From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 12 14:19:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D294106568A for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvanguardia@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA258FC1D for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvanguardia@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so345308ywe.13 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:19:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=WrJ+BgXJHaul2FD7Af1Z0V2UXuOwvrjW70R1NUbqi6Y=; b=ZTiq0oZI/3O8UGtUlUhXtdj2V9tPEct+aZMfYKljEgM2Z4XgBu8RB7RGnEbnJheize DFtHCwGOVyp448ei7zyHHz/37vF5LCsIc10RoToqlfdwNSJlxb4KSgW25YABgeycbD3R 9wCAlc9FPq7e6AwT7HQSSBrF9NcUpeh7sb+AA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FDbNE3vLFuFZ+117/a0E+qr61jmUzQQr8VgfMp7hQmVMhwr8Ncg1WyIF3zIId7w7Bv 8AruGDndR3Ccs0/78OCxIsBvW4F9mWOF+9q7WgArMuZMtCV/AzsAmuQZ+26hzYkhTeJC z6ip64ctyZYfO/zIpyjJgrGg3545KhXVZMRrU= Received: by 10.151.156.12 with SMTP id i12mr6089125ybo.194.1223821164137; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.11 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f95f7db0810120719j323efd4eh1923f1744f0f4fd6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:19:24 +0800 From: "Patrick Vanguardia" To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:19:25 -0000 Hi, Is there anyone of you have a working multi-ip patch for RELENG_7_0_0? The reason im using RELENG_7_0_0 is because i cant just upgrade my kernel to my dedicated hosting since it has a WHM and a CPANEL that might not work after the update. I'm seeing some patches in the mailing list like the ff.. (see below) and i just want to confirmed if thats the patch for RELENG_7_0_0 HEAD: bz_jail-20080727-10-at146056.diff STABLE: bz_jail7-20080727-11-at146062.diff Thanks, Patrick From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 12 15:40:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B41065689 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B658FC14 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89AC41C60F; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:40:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbsbhY+5yqiy; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 5579E41C616; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC70844487F; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:35:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Patrick Vanguardia In-Reply-To: <4f95f7db0810120719j323efd4eh1923f1744f0f4fd6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081012153425.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <4f95f7db0810120719j323efd4eh1923f1744f0f4fd6@mail.gmail.com> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:40:08 -0000 On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Patrick Vanguardia wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyone of you have a working multi-ip patch for RELENG_7_0_0? The > reason im using RELENG_7_0_0 is because i cant just upgrade my kernel to my > dedicated hosting since it has a WHM and a CPANEL that might not work after > the update. > > I'm seeing some patches in the mailing list like the ff.. (see below) and i > just want to confirmed if thats the patch for RELENG_7_0_0 > > HEAD: bz_jail-20080727-10-at146056.diff > STABLE: bz_jail7-20080727-11-at146062.diff I have put the latest 7.0-R patch I had done and found here tmeporary: http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20080617-01-jail-7.0R.diff Do not expect any update for it or anything. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 12 16:28:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3BF106569E for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AE98FC1C for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so1658498rvb.0 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=eTh8leshdauh55JMK7HlTGtMXACZqr73Mxcd7zeW/EY=; b=YNL7f/ohGwrCO3ZtyDXG2z7UOpDcSyj6yxpzFwC71FNY4K7lGpVFaRMIhdRnpxf54d 5/irAvsnBu8gM5VNsqCx8O3IjCJkKgq8mzIisxNP2KNETeK+4vpIC9TvKen7+4A+N8aY LTc0+/z9OLFXvcD3cM1baDrC9lV8d4LaN1VNY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=vUQbyd9GFCEZBas+jdkTSk3GbrZt9Q3aQjuTHRml1G/HqD0jGqt/v/B0WIlky6Zf+A 8jHmlruiBVgHWu5bI+otrdZ7PUbU7DBa1EzBJMv8y182wSzkaWH9CMlrS+/RjMC+yfd/ +5UNI8f6s4xCXDV3Ofq/XY4Wp3rN6qFQudAio= Received: by 10.140.126.14 with SMTP id y14mr2970177rvc.160.1223828910993; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.192.21 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:28:30 +0200 From: "Sami Halabi" To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: udp problem in multiple ips jail?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:28:31 -0000 Hi, I have the latest Multiple ips jail patch from bz, my problem is that the outer world can't reach the jail which i installed in it a DNS server... from the jail/host enviromet it works, but from other hosts it simply refuses. dns uses udp port 53... help... Sami From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 12 16:35:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2D01065688 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A688FC1B for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3AA41C66F; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:35:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iaBFTS1PHWJD; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 4E4FC41C667; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C59944487F; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:32:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Sami Halabi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081012163117.H2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: udp problem in multiple ips jail?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:35:07 -0000 On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > > I have the latest Multiple ips jail patch from bz, my problem is that the > outer world > can't reach the jail which i installed in it a DNS server... > from the jail/host enviromet it works, but from other hosts > it simply refuses. > > dns uses udp port 53... > > > help... netstat -an tcpdump sockstat ps ax netatst -rn ifconfig -a firewall ping check that all of those are ok. I'd start to see if I can reach the jail from outside the local network by ping/ssh and more forward... -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 12 18:43:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0E91065697 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvanguardia@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40A38FC13 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvanguardia@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so357187yxb.13 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:43:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ggoLu8RB7Qt6cILZ+i5bhHVGX/DaWUoyjZs4pnyff3k=; b=BXdGByPZeeUub0js7imBovEEHIof3kq3VAZOD6OVCo3EQTFgc3tmFeaK4KLr9y6fiS 6vgY7HJ52C0rQKm93Z4S19/9xLNRBUHyFNYEI4cSHGIDZMZD2H6kuLTzmhcZiqQWDzhS +sSv7Qdw7PFoiinSsmfK/Nwgrj7wQVPNCMJdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=YgwXSiAYVCO8cAHaJatn7uAQF2qq15KbDNudhfH9mtl6FdxywI0VTvSO6ZsrcjWk+I bf+opmUUhqaYDREF5kIHa9DVN8lcDo49JpzZKIsWmGnHhPqK9hMwoMdZ127rENYfSbZL Te4INob3IkbDtujqyyoSDokuPlQOh3tCt7kmk= Received: by 10.151.48.15 with SMTP id a15mr5739498ybk.69.1223837035995; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.11 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f95f7db0810121143u1f6aaaa8jb363490f3ef42195@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:43:55 +0800 From: "Patrick Vanguardia" To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <20081012161551.B2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4f95f7db0810120719j323efd4eh1923f1744f0f4fd6@mail.gmail.com> <20081012153425.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4f95f7db0810120852l18e44fdbp26ad9adc5a59bc4c@mail.gmail.com> <20081012161551.B2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:43:57 -0000 ic, thanks, i think i successfully run it one thing i noticed is that when i run ifconfig it only shows 1 IP On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Patrick Vanguardia wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks Bjoern. Yes I will not expect any update from it but is it already >> stable (fully functional)? any known bugs in this release? >> > > well people ran it as they had asked for it. if you would have Cc:ed > the lists someone might have showed up next week end told you. Run a > poll there;-) > > I have never ran it for production or anything. > You may want to check if there had been any follow-ups to tha patch > (take the date from the filename) and check to find the posting where > I had posted the patch: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/ > > > It's not as complete as a releng_7 patch as releng_7 has cpuset that > 7.0-R did not have yet, sctp still was disabled, ... > > Apart from that nothing pops out of my head. > > > /bz > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. > From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 11:06:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D59106569D for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC248FC21 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9DB6qte029473 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:52 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m9DB6pon029469 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:51 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:51 GMT Message-Id: <200810131106.m9DB6pon029469@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:06:52 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/126368 jail [jail] Running ktrace/kdump in jail leads to stale jai o kern/120753 jail [jail] Zombie jails (jailed child process exits while o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o kern/97071 jail [jail] [patch] add security.jail.jid sysctl o kern/89989 jail [jail] [patch] Add option -I (ASCII 73) PID to specif s kern/89528 jail [jail] [patch] impossible to kill a jail o kern/84215 jail [jail] [patch] wildcard ip (INADDR_ANY) should not bin o kern/74314 jail [resolver] [jail] DNS resolver broken under certain ja o kern/72498 jail [libc] [jail] timestamp code on jailed SMP machine gen o kern/68192 jail [quotas] [jail] Cannot use quotas on jailed systems o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 12 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 14 18:24:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79382106568C for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4918B8FC1C for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so2087722rvf.43 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=dQmpPyS5fXEd7mz4F7olt0IW+D2cidkruKkTYyIlifw=; b=xnjej4JPxLDru/DkhUPwdpbYXTArM9JQAEzesM+p5yOE0fgznDr9i9Fr3UwnVfNDjl w/2jXA/4hSazylGsHFbPhbQQwhACd59cffQqzFmskuObEsJ7d2jGrblzhGvXHI6ds/zj LfIWuGMF3KaIUxKSuG73WsqR+mXNaUegfdD38= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=hvfNQc19XijG/XWRDT8rIOaKuf4nVWTEcAqbMk9RJDaf6x+0AYIUpC2RoVbw9D3Lrb WA1iGTyIdVPKtPaebtGWOCKuv8OLKGp7+AqxDTkALa4svm/swUrNvTALx69MCThJ5Ihq skXoCD4A+PZibTT5bsZqkKxHX6MwMnPpIMrvY= Received: by 10.141.162.6 with SMTP id p6mr2598rvo.121.1224008674367; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.192.21 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:24:34 +0200 From: "Sami Halabi" To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20081012163117.H2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: udp problem in multiple ips jail?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:24:35 -0000 Hi, It wasn't jail problem after all. seems a local dns problem in my computer. DNS and UDP packets works very good under multiple ips jail. Sami On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Sami Halabi wrote: > thanks, > the problem was that the dns conf didn't allow queries for > non-authoritative > requests so it always failed. > > jail works fine:) > > Sami > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < > bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Sami Halabi wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I have the latest Multiple ips jail patch from bz, my problem is that the >>> outer world >>> can't reach the jail which i installed in it a DNS server... >>> from the jail/host enviromet it works, but from other hosts >>> it simply refuses. >>> >>> dns uses udp port 53... >>> >>> >>> help... >>> >> >> netstat -an >> tcpdump >> sockstat >> ps ax >> netatst -rn >> ifconfig -a >> firewall >> ping >> >> check that all of those are ok. >> >> I'd start to see if I can reach the jail from outside the local >> network by ping/ssh and more forward... >> >> >> -- >> Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. >> > > From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 22:03:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8580106568C for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from mail.tnode.com (common.tnode.com [91.185.203.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8CC8FC13 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (mail.jail [10.1.1.10]) by mail.tnode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5261221FD9C6; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.tnode.com ([10.1.1.10]) by localhost (mail.tnode.com [10.1.1.10]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38084-02; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.15.2] (lk.84.20.249.154.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net [84.20.249.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nejc@skoberne.net) by mail.tnode.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DCB721FC1FF; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48F668C9.9020804@skoberne.net> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:53 +0200 From: Nejc Skoberne User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <48E365FB.10104@skoberne.net> <20081001120836.X7528@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <48E36B2F.1070707@skoberne.net> <20081003081218.J7528@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081003140255.40813qif4rznqaec@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20081003140255.40813qif4rznqaec@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba inside jails [was: jail/broadcast IP [was: ...]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:03:57 -0000 Hello, > I have samba running in a jail (8-current from a month or two ago, no > multi-IP patch). No problems here. I haven't tried 8-CURRENT, though. > I use it with network drives, so I'm not sure about broadcasts... Do you use WINS server on Windows hosts or not? Thanks, Nejc From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 07:41:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117451065698 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5DE8FC26 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2EF8D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.239.141]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6732E2E16C; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:41:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495318B37; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:40:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1224142845; bh=qVC16srcMBjAdp3PyVD2kjqN4RkwI/QzV Hlkw72cISc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AiKErD+G1tBgFsUHCSAEjyGbflacWlSvk4CvZy2RozpuiJ8IqqyOESlXc5AVwunOh YpHLxPKFAHyM8qAQ1h+Z9QiU7/89w6gR6lq31DIERCt+O1a3/bqtWwXig6Z0mzmzBM1 XnG4p9e11xgrBzMxH5O7wPrFAlA9WTprL128kNTD5siORw4YmLK5B26/diqcCm6N1Cu 89CAeptDPZMe7g/AveOHmsFtPmC2+rhJnb8fCXwf8yYfkTQ82XpowYiOCs2NpsSZVrD EWBvj9zNaZhMF6W8fhnlwqf9I3GtXkFjg54juG1RjvBKOHDmpORjcy9AO18T+lX+ORS zQJpQW0ew== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m9G7eipX024349; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:40:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20081016094044.98413dr9tmbp4pog@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:40:44 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Nejc Skoberne References: <48E365FB.10104@skoberne.net> <20081001120836.X7528@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <48E36B2F.1070707@skoberne.net> <20081003081218.J7528@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081003140255.40813qif4rznqaec@webmail.leidinger.net> <48F668C9.9020804@skoberne.net> In-Reply-To: <48F668C9.9020804@skoberne.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 6732E2E16C.7E333 X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.9, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@Freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba inside jails [was: jail/broadcast IP [was: ...]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:41:18 -0000 Quoting Nejc Skoberne (from Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:53 +0200): > Hello, > >> I have samba running in a jail (8-current from a month or two ago, no >> multi-IP patch). No problems here. > > I haven't tried 8-CURRENT, though. > >> I use it with network drives, so I'm not sure about broadcasts... > > Do you use WINS server on Windows hosts or not? The only windows systems which use this are lone warriors (laptops). They get an IP and DNS via DHCP from an unix box. There's no Windows domain or any other Windows setup there, just the samba server. Samba is configured with wins support = yes dns proxy = no Bye, Alexander. -- "Your son still sliding down the banisters?" "We wound barbed wire around them." "That stop him?" "No, but it sure slowed him up." http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 11:43:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D271065697 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jose.amengual@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEA38FC18 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jose.amengual@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so733158yxb.13 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=5rAn8TY8nnQ4udazdsML8qqu+9MxawFtTzsmENEVjvQ=; b=xMzULMxLC5jRKm3gpiZVuhAujlTZsKKAFDBNswZ9kvwMkxfL2f8hgLCFlJZdPoDad5 iQ+BkgId7/DCOiqSSnK58wKtv/HMo1Zx6b0gHZ1xqwaosWZip22YRZMvS+Jxmbn79XeG EPMCTHqfDiUVgtIflgYDrExFN8uUCntxJE61c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=g7HxH0pQlC7B8nLazFj1ZwX6QnP8MsPDLxCUXl9feKoHsmVqHp6P1bwWt+pkpP9mZA U4HWwM7PdBgbsxzG3GDisHBn4o6CWbn1FxfQr8Ni+F0Rk5Ca5/lbM8DVcPW/kjXnBEWL D+1Irp1HNI5LOCLYIdKb7kgXWwRz9rlqbXpOY= Received: by 10.151.156.1 with SMTP id i1mr458568ybo.76.1224157399793; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 142-35-50.adsl.terra.cl (142-35-50.adsl.terra.cl [200.50.35.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm1330651yxs.5.2008.10.16.04.43.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> From: Jose Amengual To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:43:15 -0300 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Subject: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:43:20 -0000 Hi Guys. The other day I install a server with jails with FreeBSD 7 32 bit in a 64 bit capable processor. After I install I start wondering some things that I point out here : Any benefit to install 64 bit vs 32 bit with the purpose of use jails ? Can I install a 32 bit FreeBSD and create 64 bit jails ? ( using ezjail or downloading the full 64 bit source to create the jail ). Can I install 32 bit FreeBSD and then made a make world and change it to 64 bit ? ( is recommended ?) Can I install a FreeBSD 64 bit and create 32 bit jails ? I know that some questions are not jail related but because my focus is jail, I'm sending this email to this list. Thanks in Advance. Jose Amengual. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 16:22:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D3106568B for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549278FC22 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so54900rvf.43 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:22:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; bh=7+eHsIOGjflMitrmpsmEHZhZZNKaC4UadpcmdL06zLU=; b=ZkLL3vIvjmWU22u4uxHA54WuH9zDCkw80+58RdTSVkNItY23isT+QRk3q01NlIFoy2 NaoHjNCalRwisQI9p4cxunUn7mCtAiJG0xlxGCz/ur+HxjHqe+x/IwfBHAQGRbPFo5TU ncI4OZM1qNV1shlmtu2w3JQslgaBteK9UXEaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; b=pDOQWXYPNFU+HG2XJsysxoRFhKOlVK2WOTs+KPW/Y/6RDDOppeuOpXCP9wXMThiXZ2 NCT0ChYr0FOuszNycLDhk+E8sLz0RZ5EUYkWaTvz/0dEnnNLqlD1AR7dgOhf7m+7Vz4q B/KI82t2CgB711XGn5WYdhe7T3C4vMvUl0/P8= Received: by 10.140.201.21 with SMTP id y21mr1707971rvf.259.1224174175998; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.192.21 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:22:55 +0200 From: "Sami Halabi" To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: ezjails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:22:56 -0000 Hi, i just read about the ezjail tool, nasicly i used my own tools, but it sound nice tool. my question is if there is a modified version of ezjails that administrates the multiple ips patched jails. thanks in advance, Sami From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 17:05:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B6610656A2 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from mail.btshosting.co.uk (mail.btshosting.co.uk [213.228.232.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBA8FC08 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host86-148-119-240.range86-148.btcentralplus.com [86.148.119.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.btshosting.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9GGsx72019797; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:54:59 +0100 Message-ID: <48F771DA.1020308@beardz.net> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:54:50 +0100 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sami Halabi References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93.3, clamav-milter version 0.93.3 on 87.117.208.49 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:05:57 -0000 Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > > i just read about the ezjail tool, nasicly i used my own tools, but it sound > nice tool. > my question is if there is a modified version of ezjails that administrates > the multiple > ips patched jails. > > thanks in advance, > Sami > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi, The last time I checked, the author of ezjail stated that he would only support multi-ip jails within ezjail once they became an official feature of FreeBSD, rather than just a patchset. Regards, Jase. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 17:20:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429F31065690 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D608FC1E for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so75583wag.27 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8S1n9xE0DuOe5sZi/nYr35DvTJp34SkENDh3yMahbjM=; b=w7A9aZHrFTEzVpOrJx5fYceqV3AyT9xh3agG2yo95TLVMbPrlGdqHyHlNqs5Nk7oNp CcZo/5Jz5EvjzwOH92jVnDtnFrG7BsDiYBSGwY7u0G+NQUUL22sM9VMF22G/xVhD8fzR qYU384aoON7W182/58h6+9DUWwE/z3I9TIUUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=uyQikOCehVn3LZiHV3S2wMdXgofjc2FY+fokhEVoXMxAAV5t4Gy1PHziBcmDBy2LVX NZzhT9M6kVdRhgwy7A41d4mvKcZUgpN0Ljcp0/F0yywvoLPBY9NW4XUgrcNygtcWXWqm cRTd3hDcjR+1BQLQHhd63ElkYqqFtB4awZN+s= Received: by 10.141.169.11 with SMTP id w11mr1757191rvo.281.1224177603474; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.192.21 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:20:03 +0200 From: "Sami Halabi" To: "Jase Thew" In-Reply-To: <48F771DA.1020308@beardz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48F771DA.1020308@beardz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:20:04 -0000 any idea where to find that patchset??? On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Jase Thew wrote: > Sami Halabi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i just read about the ezjail tool, nasicly i used my own tools, but it >> sound >> nice tool. >> my question is if there is a modified version of ezjails that >> administrates >> the multiple >> ips patched jails. >> >> thanks in advance, >> Sami >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > Hi, > > The last time I checked, the author of ezjail stated that he would only > support multi-ip jails within ezjail once they became an official feature of > FreeBSD, rather than just a patchset. > > Regards, > > Jase. > From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 00:41:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFE81065696 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acidmax@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 651468FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acidmax@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 34613 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Oct 2008 00:14:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=yqbLcc9JzV6VymnktmsBJ3EJOUSTKdILs0n2ZJ4WlChuwiciSbU10cYWC5st0eGob/7ATClpNFrRv9j1URo6TOIbT4IO+x8sjpcALKQcDslFI8oyCOAfdLbPqAyojMcs+EpIzdVFceRSqtbA5VM1C/Io1JH4aJQbBHTGQqgTRSs=; X-YMail-OSG: pTEUjvsVM1lwx_8zs1HHxcLnKEM8.X5LHipE5mhwqmeGwU72WcDEqspd5HH3kMvV1Pyluu8gfqpcv5yugSPgQe1GJFoojqQRUoCiXgGNDHDHOxfYGG609zeRmGfhIzYMZGtxqWVHRSohOdES3rJE0o_XLNlwPgFxy055AIw- Received: from [68.249.228.139] by web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:14:36 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:14:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <434247.34127.qm@web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: multi-ip v4/v6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: acidmax@sbcglobal.net List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:41:17 -0000 Is there a patch for multi-ip/ipv4/ipv6 for freebsd 6.3-release-p5? From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 01:01:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8619106568C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from mail.btshosting.co.uk (mail.btshosting.co.uk [213.228.232.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE968FC17 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bazerka@beardz.net) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host86-148-119-240.range86-148.btcentralplus.com [86.148.119.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.btshosting.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9H11GPd023225; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:01:16 +0100 Message-ID: <48F7E3D1.7030804@beardz.net> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:01:05 +0100 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sami Halabi References: <48F771DA.1020308@beardz.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93.3, clamav-milter version 0.93.3 on 87.117.208.49 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:01:19 -0000 Sami Halabi wrote: > any idea where to find that patchset??? > Hi, I think you might have misunderstood my reply. To clarify, the author stated he would not introduce support in ezjail for multi-ip jails which use FreeBSD patched with a multi-ip patchset. As far as I'm aware, there are no patchsets for ezjail itself, to support multi-ip jails. Rgs, Jase. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 06:07:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0E0106569C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) Received: from post.behrens.de (post.behrens.de [IPv6:2a01:170:1023::1:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424EE8FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=behrens.de; h=from:to:date:mime-version:subject:cc:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-description; s=pinky1; t=1224223674; i=frank@harz.behrens.de; bh=xV/MR+17Ar7g7OwWN56S/QcUimmmAeAUc1kNYGrSNs8=; b=s9JMHQfFNKWq+W6VgtqhwgkxBYwXHzl1kxvtyjDd7GmgHcViAu0U4xxzaToeyBPIouJG1Ek5A9EsXR8IlkxzzA== Received: from sun.behrens ([IPv6:2a01:170:1023:0:b54e:dccd:b541:ac74]) by post.behrens.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP-MSA id m9H67nQ1079937; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:07:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) Message-Id: <200810170607.m9H67nQ1079937@post.behrens.de> From: "Frank Behrens" To: "Sami Halabi" Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:07:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31, DE v4.31 R1) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Hashcash: 1:23:081017:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org::i8KOK7WF7jIViRhG:0000000006aNh X-Hashcash: 1:23:081017:sodynet1@gmail.com::r8HBFuff6Ck3MW4u:NMYI Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:07:57 -0000 Sami Halabi wrote on 16 Oct 2008 18:22: > i just read about the ezjail tool, nasicly i used my own tools, but it sound > nice tool. > my question is if there is a modified version of ezjails that administrates > the multiple > ips patched jails. I don't know, if you can _create_ a multi-ip jail with ezjail, but you can add your additional addresses to your ezjail configuration file and start/stop your jail with ezjail without any problem. -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 08:44:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA3B106568E for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2FB8FC1E for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2F457.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.244.87]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCDB2E1FB; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187E132A6F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:43:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1224233002; bh=IS2DA+WpzNbZ8WP0MsYW2Uc29oJi+bKC3 Jtignv9nCU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FqKWpQPPGvmd2WOZ5XqEB4CTdbGItvuUQRWeL7Dgfs1MLNUKzaSTTjqvUAll/MGRK Plsh8+EXMzGDfCy1RvyDZzEy9E2STBaLYbNmqsse+kPsWCyvMCBQDYRefFPAmjbXIkR TZO/zH1ElPTgVSxnjhK0dk6hHcTcnMx+180AohMkJJ5wqE/FYt0kX+CiuXm/8IJScGQ 1b5XGkCChnZeof393lD3LjzftpkfUH77oHFnlBCyZvQ/oPL16U8rNDG9OYVnKEEOrR8 YgjJfrrdbROwQRFAiKu9PfCYtdfTrD+WAvaLmGGzhYih+BP5+N8iXVziZ3/FvJDwmdJ m9/Syr1FQ== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m9H8hLNu092047; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:43:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:43:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:43:21 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Jose Amengual References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 8FCDB2E1FB.8B37F X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.823, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10, TW_ZJ 0.08) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:44:01 -0000 Quoting Jose Amengual (from Thu, 16 Oct 2008 =20 08:43:15 -0300): > Hi Guys. > > The other day I install a server with jails with FreeBSD 7 32 bit in =20 > a 64 bit capable processor. > > After I install I start wondering some things that I point out here : > > Any benefit to install 64 bit vs 32 bit with the purpose of use jails ? It depends. If you want to use more than 4G: yes. > Can I install a 32 bit FreeBSD and create 64 bit jails ? ( using =20 > ezjail or downloading the full 64 bit source to create the jail ). No. > Can I install 32 bit FreeBSD and then made a make world and change =20 > it to 64 bit ? ( is recommended ?) IIRC this depends upon your FreeBSD version. I think in CURRENT =20 there's code which supports that now. No guarantees. > Can I install a FreeBSD 64 bit and create 32 bit jails ? Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure =20 32bit support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will then =20 run just fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). It's =20 the same way as you can run linux programs in a jail. Bye, Alexander. --=20 If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 09:37:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422B9106568E for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: from email.octopus.com.au (host-122-100-2-232.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CC18FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 8D087173D3; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:19:57 +1100 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on email.octopus.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 Received: from [10.20.30.100] (60.218.233.220.exetel.com.au [220.233.218.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: admin@email.octopus.com.au) by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B25D172FC; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:19:53 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:19:51 +1100 From: Andrew Snow User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:37:48 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure 32bit > support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will then run > just fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). How is this done? I've never been able to find out how, it doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. - Andrew From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 09:44:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0461065687 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251218FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2F457.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.244.87]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7382E290; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:44:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABD33ED4; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:43:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1224236637; bh=77+ZF7JqX4VrVg1kSK+2zUtW1hI0X51hZ ySnn5SG0Ns=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1AMjA6bDgdBzgFFQoOoK2ZBFhgbbdLJo/TON3Ex1+zlIL6lYydRueuF09t6l+JGCX 0xIdyG6Me2G9bHtB+unAYq3IOOzSszETPJpCuUT1eIOZL3L+v0yZPsiRjuEqjXzhDOW fA2zp+LGgexV22sCsk+lP/nbn1WpUuPXO6Dy/TYvURX1nPVDK9IynHhwkUZB1xQxfTz vC5sb2dcoT9vXmmzxqzyuw5dgfLXEoZv4Zv4c1CF4RfDk9YQ9vqnGj5Jun74gxa0hwc D13MkGHiG2WmXrT5NfBgr5wXxgwZlyssQoagjEUXlL2Cx7jxYb7hEG6KD0jCbGSokpL dFkjPYrNQ== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m9H9ht0V002854; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:43:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:43:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20081017114355.12775yvj1q5pktc0@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:43:55 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Andrew Snow References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> In-Reply-To: <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 2C7382E290.D52A0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.9, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:44:32 -0000 Quoting Andrew Snow (from Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:19:51 +1100): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure >> 32bit support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will >> then run just fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). > > How is this done? > > I've never been able to find out how, it doesn't appear to be > documented anywhere. Take a 32bit world (e.g. NFS mount from/on another machine, or the stuff which comes in releases on CD or the network) and put it into the directory where you want to have the jail (this is replacing the "Setting up a Jail Directory Tree" in the example section of "man jail"). Bye, Alexander. -- You recoil from the crude; you tend naturally toward the exquisite. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 09:47:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73761065686 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678B28FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1B519E019; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2199C19E023; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48F85F53.8040005@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:48:03 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jose Amengual , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:47:32 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Jose Amengual (from Thu, 16 Oct 2008 > 08:43:15 -0300): > >> Hi Guys. >> >> The other day I install a server with jails with FreeBSD 7 32 bit in >> a 64 bit capable processor. >> >> After I install I start wondering some things that I point out here : >> >> Any benefit to install 64 bit vs 32 bit with the purpose of use jails ? > > > It depends. If you want to use more than 4G: yes. > >> Can I install a 32 bit FreeBSD and create 64 bit jails ? ( using >> ezjail or downloading the full 64 bit source to create the jail ). > > > No. > >> Can I install 32 bit FreeBSD and then made a make world and change it >> to 64 bit ? ( is recommended ?) > > > IIRC this depends upon your FreeBSD version. I think in CURRENT there's > code which supports that now. No guarantees. > >> Can I install a FreeBSD 64 bit and create 32 bit jails ? > > > Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure > 32bit support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will then > run just fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). It's > the same way as you can run linux programs in a jail. Do you mean installing whole 32bit world instead of 64bit, for example from ftp.freebsd.cz:/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/7.0-RELEASE/base/ or just /lib32 /usr/lib32 libraries? Will it be possible in this (32bit) jail to install ports marked as arch i386 only, or some voodoo is needed to trick the ports system? What do you mean by "32bit support in kernel"? Is it just options COMPAT_IA32 as is in amd64 GENERIC or anything else? I am interested in running 32bit ports on amd64 bit machine. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 10:00:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E031065686 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CF98FC1C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3590C41C69F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:00:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNDnwFOogbo0; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:00:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id D6D7141C66F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:00:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827FF44487F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Brian In-Reply-To: <434247.34127.qm@web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20081017095232.E2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <434247.34127.qm@web81008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multi-ip v4/v6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:00:09 -0000 On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Brian wrote: > Is there a patch for multi-ip/ipv4/ipv6 for freebsd 6.3-release-p5? no; there is an multi-IPv4 patch for 6.x somehere around ... let mevfind it ... here it is: http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/multi-ip-jail-6.4-pre-20080926-01.diff That's the best I can give you. I have no plan to support multi-ipv4/v6/no-IP patches for before 7.1-PRE (anymore) atm. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 10:05:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5FA1065677 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdcmystere@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25898FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdcmystere@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so313232wag.27 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=hCVHCIoL450c0RRaIpDRbT9Gz8Wj+PeFywaq2fpePhE=; b=Fx6UGiUa6/US4MJCnnmD7XdT9nBCISgUbKvK+wmxUQIqHYQ/Lkjoc2rb+SB8qgJN1D iWCVbvFj1dyM2/1Wv2LHwRG5LAh3H59l8/6Q2WEs0JeyUL5N8dxh0ykLio6oeY+oHbny oDufqPKZq6gSezYr1b2PElbc3SOQReWNzkt9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=gv5iMnQCHLlDcTdAjUzTil/WcWJO5q58hbIao4gLKTzI2r8WKtZTRtahVFI1YDduPu +NEydwHVNdOLFuovTeEXxS4NvxVZu8HMBvmzB2Q5sMfGQGq4bQkspiygtZKkHRQUIVLO LVZ1WOgXk1+2XH5tjeHa5aQFquC7t8FtaWR6E= Received: by 10.114.37.1 with SMTP id k1mr3271214wak.42.1224237940821; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.102.12 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:05:40 +0200 From: "Antipov Dima" To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Network configuration for KVM - Config reseau pour kvm X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:05:41 -0000 *English* Hi all sorry for my english i have little problem whis a network configuration for my freebsd used whi= s KVM so my probleme is simple ip of my host 91.121.156.206 ip oh my guest 91.121.234.115 from Gust i can ping any ip's but no domaines i can not ping my Guest from anywhere esolv.conf nameserver 231.186.33.99 domaine ovh.net search ovh.net on my host i have network interface wmbr0 so i add ip route add 91.121.234.115 (ip of my gust) dev vmbr0 on my guest i add a default route ip route add default 91.121.234.115 Thank you for all *French* bonjour a tous voila j ai jamais utilis=E9 freebsd et la j en ais besoin mon soucis j arrive a pinguer depuis le guest l exterieur et l interieur depuis host impossible pourtant la route est bien mise puis depuis guest je sais pinguer que les ip pas de domaines dans mon resolv.conf nameserver 231.186.33.99 domaine ovh.net je sais que il faut rajouter search ovh.net ou remplacer domaine par searc= h faut il faire encore qqch? et que dois je faire sur le host pour pinguer le gust? Merci d'avance From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 10:11:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5BE1065692 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdcmystere@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9526A8FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdcmystere@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so314541wag.27 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:11:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=+cBYBSm9wteys+3TQHKBxOLOTKe/yd42zZp/j9neGgw=; b=jqSFXgCvghWdmJFMYmdt+b9MK0wvtG+wPdxnYS04c4N3xhABjcsAcsgJ6vMdl9an+k Qk36yVL4lUljmr9ztDgLYJ3zhBv2AqMEwVQCsE7TLHjF9RscgYhFnJ6inOL2tsytOnJk 8BsaFf+M2IPYPw1iWLlOQ40mH5EGXU6ig/akM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=xdgmnc9yCL1J1dTmCr3FhE6ySp9749GUOQ9j4OWuzc8DoIHXl6aUXYVxUf/5IF0bNn EAvzZPabnuOumdrBCwnVFrKQJjetby6JG+SgsyNUeLXuOHQdcB+7pg/JdIsB0pPvOMEE DagXqi1b+BnWVLGPxDcQxlZn9j3KLSP494Yn4= Received: by 10.114.134.20 with SMTP id h20mr3230071wad.91.1224236396706; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.102.12 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:39:56 +0200 From: "Antipov Dima" To: listserver@FreeBSD-fr.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Network configuration for KVM - Config reseau pour kvm X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:11:11 -0000 *English* Hi all sorry for my english i have little problem whis a network configuration for my freebsd used whi= s KVM so my probleme is simple ip of my host 91.121.156.206 ip oh my guest 91.121.234.115 from Gust i can ping any ip's but no domaines i can not ping my Guest from anywhere esolv.conf nameserver 231.186.33.99 domaine ovh.net search ovh.net on my host i have network interface wmbr0 so i add ip route add 91.121.234.115 (ip of my gust) dev vmbr0 on my guest i add a default route ip route add default 91.121.234.115 Thank you for all *French* bonjour a tous voila j ai jamais utilis=E9 freebsd et la j en ais besoin mon soucis j arrive a pinguer depuis le guest l exterieur et l interieur depuis host impossible pourtant la route est bien mise puis depuis guest je sais pinguer que les ip pas de domaines dans mon resolv.conf nameserver 231.186.33.99 domaine ovh.net je sais que il faut rajouter search ovh.net ou remplacer domaine par searc= h faut il faire encore qqch? et que dois je faire sur le host pour pinguer le gust? Merci d'avance From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 10:15:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6BF1065686 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B988FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF3A41C6A1; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:15:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfXoDh3XYlKB; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 3ECDE41C69F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C76B44487F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:10:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Andrew Snow In-Reply-To: <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> Message-ID: <20081017100924.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:15:06 -0000 On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Andrew Snow wrote: Hi, > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure 32bit >> support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will then run just >> fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). > > How is this done? > > I've never been able to find out how, it doesn't appear to be documented > anywhere. I have been trying to get the people who know best to document it (at least roughly) and have failed so far. It' is more than simply installing a 32bit world as jails and starting the jail. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 13:25:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3D2106569B for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573D98FC1C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F103641C752; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:25:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8iaGteKj9lC; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6AEA941C751; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85044487F; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:24:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Andrew Snow In-Reply-To: <20081017100924.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Message-ID: <20081017132351.F2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> <48F858B7.1060304@modulus.org> <20081017100924.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:08 -0000 On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, > On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Andrew Snow wrote: > > Hi, > >> Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure 32bit >>> support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will then run just >>> fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine too). >> >> How is this done? >> >> I've never been able to find out how, it doesn't appear to be documented >> anywhere. > > I have been trying to get the people who know best to document it (at > least roughly) and have failed so far. > > It' is more than simply installing a 32bit world as jails and starting > the jail. ok, it turns out that if you just want to run things it should just work. If you want to build ports or things in there, there are a bunch of enviroment variables to set. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 17 14:28:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13311065688 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679D28FC21 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2F457.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.244.87]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C469C316D5; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469DA366FD; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:27:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1224253659; bh=cjuuYU3l0v3TpAF3+n7SHL6N5dZ8PQwN5 WQMyvIyT74=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RL26ulFmhyydeobdxgsYnQkQkRyEIpg7wxr00N6oOqnWNAvAH/EW/kHEFT0a+RZFm wZrItAO6AWnfwaGztebVWbC3qDfxfZNJgr4f2CS53mrNTuWUXQO5647LAk7r7n/RNdp +nm9iboirXqZQkM2p/fGxQRXMphXPM9LeDKLUti47n977T8Tsw3LyN1AbNFQQYuGWKv A8BOqjM5Hj+gsQRpqGoSPyaHrSz8+t0dHbTakPVKFnT9/599V8dx58jF7vu3GI/T/TS +Dumq6YZJTBWlMwB/p26v7zu9G90f4dWOEeg3eYPhMTlzJctzmTgIuw+1IC3yHSZh78 TmEkm0XOg== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m9HERcPB052209; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:27:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:27:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20081017162738.10251xmx8c2i8dlw@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:27:38 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <9251237E-8054-4B52-BFF7-B3B67189FABC@gmail.com> <20081017104321.18262zf6lz4uk7c4@webmail.leidinger.net> <48F85F53.8040005@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <48F85F53.8040005@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: C469C316D5.BDE9A X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.823, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10, TW_ZJ 0.08) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation question 64bit, 32 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:28:11 -0000 Quoting Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> (from Fri, 17 Oct 2008 =20 11:48:03 +0200): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Jose Amengual (from Thu, 16 Oct =20 >> 2008 08:43:15 -0300): >> >>> Hi Guys. >>> >>> The other day I install a server with jails with FreeBSD 7 32 bit =20 >>> in a 64 bit capable processor. >>> >>> After I install I start wondering some things that I point out here : >>> >>> Any benefit to install 64 bit vs 32 bit with the purpose of use jails ? >> >> >> It depends. If you want to use more than 4G: yes. >> >>> Can I install a 32 bit FreeBSD and create 64 bit jails ? ( using =20 >>> ezjail or downloading the full 64 bit source to create the jail ). >> >> >> No. >> >>> Can I install 32 bit FreeBSD and then made a make world and change =20 >>> it to 64 bit ? ( is recommended ?) >> >> >> IIRC this depends upon your FreeBSD version. I think in CURRENT =20 >> there's code which supports that now. No guarantees. >> >>> Can I install a FreeBSD 64 bit and create 32 bit jails ? >> >> >> Sort of. You can install a 32bit world into the jail and make sure =20 >> 32bit support is activated in the kernel. The 32bit programs will =20 >> then run just fine in the jail (but 64bit ones should run fine =20 >> too). It's the same way as you can run linux programs in a jail. > > Do you mean installing whole 32bit world instead of 64bit, for =20 > example from =20 > ftp.freebsd.cz:/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/7.0-RELEASE/base/ or just =20 > /lib32 /usr/lib32 libraries? I haven't tested it myself. I know that it is possible. It may need =20 some twiddling. I haven't carefully looked at the kernel code, but as =20 it uses the same infrastructure as the linuxulator (see =20 compat/ia32/ia32_sysvec.c), it should be able to run with a plain i386 =20 world (maybe you have to make a link /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 -> =20 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 as the compat32 stuff is trying to access this... =20 or maybe even moving ld-elf.so.1 to a different name and linking to =20 the new name, in case this may cause some kind of loop in the kernel). > Will it be possible in this (32bit) jail to install ports marked as =20 > arch i386 only, or some voodoo is needed to trick the ports system? As the compiler is responsible to create the XXbit stuff, and you are =20 using the 32bit compiler, it should be possible. Investigate the stuff =20 which is used to change the uname output on the ports build cluster. =20 This will be needed. Not all ports may work, in this case either fix =20 the port, or use a package. Some ports will never be able to work (use =20 of features which are not available in compat32). > What do you mean by "32bit support in kernel"? Is it just options =20 > COMPAT_IA32 as is in amd64 GENERIC or anything else? COMPAT_IA32 > I am interested in running 32bit ports on amd64 bit machine. If you mean 64bit jail instead of machine: should be possible. If not: =20 mixing without restrictions is not possible. It's an all or nothing =20 approach for the userland. Bye, Alexander. --=20 If society fits you comfortably enough, you call it freedom. =09=09-- Robert Frost http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 18 08:28:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD89810656A0 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uros.gruber@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C58FC19 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uros.gruber@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so828498rvf.43 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:28:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=AYQriRKFFQ9cd6iQWYi6VLh3VwYLIjrPGVK5blM+qYY=; b=rkIfS5lakQjbdVURCZaKFdvU5UKkpZ6NfPdyFXj6ZABY/8jLXuui/zbP3yw0Lg5XB/ 71oPf51d33v8z+szZZQAKhqsawxPNfkZIzun98pfhNtcjZso3v9ooKD4WN1dcqrSw6Wd 8oIUDCP9WPnld3CstFpGmE+Nw2TDznOf5FIls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jMWu/5g2W7lHOkFsL+rNZjvFA2y08qGSRId+L3reC3v46Nf11M6oaGq1xcKeJYFUxD 0KsOF7XmwdFxr+uKJ2gjBaO2fxjRfBAc0Q71Ie9yI3byFVzLbTgedPWMslX7DJxf6B4a dO4uE113CH3KzPDqYwGOkBGFPTN7tkr7HLLtY= Received: by 10.140.249.20 with SMTP id w20mr3128316rvh.189.1224317259960; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.172.10 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ef844230810180107k6d1c4c67vd33f83aa25960ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:07:39 +0200 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Uro=C5=A1_Gruber?=" To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Local IP in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:28:35 -0000 Hi, I'm setting up new jail and I was thinking enabling it on some local IP (10.1.1.1 for example). I added an alias in rc.conf and also created the jail. The only problem I have is routing is not working as it should. I don't know if it is because of jail or do I need to add manual routing for this IP to be able comunicate with outside world. Is it even possible to work this way and than use ipf to redirect trafic onto jail itself? Thanks in advance Uros From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 18 09:53:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7EF1065689 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A01C8FC1C for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A8E19E023; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:53:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B1C019E019; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:53:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48F9B22B.4060200@quip.cz> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:53:47 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?VXJvxaEgR3J1YmVy?= References: <3ef844230810180107k6d1c4c67vd33f83aa25960ee@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3ef844230810180107k6d1c4c67vd33f83aa25960ee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Local IP in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:53:17 -0000 Uroš Gruber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up new jail and I was thinking enabling it on some local > IP (10.1.1.1 for example). I added an alias in rc.conf and also > created the jail. The only problem I have is routing is not working as > it should. I don't know if it is because of jail or do I need to add > manual > routing for this IP to be able comunicate with outside world. Is it > even possible to work this way and than use ipf to redirect trafic > onto jail itself? It is possible. I am using Jails only this way (with private IPs and NAT+RDR in PF) Maybe you need to set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 (in sysctl.conf) or gateway_enable="YES" in rc.conf Miroslav Lachman