From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 23 06:55:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E1910656AD for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@van-laarhoven.org) Received: from baranao.anywi.com (baranao.anywi.com [213.207.101.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EA68FC14 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host77-63-99-123.kpn-gprs.nl (unknown [77.63.99.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by baranao.anywi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B04103F41C; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: From: Nick Hibma To: FreeBSD Chat Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20090922225029.GP21946@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:40:39 +0200 References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <4AB7ED76.5010406@FreeBSD.org> <20090922082344.GA64877@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org> <86d45i1wl3.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090922225029.GP21946@elvis.mu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on baranao.anywi.com Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:55:49 -0000 > * Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav [090922 14:47] wrote: >> Nick Hibma writes: >>> Our package system is a tremendous asset, and wholeheartedly agree >>> with Doug on this. So my vote is now a -1. Not that anyone cares. >> >> Having seen how it turned out, I'd like to vote -50,000,000 on this >> whole discussion... > > Surely we're not done until someone suggests replacing /bin/sh > with bash, amirite? In loader?! Yeah! Great idea. No need to load the base system which would save enormous amounts of bootup time. Everything that is needed could be loaded as a lib! And he scuttled off to create SillyFly BSD... Nick P.S.: I have never looked at DragonFly BSD, so I have no idea whatsoever what it is or does, apart from the fact that I *think* that it is a BSD like OS ... It runs on a