From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 2 20:42:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12871106564A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: from goofy.cultdeadsheep.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:240:801:100::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9811E8FC12 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: from goofy.cultdeadsheep.org ([194.117.244.130]) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MXhsy-000OLa-I4; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:42:31 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:42:28 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: SimosNap Administrator Message-ID: <20090802204228.GB47798@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> References: <4A73756A.7090106@simosnap.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eAbsdosE1cNLO4uF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A73756A.7090106@simosnap.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.117.244.130 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on goofy.cultdeadsheep.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on goofy.cultdeadsheep.org) Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: www/apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:42:33 -0000 --eAbsdosE1cNLO4uF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0200, SimosNap Administrator wrote: > I'm using WITH_MPM=3Ditk option but every portupgrade i need to recompil= e=20 > adding this option by hand. WITH_MPM, dispite its name, was originally designed to live in /etc/make.co= nf and to solve 2 problems: 1. expose to whole ports tree which MPM is currently in use when ${APACHE_M= PM} can't be retrieved 2. ease of integration of custom MPM (just copy the patch in files/ directory and define WITH_MPM, or create a slave port). I know, apache stuff is a bit complex and was designed to fit my needs:=20 - apache HTTPd "flavours" =3D=3D slave ports - want to add a new mpm ? -> slave port (That's the real reason we have APACHE_PORT variable) I plead guilty: I should have made a slave port for mpm-itk. > Why not adding this option to the make menu config ? I never think about this. Exposing MPMs to OPTIONS framework is, to me, a= =20 PITA. > Why not apache22=20 > does not matain old compile option ? AFAIK, no port relies on installed version. It would be a giant=20 mistake to do this. > Is very annoing this . We'll think about it but, since I usually put WITH_MPM=3DXXX in=20 /etc/make.conf or pkgtools.conf, I was never concerned about this issue. thanks, clem --eAbsdosE1cNLO4uF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp1+jQACgkQsRhfjwcjuh07XwCgkUGWpGHRlNZo/2iBJOHIt5D8 JigAn2yChPv56DAzO8Fo7axa8wH4+dG+ =Twde -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eAbsdosE1cNLO4uF--