From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 7 04:41:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6D71065672 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 04:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4218FC14 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 04:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m874dhSI046152 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 22:39:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:40:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com> To: arch@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: pax in /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:41:51 -0000 Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in /rescue? Warner