.1030007@hier7.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:55:39 -0400 From: Chris Slothouber Organization: hier7 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KAYVEN RIESE References: <462F15B4.4010201@webmail.sub.ru> <200704251208.34248.jhb@freebsd.org> <004e01c7876c$2ce8a3d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mesg = dmesg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:55:39 -0000 KAYVEN RIESE wrote: > > i sent a post from a puter with a bad "d" key. that's why > my subject didn't say "dmesg" like it should have. > > sorry. > > > here is a dmesg output: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 > root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz (600.02-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6d8 Stepping = 8 > > Features=0xafe9fbff > > Features2=0x180 > AMD Features=0x100000 > real memory = 536084480 (511 MB) > avail memory = 515223552 (491 MB) > kbd1 at kbdmux0 > acpi0: on motherboard > ACPI-0356: *** Error: Region EmbeddedControl(3) has no handler > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed > [\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_.ACS_] (Node 0xc33998c0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.AC__._INI] > (Node 0xc33993e0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI-0356: *** Error: Region EmbeddedControl(3) has no handler > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed > [\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_.BATS] (Node 0xc33998a0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] > (Node 0xc339d720), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] > (Node 0xc339d720), AE_NOT_EXIST > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff at > device 0.0 on pci0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > uhci0: port 0xe800-0xe81f > irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0xe880-0xe89f > irq 5 at device 29.1 on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci2: port 0xec00-0xec1f > irq 10 at device 29.2 on pci0 > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem > 0xffaffc00-0xffafffff irq 10 at device 29.7 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb3: EHCI version 1.0 > usb3: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 > usb3: on ehci0 > usb3: USB revision 2.0 > uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered > pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > bge0: mem > 0xff9f0000-0xff9fffff irq 4 at device 0.0 on pci2 > miibus0: on bge0 > brgphy0: on miibus0 > brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, > 1000baseTX-FDX, auto > bge0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:22:c9:91 > cbb0: at device 1.0 on pci2 > cardbus0: on cbb0 > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 > cbb1: at device 1.1 on pci2 > cardbus1: on cbb1 > pccard1: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb1 > fwohci0: mem 0xff9ef800-0xff9effff irq 10 at device 1.2 > on pci2 > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. > fwohci0: EUI64 00:e0:18:00:03:26:4c:e9 > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > firewire0: on fwohci0 > fwe0: on firewire0 > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:e0:18:26:4c:e9 > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:e0:18:26:4c:e9 > fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant > sbp0: on firewire0 > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > pci2: at device 2.0 (no driver attached) > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 31.6 (no driver attached) > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > battery0: on acpi0 > battery1: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi0 > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > sio0: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio0: port may not be enabled > sio0 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 drq 1 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq > 3 on acpi0 > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff on isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > ums0: vendor 0x2222 Macally Optigo USB Mouse, rev 1.10/6.30, addr 2, > iclass 3/1 > ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 600023816 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > ad0: 57231MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._BST] > (Node 0xc339d740), AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE > bge0: link state changed to UP Hi Kayven, It appears as though your BIOS may not be reporting ACPI information to FreeBSD correctly. I might suggest toggling the 'PNP OS Installed' option in your BIOS setup or, failing that, upgrading your BIOS firmware following your motherboard manufacturer's instructions. I hope this information helps. - Chris Slothouber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 03:02:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADEE16A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@klokan.gts.cz) Received: from klokan.gts.cz (klokan.gts.cz [195.39.36.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD61913C455 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@klokan.gts.cz) Received: from klokan.gts.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klokan.gts.cz (8.13.6/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l3Q25S1N048071 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:05:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www@klokan.gts.cz) Received: (from www@localhost) by klokan.gts.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id l3Q25RXu048052; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:05:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:05:28 +0200 (CEST) To: questions@freebsd.org From: "St.George Security Service" Message-Id: <130746500.227@stgeorge.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: St.George Online Alert : Unauthorized Access On Your Account. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:02:33 -0000 [partners_stgeorge_logo2.gif] Unauthorized Access In the last fews weeks, our Online Banking Security team has observed multiple logons on your internet banking account, from different blacklisted IP's, therefore been blocked,to prevent further unauthorized access for your safety. we have decided to put an extra verification process to ensure your identity and your internet Banking Account Security. Click on for your St.George account. [1]Shttp://www.stgeorge.com.au/1/2/security/precaution/internet-ban king/ Security Advisory, St.george Online Banking *Important* Please update your records on or before 48 hours, a failure to update your records will result in a temporal hold on your funds - it's one more way that St.george makes your online banking experience better.. © 2007 All Rights Reserved [guaranteelogo.gif] References 1. http://www.sku-nockxsang.com/images/stgeorge.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 03:21:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0AC16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9CA13C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836681D85B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17404-05 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (237.16.61.59.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.61.16.237]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6663A1D85B6 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:03 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:18:07 +0800 Message-Id: <1177557488.22129.16.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: [OT] simpliest way to process this data file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:21:54 -0000 I know this is OT but we got so many sysops here and this might be something very easy for them to drop me a quick answer? I have a data file formatted like this each block of data consist of several lines; blocks are separated by empty lines like this This is a block of data with lines and another block of data The task is to move the last line of each block to the first line of the block. So the processed data look like this: with lines This is a block of data data and other block of I have tried a lot reading info pages of sed still cannot figure out an easy solution (tried to play with "N" command a lot of times). I know how to do it in awk but I am pretty interested to learn a second language and I really think sed or other tools should be able to handle this:) -- Zhang Weiwu Real Softservice http://www.realss.com +86 592 2091112 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 03:59:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98B416A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C49713C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3Q3xDuM027249; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:59:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Svein Halvor Halvorsen" , "Lee Capps" Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:00:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Thomas Dickey , Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:59:21 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Svein Halvor > Halvorsen > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:00 AM > To: Lee Capps > Cc: Thomas Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative > advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) > > > Bill Moran wrote: > >> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: GNOME guy) > >> describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected false > >> information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research > > > And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform the > students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the facts? > And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his > misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more > important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? > > I hope this professor got some sort of reaction from his University due > to his unethical attitude towards openness, knowledge and science. > I'm afraid I have to agree. The Prof was as lazy as his students. The world abounds in misinformation, it doesen't take a lot of effort to find it. The prof could have spent the hour he spent forging info in Wikipedia, finding already forged misinformation and having his students research that. He could have started at the Scientology website, for example, then moved on to PETA and the NRA. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:03:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEF416A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FB2D13C459 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 71571 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 04:03:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=iDcUF1Y0l0Q4Im2peEN1LYTSuMcUIDqwBbFxEPiMnHViAw5poBFkMvgzWT3bNY9C5b9Z7SQtJfydrbZBocdDXhhgowgzFJ4Q515IelpBDaZUGPkujToUZxsnEYlDdDereqq9I+WG2yLGfvKdVSe1nTFi8u69hhQ/bHeCJTudquU=; Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:36 PDT Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:36 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Zhang Weiwu In-Reply-To: <1177382049.7382.1.camel@joe.realss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <763415.70560.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:03:37 -0000 Zhang (or Weiwu?), I'm surprised there are no good open source bug tracking solutions out there already. Sorry, I'm not familiar with ncurse, so can't comment on it. The system I developed ten years ago was centered on Informix RDBMS, which included tools for creating character-based forms ("Perform"), reports ("ACE report writer"), and of course queries and stored procs. The shell scripts were used in conjunction with the RDBMS for tasks such as running reports and emailing the results to various individuals and mail groups, and extracting bug regression tests into executable scripts. Overhead was very low -- that's one great advantage of character-based applications (the Windows lovers complained bitterly about it, but we proved it was far more efficient and effective than the junk they were building). Good luck finding or building a system that meets your needs. I simply don't have time for non-essential activities, as I'm a one-person operation. Zhang Weiwu wrote: If this is a product you developed long time ago, and especially if it's no longer used or the old company quit this business, it's probably possible to ask them if they can opensource the old product, and someone may come up and make it better? P.S. I was thinking of an ncurse-style interface, so can shell script do this? I thought shell tools like dialog wasn't powerful enough to support an user interface required by a bug tracker. On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 18:07 -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > I co-developed a UNIX-based multi-product bug tracking system using an > RDBMS (Informix, ISQL, Perform and ACE), bourne shell scripts, cron, > and UNIX Mail. This solution also worked on PC clients (we used > Reflection-X, but I'd recommend XWin32). Our design was selected over > a PC-only solution that another faction was pushing (we had more UNIX > clients than PC's at that time). > > It had some pretty sophisticated features for the time (some carried > over from a previous version), including: > > Automated email notifications and summaries designed to support our > software development methodology. > > Retrieve and display SCCS deltas to display code changed for a bug > fix. > > Ability to store bug regression tests (manual and automated) in > several different languages, and automatically generate automated > regression tests based on several different criteria, including > Product, Platform, Version Range, and Programming Language. This one > was my baby (brag). > > I've also rewritten HPUX makefiles in bsh to permit execution on > multiple UNIX platforms (HPUX make has some unique features not found > in make on other UNIX platforms). > > Based on the above experience, I'd recommend shell scripts, though > this will likely generate some opposition. In any case, if your system > only needs to run on one platform, I'd use built-in tools. > > Since then, I've played around with using perl for CGI scripting > (hated it), then PHP, which I love for this purpose. > > Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Dear list > > This is OT. I am a 4 year php developer and is very familiar > with > javascript and awk (familiar = knows and used all functions > and features > of the language itself) and I am a 5 year FreeBSD user. Being > frustrated > for the lack of a good console-based issue tracking tool (like > mantis or > bugzilla), I think I should start to write my own. I'll either > start > from scratch or (better) write a frontend for mantis which I > used for years. > > 1. If someone has already started, I should try join him/her > rather > than reinventing the wheel. So if someone knows any person who > is > starting to work on a slim console-based issue tracker, please > let > me know. I already did quit a few searches. I know someone is > working on a console front-end of G-Forge, but a big software > like > G-Forge is not what I am thinking of. > 2. If I start my own, I think I'll be using a console widget > library > (ncurse? because it's famous), an SQL database (no problem) > and a > programming language. I never developed console application > before, so here asking for suggestions on what programming > language to choose. Non of my known language > php/javascript/awk > are suitable so I guess I have to learn a new language anyway. > The > language better be easy to learn and work with (C++ is out), > not > necessarily have complicated calculation feature (like the > graphical report mantis makes), not necessarily OOP. I have > perl > and tcl in my head now, can you make some recommendations? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. -- Zhang Weiwu Real Softservice http://www.realss.com +86 592 2091112 --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:14:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF6916A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7213C45B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3Q4EINL027319; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:14:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Christopher Hilton" , "Grant Peel" Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:15:36 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <462FD524.3010009@vindaloo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Eric Crist , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:14:21 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Christopher > Hilton > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:25 PM > To: Grant Peel > Cc: Eric Crist; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam > > > Just my $0.02. Have you considered adding greylisting. I find the > combination of greylisting and Spamassassin with the SA's bayes filter > completely handles my spam problem. On my primary MX I use spamd on > OpenBSD and on my secondary MX I use spamd on FreeBSD. As a very > informal method of measurement my Inbox.spam folder, held an average of > 400 messages per day in October before I started using spamd. It > currently averages about 80 messages per day. > > If you don't know about greylisting it works as follows. A greylister > monitors port 25 for inbound mail connections. When a server connects to > this port to exchange mail the greylister predetermines the response > based on whether or not this server has exchanged mail in the recent > past. If it has it's allowed to exchange mail again and the server's > timestamp is updated. If the server has not exchanged mail in the recent > past the greylister responds: "45x - I'm too busy to talk to you right > now. Please try to deliver this mail later". It then puts the server and > information about the mail being delivered onto a list. If the same > server tries the same message later it passes and the greylister > promotes the server onto it's list of okay mail servers (mail servers > that it has exchanged mail with in the recent past). > > Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs > never retry message delivery. Actually, no. Greylisting works because it delays the spam injector long enough that the injector will get blacklisted by the time that the greylist opens the door for the mail to come in. Greylisting alone by itself is getting less and less effective every day. Spammers are now starting to setup spam injectors to retry. If you think about it, it is very easy to program. Simply create a list of victims, iterate through the list once, deleting all the victims that accept, then wait several hours and iterate through the list again. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. Since SA has a lot of the major blacklist servers as score-feeders, the spam that gets past the greylist just gets tagged by SA. > The best thing about greylisting is that > combines well with filters like SA by reducing the amount of mail that > they have to see. In my case something like 80% of the mail that > Spamassassin used to process just never gets past the greylister today. > > The downsides to greylisting is that it delays the first message from a > legitimate mailserver. In the most common case the incurred delay will > be between 30 minutes and an hour. This assumes that then sending mail > server retries queued mails every half hour or so. In an extreme case > the delay may be longer. If the mail sender has a cluster for delivering > outbound mails and that cluster features shared message storage and > several processing units to handle the smtp transfer then the greylister > will trap that message until the same server attempts redelivery. This > is a problem with mail coming from very large internet companies like > Google or AOL or very distributed corporations like General Electric, > Unilever or United Technologies. > That is why the greylist milter (that you use for sendmail) has an exception list. There are not many large senders that do this and it is easy enough to figure out who they are. > Since you are in an ISP environment greylisting may not be something > that you can do. I was extremely surprised when a client told me that > the 1 hr delay in receiving mail from new and infrequent mail servers > was too much to pay to stop the spam coming into his mailbox. That should not be a problem. The current greylist milter port allows you to define clients email addresses like this as an exception that won't get the benefits of the greylist, while allowing everyone else on the server to continue to enjoy it. > I don't > claim to know the political layer as much as I do the technical one. > There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their mail to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure. I would be pretty pissed off if Sprint suddenly started greylisting. It isn't just dumb-ass users making stupid political decisions to reject it, although in your case it probably was. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:34:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37F116A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBA0013C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 86717 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 04:34:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=xUM99KpHGwBSdwyfyQir/iz5rO1XZKasjSqXTHOg3RiethHBfQd8vpKZl85BOJCMCPLFFBCI/wENibpMv3ZX+rN+f248stWQxAxjKGChL6R/ci7rwHydA5hx24lF83LwCZFUbMZdsSJeqW+/+cFARb5rNU6vfZVWkasVKPSCNFk=; X-YMail-OSG: fy.Kid0VM1kmOGrntNLcL_3uiDGorTd5.rfOT5ECqDi2vODcA3kWfGyAdtrIMHQgq3dKUv7N_E2lwJ4qDHSqT_XrrQ-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:34:55 PDT Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:34:55 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6288.86242.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:34:57 -0000 Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards resolving the following network issue? I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the Internet via a cable modem that goes through the router. The router is set up to be the DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a non-unique IP address. Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, everybody was getting along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically assigned to the pc's). I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, selected "Configure additional network interfaces" from the sysinstall menu, selected "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast Ethernet card" from the top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts to try to configure IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network Configuration dialog contained the following values (which I did not alter): Host: dhcppc0 Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) Configuration for Interface fxp0: IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Extra options: (blank) Note that the Host field does not match the hostname of the FreeBSD box, which is named "SERVER" (real creative, huh?). I guess I should have changed the Host field to "SERVER", eh? Then I got the following console messages on the FreeBSD server: 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being assigned a non-unique IP address? Thanks! --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:45:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E16316A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: from mail.cepheid.org (wintermute.cepheid.org [64.92.165.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB7213C455 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: by mail.cepheid.org (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 303C3170CD; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:45:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:45:29 -0500 From: Erik Osterholm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426044528.GA73656@idoru.cepheid.org> Mail-Followup-To: Erik Osterholm , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425210305.GB70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425211459.GA82525@demeter.hydra> <20070425213852.GC70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425214749.GB82659@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425214749.GB82659@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:45:30 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:47:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:38:52PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > ># > > Right. In an earlier message you mentioned mutt and procmail, so > > here > > is a procmail/mutt solution. First off write a procmail recipe > > that > > matches the mail list(s) you wish to "flag". In the action line > > of said > > recipe use formail to add the header X-Status. Configure mutt to > > "high > > light" message which contain the X-Status header. ># > That's an excellent idea. Thank you. You don't need to add the header. You can "highlight" using ~C, which checks the To: or Cc: for a string. I have tested a rule in my .muttrc which does this: color index red black '(~C freebsd-question)' It seems to correctly color messages to the freebsd-questions list. In theory, you should be able to use other mutt patterns as per http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2 This could allow you to search for the List-ID header and color/highlight based upon that. Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:46:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9362F16A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5142613C44B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so111375ana for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eY4Sncqt2Clz0yMw3UX/TWiSuyd7qcw8BD/09VyWZtyiwPD0mqTBigxKwdrv9x8l419RzH43LwnPQsUpJIQig0bpwWvPhW/rnRCUYh+OOHM87vp/miti6tKRdilkpM3gqlSgpzhQ+Ne+kztr35Dlh3z5GvrL+f5mGxhfITQew00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UrziVve6x4qxgk+mVZ1Dk+g6HNUmxeqW8WGKIXF4zoEjK6ob+0+l5NJp6TB0h3kZuzv5jY7oUEs1eSNB1eM7fxozfGjgvllDJeH0TmD7mxhCz+bXUFSmA6qK2KTz6hsCy/xPzF/m9ugEFbV6IESKzKbzeTMdSh3AqCTQKoINH1g= Received: by 10.100.94.3 with SMTP id r3mr794707anb.1177562802318; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.41.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:46:42 +0800 From: "Daniel Marsh" To: "L Goodwin" In-Reply-To: <6288.86242.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6288.86242.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:46:43 -0000 On 4/26/07, L Goodwin wrote: > > Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards resolving the > following network issue? > > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP > address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is > using my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the FreeBSD box > is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box (which had that IP > address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being assigned a non-unique IP > address? > Have you checked the network properties (tcp-ip settings) for the XP machine to make sure it's being assigned a dynamic IP address? Have you tried running ipconfig /renew on the XP machine? Have you checked the lease information in the DSL modem? A DHCP server will not hand out the same IP address twice. The only time I've seen something like this happen is when the DHCP lease times out for an IP and windows doesn't renew the lease on the IP, the IP is put into the free-ip's pool and handed out when the DHCP feels up to it... So if the XP machine is setup for DHCP, it got the IP via dhcp, it probably didn't renew the lease on the IP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:50:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE216A40A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A2713C4E3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62D7DC7; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:50:11 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:50:04 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <6288.86242.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <6288.86242.qm@web58114.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704252050.07508.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:50:13 -0000 On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards > resolving the following network issue? > > I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router > and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other > Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the Internet via a cable > modem that goes through the router. The router is set up to be the > DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a non-unique IP address. > > Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, everybody was getting > along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically assigned to the > pc's). > > I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, selected "Configure > additional network interfaces" from the sysinstall menu, selected > "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast Ethernet card" from the > top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts to try to configure > IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network Configuration dialog > contained the following values (which I did not alter): > > Host: dhcppc0 > Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) > IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 > Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) > Configuration for Interface fxp0: > IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 > Netmask: 255.255.255.0 > Extra options: (blank) > > Note that the Host field does not match the hostname of the FreeBSD > box, which is named "SERVER" (real creative, huh?). I guess I > should have changed the Host field to "SERVER", eh? > > Then I got the following console messages on the FreeBSD server: > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using > my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 > kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address > xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the > FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box > (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being > assigned a non-unique IP address? 1. Check that your router's dhcp server is set up properly. 2. Check that the windows box is not set up with a static ip. The box could be hard coded to an ip address and your dhcp server thinks the lease is free. Other than that you need to supply more info. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 05:32:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE9B16A403; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B12913C44C; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3Q5WJ0g053425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:32:19 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3Q5WIDh088375; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:32:18 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:32:18 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704260532.l3Q5WIDh088375@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: Subject: Intel motherboard S5000PAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:32:23 -0000 Hi, Sorry for bothering, but I coul not find the answer elsewhere. Is Intel motherboard S5000PAL supported by FreeBSD 5.5, 6.2? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:08:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAF416A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from klein.pean.org (pean.org [195.24.165.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD3113C469 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [192.168.12.13] (trusted.jajja.com [217.118.217.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by klein.pean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D43DE8D1A; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <463041DD.9020708@pean.org> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:08:29 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." References: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E632890@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E632890@EXM1.otc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:08:32 -0000 GARRISON, TRAVIS J. wrote: > I am looking for software that will run on FreeBSD that is similar to Microsoft Single Instance Service. > > The Single Instance Storage Filter is a file system filter that manages the duplicate copies of files on hard-disk volumes. This filter copies one instance of the duplicate file into a central folder, and the duplicates are replaced with a link to the central copy to improve disk usage. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I cant really see why you would need something like this i FreeBSD. Why would you have shitloads of duplicates? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:12:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75DE16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A3F713C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 15502 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 06:12:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=MMs1pG/6oyWRl9enMTOiRMSuD+z2047WkMc9Zom55zfZ02a40f4Jy6bl1HNhoP1GxXEAN7seGL+lB/+euGq+FXBlAHCSh2AEPs7s781RVUUwdM8DlAkoM/zAlNqAxq44kDiwuC1mGCaisdwS6n2+pWeI8IVmg6L7ZHWyBnWikkk=; X-YMail-OSG: kKET6VQVM1k1ERdJ21wBtEl3_fiwHxzAHfFpjbUECyMVhNaX26X5wSXqA3hYVHN9HoyLhnsXyarkvhGjYJjIw1j.oQ-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:12:45 PDT Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:12:45 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Daniel Marsh In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <643591.15198.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:12:46 -0000 I'm pretty sure the XP box is configured correctly for DHCP (no static IP), but will check it again. By "check the lease information in the DSL modem", do you mean to see if the CM IP Address "Expires" date is earlier than current date? I unplugged both the modem and the router today before connecting the new FreeBSD box, so I assume that they are both "current". I'll investigate/try all of the things you listed and see if anything turns up. I'll also check to see if /etc/rc.conf contains the following entry: ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP" Is there any way that the NIC on FreeBSD box could get configured multiple times (e.g., multiple entries in config files), and if so, could this cause this? If the FreeBSD system were configured as a DHCP server (in addition to the router, which definitely is), what would you expect to happen? It shouldn't be, but what if it were? Thank you! Daniel Marsh wrote: On 4/26/07, L Goodwin wrote: Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards resolving the following network issue? 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being assigned a non-unique IP address? Have you checked the network properties (tcp-ip settings) for the XP machine to make sure it's being assigned a dynamic IP address? Have you tried running ipconfig /renew on the XP machine? Have you checked the lease information in the DSL modem? A DHCP server will not hand out the same IP address twice. The only time I've seen something like this happen is when the DHCP lease times out for an IP and windows doesn't renew the lease on the IP, the IP is put into the free-ip's pool and handed out when the DHCP feels up to it... So if the XP machine is setup for DHCP, it got the IP via dhcp, it probably didn't renew the lease on the IP. --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:13:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF6916A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD95B13C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so466625wra for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:13:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WegpxkitEDBtO+f04XGO5Kh0gr2zIGqmC1t0UqNGzDrrdVNFfyXj2dFsAUIg4UO/bMrVG33t9JNP0JnKU+Iuijm0lY9nMdPzWLC3AJMcZw5NL6lYhJy8yJwm+lSxO9bJVw9Xg1CX32h5JeHkcCIG4WRzOn9ZxpCGzSkCHEeGb8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fNmE5Di1a929RHxOaQN2kzqOn2qwZOtDRpMlka4wRho73TFWajQoJ9gA7ICmcRKKZj7Jy0phosgAeG+e9mu6Sua74FdGl30or4fkUJMOs1KJZk47q8JwQO/k6nxUtj26V5PXtTHsRaxd8809vdpza+AoBMGLMTEDRx28/bWiCmg= Received: by 10.78.146.11 with SMTP id t11mr394318hud.1177568005533; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.21.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:13:25 -0700 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Ankerst=C3=A5l?=" In-Reply-To: <463041DD.9020708@pean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E632890@EXM1.otc.edu> <463041DD.9020708@pean.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:13:27 -0000 U2VydmluZyBob21lIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzLCB5b3UgZW5kIHVwIHdpdGggdG9ucy4KCk9uZSBtYXJr ZXR0aW5nIGR1ZGUgY3JlYXRlcyBhIDEwTWIgUFBUIHNsaWRlLCBzZW5kcyBpdCB0byAxMCBwZW9w bGUgdGhhdApmb3J3YXJkIGl0IHRvIDIgbW9yZSBlYWNoLi4uCgpOZXh0IHRoaW5nIHlvdSBrbm93 IHlvdSBoYXZlIGRvemVucyBvZiBjb3BpZXMgb2YgdGhvdXNhbmRzIG9mIHRoZSBzYW1lCmRvY3Vt ZW50cyBzaXR0aW5nIGluIGRlZXAgc3RvcmFnZSBob21lIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzLCB0YWtpbmcgdXAg c3BhY2UuCgpJbiBiYWNrdXBzLCBTSVMgaXMgdGhlIGtpbGxlciBmZWF0dXJlLCBpbiBzcGlubmlu ZyBzdG9yYWdlLi5pdHMgd29ydGggMjAwJQp0aGUgY29zdCBvZiB0aGUgc3RvcmFnZSB5b3Ugc2F2 ZS4KCk1vc3Qgb2YgdXMuLndvdWxkIG5ldmVyIG5lZWQgaXQuLmJ1dCBmb3IgdGhvc2UgdGhhdCBk by4uZG8uCgpPbiA0LzI1LzA3LCBQZXRlciBBbmtlcnN0w6VsIDxwZXRlckBwZWFuLm9yZz4gd3Jv dGU6Cj4KPiBHQVJSSVNPTiwgVFJBVklTIEouIHdyb3RlOgo+ID4gSSBhbSBsb29raW5nIGZvciBz b2Z0d2FyZSB0aGF0IHdpbGwgcnVuIG9uIEZyZWVCU0QgdGhhdCBpcyBzaW1pbGFyIHRvCj4gTWlj cm9zb2Z0IFNpbmdsZSBJbnN0YW5jZSBTZXJ2aWNlLgo+ID4KPiA+IFRoZSBTaW5nbGUgSW5zdGFu Y2UgU3RvcmFnZSBGaWx0ZXIgaXMgYSBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbSBmaWx0ZXIgdGhhdCBtYW5hZ2VzCj4g dGhlIGR1cGxpY2F0ZSBjb3BpZXMgb2YgZmlsZXMgb24gaGFyZC1kaXNrIHZvbHVtZXMuIFRoaXMg ZmlsdGVyIGNvcGllcyBvbmUKPiBpbnN0YW5jZSBvZiB0aGUgZHVwbGljYXRlIGZpbGUgaW50byBh IGNlbnRyYWwgZm9sZGVyLCBhbmQgdGhlIGR1cGxpY2F0ZXMgYXJlCj4gcmVwbGFjZWQgd2l0aCBh IGxpbmsgdG8gdGhlIGNlbnRyYWwgY29weSB0byBpbXByb3ZlIGRpc2sgdXNhZ2UuCj4gPiBfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo+ID4gZnJlZWJzZC1x dWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4gPiBodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuZnJlZWJz ZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9mcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9ucwo+ID4gVG8gdW5zdWJzY3Jp YmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gIgo+IGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZy ZWVic2Qub3JnIgo+Cj4gSSBjYW50IHJlYWxseSBzZWUgd2h5IHlvdSB3b3VsZCBuZWVkIHNvbWV0 aGluZyBsaWtlIHRoaXMgaSBGcmVlQlNELiBXaHkKPiB3b3VsZAo+IHlvdSBoYXZlIHNoaXRsb2Fk cyBvZiBkdXBsaWNhdGVzPwo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4g aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlv bnMKPiBUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlv bnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciCj4K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:14:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3468416A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBEC013C468 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 79673 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 06:14:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Pi5pisvTbxUU+tSqFQDYZBOR+AkBtri9wvo06kx5Od+QpJNANUwN/mP50Q9cwokCKfYFVmTUgdEWNw2jQ9OuOMJcwtPhAeCrut4fs9cWSt1AkKwUsN4glbqpiQv+kfZN+tgvd4e0VBtcwN40v4dPEDZQ0SR1D3KTTbdxhTk9+IE=; X-YMail-OSG: r._J8MYVM1mCbqxoICYRycP1bU4EuymU8mXSlEImSlnO7bln8LeE391DsN0DxGk8MGYBHoSx6Hye6G.wx7HqnWbIQ.3tiycUVravSvrC_WivJl4pN7svT0_CwzkRP2SC Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:14:55 PDT Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:14:55 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: beech@alaskaparadise.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704252050.07508.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <453394.79542.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:14:56 -0000 I'll double-check the things you listed. If you can tell me what additional info I need to supply and where to get it, I'll be happy to oblige. Thanks... Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards > resolving the following network issue? > > I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router > and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other > Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the Internet via a cable > modem that goes through the router. The router is set up to be the > DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a non-unique IP address. > > Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, everybody was getting > along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically assigned to the > pc's). > > I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, selected "Configure > additional network interfaces" from the sysinstall menu, selected > "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast Ethernet card" from the > top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts to try to configure > IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network Configuration dialog > contained the following values (which I did not alter): > > Host: dhcppc0 > Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) > IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 > Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) > Configuration for Interface fxp0: > IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 > Netmask: 255.255.255.0 > Extra options: (blank) > > Note that the Host field does not match the hostname of the FreeBSD > box, which is named "SERVER" (real creative, huh?). I guess I > should have changed the Host field to "SERVER", eh? > > Then I got the following console messages on the FreeBSD server: > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using > my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 > kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address > xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the > FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box > (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being > assigned a non-unique IP address? 1. Check that your router's dhcp server is set up properly. 2. Check that the windows box is not set up with a static ip. The box could be hard coded to an ip address and your dhcp server thinks the lease is free. Other than that you need to supply more info. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:15:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D25416A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from klein.pean.org (pean.org [195.24.165.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330113C4C5 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from [192.168.12.13] (trusted.jajja.com [217.118.217.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by klein.pean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B811DE8D1A; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46304373.6060907@pean.org> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:15:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?= References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:15:17 -0000 Andreas Widerøe Andersen wrote: > Hi, > On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored in the > root > mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so new mail is > forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way for me to > send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address without > logging in through pop3/imap? > > A command line trick would be perfect. I think you could just use the .forward file. read about it in forward(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:21:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBB416A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D3B13C4B9 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:21:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3Q6Kn5C073106; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:20:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l3Q6Kn5C073106 Message-ID: <463044C1.6080107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:20:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." References: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A4AC@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A4AC@EXM1.otc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:21:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3162/Wed Apr 25 19:43:55 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:21:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 GARRISON, TRAVIS J. wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >> I am looking for software that will run on FreeBSD that is similar to >> Microsoft Single Instance Service. >> >> The Single Instance Storage Filter is a file system filter that > manages >> the duplicate copies of files on hard-disk volumes. This filter copies > one >> instance of the duplicate file into a central folder, and the > duplicates >> are replaced with a link to the central copy to improve disk usage. > > [GARRISON, TRAVIS J.] > > Is this something that is not possible under FreeBSD? Sure it is. You will need to write a small shell script to scan your disk volume and calculate the checksum of each file. When ever it finds a duplicated checksum, then it copies the file into the central store and replaces the on-disk copies with symbolic links. That's fairly trivial to write. However, I have to wonder if this is at all worthwhile. Quite apart from arguments along the lines of 'disk is cheap' and that the effort required to do this is out of all proportion to the amount of such duplicated files on the vast majority of systems, you're also putting all your eggs in one basket. All it takes is one idiot and you'll be recovering the one copy of your valuable document from backup. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMETB8Mjk52CukIwRCOqcAKCPJabakUoQas4kIGylpFST66H06wCdF8kL C8cMYpuXMu8QdnTIB9IPXls= =Le/5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:29:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF9416A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F029E13C45A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3Q6Tbd1064704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:29:37 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3Q6TaM8089863; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:29:36 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:29:36 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704260629.l3Q6TaM8089863@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: peter@pean.org In-reply-to: <46304373.6060907@pean.org> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:15:15 +0200) References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <46304373.6060907@pean.org> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wodfer@gmail.com Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:29:39 -0000 > but is there a simple way for me to send all these old mails in > root's mailbox to my email address without logging in through > pop3/imap? A combination of cat /var/mail/root | formail -s and something. cat /var/mail/root | formail -s will read /var/mail/root, separate each message and pipe it to the command that follow the -s. The command could be a sendmail new@email.address.com or something, you may have to investigate. cat /var/mail/root | formail -s /usr/sbin/sendmail new@email.address.com Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:31:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1893416A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9813C4BF for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3Q6VUmb073237; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:31:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l3Q6VUmb073237 Message-ID: <46304742.8060205@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:31:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Irsla References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:31:40 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3162/Wed Apr 25 19:43:55 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:31:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Irsla wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi >> > > what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't > use it. > > find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -exec vi {} \; > The critical difference is that 'find | xargs foo' runs foo once[*], to process all the files in one go. 'find -exec foo {}' runs foo one time for each matched file. In this case, it's probably not a big deal, but when you need to process hundreds of files 'find | xargs foo' is much more efficient. Cheers, Matthew [*] Actually, it runs foo repeatedly with as many filenames on the foo command line as it can each time. That's generally several hundred files at a go. - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMEdC8Mjk52CukIwRCC97AJwPY6m5uHCQ/AvdnyjceQZDDtvmngCgi0RV Im64VTob1mZRGtczhMIAaRQ= =RaJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:35:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB1D16A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607AC13C45E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3Q6ZZUs066710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:35:35 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3Q6ZZhL090019; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:35:35 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:35:35 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704260635.l3Q6ZZhL090019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk In-reply-to: <463044C1.6080107@infracaninophile.co.uk> (message from Matthew Seaman on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:20:49 +0100) References: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A4AC@EXM1.otc.edu> <463044C1.6080107@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: garrisot@otc.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:35:38 -0000 > Sure it is. You will need to write a small shell script to scan > your disk volume and calculate the checksum of each file. When > ever it finds a duplicated checksum, then it copies the file into > the central store and replaces the on-disk copies with symbolic > links. That's fairly trivial to write. Beside, what should be the behaviour when one wishes to modify his own copy of a document? How does Single Instance acts in that case? If you establish a link, there is only one version of the file, once and forever (unless you go and unlink it manually), so when one modifies the file, modification applies for everyone. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:39:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F58816A409 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5FB13C483 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56441D85B7; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:39:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18700-17; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:39:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (237.16.61.59.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.61.16.237]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3FD1D85B6; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:39:39 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: L Goodwin In-Reply-To: <763415.70560.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <763415.70560.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:35:39 +0800 Message-Id: <1177569339.22129.20.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:39:26 -0000 On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 21:03 -0700, L Goodwin wrote: > Zhang (or Weiwu?), Weiwu:) > I'm surprised there are no good open source bug tracking solutions > out there already. There are a lot! There are no known console-based bug tracker (there are also a lot of console-based bug reporter) > Sorry, I'm not familiar with ncurse, so can't comment on it. The > system I developed ten years ago was centered on Informix RDBMS, which > included tools for creating character-based forms ("Perform"), reports > ("ACE report writer"), and of course queries and stored procs. The > shell scripts were used in conjunction with the RDBMS for tasks such > as running reports and emailing the results to various individuals and > mail groups, and extracting bug regression tests into executable > scripts. Overhead was very low -- that's one great advantage of > character-based applications (the Windows lovers complained bitterly > about it, but we proved it was far more efficient and effective than > the junk they were building). > > Good luck finding or building a system that meets your needs. I simply > don't have time for non-essential activities, as I'm a one-person > operation. Thanks for the info. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 06:55:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D809C16A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC4A13C469 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE58A1D85B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:55:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19497-01 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:55:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (237.16.61.59.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [59.61.16.237]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF071D85B6 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:55:29 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1177557488.22129.16.camel@joe.realss.com> References: <1177557488.22129.16.camel@joe.realss.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:51:29 +0800 Message-Id: <1177570289.22129.39.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: Re: [OT] simpliest way to process this data file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:55:16 -0000 An example that is probably not simple enough: awk 'BEGIN { FS="\n"; RS="\n\n";} { print ""; print $NF; for (i=1; i I know this is OT but we got so many sysops here and this might be > something very easy for them to drop me a quick answer? > > I have a data file formatted like this each block of data consist of > several lines; blocks are separated by empty lines like this > > This is a > block > of data > with lines > > and another block > of > data > > The task is to move the last line of each block to the first line of the > block. So the processed data look like this: > > with lines > This is a > block > of data > > data > and other block > of > > I have tried a lot reading info pages of sed still cannot figure out an > easy solution (tried to play with "N" command a lot of times). I know > how to do it in awk but I am pretty interested to learn a second > language and I really think sed or other tools should be able to handle > this:) > -- Zhang Weiwu Real Softservice http://www.realss.com +86 592 2091112 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 07:10:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB0716A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3925313C4C3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D0C7E37; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:10:49 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:10:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <453394.79542.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <453394.79542.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704252310.45963.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:10:51 -0000 > Beech Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards > > resolving the following network issue? > > > > I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router > > and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other > > Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the Internet via a cable > > modem that goes through the router. The router is set up to be > > the DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a non-unique IP > > address. > > > > Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, everybody was getting > > along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically assigned to the > > pc's). > > > > I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, selected "Configure > > additional network interfaces" from the sysinstall menu, selected > > "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast Ethernet card" from > > the top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts to try to > > configure IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network Configuration > > dialog contained the following values (which I did not alter): > > > > Host: dhcppc0 > > Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) > > IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 > > Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) > > Configuration for Interface fxp0: > > IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 > > Netmask: 255.255.255.0 > > Extra options: (blank) > > > > Note that the Host field does not match the hostname of the > > FreeBSD box, which is named "SERVER" (real creative, huh?). I > > guess I should have changed the Host field to "SERVER", eh? > > > > Then I got the following console messages on the FreeBSD server: > > > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using > > my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 > > kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP address > > xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and found that the > > FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as the Windows XP box > > (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the FreeBSD box being > > assigned a non-unique IP address? > > 1. Check that your router's dhcp server is set up properly. > > 2. Check that the windows box is not set up with a static ip. The > box could be hard coded to an ip address and your dhcp server > thinks the lease is free. > > Other than that you need to supply more info. > > Beech > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > I'll double-check the things you listed. If you can tell me what > additional info I need to supply and where to get it, I'll be happy > to oblige. Thanks... > First off, please don't top post. It makes the conversation hard to follow. On the XP box what does the output of 'ipconfig /all' tell you about the DHCP lease? On the FreeBSD box what is in /etc/rc.conf? On your router what is the DHCP range set to? and how long do the leases last before they expire? And from the other post it's not possible to "accidentally" make the FreeBSD box a DHCP server. You would have to install the isc-dhcpd port, then configure and start it. If all of the above looks ok, go to /var/db and delete anything that says "dhclient.leases" then restart your machine and see if you get a new IP. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 07:28:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B07916A401; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C587013C457; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3Q7S27G075022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:28:03 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l3Q7S2CM090998; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:28:02 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:28:02 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200704260728.l3Q7S2CM090998@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: rb@gid.co.uk In-reply-to: <07FA1F53-2EEC-493C-87BA-8647036DD3FA@gid.co.uk> (message from Bob Bishop on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:25:28 +0100) References: <200704260532.l3Q5WIDh088375@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <07FA1F53-2EEC-493C-87BA-8647036DD3FA@gid.co.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel motherboard S5000PAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:28:05 -0000 > > Sorry for bothering, but I coul not find the answer elsewhere. > > > > Is Intel motherboard S5000PAL supported by FreeBSD 5.5, ... > > No; certainly the ESB2 ATA controller isn't. > > > ...6.2? > > Yes. We're running 8 of them. Great, thanks. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 07:33:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DCF16A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anthonyh@korbitec.com) Received: from spool.korbitec.com (ts01.korbitec.com [196.31.10.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B371613C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anthonyh@korbitec.com) Received: from [10.4.2.10] (helo=cptisnmail01.korbitec.int) by spool.korbitec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HgyTs-0005EH-SM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:33:32 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:33:32 +0200 Message-ID: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3AA18FC@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source Thread-Index: AceHUibkU/5uLinQSD+OBeOgNZBlBgAgZMMg References: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3A6DBDD@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> <44ps5sv47u.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: "Anthony Human" To: X-Spam-Score: X-Spam-Report: X-Spam-Flag: Subject: RE: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:35 -0000 Thanks for the response. However, I'm trying to avoid having to download the entire cvs tree considering I only need the source 5.5 Release or 6.2 Release. The ports tree would be great as well. The CVS Repository is 3.1 GB which is a rather large amount for us to download. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-requirem ents.html -----Original Message----- From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org]=20 Sent: 25 April 2007 17:55 To: Anthony Human Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source "Anthony Human" writes: > Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release > or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror=20 > to serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both=20 > time and bandwidth when updating. > =20 > Please could someone assist me with configuring the supfile to only=20 > download the source for the above versions? Any other advice/tips=20 > would be much appreciated. If you're running a local cvsup mirror, just grab the whole cvs tree for the sources (and the ports). You can leave out the bug database, and a few other distributions, but it's probably not worth your while to get the checked-out sources instead of the cvs files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 07:38:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D8A16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B8E13C45D for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (host86-129-186-88.range86-129.btcentralplus.com [86.129.186.88]) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3Q7PPWc065622; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:25:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) In-Reply-To: <200704260532.l3Q5WIDh088375@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <200704260532.l3Q5WIDh088375@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <07FA1F53-2EEC-493C-87BA-8647036DD3FA@gid.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Bishop Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:25:28 +0100 To: Olivier Nicole X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel motherboard S5000PAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:38:19 -0000 Hi, On 26 Apr 2007, at 06:32, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for bothering, but I coul not find the answer elsewhere. > > Is Intel motherboard S5000PAL supported by FreeBSD 5.5, ... No; certainly the ESB2 ATA controller isn't. > ...6.2? Yes. We're running 8 of them. > Best regards, > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 940 1295 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 08:16:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F305616A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.network-i.net (antigua.network-i.net [212.21.121.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E2FF13C489 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 14416 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 08:16:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by post1.network-i.net with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 08:16:13 -0000 Message-ID: <46306047.7020203@thingy.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:18:15 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eternityos@free.fr References: <1177545372.462fea9c47194@imp.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <1177545372.462fea9c47194@imp.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] cacti lost it's images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:16:16 -0000 eternityos@free.fr wrote: > After my last cacti upgrade, I seen it totaly lost it's images and sounds like > it also lost it's css... > The strange... I mean _STRANGE_ thing is when analysing the HTML source... the > images are not even called!!! > > No anywhere.... > Is it possible that the port now contains the plugin architecture, and you need to add/alter the url_path line in the config file? $config["url_path"] = '/cacti/'; I think when that is wrong, it will produce the symptoms you see. Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 09:10:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA1016A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ACE13C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so684577nza for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Cy/HjCn3MaleuOuy8SSqd7v7m/h9pv/hg0+vwC4re77rh+gcDMzEPJRuU0hZ3aHnNi2PBn0pqwXaoR6QYKERvwcRD5zZCvCTJNRlWQFVu1j/9z9jWk2oEmV6h4XZQhnzS7lBNTunHqOsNZaN0f8r893jMQ2R/Xw+p5gi8kMfDK4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rU1K3UjSuWDIDABA+GCPwOXeBoxjk3ATqF4Hk4vmC5zF+/BCaaz+D3G6szurEUv64AHwI4CmfeRCTFlb4MurOgeN/PUWFpPjQseO5Irvi8vWnY0SeE/vgBfIlr6rRNOQq5nkuZNpoAZyhV4y7QLn2Y4/i3e5lQxvH6e1DDvAudg= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr503552wak.1177577035516; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.37.11 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740704260143h1d5e2e8bia9008835b5379e1f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:43:55 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Unable to login using KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:10:42 -0000 Hello, I am debugging a (seemingly) KDE-related problem on a FreeBSD laptop. The version of FreeBSD is 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #0. I am starting in in debug mode. It is using kdm as a login screen. The corresponding line in /etc/ttys is ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure The problem is: when I type the username and password and try to login it returns me to the login screen again. I am 100% sure that I use correct passwords since I changed them for a couple of accounts. I am able to login from the text terminals. There are two suspicious messages when the machine is booted. The first one is: Information: reading old kdmrc /usr/local/share/config/kdm/kdmrc (from kde >= 2.2.x) Information: old kdmrc is from kde >= 3.1 (config version 2.3) The second one is: kdm_config[543]: Host "" not found and it is repeated four times with a different gibberish text. I googled for these errors but found nothing. I would be very grateful for any advice or pointers. Regards Rambius -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 09:55:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D716C16A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5F513C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 798D81CC21; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:07:13 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:07:12 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> Subject: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:55:43 -0000 How do I stop these messages from umass devices. Apr 18 03:27:03 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da1 -> 6 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 6 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error [root@dns1 /tmp]# camcontrol devlist at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (pass1,da1) [root@dns1 /tmp]# With no devices plugged I get these meesages at the rate of 1 every two seconds into /var/log/messages Thanks in advance david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:11:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F4816A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE8313C48A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3QABilj019835 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3QABiJF019834 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:11:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:11:44 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426101144.GA18259@saltmine.radix.net> References: <763415.70560.qm@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1177569339.22129.20.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177569339.22129.20.camel@joe.realss.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: best programming language for console/sql application? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:46 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:35:39PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > There are a lot! There are no known console-based bug tracker=20 > (there are also a lot of console-based bug reporter) I use lynx to update comments on Redhat's bugzilla. That's console-based. (It also uses ncurses) --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGMHpXtIqByHxlDocRAlWeAJ4gbohim1r5an9dxspc+orlSy1auACeOYKE iCnajB32UCH29P2EoIEdovk= =lSeN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:11:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F2216A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E46613C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QABsfW020660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:11:54 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QABrp5027492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:11:54 -0700 Message-ID: <46307AF0.5080106@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:12:00 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070424140528.95287ff4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <021201c7869f$ee90fd70$0300020a@mickey> <3ee9ca710704241144n4ab349c6m901586e427b1ae0d@mail.gmail.com> <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.25434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:55 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > > Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my > understanding > > that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G > (which > > is the problem it's intended to solve) > > > > If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of it. > > At least, that's my understanding of the issue. > > I don't think that's how PAE works. AFAIK, it adds all the memory pages > it can find (including those above and below 4 GB) into the VM pool with > 64-bit addresses, so all of them can be used by the applications in an > uniform way. Kind of like swap works. From what I've read, don't use PAE because it's a hack for hardware to attempt to properly map 4GB+ into 32-bit address space. Many OSes make up for that fact by masking that only 3.5GB is usable, because precision is an issue (4GB is the tipping point for 32-bit architectures). PAE was brought about prior to real native Intel-compatible 64-bit architectures came into play (Itanium aka IA64 doesn't count, because that's a whole different ball of wax). From my understanding of the underlying hardware, PAE uses two separate sets of control buses, and as logic dictates, having two things trying to tell programs what memory gets mapped to what becomes messy / slow. A true 64-bit architecture will properly map all of that memory (up to 64TB? -- I forget the actual number), and can properly use the memory for your intended purposes. You'll need to make sure that you run a 64-bit compiled OS though, not a 32-bit OS. AMD64 and EMT64 allow you to run 32-bit binaries and 64-bit binaries, with many times little issue (the only issue may exist in compiling the binaries, but that's what PRs are for to ports / core maintainers). Plus, because FreeBSD can be compiled (for the most part besides proprietary drivers like the nvidia-kernel) with 64-bit support from the bottom up, it's a much better OS than say Windows XP-x64 (a bloody f'ing hack from M$ I've discovered -- about as much driver support and stability at times as 95/98 offered for 32-bit back in the day) or Vista x64. My 2 cents. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:15:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6AC16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972A813C45A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAFAaK006973 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:15:10 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAF9uX003468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:15:09 -0700 Message-ID: <46307BB4.109@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:15:16 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070425190042.GA70940@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20070425190042.GA70940@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.25434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:15:10 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: RIPEMD160 >> >> Gary Kline wrote: >>> Guys, >>> >>> This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I >>> need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), >>> that's okay... >>> >>> I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and >>> edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This >>> works to print $9 the filenames. >>> >>> ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 >>> == 26 ) print $9}' >>> >>> What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and >>> xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any >>> clues! >>> >> xargs(1) is your friend. >> >> Simply arrange for your awk script to print out the names of all the >> files you have selected to edit, then pipe the result into xargs. >> Like so: >> >> ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) >> print $9}' | xargs vi > > > Doing a pipe thru "xargs vi" is the first thing that > failed--with: > > ex/vi: Vi's standard input and output must be a terminal > > > whereas > > ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 > == 26 ) print $9}' > > > printed a slew of files to stdout. > >> This does assume that the file names you are using do not contain >> spaces, quote marks, brackets or other characters of syntactical >> significance to the shell. In that case you could use something like >> this: >> >> find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi > > > No, no non-ASCII characters in the filenames. I'll try the -0 > and see if that gets rid of the "must be a terminal" blurb... > > > ph 11:47 [5133] ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == > "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}' | xargs -0 vi > ex/vi: Files with newlines in the name are unrecoverable > ex/vi: Modifications not recoverable if the session fails > ex/vi: Vi's standard input and output must be a terminal > > > Ah, so vi sees "filename\n" ... perhaps. [?] > > > > >> where find's '-print0' and the '-0' flag to xargs make the commands >> produce and consume respectively a null separated list of filenames. >> >> Unfortunately with find(1) there doesn't seem to be a way of expressing >> an absolute date / time -- all you can do is the time difference between >> now and when you want (which defaults to 'number of days' but can be set >> to use various other time units. I can think of a couple of ways of >> calculating that, but personally I'd find it cleaner to just roll the >> whole thing into a small perl script which identified the files in >> question and forked off an instance of vi(1) to do the editing. >> > > > You're probably right about the script. There are at least > dozens of files around ... they could be /bin/mv'd or cp'd to > a tmp and then run thru vi. --Or?? > > thanks much, Matthew. appreciate it, > > gary > > >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> - -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 >> 7 Priory Courtyard >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate >> Kent, CT11 9PW, UK >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFGLwgk3jDkPpsZ+VYRAxaaAJ9H4q3vD4qqBo+FijEs+PqmaR0kaQCgidpA >> kXOmJIpsODutFhLIvIoJpEE= >> =fNoc >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Or my favorite structure (bourne shell style).. for i in `ls -l | awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) print $9}'`; do vi $i; done Could you provide examples of what you are trying to edit though Gary? Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:17:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F3216A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE90413C45D for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAH267031835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:17:02 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAH1jn003545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:17:02 -0700 Message-ID: <46307C24.6010908@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:17:08 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <46304742.8060205@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <46304742.8060205@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.30434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:17:03 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Irsla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi >>> >> what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't >> use it. >> >> find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -exec vi {} \; >> > > The critical difference is that 'find | xargs foo' runs foo once[*], > to process all the files in one go. 'find -exec foo {}' runs foo one > time for each matched file. In this case, it's probably not a big > deal, but when you need to process hundreds of files 'find | xargs > foo' is much more efficient. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > [*] Actually, it runs foo repeatedly with as many filenames on the > foo command line as it can each time. That's generally several > hundred files at a go. > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGMEdC8Mjk52CukIwRCC97AJwPY6m5uHCQ/AvdnyjceQZDDtvmngCgi0RV > Im64VTob1mZRGtczhMIAaRQ= > =RaJi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Doesn't -xargs prebuffer input via xargs, where -exec does exec on the fly? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:22:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB62A16A40F for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9690B13C4B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAMJ5Y008253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:22:20 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QAMJO5003780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:22:19 -0700 Message-ID: <46307D62.6030709@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:22:26 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20070425061655.0264d980@mail.computinginnovations.com> <20070425191942.GB70940@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20070425191942.GB70940@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.30434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:22:20 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:21:52AM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: >> At 02:29 AM 4/25/2007, Gary Kline wrote: >>> Guys, >>> >>> This is an awk-type question. Hopefully a one-liner. If I >>> need to use #!/usr/bin/awk and a BEGIN/END (or whatever it is), >>> that's okay... >>> >>> I want to do an ls -l in a /home/kline/ and find and >>> edit files that are dated (let's say) Apr 19 or Mar 26. This >>> works to print $9 the filenames. >>> >>> ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 >>> == 26 ) print $9}' >>> >>> What's the final part to get awk to vi $9? Or another pipe and >>> xargs and "vi"? Nothing simple works, so thanks for any >>> clues! >> I would use a simple approach incase you need to re-edit the list since >> editing will change file times: >> ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == 26 ) >> print $9}' > /tmp/myfilelist >> then you can: >> for i in `cat /tmp/myfilelist`;do vi $i;done >> >> if you don't want to use a file, you can do in one shell loop too, but >> again this will change your file modification times: >> for i in `ls -l| awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && $7 == >> 26 ) print $9}'`;do vi $i;done > > > Yep; this is the simple kind of script I had in mind first but > wasn't sure if/how it would work. Your one-liner works > "as-advertized", but then as you note, the timestamp is > changed!! (duh)... So it does make more sense to put the list > into a /tmp/ file. Save typing when I re-edit. > > thanks much, indeed, > > gary > > >> -Derek Don't forget my friendly, friend cut(1) (almost forgot that in my previous post). I think it's a lot more lightweight and faster than awk is; the only drawback is that delimiters are only 1 character wide, whereas heavier weight text processing tools can do multiple character search and replacements (sed, awk, perl, etc). ls -l | cut -d ' ' -f 9 | xargs vi {} \; # change -f to meet your needs -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:25:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD46916A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B23613C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so515583wra for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=R8u+Li+qihz3Brqi/4W3sQLlSAKkRVpgv+hrjTsijT3scMlEQbS5RsF1s5uKPtDS3DR8BZxlocIZfB5TnxSkPvYkCul71DC4vTCVe5ewru36Az/BljtoDbvk2OwnSdJ9Ah05NhbUdO6/U/WjvkY+kHq1yoF8mSdro40hgdwvsUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=PB5jewuStmBTx/YMM5t8PzxIPRYNq47waOMGr4eH28yvCcMU9g//MjKNoAHdprqQD7jUiopviUgaaOFSKSYlsKCexUaTMzwFRmsivGs1rlBPZEYCsDj5SBuutBurg5aq8RCOzLfjLS0CGtPkHTA/zyVhz2y2/hDEFTF7CZzmLOM= Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr522896wak.1177583106201; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:25:06 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:25:07 -0000 I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a pretty basic FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I get from my daily security run output: myserver.domain.com login failures: Apr 25 20:00:19 myserver sshd[57810]: Invalid user staff from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:22 myserver sshd[57812]: Invalid user sales from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:24 myserver sshd[57814]: Invalid user recruit from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:26 myserver sshd[57816]: Invalid user alias from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:28 myserver sshd[57818]: Invalid user office from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:30 myserver sshd[57820]: Invalid user samba from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:32 myserver sshd[57822]: Invalid user tomcat from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:34 myserver sshd[57824]: Invalid user webadmin from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:36 myserver sshd[57826]: Invalid user spam from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:38 myserver sshd[57828]: Invalid user virus from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:41 myserver sshd[57830]: Invalid user cyrus from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:43 myserver sshd[57832]: Invalid user oracle from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:45 myserver sshd[57834]: Invalid user michael from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:47 myserver sshd[57836]: Invalid user ftp from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:49 myserver sshd[57838]: Invalid user test from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:51 myserver sshd[57840]: Invalid user webmaster from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:53 myserver sshd[57842]: Invalid user postmaster from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:56 myserver sshd[57844]: Invalid user postfix from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:57 myserver sshd[57846]: Invalid user postgres from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:59 myserver sshd[57848]: Invalid user paul from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:04 myserver sshd[57852]: Invalid user guest from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:06 myserver sshd[57854]: Invalid user admin from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:08 myserver sshd[57856]: Invalid user linux from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:11 myserver sshd[57858]: Invalid user user from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:13 myserver sshd[57860]: Invalid user david from 65.171.74.26 How can I stop these attempts or block them - or even recognize them? I do not have IPF installed. Thanks for your help. Best regards, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:36:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B3B16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C0913C45E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE77A7DC7; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:36:05 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:36:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704260236.02847.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?q?Wider=F8e?= Andersen Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:36:07 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen said: > I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a > pretty basic FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. > Here's what I get from my daily security run output: > > myserver.domain.com login failures: > Apr 25 20:00:19 myserver sshd[57810]: Invalid user staff from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:22 myserver sshd[57812]: Invalid user > sales from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:24 myserver sshd[57814]: > Invalid user recruit from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:26 myserver > sshd[57816]: Invalid user alias from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:28 > myserver sshd[57818]: Invalid user office from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 > 20:00:30 myserver sshd[57820]: Invalid user samba from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:32 myserver sshd[57822]: Invalid user tomcat from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:34 myserver sshd[57824]: Invalid user > webadmin from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:36 myserver sshd[57826]: Invalid user spam from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:38 myserver sshd[57828]: Invalid user > virus from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:41 myserver sshd[57830]: > Invalid user cyrus from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:43 myserver > sshd[57832]: Invalid user oracle from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:45 > myserver sshd[57834]: Invalid user michael from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 > 20:00:47 myserver sshd[57836]: Invalid user ftp from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:49 myserver sshd[57838]: Invalid user test from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:51 myserver sshd[57840]: Invalid user > webmaster from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:53 myserver sshd[57842]: Invalid user postmaster from > 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:56 myserver sshd[57844]: Invalid user postfix from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:00:57 myserver sshd[57846]: Invalid user > postgres from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:59 myserver sshd[57848]: Invalid user paul from > 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:04 myserver sshd[57852]: Invalid user > guest from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:06 myserver sshd[57854]: > Invalid user admin from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:08 myserver > sshd[57856]: Invalid user linux from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 20:01:11 > myserver sshd[57858]: Invalid user user from 65.171.74.26 Apr 25 > 20:01:13 myserver sshd[57860]: Invalid user david from 65.171.74.26 > > How can I stop these attempts or block them - or even recognize > them? I do not have IPF installed. > > Thanks for your help. > > Best regards, > Andreas Check out denyhosts, it's in the tree. It works well for me and is=20 easy to set up. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 10:55:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542A816A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za (sirian.hst.org.za [209.203.2.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDCC13C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from localhost (localhost.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF3631D56C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:49:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sirian.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61498-07 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:49:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8464A31CB58 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:49:58 +0200 (SAST) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:57:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1177557488.22129.16.camel@joe.realss.com> <1177570289.22129.39.camel@joe.realss.com> In-Reply-To: <1177570289.22129.39.camel@joe.realss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261257.35584.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hst.org.za Subject: Re: [OT] simpliest way to process this data file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:55:00 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:51, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:18 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: [snip] > > I have a data file formatted like this each block of data consist of > > several lines; blocks are separated by empty lines like this > > > > This is a > > block > > of data > > with lines > > > > and another block > > of > > data > > > > The task is to move the last line of each block to the first line of the > > block. So the processed data look like this: > > > > with lines > > This is a > > block > > of data > > > > data > > and other block > > of [snip] I would use Perl, which can read in a paragraph at a time. Assuming you don't mind having multiple blank lines in the input replaced by a single blank line, this Perl commandline will do what you want: perl -l -00 -pe 's/(.*)^(.*)$/$2\n$1/ms' datafile Read perldoc perlrun for the flags, and perldoc perlre to understand the regex (in particular the m and s modifiers). Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:07:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E368816A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:07:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA1013C489 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:07:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so715767nza for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kUhsEclqxBb3R6F5kE/WJU2w9fDlxC2e4C98qtCKK94DV2+jjAEWIWyeU3xd5pTV9u7cmwDiwu5k36Jj5FmKvIws/UDBnVpoNSAFwlo2pASwyeY8dDqUv1HXt2NLn2+CYTkATCGcnDF9JX5DyduL7Wi8EL8ngAhA6k/rhEkgV0w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IJvEjpH3wYRN6C96IJug7MdjBPodP4JUAvTJ9tnvr5JiGVp+jPK1hnHlAXstUi6kbUzDiJIXVxyIJ2fA6lIHNJTQD0LVsqpUJq7+cqn4LZunNeQQwO9j2AUU2SeKjaec30UAKwaBw7GKwENtkRxxifMpEexyCuv4r07K017Mopc= Received: by 10.114.167.2 with SMTP id p2mr542557wae.1177585628755; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704260407v39dd1d3al109148fef1d8a0f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:07:08 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <78814ac0704260357g2bedb91s48c9f8aa7cd4f27f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <78814ac0704260357g2bedb91s48c9f8aa7cd4f27f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:07:10 -0000 On 4/26/07, Arek Czereszewski wrote: > > Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen wrote: > > I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a pretty > basic > > FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I get fro= m > my > > daily security run output: > [...] > > Run sshd on other port. > And say about this your ssh users. Can I change the ssh port on a live server somehow without getting locked out? The server is on a remote co-location a flight away from me. /Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:11:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406F916A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E2513C4B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so196646ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:11:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DeFsfqKwjc4OI6IlHMl2+WYyjSD2zHT4zF4fkZ0156wgT2PRjSJqY86LHjBsMjtm4lXIpyXtEx+CrXDrQzZ9ZKIuCGALyTPErXUqu8HNNH167RsEA/Gmio4uUDrKX0AN28xT3Kp7PbDjaaIQE6cp6OlQjplrafTtfuv8sSrDZUE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iB6firuEOqgF0PiJasZvhdm6b9kHnvRIN3fUp9TGZpChmuIbWL43kLrO2/WgDPZm2ssSFg+q86CWAuis6ngaMRLQJFP97J6Yt2jGWwgkhb6mpGPCkta0Yb41QMXGaAlwi0rl+496cQh3oxoAHY30rQJvatqmAuYFbM7zdLaDLxc= Received: by 10.100.13.12 with SMTP id 12mr791274anm.1177585883142; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.111.5 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:11:23 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Wider=C3=B8e_Andersen?=" In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:11:24 -0000 T24gNC8yNi8wNywgQW5kcmVhcyBXaWRlcsO4ZSBBbmRlcnNlbiA8d29kZmVyQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4g d3JvdGU6Cj4gSSdtIGdldHRpbmcgYSBsb3Qgb2YgdW5hdXRob3JpemVkIHNzaCBsb2dpbiBhdHRl bXB0cy4gSSBoYXZlIGEgcHJldHR5IGJhc2ljCj4gRnJlZUJTRCA2LjIgc2V0dXAuIEkgaGF2ZSBj b21waWxlZCBteSBvd24ga2VybmVsLiBIZXJlJ3Mgd2hhdCBJIGdldCBmcm9tIG15Cj4gZGFpbHkg c2VjdXJpdHkgcnVuIG91dHB1dDoKPgo+IG15c2VydmVyLmRvbWFpbi5jb20gbG9naW4gZmFpbHVy ZXM6Cj4gQXByIDI1IDIwOjAwOjE5IG15c2VydmVyIHNzaGRbNTc4MTBdOiBJbnZhbGlkIHVzZXIg c3RhZmYgZnJvbSA2NS4xNzEuNzQuMjYKW3NuaXBdCj4gQXByIDI1IDIwOjAxOjEzIG15c2VydmVy IHNzaGRbNTc4NjBdOiBJbnZhbGlkIHVzZXIgZGF2aWQgZnJvbSA2NS4xNzEuNzQuMjYKPgo+IEhv dyBjYW4gSSBzdG9wIHRoZXNlIGF0dGVtcHRzIG9yIGJsb2NrIHRoZW0gLSBvciBldmVuIHJlY29n bml6ZSB0aGVtPyBJIGRvCj4gbm90IGhhdmUgSVBGIGluc3RhbGxlZC4KCkluIG15IGhvbWUgc2Vy dmVyLCBJIHB1dCBTU0ggb24gYSBoaWdoZXIgcG9ydCBhbmQgdXNlIHB1YmxpYyBrZXkgdG8KYXV0 aGVudGljYXRlLgpUaGlzIHNob3VsZCBnZXQgeW91IHJpZCBvZiB0aG9zZSBtZXNzYWdlcy4uLgoK Pgo+IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciBoZWxwLgoKSG9wZSB0aGlzIGhlbHBzLAoKPiBCZXN0IHJlZ2Fy ZHMsCj4gQW5kcmVhcwoKLS0gClBpZXRybyBDZXJ1dHRpCgotIEFTQ0lJIFJpYmJvbiBDYW1wYWln biAtCiBhZ2FpbnN0IEhUTUwgZS1tYWlsIGFuZAogcHJvcHJpZXRhcnkgYXR0YWNobWVudHMKICAg d3d3LmFzY2lpcmliYm9uLm9yZwo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:12:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A77D16A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3698313C469 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so196962ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:12:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Wkk8otLdizDxXDxhBWshcTSikFxzqbUxZrN2hKaBX24jSA613OKCdtJJcs/kE7VP6rRVmCacSUta+cpA5Kju90FOh8WnOz3y4t6UQvddg+hTOGIltroC4KobkwgVYmCdXu37NADScAv5Opxp6m0H4lE1dcXeASmj6qrdbFBZ/R8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nPbNG7K/EKcVb/BvJ1RhoH3jli+qCqzKQXQQh91zm47s7CHDIS7I5ZXYMSAgGmgL+i/bmsJItqRaBxfpHhprlOzDNYtlLiOfLjyGDBB/iM1++QNA3vHU0kLJePUm6oMxmUkQ7zB1XinfvAWYCGzRFmtAhzmrzo3uaBvLlm4mhGE= Received: by 10.100.125.5 with SMTP id x5mr963705anc.1177585961147; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.111.5 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:12:41 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Wider=C3=B8e_Andersen?=" In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704260407v39dd1d3al109148fef1d8a0f6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <78814ac0704260357g2bedb91s48c9f8aa7cd4f27f@mail.gmail.com> <23ed14b80704260407v39dd1d3al109148fef1d8a0f6@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:12:42 -0000 T24gNC8yNi8wNywgQW5kcmVhcyBXaWRlcsO4ZSBBbmRlcnNlbiA8d29kZmVyQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4g d3JvdGU6Cj4gT24gNC8yNi8wNywgQXJlayBDemVyZXN6ZXdza2kgPGFyZWtjemVyQGdtYWlsLmNv bT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gPgo+ID4gQW5kcmVhcyBXaWRlcsO4ZSBBbmRlcnNlbiB3cm90ZToKPiA+ID4g SSdtIGdldHRpbmcgYSBsb3Qgb2YgdW5hdXRob3JpemVkIHNzaCBsb2dpbiBhdHRlbXB0cy4gSSBo YXZlIGEgcHJldHR5Cj4gPiBiYXNpYwo+ID4gPiBGcmVlQlNEIDYuMiBzZXR1cC4gSSBoYXZlIGNv bXBpbGVkIG15IG93biBrZXJuZWwuIEhlcmUncyB3aGF0IEkgZ2V0IGZyb20KPiA+IG15Cj4gPiA+ IGRhaWx5IHNlY3VyaXR5IHJ1biBvdXRwdXQ6Cj4gPiBbLi4uXQo+ID4KPiA+IFJ1biBzc2hkIG9u IG90aGVyIHBvcnQuCj4gPiBBbmQgc2F5IGFib3V0IHRoaXMgeW91ciBzc2ggdXNlcnMuCj4KPgo+ IENhbiBJIGNoYW5nZSB0aGUgc3NoIHBvcnQgb24gYSBsaXZlIHNlcnZlciBzb21laG93IHdpdGhv dXQgZ2V0dGluZyBsb2NrZWQKPiBvdXQ/IFRoZSBzZXJ2ZXIgaXMgb24gYSByZW1vdGUgY28tbG9j YXRpb24gYSBmbGlnaHQgYXdheSBmcm9tIG1lLgoKWWVzIHlvdSBjYW4uIFNTSCB3aWxsIGtlZXAg eW91ciBjb25uZWN0aW9uIGFjdGl2ZSB1bnRpbCB5b3UgbG9nIG91dCwKdGhlbiB5b3UgY2FuIGxv ZyBpbiB1c2luZyB0aGUgbmV3IHBvcnQKCj4KPiAvQW5kcmVhcwoKCi0tIApQaWV0cm8gQ2VydXR0 aQoKLSBBU0NJSSBSaWJib24gQ2FtcGFpZ24gLQogYWdhaW5zdCBIVE1MIGUtbWFpbCBhbmQKIHBy b3ByaWV0YXJ5IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzCiAgIHd3dy5hc2NpaXJpYmJvbi5vcmcK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:17:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C8E16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3281013C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so527217wra for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:17:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FGeh/uUjy+5Iw+WEHJn9feGb3XNCzFeOUu3BKYa6pl+CJWFteCD7iGkIP+tHv+WaA1JQXIiH+pgyjpITb/BpY3J476EPbp8TZUvCe6hTKNOHeDa0rYk/ZlYrr5wJhg098K+qtz01CCM7vNFefEacX9h4OIfRGKV487lb5hQJoyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Lbv8/AmKp+hdkwFDAyiQEhQbhjANxv9nePECuXHUuISjylQCZftYvDznINzVqp5AFtjBqRw22i2N8O+juqC95h9QmM4BnNEk5MC6RFsLc8LX6CpRF2+CjAsyEhLI2aOsE/e3jktTXSZvtZJ6+Bv2/IwIXexIxSS+7CwobVANXoQ= Received: by 10.114.157.1 with SMTP id f1mr573331wae.1177584769170; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.13.5 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:52:49 -0300 From: "Roberto Pereyra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:17:06 -0000 hi I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have this error when I start the jail (jail0): srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start Configuring jails:. Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist jail0. srv1# What I do wrong ? Thanks in advance. roberto This is my /etc/rc.conf # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Apr 23 09:32:04 2007 # Created: Mon Apr 23 09:32:04 2007 # Enable network daemons for user convenience. # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. defaultrouter="192.168.0.2" hostname="srv1.gualeguaychu.gov.ar" ifconfig_sk0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" keymap="spanish.iso.acc" linux_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Apr 23 12:52:02 2007 moused_port="/dev/cuad0" moused_type="auto" moused_enable="YES" ## jails sendmail_enable="NO" inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.1" rpcbind_enable="NO" jail_enable="YES" # Set to NO to disable starting of any jails jail_list="jail0" # Space separated list of names of jails jail_jail0_rootdir="/usr/home/jails/jail0" # jail's root directory jail_jail0_hostname="jail0" # jail's hostname jail_jail0_ip="192.168.0.3" # jail's IP address #jail_jail0_devfs_enable="YES" # mount devfs in the jail #jail_jail0_devfs_ruleset="www_ruleset" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline http://www.contenidosonline.com.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:20:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F3B16A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7218613C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [192.168.1.10]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1826928F879; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Pietro Cerutti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070426112111.G4140@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <78814ac0704260357g2bedb91s48c9f8aa7cd4f27f@mail.gmail.com> <23ed14b80704260407v39dd1d3al109148fef1d8a0f6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1758969154-1177586541=:4140" Cc: freebsd-questions , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Wider=C3=B8e_Andersen?= Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:20:55 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1758969154-1177586541=:4140 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 4/26/07, Andreas Wider=C3=B8e Andersen wrote: >> On 4/26/07, Arek Czereszewski wrote: >> > >> > Andreas Wider=C3=B8e Andersen wrote: >> > > I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a prett= y >> > basic >> > > FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I get= =20 > from >> > my >> > > daily security run output: >> > [...] >> > >> > Run sshd on other port. >> > And say about this your ssh users. >> >> >> Can I change the ssh port on a live server somehow without getting locke= d >> out? The server is on a remote co-location a flight away from me. > > Yes you can. SSH will keep your connection active until you log out, > then you can log in using the new port I will add the fact you will want to keep the current connection live and= =20 test after you make the change with a new connection. That way if the new= =20 connection fails, you still have a "foot in the door". --0-1758969154-1177586541=:4140-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:27:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37C016A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF89713C48C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [192.168.1.10]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B20528F879; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Roberto Pereyra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070426112307.U4140@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:27:41 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Roberto Pereyra wrote: > hi > > I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have > this error when I start the jail (jail0): > > srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start > Configuring jails:. > Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist > jail0. > srv1# > > > What I do wrong ? > > Thanks in advance. > > roberto > > This is my /etc/rc.conf > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Apr 23 09:32:04 2007 > # Created: Mon Apr 23 09:32:04 2007 > # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > defaultrouter="192.168.0.2" > hostname="srv1.gualeguaychu.gov.ar" > ifconfig_sk0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" > keymap="spanish.iso.acc" > linux_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="YES" > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Apr 23 12:52:02 2007 > moused_port="/dev/cuad0" > moused_type="auto" > moused_enable="YES" > > ## jails > sendmail_enable="NO" > inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.0.1" > rpcbind_enable="NO" > > jail_enable="YES" # Set to NO to disable starting of any jails > jail_list="jail0" # Space separated list of names of jails > > jail_jail0_rootdir="/usr/home/jails/jail0" # jail's root directory > jail_jail0_hostname="jail0" # jail's hostname > jail_jail0_ip="192.168.0.3" # jail's IP address > #jail_jail0_devfs_enable="YES" # mount devfs in the jail > #jail_jail0_devfs_ruleset="www_ruleset" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail > You do not have your jail IP set up as an alias on your network interface. You need to add ifconfig_sk0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.0.0" after your primary interface ifconfig_sk0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" in the /etc/rc.conf. Then do an ifconfig sk0 inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.0.0 alias to make it live without having to reboot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:37:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5416A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D604B13C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so562389ika for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:37:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ufTbR/c6Z/QbZkp60zWFjMbSYvq2ODRj8oLc23GFXiXhiUzVvz8LM0Rd60zW3UCzAEwaepttWnq6oE418Gnf2gNJFfv1BBBGtxRIKgj7ax2nIEsIGCpOHI2M5sUx/4yCTTVAykKKlLwPoK20nvDvQiSpq1oRc/WUiv/y3r3Uqyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kV7BzOD0fGv4hL7pqn5QCbK0F6aXcsVEExj5xgpPgyXdbPxaVIYyZU+WEkidIAIvRg4tICRKDOiHImDD1CU8LU8biU8Kuh3Oig/WMlKikIqL2KJ3B8zdCF+ksqGm+D0/joId1n4UcqneP2ZgWwgkLrSD1iMSLsd5KjXNWcjouh4= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr3099512buc.1177587432380; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [87.207.160.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 59sm4934731ugf.2007.04.26.04.37.10; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46308EDF.9080602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:37:03 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roberto Pereyra References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:37:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Roberto Pereyra wrote: > hi > > I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have > this error when I start the jail (jail0): > > srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start > Configuring jails:. > Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist > jail0. > srv1# > > > What I do wrong ? [snip] > This is my /etc/rc.conf [...] > ifconfig_sk0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" [...] > jail_jail0_ip="192.168.0.3" # jail's IP address Is 192.168.0.3 assigned to any interface? Have a look at ifconfig(8) output. You can add an alias with ifconfig and/or put something similar to /etc/rc.conf (assuming sk0 interface): % ifconfig_sk0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" HTH, Karol - -- Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMI7fezeoPAwGIYsRCEy1AKCDhJxHggkdcANKc6GToJUSLFMfVwCdF+I4 GFW56bytWUfTavzmfhKzfJw= =0fDD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:15:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473BD16A40B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB18013C4B8 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so515781ugh for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:15:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=UxzqHjDagYBSMiMmKfuBfHAwjeu5yNbTcO17BhyaoQk600DNExsWzJraj6MMQzPmWpuf8Q8sDeFPTVdsnyCdPw1gr6YR0ymdiFPZH0sBmg2783k/z4X4P/ldzNRXUyojJx2qaiPG7kgRYfb6B+qrXSkOhu3BW6CUkbrTWgck9Cs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=LRf7aEt96U2hJJqY7VfQ3yFG17yHrhfEm9folGJb07NLmqGsCJ3LhTud4tsINsGHUC3OYGE0EtkdV4K9izoTqJrcfU9+rvuaC3d+jap9WexCoZsmmoJPpMEPShpPGDH0TJnpZwlUvvgCyfPdLQ0EbnSJzC8fu/44pN7k9vPeshY= Received: by 10.67.10.18 with SMTP id n18mr2130476ugi.1177586120571; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [213.206.147.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1sm4927523uge.2007.04.26.04.15.18; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:15:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Evans To: Kelly Jones In-Reply-To: <26face530704241939x1acd5d6en56b26fe4bdf69d85@mail.gmail.com> References: <26face530704241939x1acd5d6en56b26fe4bdf69d85@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kGPQ+rep418szBg4K85B" Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1177586116.3530.4.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:02 +0000 Cc: techtalk@linuxchix.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, linuxusersgroup@googlegroups.com, nmosug-l@mailman.swcp.com, nmlug@nmlug.org Subject: Re: Using LD_PRELOAD to make date return a specific date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:15:22 -0000 --=-kGPQ+rep418szBg4K85B Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 19:39 -0700, Kelly Jones wrote: > I recently discovered LD_PRELOAD, a cool environment variable that > lets a library "intercept" system calls. For example, setting > LD_PRELOAD to /usr/lib/libtsocks.so lets tsocks intercept socket > connections and redirect them to a SOCKS proxy. >=20 > My question: how can I write a library that intercepts the > gettimeofday() system call (or time() or whatever the 'date' command > uses) and gets 'date' to return, say, "Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 1970"? >=20 > I realize this involves a couple of steps (writing a C "library" for > one), so any pointers are appreciated. My real intentions are more > complex (and sinister ). >=20 It's quite straightforward. /bin/date actually uses localtime(), not gettimeofday(), but the principle is the same. > $ cat localtime_hack.c=20 #include #include struct tm * localtime(const time_t *clock) { static struct tm tv; time_t epochal =3D 1; localtime_r(&epochal, &tv); return &tv; } > $ gcc -Wall -fpic -c -o localtime_hack.o localtime_hack.c > $ gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,localtime_hack.so.1 -o \ =20 liblocaltime_hack.so.1.0 localtime_hack.o > $ LD_PRELOAD=3D"`pwd`/liblocaltime_hack.so.1.0" /bin/date Thu 1 Jan 1970 01:00:01 BST Cheers Tom --=-kGPQ+rep418szBg4K85B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGMIm/lcRvFfyds/cRAp6TAJ4oGg26SQi7we9WC0JUPxNMfcBdkQCcDXVE jjgNvQR4jkXOBNzslSj+7Zo= =ztsu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kGPQ+rep418szBg4K85B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:45:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589616A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D93913C44B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11951 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 11:45:45 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 11:45:45 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C7028426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:45:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 58A6D1CCC9; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:45:41 -0400 (EDT) To: "Anthony Human" References: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3A6DBDD@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> <44ps5sv47u.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3AA18FC@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:45:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <490F273F58BE854EBF3D5BE7CF7A8FC3AA18FC@cptisnmail01.korbitec.int> (Anthony Human's message of "Thu\, 26 Apr 2007 09\:33\:32 +0200") Message-ID: <44bqhbjr4q.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:45:46 -0000 Don't top-post, please. "Anthony Human" writes: > Thanks for the response. > > However, I'm trying to avoid having to download the entire cvs tree > considering I only need the source 5.5 Release or 6.2 Release. The ports > tree would be great as well. Well, you can certainly do that. Just set the prefix and tag variables differently for the different branches. Ports aren't branched. > The CVS Repository is 3.1 GB which is a rather large amount for us to > download. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-requirements.html Right now I seem to have about 1.6G for src and 1.2G for ports. Still, it's a one-time expense; your ongoing download requirements may even be a little *smaller* for keeping the whole cvs tree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 11:58:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFE216A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CB813C455 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r28so730447nza for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pnATqybP0IVSgag2VS/uC/js9UP7iZvTURyJXB/dBAx/eCAk2xtxLDpWVe7SqDI3vNTMX5YOE7eoO9a5xxjh5fWa1fLS53OS4njbLlgSGmyzgKr+0y2Ez4dmWrD0j/M1r6XrzsVfjJaqMbd2GxJFghAyLcX/nDy683SF6WCNPss= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=j+s4DorSYVjLY/bU3UduUuc3iSP0RcGLZfaWS+bgtLeOHECM4/BV+9PLESjrOts5zvS+iN2Od1uuw0jAS872gDT49Wg8pKXuc/FHynV7PiJNMSK96KLOyNLIEn3kyqFpwfOABiyDyb5aQ1Z0f2QlGfr4xDMhtfdZR46jsihBBCI= Received: by 10.114.93.17 with SMTP id q17mr554690wab.1177588734603; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.193.12 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23ed14b80704260458l204c01c9xa4398be47610200a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:58:54 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?=" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20070426112111.G4140@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <78814ac0704260357g2bedb91s48c9f8aa7cd4f27f@mail.gmail.com> <23ed14b80704260407v39dd1d3al109148fef1d8a0f6@mail.gmail.com> <20070426112111.G4140@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:58:56 -0000 On 4/26/07, Duane Hill wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > On 4/26/07, Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen wrote: > >> On 4/26/07, Arek Czereszewski wrote: > >> > > >> > Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen wrote: > >> > > I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a > pretty > >> > basic > >> > > FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I ge= t > > from > >> > my > >> > > daily security run output: > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > Run sshd on other port. > >> > And say about this your ssh users. > >> > >> > >> Can I change the ssh port on a live server somehow without getting > locked > >> out? The server is on a remote co-location a flight away from me. > > > > Yes you can. SSH will keep your connection active until you log out, > > then you can log in using the new port > > I will add the fact you will want to keep the current connection live and > test after you make the change with a new connection. That way if the new > connection fails, you still have a "foot in the door". Thanks! I got it working without having to fly out to the server. :-) Let's see if this will prevent the unauthorized sshd login attempts. Cheers, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 12:03:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F3C16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA21413C45D for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QC1mB4033821; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:01:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426065937.026912b8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:00:51 -0500 To: "Charlie McElfresh" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <44b41e4e0704251231x1358b123ma70550e0181d7dcd@mail.gmail.co m> References: <44b41e4e0704251231x1358b123ma70550e0181d7dcd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: can't add any new users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:19 -0000 At 02:31 PM 4/25/2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote: >Hi, > >I recently upgraded all my machines to 6.2 RELEASE. All my machines except >one work fine. > >On one of my machines, I can log in from the console to the super user >account, but I could not su to my user account. > >So, I backed up all my data, and I deleted my user account. Then, I added >it back with adduser. > >When I look in /etc/passwd and /etc/group, I'm in there. > >When I try to su to my newly created account, I get this message: > >Bad system call (core dumped) > >I tried removing my account with rmuser, then adding it back again -- same >problem. > >Any ideas? > >Charlie You didn't say how you upgraded this server to 6.2, nor from what version. I suspect you have an old or missing library. You might do well on this server to cvsup, buildworld, and install world. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 12:08:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4159316A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lcapps@cteresource.org) Received: from gershwin.cteresource.org (mail.cteresource.org [206.136.187.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082D13C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lcapps@cteresource.org) Received: by gershwin.cteresource.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 324FD1CCC2; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (hank.cteresource.org [192.168.1.130]) by gershwin.cteresource.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0311CCBE; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:06:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lee Capps Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:08:15 -0400 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , Thomas Dickey , Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:08:24 -0000 On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Svein Halvor >> Halvorsen >> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:00 AM >> To: Lee Capps >> Cc: Thomas Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the >> relative >> advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) >> >> >> Bill Moran wrote: >>>> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: >>>> GNOME guy) >>>> describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected >>>> false >>>> information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research >> >> >> And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform >> the >> students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the >> facts? >> And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his >> misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more >> important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? >> >> I hope this professor got some sort of reaction from his >> University due >> to his unethical attitude towards openness, knowledge and science. >> > > I'm afraid I have to agree. The Prof was as lazy as his students. > The > world abounds in misinformation, it doesen't take a lot of effort > to find > it. The prof could have spent the hour he spent forging info in > Wikipedia, > finding already forged misinformation and having his students > research that. > He could have started at the Scientology website, for example, then > moved > on to PETA and the NRA. I note with interest that, so far, none of us has tried to track down this professor's possibly apocryphal research ;-) --- Lee Capps Technology Specialist lcapps@cteresource.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 12:15:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D0B16A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF4613C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B925197E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:15:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:15:33 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426131533.52005972@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <462FEC41.50701@yahoo.de> References: <462FEC41.50701@yahoo.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portinstall --batch something X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:37 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:03:13 +0200 Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello list, > > what will portinstall do if I give it the --batch argument? Will it > compile the port with all options it knows or only the standard ones? > I ask because "man 1 portinstall" or "man 7 ports" is not informative > enough at this point. > It does the makes with BATCH=yes set. The main effect of this is that it prevents the options menus from showing, which means ports build with the last options set or the default. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 12:34:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A7E16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A012813C468 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344EEBC78; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:34:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:34:38 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?"Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen"?= Message-Id: <20070426083438.52397267.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:34:40 -0000 In response to "Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen" : > I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a pretty bas= ic > FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I get from = my > daily security run output: >=20 > myserver.domain.com login failures: > Apr 25 20:00:19 myserver sshd[57810]: Invalid user staff from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:22 myserver sshd[57812]: Invalid user sales from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:24 myserver sshd[57814]: Invalid user recruit from 65.171.74= .26 > Apr 25 20:00:26 myserver sshd[57816]: Invalid user alias from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:28 myserver sshd[57818]: Invalid user office from 65.171.74.= 26 > Apr 25 20:00:30 myserver sshd[57820]: Invalid user samba from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:32 myserver sshd[57822]: Invalid user tomcat from 65.171.74.= 26 > Apr 25 20:00:34 myserver sshd[57824]: Invalid user webadmin from > 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:36 myserver sshd[57826]: Invalid user spam from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:38 myserver sshd[57828]: Invalid user virus from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:41 myserver sshd[57830]: Invalid user cyrus from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:43 myserver sshd[57832]: Invalid user oracle from 65.171.74.= 26 > Apr 25 20:00:45 myserver sshd[57834]: Invalid user michael from 65.171.74= .26 > Apr 25 20:00:47 myserver sshd[57836]: Invalid user ftp from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:49 myserver sshd[57838]: Invalid user test from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:51 myserver sshd[57840]: Invalid user webmaster from > 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:53 myserver sshd[57842]: Invalid user postmaster from > 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:56 myserver sshd[57844]: Invalid user postfix from 65.171.74= .26 > Apr 25 20:00:57 myserver sshd[57846]: Invalid user postgres from > 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:00:59 myserver sshd[57848]: Invalid user paul from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:01:04 myserver sshd[57852]: Invalid user guest from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:01:06 myserver sshd[57854]: Invalid user admin from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:01:08 myserver sshd[57856]: Invalid user linux from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:01:11 myserver sshd[57858]: Invalid user user from 65.171.74.26 > Apr 25 20:01:13 myserver sshd[57860]: Invalid user david from 65.171.74.26 >=20 > How can I stop these attempts or block them - or even recognize them? I do > not have IPF installed. One possibility: http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/16 --=20 Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 12:57:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA916A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F4A13C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l3QCukLA005892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:56:53 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3QCuOK6003747 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:56:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l3QCuOHm003746 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:56:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:56:23 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426125623.GA3633@kobe.laptop> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.522, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.68, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:57:31 -0000 On 2007-04-25 14:05, Chad Perrin wrote: >> List-Id: User questions >> >> Can gmail not filter on that? > > Do you have any suggestions for how to do something similar with mutt or > procmail? Sure; you can use something like this in your `.procmailrc': :0 H List-Id: .* X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4050B16A40A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD3D13C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312D0EBC78; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:32 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Lee Capps Message-Id: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , Thomas Dickey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:17:34 -0000 In response to Lee Capps : > > On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Svein Halvor > >> Halvorsen > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:00 AM > >> To: Lee Capps > >> Cc: Thomas Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the > >> relative > >> advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) > >> > >> > >> Bill Moran wrote: > >>>> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: > >>>> GNOME guy) > >>>> describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected > >>>> false > >>>> information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research > >> > >> > >> And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform > >> the > >> students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the > >> facts? > >> And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his > >> misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more > >> important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? > >> > >> I hope this professor got some sort of reaction from his > >> University due > >> to his unethical attitude towards openness, knowledge and science. > >> > > > > I'm afraid I have to agree. The Prof was as lazy as his students. > > The > > world abounds in misinformation, it doesen't take a lot of effort > > to find > > it. The prof could have spent the hour he spent forging info in > > Wikipedia, > > finding already forged misinformation and having his students > > research that. > > He could have started at the Scientology website, for example, then > > moved > > on to PETA and the NRA. > > I note with interest that, so far, none of us has tried to track down > this professor's possibly apocryphal research ;-) :D Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources while none of you checked your sources ... Muhahaha ... In any event, it's been a fascinating sociological lesson for me. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 14:09:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF46916A40B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDF513C4B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 64440 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 09:43:02 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 09:43:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4630AC65.8010609@queue.to> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:43:01 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2d19405f0704201946g1ed8c1a8lce50802c4c52fc70@mail.gmail.com> <2d19405f0704241012y418f7491x2c88443968a62051@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net Subject: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:09:44 -0000 Drew Sanford wrote: > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it starts > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a file > one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a file on > any start up, it crashes. I have this exact same problem and reverted to 1.5 where the problem frustratingly reared its head again (modified subject to break out from other coredump). The seamonkey also suffers from the issue. It's as if something else regressed. I rebuilt all 670 ports over the course of 2 days to try to rid myself of bitrot, to no avail :( Here's a backtrace, I don't have time before I go into the office to see what's going on in pthreads, maybe this'll help someone else? #0 0x28c87b17 in pthread_testcancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #1 0x28c76428 in sigaction () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #2 0x28c6fb3d in pthread_kill () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #3 0x28c6f452 in raise () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #4 0x08069139 in nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler (signo=11) at nsProfileLock.cpp:206 #5 0x28c74304 in sigaction () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #6 0x28c75ec2 in sigaction () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #7 0x28c7ed6c in pthread_mutexattr_init () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #8 0x28c7edd5 in pthread_mutexattr_init () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #9 0x28d417a7 in _ctx_start () from /lib/libc.so.6 #10 0x00000000 in ?? () #11 0xbfbfacd0 in ?? () #12 0xbfbfaa10 in ?? () #13 0x00000000 in ?? () #14 0x28c7ed93 in pthread_mutexattr_init () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #15 0x285abb35 in gtk_tray_icon_get_type () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #16 0x285aa4e9 in gtk_tray_icon_get_type () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #17 0x28593022 in gtk_file_system_unix_new () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #18 0x28a232c2 in g_hash_table_size () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #19 0x285945a9 in gtk_file_system_unix_new () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #20 0x2859465c in gtk_file_system_unix_new () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #21 0x28a322b4 in g_child_watch_add () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #22 0x28a2f2a4 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #23 0x28a30b16 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #24 0x28a30e27 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #25 0x283dd0a3 in gtk_dialog_run () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #26 0x2a6de3b8 in nsFilePicker::Show (this=0x8fd6e00, aReturn=0xbfbfb520) at nsFilePicker.cpp:583 #27 0x282715a5 in XPTC_InvokeByIndex (that=0x8fd6e00, methodIndex=17, paramCount=134709248, params=0xbfbfb520) at xptcinvoke_unixish_x86.cpp:179 #28 0x29a7a5fa in XPCWrappedNative::CallMethod (ccx=@0xbfbfb600, mode=XPCWrappedNative::CALL_METHOD) at xpcwrappednative.cpp:2168 #29 0x29a8531b in XPC_WN_CallMethod (cx=0x976e800, obj=0x17e, argc=382, argv=0xbfbfb600, vp=0x17e) at xpcwrappednativejsops.cpp:1455 #30 0x280f3ea9 in js_Invoke (cx=0x976e800, argc=0, flags=0) at jsinterp.c:1396 #31 0x28100e1b in js_Interpret (cx=0x976e800, pc=0x8f874a0 ":", result=0xbfbfb9fc) at jsinterp.c:3973 #32 0x280f3f35 in js_Invoke (cx=0x976e800, argc=1, flags=2) at jsinterp.c:1415 #33 0x29a72e7d in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x8724500, wrapper=0x17e, methodIndex=5, info=0x84b0c98, nativeParams=0xbfbfbeb0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1415 #34 0x29a6bf57 in nsXPCWrappedJS::CallMethod (this=0x98cfe80, methodIndex=5, info=0x17e, params=0x17e) at xpcprivate.h:2243 #35 0x2827187c in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x98cfe80, methodIndex=5, args=0xbfbfbf6c) at xptcstubs_unixish_x86.cpp:95 #36 0x28271937 in nsXPTCStubBase::Stub5 (this=0x98cfe80) at xptcstubsdef.inc:7 #37 0x282715a5 in XPTC_InvokeByIndex (that=0x98cfe80, methodIndex=5, paramCount=134709248, params=0xbfbfc1d0) at xptcinvoke_unixish_x86.cpp:179 #38 0x29a7a5fa in XPCWrappedNative::CallMethod (ccx=@0xbfbfc2b0, mode=XPCWrappedNative::CALL_METHOD) at xpcwrappednative.cpp:2168 #39 0x29a8531b in XPC_WN_CallMethod (cx=0x976e800, obj=0x17e, argc=382, argv=0xbfbfc2b0, vp=0x17e) at xpcwrappednativejsops.cpp:1455 #40 0x280f3ea9 in js_Invoke (cx=0x976e800, argc=1, flags=0) at jsinterp.c:1396 #41 0x28100e1b in js_Interpret (cx=0x976e800, pc=0x8194bd2 ":", result=0xbfbfc6ac) at jsinterp.c:3973 #42 0x280f3f35 in js_Invoke (cx=0x976e800, argc=1, flags=2) at jsinterp.c:1415 #43 0x280f4205 in js_InternalInvoke (cx=0x976e800, obj=0x17e, fval=382, flags=0, argc=1, argv=0xbfbfc90c, rval=0xbfbfc8f4) at jsinterp.c:1490 #44 0x280c054a in JS_CallFunctionValue (cx=0x976e800, obj=0x17e, fval=382, argc=382, argv=0x17e, rval=0x17e) at jsapi.c:4356 #45 0x2ae168ef in nsJSContext::CallEventHandler (this=0x97768c0, aTarget=0x909a050, aHandler=0x909a048, argc=382, argv=0x17e, rval=0xbfbfc8f4) at nsJSEnvironment.cpp:1493 #46 0x2ae74e45 in nsJSEventListener::HandleEvent (this=0x9785bc0, aEvent=0x8fd688c) at nsJSEventListener.cpp:185 #47 0x2acbb0ce in nsEventListenerManager::HandleEventSubType (this=0x17e, aListenerStruct=0x9783900, aListener=0x9785bc0, aDOMEvent=0x8fd688c, aCurrentTarget=0x90de380, aSubType=8, aPhaseFlags=382) at nsEventListenerManager.cpp:1655 #48 0x2acbb576 in nsEventListenerManager::HandleEvent (this=0x9785b80, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0xbfbfcfb0, aDOMEvent=0xbfbfccac, aCurrentTarget=0x90de380, aFlags=7, aEventStatus=0xbfbfd18c) at nsEventListenerManager.cpp:1757 #49 0x2adcadf5 in nsXULElement::HandleDOMEvent (this=0x9785b40, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0xbfbfcfb0, aDOMEvent=0xbfbfccac, aFlags=7, aEventStatus=0xbfbfd18c) at nsXULElement.cpp:2229 #50 0x2adca2d2 in nsXULElement::HandleDOMEvent (this=0x987e0c0, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0xbfbfd190, aDOMEvent=0xbfbfcf0c, aFlags=1, aEventStatus=0xbfbfd18c) at nsXULElement.cpp:2033 #51 0x2a9fe086 in PresShell::HandleDOMEventWithTarget (this=0x9774000, aTargetContent=0x987e0c0, aEvent=0x17e, aStatus=0x17e) at nsPresShell.cpp:6520 #52 0x2abccfc1 in nsButtonBoxFrame::DoMouseClick (this=0x987f144, aEvent=0xbfbfd540, aTrustEvent=0) at nsButtonBoxFrame.cpp:179 #53 0x2abbe1e6 in nsButtonBoxFrame::MouseClicked (this=0x17e, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0x17e) at nsButtonBoxFrame.h:61 #54 0x2abccdc2 in nsButtonBoxFrame::HandleEvent (this=0x987f144, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0xbfbfd540, aEventStatus=0xbfbfdb20) at nsButtonBoxFrame.cpp:149 #55 0x2a9fdde6 in PresShell::HandleEventInternal (this=0x9774000, aEvent=0xbfbfd540, aView=0x0, aFlags=1, aStatus=0xbfbfdb20) at nsPresShell.cpp:6465 #56 0x2a9fd805 in PresShell::HandleEventWithTarget (this=0x9774000, aEvent=0x17e, aFrame=0x17e, aContent=0x17e, aFlags=382, aStatus=0x17e) at nsPresShell.cpp:6322 #57 0x2acc6d0b in nsEventStateManager::CheckForAndDispatchClick ( this=0x9773300, aPresContext=0x9779600, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aStatus=0xbfbfdb20) at nsEventStateManager.cpp:3206 #58 0x2acc447b in nsEventStateManager::PostHandleEvent (this=0x9773300, aPresContext=0xbfbfd860, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aTargetFrame=0x987f144, aStatus=0xbfbfdb20, aView=0x977ff00) at nsEventStateManager.cpp:2169 #59 0x2a9fdfc2 in PresShell::HandleEventInternal (this=0x9774000, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aView=0x977ff00, aFlags=1, aStatus=0xbfbfdb20) at nsPresShell.cpp:6496 #60 0x2a9fd476 in PresShell::HandleEvent (this=0x9774000, aView=0x977ff00, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aEventStatus=0xbfbfdb20, aForceHandle=1, aHandled=@0xbfbfdb24) at nsPresShell.cpp:6260 #61 0x2ae0914a in nsViewManager::HandleEvent (this=0x977fe80, aView=0x977ff00, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aCaptured=382) at nsVoidArray.h:61 #62 0x2ae08361 in nsViewManager::DispatchEvent (this=0x977fe80, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aStatus=0xbfbfdd2c) at nsViewManager.cpp:2246 #63 0x2adfd209 in HandleEvent (aEvent=0xbfbfdd80) at nsView.h:251 #64 0x2a6d38b8 in nsCommonWidget::DispatchEvent (this=0x9773400, aEvent=0xbfbfdd80, aStatus=@0xbfbfdd7c) at nsCommonWidget.cpp:219 #65 0x2a6c6088 in nsWindow::OnButtonReleaseEvent (this=0x9773400, aWidget=0x8b19a28, aEvent=0x80a1e90) at nsWindow.cpp:1718 #66 0x2a6cb1c3 in button_release_event_cb (widget=0x17e, event=0x80a1e90) at nsWindow.cpp:3908 #67 0x2845b2b8 in gtk_marshal_VOID__UINT_STRING () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #68 0x289d086a in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #69 0x289e528a in g_signal_has_handler_pending () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #70 0x289e5f16 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #71 0x289e64b7 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #72 0x2857347e in gtk_widget_activate () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #73 0x2845986e in gtk_propagate_event () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #74 0x28459b41 in gtk_main_do_event () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #75 0x286af261 in gdk_event_get_graphics_expose () from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #76 0x28a2f2a4 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #77 0x28a30b16 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #78 0x28a30e27 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #79 0x28458ecb in gtk_main () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #80 0x2a6d10a3 in nsAppShell::Run (this=0x8410b00) at nsAppShell.cpp:139 #81 0x2b4ca698 in nsAppStartup::Run (this=0x840eb40) at nsAppStartup.cpp:151 #82 0x080570e2 in XRE_main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbfe834, aAppData=0x806dbe0) at nsAppRunner.cpp:2695 #83 0x0804e9a4 in main (argc=382, argv=0x17e) at nsMailApp.cpp:62 (gdb) Sorry about th eline wrap From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 14:35:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8AF16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from sipala.earlham.edu (sipala.earlham.edu [159.28.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F054F13C487 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from [159.28.7.5] (ec454.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by sipala.earlham.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QEZB9F012021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:35:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sipala.earlham.edu: Host ec454.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.5] claimed to be [159.28.7.5] In-Reply-To: <20070426083438.52397267.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> <20070426083438.52397267.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Kevin Hunter Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:34:57 -0400 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:35:13 -0000 At 8:34a -0400 on 26 Apr 2007, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to "Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen" : > >> I'm getting a lot of unauthorized ssh login attempts. I have a =20 >> pretty basic >> FreeBSD 6.2 setup. I have compiled my own kernel. Here's what I =20 >> get from my >> daily security run output: >> >> myserver.domain.com login failures: >> Apr 25 20:00:19 myserver sshd[57810]: Invalid user staff from =20 >> 65.171.74.26 >> [similar lines snipped] >> >> How can I stop these attempts or block them - or even recognize =20 >> them? I do >> not have IPF installed. > > One possibility: > http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/16 I'm a noob to *BSD, so I'm not sure if not having IPF installed means =20= you still have another firewall option. If you do, I'd say following =20= Bill's [sp]age advice is best for your system security overall. If you don't have a firewall, another option would be to disallow ssh =20= password logins. i.e. only allow login via public/private key =20 authentication. This is a server side option, so 'man sshd_config' =20 and look for the PasswordAuthentication option. You'll still get the =20= "Invalid user..." warning messages, but short of wasting your =20 bandwidth and (log) diskspace, they'll be useless cracker attempts. (And if you're looking for how to create public/private keys, 'man =20 ssh-keygen'.) In general, utilizing public/private keys for remote authentication =20 is /much/ more secure than passwords. HTH, Kevin= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:05:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADC716A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922F913C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 5936 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 15:05:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 15:04:59 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A83128426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 015961CD2B; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:04:55 -0400 (EDT) To: Scott D Friedemann References: <462E8A51.2000502@friedemann.us> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:04:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462E8A51.2000502@friedemann.us> (Scott D. Friedemann's message of "Tue\, 24 Apr 2007 17\:53\:05 -0500") Message-ID: <44tzv3mb1k.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error from mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:05:00 -0000 Scott D Friedemann writes: > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #0 > > I have run mount_smbfs for the last couple years without incident. > Now I find the command no longer works, but gives this error. > > mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.100 //drogo/c /mnt/bsdstuff > Password: > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Cannot allocate memory > > Can anyone offer a clue? I tracked it as far as an ioctl call for creating what looks like a protocol block. I don't have the time to trace into the kernel right now, and it doesn't look like anything in the smbtools userland has changed in quite a while. Can we assume that you checked the obvious things, like making sure that the system isn't running out of memory? Does this happen with a GENERIC kernel? Are you sure the kernel matches the userland? Also let us know if you can recall when it stopped working. And for what it's worth, I don't get such an error on -STABLE. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:14:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D215C16A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3E613C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 19417 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 15:14:32 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 15:14:31 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE8E28426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:14:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 453B71CCC9; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:14:26 -0400 (EDT) To: Doug Lee References: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:14:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> (Doug Lee's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 10\:18\:05 -0400") Message-ID: <44ps5rmalp.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB console or other alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:14:32 -0000 Doug Lee writes: > I'm one of these guys running FreeBSD 4.11 on very old hardware (a > Pentium 166, specifically), and I want to upgrade to FreeBSD 6 or 7 > soon but with new hardware. Being blind, I need to use something > other than the video card for a console. I've been using a serial > console for a long time, but serial ports are getting scarce. I need > the console to become active during the boot sequence in case of > problems, as it can with a serial console. As I did with FreeBSD 3 > and 4, I will also want to activate this console during FreeBSD > installation if possible, so I don't have to have someone else be here > when I install it. > > Can modern hardware and a modern FreeBSD version provide console > access before the kernel loads via USB or via anything other than an > actual on-board or PCI serial port? I am not sure, but I would expect that you would need BIOS support for something like that. Personally, I would stick with serial ports as long as possible, because they are much more simple than any alternatives. What do you hook up to that serial port, anyway? Sorry I can't be more helpful, but I wanted to make sure you got *some* help. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:21:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3696716A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012813C45B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12517 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 15:21:51 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 15:21:51 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ECA28426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A96E81CD2B; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:46 -0400 (EDT) To: Vulpes Velox References: <20070425135628.5334ddf7@vixen42> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070425135628.5334ddf7@vixen42> (Vulpes Velox's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 13\:56\:28 -0400") Message-ID: <44lkgfma9h.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDAP and xscreensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:52 -0000 Vulpes Velox writes: > xscreensaver: couldn't get password of "kitsune" > xscreensaver: 13:54:14: locking is disabled (error getting password). > xscreensaver: 13:54:14: does xscreensaver need to be setuid? consult > the manual. > > Is what I am getting on the console when I run it. It is setuid. The > passwords and userinfo is stored in LDAP. I haven't used LDAP for passwords, so I can't test this, but my guess would be that you are missing a pam configuration for xscreensaver. Something like "auth sufficient pam_ldap.so", perhaps? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:23:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB3C16A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226D013C45B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 694 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 15:23:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 15:23:58 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B538728426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F216C1CD2B; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:23:54 -0400 (EDT) To: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" References: <2395703.1801177525963776.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:23:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2395703.1801177525963776.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> (RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 11\:32\:43 -0700 \(MST\)") Message-ID: <44hcr3ma5x.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java build error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:23:59 -0000 "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" writes: > Hello all i am getting this error when trying to install java jdk15 from the ports. please help and thank you in advance > > acpi0_check: nexus0 attachedom/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.java:162: warning: non-varargs call of varargsacpi0_check: legacy0 not-presentpe for last parameter; > cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call acpi0_check: npx0 attached > cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning acpi0_check: acpi0 attachednewInstance(null); > ^ > Note: * uses or overrides a deprecated API. > Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. > Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. > Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. > 21 errors > 12 warnings > gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' > gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' > gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. > *** Error code 1 Not giving us much to work with, are you? ;-) Do you have a java compiler installed at that point? Which one? Are you using a non-supported version of FreeBSD with a recent ports tree? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:42:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7025716A40B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACC113C4BD for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([71.178.107.244]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JH4003UK3LXFXMC@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:41:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QFfuOB020441 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:56 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) id l3QFfut0020440 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:56 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl) Content-return: prohibited Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:41:56 -0400 From: Doug Lee In-reply-to: <44ps5rmalp.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mail-followup-to: Doug Lee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070426154156.GD10261@kirk.dlee.org> Organization: SSB + BART Group MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> <44ps5rmalp.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: USB console or other alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:42:05 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:14:26AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Doug Lee writes: > > > I'm one of these guys running FreeBSD 4.11 on very old hardware (a > > Pentium 166, specifically), and I want to upgrade to FreeBSD 6 or 7 > > soon but with new hardware. Being blind, I need to use something > > other than the video card for a console. I've been using a serial > > console for a long time, but serial ports are getting scarce. I need > > the console to become active during the boot sequence in case of > > problems, as it can with a serial console. As I did with FreeBSD 3 > > and 4, I will also want to activate this console during FreeBSD > > installation if possible, so I don't have to have someone else be here > > when I install it. > > > > Can modern hardware and a modern FreeBSD version provide console > > access before the kernel loads via USB or via anything other than an > > actual on-board or PCI serial port? > I am not sure, but I would expect that you would need BIOS support for > something like that. Personally, I would stick with serial ports as > long as possible, because they are much more simple than any > alternatives. More simple once found at least. :-) > What do you hook up to that serial port, anyway? A desktop Windows machine with a serial port, until said machine suddenly ceased to function entirely. Now it would be a laptop with a USB-to-serial adapter except the one I bought also seems unwilling to function. I tend to run short of PCMCIA slots for such things on my laptop, my one-and-only PCMCIA slot being occupied pretty permanently by an EVDO card. Sounds like I'll need a *functional* USB-to-serial adapter on the laptop end, an actual serial port on whatever new box of parts ends up running FreeBSD 6/7, and my old trusty null modem conglomerate of cable and adapters. I guess I'll collect recommendations for a good USB-to-serial adapter. I've seen prices range from around $30 to around $120.00 if memory serves, and the last one I bought was closer to the former. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org SSB + BART Group doug.lee@ssbbartgroup.com http://www.ssbbartgroup.com "A mailing list is a crude but effective cross between a chain letter and a shouting match." -Andrew Kantor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 15:49:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD7116A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4AC513C45B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 25913 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 15:49:29 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 1.471193 secs); 26 Apr 2007 15:49:29 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.13) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 15:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 15316 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 15:49:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 15:49:27 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:27 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:27 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:49:31 -0000 I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader screen is displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot loader prompt. What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up with leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new hardware just for this project. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:04:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FD616A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8362313C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.68] (dagobah.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621825CBB; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:04:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4630CDA4.30201@vindaloo.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:04:52 -0400 From: Christopher Sean Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt , User Questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:04:54 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: [snip...] >> Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs >> never retry message delivery. > > Actually, no. Greylisting works because it delays the spam injector > long enough that the injector will get blacklisted by the time that the > greylist opens the door for the mail to come in. Greylisting alone > by itself is getting less and less effective every day. Spammers are now > starting to setup spam injectors to retry. If you think about it, it is > very easy to program. Simply create a list of victims, iterate through > the list once, deleting all the victims that accept, then wait several > hours and iterate through the list again. It didn't take a rocket scientist > to figure that one out. > > Since SA has a lot of the major blacklist servers as score-feeders, the > spam that gets past the greylist just gets tagged by SA. > When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window. The reason that I'm using greylisting is to reduce the load on SA so I can continue to use spam bayes. Quite honestly spam bayes is either the most or second most effective spam filtering technique that I'm using but its a CPU hog. If I had to rank the effectiveness of the filtering that I'm doing I would say that greylisting is probably the most effective. I'm using spamd with tarpitting and that alone is responsible for filtering 90% of my spam. Spam bayes is probably second but I haven't counted the number of messages that are getting filed as spam based on the bayes classifier. Some numbers from crunching my combined maillogs (primary and secondary mx) from Apr 24th 20:00:00 ~ Apr 25th 20:00:00. 1566 hosts generated 1907 connections to my primary and secondary MXers. 155 hosts generated 192 greylisting entries on either one or both of my mailservers. 34 hosts attempted to retry mail generating 40 whitelist transactions on one or both of my mailservers. -- Chris __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton chris | at | vindaloo.com pgp: f5:30:0a:54:e1:55:76:9b:1f:47:0b:07:e9:75:0e:14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:16:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D0616A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) Received: from MX1.otc.edu (mx1.otc.edu [198.209.160.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5447213C4BD for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177604161-2e3b002e0000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://198.209.160.201:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Sender Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5922D3A42D for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:16:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu with ESMTP id wHXC0DrZ5jjwBrHv for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:16:01 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Single Instance Service Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:16:00 -0500 Message-ID: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A790@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200704260635.l3Q6ZZhL090019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Single Instance Service Thread-Index: AceHzR6oh+AWJv48QlyL0X7r3Z+8CwAUEYwg From: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." To: X-Barracuda-Connect: exn1.otc.edu[172.16.2.131] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177604161 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OTC E-Mail System at otc.edu Subject: RE: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:02 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Nicole > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:36 AM > To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk > Cc: GARRISON, TRAVIS J.; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Single Instance Service >=20 > > Sure it is. You will need to write a small shell script to scan > > your disk volume and calculate the checksum of each file. When > > ever it finds a duplicated checksum, then it copies the file into > > the central store and replaces the on-disk copies with symbolic > > links. That's fairly trivial to write. >=20 > Beside, what should be the behaviour when one wishes to modify his own > copy of a document? How does Single Instance acts in that case? >=20 > If you establish a link, there is only one version of the file, once > and forever (unless you go and unlink it manually), so when one > modifies the file, modification applies for everyone. >=20 > Olivier [GARRISON, TRAVIS J.]=20 I know with Windows Storage Server, if a user modifies the file, it will then create the user their own copy of the file. This happens automatically. Exchange Server is another example of this type of storage. When someone sends an attachment to several people, the server saved one copy of the file. I am currently managing 7TB worth of data with roughly 1 to 2TB of duplicate files. This gets fairly expensive with a fiber channel san backend. I know it can be done in the windows world automatically, just wondered if it could be done automatically in the Unix world also. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:18:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7786A16A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) Received: from MX1.otc.edu (mx1.otc.edu [198.209.160.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5B713C4E3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177604307-2e3b00380000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://198.209.160.201:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Sender Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D02A83A5CF for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:18:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX1.otc.edu with ESMTP id m5NYiGqZJh0Y66jz for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:18:27 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Single Instance Service Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:18:27 -0500 Message-ID: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A796@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <463041DD.9020708@pean.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Single Instance Service Thread-Index: AceHyVIfOsVb8vp3TOOL+2ERIeXCPgAVO8Ag From: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." To: X-Barracuda-Connect: exn1.otc.edu[172.16.2.131] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177604307 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OTC E-Mail System at otc.edu Subject: RE: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:18:28 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Ankerst=E5l [mailto:peter@pean.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:08 AM > To: GARRISON, TRAVIS J. > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Single Instance Service >=20 > GARRISON, TRAVIS J. wrote: > > I am looking for software that will run on FreeBSD that is similar = to > Microsoft Single Instance Service. > > > > The Single Instance Storage Filter is a file system filter that = manages > the duplicate copies of files on hard-disk volumes. This filter copies = one > instance of the duplicate file into a central folder, and the = duplicates > are replaced with a link to the central copy to improve disk usage. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > I cant really see why you would need something like this i FreeBSD. = Why > would > you have shitloads of duplicates? [GARRISON, TRAVIS J.]=20 This is peoples userhomes to save pretty much whatever files they = want/need. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:20:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5968916A40A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crussell_1969@yahoo.com) Received: from web51611.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51611.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.224.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E60AA13C46E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crussell_1969@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 80507 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 15:53:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=tBqZX+LaWtW7zj8Pj/F9eigRLoPBF/on+AZRlacQby7AvUYCZ+bDINXF5mbrZnDxiwISTt4lmhzI4wuqTG4hy+rxF9CtAly/4yoh06ehLbuFPmYhqttSiZb6eAZfGVMw1PLr+MK9CdMz6OiZ/O2fHbyRC2UyHvYdsEiV2GcXJOY=; X-YMail-OSG: n2mC6h0VM1lAofrCISFCLM7B3zrWDrDzWCNlhOrq Received: from [208.71.248.176] by web51611.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:53:57 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Craig Russell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <164924.79985.qm@web51611.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:20:41 -0000 Sorry if this is obvious but I just did this myself with similar problems. Is your /boot a seperate partition? If so, bsd will not boot. It will happily install but will come back with a no kernel found error or similar. I believe this is because only the / partition is mounted at that point. Hope this helps. Craig Russell --- jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 > server with an E200i > Smart Controller installed. The installation was > flawless. > > When I reboot the server after the installation, the > boot loader screen is > displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and > comes back to the boot > loader prompt. > > What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I > usually end up with > leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to > purchase new hardware > just for this project. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks for your help. > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:23:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0BD16A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AA413C48C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QGMeLM085398; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:22:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:43 -0500 To: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband. net> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:29 -0000 At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i >Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. > >When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader screen is >displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot >loader prompt. > >What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up with >leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new hardware >just for this project. > >Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >Thanks for your help. Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be written. If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in your BIOS. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:39:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486C16A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.tomasich@archo.it) Received: from smtpout24.attiva.biz (smtpout24.attiva.biz [85.37.16.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92C013C455 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.tomasich@archo.it) Received: from fbcmfe02b04.fbc.local ([192.168.30.33]) by smtpout24.attiva.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:27:05 +0200 Received: from mussi ([80.16.54.30]) by fbcmfe02b04.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:27:05 +0200 From: "Andrea Tomasich" To: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:27:02 +0200 Message-ID: <002e01c7881f$b8c91ca0$2b00a8c0@mussi> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Importance: High Thread-Index: AceIH7c9rRQEkg75T1OjJs+LdZosTQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Apr 2007 16:27:05.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA8D61E0:01C7881F] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to: scripts on rel. 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: a.tomasich@archo.it List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:39:15 -0000 Ciao, I'm a beginner in freebsd but I must grow up quickly with scripts. How to do that? Someone can give me some link to easy docs about that? Andrea From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:41:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2165916A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.tomasich@archo.it) Received: from smtpout30.attiva.biz (smtpout30.attiva.biz [85.37.16.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A5113C4BD for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.tomasich@archo.it) Received: from fbcmfe02b04.fbc.local ([192.168.30.33]) by smtpout30.attiva.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:55 +0200 Received: from mussi ([80.16.54.30]) by fbcmfe02b04.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:54 +0200 From: "Andrea Tomasich" To: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:51 +0200 Message-ID: <003301c7881f$f9ee82b0$2b00a8c0@mussi> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Importance: High Thread-Index: AceIH7c9rRQEkg75T1OjJs+LdZosTQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Apr 2007 16:28:55.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBB538F0:01C7881F] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to: scripts on rel. 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: a.tomasich@archo.it List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:41:00 -0000 Ciao, I'm a beginner in freebsd but I must grow up quickly with scripts. How to do that? Someone can give me some link to easy docs about that? Andrea From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:52:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D916A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from sipala.earlham.edu (sipala.earlham.edu [159.28.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22BD13C4B9 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunteke@earlham.edu) Received: from [159.28.7.5] (ec454.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by sipala.earlham.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QGpx3C007888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:51:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sipala.earlham.edu: Host ec454.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.5] claimed to be [159.28.7.5] In-Reply-To: <07DD32B1-E79A-42D4-9059-2CBD98C8C3C8@cc.usu.edu> References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> <20070426083438.52397267.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <07DD32B1-E79A-42D4-9059-2CBD98C8C3C8@cc.usu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <57D63937-4610-4917-B9DF-2943034D2B18@earlham.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevin Hunter Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:51:48 -0400 To: hal X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:52:01 -0000 At 11:22a -0400 on 26 Apr 2007, Hal wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote: >> In general, utilizing public/private keys for remote >> authentication is /much/ more secure than passwords. > > There is some debate about which is more secure > public/private keys or username/password. Yep, thank you for that reminder. :-) I suppose we now know what I'm arguing! > With public/private keys anyone who has > access to your machine has access to any machine > your machine has a key on. Without a passphrase, I'd agree. The key word that I made sure to put in was 'remote'. With passphrases, it becomes a two-step authentication, one locally to unlock the private key, and one remotely to at least confirm that you have the other half of the key. The other thing that I personally like about public/private key combinations is that for the more lazy of us, we don't always check the fingerprint matches. If I decide to log on to a remote machine to which I've not logged directly on before (e.g. a company NFS- shared home directory), then I can be assured that I'm not falling victim to a man-in-the-middle attack; I can blindly accept the fingerprint, and if it hangs, I can guess that I'm in the middle of an attack attempt, and try another avenue to get where I'm going. > With username/password protection is only as > strong as your password. But your password is > needed. Yep. I agree. > So... Use a firewall which limits access to only machines > you are willing to let in. Yep. I agree. See Bill's page about limiting number of connections per time frame as well. > Use hosts.allow to further restrict access to ssh. Yep. I agree. > Change the ssh port to something not generally known. This I place into the category of security-through-obscurity, which I don't find a particularly comforting method. So it adds a single extra layer, but if a cracker is worth her/his salt, it's easily discovered and, in my opinion, not worth the extra effort it takes me to type -p everytime. (Yes, I could use an alias or some such, but that's still extra thought-power that I'd rather place elsewhere.) > In sshd_config use the AllowUsers parameter to allow > specific users to have access to ssh. Yep. I agree. I think that in the end, those who are security conscious, such as presumably you and me, the specifics of how we do it become largely a moot point or highly dependent on what it is that we're securing. My personal preference is to follow the 80/20 rule. I don't have 100% of my time to devote to doing the exact right thing. But I do have 20% of my time to devote to doing 80% of the exact right thing. If/ when that becomes a problem, I'll reevaluate my approach. On that note, you may know better than I do: is there a web page or blog somewhere that coalesces all the different things that should be done/are currently best-practice to secure a system? Especially to a *BSD noob? Thanks, Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 16:53:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD29816A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5613E13C457 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so627163wra for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:53:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MNR89+Hrlq2kRu/oxv50MSK0kGmoC2ZY0IxOQ7W6XLikEMgpXW0oe2JuF/A2b8ZSm6iZGQRgj329mnskbBybTJxGsm9k/s/vuNazV0ujhCkiB/8cIclozNtNdaMod5fJKvzvmQ2SeXsOxb1IE+0lesLfSBOskPIx/4bwythPrLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NgdPHm7p8XqtnHxKkelpy26YPvk3TMVZoDZq8gVlS8tbqeMG8uQ0WHv9+NgbSLqyE7RKfi4Xyx+LMjG8AXigGSwXhx6kTMzn/iET3/67WZmo2LuA00jwDwcGNXVI2Sgiy0CXfXWnTrKJkciXx+yPG/0xnRDSe75QpiYYcZuumRY= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr561068hue.1177606412557; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.21.13 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:53:32 -0700 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." In-Reply-To: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A790@EXM1.otc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200704260635.l3Q6ZZhL090019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0A790@EXM1.otc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:53:34 -0000 It can if your storage appliance supports ASIS. Some even operate at the block level, not just the file level. On 4/26/07, GARRISON, TRAVIS J. wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Nicole > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:36 AM > > To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk > > Cc: GARRISON, TRAVIS J.; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Single Instance Service > > > > > Sure it is. You will need to write a small shell script to scan > > > your disk volume and calculate the checksum of each file. When > > > ever it finds a duplicated checksum, then it copies the file into > > > the central store and replaces the on-disk copies with symbolic > > > links. That's fairly trivial to write. > > > > Beside, what should be the behaviour when one wishes to modify his own > > copy of a document? How does Single Instance acts in that case? > > > > If you establish a link, there is only one version of the file, once > > and forever (unless you go and unlink it manually), so when one > > modifies the file, modification applies for everyone. > > > > Olivier > [GARRISON, TRAVIS J.] > > I know with Windows Storage Server, if a user modifies the file, it will > then create the user their own copy of the file. This happens > automatically. Exchange Server is another example of this type of > storage. When someone sends an attachment to several people, the server > saved one copy of the file. I am currently managing 7TB worth of data > with roughly 1 to 2TB of duplicate files. This gets fairly expensive > with a fiber channel san backend. I know it can be done in the windows > world automatically, just wondered if it could be done automatically in > the Unix world also. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:30:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BC016A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F57A13C48A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 2361 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QHTp94087968 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QHToLV087967 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:50 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:30:02 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like > fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources > while none of you checked your sources ... > > Muhahaha ... > > In any event, it's been a fascinating sociological lesson for me. If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the necessary information for checking up on it, we simply can't do anything with it. Sociological lesson? If you're just trying to get a reaction, I think the technical term is actually "trolling". -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2); From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:48:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76B016A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756413C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2AEBC78; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:46 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Chad Perrin Message-Id: <20070426134846.d32e3993.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> References: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 -0000 In response to Chad Perrin : > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like > > fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources > > while none of you checked your sources ... > > > > Muhahaha ... > > > > In any event, it's been a fascinating sociological lesson for me. > > If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check > *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the > necessary information for checking up on it, we simply can't do anything > with it. I gave my source. Have you contacted him? Why are you accusing me of failing to do something that I did? > Sociological lesson? If you're just trying to get a reaction, I think > the technical term is actually "trolling". Don't invent things that aren't there. Yes, it's been a sociological lesson. No, I was not "trying to get a reaction". The major sociological lesson is the reaction that I _did_ get, which I did not expect, and (quite frankly) didn't want -- still don't, for that matter. Perhaps you should switch to decaf? As for me, I will post no more on this topic to questions@ as the subject matter is no longer relevant, and is obviously inflammatory. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:52:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C390416A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2885513C46A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 23187 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 17:52:56 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 0.519245 secs); 26 Apr 2007 17:52:56 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.22) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 17:52:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20696 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 17:52:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 17:52:55 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:52:55 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:52:55 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Derek Ragona" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:52:57 -0000 Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S incorrectly during setup? Thanks, Jay > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader screen >> is >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot >>loader prompt. >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up with >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new hardware >>just for this project. >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >>Thanks for your help. > > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be written. > > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in your > BIOS. > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:59:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F243516A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ED713C487 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QHwRN9086524; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:58:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:57:30 -0500 To: jhall@vandaliamo.net From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband. net> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:06 -0000 At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S >incorrectly during setup? > >Thanks, What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry when you ran sysinstall? How did you partition and slice the hard drive? -Derek >Jay > > > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i > >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. > >> > >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader screen > >> is > >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot > >>loader prompt. > >> > >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up with > >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new hardware > >>just for this project. > >> > >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >> > >>Thanks for your help. > > > > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be written. > > > > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in your > > BIOS. > > > > -Derek > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > > > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:59:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0522B16A40F for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=/A1mEd=J5=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA77013C4C7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=/A1mEd=J5=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan58.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.58] helo=mailscan58.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hh8Fo-0001Gg-NM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:59:40 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] ident=exim) by mailscan58.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1Hh8Fo-0004Ix-9R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:59:40 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] helo=authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan58.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hh8Fe-0004G2-4z; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:59:30 -0400 Received: from cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com ([65.185.51.114] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Hh8Fd-0000YE-SS; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:59:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:04:49 -0400 From: Vulpes Velox To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20070426140449.7e044739@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <44lkgfma9h.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> References: <20070425135628.5334ddf7@vixen42> <44lkgfma9h.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox X-EN-OrigIP: 65.185.51.114 X-EN-OrigHost: cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDAP and xscreensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:42 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:46 -0400 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Vulpes Velox writes: > > > xscreensaver: couldn't get password of "kitsune" > > xscreensaver: 13:54:14: locking is disabled (error getting > > password). xscreensaver: 13:54:14: does xscreensaver need to be > > setuid? consult the manual. > > > > Is what I am getting on the console when I run it. It is setuid. > > The passwords and userinfo is stored in LDAP. > > I haven't used LDAP for passwords, so I can't test this, but my > guess would be that you are missing a pam configuration for > xscreensaver. Something like "auth sufficient pam_ldap.so", perhaps? Just submitted a patch for this... it is currently compiled without LDAP support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:06:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8499F16A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=/A1mEd=J5=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.254.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427C413C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=/A1mEd=J5=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan37.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.37] helo=mailscan37.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hh7rC-0000tt-Mi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:34:14 -0400 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8] ident=exim) by mailscan37.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1Hh7rC-00035n-Is for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:34:14 -0400 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8] helo=authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan37.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Hh7r4-00032j-Ow; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:34:06 -0400 Received: from cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com ([65.185.51.114] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Hh7r4-00033h-Dq; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:34:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:39:27 -0400 From: Vulpes Velox To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20070426133927.6af50c72@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <44lkgfma9h.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> References: <20070425135628.5334ddf7@vixen42> <44lkgfma9h.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox X-EN-OrigIP: 65.185.51.114 X-EN-OrigHost: cpe-65-185-51-114.columbus.res.rr.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDAP and xscreensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:06:31 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:46 -0400 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Vulpes Velox writes: > > > xscreensaver: couldn't get password of "kitsune" > > xscreensaver: 13:54:14: locking is disabled (error getting > > password). xscreensaver: 13:54:14: does xscreensaver need to be > > setuid? consult the manual. > > > > Is what I am getting on the console when I run it. It is setuid. > > The passwords and userinfo is stored in LDAP. > > I haven't used LDAP for passwords, so I can't test this, but my > guess would be that you are missing a pam configuration for > xscreensaver. Something like "auth sufficient pam_ldap.so", perhaps? Yeah, it is there. I did get curious and checked the make file... CONFIGURE_ARGS= --without-pam --with-gl --with-gle --with-xpm --with-xml \ --with-hackdir=${PREFIX}/bin/xscreensaver-hacks/ \ --with-configdir=${PREFIX}/share/xscreensaver/config/ \ --with-jpeg=${LOCALBASE} --without-gnome --without-kerberos \ --without-motif --mandir=${PREFIX}/man It looks like that is the issue right there. Just removed --without-pam and am seeing what happens now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:16:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B948C16A40A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 620BC13C468 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 28532 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 18:16:30 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 0.906732 secs); 26 Apr 2007 18:16:30 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.21) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 18:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31374 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 18:16:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 18:16:28 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:16:28 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:16:28 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Derek Ragona" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:16:31 -0000 > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S >>incorrectly during setup? >> >>Thanks, > > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry when > you ran sysinstall? > > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? > > > -Derek > > Derek, In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives are configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. I did not specify any geometry during the installation. I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). Thanks for your help. Jay >>Jay >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >> >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader >> screen >> >> is >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot >> >>loader prompt. >> >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up >> with >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new >> hardware >> >>just for this project. >> >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be written. >> > >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in >> your >> > BIOS. >> > >> > -Derek >> > >> > -- >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> > believed to be clean. >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > >> >> >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:18:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8A316A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from closetotheledge@yahoo.com) Received: from web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.97.127]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49B5C13C487 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from closetotheledge@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 93865 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 17:51:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=qtim6O/hfJDZHd8hXZWDBvDXiyyjlH4VbKT/zWo8d24uQa3e6A07y88cUju/GFkhTudiqjlMApzPgXVnwmmzUEw/HpVD4SsPLOHUD3f47OA6xFgEWdzwXjTDXQJzNaDeGeX/61YL1ElVAsmKUYP6pVLKApJRhwMLb/qcG0TLWak=; X-YMail-OSG: B4vmyXUVM1kp.4mX0yNNoIdU6Z7vZae7EIunczujkTKwD4wuaWevhY2xHlLtvCRQGA-- Received: from [216.113.237.29] by web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:51:56 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Duane Winner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <509997.91841.qm@web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VPS, Colocation, Dedicated X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:18:37 -0000 Hello, I am looking for any sort of insight, experience from anybody who uses VPS technology to substitute for managing their own infrastructure and servers for business apps. We are looking at different options to unload some of the burden of supporting a network and server infrastructure that is composed of 50+ FreeBSD servers. The concept of VPS technology has been put on the table, along with co-lo and dedicated server options. Web hosting is right out of the question. Requirements: 1. We need to have servers take over the role of the 30+ web servers, which run apache and mzscheme webapps. These web servers to talk to 2+ postgresql databases on seperate servers. 2. The data on the pgsql databases is of a sensitive nature, so it needs to be secured in part by keeping these servers on a separate network segment, accessible only by the web servers, using stunnel encryption. 3. All servers should have some form of firewall protection, either locally (software) or on the network. Preferably network. 4. If using VPS, the FreeBSD image should look and feel just as if we installed it ourselves from scratch, starting off barebones and installing only the apps and services we need. 5. Web server disk space needs to be 10GB. Can scale back to 5GB if ports are kept off the server and compiled offline then synced up. 6. One of our database servers is utilizing 33GB of disk space at the moment, so we would need at least 50GB per server. Findings: I have found about 4-5 providers who offer FreeBSD VSP's. I've evaluated 2: JohnCompanies and Verio. 1. JohnCompanies' VPS image was nearly exactly what I'm looking for -- started off barebones, and I had to do the rest. Just like in my server room. But disk space was abysmal $29/month for 2GB or $69/month for 8GB. 2. Verios turned me off right away between high-pressure sales tactics and an evaluation that saw a base image loaded with crap like it was a Linux or worse, a Windows box: NAS audio server, mp3 player, a default Apache 2.2 install (who said I want 2.2?), that wasn't a port, but built-in shared app! PHP, X....ridiculous. 3. Nobody seems to include any sort of firewall protection -- just throw the server out in the public DMZ, and then there is no option to protect database servers on a private subnet. Not even ipfw is included. Verios told me that their FreeBSD images cannot firewall, but their Linux images can, and then tried to pressure me into just converting to Linux. Sorry, they're off the list now. Summary: I really don't think VPS technology can scale to our requirements or meet the specs we need, in resources or security. Their are other in my group who wanted to investigate VPS technology because of the notion that it is more secure. For instance, there is the concept that because it is "virtual", and more hidden, it would be more difficult for an employee at our provider to get at the data, whereas if we colocated, they could just pull a hard drive and get at the data. Personally, I think it would be easier to hi-jack a VMware session or image that it would be to get through security, and into a locked cabinet at a colo facility and reboot into single user mode or yank out a disk in a RAID array to get to the data. But I'm still willing to be proven wrong, and if anybody can tell me that there is a good VPS provider who can meet these needs, I'm all ears, but otherwise, I'm leaning towards colocation as the best solution. (Also, I should mention we already own the hardware -- servers for all -- why not leverage that investment?) Thanks for any feedback! --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:25:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956E216A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B4313C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QIPAYT086877; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:25:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:24:13 -0500 To: jhall@vandaliamo.net From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband. net> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:25:45 -0000 At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S > >>incorrectly during setup? > >> > >>Thanks, > > > > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry when > > you ran sysinstall? > > > > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? > > > > > > -Derek > > > > > >Derek, > >In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial >SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives are >configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. > >I did not specify any geometry during the installation. > >I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the >appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). > >Thanks for your help. Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any error message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic boot messages if they are not turned on. Does they system boot from a CD ok? -Derek >Jay > > >>Jay > >> > >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an E200i > >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. > >> >> > >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader > >> screen > >> >> is > >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the boot > >> >>loader prompt. > >> >> > >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up > >> with > >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new > >> hardware > >> >>just for this project. > >> >> > >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >> >> > >> >>Thanks for your help. > >> > > >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be written. > >> > > >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in > >> your > >> > BIOS. > >> > > >> > -Derek > >> > > >> > -- > >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> > believed to be clean. > >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>This message has been scanned for viruses and > >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >>believed to be clean. > >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > > > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:31:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A55516A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4BAA13C465 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 18730 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 1.16429 secs); 26 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.15) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 25230 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Derek Ragona" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:10 -0000 > At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S >> >>incorrectly during setup? >> >> >> >>Thanks, >> > >> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry >> when >> > you ran sysinstall? >> > >> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? >> > >> > >> > -Derek >> > >> > >> >>Derek, >> >>In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial >>SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives are >>configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. >> >>I did not specify any geometry during the installation. >> >>I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the >>appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). >> >>Thanks for your help. > > Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any error > message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic boot > messages if they are not turned on. > > Does they system boot from a CD ok? > > -Derek Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs during the install without any problems. The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. Thanks, Jay > > > > >>Jay >> >> >>Jay >> >> >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an >> E200i >> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >> >> >> >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader >> >> screen >> >> >> is >> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the >> boot >> >> >>loader prompt. >> >> >> >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up >> >> with >> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new >> >> hardware >> >> >>just for this project. >> >> >> >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> >> > >> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be >> written. >> >> > >> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in >> >> your >> >> > BIOS. >> >> > >> >> > -Derek >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> > believed to be clean. >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >>believed to be clean. >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > -- >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> > believed to be clean. >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > >> >> >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:35:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CC616A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miguel.alc@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D7B13C4B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miguel.alc@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so352623ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=m2IMKP0fmas9L0Bza4Iy6derNXmuPZw3LwnhEP+l82b/B8ybz1XFor4JVomB131OsondgOND59cY6kHqXI3O2ZTjJl1ywgLALuS0wJnnIU2Y+eDoOP1ABKpkCxc725Mq55K0KgA+L290SnJHwVj/vGpTdzRprHZ6SZs/p0LjD4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=GLwPaeXnbJFPtkaxgWobwJkJcsAWAT2MLDESj5MKPgfJnQ4IUXSo3aBayMKXXi+e631od9GnBS/JN6FvO8L/ic6SqJtbvql8jA3UVPvgZhZFgi5S3EbWgGmB6WwNYY/uAV04jIkj8L/Teo3AoJxKUQhS+AwBkg1A4Gr8OygZkK0= Received: by 10.100.153.17 with SMTP id a17mr1381367ane.1177612527207; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.58.10 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5855700c0704261135m7ddc06dbuc74e501e9bef3ca1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:35:27 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Miguel_Alc=C3=A1ntara?=" To: faqfreebsd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: PF NAt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:35:29 -0000 aGVsbG8gdG8gYWxsIHRoZSBwZW9wbGUsIGknbSB0cnlpbmcgZm9yIGRheXMgdG8gZ2V0IHdvcmsg bmF0dGluZywgYnV0Cm5vdGhpbmcgaGFwcGVucy4KCkZyZWVCU0QgNi4yCgovZXRjL3JjLmNvbmYK CmdhdGV3YXlfZW5hYmxlID0gIllFUyIKCmlmY29uZmlnX3ZyMD0iaW5ldCAxOTIuMTY4LjEuMiBu ZXRtYXNrIDI1NS4yNTUuMjU1LjAiCmlmY29uZmlnX3hsMD0iaW5ldCAxOTIuMTY4LjEuMyBuZXRt YXNrIDB4ZmZmZmZmZmYiCnNxdWlkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgoKLS0tCgovZXRjL3BmLmNvbmYKCmV4 dGVyX2lmID0gInZyMCIKaW50ZXJfaWYgPSAieGwwIgoKbmF0IG9uICRleHRlcl9pZiBmcm9tICRp bnRlcl9pZiAgdG8gYW55IC0+ICRleHRlcl9pZgpyZHIgb24gJGludGVyX2lmICBpbmV0IHByb3Rv IHRjcCBmcm9tICBhbnkgdG8gYW55IHBvcnQgd3d3IC0+IDEyNy4wLjAuMSBwb3J0CjMxMjgKCgov dXNyL2xvY2FsL2V0Yy9zcXVpZC9zcXVpZC5jb25mCgpodHRwX3BvcnQgMzEyOCB0cmFuc3BhcmVu dAp2aXNpYmxlX2hvc3RuYW1lIGZvbwoKI2FsbCB0aGUgcmVzdCBpcyBsZWZ0IGJ5IGRlZmF1bHQK ClRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIGlzIHRoYXQgYW5vdGhlciBtYWNoaW5lIGNhbid0IHN1cmYgb3IganVzdCBw aW5nIHRoZSBleHRlcm5hbCBuaWMKdnIwLiBXaGF0IEknbSBkb2luZyB3cm9uZywgaGVscCBtZSBw bGVhc2UuIFRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLgotLSAKJCBtaWd1ZWxfYWxjw6FudGFyYSAkCgoi4oCm IGVtcGllem8gYWPDoSBjb24gbGEgaWRlYSBkZSBpciBhbGzDoSBlbiB1biBleHBlcmltZW50byBw YXJhIGF1bWVudGFyLCBwb3IKZWplbXBsbywgbGEgdmVsb2NpZGFkIGRlbCBjYWJsZSBpbnRlcm9j ZcOhbmljbyBkZWwgQXRsw6FudGljbzsgcGVybyBjdWFuZG8gaGUKbGxlZ2FkbyBlbiBwYXJ0ZSBh IGxhIG1ldGEsIG1lIGVuY3VlbnRybyBjb24gdW4gZmVuw7NtZW5vIHF1ZSBtZSBlbXB1amEgZW4K b3RyYSBkaXJlY2Npw7NuIFsuLi5dIGhhY2lhIGFsZ28gY29tcGxldGFtZW50ZSBpbmVzcGVyYWRv Ii4KClRob21hcyBBLiBFZGlzb24uCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:39:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5448916A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A4813C45A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C324768621E6B; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:40:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id o2kfGWrAItS7; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id A60E568621E6A; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:40:19 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426184019.GB3401@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> <20070426083438.52397267.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <07DD32B1-E79A-42D4-9059-2CBD98C8C3C8@cc.usu.edu> <57D63937-4610-4917-B9DF-2943034D2B18@earlham.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57D63937-4610-4917-B9DF-2943034D2B18@earlham.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:39:50 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Kevin Hunter wrote: >At 11:22a -0400 on 26 Apr 2007, Hal wrote: >>On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote: >>>In general, utilizing public/private keys for remote >>>authentication is /much/ more secure than passwords. >> >>There is some debate about which is more secure >>public/private keys or username/password. > >Yep, thank you for that reminder. :-) I suppose we now know what >I'm arguing! > >> With public/private keys anyone who has >> access to your machine has access to any machine >> your machine has a key on. > >Without a passphrase, I'd agree. The key word that I made sure to >put in was 'remote'. With passphrases, it becomes a two-step >authentication, one locally to unlock the private key, and one >remotely to at least confirm that you have the other half of the key. As a rule, we restrict systems to public/private key access with secure shell. On a few systems where people claim they need to use username/password authentication, we restrict access using tcp wrappers to specific systems. One of the biggest problems I see is how to handle things like cron jobs and automatic updates securely without opening up the can of worms of identities without pass phrases. Using rsync modules, restricted to specific hosts is very useful as it permits fine grained control by directory and IP address, and can be done in many cases over insecure channels as updates of existing files with rsync only transmits pieces of the files, not the whole thing. Many of the things we use this for aren't very sensitive information, djbdns data files, postfix configuration, and such. We also use XMLRPC with https to control some things such as running make in the /etc/postfix directory where we have the Makefile set up to rebuild anything necessary as changes are made. We have an XMLRPC server (written in python not php thank you very much :-), which is accessible under the normal Apache restricted security. This server has a limited set of procedures than can do things like restrict access based on the IP address of the client. This server can then make an XMLRPC call to another XMLRPC server running with root priviledges on localhost to do the processing. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 ``People from East Germany have found the West so confusing. It's so much easier when you have only one party.'' -- Linus Torvalde, Linux Expo Canada when asked about confusion over many Linux distributions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 18:59:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDB316A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA4313C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so360468ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:59:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MAuLtOVjZYeGh5JZeYQiObMUfKYuPl8vR/eJfcsjafc33zYRelsEPgRITEkbNQazKRYi0WQWis9a6ClLYUlVbsOAmDpMZluvJlXLvYhiH3absd36kTPrJkSjbcbBxwKAgADZcDpGlZzQJwzhcBDhx9GXKls9fL5UIbgQpX7pNds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ecfB8QWki3v+Roq5/72kgofSoe6eHhOdaddp1PWynqyIzcRKyWPB3l4OMUw1tlUcgjZ1IMVFWzm4vvWFVBEcX0HS/41aDfh5klpFq4o1PDi492SgfDdGPxTxJQH7ulVbrB/MOXRZ/GhlPhud2o2/VKIpjAp7LXNZCyRo56YQVuM= Received: by 10.100.111.16 with SMTP id j16mr1398757anc.1177613962918; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.6 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1455a3d90704261159t323cc7ffm74e7b311c7e2a1c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:59:22 -0300 From: freenity To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1455a3d90704251514m40d09651mf125a5a530f713f4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> <462F9349.4070706@daleco.biz> <1455a3d90704251514m40d09651mf125a5a530f713f4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:59:29 -0000 Well. I installed nvidia-settings and could configure the refresh rate in that windows to 75, then I applied changes and saved it in xirg.conf. But when I go to Display options in KDE it shows 50hz. Whats wrong? Is kde right? how do I know the real refresh rate.?? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:00:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2808216A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC1113C4B0 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonmaster@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so360842ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:00:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GDRkR4BER9KPn0Nc8pb4Q/o4aa589fMDEcWnIsHRoKLbPkLcYB6gimOxj6BMdmqS5jrTlRc62FxmV4THX4ohKRKTcZ3qeaJT+1X47HfRUR8CJ2wNaFhKYI/VsxiTMKbg7GZdZT18L0SiNu8Jx2iHx6TLepH3nVWfINHGto103xo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kVzFIxHsr/MZ7Fr7AzMgLfj/DYG3txGGB9kIRDcge/5J7H1NhM7JDdhCHK2p89noFA4tYZ+Pr6N2NvTYnVb+5SB3UbZBl+uX/WGmllQ+ViicKaszL4P1fmhgkLTcrJSG12u+DlZJe1IpuUzVc7hYRyMV5HD3/m5xNnzOdfQjrg8= Received: by 10.100.94.3 with SMTP id r3mr1410426anb.1177614031618; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.6 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1455a3d90704261200i310be02eg770cda4f4fe4d61a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:00:31 -0300 From: freenity To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1455a3d90704261159t323cc7ffm74e7b311c7e2a1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> <462F9349.4070706@daleco.biz> <1455a3d90704251514m40d09651mf125a5a530f713f4@mail.gmail.com> <1455a3d90704261159t323cc7ffm74e7b311c7e2a1c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:00:35 -0000 p.s. This is my xorg.conf file generated by nvidia-settings: # nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings # nvidia-settings: version 1.0 (root@feudaltimes) Thu Apr 26 15:10:10 ART 2007 Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Layout0" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "extmod" Load "type1" Load "freetype" Load "glx" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "Xinerama" "0" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "PS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # generated from default Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Section "Monitor" # HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Unknown" ModelName "LG L1740B" HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0 VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Videocard0" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation" BoardName "GeForce 6100" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 16 Option "metamodes" "1280x1024_75 +0+0; 1280x1024_75 +0+0; 1024x768 +0+0; 800x600 +0+0; 640x480 +0+0; 1280x1024_60 +0+0;" SubSection "Display" Depth 16 Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection EndSection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:03:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7D616A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF1213C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFDE5086C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3QJ3JdB020313 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3QJ3J1l020312 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:19 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:21 -0000 On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 15:44:20 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > [...] > I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's > list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name > or email of the original sender in the diplay. It doesn't for me. The only time I see the list name in place of the message sender's email address is for my own posts, where it displays the To: address instead of the From: address, which is what I prefer. Perhaps you have something wrong with your setting of index_format? Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:03:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C84B16A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035D213C4BC for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (a17-128-113-35.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3QJ3hHg011912; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id B440229C006; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-a25dcbb0000013cb-84-4630f78f59c2 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 9F5E930400C; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5855700c0704261135m7ddc06dbuc74e501e9bef3ca1@mail.gmail.com> References: <5855700c0704261135m7ddc06dbuc74e501e9bef3ca1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1B9C1908-4B89-4672-9912-1887A29D3623@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:42 -0700 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Alc=E1ntara?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: faqfreebsd Subject: Re: PF NAt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:44 -0000 On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Miguel Alc=E1ntara wrote: > /etc/rc.conf > > gateway_enable =3D "YES" > > ifconfig_vr0=3D"inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_xl0=3D"inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 0xffffffff" > squid_enable=3D"YES" You're not going to have much luck trying to do NAT if both =20 interfaces are on the same subnet. Other machines will simply =20 broadcast to the other LAN addresses without being re-written by this =20= machine. For NAT to work, the traffic has to flow through this machine as a =20 router (or gateway), which means that they can't be using something =20 like 192.168.1.1 as the router. You'll have to change vr0 to use a =20 publicly routable IP if your want to use it as the "external NIC". --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:15:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB46316A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A97413C4AD for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 10564 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2007 19:15:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=qZVE/QnTJSBiv4ihCDS2FODyUnJMWR6LLitSYrnwmKewxdTB3jQ/c5/S2jVJ8/AXhRhBeX2KkpWMalQtDJ/MvdIQG2uKUuh6QevII10/0bnWDbFi9pU0KQatF65gg4IiRJlVjoL//sfv8XBMDFk6K53m7PU9hYhRndU6tlXUBwI=; X-YMail-OSG: dN1OX.wVM1maEPCBnjkX3tj1SJgTPtOGmq_uRCm3z47IXyZeGcM9lcle.z7OzDtmJrxHZrT.mz_0gFqDqn6BMDohgV7DE79VpQCaNxywvLxujeJ38Kbn4snssbsCEv4- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:06 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:15:06 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: beech@alaskaparadise.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704252310.45963.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <50606.9375.qm@web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:15:08 -0000 --- Beech Rintoul wrote: > > Beech Rintoul wrote: On > Wednesday 25 > April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > > Will someone please lead me in the right > direction towards > > > resolving the following network issue? > > > > > > I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that > consists of a router > > > and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP > Pro and the other > > > Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the > Internet via a cable > > > modem that goes through the router. The router > is set up to be > > > the DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a > non-unique IP > > > address. > > > > > > Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, > everybody was getting > > > along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically > assigned to the > > > pc's). > > > > > > I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, > selected "Configure > > > additional network interfaces" from the > sysinstall menu, selected > > > "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast > Ethernet card" from > > > the top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts > to try to > > > configure IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network > Configuration > > > dialog contained the following values (which I > did not alter): > > > > > > Host: dhcppc0 > > > Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) > > > IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 > > > Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) > > > Configuration for Interface fxp0: > > > IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 > > > Netmask: 255.255.255.0 > > > Extra options: (blank) > > > > > > Note that the Host field does not match the > hostname of the > > > FreeBSD box, which is named "SERVER" (real > creative, huh?). I > > > guess I should have changed the Host field to > "SERVER", eh? > > > > > > Then I got the following console messages on the > FreeBSD server: > > > > > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp > 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using > > > my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 > 14:07:05 dhcpp0 > > > kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP > address > > > xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > > > > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and > found that the > > > FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as > the Windows XP box > > > (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the > FreeBSD box being > > > assigned a non-unique IP address? > > > > 1. Check that your router's dhcp server is set up > properly. > > > > 2. Check that the windows box is not set up with a > static ip. The > > box could be hard coded to an ip address and your > dhcp server > > thinks the lease is free. > > > > Other than that you need to supply more info. > > > > Beech > > > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > I'll double-check the things you listed. If you > can tell me what > > additional info I need to supply and where to get > it, I'll be happy > > to oblige. Thanks... > > > > On the XP box what does the output of 'ipconfig > /all' tell you about the DHCP lease? Lease Obtained: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36:42 AM Lease Expires: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:36:42 AM (also says "Dhcp Enabled: Yes" and "Autoconfiguration enabled: Yes") Given these settings, I don't think I need to run ipconfig /renew on this system... Note: I wasn't able to get on the Vista box to get current ipconfig /all output. An older printout shows "DHCP Enabled: No", but it was enabled last time I checked. I'll check again. > On the FreeBSD box what is in /etc/rc.conf? I had a feeling I'd find something like this, but did not know where to look): ------------------------------------------------------ hostname="SERVER" (this is the hostname I want to use) ipv6_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" samba_enable="YES" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Apr 25 13:38:08 2007 ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP" ipv6_enable="YES" hostname="dhcppc0." ------------------------------------------------------ Note that there are two each of the ipv6_enable and hostname entries. I assume I should remove one of each. I want to use hostname "SERVER". If I delete this one, will it work?: hostname="dhcppc0." Please advise as to what to change. > On your router what is the DHCP range set to? and > how long do the leases last before they expire? > > And from the other post it's not possible to > "accidentally" make the FreeBSD box a DHCP server. > You would have to install the isc-dhcpd > port, then configure and start it. In any case, I verified that it's not installed. > If all of the above looks ok, go to /var/db and > delete anything that says "dhclient.leases" then > restart your machine and see if you get a new IP. Found dbclient.leases.fxp0 containing 2 "lease {...}" entries and moved it to $HOME (will delete once it's all working). I was surprised to find that the entries were for the Vista system (not the XP box). I'll verify that DHCP is enabled on the Vista box. One more question: When using DHCP, do I need to do anything to enable all hosts on the LAN to know each other by hostname (i.e., do I need to add entries to /etc/hosts file?)? Once I reboot the FreeBSD box and ensure that DHCP is enabled on all hosts, should I be able to ping the Windoze systems by hostname (does not currently work)? Thanks to Beech and all who responded! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:26:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180AC16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88C513C46A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pereyra.roberto@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so164298nze for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FK3yd95YGFbqoTzeRID6e78bbAlbAnAzCGsGS4UZ+i8UMx/zAxOoL6/8BhkSukyYu5rZu9V4rk2X1df6LkJVc1YU5/iDv5/63iAltTbI1iYPAnoPWzeBTorzJt0mFdgVWGZsc3PguU7itp6eJJQeQ6PKR7gMQVdqUDADJplR08s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S3cTMMppMyNN4naSplJhSgIgxtKEtYO09+PMN5qfzHuVN0NQF+UmJGES1zDXPETZFlL8Ckyqf5toRNiAazpsFxOFP4Qy9pouGVh5KlBeyug2roVWjG0nChGkZEpNnXQ/3HM2/YqbeSKyPL6v0eXlophbFojpH7Q9IEykc5+4Q88= Received: by 10.114.147.1 with SMTP id u1mr734370wad.1177615616465; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.13.5 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:26:56 -0300 From: "Roberto Pereyra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46308EDF.9080602@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46308EDF.9080602@gmail.com> Subject: Re: jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:58 -0000 Thanks to all!!! roberto 2007/4/26, Karol Kwiatkowski : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Roberto Pereyra wrote: > > hi > > > > I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have > > this error when I start the jail (jail0): > > > > srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start > > Configuring jails:. > > Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist > > jail0. > > srv1# > > > > > > What I do wrong ? > > [snip] > > > This is my /etc/rc.conf > [...] > > ifconfig_sk0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" > [...] > > jail_jail0_ip="192.168.0.3" # jail's IP address > > Is 192.168.0.3 assigned to any interface? Have a look at ifconfig(8) > output. You can add an alias with ifconfig and/or put something similar > to /etc/rc.conf (assuming sk0 interface): > > % ifconfig_sk0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" > > HTH, > > Karol > > - -- > Karol Kwiatkowski > OpenPGP 0x06E09309 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGMI7fezeoPAwGIYsRCEy1AKCDhJxHggkdcANKc6GToJUSLFMfVwCdF+I4 > GFW56bytWUfTavzmfhKzfJw= > =0fDD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline http://www.contenidosonline.com.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:29:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49D016A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2841413C44C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QJS6dL087712; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:28:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426142358.026d42a0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:27:08 -0500 To: jhall@vandaliamo.net From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband. net> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:29:11 -0000 At 01:31 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > > At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S > >> >>incorrectly during setup? > >> >> > >> >>Thanks, > >> > > >> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry > >> when > >> > you ran sysinstall? > >> > > >> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? > >> > > >> > > >> > -Derek > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>Derek, > >> > >>In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial > >>SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives are > >>configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. > >> > >>I did not specify any geometry during the installation. > >> > >>I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the > >>appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). > >> > >>Thanks for your help. > > > > Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any error > > message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic boot > > messages if they are not turned on. > > > > Does they system boot from a CD ok? > > > > -Derek > >Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs >during the install without any problems. > >The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. > >The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. > >Thanks, > > >Jay Can you boot the CD, mount the root filesystem and check that everything is there (/boot /kernel, etc.) -Derek > > > > > > > > > >>Jay > >> > >> >>Jay > >> >> > >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an > >> E200i > >> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader > >> >> screen > >> >> >> is > >> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the > >> boot > >> >> >>loader prompt. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up > >> >> with > >> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new > >> >> hardware > >> >> >>just for this project. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Thanks for your help. > >> >> > > >> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be > >> written. > >> >> > > >> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in > >> >> your > >> >> > BIOS. > >> >> > > >> >> > -Derek > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> >> > believed to be clean. > >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>-- > >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> >>believed to be clean. > >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> > believed to be clean. > >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>This message has been scanned for viruses and > >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >>believed to be clean. > >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:40:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF8516A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from drone1.qsi.net.nz (drone1-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz [202.89.128.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C473D13C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: (qmail 2022 invoked by uid 0); 26 Apr 2007 19:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chen.org.nz) ([202.89.146.5]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 19:39:55 -0000 Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 589327E85D; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:39:52 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:39:52 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Ivan Rambius Ivanov Message-ID: <20070426193952.GD5788@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <89ce7f740704260143h1d5e2e8bia9008835b5379e1f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740704260143h1d5e2e8bia9008835b5379e1f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Unable to login using KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:40:00 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:43:55AM +0300, Ivan Rambius Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > I am debugging a (seemingly) KDE-related problem on a FreeBSD laptop. > The version of FreeBSD is 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #0. I am starting in in > debug mode. It is using kdm as a login screen. The corresponding line > in /etc/ttys is > > ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure > > The problem is: when I type the username and password and try to login > it returns me to the login screen again. What are the contents of your ~/.xsession? Check ~/.xsession-errors as well. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beer. Now there's a temporary solution." - Homer Simpson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:50:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F89816A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C0213C45E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so377944ana for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:50:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pRCfnTxTJhb3xpjuxOlIeONMbGIZUBfoZYnLObqV03coGLsS3ZPP7d2eAOW0LO4mcdbEc1OwGssgKEhGUIG2V6Fo29bJv8FwyT3n4pkQ5Ebsv+ZJ2kIQWWNa6VPEyI5nZbCT89voTKTOCtTvvKhNN38PIvmOgbqnOHhEylaqqwA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fS/Yq8v6drWFTJebZoQKICIuPpz/1XvCLF0IvyWAgt1tNlAJt4eYEsgBR9dJeTu0gYodQqb1xK/hpWs/afQ5sniCK+pILQUp4dWXbqFGsk8pGOM8q2J948dWE2WEzNqQ1c9NlhtB2IxkpEgzu32Zy0CrF4oS/hVLBQTras73cQ4= Received: by 10.100.178.7 with SMTP id a7mr1416024anf.1177615597801; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.12.12 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6293ba970704261226s6fff67fcib26b8fa88238ea2f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:26:37 -0400 From: Steve To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Recommendations on how to find and remove sparse files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:50:51 -0000 I'm trying to find a method to recursively find and remove sparse files from a directory tree. It appears the 'find' utility won't work in this case. I'm running 6.2-R. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 19:56:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90B16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5047913C4B7 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 29551 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 19:56:58 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 0.886332 secs); 26 Apr 2007 19:56:58 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.14) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 19:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1102 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:56 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2827.65.117.48.155.1177617416.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070426142358.026d42a0@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426142358.026d42a0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:56 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Derek Ragona" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:59 -0000 I have been able to make the system boot. I had to change one of the Array options to "Max Boot enabled 8gb". I found this in an older post concerning a different controller, but it worked. Specifically, my server is an ML350 with the E200i controller. Thanks to everyone for your help. Jay > At 01:31 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> > At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the >> C/H/S >> >> >>incorrectly during setup? >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the >> geometry >> >> when >> >> > you ran sysinstall? >> >> > >> >> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -Derek >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>Derek, >> >> >> >>In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial >> >>SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives >> are >> >>configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. >> >> >> >>I did not specify any geometry during the installation. >> >> >> >>I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the >> >>appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any >> error >> > message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic >> boot >> > messages if they are not turned on. >> > >> > Does they system boot from a CD ok? >> > >> > -Derek >> >>Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs >>during the install without any problems. >> >>The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. >> >>The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. >> >>Thanks, >> >> >>Jay > > Can you boot the CD, mount the root filesystem and check that everything > is > there (/boot /kernel, etc.) > > -Derek > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>Jay >> >> >> >> >>Jay >> >> >> >> >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an >> >> E200i >> >> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader >> >> >> screen >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to >> the >> >> boot >> >> >> >>loader prompt. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end >> up >> >> >> with >> >> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new >> >> >> hardware >> >> >> >>just for this project. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be >> >> written. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on >> in >> >> >> your >> >> >> > BIOS. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -Derek >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> >> > believed to be clean. >> >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> >>believed to be clean. >> >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> > believed to be clean. >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >>believed to be clean. >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > -- >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> > believed to be clean. >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:02:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A66E16A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BB113C45A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2DC7DC7; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:02:27 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:02:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <50606.9375.qm@web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <50606.9375.qm@web58110.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261202.23459.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP/NIC IP address contention issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:29 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > --- Beech Rintoul wrote: > > > Beech Rintoul wrote: On > > > > Wednesday 25 > > > > April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > > > Will someone please lead me in the right > > > > direction towards > > > > > > resolving the following network issue? > > > > > > > > I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that > > > > consists of a router > > > > > > and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP > > > > Pro and the other > > > > > > Windows Vista. The lan is connected to the > > > > Internet via a cable > > > > > > modem that goes through the router. The router > > > > is set up to be > > > > > > the DHCP server. Now it is being assigned a > > > > non-unique IP > > > > > > address. > > > > > > > > Before adding the FreeBSD box to the mix, > > > > everybody was getting > > > > > > along fine (unique IP addresses were dynamically > > > > assigned to the > > > > > > pc's). > > > > > > > > I connected the FreeBSD box to the router, > > > > selected "Configure > > > > > > additional network interfaces" from the > > > > sysinstall menu, selected > > > > > > "fxp0 Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B PCI Fast > > > > Ethernet card" from > > > > > > the top of the list and clicked "OK" to prompts > > > > to try to > > > > > > configure IPv6 and DCHP. When done, the Network > > > > Configuration > > > > > > dialog contained the following values (which I > > > > did not alter): > > > > Host: dhcppc0 > > > > Domain: (the cable provider's domain name) > > > > IPv4 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 > > > > Name server: (IP address of ISP's name server) > > > > Configuration for Interface fxp0: > > > > IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.33 > > > > Netmask: 255.255.255.0 > > > > Extra options: (blank) > > > > > > > > Note that the Host field does not match the > > > > hostname of the > > > > > > FreeBSD box, which is named "SERVER" (real > > > > creative, huh?). I > > > > > > guess I should have changed the Host field to > > > > "SERVER", eh? > > > > > > Then I got the following console messages on the > > > > FreeBSD server: > > > > 1) "Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp > > > > 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using > > > > > > my IP address xxx.xxx.x.xx!" 2) "dhcppc0# Apr 25 > > > > 14:07:05 dhcpp0 > > > > > > kernel: arp: 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP > > > > address > > > > > > xxx.xxx.x.xx!" > > > > > > > > I ran "ipconfig /all" on both Windows boxes and > > > > found that the > > > > > > FreeBSD box is assigned the same IP address as > > > > the Windows XP box > > > > > > (which had that IP address FIRST). Why is the > > > > FreeBSD box being > > > > > > assigned a non-unique IP address? > > > > > > 1. Check that your router's dhcp server is set up > > > > properly. > > > > > 2. Check that the windows box is not set up with a > > > > static ip. The > > > > > box could be hard coded to an ip address and your > > > > dhcp server > > > > > thinks the lease is free. > > > > > > Other than that you need to supply more info. > > > > > > Beech > > > > > > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > > I'll double-check the things you listed. If you > > > > can tell me what > > > > > additional info I need to supply and where to get > > > > it, I'll be happy > > > > > to oblige. Thanks... > > > > On the XP box what does the output of 'ipconfig > > /all' tell you about the DHCP lease? > > Lease Obtained: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36:42 AM > Lease Expires: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:36:42 AM > (also says "Dhcp Enabled: Yes" and "Autoconfiguration > enabled: Yes") > Given these settings, I don't think I need to run > ipconfig /renew on this system... > > Note: I wasn't able to get on the Vista box to get > current ipconfig /all output. An older printout shows > "DHCP Enabled: No", but it was enabled last time I > checked. I'll check again. > > > On the FreeBSD box what is in /etc/rc.conf? > > I had a feeling I'd find something like this, but did > not know where to look): > ------------------------------------------------------ > hostname="SERVER" (this is the hostname I want to use) > ipv6_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="YES" > samba_enable="YES" > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- > # Wed Apr 25 13:38:08 2007 > ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP" > ipv6_enable="YES" > hostname="dhcppc0." > ------------------------------------------------------ > Note that there are two each of the ipv6_enable and > hostname entries. > I assume I should remove one of each. I want to use > hostname "SERVER". If I delete this one, will it > work?: > hostname="dhcppc0." > Please advise as to what to change. > Delete any duplicates that you don't want. You should only have one entry for hostname=, same for ifconfig_fxp0=. > > On your router what is the DHCP range set to? and > > how long do the leases last before they expire? > > > > > > And from the other post it's not possible to > > "accidentally" make the FreeBSD box a DHCP server. > > You would have to install the isc-dhcpd > > port, then configure and start it. > > In any case, I verified that it's not installed. > > > If all of the above looks ok, go to /var/db and > > delete anything that says "dhclient.leases" then > > restart your machine and see if you get a new IP. > > Found dbclient.leases.fxp0 containing 2 "lease {...}" > entries and moved it to $HOME (will delete once it's > all working). You don't need to save that. A new one has already been generated. Backing up is always a good idea. > > I was surprised to find that the entries were for the > Vista system (not the XP box). I'll verify that DHCP > is enabled on the Vista box. > > One more question: When using DHCP, do I need to do > anything to enable all hosts on the LAN to know each > other by hostname (i.e., do I need to add entries to > /etc/hosts file?)? Once I reboot the FreeBSD box and > ensure that DHCP is enabled on all hosts, should I be > able to ping the Windoze systems by hostname (does not > currently work)? Adding your machines to /etc/hosts is a good idea, but bear in mind since you are using DHCP the IP addresses may change from time to time and you will need to correct the file. > > Thanks to Beech and all who responded! > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:02:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467AD16A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2435213C4C3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 14668 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:02:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 20:02:52 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E3A732842E; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:02:51 -0400 (EDT) To: WarrenHead References: <462FAD5A.4090400@gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:02:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462FAD5A.4090400@gmail.com> (warrenhead@gmail.com's message of "Wed\, 25 Apr 2007 21\:34\:50 +0200") Message-ID: <441wi6lx90.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: remote x forwarding through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:53 -0000 WarrenHead writes: > Hi list, > > I'm trying to use ssh to forward X from a local FreeBSD server to my > ubuntu machine. > I'm unable to get X forwarded. (ssh is working) > > I set these options: > ubuntu: > /etc/ssh/ssh_config > Host * > ForwardX11 yes > ForwardAgent yes > > FreeBSD > /etc/ssh/sshd_config > X11Forwarding yes > X11DisplayOffset 10 > X11UseLocalhost yes > UseLogin no > > I didn't set the $DISPLAY variable, on purpose. > > After I log into the server and start xterm (for instance) I get this > message: DISPLAY is not set. > SSH should do that for me but I guess it doesn't. > I don't know why. > > I logged into FreeBSD with these commands: > ssh -v freebsd > ssh -v -X freebsd > ssh -v -X -A freebsd Did the (verbose) output from those commands mention X11? > What could be the cause? Client or server? My guess would be server, although Ubuntu could always be doing something weird. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:03:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D5616A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A9913C4D5 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l3QK3BfW035284; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:03:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:01:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <509997.91841.qm@web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <509997.91841.qm@web63912.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261601.04861.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Duane Winner Subject: Re: VPS, Colocation, Dedicated X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:12 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007 01:51:56 pm Duane Winner wrote: > I am looking for any sort of insight, experience from anybody who uses VPS > technology to substitute for managing their own infrastructure and servers > for business apps. > > We are looking at different options to unload some of the burden of > supporting a network and server infrastructure that is composed of 50+ > FreeBSD servers. > > The concept of VPS technology has been put on the table, along with co-lo > and dedicated server options. Web hosting is right out of the question. I've had a VPS with JohnCompanies for quite some time and have been very happy with it. A client of mine also hosts dedicated/managed servers with them with good results. > Requirements: > > 1. We need to have servers take over the role of the 30+ web servers, > which run apache and mzscheme webapps. These web servers to talk to 2+ > postgresql databases on seperate servers. > > 2. The data on the pgsql databases is of a sensitive nature, so it needs > to be secured in part by keeping these servers on a separate network > segment, accessible only by the web servers, using stunnel encryption. You may want to consider running the webservers as VPS'es and the database servers on dedicated hardware (your own or managed). That would make it easy to directly control the network environment on the database side, at least. > 3. All servers should have some form of firewall protection, either > locally (software) or on the network. Preferably network. > > 4. If using VPS, the FreeBSD image should look and feel just as if we > installed it ourselves from scratch, starting off barebones and installing > only the apps and services we need. That's what JC gives you. > 5. Web server disk space needs to be 10GB. Can scale back to 5GB if ports > are kept off the server and compiled offline then synced up. > > 6. One of our database servers is utilizing 33GB of disk space at the > moment, so we would need at least 50GB per server. Another reason to not go VPS for the DB servers. > Findings: > > I have found about 4-5 providers who offer FreeBSD VSP's. I've evaluated > 2: JohnCompanies and Verio. > > 1. JohnCompanies' VPS image was nearly exactly what I'm looking for -- > started off barebones, and I had to do the rest. Just like in my server > room. But disk space was abysmal $29/month for 2GB or $69/month for 8GB. I do think the default disk space offered with their packages is pretty low, but you can get as much more as you want/need for an extra $2/GB/mo. I would recommend contacting them directly (sales@), they are helpful and have a clue. > 2. Verios turned me off right away between high-pressure sales tactics and > an evaluation that saw a base image loaded with crap like it was a Linux or > worse, a Windows box: NAS audio server, mp3 player, a default Apache 2.2 > install (who said I want 2.2?), that wasn't a port, but built-in shared > app! PHP, X....ridiculous. Thanks for the warning... > 3. Nobody seems to include any sort of firewall protection -- just throw > the server out in the public DMZ, and then there is no option to protect > database servers on a private subnet. Not even ipfw is included. Verios > told me that their FreeBSD images cannot firewall, but their Linux images > can, and then tried to pressure me into just converting to Linux. Sorry, > they're off the list now. Again from my experience with JC.. I don't know if or how well individual VPS'es are firewalled from each other, but you can specify your own firewall rules to be run on the firewall between the VPS server host(s) and the rest of the universe. If you were to put your databases on dedicated managed servers I'm sure you could get them on their own segment, and you could run whatever firewall you choose locally. > Summary: > > I really don't think VPS technology can scale to our requirements or meet > the specs we need, in resources or security. Their are other in my group > who wanted to investigate VPS technology because of the notion that it is > more secure. For instance, there is the concept that because it is > "virtual", and more hidden, it would be more difficult for an employee at > our provider to get at the data, whereas if we colocated, they could just > pull a hard drive and get at the data. Personally, I think it would be > easier to hi-jack a VMware session or image that it would be to get through > security, and into a locked cabinet at a colo facility and reboot into > single user mode or yank out a disk in a RAID array to get to the data. JC has their own segment/cage/whatever at their datacenter with their own personnel onsite 24x7. I do know that JC tech's can access the complete filesystem of any VPS at any time without any downtime, impact or evidence on the VPS itself. This is handy for e.g. backup/restore purposes but could be viewed as a security concern. On a dedicated server, you would notice downtime (disks yanked or reboot to single-user) or at least log entries (network access) if anyone tried to access your data, barring any OS security exploits. > But I'm still willing to be proven wrong, and if anybody can tell me that > there is a good VPS provider who can meet these needs, I'm all ears, but > otherwise, I'm leaning towards colocation as the best solution. I think straight VPS is probably out. Given the size of your operation I'd be surprised if you couldn't find someone who'd cooperate with you to set up some kind of hybrid setup. > (Also, I should mention we already own the hardware -- servers for all -- > why not leverage that investment?) That is a pretty big investment, esp considering setup time.. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:03:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5339816A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FCB13C4B0 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [85.176.43.209] (helo=janh.freebsd) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1HhABr1H8E-0007Uv; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:39 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+iFYpPseS+6rWY/7bSUXGSXCP1gI3GqBakrRS ZJp216mZzQ4VGZj68zl/jNjqSLWQ3NNwk3x7oZP5LXRtgF9Rg1 CB4NY6M+lGYkLplu/BSpA== Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:03:46 -0000 Drew Sanford wrote: > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it starts > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a > file on any start up, it crashes. BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz I guess someone should file a bug report... Here are my packages that are required by Firefox in case you want to compare versions: atk-1.12.3 < needs updating (port has 1.18.0) desktop-file-utils-0.11 < needs updating (port has 0.12) expat-2.0.0_1 = up-to-date with port firefox-2.0.0.3,1 = up-to-date with port freetype2-2.2.1_1 = up-to-date with port glib-2.12.4 < needs updating (port has 2.12.11) gtk-2.10.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.10.11) jpeg-6b_4 = up-to-date with port libIDL-0.8.7 < needs updating (port has 0.8.8) libXft-2.1.7_1 = up-to-date with port libdrm-2.0.2 = up-to-date with port libiconv-1.9.2_2 = up-to-date with port nspr-4.6.3 < needs updating (port has 4.6.6) nss-3.11.3 < needs updating (port has 3.11.5) pango-1.14.7 < needs updating (port has 1.16.3) perl-5.8.8 = up-to-date with port pkg-config-0.21 = up-to-date with port png-1.2.12_1 < needs updating (port has 1.2.14) xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-truetype-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:11:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B72F16A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7354F13C46C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 31152 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:11:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 20:11:37 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5C3322842D; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:11:35 -0400 (EDT) To: David Southwell References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:11:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> (David Southwell's message of "Thu\, 26 Apr 2007 03\:07\:12 -0700") Message-ID: <44wszykia0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:11:40 -0000 David Southwell writes: > How do I stop these messages from umass devices. > Apr 18 03:27:03 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da1 -> 6 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status > Error > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check > Condition > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 6 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 20 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status > Error > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check > Condition > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error > > [root@dns1 /tmp]# camcontrol devlist > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) > at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (pass1,da1) > [root@dns1 /tmp]# > > With no devices plugged I get these meesages at the rate of 1 every two > seconds into /var/log/messages Is something polling those devices? Some kind of automounter? [Gnome and KDE seem to have their own automounters, running from user level...] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:24:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BD116A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BD913C4AE for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29557 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:24:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 20:24:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8AAC32842D; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:24:23 -0400 (EDT) To: Doug Lee References: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> <44ps5rmalp.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <20070426154156.GD10261@kirk.dlee.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:24:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070426154156.GD10261@kirk.dlee.org> (Doug Lee's message of "Thu\, 26 Apr 2007 11\:41\:56 -0400") Message-ID: <44r6q6khoo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB console or other alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:24:25 -0000 Doug Lee writes: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:14:26AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Doug Lee writes: >> >> > Can modern hardware and a modern FreeBSD version provide console >> > access before the kernel loads via USB or via anything other than an >> > actual on-board or PCI serial port? > >> I am not sure, but I would expect that you would need BIOS support for >> something like that. Personally, I would stick with serial ports as >> long as possible, because they are much more simple than any >> alternatives. > > More simple once found at least. :-) More simple electrically, I was thinking. >> What do you hook up to that serial port, anyway? > > A desktop Windows machine with a serial port, until said machine > suddenly ceased to function entirely. Now it would be a laptop > with a USB-to-serial adapter except the one I bought also seems > unwilling to function. I tend to run short of PCMCIA slots for > such things on my laptop, my one-and-only PCMCIA slot being occupied > pretty permanently by an EVDO card. So the problem is a lack of serial ports on your laptop "terminal", not on the FreeBSD machine? That sounds easier to work around than the other way around. There are some other possibilities, but I don't think they will work as early in the boot process. I *think* you can use a USB serial port as a console, but the loader doesn't seem to understand it. There's also dcons(4), but that needs firewire, and I don't know if that knows how to talk to anything on a Windows machine. Good luck; sorry I can't be more help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:25:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0DE16A474 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3313C469 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QKNFUd099497; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QKNEIF099496; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:23:14 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: jhall@vandaliamo.net Message-ID: <20070426202314.GA99445@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:25:53 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:31:05PM -0000, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > > At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the C/H/S > >> >>incorrectly during setup? > >> >> > >> >>Thanks, > >> > > >> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the geometry > >> when > >> > you ran sysinstall? > >> > > >> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? > >> > > >> > > >> > -Derek > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>Derek, > >> > >>In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial > >>SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives are > >>configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. > >> > >>I did not specify any geometry during the installation. > >> > >>I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the > >>appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). > >> > >>Thanks for your help. > > > > Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any error > > message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic boot > > messages if they are not turned on. > > > > Does they system boot from a CD ok? > > > > -Derek > > Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs > during the install without any problems. > > The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. > > The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. One question you didn't quite answer. Someone asked 'how did you partition the device. I think the intent was to ask what process did you use - for example sysinstall or manual fdisk/bsdabel/newfs? Did you first create a single slice on the drive and then divide that slice in to partitions? In either case, you must tell either sysinstall or fdisk & bsdlabel to make the drive and slice bootable, to write either a generic boot record or the FreeBSD MBR in fdisk or the fdisk portion of sysinstall and then select make the slice bootable in bsdlabel or the bsdlabel part of sysinstall. If you don't, it won't find a bootable device there. If you have done those things, then, back to the drawing board. ////jerry > > Thanks, > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > >>Jay > >> > >> >>Jay > >> >> > >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an > >> E200i > >> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader > >> >> screen > >> >> >> is > >> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to the > >> boot > >> >> >>loader prompt. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end up > >> >> with > >> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new > >> >> hardware > >> >> >>just for this project. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Thanks for your help. > >> >> > > >> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be > >> written. > >> >> > > >> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on in > >> >> your > >> >> > BIOS. > >> >> > > >> >> > -Derek > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> >> > believed to be clean. > >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>-- > >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> >>believed to be clean. > >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> > believed to be clean. > >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>This message has been scanned for viruses and > >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >>believed to be clean. > >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:32:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DDF16A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F30F13C44B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 1896 invoked by uid 1006); 26 Apr 2007 20:32:40 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(1.0/100.0):. Processed in 0.844984 secs); 26 Apr 2007 20:32:40 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.11) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2759 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2855.65.117.48.155.1177619559.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <20070426202314.GA99445@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <2172.65.117.48.155.1177602567.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426112024.026c7ec0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2534.65.117.48.155.1177609975.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426125610.026c3ea0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2566.65.117.48.155.1177611388.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070426131910.026cd3e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2629.65.117.48.155.1177612265.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <20070426202314.GA99445@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:32:39 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Jerry McAllister" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:32:41 -0000 > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:31:05PM -0000, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > >> > At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the >> C/H/S >> >> >>incorrectly during setup? >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the >> geometry >> >> when >> >> > you ran sysinstall? >> >> > >> >> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -Derek >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>Derek, >> >> >> >>In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial >> >>SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives >> are >> >>configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. >> >> >> >>I did not specify any geometry during the installation. >> >> >> >>I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the >> >>appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any >> error >> > message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic >> boot >> > messages if they are not turned on. >> > >> > Does they system boot from a CD ok? >> > >> > -Derek >> >> Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs >> during the install without any problems. >> >> The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. >> >> The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. > > One question you didn't quite answer. Someone asked 'how did you > partition the device. I think the intent was to ask what process > did you use - for example sysinstall or manual fdisk/bsdabel/newfs? > > Did you first create a single slice on the drive and then divide > that slice in to partitions? > > In either case, you must tell either sysinstall or fdisk & bsdlabel > to make the drive and slice bootable, to write either a generic > boot record or the FreeBSD MBR in fdisk or the fdisk portion of > sysinstall and then select make the slice bootable in bsdlabel or > the bsdlabel part of sysinstall. If you don't, it won't find a > bootable device there. > > If you have done those things, then, back to the drawing board. > > ////jerry I used sysinstall to partition the device. And, I selected boot mgr for the boot manager. When the system booted, it would boot to the point to where I had to press F1 to boot FreeBSD. When F1 was pressed, or the timeout was waited for, the system would just beep, the drive lights would flash, and nothing else would happen. Sorry for the confusion. Jay > >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Jay >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>Jay >> >> >> >> >>Jay >> >> >> >> >> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an >> >> E200i >> >> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader >> >> >> screen >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to >> the >> >> boot >> >> >> >>loader prompt. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end >> up >> >> >> with >> >> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new >> >> >> hardware >> >> >> >>just for this project. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks for your help. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be >> >> written. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on >> in >> >> >> your >> >> >> > BIOS. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -Derek >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> >> > believed to be clean. >> >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> >>believed to be clean. >> >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >> > believed to be clean. >> >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >> >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> >>believed to be clean. >> >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > -- >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> > believed to be clean. >> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:43:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3B016A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD63F13C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 94484 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:42:32 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QKhakU088821 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:43:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QKhZax088820 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:43:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:43:35 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:43:39 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:03:19PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 15:44:20 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > [...] > > I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's > > list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name > > or email of the original sender in the diplay. > > It doesn't for me. The only time I see the list name in place of the > message sender's email address is for my own posts, where it displays > the To: address instead of the From: address, which is what I prefer. > > Perhaps you have something wrong with your setting of index_format? I think you must misunderstand something in what I said. I'm talking about ways to get visual cues for the list origins of emails. The fact that the "subscribe" setting in .muttrc allows the display to show the list's address (the "To:" address) instead of the sender's address (the "From:" address) is a means of achieving that. That's not the best way, in my opinion, to make the list association of an email clear, but it's the way the "subscribe" setting does it. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Ben Franklin: "As we enjoy great Advantages from the Inventions of others we should be glad of an Opportunity to serve others by any Invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:45:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0024916A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060A13C45A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 72472 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 16:45:05 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 16:45:05 -0400 Message-ID: <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:45:05 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: me@janh.de, barner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:45:07 -0000 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > Drew Sanford wrote: > > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it starts > > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a > > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a > > file on any start up, it crashes. > > BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times in a > row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. > > I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I > compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz > > > I guess someone should file a bug report... Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the workaround. Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc to the gnats person who closed it) > > Here are my packages that are required by Firefox in case you want to > compare versions: > > atk-1.12.3 < needs updating (port has 1.18.0) > desktop-file-utils-0.11 < needs updating (port has 0.12) > expat-2.0.0_1 = up-to-date with port > firefox-2.0.0.3,1 = up-to-date with port > freetype2-2.2.1_1 = up-to-date with port > glib-2.12.4 < needs updating (port has 2.12.11) > gtk-2.10.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.10.11) > jpeg-6b_4 = up-to-date with port > libIDL-0.8.7 < needs updating (port has 0.8.8) > libXft-2.1.7_1 = up-to-date with port > libdrm-2.0.2 = up-to-date with port > libiconv-1.9.2_2 = up-to-date with port > nspr-4.6.3 < needs updating (port has 4.6.6) > nss-3.11.3 < needs updating (port has 3.11.5) > pango-1.14.7 < needs updating (port has 1.16.3) > perl-5.8.8 = up-to-date with port > pkg-config-0.21 = up-to-date with port > png-1.2.12_1 < needs updating (port has 1.2.14) > xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port > xorg-fonts-truetype-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port > xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 20:46:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF6716A408 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CCC013C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 96521 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 20:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:45:08 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QKkC44088864 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:46:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QKkCFs088863 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:46:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:46:12 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426204612.GH87931@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> <20070426134846.d32e3993.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426134846.d32e3993.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:46:14 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Chad Perrin : > > > > If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check > > *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the > > necessary information for checking up on it, we simply can't do anything > > with it. > > I gave my source. Have you contacted him? Why are you accusing me of > failing to do something that I did? Funny -- I don't remember seeing that information. Perhaps you could re-post it. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to build programs out of the wrong concepts." - Paul Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:03:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB27F16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7FB13C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D5A503D0 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3QL3kZu021073 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3QL3kFd021072 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:03:46 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:03:48 -0000 On Thursday, 26 April, 2007 at 14:43:35 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:03:19PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 15:44:20 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's > > > list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name > > > or email of the original sender in the diplay. > > > > It doesn't for me. The only time I see the list name in place of the > > message sender's email address is for my own posts, where it displays > > the To: address instead of the From: address, which is what I prefer. > > > > Perhaps you have something wrong with your setting of index_format? > > I think you must misunderstand something in what I said. I'm talking > about ways to get visual cues for the list origins of emails. The fact > that the "subscribe" setting in .muttrc allows the display to show the > list's address (the "To:" address) instead of the sender's address (the > "From:" address) is a means of achieving that. That's not the best way, > in my opinion, to make the list association of an email clear, but it's > the way the "subscribe" setting does it. Okay, I think I understand. :-) I think the misunderstanding was because I am using mutt very differently from you. I have each list I am subscribed to filtered into its own mail box by procmail. I have listed all of these mailing lists in mutt's subscribed setting. I also have status_on_top set and pager_index_lines set to 10. The up shot of all this is that I know which mailing list I am reading because it is listed in the status line. Separate mail boxes for each mailing list just makes more sense to me. :-) Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not CC me on replies, I read the list and don't need the dupes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:22:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F7316A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1E513C459 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id A8BF61CC21; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:34:00 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <44wszykia0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wszykia0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:22:27 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007 13:11:35 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Southwell writes: > > How do I stop these messages from umass devices. > > Apr 18 03:27:03 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da1 -> 6 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: > > 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > > Status Error > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check > > Condition > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 6 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: > > 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI > > Status Error > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check > > Condition > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present > > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error > > > > [root@dns1 /tmp]# camcontrol devlist > > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) > > at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (pass1,da1) > > [root@dns1 /tmp]# > > > > With no devices plugged I get these meesages at the rate of 1 every two > > seconds into /var/log/messages > > Is something polling those devices? > Some kind of automounter? > [Gnome and KDE seem to have their own automounters, running from user > level...] _______________________________________________ I do not know -- how can I find out? If I put a 256M memory card in then messages for da0 stop.. david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:29:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7105A16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16613C48C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [85.176.43.209] (helo=janh.freebsd) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1HhBWl3i0E-0005me; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:29:27 +0200 Message-ID: <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:29:19 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> In-Reply-To: <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/aa6vQwLd4eshgHvIhGyoZCDkfq9WdwNH4kzR EZhdS5vkJwJ2+lhk+syVCZr2pAT2kXRrNq0dB8ND96NfsQMZVd AA/Drcd/kgfC1MQVoL0ag== Cc: Howard Goldstein , barner@freebsd.org, Michel Le Cocq Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:29:45 -0000 Michel Le Cocq wrote: > I think it's a global thunderbird 2 bug, because i have exactly the same > trouble ona mac os 10.4 with a binary update. I do not think it is exactly the same -- see below. > Howard Goldstein a écrit : >> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>> Drew Sanford wrote: >>> > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it >>> starts >>> > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a >>> > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a >>> > file on any start up, it crashes. >>> >>> BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times >>> in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. >>> >>> I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I >>> compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): >>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz >>> >>> >>> I guess someone should file a bug report... >> >> Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be >> reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the workaround. >> Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc to the gnats >> person who closed it) After reading the discussion in the PR, I renamed libgnome-2.so.0 and tried again: no crashes with Firefox 2.0.3 or Thunderbird 2.0.0. I do run KDE -- I probably should compile Firefox and Thunderbird without the gnome dependencies to solve it for me. The relevant packages seem not to be among the Firefox package dependencies, but: libgnome-2.16.0 < needs updating (port has 2.18.0) gnome-vfs-2.16.1 < needs updating (port has 2.18.1) I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 to see if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his ports, he can probably confirm that this happens with the current ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:38:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35716A403 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CEF13C45B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([71.178.107.244]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JH400LIGK3MOZW6@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:38:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3QLcAxB023778; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:10 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) id l3QLc94B023777; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:09 -0400 (EDT envelope-from dgl) Content-return: prohibited Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:09 -0400 From: Doug Lee In-reply-to: <44r6q6khoo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> To: Lowell Gilbert Mail-followup-to: Doug Lee , Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070426213809.GF10261@kirk.dlee.org> Organization: SSB + BART Group MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <20070425141804.GC911@kirk.dlee.org> <44ps5rmalp.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <20070426154156.GD10261@kirk.dlee.org> <44r6q6khoo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB console or other alternatives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:38:13 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:24:23PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Doug Lee writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:14:26AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> What do you hook up to that serial port, anyway? > > > > A desktop Windows machine with a serial port, until said machine > > suddenly ceased to function entirely. Now it would be a laptop > > with a USB-to-serial adapter except the one I bought also seems > > unwilling to function. I tend to run short of PCMCIA slots for > > such things on my laptop, my one-and-only PCMCIA slot being occupied > > pretty permanently by an EVDO card. > > So the problem is a lack of serial ports on your laptop "terminal", > not on the FreeBSD machine? That sounds easier to work around than > the other way around. Lack of serial ports on laptop yes; the FreeBSD hardware hasn't been chosen yet, but I predicted difficulty getting a modern machine with a serial port. Perhaps not. > There are some other possibilities, but I don't think they will work > as early in the boot process. I *think* you can use a USB serial port > as a console, but the loader doesn't seem to understand it. There's > also dcons(4), but that needs firewire, and I don't know if that knows > how to talk to anything on a Windows machine. I predicted the USB problem you mention. I have firewire on this laptop but I've never tried to use it. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org SSB + BART Group doug.lee@ssbbartgroup.com http://www.ssbbartgroup.com "There are no guarantees. From a standpoint of fear, none are strong enough. From a standpoint of love, none are necessary." - from Emmanuel's Book II From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:45:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5681E16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36F1413C480 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 46368 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 21:44:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 21:44:30 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QLjY1s089171 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:45:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QLjY3D089170 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:45:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:45:33 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070426214533.GJ87931@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:45:36 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:03:46PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: > > Okay, I think I understand. :-) > > I think the misunderstanding was because I am using mutt very > differently from you. I have each list I am subscribed to filtered into > its own mail box by procmail. I have listed all of these mailing lists > in mutt's subscribed setting. I also have status_on_top set and > pager_index_lines set to 10. The up shot of all this is that I know > which mailing list I am reading because it is listed in the status line. > > Separate mail boxes for each mailing list just makes more sense to me. > :-) Yeah, that makes a big difference. For me, filtering into separate mailboxes would just ensure that I end up ignoring some of my mailing lists for long periods of time. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Dr. Ron Paul: "Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:46:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547D116A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FFA13C455 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 73613 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 17:46:29 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 17:46:29 -0400 Message-ID: <46311DB5.8020702@queue.to> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:46:29 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: me@janh.de Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:32 -0000 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 to > see if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his ports, he > can probably confirm that this happens with the current ports. Unfortunately it does still happen for me. For those ports I'm at these versions: gnome-vfs-2.18.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System libgnome-2.18.0_1 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 21:51:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50116A4E9 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365B813C510 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15142 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2007 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8345E28426; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:51:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3222C1CCAE; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:51:30 -0400 (EDT) To: David Southwell References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <44wszykia0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:51:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> (David Southwell's message of "Thu\, 26 Apr 2007 14\:34\:00 -0700") Message-ID: <44mz0uajod.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:51:35 -0000 David Southwell writes: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 13:11:35 Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> David Southwell writes: >> > How do I stop these messages from umass devices. >> > Apr 18 03:27:03 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da1 -> 6 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: >> > 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI >> > Status Error >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check >> > Condition >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 6 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: >> > 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI >> > Status Error >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check >> > Condition >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error >> > >> > [root@dns1 /tmp]# camcontrol devlist >> > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) >> > at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (pass1,da1) >> > [root@dns1 /tmp]# >> > >> > With no devices plugged I get these meesages at the rate of 1 every two >> > seconds into /var/log/messages >> >> Is something polling those devices? >> Some kind of automounter? >> [Gnome and KDE seem to have their own automounters, running from user >> level...] _______________________________________________ > > I do not know -- how can I find out? Have you enabled amd(8)? Are you running Gnome or KDE? For example, I see that in Gnome, under the preferences menu, there is an option for whether to automatically mount removable media when inserted. If you disable that and the messages go away, then we at least know what the trigger is. > If I put a 256M memory card in then messages for da0 stop.. Good; that makes sense. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 22:08:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26D316A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp104.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9113213C44B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 18548 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 22:08:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Lox8YDa9rE/2Kp5nF1GC+BOafwotd02sG97lwz9bpL/PsXbBVUf+rZV6PsJB5PZNhWz5Wqm8uxNcMtiR8Ba/vT/pNc10Tfz3XbB5rR42qjKyCD+4wO0i2UFS5ihnJJj/pNLJYg9Q2wXN/1jl9A9k6fjS+geqQs4yNHLdKJo9ONU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO vagabund.w33) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.75.63 with plain) by smtp104.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 22:07:59 -0000 Message-ID: <463122A2.7000109@yahoo.de> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:07:30 +0200 From: Stevan Tiefert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070423 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <462FEC41.50701@yahoo.de> <20070426131533.52005972@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070426131533.52005972@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portinstall --batch something [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:08:03 -0000 RW schrieb: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:03:13 +0200 > Stevan Tiefert wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> what will portinstall do if I give it the --batch argument? Will it >> compile the port with all options it knows or only the standard ones? >> I ask because "man 1 portinstall" or "man 7 ports" is not informative >> enough at this point. >> > > It does the makes with BATCH=yes set. The main effect of this is that > it prevents the options menus from showing, which means ports build > with the last options set or the default. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thanks! ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 22:37:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310B416A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1263313C483 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn07.u.washington.edu (hymn07.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.53]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QMbsAU006986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:54 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn07.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QMbskP013504 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:54 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn07.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:54 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:54 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2855.65.117.48.155.1177619559.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.151933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Boot Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:37:55 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:31:05PM -0000, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> >>>> At 01:16 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >>>>> > At 12:52 PM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >>>>> >>Both of those checked OK. Is it possible I have specified the >>> C/H/S >>>>> >>incorrectly during setup? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > What is your type and model hard drive? Did you specify the >>> geometry >>>>> when >>>>> > you ran sysinstall? >>>>> > >>>>> > How did you partition and slice the hard drive? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -Derek >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Derek, >>>>> >>>>> In the server I currently have three 376595-001 drives (146 GB serial >>>>> SCSI) and three 432146-001 drives (300 GB serial SCSI). These drives >>> are >>>>> configured as a single drive in a RAID 5 configuration. >>>>> >>>>> I did not specify any geometry during the installation. >>>>> >>>>> I have the hard drive configured as a single partition with the >>>>> appropriate lables (/, /var, /usr, /tmp and a swap area). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>> >>>> Sounds like your system is not booting, but you're not getting any >>> error >>>> message. Check the boot order in your BIOS, and turn on diagnostic >>> boot >>>> messages if they are not turned on. >>>> >>>> Does they system boot from a CD ok? >>>> >>>> -Derek >>> >>> Yes, the system boots from CD just fine. And, it is able to run newfs >>> during the install without any problems. >>> >>> The total size of the drive is 683.5 GB. >>> >>> The boot order in the BIOS is CD and then E200i controller. >> >> One question you didn't quite answer. Someone asked 'how did you >> partition the device. I think the intent was to ask what process >> did you use - for example sysinstall or manual fdisk/bsdabel/newfs? >> >> Did you first create a single slice on the drive and then divide >> that slice in to partitions? >> >> In either case, you must tell either sysinstall or fdisk & bsdlabel >> to make the drive and slice bootable, to write either a generic >> boot record or the FreeBSD MBR in fdisk or the fdisk portion of >> sysinstall and then select make the slice bootable in bsdlabel or >> the bsdlabel part of sysinstall. If you don't, it won't find a >> bootable device there. >> >> If you have done those things, then, back to the drawing board. >> >> ////jerry > > I used sysinstall to partition the device. And, I selected boot mgr for > the boot manager. When the system booted, it would boot to the point to > where I had to press F1 to boot FreeBSD. When F1 was pressed, or the > timeout was waited for, the system would just beep, the drive lights would > flash, and nothing else would happen. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > > > Jay >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> Jay >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>> >>Jay >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > At 10:49 AM 4/26/2007, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >>>>> >> >>I have installed FreeBSD 6.2 on an HP Proliant G5 server with an >>>>> E200i >>>>> >> >>Smart Controller installed. The installation was flawless. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>When I reboot the server after the installation, the boot loader >>>>> >> screen >>>>> >> >> is >>>>> >> >>displayed. I press F1 and the system beeps and comes back to >>> the >>>>> boot >>>>> >> >>loader prompt. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>What should I be looking at? I am at a loss since I usually end >>> up >>>>> >> with >>>>> >> >>leftover hardware and this time I acutally got to purchase new >>>>> >> hardware >>>>> >> >>just for this project. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>Thanks for your help. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Check your BIOS that you are ALLOWING the boot sector to be >>>>> written. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > If that is OK, try disabling hyperthreading if that is turned on >>> in >>>>> >> your >>>>> >> > BIOS. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > -Derek Jay, Try another bootloader, such as GAG (http://gag.sf.net) or Grub (this requires a BSD slice write capable LiveCD unfortunately to install grub via ports). I've come across some cases with some computers where GAG worked where Grub and the BSD That isn't a long term solution to your problem, but it's a workaround until the actual root cause can be determined. HTT shouldn't be the cause, unless the hardware architects that designed your PATA EIDE controller did something fubar'ed in the design, I'd think. Also, please bottom-post, not top-post on this list. Thanks! -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 22:40:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC8116A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C1B13C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn07.u.washington.edu (hymn07.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.53]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QMe2rM011750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:40:03 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn07.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3QMe2YU015465 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:40:02 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn07.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:40:02 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46311DB5.8020702@queue.to> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.152734 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:40:03 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Howard Goldstein wrote: > Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 to see >> if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his ports, he can >> probably confirm that this happens with the current ports. > > Unfortunately it does still happen for me. For those ports I'm at these > versions: > > gnome-vfs-2.18.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System > libgnome-2.18.0_1 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment If you don't mind me asking, what are the file types, and about how large are these files? Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of what they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? Also, uname -a would be helpful. Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 22:51:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87F216A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC3D13C484 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05083217D82; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:23 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: GRPJoZ2A401s0tOyUalzDIfLmncN4tiCfTn9m6fiv9KF 1177627883 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B30A10682; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070426214533.GJ87931@demeter.hydra> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070426214533.GJ87931@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:51:20 -0500 To: Chad Perrin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:51:23 -0000 [mailed and posted] On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:03:46PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: >> >> Okay, I think I understand. :-) >> >> I think the misunderstanding was because I am using mutt very >> differently from you. I have each list I am subscribed to >> filtered into >> its own mail box by procmail. I have listed all of these mailing >> lists >> in mutt's subscribed setting. I also have status_on_top set and >> pager_index_lines set to 10. The up shot of all this is that I know >> which mailing list I am reading because it is listed in the status >> line. >> >> Separate mail boxes for each mailing list just makes more sense to >> me. >> :-) > > Yeah, that makes a big difference. > > For me, filtering into separate mailboxes would just ensure that I end > up ignoring some of my mailing lists for long periods of time. I've been sorting all of my FreeBSD list stuff into a common mailbox (using a sieve script on the IMAP server I use) and since this, and have just started (as a result of this discussion) playing with color coding by which particular list. The color coding is done in the MUA (Mail.app in my case). In general, I automatic delivery into particular folders as the business of the IMAP server (not the client) while something like display properties for messages meeting particular criteria as something to do in the MUA. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:00:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2D716A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net (alnrmhc11.comcast.net [206.18.177.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2590E13C458 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-71-63-141-31.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[71.63.141.31]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070426230002b1100kb5h6e>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:00:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E143147DD for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:00:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46312EE2.8060708@veldy.net> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:46 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Any PCI Draft-N wireless cards supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:00:03 -0000 Can anybody tell me if there are any 802.11n (draft) wireless PCI cards supported by FreeBSD? Thanks! Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:14:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0237B16A401 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC6613C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3QNGo46083047; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3QNGok7083046; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:16:50 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20070426231649.GA82894@thought.org> References: <20070425072914.GA65634@thought.org> <462F0824.5000107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070425190042.GA70940@thought.org> <46307BB4.109@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46307BB4.109@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: first of misc questions.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:14:43 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:15:16AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: [[ ... ]] > Or my favorite structure (bourne shell style).. > > for i in `ls -l | awk '{if ($6 == "Apr" && $7 == 19 || $6 == "Mar" && > $7 == 26 ) print $9}'`; do vi $i; done > > Could you provide examples of what you are trying to edit though Gary? There are a whole slew of html/php files (from jottings.thought.org) that I've been [[ koff, koff ]] meaning to edit and fine-tune. This for about a year. "jOttings" are my personal meditations that have been online for years. They'll always be online, but it's a wee bit hard to cuddle up and read stuff on one's computer. Even a laptop, right? So, long-story-short, I've been trying to get these mumblings into ink+paper. So they've got to be readable. "Perfect" is impossible; so maybe *polished*. Turns out that your and Derek Ragona's /bin/sh + awk is what I'm using. (OT, but the 30-45 files I'm editing had some bloopers; misspellings, puncutation errs, and more. So the files are in /tmp/Jot. [!] ) gary > > Thanks, > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:16:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4D516A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 612B513C46C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 7249 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 23:15:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 23:15:34 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QNGdDn089648 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:16:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3QNGcPa089647 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:16:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:16:38 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070426231638.GA89594@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: fusefs-sshfs fails to compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:16:41 -0000 I'm not sure why, but fusefs-sshfs refuses to compile on a Thinkpad R52 running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. I get the following when I try (watch the line wrap after -qa on the second line): Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.19963.0 env make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! sysutils/fusefs-sshfs (install error) There was a lot before that, of course, but I didn't want to dump it all to the mailing list. The rest is posted online at: http://sob.apotheon.org/files/sshfs.fail.txt Thanks in advance for any help. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:17:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB216A407 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271DA13C480 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from [192.168.11.7] (helo=[192.168.0.100]) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HhDEI-0009BP-1H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:26 +0200 Message-ID: <463132D5.2090602@szalbot.homedns.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:16:37 +0200 From: Zbigniew Szalbot User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pfctl syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:17:16 -0000 Hello, Can you please help me troubleshoot pfctl problem. I want to store table data in /etc/pfspammers so I created the file and also put in the pf.conf table definition on line 18 table persist file /etc/pfspammers and added a rule to block tcp connections if an IP is in /etc/pfspammers When I reload pfctl, I get a warning: No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled /etc/pf.conf:18: syntax error pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded What should I change to get rid of this error? Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:26:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A2216A406 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@schnarff.com) Received: from outbound.mailhop.org (outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFCF13C457 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@schnarff.com) Received: from c-76-111-69-34.hsd1.va.comcast.net ([76.111.69.34] helo=schnarff.com) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HhDLu-000Lig-7R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 11176 invoked by uid 67); 26 Apr 2007 23:26:17 -0000 Received: from 192.168.2.68 ([192.168.2.68]) by mail.schnarff.com (Horde) with HTTP for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:17 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 76.111.69.34 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19sg05KIEYzimcQVBVhpkAZWcNEuDNiG18= Message-ID: <20070426192617.v2zsj73wgsg04s0s@mail.schnarff.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:26:17 -0400 From: alex@schnarff.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <463132D5.2090602@szalbot.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <463132D5.2090602@szalbot.homedns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) Subject: Re: pfctl syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:26:19 -0000 > I want to store table data in /etc/pfspammers so I created the file and > also put in the pf.conf table definition on line 18 > > table persist file /etc/pfspammers > > and added a rule to block tcp connections if an IP is in /etc/pfspammers > > When I reload pfctl, I get a warning: > No ALTQ support in kernel > ALTQ related functions disabled > /etc/pf.conf:18: syntax error > pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded First off, the ALTQ lines aren't really so much of an error, since you're not trying to use altq functionality; don't worry about that. As for the actual error on line 18, if you review: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html You'll see that the file name should be enclosed in quotes. If that doesn't fix the error, please post the contents of /etc/pfspammers, so it can be checked for syntax errors. Alex Kirk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:36:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8142216A400 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2941A13C448 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 75848 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 19:36:54 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 19:36:54 -0400 Message-ID: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:36:54 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:36:56 -0000 youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Howard Goldstein wrote: > >> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>> I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 >>> to see if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his >>> ports, he can probably confirm that this happens with the current ports. >> >> Unfortunately it does still happen for me. For those ports I'm at >> these versions: >> >> gnome-vfs-2.18.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System >> libgnome-2.18.0_1 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment > > If you don't mind me asking, what are the file types, and about how > large are these files? An appx 1K rc file (.nvidia-settings-rc), in another case a one page 29K .pdf > > Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of what > they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? 1. start thunderbird 2. ^M or click on the write message label 3. attach any file 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default subject or change it to garbage. 5. ^M to compose another message 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump > > Also, uname -a would be helpful. cally:~$ uname -a FreeBSD cally.queue.to 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Sat Mar 31 20:04:48 EDT 2007 hg@cally.queue.to:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CALLY i386 gnome is not the desktop on this system... (FWIW, building and installing with -DWITHOUT_GNOME -DWITHOUT_GNOMEVFS as hinted by the pr does not make a difference) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:39:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1190F16A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC0013C48A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l3QNdfox013765; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:42 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <1455a3d90704251008m53a519f5ud60674c9911b5982@mail.gmail.com> <1455a3d90704251514m40d09651mf125a5a530f713f4@mail.gmail.com> <1455a3d90704261159t323cc7ffm74e7b311c7e2a1c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1455a3d90704261159t323cc7ffm74e7b311c7e2a1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704270139.41218.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freenity Subject: Re: problem while setting refresh rate in xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:39:47 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007, freenity wrote: > Well. I installed nvidia-settings and could configure the refresh rate in > that windows to 75, then I applied changes and saved it in xirg.conf. > But when I go to Display options in KDE it shows 50hz. > Whats wrong? Is kde right? how do I know the real refresh rate.?? > > Thanks. KDE is wrong. Use xvidtune(1) to find out the real refresh rate (its in the lower right corner). HTH, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 23:40:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2B116A402 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CB813C469 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93375C97; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:40:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46313884.8050000@vindaloo.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:40:52 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sharing a USB drive with Mac OS X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:40:53 -0000 Has anyone setup (fdisk/newfs) a drive to work on both Mac OS X and FreeBSD? I'd like to be able to transfer larger datasets between my Mac and my FreeBSD laptop without using my network. Thanks in advance -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 00:32:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5FD16A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E6F13C45B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:02:09 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id IOZ39557; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 20:02:03 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:02:05 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:32:42 -0000 Howard Goldstein writes: > > Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of what > > they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? > > 1. start thunderbird > 2. ^M or click on the write message label > 3. attach any file > 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default > subject or change it to garbage. > 5. ^M to compose another message > 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump While this is apples and kumquats, I don't get this behavoior with: huff@jerusalem>> uname -a FreeBSD jerusalem.litteratus.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Mar 13 22:38:20 EST 2007 huff@jerusalem.litteratus.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JERUSALEM i386 and: thunderbird 2.0.0.0 gnome-vfs-2.18.1 libgnome-2.18.0 Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 00:38:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAB716A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317EB13C469 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B614668621E6E; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i2Mfw0r13p7C; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 9A1C368621E6A; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:52 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070427000152.GA9642@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313884.8050000@vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46313884.8050000@vindaloo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Subject: Re: Sharing a USB drive with Mac OS X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:38:01 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Christopher Hilton wrote: >Has anyone setup (fdisk/newfs) a drive to work on both Mac OS X and >FreeBSD? I'd like to be able to transfer larger datasets between my Mac >and my FreeBSD laptop without using my network. I think that the M$ file system on most external disk drives and flash devices would work. OS X can format UFS (Unix File Systems) as well so it might well be able to deal with a FreeBSD formatted drive (or vice versa). OS X can mount standard ISO formatted CDs as well. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 ``It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.'' -James Madison, Federalist Paper #62 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 00:59:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA71A16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E8D13C44B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3R0xHr6019179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:17 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3R0xGPr031643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:16 -0700 Message-ID: <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:23 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.174234 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:59:17 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Howard Goldstein writes: > >> > Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of what >> > they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? >> >> 1. start thunderbird >> 2. ^M or click on the write message label >> 3. attach any file >> 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default >> subject or change it to garbage. >> 5. ^M to compose another message >> 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump > > > While this is apples and kumquats, I don't get this behavoior > with: > > huff@jerusalem>> uname -a > FreeBSD jerusalem.litteratus.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Mar 13 22:38:20 EST 2007 huff@jerusalem.litteratus.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JERUSALEM i386 > > and: > > thunderbird 2.0.0.0 > gnome-vfs-2.18.1 > libgnome-2.18.0 > > > Robert Huff Interesting indeed. Did you build thunderbird with custom cflags, and have to tried getting a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the coredump and gdb? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 01:25:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8926F16A406; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr (postfix2-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D113C4C5; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr (smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]) by postfix2-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9497FF40E07; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:08:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from MacBook.local (bdv75-2-81-57-250-158.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.250.158]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18535E134; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:08:02 +0200 From: Michel Le Cocq User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Goldstein References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> In-Reply-To: <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: me@janh.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, barner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:25:55 -0000 I think it's a global thunderbird 2 bug, because i have exactly the same trouble ona mac os 10.4 with a binary update. Howard Goldstein a écrit : > Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> Drew Sanford wrote: >> > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it >> starts >> > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a >> > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a >> > file on any start up, it crashes. >> >> BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times >> in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. >> >> I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I >> compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz >> >> >> I guess someone should file a bug report... > > Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be > reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the workaround. > Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc to the gnats > person who closed it) > >> >> Here are my packages that are required by Firefox in case you want to >> compare versions: >> >> atk-1.12.3 < needs updating (port has 1.18.0) >> desktop-file-utils-0.11 < needs updating (port has 0.12) >> expat-2.0.0_1 = up-to-date with port >> firefox-2.0.0.3,1 = up-to-date with port >> freetype2-2.2.1_1 = up-to-date with port >> glib-2.12.4 < needs updating (port has 2.12.11) >> gtk-2.10.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.10.11) >> jpeg-6b_4 = up-to-date with port >> libIDL-0.8.7 < needs updating (port has 0.8.8) >> libXft-2.1.7_1 = up-to-date with port >> libdrm-2.0.2 = up-to-date with port >> libiconv-1.9.2_2 = up-to-date with port >> nspr-4.6.3 < needs updating (port has 4.6.6) >> nss-3.11.3 < needs updating (port has 3.11.5) >> pango-1.14.7 < needs updating (port has 1.16.3) >> perl-5.8.8 = up-to-date with port >> pkg-config-0.21 = up-to-date with port >> png-1.2.12_1 < needs updating (port has 1.2.14) >> xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port >> xorg-fonts-truetype-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port >> xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 01:35:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3892016A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE68213C45D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 21:35:10 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFT75288; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:35:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 21:35:06 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17969.21324.302558.327221@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:35:08 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:35:12 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Did you build thunderbird with custom cflags, CFLAGS= -O -pipe -g > and have to tried getting > a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the > coredump and gdb? ??? Coredump? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 01:39:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C1C16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@friedemann.us) Received: from ms-smtp-03.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.166.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAFD13C4B8 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@friedemann.us) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (CPE-75-86-208-234.wi.res.rr.com [75.86.208.234]) by ms-smtp-03.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3QNEobX001859 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:14:51 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4631326E.4090301@friedemann.us> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:14:54 -0500 From: Scott D Friedemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <462E8A51.2000502@friedemann.us> <44tzv3mb1k.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44tzv3mb1k.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: Error from mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:23 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I tracked it as far as an ioctl call for creating what looks like a > protocol block. I don't have the time to trace into the kernel right > now, and it doesn't look like anything in the smbtools userland has > changed in quite a while. > > Can we assume that you checked the obvious things, like making sure > that the system isn't running out of memory? Does this happen with a > GENERIC kernel? Are you sure the kernel matches the userland? Also > let us know if you can recall when it stopped working. > > And for what it's worth, I don't get such an error on -STABLE. > I decided to update sources (still patch level 3), build world and the GENERIC kernel and see what happens. No change. Same error. This will occur logging in as root to a console on a machine with 1GB RAM, so memory is not an issue. Building my custom kernel, which has very little customization, yields the same error as before, too. I last used this successfully 16 February 2007. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 01:39:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4873316A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E277E13C45B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 78142 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 21:39:33 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 21:39:33 -0400 Message-ID: <46315455.8050200@queue.to> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:39:33 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:35 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Did you build thunderbird with custom cflags, and have to tried getting > a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the > coredump and gdb? When this started happening I rebuilt it with WITH_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_LOGGING=true WITHOUT_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=true I don't see any different obvious behavior with these flags, it still drops the core, but it is noticably slower (and it generates warnigns and info to someone's stderr, see below) My backtrace from the coredump should be in your email box if you still have freebsd-questions from 9:43 EDT this morning... I don't know if it's expected behavior or not but the debug version generates quite a few possibly interesting warnings and failed assertion messages to stderr on attaching the first (successful) message. Another interesting thing is that when saving a received attachment I can do that endlessly, it uses a different dialog though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 01:56:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FCF16A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from net@arrishq.net) Received: from arrishq.net (89-149-208-131.internetserviceteam.com [89.149.208.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D485113C45A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from net@arrishq.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.arrishq.net [127.0.0.1]) by arrishq.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3R1vZvJ056114 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:57:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from net@arrishq.net) Received: from p54b4ea39.dip.t-dialin.net (p54b4ea39.dip.t-dialin.net [84.180.234.57]) by zeus.arrishq.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:57:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20070427035735.utrlkhf34gwsw4ok@zeus.arrishq.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:57:35 +0200 From: Tommy Scheunemann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) / FreeBSD-6.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on zeus.arrishq.net X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (arrishq.net [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:57:38 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Login Conf not parsed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:56:52 -0000 Hello everyone, I'm running a FreeBSD 6.2 system, only have SSH access to it. The only user which is allowed to login had Bash (installed from the Ports) installed. Since 2 days I can't login any longer - Bash misses a library. I tried to create a login_conf file in the users home directory but it seems that the file isn't parsed. Content is: --- snip --- me:\ :shell=/bin/sh:\ :setenv=SHELL=/bin/sh: --- snip --- I've created the database via cap_mkdb at my local system and uploaded this file as well, then changed the file permissions to 0400 and ownership is right as well. Just - that file isn't parsed :( Any other way of changing the user's shell - could install in the worst case some kind of PHP shell - are also welcome. The library which is missing could be uploaded from my local system, just - of course - I don't have any write permissions in the usual locations. Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 02:08:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C3E16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howard@goldstein-pa.com) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AF513C459 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howard@goldstein-pa.com) Received: (qmail 78170 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2007 21:42:16 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2007 21:42:16 -0400 Message-ID: <463154F7.6070901@goldstein-pa.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:42:15 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:58 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Did you build thunderbird with custom cflags, and have to tried getting > a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the > coredump and gdb? I'm sorry, reading Robert Huff's reply I should have also disclosed my make.conf CFLAGS, they are custom at -O2 and -march=pentium4 from the CPUTYPE. I'll try it right now without them From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 02:50:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF9E16A406 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.68.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACF213C483 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3R1poYN022379 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:51:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:51:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200704270151.l3R1poiC022378@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:50:37 -0000 I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from the installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT enabled and 1 GB of memory). 1) The ports and packages subsystems are as fragile as ever (no big surprise). I was able to add packages for less than a day before it broke. Sometimes I can still add or delete a package, but in at least one case, I can't because pkg_add says that an earlier version of the package is already installed, while an attempt to remove the earlier version using pkg_delete gets a message saying that no such package is installed. Apparently, pkg_add and pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a particular package is actually installed. Attempting to build ports fails while trying to build dependency ports, which was what led to attempt to remove libtool and then add the newer version. I'll try to get a PR together and submitted soon. 2) I had been eagerly awaiting the new version of snd_emu10k1, which is supposed to contain support for the Soundblaster Audigy 2 cards, and I was hoping that my Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS PCMCIA card might be included in that support. Last night I finally added snd_driver_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf and rebooted. It looked good until it correctly identifed the card, at which point it hung. After some delay, the machine *powered itself down*. Trying to restart it failed repeatedly before it could complete the hardware initialization prior to booting, and it powered itself down each time, sometimes turning on the battery light briefly as it did so. Eventually, fearing hardware damage, I removed the PCMCIA card, after which I was able to boot the installation CD again in order to remove the line from /boot/loader.conf. Unfortunately, the 6.2-RELEASE installation CD does not allow me to mount the hard drive's root file system onto /mnt in order to change the hard drive's /boot/loader.conf file the way the 6.1-RELEASE CD did. I next tried booting from the hard drive, selecting safe mode-- which may not have mattered anyway--I think the key was removing the sound card, and got to where I could edit the file. Rebooting after that proceeded uneventfully. Because of the computer's thoroughly bizarre response to having the new snd_emu10k1 driver active when the sound card was present, I am reluctant to try this again to document it well enough to submit a PR. I haven't yet tried the $100 sound card again under Windows XP to find out whether it still works. 8-| 3) I use wmaker as a window manager for X. Since the 6.2-RELEASE upgrade, I seem no longer able to cut/copy + paste anything except when doing the operation entirely inside Firefox windows. I can still select the text I want to copy, but I am unable to paste it into other windows (e.g., Putty, xterm) or even into the same window. The first two I don't expect to be able to do anything about, other than maybe submitting a PR for the first one, but perhaps someone can show me a way to fix the third one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks muchly in advance. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 03:12:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8C916A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@stilltech.net) Received: from mail.geekdelivery.com (s205-206-56-226.ab.hsia.telus.net [205.206.56.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BED913C465 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@stilltech.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([70.65.134.12]) by media32.ca (mail.geekdelivery.com) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000060352.msg for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:10:33 -0600 From: Ray To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:12:29 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704262112.29415.ray@stilltech.net> X-Spam-Processed: mail.geekdelivery.com, Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:10:33 -0600 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 70.65.134.12 X-Return-Path: ray@stilltech.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.geekdelivery.com, Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:10:33 -0600 Subject: ftp chroot directory structure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ray@stilltech.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:12:59 -0000 Hello, I am setting up a new web server that must host data from an existing webserver. We've never had an organized folder structure for private data, (passwords, secure data, etc) and I'm trying to change that. there are currently a number of virtual sites all handled through apache virtualhosts. all (or at least most) users must have ftp access. my original thought was this: apache/priv_data/domain1 apache/pub_data/domain1 where apache/priv_data/domain1 contains a soft link to apache/pub_data/domain1 and the ftpchroot is apache/pri_data/domain1 this doesn't work like I wanted it to. I can't follow the link with an ftp client. obviously the best solution would be apache/priv_data/domain1 which contains apache/data/domain1/pub_data with domain1 as the ftp root and pub_data as the http root, but I'm not the developer of all the sites, and I don't want to have to trouble shoot other peoples possibly incorrectly written sites (hard coded path structures) What can you suggest as my best solution? Thanks Ray From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 03:13:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCB116A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85A913C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A741A3C19; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D737551441; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Scott Bennett Message-ID: <20070427031340.GA18571@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200704270151.l3R1poiC022378@mp.cs.niu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704270151.l3R1poiC022378@mp.cs.niu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:13:41 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade from > 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from the > installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT enabled > and 1 GB of memory). >=20 > 1) The ports and packages subsystems are as fragile as ever (no big > surprise). I was able to add packages for less than a day before > it broke. Sometimes I can still add or delete a package, but > in at least one case, I can't because pkg_add says that an earlier > version of the package is already installed, while an attempt to > remove the earlier version using pkg_delete gets a message saying > that no such package is installed. Apparently, pkg_add and > pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a > particular package is actually installed. Attempting to build ports > fails while trying to build dependency ports, which was what led > to attempt to remove libtool and then add the newer version. I'll > try to get a PR together and submitted soon. It is recommended to use an upgrade tool like portupgrade instead of trying to use pkg_add/pkg_delete "by hand". It is too easy to misuse them and leave your system in an inconsistent state, as yours apparently has become. Kris --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGMWpkWry0BWjoQKURAkkVAJ9wvha6XJpjYLVfEL2yv5MhPh/YmwCgxPCg Uxfqmp633xMmPXCnamZtNZQ= =rCHk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 03:42:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF216A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5296613C448 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3R3gkMg012448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:42:47 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.100.45] (c-67-161-171-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.171.107]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3R3gkU9008259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:42:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4631713D.7080606@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:42:53 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> <17969.21324.302558.327221@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17969.21324.302558.327221@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.26.202234 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:42:47 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Garrett Cooper writes: > >> Did you build thunderbird with custom cflags, > > CFLAGS= -O -pipe -g > >> and have to tried getting >> a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the >> coredump and gdb? > > ??? Coredump? I meant core dumped. Bleh. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 04:01:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2BB16A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1DE13C458 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2007 00:01:31 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NFU06873; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:01:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2007 00:01:27 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17969.30105.992915.523494@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:01:29 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4631713D.7080606@u.washington.edu> References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <17969.15741.513958.867345@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <46314AEB.2000200@u.washington.edu> <17969.21324.302558.327221@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4631713D.7080606@u.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:01:31 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > >> and have to tried getting > >> a backtrace for all of the calls made from thunderbird using the > >> coredump and gdb? > > > > ??? Coredump? > > I meant core dumped. Bleh. Failure to communicate. my fault. Thunderbird Works For Me under the conditions of my previous message. No core dump. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 04:03:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A95F16A409 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@stilltech.net) Received: from mail.geekdelivery.com (s205-206-56-226.ab.hsia.telus.net [205.206.56.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0370213C448 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@stilltech.net) Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([70.65.134.12]) by media32.ca (mail.geekdelivery.com) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000060374.msg for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:38 -0600 From: Ray To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200704262112.29415.ray@stilltech.net> In-Reply-To: <200704262112.29415.ray@stilltech.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:02:39 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704262202.39440.ray@stilltech.net> X-Spam-Processed: mail.geekdelivery.com, Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:38 -0600 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 70.65.134.12 X-Return-Path: ray@stilltech.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.geekdelivery.com, Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:39 -0600 Subject: Re: ftp chroot directory structure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ray@stilltech.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:03:09 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:12 pm, Ray wrote: > Hello, > I am setting up a new web server that must host data from an existing > webserver. We've never had an organized folder structure for private data, > (passwords, secure data, etc) and I'm trying to change that. > there are currently a number of virtual sites all handled through apache > virtualhosts. all (or at least most) users must have ftp access. > my original thought was this: > > apache/priv_data/domain1 > apache/pub_data/domain1 > > where > apache/priv_data/domain1 > contains a soft link to > apache/pub_data/domain1 > and the ftpchroot is > apache/pri_data/domain1 > > this doesn't work like I wanted it to. I can't follow the link with an ftp > client. after posting, I decided I'm going to do it this way, and hope the other developers didn't cheat too bad. I think this is the right way. Ray > obviously the best solution would be > apache/priv_data/domain1 > which contains > apache/data/domain1/pub_data > with domain1 as the ftp root > and pub_data as the http root, > but I'm not the developer of all the sites, and I don't want to have to > trouble shoot other peoples possibly incorrectly written sites (hard coded > path structures) > What can you suggest as my best solution? > Thanks > Ray > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 04:27:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F7716A530 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csprashantpes@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEE613C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csprashantpes@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so853412wxc for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:27:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=I9wm4DPnTd9RSj/o59NX0RJ7oNcen62Pkhm8qbw6jSbmOZWhtQjLHLFlczOUE4pkjCw2U1taNP/FIcEPS2oE5laVUj/DDGMFqv2PByCTsy+nJPD7ydGQMBIcvRZEK7rHABCZO0fPw2Jx2sqqUQMmqZ/o9iENTiVNvjJjE2xef7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=n14PZtrHYocNYgw9/BetJmgeWqIaMbo8HCTVC1vNIeojL7GYj4zNrPvqa+uBaHJnvw4TiC8Zoj8r1fZ3WxS4+e87qjg5j7g1alM0xpgIG1Tma2lPJ+F1w7XBntz7I05ShbUj0xCcPAFkw/BVIwjUF/NygKVoDwBrYCv0kPZ6lJw= Received: by 10.90.65.11 with SMTP id n11mr3094520aga.1177646437205; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.82.13 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33bfedcc0704262100s397dc39fpbe94b323b3d089b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:35 +0530 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B2=AA=E0=B3=8D=E0=B2=B0=E0=B2=B6?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B2=BE=E0=B2=82=E0=B2=A4=E0=B3=8D_?= =?UTF-8?Q?_cool_guy?=" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: reply X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:27:22 -0000 i want information like diff b/w linux/unix/sco-unix.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 04:30:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2704B16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.68.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBDE13C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3R4UKJq025285; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:30:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:30:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200704270430.l3R4UK4q025284@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:30:45 -0000 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Disposition: inline >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i > > >--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: >> I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade from >> 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from the >> installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT enabled >> and 1 GB of memory). >>=20 >> 1) The ports and packages subsystems are as fragile as ever (no big >> surprise). I was able to add packages for less than a day before >> it broke. Sometimes I can still add or delete a package, but >> in at least one case, I can't because pkg_add says that an earlier >> version of the package is already installed, while an attempt to >> remove the earlier version using pkg_delete gets a message saying >> that no such package is installed. Apparently, pkg_add and >> pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a >> particular package is actually installed. Attempting to build ports >> fails while trying to build dependency ports, which was what led >> to attempt to remove libtool and then add the newer version. I'll >> try to get a PR together and submitted soon. > >It is recommended to use an upgrade tool like portupgrade instead of >trying to use pkg_add/pkg_delete "by hand". It is too easy to misuse portinstall/portupgrade had failed to install/upgrade certain ports or packages to satisfy the dependencies in the ports I was trying to install or upgrade. I really did want to install or upgrade several ports, and so I had begun attempting to install the required (or later) versions of the prerequisites as packages in order to get around the build failures. >them and leave your system in an inconsistent state, as yours >apparently has become. That sounds to me like an attempt to skate past my observation that "Apparently, pkg_add and pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a particular package is actually installed." BTW, it is recommended that plain, ASCII text be posted to mailing lists, so as not to send lots of garbage to people who may or may not be using MIME-oriented mail interfaces or using MIME-oriented mail interfaces whose version of MIME is incapatible with that of the sender's mail interface. > >Kris >--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature >Content-Disposition: inline > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) > >iD8DBQFGMWpkWry0BWjoQKURAkkVAJ9wvha6XJpjYLVfEL2yv5MhPh/YmwCgxPCg >Uxfqmp633xMmPXCnamZtNZQ= >=rCHk >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- > Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 04:49:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492B716A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29ECB13C46A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 17922 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 04:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 04:48:44 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3R4nnZs090891 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:49:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3R4nmlb090890 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:49:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:49:48 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20070427044948.GA90766@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <33bfedcc0704262100s397dc39fpbe94b323b3d089b1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33bfedcc0704262100s397dc39fpbe94b323b3d089b1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: reply X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:49:51 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:30:35AM +0530, ???????????????????????? cool guy wrote: > i want information like diff b/w linux/unix/sco-unix.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_operating_systems That should get you started. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." - W. Somerset Maugham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 05:35:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B88D16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0630dde5d1@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F3013C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0630dde5d1@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 32423 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 05:08:32 -0000 Received: from simone-wap.iecc.com (208.31.42.48) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 27 Apr 2007 05:08:32 -0000 Date: 27 Apr 2007 05:08:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20070427050832.69792.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Setting up INN to handle user logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:35:14 -0000 I'm moving my INN server from an old BSD/OS box (yes, there are still a few of them) to FreeBSD. A few people connect to the nntp server from random places on the net and log in with a user and password. In the old version on BSD/OS the logins and passwords are in a text file, but in the current version that part has been rewritten so it's got a zillion wonderful options, none of which I appear to want. Does anyone have a current INN config I could steal that does this? In case it's not clear, these logins are unrelated to the /etc/passwd ones, they're just for news. TIA. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 05:46:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F416A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAF613C44B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 87823 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Apr 2007 05:19:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 05:19:53 -0000 Received: from 68.165.89.71 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:19:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <63405.68.165.89.71.1177651193.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:19:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: limited shell access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:46:37 -0000 hi all.. is it possible to limit access for certain users only to a certain directory tree - other then his/her home directory? for example joe logs into his home directory where there is a symbolic link to some other directory on the system but he can not go up a level (to /home or / ) or anywhere else but home and the directory under the symlink... i looked at the ssh and sshd confs but apparently nothing there... still looking... thanks.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 05:47:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE8916A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from lists.lc-words.com (lists.lc-words.com [83.19.156.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A286F13C45E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists.lc-words.com) by lists.lc-words.com with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HhJJn-0004Yg-1f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:48:31 +0200 Received: from 192.168.11.11 (SquirrelMail authenticated user zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org) by lists.lc-words.com with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:48:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1949.192.168.11.11.1177652911.squirrel@lists.lc-words.com> In-Reply-To: <20070426192617.v2zsj73wgsg04s0s@mail.schnarff.com> References: <463132D5.2090602@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070426192617.v2zsj73wgsg04s0s@mail.schnarff.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:48:31 +0200 (CEST) From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: pfctl syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:47:22 -0000 Dear Alex, > As for the actual error on line 18, if you review: > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html > > You'll see that the file name should be enclosed in quotes. If that That was it! Thank you very much. I was consulting a PDF file where the example was given without quotes. Thanks! -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 06:32:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F189316A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emarikit@infoweapons.com) Received: from ironmail.infoweapons.com (ironmail.infoweapons.com [58.71.34.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B704B13C468 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emarikit@infoweapons.com) Received: (qmail 24557 invoked by uid 98); 27 Apr 2007 06:06:13 -0000 Received: from 10.4.3.41 by ironmail.cebu.infoweapons.com (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.86.1/959. spamassassin: 3.0.4. Clear:RC:1(10.4.3.41):. Processed in 0.216685 secs); 27 Apr 2007 06:06:13 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: emarikit@infoweapons.com via ironmail.cebu.infoweapons.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(10.4.3.41):. Processed in 0.216685 secs) Received: from elan.cebu.infoweapons.com (10.4.3.41) by ironmail.infoweapons.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 06:06:12 -0000 Message-ID: <463193FE.4090504@infoweapons.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:11:10 +0800 From: Elan Marikit Organization: Infoweapons Corp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: set env in chroot script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:33:00 -0000 Greetz, I am a newbie of FreeBSD and I want to know how to set environment inside chroot in a shell script. My script looks like this: chroot $NEWROOT /bin/sh -c "" And I want to set an environment, before the . Is it possible that it will inherit my parent environment? like the environment set in my script? Thanks, Elan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 06:38:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A469E16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8662913C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544801A4D87; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5BA6513C5; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Scott Bennett Message-ID: <20070427063831.GA21999@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200704270430.l3R4UK4q025284@mp.cs.niu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704270430.l3R4UK4q025284@mp.cs.niu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:38:32 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:30:20PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Kris Kennaway > wrote: >=20 > >Mime-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Disposition: inline > >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i > > > > > >--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii > >Content-Disposition: inline > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade = from > >> 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from = the > >> installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT ena= bled > >> and 1 GB of memory). > >>=3D20 > >> 1) The ports and packages subsystems are as fragile as ever (no big > >> surprise). I was able to add packages for less than a day before > >> it broke. Sometimes I can still add or delete a package, but > >> in at least one case, I can't because pkg_add says that an earlier > >> version of the package is already installed, while an attempt to > >> remove the earlier version using pkg_delete gets a message saying > >> that no such package is installed. Apparently, pkg_add and > >> pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a > >> particular package is actually installed. Attempting to build por= ts > >> fails while trying to build dependency ports, which was what led > >> to attempt to remove libtool and then add the newer version. I'll > >> try to get a PR together and submitted soon. > > > >It is recommended to use an upgrade tool like portupgrade instead of > >trying to use pkg_add/pkg_delete "by hand". It is too easy to misuse >=20 > portinstall/portupgrade had failed to install/upgrade certain ports = or > packages to satisfy the dependencies in the ports I was trying to install= or > upgrade. I really did want to install or upgrade several ports, and so I= had > begun attempting to install the required (or later) versions of the > prerequisites as packages in order to get around the build failures. It sounds like you may not have succeeded in first bringing your system back to a sane state. Anyway, if you have problems please be more explicit here. > >them and leave your system in an inconsistent state, as yours > >apparently has become. >=20 > That sounds to me like an attempt to skate past my observation that > "Apparently, pkg_add and pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of > whether a particular package is actually installed." Well, they don't...please paste an appropriate transcript if you think there is a bug. > BTW, it is recommended that plain, ASCII text be posted to mailing > lists, so as not to send lots of garbage to people who may or may not be > using MIME-oriented mail interfaces or using MIME-oriented mail interfaces > whose version of MIME is incapatible with that of the sender's mail inter= face. Uh thanks. Read up on "PGP signatures" sometime. Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGMZpnWry0BWjoQKURAvJ3AKCgd4icbHqQDCTALWZiIhyV7i1KRwCdEvHx hprMUzPT62J6QjsEnpC4PhA= =IBUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 07:16:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F0D16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from skapet.datadok.no (skapet.datadok.no [194.54.107.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A614F13C43E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from thingy.datadok.no ([194.54.103.97] helo=thingy.datadok.no.bsdly.net ident=peter) by skapet.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhKgx-0007dn-9t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:16:31 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> From: peter@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:16:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704260325w3fc06647vb114cd411625e16b@mail.gmail.com> (Andreas Wider's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:25:06 +0200") Message-ID: <87bqhab839.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: How do I prevent unauthorized ssh login attempts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:16:33 -0000 " Andreas Wider?e Andersen " writes: > How can I stop these attempts or block them - or even recognize them? I do > not have IPF installed. There are several packages which could help, the one I prefer is a simple pf rule set which tracks the number of connection attempts per time unit and puts the too-chatty ones in a doghouse list of addresses. One way to do it is described at http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 09:01:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9D916A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CA313C44B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so673565ugh for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z+89grd9vpiI4KYhwbRE1nXnikp8xapZp7FOizWahglAlZncbDxk7VoV5Byo4CYGCMQj2pFKkyLlJ15WxCzYg/I8ipiW+eHbXHT2hdPWlsMOMfV5yFgkAmTKCRqXfRxLnxdw2VGbtT2qsCrcTpX9Wqp7hVdA3PgQda5m/ZT1NIM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lFVHLZtUAYdPSRimPu8uc6cimUPNR+cSmX8cO+PcMpdn2LvddXTYfOMIYW4DPJzlVWRAF+RCx44fTVeqvonHCcvp8kEaEWpO9HOUpiBnpJ3U3KNyaNRz/nOh+4thRJymiocmZBq2mYMfXDEgczm84RVx/3c382c1iULF3OlSpPc= Received: by 10.67.106.3 with SMTP id i3mr2879629ugm.1177664505161; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [87.207.160.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g30sm5032288ugd.2007.04.27.02.01.42; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4631BBF4.30106@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:01:40 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Goldstein References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> In-Reply-To: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:01:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Howard Goldstein wrote: > youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Howard Goldstein wrote: >> >>> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>> I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 >>>> to see if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his >>>> ports, he can probably confirm that this happens with the current >>>> ports. >>> >>> Unfortunately it does still happen for me. For those ports I'm at >>> these versions: >>> >>> gnome-vfs-2.18.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System >>> libgnome-2.18.0_1 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment >> >> If you don't mind me asking, what are the file types, and about how >> large are these files? > > An appx 1K rc file (.nvidia-settings-rc), in another case a one page 29K > .pdf > > > >> >> Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of >> what they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? > > 1. start thunderbird > 2. ^M or click on the write message label > 3. attach any file > 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default > subject or change it to garbage. > 5. ^M to compose another message > 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump If this helps I don't see the problem here (thunderbird-2.0.0.0, all ports up to date). Details below. HTH, Karol # uname -a FreeBSD persephone.orchid.homeunix.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Apr 24 13:53:30 CEST 2007 root@persephone.orchid.homeunix.org:/mnt/big/FreeBSD/obj/usr/src/sys/PERSEPHONE i386 # cd /usr/ports/mail/thunderbird && make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for thunderbird-2.0.0.0: DEBUG=off "Build a debugging image" LOGGING=off "Enable additional log messages" OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=on "Enable some additional optimizations" # portversion -Rv thunderbird atk-1.18.0 = up-to-date with port bitstream-vera-1.10_3 = up-to-date with port cairo-1.4.4 = up-to-date with port cups-base-1.2.10 = up-to-date with port desktop-file-utils-0.12 = up-to-date with port expat-2.0.0_1 = up-to-date with port fontconfig-2.4.2_1,1 = up-to-date with port freetype2-2.2.1_1 = up-to-date with port gettext-0.16.1_1 = up-to-date with port glib-2.12.11 = up-to-date with port gtk-2.10.11 = up-to-date with port hicolor-icon-theme-0.10_1 = up-to-date with port jpeg-6b_4 = up-to-date with port libIDL-0.8.8 = up-to-date with port libXft-2.1.7_1 = up-to-date with port libdrm-2.0.2 = up-to-date with port libiconv-1.9.2_2 = up-to-date with port libxml2-2.6.27 = up-to-date with port nspr-4.6.6 = up-to-date with port nss-3.11.5 = up-to-date with port pango-1.16.3 = up-to-date with port perl-5.8.8 = up-to-date with port pkg-config-0.21 = up-to-date with port png-1.2.14 = up-to-date with port popt-1.7_3 = up-to-date with port shared-mime-info-0.21_1 = up-to-date with port thunderbird-2.0.0.0 = up-to-date with port tiff-3.8.2_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-truetype-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-libraries-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port # pkg_info -Ix gno gnome-mime-data-2.18.0 gnome-vfs-2.18.1 gnome_subr-1.0 gnomehier-2.2 libgnomecanvas-2.14.0_2 /etc/make.conf: CPUTYPE=athlon-xp CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc41 CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++41 WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes - -- Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMbv0ezeoPAwGIYsRCIXZAJ4ij8ceO39XMu2gM9f/0QFHO3cqDgCgjT+n g/LKjIsbAricDtDnczq4+Rc= =C9Uk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 09:34:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BDB16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warrenhead@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D21713C45D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warrenhead@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so563682ana for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:34:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nWOgZAQ7tp7u0hKZ5jFVOjPjARxRrBpsPEA9fX8lDcFQYFX8W9HjOQ7IKwQ6vuIUdY3//q8rZSn6rNFmnMOZgML5tzTXDxArgN4kH4hgt5UamuQFRZA1pylhlueP8y475SIMtLakysYfvr0TO0t1KUZn/+BNCnVyYLQ3sVRcv/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dRwakCWXj1RLIkNpMWMIY3YFBtcvG0s6ycEVFeuDgHrblvU0q3McjEwHjQjZQguq0fOXr9E/qUeCvuu8N45HykiUY1KKxZ88Co/h55M+N02C3rpe2x0pA62lEPNTIVWkOgvcKsTPtcAzosJ4Fm442KTwT89WfiGKuCSJUzj6GmA= Received: by 10.100.111.16 with SMTP id j16mr1863660anc.1177666475570; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.174.3 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51e113440704270234p640c01a1k57b502537bea4354@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:34:35 +0200 From: "Warren Head" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <441wi6lx90.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <462FAD5A.4090400@gmail.com> <441wi6lx90.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: remote x forwarding through ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:34:36 -0000 2007/4/26, Lowell Gilbert : > > WarrenHead writes: > > > Hi list, > > > > I'm trying to use ssh to forward X from a local FreeBSD server to my > > ubuntu machine. > > I'm unable to get X forwarded. (ssh is working) > > > > I set these options: > > ubuntu: > > /etc/ssh/ssh_config > > Host * > > ForwardX11 yes > > ForwardAgent yes > > > > FreeBSD > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config > > X11Forwarding yes > > X11DisplayOffset 10 > > X11UseLocalhost yes > > UseLogin no > > > > I didn't set the $DISPLAY variable, on purpose. > > > > After I log into the server and start xterm (for instance) I get this > > message: DISPLAY is not set. > > SSH should do that for me but I guess it doesn't. > > I don't know why. > > > > I logged into FreeBSD with these commands: > > ssh -v freebsd > > ssh -v -X freebsd > > ssh -v -X -A freebsd > > Did the (verbose) output from those commands mention X11? > > > What could be the cause? Client or server? > > My guess would be server, although Ubuntu could always be doing > something weird. > Hi list, I managed to get a few different machines under my hands and it seems it is my Ubuntu machine which refuses to 'find' the $DISPLAY variable. Of course I don't have a clue as to why, but I'm going to take that to the ubuntu lists Thanks for your time! Cheers, Warren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 10:37:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC1116A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F96213C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A7CEBC78; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:37:44 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Alex Zbyslaw Message-Id: <20070427063744.7639d3e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <462F5AA6.1020906@dial.pipex.com> References: <20070415200255.18e6ab3f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> <20070425084454.165dd9d3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <462F5AA6.1020906@dial.pipex.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Defending against SSH attacks with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:37:46 -0000 In response to Alex Zbyslaw : > Bill Moran wrote: > > >I'm a big fan of PKI, but PKI suffers from one major problem, and it's > >the same flaw that physical keys suffer from: you have to have the key > >with you. > > > > > If I had to use SSH from random locations, I'd get a USB stick that > attached to a (physical) keyring and just stick it with my (physical) > keys since I already have to carry those everywhere. The SSH keys > should be protected by decent passphrases so even losing the USB stick > isn't the biggest deal. Imation seem to make one that has one of those > climbing-style buckles: > http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=247840&CatId=322 I've considered that, except that my keyring is already too damn big and bulky. I am curious about the durability of USB jump drives, though. My keys tend to get thrown around, they get wet, they experience extremes in temperature. Do you have any experience with how well jump drives hold up to that kind of torture? Despite the fact that it's a good idea, I've simply opted out on it. I've got a good, long password for my account and when I weighed the risks vs. the headaches I decided I was probably ok with a good long password. Of course, YMMV. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 05:49:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BCC16A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om_music06@yahoo.com) Received: from web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA9F213C46A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om_music06@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 34410 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Apr 2007 05:49:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ETbBAra6WQboY7mDDE0Ump7xdhYaZC7eEA/NTmuVRRkgqUBiOF6Q/qaLHvjpCkd1V7FKsbiSNFkKHs0rfDclCq6qodbnaeievieJkOkM+id1NzdLJnCU35ixZ7RLCfDiYS1AU2qCrhmTEtrXuKgAK+1tyseveTWJVo1t8riG6ps=; X-YMail-OSG: de3jj_UVM1mGUyWTl2B5CDCyzStY9adtThOVnXQCoCdR6GoLy0SOO4Pg1YawATezg3UGwVZ514uZf9yr45lPPeepq7pbSWsQMPGlhreO7uBmjV.sjUKfKrB5r1QaGw-- Received: from [124.30.120.154] by web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:49:16 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:49:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Dhananjaya hiremath To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <297939.33765.qm@web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:38:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Recompiling the source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:49:19 -0000 Hello sir, Here we installed FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and installing the gnome2.But here it is giving file system is full (device is full) but we used the entire disk how it is possible to full the disk. And another thing is we updated the source tree but how to recompile this. --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 11:57:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D5316A582 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D5113C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so409004nze for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:57:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G/enAjNY0aIeCKgcdXFNXK7juG5M21Hrez+4zPSYXgWHHmSJ0H3bUqagai65nDdxO8iRa1y6oZOONfBMiJUhMpJWkyQ0O3jQiaw3f0EUuzoVkepzDpaWi6HEJgZ8Ypp1Fx/Qr7Ch8l8L7FwvU5CdgNcsLbUaNY8D3yrZK5p86jA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lHmIKtG0Y3JX4T9fjTICsfK8zOQZMITpprpAXapiMwFbP38MIccEs6JjmoZwuETSEhOXaAu/kGhFfGP3NzCAAImETdTo0DxycJbEyiDYcyq2gRjaxrpw0h5cnHbmvIOMBcgDWFnlnxycy3fBoCMZuObZCK6thU5AT/Q3pv2EL+U= Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr990224wae.1177675020692; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.52.13 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860704270457vb60557fy62da036e06443e58@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:57:00 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: "Dhananjaya hiremath" In-Reply-To: <297939.33765.qm@web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <297939.33765.qm@web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recompiling the source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:57:02 -0000 As to rebuilding the source tree...read the handbook for a step-by-step guide for updating the source, configuring the kernel, and all those things. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ On 4/27/07, Dhananjaya hiremath wrote: > > Hello sir, > > Here we installed FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and installing the > gnome2.But here it is giving file system is full (device is full) but we > used the entire disk how it is possible to full the disk. > > > And another thing is we updated the source tree but how to recompile this. > > > --------------------------------- > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 11:58:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517116A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F406513C483 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so409444nze for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k4oniSxqNpzVjHXC5lYCl5gnFnG/AMDBNBF83yrlg5MtRdmm2wcVDEVO4SB8WhU6yMQPXKbatX1GnTodK10nz7eT4cnqk5OAUecIeLYcI/2/SAgtCgiECHZ30KnHG1oL7lXzxiyAVCBoemQrvoTRowg3oQpbLUqE8Y4aCtFvIHM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cIQcW4G6kmzG+OdeWPW3ELN9eccooK7Mv8loVxSQDier9jShdQtKikcggfNmH7wpUQ2M3jZ8h+S4cn4R1gNFgyPdbzDuh6pHWQPoVHUDGvGFSlAbabJyaYY1WD5dERl0CD/Xc8aCnQDw01ScLcnoqMZ0/4ff0e0OEyFJ9uK+Jx0= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr967348wak.1177675128028; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.52.13 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860704270458n52518c2yf74a49e1b689060f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:58:47 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20070427063744.7639d3e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070415200255.18e6ab3f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070416184315.GA93730@idoru.cepheid.org> <462E7F2A.10202@vindaloo.com> <20070425084454.165dd9d3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <462F5AA6.1020906@dial.pipex.com> <20070427063744.7639d3e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Defending against SSH attacks with pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:58:49 -0000 On 4/27/07, Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Alex Zbyslaw : > > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > > >I'm a big fan of PKI, but PKI suffers from one major problem, and it's > > >the same flaw that physical keys suffer from: you have to have the key > > >with you. > > > > > > > > If I had to use SSH from random locations, I'd get a USB stick that > > attached to a (physical) keyring and just stick it with my (physical) > > keys since I already have to carry those everywhere. The SSH keys > > should be protected by decent passphrases so even losing the USB stick > > isn't the biggest deal. Imation seem to make one that has one of those > > climbing-style buckles: > > > http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=247840&CatId=322 > > I've considered that, except that my keyring is already too damn big and > bulky. I am curious about the durability of USB jump drives, though. My > keys tend to get thrown around, they get wet, they experience extremes in > temperature. Do you have any experience with how well jump drives hold up > to that kind of torture? > > Despite the fact that it's a good idea, I've simply opted out on it. I've > got a good, long password for my account and when I weighed the risks vs. > the headaches I decided I was probably ok with a good long password. > > Of course, YMMV. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" My flash drive has gone through the washer machine and the only thing that happened was it got a small spot of rust on it. Other than that, it worked fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 12:01:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC48316A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351E613C489 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l3RC19ox031638; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:01:09 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:01:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070427035735.utrlkhf34gwsw4ok@zeus.arrishq.net> In-Reply-To: <20070427035735.utrlkhf34gwsw4ok@zeus.arrishq.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704271401.09108.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Tommy Scheunemann Subject: Re: Login Conf not parsed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:01:16 -0000 On Friday 27 April 2007, Tommy Scheunemann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm running a FreeBSD 6.2 system, only have SSH access to it. The only > user which is allowed to login had Bash (installed from the Ports) > installed. > Since 2 days I can't login any longer - Bash misses a library. I tried > to create a login_conf file in the users home directory but it seems > that the file isn't parsed. Did you name it .login_conf (note the dot)? > Content is: > > --- snip --- > > me:\ > > :shell=/bin/sh:\ > :setenv=SHELL=/bin/sh: > > --- snip --- > > I've created the database via cap_mkdb at my local system and uploaded > this file as well, then changed the file permissions to 0400 and > ownership is right as well. Just - that file isn't parsed :( > > Any other way of changing the user's shell - could install in the > worst case some kind of PHP shell - are also welcome. Try 'chsh ' as root. > The library which is missing could be uploaded from my local system, > just - of course - I don't have any write permissions in the usual > locations. > > Thanks in advance HTH, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 12:19:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2159B16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa05.ono.com (smtp.ono.com [62.42.230.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED113C46E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from sol.retena.com (83.173.184.241) by resmaa05.ono.com (7.3.118.4) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 462CBE5100268233 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:08:18 +0200 Message-ID: <462CBE5100268233@> (added by postmaster@resmaa05.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:08:19 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: CVS server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:19:33 -0000 Hello: I'm trying to setup a cvs server. I have a vps jail account so i can't= make a jail in the jail to run the cvs server. Has cvs server a /chroot/= mode? Where can i find documentation to do so? All doc, man and howto i= readed shows how to do creating a jail. Is there other way to do so? Thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------- "La copia casera esta matando los beneficios de las grandes compa=F1ias. Dejamos esta cara de la cinta en blanco para que ayudes"=20 Dead Kennedys, Cara B de /In God We Trust, Inc./ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 12:55:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B2F16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7191213C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 19290 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 05:55:49 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 19282, pid: 19283, t: 4.1337s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.84/m:43/d:3122 spam: 3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (66.205.146.210) by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 05:55:45 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (bigdaddy.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.3]) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9C2164B2E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:22:56 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on qsmtp3.surewest.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Subject: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:55:50 -0000 I'm attempting to update my systems. I see that portupgrade has been moved to ports-mgmt/portupgrade in early February. I've Googled but can not find any posts (there must be some?) on the proper steps to update. I tried the standard and here is the output: lacksheep# portupgrade -n ports-mgmt/portupgrade cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade ---> Session started at: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:16:17 -0700 ** No such installed package: ports-mgmt/portupgrade ** None has been installed or upgraded. So I thought maybe my package database needed to be updated (a guess). Here is that output: blacksheep# pkgdb -F cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade ---> Checking the package registry database Missing origin: bsdpan-CPAN-1.90 -> Ignored. (the package is held; specify -f to force) Missing origin: bsdpan-Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0302 -> Ignored. (the package is held; specify -f to force) Missing origin: bsdpan-TermReadKey-2.30 -> Ignored. (the package is held; specify -f to force) Missing origin: bsdpan-libnet-1.20 -> Ignored. (the package is held; specify -f to force) Duplicated origin: net/p5-NetPacket - bsdpan-NetPacket-0.04 p5-NetPacket-0.04 Unregister any of them? [no] Nothing about portupgrade. However I don't understand all the "Missing origin" lines or what I should do to fix them. So this seems like updating portupgrade should be trivial but I am stuck. Suggestions appreciated. Thanks, Drew -- Be a Great Magician! Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 13:06:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E916A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: from smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 828D413C4BB for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: (qmail 46533 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 13:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.27.1.5?) (cms.kw@rogers.com@74.109.56.227 with plain) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 13:06:42 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: G5z9HHcVM1nc3i.56sWla4Ci5oJVvfst4ueC1hUR639X_Fbi.OyIDCLaFTvKtp99oQ-- Message-ID: <4631F567.7080002@hier7.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:06:47 -0400 From: Chris Slothouber Organization: hier7 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Tomlinson , FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:06:47 -0000 Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I'm attempting to update my systems. I see that portupgrade has been > moved to ports-mgmt/portupgrade in early February. I've Googled but can > not find any posts (there must be some?) on the proper steps to update. > I tried the standard and here is the output: > > lacksheep# portupgrade -n ports-mgmt/portupgrade > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade > ---> Session started at: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:16:17 -0700 > ** No such installed package: ports-mgmt/portupgrade > ** None has been installed or upgraded. Hi Drew, Try portupgrade and specify the origin using the new path and the name of the installed portupgrade package, e.g.: portupgrade -f -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade-2.0.1_1,1 You can get the exact name of the installed portupgrade package by running the following: pkg_info | grep portupgrade I hope this helps! All the best. - Chris Slothouber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 13:15:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73CD16A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD5A13C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3RDFInx082536; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:15:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:15:12 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Tomlinson References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:15:21 -0000 Drew Tomlinson wrote: > So this seems like updating portupgrade should be trivial but I am > stuck. Suggestions appreciated. Yeah, I missed the note on this one, too. Not the change note, but I don't recall seeing the instructions on what to do about it. Tried deinstalling portupgrade and reinstalling? The catch-22, of course, is that you can't "cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade" in order to `make deinstall`. However, this might work (and I believe it's the kludge I used to get around the issue): $ rm -rf /var/db/pkg/portupgrade* $ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade $ make install clean HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- Schmidt's Observation: All things being equal, a fat person uses more soap than a thin person. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 13:40:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55F116A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B598913C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29786 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 13:40:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Apr 2007 13:40:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4B2612842D; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:40:08 -0400 (EDT) To: Kevin Kinsey References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:40:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> (Kevin Kinsey's message of "Fri\, 27 Apr 2007 08\:15\:12 -0500") Message-ID: <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Drew Tomlinson , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:40:09 -0000 Kevin Kinsey writes: > Drew Tomlinson wrote: > >> So this seems like updating portupgrade should be trivial but I am >> stuck. Suggestions appreciated. > > Yeah, I missed the note on this one, too. Not the change note, but > I don't recall seeing the instructions on what to do about it. > Tried deinstalling portupgrade and reinstalling? The catch-22, > of course, is that you can't "cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade" > in order to `make deinstall`. However, this might work (and I believe > it's the kludge I used to get around the issue): > > $ rm -rf /var/db/pkg/portupgrade* > $ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade > $ make install clean A little safer would be to replace the first line with "pkg_delete portupgrade*". If you're not going to go with the "portupgrade -o" solution that someone already posted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 13:45:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58A716A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from trans-warp.net (hyperion.trans-warp.net [216.37.208.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBF313C484 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [65.193.73.208]) by trans-warp.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 114583054-1860479 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:45:51 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> References: <021c01c786a0$fe7e5510$0300020a@mickey> <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <965CD908-3A6A-4324-9479-1F9D61085104@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:45:17 -0400 To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Authenticated-User: bsilver@chrononomicon.com Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:45:23 -0000 > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen > wrote: >> Bill Moran wrote: >>>> A friend of mine going for his Dr. at CMU (Patrick Wagstrom: >>>> GNOME guy) >>>> describes an exercise where a professor intentionally injected >>>> false >>>> information into Wikipedia, then gave his students a research >>>> assignment >>>> that involved that information. Apparently the number of >>>> students who >>>> trusted the false information without verifying it was quite >>>> high. I >>>> should take that as a lesson that most people _don't_ know how >>>> to verify >>>> the validity of information and be more careful when I make >>>> sarcastic >>>> statements. >> >> Lee Capps wrote: >>> That's interesting, though, to pick a nit, it may just show that >>> students were in a hurry, rather than that they necessarily trust >>> the >>> info or that they don't know _how_ to verify the info. >> >> And also: Where is this professor's ethics? Does he also misinform >> the >> students in class, only to later accuse them of not verifying the >> facts? >> And did he even think about the fact that others may have read his >> misinformation? Why does this professor think that his agenda is more >> important than Wikipedia's? Did he later correct the articles? How is it unethical? He altered information and tested his students to see if they'd verify it. Although unless it was information relating to their major I don't see why he should berate them for not checking. I'm not likely to care enough to double- or triple- check information on many many topics out there if it's something irrelevant to my line of work or my interests/hobbies. Now, if he LEFT the information vandalized, that would be unethical, since others out there may rely on the information and he knowingly left it with misleading data, since the whole idea behind the Wiki is that people with knowledge will share their knowledge and not mislead people. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 13:58:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CF816A408 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eventos@npmail.com.br) Received: from smtp2.braslink.com (smtp2.braslink.com [204.16.3.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B1A313C48C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eventos@npmail.com.br) Received: (qmail 25031 invoked by uid 0); 27 Apr 2007 08:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (189.4.15.1) by smtp2.braslink.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 08:36:45 -0000 X-Sender: eventos@npmail.com.br From: "Seminarios de licitacoes, contratos e pregao" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:36:38 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: <20070427135819.4B1A313C48C@mx1.freebsd.org> Cc: Subject: Cursos - Maio 2007 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:19 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:03:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAC216A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DA913C45B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 32B831CC21; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:14:41 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:14:40 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> <44mz0uajod.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44mz0uajod.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704270714.40992.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:03:04 -0000 On Thursday 26 April 2007 14:51:30 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Southwell writes: > > On Thursday 26 April 2007 13:11:35 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> David Southwell writes: > >> > How do I stop these messages from umass devices. > >> > Apr 18 03:27:03 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da1 -> 6 > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. > >> > CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > >> > Status Error > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: > >> > Check Condition > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY > >> > asc:3a,0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium > >> > not present Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): > >> > Unretryable error Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: Opened disk da0 -> 6 > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. > >> > CDB: 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI > >> > Status Error > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: > >> > Check Condition > >> > Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY > >> > asc:3a,0 Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium > >> > not present Apr 18 03:27:05 dns1 kernel: (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): > >> > Unretryable error > >> > > >> > [root@dns1 /tmp]# camcontrol devlist > >> > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > >> > (pass0,da0) at scbus0 target 0 lun > >> > 1 (pass1,da1) [root@dns1 /tmp]# > >> > > >> > With no devices plugged I get these meesages at the rate of 1 every > >> > two seconds into /var/log/messages > >> > >> Is something polling those devices? > >> Some kind of automounter? > >> [Gnome and KDE seem to have their own automounters, running from user > >> level...] _______________________________________________ > > > > I do not know -- how can I find out? > > Have you enabled amd(8)? > Are you running Gnome or KDE? > For example, I see that in Gnome, under the preferences menu, there is > an option for whether to automatically mount removable media when > inserted. If you disable that and the messages go away, then we at > least know what the trigger is. > > > If I put a 256M memory card in then messages for da0 stop.. > > Good; that makes sense. The problem is that although messages stop for da0 I cannot stop da1 AND I would really like to be able to control this without having to have memory cards et al in the devices at all times. I have tried kde settings>peripherals>storage media and removed the tick box adjacent to Enable medium application autostart after mount but that made no difference. The messages continue!! There must be some other way.. Thnaks in advance to anyone who can tell me how to manage these devices properly david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:06:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E4716A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from trans-warp.net (hyperion.trans-warp.net [216.37.208.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3ED13C480 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [65.193.73.208]) by trans-warp.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 114585173-1860479 for multiple; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:06:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070424182027.33d16b28.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <770D13E9-D603-4749-A09F-6BC66F0EFFE8@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:06:18 -0400 To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Authenticated-User: bsilver@chrononomicon.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:06:34 -0000 On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: >>> No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account >>> banned, >>> and the head of his department should be informed of his >>> vandalism. I >>> don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his >>> legal >>> name. . . . >> >> yawn. That sort of research has been going on for years. >> >> Less interesting is the sort of trash emitted by people who don't >> like >> knowing that whatever they've read on a webpage might not be >> completely >> accurate, and that they might have to do some of their own thinking. >> >> regards. > > At one time I had high hopes that the internet would usher in a new > era of increased knowledge and reduced gullibility. Instead it > seems to have simply hastened the arrival to the wrong conclusions. There are opportunities for increased knowledge. Gullibility, though, is part of our human nature. How many of you delve four levels deep when looking for a quick reference on something that, in the long run, you care little about? If you're not a mechanic or car enthusiast, do you look into anything and everything on how a clutch works, or every variation of four wheel drive implementations? Probably not. We don't devote time and resources into being "renaissance people". For me, I look up the answer, if it sounds reasonable, I go with it unless someone else points out a deficiency in the answer. I need a quick and dirty answer to move on to things I *do* care about. The problem is that people will accept an answer whether it makes sense or not. We had someone once convinced that a "Laser Car Wash" cleaned cars by shooting small lasers at the car to clean it. It was something so far left field of what they're interested in and knowledgeable about that they just accepted the answer, even though there's no way such a system would be affordable (or safe enough) to use as a car washing tool. Then again, there are those that do this intentionally, because spreading misinformation is in their best interest and they profit from it. Even schools profit, not necessarily monetarily, by keeping students from questioning what they are taught. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:17:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE49916A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC3C13C4B9 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3REH3Rg082976; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:17:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <463205DA.1040000@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:16:58 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Drew Tomlinson , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:11 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Kevin Kinsey writes: > >> Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> >>> So this seems like updating portupgrade should be trivial but I am >>> stuck. Suggestions appreciated. >> Yeah, I missed the note on this one, too. Not the change note, but >> I don't recall seeing the instructions on what to do about it. >> Tried deinstalling portupgrade and reinstalling? The catch-22, >> of course, is that you can't "cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade" >> in order to `make deinstall`. However, this might work (and I believe >> it's the kludge I used to get around the issue): >> >> $ rm -rf /var/db/pkg/portupgrade* >> $ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade >> $ make install clean > > A little safer would be to replace the first line with > "pkg_delete portupgrade*". > > If you're not going to go with the "portupgrade -o" solution > that someone already posted. Yeah, I think Chris hit that one right. Portupgrade_guru hat to him.... ;-) KDK -- The more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:17:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BA116A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3F913C4E3 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 91990 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 10:17:57 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2007 10:17:57 -0400 Message-ID: <46320614.1090008@queue.to> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:17:56 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <4631BBF4.30106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4631BBF4.30106@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: karol.kwiat@gmail.com Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:17:58 -0000 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Howard Goldstein wrote: >> youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Howard Goldstein wrote: >>> >>>> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>>> I guess I would have to update all gnome packages from 2.16 to 2.18 >>>>> to see if it helps... but since Howard Goldstein rebuild all his >>>>> ports, he can probably confirm that this happens with the current >>>>> ports. >>>> Unfortunately it does still happen for me. For those ports I'm at >>>> these versions: >>>> >>>> gnome-vfs-2.18.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System >>>> libgnome-2.18.0_1 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment >>> If you don't mind me asking, what are the file types, and about how >>> large are these files? >> An appx 1K rc file (.nvidia-settings-rc), in another case a one page 29K >> .pdf >> >> >> >>> Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of >>> what they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? >> 1. start thunderbird >> 2. ^M or click on the write message label >> 3. attach any file >> 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default >> subject or change it to garbage. >> 5. ^M to compose another message >> 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump > > If this helps I don't see the problem here (thunderbird-2.0.0.0, all > ports up to date). Details below. Do you by chance have openldap23-client installed? Yesterday I promised to rebuild with the default make.conf CFLAGS but in the interim gnome2 was installed which comes with openldap23-client apparently, and now the mere presence of openldap is forcing a fatal build error [blahh blah blah] gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/liblber' cc -o decode.o -c -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -pipe -I/usr/local/include -g -pipe -ansi -Wall -pthread -O -g -fPIC -DDEBUG_root -DMOZILLA_CLIENT=1 -DDEBUG=1 -DXP_UNIX=1 -DFREEBSD=1 -DHAVE_BSD_FLOCK=1 -DHAVE_LCHOWN=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DFORCE_PR_LOG -D_PR_PTHREADS -UHAVE_CVAR_BUILT_ON_SEM -DUSE_WAITPID -DNEEDPROTOS -DNET_SSL -DNO_LIBLCACHE -DLDAP_REFERRALS -DNS_DOMESTIC -I../../../ldap/include -I/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/dist/./include decode.c In file included from decode.c:52: lber-int.h:121: error: syntax error before "LDAP_CALLBACK" lber-int.h:130: error: redefinition of typedef 'Seqorset' /usr/local/include/lber.h:164: error: previous declaration of 'Seqorset' was here lber-int.h:149: error: syntax error before "ldap_x_iovec" lber-int.h:165: error: syntax error before "BERTranslateProc" lber-int.h:187: error: syntax error before "LDAP_IOF_READ_CALLBACK" lber-int.h:198: error: syntax error before "LDAP_X_EXTIOF_READ_CALLBACK ... -I /usr/local/include is what's doing it, it continues the build when manually stripping /usr/local/include from this directory's build options but it breaks later on as well. A very few google hits on this error, none of which lead to fix or workaround. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:41:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBAA16A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982BD13C44B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id AACAC1CC21; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:52:54 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: "James Seward" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:52:54 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <200704270714.40992.david@vizion2000.net> <720051dc0704270733l33f7e680j1588d2ad0b00a95e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <720051dc0704270733l33f7e680j1588d2ad0b00a95e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704270752.54496.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:41:16 -0000 On Friday 27 April 2007 07:33:11 James Seward wrote: > On 4/27/07, David Southwell wrote: > > The problem is that although messages stop for da0 I cannot stop da1 AND > > I would really like to be able to control this without having to have > > memory cards et al in the devices at all times. > > I get this when I have my USB card reader plugged in (and empty). I'm > pretty sure it's hal (via KDE) which is responsible for the polling in > my case. My low-tech fix is to yank the USB cable out when I'm not > using the reader :) If there was a way to stop it filling up my syslog > though I'd love to know. > > /JMS Umph -- glad I am not the only one with the problem. The difficulty in my case is that the media devices are built in to the front of the case so I cannot really unplu the usb without turning off the machine!! There must be a solution. I wish I was a bit brighter!! david From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:47:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728C516A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from qsmtp4.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5960613C45E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 22864 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 07:47:18 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 22849, pid: 22851, t: 2.7701s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.84/m:43/d:3122 spam: 3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (66.205.146.210) by qsmtp4 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 07:47:15 -0700 Received: from [192.168.25.6] (unknown [192.168.25.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D734C1648BB; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46320CF8.90002@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:47:20 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on qsmtp4.surewest.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:47:22 -0000 On 4/27/2007 6:40 AM Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Kevin Kinsey writes: > > >> Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> >> >>> So this seems like updating portupgrade should be trivial but I am >>> stuck. Suggestions appreciated. >>> >> Yeah, I missed the note on this one, too. Not the change note, but >> I don't recall seeing the instructions on what to do about it. >> Tried deinstalling portupgrade and reinstalling? The catch-22, >> of course, is that you can't "cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade" >> in order to `make deinstall`. However, this might work (and I believe >> it's the kludge I used to get around the issue): >> >> $ rm -rf /var/db/pkg/portupgrade* >> $ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade >> $ make install clean >> > > A little safer would be to replace the first line with > "pkg_delete portupgrade*". > > If you're not going to go with the "portupgrade -o" solution > that someone already posted. Thanks for all the replies. Funny thing is that when trying the "portupgrade -o" solution and using "pkg_info | grep portupgrade", no results were returned. The /var/db/pkg directory had no portupgrade* entries. Thus I just used "portupgrade -N portupgrade" to upgrade. All seemed OK. I did notice a "make config" window that asked me which version of Berkeley DB to use for the backend. Not knowing, I just chose the default of ">=2" and the port built without error. Next I attempted "pkgdb -L" suggested in the pkg-message file. It returned this error: blacksheep# pkgdb -L [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] I assume this is due to choosing the incorrect Berkeley DB version? So should I rebuild the portupgrade port and choose Berkeley DB 1.85 or is it recommended to convert the pkgdb to the newer version? If I should convert, how? Thanks, Drew -- Be a Great Magician! Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:51:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C3616A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5523D13C45A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so997594wxc for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uWLDlFt99uCYW9INhsmP0DesbMgA9mFcNYt2mYQgGBn5zNnxX1QvXiqwHza/WjvC/NrS4L9WNtYVrrb0ERisc4v7PvPBRk58bGzxgWOOHYdatI2MqxslE4fbY0xCaRTClAFodVpaJBHG2jahfCaITKs1TMMBT0ejUjJ7Jo/fH8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uSVhUB5AAv9yC6KNEn6moiNPSOzDh4ViHdg2R0jRN6RJ6r/TlKnw69eFYcw3D2AJAzOQPs9e35AASL5cQ8KVg1dsrj4eNWDrWqEFfoNUziJKPBf97WVP+wXjXEfACbn7rldTIBnJeLyhCQJm1g8CTMnXElDt/D3grrEdfCsATaw= Received: by 10.90.81.14 with SMTP id e14mr3484384agb.1177685514787; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [87.207.160.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b23sm1395002ugd.2007.04.27.07.51.39; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46320DF3.1020904@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:51:31 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Goldstein References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <4631BBF4.30106@gmail.com> <46320614.1090008@queue.to> In-Reply-To: <46320614.1090008@queue.to> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:51:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Howard Goldstein wrote: > Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Howard Goldstein wrote: >>> youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >>>> Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of >>>> what they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? >>> 1. start thunderbird >>> 2. ^M or click on the write message label >>> 3. attach any file >>> 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default >>> subject or change it to garbage. >>> 5. ^M to compose another message >>> 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump >> >> If this helps I don't see the problem here (thunderbird-2.0.0.0, all >> ports up to date). Details below. > > Do you by chance have openldap23-client installed? Yes, I have: # pkg_info -Ix openldap openldap-client-2.3.35 Open source LDAP client implementation > Yesterday I > promised to rebuild with the default make.conf CFLAGS but in the interim > gnome2 was installed which comes with openldap23-client apparently, and > now the mere presence of openldap is forcing a fatal build error > > [blahh blah blah] > > gmake[5]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/liblber' > > cc -o decode.o -c -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/nss > -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -pipe -I/usr/local/include -g -pipe -ansi > -Wall -pthread -O -g -fPIC -DDEBUG_root -DMOZILLA_CLIENT=1 -DDEBUG=1 > -DXP_UNIX=1 -DFREEBSD=1 -DHAVE_BSD_FLOCK=1 -DHAVE_LCHOWN=1 > -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DFORCE_PR_LOG -D_PR_PTHREADS > -UHAVE_CVAR_BUILT_ON_SEM -DUSE_WAITPID -DNEEDPROTOS -DNET_SSL > -DNO_LIBLCACHE -DLDAP_REFERRALS -DNS_DOMESTIC > -I../../../ldap/include > -I/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/dist/./include decode.c > In file included from decode.c:52: > lber-int.h:121: error: syntax error before "LDAP_CALLBACK" > lber-int.h:130: error: redefinition of typedef 'Seqorset' > /usr/local/include/lber.h:164: error: previous declaration of 'Seqorset' > was here > lber-int.h:149: error: syntax error before "ldap_x_iovec" > lber-int.h:165: error: syntax error before "BERTranslateProc" > lber-int.h:187: error: syntax error before "LDAP_IOF_READ_CALLBACK" > lber-int.h:198: error: syntax error before "LDAP_X_EXTIOF_READ_CALLBACK > ... > > -I /usr/local/include is what's doing it, it continues the build when > manually stripping /usr/local/include from this directory's build > options but it breaks later on as well. > > A very few google hits on this error, none of which lead to fix or > workaround. You'll probably need to update some of the dependencies first but that's only an uneducated guess. Those ports build fine here. Maybe ask @freebsd-ports or @freebsd-gnome? Cheers, Karol - -- Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMg3zezeoPAwGIYsRCKmPAJ46veKwcrKg0XVmSrnk5oATgJRxHACfQT5L cHsarR/fjPWg0l2B26STo/U= =IHbY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:57:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AC716A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.engmark@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF0013C465 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.engmark@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so918223wra for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=efLSVAXQRWvtMHqpQSGG7n6KOhJCYUYAGg4IAK2LL2xcnrqmH5g4sgmjkhBvaO8XJkvGc4TbHZp0Xrak1SM45vVaRRx/0OjUpABWXba7ZvItDmAY+luOdGWTq3fYzaxKIg5pMv1Rib7lqvsQvDH7Kn9t6j5wc1VwH4B2vIXWfNI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DDr1oY0v2/msJZARvMFPi/ZLKbevKFbgbL0hAaU6ssbDc6v3hC4jS3ex+bIb3AB6wUznqMM5haPQDuFdp6ClhdvcAQfSxax9OFG/K/YEuPj7+qSIW9m2Uqr4b7h+0DO3lAjuYGfrgnk45ewcPQoyLyn6HL+87UCDZZRrtefougU= Received: by 10.114.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr1019330waa.1177685866754; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.79.14 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7d4f41f50704270757v2c04ee20mc58a2561dc2dbc93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:57:46 +0200 From: "Victor Engmark" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Dell D610 touchpad configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:57:48 -0000 Hi all, I'm attempting to configure my laptop properly for X.org, and the only device which doesn't work properly now is the touchpad. The tutorials I've seen so far seem to assume that all touchpads use the Synaptic driver, but this is the information I get at boot time, and which I assume is the touchpad: $ dmesg | grep psm0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model GlidePoint, device ID 0 Apropos, "dmesg | grep -i synapt" gives no output, and "dmesg | grep -i mouse" only shows the PS/2 + the USB mouse. I've tried a lot of tutorials, restarting whenever I change something, but I always end up with the following problem: $ grep ^\(EE\) /var/log/Xorg.0.log (EE) Synaptics Touchpad Found no Synaptics, found Mouse model 1 instead (EE) Synaptics Touchpad no synaptics touchpad detected and no repeater device (EE) Synaptics Touchpad Unable to query/initialize Synaptics hardware. (EE) PreInit failed for input device "Synaptics Touchpad" Another command which might shed some light over the situation: $ cat /dev/psm0 cat: /dev/psm0: Resource temporarily unavailable Relevant sections from /etc/X11/xorg.conf: Section "ServerFlags" Option "DefaultServerLayout" "Dell Latitude D610" EndSection Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Dell Latitude D610" Screen 0 "Dell Latitude D610 screen" 0 0 InputDevice "Dell USB mouse" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Synaptics Touchpad" "AlwaysCore" InputDevice "Dell Latitude D610 keyboard" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Module" ... Load "synaptics" # Ran this first: cd /usr/ports/x11-servers/synaptics && make install ... EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Synaptics Touchpad" Driver "synaptics" Option "AlwaysCore" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "Protocol" "psm" #Option "SendCoreEvents" "on" Option "LeftEdge" "1700" Option "RightEdge" "5300" Option "TopEdge" "1700" Option "BottomEdge" "4200" Option "FingerLow" "25" Option "FingerHigh" "30" Option "MaxTapTime" "180" Option "MaxTapMove" "220" Option "VertScrollDelta" "100" Option "HorizScrollDelta" "100" Option "MinSpeed" "0.06" Option "MaxSpeed" "0.06" Option "AccelFactor" "0.0010" Option "ScrollButtonRepeat" "100" Option "UpDownScrolling" "on" Option "UpDownRepeat" "on" Option "LeftRightScrolling" "on" Option "LeftRightRepeat" "on" Option "SHMConfig" "on" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Dell USB mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection For the record, the USB mouse, keyboard, and graphical settings work fine. -- Victor Engmark Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - What is said in Latin, sounds profound From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 14:59:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0716A16A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFAA13C459 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so918866wra for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gjA0Dx5CELUgV1VlcosAzRxZr6xtpvw+l04jTMJJvjVWJqY8zqQetyjW18f/dPhbHmyG/gtlu251zHev7XpXsx7YvloAM9kOlUQWZHpk2WjQF/dhq0zNUAuKzsiS++hE8wGgZcVtsx3DdWmg6CsWNDssLhS5IsM1kMOttQZJ4/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oJRNKBGfcuJuFn8/HoepNdzRKEdAVX92OAIKOm4BIw3np5LamPk9eYzHuepCSbSmgezKlQX5qrsFDxYoPzS+eUMd0OyEolut4tAG5/a2uZJldktmzfU4u6LjfiCM/VESLCGB8RuyoZSdoljYj1LlG8imShUiKjd/9G6qJf/mXas= Received: by 10.114.178.1 with SMTP id a1mr1003933waf.1177684391835; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.145.3 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <720051dc0704270733l33f7e680j1588d2ad0b00a95e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:33:11 +0100 From: "James Seward" To: "David Southwell" In-Reply-To: <200704270714.40992.david@vizion2000.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> <44mz0uajod.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <200704270714.40992.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:59:52 -0000 On 4/27/07, David Southwell wrote: > The problem is that although messages stop for da0 I cannot stop da1 AND I > would really like to be able to control this without having to have memory > cards et al in the devices at all times. I get this when I have my USB card reader plugged in (and empty). I'm pretty sure it's hal (via KDE) which is responsible for the polling in my case. My low-tech fix is to yank the USB cable out when I'm not using the reader :) If there was a way to stop it filling up my syslog though I'd love to know. /JMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 15:01:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9261316A408 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3D613C45B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3RF1lu9044610; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Christopher Sean Hilton" , "User Questions" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <4630CDA4.30201@vindaloo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:01:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Sean Hilton [mailto:chris@vindaloo.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:05 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt; User Questions > Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam > > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > [snip...] > > >> Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs > >> never retry message delivery. > > > > Actually, no. Greylisting works because it delays the spam injector > > long enough that the injector will get blacklisted by the time that the > > greylist opens the door for the mail to come in. Greylisting alone > > by itself is getting less and less effective every day. > Spammers are now > > starting to setup spam injectors to retry. If you think about it, it is > > very easy to program. Simply create a list of victims, iterate through > > the list once, deleting all the victims that accept, then wait several > > hours and iterate through the list again. It didn't take a > rocket scientist > > to figure that one out. > > > > Since SA has a lot of the major blacklist servers as score-feeders, the > > spam that gets past the greylist just gets tagged by SA. > > > > When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a > greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The > other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window. That's probably par. However, the reason your putting so much faith in the delaying, is simply that you aren't getting a lot of spam. I have published e-mail addresses. Without greylisting I got about 1500-2000 mail messages a day to each of them. With greylisting alone that drops down to about 400-500. The thing is, that spam is a numbers game. Someone who is only getting for example 50-100 spams a day to their mailbox is going to think greylisting is virtually 100% effective, simply because when they institute it, their spam goes from 50-100 down to 1-5 spams. So they are going to probably conclude that someone getting ten times the amount of spam as them will have their spam drop down to the same 1-5 after greylisting. But, spammers are perfectly willing to send 1000 spams to a single mailbox if they think that doing so will get 1 spam past the filters on that box. I do have customers with -unpublished- e-mail addresses that are perfectly satisfied with greylisting alone - simply because they don't get a lot of spam in the first place. But, that's like saying that injecting a can of stop-leak into a leaking tire is a fix for it. Stop-leak will reduce the rate that air leaks out down to an undetectable amount if the initial leak was small, but the tire still is leaking. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 15:31:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B7B16A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1309E13C4AE for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3RFSYd3003537; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:28:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3RFSYgk003536; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:28:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:28:34 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Dhananjaya hiremath Message-ID: <20070427152834.GA3385@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <297939.33765.qm@web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <297939.33765.qm@web39203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recompiling the source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:31:12 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:49:16PM -0700, Dhananjaya hiremath wrote: > Hello sir, > > Here we installed FreeBSD 6.2 RELEASE and installing the gnome2. > But here it is giving file system is full (device is full) but we used > the entire disk how it is possible to full the disk. Well, that is a big problem. The first question is: is your disk small or is there a lot of stuff there that should be cleaned out? Doing an upgrade can require a lot of extra disk - a couple Gb or so, but not 30 GB or something like that. You also do not say which file system is full. If it is '/' and you have everything in '/', then it could be trouble. If it is /tmp and the other file systems have plenty of space, just nuke what is in /tmp. Use 'df -k' to check file system usage. Then cd to the file system that is full and use du(1) to find out where the space is being used. du -sk * CD in to any directory that look unexpectedly large and do the same du -sk * command again. Keep following the directory tree until you track down where some space might be filled with old or unnecessary stuff and clean it up. If you cannot make enough space that way, you may have to add disk. Once you get the disk issue worked out, then follow the handbook sections on upgrading step by step. It will work. > > > And another thing is we updated the source tree but how to recompile this. > The handbook tells exactly the steps you need to take. Each step is a 'make xxxxx' something in a correct directory and a reboot, plus a mergemaster. ////jerry > > --------------------------------- > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 15:49:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C4F16A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B99613C4BA for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3RFnS5T044891; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Bart Silverstrim" , "Paul Schmehl" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:51:03 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <770D13E9-D603-4749-A09F-6BC66F0EFFE8@chrononomicon.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of therelative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory>3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:49:36 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bart > Silverstrim > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:06 AM > To: Paul Schmehl > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of therelative > advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory>3.5GB not used?)) > > > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > --On Wednesday, April 25, 2007 15:29:04 -0400 Thomas Dickey > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:15:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > >>> No kidding. That professor should have his Wikipedia account > >>> banned, > >>> and the head of his department should be informed of his > >>> vandalism. I > >>> don't suppose you know the name of his Wikipedia account, or his > >>> legal > >>> name. . . . > >> > >> yawn. That sort of research has been going on for years. > >> > >> Less interesting is the sort of trash emitted by people who don't > >> like > >> knowing that whatever they've read on a webpage might not be > >> completely > >> accurate, and that they might have to do some of their own thinking. > >> > >> regards. > > > > At one time I had high hopes that the internet would usher in a new > > era of increased knowledge and reduced gullibility. Instead it > > seems to have simply hastened the arrival to the wrong conclusions. > > There are opportunities for increased knowledge. Gullibility, > though, is part of our human nature. > > How many of you delve four levels deep when looking for a quick > reference on something that, in the long run, you care little about? I try to avoid stuff I don't care about. > If you're not a mechanic or car enthusiast, do you look into anything > and everything on how a clutch works, or every variation of four > wheel drive implementations? Probably not. Yes, but if your driving a car you should. There's a lot of stuff people should be doing these days that they aren't doing. I guess people's mothers aren't telling their kids to eat their vegetables anymore. > We don't devote time and > resources into being "renaissance people". Most of us don't. And the reasons why are complex, but what it essentially boils down to is that there's a lot of vested interests out there that don't want the majority of people to be renaissance people and so they have been on a campaign for many years to discourage it, and a lot of people are stupid and have fallen for that. > For me, I look up the > answer, if it sounds reasonable, I go with it unless someone else > points out a deficiency in the answer. I need a quick and dirty > answer to move on to things I *do* care about. > Why do you need a quick and dirty answer for stuff you admittedly don't care about? > The problem is that people will accept an answer whether it makes > sense or not. We had someone once convinced that a "Laser Car Wash" > cleaned cars by shooting small lasers at the car to clean it. It was > something so far left field of what they're interested in and > knowledgeable about that they just accepted the answer, even though > there's no way such a system would be affordable (or safe enough) to > use as a car washing tool. > Damn, there goes those patent plans... > Then again, there are those that do this intentionally, because > spreading misinformation is in their best interest and they profit > from it. Even schools profit, not necessarily monetarily, by keeping > students from questioning what they are taught. Yes, that is true. But it's important to keep in mind that while schools profit from this, many teachers don't - and therefore buck the pressure to churn out unquestioning students. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 16:19:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BA116A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAA913C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so733463ugh for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sfJTyHL4fgczmh97sXD+LALySMGK36QVEJqrpjOW6yIrFrMwT2ISKSLvwsbx3Js1hae4WzwzomD0aALJ1HOEkGKCxDz8znK/wdkYyxjUoS/7GwF8atZwr5cK2RVewx3zvQ+kVICA4EFgrp07Hqw98XvI1vtE2yCmFeA4DAZMKNs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E3YWq6PGk2/aTHso8L6o7WLcG7pw5vQdcfrCVUg7porL9IhXKOzGXazqrwFXtEfqlpgdh2fC8XzFNDPbZJQSAJq5nZz6rt5gq/LmpskJrHJyz/8htuDIM9lzmcdEZ43QW8QZw9/9KHjfcyHK7e/QJny6Qvh0XIMfzEsYdHGxkSc= Received: by 10.67.116.1 with SMTP id t1mr3115427ugm.1177690780551; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [87.207.160.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1sm1509511ugf.2007.04.27.09.19.37; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46322297.4020104@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:19:35 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Goldstein References: <46313796.7070601@queue.to> <4631BBF4.30106@gmail.com> <46320614.1090008@queue.to> <46320DF3.1020904@gmail.com> <46321139.9090304@goldstein-pa.com> In-Reply-To: <46321139.9090304@goldstein-pa.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:19:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Howard Goldstein wrote: > Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Howard Goldstein wrote: >>> Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> Howard Goldstein wrote: >>>>> youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >>>>>> Could everyone affected by this issue document a few more steps of >>>>>> what they do to cause Thunderbird to coredump, please? >>>>> 1. start thunderbird >>>>> 2. ^M or click on the write message label >>>>> 3. attach any file >>>>> 4. send an email to self, garbage or empty message, take the default >>>>> subject or change it to garbage. >>>>> 5. ^M to compose another message >>>>> 6. at any point from this point on , attaching a file will coredump >>>> If this helps I don't see the problem here (thunderbird-2.0.0.0, all >>>> ports up to date). Details below. >>> Do you by chance have openldap23-client installed? >> >> Yes, I have: >> >> # pkg_info -Ix openldap >> openldap-client-2.3.35 Open source LDAP client implementation >> >> >>> Yesterday I >>> promised to rebuild with the default make.conf CFLAGS but in the interim >>> gnome2 was installed which comes with openldap23-client apparently, and >>> now the mere presence of openldap is forcing a fatal build error >>> >>> [blahh blah blah] >>> >>> gmake[5]: Entering directory >>> `/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/liblber' >>> >>> >>> cc -o decode.o -c -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/nss >>> -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -pipe -I/usr/local/include -g -pipe -ansi >>> -Wall -pthread -O -g -fPIC -DDEBUG_root -DMOZILLA_CLIENT=1 -DDEBUG=1 >>> -DXP_UNIX=1 -DFREEBSD=1 -DHAVE_BSD_FLOCK=1 -DHAVE_LCHOWN=1 >>> -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DFORCE_PR_LOG -D_PR_PTHREADS >>> -UHAVE_CVAR_BUILT_ON_SEM -DUSE_WAITPID -DNEEDPROTOS -DNET_SSL >>> -DNO_LIBLCACHE -DLDAP_REFERRALS -DNS_DOMESTIC >>> -I../../../ldap/include >>> -I/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird/work/mozilla/dist/./include decode.c >>> In file included from decode.c:52: >>> lber-int.h:121: error: syntax error before "LDAP_CALLBACK" >>> lber-int.h:130: error: redefinition of typedef 'Seqorset' >>> /usr/local/include/lber.h:164: error: previous declaration of 'Seqorset' >>> was here >>> lber-int.h:149: error: syntax error before "ldap_x_iovec" >>> lber-int.h:165: error: syntax error before "BERTranslateProc" >>> lber-int.h:187: error: syntax error before "LDAP_IOF_READ_CALLBACK" >>> lber-int.h:198: error: syntax error before "LDAP_X_EXTIOF_READ_CALLBACK >>> ... >>> >>> -I /usr/local/include is what's doing it, it continues the build when >>> manually stripping /usr/local/include from this directory's build >>> options but it breaks later on as well. >>> >>> A very few google hits on this error, none of which lead to fix or >>> workaround. >> >> You'll probably need to update some of the dependencies first but that's >> only an uneducated guess. Those ports build fine here. Maybe ask >> @freebsd-ports or @freebsd-gnome? >> > > Thank you. I have a sinking feeling these various issues may at the end > of the day be tied in with the modular x.org 7.2 and X11BASE=/usr/local > from the git server. IIRC we're going to be merging 7.2 into the ports > tree next week and that should encourage some more folks with a better > understanding of gnome than I have (which is zero) to help Just FYI, I've got X11BASE=/usr/local set in make.conf, too (but I don't use git xorg sources). Karol - -- Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMiKXezeoPAwGIYsRCHZdAJ4rcXAw/RIwpJxQBpKp5OhTu0IBAACeJHgL uWUNqSNCvCPHXw2bF78G9Xk= =IgIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 16:30:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E056416A40F for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@mtcenter.ru) Received: from ns.fem.ru (fem.ru [194.190.225.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706DC13C43E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@mtcenter.ru) Received: from ASUS (utm.spbstu.ru [195.209.231.237]) by ns.fem.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3RGF6Jm000612 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:15:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from alex@mtcenter.ru) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:08:21 +0400 From: Alexandre Fedotov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional Organization: Management Training Center X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <416668549.20070427200821@fem.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Bandwith limitations, NAT and transparent proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Fedotov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:30:33 -0000 Çäðàâñòâóéòå, freebsd-questions. You need to add queue's and forward all you inside subnets to those queues smthing like this ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 128Kbit/s queue 20Kbytes ${fwcmd} queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 50 queue 20 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff ${fwcmd} queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 50 queue 20 mask src-ip 0xfffffff ${fwcmd} add 40000 queue 1 ip from any to 192.168.1.128/25 via em0 ${fwcmd} add 40001 queue 2 ip from 192.168.1.128/25 to any via em0 > Hi ! > > I have FreeBSD 4.8 installed. > There is IPFIREWALL, IPFIREWALL_FORWARD, IPDIVERT and DUMMYNET in my > kernel configration. > On my FBSD gateway to the Internet I would like to use NAT (of course > :-))) ), transparent proxy and limit the outgoing traffic. > xl0 (62.169.170.166/30) is the public interface, xl1 (192.168.1.1/24) is > the private one. > > If my firewall rules look like: > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 256Kbit/s queue 40Kbytes > ipfw add 47 pipe 1 ip from any to any out via xl0 > ipfw add 48 allow ip from 192.168.1.1 to any > ipfw add 49 fwd 192.168.1.1,3128 tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any 80 > ipfw add 50 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0 > ... (the rest of OPEN firewall rules) > nothing except http (because of transparent proxy, I think) goes through > the gateway from the local net. > > If my firewall rules look like: > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 256Kbit/s queue 40Kbytes > ipfw add 47 pipe 1 ip from 62.169.170.166 to any out via xl0 > ipfw add 48 allow ip from 192.168.1.1 to any > ipfw add 49 fwd 192.168.1.1,3128 tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any 80 > ipfw add 50 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0 > ... (the rest of OPEN firewall rules) > everything works fine except except the bandwith limitation. > > Do you have any ideas, how to get these three things (bandwith > limitation, nat, transparent proxy) work together ? > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > GIGI -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Alexandre Fedotov Management Training Center www.mtcenter.ru mailto:alex@mtcenter.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:02:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 031F316A40A; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070427170201.031F316A40A@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:02:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 0A40F16A40D; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070427170201.0A40F16A40D@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:08:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1917116A401; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D099613C484; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.66) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1HhTe7-0003kP-6c>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:50:11 +0200 Received: from [217.66.62.83] (helo=[192.168.2.64]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.66) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1HhTe7-0005wp-4s>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:50:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4632299C.80905@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:49:32 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 217.66.62.83 Cc: Subject: IBM x3655: FBSD 7.0-SNAP 200704 USB keyboard problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:11 -0000 Hello, seems I do have a typical problem and don't know how to solv it. I try to install FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT SNAP 200704 for AMD64 on IBM x3655 with two Opteron 22XX CPUs. The ISO CD1 boots well and keyboard reacts with the beastie-menu, but after booting into installation menu (showing up keyboard layout) keyboard (USB) is not usuable anymore. Please, can anyone tell me hw to solve this problem? Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:49:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EDB16A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1810813C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070427174935.SCRB14403.mta9.adelphia.net@laptop>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:49:35 -0400 From: "Bob" To: , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:49:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: RE: Help with pkg_add X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:49:36 -0000 Figured it out. need -r option in the command pgk_add -r ytree Sorry -----Original Message----- From: Bob [mailto:bob@a1poweruser.com] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:34 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG Subject: Help with pkg_add Trying to execute pkg_add ytree and get this message under Freebsd 6.2 Can't stat package file 'ytree' It does not even try to connect to server first. What is this cryptic message trying to tell me???? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:54:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3048416A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEC413C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15325 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 17:54:31 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Apr 2007 17:54:31 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F1E042842D; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:54:29 -0400 (EDT) To: "James Seward" References: <200704260307.13286.david@vizion2000.net> <200704261434.00465.david@vizion2000.net> <44mz0uajod.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <200704270714.40992.david@vizion2000.net> <720051dc0704270733l33f7e680j1588d2ad0b00a95e@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:54:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <720051dc0704270733l33f7e680j1588d2ad0b00a95e@mail.gmail.com> (James Seward's message of "Fri\, 27 Apr 2007 15\:33\:11 +0100") Message-ID: <44hcr1u2i2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: var/log/messages umass da0 >6 how to stop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:54:32 -0000 "James Seward" writes: > I get this when I have my USB card reader plugged in (and empty). I'm > pretty sure it's hal (via KDE) which is responsible for the polling in > my case. My low-tech fix is to yank the USB cable out when I'm not > using the reader :) If there was a way to stop it filling up my syslog > though I'd love to know. Okay, that's a clue to the source. There seems to be a "KDE HAL Device Manager", which I assume (from its name) should be controlling this. Can you get into a configuration for that and see what you can do? [Sorry I can't help more now, but I don't use KDE, and my machine with a card reader is powered down at the moment.] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 17:58:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664F916A406 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B1813C4BE for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20568 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 17:58:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Apr 2007 17:58:04 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3169A2842D; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:04 -0400 (EDT) To: Drew Tomlinson References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <46320CF8.90002@mykitchentable.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46320CF8.90002@mykitchentable.net> (Drew Tomlinson's message of "Fri\, 27 Apr 2007 07\:47\:20 -0700") Message-ID: <44abwtu2c3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:58:05 -0000 Drew Tomlinson writes: > Thanks for all the replies. Funny thing is that when trying the > "portupgrade -o" solution and using "pkg_info | grep portupgrade", no > results were returned. The /var/db/pkg directory had no portupgrade* > entries. Thus I just used "portupgrade -N portupgrade" to upgrade. > All seemed OK. I did notice a "make config" window that asked me > which version of Berkeley DB to use for the backend. Not knowing, I > just chose the default of ">=2" and the port built without error. Missing entries in the package database? Could be a problem, although more likely it's just a mistake of some sort. > Next I attempted "pkgdb -L" suggested in the pkg-message file. It > returned this error: > > blacksheep# pkgdb -L > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- > Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] > > I assume this is due to choosing the incorrect Berkeley DB version? > So should I rebuild the portupgrade port and choose Berkeley DB 1.85 > or is it recommended to convert the pkgdb to the newer version? If I > should convert, how? My build machine is powered down today, so I can't get the exact answer, but it was in /usr/ports/UPDATING at the time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 18:01:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BC416A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A85113C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so974391wra for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ozk/3khUNoXDSAts9tYxZwNMzuS6DbTBxxg8JORATrmds6wnGaOlJA95jrYI/L3hABo6WfBEBxoxT434rpk27sCCTZpbqTFDKfepMctKPV6eOPO/e9LldozEOlKIyLlXqpy3z+TD4Od2YEfAibpgC1I3zcs3Ft+1ZSm2iFYHB+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YFIWGNmvcNblWFQImokbyGfTtezN0qmNieWrqDdjeeFc/Scifqg3SKQMNlFS3rU/1r6ytFx5IYQdH1cTvp5my8NRyc2NoBI5X/InEwkF/toU1T2E4MVwZpc2i2J2VQIrzhfIObfHOe1f7bzRPPJX1zyth4yX7gisoHtGrBKdkJc= Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr1060253wal.1177695281031; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.78.18 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:34:40 -0700 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: FreeBSD-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Desktop rebuild X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:01:14 -0000 I have a laptop that I am currently updating world to the latest from the v6 branch, once that is done I want to completely start fresh with the GUI. Right now I have gnome in a mostly working state, a mostly out of date KDE and a bunch of other random crud I have installed over the last 16 months or so. Instead of trying to use portupgrade and have it fail out/fix/restart, I was thinking life would be easier if I just removed anything graphical and start that from scratch. This way all my settings/data remain intact and I can just do a pkg install the new stuff. Is anyone aware of a quick/safe way of blowing away nearly all installed apps as such to start from near scratch. I do use bash and probably a couple other non-GUI installs, so I didn't necessarily want to kill _all_ installed ports/pkgs but I might be willing to do that if needed. Any thought on the best way to approach this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 18:04:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C0F16A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta3.adelphia.net (mta3.adelphia.net [68.168.78.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ECC13C4B8 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070427173356.TTRQ16517.mta11.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:33:56 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:33:59 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Help with pkg_add X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:04:16 -0000 Trying to execute pkg_add ytree and get this message under Freebsd 6.2 Can't stat package file 'ytree' It does not even try to connect to server first. What is this cryptic message trying to tell me???? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 18:58:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F4916A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from qsmtp1.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDDB13C43E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 21013 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 11:58:16 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 20954, pid: 20955, t: 13.1799s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.84/m:43/d:3122 spam: 3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (66.205.146.210) by qsmtp1 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 11:58:03 -0700 Received: from [192.168.25.6] (unknown [192.168.25.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986AD1648BB for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <463247C0.2050509@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:58:08 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <46320CF8.90002@mykitchentable.net> <44abwtu2c3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44abwtu2c3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on qsmtp1.surewest.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Subject: How to Upgrade Berkeley DB? (Was Re: How to Upgrade Portupgrade?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:58:17 -0000 On 4/27/2007 10:58 AM Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Drew Tomlinson writes: > > >> Thanks for all the replies. Funny thing is that when trying the >> "portupgrade -o" solution and using "pkg_info | grep portupgrade", no >> results were returned. The /var/db/pkg directory had no portupgrade* >> entries. Thus I just used "portupgrade -N portupgrade" to upgrade. >> All seemed OK. I did notice a "make config" window that asked me >> which version of Berkeley DB to use for the backend. Not knowing, I >> just chose the default of ">=2" and the port built without error. >> > > Missing entries in the package database? Could be a problem, although > more likely it's just a mistake of some sort. > > >> Next I attempted "pkgdb -L" suggested in the pkg-message file. It >> returned this error: >> >> blacksheep# pkgdb -L >> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- >> Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] >> >> I assume this is due to choosing the incorrect Berkeley DB version? >> So should I rebuild the portupgrade port and choose Berkeley DB 1.85 >> or is it recommended to convert the pkgdb to the newer version? If I >> should convert, how? >> > > My build machine is powered down today, so I can't get the exact > answer, but it was in /usr/ports/UPDATING at the time. I just searched /usr/ports/UPDATING. I only find two entries, neither of which seems to cover my situation: 20061130: AFFECTS: users of net/openldap2[34]-server AUTHOR: delphij@FreeBSD.org The default Berkeley DB version has been changed from 4.3 to 4.4, as suggested by OpenLDAP developers. 0060403: AFFECTS: users of databases/db* AUTHOR: swhetzel@gmail.com Most of the ports that depend on Berkeley DB have been updated to use Mk/bsd.database.mk. Mk/bsd.database.mk is used to include MySQL, PostgreSQL, Berkeley DB, and SQLite in a port. A quick Google search didn't reveal anything specific to FBSD and portupgrade on how to upgrade Berkeley DB. However I will keep looking. If you come across something on how I should update my systems to use the latest stable Berkeley DB and convert all dbs to that version, I'd appreciate the link. Thanks, Drew -- Be a Great Magician! Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 19:43:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3B316A402; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe12.swip.net [212.247.155.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7FA13C465; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [193.71.38.142] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [10.42.11.147]) by mailfe12.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTPA id 304812127; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:43:18 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:43:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <4632299C.80905@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4632299C.80905@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704272043.01779.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM x3655: FBSD 7.0-SNAP 200704 USB keyboard problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:43:22 -0000 On Friday 27 April 2007 18:49, O. Hartmann wrote: > Hello, > > seems I do have a typical problem and don't know how to solv it. > I try to install FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT SNAP 200704 for AMD64 on IBM x3655 > with two Opteron 22XX CPUs. The ISO CD1 boots well and keyboard reacts > with the beastie-menu, but after booting into installation menu (showing > up keyboard layout) keyboard (USB) is not usuable anymore. > Please, can anyone tell me hw to solve this problem? > A few people have reported to me that they need the "new USB stack" to get USB working on AMD64. http://www.turbocat.net/~hselasky/usb4bsd SVN version. By the way, it does not compile with FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT yet. You need FreeBSD 6.X. I'm working on this. --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:07:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546B116A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B75A13C458 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9014651946 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:07:09 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070427210709.4ae21d53@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Desktop rebuild X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:15 -0000 On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:34:40 -0700 "Derrick Ryalls" wrote: > I have a laptop that I am currently updating world to the latest from > the v6 branch, once that is done I want to completely start fresh with > the GUI. Right now I have gnome in a mostly working state, a mostly > out of date KDE and a bunch of other random crud I have installed over > the last 16 months or so. Instead of trying to use portupgrade and > have it fail out/fix/restart, I was thinking life would be easier if I > just removed anything graphical and start that from scratch. This way > all my settings/data remain intact and I can just do a pkg install the > new stuff. > > Is anyone aware of a quick/safe way of blowing away nearly all > installed apps as such to start from near scratch. I do use bash and > probably a couple other non-GUI installs, so I didn't necessarily want > to kill _all_ installed ports/pkgs but I might be willing to do that > if needed. If I were you I'd just get a list of ports-origins pkg_info -oqa > portlist and then just delete the lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:13:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CA616A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from qsmtp4.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6C2A13C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 25663 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 13:13:51 -0700 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 25636, pid: 25639, t: 2.2909s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.84/m:43/d:3122 spam: 3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) (66.205.146.210) by qsmtp4 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 13:13:49 -0700 Received: from [192.168.25.6] (unknown [192.168.25.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7CB1648BB; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46325982.7030506@mykitchentable.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:13:54 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <4631EB20.20808@mykitchentable.net> <4631F760.80809@daleco.biz> <44hcr2x7ev.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <46320CF8.90002@mykitchentable.net> <44abwtu2c3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <463247C0.2050509@mykitchentable.net> <44647hy3yg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44647hy3yg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on qsmtp4.surewest.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to Upgrade Berkeley DB? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:13:52 -0000 On 4/27/2007 1:09 PM Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Drew Tomlinson writes: > > >> On 4/27/2007 10:58 AM Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >>> Drew Tomlinson writes: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for all the replies. Funny thing is that when trying the >>>> "portupgrade -o" solution and using "pkg_info | grep portupgrade", no >>>> results were returned. The /var/db/pkg directory had no portupgrade* >>>> entries. Thus I just used "portupgrade -N portupgrade" to upgrade. >>>> All seemed OK. I did notice a "make config" window that asked me >>>> which version of Berkeley DB to use for the backend. Not knowing, I >>>> just chose the default of ">=2" and the port built without error. >>>> >>>> >>> Missing entries in the package database? Could be a problem, although >>> more likely it's just a mistake of some sort. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Next I attempted "pkgdb -L" suggested in the pkg-message file. It >>>> returned this error: >>>> >>>> blacksheep# pkgdb -L >>>> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- >>>> Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] >>>> >>>> I assume this is due to choosing the incorrect Berkeley DB version? >>>> So should I rebuild the portupgrade port and choose Berkeley DB 1.85 >>>> or is it recommended to convert the pkgdb to the newer version? If I >>>> should convert, how? >>>> >>>> >>> My build machine is powered down today, so I can't get the exact >>> answer, but it was in /usr/ports/UPDATING at the time. >>> >> I just searched /usr/ports/UPDATING. I only find two entries, neither >> of which seems to cover my situation: >> > > You missed 20060703. > Ah, now I see. Berkeley is misspelled so when I searched the file for "Berkeley", it didn't catch "Berkley". Thanks, Drew -- Be a Great Magician! Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:19:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD47416A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giacomo@eclypse.it) Received: from eclypse.it (host62-173-dynamic.58-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [82.58.173.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A318C13C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giacomo@eclypse.it) Received: from eclypse.it (localhost.it [127.0.0.1]) by eclypse.it (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3RJi6iG013665 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from giacomo@eclypse.it) Received: (from giacomo@localhost) by eclypse.it (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id l3RJi5Fw013663 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from giacomo) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:05 +0200 From: FreeBSD User Giacomo To: questions FreeBSD Message-ID: <20070427194405.GA13184@eclypse.it> Mail-Followup-To: questions FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Suggestions for an antispam. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:19:36 -0000 Hi, I would want a suggestion for an antispam for my email. I use getmail-procmail-mutt in order to receive the mail. Thanks. -- Isaia Luciano FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:49:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A99816A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E85113C46E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 53627 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Apr 2007 20:49:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=oxN4AQ7HBAJmig7KLYJEWx9cD/uQyxMu/eTCJs9q88NN3aklRSRiLz/mmsuGnQ79OPtPB5r6MvU0rQQoq4C++a9uCqOcRU7SIxJ2k08mhd3jHqN8LCParxFCfx1N0P//16IKVwEXMQgIAAqhbx8TU6GEata6LQK4FlcDmmt/66c=; X-YMail-OSG: cb8s2Z4VM1lpd2g1HKzTbZfy8aiacCXxurHTE1Aj8HKJFQV332WL0Ug8LFCLPaICHVSGHEXJNSv1iWpvwjYK3O3pxk0VfaQXBtCZBRje8qbQrhqHqPtxtlEbFl7F0MmZ Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:49:33 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:49:33 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:34 -0000 I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba share on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage for clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista Home Premium. I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, and was told a number of things that I would like to confirm or deny: 1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active Directory Domain Connections functionality! Is this true? 2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home editions is to change the Samba server's domain configuration to "peer-to-peer". Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 HOW TO and Reference Guide. 3) Other options discussed: 1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" edition. 2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? Feedback and reference on a good "how to" appreciated. 3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). Can anyone address these assertions and/or provide assistance in other ways to use FreeBSD as a fileserver for Windows "Home" (and Pro) clients? He also cited a recent InfoWorld survey in which 30% of companies responding plan to never implement Vista, that they consider it an "interim" version that will be used as an excuse for dropping legacy support. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:58:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E9916A484 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from trans-warp.net (hyperion.trans-warp.net [216.37.208.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932D213C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [65.193.73.208]) by trans-warp.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 114624069-1860479 for multiple; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:58:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:57:52 -0400 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Authenticated-User: bsilver@chrononomicon.com Cc: Eric Crist , Grant Peel , Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:58:02 -0000 On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their > mail > to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is > in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure. > I would be pretty pissed off if Sprint suddenly started > greylisting. It > isn't just dumb-ass users making stupid political decisions to reject > it, although in your case it probably was. If it is a legitimate mail server, it would be promoted to the auto- whitelist. Not all mail is constantly greylisted by most intelligent greylist systems. Only the first few messages would be delayed, until it is established as legitimate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 21:15:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3857516A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) Received: from MX2.otc.edu (mx2.otc.edu [198.209.160.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B0013C480 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrisot@otc.edu) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1177708554-405e00460000-jLrpzn X-Barracuda-URL: http://198.209.160.202:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi X-ASG-Whitelist: Sender Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX2.otc.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0B58D6173; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:15:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from EXM1.otc.edu (exn1.otc.edu [172.16.2.131]) by MX2.otc.edu with ESMTP id xBzZTzM59eQP4LZ4; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:15:54 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:15:52 -0500 Message-ID: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0AEED@EXM1.otc.edu> In-Reply-To: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions Thread-Index: AceJDgbruDIB/dRBRHWDNxdwIyJcPwAAu6Ug References: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> From: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." To: "L Goodwin" X-Barracuda-Connect: exn1.otc.edu[172.16.2.131] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1177708555 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by OTC E-Mail System at otc.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:15:56 -0000 Windows Home editions cannot join an Active Directory domain, but they can access smb shares. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of L Goodwin Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:50 PM To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba share on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage for clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista Home Premium. I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, and was told a number of things that I would like to confirm or deny: 1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active Directory Domain Connections functionality!=20 Is this true? 2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home editions is to change the Samba server's domain configuration to "peer-to-peer".=20 Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 HOW TO and Reference Guide. 3) Other options discussed: 1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" edition. 2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? Feedback and reference on a good "how to" appreciated. 3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). Can anyone address these assertions and/or provide assistance in other ways to use FreeBSD as a fileserver for Windows "Home" (and Pro) clients? He also cited a recent InfoWorld survey in which 30% of companies responding plan to never implement Vista, that they consider it an "interim" version that will be used as an excuse for dropping legacy support. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20 http://mail.yahoo.com=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 21:44:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAD116A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC8213C44C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0B15D09; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46326ECD.8060604@vindaloo.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:44:45 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:44:47 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: [snip] >> When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a >> greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The >> other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window. > > That's probably par. > > However, the reason your putting so much faith in the delaying, is simply > that you aren't getting a lot of spam. > > I have published e-mail addresses. Without greylisting I got about > 1500-2000 mail messages a day to each of them. > > Greylisting isn't just about delaying. IIRC greylisting is filtering for spam/ham based on behaviour in the message originators MTA. My greylister is using two behavioural assumptions: Spamming MTA's don't have the capability to queue and retry mail. Asking them to queue and retry will cause them to drop the mail on the floor thus filtering spam. Spamming MTA's don't like to be tarpitted. Stuttering at them and sizing the TCP Windows so they must wait will result in them disconnecting before they can exchanged mail thus filtering spam. I may not receive as much spam as you but I do think that I receive "a lot of spam". For mail vindaloo.com is a small domain. I'm a mail reflector for a couple of .orgs and I have a handful of addresses for which I'm the endpoint. My greylister trapped 1907 connections from 1566 hosts on Tuesday. I assume that without my greylister this would have been 1566 delivered messages and nearly all of them would have been spam. In a nutshell here's my math: Tuesday's spam statistics: 1907 connections from 1566 hosts to the greylister. 1411 hosts hung up before getting to an SMTP RCPT TO. (rejected by Tarpitting) 121 hosts worked with pf-spamd and sent an SMTP RCPT TO generating a greylisting tuple. None of these hosts attempted redelivery. (rejected by delay/queue) 34 hosts worked with pf-spamd as above enough to generate a whitelist transaction. For roughly the next month these 34 hosts can deliver mail to me. Assuming that the each host wanted to send one message and that the one message was spam my greylister has achieved a rejection rate of 97.8% over 1566 messages. The real beauty of this is that it comes with little resource cost to me. Without Greylisting those 1566 messages would have to be scanned by Spam Assassin. I use SA's bayes filter. Last time I looked at it SA was averaging 2 ~ 4 seconds per message scanned. I'm not sure it would have to be done how well SA works when concurrently scanning messages but if I just do the simple math that's 1.3 hours of real time scanning messages for spam. Without greylisting I'd have to buy new hardware for my mailserver and that's just not worth it. -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 21:51:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D2916A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0913C455 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3RLoqg7002824; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:50:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070427164238.02745d78@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:49:52 -0500 To: L Goodwin , FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:51:54 -0000 At 03:49 PM 4/27/2007, L Goodwin wrote: >I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba share >on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage for >clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista Home >Premium. > >I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, >and was told a number of things that I would like to >confirm or deny: > >1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) >have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active >Directory Domain Connections functionality! >Is this true? Not exactly. Home edition CANNOT log into a domain or active directory. If you need that functionality, upgrade to XP Pro. >2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home >editions is to change the Samba server's domain >configuration to "peer-to-peer". >Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? >Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 >HOW TO and Reference Guide. I've never done that so am no help. >3) Other options discussed: > >1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista >Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" >edition. Vista licenses can be downgraded to XP. You need to check on which versions can be downgraded to XP Pro. >2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or >DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? Feedback and >reference on a good "how to" appreciated. I assume you mean just setup a windows box. You can do that, but your hardware is so slow it won't perform well under windows. >3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). > >Can anyone address these assertions and/or provide >assistance in other ways to use FreeBSD as a >fileserver for Windows "Home" (and Pro) clients? > >He also cited a recent InfoWorld survey in which 30% >of companies responding plan to never implement Vista, >that they consider it an "interim" version that will >be used as an excuse for dropping legacy support. No one I know is jumping to vista until service pack one ships. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 21:55:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A8C16A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4187713C448 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.236.62]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3RM5we5010289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:06:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3RLt2ku005298; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:55:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4632711C.1090201@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:54:36 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: L Goodwin References: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <416323.52564.qm@web58112.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:55:13 -0000 L Goodwin wrote: > I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, > and was told a number of things that I would like to > confirm or deny: I don't think you are that clear, but I'll try and answer anyway... > 1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) > have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active > Directory Domain Connections functionality! > Is this true? Depends on what you mean. You can access Samba share from Win XP Home, but you cannot join a domain. I guess Vista Home should work the same, but I don't really know: there might still compatibility issues in Samba, but we are a bit OT here; you should ask on a Samba list. > 2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home > editions is to change the Samba server's domain > configuration to "peer-to-peer". > Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? > Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 > HOW TO and Reference Guide. AFAIK there is no such switch in Samba. A Samba server can be a PDC, a BDC, a domain member or a stand-alone server, but the concept of peer-to-peer is quite out of scope. Besides I've succesfully connectectd many WinXP Home to a PDC/BDC, so I guess that setting is irrelevant. > 3) Other options discussed: > > 1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista > Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" > edition. Quite expensive. Might be worth or might be not. Either way it's not the solution for you; I fear your problems lies somewhere else and you would still get them, unless what you are trying to achieve is a central account/password management. If that is in fact the case, this is *the only* solution. > 2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or > DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? What has this to do with the rest? > 3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). I dub your (ugh). Besides this is not gonna help, if what you want is a domain. Win Home will still be unable to join it; it's just crippled like that. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 22:11:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6637616A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E383213C45E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1120162muf for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:11:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b7JppwlZRtaQXwUrk81xnt7vM9PT7Cbq1FfntQ/AIFycGPs2myyywmKdBHRHmK3BvHSJw6CRivXDO8J98tMz2ss7Ux8W4LlhHmJyLhOzCMq2OYfadDG0qhntCgBWPhVno600WIl/4gzr5GyvKB6zIcJFUWXdKpn0gX7CkS8VSfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RhlPxWRcdsbxugXMTV6V+FFQfK9YfR8wwwRKKnohMgb2nduOYNbl/sjcZ9cTD48btTGT9h5MC9lVo1qJHWg+OOcYgK5TaRc9NWq5sODO7KS4eckTr1enr3vT9zrpm7UDPUttZWivsoYCU7GxyX1ly1Z6zVkokLaLhGPPDKAq9Ac= Received: by 10.82.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr6669395bub.1177711871383; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.12 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:11:11 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Bart Silverstrim" In-Reply-To: <770D13E9-D603-4749-A09F-6BC66F0EFFE8@chrononomicon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070424145433.734761db.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425083153.1cfa3a38.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070425124847.GB19653@saltmine.radix.net> <20070425085531.5998728b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <66681924-B13F-4E91-96BB-AE6FB92CEBF0@cteresource.org> <462F5ECF.1040508@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <20070425191503.GB81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425192904.GA15766@saltmine.radix.net> <770D13E9-D603-4749-A09F-6BC66F0EFFE8@chrononomicon.com> Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:11:13 -0000 On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > > We don't devote time and > resources into being "renaissance people". Human intelligence is hardly limited in that regard. While I do not subscribe to the Colin Wilson theory, the vast majority of people contain so little information it is quite shameful, and the less you learn the harder it is to learn. These arguments about ethics show how truly shallow ethicists bother to think. Wikipedia is a daycare centre which has given out a nearly unlimited number of crayons and is now complaining about children drawing on the walls. It is also a fairly plain example of the cliche of the inmates running the asylum. To assign scholarly status and impute scholarly ethics on such a nonsensical rubbish pile is as silly as taking my arguments here as more than the ranting of a deranged keyboard jockey. What that purported professor did is no more unethical than crapping in somone else's toilet, and to claim other- wise is to elevate it to a king's throne. Once wikipedia (and its ilk) begin to systematically vet contributors for expertise and seriously review articles against fact we can nail them to the wall for political bias. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 22:58:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664016A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC63D13C45E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so784587ugh for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:58:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dEiqR0D6s1WDXJXtf3kM+uMLMShQZ24yAyC/V7nYH57zTl/jknTEj6WX4ZkyioyEL0ob1wfurljh4rqGjku3+fEhwBWHWu981VDqCZRTeBjGfpr3WMr28MyORUK4dJmDF3GOECTReL3bvUyjBs7RdWxoejyZWNPBkOxM50JpcuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Gnv11r5sbHAXljreR2cfQZQwZ0iTUky9bAMSW8jKn/ygk0uFI3aXX4CLbwrcwCgaptuzjzjrv8tujZRaU8a1LJwCcF48RUpam/wd+lq8htkUj4W2+V0zetSlXIzYoMPrDObmvFQW2/TtWc/hs99edrMkdx+QOAOzeCAVdFYTFMQ= Received: by 10.82.120.14 with SMTP id s14mr6730463buc.1177714694646; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.12 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:58:14 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Derrick Ryalls" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Desktop rebuild X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:58:16 -0000 On 27/04/07, Derrick Ryalls wrote: > I have a laptop that I am currently updating world to the latest from > the v6 branch, once that is done I want to completely start fresh with > the GUI. Right now I have gnome in a mostly working state, a mostly > out of date KDE and a bunch of other random crud I have installed over > the last 16 months or so. Instead of trying to use portupgrade and > have it fail out/fix/restart, I was thinking life would be easier if I > just removed anything graphical and start that from scratch. This way > all my settings/data remain intact and I can just do a pkg install the > new stuff. > > Is anyone aware of a quick/safe way of blowing away nearly all > installed apps as such to start from near scratch. I do use bash and > probably a couple other non-GUI installs, so I didn't necessarily want > to kill _all_ installed ports/pkgs but I might be willing to do that > if needed. > > Any thought on the best way to approach this? The best method I have come up with is to first gather a list of leaf packages with ports-mgmt/portmaster: $ portmaster -l and then (assuming you have ports-mgmt/portupgrade installed): $ pkg_deinstall -r or $ pkg_delete -r ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves is a bit overly thorough (and underly[1] conservative) for my tastes, but may be more your style. This shouldn't delete anything required by the stuff you want to keep and should clean out most of the kipple. Multiple runs are suggested and deleting root packages (as listed under portmaster -l) most likely won't harm anything (though some of them may be reinstalled when you upgrade). pkg_deinstall has the advantage of being able to issue $ pkg_deinstall -Rr kde* , which will delete anything requiring kde and required by kde (at least that is not required by some other package), and the disadvantage of requiring that both perl and ruby be installed. [1] May not be an honistically truthifiable word. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:08:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F11016A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F32513C457 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 34161 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 23:07:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 23:07:21 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3RN8TgY001576 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3RN8TAg001575 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:08:28 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070427230828.GA1555@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: controlling the wireless interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:08:31 -0000 I've gotten the wireless interface on a Thinkpad R52 working from the instructions in the FreeBSD Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html Unfortunately, I seem to have run into a problem. Most of the time, the interface that will be used is the RJ-45 ethernet NIC, not the IPW2200 wireless NIC. I've yet to find a way to get the wireless to work without starting it at boot time. How would I go about configuring the system so that it doesn't start fwe0 at boot, but allows me to start it (easily) later if I need it? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] McCloctnick the Lucid: "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:09:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD3A16A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA07F13C45D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACF51A4D91 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E5CD513AE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:09:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: questions FreeBSD Message-ID: <20070427230942.GA64423@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070427194405.GA13184@eclypse.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070427194405.GA13184@eclypse.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: Suggestions for an antispam. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:09:44 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0200, FreeBSD User Giacomo wrote: > Hi, > I would want a suggestion for an antispam for my email. > I use getmail-procmail-mutt in order to receive the mail. > Thanks. bogofilter. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:29:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E316A402 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 010D713C46C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84741 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Apr 2007 23:29:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=how2arqJESLahStxasK2obuXhb4CB9vIsFkyd4NbiSgD96YZYPQEgWzOXDpFULdM1ayaaQp3sR9d7RUxcddU3DFYezXmlzaeCGicXsuQuKJBh5w/PcFcB3O/LJQD7z40CbjCL6xwt4/ft6nNUw+4W9Qe316d/qopIVqYjqfWdak=; X-YMail-OSG: Kpcml4IVM1kIm.kgXxKzOylWitSwvlHTZDsit2WdQfysz8f3dmk5JxNq21eQ1YJ3rFIEAR82Zt.HzD1afPrMi36oE0o9uGR0zS1avmoGgKULgyIhwVSdaBaZs.ka0XXj Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:29:36 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <410393.84154.qm@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: DHCP client configuration on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:29:37 -0000 When I ran the DHCP client configuration tool on FreeBSD 6.2, it added a new hostname variable to /etc/rc.conf below existing the hostname var (it did not remove or comment-out the old hostname variable). The NEW hostname includes the ISP's domain name: hostname="dhcppc0." This hostname differs from the hostname listed in the router's DHCP table "dhcpp0" (no domain name). It also shows unique IP addresses and MAC addresses for all hosts on the LAN. I can ping the IP address assigned to the FreeBSD system, but ping and net lookup fail when its hostname is specified (both with and without the domain name). Questions: 1) Why did the hostname get changed (does not occur for Windows clients)? 2) Why does the hostname in /etc/rc.conf contain the DNS domain name? 3) How do I resolve this problem? Thanks! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:32:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D716A404 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35D6613C45B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 46560 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 23:31:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 23:31:24 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3RNWWAk001672 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:32:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3RNWVJn001671 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:32:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:32:31 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070427233231.GA1653@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070427230828.GA1555@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070427230828.GA1555@demeter.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: controlling the wireless interface [fixed -- ignore] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:32:34 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:08:28PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > I've gotten the wireless interface on a Thinkpad R52 working from the > instructions in the FreeBSD Handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html > > Unfortunately, I seem to have run into a problem. Most of the time, the > interface that will be used is the RJ-45 ethernet NIC, not the IPW2200 > wireless NIC. I've yet to find a way to get the wireless to work > without starting it at boot time. How would I go about configuring the > system so that it doesn't start fwe0 at boot, but allows me to start it > (easily) later if I need it? Please ignore this. I seem to have made a stupid error during install. I used the wrong firmware. All is now well. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Larry Wall: "A script is what you give the actors. A program is what you give the audience." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:35:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366F316A403 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF2B713C4B7 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 52070 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Apr 2007 23:35:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=uM9+zpowfn/noHcFpnOCxTxPEPR9+D1qXS9ENgZf6UTFk9Q2W6OHL3wNDi/VQLLKo6h4duZ/LYPt7T0Lwe/k/cqkQzqlwGjY7IkrD/gtbuILsi8+iSh5jOXVnD8fHuv84B0DTpLH4NGz+SNjsQl1gJUYePqQvAJUTkr+Uc9r46I=; X-YMail-OSG: lbvJcdgVM1mhhJRdCgoWO70x0W54tCvpbgi2laPejd_mJQ4T.AF8.4NTMPGjpduF1DUeULUc4pL6rbK62sRH52nAHtBudqkCd3zz Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:35:11 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:35:11 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." In-Reply-To: <06D1B6D4926222458F803D0D3EDCCB7E01D0AEED@EXM1.otc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <479503.49419.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:35:12 -0000 --- "GARRISON, TRAVIS J." wrote: > Windows Home editions cannot join an Active > Directory domain, but they > can access smb shares. That's good news. Thanks! Now I just need to figure out what to do to make it work. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of L Goodwin > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:50 PM > To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home > Editions > > I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba share > on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage for > clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista > Home > Premium. > > I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, > and was told a number of things that I would like to > confirm or deny: > > 1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) > have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active > Directory Domain Connections functionality! > Is this true? > > 2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home > editions is to change the Samba server's domain > configuration to "peer-to-peer". > Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? > Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 > HOW TO and Reference Guide. > > 3) Other options discussed: > > 1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista > Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" > edition. > > 2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or > DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? Feedback and > reference on a good "how to" appreciated. > > 3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). > > Can anyone address these assertions and/or provide > assistance in other ways to use FreeBSD as a > fileserver for Windows "Home" (and Pro) clients? > > He also cited a recent InfoWorld survey in which 30% > of companies responding plan to never implement > Vista, > that they consider it an "interim" version that will > be used as an excuse for dropping legacy support. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 23:56:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF4716A401; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [64.142.15.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E2C13C46C; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost.bitblocks.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0225BAE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT) To: "O. Hartmann" In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:49:32 +0200." <4632299C.80905@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:29:52 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20070427232952.CA0225BAE@mail.bitblocks.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM x3655: FBSD 7.0-SNAP 200704 USB keyboard problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:56:10 -0000 > seems I do have a typical problem and don't know how to solv it. > I try to install FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT SNAP 200704 for AMD64 on IBM x3655 > with two Opteron 22XX CPUs. The ISO CD1 boots well and keyboard reacts > with the beastie-menu, but after booting into installation menu (showing > up keyboard layout) keyboard (USB) is not usuable anymore. > Please, can anyone tell me hw to solve this problem? I ran into a similar problem with a dell machine & 6.2. What worked finally was to move its keyboard to a different usb port. Try that and let us know if it works! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 00:21:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AC616A406 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.127]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39CA813C480 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14994 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2007 00:21:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Z+uWCg3FX2sbmsaw9Czkilh/PItEj+KSsODyzG5Bi7svbePfvm+uo6090bqN/NG0Z+7vHpOHpbCs6qT7mSe+E4uA969yCXDs4bnrF+jxuTFr1gGfMzuQf/6XO9nIUWU2y869VkSEKGV3CyRaslKQZTOPK/teVS0w6FMznuFSDl8=; X-YMail-OSG: fmHm3hgVM1kDg16TioB6kNs7cDj7LIELInfEGhWBTNakCOLdQNjFeUW2Sa0bxg6yetJeJQilYI_Qgn1vRrq1ZACFawh5D9firrJHlhkTyhnvyzq2vjkDcWgpnaIQmUY- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:21:20 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:21:20 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Derek Ragona , FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070427164238.02745d78@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <646232.14982.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:21:21 -0000 --- Derek Ragona wrote: > At 03:49 PM 4/27/2007, L Goodwin wrote: > >I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba > >share on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage > >for clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows > >Vista Home Premium. > > > >I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, > >and was told a number of things that I would like > >to confirm or deny: > > > >1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) > >have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active > >Directory Domain Connections functionality! > >Is this true? > > Not exactly. Home edition CANNOT log into a domain > or active directory. > If you need that functionality, upgrade to XP Pro. I want to implement Samba in the way that best suits this situation -- just don't know yet what that is. Am trying to implement Samba "incrementally". First priority is to get to the point where Windows clients can mount the share (without authentication) and read/write files to/from it. Was planning to read up on things like access control later, with the hope that I can utilize non-Windows. > >2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home > >editions is to change the Samba server's domain > >configuration to "peer-to-peer". > >Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? > >Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 > >HOW TO and Reference Guide. > > I've never done that so am no help. > > >3) Other options discussed: > > > >1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista > >Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" > >edition. > > Vista licenses can be downgraded to XP. You need to > check on which versions can be downgraded to XP Pro. I was wondering about that. Good to know... > >2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS (or > >DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? Feedback and > >reference on a good "how to" appreciated. > > I assume you mean just setup a windows box. You can > do that, but your > hardware is so slow it won't perform well under > windows. It looks like I won't need to do that. We'll see once I get the DHCP/hostname issue resolved on the FreeBSD box. Just about everything that can go wrong has gone wrong on this project. I always try to get the client to see the advantage of subdividing big projects into a series of smaller projects, but they rarely listen (sigh)... > >3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server (ugh). > > > >Can anyone address these assertions and/or provide > >assistance in other ways to use FreeBSD as a > >fileserver for Windows "Home" (and Pro) clients? > > > >He also cited a recent InfoWorld survey in which > 30% > >of companies responding plan to never implement > Vista, > >that they consider it an "interim" version that > will > >be used as an excuse for dropping legacy support. > > No one I know is jumping to vista until service pack > one ships. Yeah. I recommended Windows XP Pro SP2, but they went with Vista Home Premium anyway... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 00:35:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CBE16A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.127]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92EA213C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 19509 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2007 00:35:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=0lA88jns+Ac+3XdZZFUn4sQ2AJRnVaKmmWTDTcp3rLcgTT7WKCFzb2QkoTldjkbbpR5XwnodcrAmt4hL1t7N5QeRhw/lYBlDxcI3o5cHmP+48Onl+IokhuNtNgMNKHIjjOZAmlVSkAo98nI8ArmiAtpKdtu6RiO231Ztnr2Z05g=; Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:35:54 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:35:54 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <4632711C.1090201@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <978040.16088.qm@web58104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:55 -0000 --- Andrea Venturoli wrote: > L Goodwin wrote: > > I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech > > support, and was told a number of things that I > > would like to confirm or deny: > > I don't think you are that clear, but I'll try and > answer anyway... > > > 1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and > Vista) > > have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active > > Directory Domain Connections functionality! > > Is this true? > > Depends on what you mean. > You can access Samba share from Win XP Home, but you > cannot join a domain. > I guess Vista Home should work the same, but I don't > really know: there > might still compatibility issues in Samba, but we > are a bit OT here; you > should ask on a Samba list. Good suggestion, I'll do that once I resolve the issue with DHCP client on FreeBSD vs. DHCP server on the router (they can't agree on the hostname). I guess I should just edit /etc/rc.conf and change hostname to whatever I want, then do the same in the router. I'd like to know why this happened, though... > > 2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows > Home > > editions is to change the Samba server's domain > > configuration to "peer-to-peer". > > Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? > > Could not find reference it in the Official > Samba-3 > > HOW TO and Reference Guide. > > AFAIK there is no such switch in Samba. > A Samba server can be a PDC, a BDC, a domain member > or a stand-alone server, but the concept of > peer-to-peer is quite out of scope. > Besides I've succesfully connectectd many WinXP Home > to a PDC/BDC, so I guess that setting is irrelevant. I just found the chapter on Domain Control. I'll read it and see how far that gets me. > > 3) Other options discussed: > > > > 1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or > Vista > > Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" > > edition. > > Quite expensive. Might be worth or might be not. > Either way it's not the solution for you; I fear > your problems lies > somewhere else and you would still get them, unless > what you are trying > to achieve is a central account/password management. > If that is in fact the case, this is *the only* > solution. What I want is for the users not to have to do anything special to get to their files on the server, while at the same time, having a reasonable level of security. Don't know enough about Samba configuration options to know what I am aiming for yet. > > 2) Repartition the RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex as NTFS > (or > > DOS) partitions (and don't use Samba)? > > What has this to do with the rest? The idea was if Samba won't work for Windows "Home" editions, use a file system that does not require it. > > 3) Change FreeBSD server to a Windows server > (ugh). > > I dub your (ugh). > Besides this is not gonna help, if what you want is > a domain. Win Home > will still be unable to join it; it's just crippled > like that. Good, I'm glad for that. :-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 00:35:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3A16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE2413C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 18061 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2007 20:35:57 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2007 20:35:57 -0400 Message-ID: <463296ED.50906@queue.to> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:35:57 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070427) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070206010003000704040709" Cc: me@janh.de Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op (workaround) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:35:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070206010003000704040709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > Michel Le Cocq wrote: >> I think it's a global thunderbird 2 bug, because i have exactly the >> same trouble ona mac os 10.4 with a binary update. > > I do not think it is exactly the same -- see below. > >> Howard Goldstein a écrit : >>> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>> Drew Sanford wrote: >>>> > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it >>>> starts >>>> > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a >>>> > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a >>>> > file on any start up, it crashes. >>>> >>>> BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times >>>> in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. >>>> >>>> I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I >>>> compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): >>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz >>>> >>>> >>>> I guess someone should file a bug report... >>> >>> Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be >>> reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the >>> workaround. Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc to >>> the gnats person who closed it) > > After reading the discussion in the PR, I renamed libgnome-2.so.0 and > tried again: no crashes with Firefox 2.0.3 or Thunderbird 2.0.0. I do > run KDE -- I probably should compile Firefox and Thunderbird without the > gnome dependencies to solve it for me. I wish I'd googled for KDE along with this as the problem was apparently fixed once for KDE, although for some reason came back again now for some of us. Here's a link to the very same bug along with a fix that was targeted only for KDE http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016299.html Based on your find Jan it's fairly simple to workaround this in the 2.0.0.0 Makefile by disabling gnomeui and gnomevfs linkages. Here's my diff which also includes tiny cruft disabling ldap during the build since I can't build an LDAPable thunderbird2 on my system. (before the diff, following up, reverting CFLAGS to -O -pipe and the default CPUTYPE didn't help, neither did installing gnome2) --------------070206010003000704040709 Content-Type: text/plain; name="tbird_no_gnome.dif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="tbird_no_gnome.dif" *** mail/thunderbird/Makefile.orig Fri Apr 27 18:00:27 2007 --- mail/thunderbird/Makefile Fri Apr 27 19:15:58 2007 *************** *** 17,23 **** COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands above CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* ! WANT_GNOME= yes ALL_TARGET= default CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} HAS_CONFIGURE= yes --- 17,25 ---- COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands above CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* ! #hgWANT_GNOME= yes ! WANT_GNOME= no ! #hg ALL_TARGET= default CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} HAS_CONFIGURE= yes *************** *** 31,36 **** --- 33,41 ---- MOZ_GRAPHICS= default,-xbm MOZ_OPTIONS= --enable-single-profile --disable-profilesharing \ --enable-application=mail --enable-official-branding + #hg + MOZ_OPTIONS+= --disable-ldap --disable-gnomeui --disable-gnomevfs + #hg MOZ_MK_OPTIONS= MOZ_MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 MOZ_EXPORT= MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 --------------070206010003000704040709-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 00:39:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC5916A406 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800413C484 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 87858 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Apr 2007 00:38:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 00:38:59 -0000 Received: from 68.165.89.71 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64888.68.165.89.71.1177720739.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <63405.68.165.89.71.1177651193.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <63405.68.165.89.71.1177651193.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:38:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: limited shell access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:39:01 -0000 > hi all.. > > is it possible to limit access for certain users only to a certain > directory tree - other then his/her home directory? so... can i do that or not? > for example joe logs into his home directory where there is a symbolic > link to some other directory on the system but he can not go up a level > (to /home or / ) or anywhere else but home and the directory under the > symlink... > > i looked at the ssh and sshd confs but apparently nothing there... still > looking... > > thanks.... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 00:43:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D814616A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653CB13C46C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 88552 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Apr 2007 00:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 00:43:05 -0000 Received: from 68.165.89.71 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64907.68.165.89.71.1177720985.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <20070427194405.GA13184@eclypse.it> References: <20070427194405.GA13184@eclypse.it> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:43:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "questions FreeBSD" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Suggestions for an antispam. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:43:03 -0000 > Hi, > I would want a suggestion for an antispam for my email. > I use getmail-procmail-mutt in order to receive the mail. > Thanks. dspam. > -- > Isaia Luciano > FreeBSD user > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 01:12:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB63316A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58115.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58115.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6961E13C489 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14501 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2007 01:12:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ptiPK8pQWGVnJ31KE1ebbm3d1IWjFzmgdBi+Q5OHvYwz5EXbVg5FMsz2oET4dFpWNNj7DpKFiWOYWTVtZ4UhhdIR+Qutzq6v9oGhZ6r8ssOKLld6A7KIP8l/9t70eHaHIx0argZK2B2yS9TWAZyhp1VRYaqJ7MfKrL8+NIqKtSg=; X-YMail-OSG: wdLnV.0VM1l7jVzCk1JIBUWz_SDRFSmi2hMWSZEbTuLrF3Nh1E.K7E0JGI_t4xJSETp8uSFNPGO8RxEjiB4o3wTFMg-- Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58115.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:12:06 PDT Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:12:06 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <17966.31696.836044.479917@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <434177.14218.qm@web58115.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:12:07 -0000 --- Robert Huff wrote: > > L Goodwin writes: > > > The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb > drives are not > > considered a good long-term storage solution, but > for daily > > backups, I could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB > drives (until data > > grows too large). > > And if you've been retiring undersize IDE drives to > a back room.... Yes, I have a few of those, but I'm looking for an offsite storage solution. Good idea, though! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 01:30:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F203116A411 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eventos@npmail.com.br) Received: from smtp2.braslink.com (smtp2.braslink.com [204.16.3.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFF9A13C458 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eventos@npmail.com.br) Received: (qmail 24671 invoked by uid 0); 27 Apr 2007 21:02:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (189.4.15.1) by smtp2.braslink.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2007 21:02:57 -0000 X-Sender: eventos@npmail.com.br From: "Seminarios de licitacoes, contratos e pregao" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:02:50 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20070428013031.BFF9A13C458@mx1.freebsd.org> Cc: Subject: Cursos - Maio 2007 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:30:32 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 01:34:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5811016A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4F213C45D for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EA37DC7; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:34:07 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:34:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <410393.84154.qm@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <410393.84154.qm@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704271734.04091.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP client configuration on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:34:09 -0000 On Friday 27 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > When I ran the DHCP client configuration tool on > FreeBSD 6.2, it added a new hostname variable to > /etc/rc.conf below existing the hostname var (it did > not remove or comment-out the old hostname variable). > > The NEW hostname includes the ISP's domain name: > hostname="dhcppc0." > > This hostname differs from the hostname listed in the > router's DHCP table "dhcpp0" (no domain name). It also > shows unique IP addresses and MAC addresses for all > hosts on the LAN. > > I can ping the IP address assigned to the FreeBSD > system, but ping and net lookup fail when its hostname > is specified (both with and without the domain name). > > Questions: > 1) Why did the hostname get changed (does not occur > for Windows clients)? > 2) Why does the hostname in /etc/rc.conf contain the > DNS domain name? FreeBSD uses the FQDN (fully qualified domain name) as the hostname. Example: hostname= "yourmachine.yourdomain.com" > 3) How do I resolve this problem? Unless you provide your own DNS that resolves your internal network and supersede dhclient with your domain name, DHCP will use the domain and DNS from your provider. Your windows boxes point to your isp's nameservers which have no records of your server or it's address. Therefore it can't resolve your machine's hostname. If you do provide your own internal name service you will also need to edit /etc/dhclient.config (see man dhclient.conf), and point your windows boxes to your DNS instead of your isp's. You can use a fictitious domain name internally, just make sure that the domain doesn't actually exist on the net. You can also use the FreeBSD IP address as a domain name on your windows boxes to connect. Running bind requires a fairly steep learning curve, but there are simple nameservers in the ports tree that would probably better suit your needs. Beech > > Thanks! > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 01:41:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1810616A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from olmec.nighttide.net (jasper.nighttide.net [207.5.141.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD16413C457 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from olmec.nighttide.net (darren@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olmec.nighttide.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3S15bGb096570; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:05:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from localhost (darren@localhost) by olmec.nighttide.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l3S15brD096567; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:05:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) X-Authentication-Warning: olmec.nighttide.net: darren owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:05:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Darren Henderson To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> Message-ID: <20070427210336.J96284@olmec> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425203042.GA70703@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070425204730.GH81828@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:41:00 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Chad Perrin wrote: > I wasn't referring to a desire for instructions on how to use procmail. > I was hoping for some suggestion as to what to set up. It's usually This will put messages from the freebsd lists in folders by list name prepended with FBSD- :0: * ^Sender: owner-freebsd-\/[^@]+@FreeBSD.ORG { LISTNAME=${MATCH} :0 * LISTNAME??^\/[^@]+ Mail/In/FBSD-${MATCH} } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 02:53:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8B316A404 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jthompson203@tampabay.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2295113C4AD for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jthompson203@tampabay.rr.com) Received: from [68.200.17.188] (188-17.200-68.tampabay.res.rr.com [68.200.17.188]) by ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3S2JETi001574; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:27 -0400 From: james thompson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: Subject: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:53:49 -0000 How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to Apple OSX? I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 with Publisher be ran on FreeBSD? I want to use FreeBSD to compose articles, and combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office Operation by a person with little experience beyond windows. In 1995, I took a MicroComputer Operating Systems course in Windows 3.11 and DOS 6.22. I have used Windows 95, 98, and XP Home & upgraded to Media Edition. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 03:36:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9817F16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au (relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au [202.136.32.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AF613C455 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from [58.163.90.10] (helo=[10.100.6.5]) by relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HfErL-0006tY-Fc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:38:35 +1000 From: Warren Liddell Organization: Blackthorne PTY LTD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:36:42 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704212236.43567.shinjii@maydias.com> Subject: Azureus Build Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:36:23 -0000 Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. Azureus as always fials with the following (any ideas/suggestions welcomed) --------------- ===> Building for azureus-3.0.1.0 Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build compile: [javac] Compiling 2510 source files to /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build [javac] /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/org/gudy/azureus2/pluginsimpl/local/utils/resourcedownloader/ResourceDownloaderFactoryImpl.java:66: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : method toURI () [javac] location: class java.net.URL [javac] return( new ResourceDownloaderFileImpl( null, new File( url.toURI()))); [javac] ^ [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. [javac] 1 error BUILD FAILED /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build.xml:22: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. Total time: 1 minute 7 seconds *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 05:14:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1216A404 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285E013C45E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S5EwdW017262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:14:58 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.11.6] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S5EvCa018944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:14:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4632D84F.1070409@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:14:55 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> <463296ED.50906@queue.to> In-Reply-To: <463296ED.50906@queue.to> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.27.215434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op (workaround) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:14:59 -0000 Howard Goldstein wrote: > Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> Michel Le Cocq wrote: >>> I think it's a global thunderbird 2 bug, because i have exactly the >>> same trouble ona mac os 10.4 with a binary update. >> >> I do not think it is exactly the same -- see below. >> >>> Howard Goldstein a écrit : >>>> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>>> Drew Sanford wrote: >>>>> > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it >>>>> starts >>>>> > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a >>>>> > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a >>>>> > file on any start up, it crashes. >>>>> >>>>> BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few times >>>>> in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. >>>>> >>>>> I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I >>>>> compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): >>>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I guess someone should file a bug report... >>>> >>>> Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be >>>> reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the >>>> workaround. Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc to >>>> the gnats person who closed it) >> >> After reading the discussion in the PR, I renamed libgnome-2.so.0 and >> tried again: no crashes with Firefox 2.0.3 or Thunderbird 2.0.0. I do >> run KDE -- I probably should compile Firefox and Thunderbird without >> the gnome dependencies to solve it for me. > > I wish I'd googled for KDE along with this as the problem was apparently > fixed once for KDE, although for some reason came back again now for > some of us. Here's a link to the very same bug along with a fix that > was targeted only for KDE > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016299.html > > Based on your find Jan it's fairly simple to workaround this in the > 2.0.0.0 Makefile by disabling gnomeui and gnomevfs linkages. Here's my > diff which also includes tiny cruft disabling ldap during the build > since I can't build an LDAPable thunderbird2 on my system. > > (before the diff, following up, reverting CFLAGS to -O -pipe and the > default CPUTYPE didn't help, neither did installing gnome2) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *** mail/thunderbird/Makefile.orig Fri Apr 27 18:00:27 2007 > --- mail/thunderbird/Makefile Fri Apr 27 19:15:58 2007 > *************** > *** 17,23 **** > COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands above > > CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* > ! WANT_GNOME= yes > ALL_TARGET= default > CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} > HAS_CONFIGURE= yes > --- 17,25 ---- > COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands above > > CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* > ! #hgWANT_GNOME= yes > ! WANT_GNOME= no > ! #hg > ALL_TARGET= default > CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} > HAS_CONFIGURE= yes > *************** > *** 31,36 **** > --- 33,41 ---- > MOZ_GRAPHICS= default,-xbm > MOZ_OPTIONS= --enable-single-profile --disable-profilesharing \ > --enable-application=mail --enable-official-branding > + #hg > + MOZ_OPTIONS+= --disable-ldap --disable-gnomeui --disable-gnomevfs > + #hg > MOZ_MK_OPTIONS= MOZ_MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 > MOZ_EXPORT= MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 Based on someone's comments about OSX though, there might be an issue with the underlying base system or kernel in FreeBSD <6.2 that Thunderbird 2 unearths, dealing with filesystem handling, threading, linking, or something along those lines (I know, that really doesn't narrow down the list). It should be a core component though because Thunderbird under OSX doesn't have any GTK or X11 support compiled in and is natively run under Aqua. I'll look for the core dump sent previously, but if more people can contribute their core dumps this would help isolate the issue. The bigger (and compressed) the better, as long as you don't have sensitive data hanging around in the background. This might just help capture the problem at hand. Hardware specs and CPUTYPE, as well as whether or not you're running a custom or generic kernel with what options would help as well. Please link off site if you can. After that maybe we should all band together and submit a bug report. Now let me see if I can reproduce it on my iBook :). Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 05:32:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6963E16A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilfre@mail.ru) Received: from mx28.mail.ru (mx28.mail.ru [194.67.23.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA3613C455 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilfre@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2-2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx28.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 093A16E9722 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:47:04 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [213.234.3.130] (port=19053 helo=[192.168.200.254]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1Hhepp-000GT3-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:47:02 +0400 Message-ID: <4632D1C4.5000809@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:47:00 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Semyonov" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060814) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5855700c0704261135m7ddc06dbuc74e501e9bef3ca1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5855700c0704261135m7ddc06dbuc74e501e9bef3ca1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PF NAt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:32:22 -0000 > /etc/pf.conf > > exter_if = "vr0" ^^^ > nat on $exter_if from $inter_if to any -> $exter_if ^^^^^^^^^ Now look at man page about nat/rdr rule syntax: nat-rule = [ "no" ] "nat" [ "pass" ] [ "on" ifspec ] [ af ] [ protospec ] hosts [ "tag" string ] [ "tagged" string ] [ "->" ( redirhost | "{" redirhost-list "}" ) [ portspec ] [ pooltype ] [ "static-port" ] ] Grammar says, that after the "->" keyword there should be specified _host(s)_. So, if you want to use a macro, pointing to your interface _name_, there's a technique to translate it to it's primary or any aliased IP: ($macro) Your line should look like this: nat on $exter_if from $inter_if to any -> ($exter_if) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 05:37:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B82B16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC5213C43E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S5biBc024361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:37:44 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.11.6] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S5bhm9014696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:37:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4632DDAF.9060306@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:37:51 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <63405.68.165.89.71.1177651193.squirrel@mail.el.net> <64888.68.165.89.71.1177720739.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <64888.68.165.89.71.1177720739.squirrel@mail.el.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.27.222534 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: limited shell access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:37:45 -0000 kalin mintchev wrote: >> hi all.. >> >> is it possible to limit access for certain users only to a certain >> directory tree - other then his/her home directory? > > so... can i do that or not? > > > >> for example joe logs into his home directory where there is a symbolic >> link to some other directory on the system but he can not go up a level >> (to /home or / ) or anywhere else but home and the directory under the >> symlink... >> >> i looked at the ssh and sshd confs but apparently nothing there... still >> looking... >> >> thanks.... Yes, things like this can be done, but it involves a) making jails, b) limiting (limit.conf(8)) accounts, and c) setting up proper permissions so the user can write to all of the required files in their directory (.profile, .ssh/, etc at least). A lot of work if you ask me ... :). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:20:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AEA16A476 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D711713C459 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3S6KKcr086223; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:20:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7735DB854; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:20:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:20:20 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: james thompson Message-ID: <20070428062020.GA51905@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: james thompson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:20:23 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:20:27PM -0400, james thompson wrote: > How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to= =20 > Apple OSX?=20 Setup is difficult to compare, since OSX always comes pre-installed, and has a limited range of hardware to contend with. FreeBSD is more difficult for a novice, because you have to learn a lot before you can use UNIX effectively. OSX hides all the gory details that FreeBSD administrators have to deal with. OTOH, FreeBSD (and UNIX in general) is a very powerfull toolbox. OSX hides this toolbox under a lot of eye-candy. Mastering that toolbox takes more effort that dealing with the eye-candy, but it is well worth the effort, IMHO. Windows OTOH comes with an empty toolbox. > I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 with=20 > Publisher be ran on FreeBSD?=20 Maybe it can be run under the wine emulator. See www.winehq.com. But there is an excellent free alternative: http://www.openoffice.org/ (which incidentally runs on a lot of operating systems, including Windows, FreeBSD and OSX) > I want to use FreeBSD to compose articles, and=20 > combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office Operation by = a=20 > person with little experience beyond windows. For you it would probably be best to stick with OSX, because it it a good combination fo ease-of-use for a novice and powerfull tools that you can learn at your leisure. But beware that office suites might not be the best tool for writing a book. MS Word ('97 and 2000) has trouble with large documents. Adding lots of pictures will make word extremely slow and will crash it and corrupt your file at some point. For books and articles I can recommend the TeX typesetting software with the LaTeX macros. I've written a 300+ page book with 100+ figures and tables, and several 40+ pages reports with dozens of pictures, tables and mathematical formula in LaTeX. Comparing LaTeX to Word/Writer is like comparing UNIX to Windows. The former has a steeper learning curve buyt is much more powerfull. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGMuekEnfvsMMhpyURAqArAJ9jL2/D7xv422atd5bAzcW0kL/6XwCfeQP9 qJ+Ywu1kHDuwiex4qzE9Vsk= =CNlU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:34:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBB416A404 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160DA13C484 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689311C809F; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28859-03; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (135.231.77.125.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [125.77.231.135]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F9E1C0019; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:34:35 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: james thompson In-Reply-To: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:23 +0800 Message-Id: <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:34:29 -0000 Dear James I am afraid the answer is no. FreeBSD is simple enough on its technical structural but not the kind of "simple" as to novice user (so the right question might be if FreeBSD is novice-user friendly enough or easy to learn enough). The OS best fitting your requirement could be Ubuntu Linux or SuSE, while both can run Office 98, but you probably need to buy and install a software called CrossOffice (around 65$) before you can run Office 98. However the OpenOffice office suit which by default installed in SuSE and Ubuntu is superior than Office 98 in functionality, and can open your old Office 98 documents just fine (except, if you are in China, the Chinese compatibility is not very good for both Office 98 and OpenOffice). If you install CrossOffice, Microsoft Publisher 2000 can run on it, but better check with CrossOffice sales people first, this company designed and sells CrossOffice: http://www.codeweavers.com The interface of Ubunti Linux is very easy to learn and is not very different from Windows. I myself use OpenOffice Draw for making publications. For me it's enough, however it lack the feature of template publications which Publisher offers, so if you think templates are very important (e.g. being able to use template to create a Christmas Card in minutes without having design knowledge like match color) then maybe you still need Publisher. I myself use OpenSuSE for desktop, making publication and doing spreadsheet for business, writing documents, contracts and invoices, using email etc. (Right now I am using it). I know many friends use Ubuntu that can do these things just fine. FreeBSD is used as server system here in my office. FreeBSD also can run a lot of desktop software but all through the years I generally see much more Linux users using desktop software. Best Regards On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 22:20 -0400, james thompson wrote: > How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to > Apple OSX? I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 > with Publisher be ran on FreeBSD? I want to use FreeBSD to compose > articles, and combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office > Operation by a person with little experience beyond windows. In 1995, > I took a MicroComputer Operating Systems course in Windows 3.11 and DOS > 6.22. I have used Windows 95, 98, and XP Home & upgraded to Media Edition. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:43:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B860516A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C78B13C43E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54221C001A; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:43:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15714-18; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:43:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (135.231.77.125.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [125.77.231.135]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55541C0019; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:43:15 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: james thompson In-Reply-To: <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:39:02 +0800 Message-Id: <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:43:04 -0000 On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 14:30 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Dear James > run Office 98. > However the OpenOffice office suit which by default installed in SuSE > and Ubuntu is superior than Office 98 in functionality, and can open > your old Office 98 documents just fine I forgot to mention: using OpenOffice is completely free of charge, this software can also be used on MacOS. It's my everyday office life. And using OpenOffice you don't need to buy CrossOffice (65$) which is used to run Microsoft Office (which again is not free) If you have questions using OpenOffice, there are a lot of OpenOffice users there on the forum that are very willing to help. See www.oooforum.org I think both Ubuntu and Mac OS are your good choice! If you are interested in and have time on learning managing powerful system like FreeBSD it's also a good choice. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:55:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BAC16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FAD13C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3S6tGWq025720; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:55:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:55:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200704280655.l3S6tGs7025719@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:55:34 -0000 On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 quoth Kris Kennaway : >--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:30:20PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Kris Kennaway g> >> wrote: >>=20 >> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >> >Content-Disposition: inline >> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i >> > >> > >> >--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 >> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii >> >Content-Disposition: inline >> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> > >> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade = >from >> >> 6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from = >the >> >> installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT ena= >bled >> >> and 1 GB of memory). >> >>=3D20 >> >> 1) The ports and packages subsystems are as fragile as ever (no big >> >> surprise). I was able to add packages for less than a day before >> >> it broke. Sometimes I can still add or delete a package, but >> >> in at least one case, I can't because pkg_add says that an earlier >> >> version of the package is already installed, while an attempt to >> >> remove the earlier version using pkg_delete gets a message saying >> >> that no such package is installed. Apparently, pkg_add and >> >> pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of whether a >> >> particular package is actually installed. Attempting to build por= >ts >> >> fails while trying to build dependency ports, which was what led >> >> to attempt to remove libtool and then add the newer version. I'll >> >> try to get a PR together and submitted soon. >> > >> >It is recommended to use an upgrade tool like portupgrade instead of >> >trying to use pkg_add/pkg_delete "by hand". It is too easy to misuse >>=20 >> portinstall/portupgrade had failed to install/upgrade certain ports = >or >> packages to satisfy the dependencies in the ports I was trying to install= > or >> upgrade. I really did want to install or upgrade several ports, and so I= > had >> begun attempting to install the required (or later) versions of the >> prerequisites as packages in order to get around the build failures. > >It sounds like you may not have succeeded in first bringing your >system back to a sane state. Anyway, if you have problems please be >more explicit here. Please note that I posted the first two items merely to inform the readership of the existence of the problems. I only hoped for assistance on the third problem. Now, given that you are among the core ports team members, perhaps you would enlighten me as to which indicators pkg_add uses and which indicators pkg_delete uses to decide whether a particular package or port is already installed. With that information in mind, I might be able to fix the problem by hand. Perhaps you could also explain the rationale behind having them both not use the same indicators, too, so that it might not simply appear to me to be a glaring design error. > >> >them and leave your system in an inconsistent state, as yours >> >apparently has become. >>=20 >> That sounds to me like an attempt to skate past my observation that >> "Apparently, pkg_add and pkg_delete do not refer to the same indicators of >> whether a particular package is actually installed." > >Well, they don't...please paste an appropriate transcript if you think >there is a bug. > >> BTW, it is recommended that plain, ASCII text be posted to mailing >> lists, so as not to send lots of garbage to people who may or may not be >> using MIME-oriented mail interfaces or using MIME-oriented mail interfaces >> whose version of MIME is incapatible with that of the sender's mail inter= >face. > >Uh thanks. Read up on "PGP signatures" sometime. Well, it's true that I haven't used PGP for a few years now. However, every version of PGP that I did use was perfectly able to sign a cleartext file by placing a header line at the start of the file and a trailer line at the end of the file, followed by a PGP signature block. IIRC, the options to do that were -sat. It was never necessary to use MIME to send a signed message to a mailing list. I note that your signature block, quoted below, says it was produced by GnuPG, *not* PGP. I haven't used GnuPG and am therefore not familiar with its abilities or deficiencies. In any case, MIME is bad for mailing lists. > >Kris > >--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature >Content-Disposition: inline > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) > >iD8DBQFGMZpnWry0BWjoQKURAvJ3AKCgd4icbHqQDCTALWZiIhyV7i1KRwCdEvHx >hprMUzPT62J6QjsEnpC4PhA= >=IBUj >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- > I post only infrequently to the freebsd-* lists and usually do so in search of assistance with some problem for which I haven't yet found a solution. On occasion I have posted information to help someone else who was looking for help, but because I subscribe to the digests, rather than to all of the direct lists, by the time I see a call for help on a matter I might be able to help with, there have already been several responses. But when I've posted, you've frequently responded with some critical note offering no help whatsoever, and it has often seemed that the ensuing exchange has deterred anyone else from offering help on the matters in question. I have noticed that you often respond in similar fashion to others' requests for assistance or information. I can't speak for those others, but I would appreciate it greatly if you only posted helpful information in response to *my* requests for help. If you can tell me a way to get cut/copy + paste operations to work under 6.2-RELEASE-p3's version of X, I would be grateful. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:58:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BBD16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438813C487 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S6wL5P017606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:58:22 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S6wL28022999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:58:21 -0700 Message-ID: <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:58:28 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhang Weiwu References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> In-Reply-To: <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.27.233934 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: james thompson , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:58:23 -0000 Zhang Weiwu wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 14:30 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: >> Dear James > >> run Office 98. >> However the OpenOffice office suit which by default installed in SuSE >> and Ubuntu is superior than Office 98 in functionality, and can open >> your old Office 98 documents just fine > > I forgot to mention: using OpenOffice is completely free of charge, this > software can also be used on MacOS. It's my everyday office life. And > using OpenOffice you don't need to buy CrossOffice (65$) which is used > to run Microsoft Office (which again is not free) > > If you have questions using OpenOffice, there are a lot of OpenOffice > users there on the forum that are very willing to help. See > www.oooforum.org > > I think both Ubuntu and Mac OS are your good choice! If you are > interested in and have time on learning managing powerful system like > FreeBSD it's also a good choice. A few things: Why are you stuck with Office 98? Arguably, there have been great advances from 98 to 2000, to XP, to 2003, and 2007. Don't think that using Office on OSX will be better than on Windows, because frankly given experience, it sucks. Having to have a compatibility checker to see if a given document is viewable on OSX as well as Windows, even in Mac Office 2004, is a horrible hack by Microsoft, and in my opinion the Mac Office devs should be taken out into the street and shot for this. I've had to do a lot of workarounds in documents with Windows users because of this. OpenOffice in OSX still isn't that great either because there still isn't a native (Aqua) build. It's done through some pain in the arse steps with X11 (not standard with OSX; need to install XFree86, and then optionally move up to Xorg-x11 with Fink, Darwinports, or something similar). As for running Windows binaries of Office on Wine / Crossoffice, this is tricky at best.. particularly with newer MS products (what with the validation mess MS has made). But even then with older products it's not easy in all cases (in particular with complex products like Office), because Wine does a lot of hacked up emulating in newer versions that tends to break Windows binaries. I gave up on Wine and use OpenSource producets after trying to use it because trying to make Windows binaries run on Unix typically took up 2-12 hours searching, testing, and validating that things work. And even then there are a large number of quirks in terms of how Wine does things, which breaks Windows apps.. If you really need Windows products and want FreeBSD stability, run them from a virtual machine like Qemu (runs well for most) or Xen (full support coming soon hopefully; runs better than Qemu on Linux from what I've read because of its design). All you need is a little bit of RAM, and possibly a bit more patience while stuff loads sometimes. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 07:01:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C2216A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5DE13C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S71n2r030961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:01:49 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3S71m2k023171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:01:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4632F164.6010900@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:01:56 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Bennett References: <200704280655.l3S6tGs7025719@mp.cs.niu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200704280655.l3S6tGs7025719@mp.cs.niu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.27.234433 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: annoying problems after upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:01:50 -0000 Scott Bennett wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 quoth Kris Kennaway : > Please note that I posted the first two items merely to inform the > readership of the existence of the problems. I only hoped for assistance > on the third problem. > Now, given that you are among the core ports team members, perhaps > you would enlighten me as to which indicators pkg_add uses and which > indicators pkg_delete uses to decide whether a particular package or port > is already installed. With that information in mind, I might be able to > fix the problem by hand. Perhaps you could also explain the rationale behind > having them both not use the same indicators, too, so that it might not > simply appear to me to be a glaring design error. Check into /var/db/pkg if you wish. All of the installed pkg data is kept there. I agree though with Kris. This email chain's a mess.. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 08:14:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F4616A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: from smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D9013C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hier7.com) Received: (qmail 73443 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 08:14:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.27.1.5?) (cms.kw@rogers.com@74.109.56.227 with plain) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 08:14:26 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ErXYiDYVM1lyDBoVwVKsFeYPv_aSXX9l3dqJuyhg1ht5RKYYbWY913wjdZaU3ItJKw-- Message-ID: <46330264.2080301@hier7.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:14:28 -0400 From: Chris Slothouber Organization: hier7 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: james thompson , FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:14:27 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2007-04-27 22:20, james thompson wrote: > How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to > Apple OSX? I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 > with Publisher be ran on FreeBSD? I want to use FreeBSD to compose > articles, and combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office > Operation by a person with little experience beyond windows. In 1995, > I took a MicroComputer Operating Systems course in Windows 3.11 and DOS > 6.22. I have used Windows 95, 98, and XP Home & upgraded to Media Edition. Hi James, As far as being able to easily create articles, create a book, and publish to a website, IMHO Apple OSX's ease-of-use and seamless design takes the cake. All new Macs (including the iMac) come with a very easy to use (and powerful) set of applications called 'iLife'. Included is the 'iWeb' application, which makes the task of creating and updating an attractive web space quite simple. More information on this 'iWeb' app can be found here: http://www.apple.com/ilife/iweb/ On top of this, a 30-day trial for the 'iWork' bundle, which includes a word processor/desktop publishing app called 'Pages' and presentation software called 'Keynote' (basically PowerPoint on steroids, this is what Al Gore used to create his much-ballyhooed 'PowerPoint' presentation with). If you want to keep using it, it's only $79 (versus $200+ for the basic MS Office Suite for Windows). Pretty good value for software that fuses simplicity and power. It can also import all of your old MS Word documents without too much fuss. Here's some info on that: http://www.apple.com/iwork/pages/ I really don't mean to sound like I work for Apple, but since everyone has given the opensource/FreeBSD side of your questions a fairly good beating, I thought I'd present the other end of your email a fair treatment. All of this can be done very well on FreeBSD (or Linux, or Windows) just the same, but as far as what you're asking, OSX truly does make the whole job a heck of a lot easier, without sacrificing much functionality. I hope this information helps! - - Chris - -- Chris Slothouber (chris@hier7.com) -=- Mercenary Sysadmin BIZ: http://www.hier7.com -=- building.better.ideas PGP: 7A83 F021 5AC3 4BD7 6738 21D8 B348 0B16 79C0 C27F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMwJks0gLFnnAwn8RAr2AAJ45Eh92jVzp4hDnZj9+82FoIaJlTACeMT7O zCmBRFqiOuFBbpFHGXz8aOo= =lyJs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 08:36:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B30116A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CB213C465 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC0C1C001A; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:36:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30121-07; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:36:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [218.193.55.195] (135.231.77.125.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [125.77.231.135]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8E1C0019; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:36:42 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Weiwu To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Real Softservice Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:32:22 +0800 Message-Id: <1177749142.28603.50.camel@joe.realss.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Cc: james thompson , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:36:32 -0000 On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 23:58 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > As for running Windows binaries of Office on Wine / Crossoffice, this is > tricky at best.. particularly with newer MS products (what with the Did you really try to run Windows applications on Crossoffice that crossoffice claimed to be supported? Frankly it's so much easier on wine. If something doesn't work on wine, after some search I probably can fix it; if something doesn't work on crossoffice I simply don't try spend one more minute searching for a solution, because generally that means there is no solution. Install some software on crossoffice is breezy: you follow a wizard and later it's working. That's only from my limited experience because I really didn't try a lot of windows software but I had this feeling. That's why when the original poster ask the question I even didn't mention the word "wine", I did this intentionally so that I can save him time searching for solutions to fix wine or get disappointed by it. To techies like us we have 3 solutions: 1) use OOS replacement; 2) dig into wine and google around for a solution and 3) try buy crossoffice, for NOVINCE user there are only two choices: 1) use OOS replacement; 2) buy crossoffice if the software is supported. I simply give user-aspect opinion from me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 08:38:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7319E16A5C1 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303A613C480 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.8]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH700ELB9BVTB50@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:38:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JH700LZS9BV4GS0@pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:38:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: from s01060014bf5ee711.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.71.220]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH7007VG9BV54J0@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:38:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:38:17 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy In-reply-to: <20070426193952.GD5788@osiris.chen.org.nz> To: Ivan Rambius Ivanov Message-id: <200704280138.17842.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <89ce7f740704260143h1d5e2e8bia9008835b5379e1f@mail.gmail.com> <20070426193952.GD5788@osiris.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Unable to login using KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:38:19 -0000 > > I am debugging a (seemingly) KDE-related problem on a FreeBSD laptop. > > The version of FreeBSD is 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #0. I am starting in in > > debug mode. It is using kdm as a login screen. The corresponding line > > in /etc/ttys is > > > > ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure > > > > The problem is: when I type the username and password and try to login > > it returns me to the login screen again. > > What are the contents of your ~/.xsession? Check ~/.xsession-errors as > well. Do you use alpha-numeric symbols only in your password? The keyboard layout in kde might be different, so the same keys can generate different input. Try something simple and see if it works. Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 08:58:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E028E16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9358C13C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so709334nze for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=UocWWYgP52Mln/gdeLbcMZWpMiwRexyI8yJyLf96DPcEMQAZUa6tI/D4eA0yW7vu0S+oJ+3kSb398fGQdzrChmFT2/uf0T0lzRCHjc63iI9/TiuDoRcgpgIWJ48JkU9rPMCjo5prqsHXzVknfWLbkfr6wObyvYfX7bdJOvh/9OA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mYwKm6XDyAauBbQcJLgnB5BbxjEdZpPIfpIoB5N0MLZsY/XlEiYlJKNZeOqhRRNfLeF/lmdYdemH5BqeFpy813DwFlJ/7/w7T8aSGA+ivSBNMyKbtMTdp6OPMdcCEisbQmykW2drWdWjHfayDWvG07A5VJoMqddkZrZ6lfMqgb8= Received: by 10.114.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr1295802waa.1177750697847; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.95.7 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:58:17 +0200 From: VeeJay To: FreeBSD-Questions , maanjee@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Help, please ....Port Install Problem, Google didn't help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:58:20 -0000 Hello I am trying to run a perl script connecting a mysql50 database on a freebsd61 box. But I get this error: Can't locate Mysql.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at...... But when I want to install perl database driver, I get this error: localhost# make install clean ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/DBI.pm - found ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - not found ===> Verifying install for mysqlclient.15 in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client ===> Installing for mysql-client-5.0.27 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if databases/mysql50-client already installed ===> mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of databases/mysql50-client without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql50. localhost# Please help and advise, what should I do? I have tried to google allready but could not find any solution.... -- Thanks! BR / vj From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:09:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0CC16A40A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348713C4AD for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3S99X3Q049290; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:09:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Bart Silverstrim" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:10:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relativeadvantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > illoai@gmail.com > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:11 PM > To: Bart Silverstrim > Cc: Paul Schmehl; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the > relativeadvantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not > used?)) > > > On 27/04/07, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > > > > We don't devote time and > > resources into being "renaissance people". > > Human intelligence is hardly limited in that regard. > While I do not subscribe to the Colin Wilson theory, > the vast majority of people contain so little information > it is quite shameful, and the less you learn the harder > it is to learn. > > These arguments about ethics show how truly shallow > ethicists bother to think. Wikipedia is a daycare centre > which has given out a nearly unlimited number of crayons > and is now complaining about children drawing on the > walls. It is also a fairly plain example of the cliche of the > inmates running the asylum. To assign scholarly status > and impute scholarly ethics on such a nonsensical rubbish > pile is as silly as taking my arguments here as more than > the ranting of a deranged keyboard jockey. > > What that purported professor did is no more unethical > than crapping in somone else's toilet, and to claim other- > wise is to elevate it to a king's throne. > > Once wikipedia (and its ilk) begin to systematically vet > contributors for expertise and seriously review articles > against fact we can nail them to the wall for political bias. > Wikipedia won't, mainly because there's another competing web encyclopedia out there that is taking this approach. However, you sound like you have a case of sour grapes, and you definitely don't sound like you have read much on Wikipedia. The true value of Wikipedia is that it can deal with controversial subjects. Take abortion, for example. Reading about it in a "peer reviewed" encyclopedia, if you didn't know dick about it, you would wonder what all the controversy was about - because those entries are completely stripped out of all loaded phrases and emotion. The same goes with the 2000 US Presidential election. A huge number of people, possibly the majority in the country, believe that there were dirty tricks and that the election was stolen. But, you won't get any sense of that at all reading about it in the Encyclopedia Britannica. I couldn't read the online entries about either of those topics in a peer-reviewed encyclopedia and even end up knowing where to go to find each sides wacko-rediculous statements, and without reading any of that stuff there's no way anyone can understand how unsolvable that issues like that are. Wikipedia is one of the best starting platforms out there on subjects. Naturally, you don't take it as canonical. But, it is going to suggest avenues of research that the official stuff won't. For example, look up "operation freakout" and "operation snow white" in Wikipedia, and look them up in an official encyclopedia. Quite an amazing difference, there. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:12:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715AB16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F89213C44B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l3S9COiJ025669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:12:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l3S9CO5a025668; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18151; Sat, 28 Apr 07 02:09:20 PDT Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:08:30 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: youshi10@u.washington.edu Message-Id: <46330f0e.SqjNK65h0+n07uPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:12:25 -0000 > OpenOffice in OSX still isn't that great either because there > still isn't a native (Aqua) build. I suspect the NeoOffice folks would be surprised to hear that :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:19:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C7816A409 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32AD13C484 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3S9JZDY049368; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:19:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Derek Ragona" , "L Goodwin" , Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:20:18 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070427164238.02745d78@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:19:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Derek Ragona > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:50 PM > To: L Goodwin; FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: No SMB/Samba support on Windows Home Editions > > > At 03:49 PM 4/27/2007, L Goodwin wrote: > >I've been working feverishly to set up a Samba share > >on FreeBSD 6.2 server to provide file storage for > >clients running Windows XP Pro and Windows Vista Home > >Premium. > > > >I just had a long talk with the ISP's tech support, > >and was told a number of things that I would like to > >confirm or deny: > > > >1) Windows "Home" editions (including XP and Vista) > >have support for SMB protocol disabled in Active > >Directory Domain Connections functionality! > >Is this true? > > Not exactly. Home edition CANNOT log into a domain or active > directory. If you need that functionality, upgrade to XP Pro. > > > >2) The only way to make Samba work for Windows Home > >editions is to change the Samba server's domain > >configuration to "peer-to-peer". > >Is this true? If YES, how do I do that? > >Could not find reference it in the Official Samba-3 > >HOW TO and Reference Guide. > > I've never done that so am no help. > There is a hack for HP home that makes it join a domain. You can google for this. It is a violation of the license agreement, of course. Not recommended for a business to do this. The only realistic option here is to run share-level security under a workgroup style network. The downside is that there is no centralized password management. But, in a smaller network that really doesen't matter. > >3) Other options discussed: > > > >1) Replace Vista Home with Windows XP Pro (or Vista > >Pro) or exchange computer for one with a "Pro" > >edition. > > Vista licenses can be downgraded to XP. You need to check on which > versions can be downgraded to XP Pro. > Only the Vista Business versions have downgrade rights to XP Pro. The Vista Home versions can only downgrade to XP Home. Additionally, there are no downgrade rights with OEM licenses. > > No one I know is jumping to vista until service pack one ships. > One of the Intel VPs during an interview accidentally let it slip out that Microsoft has scheduled SP1 for Vista for 4th quarter 2007. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:20:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AF616A40B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7413C469 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH700E85B9NTD60@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:20:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151]) by pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JH700GEUB9MEX31@pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:20:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from s01060014bf5ee711.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.71.220]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH7006B8B9MRO31@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:20:10 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:20:09 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy To: FreeBSD-questions Message-id: <200704280220.09178.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Subject: Response "Fwd: failure notice" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:20:10 -0000 On every message, sent to the list, I receive a strange response with the subject line: "Fwd: failure notice". The body contains: ===> BODY BEGIN Hi. This is the deliver program at eyou.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

kugua065315@163.com
550 MI:SPF mx18,wKjR47Dr_AisCDNGl+65Ow==.9315S2 1177749676 http://mail.163.com/help/help_spam_16.htm
--- Attachment is a copy of the message.

_______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ===> BODY END Sure, I know nothing about eyou.com and kugua065315@163.com. My message appears on the list, so it is delivered. What does this response mean? Could anyone explain me why I get this response? Thank you in advance. Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:24:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC9C16A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EAB13C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3S9Odle049400; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:24:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Bart Silverstrim" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:25:22 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Eric Crist , Grant Peel , Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:24:46 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:bsilver@chrononomicon.com] > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:58 PM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Christopher Hilton; Grant Peel; Eric Crist; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam > > > > On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their > > mail > > to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is > > in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure. > > I would be pretty pissed off if Sprint suddenly started > > greylisting. It > > isn't just dumb-ass users making stupid political decisions to reject > > it, although in your case it probably was. > > If it is a legitimate mail server, it would be promoted to the auto- > whitelist. Not all mail is constantly greylisted by most intelligent > greylist systems. Only the first few messages would be delayed, > until it is established as legitimate. > That won't work in my case since I generally only have a failure that causes a problem which results in paging about once every 3 months or so. By the time the pages got through the greylist it would be at least an hour later after the system had gone down. That isn't acceptable for a notification system. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 09:29:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA82616A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EBE13C45A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l3S9TAkO049420; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:29:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Christopher Hilton" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:29:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <46326ECD.8060604@vindaloo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:29:10 -0700 (PDT) Cc: User Questions Subject: RE: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:29:12 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Christopher > Hilton > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:45 PM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: User Questions > Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam > > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > [snip] > > >> When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a > >> greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The > >> other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window. > > > > That's probably par. > > > > However, the reason your putting so much faith in the delaying, > is simply > > that you aren't getting a lot of spam. > > > > I have published e-mail addresses. Without greylisting I got about > > 1500-2000 mail messages a day to each of them. > > > > > > Greylisting isn't just about delaying. IIRC greylisting is filtering for > spam/ham based on behaviour in the message originators MTA. My > greylister is using two behavioural assumptions: > > Spamming MTA's don't have the capability to queue and retry mail. > Asking them to queue and retry will cause them to drop the mail on the > floor thus filtering spam. > > Spamming MTA's don't like to be tarpitted. Stuttering at them and > sizing the TCP Windows so they must wait will result in them > disconnecting before they can exchanged mail thus filtering spam. > Both of those are assumptions your making that are just not true anymore. Spammers are adapting to greylisting. I've been running it for at least 2 years now and every month more and more spam is making it past the greylist and getting caught by spamassassin. As I mentioned previously, it does not take a lot of programming effort to do it. When I first setup greylisting the results were literally spectacular. Nowadays they are great, but not much beyond that. All of the things your saying about greylisting decreasing the load and all that are true, and just because it's not as effective as it once was doesen't mean you should not use it. But, I am not blind to what my eyes are telling me. In aonther 5 years, greylisting will be like all other spamfilter techniques, effective only against a minority of spam Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 10:27:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551A016A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from mailout2.pacific.net.au (mailout2-8.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4F213C45B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C9B10D0C1; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:59:27 +1000 (EST) Received: from [192.168.100.2] (ppp2CAB.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.44.171]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3602740A; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:59:32 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <77D9AF4A-AA68-4AA4-B1CB-9E8781BB77C6@brooknet.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:59:18 +1000 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:27:34 -0000 On 28/04/2007, at 7:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:bsilver@chrononomicon.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:58 PM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> Cc: Christopher Hilton; Grant Peel; Eric Crist; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam >> >> >> >> On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> >>> There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their >>> mail >>> to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail >>> address is >>> in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server >>> failure. >>> I would be pretty pissed off if Sprint suddenly started >>> greylisting. It >>> isn't just dumb-ass users making stupid political decisions to >>> reject >>> it, although in your case it probably was. >> >> If it is a legitimate mail server, it would be promoted to the auto- >> whitelist. Not all mail is constantly greylisted by most intelligent >> greylist systems. Only the first few messages would be delayed, >> until it is established as legitimate. >> > > That won't work in my case since I generally only have a failure > that causes > a problem which results in paging about once every 3 months or so. > By the > time the pages got through the > greylist it would be at least an hour later after the system had gone > down. That isn't acceptable for a notification system. Email is not an instant messaging system, no matter how much you want it to be one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 10:43:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEFC16A408 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE20713C46C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan@careytech.com.au) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,464,1170595800"; d="scan'208,217";a="120575523" Received: from ppp154-213.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([150.101.154.213]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2007 20:13:49 +0930 Message-ID: <46332564.2030600@careytech.com.au> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:43:48 +1000 From: Ivan Carey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Babiy References: <89ce7f740704260143h1d5e2e8bia9008835b5379e1f@mail.gmail.com> <20070426193952.GD5788@osiris.chen.org.nz> <200704280138.17842.ABabiy@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <200704280138.17842.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ivan Rambius Ivanov , FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Unable to login using KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ivan@careytech.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:43:53 -0000 Andriy Babiy wrote: >>> I am debugging a (seemingly) KDE-related problem on a FreeBSD laptop. >>> The version of FreeBSD is 6.1-RELEASE-p10 #0. I am starting in in >>> debug mode. It is using kdm as a login screen. The corresponding line >>> in /etc/ttys is >>> >>> ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure >>> >>> The problem is: when I type the username and password and try to login >>> it returns me to the login screen again. >>> >> What are the contents of your ~/.xsession? Check ~/.xsession-errors as >> well. >> > > Do you use alpha-numeric symbols only in your password? The keyboard layout > in kde might be different, so the same keys can generate different input. > Try something simple and see if it works. > > Andriy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I'm using kdm ok with the line in /etc/ttys ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm" xterm on secure Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 11:44:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FD216A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (mail.edmc.ru [213.33.142.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792313C45A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69EE6026; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:13:07 +0400 (MSD) Received: from adm36.relax.ru (adm36.relax.ru [80.68.244.36]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E124EE6025; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:13:06 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:13:06 +0400 From: Reshmakov Roman X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.06) Professional Organization: RBC X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1743483595.20070428151306@rrv.ru> To: VeeJay In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sat Apr 28 15:13:07 2007 +0400 (MSD) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Help, please ....Port Install Problem, Google didn't help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Reshmakov Roman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:57 -0000 after 'make' type 'make deinstall && make install' > Hello > I am trying to run a perl script connecting a mysql50 database on a > freebsd61 box. > But I get this error: > Can't locate Mysql.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at...... > But when I want to install perl database driver, I get this error: > localhost# make install clean =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/DBI.pm - found =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8= .8 - > found =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.= 15 - not > found =3D=3D=3D>> Verifying install for mysqlclient.15 in > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client =3D=3D=3D>> Installing for mysql-client-5.0.27 =3D=3D=3D>> Generating temporary packing list =3D=3D=3D>> Checking if databases/mysql50-client already installed =3D=3D=3D>> mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of > databases/mysql50-client > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql50. > localhost# > Please help and advise, what should I do? I have tried to google allready > but could not find any solution.... --=20 =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, Reshmakov mailto:ml@rrv.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 11:50:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73F616A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:50:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F2613C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:50:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-105-193.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.105.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779A2EBC78; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:50:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:50:27 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Reshmakov Roman Message-Id: <20070428075027.af3beb1d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1743483595.20070428151306@rrv.ru> References: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> <1743483595.20070428151306@rrv.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay Subject: Re: Help, please ....Port Install Problem, Google didn't help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:50:29 -0000 Reshmakov Roman wrote: > > after 'make' type 'make deinstall && make install' I've found that a "make clean" frequently cleans up this problem as well, which basically seems to be the result of the port system somehow losing track of the fact that a particular dependency is already installed. > > Hello >=20 > > I am trying to run a perl script connecting a mysql50 database on a > > freebsd61 box. >=20 > > But I get this error: > > Can't locate Mysql.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at...... >=20 > > But when I want to install perl database driver, I get this error: >=20 > > localhost# make install clean > =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/DBI.pm - found > =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5= .8.8 - > > found > =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on shared library: mysqlclien= t.15 - not > > found > =3D=3D=3D>> Verifying install for mysqlclient.15 in > > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client > =3D=3D=3D>> Installing for mysql-client-5.0.27 > =3D=3D=3D>> Generating temporary packing list > =3D=3D=3D>> Checking if databases/mysql50-client already installed > =3D=3D=3D>> mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed > > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of > > databases/mysql50-client > > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > > *** Error code 1 >=20 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. > > *** Error code 1 >=20 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql50. > > localhost# >=20 >=20 > > Please help and advise, what should I do? I have tried to google allrea= dy > > but could not find any solution.... >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, > Reshmakov mailto:ml@rrv.ru >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 12:02:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031BF16A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (mail.edmc.ru [213.33.142.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6537413C458 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A99E6024; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:02:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from adm36.relax.ru (adm36.relax.ru [80.68.244.36]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7C2E6022; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:02:55 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:02:55 +0400 From: Reshmakov Roman X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.06) Professional Organization: RRV X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <131202964.20070428160255@rrv.ru> To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20070428075027.af3beb1d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> <1743483595.20070428151306@rrv.ru> <20070428075027.af3beb1d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sat Apr 28 16:02:56 2007 +0400 (MSD) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , VeeJay Subject: Re[2]: Help, please ....Port Install Problem, Google didn't help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Reshmakov Roman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:02:58 -0000 =0D=0A> Reshmakov Roman wrote: >> >> after 'make' type 'make deinstall && make install' key phrase: "mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed", so you need remove old package and install new :) "make clean" does not solve this problem cause you clean build tree, not package. > I've found that a "make clean" frequently cleans up this problem as well, > which basically seems to be the result of the port system somehow losing > track of the fact that a particular dependency is already installed. >> > Hello >>=20 >> > I am trying to run a perl script connecting a mysql50 database on a >> > freebsd61 box. >>=20 >> > But I get this error: >> > Can't locate Mysql.pm in @INC (@INC contains: >> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN >> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach >> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl >> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at...... >>=20 >> > But when I want to install perl database driver, I get this error: >>=20 >> > localhost# make install clean >> =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: >> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/DBI.pm - found >> =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl= 5.8.8 - >> > found >> =3D=3D=3D>> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on shared library: mysqlclie= nt.15 - not >> > found >> =3D=3D=3D>> Verifying install for mysqlclient.15 in >> > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client >> =3D=3D=3D>> Installing for mysql-client-5.0.27 >> =3D=3D=3D>> Generating temporary packing list >> =3D=3D=3D>> Checking if databases/mysql50-client already installed >> =3D=3D=3D>> mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed >> > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again >> > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. >> > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of >> > databases/mysql50-client >> > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" >> > in your environment or the "make install" command line. >> > *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. >> > *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql50. >> > localhost# >>=20 >>=20 >> > Please help and advise, what should I do? I have tried to google allre= ady >> > but could not find any solution.... >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, >> Reshmakov mailto:ml@rrv.ru >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" --=20 =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, Reshmakov mailto:ml@rrv.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 12:30:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DC16A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C8D313C45E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2007 12:30:09 -0000 Received: from h081217094222.dyn.cm.kabsi.at (EHLO taxman.pepperland) [81.217.94.222] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 14:30:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #16703784 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+PfE5HJLOP2D/khIP2so9hFWYb/n7cjlNAqr7TFY io3kotORiAKFWs From: Stefan Ehmann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704281416.34783.shoesoft@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200704281416.34783.shoesoft@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704281430.09514.shoesoft@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: syslog(3) as user sets errno X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:30:11 -0000 On Saturday 28 April 2007 14:16:34 Stefan Ehmann wrote: > If a non-privilged program calls syslog(3), after the call, errno is set to > 13 (permission denied). Seems like I jumped the gun. opengroup.org says "The value of errno should only be examined when it is indicated to be valid by a function's return value." So it seems perfectly valid that errno is set. Sorry for the noise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 12:43:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C30016A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA7C713C45B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2007 12:16:35 -0000 Received: from h081217094222.dyn.cm.kabsi.at (EHLO taxman.pepperland) [81.217.94.222] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 14:16:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #16703784 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BYHp+nqvBSPfsntxRqPSfqC9oTha3zh4cDZ0Ssi +FsjnMGYzUtrrI From: Stefan Ehmann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:16:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704281416.34783.shoesoft@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: syslog(3) as user sets errno X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:43:17 -0000 If a non-privilged program calls syslog(3), after the call, errno is set to 13 (permission denied). In lib/libc/gen/syslog.c connectlog(), it is first tried to connect to /var/run/logpriv. If it fails /var/run/log is tried. The first connect fails if syslog() is not called as root, it fails with errno=13 and the second connect succeeds. This is all fine, except that errno is set to 13 after calling syslog(). Is this a bug or expected behaviour? IMHO errno should be set to 0 before the second connect is called -- or is this a bad idea? Stefan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 12:22:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE57716A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mukul_chou@yahoo.co.in) Received: from web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.43.219.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE96013C43E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mukul_chou@yahoo.co.in) Received: (qmail 37119 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2007 11:56:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Ocxw4apE3KNKwu7gdugUZY/cG5P8hvrf1Uo02CM4HWm5r/fjRPOKizdCPiN2xzXhqd/faFQhnQ0ll9aBAI17YPYV+gT3fArdnRQ11SPtLbfCDRfNR1kXAGFIFrnl9cKdW2LJe0KRQ6UVHhC4GxGQlCAfW3WqCR7vvKHcwW0RStE=; X-YMail-OSG: OCvXnDYVM1nFhqX7jabDTbeiL6zn4a6j4EYHP8zFL0STDJa4BRJ6LJPWQDjUG8fMlobBQ3jX7XclYKmqrUTsIKFekWfHE42gAskQbaGGamGpqPEk8CFZFo2GAluJvA-- Received: from [59.93.194.174] by web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:04 BST Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:04 +0100 (BST) From: mukul choudhuri To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <500464.36852.qm@web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:48:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Hardware requirement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:22:48 -0000 Hello, Would U Plz. tell me about MAX amount of RAM freeBSD supports per processor in SMP systems? Does a dualcore system be considered as SMP system? Say an AMD X2 or Core2Duo? Thanks Mukul Chaudhuri --------------------------------- SHOUT IT OUT! Tell everyone, from anywhere, that you're online on Yahoo! Messenger From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 13:38:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C42B16A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A648013C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 31919 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 09:38:50 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (HELO ?172.16.0.6?) (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2007 09:38:50 -0400 Message-ID: <46334E6A.8040206@queue.to> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:38:50 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: 462F5D1C.8030302@wilderness.homeip.net <4631059B.2030303@janh.de> <46310F51.6080903@queue.to> <463114B2.3090704@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> <463119AF.9010001@janh.de> <463296ED.50906@queue.to> <4632D84F.1070409@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4632D84F.1070409@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040700060207040207010908" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2.0 dumps core on second file open op (workaround) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:38:52 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040700060207040207010908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Garrett Cooper wrote: > Howard Goldstein wrote: >> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>> Michel Le Cocq wrote: >>>> I think it's a global thunderbird 2 bug, because i have exactly the >>>> same trouble ona mac os 10.4 with a binary update. >>> >>> I do not think it is exactly the same -- see below. >>> >>>> Howard Goldstein a écrit : >>>>> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>>>> Drew Sanford wrote: >>>>>> > No, but I am seeing it core dump rather strangely. Each time it >>>>>> starts >>>>>> > up, I can open a file dialog box to save an attachment or attach a >>>>>> > file one time just fine. The second time I try to attach or save a >>>>>> > file on any start up, it crashes. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW: Firefox 2.0.X does the same. Use "Save Link As..." a few >>>>>> times in a row (2 is usually sufficient) and have a core dump. >>>>>> >>>>>> I had this happen with Firefox 2.0.X and Thunderbird 2.0.0 that I >>>>>> compiled myself as well as with this one (on 6.2-RELEASE): >>>>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/www/firefox-2.0.0.3,1.tbz >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess someone should file a bug report... >>>>> >>>>> Looks like the same problem at ports/105589, perhaps it needs to be >>>>> reopened, seems to be the same problem. Haven't tried the >>>>> workaround. Not sure how to do that on someone else's gnats. (cc >>>>> to the gnats person who closed it) >>> >>> After reading the discussion in the PR, I renamed libgnome-2.so.0 and >>> tried again: no crashes with Firefox 2.0.3 or Thunderbird 2.0.0. I do >>> run KDE -- I probably should compile Firefox and Thunderbird without >>> the gnome dependencies to solve it for me. >> >> I wish I'd googled for KDE along with this as the problem was >> apparently fixed once for KDE, although for some reason came back >> again now for some of us. Here's a link to the very same bug along >> with a fix that was targeted only for KDE >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016299.html >> >> >> Based on your find Jan it's fairly simple to workaround this in the >> 2.0.0.0 Makefile by disabling gnomeui and gnomevfs linkages. Here's >> my diff which also includes tiny cruft disabling ldap during the build >> since I can't build an LDAPable thunderbird2 on my system. >> >> (before the diff, following up, reverting CFLAGS to -O -pipe and the >> default CPUTYPE didn't help, neither did installing gnome2) >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *** mail/thunderbird/Makefile.orig Fri Apr 27 18:00:27 2007 >> --- mail/thunderbird/Makefile Fri Apr 27 19:15:58 2007 >> *************** >> *** 17,23 **** >> COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that >> stands above >> CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* >> ! WANT_GNOME= yes >> ALL_TARGET= default >> CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} >> HAS_CONFIGURE= yes >> --- 17,25 ---- >> COMMENT= Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that >> stands above >> CONFLICTS= lightning-0.[0-9]* >> ! #hgWANT_GNOME= yes >> ! WANT_GNOME= no >> ! #hg >> ALL_TARGET= default >> CONFIGURE_ENV= LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE} >> HAS_CONFIGURE= yes >> *************** >> *** 31,36 **** >> --- 33,41 ---- >> MOZ_GRAPHICS= default,-xbm >> MOZ_OPTIONS= --enable-single-profile --disable-profilesharing \ >> --enable-application=mail --enable-official-branding >> + #hg >> + MOZ_OPTIONS+= --disable-ldap --disable-gnomeui --disable-gnomevfs >> + #hg >> MOZ_MK_OPTIONS= MOZ_MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 >> MOZ_EXPORT= MOZ_THUNDERBIRD=1 > > Based on someone's comments about OSX though, there might be an issue > with the underlying base system or kernel in FreeBSD <6.2 that > Thunderbird 2 unearths, dealing with filesystem handling, threading, > linking, or something along those lines (I know, that really doesn't > narrow down the list). It should be a core component though because > Thunderbird under OSX doesn't have any GTK or X11 support compiled in > and is natively run under Aqua. > > I'll look for the core dump sent previously, but if more people can > contribute their core dumps this would help isolate the issue. The > bigger (and compressed) the better, as long as you don't have sensitive > data hanging around in the background. This might just help capture the > problem at hand. > > Hardware specs and CPUTYPE, as well as whether or not you're running a > custom or generic kernel with what options would help as well. Please > link off site if you can. > > After that maybe we should all band together and submit a bug report. > > Now let me see if I can reproduce it on my iBook :). Yes I think we need to continue on fixing this since my rotten stinking workaround doesn't workaround for long anyway. Thunderbird survived a few additional attachments than before, but still dumped a core this morning after idling all night when I attempted to attach the files indicated below to this very email :( Here are some additional details: - sys is an Asus P4P800, two SATA drives in RAID1 config using the onboard ICH5 controller, a crappy IDE winchester and a crappy IDE CDROM, floppy - dmesg (non debug, sorry) and x.org log attached Let me know if I can send along anything else. Bizarre, isn't it? While googling I saw a fleeting note that pthreads were suspected and darned if it doesn't die in there. --------------040700060207040207010908 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg" Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 27 16:25:16 EDT 2007 hg@cally.queue.to:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CALLY Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz (2598.76-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4400> Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1609760768 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1559896064 (1487 MB) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xf6000000-0xf6ffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff irq 10 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: port 0xd480-0xd49f irq 10 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 15 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xd880-0xd89f irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 10 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xf5fffc00-0xf5ffffff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb80f irq 11 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xc880-0xc883,0xc800-0xc807,0xc480-0xc483,0xc400-0xc40f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pcm0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff,0xd400-0xd43f mem 0xf5fff800-0xf5fff9ff,0xf5fff400-0xf5fff4ff irq 14 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 ppi0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/27.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 8 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2598762436 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad5: 156334MB at ata2-slave UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata3-master UDMA33 ad8: 190782MB at ata4-master SATA150 ad10: 190782MB at ata5-master SATA150 ar0: 190782MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad8 at ata4-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad10 at ata5-master Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a skc0: <3Com 3C940 Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xf7ffc000-0xf7ffffff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 skc0: 3Com Gigabit LOM (3C940) rev. (0x1) sk0: on skc0 sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:6e:60:96:2a miibus0: on sk0 e1000phy0: on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging disabled sk0: link state changed to UP nfs server pid549@cally:/n: not responding nfs server pid549@cally:/n: not responding nfs server pid549@cally:/n: not responding nfs server pid549@cally:/n: is alive again pid 66184 (thunderbird-bin), uid 1000: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 10969 (thunderbird-bin), uid 1000: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) --------------040700060207040207010908-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 13:57:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D756516A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D39413C44B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3SDvoJi031680; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:57:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 98423B854; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:57:50 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: mukul choudhuri Message-ID: <20070428135750.GA64527@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: mukul choudhuri , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <500464.36852.qm@web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <500464.36852.qm@web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware requirement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:57:52 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:56:04PM +0100, mukul choudhuri wrote: > Would U Plz. tell me about MAX amount of RAM freeBSD supports per > processor in SMP systems? Depends on the architecture. A 32 bit x86 chip can address 4GB, unless you have the PAE extension in the kernel. In that case it is 64 GB. Beware that some drivers are not compatible with PAE. The amd64 architecture has been tested with 8 GB. For other architectures, see the release notes: http://www.nl.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware.html=20 > Does a dualcore system be considered as SMP system? Say an AMD X2 or Core= 2Duo? Yes, AFAIK. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGM1LeEnfvsMMhpyURApFaAKCIdGu1ZQMv2zLhSNTZwN73lDpA0wCfUfw8 JdKGVCxmFluX7PbPbDDeC7c= =bJjx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 14:08:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2C816A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (mail.edmc.ru [213.33.142.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19EB13C45D for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@rrv.ru) Received: from mail.edmc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A10CE6024; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:08:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from adm36.relax.ru (adm36.relax.ru [80.68.244.36]) by mail.edmc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3EBE6022; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:08:36 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:08:35 +0400 From: Reshmakov Roman X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.06) Professional Organization: RRV X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <947509420.20070428180835@rrv.ru> To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20070428135750.GA64527@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <500464.36852.qm@web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com> <20070428135750.GA64527@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sat Apr 28 18:08:36 2007 +0400 (MSD) Cc: mukul choudhuri , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Hardware requirement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Reshmakov Roman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:08:38 -0000 We sucessfuly use amd64 arch on Intel Xeon CPUs. > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:56:04PM +0100, mukul choudhuri wrote: >> Would U Plz. tell me about MAX amount of RAM freeBSD supports per >> processor in SMP systems? > Depends on the architecture. A 32 bit x86 chip can address 4GB, unless > you have the PAE extension in the kernel. In that case it is 64 > GB. Beware that some drivers are not compatible with PAE. > The amd64 architecture has been tested with 8 GB. > For other architectures, see the release notes: > http://www.nl.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware.html=20 >> Does a dualcore system be considered as SMP system? Say an AMD X2 or Cor= e2Duo? > Yes, AFAIK. > Roland --=20 =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, Reshmakov mailto:ml@rrv.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 14:30:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B9F16A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF19113C45D for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4343 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 14:30:20 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Apr 2007 14:30:20 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009C628426; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6F3B31CEC9; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:30:15 -0400 (EDT) To: Elan Marikit References: <463193FE.4090504@infoweapons.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <463193FE.4090504@infoweapons.com> (Elan Marikit's message of "Fri\, 27 Apr 2007 14\:11\:10 +0800") Message-ID: <44abwsd11k.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: set env in chroot script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:30:21 -0000 Elan Marikit writes: > I am a newbie of FreeBSD and I want to know how to set environment > inside chroot in a shell script. > > My script looks like this: > chroot $NEWROOT /bin/sh -c "" > > And I want to set an environment, before the . > > Is it possible that it will inherit my parent environment? like the > environment set in my script? According to the chroot(8) manual, only the SHELL value will be inherited. Try making a wrapper script to set the values you want, and call the command from inside that script. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 14:40:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5701F16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608F13C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l3SEeDlj007471 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:40:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id l3SEeD91007470 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:40:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:40:13 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070428144012.GA5691@saltmine.radix.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relativeadvantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:40:14 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > The true value of Wikipedia is that it can deal with controversial > subjects. ... on the other hand, for some instances it doesn't _deal_ with controversial subjects, but only reflects the most common opinion. Currently(*) the only way to see what's going on is to examine the history of changes to a given page, taking into account that since the updaters are anonymous there's no guarantee that one can relate their opinions to facts. (*) is there a guarantee that the change history will remain? If not, at that point one may as well delete wikipedia. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFGM1zLtIqByHxlDocRAiFaAJoDU6Xz9mAYIMyKrjGSigOScBUz+gCgmi2v MDhGn94e6qkK29uNgREFEP4= =MnCp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 14:45:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730CE16A403 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A93513C45A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 16752 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 14:45:38 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Apr 2007 14:45:38 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E0B28426; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 72C221CCF2; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:45:35 -0400 (EDT) To: Eduardo Morras References: <462CBE5100268233@> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:45:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462CBE5100268233@> (added by postmaster@resmaa05.ono.com) (Eduardo Morras's message of "Fri\, 27 Apr 2007 14\:08\:19 +0200") Message-ID: <44647gd0c0.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS server setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:45:39 -0000 Eduardo Morras writes: > I'm trying to setup a cvs server. I have a vps jail account so i can't make a jail in the jail to run the cvs server. Has cvs server a /chroot/ mode? Where can i find documentation to do so? All doc, man and howto i readed shows how to do creating a jail. Is there other way to do so? You should be able to use chroot(8) on it directly, as far as I can tell. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 14:47:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB81D16A404 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5541F13C4C9 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so915714ana for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:47:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aUu2L11tG73ZuuIQbadL9RI8sX6sJKjwKPqSjQH4pQIRuWg4f5sCHPvkmwi36mLSviZ+sbnwVMIAqXAEWU1THFlPAgt54Rq758yipyLyd1+pONmUh5dBtzFtn3VZ0Ov90HfhDpvO7UL7fhIKj7z4tmGb00tRMPgDr6HpHr6EXHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BXCsInK2w8dN38Bx0G+SfG13SYA0MvfOqDYfnIefb0sftEhBdHIdbEKy2YVmw6lJ9E+3HbG7SrYkYjRv950JY8G/Jm1EbRZptsbzsL4jgjzBTqySpgQjs5+NAZwDPKuiNuXmhTCFDTining+2R4EBcw+yHKB4RwT4ssgGns8NkQ= Received: by 10.100.173.19 with SMTP id v19mr2837666ane.1177771631155; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0704280747p1d017ec9pda0658124f584f93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:47:10 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "james thompson" In-Reply-To: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, JamesThompson65@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:47:12 -0000 On 4/28/07, james thompson wrote: > How difficult is FreeBSD to use in place of MS windows, say compared to > Apple OSX? I believe it may be able to run Offide 98; can Office 98 > with Publisher be ran on FreeBSD? I want to use FreeBSD to compose > articles, and combine them into a Book for publication, as a Home Office > Operation by a person with little experience beyond windows. In 1995, > I took a MicroComputer Operating Systems course in Windows 3.11 and DOS > 6.22. I have used Windows 95, 98, and XP Home & upgraded to Media Edition. Hello, It's very easy, I suggest for new bsd users to go for PC-BSD http://www.pcbsd.org/ since it's one setup CD with complete desktop interface. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 15:04:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F75C16A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEE213C455 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D01217A88; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:04:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:04:18 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 4+LsDOcLu3K4rpIabrfRNq1MXcHkNEoMDoTDRKxZ6bux 1177772657 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4775C3F8; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:04:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200704280220.09178.ABabiy@shaw.ca> References: <200704280220.09178.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-3--250524125"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <6054DA6C-B3B3-48E3-9725-FC6D347D454A@goldmark.org> From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:04:05 -0500 To: Andriy Babiy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Response "Fwd: failure notice" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:04:18 -0000 --Apple-Mail-3--250524125 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Apr 28, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Andriy Babiy wrote: > On every message, sent to the list, I receive a strange response > with the > subject line: "Fwd: failure notice". This is because (at least) one member of the list, kugua065315@163.com, has an address behind a broken MTA. If the email system for that delivery worked, then the bounce message would go to owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org instead of to the person who posted the message. People behind mail systems like those should never, ever be allowed near Internet email discussion groups. I haven't seen a mail system that broken for a long time. Typically it is because the mail goes through some kind of gateway that fails to preserve the "envelope from" address. It would be nice if the list manager for this list could trace down which subscribed address is causing the problem (not always an easy thing to do) and ban them from the list. A more common problem is the list subscriber who has a badly configured auto responder set up. I have a rant about those at http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/auto-resp/ Cheers, -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ --Apple-Mail-3--250524125-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 15:18:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF86716A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.cardona@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D4CC13C458 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.cardona@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 84854 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 14:51:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type; b=ZIrknbsbXLbq0CQpFDgZzHAIxMdS4JjVcP+TzE/OCEokjdc+SfOc330/fmEC1A545wTzIgO9EO43Hp1okl/0pfqq88v2TcSuf8sz2uw34nZre2ZiBuzT1kTR5cniV42fJiHEqwjvtwwirwFsl6FkQnSjVCJDVCwTNxeIqpF65Mk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.4?) (v.cardona@sbcglobal.net@70.225.47.131 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 14:51:43 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: q09U4vMVM1nU3oLlFfltRsi_YBUlDSrWMOKp6GxeqH77bFCo1noWMuvngO.gRD.Evqin3VRiERXxYqhKgmtkDXhlzvfH3IjHDCmA Message-ID: <46335F75.1070704@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:51:33 -0500 From: Victor Cardona User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200704212236.43567.shinjii@maydias.com> In-Reply-To: <200704212236.43567.shinjii@maydias.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3E49F868CFE18CDC29F81510" Subject: Re: Azureus Build Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:18:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3E49F868CFE18CDC29F81510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Warren Liddell wrote: > Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. Azureus as always fials with the followin= g (any=20 > ideas/suggestions welcomed) > --------------- >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Building for azureus-3.0.1.0 > Buildfile: build.xml >=20 > init: > [mkdir] Created dir: /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build >=20 > compile: > [javac] Compiling 2510 source files=20 > to /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build > =20 > [javac] /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/org/gudy/azureus2/pluginsimpl/l= ocal/utils/resourcedownloader/ResourceDownloaderFactoryImpl.java:66:=20 > cannot resolve symbol > [javac] symbol : method toURI () > [javac] location: class java.net.URL > [javac] return( new=20 > ResourceDownloaderFileImpl( null, new File( url.toURI()))); > [javac] = =20 > ^ > [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. > [javac] Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. > [javac] 1 error >=20 > BUILD FAILED > /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus/work/build.xml:22: Compile failed; see the c= ompiler=20 > error output for details. >=20 > Total time: 1 minute 7 seconds > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= =2Eorg" >=20 What version of Java do you have installed? The method that cannot be found toURI() was added in Java 1.5. If you are still using 1.4 or earlier, then you will need to upgrade your JRE or JDK first. --------------enig3E49F868CFE18CDC29F81510 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFGM198/vsF3HWT+ZURAtg3AJ9QGIv9uwn5Lsn/78iZQQVSyUEWLwCYoWmf kyTTVloW+QPrqAZpSx7k4g== =5IN4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3E49F868CFE18CDC29F81510-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 16:16:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1CB16A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A4E13C457 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070428161619.PLRC14403.mta9.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:16:19 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:16:18 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: fbsd 6.2 new boot time messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:16:20 -0000 Just installed 6.2 from cd and now see many " Instructions: not found" messages. What are these messages referring to??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 16:34:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4B216A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:34:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maximo4k@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF02113C44B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maximo4k@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so934220ana for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:34:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rSjgqiuL/R7thfQaVBPyvbMiUVbp/vzEzpUtFNrlmXrQBFgeMF3gfdPoXQIPwXZX0DCds5z+I+0opEH4fnbpiOOMKgIIHccL/CtTcfHdrEBfQ1Y2pN6S+RrX/QaV3l4OwGBVv3nEhmgug2JG2P9F8Wa8+5dLdmSicTW6+mnIUgM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:x-mailer:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=unvn6Tpaa0ruhi3sDcYrE/OV7QXsNZr7MnTNqGZTJsobPlaVyxJI3Twz55LFl7fx84L1FvLkcsATaS5KPg6/H1Hl20UgYLAaAlfrxg/kwAAuZzqU6Ep5Qhc6drfwTrz5009/oV3LMebHHznnobVr75tHW2/T7bFJ6WliXx5py5o= Received: by 10.100.153.17 with SMTP id a17mr2878013ane.1177776555088; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.3.7.11? ( [207.101.72.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c13sm5609298anc.2007.04.28.09.09.14; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:09:55 -0700 From: maximo4k X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.85.03) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1514709144.20070428120955@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Need your help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: maximo4k List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:34:47 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, From: Maksym Kuvyklin Subject: I have suspicion that somebody use my server like zombie server. Environment:FreeBSD mail.ukremb.com 5.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE #6: Mon Apr 23 14:41:21 EDT 2007 root@mail.ukremb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 Description: Sorry for my pure English. I am new in this community. I had detected that somebody tryed to penetrate via ssh into my server. When I had changed the port all this attempts were finished. Then server notified me about that somebody use my IP address and after that my network adapter had down. I had changed it to another one and the server had started work again. I have static IP address. But, now my connection is very slow. I have looked throught the logs and I had not found any tracks of penetration. Please, help me to solve this problem. -- Best regards, maximo4k mailto:maximo4k@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 16:59:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F5916A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: from web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADD5D13C45A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xrayv19@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 55175 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2007 16:59:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=EB8Bn5ve6BBtIIq6rXSmcnChNDRrzDunc3p7PXK8H3OS8efVDZSs4MgEYl0q7PsYMLJChB8O5k4PMOLq9phh9tQzN8YtNVMQmPfBwkozRRMGI8oYXDlrIP8XOmgxugkA0BhecCAMPTCC9eq8+U0OqUCr8sIsz3JfiPUlPkxcRkU=; X-YMail-OSG: jbd9jEwVM1kfJL_BT8yFKQWaER2R2zl6c4NVxCdjWVBvQtZamcczMMG4txuktM21gVQCGDRHxfKTDcfHG2NMW0pGdSWhqzOZiIyK Received: from [131.191.24.2] by web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:59:01 PDT Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:59:01 -0700 (PDT) From: L Goodwin To: beech@alaskaparadise.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200704271734.04091.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <39066.55121.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: DHCP client configuration on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:59:02 -0000 --- Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > When I ran the DHCP client configuration tool on > > FreeBSD 6.2, it added a new hostname variable to > > /etc/rc.conf below existing the hostname var (it > > did not remove or comment-out the old hostname > > variable). > > The NEW hostname includes the ISP's domain name: > > hostname="dhcppc0." > > > > This hostname differs from the hostname listed in > > the router's DHCP table "dhcpp0" (no domain name). > > It also shows unique IP addresses and MAC addresses > > for all hosts on the LAN. > > > > I can ping the IP address assigned to the FreeBSD > > system, but ping and net lookup fail when its > > hostname is specified (both with and without the > > domain name). > > > > Questions: > > 1) Why did the hostname get changed (does not > > occur for Windows clients)? > > 2) Why does the hostname in /etc/rc.conf contain > > the DNS domain name? > > FreeBSD uses the FQDN (fully qualified domain name) > as the hostname. > Example: hostname= "yourmachine.yourdomain.com" > > > 3) How do I resolve this problem? > > Unless you provide your own DNS that resolves your > internal network and supersede dhclient with your > domain name, DHCP will use the domain and DNS from > your provider. Your windows boxes point to your > isp's nameservers which have no records of your > server or it's address. Therefore it can't resolve > your machine's hostname. > If you do provide your own internal name service you > will also need to edit /etc/dhclient.config (see man > dhclient.conf), and point your windows boxes to your > DNS instead of your isp's. You can use a fictitious > domain name internally, just make sure that the > domain doesn't actually exist on the net. > You can also use the FreeBSD IP address as a domain > name on your windows boxes to connect. Is there a way to a) make dhclient use hostname without a domain name appended, or b) make dhclient instruct the DHCP server to append the domain name to the hostname? > Running bind requires a fairly steep learning > curve, but there are simple nameservers in the ports > tree that would probably better suit your needs. Are you referring to the built-in command in bsh that lists/alters key bindings for the line editor? I don't understand what bind has to do with any of this. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 17:02:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CD116A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC7213C4BD for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip72-193-85-114.lv.lv.cox.net ([72.193.85.114] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HhqJd-000Ll6-8z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:02:33 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:02:12 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c789b6$f7130320$0700020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AceHV5X36rgjN4dwSjG9J82EuSj74Q== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Quotacheck failing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:23 -0000 I'm having a problem with quotacheck failing and giving this message: quotacheck: /home/quota.user: seek failed: Invalid argument THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: /dev/twed0s1d (/home) However, I have run a full fsck from single user mode on this volume and it comes up clean every time. I've removed the quota.user and had it re-generated, but that didn't help either. Anyone know how/why this is happening, and what do try to do to fix it? Is there possible some corrupt file somewhere on the volume that quotacheck doesn't like, but is technically fine according to fsck? I haven't heard from any one with any ideas, so I'm reposting. Beyond moving the data off the array, reformatting it and moving it back (which I did originally) how can I fix this problem? Thanks for any suggestions! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 17:02:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CD516A407 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A82813C457 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3SH08wn008592; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:00:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l3SH083B008589; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:00:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:00:08 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Maksym Kuvyklin Message-ID: <20070428170007.GA8507@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <200704281407.l3SE7WWV079610@www.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704281407.l3SE7WWV079610@www.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/112207: I have suspicion that somebudy use my server like zombie server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:02:49 -0000 On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:07:32PM +0000, Maksym Kuvyklin wrote: > > >Synopsis: I have suspicion that somebudy use my server like zombie server. > >Arrival-Date: Sat Apr 28 14:20:04 GMT 2007 > >Originator: Maksym Kuvyklin > >Release: FreeBSD 5.5 STABLE > >Environment: > FreeBSD mail.ukremb.com 5.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE #6: Mon Apr 23 14:41:21 EDT 2007 root@mail.ukremb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > >Description: > Sorry for my pure English. I am new in this community. > I had detected that somebody tryed to penetrate via ssh into my server. When I had changed the port all this attempts were finished. Then server notified me about that somebody use my IP address and after that my network adapter had down. I had changed it to another one and the server had started work again. I have static IP address.But, now my connection is very slow. I have looked throught the logs and I had not found any tracks of penetration. Please, help me to solve this problem. > > I took the liberty to make a response and redirect this to the questions list. I hope that is OK. I am not a network security expert, so if someone tells you better, then, go with their information. But,,, Someone is always trying to penetrate ssh on systems. They go around and scan every machine they can find with a common list of ids. You can put in place some blocking software of firewalls to prevent those scans from getting to your machine, but it might not be all that meaningful. As for a warning that some other machine is using your IP address, this can be possible if some other machine is badly configured. It can be a lot of work to track down that machine, but that is the only way to fix it. It is possible that another machine may be using your IP address to try and steal information or use your address to either spam or attack others. Or, it may be just someone who is either incompetent or lazy with setting up their system. It is hard to tell without more examination. Definitely something like that can cause your network traffic to be very slow. If you are lucky, that machine using your IP will be physically near you and can be tracked down. Maybe some other people can help with hints on how to do it. Anyway, it may, but does not necessarily indicate that your machine has been broken in to. If you can find not other signs, then maybe you are lucky and all the problem is external to your machine. But you do need to track that bad machine using your IP and shut it down. Good luck, ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 17:35:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1281916A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247E513C45A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E647D97; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:34:58 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD Port Maintainer To: L Goodwin Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:34:51 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <39066.55121.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <39066.55121.qm@web58113.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704280934.54852.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP client configuration on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@alaskaparadise.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:35:01 -0000 On Saturday 28 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > --- Beech Rintoul wrote: > > On Friday 27 April 2007, L Goodwin said: > > > When I ran the DHCP client configuration tool on > > > FreeBSD 6.2, it added a new hostname variable to > > > /etc/rc.conf below existing the hostname var (it > > > did not remove or comment-out the old hostname > > > variable). > > > The NEW hostname includes the ISP's domain name: > > > hostname="dhcppc0." > > > > > > This hostname differs from the hostname listed in > > > the router's DHCP table "dhcpp0" (no domain name). > > > It also shows unique IP addresses and MAC > > addresses > > > > for all hosts on the LAN. > > > > > > I can ping the IP address assigned to the FreeBSD > > > system, but ping and net lookup fail when its > > > hostname is specified (both with and without the > > > domain name). > > > > > > Questions: > > > 1) Why did the hostname get changed (does not > > > occur for Windows clients)? > > > 2) Why does the hostname in /etc/rc.conf contain > > > the DNS domain name? > > > > FreeBSD uses the FQDN (fully qualified domain name) > > as the hostname. > > Example: hostname= "yourmachine.yourdomain.com" > > > > > 3) How do I resolve this problem? > > > > Unless you provide your own DNS that resolves your > > internal network and supersede dhclient with your > > domain name, DHCP will use the domain and DNS from > > your provider. Your windows boxes point to your > > isp's nameservers which have no records of your > > server or it's address. Therefore it can't resolve > > your machine's hostname. > > If you do provide your own internal name service you > > will also need to edit /etc/dhclient.config (see man > > dhclient.conf), and point your windows boxes to your > > DNS instead of your isp's. You can use a fictitious > > domain name internally, just make sure that the > > domain doesn't actually exist on the net. > > You can also use the FreeBSD IP address as a domain > > name on your windows boxes to connect. > > Is there a way to a) make dhclient use hostname > without a domain name appended, or b) make dhclient > instruct the DHCP server to append the domain name to > the hostname? You're confusing windows networking with "real" networking. If all you're trying to do is share files with the windows boxes, just put the machine name as hostname and don't worry what gets appended to it. Samba will handle the windows part of it (machine name and workgroup). Windows uses a different system to identify machines on it's network. Don't confuse a windows "domain" with a real domain they are different things. On a windows network you use samba to make the windows boxes "think" that the FreeBSD box is one of theirs and share files and printers. You can find detailed how-to's on samba's site. There is no need to ping by hostname unless you're running a server on the FreeBSD box in which case you need to setup real DNS or just use the FreeBSD IP as the hostname from windows. > > > Running bind requires a fairly steep learning > > curve, but there are simple nameservers in the ports > > tree that would probably better suit your needs. > > Are you referring to the built-in command in bsh that > lists/alters key bindings for the line editor? > I don't understand what bind has to do with any of this. I'm not talking about binding keys, what I was talking about is bind. That's a dns server already in the base system. If you want to freely resolve your machines by hostname and domain you probably need to set up a caching nameserver to resolve your internal network. And point all your machines at it. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 17:42:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B3416A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB7D13C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070428174208.YTZJ13783.mta13.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:42:08 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:42:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: fbsd 6.2 new boot time messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:42:09 -0000 Figured it out. Had a comment in rc.conf that was not preceded with # sign. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bob Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:16 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG Subject: fbsd 6.2 new boot time messages Just installed 6.2 from cd and now see many " Instructions: not found" messages. What are these messages referring to??? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 18:27:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D26016A406 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1582013C46C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIRkTX018490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:27:46 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIRjIF001022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:27:46 -0700 Message-ID: <46339228.7050107@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:27:52 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4632AF6B.3020500@tampabay.rr.com> <1177741823.28603.24.camel@joe.realss.com> <1177742342.28603.30.camel@joe.realss.com> <4632F094.4090408@u.washington.edu> <46330f0e.SqjNK65h0+n07uPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <46330f0e.SqjNK65h0+n07uPK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.28.111034 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:27:47 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> OpenOffice in OSX still isn't that great either because there >> still isn't a native (Aqua) build. > > I suspect the NeoOffice folks would be surprised to hear that :) Yes >_>.. I mean that the latest and greatest version of OOo isn't available for Aqua native yet. It's going to take another year to port, as someone has claimed already. There was a big leap in terms of functionality from 1.x vs 2.x in OOo, but then again considering that the OP was asking about running Office 98 (:D..), I don't think he'd mind running the 1.x version binaries. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 18:29:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB70816A403 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C7A13C465 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIT0Ax028154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:29:00 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SISwls017818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:28:59 -0700 Message-ID: <46339272.9050506@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:29:06 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VeeJay References: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0704280158u3ba40eb3vb1114a9e5ce32a95@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.28.111034 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_SUBJ_9 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Help, please ....Port Install Problem, Google didn't help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:29:00 -0000 VeeJay wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to run a perl script connecting a mysql50 database on a > freebsd61 box. > > But I get this error: > Can't locate Mysql.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at...... > > But when I want to install perl database driver, I get this error: > > localhost# make install clean > ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/DBI.pm - found > ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - > found > ===> p5-DBD-mysql50-4.0000 depends on shared library: mysqlclient.15 - > not > found > ===> Verifying install for mysqlclient.15 in > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client > ===> Installing for mysql-client-5.0.27 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if databases/mysql50-client already installed > ===> mysql-client-5.0.27 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of > databases/mysql50-client > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql50. > localhost# > > > Please help and advise, what should I do? I have tried to google allready > but could not find any solution.... Do as the directions say. cd to the port directory, run make deinstall, make install. If you get this all the time, try updating your ports, and/or contacting the maintainer because it could be an improper packing list, or some sort of weird circular dependencies (former rather than latter). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 18:36:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E8D16A40A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D25113C4AD for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIaPf4007245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:36:25 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIaN2L015281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:36:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4633942F.20102@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:36:31 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reshmakov Roman References: <500464.36852.qm@web8607.mail.in.yahoo.com> <20070428135750.GA64527@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <947509420.20070428180835@rrv.ru> In-Reply-To: <947509420.20070428180835@rrv.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.28.111833 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE 0.1, __CHARSET_IS_CP1251 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Roland Smith , mukul choudhuri , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware requirement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:36:26 -0000 Reshmakov Roman wrote: > We sucessfuly use amd64 arch on Intel Xeon CPUs. EMT64 is fully compatible with the major features in AMD64. However, IA64 (64-bit architecture made by Intel in older Xeons) isn't compatible with AMD Opterons AFAIK. Besides, IA64 doesn't allow binary/library profiling and requires all stuff to be done in 64-bit whereas EMT64 and AMD64 do allow for 32-bit and 64-bit operation, simultaneously IIRC. >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:56:04PM +0100, mukul choudhuri wrote: > >>> Would U Plz. tell me about MAX amount of RAM freeBSD supports per >>> processor in SMP systems? > >> Depends on the architecture. A 32 bit x86 chip can address 4GB, unless >> you have the PAE extension in the kernel. In that case it is 64 >> GB. Beware that some drivers are not compatible with PAE. As Roland suggested, you should go with non-PAE 32-bit (in this case 64-bit operating system) if you want more than 4GB of RAM. Look up the archives for this mailing list on recent discussion centered around this topic. >> The amd64 architecture has been tested with 8 GB. >> For other architectures, see the release notes: >> >> http://www.nl.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/hardware.html >> >>> Does a dualcore system be considered as SMP system? Say an AMD X2 or Core2Duo? > >> Yes, AFAIK. Yes, they are. SMP = "Symmetric multiprocessor system", which includes hyperthreading, multi-processor, and multi-core capable CPUs (or some hybrid variant of the above). >> Roland -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 18:44:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F9816A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE6913C45E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIiehN020463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:40 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-67-187-164-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.187.164.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l3SIidGU018501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: <4633961A.4040403@u.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:44:42 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: maximo4k References: <1514709144.20070428120955@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1514709144.20070428120955@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.4.28.112634 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need your help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:44:40 -0000 maximo4k wrote: > Hello freebsd-questions, > > From: Maksym Kuvyklin > > Subject: I have suspicion that somebody use my server like zombie server. > > Environment:FreeBSD mail.ukremb.com 5.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE > #6: Mon Apr 23 14:41:21 EDT 2007 > root@mail.ukremb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > > Description: > Sorry for my pure English. I am new in this community. > I had detected that somebody tryed to penetrate via ssh into my server. > When I had changed the port all this attempts were finished. Then server notified > me about that somebody use my IP address and after that my network adapter had down. > I had changed it to another one and the server had started work again. I have static IP address. > But, now my connection is very slow. I have looked throught the logs and I had not > found any tracks of penetration. Please, help me to solve this problem. What I'd do is determine from another machine if there's another machine trying to spoof your IP, and thus trying to do a man in the middle type of attack, knowingly or unknowingly. Contact your ISP or talk with your network admin and see if you can get the offender kicked off the network IF you are supposed to have a static IP address. If you set the IP address statically yourself and you don't manage your network or you didn't get the AOK from your network managers, you are IP squatting, which isn't a good idea in the first place, and technically you are the one at fault for causing this issue. If not, then you should check your machine for active connections (netstat -a -f inet), and see if there's anything out of the ordinary that you didn't expect to be running on your PC. If you still can't determine anything, check /var/log/auth.log -- this assumes you're running syslog; syslog can be turned on by going to rc.conf, adding SYSLOG_ENABLE="YES" and then running "/etc/rc.d/syslog start". After that, see if there are any users logging in that are unknown to you, or should not be logging in. Good things to think about when administering a system though: 1. Use strong passwords. 2. Turn off unnecessary services. 3. Reduce possible sources of entry into your system (ties into 2.). Cheers and best of luck, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:24:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E951316A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A813C489 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3F048C58B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:24:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99648-03 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:24:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375D148BECA for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:24:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E555FF14 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:24:39 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:24:39 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: "BSDstats: Minor Update to Port ..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It has been brought to my attention that there is / was an inherent flaw in how/when bsdstats is run ... it makes the assumption that the server is actually *running* at 5am on the 1st of each month, instead of shutdown as numerous offices do ... I've just made a slight change to the port so that it adds a bsdstats.sh script to /usr/local/etc/rc.d that can be enabled in /etc/rc.conf so that it runs on system reboot ... The script that prompts you to enable will auto-enable boottime reporting if you enable monthly reporting as well ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGM5934QvfyHIvDvMRAmHMAKC/scpziDRgGfjge4Xgd6c1yHs1QACg6Ysl +UPjZuM2FlOGKB2DJ2xaruc= =3hFG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:24:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5B216A406 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07C13C4BA for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.178]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH800LCR0BMJWB0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:21:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JH8000KV0BMQFN0@pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:21:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([24.81.202.129]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH8006XB0BLDN30@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:21:22 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:21:20 -0700 From: Graham North To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <463390A0.20508@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: normal mount points X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:24:41 -0000 I ran the df command last night to check slice sizes in anticipation of doing some backup and eventual tranfer to a new machine. The output gave me not just normal slices that were created at install but also three additional (mount points?) /proc /net /host The machine is a simple web server and print server with little else on it. Can some explain to me (or point me to) an explanation of mount points? Thanks, Graham/ -- Graham North Vancouver BC Canada www.soleado.ca Kindness is infectous, try it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:37:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7335016A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508C813C448 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH800LCV3V6JYD0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:37:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80]) by pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JH800KS13V6W5L0@pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:37:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([24.81.202.129]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH800BKJ3V5LBA0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:37:54 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:37:52 -0700 From: Graham North To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <4633A290.1060807@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: common freebsd mount points? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:37:54 -0000 I ran the df command last night to check slice sizes in anticipation of doing some backup and eventual tranfer to a new machine. The output gave me not just normal slices that were created at install but also three additional (mount points?) /proc /net /host The machine is a simple web server and print server with little else on it. Can some explain to me (or point me to) an explanation of mount points? Thanks, Graham/ -- Graham North Vancouver BC Canada www.soleado.ca Kindness is infectous, try it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:55:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3188916A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEAF13C46A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3SJvLkp034421 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l3SJvLtm034420 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:57:21 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20070428195720.GA34336@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: Subject: misc question #2:: howto stream .RAM/realplay via "kmplayer"?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:08 -0000 I'm still building my backup DNS server on my remaining Kayak playing with various window managers (aka "desktops"). Stuck. To any browser/media/audio wizards out there in freebsd-land: A few weeks ago (after failing with both mozilla and firefox) I tried the KDE broswer to stream video. And after several tries, got kmplayer working with Konqueror. It streams windows video and better yet, streams windows audio (using the Mplayer backend). But there are some NPR/PBS webcasts only in real-audio. After a few hours of poking around the web and trying to reconfigure Konqueror I-give-up. I've reached the "File Association" -> "Audio" and to "x-pn-realplay" {or something like that}, then I'm wedged. Is there an honest textfile I can use to associate [.ra, .rm, .ram] with /usr/X11R6/bin/realplay???? thanks for any help! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:55:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3F116A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3BC13C455 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1306042muf for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M0HflB9kl6DokF3bF1I4Co2SmgRbP21Cm6SxMkIKeSo21DXWGSwOEQpHMy6atVhnWRuylQmr71Zq2zCZM19eR8qnxzOT7ksQppQvnE92nMNSGtE0e6hYznwJxdOCBN4brCE2bRsXZCJBy3Kj3nhbq/EKbplu0YQbzIhtS1JveDo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=D/2Cktd+DZTmwvTNK2Qbm455Wd1asdEpgaepGySgQdVM0AAVNG+8Ebn56HhvQ+Xb0K56DosPMMi4QoMc4n63taZvsOz7zU92BTHZmKfkZ9mP7m6BTp1V01KUSzjkc+PaQBbBViy9jeaqjOqf0PIexHD6BfQgUvEG85HRqFAi9XQ= Received: by 10.82.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr8253150buf.1177790123073; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.12 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:55:22 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Graham North" In-Reply-To: <463390A0.20508@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <463390A0.20508@shaw.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: normal mount points X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:55:24 -0000 On 28/04/07, Graham North wrote: > I ran the df command last night to check slice sizes in anticipation of > doing some backup and eventual tranfer to a new machine. > The output gave me not just normal slices that were created at install > but also three additional (mount points?) > /proc > /net > /host > > The machine is a simple web server and print server with little else on > it. Can some explain to me (or point me to) an explanation of mount > points? Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 1012974 36926 895012 4% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/ad2s1d 5616214 716542 4450376 14% /home /dev/ad0s1e 1012974 22352 909586 2% /tmp . . . Mount points are merely directories where devices are mounted as part of the filesystem. These can be automatically mounted by a listing in /etc/fstab or manually mounted using /sbin/mount. That they show up in df's listing means that something is in fact mounted on it. Typing "mount" at a command prompt will give you a listing of mounted devices like so: /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad2s1d on /home (ufs, NFS exported, local, nosuid, soft-updates) /dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) . . . As none of those above (/proc /net /host) are part of the standard layout (Well, /proc was on 4.x and earlier) some- one at some time has added them. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 19:56:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0928716A402 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B737B13C44B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1098483pyh for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=qa73FHv5d1OQtxy9cGXd8kCcvq4SyCE1fTvthhQLx9rCwCwfIW/dZdpp4VjY8N/zHiHUrB8Q5YlMxuEjCco4L0Q3D3pbZ0Pjd3Acmjsw1xQ29eiJ/02XgoCtwKosJpaiGNE+FKziLjHinmpJfRO8l2WoTbcGsd+xv9+CAydQcM0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=rUCMJwxpDEodPqjjVEFbBSX/V22Gek0BDitpfYup6tek/40aySQ3zW5BNW8bUBvAVKAYimKLbPfEspaUXYo1uSA1u9OPXmz3BkhmfE4vJ5hcZmhi9DrTql2RTIfbwO9X7PwCn3I+Et4MyjUXIFzh2WThIdrtooSxDIwTcgdYmfU= Received: by 10.35.100.6 with SMTP id c6mr7894711pym.1177790172088; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? ( [209.240.66.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a70sm4046251pye.2007.04.28.12.56.10; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80704250423n21d5eaa1hc78ce1262d710959@mail.gmail.com> References: <23ed14b80704250211l16756f5dkab26503c0f66e2a2@mail.gmail.com> <20070425095713.GA9767@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <23ed14b80704250423n21d5eaa1hc78ce1262d710959@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <987BC865-AF4A-4324-B2EB-A16E00907847@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Eric Crist Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:56:08 -0500 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How do I forward old root emails from the root mailbox to my address? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:13 -0000 On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AMApr 25, 2007, Andreas Wider=F8e Andersen = wrote: > On 4/25/07, Oliver Peter wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Widere Andersen =20 >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > On one of my FreeBSD servers all system emails to root is stored =20= >> in the >> root >> > mailbox under /var/mail/root. I have updated my alias file so =20 >> new mail >> is >> > forwarded to one of my email adresses, but is there a simple way =20= >> for me >> to >> > send all these old mails in root's mailbox to my email address =20 >> without >> > logging in through pop3/imap? >> > >> > A command line trick would be perfect. >> >> mutt is your friend. >> >> Open the mbox file with >> # mutt -R -f /var/mail/root >> >> Then Tag all mails (press 'T' then enter '.') and bounce the tagged >> messages (press ';' and thenn 'b') to your personal email address. >> >> That's the easiest way I know. >> (Of course you need a running MTA, too) > > > Thanks for your reply. I don't have mutt installed and I was hoping =20= > for a > way of doing this without installing additional software. Also, I =20 > didn't > mention that on one of the machines there are probably a year of =20 > emails so > the box is quite large. > > Any other ways? I have sendmail installed and running. > > Cheers, > Andreas Andreas, Edit /etc/mail/aliases and uncomment the root: line and make it look =20 like: root: Where is the local account and/or email address you =20 want to recieve root email. Save the file, while in the /etc/mail directory, run 'make install && =20= make restart' as root, without the quotes. all email will now go to =20 the new address. Eric= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 20:07:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA0916A403 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2959F13C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1099668pyh for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NJp/hNknxZ0a5TSu626u8q22Z+lBPGJK+gRAE61Y28Hz9oKCVv6aNQm1Nih832OY/zCv9N/Vdsdr1oTNLIjNwZM6GCoIkIFC8xChnIG08EkvyuZcBvvqLmUxO8N3IrGGmD8DfCGDNf5dmGacj9brb6bEvGt8wgX4jr/X0ObXT78= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=EKQBQuWgxmVLAfbw0/D4b6ZOlh+n7fVCTAnICJNS4TH7RnsCKbpCR3ZxracF6LS97XPFjxqESckH2iJ5TLzMJv6wwI1zn1ja50od3mQSGeU7n1PRoUpeT45BplMuwgbvJBKmpA5/98tSTYtlTsAXPFQ7GwxGgcIxaV0mZfdW1n0= Received: by 10.35.75.1 with SMTP id c1mr7874772pyl.1177790861405; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? ( [209.240.66.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v15sm4188935pyh.2007.04.28.13.07.40; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:07:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070427035735.utrlkhf34gwsw4ok@zeus.arrishq.net> References: <20070427035735.utrlkhf34gwsw4ok@zeus.arrishq.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <508D109C-83E1-42C9-966B-D3B81270EA6F@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:07:38 -0500 To: Tommy Scheunemann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Login Conf not parsed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:07:42 -0000 On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:57 PMApr 26, 2007, Tommy Scheunemann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm running a FreeBSD 6.2 system, only have SSH access to it. The > only user which is allowed to login had Bash (installed from the > Ports) installed. > Since 2 days I can't login any longer - Bash misses a library. I > tried to create a login_conf file in the users home directory but > it seems that the file isn't parsed. > Content is: > > --- snip --- > > me:\ > :shell=/bin/sh:\ > :setenv=SHELL=/bin/sh: > > --- snip --- > > I've created the database via cap_mkdb at my local system and > uploaded this file as well, then changed the file permissions to > 0400 and ownership is right as well. Just - that file isn't parsed :( > > Any other way of changing the user's shell - could install in the > worst case some kind of PHP shell - are also welcome. > The library which is missing could be uploaded from my local > system, just - of course - I don't have any write permissions in > the usual locations. > > Thanks in advance If you can do that, why not change the shell in /etc/master.passwd and rebuild that database? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 20:32:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B3716A400 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3245F13C458 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from northg@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr1so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.177]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH800EJ16EXZM20@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:32:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80]) by pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JH800MBP6EWO2Y0@pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:32:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([24.81.202.129]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JH800EXB6EVS070@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:32:56 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:32:54 -0700 From: Graham North In-reply-to: To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-id: <4633AF76.4010408@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <463390A0.20508@shaw.ca> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: normal mount points X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:32:57 -0000 Hmmm. My system is 4.11 so that would explain /proc. Could /net and /host be related to running apache or samba? I did not knowingly create these "devices" I haven't been as vigilant as I could have been for security (one of my reasons for an upcoming reinstall), so there is a possibility of the server being hijacked...? But I don't want to assume the worst on false concersns.. illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 28/04/07, Graham North wrote: >> I ran the df command last night to check slice sizes in anticipation of >> doing some backup and eventual tranfer to a new machine. >> The output gave me not just normal slices that were created at install >> but also three additional (mount points?) >> /proc >> /net >> /host >> >> The machine is a simple web server and print server with little else on >> it. Can some explain to me (or point me to) an explanation of mount >> points? > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 1012974 36926 895012 4% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > /dev/ad2s1d 5616214 716542 4450376 14% /home > /dev/ad0s1e 1012974 22352 909586 2% /tmp > . . . > > Mount points are merely directories where devices > are mounted as part of the filesystem. These can be > automatically mounted by a listing in /etc/fstab or manually > mounted using /sbin/mount. That they show up in df's > listing means that something is in fact mounted on it. > > Typing "mount" at a command prompt will give you a listing > of mounted devices like so: > > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > /dev/ad2s1d on /home (ufs, NFS exported, local, nosuid, soft-updates) > /dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) > . . . > > As none of those above (/proc /net /host) are part of the > standard layout (Well, /proc was on 4.x and earlier) some- > one at some time has added them. > -- Graham North Vancouver BC Canada www.soleado.ca Kindness is infectous, try it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 20:35:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F61516A403 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta15.adelphia.net (mta15.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E3413C44C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta15.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with SMTP id <20070428203531.OHXZ6560.mta15.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:35:31 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:35:31 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: problem with php5 port & where ports are to look to see if dependants are available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:35:32 -0000 The php5 port seems to look in the port dir tree for installed dependants instead of the /ver/db/pkg I have all of php5 dependants preinstalled as packages. I install the dependants for (port named links. Which is a command line browser) as packages and then do the make install clean command in the LINKS port tree directory so I can change the install defaults to use sva support and it finds all its dependants are loaded and complies fine. Using this same technique for php5 it says the dependants are not installed when I run the php5 port. Looks like the port php5 is looking in the ports directory tree to determine if the dependants are installed. I think this is incorrect behavior. Is this a problem in the way the php5 port is written? It's my understanding that ports are suppose to be written to check /ver/db/pkg to determine if dependants are available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 22:33:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0C316A403 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E2613C457 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.130.189] (port=38513 helo=smtp2.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1HhvTu-0003KT-Ps for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:33:30 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.214.242]:59994 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1HhvTt-0005Bs-E4; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:33:29 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:32:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070428195720.GA34336@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20070428195720.GA34336@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704290032.37933.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: misc question #2:: howto stream .RAM/realplay via "kmplayer"?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:33:32 -0000 On Saturday 28 April 2007 21:57:21 Gary Kline wrote: > I'm still building my backup DNS server on my remaining Kayak > playing with various window managers (aka "desktops"). Stuck. > To any browser/media/audio wizards out there in freebsd-land: > > A few weeks ago (after failing with both mozilla and firefox) > I tried the KDE broswer to stream video. And after several > tries, got kmplayer working with Konqueror. It streams windows > video and better yet, streams windows audio (using the Mplayer > backend). But there are some NPR/PBS webcasts only in > real-audio. After a few hours of poking around the web and > trying to reconfigure Konqueror I-give-up. > > I've reached the "File Association" -> "Audio" and to > "x-pn-realplay" {or something like that}, then I'm wedged. > Is there an honest textfile I can use to associate [.ra, .rm, > .ram] with /usr/X11R6/bin/realplay???? > > thanks for any help! > > > gary First, you need to confirm that you can play Real in kmplayer. You must have the win32 codecs. Fast forward and such in a Real stream will be a bitch. But it plays. Then you want to go through the mime types in konqueror's config and set kmplayer to the first app to play such types with. And for embedding (the other tab) set the kmplayer_part or whatsitcalled as the first or only. Mime types would include/have: vn-realmedia, rm, ra, ram, rv, smil, vn-realaudio vn-realvideo, x-pn-realaudio, and several other older ones. If you don't find them all at first you'll find them when encountering a oddly mime-ified stream that wont play. There's another way to have Real with konqueror, and that is with the plugin that comes with the realplayer port. It may have poor layout in the webpage but at least it does support moving back and forth in the stream. To make this work you use the linuxpluginwrapper port and an appropriate libmap.conf. Both work reasonably well, or equally bad depending on the tilting of the earth and the humidity on the moon :) I usually prefer kmplayer because it can be used as a general a/v plugin replacement in konqueror and if something with Real doesn't work I can always try to "Open with.." realplayer instead. HTH, Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 23:44:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B003B16A401 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dlp21@bath.ac.uk) Received: from binda.bath.ac.uk (binda.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E7413C45B for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dlp21@bath.ac.uk) Received: from authenticated user by binda.bath.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (envelope-from ) id 1HhwLF-0003ce-AB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:28:37 +0100 From: Dylan Piergies Organization: University of Bath To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:28:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704290028.34281.dlp21@bath.ac.uk> X-kerberosV-authenticator: dlp21@BATH.AC.UK X-Scanner: e57ef6f65ddf182f86ea9ef974903fd2dc7d2eb0 Subject: Linux md devices under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:44:53 -0000 Could somebody please tell me if there is any software capable of reading Linux md devices under FreeBSD (for transition purposes) or if lengthier, less convenient methods will be required? -- Dylan Piergies Undergraduate Physics University of Bath dlp21@bath.ac.uk