From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 6 01:42:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id C36E41065682; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 01:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AE3106564A; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 01:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp [133.80.152.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4C18FC15; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 01:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id m661FePO072727; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:15:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:15:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080706.101512.193761302.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: marcel@freebsd.org From: Takahashi Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: perforce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 144729 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:42:32 -0000 In article <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org> Marcel Moolenaar writes: > @@ -67,9 +65,7 @@ > struct uart_class *class; > unsigned int i, j, ivar; > > - class = &uart_ns8250_class; /* currently ns8250 only */ > - if (class == NULL) > - return (ENXIO); > + class = &uart_i8251_class; > > /* Check the environment. */ > if (uart_getenv(devtype, di, class) == 0) Please revert this change. We want to use ns8250 class as default. And the above comment in the diff was wrong... The uart_i8251_class should be added to the uart_classes in uart_subr.c. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro