From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 3 08:06:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B513316A41B for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 08:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7727C13C4D5 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 08:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lB37i82X011212; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 02:44:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lB37i8Hk011211; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 02:44:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 02:44:08 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20071203074407.GA10989@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Kargl , Bruce Evans , freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20070928152227.GA39233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20071001173736.U1985@besplex.bde.org> <20071002001154.GA3782@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20071002172317.GA95181@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20071002173237.GA12586@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20071003103519.X14175@delplex.bde.org> <20071010204249.GA7446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071010204249.GA7446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: long double broken on i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:06:09 -0000 Is the latest version of the patch the one you sent to the list? If cosl and friends produce accurate answers within a reasonable domain, it's worth committing; the whole business about how accurate cosl(1000000000) is can be dealt with later.