From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 05:57:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1712E106566C for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (gerbercreations.com [71.39.140.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE28FC18 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0P5JSoA086962 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:19:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0P5JS04086961 for freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:19:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:19:28 -0800 From: Greg Lewis To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Subject: Eclipse plugins ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:57:00 -0000 G'day all, I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having a port for one is if there is some code that needs changes (and the only one of those I see is eclipse-cdt). What are peoples thoughts on this? Who feels they get a lot of value out of having FreeBSD ports for those plugins that we do have and why? -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 06:31:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E8E106564A for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C888FC13 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:31:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: mbowie@buzmo.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-138.messagelabs.com!1232863489!73462504!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [69.12.11.77] Received: (qmail 9703 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2009 06:04:49 -0000 Received: from smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (HELO smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com) (69.12.11.77) by server-8.tower-138.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Jan 2009 06:04:49 -0000 Received: from Macintosh.vny.strongaero.com (nat.strongaero.com [64.81.41.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0P65eH8009729; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:05:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Message-ID: <497C00FB.1070204@buzmo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:04:43 -0800 From: Mike Bowie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse plugins ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:31:32 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: > G'day all, > > I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have > to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good > built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having > a port for one is if there is some code that needs changes (and the only > one of those I see is eclipse-cdt). > > What are peoples thoughts on this? Who feels they get a lot of value out > of having FreeBSD ports for those plugins that we do have and why? > G'day indeed Greg, Nice to hear from you. If you recall or review a few of my prior posts on the matter, you'll find I was wondering the same thing. I myself don't see the point at this, uh, point, besides the minor patches to CDT, everything else is somewhat redundant and only serves to cause confusion. Cheers, Mike. -- "You don't see FreeBSD developers sitting in a smoke-filled room plotting the overthrow of Microsoft. We sit in light, airy rooms and plot where to get the best drinks." - Michael Lucas From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 08:16:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E3210656D6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:c:20d:56ff:fe6f:f935]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8918FC18 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from koala.droso.net (localhost.droso.net [IPv6:::1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F121CCA5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:16:38 +0100 (CET) From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090126081638.83F121CCA5@mail.droso.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:16:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:16:39 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions. The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 5.x/6.x/-current with target architecture'.) (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not the error still applies to the latest version. The program that generates this report is not yet able to determine this automatically.) portname: java/eclipse-webtools broken because: deletes files installed by dependency on deinstall build errors: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20090113074140/eclipse-webtools-2.0.3.log (Sat Jan 17 10:03:13 UTC 2009) overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=java&portname=eclipse-webtools If these errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these error reports really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 21:18:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAA6106564A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from zerofail.com (gatekeeper1.zerofail.com [208.71.11.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54BA8FC1E for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from telcobridges.com by freebsd.org (zerofail.com) (SecurityGateway 1.1.2) with SMTP id SG001380475.MSG for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:07:57 -0500 Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([208.94.105.59]) by telcobridges.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:08:00 -0500 Message-ID: <497E262F.6060900@videotron.ca> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:07:59 -0500 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2009 21:08:00.0824 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BAF7380:01C97FFA] X-SGHeloLookup-Result: hardfail smtp.helo=telcobridges.com (does not match 208.71.8.41) X-SGOP-RefID: str=0001.0A090209.497E2631.00A6,ss=2,fgs=0 (_st=2 _vt=0 _iwf=0) Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse plugins ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:18:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg Lewis wrote: > G'day all, > > I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have > to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good > built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having > a port for one is if there is some code that needs changes (and the only > one of those I see is eclipse-cdt). > > What are peoples thoughts on this? Who feels they get a lot of value out > of having FreeBSD ports for those plugins that we do have and why? > +1, As this is the main reason that eclipse-devel is still -devel, I wholeheartedly support removing the plugins (except those that require native libraries, like cdt). Most eclipse problems that I've received would have been avoided if people had used eclipse-devel in the first place. As for CDT 5.0, even the missing native libraries are not that critical. Some minor functionalities are not working right and the integration with the toolchain leaves much to be desired but the functionality is there and is working properly in the majority of cases. Regards, Steph (eclipse-devel maintainer hat) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl+Ji8ACgkQmdOXtTCX/nttCQCguE2QUYSg9oqOp/+5+oiNOPdO VCMAoOsnuSvHBwLu5ON4/9FpTs50AanU =HnHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 21:51:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBDC106564A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23AE08FC0A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 85711 invoked by uid 2001); 26 Jan 2009 21:25:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:25:15 -0600 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: Greg Lewis Message-ID: <20090126212515.GA85635@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Eclipse plugins ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:51:58 -0000 On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 09:19:28PM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote: > > I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have > to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good > built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having > a port for one is if there is some code that needs changes (and the only > one of those I see is eclipse-cdt). > > What are peoples thoughts on this? Who feels they get a lot of value out > of having FreeBSD ports for those plugins that we do have and why? IIRC, in the original discussion we wanted to get rid of all eclipse plugins as ports and use Eclipse's plugin management system. However there were some patches against some of these plugins. My suggestion was to push those patches upstream and remove the plugins from our ports. As to the removal of old eclipse versions, I think it would be nice if we could keep legacy ones around. For example, I use 3.2.1 because of a missing feature in later versions. perhaps eclipse-32 for this port and similar names for the others. The most recent released eclipse should always be eclipse and the snapshots should be eclipse-devel. No one has put the effort into making all these changes. Also I think eclipse-* should be in devel instead of java (as its primary location; it can remain in java as an auxiliary category), but that's another story. -- Rick C. Petty From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 22:11:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718711065673 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from zerofail.com (gatekeeper1.zerofail.com [208.71.11.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145198FC1C for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from telcobridges.com by freebsd.org (zerofail.com) (SecurityGateway 1.1.2) with SMTP id SG001381537.MSG for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:11:05 -0500 Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([208.94.105.59]) by telcobridges.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:11:01 -0500 Message-ID: <497E34F4.5050608@videotron.ca> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:11:00 -0500 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com References: <20090125051928.GA86858@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20090126212515.GA85635@keira.kiwi-computer.com> In-Reply-To: <20090126212515.GA85635@keira.kiwi-computer.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2009 22:11:01.0642 (UTC) FILETIME=[F93A7EA0:01C98002] X-SGHeloLookup-Result: hardfail smtp.helo=telcobridges.com (does not match 208.71.8.41) X-SGOP-RefID: str=0001.0A090208.497E34FC.00DD,ss=2,fgs=0 (_st=2 _vt=0 _iwf=0) Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse plugins ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:11:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rick C. Petty wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 09:19:28PM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote: >> I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have >> to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good >> built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having >> a port for one is if there is some code that needs changes (and the only >> one of those I see is eclipse-cdt). >> >> What are peoples thoughts on this? Who feels they get a lot of value out >> of having FreeBSD ports for those plugins that we do have and why? > > IIRC, in the original discussion we wanted to get rid of all eclipse > plugins as ports and use Eclipse's plugin management system. However there > were some patches against some of these plugins. My suggestion was to push > those patches upstream and remove the plugins from our ports. > > As to the removal of old eclipse versions, I think it would be nice if we > could keep legacy ones around. For example, I use 3.2.1 because of a > missing feature in later versions. perhaps eclipse-32 for this port and > similar names for the others. The most recent released eclipse should > always be eclipse and the snapshots should be eclipse-devel. No one has > put the effort into making all these changes. > > Also I think eclipse-* should be in devel instead of java (as its primary > location; it can remain in java as an auxiliary category), but that's > another story. > I originally planned to have the eclipse 3.4 port named eclipse-ganymede and have eclipse 3.3 renamed eclipse-europa. But Greg preferred to have only one version of eclipse at any given time. This way it's easier for the users as they know that by installing eclipse they get the latest one (instead of having to chose between eclipse-europa, eclipse-ganymede, eclipse-gelileo, eclipse-savor-of-the-day). I admit that eclipse is currently lagging behind and that eclipse-devel should already have been switched as the main eclipse port and I accept full responsibility for that. I've been bogged down with other issues and have not had the time to convert/test all the plugins to the new p2 framework so they integrate correctly with Ganymede. Greg's proposition to remove the plugins will greatly facilitate my work and enable me to concentrate on finishing the CDT port and switching eclipse-devel to Galileo. Regards, Steph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl+NPQACgkQmdOXtTCX/nvqfgCg6FV+KeOG8IIZBNYTVo/M1rhd X4MAniB8PoCNV9iOLQ0rndDyHV3Jr+w+ =zwSx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:36:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FF5106566B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from relay.sw.ru (mailhub.sw.ru [195.214.232.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573918FC1C for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru ([10.30.1.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay.sw.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0REpTai006750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:51:30 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LRpHl-000Ojs-Pl for eclipse@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:51:29 +0300 From: Vladimir Grebenschikov To: eclipse@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: SWsoft Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:51:29 +0300 Message-Id: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov Cc: Subject: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vova@fbsd.ru List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:36:25 -0000 Hi After recent upgrade (gnome, xorg) eclipse-devel does not works any more it shows splash screen, then hide it, then show again and so on in infinite loop. In logs there is: !SESSION 2009-01-27 16:26:00.539 ----------------------------------------------- eclipse.buildId=M20080911-1700 java.version=1.6.0_03-p4 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=freebsd, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=ru_RU Command-line arguments: -os freebsd -ws gtk -arch x86 !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2009-01-27 16:26:01.912 !MESSAGE Bundle initial@reference:file:plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar/ [1] is not active. Same time $ zip -T /usr/local/eclipse-devel/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar test of /usr/local/eclipse-devel/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar OK $ If I remove .eclipse - new, fresh version of eclipse works just fine, but I loose all installed plugins and configuration. $ diff -u .eclipse/1767688504/configuration/config.ini .eclipse.new/1767688504/configuration/config.ini --- .eclipse/1767688504/configuration/config.ini 2009-01-27 16:25:52.000000000 +0300 +++ .eclipse.new/1767688504/configuration/config.ini 2009-01-27 16:13:59.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -#This configuration file was written by: org.eclipse.equinox.internal.frameworkadmin.equinox.EquinoxFwConfigFileParser -#Fri Dec 12 10:46:15 MSK 2008 +#Linked configuration +#Tue Jan 27 16:13:59 MSK 2009 osgi.sharedConfiguration.area=file\:configuration/ -osgi.bundles=reference\:file\:../../../home/vova/.eclipse/1767688504/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.hook_1.0.0.v20080610.jar@4,reference\:file\:org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar@1\:start $ Any hints how to make it work without loosing configuration ? -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov vova@fbsd.ru From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:05:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F29106566C for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from zerofail.com (gatekeeper1.zerofail.com [208.71.11.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190E78FC16 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from telcobridges.com by freebsd.org (zerofail.com) (SecurityGateway 1.1.2) with SMTP id SG001392473.MSG for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:55:20 -0500 Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([208.94.105.59]) by telcobridges.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:55:22 -0500 Message-ID: <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:55:23 -0500 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vova@fbsd.ru References: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2009 16:55:22.0913 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B478910:01C980A0] X-SGHeloLookup-Result: hardfail smtp.helo=telcobridges.com (does not match 208.71.8.41) X-SGOP-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.497F3C7B.00DE,ss=2,fgs=0 (_st=2 _vt=0 _iwf=0) Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > Hi > > After recent upgrade (gnome, xorg) > eclipse-devel does not works any more > > it shows splash screen, then hide it, then show again and so on in infinite loop. > > In logs there is: > > !SESSION 2009-01-27 16:26:00.539 ----------------------------------------------- > eclipse.buildId=M20080911-1700 > java.version=1.6.0_03-p4 > java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. > BootLoader constants: OS=freebsd, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=ru_RU > Command-line arguments: -os freebsd -ws gtk -arch x86 > > !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2009-01-27 16:26:01.912 > !MESSAGE Bundle initial@reference:file:plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar/ [1] is not active. > > > Same time > $ zip -T /usr/local/eclipse-devel/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar > test of /usr/local/eclipse-devel/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar OK > $ > > If I remove .eclipse - new, fresh version of eclipse works just fine, but I loose all installed plugins and configuration. > > $ diff -u .eclipse/1767688504/configuration/config.ini .eclipse.new/1767688504/configuration/config.ini > --- .eclipse/1767688504/configuration/config.ini 2009-01-27 16:25:52.000000000 +0300 > +++ .eclipse.new/1767688504/configuration/config.ini 2009-01-27 16:13:59.000000000 +0300 > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ > -#This configuration file was written by: org.eclipse.equinox.internal.frameworkadmin.equinox.EquinoxFwConfigFileParser > -#Fri Dec 12 10:46:15 MSK 2008 > +#Linked configuration > +#Tue Jan 27 16:13:59 MSK 2009 > osgi.sharedConfiguration.area=file\:configuration/ > -osgi.bundles=reference\:file\:../../../home/vova/.eclipse/1767688504/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.hook_1.0.0.v20080610.jar@4,reference\:file\:org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator_1.0.0.v20080604.jar@1\:start > $ > > > Any hints how to make it work without loosing configuration ? > This is weird... As I've not yet done the jump to the new Xorg so I can't be sure that it will work out of the box but I would not have expected it to cause any problems. The problem that you are reporting doesn't seems to be caused by the switch to Xorg. Can you confirm that you didn't install any new plugin around the time you upgraded to thew new Xorg? Your osgi.bundles property doesn't seems quite right. The org.eclipse.equinox.transform.hook reference should normally be listed in a osgi.framework.extensions property. The osgi.bundles should have a reference to the actual transforms that you are using (like org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.xslt for example). You could try to remove the osgi.bundles property of your config.ini file. This should give you back most of your plugins but I guess that the plugin that added this funny line will probably won't work. I'll update a scratch box to the new Xorg and check whether it works correctly just in case I'm digressing with the transform hook part. Steph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl/PHoACgkQmdOXtTCX/nsk2gCgirPKGKQhTvWnsazIVhyd30zR qBsAn1JzKEzGvn0AYgxydqAUZLcd4cOy =x12e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:05:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EF51065757 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from relay.sw.ru (mailhub.sw.ru [195.214.232.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BE78FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru ([10.30.1.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay.sw.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0RH5lkr000789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:05:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LRrNj-000F1v-J3; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:05:47 +0300 From: Vladimir Grebenschikov To: "Stephane E. Potvin" In-Reply-To: <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> References: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: SWsoft Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:05:47 +0300 Message-Id: <1233075947.1659.82.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vova@fbsd.ru List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:52 -0000 > This is weird... > > As I've not yet done the jump to the new Xorg so I can't be sure that it > will work out of the box but I would not have expected it to cause any > problems. The problem that you are reporting doesn't seems to be caused > by the switch to Xorg. Can you confirm that you didn't install any new > plugin around the time you upgraded to thew new Xorg? Yes, I do not change anything in plugins while upgrade. > Your osgi.bundles property doesn't seems quite right. The > org.eclipse.equinox.transform.hook reference should normally be listed > in a osgi.framework.extensions property. The osgi.bundles should have a > reference to the actual transforms that you are using (like > org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.xslt for example). > > You could try to remove the osgi.bundles property of your config.ini > file. This should give you back most of your plugins but I guess that > the plugin that added this funny line will probably won't work. I've tried, for my surprise, it starts, but looks like all configuration (with installed plugins) was lost. > I'll update a scratch box to the new Xorg and check whether it works > correctly just in case I'm digressing with the transform hook part. Probably it does not related to Xorg upgrade but related to Gnome upgrade ? As far as I remember there was an command line option for eclipse to reset configuration somehow. Unfortunately I can't remember exact spelling. Probably this may help ? > Steph -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov vova@fbsd.ru From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:41:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37C2106564A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D258FC1D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: mbowie@buzmo.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-190.messagelabs.com!1233076502!84633580!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [69.12.11.76] Received: (qmail 30594 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2009 17:15:03 -0000 Received: from smtp0.dfw.fabriclabs.com (HELO smtp0.dfw.fabriclabs.com) (69.12.11.76) by server-4.tower-190.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jan 2009 17:15:03 -0000 Received: from Macintosh.sv.fabriclabs.net (99-7-126-96.lightspeed.simica.sbcglobal.net [99.7.126.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp0.dfw.fabriclabs.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0RHEgOl065405; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:14:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Message-ID: <497F4115.6010800@buzmo.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:15:01 -0800 From: Mike Bowie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vova@fbsd.ru References: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> <1233075947.1659.82.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1233075947.1659.82.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:41:44 -0000 Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > As far as I remember there was an command line option for eclipse to > reset configuration somehow. Unfortunately I can't remember exact > spelling. Probably this may help ? > eclipse -clean ? Mike. -- "You don't see FreeBSD developers sitting in a smoke-filled room plotting the overthrow of Microsoft. We sit in light, airy rooms and plot where to get the best drinks." - Michael Lucas From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 23:01:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD491065E9E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from relay.sw.ru (mailhub.sw.ru [195.214.232.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B5E8FC29 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru ([10.24.21.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay.sw.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0RN19wB001534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:01:11 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LRwvd-000Mpl-4p; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:01:09 +0300 From: Vladimir Grebenschikov To: Mike Bowie In-Reply-To: <497F4115.6010800@buzmo.com> References: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> <1233075947.1659.82.camel@localhost> <497F4115.6010800@buzmo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: SWsoft Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:01:08 +0300 Message-Id: <1233097268.2181.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vova@fbsd.ru List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:01:23 -0000 On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:15 -0800, Mike Bowie wrote: > Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > > > > As far as I remember there was an command line option for eclipse to > > reset configuration somehow. Unfortunately I can't remember exact > > spelling. Probably this may help ? > > > > eclipse -clean ? Unfortunately it does not helps. > Mike. -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov vova@fbsd.ru From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 14:03:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F161910656D2 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CF28FC12 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([96.21.231.154]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KEC00CIK6Y6P690@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for eclipse@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:03:43 -0500 (EST) Message-id: <49844C17.6070700@videotron.ca> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:03:19 -0500 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090129) To: vova@fbsd.ru References: <1233067889.1659.50.camel@localhost> <497F3C7B.2090607@videotron.ca> <1233075947.1659.82.camel@localhost> <497F4115.6010800@buzmo.com> <1233097268.2181.2.camel@localhost> In-reply-to: <1233097268.2181.2.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eclipse-devel does not works after recent upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:03:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:15 -0800, Mike Bowie wrote: >> Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: >> >>> As far as I remember there was an command line option for eclipse to >>> reset configuration somehow. Unfortunately I can't remember exact >>> spelling. Probably this may help ? >>> >> eclipse -clean ? > > Unfortunately it does not helps. > I found out what's happening. It seems that p2 doesn't like when eclipse's timestamp are earlier than the timestamps recorded in the .eclipse directory. When you upgraded to Xorg 7.4, eclipse was reinstalled, which changed the timestamps. As a workaround, you can run the following command which should fix the problem: find ~/.eclipse -exec touch {} \; I have no idea yet why it's doing this though. Steph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmETBcACgkQmdOXtTCX/nveXgCguSOoqxLguyjiQPBYxDI+bQEh 5xkAnReSPabXgV3a4zlWvEGaoM+23hgy =PZjb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----