From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 13 15:20:43 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3036A106566B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:20:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com
	[209.85.220.210])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92ED8FC0A
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1541846fxm.43
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
	:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type; bh=EmSY9MpxrYFKRrOO5VjAm4dNwER/BFa2mGIHygbM0jo=;
	b=eHlc40rRVo3k3ZNhxJd6iFpVbmkDswyDopb0r2Ntt8pWemVaeRmUqx/W6pd3SI5Mz+
	h74wLhyU/V4opI1LUk7Oz5prNKBHZNy2e/OxRx3yYIDKh+nRO5Ca6ezRu2sOsxHHVhKt
	OL43GEvj5cL47ULGSCUjvkonks3MkfGCTAs0Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	b=U6Jr1eFHOskCQWb0rNc5dX3TlU4oWLNC6T91r9OByAQfr0mbFfS/A6fVgUrneCVoCY
	kzpqUZvm7vnu9ibiz3mM7i/m6ok2foQi/7DJNgsQhpMpXqKONvQHVpW5tIyXhOAZWhKf
	b4H6M+o6Mpc28/ILSnjDZ5DEJCFEUlyiHKsFI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.161.205 with SMTP id s13mr1922399fax.27.1252855241657; 
	Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090905.111446.500055027.imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <3bbf2fe10909041546y2b5633e1ue063955568df1a06@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090904.172310.-1939841993.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<3bbf2fe10909050812l4340f679h6a4d7dae1daa3bf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090905.111446.500055027.imp@bsdimp.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:20:41 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fc99d7fe187f3ee7
Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10909130820t62f03cfflcdf45a651db15f14@mail.gmail.com>
From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NEWBUS states
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:20:43 -0000

2009/9/5 M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>:
> Attilio,
>
> [[ trimmed ]]
>
> Sounds like we're getting closer to closure...
>

So I reverted r196779 and now I would like to commit and MFC just this patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/newbus9-8.diff

I still think the good way to go is to use the device flags, but this
patch will allow us to be highly flexible in terms of adding new
states, if we need it in the future.

Let me know if you have objections against that.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein